Aksiyon Hayat

Obama is afraid from Zionism, Netenyahu etc.

2011-11-10T11:45:00.000-08:00

"I can't stand him any more, he's a liar," Mr Sarkozy said in French.
"You may be sick of him, but me, I have to deal with him every day," Mr Obama replied.

(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15635476)

The background of political sayings

Those opinions are expressed about Israeli PM Netanyahu by Obama and Serkozy. Why to feel a fear from Netanyahu? For me, this is a product of the understanding of globally Zionism.

Let's talk about the origin of Zionist philosophy. And how to take a power all over the world?

Zionism takes its philosophy from some verses Torah and the teachings of Kabbalah. Most jewish people believes that their jewish people existed as holy in the presence of God. Even more they believe that other nations were created as helper and serf to them. In the Jewish law any person cannot join to Judaism and this is more important to being born as jewish. These are the basic teachings of Judaism.

Judaism and Zionism, both of them are not in same philosophy. Zionism is a political vision. This idea was put forward in a systematic way by Theodor Herzl on beginning of the twentieth century. Zionism philosophy is means to collect jewish people who are lives all over the world in holy lands, the present Israel. And this opinion did not disappear any time for them. Today, that awaited Jewish state was established again after two thousand years.

Today Israel state faces many problems in world policy. Israel is known with hard attacks to Palestinian people with heavy weapons. Lastly Israeli army forces attacked to Gaza Aid Boat who known as Mavi Marmara. This event happened a very profound impact in the public.

Israel appears in a very relaxed attitude in world media. Israel state is highly influential for to be taken some of decisions in world politics. Today we can see this reality very clear in world policy; lastly in the expressions of US President Obama and French President Sarkozy.

United States should break out from the oppression of Jewish lobbies...And stop to support Israel's bloody policy.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Rising political values in Muslim countries

2011-09-18T12:36:00.000-07:00

Muslim countries has followed political values very different way according to Western political understanding. So Islamic tradition has been very effective in to shaping of this issue. There is a faith on the understanding of Islamic governance. This is the caliphate (Khilafat) institution. The Ottoman Empire managed to maintain this mission for 400 years. According to Islam, the Khilafat is an institution that are maintained in one hand of management general decisions. Today, this institution has lost functionality. Islamic countries determined own decisions as a result of the first world war have been without Khilafat. However, many Arab intellectuals and politicians embraced the understanding of 'Arab nationalism' after Ottoman's Khilafat. After this, the Arab leaders has started to govern their countries with a oppressive attitude.

On the other hand, until recently, many Muslim statesman followed a way to kill their own people with a cruel policy. In many Muslim countries, the anarchy and blood still has not stopped since nearly one hundred years. In the Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somali, Libya and in many Muslim countries, are still very violent clashes continues.

Terrorism is a big problem for the Western people, both Muslims. However, western society very like to discuss this concept about Islamic terrorism. This idea was expressed in a way very hard after the September 11 attacks. But today, almost all muslim scholars talks about that the Islamic belief never cannot accept to kill innocent people and even denounces this way. Perhaps the Western society may be relieved from these explanations. Today, religious radicalism is not be a problem just for Muslims. So we can say this reality there are also many radicalist opinions in western countries. Peace idea of civilizations in the emerging of this way is important once again. These ideas must actively be supported by all states.

The period of Arab Spring is very important actions to win to real political values and destroy undemocratic practices by people power. The systems of dictator leaders are collapsing now. I believe that those states shall take steps more stable for the future.

So the Islamic world must get out from hegemony of the West's expansionist. I do not know whether the Islamic world ready for a new union. But, this is clearly to say the Islamic world will be more powerful for new period. Therefore, Turkey is taking very strong steps for the establishment of this union during this period. Turkey's peaceful face builds a mission on Mideast countries. So we can say that architect of this idea is Turkish Hero Erdogan who owns a great unity mission for these lands.

Erdogan's tour in the Libya

Turkish PM Erdogan founded AKP (The Justice and Development Party), in 2001 and, he won the election in the 2002 elections with very high rate of voting. He has passed many difficult political challenges until now. Now he won the love and support of Turkish people; and people showed it with 50% votes in the last elections. Also in many muslim countries, he is known as a charismatic leader.

Erdogan is very effective on many issues as a political leader in the Turkey and world. He took many decisive steps in the development of Turkey's policy. Firstly he has reformed on the civil-military relations and removed the military intervention to democracy. Turkey has witnessed major political and social advances in many ways by his government. He is appreciated by many politicians and intellectuals, because of conducted a strong foreign policy of Turkey of all over the world.

His visiting for Arab Spring countries presents a message to people of those countries and western politician. He challenged very hard to Israel's bloody policy and Western colonial understanding in the Libya. For me; this means that just calls a real justice for all nations. Many people discuss his opinions for future of world policy.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Erdogan's tour on Arab Spring countries

2011-09-12T13:12:00.000-07:00

Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan will start to tour to Arab countries which is lived Arab Spring in this week. This means that Turkey supports these nations' moves to build a new system in the own countries.

