Here’s a graph the Keynesians, statists, and Wall Street gamblers—yes, we repeat ourselves—would prefer not to explain. At the same time, it also explains why socialism at this late date in history—and after all its abysmal failures the world over—is having some kind of dubious second coming in America.

During the last three decades the national savings rate (red line) has essentially collapsed, having fallen from 6.3% of GDP in 1997 to 0.5% of GDP in 2025. Between the same two dates, however, the net worth of US households (blue line) has soared from 4.6X personal income to 6.5X personal income.

In economist jargon, the question would recur as follows: How in the world over a three-decade period did the stock of wealth soar when the flows of savings virtually evaporated?

Or in plain English, how did so many Americans get so damn rich while living high on the hog? And we do mean wealthy: According to the Fed’s Flow of Funds data, household net worth erupted from $32 trillion in 1997 to $169 trillion at present. These figures amount to an average of $320,000 per household in 1997, which grew to an average of $1.250 million per household 28 years later.

Needless to say, some substantial part of that gain is reflective of inflation. But even in constant 2025 dollars, average net worth per household has virtually doubled from about $630,000 to the aforementioned $1.250 million.

In short, the average savings per household diminished to nearly zero over that three-decade period—even as $85 trillion in added wealth accumulated in household balance sheets.

As it happened, of course, the massive $136.4 trillion increase in net worth over this period went to the holders of financial and housing assets, less associated debts. Accordingly, with a lot of debt at the bottom income rungs relative to modest asset levels, the resulting wealth distribution skewed sharply to the tippy-top of the economic ladder.

To wit, $44.1 trillion of the gain was accounted for by the top 1% of households and fully $94.2 trillion by the top 10%. And while Keynesians, statists, and stockbrokers would have you believe this was nothing more than Mr. Market at work, we beg to differ.

Under a regime of sound money and honest markets there would have been no soaring gains in net worth relative to the very modest gains in national income and savings. To the contrary, the former is the work of the money-printers at the central bank and the Cantillon Effect of monetary inflation.

That is to say, when the Fed prints money it effectively first deposits the receipts among the primary bond dealers, which sell government bonds to its open market desk and then send the proceeds ricocheting through the canyons of Wall Street. At length, the inflation gets to Main Street in the form of higher energy, food, and other everyday prices, but not before much of the inflation is absorbed by the leveraged gamblers on Wall Street.

So there is no mystery as to why the wealth distribution in America has been skewed sharply to the top of the ladder during recent years. The culprit was not the Reagan tax cuts back in the 1980s or the inherent inequality of capitalism.

To the contrary, the normal skew of wealth to the most productive, capable, persistent, and enterprising households has been badly thrown out of kilter by the capture of the Federal Reserve by Wall Street speculators.

In the interim, however, the chart below speaks for itself. By embracing Greenspan-style monetary central planning in lieu of gold standard sound money, the modern day GOP has paved the way for the emerging Mamdani socialist coup in the Democrat Party.

That is to say, the wealth disparities shown below did not exist with nearly this much skew as recently as 1987, when Alan Greenspan’s pro-inflation, pro-wealth effects regime became official policy at the Fed. Then again, the Fed’s balance sheet stood at $250 billion in Q2 1987 after 73 years of a moderately tame printing press, which footings then ballooned to nearly $9 trillion by the peak in Q1 2022.

Yes, flood the free market with $8.75 trillion of fiat credits in barely 25 years, and you will indeed get a rip-roaring financial asset inflation. And you will also get a rekindling of socialist economics, which should have been finally left for dead by 1984.

Let’s start with the axiomatic. Redistribution of wealth from rich to poor is none of the state’s business. Full stop. At the same time, however, it’s an equally grave sin for agencies of the state to artificially tilt the scales on behalf of the already rich. Yet that is unmistakably the consequence of Keynesian monetary policy as it has been practiced and amplified since the arrival of Alan Greenspan at the Fed in August 1987.

In this context, there is no reason to believe that the wealthy were getting shortchanged on the net worth front after the Morning in America boom of the mid-1980s. Yet as is evident in the graph below, the gap between the very rich and the bottom 50% of households has been relentlessly expanding since Greenspan bailed out Wall Street gamblers the first time after Black Monday in October 1987.

The net worth of the top 0.1% of households back then stood at $1.757 trillion, which was 2.4X the $718 billion net worth of the bottom 50% of US households. In unit terms, that amounted to an average net worth of $15,460 among the bottom 50% of households, which compared to $18.892 million for the top 0.1% of households.

Call this the status quo ante and there was no reason to find it objectionable. Mr. Market at work, as it were.

Fast forward to 2025, however, and the wealth distribution is far, far more skewed. The net worth of the top 0.1% or 135,000 ultra-wealthy US households now stood at $25.072 trillion, which compared to aggregated net worth of $4.266 trillion among the 67.4 million households in the bottom 50%.

That is to say, the gap had widened from 2.4X in 1989 to 5.9X by 2025. And this widening was even more dramatic when expressed in per household terms, where net worth now stood at $185.7 million each among the top 0.1% of households compared to $63,300 for the bottom 50%.

The truth is, there is absolutely no reason to believe that under a regime of sound money and honest financial markets that the gap between the tippy-top and bottom half of American households would have doubled during that interval. Not even remotely for the reasons we amplify below.

To the contrary, what we have is the Cantillon Effect: The inflationary emissions from the Eccles Building stick to the walls earlier and more completely on Wall Street and among financial asset holders before they eventually wend their way into the incomes and spending levels of the Main Street population.

There is no mystery, however, as to how the central banking branch of the state managed to double the wealth gap between the ultra-rich and the bottom 50% of US households in barely 37 years. Keynesian central banking has just a single policy instrument and it inherently makes the asset rich richer.

It can be succinctly described as systematic falsification of the price of debt or what economists are pleased to call “financial repression.” It is axiomatic, in fact, that when bond yields are artificially pushed lower, asset prices get jacked higher—even as leveraged speculation becomes even more rewarding as a matter of sheer arithmetic.

So what you have is a central bank-enabled double-whammy for the age-old carry trade: Through massive bond-buying, pegging of overnight money market rates, and open-mouth steering of price action on Wall Street, the Fed artificially boosts the asset side of the ledger—even as the carry cost of highly leveraged ownership of these appreciating assets falls increasingly below risk-based free market rates.

That is to say, the reason the net worth of the top 0.1% rose by 14.3X—from $1.757 trillion to $25.072 trillion—over a 36-year period in which the national income (GDP) rose by only 5.6X is this: Owing to a lot of help from their friends in the Eccles Building wealthy asset holders have been shooting fish in a barrel for the better part of three decades.

This has manifested itself, of course, in the relentless rise of PE multiples since the 1970s. Indeed, the S&P 500 traded at about 11X trailing GAAP earnings in the late 1970s, which multiple has climbed steadily on a rolling three-year trend basis to nearly 30X at present (dotted red least squares trend).

Then again, the logical direction of the trend line above would be the opposite—from the upper left to the lower right. That’s because the underlying performance trend of the US economy has sharply deteriorated over the past four decades.

Thus, the trend of the three-year rolling average of real GDP has been moving decisively counter to the upward trend of valuation multiples. From a trend rate of 3.5% per annum in the late 1970s the real GDP growth trend has marched downhill for 40 years, currently posting at barely 2.0% per annum.

To be sure, in shorter intervals the profits share of GDP can fluctuate and potentially trend higher. But over time the real economy has to expand in order for business activity and the profit offtake from it to rise, as well.

Alas, the valuation multiple trend above is just plain not compatible in economic terms with the steadily falling rate of US economic performance depicted below. Somebody had their big fat thumbs on the scale, and that was the debt-enabling money-printers at the nation’s central bank.

Yes, it is that simple. Like the case of the Wizard of Oz, the only thing behind the screens at the Eccles Building is the stimulation of debt, more debt, and still even more debt. And the reason remains the tattered Great Depression-era fallacy that times were hard because consumers and businesses suddenly lost their nerve and their minds, apparently, and refused to spend enough on consumer goods and capital goods to keep the macr0 economy on an expansionary path.

So economic policy-makers ever since, and one way or another through a variety of fiscal and monetary “stimulus” expedients, have sought to goose spending by fostering cheaper and more abundant debt than the free market would generate on its own steam.

This cardinal (Keynesian) error of modern economic policy has had a Brobdingnagian impact on financial markets and the Main Street economy alike.

