<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Aeshen Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://aeshen.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Evangelize Aeshen Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Aeshen" /><feedburner:info uri="aeshen" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Quality Assurance –Making it Better:  Part 4: Understanding the Defect Workflow process</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/xgWIRatiXX4/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/08/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93making-it-better-part-4-understanding-the-defect-workflow-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defect workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=636</guid>
		<description>In this post I’m going to walk through the defect reporting and resolution process. It's something that many developers have told us they didn’t quite understand until we walk through it, so we’re going do that here, and point out along the way how developers and QA teams can save each other time.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/xgWIRatiXX4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/08/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93making-it-better-part-4-understanding-the-defect-workflow-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/08/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93making-it-better-part-4-understanding-the-defect-workflow-process/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Differences in Developing Apps for Windows Phone 7</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/Maq8d6wgINY/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/differences-in-developing-apps-for-windows-phone-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=634</guid>
		<description>Aeshen consults with agencies and other development firms on Windows Phone 7 development.  Today I thought I would share with you some of the key things we talk about when mobile development firms looking to port their applications to Windows Phone 7.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/Maq8d6wgINY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/differences-in-developing-apps-for-windows-phone-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/differences-in-developing-apps-for-windows-phone-7/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Return of Best of Breed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/oL1ODx1zpmk/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/the-return-of-best-of-breed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of Breed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=632</guid>
		<description>Once again, the platforms are dictating application capabilities as well as user experience and design.  Apps written for one platform aren’t as polished on other form factors even when they are from the same manufacturer.  We will have to wait and see if this trend continues or if uniformity on some level can be brought to mobile application development.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/oL1ODx1zpmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/the-return-of-best-of-breed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/the-return-of-best-of-breed/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Windows PowerShell as an IT Pro – Part 20</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/sVbRwuqWPWM/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/using-windows-powershell-as-an-it-pro-part-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peterl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerShell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=630</guid>
		<description>In my last post I finished looking at operators. Now let’s take a look at controlling flow. Up until now most of what we have gone over could be single line commands or commands that are part of a larger script. When you start using flow control then you pretty much have a script on [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/sVbRwuqWPWM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/using-windows-powershell-as-an-it-pro-part-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/using-windows-powershell-as-an-it-pro-part-20/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Features in Windows Phone 7 Mango</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/EJIfjeaYt6s/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/new-features-in-windows-phone-7-mango/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool and Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mango]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=620</guid>
		<description>There’s a lot of talk about the impending update to Windows Phone 7.  There’s a lot of rumor, and some information that’s been released from Microsoft.   We wanted to list out some of our favorite new features we think will be in Mango.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/EJIfjeaYt6s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/new-features-in-windows-phone-7-mango/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/new-features-in-windows-phone-7-mango/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality Assurance –Making it Better:  Part 3: Communicating for the Best QA</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/RYXNHUOA3qs/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93making-it-better-part-3-communicating-for-the-best-qa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=617</guid>
		<description>In part 3 of this seriesI’m going to dive a little deeper into communication between developers and QA and discuss things developers can communicate to QA that will help make their products better, and reduce QA churn.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/RYXNHUOA3qs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93making-it-better-part-3-communicating-for-the-best-qa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93making-it-better-part-3-communicating-for-the-best-qa/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Know the Trade-offs Between Pre-Made and Custom Components</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/rfz4iQP8lRc/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/know-the-trade-offs-between-pre-made-and-custom-components/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=615</guid>
		<description>We think that finding a partner that understands the native capabilities for a platform and the associated Software Development Kits (SDKs) is important for customers to get the best development choices.  Clients should have a partner that can point out capabilities that are readily available from SDKs or other third party tools and the trade-offs in functionality, experience and cost between using those components when compared to writing custom controls.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/rfz4iQP8lRc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/know-the-trade-offs-between-pre-made-and-custom-components/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/07/know-the-trade-offs-between-pre-made-and-custom-components/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality Assurance – Making it Better.  Part 2: How a QA Team Looks at Features</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/LiRwGdBrWSk/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93-making-it-better-part-2-how-a-qa-team-looks-at-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=613</guid>
		<description>For the next part in our series I want to talk about how QA teams look at features and the type of information they need from development teams.  To do this I’ll start with an example that our instructor used when delivering a QA class.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/LiRwGdBrWSk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93-making-it-better-part-2-how-a-qa-team-looks-at-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93-making-it-better-part-2-how-a-qa-team-looks-at-features/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Architecting Your Web Site or Application for Localization</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/By_NwGXiiy8/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/architecting-you-web-site-or-application-for-localization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=610</guid>
		<description>Most of the Web and desktop applications we write these days are meant to go live worldwide, if not right away, within three to six months of launch.  Here at Aeshen, we've developed methods that help keep localization costs low for our clients.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/By_NwGXiiy8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/architecting-you-web-site-or-application-for-localization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/architecting-you-web-site-or-application-for-localization/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality Assurance – Making it Better.  Part 1: Perspectives on QA.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Aeshen/~3/APiyqxjdl2E/</link>
		<comments>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93-making-it-better-part-1-perspectives-on-qa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Part 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assuarance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aeshen.com/wordpress/?p=606</guid>
		<description>Aeshen has an in-house Quality Assurance (QA) team and we pride ourselves on delivering great services and applications that are thoroughly tested.  Our team is so good, QA has evolved from a being a component of our service offerings to being its own service offering.  We provide QA for hire services to companies large and [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Aeshen/~4/APiyqxjdl2E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93-making-it-better-part-1-perspectives-on-qa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://aeshen.com/wordpress/2011/06/quality-assurance-%e2%80%93-making-it-better-part-1-perspectives-on-qa/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