A jewish rejects bloody Zionism policy

Erdogan's government often talks about a new policy for Mideast. When he starts to criticize openly about Israel's bloody policy, so that he won a strong support of arab public, also with Arab Spring countries. Today he stands very effective personality for Mideast countries also in almost all Islamic states. His political opinions rejects and works to stop injustice and that killing policy in Islamic world. Turkish people gave him a way with last election for this in next period.

Today many western thinker discusses on Turkey's fastly rise in world policy. So Turkey emerges very strong with the rise of emerging economic power and wins a support of many countries with warmly policy. However, Turkey's new mission will shape with visible actions to world policy in next period. The countries which is lived Arab Spring takes an ideological model from moderate politic values of the Turkey. Turkey always has existed as a model state to Mideast countries; but in this time, Arab states steps more careful to win real democracy and to be aganist to dictatorship and radicalism.

Now Erdogan is ready to give some messages to new Egypt's state. After this, Arab-Israeli relations will be entering a new era with Erdogan's expresses.

Many western journalist criticizes very hard about Israel's that attitude is to reject to apologize to Turkey for Mavi Marmara raid. Israel's government has lost prestige in world opinion. But Turkey's peaceful policy is appreciated by many countries.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Tarihin en kanlı toprakları: Ortadoğu

2011-08-18T19:53:00.000-07:00

Ortadoğu coğrafyası tarihin her döneminde kargaşaların ve çatışmaların merkezi oldu. Zengin akarsu havzalarına sahip olan bu coğrafyanın getirdiği bolluk aynı zamanda bu topraklarda zengin bir kültürel yapıyı da beraberinde getirmiştir. Tarihte birçok medeniyete ev sahipliği yapan bu topraklarda yaşanılan her gelişme, ardından savaşları da beraberinde getirmiştir. Mezopotamya bölgesi olarak anılan bu coğrafyada yazının tarihte ilk kez burada kullanılmış olması bu toprakların kültür tarihi açısından ne derece önemli olduğunu bizlere göstermektedir.

Ortadoğu toprakları sadece Mezopotamya havzası ile sınırlı olmayıp, güneyde Arap yarımadasından kuzeyde Güneydoğu Anadolu sınırlarına kadar uzanır. Bununla birlikte bazı araştırmacılar Anadolu topraklarının tamamını bu hat üzerine katmak isterler. Mısır ve İran bölgeleri de Ortadoğu topraklarını tanımlar. Genel ifade ile Ortadoğu coğrafyasının merkezi Mezopotamya bölgesidir.

Ortadoğu bölgesi aynı zamanda birçok dinin, tarikatın ve çeşitli siyasi düşüncelerin de merkezi sayılmıştır. İlkçağ uygarlıklarının dini ritüelleri genelde pagancılık düşüncesindeydi. Semavi dinlerin gelmesi ile birlikte bu putperest kültür terkedildi. Kutsal kitaplarda bildirilen birçok hadise bu topraklarda cereyan etti. Hz. Nuh'un kavmini azgınlıktan kurtarmak için yaptığı gemi burada inşa edildi. İbrahimi dinler olarak bilinen Musevilik, Hıristiyanlık ve İslamiyet de bu topraklarda taraftarlarını topladı.

19. yüzyılda yaşanan bilimsel keşifler ile birlikte sanayi hammaddesinin en önemli yakıtı olan petrolün bulunması artık savaşların toprak eksenli işgal düşüncesinde kalmayıp ülkelerin sahip olduğu yeraltı zenginlikleri de elde etmenin yolları aranmaya başlanmış oldu. Petrolün sanayi hammaddesi olarak kullanılması gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülke ekonomilerinin bu kaynağa sahip olmak için birçok yolu denemelerine neden olmuştur. Petrol birçoğumuzun bildiği gibi Ortadoğu devletlerinin bir numaralı ihracat hammaddesidir. Birinci Dünya Savaşı'nın patlak vermesinin en önemli nedenleri arasında sömürge rekabetinin hız kazanması ve zengin yeraltı kaynaklarına sahip bu ülkeleri bir şekilde kontrol altına almak düşüncesi yatar. Ekonomik rekabetin hız kazandığı Batıda yeni kaynakların bulunması ve idare edilmesi birçok devlet adamının birinci politikası haline gelmiştir. Ortadoğu'nun gelecekte kaderinin belirlenmesi de hep bu politikaların ürünü olarak çeşitli tarihlerde, savaş, sindirme ve bu ülkelerin idarecilerine dolaylı yoldan etki etme düşünceleri her dönemde karşımıza çıkacaktır.

