<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</title>
	<atom:link href="https://2020science.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://2020science.org/</link>
	<description>An archive of posts on the blog 2020 Science from 2007 - 2020</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">89597148</site>	<item>
		<title>2020 Science in 2020</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2019/12/31/2020-science-in-2020/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 01:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2019/12/31/2020-science-in-2020/">2020 Science in 2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15992</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new website for Films from the Future</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2019/02/17/a-new-website-for-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2019 22:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new website for the book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies that you might want to check out! As well as an overview of the book, and those every-important links to where to purchase it, the site contains information and resources not available elsewhere. These include: Resources for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2019/02/17/a-new-website-for-films-from-the-future/">A new website for Films from the Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15980</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A book club guide for Films from the Future</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2019/02/02/a-book-club-guide-for-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The same structure that makes Films from the Future ideal for undergrads, also makes it perfect for an extremely engaging book club - one where you not only read a book together, but you get to watch films as well!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2019/02/02/a-book-club-guide-for-films-from-the-future/">A book club guide for Films from the Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15974</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sci-fi movies are the secret weapon that could help Silicon Valley grow up</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/11/15/sci-fi-movies-are-the-secret-weapon-that-could-help-silicon-valley-grow-up/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Industrial Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurassic park]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If there’s one line that stands the test of time in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Jurassic Park,” it’s probably Jeff Goldblum’s exclamation, “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.” Goldblum’s character, Dr. Ian Malcolm, was warning against the hubris of naively tinkering with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/11/15/sci-fi-movies-are-the-secret-weapon-that-could-help-silicon-valley-grow-up/">Sci-fi movies are the secret weapon that could help Silicon Valley grow up</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15927</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even “bad” sci-fi movies can teach us something about emerging technologies!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/11/15/even-bad-sci-fi-movies-can-teach-us-something-about-emerging-technologies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcendence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The film Transcendence, is not a great movie. Yet this futuristic thriller, which stars Johnny Depp as a genius scientist who mind-melds with a supercomputer, provides surprising and sometimes startling insights into how future technologies are unfolding, and the moral and ethical challenges they potentially raise.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/11/15/even-bad-sci-fi-movies-can-teach-us-something-about-emerging-technologies/">Even “bad” sci-fi movies can teach us something about emerging technologies!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15924</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Films from the Future: The Last Chapter</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/11/08/films-from-the-future-the-last-chapter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2018 13:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Through this book, I’ve set out to show how science fiction movies can help point the way along this journey, flawed as they are. As I’ve been researching and writing it, I’ve developed a deeper appreciation of how the movies here can expand our appreciation of the complex relationship between technology and society, not because they are accurate or prescient, but precisely because they are not tethered to scientific accuracy or to realistic predictions of the future.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/11/08/films-from-the-future-the-last-chapter/">Films from the Future: The Last Chapter</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15918</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contact: Occam&#8217;s Razor and Films from the Future</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/11/01/contact-occams-razor-and-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 13:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Sagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occam's Razor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>William of Occam was a fourteenth-century English philosopher, friar, and theologian. From historic accounts, he was sharp thinker, and a somewhat controversial religious figure in his time. Yet, these days, he is best known for the scientific rule of thumb that bears his name.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/11/01/contact-occams-razor-and-films-from-the-future/">Contact: Occam&#8217;s Razor and Films from the Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15911</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental resilience and The Day After Tomorrow</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/25/environmental-resilience-an-excerpt-from-films-from-the-future-the-technology-and-morality-of-sci-fi-movies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoengineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resiliency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Resiliency, I have to admit, is a bit of a buzz-word these days. In the environmental context, it’s often used to describe how readily an ecosystem is able to resist harm, or recover from damage caused by some event. But resiliency goes far beyond resistance to change..</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/25/environmental-resilience-an-excerpt-from-films-from-the-future-the-technology-and-morality-of-sci-fi-movies/">Environmental resilience and The Day After Tomorrow</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15904</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Honest Broker meets Dan Brown&#8217;s Inferno</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/18/the-honest-broker-inferno-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honest Broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inferno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ehrlic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science fiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Each week between now and November 15th (publication day!) I’ll be posting excerpts from  Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies This week, it’s chapter eleven, and the movie Inferno. Inferno may seem like an odd choice of movie in a book about science fiction films and the future. It bombed with the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/18/the-honest-broker-inferno-films-from-the-future/">The Honest Broker meets Dan Brown&#8217;s Inferno</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15896</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything you wanted to know about the book &#8220;Films from the Future&#8221;, but were afraid to ask</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/11/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-films-from-the-future-but-were-afraid-to-ask/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/11/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-films-from-the-future-but-were-afraid-to-ask/">Everything you wanted to know about the book &#8220;Films from the Future&#8221;, but were afraid to ask</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15888</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Nanoscale Perspective on The Man in the White Suit</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/11/a-nanoscale-perspective-on-the-man-in-the-white-suit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Industrial Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materials science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Each week between now and November 15th (publication day!) I’ll be posting excerpts from  Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies This week, it’s chapter ten, and the movie The Man in the White Suit. The Man in the White Suit is a 1951 Ealing Comedy that&#8217;s as dry as it comes. So [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/11/a-nanoscale-perspective-on-the-man-in-the-white-suit/">A Nanoscale Perspective on The Man in the White Suit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15882</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Films from the Future: Judging a book by its cover!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/09/films-from-the-future-judging-a-book-by-its-cover/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science fiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re just five weeks and a couple of days away from the official publication of Films from the Future on November 15th, but in the meantime, here&#8217;s a sneak-peek at the book&#8217;s cover: &#160; And just a reminder that the book&#8217;s currently available for pre-order at Amazon.com!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/09/films-from-the-future-judging-a-book-by-its-cover/">Films from the Future: Judging a book by its cover!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15874</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enter the Neo-Luddites: Transcendence, The Singularity, and Technological Resistance</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/08/enter-the-neo-luddites-from-chapter-nine-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luddism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luddites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcendence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On January 15, 1813, fourteen men were hanged outside York Castle in England for crimes associated with technological activism. It was the largest number of people ever hanged in a single day at the castle. These hangings were a decisive move against an uprising protesting the impacts of increased mechanization, one that became known as the Luddite movement after its alleged leader, Ned Ludd.