<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AICPA.Org Professional Ethics</title>
    <link>http://www.aicpa.org/INTERESTAREAS/PROFESSIONALETHICS</link>
    <description>The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants is the national, professional organization for all Certified Public Accountants. Its mission is to provide members with the resources, information, and leadership that enable them to provide valuable services in the highest professional manner to benefit the public as well as employers and clients.</description>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics" /><feedburner:info uri="aicpa_professionalethics" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
      <title>Comment Letters for the Ethics Division Nov. 16, 2012 Exposure Draft</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics/~3/bqlJmVMzTvc/Ethics-Nov-16-2012-Exposure-Draft.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 05:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b033bcf-5f9d-4a38-908e-91fdf023a975</guid>
      <description>





Following are the comment letters received on the November 16, 2012 exposure draft of the Professional Ethics Division:

1.  North Carolina State Board of Examiners
2.  NASBA
3.  Ohio Society of CPAs Professional Ethics Committee
4.  New York State Society of </description>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Community/ExposureDrafts/Pages/Ethics-Nov-16-2012-Exposure-Draft.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment Letters for the November 16, 2012 Exposure Draft</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics/~3/afJHReOMMi0/November16,2012ExposureDraft.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a95245d-4d07-4715-8aaa-8f744671717a</guid>
      <description>

Following are the comment letters received on the November 16, 2012 exposure draft of the Professional Ethics Division:

1.  North Carolina State Board of Examiners
2.  NASBA
3.  Ohio Society of CPAs Professional Ethics Committee
4.  New York State Society of CPAs </description>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Community/ExposureDrafts/Pages/November16,2012ExposureDraft.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment Letters For the September 19, 2012 Ethics Exposure Draft</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics/~3/quDkFAiPYeg/CommentLettersFortheSeptember19,2012EthicsExposureDraft.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 08:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1dab5900-115f-4c4c-b979-63d50a76b094</guid>
      <description>


Following are the comment letters received on the September 19, 2012 exposure draft of the Professional Ethics Division:

1.   Laura Lindel 
2.   North Carolina State Board
3.   Texas Society of CPAs Ethics Committee
4.   Indiana CPA Society Ethics </description>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Community/ExposureDrafts/Pages/CommentLettersFortheSeptember19,2012EthicsExposureDraft.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>PEEC Non-Enforcement Policy</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics/~3/LEFYSaH99ME/Non-Enfor.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2828cc43-7d8d-41f1-8a9f-0940fc1673a6</guid>
      <description>The Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC) has agreed that it will not take enforcement action against a member who is a member of a group engagement team in cases where a foreign component auditor involved in the group audit is not in compliance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct </description>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Resources/EthicsEnforcement/Pages/Non-Enfor.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment Letters For the November 30, 2011 Exposure Draft</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics/~3/x_NITJqXjNQ/2011November30ExposureDraftCommentLetters.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7384536d-22c9-4ef9-9a6b-3e9b64441d46</guid>
      <description>









Following are the comment letters received on the November 30, 2011 exposure draft of the Professional Ethics Division: 

1.    Marguerite I. Harkness, CPA
2.    Professional Ethics Committee of the New York State Society of </description>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Community/ExposureDrafts/Pages/2011November30ExposureDraftCommentLetters.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment Letters For the September 23, 2011 Exposure Draft</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AICPA_ProfessionalEthics/~3/Cdq-HZTUCLY/2011-Sept-Exposure-Draft-Comment-Letters.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2eccef0e-1d29-4b93-aa99-9bfbafecdeca</guid>
      <description>Comments are requested by XXXX ##, 2011 for the September 23, 2011 exposure draft -proposed new interpretation  . 
</description>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ProfessionalEthics/Community/ExposureDrafts/Pages/2011-Sept-Exposure-Draft-Comment-Letters.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