Ortadoğu coğrafyasında bilinen en eski semavi dini Hz. Musa ile gelen Musevilik'tir (Bazen bu terim Yahudilerin dini olarak da kullanılır.). Yahudiler çeşitli kimlik özellikleriyle veya güçlü kültürleriyle bu coğrafyada yaşamış ve hâlâ bu coğrafyanın çeşitli yerlerinde yaşamlarını ikame etmektedirler. Yahudilerce kutsal ve Tevrat'ta vaadedilmiş olarak bildirilen bu topraklar Mısır'dan Güneydoğu Anadolu havzasına kadar uzanan coğrafyayı teşkil etmektedir. Kudüs'te bulunan Ağlama Duvarı ve yıkılan Hz. Süleyman'ın Mabedi'nin burada oluşu Yahudilerin bu toprakları himaye etme düşüncesi her zaman bir ideal oldu. Tarihi Kudüs (Jerusalem) şehri Yahudi inancında olduğu kadar İslamiyet ve Hıristiyanlık'ta da kutsaldır. Hz. İsa tebliğini ilk kez bu topraklarda yapmıştır. Hz. İsa, yine Yahya tarafından Şeria Nehri'nde vaftiz edilmiş ve havarilerini Kudüs'te toplamaya başlamıştır. Hıristiyanlığın bu topraklarda doğmuş olması birçok yahudiyi ürpertti. Ortadoğu tarihine baktığımızda Roma İmparatorluğu sınırlar içersinde gelişen Hıristiyanlık bu toprakların gelecek yüzyıllarda nasıl şekilleneceği konusunda bize bilgi vermektedir. Hıristiyanlık ilk yıllarında birçok şehit vererek gizlilik içersinde, Roma topraklarının önemli şehirlerine kadar ilerledi. Hıristianlığın resmi bir din olarak kabul edilmesi yaklaşık üçyüz yıl sonra İmparator Büyük Konstantin'in eliyle gerçekleşmiştir. Doğu Roma'nın pagan kültürden sıyrılması ile bu yeni din hayatın birçok alanına egemen olacağı anlamına geliyordu.

İslamiyetin yükselişe geçmesi ile birlikte Ortadoğu toprakları Perslerin ve Romalıların elinden alınmış oldu. Bu geniş coğrafya artık yüzyıllar boyunca müslümanların eline geçmiş olacaktı. Bu düşünceye şiddetle karşı çıkan Batı Roman'ın dini kalesi Vatikan, bir dizi saldırı ile bu toprakları tekrar almak istedi. Tarihte Haçlı Seferleri olarak bilinen bu saldırılar dini bir merkez tarafından idare ediliyordu. Bunun sonucunda birçok Romalı ve müslüman asker hayatını kaybetti. Neticede Papanın bu çabaları sonuçsuz kaldı.

Ortadoğu'nun en gizemli halklarında biri olan yahudiler çeşitli dönemlerde yürütmüş olduğu faaliyetler neticesinde kutsal Kudüs'ten çıkarılıp dünyanın çeşitli yerlerine dağıtılmışlardır. Diğer taraftan yahudiler bu topraklardan çıkarımalarını hazmedemeyerek birçok alanda faal olmaya adeta yemin etmişlerdi. Bugün yahudi topluluklarına baktığımızda sosyal hayata tamamen adepte olmuş bir şekilde binlerce yıllık düşüncelerine sadık, birçok kurum ve kuruluşlarda faaliyetlerini sıkı bir şekilde sürdürmektedirler. Günümüzde yahudiler dünyanın heryerinde hayatlarını sürdürmektedirler. Yahudiler, Vaadedilmiş Topraklar'a (Arz-ı Mev'ud) tekrar dönme umutlarını hiçbir zaman yitirmediler. Bunun için her dönemde etki altına aldıkları toplumları siyasi ve sosyal alanda etkilemeyi başarabilmişlerdir.

Yahudi göç haritası

Yahudileri tekrar Kutsal Topraklar'da toplanması fikri, sistemli bir politika olarak Theodor Herzl ile birlikte gündeme getirildi. Theodor Herzl siyonizmin politik babası olarak kabul edilir. Fakat Herzl'in yapmak istediği bununla sınırlı değildi. Yalnız yahudileri Kudüs'te toplama düşüncesi ile ortaya çıkmamış, din merkezli olmaktan ziyade seküler ve ulusal bir düşüncede bu görüşlerini hayata geçirmeyi başarmak istemiştir. Sadece Siyon topraklarının kutsallığı değil bununla birlikte aşırı bir ırk üstünlüğü düşüncesine dayanan bir politikanın izlenmesiydi. Hatta birçok teorisyen de Nazilerin yahudi kıyımının ardında çeşitli ideolojik sebeplerin olduğunu ve bir yahudi ulus devletinin kurulması için bu olayların yaşanması gerektiğini ve planlı olarak yürütüldüğünü ifade etmektedirler. Siyonistler aslında yahudileri göçe zorlayarak meşru zeminde bir devletin kurulmasına olanak vermiş oldular. Bugün İsrail'in resmi politikası, dünyada milyonlarca dindar yahudi tarafından çok ağır bir şekilde eleştirilmektedir. Yürütmüş olduğu kanlı eylemlerin hiçbir şekilde din ile bağdaşmayacağı yine İsrail'de yaşayan birçok haham tarafından dile getirilmektedir.