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/08/enter-the-neo-luddites-from-chapter-nine-of-films-from-the-future/">Enter the Neo-Luddites: Transcendence, The Singularity, and Technological Resistance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15868</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What people are saying about &#8220;Films from the Future &#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/05/what-people-are-saying-about-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s still a few weeks before Films from the Future is published (November 15th &#8211; mark your calendar!), a few people have already had the chance to read the book, and provide their thoughts on it. The book, by the way, is already available for pre-order on Amazon (here), and is the best way [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/05/what-people-are-saying-about-films-from-the-future/">What people are saying about &#8220;Films from the Future &#8230;&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15862</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Superintelligence: From Chapter Eight of Films from the Future</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/10/04/superintelligence-from-chapter-eight-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2018/10/04/superintelligence-from-chapter-eight-of-films-from-the-future/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 18:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ex Machina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superintelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In January 2017, a group of experts from around the world got together to hash out guidelines for beneficial artificial intelligence research and development. The meeting was held at the Asilomar Conference Center in California, the same venue where, in 1975, a group of scientists famously established safety guidelines for recombinant DNA research. This time, though, the focus was on ensuring that research on increasingly powerful AI systems led to technologies that benefited society without creating undue risks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/10/04/superintelligence-from-chapter-eight-of-films-from-the-future/">Superintelligence: From Chapter Eight of Films from the Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2018/10/04/superintelligence-from-chapter-eight-of-films-from-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15857</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being Human in an Augmented Future (From chapter seven of Films from the Future)</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/09/27/being-human-in-an-augmented-future-from-chapter-seven-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghots in the Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Augmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science fiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The forthcoming book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies explores the complex dynamics between emerging technologies and society through twelve science fiction movies. This excerpt comes from the chapter on the 1995 Japanese Anime movie Ghost in the Shell. Through a Glass Darkly On June 4, 2016, Elon Musk tweeted: “Creating a neural lace [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/09/27/being-human-in-an-augmented-future-from-chapter-seven-of-films-from-the-future/">Being Human in an Augmented Future (From chapter seven of Films from the Future)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15853</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social inequity in an age of technological extremes (from chapter six of Films from the Future)</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/09/19/social-inequity-in-an-age-of-technological-extremes-from-chapter-six-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bioprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elysium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci-Fi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On September 17, 2011, a small group of social activists occupied Zuccotti Park in New York City. The occupation became the spearhead for the global “Occupy” movement, protesting a growing disparity between “haves” and “have-nots” within society. Two years later, the movie Elysium built on this movement as it sought to reveal the potential injustices of a technologically sophisticated future where a small group of elites live in decadent luxury at the expense of the poor.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/09/19/social-inequity-in-an-age-of-technological-extremes-from-chapter-six-of-films-from-the-future/">Social inequity in an age of technological extremes (from chapter six of Films from the Future)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15846</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limitless: Pharmaceutically-Enhanced Intelligence (from chapter 5 of Films from the Future)</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/09/13/limitless-pharmaceutically-enhanced-intelligence-from-chapter-5-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 03:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nootropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Drugs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In2004, the academic and medical doctor Anjan Chatterjee wrote a review of what he termed “Cosmetic Neurology.” He was far from the first person to write about the emergence and ethics of cognitive enhancers, but the piece caught my attention because of its unusual title...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/09/13/limitless-pharmaceutically-enhanced-intelligence-from-chapter-5-of-films-from-the-future/">Limitless: Pharmaceutically-Enhanced Intelligence (from chapter 5 of Films from the Future)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15837</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minority Report: Predicting Criminal Intent (From chapter four of Films from the Future)</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/09/10/minority-report-predicting-criminal-intent-from-chapter-four-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minority Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prediction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There’s something quite enticing about the idea of predicting how people will behave in a given situation. It’s what lies beneath personality profiling and theories of preferred team roles. But it also extends to trying to predict when people will behave badly, and taking steps to prevent this...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/09/10/minority-report-predicting-criminal-intent-from-chapter-four-of-films-from-the-future/">Minority Report: Predicting Criminal Intent (From chapter four of Films from the Future)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15821</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never Let Me Go: A Cautionary Tale of Human Cloning (from chapter three of Films from the Future)</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/09/05/never-let-me-go-a-cautionary-tale-of-human-cloning-from-chapter-three-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 02:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Never Let me Go]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2002, the birth of the first human clone was announced. Baby Eve was born on December 26, 2002, and weighed seven pounds. Or so it was claimed. The announcement attracted media attention from around the world, and spawned story after story of the birth. Since then, no proof has emerged that baby Eve was anything other than a publicity stunt. But the furor at the time demonstrated how contentious the very idea of creating living copies of people can be.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/09/05/never-let-me-go-a-cautionary-tale-of-human-cloning-from-chapter-three-of-films-from-the-future/">Never Let Me Go: A Cautionary Tale of Human Cloning (from chapter three of Films from the Future)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15814</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jurassic Park: The Rise of Resurrection Biology (from chapter two of Films from the Future)</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/29/jurassic-park-the-rise-of-resurrection-biology-from-chapter-two-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 02:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthetic Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurassic park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science fiction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was a newly minted Ph.D. when I first saw Jurassic Park. It was June 1993, and my wife and I were beginning to enjoy our new-found freedom, after years of too much study and too little money. I must confess that we weren’t dinosaur geeks. But there was something about the hype surrounding the movie that hooked us. Plus, we fancied a night out.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/29/jurassic-park-the-rise-of-resurrection-biology-from-chapter-two-of-films-from-the-future/">Jurassic Park: The Rise of Resurrection Biology (from chapter two of Films from the Future)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15807</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the Beginning &#8230; Chapter One of &#8220;Films from the Future&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/23/in-the-beginning-chapter-one-of-films-from-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001 a Space Odyssey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I first saw Stanley Kubrick’s 2001 A Space Odyssey on a small black and white TV, tucked in a corner of my parents’ living room. It was January the first 1982, and I was sixteen years old...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/23/in-the-beginning-chapter-one-of-films-from-the-future/">In the Beginning &#8230; Chapter One of &#8220;Films from the Future&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15773</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube channel on the Science of Risk hits a milestone</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/22/youtube-channel-on-the-science-of-risk-hits-a-milestone/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science communication]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while coming, but the YouTube channel Risk Bites has just hit 10,000 subscribers. It may not sound a lot when compared to some YouTube mega-channels, but for a low-budget channel that occupies the space between academic expertise and people who just want to know stuff, it&#8217;s a pretty major milestone! I started [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/22/youtube-channel-on-the-science-of-risk-hits-a-milestone/">YouTube channel on the Science of Risk hits a milestone</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15782</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second-guessing consumer views on products using nanotechnology</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/21/second-guessing-consumer-views-on-products-using-nanotechnology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanomaterial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This month&#8217;s copy of the journal Nature Nanotechnology has a commentary in it by myself and colleague Justin Kidd, where we ask whether manufacturers of nano-enabled water treatment products are in danger of second-guessing consumer views. The commentary draws on research we&#8217;re currently involved in on gauging manufacturer perceptions of consumer perceptions, as they develop [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/21/second-guessing-consumer-views-on-products-using-nanotechnology/">Second-guessing consumer views on products using nanotechnology</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15779</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excerpts from Films from the Future</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/21/excerpts-from-films-from-the-future-stay-tuned/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the next several weeks, I&#8217;ll be posting short excerpts from Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies ahead of the book&#8217;s publication on November 15 &#8212; visit regularly to read the latest, and remember that you can pre-order the book now on Amazon! Schedule: August 23. In the beginning &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/21/excerpts-from-films-from-the-future-stay-tuned/">Excerpts from Films from the Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15769</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/20/films-from-the-future-the-technology-and-morality-of-sci-fi-movies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoengineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Augmentation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thrilled that my new book Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies (Mango Publishing) is now available! From the listing: Learn how movies reveal the future of technology Fans of The Science of Interstellar, The Second Machine Age, and Physics of the Future will love the Films from the Future. Science, technology, and society: In Films from the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/20/films-from-the-future-the-technology-and-morality-of-sci-fi-movies/">Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15757</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book update: New title, Amazon Listing, Publication Date, Contents, and more &#8230;</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/08/03/book-update-new-title-amazon-listing-publication-date-contents-and-more/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After a hectic summer of writing and editing, I&#8217;m pleased (if a little frazzled) to report that the book formerly known as &#8220;The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future&#8221; is on schedule to be published mid-November of this year. Just to whet your appetite, here&#8217;s a quick update on where things stand: What&#8217;s the new title? After [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/08/03/book-update-new-title-amazon-listing-publication-date-contents-and-more/">Book update: New title, Amazon Listing, Publication Date, Contents, and more &#8230;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15729</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sounds of the Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/06/13/the-sounds-of-the-moviegoers-guide-to-the-future/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soundtracks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I must confess that, over the past year, I&#8217;ve taken immersing myself in the movies at the core of The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future rather seriously &#8212; perhaps too seriously! Of course, I&#8217;ve watched the movies many, many times. But I&#8217;ve also been submersed in their soundtracks; often in the hope of getting inspiration [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/06/13/the-sounds-of-the-moviegoers-guide-to-the-future/">The Sounds of the Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15723</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nootropics</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/06/11/nootropics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 14:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limitless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nootropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snart Drugs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Excerpted from a early draft of Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies (out November 2018); inspired by the movie Limitless.  In 2004, the academic and medical doctor Anjan Chatterjee wrote a review of what he termed “Cosmetic Neurology”.[1] He was far from the first person to write about the emergence [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/06/11/nootropics/">Nootropics</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15715</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Science” of Predicting Bad Behavior</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/06/05/the-science-of-predicting-bad-behavior/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 02:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fMRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minority Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Excerpted from a early draft of The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future; inspired by the movie Minority Report.  In March 2017, the British newspaper The Guardian ran a web-story with the headline “Brain scans can spot criminals, scientists say”.[1] Unlike in Minority Report, the scanning was carried out using a hefty functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/06/05/the-science-of-predicting-bad-behavior/">The “Science” of Predicting Bad Behavior</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15708</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We need to make the PhD system more student-supportive and student-centric</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/06/03/we-need-to-make-the-phd-system-more-student-supportive-and-student-centric/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2018 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEM]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone aspires to getting a PhD. But for those who do, pursuing one should be the pinnacle of their educational experience. Yet for many graduate students, studying for their doctoral degree turns into nightmare that continues to haunt them long after they’ve left university. And the reason is surprisingly simple; as a PhD student, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/06/03/we-need-to-make-the-phd-system-more-student-supportive-and-student-centric/">We need to make the PhD system more student-supportive and student-centric</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15703</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future: Beginnings</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/05/31/th-moviegoers-guide-to-the-future-beginnings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 20:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001 a Space Odyssey]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future book comes together over the next few weeks, I thought it would be interesting to post excerpts from the early drafts. These will change during editing &#8212; drastically so in some cases I suspect. But they might pique your interest, and give you a sense of the flavor [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/05/31/th-moviegoers-guide-to-the-future-beginnings/">The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future: Beginnings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15694</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The BS and the Science of Nanotechnology</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/05/29/the-bs-and-the-science-of-nanotechnology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, Elon Musk called BS on the field of nanotechnology last week. The ensuing Twitter spat was admittedly rather small on the grand scale of things. But it did throw up an important question: just what is nanotech, and where does the BS end and the science begin? I have a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/05/29/the-bs-and-the-science-of-nanotechnology/">The BS and the Science of Nanotechnology</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15691</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I just signed a book deal &#8211; The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future&#8217;s happening!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/05/25/just-signed-book-deal-moviegoers-guide-futures-happening/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 19:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films from the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Industrial Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Moviegoer's Guide to the Future]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The big news is that I&#8217;ve just signed a book deal with the publisher Mango! The working title for the book is The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future (Update: the final title is Films from the Future: The Technology and Morality of Sci-Fi Movies), and it&#8217;s going to be a roller coaster ride through emerging [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/05/25/just-signed-book-deal-moviegoers-guide-futures-happening/">I just signed a book deal &#8211; The Moviegoer&#8217;s Guide to the Future&#8217;s happening!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15675</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 potential risks of artificial intelligence we should probably be thinking about now</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/05/12/10-potential-risks-artificial-intelligence-probably-thinking-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 18:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithmic bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heuristic manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lethal autonomous weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value misalignment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To unpack some of the challenges around the risks and benefits  Artificial Intelligence, Risk Bites has a 5 minute introduction to ten potential risks of AI we should probably be thinking about now</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/05/12/10-potential-risks-artificial-intelligence-probably-thinking-now/">10 potential risks of artificial intelligence we should probably be thinking about now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15651</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humility in science communication</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/05/09/humility-science-communication/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 21:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Mobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science communication]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, I was asked to give a keynote on Knowledge Mobilization for the annual Graduate College Impact Awards at Arizona State University (the video&#8217;s at the end of this post). The talk was to be science communication. But on reflection, I took the opportunity to address something that&#8217;s increasingly informed my work [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/05/09/humility-science-communication/">Humility in science communication</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15643</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Tempe fatality, self-driving car developers must engage with public now or risk rejection</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/03/21/tempe-fatality-self-driving-car-developers-must-engage-public-now-risk-rejection/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self driving cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-driving cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uber]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Maynard, Arizona State University; Jameson Wetmore, Arizona State University, and Thaddeus R. Miller, Arizona State University On Sunday evening, March 18, an Uber SUV hit and killed a pedestrian in the Arizona city of Tempe. In a place where vehicle-related pedestrian fatalities are unfortunately a regular occurrence, this shouldn’t have stood out as particularly [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/03/21/tempe-fatality-self-driving-car-developers-must-engage-public-now-risk-rejection/">After Tempe fatality, self-driving car developers must engage with public now or risk rejection</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15686</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eager to dye your hair with ‘nontoxic’ graphene nanoparticles? Not so fast!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/03/20/eager-dye-hair-nontoxic-graphene-nanoparticles-not-fast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanomaterials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Graphene is something of a celebrity in the world of nanoscale materials. Isolated in 2004 by Nobel Prize winners Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, these ultrathin sheets of carbon atoms are already finding novel uses in areas like electronics, high-efficiency heating systems, water purification technologies and even golf balls. According to recent research published in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/03/20/eager-dye-hair-nontoxic-graphene-nanoparticles-not-fast/">Eager to dye your hair with ‘nontoxic’ graphene nanoparticles? Not so fast!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15682</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and why should you care?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2018/01/25/fourth-industrial-revolution-care/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Industrial Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th Industrial revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We have a new video up on the YouTube Risk Bites channel that asks what the fourth industrial revolution is, and looks at the technological trends underpinning it. If you&#8217;ve ever wondered what the fourth industrial revolution is, why it&#8217;s so important, what whatever happened to the previous three, check it out!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2018/01/25/fourth-industrial-revolution-care/">What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and why should you care?