That’s because the other key line on the graph also has been chugging relentlessly uphill—most especially after Nixon shit-canned sound gold-backed money at Camp David in August 1971. We are referring to the trend of the national leverage ratio, which is depicted by the least squares line (dotted red line) in the graph below. It could not be more dispositive.

From a historic ratio of below 1.5X national income in 1955, total public and private debt outstanding now sits at an aberrant and unprecedented 3.5X national income.

Those two turns of extra debt tell you everything you need to know about today’s massive central bank-fostered financial bubbles. At the historically stable and prosperity-compatible 1.5X ratio to national income, combined public and private debt outstanding today would total just $48 trillion.

As it happens, of course, that figure was actually $116 trillion at the end of Q1 2026. What we have, therefore, is an extra $70 trillion of debt freighting down the US economy at a level never before even imagined. In turn, this comprises the flood of mispriced debt that sent Wall Street into a relentless frenzy of leveraged speculation.

From endless basis trades to triple-leveraged ETFs and every manner of inherently leveraged options trading schemes, Wall Street has driven financial asset prices ever higher. But these pyramids of speculation and debt are not based on sustainable value-added and real economic output—they are the fetid fruit of the central bank printing presses.

Here’s the skunk on the woodpile, however. None of the massive buildup of leverage and $70 trillion of extra debt depicted above was necessary for prosperity. It made the wealthy unspeakably rich—perhaps symbolized by trillionaire Elon Musk—but it was built on the so-called “Greenspan wealth effect” doctrine, surely the greatest economic policy error of modern times.

And now it threatens the very basis of American democracy, as well. That’s because it is generating such egregious wealth disparities as to actually revive what had been the dead-as-a-doornail carcass of socialism at the turn of the century.

Using the 1955 Golden Era’s ratio of total public and private debt to national income (GDP) at 1.4X, here is the buildup of the current $70 trillion of excess debt now hanging like a financial sword of Damocles over the financial markets and US economy.

Indeed, this data makes clear that the main thing being cooked up behind the screen by the monetary wizards at the Eccles Building—especially since Greenspan’s arrival—was the false elixir of debt, more debt, and still even more debt. After all, during the 70 years after 1955 total US public and private debt outstanding rose by a staggering 190X, from $600 billion to $113.6 trillion.

And, yes, there was a fair amount of economic growth and an even more fulsome inflation of the price level during that seven-decade interval. But, still, the debt growth far outpaced both of these macr0 drivers, thereby causing the national leverage ratio—or ratio of total public and private debt to nominal GDP—to rise from 141% in 1955 to 370% at present.

In a word, the legacy of activist central banking since the mid-1960s has been the saddling of American free enterprise with what amounts to a rolling and perpetual national LBO. And like in all leveraged buyouts, it is the existing shareholders who get the loot, not the workers, businessmen, and consumers who subsequently labor under its crushing burden of debt.

Moreover, unlike standard LBOs where sponsors claim—and sometimes do—enhance returns by steady debt paydowns, the Fed’s national LBO has worked in only one direction: Namely, toward ever higher national leverage ratios and a progressively greater burden of excess debt, which we are here defining as leverage above the 140% of GDP historic standard.

The blue area of the graph below depicts the growing margin of debt in excess of the 140% of GDP standard as it stood in 1955. It makes clear as a bell that we are not talking about an oscillating cyclical trend, but a long-term path driven by the central bank printing presses that have generated a growing, debilitating wedge of debt on the US economy.

In fact, when your editor first arrived in Washington, DC as a youthful Capitol Hill staffer on the eve of Nixon’s folly at Camp David in August 1971, the excess debt wedge stood at a modest $163 billion and 15% of GDP. But by the time Greenspan took the helm at the Fed in 1987, the newly liberated proprietors of its printing presses had already expanded the excess debt wedge to $4.416 trillion and 95% of GDP.

Thereafter, of course, it was off to the races. Even before Greenspan went full retard after the dotcom crash, excess debt already stood at $16.2 trillion and 158% of GDP, but in successive turns at bat his successors and assigns—Bernanke, Yellen, and Powell—operated the printing presses on turbocharge for the next two decades, causing the excess debt wedge to balloon to nearly $49 trillion and 227% of GDP by 2019.

Despite Powell’s belated efforts to shrink the Fed’s elephantine balance sheet via a short spell of QT (quantitative tightening), there has been no respite from the excess debt tsunami. At the end of 2025, in fact, it stood at $113.7 trillion and has continued to grow by leaps and bounds and is likely to hit $120 trillion by year-end 2026.

Yet and yet. The proof that none of the chronic and systemic interest rate repression that fostered this debt explosion was necessary lies in the pudding of the historical economic performance statistics. Indeed, if we scroll back to the very low starting debt figures and national leverage numbers of 1955, what we find is that was one barnburner of a year economically. On a Y/Y basis, real GDP had boomed by 7.1%, while the CPI actually fell by 0.4% and real median family income surged by 6.6%.

In a word, 1955 was the epicenter of the Golden Era that Donald Trump only brags about today. The aforementioned $600 billion of total public and private debt, which represented 141% of GDP, stood right square upon the prior long-term average of about 150% after 1870.

Obviously, it took nothing like today’s mountainous debt levels and the associated inflationary bloating of both financial asset prices and goods and services to generate the prosperity of 1955—a time when the great President Dwight Eisenhower was also slashing real defense spending by 35%, seeking a rapprochement with the Soviet Union, and moving the Federal budget into balance for the first time since the 1920s.

None of these conditions were remotely akin to the spend/borrow/speculate and print modus operandi of present times. In fact, during the period between Q1 1952 and Q1 1966, constant dollar US output (as measured by real final sales of domestic product) rose by 4.0% per annum.

By contrast, during the years since Q4 2007, when the Fed went all-in on stimmies and money-printing, real final sales grew at just 1.96% per annum or by barely half the growth rate during the Golden Era of the 1950s and 1960s. Over a continuous 14-year period these growth rate differences make a huge cumulative difference.

As shown in the graph below, the US economy was actually 72% larger by Q1 1966 than it had been in Q1 1952. By contrast, under the growth rate which has prevailed since the Great Finance Crisis—and notwithstanding massive fiscal and monetary stimulus from Washington policy makers—it would have been only 30% larger.

We’d call that a smoking gun. The Fed and its shills on Wall Street and Washington alike always claim that a modest amount of inflation on Main Street and a goodly helping of asset inflation on Wall Street are the necessary price to obtain higher growth, job creation, and overall prosperity on Main Street.

It is not. Not in the slightest as we detail below.

In fact, there is no contest. The table below compares real growth, inflation, real median family income, and job growth for the two periods, and the sharp contrasts speak for themselves.

Finally, it needs be recalled that this 14-year Golden Era occurred immediately after the 1951 Treasury Accord, which ended WWII-style monetization of the public debt and the pegging of Treasury bond interest rates at artificially low levels. As a consequence, under the sound money leadership of William McChesney Martin, the Fed’s printing press was virtually idle until 1966, when LBJ forced the Fed Chairman to monetize his ill-conceived “guns and butter” policies for war in Southeast Asia and the so-called Great Society at home.

Over the course of 1951 thru Q2 1966, however, the Fed’s balance sheet had expanded by a micr0scopic 0.7% per year, and that’s in nominal terms.

In inflation-adjusted dollars it actually shrank by nearly 11% and dropped from 15% of GDP to just 7%.

By the lights of today’s Fed fanboys, of course, the American economy—left unattended and undernourished by the central bank printing presses as it was during this 14-year period—should have tumbled into severe economic disrepair and crisis.

It didn’t. American businesses, workers, consumers, savers, investors, inventors, and speculators pursuing their own best interest on the free market—coupled with relatively sound money—caused the American economy to actually boom and glow with noninflationary prosperity.

In a word, it showed its true stuff. No government “stimulus” and lickety-split debt growth was needed then, and it’s not needed now.

So the first step toward restoration of a True Golden Era is the opposite of the recipe of easy money, big deficits, high tariffs, and ceaseless Washington meddling in the process of investment, resource allocation, and growth on the free market.

Simply pass a law forbidding the Fed to own government debt or buy and sell any securities at all. In lieu of this mode of monetary central planning, instead, just restore passive Discount Window lending at a penalty spread above the free market rate of interest based on the presentation of sound commercial collateral by Member banks.

That’s all it would take to promote sustainable prosperity. And the proof is in the Golden Era pudding.

