<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Trends in Agricultural Economics - Current Issue</title>
<link>https://scialert.net</link>
<description>Trends in Agricultural Economics</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Science Alert</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:11:57 +0200</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:14:14 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>RssPublisher 0.2.0 beta</generator>

<item>
Evaluating the Impact of Financial Inclusion on Income Optimization in Farm Enterprises<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the Impact of Financial Inclusion on Income Optimization in Farm Enterprises]]></title> 
<description><![CDATA[<b>Background and Objective:</b>  There exists some unknown and yet unmeasured empirical endogenous financial inclusivity scoring boosters with unique peculiarities to specific sectoral or sub-sectoral applicants. This study hereby aimed at unraveling the extent and roles of financial inclusion in optimizing farm enterprise income levels and its deterministic variables. <b>Materials and Methods:</b>  Analytical responses from a randomly selected 210 poultry farm holders were analyzed using mean, percentages and logit models alongside required econometric diagnostics. Data on socioeconomic, demographic and financial inclusion variables were randomly collected via questionnaire schedules in a multi-staged sampling procedure. <b>Results:</b>  From the population, the financially excluded were outrightly more (82.38%) than the financially included (17.62%). Also, 56.76, 64.86 and 62.16% of the financially included access to electricity joined cooperatives and solely engaged in farming while it is 6.38, 38.30 and 40.43% for the excluded, respectively. Besides, financially included households had higher gross returns to factor, relative to the deprived by at least 57.4% more and significant at a 5% level. Deterministic analyses of financial inclusivity, while infrastructural access, increasing formal education, cooperative membership, farming experience, solely farmers and age significantly determined financial inclusivity, owing to some or all of the reasons hypothesized. <b>Conclusion:</b>  Financial inclusion significantly optimized farm income earning to an appreciable extent, with its influencing factors among the farm enterprises as investigated by this study hence, a favorably enabling environment that further consolidates its sustainability should be fostered.]]></description>
<link>https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=tae.2025.1.8</link> 
<pubDate>10 June, 2026</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
Trends of Maize Production in Mozambique: A Fixed Effects Model Analysis of Two Decades (2002-2023)<title><![CDATA[Trends of Maize Production in Mozambique: A Fixed Effects Model Analysis of Two Decades (2002-2023)]]></title> 
<description><![CDATA[<b>Background and Objective:</b>  In Mozambique, agriculture has been based on poorly resourced farmers over the past decades and is the mainstay of the economy and livelihood activity in rural areas. To find methods for raising productivity, based on panel data, this study was initiated to examine the relationship between maize production in cropped areas and its trends in production for the past 20 years. <b>Materials and Methods:</b>  This study was done by developing a fixed-effects pooled data model to estimate the link between the area and maize production. The study variables namely cropped area and maize production were found modeled. The relationship between maize production and area in log trends was investigated to whether progress has been made in production for the past 20 years in Mozambique based on panel data. The Hausman, Breusch Pagan and Wald tests were used and with (Rho of 76%), the fixed effect model showed high significance at 0.05 level of pooled OLS model that fits the data well (F = 87.84 and p&lt;0.0000) regression analysis of study variables with notable changes observed in the cropped area and maize yield (p&lt;0.0000). <b>Results:</b>  The area under maize production&rsquo;s slope coefficient was found highly significant, indicating that the cropping area under maize was a key factor in variations in maize production. Accordingly, for every unit increase in area; the production would be increased by 4% and for every change in area by 1%, the production of maize increase by 0.715%. The model&rsquo;s R<sup>2</sup> value as determined by statistical analysis is 0.9518. <b>Conclusion:</b>  The study assured the area cropped significantly influenced the production of maize, showing the trend of production and area cropped are not significantly the same.]]></description>
<link>https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=tae.2025.9.19</link> 
<pubDate>10 June, 2026</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>