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15636</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Geostorm’ movie shows dangers of hacking the climate – we need to talk about real-world geoengineering now</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2017/10/20/geostorm-movie-shows-dangers-hacking-climate-need-talk-real-world-geoengineering-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoengineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geostorm]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jane A. Flegal, University of California, Berkeley and Andrew Maynard, Arizona State University Hollywood’s latest disaster flick, “Geostorm,” is premised on the idea that humans have figured out how to control the Earth’s climate. A powerful satellite-based technology allows users to fine-tune the weather, overcoming the ravages of climate change. Everyone, everywhere can quite literally [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2017/10/20/geostorm-movie-shows-dangers-hacking-climate-need-talk-real-world-geoengineering-now/">‘Geostorm’ movie shows dangers of hacking the climate – we need to talk about real-world geoengineering now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15619</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Elon Musk: Your dazzling Mars plan overlooks some big nontechnical hurdles</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2017/10/02/dear-elon-musk-dazzling-mars-plan-overlooks-big-nontechnical-hurdles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 13:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interplanetary Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk has a plan, and it’s about as audacious as they come. Not content with living on our pale blue dot, Musk and his company SpaceX want to colonize Mars, fast. They say they’ll send a duo of supply ships to the red planet within five years. By 2024, they’re aiming to send the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2017/10/02/dear-elon-musk-dazzling-mars-plan-overlooks-big-nontechnical-hurdles/">Dear Elon Musk: Your dazzling Mars plan overlooks some big nontechnical hurdles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15612</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>These scientist-communicators deserve your attention!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2017/09/17/scientist-communicators-deserve-attention/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Showcase]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 22 2017, over a million people marched for science around the world. They came for many reasons &#8212; to celebrate science; to soak up the vibe; to protest a growing distain for evidence-based decisions within society; to say they&#8217;d been there. But if there was an overarching message, it was this: that science [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2017/09/17/scientist-communicators-deserve-attention/">These scientist-communicators deserve your attention!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15605</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have spacesuit, will travel?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2017/08/26/spacesuit-will-travel/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2017/08/26/spacesuit-will-travel/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2017 00:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Tourism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spacesuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Elon Musk gave the world a sneak-peek of  the new SpaceX space suit on Instagram. I was passingly intrigued when I saw it. But then came the request from Fortune.com to write an article tying in the new suit to the future of space tourism &#8230; First picture of SpaceX spacesuit. More in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2017/08/26/spacesuit-will-travel/">Have spacesuit, will travel?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2017/08/26/spacesuit-will-travel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15596</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten reasons why more scientists should be on YouTube</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2017/08/06/ten-reasons-scientists-youtube/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2017 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago I tweeted ten reasons I think more scientists should be on YouTube. I know it’s hard &#38; takes time, but there are lots of reasons why scientists should enter this #scivid contest! https://t.co/P5HWHKRFxe pic.twitter.com/Fb4x5ANJQ3 — Andrew Maynard (@2020science) July 24, 2017 For anyone who&#8217;s been following me for the past [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2017/08/06/ten-reasons-scientists-youtube/">Ten reasons why more scientists should be on YouTube</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15542</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2017 Science Showcase Video Contest</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2017/08/05/2017-science-showcase-video-contest/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 19:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Can researchers make awesome science communication videos? To find out (and, quite honestly, to encourage scientists to show us what they can do!), we&#8217;re running a science video competition this year on the YouTube channel Science Showcase. Entries are being accepted to August 31, with a top prize of $2,000 for the video selected by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2017/08/05/2017-science-showcase-video-contest/">2017 Science Showcase Video Contest</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15539</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will driving your own car one day be as socially unacceptable as smoking in public?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/09/26/will-driving-car-one-day-socially-unacceptable-smoking-public/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 22:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomous vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-driving cars]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2014, over 32,000 people were killed in car crashes in the U.S. In 2012, more than two million Americans visited the emergency room as a result of car crashes. And an estimated 94 percent of the crashes that cause these injuries and fatalities are attributable to human choice or error. These are sobering statistics. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/09/26/will-driving-car-one-day-socially-unacceptable-smoking-public/">Will driving your own car one day be as socially unacceptable as smoking in public?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15270</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking on the complex ethics of emerging brain technologies</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/09/15/taking-complex-ethics-emerging-brain-technologies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optogenetics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine infusing thousands of wireless devices into your brain, and using them to both monitor its activity and directly influence its actions. It sounds like the stuff of science fiction, and for the moment it still is – but possibly not for long. Brain research is on a roll at the moment. And as it [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/09/15/taking-complex-ethics-emerging-brain-technologies/">Taking on the complex ethics of emerging brain technologies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15263</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the nanotechnology risk landscape &#8211; pointers for early career scientists</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/07/28/navigating-nanotechnology-risk-landscape-pointers-early-career-scientists/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanomaterial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Navigating the risk landscape that surrounds nanotechnology development can be a daunting task – especially if you are an early career researcher just getting started in the field.  There are plenty of studies and speculations around what might – or might not – be risky about nanoscale science and engineering.   But surprisingly, there are relatively [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/07/28/navigating-nanotechnology-risk-landscape-pointers-early-career-scientists/">Navigating the nanotechnology risk landscape &#8211; pointers for early career scientists</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15250</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A fifth grader (and up) introduction to nanotechnology</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/07/26/a-fifth-grader-and-up-introduction-to-nanotechnology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The latest video from Risk Bites takes a four minute dive into what nanotechnology is, and why it&#8217;s important.  It was created as a primer for 5th graders &#8211; which probably means that there&#8217;ll be a lot of 5th graders at heart watching it! It also takes a somewhat less than conventional approach to nanotech: The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/07/26/a-fifth-grader-and-up-introduction-to-nanotechnology/">A fifth grader (and up) introduction to nanotechnology</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15240</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elon Musk&#8217;s new master plan will take more than advanced tech to pull off</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/07/23/elon-musks-new-master-plan-will-take-more-than-advanced-tech-to-pull-off/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 15:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomous vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photovoltaics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla Motors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk – CEO of Tesla Motors – has just revealed the second part of his master plan for the company. And it’s a doozy. Not content with producing sleek electric cars (which to be fair, was only ever a stepping stone to greater things), Musk wants to fundamentally change how we live our lives. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/07/23/elon-musks-new-master-plan-will-take-more-than-advanced-tech-to-pull-off/">Elon Musk&#8217;s new master plan will take more than advanced tech to pull off</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15223</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How risky are the World Economic Forum’s top 10 emerging technologies for 2016?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/06/23/risky-world-economic-forums-top-10-emerging-technologies-2016/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top ten emerging technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Take an advanced technology. Add a twist of fantasy. Stir well, and watch the action unfold. It’s the perfect recipe for a Hollywood tech-disaster blockbuster. And clichéd as it is, it’s the scenario that we too often imagine for emerging technologies. Think superintelligent machines, lab-bred humans, the ability to redesign whole species – you get [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/06/23/risky-world-economic-forums-top-10-emerging-technologies-2016/">How risky are the World Economic Forum’s top 10 emerging technologies for 2016?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15209</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guiding &#8220;questions&#8221; for science communication – personal reflections</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/06/17/guiding-principles-science-communication-personal-reflections/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm a Scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientist communicator]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, I was asked to articulate my “rules” for effective science communication. I don’t actually have a check-list for developing science communications (and I’m not sure that a rigid check list would be such a good idea).  