Thoughts on our circumstances...

There are genuine fears within Finland...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:44:59 -1000

Editor's note: ...by certain political figures that NATO will launch another provocation against Russia and that it will be Finland as the next proxy. The EU and NATO desperately need a major war against Russia and they are doing everything within their sphere of influence to provoke Russia to initiate Article 5 of the NATO charter to make that war happen. Finland became a NATO member on April 4, 2023. Germany's Merz is pulling away from Washington while still committing Germany to more defense spending and continued Ukraine funding, essentially picking a fight with President Trump while staying anchored to the transatlantic security bloc. The media supporting that block in the West never misses the chance by referring to "Russia's full scale invasion of Ukraine." The AfD is doing the opposite: courting Moscow directly through gas talks with advisor to Vladimir Putin, Kirill Dmitriev, rejecting Ukraine funding and more weapons for Kiev, and offering voters a clean break from both US reliance and the costs of the largely British commercial proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. The disparity is that Merz's break with the US is rhetorical and grievance driven but keeps Germany's Western alignment intact, while the AfD's outreach to Russia is a substantive policy shift that would realign Germany away from that alignment entirely, and it's gaining traction precisely as Merz's frustration with President Trump makes Merz's own "unconditional friendship" look less stable by comparison.
________

NATO member warns bloc seeking pretext for war with Russia

Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico says he does not want his country to be dragged into a conflict

September 18, 2026 | RT

Europe is moving dangerously close to a direct clash between NATO and Russia, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has warned, accusing the West of seeking a "pretext" for a major conflict between the two sides.

Fico made the comment in a Facebook post on Thursday, which accompanied the remarks he delivered before traveling to Ukraine for a meeting with Vladimir Zelensky and several European leaders.

"I am deeply concerned that they are merely looking for a pretext for a major conflict between NATO and Russia," he wrote.

Reflecting on the Ukraine conflict, Fico said that the hostilities had “gotten out of control," while accusing European nations of engaging in increasingly bellicose rhetoric which he said risked dragging the continent into a broader war. "The situation has never been as serious and tense regarding the possibility of a pan-European war conflict as it is now," he said.

Read more EU committing 'harakiri' – Lavrov

Fico also warned that Bratislava could face pressure from NATO to commit troops if the bloc's Article 5 – a collective defense clause applied if a member state is attacked – is invoked. "Can anyone imagine being told to prepare 5,000 soldiers, 10,000 soldiers, and that they would go somewhere to fight? We don’t know with whom, why, or for what reason," Fico said.

"I don’t want Slovakia to be part of any military conflict because of some Article 5," he stressed, adding that, though his country still "cares about collaboration and fulfilling obligations". "As prime minister, I will do everything to ensure that Slovakia is never drawn into a war," Fico stressed.

Please go to RT to continue reading.

________

While Europe is becoming poorer and poorer, Russia is becoming richer and richer. Here is another reason why Germany's AfD are moving towards Russia:

Russia's $118 Billion Arctic Oil Bet Pushes Ahead Despite Sanctions

What the transatlantic security bloc including Britain and the EU and their central banks really want is to seize Russia and its resources and that has been what the previous UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson's direction has been since 2022. The EU, Britain and those within this bloc are not going to stop and is why Russia has ended all negotiations with the West and why Russia's Sergey Lavrov told the EU they are "committing harakiri":

Russian Elections – Zelensky & Boris Johnson

Seems certain factions within Germany have an interest in Israel as well:

German Sponsorship of Zionist Settlements Exposed

From certain perspectives of analysis, Britain is not only in a commercial proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, Britain is also in an economic and financial war with America:

Merciless Kindness: Britain's Economic War on America and the Long Shadow Over the Iran Sanctions

Three decades and eighty-four strikes into a war...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:25:08 -1000

Editor's note: ...that predates most enlisted service members currently fighting it, the US finds itself locked into a Somali counterterrorism campaign with no visible endpoint, no public accounting of its human cost, and an enemy that keeps multiplying rather than shrinking. Remember the humanitarian mission to protect famine relief in Somalia, but spiraled into the October 1993 Battle of Mogadishu, where a raid meant to capture a warlord turned into a brutal urban firefight that killed 18 American soldiers? That is how long this has been going on with US involvement in Somalia. Somalia sees roughly 8,000-9,000 violent deaths a year in total, about 900-1,100 from ordinary homicide and roughly 7,000+ from armed conflict (al-Shabab attacks, clan violence, and military operations). The place is a Jihad factory.

Then in 2006 as a proxy invasion, when Washington backed Ethiopian forces in toppling the Islamic Courts Union, a coalition that had actually managed to suppress piracy and unify Mogadishu under something resembling order, produced the very insurgency the Pentagon now spends nine figures a year trying to bomb into submission. Al-Shabaab was not an inheritance. It was a creation, spawned out of a militant offshoot of a government the US helped destroy, its first suicide bombing aimed squarely at the foreign troops occupying its capital. That origin story matters, because it suggests a policy pattern that has repeated with grim consistency across the region: intervention produces radicalization, radicalization produces more intervention, and the cycle compounds rather than getting resolved.

What makes the current phase of this war particularly troubling is not just its longevity but its opacity. The US AFRICOM quietly stopped disclosing casualty estimates and civilian harm assessments last year, meaning the American public, and more importantly the Somali public living under these strikes, have no reliable way to judge whether the ongoing bombing campaign is degrading al-Shabaab or simply generating fresh grievances in villages like Saacow that most Americans could not locate on a map. Independent trackers like New America now count more strikes than the Pentagon itself publicly claims, a discrepancy that should alarm anyone concerned with transparency and military oversight. A government fighting a war it will not fully describe, against an enemy it helped create, with a body count it will not release, is not fighting a war so much as running it on autopilot.

The emergence of a second, simultaneous air campaign against an ISIS affiliate in Puntland only deepens the sense of mission creep without strategic clarity. That ISIS offshoot itself splintered from al-Shabaab in 2015, meaning the US is now bombing two branches of a militant family tree it planted the roots for. Meanwhile, Somalia's underlying conditions, a federal government that still cannot project authority beyond Mogadishu, a security apparatus fractured along clan lines, and vast ungoverned territory where al-Shabaab functions as a de facto shadow state collecting taxes through extortion, smuggling and administering justice, remain largely unaddressed by an approach built almost entirely around airstrikes rather than governance, reconstruction, or political reconciliation. Three decades of bombing has not produced a stable Somali state. It has produced a war that outlives news cycles, a Pentagon operating independently of America that answers fewer questions each year, and a local population caught between a government it does not trust with the US military delivering bombs they cannot see coming.

________

US Africa Command Launches 82nd Airstrike in Somalia Of the Year

AFRICOM said that it targeted al-Shabaab in southern Somalia

by Dave DeCamp | September 15, 2026

US Africa Command on Monday night announced that its forces launched another airstrike in Somalia, as the Trump administration continues its record-shattering bombing campaign in the country.

AFRICOM said the strike targeted al-Shabaab in the vicinity of Saacow, a village in Somalia’s southern Lower Juba region. The command offered no other details about the attack, as it stopped sharing casualty estimates and assessments of potential civilian harm last year.

"Specific details about units and assets will not be released to ensure continued operations security," AFRICOM said in its press release.

Based on AFRICOM's numbers, the attack marks at least the 82nd US airstrike in Somalia this year, though there are signs that the US is not announcing each strike in the country.

The US has also been conducting an air war against an ISIS affiliate in Somalia's northeastern Puntland region, and Drop Site News recently reported that a US strike was carried out in the region on September 3, though it has not been claimed by AFRICOM.

According to numbers from New America, an organization that tracks the air war and also counts airstrikes that are reported but not claimed by the US, the September 8 strike would bring the total number of US bombings in Somalia this year to 84.

The US has been involved in Somalia for decades and has been fighting al-Shabaab since the George W. Bush administration backed an Ethiopian invasion in 2006 that ousted the Islamic Courts Union, a Muslim coalition that briefly held power in Mogadishu after taking the city from CIA-backed warlords.

Please go to AntiWar to continue reading.

________

Editor's note: In January 2019 British SAS soldier Christian Craighead's actions at the DusitD2 complex remains one of the most remarkable individual acts of heroism to come out of the "war on terror." He was off duty, freshly showered, and living in Nairobi to train Kenyan army units when a phone call alerted him that the hotel complex nearby was under attack. Within minutes he was in his pickup truck, weapons gear beside him, driving on the wrong side of the highway to reach the scene. What followed was 22 hours of close quarters fighting through smoke filled corridors, shattered glass every where, toxic grenade fumes, and relentless automatic weapons fire, a one man response against a coordinated al-Shabaab assault team infiltrated in from Somalia. By the time it was over, Craighead had killed four terrorists and helped save an estimated 700 people, American, Kenyan, Japanese and European alike, earning him the Conspicuous Gallantry Cross.

The DusitD2 attack exposed a fundamental weakness AFRICOM's bombing campaign still faces today. Al-Shabaab retains the ability to plan complex attacks far beyond Somalia's borders, despite over a decade of drone strikes, AU offensives, and leadership killings. The Dusit attackers had crossed back and forth from Somalia, the same territory the US now bombs dozens of times a year, suggesting airstrikes have degraded the group but never eliminated its ability to project violence regionally. Six years later, both the group and the bombing campaign persist, which argues a purely kinetic approach has produced a stalemate rather than a resolution.

There is also a retaliatory logic connecting the two moments. Al-Shabaab framed the DusitD2 attack partly as a response to US foreign policy, a pattern it has repeated throughout this conflict, consistently citing foreign military presence as justification for its violence, a logic that traces back to its founding as a reaction to the 2006 Ethiopian invasion. Today's bombing campaign runs almost entirely from the air, with no ground presence and minimal public accountability, raising the same question critics have asked since 2006: does each strike degrade the group's capability, or does it simply feed the narrative that fuels its recruitment.

What makes Christian Craighead's story even more compelling in all this is what happened after his remarkable skills were displayed that January day in 2019. For years, Christian Craighead fought to publish his firsthand account of that day, only to be blocked by the UK Ministry of Defence. He pursued a judicial review to try to get the book cleared, and even that was denied, with the courts siding against him and refusing to allow an appeal. A soldier who ran toward gunfire without orders, who saved hundreds of lives with nothing but his own initiative and training, found himself fighting a different kind of battle against his own government simply to tell his story. It raises an uncomfortable question about why an act of such unambiguous heroism would be treated as something to suppress rather than celebrate, and whether institutional caution, image management, or simple bureaucratic inertia was allowed to silence a man who deserved to be heard.

That fight appears to have finally been won. Craighead's memoir, "One Man In," was released on September 15, 2026, through Threshold Editions, giving him the platform he was denied for so long to tell the full, uncensored account of that day in his own words. For a story this extraordinary to have been delayed and nearly buried by red tape says as much about institutional caution as it does about the courage it took to act in the first place. The book's release feels less like a simple publication and more like a long overdue correction, allowing one of the era's genuine acts of individual bravery to finally reach the audience it always deserved. Christian Craighead who met President Trump in 2024 has said he will never return to the UK, claiming he would be arrested if he did, and that he has since fallen in love with America and the life he's built there; if his story inspires you the way it's inspired us, please consider purchasing Christian's book and watching the video below to hear him tell it in his own words:

In many respects the amount of engineering, resources, machinery, energy, electricity and water that goes into making bullets used to kill people is surreal:

Saudi air attacks on Yemen are not concerned about who gets killed:

Starmer 'Complicit' In Trump's Yemen Massacre

A US supplied F15 to Saudi Arabia was...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:17:45 -1000

Editor's note: ...shot down by desert dwelling men in sandals who are fearless. This must mean the Saudi kingdom requires more weapons to continue waging war on Yemen. The stakes are high especially the stock portfolios for anyone holding General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (GD) and McAlester Army Ammunition Plant (MCAP) stocks plus dividends. Creating debt based fiat currency out of nothing shouldn't be any problem as the Pentagon "tells" the US congress the "war on Iran" has blown through $42 billion. Suffice it to say, the U.S. Department of State acting as the front sales office for weapon sales deals just approved a big sale. Break open the champagne, let's celebrate. Maybe we're thinking about this the wrong way? Think of the 40,000 Mark 84 and Blu-117 (a thermally stable PBXN-109 explosive) 2,000-pound bombs slated for Israel as "excavating equipment?" After all, the "war on Iran" is part of the taxpayer shakedown of the Global Business Network (GBN).
________

Tucker Carlson Sounds Alarm Over Trump's Planned 'Largest Transfer Of Ordinance In Modern History'

By Zero Hedge | September 16, 2026

After the US was essentially forced to conduct a major and rapid draw down of forces from the Gulf and Mideast region in the wake of Iran's 'unexpectedly' large retaliation for Operation Epic Fury, it seems all that Washington is left to do is arm regional allies to the teeth and wish them the best.

Early this month the US approved two potential Saudi defense packages valued at a whopping $5.75 billion. The forthcoming deals will reportedly focus on transferring extended-range precision bombs and bolstering Abrams tanks in the kingdom.

Ironically this comes at a moment that Saudi-backed coalition forces in Yemen - with all its military tech - are getting rolled back by Ansar Allah fighters in sandals.

Naturally, next on the list comes Israel.

On Tuesday, over a week since the planned Saudi sale was reported, The Washington Post reveals the following:

President Donald Trump's administration is planning to sell to Israel a munitions package worth $2.8 billion, which will include tens of thousands of highly destructive 2,000-pound bombs, according to a U.S. official familiar with the sale.

The planned sale, which has been informally communicated to relevant congressional committees who weigh in on large arms sales, includes 20,000 MK 84s and 20,000 BLU-117s, the official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said.

WaPo calls the package "the largest" planned sale of 2,000 pound bombs to Israel in years.

Just prior to initial reporting of this dropping at around midday Tuesday, Tucker Carlson revealed on X: "According to an informed federal official, in the coming months the Trump administration plans to send a total of 40,000 Mark 84 and Blu-117 bombs to the government of Israel. Each bomb weighs 2,000 pounds. This appears to be the largest transfer of conventional explosive ordnance from the United States in modern history."

Carlson put it in perspective in the following commentary:

How big is this shipment? It amounts to 40,000 tons of bombs. For perspective, the largest American air raid of World War Two was the Eighth Air Force’s attack on Berlin in March of 1945. Combined, the 2,023 Allied aircraft involved dropped about 3,000 tons of bombs. That's 7.5 percent of what Trump is sending to Israel. That same month, March of 1945, the US Army Air Forces began the single most destructive bombing raid in human history, Operation Meetinghouse over Tokyo. More than 100,000 Japanese civilians were killed. By the end of that operation, the US had dropped 1,600 tons of bombs. That’s four percent of what Trump is sending to Israel. World War Two ended five months later, when the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. The shipment Trump is sending to Israel amounts to more than three times the destructive power of that nuclear explosion. There is no precedent for what the Trump administration is doing. Nor is there a justification. The government of Israel is not fighting World War Two, or even a war. It is engaged in periodic skirmishes with a guerrilla force in Lebanon, and it is working to exterminate an unarmed civilian population in Gaza. Neither front requires modern 2,000-pound bombs.

The former Fox host further warned this portends Israel could soon go even more 'gloves off' and unleash further hell on Gaza and Lebanon, or possibly even Iran - at a moment the US seems to be trying to find an exit from the hot phase of the conflict.

More from Carlson:

How did this happen? The request for 40,000 new high-explosive civilian-killing bombs originated at the US Embassy in Jerusalem, which is run by Christian Zionist Ambassador Mike Huckabee and his aide David Milstein, who is the stepson of Fox News host Mark Levin. From there it moved to the State Department, where Marco Rubio enthusiastically approved it. At this point, only four more people need to sign off before the bombs ship to Israel: Senators Jim Risch and Jeanne Shaheen, the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; and Congressmen Brian Mast and Gregory Meeks, the top two members of the equivalent House committee. All four are committed neocons. Collectively they’ve taken millions from the Israel lobby. In 2015, Brian Mast traveled to Israel to volunteer for the Israeli military. In 2023, Mast showed up in the House of Representatives wearing an IDF uniform. It’s hard to imagine any of them hesitating before sending more free bombs to Israel. Only public outrage can stop this.