Undertake these reforms else we will see the rage grow and the long knives of wealth slayers drawn and used in ways no one wants. An economy this top-heavy with paper wealth – as the poor and middle class get destroyed with persistent inflation, slow growth, and unstable labor markets pervasive with dropouts – is not sustainable. It’s not capitalism but rather corruption by the printing press. History shows precisely where this leads, namely to some upheaval that is even worse for everyone. 

This essay is drawn from a 3-part essay on Stockman’s Corner 

The post The Money Printers Fueling Socialism’s Rise appeared first on Activist Post.

Occultism was prominent in the highest echelon of the Third Reich, and mysterious figures from the shadows played outsized roles in the future of Germany. Upper management within the Nazi S.S. was reserved for those enlightened in the dark arts, with Aleister Crowley and Helena Blavatsky heavily influencing those in positions of great power.

Expeditions were launched globally to explore places under Antarctica, mysterious locations in the Andes of Peru, and the entrance to the hidden kingdom of Shambala inside the hollow Earth in Tibet, all searching for confirmation of their superiority through the collection of ancient artifacts. What did they find in these magical places, and did the Nazis really lose the war?

Hypocrazy Audiobook: https://amzn.to/4aogwms

The Octopus of Global Control Audiobook: https://amzn.to/3xu0rMm

Website: www.Macroaggressions.io

Merch Store: https://macroaggressions.dashery.com/

C60 Power: https://go.shopc60.com/PBGRT/KMKS9/
Promo Code: MACRO

Chemical Free Body: https://chemicalfreebody.com/macro/
Promo Code: MACRO

Wise Wolf Gold & Silver @ (800) 426-1836: https://macroaggressions.gold/

LegalShield: www.DontGetPushedAround.com

Christian Yordanov’s Health Program: www.LiveLongerFormula.com/macro

Replace Your Mortgage: www.WipeOutYourMortgageNow.com

Augason Farms: https://augasonfarms.com/MACRO

Activist Post: www.ActivistPost.com

Matt Ehret: https://substack.com/@matthewehret

The post #665: Secrets of the Black Sun Rising | Matt Ehret appeared first on Activist Post.

If the video above does not play, please try on our social media channels

Bitchute / Odysee / Substack

Derrick Broze and Hakeem Anwar discuss the rapid expansion of AI data centers and the rising surveillance state. They introduce ReclaimFuture.com, a platform designed to help citizens map local data centers that threaten utility prices, water supplies, and digital privacy. The conversation highlights a growing movement of mass non-compliance against technologies like license plate readers and biometric tracking. The speakers argue that these infrastructure projects are part of a transnational technocracy that spans both Western and BRICS nations, requiring a unified, grassroots response. To combat this, they are organizing a national day of local activism on August 1st to encourage community-led resistance. They emphasize that achieving data privacy and preserving resources depends on people power and education rather than relying on global political shifts.

Reclaim Our Future https://reclaimfuture.com

AI Data Center Map https://aidatacentermap.org

The Conscious Resistance https://theconsciousresistance.com

Derrick Broze X https://x.com/DBrozeLiveFree

Derrick Broze Substack https://derrickbroze.substack.com

Take Back Our Tech https://takebackourtech.org

TBOT Substack https://tbot.substack.com

Above Phone https://abovephone.com/?above=tcrn

The post Reclaiming Our Future Against AI Data Centers (Derrick Broze & Hakeem Anwar on Geopolitics & Empire) appeared first on Activist Post.

When asked at a U.S. Senate hearing whether she thinks mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, CDC director nominee Dr. Erica Schwartz replied, “I do believe that mRNA technology is safe and effective.” Both the question and the answer show a serious lack of scientific understanding.

When asked at a U.S. Senate hearing whether she thinks mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director nominee Dr. Erica Schwartz replied, “I do believe that mRNA technology is safe and effective.”

Both the question and the answer show a serious lack of scientific understanding.

Here’s the scientifically accurate answer to the question: We don’t know the full safety profile of either of the two types of approved mRNA vaccines or the technology. First, It’s all too new. Second, we’re not even collecting the full data.

Read on for details.

According to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scientists and other experts in the field, comprehensive safety data isn’t known until a new drug (including vaccines) has been on the market and in widespread use for 7-12 years.

Even now, we aren’t getting full information on safety profiles because the data isn’t even being collected in the comprehensive manner required for accurate analysis.

The established scientific process requires that all illnesses after vaccination be meticulously recorded regardless of whether a patient or doctor thinks the illness is actually connected to the vaccine.

Most doctors are not following the process. Some misunderstand. Others are willfully ignoring. And no authority is ensuring they do their job.

Doctors typically aren’t even asking their ill patients whether they had an mRNA vaccine (for COVID-19 or RSV), which one(s), and when. So they aren’t collecting that crucial data.

Most people, including physicians, don’t understand that patients being treated for any illness are supposed to be queried.

This means, for example, someone who comes to the ER with a retinal detachment should be asked if he had a COVID-19 vaccine, which one, how many, and when, and then the data should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Same with someone who becomes sick with a rash, headaches, tendon rupture, stiff neck, depression or chest congestion. Everything.

Even when patients do tell a physician they think an illness might be vaccine-related, the physician frequently, improperly, determines on the front end that he doesn’t need to report the possible adverse event to the established database unless he thinks it’s connected to the vaccine. That’s not how the system works.

No doctor is qualified to make that determination about a new medicine. All illnesses are supposed to be recorded so that previously unrecognized adverse events can be unearthed.

Additionally, many doctors and patients don’t understand — and aren’t being told — that adverse events from vaccines and other medicine can arise months or years after the medicine is taken.

Further, they don’t understand that an adverse event can be related to a drug even if the patient did not initially become ill after taking the vaccine or other medicine.

And the blanket question itself, “Are mRNA vaccines safe and effective,” shows a lack of scientific understanding on the part of the questioner. It begs counter-questions: Safe for whom? Under what circumstances? Effective at what?

It’s as ridiculous as asking, “Is medicine safe and effective?” Depends on whether or not you’re allergic to it. Depends on whether you have predispositions for things that make you more susceptible to the side effects. Depends on whether its particular mechanisms work in your individual biology. These are individual calculations.

Even in the general picture, there aren’t blanket answers. We know mRNA COVID-19 vaccines failed woefully — proved ineffective — at a sliding scale of supposed goals: They don’t prevent infection. They don’t prevent spread.

They don’t prevent illness. There’s a debate over whether they prevent serious illness, which most people don’t get from COVID-19, and children almost never get.

Until we stop pretending that the blanket questions make sense, and that the answers are connected in any way to science, we will continue to have leaders who misinform or mislead.

So, from diabetes drugs that can cause fatal genital tears to acne medicine that can cause sexual dysfunction that never goes away, here are some notable examples of unexpected adverse events that were eventually linked to vaccines or other medications.

1. Sildenafil (Viagra) and blindness (non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy [NAION]/sudden vision loss).

Viagra treats erectile dysfunction by inhibiting PDE5 (phosphodiesterase type 5) to increase blood flow. Early marketing focused on cardiovascular risks but not eye issues. Hundreds of post-approval reports eventually linked it to sudden vision loss from NAION.

The adverse event was only recognized when enterprising physicians pressed the issue and published case reports, and I reported on them for CBS News. The FDA added warnings in 2005. Labels now advise stopping use and seeking care for sudden vision changes. Similar risks apply to the PDE5 inhibitor class.

2. Likewise, Viagra was eventually connected to hearing loss.

Reports emerged of sudden hearing decrease/loss (sometimes with tinnitus/dizziness) after use. Initially not linked, post-marketing data led to label updates advising immediate medical attention. Nobody initially guessed an erectile dysfunction drug could cause deafness and blindness!

3. Statins such as atorvastatin and simvastatin, and severe and potentially fatal muscle pain/weakness (myalgia, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis).

Statins are used to lower cholesterol to prevent heart disease/stroke. Early labels noted mild muscle issues, but the drugmakers initially denied severe cases (including rhabdomyolysis, which can cause kidney failure).

Independent doctors, lawsuits and my reporting for CBS News drew attention to this problem. Eventually, the drug makers added warnings, monitoring advice and dose adjustments.

4. Statins and cognitive effects (memory loss, confusion).

Some users reported “brain fog” or confusion, initially dismissed as unrelated. I reported on this, too, for CBS News. Eventually, FDA added reversible cognitive side effects to labels in 2012 based on reports.