But I do have an informal (and until now not clearly articulated) framework that informs [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/06/17/guiding-principles-science-communication-personal-reflections/">Guiding &#8220;questions&#8221; for science communication – personal reflections</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15194</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the latest on carbon nanotube safety?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/06/15/whats-latest-carbon-nanotube-safety/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon nanotubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vantablack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Just a few years ago, carbon nanotubes were front and center of discussions around the safety of engineered nanomaterials.  These days, not so much. So what happened?  Did we do the science and discover that they&#8217;re just as safe as any other form of carbon? Or did they simply slip off the safety radar? In [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/06/15/whats-latest-carbon-nanotube-safety/">What&#8217;s the latest on carbon nanotube safety?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15190</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to give the perfect scientific presentation</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/06/05/give-perfect-scientific-presentation/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2016/06/05/give-perfect-scientific-presentation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 12:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerpoint]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Too often, it seems, the mark of a &#8220;good&#8221; scientist is the ability to give an excruciatingly embarrassing and incomprehensible scientific presentation &#8211; the sort of presentations that litter academic conferences. Borne out of long-standing frustration, I posted a tongue-in-cheek 12-point plan for the &#8220;perfect&#8221; presentation on Twitter yesterday: How to give the best scientific [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/06/05/give-perfect-scientific-presentation/">How to give the perfect scientific presentation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2016/06/05/give-perfect-scientific-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15170</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nanoparticles in baby formula: should parents be worried?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/05/17/nanoparticles-baby-formula-parents-worried/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 21:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroxyapatite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There’s a lot of stuff you’d expect to find in baby formula: proteins, carbs, vitamins, essential minerals. But parents probably wouldn’t anticipate finding extremely small, needle-like particles. Yet this is exactly what a team of scientists here at Arizona State University recently discovered. The research, commissioned and published by Friends of the Earth (FoE) – [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/05/17/nanoparticles-baby-formula-parents-worried/">Nanoparticles in baby formula: should parents be worried?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15164</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>With carbon nanotubes in the news again, where&#8217;s the public interest in possible risks?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/03/29/carbon-nanotubes-news-wheres-discussion-possible-risks/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2016/03/29/carbon-nanotubes-news-wheres-discussion-possible-risks/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnon nanotube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2008, carbon nanotubes – exceptionally fine tubes made up of carbon atoms – were making headlines. A new study from the U.K. had just shown that, under some conditions, these long, slender fiber-like tubes could cause harm in mice in the same way that some asbestos fibers do. As a collaborator in that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/03/29/carbon-nanotubes-news-wheres-discussion-possible-risks/">With carbon nanotubes in the news again, where&#8217;s the public interest in possible risks?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2016/03/29/carbon-nanotubes-news-wheres-discussion-possible-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15155</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peanut allergy &#8211; what does the LEAP study tell us?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/03/28/peanut-allergy-leap-study-tell-us/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peanut allergy LEAP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Peanut allergy continues to increase, and affects an estimated 1% &#8211; 3% of the population in Western countries.  Yet we&#8217;re still not clear what the cause is. A recent British study though is indicating that exposing infants to peanuts early in their life can &#8211; surprisingly perhaps &#8211; decrease the chances of them later developing an allergy. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/03/28/peanut-allergy-leap-study-tell-us/">Peanut allergy &#8211; what does the LEAP study tell us?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15150</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public universities must do more: the public needs our help and expertise</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/03/12/public-universities-must-do-more-the-public-needs-our-help-and-expertise/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The water crisis in Flint, Michigan, has been in the national headlines for months, culminating in its central role at a recent debate in the city when Democratic presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton slammed government officials for dismissing the health of residents. Sadly, not every marginalized community can depend on a political debate [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/03/12/public-universities-must-do-more-the-public-needs-our-help-and-expertise/">Public universities must do more: the public needs our help and expertise</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15122</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three ways advanced genetic engineering could help address Zika and other mosquito-borne diseases</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/02/03/three-ways-synthetic-biology-could-annihilate-zika-and-other-mosquito-borne-diseases/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2016/02/03/three-ways-synthetic-biology-could-annihilate-zika-and-other-mosquito-borne-diseases/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthetic Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zika]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In just a few short weeks, Zika has shot from being an obscure infection to a headline-hitting public health disaster. The virus is spreading rapidly across the Americas (and potentially beyond), is suspected of being associated with birth defects that affect brain development and currently has no specific vaccine or treatment. Understandably, scientists are scrambling [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/02/03/three-ways-synthetic-biology-could-annihilate-zika-and-other-mosquito-borne-diseases/">Three ways advanced genetic engineering could help address Zika and other mosquito-borne diseases</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2016/02/03/three-ways-synthetic-biology-could-annihilate-zika-and-other-mosquito-borne-diseases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15102</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can citizen science empower disenfranchised communities?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/01/27/can-citizen-science-empower-disenfranchised-communities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flint]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Early in 2015, a group calling itself the Nappy Science Gang hit the parenting scene in the U.K. It was made up of moms and dads who used cloth nappies – or diapers – with their kids, and wanted to know the best ways to keep them clean and safe. The Nappy Science Gang is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/01/27/can-citizen-science-empower-disenfranchised-communities/">Can citizen science empower disenfranchised communities?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15082</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology innovation and life in the 21st century: Views from Civil Society</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/01/22/technology-innovation-and-life-in-the-21st-century-views-from-civil-society/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2009, I commissioned ten guest articles on technology innovation from people working for, associated with or generally reflecting the views of Civil Society groups. Over six years on, these essays still present insightful and often challenging views on technology innovation, and are well worth a revisit. The aim was to expose readers to perspectives on technology innovation that are sometimes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/01/22/technology-innovation-and-life-in-the-21st-century-views-from-civil-society/">Technology innovation and life in the 21st century: Views from Civil Society</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15077</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What will it take to master the fourth industrial revolution?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/01/15/what-will-it-take-to-master-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fourth Industrial Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In April 2000, Bill Joy famously wrote in Wired Magazine: Our most powerful 21st-century technologies – robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech – are threatening to make humans an endangered species. At the time, Joy was an accomplished technologist and chief scientist at Sun Microsystems. Yet he argued passionately that society was in danger of being [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/01/15/what-will-it-take-to-master-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/">What will it take to master the fourth industrial revolution?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15070</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What if we approached risk like entrepreneurs approach innovation?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/01/12/what-if-we-approached-risk-like-entrepreneurs-approach-innovation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If you’ve been following this month’s Consumer Electronics Show (CES), you’ll know with absolute certainty that the future is cool, shiny and stuffed to the brim with “must-have” gadgets. Reading the ebullient reports, you’d be hard-pressed to find anything other than overflowing optimism for how technology will transform our lives. And admittedly, it’s hard to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/01/12/what-if-we-approached-risk-like-entrepreneurs-approach-innovation/">What if we approached risk like entrepreneurs approach innovation?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15066</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five steampunk technology trends to watch for in 2016</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2016/01/04/five-steampunk-technology-trends-to-watch-for-in-2016/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steampuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology trends]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s that time of year again when technology pundits peer into their crystal balls, and predict the hottest tech trends of the coming twelve months.  Let’s be honest though, these lists can get a little stale. So I thought I’d break ranks this year by imagining what a top tech trends list would look like in a “steampunk” world, where steam engines, clockwork mechanisms, and retro-artistic flair, rule supreme.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2016/01/04/five-steampunk-technology-trends-to-watch-for-in-2016/">Five steampunk technology trends to watch for in 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15060</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Elon Musk is a Luddite, count me in!