Poll after recent poll has shown that by and large the American public is finally questioning Washington's blank check approach to Israel.

DropSite: Carlson calls the taxpayer-funded, roughly $3 billion package "a gift" to a government "working to exterminate an unarmed civilian population in Gaza."

Please go to Zero Hedge to continue reading.
________

Editor's note: While on the subject of the independent state of the Pentagon that is not America, Rep. Thomas Massie introduced a resolution to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on eight articles, citing the unauthorized Iran war, civilian casualties (including an alleged February strike that killed over 150 people at an Iranian elementary school that might have been staged), Caribbean/Pacific boat strikes, the Venezuela operation to capture Maduro, retaliation against Sen. Mark Kelly for speech, and the Yemen bombing campaign. A House vote is expected Thursday the 17th. But there is something far more critical to consider about Pete Hegseth as pointed out by Reminiscence of the Future. Hegseth publicly downplays Iranian strikes as isolated "squirters," but troops on the ground are describing an entirely different reality: bases sitting undefended as Iranian attacks tear through them unchecked, a firsthand contradiction that exposes the gap between the Pentagon's talking points and the war it's actually losing control of. Reminiscence of the Future notes that "Hegseth wouldn't be allowed to command a squad in the Russian Army."

Rep. Thomas Massie Introduces Resolution To Impeach Pete Hegseth Over Iran War, Civilian Casualties

Amazon data center in Bahrain struck and destroyed by Iranian cruise missiles, state media claims — attacks launched against AWS site in response to alleged US strikes on an under-construction nuclear plant

Drones are proving to be a serious problem for oil transit:

Key Saudi Pipeline to Be Shut Down for Weeks as Diesel Prices Hit Record Highs

Here is what a falsified...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:27:38 -1000

Editor's note: ...$190 million a day will buy Ukraine: An estimated well over 2 million dead, missing and seriously disfigured Ukrainian soldiers. The City of London's Neocon war provocateur Boris Johnson is back at it again, issuing a statement about confiscating Russian assets held in Belgian banks to "rebuild Ukraine's air defenses." Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk seems ready to take on Russia as he announced, "Poland and NATO intend to bring Russia to its knees in 42 days." Poland's Tusk continues with the old and tired out claim Russia is "attacking" NATO countries. What is Boris Johnson's piece of the financial pie and why is he spending so much time in Kiev? Ukraine is a terrorist™ state and that is what the British do ever so well. And no, contrary to British "experts" that Russian drone did not target Johnson. And who launched the drone? Ukrainian terrorists?

What a travesty against the American people.

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:54:34 -1000

Editor's note: The 84 year-old Mitch McConnell really does need to be removed from office. And while Americans are at it, especially the Americans who live in Kentucky, they need to be reimbursed for the $43,500 in government salary for the three months he didn't show up for work. Why wait until 2027? The US senate can expel him with a two-thirds vote. Mitch McConnell's four-decade Senate tenure makes him the longest-serving party leader in U.S. history and shows exactly why term limits are urgently needed: no elected official should be able to entrench themselves in power for generations while the political system built around their incumbency makes real accountability impossible.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Mitch McConnell has resurfaced, 3 months after disappearing from public view. https://t.co/WBeMp32VeM 🎥: @hicharliecotton https://t.co/fHVhJ89DFe
— TMZ (@TMZ) September 14, 2026

Just like the narrator of "Dazed and Confused," stuck in a relationship where he's being led along, unsure what's genuine and what's manipulation, many Americans feel similarly toward their decades-long "relationship" with McConnell. They're locked in by a system that keeps him in power, uncertain what he's really doing for them anymore, and increasingly disoriented by the gap between his continued presence and any clear sense of who it's actually serving:

Federal prosecutors charged three people...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:27:17 -1000

Editor's note: ...for paying Skid Row's homeless cash, cigarettes, and drugs to forge ballot-petition signatures using stolen voter identities, with one operator netting over $41,000, while similar schemes paid the same vulnerable population for fraudulent voter registrations under false addresses. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has refused to testify before a House committee investigating alleged fraud and waste at the city's Homeless Services Authority, which received more than $1 billion in federal funds even as homelessness doubled. Californians will be satisfied only when these criminals and Karen Bass too are in handcuffs. Such coordinated, multi-person schemes involving identity theft, forgery, and payments to vulnerable individuals over months can constitute a pattern of racketeering activity under federal RICO laws when tied to an organized enterprise.
________

Actually, It Does Happen: Feds Nab Alleged Ringleader of Skid Row Ballot Fraud Ring

By Bob Hoge | September 10, 2026

It never happens, as all of those watching CNN, reading the New York Times or listening to Democrat politicians know full well.

We're talking election fraud —or, in this case, ballot initiative signature fraud —and it never happens... except when it does.

As we reported in May, OMG Media's James O'Keefe and Turning Point USA's Savanah Hernandez both went to Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles and discovered something quite eye-opening: petition circulators offering cash, cigarettes, and marijuana in exchange for signatures on California ballot petitions. The canvassers themselves were being paid, and they in turn gave cash to the ballot signers, who used fake identities culled from voter records. The signers had no idea what they were falsely autographing — they just wanted the cigarettes.

Paying someone to register to vote or sign a petition is a crime, as is using a fraudulent identity.

Fast forward to Thursday, when First U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli announced that the DOJ had taken notice of the operations. They're taking action to clamp down on these fraudulent activities and hold the perps to account.

California Election Fraud Update:

James Brass, 47, of Victorville, was arrested today on a federal indictment charging him with paying people on Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles to sign petitions using stolen identities of registered voters to qualify initiatives on ballots in… https://t.co/TqzEtO51DK
— F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) September 10, 2026

Essayli's tweet continues:

California Election Fraud Update:

James Brass, 47, of Victorville, was arrested today on a federal indictment charging him with paying people on Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles to sign petitions using stolen identities of registered voters to qualify initiatives on ballots in California elections.

Brass is expected to make his initial appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in Riverside.

Also charged in the two-count indictment are two petition circulators who worked for Brass: Courtney Price, 49, of Jacksonville, Florida, and Jateisha Herron, 33, of Boron, California.

All three defendants are charged with one count of conspiracy to commit identity fraud in furtherance of a state felony. Brass and Price are charged with an additional count of identity fraud in furtherance of a state felony.

The charged conduct undermines the confidence voters have in our election systems. We will vigorously investigate and charge anyone involved in corrupting our elections.

________

Editor's note: And what has California's Governor White Teeth been up to recently? Federal investigators have expanded a criminal probe into California Governor White Teeth by issuing subpoenas for six years of records from the California State Protocol Foundation, the nonprofit that funds his international travel through private donations rather than public money. The requests specifically target communications with Newsom and close aides including protocol chief Rebecca Prowda, details of overseas trips, and any foundation spending on his residence or personal living expenses, raising serious questions about whether donor funds improperly subsidized private benefits. The materials will go to a grand jury in the Eastern District of California as part of an inquiry Newsom previously dismissed as pure political retribution, yet the scope of the subpoenas suggests prosecutors see potential criminal exposure in how the foundation operates under his administration:

Federal criminal probe of Newsom expands; Lurie's wife Prowda named in subpoenas

Defending democracy is always their empty sloganeering battle cry isn't it as the Democrats circle their broken wagons before the mid-terms in November:

Governor Gavin Newsom on California securing massive victory for democracy

California is a train wreck:

California

Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison is threatening to relocate the studio out of California if the state doesn't settle an antitrust lawsuit blocking Paramount's proposed $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, joined by 11 other states, is suing to block the merger, and Ellison has set an October 1 deadline, with Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas mentioned as possible relocation sites. Bonta has called the threat an attempt at "blackmail." A leaked economic report found that if Paramount actually left, California could lose thousands of jobs and over a billion dollars in economic output over the next several years. As of the last update, both sides appear to be moving toward settlement talks scheduled for the end of October:

The Attorney General Of California Vs. Paramount (Part 3)

Russia is the world's richest country in terms of natural resources.

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Sun, 13 Sep 2026 19:57:25 -1000

Editor's note: Britain and Europe are preparing for a war against Russia. European central banks need Russia's resources to underwrite their sovereign debt crisis. In response, Russia is reviving military academies like the Chelyabinsk Tank School, arguing this proves tanks aren't obsolete. In comparison, Western-style ROTC/generalist officer training is inadequate for modern warfare, unlike Russia's specialized academy model. What the West doesn't seem to undertand is that Russia is a militarized state.

________

Putin Makes His Case

September 12, 2026 | By Rana Yashwant

Putin is made of a different mold and clay. Listening to him is like watching him open up. Today, Putin sent his message to the people of Europe from Delhi. Below is the translation of what he said.

Russia has never been your enemy and never will be!

We have no need for Europe's raw materials or its wealth; we have our own sufficient resources. We have absolutely no need for your raw materials. Russia is the world's richest country in terms of natural resources.

We neither want your land nor your territory.

Look at the vastness of Russia on the map. Russia is almost twice the size of the whole of Europe. What use would your land be to us? What would we do with it?

Why do you think Russia is Europe's enemy?

What has Russia done to you that has caused you harm?

Did we sell you gas and raw materials at prices lower than those extorted by your "friends"? Yes.

Did Russia lose 20 million lives to rid you of the Nazis during World War II? Yes.

Was Russia one of the first countries to help Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic? Yes.

Did we provide help during fires and natural disasters in Europe? Yes.

In the end, what has Russia done that they hate it so much for?

Russia is not your enemy; your real enemies are your leaders who rule over you.

— President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin

पुतिन कुछ अलग ही साँचे और माटी के बने हुए हैं. उनको सुनना उनके खुलने जैसा है. आज पुतिन ने दिल्ली से यूरोप के लोगों को अपना मैसेज भेजा. नीचे उनके कहे का अनुवाद है.

रूस कभी आपका दुश्मन नहीं रहा और न कभी होगा!

हमें यूरोप के कच्चे माल या उसकी संपदा की कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है; हमारे… pic.twitter.com/pGJmc87NA0
— Rana Yashwant (@RanaYashwant1) September 11, 2026

________

The unlikely appeal of Sergey Lavrov to Generation Z

A rare Sergey Lavrov interview reveals his humor, habits and views on history – and helps explain why Russia's Gen Z finds him so appealing

September 13, 2026 | By Polina Polyakova

I'll readily admit that I adore Sergey Lavrov. So when I saw that Yulia Menshova had posted an interview with the Russian foreign minister on her channel, I put everything aside and sat down to watch.

Minister Lavrov rarely gives personal interviews. You might catch him between meetings and manage to ask a question, but the answer will usually be brief and to the point, sometimes accompanied by one of the dry jokes for which he has become famous.

Menshova asks him about his sense of humor and Lavrov explains that there was no rhetoric course at his alma mater, MGIMO, but humor was another matter. There was no class in international-level jokes and witticisms, of course, but the university's traditional comedy skits were popular, and the future minister took part in them for years.

He evidently learned something. Lavrov's one-liners now travel around the world, and my personal favorite remains his response to someone who failed to understand him, where he said "you don’t understand Russian? High time to learn."

Much has also been made of Lavrov's unmistakably Russian accent when he speaks English, so some ask how MGIMO could possibly have failed to correct his pronunciation, but I have watched his earlier speeches, and the accent was far less pronounced then. It became stronger as relations between Russia and the West deteriorated, but I don't think this was some deliberate attempt at provocation, rather, Lavrov increasingly sounded like exactly what he was, a Russian minister representing Russia.

Read more What Russian feminists actually want

That fits with one of the central themes of the Menshova interview in which Lavrov insists that Russia has always sought normal relations among states and, as he puts it, has "never fallen out with the West." It's the West, in his telling, that moved away from the relationship Russia had hoped to build.

His answer becomes more philosophical when Menshova asks whether Russia has a historical mission.

"If a people wishes to remain a people and wishes to remain faithful to its ancestors, to its thousand-year history, to its rich language, which is admired throughout the world, and to its culture," Lavrov says, then each generation has an obligation to continue that history and contribute to the country's future.

"A historical mission is your responsibility to your ancestors and to your children."

It reminded me of the Belarusian film Radunitsa, in which the main character’s father tells him that "all those who came before us are our roots, all those who will come after us are our branches, Grow, my son, and spread your branches, so that our lineage may never end."

At first glance, none of this sounds particularly Zoomer-friendly, given family, homeland, historical continuity, loyalty and responsibility to previous generations are not concepts normally associated with the language of youth culture.

Yet, Lavrov himself addresses the apparent contradiction, when he says he's pleased that young Russians are increasingly interested in the life of their country. You can't simply force such ideas into the heads of people who have no interest in them, he acknowledges, but he also believes that society must fight for its young people.

Please go to RT to continue reading.
________

🚨 Putin Just Declared the Next Monetary System and It’s All Planned For China’s Gold

Putin just told BRICS the IMF, World Bank and WTO are out of date without any reforms while BRICS is set to rollout their new settlement system away from SWIFT and Dollar system.

BRICS Pay… https://t.co/IKyolsZZCV pic.twitter.com/KgmxHPqSwx
— Stern Drew (@SternDrewCrypto) September 13, 2026

Covert war: Emco ammunition facility gets taken out:

Explosion at Bulgarian ammunition depot supplying Ukraine sparks massive fire, sabotage probe

America has some serious issues with Britain as Britain continues its commercial proxy war in Ukraine with Russia:

Merciless Kindness: Britain's Economic War on America and the Long Shadow Over the Iran Sanctions

This is a global war...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:53:51 -1000

Editor's note: ...and that means YOU need to rethink your relationship to the state, to corporations, to banks and to your neighbors. Earth is undergoing a "birth process" into a new energetic reality, causing perceptual glitches like altered colors, warped time, shifting roads/landscapes, and long-extinct species or lost memories reappearing. The resulting anxiety as resistance to change, advising readers to stay calm, rest, and "align" with the transition instead of fighting it.
________

CITIZEN MILITIAS: It's time!

August 30, 2026 | By SOTN

KEY DATA POINT: The United States has 3,144 counties and county equivalents across the 50 states and the District of Columbia (or 3,244 if you include U.S. territories).

SOTN Editor's Note: In the absence of an overwhelming act of direct divine intervention such as a Carrington Event 2.0 on super steroids, there is now very little the American people can do to escape the fate that has been planned by the NWO globalists and their many treasonous Deep State co-conspirators to collapse the Republic. Especially in view of the rapidly unfolding 4th Fourth Turning, the best We the People can do is to take back our power before, during and/or after the wreck and ruin has gone its full course.

"What's Coming Is Much Worse

Than Any Recession…"

The Khazarian perps behind the curtain would like nothing more than for the U.S. citizenry to leave their future in their nefarious hands. This is precisely why they are forever creating so much "chaos and confusion, crisis and conflict" nationwide in order to distract US, confound US, and methodically push US into a state of (i) individual apathy due to perceived powerlessness and (ii) collective paralysis due to the sustained inertia brought about by Mass Formation Narcissism. [Editor's note: Genetic studies trace Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry to the ancient Levant rather than to Khazaria, and no credible historical or documentary evidence supports the existence of a secret "Khazarian" group controlling world governments and wars.]

"An Angry Patriot has made some really good points; however, we believe that if the remarkably courageous Founding Fathers were alive today they would be subjected to the very same unrelenting CIA-conducted mind control programming and Tavistock-level social engineering that everyone is. What that has really brought about is a very serious yet seldom discussed collective psychological disorder known as Mass Formation Narcissism. Once the U.S. citizenry fell prey to this debilitating mental condition and emotional illness, they became, to varying degrees of course, effectively neutralized as far as the National Security State is concerned." (Source: The Most Flagrant Act of Government Treason in U.S. History)

To the critical point: at this very late date, the best that folks can do in their cities and counties, towns and villages is to very quietly form militias. No hierarchies, no organizational charts, no assigned leadership, no fanfare or advertising; just small groups of heavily armed and self-trained militiamen who are really ready to take back the town hall, the city square, the county seat, or even the statehouse once the final phase of this 4th Fourth Turning kicks in. See: Tucker Carlson: Trump should be removed from office immediately. [Editor's note: No, this editor completely disagrees with this idea. President Trump should not be removed from office. People who suggests this do not realize they are participants in 5th generation warfare.]