Ortadoğu coğrafyası, tarihinde en sükunetli yıllarını Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun hakimiyeti döneminde yaşadı. Osmanlı yönetimi boyunca bölge, istikrarlı ve çatışmalardan uzak bir politika ile yönetilmiştir. Osmanlı, hıristiyan, musevi ve müslüman halkları uzun yıllar boyunca etnik kimlik anlayışından uzak bir şekilde bir arada barış içersinde yönetmeyi başarabilmiştir. Fransız devriminin getirmiş olduğu milliyetçilik akımı ve ulus-devlet anlayışı bu topraklarda yaşayan halkları bir bütün olmaktan çıkarıp onları küçük devletler olarak varolmaya itti. Birçok yabancı tarihçinin dile getirdiği Osmanlı'nın Ortadoğu'da yürütmüş olduğu politikada hiçbir topluluk dininden veya milletinden dolayı herhangi bir üstünlüğe sahip varolmamıştır. Birinci Dünya Savaşı ile birlikte hazırlanan senaryolar neticesinde bölge halkları aynı kültürel değeri paylaşmasına rağmen suni bir bölünmeye maruz kalmışlardır. Bu tarihten itibaren bu coğrafyada yaşayan halklar hiçbir zaman kendi kaderini çizecek bir duruma gelmemişlerdir.

Osmanlı'nın bu topraklardan çekilmesi ile birlikte anarşi ve terör başlamış oldu. Siyonistlerin uzun yıllardan beri kurmak istedikleri İsrail devleti Batılı devletlerin desteği ile kuruldu. 19. yüzyılda başlayan sistemli politikalar ile yahudi halkı, dünyanın birçok yerinden bu topraklara göçe zorlandı. Theodor Herzl'in önderliğinde kurulan siyonizm hareketi İngiliz bürokrasisini de arkasına alarak geniş platformda dile getirildi. Herzl, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nu bu harekete muhalif görerek daha da ileri giderek padişah II. Abdülhamid ile anlaşmaya çalışmıştır. Siyonist gizli teşkilatlanma 14 Mayıs 1948 yılında Dünya politikasını da arkasına alarak bugünkü İsrail devletini kurmuş oldu. Devletin, ABD ve Sovyetler Birliği tarafından tanınması ile birlikte, ardından bölge Arap devletleri İsrail'e savaş açtı. Savaş, ilk bakışta Arapların lehine gibi görünse de İsrail'in güçlü savunması ile birlikte savaş İsrail tarafından kazanıldı. İsrail, bu savaş ile birlikte topraklarını biraz daha genişletmiş ve bölgeye ağırlığını koymuş oldu. Bu İsrail devleti için ilk askeri ve siyasi zafer oldu.

İsrail kurulduğu günden bu yana birçok terör olaylarında yer alarak Gazze ve diğer bölgelerde Filistin halkına sistemli bir soykırım yapmaktadır. Ortadoğu'da hüküm süren İsrail hegemonyası Batılı devletlerin desteği dahilinde yürütülmektedir. Bugün Amerikan bürokrasisinde faal olan yahudi lobisi, hayatın birçok alanında, basından film endüstrisine kadar birçok şirketi bünyesine alan gizli bir güç olarak dünya politikasına yön verebilmektedir. Amerikan kongresine sunulan politik kararların bu yahudi lobilerince düzenlenmiş olması her zaman tartışılmıştır. Bununla birlikte bu kongrede, İsrail'in aleyhine hiçbir kararın çıkmaması gibi, İsrail ile sıkı ilişkilerin tesisinde bu lobiler köprü vazifesi görmektedir.

Ortadoğu'da barışın tesis edilebilmesi için yeni bir Osmanlı yönetim modelinin tekrar bu topraklarda uygulanması gerekmektedir. Müslümanlara yapılan zulümlerin arkasında yatan nedenlerin deşifre edilmesi ve gerekli önlemlerin alınması, birlik düşüncesinde tavır konulması çok önemldir. Tarihte liderlik rolünü üstlendiğimiz bu coğrafyada tekrar özlenen barışın ve adaletin sağlanması, Osmanlı'nın modern dönemdeki mirası Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'nin eliyle olacaktır.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

PKK ideolojisinin temeli Diyalektik Materyalizm'dir

2011-08-03T15:37:00.000-07:00

PKK Hareketi ve İdeolojik Yapılanması

Materyalizm genel anlamı ile maddeyi mutlak varlık olarak kabul eden, Tanrı, ruh, sevgi gibi metafizik görüşleri kabul etmeyen, herşeyin temelinin yalnız maddeden ibaret olduğunu öne süren bir felsefi oluşumdur. Bu fikir, tarihin çeşitli dönemlerde ortaya atılmış olup, Allah'ın varlığını inkar etmek için çeşitli çevrelerce savunulmuştur. Eski Yunan filozofları tarafından hararetle savunulan bu görüş, sistemli olarak Aydınlanma Çağı düşünürleri tarafından tekrar gündeme getirilmiştir. Hegel, Hume, Feuerbach, Marx gibi dönemin en meşhur felsefecileri Materyalizmi çeşitli bilim dallarına uyarlamak istemişlerdir. Materyalist felsefede, sosyal olaylar, tarihi çıkarımlar, doğadaki tür çatışmaları, toplumdaki ideolojik çatışmalar gibi birçok olay ve durum gelişimin bir ürünü olarak görülmektedir. Tez-antitez-sentez düşüncesi maddeci bir çıkarım olup sosyal ve doğal hayatın bir sonucudur.