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/12/23/if-elon-musk-is-a-luddite-count-me-in/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fourth Industrial Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luddite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On December 21, the company SpaceX made history by successfully launching a rocket and returning it to a safe landing on Earth. It’s also the day that SpaceX founder Elon Musk was nominated for a Luddite Award. It’s an odd juxtaposition, to say the least.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/12/23/if-elon-musk-is-a-luddite-count-me-in/">If Elon Musk is a Luddite, count me in!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15048</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoverboards and health: how good for you is this year’s hottest trend?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/12/22/hoverboards-and-health-how-good-for-you-is-this-years-hottest-trend/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoverboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=15043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Walking across campus to my office each morning this semester, I’ve found it hard to ignore the growing number of students using hoverboards to get around. These two-wheel self-balancing boards (they don’t really hover, Back-to-the-Future-style) are one of the hottest gadgets this holiday season. As sedentary lifestyles continue to be a major underlying factor in chronic conditions like type 2 diabetes and heart disease, I wondered whether these trendy two-wheelers are simply another way to avoid the exercise we all need to stay healthy. As it turns out, it's not only their health that hoverboard users need to worry about.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/12/22/hoverboards-and-health-how-good-for-you-is-this-years-hottest-trend/">Hoverboards and health: how good for you is this year’s hottest trend?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15043</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer: Countering the &#8220;bad luck&#8221; hypothesis</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/12/16/cancer-countering-the-bad-luck-hypothesis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good luck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life style]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14988</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A new study has just been published in the journal Nature that calls the so-called "bad luck hypothesis"of cancer formation  into question, and concludes that cancer risk is heavily influenced by external factors.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/12/16/cancer-countering-the-bad-luck-hypothesis/">Cancer: Countering the &#8220;bad luck&#8221; hypothesis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14988</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are vegetarian diets really more harmful to the environment?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/12/15/are-vegetarian-diets-really-more-harmful-to-the-environment/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/12/15/are-vegetarian-diets-really-more-harmful-to-the-environment/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Carnegie Mellon University had an eye-catching headline on its news feed this morning: Eat More Bacon.  It was based on a new study that suggests fruit and veg have a higher environmental impact per calorie than meat.  However, the analysis failst to take account of the nutritional needs in a healthy diet.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/12/15/are-vegetarian-diets-really-more-harmful-to-the-environment/">Are vegetarian diets really more harmful to the environment?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/12/15/are-vegetarian-diets-really-more-harmful-to-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14977</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s the real risk from consumer drones this holiday season?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/12/14/whats-the-real-risk-from-consumer-drones-this-holiday-season/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sUAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sUAV]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This holiday season, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is estimating that over one million small “Unmanned Aerial Systems” (sUAS’s) – drones, to the rest of us – will be sold to consumers. But as hordes of novice pilots take to the air, just how safe are these small bundles of metal, plastic, video cameras and whirling blades?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/12/14/whats-the-real-risk-from-consumer-drones-this-holiday-season/">What’s the real risk from consumer drones this holiday season?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14973</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making sense of gene drives and gene editing</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/12/01/gene-drives-gene-editing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 19:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthetic Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene editing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gene editing and gene drives are rapidly emerging as the disruptive technologies du jour.  But what are they, what can they do, and why should you care? Just last week, research was published that took us a step closer to being able to re-engineer whole species by driving specific genes through successive generations   &#8211; the species in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/12/01/gene-drives-gene-editing/">Making sense of gene drives and gene editing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14950</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you breathing carbon nanotubes, and should you be worried?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/10/23/are-you-breathing-carbon-nanotubes-and-should-you-be-worried/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/10/23/are-you-breathing-carbon-nanotubes-and-should-you-be-worried/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon nanotubes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For over two decades, carbon nanotubes have been attracting attention.  First, they were seen as a super-strong, super-conductive new form of carbon that could potentially revolutionize everything from space travel to drug delivery.  Later, concerns were raised that these long, thin, fiber-like materials might cause or exacerbate lung diseases if inhaled. Now, a new study [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/10/23/are-you-breathing-carbon-nanotubes-and-should-you-be-worried/">Are you breathing carbon nanotubes, and should you be worried?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/10/23/are-you-breathing-carbon-nanotubes-and-should-you-be-worried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14934</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do people read science blogs?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/09/30/why-do-people-read-science-blogs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdfunding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarreau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science blogs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why do people read science blogs? Surprisingly, we don&#8217;t have a good answer to this.  There&#8217;s a vibrant online community of people blogging about science, and talking about blogging about science, and blogging about blogging and talking about science.  But we don&#8217;t know that much about the people that science blogs and bloggers set out to serve. This is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/09/30/why-do-people-read-science-blogs/">Why do people read science blogs?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14927</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New report on sustainable hydraulic fracking</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/09/23/new-report-on-sustainable-hydraulic-fracking/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Michigan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2011 &#8211; while I was Director of the University of Michigan Risk Science Center &#8211; I was part of a larger team exploring the possibility of conducting a full-blown assessment of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) possibilities and pitfalls in Michigan.  We were interested in applying the Integrated Assessment methodology developed at the University of Michigan [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/09/23/new-report-on-sustainable-hydraulic-fracking/">New report on sustainable hydraulic fracking</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14914</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microbeads: The science behind the risk</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/09/18/microbeads-the-science-behind-the-risk/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 05:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbeads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal care products]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new viewpoint article in the Journal Environmental Science and Technology that calls for a ban on the use of microbeads, based on available evidence, and that has been causing something of a stir. The authors argue that the number of microbeads being washed into the environment from personal care products raises sufficient concerns [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/09/18/microbeads-the-science-behind-the-risk/">Microbeads: The science behind the risk</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14902</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>For tech innovation to succeed, we need parallel innovation in how we think about risk</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/09/07/for-tech-innovation-to-succeed-we-need-parallel-innovation-in-how-we-think-about-risk/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/09/07/for-tech-innovation-to-succeed-we-need-parallel-innovation-in-how-we-think-about-risk/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In October 2014, Google announced it was working on an innovative nanotechnology-based approach to avoiding and managing disease. The idea was to create a pill that would deliver magnetic, functionalized nanoparticles from the gut to the bloodstream. Once there, they would circulate — presumably for days, or longer — picking up biomarkers of disease along [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/09/07/for-tech-innovation-to-succeed-we-need-parallel-innovation-in-how-we-think-about-risk/">For tech innovation to succeed, we need parallel innovation in how we think about risk</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/09/07/for-tech-innovation-to-succeed-we-need-parallel-innovation-in-how-we-think-about-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14882</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Acts of Kindness &#8211; Thank You Postcard Underground!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/08/05/small-acts-of-kindness-thank-you-postcard-underground/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/08/05/small-acts-of-kindness-thank-you-postcard-underground/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postcard Underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Bites]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this age of public outrage and social media shaming, small acts of private kindness sometimes don&#8217;t seem to count for that much.  Yet even though they may not have the social cachet of jumping on the hashtag du jour, to the individual who receives them, they can still mean a lot. Anyone following this blog [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/08/05/small-acts-of-kindness-thank-you-postcard-underground/">Small Acts of Kindness &#8211; Thank You Postcard Underground!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/08/05/small-acts-of-kindness-thank-you-postcard-underground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14828</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can public engagement stunt academic careers?