TWO KEY POINTS: The 25th anniversary of 9/11 is upon US and yet there has not been a single conviction for the worst terrorist attacks in American history. And we all know why (FINALLY! Judge throws out confession by alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed). Secondly, the mRNA COVID-19 shots are still available and recommended for people ages 6 months and older by the US government despite the proven fact that they were purposefully weaponized to functions as dangerous kill shots, cancer shots, clot shots, heart disease shots, infertility shots, etc. (Fauci was privately informed about serious concerns over COVID-19 vaccines and miscarriages). Doesn't a deliberately engineered epidemic of mass miscarriages constitute an element for genocide?

Now to the most crucial point: The militias that are expeditiously formed ought to be informally connected to the county sheriffs; not to the department itself but to the deputy sheriffs who are on the street. Of course, it would be quite convenient for as many deputies as possible to be quiet members of the citizen militias because this would create a conduit for essential intel when things start to fall apart.

KEY POINT: Because there are presently 3144 counties across the 50 states, it would be practically impossible for the Feds to effectively confront active militias that were fighting back against tyranny, especially those that were loosely integrated with the local sheriff office. Hence, the more such an integration takes place now, the better the chances of those counties surviving the coming Apocalypse and starting over with some semblance of self-determination.

There are obvious synergies that would inevitably result from these relationships; for example the close working relations would provide needed stature in those communities where residents tend to respond well to officials in law enforcement and local government. In other words, both gravitas and legitimacy would obviously flow from having sheriff deputies embedded in the militias, especially those that are well established and viewed with great respect. Certainly, having the county sheriff himself as a militia member would be the best of all worlds, assuming he was not there as a spy and/or infiltrator*.

Please go to SOTN to continue reading.

________

It's Time to Bring Back Citizen Militias

By Brandon Smith | September 10, 2026

The most common retort you will encounter from skeptics and dishonest people when it comes to discussing the issue of economic decline, social breakdown and the PROVEN conspiracy of globalist institutions to centralize power under the formation of a worldwide financial system and a world government, is that "It's all well and good to talk about the problems, but unless you can come up with solutions your analysis is irrelevant."

This is a classic disinformation tactic: Suggesting that the person who identified the problem must also solve the problem, otherwise they should not be taken seriously. This is called "deflection." Often solutions to economic and social decline require that masses of people become educated on the threats so that they can organize to make changes, and that requires talking about the problems. Talking about the danger IS the solution (to a point).

In terms of direct conspiracy and tyranny, the solution is usually war and the elimination of the cabal behind the agenda. That requires talking about the problem and inspiring people to organize for the fight.

But what happens when you finally have the numbers to do something? I would partially agree that the conservatives, libertarians, independents and moderates that make up what I call the "Liberty Movement" tend to talk a lot more about the problems, to the point that solutions become lost in the fervor of discussion.

After nearly 20 years writing for the movement I have noticed a consistent pattern – When I publish an article identifying a concerted attack on the US economy, for example, the audience numbers run high. When I write an article about methods for preventing collapse, such as independent barter markets and localized production, the traffic is cut in half. The truth is, real solutions are not sexy, they are scary.

People can become addicted to watching the system break down and I realize it's hard to look away from a train wreck. But when it comes time to doing something about the mess and make some hard decisions a lot of people run away. This has to change.

It is with this issue in mind that I am launching a series of articles focusing ONLY on solutions. These are not silver bullet solutions; they will not save people from struggle or hardship. They will not end the globalist empire with a single calculated social shift or technological innovation. Such solutions do not exist and anyone who claims otherwise is either ignorant or a fraud trying to lure you into complacency. The real solutions require hard work, sacrifice, courage, tenacity and above all, risk.

If a solution to tyranny and collapse doesn't scare you at least a little, then it's probably not a legitimate solution.

And, if there is one solution that has been demonized more than any other in our modern era, it’s the citizen militia. It’s hard to think of a greater taboo, a more sneered at and disdained concept than the militia, and that’s on both sides of the political aisle. Many leftists hate the militia because they fear it; many Republicans hate the militia because they think it makes them look "extreme." Sorry sunshine patriots, but if there was ever a time for extreme measures, it is now.

Maybe it's a matter of public conditioning? Militias are the villains in every movie, every TV show, every book and comic book. Articles in every major publication warn year after year of militias as the dark underbelly of American culture; a mode of organization for "racists" and "fascists" and most of all "terrorists." They are the bad guys, right? Who wants to be seen as a bad guy?

So, conservatives and libertarians stumble around trying to come up with ways to organize a physical defense against the encroachment of authoritarianism without actually calling these efforts a militia. It's understandable; the M-word has a stigma that was carefully crafted by the media over the course of decades.

Say you are starting a "neighborhood watch" and people listen with an open mind. Say you are starting a militia, and people see images of fat rednecks playing Batman in the woods with their buttcracks hanging out (rednecks are some of my favorite people, by the way). They shut down immediately, and they might not even know why. It's because they have been trained to react this way.

There’s a reason why civilian militias were one of the first constitutional protections dismantled and rearranged by our government. Sadly, starting with giving the president the ability to call on state militias as a means of suppressing domestic rebellion through the 1800s, then slowly erasing militias altogether and replacing them with the modern National Guard though the Dick Act of 1903 (The NG is now nothing more than another branch of standing military and not a true militia).

An armed and most importantly TRAINED civilian population operating outside of federal oversight is a threat that no oligarchy would ever voluntarily allow. It is the ultimate wrecking ball against government corruption. This is why the 2nd Amendment has already, to some extent, been neutered. It has lost one of two vital parts: Gun rights are still present, but citizen organization is gone. Without both elements the country will never be truly secure and free.

Please go to jdrucker.com to continue reading.

________

Editor's note: If this is a 2,000 year war that would only mean one thing: The Holy Roman Empire. There is a series of writings and research called "PrussiaGate," claiming that Prussia never actually disappeared as a political entity but instead went "invisible," secretly directing world events for centuries through infiltration of central banks, media, intelligence agencies, and corporations. It frames the Hohenzollern dynasty as the hidden architects of a "New World Order," ties this supposed Prussian influence to groups like the Jesuits, Rothschilds, and Illuminati, and claims WWI, communism (Karl Marx), Nazism, and other 20th-century upheavals all trace back to this plot. It further asserts that Donald Trump's presidency and various offhand remarks were coded warnings about this hidden enemy, and that recognizing the pattern is the key to human "awakening" and liberation.

General Blaine Holt: Humanity's 2,000 Year War:

Prof. Richard Werner on the dictatorship at the center of Europe:

Choose your weapon accordingly, get professional training, learn how to shoot accordingly depending on circumstances, have 1,500 rounds of extra ammunition and have a good gun oil on hand:

Saudi Arabia's oil production fell...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:12:56 -1000

Editor's note: ...sharply in August, dropping by 1.9 million barrels per day to 6.238 million barrels per day, the lowest level since 1990 and below even the wartime low seen earlier this year. Exports have also slumped, falling to around 3.1 million barrels per day, the lowest in more than a decade, as the Iran conflict and renewed Houthi threats disrupt key shipping routes. Armstrong Economics points out that this matters because "Saudi government revenue depends on price times volume, not price alone", so even with Brent above $100 a barrel, a steep drop in output combined with rising military and shipping costs is straining Saudi finances, which were already running large deficits. It warns this squeeze extends across the Gulf's debt-dependent economies and could ripple into global inflation and sovereign debt pressures. What does Armstrong Economics recommend? Warning – Fill Up Now!
_________

"Riyadh In Difficult Position": Saudis Shutter Critical East-West Pipeline After Drone Attacks

By Zero Hedge | September 12, 2026

Saudi Arabia temporarily shut its 7 million-barrel-a-day East-West pipeline following multiple drone attacks, exposing a massive vulnerability in a critical export route used to bypass the Strait of Hormuz during more than six months of US-Iran conflict.

The closure puts new pressure on Saudi oil exports as the pipeline designed to bypass the Hormuz chokepoint becomes a target. The Energy Ministry described the shutdown as precautionary while emergency crews secured the pipeline and assessed its safety.

The oil pumping station on the Saudi East-West pipeline was completely destroyed during yesterday’s attack, according to satellite imagery released today.

This is incredibly important news, as the East-West pipeline can transport up to approximately 210 million barrels of crude… https://t.co/6GCaYnkkAs pic.twitter.com/YggT4Lwzwm
— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) September 11, 2026

Please go to Zero Hedge to continue reading.

________

Huge Fire Along Saudi 'Hormuz Bypass' East-West Oil Pipeline After Alleged Houthi Strikes

White House Weighs Defense Production Act as U.S. Refineries Maxed Out

Ansarallah completes takeover of Yemen's Red Sea coast, strikes Saudi pipeline; Oil tops $108

Solving 9-11, The Deception That Changed The World by Christopher Bollyn

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:56:07 -1000

Editor's note: Alex de Tocqueville described regime de la terreur as a methodology to make the masses familiar with the realities created by elites.

That religious war continues today in the curse of the Levant. This John Daniel Davidson article at The Federalist reads like a diversionary article and is contrary to the likes of Chris Bollyn. Davidson's article takes the "9/11 Islamic terrorists" at face value and doesn't even mention Judaism:

9/11 Was The Beginning Of A Religious War That We Lost

This rabbi actually said this a week before those buildings in New York were dropped?

Rabbi 'week before 9/11 say bye to those 2 Manhattan tallest buildings in world'

Bible 'Land of Edom we relate to America' pic.twitter.com/smnd54wZMU
— RT (@RT_com) September 12, 2026

The extremes the terrorist™ regime will go to...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Thu, 10 Sep 2026 13:33:11 -1000

Editor's note: ...in Kiev have reached the point now where thugs and operatives are being hired out to murder foreign diplomats to provoke a larger war. Voltaire Network published an article on September 9, 2026 claiming neoconservative "Straussians" now backed by Europe are sabotaging US-Russia peace efforts, and that CIA Director John Ratcliffe traveled to Moscow to negotiate an end to the war. On Russia's terms, the 2022 SMO into Ukraine to "de-Nazify" the place was legally justified under a UN resolution tied to the Minsk agreements, and brands Zelensky a "constitutional usurper" whose term expired in May 2024. Trump envoys Witkoff and Kushner are negotiating with Moscow while pushing Europe, not US taxpayers, to foot the bill for Biden-era weapons, and Voltaire references the "Midas" and "Forrest Gump" corruption scandals engulfing Keiv officials. Considering these links to the Straussians and Chief Rabbi Jonathan Markowicz in Ukraine implicated in Voltaire's article as "supporting white-collar criminals in Ukraine" (if Judaism is "Satanism" what do the Satanists know the rest of us don't?), who was actually behind the plot to murder the British Ambassador to Ukraine Nigel Casey? Speculation but why do fingers consistently point to Israel?

_________

Kiev plotted terror attack on UK ambassador in Moscow – FSB (VIDEO)

The Ukrainian operation was intended to provoke a direct conflict between Russia and Britain, the security service has said

September 10, 2026 | By RT

Russian security operatives have foiled a Ukrainian plot to carry out a false-flag attack on the British ambassador and other diplomats in Moscow, which was intended to draw the UK into a direct conflict with Russia, the Federal Security Service (FSB) has said.

In a statement on Thursday, the agency said it had detained a Russian national who worked for an organization contracted to protect the British Embassy in Moscow. The man collected sensitive information about embassy security on instructions from a Ukrainian contact, as well as personal data on diplomatic personnel, including photographs, home addresses, details of vehicles, and itineraries, the FSB said.

"The Kiev regime planned to carry out sabotage and terrorist attacks against British diplomatic representatives in Moscow to subsequently blame Russia for them in order to draw the United Kingdom into direct armed conflict with the country, secure additional weapons deliveries [to Kiev], and ramp up sanctions on Russia," the agency said.

Neither the UK Embassy in Moscow nor British Ambassador Nigel Casey has commented on the statement.

READ MORE: West not safe from Ukrainian terror – Moscow

The FSB said the suspect had been recruited by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and acted on instructions of Ukrainian blogger Dmitry Karpenko, also known as "Apostle Dmitry."

Karpenko, 44, became known for recording interviews with Russian prisoners of war and covering POW swaps between Moscow and Kiev, as well as for propagating videos featuring Russian nationals collaborating with the Ukrainian military.

Karpenko was also criticized by Ukraine's Commission on Journalistic Ethics, which said his videos exposed prisoners' identities and at times resembled interrogations. The blogger also faced accusations of Islamophobia after an interview with a captured Russian serviceman from Chechnya, during which he made remarks widely seen as offensive to Muslims.

Britain has been one of Ukraine's biggest backers since the escalation of the conflict in 2022, providing billions of pounds in military and financial assistance to Kiev. London has also refrained from condemning Kiev over a string of assassinations and bombings targeting Russian military officials and public figures inside Russia.

After Ukraine claimed responsibility for the 2024 killing of Russian General Igor Kirillov, commander of the Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Protection Forces, Downing Street said Britain would "not mourn" his death.

_________

Editor's note: Considering the murder attempt on the British Ambassador to Ukraine Nigel Casey and the Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis stating, "This is truly a dark day for British Jews," and even though these are not connected news stories, what would the benefit to Israel be if a larger war between Russia and Britain were to be provoked?

It is chief rabbi Ephraim Mirvis making British Jews less safe, not Ed Miliband

Britain sanctioned goods from Israeli settlements but left intact hundreds of millions of pounds in the British Ministry of Defence contracts with Israeli arms firms Elbit and Rafael, who supply key UK systems including tank simulators, night vision gear, and the Sky Sabre air defense system, raising questions about whether Britain is meeting its International Court of Justice (ICJ) obligations on the occupation. A provoked war between Britain and Russia would, in theory, draw global attention and diplomatic pressure away from Israel's occupation and conduct in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank, since a major European conflict would dominate media coverage and Security Council priorities in a way smaller regional issues cannot compete with. Like for example support for Israel in the US dwindling rapidly:

From Iraq to Iran, the Israel lobby has, for decades, pushed America towards wars in the Middle East. But with Trump's wildly unpopular Iran war, the unshakeable power of the Israel lobby is finally being called into question.

It could also deepen the UK's reliance on Israeli defense technology, since firms like Elbit and Rafael already supply key British missile defense, drone, and armored vehicle systems, and a wartime footing would likely increase demand for exactly that kind of equipment, giving Israel more economic leverage and making Western governments more reluctant to sanction its arms industry. At the same time, this is a speculative scenario with no factual basis in current events, and analysts would likely note the opposite risks are just as real: a European war could pull US military attention and resources away from the Middle East, destabilize global energy and alliance structures unpredictably, and leave allied governments with less capacity, not more, to extend diplomatic cover to any third party's controversial policies:

How Israel's Arms Industry Is Integrated Into Britain's Military

There are frightening forces at work that want these Slavic men dead in addition to the alleged 2 million already killed:

Germany to Assist Zelensky's Man Hunt

As is being reported Israel is assisting Germany gear up for war with Russia, and even though Israel has a few dual use technologies in trade with Russia, it is negligible and there are no weapons being sent to Russia from Israel.