19. yüzyıla gelindiğinde yaşanılan birçok olay, materyalist felsefenin hayatın birçok alanında etkili olduğu düşüncesi çok güçlendi. Siyasi liderler rollerini bu düşüncede ispata kalkıştı. Bilimsel düşüncede ise doğa tarihinde evrim düşüncesi, sosyoloji alanında ise Marx'ın ön gördüğü teori komünizm, psikolojide ise Freud'un düşünceleri kabul gördü. Maddeci söylemde gelişen bu düşüncelerin temelinde evrende hiçbir mutlak güç yani Yaratıcının reddi yatmaktaydı. Sosyal ve doğal olgular yine sosyal ve doğal olgularla açıklanabilir deniliyordu.

Komünizm, Darwinizm'in doğal bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkan Faşizm dahi bu maddeci düşüncenin kitlelere empoze edilmesi ile yeni bir toplum yaratılmak istendi. Komünizm ilk bakışta insanlığın yararına geliştirilen bir düşünce olarak görülebilir. Fakat düşüncenin kökeninde yatan en önemli sorun insanlığın Yaratıcıdan tamamen arınması, istenilen koşulların sağlandığı takdirde insanların dini duyguları doğal olarak red edeceği kanısı veriliyordu. Marx, dinin insanlar tarafından inşa edildiği ve tarihten bu yana böyle olduğunu ifade etmesiyle herhangi bir dini inanışı kabul etmediği anlaşılmaktadır. Böylece dini bir afyon olarak görmüş, insanların aydınlanması halinde bu uyuşukluktan kurtulacağını zannetmekteydi. Siyasi liderler bu düşünceden hareketle milyonlarca insanı tarlalarda zor koşullarda çalıştırarak verdikleri vaatlerin hiçbirini hayata geçirmemiş, halka çok büyük acılar çektirmişlerdir. Stalin, Mao ve Lenin gibi siyasi liderler düşünceleri gereği insanları gelişmiş bir maymun olarak görmüş, hiçbir manevi değere yer vermemiş ve milyonlarca insanı acımadan katletmişlerdir.

PKK düşüncesinin lideri Abdullah Öcalan da kitaplarında sosyalist düşünce üzerinde olduklarını şu sözleriyle beyan etmektedir:

“Lenin 1900’de ne ise ben de 21. yüzyıl sosyalizmini temsil ediyorum, reel sosyalizmle savaşarak, emperyalizmle savaşarak yeni sosyalizmi inşa ediyorum.“ (Özgür Yaşamla Diyaloglar, s. 201)

PKK hareketi bazı insanlar tarafından yanlış bilinmektedir. Birçok insan bu hareketin kürt kimliği adına yürütülen bir hareket olduğunu düşünmektedir. Hümanist düşüncede nasıl bir insan, insan olduğu için değerli olmayıp yalnız insani değerlerin korunması için oluşturulan belirli bir kesimin dikkatini ve desteğini almak için düzenlenmiş bir düşünce birliğidir; PKK hareketi de kürt halkının değerlerini, maneviyatını ve dinini hiçbir surette kabul edemeyeceği bir yapılanmadır. Sözde kürt halkının haklarını savunuyormuş gibi ortaya çıkmış olsalar da hangi düşünceye hizmet ettikleri aşikârdır.

Dindar kürt halkının asla kabul etmeyeceği bu düşünce sisteminde Allah, din, maneviyat gibi kavramlar hiçbir zaman kabul edilmeyecektir. Abdullah Öcalan, bu konuda nasıl bir düşünceye sahip olduğunu şu sözleriyle izah etmektedir:

“Lise dönemlerinde büyük felsefik bunalımı yaşadım. Tanrı ile savaşı verdim, bu savaştan başarı ile çıktıktan sonra yarı Tanrı oldum.” (Özgür Yaşamla Diyaloglar, Ekim 2002, s. 257)

Allah'ı tenzih ederiz; kendisini Tanrı olarak görecek kadar küstah bir açıklama yapan Öcalan, ideal devlet sisteminin hangi düşüncede şekilleneceğini çok açık bir şekilde izah etmektedir.