5. Troglitazone (Rezulin) and severe liver failure.

This thiazolidinedione treated Type 2 diabetes. Only post-1997 use among millions revealed dozens of acute liver failure cases (deaths/transplants), originally denied by the drugmaker. Reporting by the Los Angeles Times and then by me at CBS News forced the issue. Eventually, the drug was withdrawn in 2000 after the FDA tied it to about 63 deaths. (Scientists say each recognized and reported death implies 1,000 to 100,000 more that are never reported.)

6. SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) inhibitors such as canagliflozin/Invokana, dapagliflozin/Farxiga, empagliflozin and potentially fatal Fournier’s gangrene (necrotizing fasciitis of perineum/genitalia).

These diabetes drugs lower blood sugar via urinary glucose excretion. Believe it own ot, they can cause life-threatening flesh-eating infections in the genital/perineal area. FDA issued a warning in 2018. The labels now carry strong alerts.

7. mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) and myocarditis/pericarditis heart issues.

As you know, these vaccines were found to cause heart inflammation, mostly in young men after the second dose. This was initially unexpected.

8. COVID-19 vaccines and menstrual irregularities.

Many women reported changes such as heavier bleeding and cycle shifts, but were largely called conspiracy theorists. This adverse event like so many others linked to COVID-19 vaccines, weren’t identified — at least they weren’t reported — after initial studies.

9. COVID-19 vaccines and eye issues. Even without persistent data gathering, there have been enough reports of eye inflammation and retinal problems to raise concern over a possible link.

10. Thalidomide and severe birth defects.

Once marketed as a sedative and morning sickness aid in the 1950s-60s, it turned out to cause more than 10,000 cases of babies born with shortened or absent limbs and other defects.

11. Isotretinoin (Accutane) for acne and persistent sexual dysfunction.

Recent FDA updates added erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, vaginal dryness and lubrication issues that may persist even when people stop taking the drug.

12. A similar effect was initially denied but later found with SSRI antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. They can cause persistent sexual dysfunction.

13. Cisapride (Propulsid) for indigestion and cardiac arrhythmias/QT prolongation. It was withdrawn after heart rhythm deaths. I reported for CBS News on the cover-up of a baby death in a fraudulent Propulsid study.

14. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) and cardiovascular events. Nobody guessed a pain medicine and arthritis drug would cause heart attacks and strokes. All concerned initially denied the signals, but the medicine was eventually removed from the market for this reason.

15. Fenfluramine/phentermine (Fen-Phen) weight-loss drug and heart damage. This is another drug that caused unpredicted heart problems and was eventually taken off the market after the FDA had approved it as “safe and effective.”

16. Certain fluoroquinolones and tendon rupture/peripheral neuropathy. Who would have guessed antibiotics could cause a tendon rupture or nerve damage? Eventually, all agreed that fluoroquinolones can do this, and a serious “black box” warning was added to the label.

17. Antipsychotics and tardive dyskinesia. Drugs meant to control psychotic tendencies can actually cause serious movement disorders, which nobody anticipated initially.

18. What about when a cancer treatment causes cancer? Tamoxifen for breast cancer can cause uterine cancer. Nobody predicted that. The warning was later added to the labels.

19. Ketamine for pain and anesthesia and bladder damage. This side effect only emerged when there was greatly expanded psychiatric use of the medicine.

20. Lots of medicines turn out to cause unexpected bone loss, including medicine that’s prescribed to protect bones! They include bisphosphonates like Fosamax or alendronate, Actonel, Boniva and Reclast. They are commonly prescribed to treat and prevent osteoporosis by slowing bone breakdown.

However, after lots of use, scientists learned they can actually cause serious bone problems, including thigh bone fractures, osteonecrosis of the jaw (dead jawbone) and delayed bone healing. FDA eventually added warnings and updated the labels.

Other drugs eventually linked to bone loss and fracture risk include: corticosteroids like prednisone for inflammation, asthma, autoimmune diseases and allergies; acid reflux drugs (like omeprazole/Prilosec or esomeprazole/Nexium); aromatase inhibitors (like anastrozole/Arimidex) for breast cancer; and the injectable birth control shot Depo-Provera.

Originally published on Sharyl’s Substack page.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

The post Trump’s Nominee for CDC Director Calls mRNA Technology ‘Safe and Effective’ appeared first on Activist Post.

Russia’s parliament passed its first comprehensive crypto law, creating a state-regulated framework for exchanges and investors.

Russia’s State Duma passed a law on Tuesday that regulates the circulation of crypto and digital rights for the first time, a framework that sets rules for crypto exchanges, digital depositories, and investors while it opens a state-supervised channel for cross-border trade.

Lawmakers cleared bill No. 1194918-8, “On Digital Currency and Digital Rights,” in its second and third readings, the final stage in the chamber, according to semi-official Russian news agency Tass. 

The measure heads to the Federation Council and to President Vladimir Putin for a signature, a process expected to take two more weeks before the law takes effect. It caps a sweeping regulatory push that has moved through parliament across the year.

Legalization or taxation?

The law does not turn bitcoin into money a Russian can spend at the store. The ruble stays the sole lawful currency for goods and services inside Russia, the ban on crypto payments holds, and a bar on advertising that promotes such use holds with it. 

What the law does is grant crypto a legal identity and a set of gates. It recognizes digital assets as property, licenses the firms that handle them, lets investors buy within set limits, and clears crypto for use in foreign trade. 

In plain terms, Russia is not freeing crypto for daily life; it is bringing crypto inside the state’s fence, where the government can watch it, tax it, and steer it toward the uses it wants.

Anatoly Aksakov, chairman of the Duma Committee on Financial Markets, said the bill was “aimed at creating legal conditions for the functioning of cryptocurrencies in our country,” and that lawmakers had “maximally” weighed industry feedback. 

From September 1, 2026, the Bank of Russia will license five categories of participant — exchanges, brokers, management companies, depositories, and exchangers — the spine of the new market.

Firms in a special registry may run exchange activity, with a grace period to July 1, 2027, before that requirement takes hold.  Such firms must carry minimum capital of 15 million rubles, some $190,000, and must join a self-regulatory body. 

The law defines exchange activity as the systematic purchase and sale of cryptocurrency for one’s own account outside organized trading, with “systematic” set at two or more deals in a month above 3.5 million rubles.

A channel for sanctioned trade

The commercial heart of the law sits in the cross-border carve-out. The framework legalizes what gray-market networks did in the shadows: settlement of foreign trade in crypto, outside the dollar-and-euro banking system that Western sanctions target. It hands the practice the Bank of Russia’s stamp. 

The same function ran through venues such as Garantex, which U.S. law enforcement shut down in March 2025, and through the ruble-pegged A7A5 stablecoin, a token that has moved tens of billions in sanctions-linked flows and that the U.K. has named in a sanctions round. 

Russia’s crypto pivot

Moscow has pitched crypto trade as a route around sanctions for years; the new law builds it into formal infrastructure.

The turn is a sharp one. In January 2022, weeks before the invasion of Ukraine, the Bank of Russia proposed an outright ban on crypto transactions and mining, and cast digital assets as a threat to financial stability. 

That stance held for as long as it took Western governments to cut Russian banks from SWIFT, a move that made trade in dollars and euros a harder task. Four years of infighting followed between a finance ministry that wanted crypto legal and a central bank that wanted it banned. 

Putin signed an experimental law in August 2024 that permitted mining and international crypto payments; Tuesday’s bill is the permanent frame that replaces the trial.

The law’s rules for investors and coins

For investors, the law splits the market in two. Non-qualified retail buyers may purchase up to 300,000 rubles of cryptocurrency, near $3,800, through a single licensed intermediary each year, and may send up to 100,000 rubles abroad. 

Qualified investors face higher ceilings — up to 3 million rubles for purchases and 1 million rubles for foreign transfers. Both groups must pass a risk-awareness test, and qualified status can rest in part on prior crypto experience. Tax treatment is set to track the rules for securities, with rates to firm up as implementing regulations arrive. The tiered design follows earlier steps that opened bitcoin access to retail buyers.

The law leans on monitoring rather than disclosure of every wallet. Drafters dropped an earlier plan to require holders to reveal individual wallet addresses; reporting will center on transaction volumes and account balances.

Large transfers to foreign or third-party accounts face a 48-hour hold, a window for authorities to review funds before they clear. 