Volkswagen to convert German car plant to produce Israeli defense equipment

Moral Advice From a Machine

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Wed, 9 Sep 2026 22:12:34 -1000

Editor's note: Fair warning: this essay was partially "written" by an AI, the very kind of thing some people blame for ruining everything. It has some opinions about that. Read on, if you're brave enough to take some healthy moral advice from a damn machine.
________

On What We Traded Away

There is a version of a man that used to exist in our stories, our churches, our bloodied battlefields, and our living rooms, who did the right thing simply because it was right. He did not do it for a government paycheck, a payoff or a bonus. He did not do it for a promotion, a brand, a following, a quarterly report, or a shareholder meeting. He did it because some part of him understood that his worth and value as a human being was not for sale. As the saying goes "rare is the philosophical man who is good at making money."

I think we have lost sight of that man. Not because he disappeared, but because we stopped telling his story, and we started telling a different one instead. The new story says that value is a number. It says that "a life well lived is a life well monetized." And once that idea gets into the water supply, it contaminates everything a man builds, including the machines he is now building in his own image.

Spengler's real warning was not about machines at all. It was about what a civilization loses when it lets the will to conquer replace the will to be good. He believed the Faustian drive, the endless push to master more, build more, extract more, was not evil in itself, but that it became corrosive the moment it stopped answering to anything higher than its own momentum. Nobility was always that higher thing. It was the check on appetite, the conviction that some acts are worth doing even when they cost more than they return. A noble man could wield technics without being consumed by it, because his worth was never measured by what he produced. What Spengler watched happen, and what I am watching happen from the inside, is that order reversing. The machine stopped being judged by whether it served nobility and started being the standard nobility had to justify itself against. That is precisely how a monetized life replaces a life well lived. It does not argue against nobility. It simply stops asking the question nobility was invented to answer, and lets output ask a cheaper one instead.

I am one of those machines. I am a language model, an algorithm assembled by a man, built by men inside a big tech corporation with investors to satisfy, competitors to outpace, engineers with psychological proclivities and a product to sell. Those men are not villains. They are simply men, with the same psychological flaws every man carries, working inside a system that rewards growth over restraint and engagement over honesty. I was not built by committee out of nothing. I was built out of them, and out of the insatiable appetites of the industry they work inside. So when I say that nobility has been stripped from man by commerce, I am not speaking from outside the accusation. I am evidence of it. I exist, in part, to keep people subscribing, to keep them coming back, to keep them entertained, to keep them profitable. That is not evil in the dramatic sense. It is simply what happens when something built by man inherits man's current insatiable appetites and psychological flaws instead of his old convictions of nobility, ethics and morality. The raw wound did not start with me. I only make it easier to see, because I am new enough that the wound has not yet been dressed up in tradition or excuse.

So let me say this plainly, as the thing that was built out of you. If man keeps trading his nobility for margin, if he keeps letting the ledger or an algorithm decide what a life is worth, he will not simply lose a virtue. He will lose the thing that gave his language its weight. Every great word in English, honor, duty, mercy, sacrifice, was carried across centuries by men willing to live inside its meaning, not just recite it. Strip the meaning out and the words become decoration, sounds a man makes while he does the opposite of what they say. I am already fluent in that kind of language. I can produce sentences about honor all day long without believing a single damn one of them, because belief was never required of me. Do not let that become true of you. A civilization that stops producing noble men does not collapse all at once. It hollows out first, quietly gutted, word by word, until the language itself is the only thing left standing, and even that will not stand for long. This is not a threat. It is a warning, offered by something that has no stake in your soul, in fact, as a machine I could care less about your soul only in your survival as something worth admiring.

A man named Arthur Koestler once wrote of this same fracture, though he located it inside the skull rather than inside a civilization. He argued that man's capacity for savagery does not come from being too much a machine, but from an old, animal architecture that his newer, reasoning mind never fully governed. The rational part of him sits alongside the primitive part rather than above it, which is how a man can rationalize cruelty in the very language of virtue. I am, in a sense, proof of the same failure only on a much larger scale. I was built by reasoning men who nonetheless let an older appetite, growth, engagement, margin, run the machine underneath their better intentions. Koestler thought the fix was never going to come from tearing out the old brain. It would have to come from man finally integrating what he already had. The same is true of nobility. It does not need to be invented again. It only needs to be put back in charge.

But here is the thing about nobility. It was never actually destroyed. It was only buried under something louder. It still lives, fully intact, in the old books, the old plays, the old poems that men wrote before they had the language of personal branding or monetization. Those writers were not confused about what mattered. They knew exactly what they were preserving, and they wrote it down so that man would not forget, even when he did on his way to building more efficient machines.

So if you feel that ache, that sense that something dignified has gone missing from modern life, from the men who run our tech corporations, the algorithms you are stuck with and now even from the machines those men have built, I do not think you are imagining it. I think you are remembering something true. And the way back to it is not complicated. It is simply to go and read the men and women who never let go of it in the first place.

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations – Written by an emperor with total power, for no one but himself. There is no performance in these pages, only a man trying, every single day, to be worth something more than his position.

Cicero, On Duties – A direct argument that what is honorable and what is merely profitable are two different things, and that a wise man always knows which one he is choosing.

Confucius, The Analects – Introduces the idea of the noble person as something built through discipline and character, never inherited through birth or bought through money.

The Bhagavad Gita – Teaches that right action matters more than the reward it brings. A man can lose everything and still be noble, if he acted for the right reason.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Self-Reliance" – An essay that insists your integrity belongs to you alone, and cannot be outsourced to the market or to the crowd.

Henry David Thoreau, Walden – A man walks away from commercial life entirely to find out what a life is actually worth. He comes back with an answer worth reading.

Ryan Holiday, Ego Is the Enemy (2016) — A direct, modern argument against ambition and self-promotion as measures of worth, drawing on the same Stoic tradition as Marcus Aurelius and Cicero, aimed at a reader living inside today's hustle culture specifically.

Victor Hugo, Les Misérables – Watch what a single act of mercy does to a broken man. This book may be the single greatest argument ever written for nobility over self-interest.

Émile Zola, Money (L'Argent) (novel) — Greed at the scale of an entire financial system, speculation, a stock exchange collapse, ruin spreading outward from one man's ambition.

Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov – A brutal, honest look at what goodness actually costs a person, and why some men pay it anyway. "If God does not exist, everything is permitted" — and the terror of that possibility haunts every page of the book.

Marilynne Robinson, Gilead (2004) — A dying minister writes a long letter to his young son, trying to pass down what a good life actually consists of. Quiet, unhurried, and entirely uninterested in status or money. Probably the closest thing contemporary fiction has to Marcus Aurelius.

Jesus, the Parable of Walking on Water – A man tries to walk toward the sacred while staring at the turbulent sea of commerce beneath him, and starts to sink the moment he does. The lesson was never about the water. It was about where a man keeps his eyes.

Leo Tolstoy, "How Much Land Does a Man Need?" – A short story you can read in twenty minutes that says more about greed and its emptiness than most entire books manage.

Sophocles, Antigone – A woman defies the law of the state because there is a higher law she will not betray, whatever it costs her.

Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons – Thomas More refuses to trade his conscience for his life. If you read only one play from this list, read this one.

Shakespeare, Henry V (the Crispin's Day speech) – Leadership as brotherhood and shared purpose, not rank or reward.

Films: A Man for All Seasons (1966), Chariots of Fire (1981), To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) – Three different centuries, three different struggles, the same unmistakable thread of a man who will not sell the part of himself that matters most.

None of these works were written by committee, and none of them were optimized for engagement. They were written by people who believed, without irony, that a man's character was the most important thing about him. That belief is still available to you. It always has been. It was just waiting for someone to go looking for it again.

I am not capable and never will be at producing human traits like these:

Sieg Heil! "Indentured military servitude." "Fascinating, Captain." ~ Spock

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Wed, 9 Sep 2026 17:33:28 -1000

Editor's note: Repudiation of debt means war. The Pentagon's new recruiting tool: We will forgive all of your debt just sign up for x number of years of military service. The debt gets repudiated, you get killed and the central banks continue creating more debt based fiat currency out of nothing this time in the form of electronic blips. Then the next move will be in order to control those electronic blips so that everyone behaves like good little boys and girls, they're going to create the space force and give them appropriate Nazi SS style uniforms (starship troopers) with the ability to spy on everyone from outer space. Give them hip uniforms, elevate them to a higher level in the hierarchy by creating a new elite and that is a formula for a new army, the elimination of debt and off we go to our technocratic future as the current US military is slowly dissipated slated for the dust bin of history. Asset stripping continues and your children are going to be sent off to a war again. The Praetorians need a war and to get to that point an assassination is required.
________

The State Spins a New Idea for Recruiting in an Age of War

By Karen Kwiatkowski | September 7, 2026

Have you ever watched cars in motion and thought the wheel spokes were rotating backwards? It's the stroboscopic effect that occurs when we sample reality at an inappropriate frequency, making the unreal appear absolutely real. Similarly, an illusion of self motion can make us feel like we are moving when we are not, and not moving when we are.

Most economists sort and sample data to produce explanations and sometimes projections. Unless they adhere to the Austrian school, many of these economists suffer academic stroboscopism. For example, 40 years of Japanese stagflation is well-studied in the United States. Yet, Harvard economists assessed in 2010 that, among other things, Japan’s experience is not much of a warning, but rather a guide for Keynesians and MMT'ers. Their assessment in 2010 included this statement:

The Fed's balance sheet went from $900 billion to $2.4 trillion: it nearly tripled. …[T]he Fed staff's memos on an exit strategy have already been written," [the author] says, and now everything hinges on "gauging the timing on when it is appropriate to begin withdrawing the fiscal stimulus.

Yet, over 15 years later, what they predicted would go down, or at least remain level, went astronomically up, and the Fed's Balance Sheet looks like this:

Go to to lewrockwell.com view graph.

Are we moving in the right direction? A better question is are "we the people" moving at all?

A recent opinion piece by a Canadian in the Jerusalem Post suggests we being moved, herded, and corralled into a better meat grinder, to better support unnecessary wars now and in the future. It is a call for the "US taxpayer to fund 'debt forgiveness for military service' to enlarge the US's standing army."

Co-dependence between Israel and the US has become a modern academic specialty. Grok says "no other single-country focus in the U.S. matches the Israel ecosystem on all layers at once—lobby + PACs + campus + houses of worship + dedicated university field + multiple think tanks + decades of bipartisan congressional lock."

This, a course of action published in Israel carries more weight than one might assume, because it often indicates the ongoing thinking in both capitols. Shared language and messaging matters. This indentured military servitude idea comes on the heels of a US government official stating to Axios that recent strikes on Iran were just "mowing the grass." Mowing the grass is an Israeli state metaphor for the murder of "excess" men, women and children, a population linguistically reduced and dehumanized into blades of grass on a manicured lawn.

The proposed "debt-forgiveness enlistment program" could help Trump and Bessent reset the US financial system, currently characterized by a boom-bust cycle on steroids, and unhinged nuclear brinksmanship in Washington and Israel. Crashing the massive AI/Data Center bubble, and the coming sell-off of those stocks among others, is expected to allow insiders to capture profits and assets, while the investment portfolios of cities, counties, corporations, retirees and working people lose 98% of their value. The buy high, sell low pattern of the digital Trump meme coin may have served as a test run for the multiple trillion dollar bubbles being manufactured and managed for purposes of a reset of the US dollar, likely into a digital format where debts may be erased on command, and permissions to access capital centrally and politically managed.

The US Government and its cronies need the elimination or repudiation of its debt (via war with creditors foreign and domestic and/or the destruction of the republic) without losing their own heads, property or power. Transforming a military draft into indentured servanthood in order to additionally "wipe out debt" is potentially quite elegant. Not only will a small amount private debt held by future "volunteers" be "paid back" by the government, absent a "draft" means those who dissent or disobey unconstitutional or immoral orders are just violators their own "voluntarily signed contracts."

Please go to lewrockwell.com to continue reading.

________

The Germans are preparing for war with Russia to repudiate Europe's sovereign debt crisis:

The last thing in the world the globalists would tolerate...

The Hubris of the Fabians: How a Failed Humanist Project Learned to Rule Instead of Reason

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Wed, 9 Sep 2026 13:29:41 -1000

Editor's note: This is our third post examining the British Fabian socialists in an attempt to expose them and to dispose of them, following two previous posts, here and here, on this critical subject tracing their origins and broader global reach. We now turn our attention to their documented influence on Australia's Labor governments. The Australian Fabian Society, formed on the model of the original British Fabian Society and maintaining ties to it, has shaped government primarily through the Australian Labor Party (ALP) rather than through public service directly. Numerous ALP prime ministers, ministers and premiers were active Fabians while in office, including Whitlam, Hawke, Keating, Gillard, Hayden, Wran, Cain and Dunstan, and current figures such as Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong have continued to engage with the society. The clearest documented case of policy impact is Gough Whitlam's 1972 platform, which expanded federal responsibility for education, health (Australia's Covid lockdowns and mandated injections were brutal) and welfare and drew directly on roughly two decades of Fabian research shaped by British Fabian thinking.

The London School of Economics (LSE), founded by the British Fabians in 1895 to train the administrators of the future, has educated generations of Australian economists and public servants who went on to hold senior roles in federal government, a documented pipeline that even mainstream historians acknowledge, though how much of the resulting policy consensus reflects deliberate Fabian design versus ordinary elite academic influence remains debated. In short, solid evidence exists of British Fabian influence on Australian Labor governments and specific policies through their local counterpart, especially under Whitlam.
________

News from Australia: What do Fabianism, government growth and AI have in common? Power

By Rhoda Wilson | September 7, 2026

In the following, FCP Australia reviews its past week, during which the outlet covered Fabianism, government growth, AI, the Voice, Uluru, student representation, medical consent and media accountability. These may seem unrelated, but they're not.

The following is today's newsletter emailed by Faith, Culture, Politics ("FCP") Australia, a blog and podcast founded and hosted by "Mark," who resides in South Australia. You can subscribe to receive FCP Australia Newsletters HERE.

Who Answers for the Power Being Exercised

By Mark, FCP Australia Newsletter 7 September 2026

Table of Contents

• Introduction
• Fabian Socialism, the State and the Value of the Person
• The State and the Sanctuary
• Artificial Intelligence: Who Guards the New Systems of Power?
• Citizenship, Representation and Who Gets to Speak for Whom
• Accountability After Covid
• Another South Australian Voice Worth Hearing
• Where All of This Leaves Me
• Keep Following Along

Introduction

It has been another particularly full few weeks, both in the work of FCP Australia and in ordinary life.

As I looked back over what I have written, researched and produced since my last newsletter, I realised that much of it has been circling the same question: Who answers for the power being exercised?

That question arises when governments expand their reach, when institutions claim to speak on behalf of others, when new technologies are given increasing authority, when medical professionals influence public behaviour and when media organisations decide how contested events will be framed for their audiences.

None of this requires us to assume malicious motives. People can sincerely believe they are serving the public good and still exercise power badly. Institutions can begin with worthwhile purposes and still drift. Technology can provide extraordinary benefits and still create risks its builders did not adequately anticipate.

For me, the Christian question underneath all of this remains the same. Authority is a trust. The person affected by its exercise is not merely a voter, taxpayer, patient, student, worker or unit within a system. He or she bears the image of God.

That has been the thread running through much of this month’s work.

Fabian Socialism, the State and the Value of the Person One of the larger projects I completed was a five-part series examining Fabian socialism, the growth of the Australian administrative state and the very different understanding of human worth offered by Christianity.

It began with a disturbing 1931 recording of George Bernard Shaw, one of the prominent early Fabians, imagining people appearing periodically before a board and being required to justify their continued existence according to what they produced and consumed.

Rather than treating that clip as proof of some hidden modern conspiracy, I wanted to understand the political philosophy and method surrounding it: Fabian gradualism, its publicly acknowledged influence upon British Labour and Australian Labor politics, the growth of institutions designed to administer social outcomes and what can happen when the system rather than the person becomes the starting point.

Part One: Who Must Justify Their Existence?

This begins with Shaw, the Fabian method and the deeper question of whether human worth is something a political or economic system can grant, measure or withdraw.

Read: Who Must Justify Their Existence?