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/07/11/can-public-engagement-stunt-academic-careers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lubchenco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watermeyer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As an academic, I take public engagement seriously.  I see it as a responsibility that comes with the societally-sanctioned license to study the things that I&#8217;m passionate about.  And I consider it a privilege to interact with others who can inform what I do as well as potentially benefitting from it.  Yet I&#8217;d be the first [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/07/11/can-public-engagement-stunt-academic-careers/">Can public engagement stunt academic careers?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14813</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Characterizing nanoparticles in the 1880&#8217;s</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/07/05/characterizing-nanoparticles-in-the-1880s/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 22:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aitken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 29th, there were 52,000 nanoparticles per cubic centimeter of air measured at the top of the Eiffel Tower. This may not seem the most compelling opening to an article, until you realize that the measurement was made in 1889 - over 100 years before nanotechnology and nanoparticles began hitting headlines as one of the most talked about emerging technologies in recent decades.  The particles were measured by the Scottish scientist John Aitken, using his newly developed device for counting airborne dust particles.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/07/05/characterizing-nanoparticles-in-the-1880s/">Characterizing nanoparticles in the 1880&#8217;s</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14750</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics don&#8217;t always play a role in attitudes toward science issues</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/07/01/politics-dont-always-play-a-role-in-attitudes-toward-science-issues/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Comments provided for GENeS on the launch of the Pew Research Center attitudes survey on Americans, Politics and Science Issues (July 1 2015) Political leanings are frequently associated with attitudes toward science and technology in the U.S.  Yet as the most recent poll from the Pew Research Center on Americans, Politics and Science Issues shows, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/07/01/politics-dont-always-play-a-role-in-attitudes-toward-science-issues/">Politics don&#8217;t always play a role in attitudes toward science issues</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14744</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should indoor tanning be banned?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/06/10/should-indoor-tanning-be-banned/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tanning bed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UV]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Just how dangerous is indoor tanning?  A couple of weeks ago, colleagues from the University of Michigan published an article with a rather stark recommendation: an immediate age limited ban on indoor tanning in all U.S. states, followed by a five-year phase-in ban for all commercial tanning.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/06/10/should-indoor-tanning-be-banned/">Should indoor tanning be banned?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14711</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using animations in science communication</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/06/10/using-animations-in-science-communication/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Queen Alike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arsenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLM]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Can short animations be used for effective science communication, asks guest-blogger Queen Alike, Public Health Specialist at the National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine (NLM).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/06/10/using-animations-in-science-communication/">Using animations in science communication</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14672</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>American universities: reclaiming our role in society</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/06/01/american-universities-reclaiming-our-role-in-society/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Discourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Conversation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>American universities are facing a crisis of relevance. There is, quite simply, a growing tension between their internal cultures and their role within society.  But the good news is that a growing number of us academics are taking this issue head on, exploring a broader range of models for what it means to be a scholar within society, and challenging old models that stand in the way of such progress.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/06/01/american-universities-reclaiming-our-role-in-society/">American universities: reclaiming our role in society</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14675</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lubchenco &#8211; Delivering on Science&#8217;s Social Contact</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/05/05/lubchenco-delivering-on-sciences-social-contact/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 20:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Lubchenco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1998, then-president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Dr. Jane Luchenco called for a "New Social Contract with science".  She argued that, in the face of emerging challenges, scientists needed to rethink their roles and responsibilities within society.   Next Wednesday she will be examining how far we've come - and how far we still need to go - on delivering on science's social contract, at the University of Michigan meeting on Academic Engagement in Public and Political Discourse. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/05/05/lubchenco-delivering-on-sciences-social-contact/">Lubchenco &#8211; Delivering on Science&#8217;s Social Contact</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14658</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new home for Risk Innovation</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/04/29/a-new-home-for-risk-innovation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Innovation Lab]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Five years ago, I joined the University of Michigan School of Public Health as Director of the U-M Risk Science Center.  It's been a good five years.  However, last year, the good folks at Arizona State University made me an offer I couldn't refuse - the opportunity to expand substantially my work on risk and innovation, at one of the most exciting and progressive universities in the U.S.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/04/29/a-new-home-for-risk-innovation/">A new home for Risk Innovation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14639</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Poetry of Innovating Responsibly</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/04/24/the-poetry-of-innovating-responsibly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 20:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haiku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://2020science.org/?p=14615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What have technology innovation, haiku, and this summer's blockbuster-in-waiting Jurassic World got in common?  The answer: a short book of haiku on responsible technological innovation that a group of colleagues helped put together last summer.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/04/24/the-poetry-of-innovating-responsibly/">The Poetry of Innovating Responsibly</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14615</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No New York Times, wearable computers couldn&#8217;t be as harmful as cigarettes!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/03/18/no-new-york-times-wearable-computers-couldnt-harmful-cigarettes/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/03/18/no-new-york-times-wearable-computers-couldnt-harmful-cigarettes/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wearable Computer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was taken aback- to say the least - by an article from the New York Times that crossed my Twitter feed today that suggested wearable electronics like the new Apple Watch could be has harmful as smoking.  I have to wonder whether the author actually read the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monograph on which it's based!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/03/18/no-new-york-times-wearable-computers-couldnt-harmful-cigarettes/">No New York Times, wearable computers couldn&#8217;t be as harmful as cigarettes!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/03/18/no-new-york-times-wearable-computers-couldnt-harmful-cigarettes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14552</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solving public health challenges through innovation</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/03/16/solving-public-health-challenges-innovation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[. IAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation In Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday, the second annual University of Michigan Innovation In Action competition concluded, with six stunning student pitches for startups that could make a significant dent on the health and well-being of communities.  It was a great example of what can be achieved at the intersection of public health, entrepreneurship, and the creativity and energy that students can bring to real-world problems.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/03/16/solving-public-health-challenges-innovation/">Solving public health challenges through innovation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14536</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dunkin&#8217; Donuts ditches titanium dioxide – but is it actually harmful?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/03/12/dunkin-donuts-ditches-titanium-dioxide-actually-harmful/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/03/12/dunkin-donuts-ditches-titanium-dioxide-actually-harmful/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donkin' Donuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titanium dioxide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In response to pressure from the advocacy group As You Sow, Dunkin’ Brands has announced that it will be removing allegedly “nano” titanium dioxide from Dunkin’ Donuts’ powdered sugar donuts. As You Sow claims there are safety concerns around the use of the material, while Dunkin’ Brands cites concerns over investor confidence. It’s a move [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/03/12/dunkin-donuts-ditches-titanium-dioxide-actually-harmful/">Dunkin&#8217; Donuts ditches titanium dioxide – but is it actually harmful?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/03/12/dunkin-donuts-ditches-titanium-dioxide-actually-harmful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14512</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toxicologists are Freakin&#8217; Awesome!</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/03/10/toxicologists-freakin-awesome/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Bites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Risk Bites is going to be at the San Diego Festival of Science &#038; Engineering Expo this year (Saturday March 21st - be there!).  I'll be there as part of the Society of Toxicology (SOT) annual meeting, sharing the SOT stand.  