Assets that clear strict thresholds may trade on organized venues — an average market cap above 5 trillion rubles over two years and average daily volume above 1 trillion rubles — limits expected to confine early trading to bitcoin and ether, with solana a possible third. Privacy coins that hide transaction data stay barred.

The main provisions take effect on September 1, 2026, with a transition period for existing operators that runs to March 1, 2027.

The passage marks another step in a run of Russian crypto moves, from a bid to make digital assets part of “everyday finance” to a crackdown on unregistered mining that carries the threat of forced labor. 

The post Russia Passes Landmark Crypto Law, Setting State-Run Rails for Sanctioned Trade appeared first on Activist Post.

We are still drifting along in this “short-term pain for long-term gain” narrative arc. 

Remember when they told us it would just be a few days, maybe a few weeks? Well, we’re cruising past month five now, and the script is getting so loud it’s a miracle anyone is still falling for it.

Just look at the timing. Donald Trump goes on television declaring that the US is officially taking over the Strait of Hormuz – crowning himself the “guardian of the strait.” Literally minutes later, breaking footage drops of the bulk carrier Lonnie splitting in two and sinking after a sudden hull fracture. You can’t make this stuff up; it plays out like pure, unadulterated 3D video game programming.

Immediately, right on cue, the media echo chamber lights up. Mainstream narrative enforcers start blasting out posts about how Trump has supposedly “unleashed the full might of the US military on Iran,” claiming a complete naval blockade and massive airstrikes. They post dramatic updates about the US Navy obliterating an “Iranian vessel advancing toward them.” Except, if you actually look at the footage, it’s clearly a civilian cargo ship or an oil tanker. Then, twenty minutes later, the flip side of the script kicks in: “Breaking: First ship of the night defies orders; Iranian military blows up a vessel in the Strait.”

Are you starting to get it yet? Both sides are blowing up ships in the exact same bottleneck, ensuring absolutely nothing gets through. It’s the systematic execution of Agenda 2030 right in front of your face. They are choking global supply lines, shelling fuel tanks in Jebel Ali port, and targeting water desalination plants in Kuwait.

While the theater plays out, the financial handlers are cleaning up. I began buying leveraged oil again when it was sitting around $72; by the time I checked the charts today, it was already flying around $87. We broke down this exact strategy in the July issue of The Dollar Vigilante newsletter, which you can check out if you’re trying to build capital while they collapse the board.

But the real insider game is happening at the top. It has now been reported that Trump Media is planning to sell faster, millisecond-level access to Truth Social posts starting August 1st. Think about the absolute insanity of this: high-frequency trading firms and hedge funds will literally pay millions to get a fraction-of-a-second head start on a post. This comes right on the heels of reports that insider networks cleared an estimated $9 billion in profits from market manipulation by trading directly on leaked negotiation data. They can tank or spike global oil prices with a single post, buy the dip, and sell it back to the public a millisecond later before the rest of the world even hits refresh.

When the media asks Trump if he’s worried about these operations turning a profit, he openly brags about it on camera: “The defense companies are doing great. It’s jobs. It’s all jobs.” He doesn’t care, and his handlers don’t care. They are making billions off the volatility while using the conflict as a convenient cover to induce regional crises by striking food infrastructure and medical centers.

How am I one of the only people who sees this? Sometimes I walk out here in nature with my dogs, looking at the dragonflies, and I genuinely wonder if there is anyone else actually out there, or if this is just my own personal Truman Show.

People remain completely brainwashed by the illusion of political choice. They line up by the millions to vote, totally oblivious to basic mathematics… your single vote among 100 million does not alter the code of the simulation. It’s all staged.

Case in point: look at the massive “bombshell” announcement Trump just delivered from the Oval Office. The online hype squads were screaming about a historic address, but what was it? A half-hour speech about China allegedly acquiring 220 million US voter files back during the 2020 cycle. Who cares? All of that data is already completely owned and parsed by Palantir, the CIA, and international intelligence agencies anyway. It is a textbook redirection tactic to keep people from noticing that the US military infrastructure in the Middle East is being intentionally dismantled. US bases in Qatar and Jordan are being leveled by missile strikes because the controlled demolition of the American Empire is required to usher in the new technocracy.

If you want to know who actually holds the leash, don’t look at the teleprompter, look at the behavior. Every single president since JFK has lined up to pay homage at the Western Wall. The system gatekeepers love to talk about putting “America First” and ending foreign aid, yet when the bills hit the floor, almost every single politician lines up to sign away billions of taxpayer dollars.

When independent voices like Thomas Massie try to vote against sending domestic capital overseas, the entire political machine moves heaven and earth to replace them. And, the moment an establishment fixture like Lindsey Graham passes away, do they hold a real election? Of course not. They immediately swear his sister into office, who promptly joins the rest of the Senate to vote in favor of integrating the US military command directly with foreign defense forces. Even the figures who built their entire brands on “ending the Fed” or questioning the state eventually fall right back into line, posing for the exact same photo-ops.

It is a monolithic system. They build the surveillance state, fund the tracking cameras, manipulate the energy markets, and use media programming to keep the populace cheering for their own economic lockdown. The only way through the next few years is to stop giving your energy to the television, focus entirely on your physical health, get your capital into sovereign assets outside their banking grid, and enjoy the walk.

Meanwhile, the bread and circuses continue right on schedule… and surprise, surprise, Argentina won their match just like I said they would. Let’s be real, the entire tournament plays out like a poorly coded simulation. We’re supposed to believe it’s all organic, but when you look at the field, the script is glaring. Any time an opposing team gets a fingernail offside against Argentina, the goals get wiped off the board instantly. Just ask Iran. But when Argentina’s game-winning goal against England is clearly offside? Absolute silence from the broadcasting booth. The ref doesn’t even bother to check the VAR, and it receives zero mention on your daily television programming, because that’s just the way it goes.

Everyone in Israhell seemed absolutely thrilled about it. Why are so many Israelis waving the Argentinian flag this World Cup? Because now we’re looking at Argentina versus Spain for the finals… essentially an Israel versus Palestine proxy match played out in the stadium.

If you still think this reality isn’t pre-programmed, look at the premier narrative arc they’ve been cooking up for the final on Sunday in New York City. Supposedly, 19 years ago, some random family in Spain won a raffle. The grand prize? They got to take photos of their newborn baby being bathed by none other than a young Lionel Messi. Think about the logistics of that for a second. What kind of setup is that?

Fast forward to today: that exact same baby grows up to become Lamine Yamal – Spain’s top prodigy, heralded by the media as “the next Messi.” Now, they just happen to be facing each other in the World Cup Finals. The odds of a raffle baby growing up to face the exact same superstar in a global championship game nearly two decades later are astronomical. To make it even more obvious, Adidas dropped a promo image featuring the “goat” and the “kid” two years ahead of schedule. If you know what the goat represents in occult symbolism, you know exactly what time it is. It’s all giving major industry vibes, much like those old photos of Justin Bieber with a baby. The elite love their symbols, their rituals, and their pre-planned narratives.

Speaking of the global apparatus, let’s talk about where people are burning their money trying to predict these scripted events. A lot of people have been flocking to Polymarket lately because it seemingly blew up out of nowhere. Whenever a platform experiences that kind of meteoric rise, it’s because the system is pushing it. If you look into the actual history of the platform, the puzzle pieces click together perfectly.

Polymarket is essentially a CIA/Mossad psyop. If you’ve read the work of Whitney Webb and Mark Goodwin, you know the history. This isn’t some organic betting site; it’s the spiritual successor to the DARPA Policy Analysis Market (PAM) project from 2003. That project, led by Admiral John Poindexter, was designed to create a “market” for political developments and terror attacks. It’s social engineering masquerading as a casino.

The connections are all there if you bother to look and I lay out how the puzzle fits together in today’s video – from the founder, Shane Coplan, who links back to Robin Hanson, the DARPA architect, to Token Union’s close partnership and integration with Bancorp, a decentralized finance protocol enabling on chain trading and liquidity created by Guy and Galia Bernardzi, the nephew and niece of none other than longtime and current Israeli Prime Murderer Benjamin Netanyahu. 

You knew that this is where the story was eventually going to end up. Additionally, Galia Benazi, immediately prior to creating Bancorp, had been a partner at Peter Thiel’s Founders Club, where she helped lead the firm’s investments in Israel. And get this next part. Sitting right next to Netanyahu’s nephew and niece on Copeland’s advisory board was a man named Lou Kerner, a prominent venture capitalist heavily embedded in the Israeli tech ecosystem. A startup scene that former Mossad Directors have openly stated is heavily populated by intelligence veterans running front companies for state operations. 