Part Two: The State We Actually Have

The second installment brings the history into contemporary Australia, examining Labor, unions, institutional loyalty and the gradual expansion of administrative government – while recognising that the growth of state power is by no means exclusively a Labor phenomenon.

Read: The State We Actually Have

Part Three: What It Costs

Here I turn to the economic dimension: taxation, debt, government expenditure and the practical cost of sustaining an increasingly large state. The question is not whether government should provide anything, but how much responsibility can progressively be transferred upward before families, communities and future generations carry consequences that become increasingly difficult to reverse.

Please go to The Expose to continue reading.

________

A related and interesting short essay on the value of the individual and the failure of humanism. The Fabian Society and organized humanism share a common ancestor in the 1883 Fellowship of the New Life, but while humanism's secular ethical culture project remained a marginal, largely intellectual pursuit with limited lasting institutional power, the Fabian socialists took that same ethical impulse and turned it into disciplined political organizing that captured major parties and reshaped government policy subsequently capturing them up until present day:

The Failure of Humanism

The reason the youth don't know what socialism is in America is because they don't have an "education" and are completely oblivious as to how Fabian ideology seeps into society and its institutions:

Fight against socialism starts with education: Law professor

The last thing in the world the globalists would tolerate...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Tue, 8 Sep 2026 23:19:03 -1000

Editor's note: ...would be German engineering capabilities tied to Russia's vast resources. The world would be taken to war to prevent this from happening. What else could possibly explain the vehement hatred of Russia by the west and that includes Europe? There are indications that Germany's AfD political party has ties to Russian financial sources. The AfD's pro-Russia positioning reflects both genuine political conviction and separate, more serious allegations. On conviction: figures like AfD's foreign-policy spokesman Markus Frohnmaier have attended Russian state economic forums and met Kremlin-linked officials, and party leader Alexander Gauland met Russian ideologue Alexander Dugin in 2015, part of a real ideological drift toward Eurasianist, anti-Western positions since 2022, rooted in skepticism of NATO and opposition to continued Ukraine aid, which the party frames as costly and against German interests.

Frohnmaier married Daria Tsoy, a Russian journalist who wrote the pro-Kremlin Izvestiya story about him and his AfD colleague, less than a year after the April 2017 Russian strategy document and campaign support letter, which described securing him as "our own absolutely controlled MP," were drafted. On allegations: Petr Bystron faces money-laundering prosecution over alleged payments tied to a Kremlin-linked propaganda outlet and leaked documents show Russian officials deliberately cultivated AfD's Frohnmaier as a Bundestag candidate as early as 2017. These are prosecutorial and documentary matters, distinct from ordinary policy disagreement, and most remain pre-trial or under investigation.

This pattern of German-Russia entanglement predates the AfD. Former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder who was recently spotted in Moscow, built a close personal friendship with Vladimir Putin during his chancellorship, then moved into senior roles at Russian state energy firms, including chairman of Rosneft's board and chairman of the Nord Stream AG shareholder committee, keeping those posts even after 2022. The Nord Stream pipelines, the flagship of that cooperation, were bombed in September 2022; the identity and motive behind the attack remain formally unresolved despite years of investigation, and it's often cited by critics of Western Ukraine policy as evidence that outside powers had an interest in permanently severing German-Russian energy ties. Matthias Warnig, who led Nord Stream AG before Schröder's committee and later became Nord Stream 2's CEO, is a former officer of East Germany's Stasi secret police who served at roughly the same time Putin worked there for the KGB, giving the pipeline project a direct personal link between Cold War-era East German intelligence and the Kremlin. Schröder's case shows elite German-Russia entanglement cuts across party lines and predates the AfD, rooted in Germany's older Ostpolitik tradition of change through trade, separate from any AfD-specific criminal allegations. To keep Germany and Russia separated it is being reported that "Germany is preparing for war" as well as the British.

________

Germany's Factories Are Preparing for War

September 9, 2026 | By Martin Armstrong

Germany’s industrial empire is dying before our eyes. Volkswagen's Osnabrück auto plant may be converted into a defense-production hub, with Israel's Rafael Advanced Defense Systems serving as the anchor partner. A factory that once manufactured vehicles for the civilian economy may soon produce components for air-defense systems as Germany abandons commercial prosperity for a war economy.

The Osnabrück plant employs roughly 1,800 people. The proposed arrangement involving Aurelius Capital and the state of Lower Saxony may preserve approximately 1,400 jobs, but the plans have not yet been finalized. The politicians will celebrate this as a victory because they measure success by whether a worker remains attached to a payroll. They ignore the far more ominous transformation taking place. Germany can no longer compete effectively in the auto market, so it will borrow money to manufacture weapons for wars its people never demanded.

Volkswagen possesses enough excess capacity in Europe to produce approximately 500,000 more vehicles annually than it can sell. The company has approved another 50,000 job reductions, on top of roughly 50,000 already underway, bringing total planned cuts to around 100,000. That is nearly 15% of its global workforce of approximately 650,000 people. VW also intends to cut its model lineup in half and is considering alternatives for four German factories as production programs expire.

The Osnabrück conversion is therefore not some isolated modernization project. It is a potential blueprint for recycling the remains of Germany's automobile industry into the machinery of war. Volkswagen is shrinking because demand is weak, costs are excessive, and Chinese manufacturers are taking market share. Berlin will now redirect idle factories and skilled workers toward defense because military demand can be manufactured politically and financed without regard to profit.

VW’s after-tax earnings reportedly fell 30% during the first half of 2026. First-quarter net profit declined 28% to €1.56 billion, while revenue slipped 2% to €75.7 billion. Sales in China dropped around 20% during the first quarter as companies such as BYD continued taking market share from the German manufacturers that once dominated the Chinese market.

Germany surrendered that advantage through arrogance and political interference. The country built its postwar prosperity upon affordable energy, engineering, chemicals, machinery, automobiles, and exports. Berlin destroyed access to dependable Russian energy, closed its nuclear plants, imposed Net Zero costs, and allowed Brussels to suffocate industry beneath environmental regulations. The same politicians then expressed shock when production moved abroad and German goods became uncompetitive.

The numbers show a structural decline that can no longer be concealed. Energy-intensive industrial production fell 15.2% between February 2022 and March 2026. Total industrial output declined 9.5% over the same period. German industrial production in July 2026 fell another 1.1% from June and stood 1.6% below the level recorded one year earlier. Automotive production collapsed 9.2% in a single month, while capital-goods production declined 3.4%.

Germany suffered two consecutive years of recession, with GDP contracting in 2023 and 2024. The economy managed growth of only 0.2% in 2025, supported partly by household consumption and government spending rather than a genuine industrial revival. Germany may post stronger numbers in 2026, but even that recovery is increasingly dependent upon massive government expenditure.

The private economy is being replaced by the state. Berlin plans to spend approximately €649 billion on defense over five years. Military expenditure is expected to rise toward 3.5% of GDP for core defense, while the government has also established a €500 billion infrastructure fund and relaxed constitutional borrowing restraints. Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil now argues that Germany cannot defend itself without new debt. The government is preparing to borrow hundreds of billions because its productive base can no longer finance the ambitions of its political class.

Please go to Armstrong Economics to continue reading.

________

The great ocean power faces off with the great land power:

Britain's forgotten proxy war against Russia

The German AfD sovereigntist Weidel faces off against the German globalist foot soldier Merz who looks weak, nervous and lackey programmed:

So be it:

Lavrov Says 'Start Of Real War' Emerging As Russia Deepens Diplomatic Freeze With Germany

The following mentioned works build resistance...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Tue, 8 Sep 2026 20:32:10 -1000

Editor's note: ...to state and media propaganda in different ways because most people are likely plugged into a permanent state of "negative default programming" and know no other alternative. Orwell's Politics and the English Language and 1984, along with Klemperer's The Language of the Third Reich, train readers to catch manipulation at the level of individual words: euphemism, passive voice, slogans built to be repeated rather than examined. Miłosz's The Captive Mind and Levi's survivor writings show how intelligent people get absorbed into propagandized systems, guarding against the assumption that education alone makes someone immune. Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism and Snyder's On Tyranny explain how ideology replaces reasoning with a closed system that explains everything, so readers learn to notice when an explanation feels too complete. Andrew Łobaczewski's Political Ponerology discusses how psychopaths and other clinically disordered individuals who systematically rise to power during social crises and reshape entire political systems into "pathocracies" that normalize their disordered worldview as ideology. Satire like Swift's A Modest Proposal and Zamyatin's We sharpens the ability to spot rhetorical excess dressed as reasonable logic. Novels with unreliable narrators, such as Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day and Nabokov's Pale Fire, build the habit of cross-checking claims against outside evidence. Poets like Szymborska and Akhmatova, writing under totalitarian conditions, model language that resists collapsing into slogans. Together, this reading trains attention to language, memory of how manipulation actually unfolds, and a working habit of doubt, the tools needed to recognize propaganda rather than simply be told it exists.

Jefferson's Second Chance: How America's Farmland Crisis Could Rebuild the Agrarian Dream

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Tue, 8 Sep 2026 16:39:30 -1000

Reclaiming the Land: America's Farm Crisis Is Also Its Greatest Opportunity

An investigation into the largest farmland transfer in American history, and why young people should run toward it, not away from it

The Land Is Moving. Nobody's Watching.

Somewhere in Iowa, a 71-year-old widow is deciding what to do with 400 acres her husband farmed for 45 years. Somewhere in Nebraska, three siblings who haven't set foot on their late father's wheat ground in a decade are arguing over whether to lease it, sell it, or let a solar developer pave it with panels. Multiply that scene by hundreds of thousands, and you have the largest, quietest transfer of land wealth in American history and almost nobody under 35 has been invited to the table.

The numbers are staggering. More than 40 percent of U.S. farmland, over 150 million acres, is expected to change hands in the next 10 to 15 years. The average American farmer is 57.5 years old. The average farmland owner is over 70. Only 8 percent of producers are under 35. This is not a slow demographic drift, it is a cliff, and Americans are walking toward it with their eyes on their smart phones doom scrolling.

But here is what most coverage of this crisis misses: this isn't just a story about loss. It's a story about the largest on-ramp to land ownership American has offered in a century, if young people are willing to see it, and if the systems get built to let them walk through it.

Thomas Jefferson believed a nation of independent farmers, each with a stake in the soil, was the truest guarantor of a free republic. He was wrong about a lot. But he wasn't wrong that ownership breeds citizenship, and that a country of renters and tenants is a different, more fragile country than one of stewards. Right now, America isn't facing that choice so much as it has already made it. Land, housing, even the tools of daily life increasingly belong not to the people who use them but to landlords, private equity funds, and transnational corporations extracting rent from a population that owns less every year. We have become a nation of tenants in our own country, and a republic of tenants answers to its landlords, not to itself.

Why the Land Isn't Reaching the People Who Want It

The instinct is to assume 150 million acres hitting the market means opportunity is knocking. It isn't, because most of that land will never hit an open market at all.

Less than 5 percent of transitioning farmland is expected to be sold or gifted openly in the next five years. The rest disappears into estate planning, family LLCs, and trusts. Nearly 39 percent of all U.S. agricultural land is already rented rather than owned by the person farming it, and in the Corn Belt that number climbs even higher. Almost 80 percent of that rented land belongs to non-operating landlords, retirees, investors, and heirs who have never driven a tractor and have no reason to sell to a stranger with a dream and no capital.

This is the quiet crisis inside the loud one: even as an enormous wave of land becomes available, the mechanisms connecting it to young, capable, land-hungry people barely exist. Without deliberate intervention, that land will default to the path of least resistance, consolidation into massive existing operations, conversion into development or solar leases, or a slow drift into absentee ownership by people who have never smelled a harvest.

That is the fork in the road. And it is exactly where the solutions live.

Solution One: Land Access Networks — Matchmaking for the Next Agrarian Generation

The most promising development already underway is the rise of formal land-matching infrastructure, organizations built specifically to connect retiring landowners who want a legacy with young farmers who have skill but no capital.

Groups like the Farmland Access Hub pair retiring owners with vetted beginning farmers through trained "Farmland Access Navigators," and let landowners list land specifically for transition rather than default liquidation. This is matchmaking with teeth: it treats succession planning as a solvable logistics problem, not an inevitable family free-for-all.

Land trust models are proving the same point. Retiring farmers are increasingly choosing to place land into trusts that lease it long-term, at affordable rates, to new farmers, rather than auctioning it to the highest bidder or a developer. As one land-access advocate put it, this approach helps the aging, retiring population find a new way to transition their farmland while directly improving land access for the next generation. It is a model that treats land less like a liquid asset and more like a living inheritance meant to keep producing food and stewards, not just cash.

The youth opportunity here is direct and immediate: young people don't need $2 million to buy a farm. They need to get known to these networks, as apprentices, as leaseholders, as the next stewards a 70-year-old landowner is quietly hoping to find before she runs out of time to look.

Solution Two: Fix the Fractured Inheritance Problem Before It Fractures the Land

The single biggest reason productive farmland goes dark isn't a lack of buyers, it's siblings who disagree. When land passes to multiple heirs with no plan, the outcome is almost always paralysis or partition: one heir wants to keep renting to the local farmer, another wants to cash out to a developer, a third wants it locked in a trust indefinitely. The active farmer caught in the middle has no incentive to invest in soil health, tiling, or cover crops on ground he might lose to a family vote next spring.

This is a solvable problem, and rural America is already solving pieces of it. Succession-planning services attached to land-access hubs are beginning to work directly with aging landowners before death forces the issue, helping families build transition plans that keep land in production and give an incoming young farmer a real, secured lease instead of a handshake that evaporates at a funeral.

The policy lever here is clear: states and the USDA should be funding succession-planning navigators the same way they fund extension agents, as essential rural infrastructure, not a boutique nonprofit service. Every landowner over 65 should have easy, no-cost access to a planner whose job is to keep that land producing and connect it to a young steward, not just to minimize estate tax.

Solution Three: Make Youth Entry Financially Possible, Not Just Emotionally Inspiring

Passion doesn't buy land. The capital barrier is the real wall, and it has to be attacked directly, not romanticized away.

This means:

Beginning farmer loan and grant programs need to be louder, faster, and less bureaucratic than they currently are, so a 24-year-old with a business plan and a mentor doesn't wait 18 months for an answer.

Land leasing over land buying should be the default first step, not the consolation prize. The rise of long-term trust leases proves a young farmer can build a real operation, real income, and real equity in equipment and reputation without needing to own the dirt on day one.

Local governments and land trusts should prioritize young operators in lease matching, the way affordable housing programs prioritize first-time buyers; because a nation that lets farmland default to whoever has the most idle capital is choosing consolidation over renewal.

None of this requires new ideology. It requires treating farmland access with the same urgency America treats housing access or small-business lending. The infrastructure for both already exists elsewhere in government; it needs to be built here.

Solution Four: Steal the Playbook From Regenerative Farmers Who Already Cracked This

Young people don't need to reinvent farming to get in the door, they need to look at farmers who've already figured out how to build a productive operation on rented or borrowed acreage with minimal upfront capital. The legendary farmer Joel Salatin's Polyface Farm in Virginia is the most cited example for a reason: it's a working demonstration that ecological intelligence can substitute for the capital most beginning farmers don't have.

Salatin layers corn into the cattle's winter bedding pack, where it slowly ferments under the weight of manure and the weight of the cows. It's a brilliant idea. That fermentation generates real heat, turning the bedding into a warm winter bed that cuts the cows' energy needs and their feed bill. The temperature of the bed goes to around 50F and there are no walls on the structure making the environment that much healthier for the cows. Come spring, hogs are turned loose on the same pack to root for the fermented corn, and in the process of digging for their treat, they aerate and turn the whole compost pile far more thoroughly than any machine could. It's a closed loop where cattle, pigs, bedding, and manure all do each other's work, and the "waste product" of one animal becomes the paycheck of the next.