Birçok insan PKK terör örgütünü tanımlarken yanlış ifadeler kullanmaktadırlar. Asıl üzerinde durulması gereken konu ise bu yapılanmanın adının açık bir şekilde ortaya konulmasıdır. PKK manevi duygulardan tamamen yoksun "Ramazan ayında bari yapmayın." gibi ifadelerinden hiçbir şekilde etkilenmeyen, yaptığı saldırıların medyada yankı bulmasını hedefleyen, şehit cenazelerine katılan üst düzey bürokrat insanların aciz durumundan çok memnun olan vahşi komünist, ateist bir örgüt olarak tanımlanması daha doğrudur. Yapmış olduğu güçlü propaganda ile birçok insanı kandırabilmekte, onlara kendi düşüncelerini dayatabilmekte, hiçbir insani duyguyu ön plana almadan yaptığı faaliyetler ile birçok bilgisiz insanı kendi safına çekebilmektedir.

Öcalan, yazmış olduğu kitaplarda manevi duygularla sözde alay etmekte ve kürt halkının müslüman olmasından çok rahatsız olmaktadır. Birçok defa da Murat Karayılan ifadesinde Zerdüşlükten övgü ile bahsetmektedir. Karayılan bir ifadesinde İslam'ı seçmenin bir ihanet olacağını şu sözlerle dile getirmektedir:

“Kürdistan toplumunda her zaman bir ihanet çizgisi varlığını sürdürmüştür. Özellikle İslamiyet`in Kürdistan`a girmesiyle beraber bu ihanetçi çizginin artık çığırından çıkmış olduğu ve kendisine meşru bir zemin yaratmaya çalıştığı bilinmektedir.”

Doğu Perinçek ve Abdullah
Öcalan'ın ideolojik ittifakı

İdeolojik eğitimden geçirilen terörist gurupları tam anlamıyla komünist gerilla hareketinin taktikleri ile donatmaktadırlar. Milletimize düşen görev romantik izahlardan* sıyrılıp, PKK hareketine kesin çözümün güçlü bir anti-komünist ve anti-materyalist eğitimin verilmesi gerekmektedir. PKK hareketine vurulacak en büyük tokat ise bu yapılanmanın dininin yok edilmesidir. Materyalist temelli bu yapılanma manevi değeri yüksek güçlü ordumuzun desteğiyle yürütülecek fikri mücadele neticesinde çözüme ulaşılacaktır.

*'Romantik izah' olarak değindiğim bu konu hakkında düşünülmesi gereken bazı hususlar var. Birçok devlet adamı manevi değerlerden tamamen yoksun olan bu örgüte karşı çok yanlış ifadeler kullanmaktadırlar. ...Annenizin sıcak çorbasını için...Makarna, yemek dağıtalım... gibi aciz ifadeler kullanmaktadırlar.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Richard Dawkins on Darwinian Society

2011-07-30T09:20:00.000-07:00

Richard Dawkins is known as a supporter of Darwin's theory of evolution all over the world. He has written and published many books on topics of evolution of species. In the books, He argues very strict in the theory of evolution. He is also a notorious atheist who is disrespectful for all religions. He speaks in an ironic way with many religious scholars. He debates with many people who has different status of society. In these days, Turkish creationist leader Harun Yahya calls him to debate on public about evolution and creation. But, Richard Dawkins rejects this calling and he does not want to debate in front of public, a face-to-face. He said that "Yahya is not a scientist to debate to him." But, Dawkins likes to debate any kinds of faithful people.

Creationist's a call to Dawkins on a newspaper

Sometimes Richard Dawkins expresses about that Darwinian society's evils. He says that he does not want to live in a Darwinian society. He explains it this way Darwinian principle brings that way rich people oppress poor people, and also It's ruthless and injustice of free market economy. So he explains to be caused these evils by Darwinian thought.

Dawkins does not want to think that reality of what is origin of morality and justice and love. Human did not win the concept of morality by natural selection. In Darwinian philosophy there is no any existing process in nature by any power. Nature is a product of blind chance according to Darwin's opinion, and, this is a view that is based on atheism.

Many people says that Darwin's theory of evolution based on scientific facts. Darwin's views could not go further than a myth. On the other hand, millions of evidence proving the existence of a Creator. Many modern scientists explains that there are infinite signatures of Creator in the universe, even from galaxies to atomic particles. Modern physics has proven that the universe was created in conjunction with the Big Bang.

Richard Dawkins should think that world was not existed as a game. Eternity has begun...

Richard Dawkins' atheism propaganda

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Sheikh Nazim and His sufism way

2011-07-19T03:57:00.000-07:00

Sheikh Nazim's Global Sufism Community

Sheikh Nazim is born in Cyprus in 1922. He is a spiritual leader of Naqshbandi order all over the world. He studied department of Chemical Engineering in Istanbul University and also studied spiritual teaches from Great Islamic Masters. His first Sufi Master is Abdullah ad-Daghestani. Nazim said that he took many spiritual knowledge by Master Abdullah.

Naqshbandi way is famous an Islamic spiritual community all over the world. They follow the Sunnah and Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) words who has instituted by Great Master Baha-ud-Din Naqshband Bukhari. However, there are many Great Masters to lead Islamic people in the Islamic history. Naqshband Bukhari is one another Great scholar of the Islamic world.

