<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>



<title>Ecologia - Current Issue</title>
<link>http://scialert.net</link>
<description>Ecologia</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Science Alert</copyright>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 18:11:57 +0200</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 18:14:14 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>RssPublisher 0.2.0 beta</generator>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/1996-4021" /><feedburner:info uri="1996-4021" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>1996-4021</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
A Case Study Approach to Demonstrate the Use of Assessment and Monitoring as Tools for Participatory Environmental Governance<title><![CDATA[A Case Study Approach to Demonstrate the Use of Assessment and Monitoring as Tools for Participatory Environmental Governance]]></title> 
<description><![CDATA[Effective implementation of participatory environmental governance faces a number of challenges, including the need for appropriate mechanisms and incentive systems that can operate across multiple-use landscapes. This study demonstrated scenarios for such governance from three agro-ecological zones in different geographical, biophysical and socio-cultural settings: (i) Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary in the temperate forests of the Central Himalayas, (ii) Kolleru Lake, a freshwater lake in the Krishna Basin and (iii) the downstream Ganges seasonal floodplains in Bangladesh. The cross-disciplinary set of approaches in these examples involves the use of spatial tools and socioeconomic surveys to build a scenario-based framework with cross-scaling prospects. The comparative analysis between these sites is significant in the context of providing guidance for trans-boundary environmental governance and the underlying challenges that occur in politically complex and common property resource institutional arrangements. Meeting these challenges will assist in the efforts, locally and nationally, to make wise use of all wetlands, as required under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Kedarnath Wildlife Sanctuary symbolizes a case of increasing anthropogenic pressure, limited livelihood options and with gaps in the governance structure. Kolleru Lake represents a case of inadequate understanding of the ecological dimensions of livelihood interventions and the consequential community conflict. The case of floodplains in Bangladesh illustrates the potential of collective action, supported by appropriate institutional arrangements, for improving rice-fish productivity. The case studies support the argument that monitoring and assessment of the resource structure and its dynamics, with the application of geospatial tools, adds value when shaping a framework for policy debate and for ensuring the wise use of wetlands.]]></description>
<link>http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ecologia.2012.60.75</link> 
<pubDate>26 May, 2012</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
Forest Community Structure along an Altitudinal Gradient of District Rudraprayag of Garhwal Himalaya, India<title><![CDATA[Forest Community Structure along an Altitudinal Gradient of District Rudraprayag of Garhwal Himalaya, India]]></title> 
<description><![CDATA[The present study communication examines the forest Community structure and their status in Rudraprayag district of Garhwal Himalaya. On the basis of physiognomy, species composition, structure, habitat and physiography forests of the district were classified into four types viz., temperate forest, temperate mixed forest, Subtropical forest and subtropical mixed forest. The district is mostly covered by temperate forests and partially by the sub tropical forest. Temperate forests are dominant forest types of the district with a density of 1980, 1550 plant ha<SUP>-1</SUP> and basal cover 40.19, 20.94 m<SUP>2</SUP> ha<SUP>-1</SUP> in temperate mixed and temperate forest, respectively. The subtropical forests located in the lower valleys with southern slopes and are generally sparse forest type of the district.]]></description>
<link>http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ecologia.2012.76.84</link> 
<pubDate>26 May, 2012</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
Proposal of a New and Simple Descriptive Measure of Diet Breadth<title><![CDATA[Proposal of a New and Simple Descriptive Measure of Diet Breadth]]></title> 
<description><![CDATA[Measuring diet breadth from gut content by Levins or Smith does not give true range of diet of an organism in comparison to available food resources in the environment. These measures consider proportions of food content in the gut to total food content in the gut for analysis. However, the credibility of food organisms available in the environment to exhibit and supply food to the prey feeding on it has been totally ignored. To overcome such limitations a new and simple non parametric diet breadth i.e., DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>) has been proposed. A theoretical data set with gut content from six fish species as F1, F2, F3, F4, F5 and F6 have been considered to explain the DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>). All these gut content data have variations within the gut content data set as well as between two guts and also with resource state as R. The computation and analysis of DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>) not only explain a realistic picture of diet breadth of guts considered, but also provide an information on possible of diet overlap between two or more guts through &#145;clumping&#146; of guts. The &#145;clumping&#146; of guts based on DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>) clearly explains diet overlapping or competition among different species or individuals of a species for available resources. While comparing the DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>) to niche measures of Levins, Hulbert and Smith, the DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>) showed clearer representation guts exploiting food organisms around R. DB(&#967;<SUP>2</SUP>) also shows sensitivity to variation of food abundances within gut content as well as to resource state that other measures failed to express.]]></description>
<link>http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ecologia.2012.85.92</link> 
<pubDate>26 May, 2012</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