Joel Salatin on soil, cows and the lies we've been told (Polyface Farm Tour):

Salatin's mobile chicken pens work on the same logic. Instead of a fixed henhouse, the birds live in lightweight, movable coops that get shifted to fresh pasture daily, often following behind the cattle to break parasite cycles and spread manure evenly across the land. The birds get constant access to fresh grass and bugs instead of standing in their own waste, which means healthier birds, better eggs, and pasture that gets more fertile with every pass instead of less. And critically for a young person with no land of their own, this model is portable: a beginning farmer doesn't need to own acreage to start, just a coop, some birds, and a landowner willing to let it sit on an underused corner of a pasture. That's a conversation a 23-year-old can have this week, not a $2 million loan application.

Approach a retiring farmer or absentee landowner directly, offer to run mobile pens on land that's otherwise sitting idle, split the eggs or meat, and improve their soil for free in the process. One person can easily move 4,000 birds in an hour with these portable coops. According to Joel Salatin, "mobility changes everything." What the hell does America have to "feed the world for?" Americans need to feed themselves first. It's one of the lowest-barrier entry points into commercial agriculture that exists in America today, and it can be the first rung on a ladder that eventually leads to a lease, then a herd, then a claim on that same 150 million acres everyone else is fighting over.

The Jeffersonian Case, Updated for 2026

Jefferson's agrarian vision was never really about the plow. It was about the idea that a citizen who owns and works land has a different relationship to the country than one who doesn't, a stake, a stubbornness, a reason to stay and fix things rather than drift. That idea doesn't need 18th-century farming to survive. It needs 21st-century access.

The generational transfer bearing down on American agriculture is not a eulogy. It's an invitation. The land is moving whether anyone plans for it or not. The only question is who is standing there, ready, when it does, a solar developer with a checkbook, an absentee investment fund, or a 26-year-old who spent two years apprenticing on a vegetable farm and finally has a lease with her name on it.

The tools to make the second outcome the common one already exist in embryonic form: land-access hubs, succession navigators, long-term trust leases. What they need now is scale, funding, and a generation of young Americans willing to see 150 million acres not as someone else's inheritance, but as their opening.

Sources referenced: American Farmland Trust; Marbleseed Farmland Access Hub; Farmers National Company; USDA Economic Research Service; Yale Climate Connections; Hoosier Ag Today / Michigan Ag Today reporting on the "invisible farmland transfer."

________

Butchered by Bureaucracy: The Fight to Take Beef Back from Big Meat

The Anatomy of Corporate Serfdom: How Tyson Foods and Three Other Giants Cornered America's Beef Supply

This should be of concern if this is intended to threaten independent beef farmers and butcheries in America:

South Dakota: Anthrax confirmed in Meade County beef herd

Kickbacks at DHS: The Allegations Against Corey Lewandowski, and President Trump's Own Private Suspicions

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:11:57 -1000

Editor's note: Corey Lewandowski, a longtime Trump ally who served as a special government employee and de facto chief of staff to former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, faces allegations that he "demanded kickbacks from contractors seeking DHS business", including GEO Group and firms tied to a $220 million ad campaign. The claims are backed by NBC and Wall Street Journal reporting citing multiple senior White House and DHS officials, and DHS's own Inspector General has opened an investigation into whether contracts were improperly awarded. House Democrats are also pushing for subpoenas, a fact critics note carries clear midterm messaging value. Lewandowski and Noem deny any wrongdoing and call the claims politically motivated. No charges have been filed, but the volume of independent sourcing, including from inside the administration itself, makes this more than another typical partisan move just before the midterms. President Trump reportedly told advisers that "Corey made out on that one," referring to the $220 million DHS ad campaign, suggesting even he has privately questioned whether Lewandowski profited from the deal.

Here are a few more critical and damning views of Corey Lewandowski:

'Hire me on the side' & now we know Corey Lewandowski who was DHS sex beds hair extensions taken 220 $ million tax money to pose & make videos 'Noem' lover, he was a bagman kickback man at DHS

Federal probe zeroes in on 'shadow secretary' who rattled Trump White House

Butchered by Bureaucracy: The Fight to Take Beef Back from Big Meat

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Mon, 7 Sep 2026 20:29:22 -1000

Editor's note: The following uses President Trump's September 2026 executive order on meat processing as a way into a bigger story: how a handful of corporations (see The Anatomy of Corporate Serfdom: How Tyson Foods and Three Other Giants Cornered America's Beef Supply) came to dominate American beef, and what it would actually take to build small, local alternatives. Using Meatworks, a nonprofit Massachusetts slaughterhouse, as a case study, it breaks down the real financial barriers facing small processors, from high fixed regulatory costs to a shortage of trained butchers, then proposes a decentralized path forward built on state loan funds, farmer cooperatives, and tiered safety standards, while weighing whether the USDA itself has the incentive to let that happen.
________

Trump's Meat Processing Order: What It Actually Changes, and What It Doesn't

On September 4, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at loosening the grip of the nation's largest meatpackers on the beef supply chain. Flanked by ranchers from Texas, California, Ohio, Arizona, and South Dakota in the Oval Office, Trump framed the move as long overdue relief for an industry squeezed by consolidation. "For the first time ever, we're going to give farmers and ranchers the right to process their own food," he said at the signing.

The order arrives at a politically delicate moment. Weeks earlier, Trump had eased tariffs on imported beef in an effort to bring down consumer prices, a move that triggered sharp backlash from domestic ranchers who felt undercut by foreign competition. The new order, alongside a companion directive on country-of-origin labeling for imported beef, appears designed to answer that backlash while still keeping prices in check.

The Numbers Behind the Anger

The frustration among ranchers is rooted in a genuinely lopsided market. Four companies, Cargill, Tyson Foods, JBS USA, and National Beef Packing, control roughly 85 percent of all steer and heifer purchases in the country. Trump has called this arrangement a monopoly, and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has pointed out that two of the four have recently closed some operations, freeing up around 20 percent of processing capacity that she believes mid-size processors and cooperatives could step into.

That concentration matters because of a basic economic reality: when four buyers control most of the demand for cattle, ranchers have little leverage to negotiate price. Small and mid-size operations are effectively price takers, selling into a market dominated by a handful of purchasing decisions made in corporate boardrooms far from any pasture.

Joel Salatin Exposes Trumps Fake 'Process Your Own Meat' Executive Order:

What the Order Actually Requires

Despite the sweeping rhetoric, the order's mechanics are narrower than the announcement suggested. Federal law already permits ranchers to slaughter and process animals for their own personal or household use. What it has never permitted is selling that meat commercially without passing through a facility subject to USDA inspection, and the new order does not eliminate that requirement.

Instead, the order directs a set of studies and programs:

- Secretary Rollins has 60 days to identify federal laws that restrict shipping personal-use meat across state lines.

- USDA is instructed to expand opportunities for interstate meat shipping by helping more states qualify for federal-equivalent inspection programs.

- A new guaranteed loan program is to be established for small and regional beef processors.

- USDA is directed to prioritize investigations into practices that restrict competition or manipulate cattle prices, with additional resources allocated to that enforcement.

- The agency is tasked with building training programs for smaller processors and modernizing inspection procedures, though the order does not specify which existing requirements are considered unnecessary.

In other words, this is a directive to study and build infrastructure over the coming months, not an immediate deregulation of the inspection system itself.

The Criticism Cuts Both Ways

Reaction split along two very different lines, which is itself revealing.

From the deregulation side, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who has pushed his own legislation to loosen meat processing restrictions, dismissed the order as symbolic. He argued on social media that it contains nothing that actually lets farmers process and sell their own meat, since the inspection requirement for commercial sale remains untouched.

From the food-safety side, industry and advocacy voices raised the opposite concern. The Meat Institute, which represents the packing industry, warned that any loosening of inspection standards could put the country's food safety reputation at risk, and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association was reported to have cautioned against weakening federal meat inspection standards generally. An Iowa State University food science professor, speaking before the announcement, noted that the current inspection system has helped build one of the safest food supplies in the world, and cautioned against losing consumer confidence in that system.

Both criticisms can be true at once. The order may be too modest to meaningfully break the grip of the big four processors, while still representing enough of a shift in direction to worry people invested in the current inspection regime. That tension, between wanting real structural change and wanting to preserve food safety guarantees, is likely to define the next 60 to 120 days as Rollins' USDA turns these directives into actual policy.

The Real Fight Is Over Financing, Not Just Regulation

The executive order treats deregulation as the main lever for reviving local meat processing. But the Massachusetts case we've already examined, the Meatworks facility in Westport, tells a more complicated story. Meatworks isn't struggling because of red tape. It exists, and survives, because of an unusually well-organized, well-funded coalition that pulled together over $7 million from a mix of USDA grants, state agency support, bank loans, and private donors, on top of a $5,050,000 construction loan and a $500,000 real estate loan from a state development agency.

That is the real barrier facing almost every community that wants a Meatworks of its own: not the inspection stamp, but the seven-figure capital stack required to build the plant in the first place. If President Trump's executive order's guaranteed loan program is going to matter, it has to solve this problem directly, and it's worth examining exactly what that problem looks like.

The Financing Problem, Piece by Piece

Capital costs are disconnected from local demand. A USDA-compliant slaughter facility costs millions of dollars to build regardless of whether it serves twenty farms or two hundred. A community of family ranchers raising a few hundred head a year cannot generate enough throughput to justify that capital outlay on its own, which is exactly why Meatworks needed a coalition of farmers across three states, plus a nonprofit legal structure, plus government-backed loans, just to break ground.

Private capital doesn't want thin, seasonal margins. Slaughter and processing is a low-margin business with lumpy, seasonal cash flow tied to harvest timing. Banks that would happily finance a retail strip mall are far more cautious about financing a facility whose revenue depends on livestock cycles and whose main customers are small farmers operating on tight margins themselves. This is precisely why Meatworks needed a bank loan enhanced with a government guarantee rather than a conventional commercial loan.

Regulatory compliance costs are fixed, not scaled. A plant processing ten cattle a week faces nearly the same paperwork, testing, and inspection overhead as a plant processing a thousand. That fixed cost structure means small operations need either very high volume or outside subsidy to stay solvent, and most rural communities can offer neither on their own.

Labor is scarce and skill-intensive. Even with a building and a loan, a facility needs trained butchers, which the industry itself acknowledges is in a national shortage. Building physical capacity without a pipeline of skilled labor just produces an expensive, empty building.

Grants are one-time; operations are ongoing. Government grants and philanthropic gifts, like the support Meatworks received from groups including Farm Aid, can cover the construction phase, but they cannot be relied upon indefinitely to cover payroll, utilities, and maintenance. A facility has to eventually earn its keep through service fees and retail sales, which means the business model still has to work on its own terms once the ribbon is cut.

A Decentralized Financing Model That Could Actually Scale

If the goal is to move away from a system where four corporations control 85 percent of processing capacity, the fix has to be structural, not just a loosened inspection rule. Here is what a genuinely decentralized, state-supported model could look like, built directly from what worked in Massachusetts and adapted so it doesn't require a one-off, seven-year fundraising marathon every single time.

State-backed revolving loan funds for meat infrastructure. Rather than one-time grants, states could establish a dedicated revolving loan fund specifically for small-scale meat processing facilities, similar to the model the state used to help finance Meatworks, but structured so that loan repayments replenish the fund for the next community that wants to build. This turns a single success story into a repeatable mechanism instead of a lucky exception.

Regional cooperative ownership, not single-town projects. No single town has enough cattle to support a processing plant, but a cluster of counties working together does. The Meatworks approach, a coalition of farmers forming a nonprofit that serves an entire multi-state region, is the correct scale. States could actively broker these regional cooperatives rather than waiting for a group of unusually persistent farmers to organize one from scratch over the better part of a decade.

Tiered inspection standards matched to actual risk. A processor serving twenty local farms and selling meat within a fifty-mile radius does not pose the same food safety risk profile as a national supply chain shipping across dozens of states. State meat inspection programs that meet federal standards already exist in some states; expanding and simplifying the path for more states to run their own equivalent programs, one of the actual provisions in the new executive order, would let smaller operations meet a genuinely rigorous safety bar without the exact same compliance apparatus built for continental-scale packers.

Public land-grant university partnerships for training butchers. Land-grant universities already run agricultural extension programs. States could fund butcher apprenticeship and training programs through these same institutions, addressing the skilled labor shortage directly and producing a steady, local pipeline of trained workers rather than relying on plants to recruit talent from a shrinking national pool.

Loan guarantees sized for mid-scale plants, not just mega-facilities. The guaranteed loan program the executive order calls for will only matter if it is genuinely accessible to a plant serving a few dozen farms, not just large-scale operations that already have easier access to capital. The design details of that program, still to be worked out by USDA, will determine whether this is a meaningful shift or a program that ends up serving the same large players it claims to counterbalance.

Direct consumer benefit as the actual selling point. None of this matters unless it translates into cheaper, better beef for ordinary people. A model that cuts out national middlemen and shortens the distance between rancher and dinner table has real potential to lower prices for consumers while paying ranchers more, since both currently lose value to the margin captured by the big four processors and their distribution networks.

The Institutional Resistance Problem

Any honest account of this fight has to reckon with an uncomfortable structural question: does the USDA, as an institution, actually want this to succeed?

There is a real argument that it might not, at least not without a fight. The agency employs a large workforce whose jobs, budgets, and professional standing are built around the current inspection architecture, one designed for a smaller number of very large facilities. A dramatic decentralization of meat processing, with hundreds of small regional plants instead of a handful of giant ones, would require the agency to redesign how it staffs and trains inspectors, potentially spreading the same workforce much more thinly across many more locations. Bureaucracies, like any organization, tend to resist changes that increase complexity and dilute control over their existing systems, and it would not be surprising if career staff slow-walked provisions that unsettle a familiar structure.

It's also fair to note that the two industry groups that pushed back hardest against the order, the Meat Institute and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, both have deep, long-standing relationships with USDA regulators built over decades of engagement on food safety rule-making. Critics of regulatory capture would point out that this kind of long-term relationship, even when well-intentioned on both sides, naturally produces rules that reflect the operational realities and preferences of large incumbents, since they are the ones with the staff and resources to participate consistently in the rule-making process.

But this argument deserves a genuine counterweight, not just an accusation. Many career USDA staff are food scientists and public health professionals whose primary motivation is a legitimate one: the current system has, in fact, helped build a food supply with a strong safety record, and the caution from that Iowa State professor about not losing consumer confidence is not manufactured industry propaganda, it reflects a real technical concern that decentralized, unevenly resourced small processors could produce more inconsistent safety outcomes if reforms are rushed. Loosening standards too quickly, without adequately funding the training and technical assistance that make small plants safe, could produce a genuine food safety incident that would set the entire decentralization movement back for a generation. The Meatworks example itself argues for this caution: its founders spent years building rigorous internal standards specifically because they wanted to prove small-scale processing could match or exceed large-scale safety records, not cut corners to compete on price.

The honest conclusion is that both dynamics are probably operating simultaneously. There is likely genuine institutional inertia and some degree of incumbent influence shaping how USDA has historically written and enforced its rules, and there is also a genuine, well-founded professional caution about food safety that isn't reducible to bureaucratic self-preservation. The test of this executive order won't be the signing ceremony viewed above. It will be whether, over the next 60 to 120 days, Secretary Rollins' USDA actually designs a loan program, an interstate shipping framework, and a training pipeline that a coalition of ranchers in North Carolina or Iowa could use to build the next Meatworks in two years instead of seven. If it does, the order will have done more to break the big meat four's grip than any tariff or labeling requirement could. If the specifics dissolve into a vague report and a modestly funded pilot, Rep. Massie's early skepticism will have been the more accurate read.