Given the toxicology theme, we have a special Risk Bites video for the Expo - a toxicology primer in 3 minutes for completely uninitiated.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/03/10/toxicologists-freakin-awesome/">Toxicologists are Freakin&#8217; Awesome!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14500</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responsible Innovation, and the (nano) entrepreneur&#8217;s dilemma</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/03/05/responsible-innovation-nano-entrepreneurs-dilemma/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Responsible innovation is a great concept - it embodies ideas around ensuring our inventiveness works for the long term good of society, without inadvertently throwing up more problems than it solves.  But to entrepreneurs and others trying to make ends meet while launching a new product or idea, it can quickly begin to look like an ill-affordable luxury</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/03/05/responsible-innovation-nano-entrepreneurs-dilemma/">Responsible Innovation, and the (nano) entrepreneur&#8217;s dilemma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14433</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responsible development of new technologies critical in complex, connected world</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/03/04/responsible-development-new-technologies-critical-complex-connected-world/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top ten emerging technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Economic Forum]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The World Economic Forum's 2015 top 10 emerging technologies reflect the tremendous potential of technology innovation.  Yet to build a resilient tech-based future, we need new ideas, new research and new tools that will enable us to realize the benefits of technology innovation, while keeping us a safe distance from potentially catastrophic collapse. It’s a tough challenge, and one that will demand unprecedented levels of interdisciplinary investment, collaboration and creativity. Yet the price of not innovating responsibly is one that may just be too large to live with.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/03/04/responsible-development-new-technologies-critical-complex-connected-world/">Responsible development of new technologies critical in complex, connected world</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14419</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you ever wondered &#8230;?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/02/27/ever-wondered/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Risk Bites]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wondered if green potato chips are safe to eat?  Or whether peeing in the swimming pool is a good idea?  Or what makes something toxic? Risk Bites has a snazzy new poster aimed at raising awareness of the video channel to K-12 students (and their teachers). Please do download the PDF (just click the image below) and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/02/27/ever-wondered/">Have you ever wondered &#8230;?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14400</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science of &#8220;anti-vaccination&#8221; &#8211; a great primer from SciShow</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/02/20/science-anti-vaccination-great-primer-scishow/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/02/20/science-anti-vaccination-great-primer-scishow/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scishow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Hank Green and the YouTube channel SciShow posted a particularly good video on the anti-vaccination movement.  Unlike many commentators from within the science community, instead of vilifying  parents who don't get their kids vaccinated - or are hesitant about doing so - Green takes a science-grounded look at why people reject vaccines.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/02/20/science-anti-vaccination-great-primer-scishow/">The science of &#8220;anti-vaccination&#8221; &#8211; a great primer from SciShow</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/02/20/science-anti-vaccination-great-primer-scishow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14363</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Measles mortality rates &#8211; 2008-2011 outbreak, France</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/02/04/measles-mortality-rates-2008-2011-outbreak-france/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/02/04/measles-mortality-rates-2008-2011-outbreak-france/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortality rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I posted a piece examining the oft-quoted mortality rate for measles of one to two deaths per thousand cases of infection.  Today, I want to look at what can be learned from more recent and more comprehensive dataset &#8211; this one from the 2008-2011 measles outbreak in France. In the early 2000&#8217;s, measles was a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/02/04/measles-mortality-rates-2008-2011-outbreak-france/">Measles mortality rates &#8211; 2008-2011 outbreak, France</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/02/04/measles-mortality-rates-2008-2011-outbreak-france/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14289</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the risk of dying if you catch measles?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/02/03/risk-dying-catch-measles/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/02/03/risk-dying-catch-measles/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 23:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If you catch measles, what are your chances of dying? When I was a kid, measles was one of those things you were expected to catch.  I had it when I was five, and must confess, I don&#8217;t remember much about the experience.  I do remember being confined to bed.  And I also remember being told [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/02/03/risk-dying-catch-measles/">What is the risk of dying if you catch measles?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/02/03/risk-dying-catch-measles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14275</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is novelty in nanomaterials overrated when it comes to risk?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/02/02/novelty-nanomaterials-overrated-comes-risk/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/02/02/novelty-nanomaterials-overrated-comes-risk/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanomaterial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Novelty and nanotechnology are deeply intertwined. The search for nanostructure-enabled materials has driven research funding in nanotechnology for well over a decade now; the exploitation of novel properties has underpinned the commercialization of nanomaterials; and concerns over potential risks has stimulated widespread studies into what makes these materials harmful. Yet 'novelty' is an ephemeral quality, and despite its close association with nanotechnology, it may be an unreliable guide to ensuring the long-term safety of materials that emerge from the field. If this is the case, do we need to find alternative approaches to developing advanced materials and products that are safe by design?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/02/02/novelty-nanomaterials-overrated-comes-risk/">Is novelty in nanomaterials overrated when it comes to risk?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/02/02/novelty-nanomaterials-overrated-comes-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14248</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerging technologies must be developed responsibly</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/01/22/emerging-technologies-must-developed-responsibly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Responsible innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>From smart phones to cancer cures, we depend on technology innovation more now than at any point in human history. Yet in a cruel twist of irony, emerging technologies that could help improve lives and protect the environment may ultimately end up doing more harm than good. That is, unless new approaches to responsible innovation are developed and adopted...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/01/22/emerging-technologies-must-developed-responsibly/">Emerging technologies must be developed responsibly</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14159</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Economic Forum highlights risks of emerging technologies</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/01/15/world-economic-forum-highlights-risks-emerging-technologies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Economic Forum]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The challenges of governing emerging technologies are highlighted by the World Economic Forum in the 2015 edition of its Global Risks Report. Focusing in particular on synthetic biology, gene drives and artificial intelligence, the report warns that these and other emerging technologies present hard-to-foresee risks, and that oversight mechanisms need to more effectively balance likely benefits [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/01/15/world-economic-forum-highlights-risks-emerging-technologies/">World Economic Forum highlights risks of emerging technologies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14122</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are quantum dot TVs actually better for the environment?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/01/07/quantum-dot-tvs-toxic-ingredients-actually-better-environment/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/01/07/quantum-dot-tvs-toxic-ingredients-actually-better-environment/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QD Vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxicity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, The Conversation reported that, “The future is bright, the future is … quantum dot televisions.” And judging by the buzz coming from this week’s annual Consumer Electronics Show (CES) that’s right – the technology is providing manufacturers with a cheap and efficient way of producing the next generation of brilliant, high-definition TV [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/01/07/quantum-dot-tvs-toxic-ingredients-actually-better-environment/">Are quantum dot TVs actually better for the environment?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/01/07/quantum-dot-tvs-toxic-ingredients-actually-better-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14097</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad luck and cancer &#8211; did the media get it wrong?</title>
		<link>https://2020science.org/2015/01/02/bad-luck-cancer-media-get-wrong/</link>
					<comments>https://2020science.org/2015/01/02/bad-luck-cancer-media-get-wrong/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Maynard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 01:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad luck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.riskscience.umich.edu/?p=14034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The chances are that, if you follow news articles about cancer, you&#8217;ll have come across headlines like &#8220;Most Cancers Caused By Bad Luck&#8221; (The Daily Beast) or &#8220;Two-thirds of cancers are due to &#8220;bad luck,&#8221; study finds&#8221; (CBS News).  The story &#8211; based on research out of Johns Hopkins University &#8211; has grabbed widespread media [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://2020science.org/2015/01/02/bad-luck-cancer-media-get-wrong/">Bad luck and cancer &#8211; did the media get it wrong?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://2020science.org">2020 SCIENCE ARCHIVE</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://2020science.org/2015/01/02/bad-luck-cancer-media-get-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14034</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