Sheikh Nazim as a student

Naqshbandi followers have some religious rituals to pray to Allah, it is expressed "dhikr". These rituals are maintained since the time of Prophet Muhammad (saas). Hazrat Abu Bakr is known as the first leader of the dhikr; because of he has learned directy by Prophet while they were in the emigration, cave; according to Islamic literature. Prophet Muhammad said that Hazrat Abu Bakr is the nearest person of the companions of His (saas). Even Prophet said he is the top of the companions; because of he was first muslim and been best helper of the Prophet (saas) in hard times.

Today Sheikh Nazim lives in the Cyprus, and he warmly welcomes to all muslim and non-muslims in his house, and makes conversation in his dargah. He is visited by thousands of people from all around the world since many years. He is visited by political leaders and scientists, artists, pop singers and many people of which has different status, in the Lefka town of Cyprus. His messages are so impressive for all people who listen him. He often have live broadcast in different languages from his house in Santanat Tv in website.

Sheikh Nazim has traveled to introduce of the Islam to many places of the world on some dates. First he has traveled to United States. He was welcomed very warmly by some foundation and Faith Centers. After he talked sincerely about Islam these thousands of university students converted to Islam in the United States.

A meeting with Pope Benedict XVI

His followers established many dargahs (Sufi meeting rooms) all over the world, from the Malaysia to the United States. The followers works very good to present Islamic teachings and morality values. Many political and religious leaders supports that organization workings and implements their dialogue ideas between religions. For example, Master Sheikh Nazim has met with Pope Benedict XVI and they gave the message to accept the belief in only one God and dialogue relation between Islam and Christianity. Sheikh Nazim said that when Jesus (pbuh) returns to the Earth then all believers will connect in belief of one religion (Islam).

Sheikh Nazim always gives a message of love and peace to be against bigot and terror to based of the Quran. Master Sheikh Nazim has most disciple of millions all over the world. These disciples are very polite and educated and has high morality.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Evolution is a myth?

2011-07-11T13:31:00.000-07:00

How did life begin in the Earth?

We have two opinions about this question. First opinion is the creation of everything by God and to refer this idea to base by Holy Books. Creationism is meaning that everything was created perfectly on all details. So this opinion finds a very strong ground, because of, scientific discoveries proved the world was created from nothingness. It's name is the theory of Big Bang. On the basis of this theory, the universe doesn't have a static status and the it's expanding. So that, science has proved firstly all universe comes from nothingness. Holy Books always had a belief about the creation of universe. Today, this belief are supported also by many scientific discoveries. However, the science agrees about that: "Creation". But, some scientist doesn't want to accept this reality. For example John Maddox said about that:

"Apart from being philosophically unacceptable, the Big Bang is an over-simple view of how the Universe began, and it is unlikely to survive the decade ahead..."
("Down with the Big Bang", John Maddox, editor of Nature, Nature 340, 1989, p. 425)

Theory of existence of galaxies

Creationists says there are many details in the nature to see clearly an Intellegent Design. Darwin's theory is based that nature is evolving and species comes from a single common ancestor. According to him, nature replicates itself by itself by chance. So there is no any designer in the nature, according to him.

The theory of evolution was put forward to find a support for the ideology of the atheist philosophy. Today, famous atheist and darwinist Richard Dawkins explains this by saying: "Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist." (Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, 1986, p. 6)

The Darwinism cannot explain that how life existed in the Earth because, the life cannot exist by *accident. The Darwinian's idea work to explain origin of life but since long years there is no any single evidence about that. However, Dawkins sometimes stated that the life has began by 'high civilizations' and they sent a life to earth, he said. So we are talking about scientific facts takes us to think that life comes so complex on all details.

Giraffe is same as millions of years

Darwin said that adaptation makes alives to suit life status. Suitable living things, evolve a suitable environment. Natural selection makes that strongest alives stays in nature. But Natural Selection does not create a new species; it just eliminates the weaker species. A deer never can evolved to a giraffe by Natural Selection. DNA replication never allow this to happen so.

In the other hand, there are millions of fossil records to prove living creatures; never evolved and shows that living creatures existed at a moment. Fossil records are the most important a piece of evidence that shows one of the oldest living creatures. When we looked to fossils they proved a perfectly creation and design of living creatures since millions years and never existed an evolution. Evolutionists says that we must find many transitional forms by fossil records to prove existence of the theory of evolution; but today there is no any transitional form in fossil records.

Evolutionists sometimes refers to fraud to make a sensation in science world. Piltdown Man is one of these fakes. They mounted an orangutan jaw to human skull. The theory of evolution is still endeavored to be supported by some institutions. Today scientific evidence proves that DNA preserves a great memory up to one million encyclopedic. Materialist philosophy was removed in a period of history by the Big Bang. Today, biology, astronomy and physics, along with developments in, scientists says about facts of creation:

"At all events, we should say, in summing up, that, according to everything taught by the exact sciences about the immense realm of nature in which our tiny planet plays an insignificant role, a certain order prevails - one independent of the human mind. Yet, in so far as we are able to ascertain through our senses, this order can be formulated in terms of purposeful activity. There is evidence of an intelligent order of the universe."