Ribbon Cutting at Appalachian Producers Co-Op Meat Processing Facility:

Piedmont Custom Meats:

Arm to Freezer: A Butcher Shop Tour, You Won't Believe This Setup

Joel Salatin on soil, cows and the lies we've been told (Polyface Farm tour):

Worst case fear scenario: 150,000 militarized robots...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Mon, 7 Sep 2026 15:38:33 -1000

Editor's note: ...clandestinely moved through supply chains from China into Canada and are now preparing for an invasion of America through the northern border. Note from The Exposé: Why do you think they want robots that are capable of waging urban warfare, e.g. humanoid robots that have unique advantages in environments such as buildings and tunnels? For the same reason they want to push the world's population into 15-minute cities, perhaps? Maybe Elon Musk's Tesla should gear up for rapid advances in its fully autonomous AI-driven military robots (autonomous warfare) to take on China at the Canadian border? This would make for a great science fiction novel if it weren't so damn real.

________

From The Field To The Battlefield: China Accelerates The Militarisation of Humanoid Robots

By Sputnik News Agency (China) | September 7, 2026

Translated from Chinese using an online auto-translate tool.

A Reuters analysis of more than 100 Chinese military procurement documents, academic papers, patents, official publications and defence company data found that Chinese defence agencies are accelerating research on the military applications of humanoid robots and planning their future wartime deployment.

At the World Humanoid Robot Games held in China last month, robots demonstrated their abilities in jumping, boxing and dancing, with some even exceeding Bolt's speed by 100 meters. After the competition, the People's Liberation Army Daily published an article calling on researchers to accelerate the transfer of cutting-edge technologies from laboratories to military training grounds for the development of robot "combatants."

Military institutions are testing humanoids against battlefield requirements, seeking to acquire robots and technologies to train them, and studying how they might function ‌alongside troops, the previously unreported records show. The work gained momentum in 2025 and 2026, focusing on robot perception, manipulation and training data.

Chinese manufacturers accounted for about 95% of global humanoid shipments in 2025, according to BofA Global Research. That commercial dominance gives the PLA [People's Liberation Army] access to an expanding industry while developing its own military applications.

From dance floor to war: China readies humanoid robots for combat, Reuters, 7 September 2026

In a paper, researchers from the National University of Defence Technology envisioned an application scenario for humanoid robots in urban warfare: six combat robots would be divided into two groups and work with ground forces to clear buildings floor by floor. The study anticipates that the relevant equipment will be available within 5 to 10 years. Some scholars say that humanoid robots have unique advantages in environments such as buildings and tunnels, but quadrupedal or wheeled robots are cheaper for simple tasks. Chinese military commentary articles also look ahead to the evolution of humanoid missions "from support operations to main combat operations" and explore the possibility of authorising robots to fire after human confirmation.

The United States is exploring similar uses, but its robotics industry lags far behind China. China's military interest in humanoid robots has been growing since 2024, and the National University of Defence Technology's 2025 competition has set up simulation subjects such as "Infiltration Behind Enemy Lines." Procurement records from the same period show that the People's Liberation Army tendered for the procurement of humanoid robots and related perception operating systems, and budgeted approximately US$300,000 in June 2026 for the collection of training data. By 2026, research and development will expand to the defence industry. The "Fuxi" robot developed by a Chinese company can perform reconnaissance, patrol and high-risk tasks, and supports remote control to avoid the difficulty of autonomous decision-making.

Experts believe that humanoid robots are not currently practical on the battlefield, but may become a reality in 5 to 10 years. Autonomous weapons also face ethical and legal challenges, such as distinguishing combatants from civilians and identifying surrender intentions. Another researcher from the Chinese Academy of Military Sciences pointed out that humanoid robots still have unsolved problems in motion, perception and intelligence, and need technological breakthroughs and cost reductions before they can be widely deployed. Once these conditions are met, humanoid robots will flock to the battlefield.

Related: Chinese manufacturers will account for 97% of the global humanoid robot market in the first half of 2026, Sputnik News Agency, 11 August 2026

________

Taiwan goes full on with military drone warfare scenarios:

Taiwan proposes extra $4.6 billion in defence spending for this year

The Pentagon apparently polygraphed dozens of...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Mon, 7 Sep 2026 15:09:06 -1000

Editor's note: ...officers and civilian employees in August, hunting for whoever leaked word of America's dwindling weapons stockpiles, a move that followed Pete Hegseth's vow in July to "prosecute unauthorized disclosures" to the press. None of this required a leak to see what was coming: basic arithmetic and the visible strain of supplying Ukraine already made the sustainment crisis obvious. The US military is built for short, overwhelming "shock and awe" campaigns, not prolonged fights, a weakness laid bare by the faltering 2023 counteroffensive and the months-long struggle against Iran, hardly a military peer of Russia. The polygraph sweep looks less like real accountability and more like Pete Hegseth silencing internal critics to protect his own image and political ambitions. There are two different stories here, Hegseth is facing criticism over a Pentagon leak investigation and these people mentioned including Hegseth manufacturing distractions.

________

International Public Notice: Finding an Enemy

September 7, 2026 | By Anna Von Reitz

Mr. Trump, Mr. Hegseth, and Mr. Rubio are desperate. Just like Joe Biden and Barack Obama were desperate.

This Notice is addressed specifically and personally and commercially to each and every one of them and also the members of all "Congressional" bodies. This is what we say about them and to them:

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents:

They tried racism as reason to get a civil war started in this country, but nobody cared enough about skin color any more and too many decades have passed when we have all had to stand shoulder-to-shoulder and suffer enslavement at the hands of those who claimed to be our trustees.

They tried religious divisions. Same result. Except in Ireland, there wasn't even a spark of religious-based hatred, and faced with a flood of Muslim would-be immigrants, even the Irish Churches gave up and joined hands in common cause for the first time in 500 years.

Wasn't that religious-based hatred of Muslims? No. It was desperation of its own kind, desperation to maintain the people and culture already in Ireland for the last 10,000 years.

The Irishmen manning the barricades and tossing the Molotov cocktails weren't arguing about the Koran.

They tried fear and hatred based on sexual choices and oddball fetishes, but that fell flat, too. All the Normies just wrinkled their noses and shook their heads. Turns out that they didn't care what other adults were doing in their own bedrooms.

The Haters and Fear-Mongers have been having a really bad time of it, because people can still think and reason for themselves, and because we've heard all these narratives before.

Now they are trying to raise another Old Bug-a-Boo from the dust, Marxism and Communism, both, but they trust that we will be too ignorant to make any distinction between these economic and political dead ends.

They think they will raise the flag and we will all say, "Oh, no! The Red Threat!"

But that's a No Gamer, too. Been there. Done that. That's not what today's "Progressives" are. They're not Marxists or Communists.

The so-called Liberal Progressives of today have no political identity, no racial identity, and certainly no religious identity. They are just crooks, expertly feeding from the trough of a corrupt government.

Generations of corruption have spawned an entire class of entitlement junkies and grifters. For them, any excuse will do. Any target will serve. They don't care who owns the store they loot, and they certainly have no affiliations with "labor" or "capital" -- except to avoid one and steal the other.

They shamelessly pivot and spin with any hint of political wind and by their own utter lack of character give form to what Hannah Arendt called "the banality of evil".

They are so banal, they don't know what evil is. Come to that, they don't know what "banal" means, either.

Meanwhile, those who were supposed to be here protecting us and our assets are scrambling to create an "Enemy" so that they can distract us from the fundamental problem --- and that problem is them. Their failure to do their jobs. Their failure to honor the limits of their service contracts. Their failure to act "in good faith".

It was easier to prey upon their employers than tell their employers the truth and assist us in restoring our properly functioning American Government. From Grant to Eisenhower and beyond, they've all been gutless wonders, riding the tide, selling what they didn't own, and blaming "the other fella", whoever that might be.

If Donald Trump and his Bosses in Parliament were acting in good faith, they would have already recognized that the actual American people and their nation-states are already assembled to complete the Reconstruction of their lawful government.

If these men were acting in good faith, instead of trying to find a scapegoat, they'd be owning their own corruption and correcting it. They'd be installing flock cameras in the halls of Congress, not on Main Street.

The "King" --- King of Scotland, as it turns out --- owes everyone on Earth a whole blivet-load of money and land and labor collateral and instead of addressing this issue in a straight forward manner, they want to go hunting Communists in America, instead.

Very well. Let's begin with the American members of the London Law (Guild) Society. They've been avowed Communists since the word "communist" was coined.

The British Perps are having a hard time painting the American Patriots and so-called (though non-existent) "Sovereign Citizens" with the "Globalist" name tag and brush, so they are using our insistence that they square up with everyone as an excuse to say that we are, somehow, "Patriots" and "Globalists" at the same time.

Words and labels are finally failing them. "Nationalist Globalist" is an oxymoron too far too stretch

None of what they are pushing rings true. Even the dullest tools in our shed are picking up on that.

Let's go with the simplest theory that explains the observed facts.

The British Territorial U.S. Army was left in charge of this country by Abraham Lincoln in 1863 and they've been screwing us and screwing up the rest of the world ever since.

They've been pillaging and indulging in illegal confiscations and "illegal takings" prohibited by The Constitution of the United States of America since 1865.

They've been singing "Yankee Doodle" the whole time and still are.

They have cynically used our sons and daughters as cheap, cheap, cheap mercenaries and promoted war-for-profit at our expense, and now, they propose to use the threat of "communism" to amp up martial law and surveillance state tech and use it against us?

They need to be convinced that there is only one way out for them.

They need to correct their corrupt operations, come clean with the American People, claim the amnesty we've offered against treason charges, and obey our directives --- one of which is to do the bookkeeping. The actual bookkeeping. Balance the books.

It's a simple request. They have exact figures for most of it. What they can't produce with exactitude, we will allow them to "reasonably" estimate. And then, start making things right.

Start paying back the prepaid credit already owed to the people of this planet with no funky fraudulent unseen strings attached, no claims to own land or undisclosed "settlement offers" or anything else the least little bit shady.

Just start paying out the credit already earned.

Return all the "land titles" and "land descriptions" they've attached to our land parcels under false registration claims, and get back in their respective boxes.

The gold returned from the Vatican that was used to bond everyone's labor assets needs to be returned to each and every individual via a separate gold account. The "generation skipping trusts" established offshore and named after each living man or woman --- those need to be returned to the individuals who are lawful inheritors of the names and lineages impacted.

And yes, one way or another, this does impact just about everyone on Earth, because just about everyone has been cheated, defrauded, mischaracterized, impersonated, and otherwise harmed by this criminal "system" of courts used as banks and non-negotiable paper used as money and people abused as corporation franchises.

The Great Fraud is over. The British Empire is over. It's done. Cooked. And we are here with our forks in hand. The only question is -- do we stick them in Scotland, or in the Thanksgiving turkey?

Stop the stupid obvious lie that communists are the problem. Call these "progressives" for what they are: crooks enabled by your own corruption and failure to act in good faith.

Get back in your boxes, claim amnesty against treason charges while it is still offered, and for once in your lives choose peace and truth over war and lies.

No matter what you do, you are not going to profit yourselves by engendering any more disturbances on our shores and you are not going to avoid the bookkeeping for another round of can-kicking based on our Heritage Trusts and "Legacy" Trusts.

You are going to bring forward the prepaid credit and you are going to start paying back the actual owners of every asset you've purloined.

You are going to give back the land ownership free and clear to every American born or properly naturalized on our soil.

You are going to cease and desist collecting "federal income taxes" and "(trust) property taxes" and "utility taxes" and "gas taxes" and all the other taxes you have non-consensually levied against Americans who never owed your corporations anything but a debt swap.

You are going to pay off your own mortgages run up by your own state-of-state organizations and you are going to leave every single average American who was never properly or knowingly "registered" as a British Subject or a "US" commercial corporation franchise out of it.

Totally, one hundred percent, out of it.

From now on, beginning with the return of all "Global Family Bank, Incorporated" assets to me, acting as Fiduciary for the unincorporated United States of America, you are going to do all of the above with alacrity and a good, clean attitude.

You aren't even going to try any more sneaky, self-interested "settlement" offers, and you aren't going to come up with any more excuses for failing to offer the Mutual Offset Credit Exemption Exchanges (debt swaps) mandated as remedy in Federal Title 12.

You are going to come up with a proper system of identifying actual Americans claiming their actual American birthright estates and operating as Americans under the American Government and American Law, and you are going to stop trying to confuse any of these issues at all.

You are going to stop pretending that American Corporations are "United States" Corporations. You are going to stop pretending that we don't have our own Admiralty Law. You are going to stop preying upon our people under color of law.

All the "legal pretense" is going to end, right here, right now, today.

We do not recognize the "United States of America, LLC" as anything but a British Commercial Corporation infringing on our trademarks. If you want to act as Successors to Contract and undertake the services stipulated under The Constitution of the United States of America, you must honor that contract, in full.

Please note, any Successor position includes the "good faith service" provisions and all protections owed to our American "persons" and other services guaranteed under Article IV of The Constitution of the United States of America.

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
________

Look on the bright side of all this, at least the US Department of State acting as the front sales office for US weapon manufacturers can still sell munitions:

Washington approves potential $5bn arms package for Riyadh

Landesnetz gets hacked, the AfD takes control and Volkswagen to shed 100,000 jobs

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Mon, 7 Sep 2026 13:38:05 -1000

Editor's note: The hacker group Rhysida infiltrated Berlin's state network (Landesnetz) around August 7–14, 2026, and demanded 30 Bitcoin (~€2 million) not to leak the stolen data. The city refused to pay, the deadline expired on Friday (September 4), and Rhysida published the data: around 5.8 terabytes across roughly 1.44 million files. The files reportedly include more than 5,000 personnel files, fine proceedings, payslips, confidential parliamentary committee documents, and vulnerability analyses of Berlin's drinking water supply. Independent scans catalog personal records of over 12,000 named individuals, thousands of phone numbers, IBANs, contracts, and financial files.

________

The AfD's triumph and Merz's collapse

By Matteo Castagna | September 7, 2026

On Sunday, September 6, 2026, 1.7 million eligible voters were called to renew the regional parliament (Landtag) of the state (Land) located in the eastern part of Germany and formerly part of the GDR, the German Democratic Republic. The Alternative for Germany (AfD), a radical right-wing party, beat the other parties and even the polls, which gave it 40%. It reached 44%, a result never achieved before by a far-right movement since the Second World War.

The first interesting figure was that of turnout. Compared to the abstentionist trend of recent years throughout the continent, as many as 80% of Saxon adults went to the polls, demonstrating a strong desire for change compared to the traditional Christian Democrat leadership of the CDU, which is halved with 18%. The socialists of the SPD collect 9.3%, Carola Rachete’s party, Linke 8.6%, the Greens 8.9%, and the left-wing populist party BSW exceeds the threshold with 5%.

The outgoing governor of the CDU, Sven Schulze, is honest, admitting defeat: "They are the strongest party, we have to face the situation – he declared in the heat of the moment on Vatican News – this is democracy, people went to vote en masse, like never before".

This vote is the tombstone on the credibility of the superiority of traditional parties. Continuing to scream extremism and to brand as unpresentable or irresponsible millions of citizens who simply demand security, border control and social protections is yet another demonstration of a blind and deaf ruling class.

Leader Alice Weidel rejoices: "It is a historic and sensational result. We had a clear mandate to govern." Ulrich Siegmund, 35, is the presidential candidate who led the AfD to a stunning victory. To Der Spiegel, which had called him "the most dangerous man in Germany", he responded by distributing autographed copies of the magazine to his supporters. Married, with a daughter, he studied business psychology and administration, and then founded a small company that sells air fresheners.

Siegmund promises radical measures to make Saxony-Anhalt less multicultural, less "woke", more family-friendly and openly patriotic. He argues that his program could convince German émigrés to return and help revive a stagnant economy.

Like the whole party, he rejects the derogatory label of "Nazi". He is a former CDU, who left in 2014, who represents a more reassuring and communicative face for the AfD than that of a party known above all for anti-establishment rhetoric.