Just a string of coincidences, right? 

Right. 

Finally, you follow the money to Peter Thiel. Thiel isn’t just a venture capitalist; he’s a primary architect of the surveillance state. Through Palantir, Thiel has built a digital panopticon. Every “data breach” you hear about on the news (like the theft of voter files) is a distraction. That data is already owned and processed by Palantir, the CIA, and Mossad. They don’t need to steal your data; they already have the keys to your digital soul… and your body.

Here’s another new twist: most of Canada is on fire again, which is likely the work of the warfare apparatus, because that’s usually how it goes. It is creating brutal air quality throughout Canada and into the northeastern US, including the New York and New Jersey areas where the final match will be played on Sunday. Right now, you can barely see ten feet ahead of you in New York City.

Interestingly, an independent test of the air revealed a whole bunch of toxins. There are things you would expect from a fire, but also things you might not expect at all, like lead and graphene oxide. Remember what I said about them potentially doing something at this World Cup? I don’t know if this is it, but are they planning to use the hazy cover to expose everyone at the game to these compounds as part of a ritual?

It’s clearly making people sick. Even mainstream television programming has noted a sudden spike in overnight respiratory and GI distress outbreaks corresponding with the heavy wildfire smoke.

At the same time, I’ve heard a ton of people talking about peptides recently. It made me wonder who actually manufactures these compounds, because I refuse to take anything from big pharma giants like Pfizer or AstraZeneca. Apparently, these massive conglomerates are the ones producing a large portion of the market’s peptides. And, the daddy of peptides of course… Kill Gates. 

This corporate crossover shouldn’t be surprising. Look back at the 2020 cycle when everyone was excited that Trump was going to bring in RFK Jr. to hold figures accountable. Instead, the political fixtures all still attend the same circles. Trump even nominated a new CDC director, Erica Schwartz, who has openly supported mRNA platforms and corporate mandates in her past work. If you pay attention to the details, the symbolism worn by these establishment figures tells you everything you need to know about their allegiance to control and technology.

A Strategy for Self-Reliance

Fortunately, you can protect yourself from these environmental and systemic pressures by focusing on tangible, self-reliant protocols:

TZLA plasma energy healing: Clean your blood from the nanotech clotting.

Clean Sourcing: Transition away from packaged goods and massive supermarket chains. Find local farmers, buy whole foods, and grow whatever you can on your own land.

Deep Detoxification: Utilizing regular infrared saunas is an efficient way to force heavy metals and environmental toxins out through sweat.

Coffee Enemas and Liver Support: Keep your body’s natural filtration systems running optimally with clean, organic protocols to help flush out daily environmental stressors.

Critical Evaluation: Be incredibly careful with trendy health fads, ensuring you know exactly where your supplements are manufactured and sourced.

The global landscape is shifting rapidly, and the narratives on television are only going to get stranger as the year winds down. The best defense is maintaining a self-reliant lifestyle, keeping your body operating at peak performance, and recognizing the theater for exactly what it is.

Watch on:
Vigilante.tv | Odysee | Rumble | Bitchute | Brighteon | Telegram | X/Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe to the TDV podcast: Amazon Music | RSS | More

The post “Guardian of the Strait”, World Cup Scripts, Millisecond Trades, and the Controlled Sinking of Global Shipping appeared first on Activist Post.

While politicians and central bankers scramble to deploy total financial control grid mechanisms, a parallel network of uncompromised, privacy-first infrastructure is quietly rendering their coercion obsolete.

The global surveillance state is expanding at a terrifying pace, but beneath the surface of their algorithmic control grid, a quiet mutiny is brewing. For years, the narrative has been intentionally bleak—central bank digital currencies looming on the horizon, cash being systematically criminalized, and every transaction scrutinized by unease-inducing government bureaucracies. Yet, the counter-surveillance movement is experiencing an unprecedented surge of momentum, arming peaceful individuals with the technological weaponry needed to make state coercion completely obsolete. We are not just resisting; we are out-building them, creating a parallel economy that operates entirely outside the boundaries of their permission-based systems.

The urgency of this shift becomes glaringly obvious when you look at how the establishment has poisoned the current crypto landscape. The primary battleground for everyday people seeking stability has been stablecoins, assets marketed as decentralized escape hatches but built as weaponized corporate honeypots. According to the latest figures, a staggering 9,649 addresses have been frozen, locking up over $4.53 billion in assets without a single judicial warrant. The exponential surge in these bans since October 2017 proves that centralized stablecoins are merely an extension of the legacy banking system, allowing the state to freeze your life savings with a keystroke if you express the wrong political opinion.

The solution to this vulnerability is already operational within the Zano privacy ecosystem through fUSD, a confidential asset engineered specifically to be completely immune to being frozen. Because it lacks a central authority or an intentional corporate backdoor, no bureaucrat can blacklist a user’s funds or halt a transaction. It functions as true digital cash, honoring the non-aggression principle by ensuring that your wealth cannot be stolen or manipulated by third parties.

Beyond protecting static wealth, the movement is actively tackling the structural vulnerabilities of blockchain networks themselves. Proof of Work mining, while foundational, has inadvertently created a centralized dependency on the industrial energy grid. Miners are perpetually forced to liquidate their block rewards just to cover massive monthly utility bills, creating a continuous source of downward market pressure. Zano is systematically eliminating this structural weakness by transitioning to Zenith, a pure Proof of Stake consensus mechanism built on the privacy architecture of Zarcanum.

When Zenith goes live on the mainnet, it will entirely dismantle the necessity for industrial mining and the forced selling that accompanies it. Zenith obliterates the current dynamic by completely axing the computational arms race in favor of pure Proof of Stake. Network security becomes mathematically anchored by the participants who actually hold the asset, dropping energy consumption to near zero. This eliminates the structural necessity to liquidate roughly 262,800 ZANO annually just to pay the electric company, keeping the value secured within the privacy ecosystem.

What’s more, Zenith keeps staking balances and histories completely confidential. Impressively, it also simultaneously slashes block times to 15 seconds, delivering secure confirmations in under a minute and a half without sacrificing security.

As authoritarian regulators attempt to enforce a financial quarantine by forcing centralized exchanges to delist privacy-centric assets, the counter-surveillance movement is deploying infrastructure designed to bypass these choke points entirely. Zano’s upcoming Hard Fork 6 introduces Gateway Addresses, an account-based address type specifically designed to let decentralized exchanges and bridges integrate seamlessly without the heavy engineering friction that previously blocked them. This milestone enables the launch of Bridgeless, a completely non-custodial mechanism allowing native ZANO to move to chains like Ethereum, Solana, and TON without relying on a centralized intermediary or creating a single point of failure.

But interacting with decentralized finance on transparent chains like Ethereum still exposes your financial history to the world. Every swap, loan, and yield strategy is broadcasted to chain analysis firms and three-letter agencies. Zano’s upcoming Execution Layer dismantles this surveillance apparatus by bringing an EVM sidechain directly into their privacy ecosystem. Standard Solidity contracts will run unmodified, meaning developers can launch lending markets and automated market makers using bridged ZANO for gas, shielding decentralized finance from the prying eyes of the State.

In other words, standard smart contract platforms act like a public glass bank where any government agent can watch exactly how you invest, borrow, or trade your money. Zano’s Execution Layer pulls a heavy curtain over that glass bank. It allows developers to build the exact same popular financial tools—like lending platforms or automated trading pools—but keeps all the details completely hidden from public view, using ZANO to fuel the system privately.

This war for individual sovereignty extends far beyond the financial ledger and into the digital spaces where we communicate. Public forums and crypto communities are heavily targeted by state-sponsored actors, bots, and sophisticated phishing campaigns engineered to erode trust and derail voluntary organization. To neutralize this psychological warfare, the ecosystem has launched the official Zano Forum, utilizing a secure on-chain alias verification system. Members can definitively prove their authenticity with a verified badge tied directly to their blockchain identity without revealing a single shred of real-world personal data. 

The state relies entirely on coercion, deception, and the weaponization of financial architecture to maintain control, but through the deliberate deployment of uncompromised, privacy-first technology, the tools to opt out completely are officially in our hands.

There are two paths you can take: stay on the same path and march off a cliff into a total surveillance and control grid, or choose freedom and privacy. Which will it be?

