<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>12 King's Bench Walk - Case Commentaries</title>
<description>12 King's Bench Walk is one of the best known and respected civil sets of barristers' chambers in London. Over 50 barristers offer a wealth of experience and skill in a wide range of legal fields.</description>
<link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk</link>
<language>en-uk</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:53:20 +0100</pubDate>

 
     <item> 
        <title> Robb v Salamis - Foreseeing the unforeseeable</title> 
        <description> The House of Lords considers PUWER.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;12 February 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/98/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:59 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/98/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Phillip Cattlin t/a Success First v Jodie Croxford Employment Appeal Tribunal, UKEAT/0231/06.</title> 
        <description> </description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/97/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:58 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/97/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Flora v Wakom, periodical payments and indexation: the story continues? </title> 
        <description> Further High Court decisions.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;23 November 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/96/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:57 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/96/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Thomas v The Home Office: Agreeing extensions of time for service of a claim form - how not to do it</title> 
        <description> A salutory Court of Appeal case.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;8 November 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/95/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:56 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/95/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Hughes v Carratu International plc: Enquiry agents and the wrong side of the law </title> 
        <description> A&amp;nbsp;cautionary highlighting the limits of legitimate investigation. &lt;strong&gt;6th September 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/94/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/94/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Shinedean v Alldown Demolition &amp; AXA: Failing to co-operate with insurers within a reasonable period - does prejudice matter? </title> 
        <description> An important decision defining insurers&#039;&amp;nbsp;iability to indemnify in respect of claims of which they were not informed&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&amp;nbsp; 6th September 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/93/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:54 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/93/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Flora v Wakom (Heathrow) Ltd: Indexation of periodical payments - is the RPI the only method? </title> 
        <description> The Court of Appeal takes an early look at the new law.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;6th&amp;nbsp;September 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/92/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:53 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/92/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Miller v Hales, QBE International Insurance and MIB - Policemen, employees, and getting into a car</title> 
        <description> &lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;This case offers an instructive analysis of difficult points within&amp;nbsp;the &lt;u&gt;Road Traffic Act 1988&lt;/u&gt;&lt;strong&gt;. 6th September 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/91/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:52 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/91/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Clark v Bowlt - The Animals Act claims another judicial victim </title> 
        <description> The Court of Appeal revisits these difficult provisions.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;6th September 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/90/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:51 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/90/</guid>
     </item>    
 
     <item> 
        <title> Toth v Jarman - Experts and conflicts of interest </title> 
        <description> Further&amp;nbsp; guidance on best practice from the Court of Appeal.&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;6th September 2006&lt;/strong&gt;</description> 
        <link>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/89/</link> 
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:37:50 +0000</pubDate> 
		<guid>http://www.12kbw.co.uk/cases/commentary/id/89/</guid>
     </item>    
  

</channel>
</rss>