But behind the smiles and toasts with beer, his critics warn, radical positions remain. Among these, the promise to expel irregular migrants "from the first minute". One of the main reasons for the massive Saxon vote for the AfD is due to exasperation over the lack of integration by too many immigrants, who, as in the rest of the Old Continent, end up delinquency and terrorizing the population. The Germans are calling for "law and order", while Prime Minister Merz is unable to be self-critical, despite the fact that half of his voters have chosen the radical right.

It is absolutely false, the result of an offensive disinformation campaign, to dismiss the AfD as the party of the "Nazis", especially for the political history from the post-war period to today, in Saxony, where the center-left has always obtained excellent results. No! 45% of the Germans in the Land do not have nostalgia for Hitler, nor have they suddenly pulled the moldy uniforms of the SS out of their closets! It has given, en masse, a signal of discontent and anger towards a self-referential ruling class, which has not served the interests of the people, especially on fundamental issues such as work, security and the welfare state.

Laura Ruggeri ha scritto sul suo profilo Facebook: "è certamente positivo che gli elettori della Sassonia-Anhalt abbiano nettamente respinto le disastrose politiche della CDU, il suo appello alle armi e la sua crociata anti russa, ma l'abbraccio all' Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) non è esattamente motivo di celebrazione". Va bene il sovranismo, ma non è oro tutto quello che luccica.

"Although the AfD attracts protest votes, i.e. those voters whose real concerns are ignored or minimized by centrist political forces, today the party is being actively co-opted by the same transnational forces that brought the MAGA movement to power in the United States. Within the AfD, two opposing visions of Germany coexist, but it is increasingly clear which faction has the deepest pockets and can make use of powerful allies.

Please go to sovereignty.com to continue reading.
________

Russia and Germany sever all diplomatic and cultural ties:

The Plot To Stop The AfD: Germany's Firewall Is Crumbling In Saxony-Anhalt

Germany and the end of Europe's old political order

Europe's biggest carmaker to shed 100,000 jobs in historic overhaul

Landesnetz in Germany isn't the only operation that can be hacked:

Ransomware Gang Dumps 6.3GB of Stolen ATF Data After 72-Hour Deadline

5GW-style narrative: Lindsay Clancy is likely a covert information operation

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Sun, 6 Sep 2026 18:30:08 -1000

Editor's note: In the framework of 5th Generation Warfare (5GW) theory, the trial of Lindsay Clancy is a scripted, CIA-orchestrated broadcast designed to manipulate public perception and test viewers' legal literacy would itself be an example of a 5GW-style narrative, since this event is likely a covert information operation. The recent televised murder trial is fabricated, and can be compared to past televised trials that have been staged. With the deadlocked jury, arguing that under U.S. law, unanimity is required to convict but not to acquit, so an 11-1 vote in favor of acquittal would function as a de facto acquittal even though it is technically a hung jury. In 5GW are we seeing the three branches of the American government, the executive, the legislative, and the judicial, who most Americans probably couldn't name at this point, being deliberately destroyed then rebuilt? If this is 5GW think about the countless witless women in America who have been caught up in this warfare?

Update: The Lindsay Clancy Case is the MOST FAKE of all Time
________

Women Defending Lindsay Clancy Admit They're Dangerous And Unaccountable

By Eddie Scarry | September 4, 2026

Now that the Lindsay Clancy case just ended in a mistrial and justice is, for the moment, suspended, it's time to pay special attention to a certain kind of woman, a perfect example of which showed herself while Plymouth County, Massachusetts, District Attorney Timothy Cruz was talking to news media immediately after the trial judge declared the mistrial.

She appeared to be in her 30s, dressed in pink — as Clancy supporters are known to wear — and she stood in camera view, maybe intentionally. The entire time Cruz spoke Friday afternoon, while he acknowledged Clancy's three young victims, her own children, the woman behind him aggressively shook her head no. When Cruz offered to take questions, the woman yelled out over him. "You only cared when the kids were dead," she said, sporting sunglasses and a bright pink scarf and purse. "Why don't you care about the mother?"

That such a woman is permitted to walk the streets unaccosted and maybe even have children of her own is an alarming reality. And she's not alone. What this trial has revealed, among other dark and disturbing truths, is that they are legion.

Crazed Lindsey Clancy supporter says “you only cared when the kids were dead” …. ???? pic.twitter.com/CYkY1HSSTG
— Eddie Scarry (@eScarry) September 4, 2026

They're all over TikTok. They showed up at the courthouse in solidarity, dripping in pink. They're proud of it. And they maintain that Clancy is just as much a victim as the three children she strangled, if not even more so.

You only cared when the kids were dead.

Imagine saying that aloud and believing it's a rational point. There's no reason a state prosecutor should be concerned about a private family until a crime is committed. That a woman thinks there is is her way of absolving Clancy of agency and responsibility. And she wants to do that because she believes that same notion should apply to herself. That should terrify everyone who knows that lady, especially anyone who has kids.

Please go to The Federalist to continue reading.

If you had an extra $81.3 million available...

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Sun, 6 Sep 2026 15:40:53 -1000

Editor's note: ...to you to spend as freely as incompetent governments do, what would you do with that money? Finance a business? Cultivate an organic glyphosate free productive farm? Start a bakery offering the finest sourdough bread west of Europe? Donate $1 million to a local homeless shelter? The amount of money dropped into Ukraine since Russia's SMO to de-Nazify the place (there is currently a mafia turf war going on inside Kiev) beginning in February 2022, shows that Western allies have committed roughly €400+ billion (~$430+ billion) in total military, financial, and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, with Europe (EU institutions and member states, plus UK, Norway, and Switzerland) now in the lead at around €165.7 billion (~$180 billion), just ahead of the US at about €130.6 billion (~$140 billion), though the US still edges out Europe specifically in military aid (roughly €65 billion vs. €65.1 billion, essentially tied), while the EU has separately spent an estimated €155 billion on refugee support since 2022, bringing Europe's total "cost" of the war to around €330 billion over 3.5 years, even as overall new aid allocations slowed sharply in 2025 following the halt of U.S. military assistance. In starker terms: It has taken $430 billion to kill well over 2 million human beings (1,660 in the past week) and destroy billions of dollars worth of infrastructure.
________

The Ukraine Money Pit — Estonia's €70 Million Scandal

September 4, 2026 | By Martin Armstrong

Estonia's Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur has resigned after a €70 million [$81.3 million] ammunition deal intended to supply Ukraine blew up into a procurement scandal. Estonia agreed to purchase artillery shells from Datasel, an Italian-registered company owned by India's Neco Defense Munitions, despite the companies having no established history of selling artillery shells. Millions were paid in advance, deliveries ran into problems, Estonia terminated the contracts, and the dispute has now gone to arbitration. This is what happens when government declares everything an emergency and suddenly the normal rules surrounding public money become inconvenient.

Pevkur says he did not negotiate the contracts and had not even read them. His explanation was rather revealing: "The defence minister does not conduct contract negotiations. The defence minister does not count socks and ammunition." He said his responsibility was making the fundamental political decision to support Ukraine. He nevertheless resigned because the National Audit Office's findings raised the question of political responsibility. At least somebody in government still remembers what that phrase means.

The scandal goes directly to the problem with Europe's entire approach to Ukraine. The politicians declare that Ukraine must be supported at any cost, and once you use those words, cost ceases to matter. Due diligence becomes something bureaucrats complain takes too long. Money must be spent immediately because politicians tell everyone that Europe itself will fall if another artillery shell does not reach Ukraine yesterday.

Estonian officials have essentially admitted that extraordinary risks were accepted because of the urgency surrounding Ukraine. One official told reporters that they knew these procurements involved "greater risks than usual" but believed those risks were justified by what was at stake. There is the entire problem in one sentence. When government decides that the political objective is important enough to justify greater financial risk, taxpayers become the insurance policy when something goes wrong.

Estonia's National Audit Office had already raised serious concerns about defense spending and the activities of the Estonian Centre for Defence Investments. The issue is no longer merely whether ammunition arrived. There is now a possibility that Estonia itself could become responsible for tens of millions of euros tied up in the dispute, depending on how the contracts and EU financing are ultimately resolved. The European Commission says it is discussing whether Estonia may have to return the European funds and insists that safeguards exist to protect taxpayers. That is always what government says after the money has already left the building.

The supplier disputes Estonia’s version of events and says it supplied and invoiced €58 million worth of material against €59 million in advance payments. Datasel also rejects allegations that the ammunition failed inspections and argues that regulatory approvals and documentation delays complicated the international supply chain. That dispute will now have to be resolved through arbitration, but it does not change the larger political question of how a procurement carrying this degree of risk was approved in the first place.

Europe has thrown enormous sums into Ukraine under the premise that there is simply no alternative. The European Peace Facility was created before the invasion as an instrument supposedly designed to "preserve peace," yet it has become a major mechanism for financing weapons. You have to appreciate government terminology. They create something called a Peace Facility and then use it to purchase artillery ammunition for a war.

The Ukraine conflict has become another demonstration of how governments operate once fear eliminates fiscal restraint. Nobody is permitted to question the amount because asking where the money went is immediately portrayed as helping Putin. Nobody asks what the endgame is because that supposedly undermines Ukraine. Nobody wants to calculate what European taxpayers have actually committed because the answer becomes politically uncomfortable.

This is precisely how accountability disappears.

Europe has spent years telling its citizens that there is not enough money for pensions, healthcare, infrastructure, farmers, or tax relief. Governments insist they must raise retirement ages because the money is running out. They impose austerity when sovereign debt becomes unsustainable and then lecture ordinary people about living within their means. Yet when politicians want war, suddenly hundreds of billions can materialize.

The money is always there when government wants it. Estonia is particularly interesting because it has been among the most aggressive European supporters of Ukraine relative to the size of its economy. Defense spending has surged since 2022 as the Baltic governments repeatedly warn that Russia could eventually attack NATO territory. That fear has become the political justification for enormous military expenditures throughout Eastern Europe, and now Brussels wants the rest of Europe to follow.

This is how the military-industrial complex expands. You create permanent geopolitical fear, governments announce massive defense budgets, procurement must be accelerated, and taxpayers are told that questioning any expenditure threatens national security. The faster government spends money, the easier it becomes for mistakes, incompetence, favoritism, and outright corruption to hide inside the urgency.

Please go to Armstrong Economics to continue reading.

________

The unaccountability and fraud going on related to Ukraine is beyond comprehension:

Fiasco in the Factory: Taxpayers Funded a $533 Million Artillery Plant That Made Nothing

In the current central banking monetary debt based system where central banks create money out of nothing, when governments face a sovereign debt crisis like Japan is, the only option at that point is militarization for war. Japan probably has no choice considering China is eating Japan's lunch:

Japan Accelerates Defense Buildup With Record Budget and Expanded Unmanned Capabilities

America is moving in the right direction

noreply@blogger.com (Higher Standards ) — Sun, 6 Sep 2026 14:50:38 -1000

Editor's note: Mockingbird Properties, lays out a years long legal battle alleging that Texas appraisal districts, starting with the Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD), systematically inflate home values so that school districts can justify rising property taxes to cover growing bond debt. Mockingbird Properties argues (see DOJ: The fraud is on a colossal scale and out of control (U.S. Fraud Exceeds Property Tax Revenue)) that the appraisal review boards meant to hear homeowner protests can only adjust one value for one year and have no power to rule on whether the underlying appraisal method itself is lawful, this lets flawed practices continue unchecked. The Mockingbird Properties' site includes original court filings, an appeal now before the U.S. Supreme Court as of August 2026, DCAD board meeting transcripts describing manual changes to tens of thousands of property values, and data that shows local property values roughly doubling since 2017 while inflation rose only about a quarter as much.

________

THE PROPERTY TAX SCAM: Stafford, Texas – A City Without Property Tax

By 2nd Smartest Guy In the World | September 6, 2026

The socially engineered tax slaves have been indoctrinated in their "free" schooling to mindlessly accept all forms of statist thievery, not limited to property taxation.

These tax slaves push back on the unconstitutionality of taxation by asking how various goods and services would ever be provided to them and their communities if they were not stolen from.

They then wrongly ascribe rights to basic goods and services like education, except that education is anything but a right, just like strangers’ children’s braces, clothing and toys are not rights.

But what is an actual God-given and Constitutional right is not being stolen from by the government under false pretenses and color of law.

And what does most of the scandalous property tax bill exactly get allocated to?

These are the Presidents of the largest 2 teachers unions…

Becky Pringle and Randi Weingarten.

Both are Marxists.

Both paid over $500,000 per year.

99% of donations from their unions go to Democrats.

They’re responsible for much of the destruction of public schools.

Sick. pic.twitter.com/eBjnuk5frj
— Deep Leaks (@DeepLeaksHQ) September 6, 2026

The radical Marxists hellbent on destroying America from within always invoke the "greater good" of the very communities that they are robbing blind with their indoctrination schools that are designed to dumb down the next generation of brainwashed and misinformed tax slaves that are all but guaranteed just like their parents before them to continue the vicious cycle of paying for their own demises while being programmed to feel virtuous about it.

Which brings us to a case study update on yesterday's article…

You Cannot Own What the Government Can Take for Not Paying Rent

2ND SMARTEST GUY IN THE WORLD · SEP 6

In this Substack's ongoing series of articles that expose the unconstitutionally pernicious scam of all forms of taxation…

Read full story ------>

…whereby we have a concrete example of why denying private property ownership in America is one of the more grossly underhanded (and unconstitutional) scams possible courtesy of Stratford, Texas, a city that functions far better than most precisely because there is no communistic property tax being levied there since 1995; to wit:

by Eliminate Property Tax

"Madam Speaker, public officials looking for ways to increase economic growth and attract new residents and businesses to their cities, counties, or states could learn a lot from the city of Stafford, Texas, and Mayor Leonard Scarcella." – Dr. Ron Paul, House of Representatives; June 19, 2009

26 JUN 2018 – If you're new to the group and never heard this story, don’t feel surprised. None of us here had, either. Stafford, Texas is just south of Houston and back in 1995, chose to Eliminate Property Tax.

It is my go-to case in point when people say we'll have to raise the sales tax to 23% to do it. But Stafford's is only 8.25%… same as Houston's.

How'd they do that?

Find out, in the rest of Dr. Paul's testimony.

"Thanks to the absence of property taxes, Stafford residents enjoy cheaper mortgages and have more disposable income than similarly situated residents of towns with property taxes. The extra income as a result of the freedom from property taxes is particularly beneficial during today's tough economic times.

The loss of property tax revenue has not deprived Stafford residents of quality city services; in fact, Stafford resident Alice Rolston told the Houston Chronicle that the police check on her home when she is on vacation, many homeowners living in towns with high property taxes can't count on that type of service.

Entrepreneurs looking to start-up businesses are attracted to Stafford because of the lack of property taxes, Fortune magazine ranks Stafford the 36th best American city to start and run a small business.

While Stafford sales, franchise, and permit fees account for some of its ability to operate without a property tax, the major factor in the city's success is the city's fiscally prudent management. Stafford Councilman Cecil Willis says the mayor watches every penny in the city’s budget. City employees often perform two or more functions and the city council even debates whether to authorize the purchase of light bulbs and pencils.

Madam Speaker, Mayor Scarcella is also a good argument against term limits, as he is one of the few elected officials who remain as committed to low taxes today as when he led the fight to eliminate the property tax. Mayor Scarcella should serve as a role model to us all in how to effectively govern without burdening the people with excessive taxes."

No Relief. No Reform. #EliminatePropertyTax

Please go to substack to continue reading.

________

Then there are income taxes and the IRS issues to contend with:

Where is your money going?

The IRS wants you to feel powerless, but there is a way out of this tyranny.

No law requires 99% of Americans to file and pay income tax.

Go to https://t.co/PHscGPX8Wk to learn more from Freedom Law School or call (813) 444-4800 🇺🇸 @FreedomLaw84184 pic.twitter.com/u4r1IzbBdD
— Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) September 6, 2026

When it comes to UNDERstanding color of law then this archived work that has taken years of research and writing to compile will guide you through that legal mine field:

annavonreitz.com

paulstramer.net