The post Out-Building the Control Grid: How Privacy Infrastructure Is Neutralizing the State appeared first on Activist Post.

For centuries, mainstream archaeologists have dismissed the idea that an advanced civilization existed long before modern times.

Now, an independent researcher claims he has uncovered ‘paradigm-shifting evidence of a lost civilization’ that hid a sophisticated code through geometry, symbolism, and monument design across the globe to preserve its knowledge ahead of catastrophic events.

Matthew LaCroix told Daily Mail the discovery, sparked by a recent find in Egypt, links symbols across continents and dates back 38,000 to 40,000 years.

According to LaCroix, this civilization tracked cosmic cycles, anticipated global disasters, and embedded teachings about human origins, the structure of the universe, and divine existence into monuments and sacred sites.

His investigation began after identifying recurring giant T-shapes, three-level indents, and step pyramids carved into ancient stones worldwide.

‘These specific symbols that are built in different size proportions, and the symbols are found in ancient stones around the world, are not supposed to exist; no cultures are supposed to have any cross-platform,’ LaCroix explained.

The symbols appear in locations ranging from Turkey’s Van region to South America and Cambodia.

According to LaCroix, the origin of this global system lies in eastern Turkey’s Lake Van region at a site known as Ionis.

He described it as the earliest source of the civilization’s symbols, architecture, and teachings, dating it to around 40,000 years old. He argues it preserves the original blueprint later carried to places such as Giza and Tiwanaku.

Recurring motifs, giant T-shapes, step pyramids, inverted pyramids, lions, and sacred geometry, appear at Ionis in their most concentrated form before repeating at distant sites worldwide, LaCroix added.

Nearby, the site of Kefkalesi provides one of the clearest examples of these symbols in stone.

The four-foot-by-four-foot basalt carving, known as the Kefkalesi relief, contains complex iconography that mirrors the symbols found at Ionis, Giza, and South American sites.

‘This relief became one of the most important artifacts for my research,’ LaCroix explained. ‘It connects Egypt back to this region and lets us back-engineer the global pattern.’

He pointed out repeating motifs: ‘Here are the T-shapes, repeating over and over. Here’s your step pyramid with three doors and the lion right here. These same elements appear repeatedly across sites worldwide.’

Regarding the lion, he added, ‘The lion is a guardian, and its placement helps explain the structure of the code.’

LaCroix said the relief solidified his interpretation of the symbols and accelerated his analysis of similar structures at the Sphinx Temple in Egypt.

Mainstream archaeologists, however, date known Lake Van sites to the Urartian period thousands of years ago and say there is no evidence supporting a pre-Ice Age global civilization, and no peer-reviewed research currently supports LaCroix’s proposed dating.

Read More: Mysterious symbols spanning the globe hint at a lost civilization 38,000 years ago

The post Mysterious symbols spanning the globe hint at a lost civilization 38,000 years ago appeared first on Activist Post.

For generations, the American supermarket symbolized abundance. Endless aisles filled with fresh produce, dairy, meat, and household essentials reflected not only the country’s productive capacity but also the confidence that ordinary families could afford to fill their shopping carts without questioning every purchase. Today, that image is beginning to fracture. Across the United States, an unsettling behavioral shift is taking place inside grocery stores. Consumers are pausing longer before reaching for familiar products, comparing prices with unprecedented scrutiny, abandoning name brands for cheaper alternatives, and, perhaps most disturbingly, placing food back on the shelves before reaching the checkout. These silent decisions rarely appear in economic headlines, yet they may reveal more about the nation’s financial condition than any quarterly GDP report or inflation statistic.

Millions ignore FEMA alerts every year, believing the real danger begins only after the warning appears.

Emergency officials know the timeline is very different—and the hidden risks often emerge long before the public is notified.

Watch the short video below to discover what happens behind the scenes before the next emergency alert reaches your phone.

The contradiction defining the current American economy is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore. Official reports suggest that inflation has moderated compared to the historic peaks experienced after the pandemic, unemployment remains relatively low, and consumer spending continues to support economic growth. Yet beneath these encouraging indicators lies an uncomfortable reality: millions of households no longer measure financial security by whether they have employment, but by whether they can comfortably afford dinner at the end of the week. Economic resilience loses much of its meaning when full-time employment no longer guarantees access to necessities that were once considered ordinary.

This transformation represents far more than a temporary consequence of inflation. It reflects the cumulative erosion of purchasing power that has occurred over several years. Prices rarely return to previous levels after inflation slows; instead, they stabilize at significantly higher levels while wages struggle to keep pace. As a result, families experience a permanent reduction in living standards even when economic reports celebrate improving inflation figures. The distinction between declining inflation and declining prices is frequently misunderstood, allowing optimistic narratives to overshadow the daily financial pressures confronting ordinary consumers.

Perhaps nowhere is this disconnect more visible than inside the grocery store. Food occupies a unique position within household budgets because it cannot be postponed indefinitely. Consumers may delay purchasing a new vehicle, cancel vacations, or postpone home renovations, but eating remains unavoidable. When families begin reducing the quantity or quality of food they purchase, economists should recognize this not as a routine adjustment but as evidence of financial distress. Grocery shopping has quietly become one of the most revealing indicators of household confidence because it reflects decisions that cannot easily be manipulated by optimism or political messaging.

According to CNBC, major food manufacturers including PepsiCo, General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Campbell’s, and Conagra have increasingly relied on aggressive discounts, promotional campaigns, and price reductions after consumers significantly reduced grocery spending. Rather than reflecting stronger competition, these pricing strategies reveal weakening demand among households increasingly unwilling—or unable—to absorb years of cumulative food inflation. Even large multinational corporations are acknowledging that consumers have fundamentally changed their purchasing habits after years of rising living costs.

The psychological consequences of this transformation are equally significant. Shopping, once a routine weekly activity, has evolved into an exercise in financial calculation. Every item placed into a shopping cart represents a trade-off against another essential expense. Parents compare unit prices with mathematical precision, elderly consumers sacrifice nutritional diversity for affordability, and young professionals increasingly discover that stable employment no longer guarantees financial comfort. The supermarket has become less a marketplace and more a battlefield where every purchasing decision reflects broader economic anxieties.

One of the most alarming developments accompanying this shift is the growing dependence on consumer credit for basic survival. Credit cards were originally designed to finance convenience and discretionary purchases, yet they are increasingly being used to purchase groceries, fuel, prescription medications, and other essential items. When households finance food with revolving debt carrying interest rates exceeding twenty percent, the financial burden extends well beyond the initial purchase. Every loaf of bread, gallon of milk, or package of vegetables purchased on credit becomes progressively more expensive as interest accumulates month after month. What appears to be temporary financial flexibility often evolves into long-term economic entrapment.

The expansion of household debt reflects a broader structural imbalance within the American economy. Total household liabilities have climbed to unprecedented levels while serious credit card delinquencies continue increasing, particularly among younger borrowers who entered adulthood during periods of elevated inflation, expensive housing markets, and rising borrowing costs. These trends suggest that financial stress is no longer confined to traditionally vulnerable populations but increasingly affects middle-income households that historically provided the backbone of consumer spending. Rising debt is not simply evidence of confidence; in many cases, it represents the growing inability to finance ordinary living expenses through earned income alone.

Housing costs further amplify this pressure. Rent and mortgage payments continue consuming historically large portions of household income across many metropolitan regions. Simultaneously, insurance premiums have increased substantially, utility bills remain elevated due to energy costs, healthcare expenditures continue expanding faster than wage growth, and transportation expenses place additional strain on family budgets. Individually, each category appears manageable. Collectively, however, they leave increasingly little financial capacity for groceries, forcing households to make choices that previous generations would have considered unimaginable.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), food prices are expected to remain under upward pressure throughout 2026 despite slower overall inflation. Government forecasts indicate continued increases for grocery purchases made at home, while restaurant prices are expected to rise even faster. Several categories remain particularly vulnerable, including fresh vegetables, sugar, sweets, nonalcoholic beverages, and beef, where structural supply constraints continue limiting production. These forecasts suggest that temporary promotions offered by retailers are unlikely to reverse the broader trajectory of rising food costs. More information is available through the USDA Food Price Outlook: USDA Food Price Outlook.

