<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:nyt="http://www.nytimes.com/namespaces/rss/2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>FiveThirtyEight</title> <link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/</link> <description>Nate Silver\'s Political Calculus</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 20:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>  <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/538dotcom" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="538dotcom" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>The Most Powerful Special Interest in Washington: The Acronym</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/the-most-powerful-special-interest-in-washington-the-acronym/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/the-most-powerful-special-interest-in-washington-the-acronym/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 20:39:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By MICAH COHEN</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[acronym]]></category> <category><![CDATA[PAC]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/the-most-powerful-special-interest-in-washington-the-acronym/</guid> <description><![CDATA[A linguistic plague is creeping through the nation's capital - the "bacronym," where a PAC or bill name is chosen so that the initial letters of each word form a desired word.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/the-most-powerful-special-interest-in-washington-the-acronym/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Democrats' Odds of Retaining Senate Improve</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/democrats-odds-of-retaining-senate-improve/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/democrats-odds-of-retaining-senate-improve/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:36:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category> <category><![CDATA[forecasting models]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category> <category><![CDATA[senate forecast]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/democrats-odds-of-retaining-senate-improve/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Republican fortunes have diminished because of retirements and questions about the quality of candidates.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/democrats-odds-of-retaining-senate-improve/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>A 30,000-Foot View on the Presidential Race</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/a-30000-foot-view-on-the-presidential-race/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/a-30000-foot-view-on-the-presidential-race/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:55:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category> <category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[forecasting models]]></category> <category><![CDATA[general election]]></category> <category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category> <category><![CDATA[polls]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/a-30000-foot-view-on-the-presidential-race/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Nothing fundamental has changed in the race in the past month or two, although there are a couple of factors that may be working in Mitt Romney's favor at the margin. ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/15/a-30000-foot-view-on-the-presidential-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Gay Marriage and the Democratic Base</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/gay-marriage-and-the-democratic-base/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/gay-marriage-and-the-democratic-base/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:21:28 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category> <category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/gay-marriage-and-the-democratic-base/</guid> <description><![CDATA[One clear rationale for President Obama's new position? It's very unusual for a president to oppose the majority of voters in his party on a major issue, and 60 percent of Democrats support gay marriage.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/gay-marriage-and-the-democratic-base/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Support for Gay Marriage Outweighs Opposition in Polls</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/support-for-gay-marriage-outweighs-opposition-in-polls/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/support-for-gay-marriage-outweighs-opposition-in-polls/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:52:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/support-for-gay-marriage-outweighs-opposition-in-polls/</guid> <description><![CDATA[President Obama's decision to endorse same-sex marriage undoubtedly entails some political risk, but recent polls suggest that public opinion is increasingly on his side.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/support-for-gay-marriage-outweighs-opposition-in-polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Moderate Republicans Fall Away in the Senate</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/moderate-republicans-fall-away-in-the-senate/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/moderate-republicans-fall-away-in-the-senate/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 01:57:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/moderate-republicans-fall-away-in-the-senate/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Most moderate Republicans who served in the Senate just a few years ago will no longer be in the Congress when it meets again 2013.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/moderate-republicans-fall-away-in-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Is Obama More Popular Than He Should Be, Revisited</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/is-obama-more-popular-than-he-should-be-revisited/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/is-obama-more-popular-than-he-should-be-revisited/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:08:05 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By JOHN SIDES</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/is-obama-more-popular-than-he-should-be-revisited/</guid> <description><![CDATA[After discussion from FiveThirtyEight readers, looking back and extending an analysis that noted President Obama's approval rating exceeded a theoretical approval rating predicted by history, the economy and other factors.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/is-obama-more-popular-than-he-should-be-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Reads and Reactions: Reader Comment Edition</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/reads-and-reactions-reader-comment-edition/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/reads-and-reactions-reader-comment-edition/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By MICAH COHEN</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[2012]]></category> <category><![CDATA[general election]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[reads and reactions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[swing states]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/reads-and-reactions-reader-comment-edition/</guid> <description><![CDATA[FiveThirtyEight readers weigh in -- often critically -- on recent posts previewing the fall campaign.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/reads-and-reactions-reader-comment-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Has Obama's Magic Jobs Number Changed?</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/has-obamas-magic-jobs-number-changed/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/has-obamas-magic-jobs-number-changed/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[economy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/has-obamas-magic-jobs-number-changed/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Earlier this year, I wrote that if the economy added more than 150,000 jobs per month, President Obama looked to be a favorite for re-election, but is that number lower now?]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/has-obamas-magic-jobs-number-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>North Carolina's Ban on Gay Marriage Appears Likely to Pass</title><link>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/north-carolinas-ban-on-gay-marriage-appears-likely-to-pass/</link> <comments>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/north-carolinas-ban-on-gay-marriage-appears-likely-to-pass/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:51:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>By NATE SILVER</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category> <category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category> <category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category> <category><![CDATA[polls]]></category> <category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/north-carolinas-ban-on-gay-marriage-appears-likely-to-pass/</guid> <description><![CDATA[Polls show that North Carolina voters are likely to pass an amendment to the state's constitution banning same-sex marriage and all domestic partnerships - but also that there is some confusion about what the amendment says.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/north-carolinas-ban-on-gay-marriage-appears-likely-to-pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>