The consequences extend beyond individual households into broader economic behavior. Consumers increasingly prioritize discount retailers, private-label brands, warehouse clubs, and promotional events while reducing impulse purchases and premium products. On the surface, retail sales may continue expanding modestly, but the composition of that spending has fundamentally changed. Growth driven primarily by discount hunting does not indicate rising confidence. Instead, it reflects an economy in which consumers have adapted to permanent financial constraints rather than temporary economic uncertainty.

History demonstrates that profound economic deterioration rarely begins with dramatic financial collapses. Instead, it emerges gradually through countless invisible adjustments made inside ordinary households. Families postpone replacing worn-out clothing. Medical appointments are delayed. Fresh produce is substituted with processed alternatives. Portions become smaller. Vacations disappear. Eventually, these incremental sacrifices accumulate into measurable declines in quality of life. By the time macroeconomic indicators fully capture these changes, the underlying deterioration has often been underway for years.

The grocery cart therefore serves as a uniquely honest economic instrument. Governments can revise employment statistics, central banks can influence interest rates, and politicians can selectively emphasize favorable indicators. Consumers, however, cannot negotiate with the prices displayed on supermarket shelves. Every abandoned purchase reflects a direct confrontation between household income and the cost of survival. Unlike financial markets driven by expectations, grocery purchases reveal present reality without interpretation.

Perhaps the darkest implication of this evolving crisis lies in its normalization. As households gradually adapt to reduced purchasing power, financial hardship begins to resemble ordinary life. Children grow accustomed to fewer choices at dinner. Parents quietly absorb additional debt without discussing it. Entire communities adjust expectations downward while public debate focuses primarily on whether inflation has technically slowed rather than whether living standards have actually improved. Economic deterioration rarely announces itself dramatically; it often advances through quiet acceptance.

America’s grocery stores have become more than places to purchase food. They have evolved into mirrors reflecting the nation’s underlying economic condition. Every product returned to the shelf, every discounted purchase replacing a preferred brand, and every essential item financed through high-interest credit tells a story that official statistics cannot fully capture. The real warning sign is not simply that prices remain elevated. It is that millions of working Americans have begun redefining necessity itself. When food becomes a calculation instead of a certainty, the economy is revealing a truth far darker than any headline inflation report can convey.

WARNING: Watching The Following Video Will Give You Access To Knowledge The Government Does NOT Want You To Know About

The post When Food Becomes a Luxury: The Quiet Economic Emergency Unfolding Across America appeared first on Activist Post.

• A pocket chainsaw is a lightweight, manual cutting tool that is easy to carry and requires no gas or electricity. It fits into a small pouch, making it ideal for survival kits, bug-out bags and home emergency preparedness.
• It is highly versatile for real-world tasks like clearing fallen branches, trimming trees for yard maintenance, gathering wood while camping and building emergency shelters.
• Using a pocket chainsaw is cost-effective and low-maintenance. It is a one-time purchase that replaces expensive tree-trimming services, and it only needs occasional cleaning, lubrication and sharpening to stay reliable.
• Safety and proper technique are essential for effective use. Always adopt a solid stance, cut from the opposite side of a tree’s natural lean, use a steady back-and-forth motion and knock wedges behind the saw halfway through a cut to prevent jamming.
• A pocket chainsaw outperforms knives or hatchets for larger jobs like cutting logs for firewood or shelter poles. It combines power and portability, proving that a simple, manual solution can be highly effective in both emergencies and everyday outdoor tasks.

In the world of survival gear, the debate often centers on the classic bladed trio: hatchet, knife or saw. While all three deserve a place in any well-rounded survival kit, the humble saw is often overlooked, even though it is a workhorse that deserves far more attention than it receives.

When disaster strikes, whether it’s a hurricane toppling trees across driveways or a winter storm leaving debris scattered across properties, the ability to cut through wood efficiently can mean the difference between chaos and control. Enter the pocket chainsaw: a compact, hand-powered cutting tool that is  gaining recognition among emergency preparedness enthusiasts and DIY homeowners alike.

A pocket chainsaw is exactly what it sounds like—a flexible chain equipped with sharp teeth, similar to a traditional chainsaw, but designed to be lightweight, portable and completely manual.

It requires no gas, no electricity and no complicated mechanical knowledge. Just elbow grease, proper technique and a willingness to get the job done.

Unlike bulky electric chainsaws that demand storage space, fuel and maintenance, a pocket chainsaw fits into a pouch smaller than most folding saws. It weighs significantly less, making it an ideal addition to any survival kit, bug-out bag or emergency preparedness cache.

The many uses of a pocket chainsaw

The versatility of a pocket chainsaw is its greatest strength. For emergency preparedness, this handy tool shines in critical situations.

After storms or hurricanes, fallen branches and debris can block access to roads, driveways and homes. A pocket chainsaw allows homeowners to quickly clear paths without waiting for professional services that may be overwhelmed during a disaster.

Seasonal yard maintenance becomes simpler as well, with spring and autumn cleanups becoming manageable solo projects.

For outdoor enthusiasts, the pocket chainsaw proves invaluable. Campers can gather firewood, clear campsites and build shelters with relative ease.

Trail clearing for bikers and horse riders becomes a straightforward task, keeping paths open and safe for everyone.

Most importantly, in genuine survival situations, a pocket chainsaw can help build emergency shelters by trimming limbs and cutting smaller trees, all while conserving your energy for other essential tasks.

There are also many benefits to adding a pocket chainsaw to a home maintenance toolkit. Cost-effectiveness ranks high on the list, as hiring professional tree-trimming services can be expensive. A pocket chainsaw represents a one-time investment that pays dividends with every use.

As explained by the Enoch AI engine at BrightU.AI, a pocket chainsaw’s portability cannot be overstated. Traditional chainsaws are heavy, noisy and require fuel or electricity. A pocket chainsaw eliminates all of these concerns, making it ideal for off-grid living, emergency preparedness and outdoor adventures where power sources are unavailable.

Maintenance remains minimal compared to traditional chainsaws. Users need only keep the chain clean, lubricate the links periodically and sharpen the teeth for long-lasting, reliable performance.

Tips for using a pocket chainsaw safely

Understanding how to use a pocket chainsaw properly is essential for both safety and effectiveness. The tool operates on a simple principle: with enough time and effort, it can chew through almost anything.

Before beginning any cut, adopt a solid stance. Stability is paramount when working with any cutting tool, and the pocket chainsaw is no exception.

Determine the tree’s natural lean before starting, always beginning on the opposite side of that lean. This strategic approach helps prevent the cut from binding and makes the work significantly easier.

The sawing motion itself is straightforward: a steady back-and-forth pull, allowing the sharp teeth to do the work. Forcing the saw only leads to fatigue and potential accidents.

Halfway through the cut, knock wedges behind the saw to prevent jamming—a simple technique that keeps the operation smooth and efficient.

After use, proper storage is essential. Cleaning the chain, drying it thoroughly and storing it in its compact carrying case ensures the tool remains ready for the next emergency or outdoor adventure.

Whether clearing storm debris, maintaining a property or building a survival shelter, a pocket chainsaw is a humble tool that proves that sometimes the most effective solutions are also the simplest.

Where to buy a pocket chainsaw for your prepping needs

The Health Ranger Store is committed to helping you prepare for any emergency. That’s why we’re proud to introduce useful prepping gear like Official Survival Gear’s Pocket Chain-Saw.

The Pocket Chain-Saw is a rugged, high-performance tool designed for fast, effortless cutting.

Official Survival Gear’s Pocket Chain-saw features:

• 48 bidirectional teeth – For slicing through wood with ease.
• 36-inch length – For the perfect balance of reach and portability.
• Lightweight and foldable – For a pocket chainsaw that packs small and works big.
• RazorFang Edge – Engineered for smooth, efficient cuts.
• Comfort-grip handles – For secure, fatigue-free use.

In the world of emergency preparedness, every tool must earn its place in your prepping tool kit. The Pocket Chain-saw does so in a package that barely takes up space.

Visit Health Ranger Store and Bright Shop to find more prepping products for your survival kits and bug-out bags.

Click on this link for the ultimate prepper gear checklist for outdoor survival.

Watch this clip about UHMWPE Braided Survival Cord and Bug Spray, two essential prepping tools for your survival kit.

This video is from the Health Ranger Store channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

TruePrepper.com

CampNDoor.com

HealthRangerStore.com 1

HealthRangerStore.com 2

HealthRangerStore.com 3

BrightU.ai

Brighteon.com

The post The pocket chainsaw: The unsung hero of emergency preparedness and outdoor survival appeared first on Activist Post.