(Max Planck, May 1937 address, quoted in A. Barth, The Creation (1968), p. 144)

Famous physicist Einstein refers that the scientific facts proves the existence of a great order in the universe.

"Well, a priori [reasoning from cause to effect] one should expect that the world would be rendered lawful [obedient to law and order] only to the extent that we [human beings] intervene with our ordering intelligence... [But instead we find] in the objective world a high degree of order that we were a priori in no way authorized to expect. This is the 'miracle' that is strengthened more and more with the development of our knowledge."

(Albert Einstein, Letters to Maurice Solovine, 1956, p. 114-115 )

*Accident is meaning that life comes from anything without to have any purpose by any power.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

“Komünist Manifesto” üzerine...

2011-07-04T11:56:00.000-07:00

Marx ve Engels'in Komünist Manifestosu

Mark ve Engels’in bu manifestoyu yazmış olmalarında, Avrupa’da komünizm fikrinin zemin bulduğunu ve bunun en yakın zamanda kitlesel olarak yayılacağını ön görmüş olmalarıdır. İngiltere, Fransa gibi ülkelerde yaşanan endüstri gelişimleri ve işçi sınıfının durumu, sosyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi gereken bir konu haline geldi. İşçi sınıfının çok zor şartlarda çalıştırıldığını ve emeğinin karşılığı alamadıklarını değerlendiren düşünürler, bunun kaçınılmaz olarak patlak vereceğini görmüşlerdir. Tamamen mülkiyet ve emek odaklı gelişen komünizm düşüncesi ezen ve ezilen düşüncesinden de gelmektedir.

Tarihin diyalektiği anlayışı her dönem için geçerli olmuştur. Komünizm ve Kapitalizm de bunun 19. yüzyıl uygulamaları olarak başlamıştır. Fakat modern dönemde liberalizm ile birlikte kapitalizm egemen bir anlayış olarak kabul görmüştür. 19. yüzyılın sosyal yapısı, komünizm anlayışı için ideal görülüyordu. Bunun kaçınılmaz olduğunu belirtmekteydiler düşünürler.

Romantik havada İşçi Sınıfı...

    Mülkiyet anlayışı tarih içersinde değişimlere uğramıştır. Fransız Devrimi’nin getirdiği özel mülkiyetin sınırlandırılması ve denetlenmesi gibi konularla komünizm anlayışında ise burjuvazi mülkiyet anlayışının tamamen kaldırılması fikri ön görülmüştür. Özel mülkiyetin tamamen kaldırılmasında, burjuvazi anlayışının halkı ezmesinde yatmaktadır. Modern dönemde ise kapitalist uygulama kendisini her ne kadar özgürlükçü göstermişse de halkı tutsak etmiştir. Modern köle veya anlaşmalı köle diye adlandırabileceğimiz uygulamayı dayatmaktadır.

    Komünist Manifesto’da dikkat çeken önemli iki sosyal terim kullanılmaktadır: Burjuvazi toplumu ve işçi toplumu. Burjuvazi toplumunda sermaye kişiseldir. Sermayenin özgür biçimde kullanmasını temel alır. Modern dönemde bunun uygulanması kapitalizmdir. Kapitalizm, temelinde serbestlik yatmaktadır. Manifestoya göre bu serbestlik aslında birilerini korumakta, birilerini de bağımlı hale getirme veya özgürlüğünü kısıtlamaktadır. Bunun özgürlük olmadığını dile getirmektedirler. Bir diğer sorun da emeğin satılması fikri olmuştur.

    Günümüzde özel mülkiyet uygulaması geçerliliğini korumakta ve bazı yaptırımlarla kişisel haklar korunabilmektedir. Sosyal hayatın temeline birey hakları konmuştur. Manifestonun yayınlandığı dönemin toplumsal yapısı bazı sorunların başlangıcı ve bu sorunların ileriki yıllarda baş göstereceğini öngördü. Bu dönem sadece işçi-patron temelli bir değerlendirme konusu değildir. İngiltere sanayisini hızla geliştirmesi, gelişimin ve büyümenin adımları olarak görülüyordu. Fakat bu gelişim birçok sorunu da beraberinde getirdi. Sanayi toplumu olan yapı kendisini canavara çevirmiştir. Aynı zamanda 20. ve 21. yüzyıl uygulamaları da sosyal adaletin sağlanabileceği yüzyıllar olarak görüldü. Dünya, düşünce olarak kutuplara bölünerek kapitalizm uygulaması vahşi bir görünüm aldı. Tarihsel diyalektik düşüncesinin temelinde de bu uygulama yer almaktadır.

      19. yüzyılda gelişerek gelen bu akım günümüzün sosyal, ekonomik ve kültürel hayatına her yönden etkileri olmuştur.

*Abdullah Korkmaz
.

Islamic Creationist Leader: Harun Yahya

2011-06-24T06:04:00.000-07:00

"...[Harun Yahya] is an international hero. His books have spread everywhere in the Islamic world. He has developed his own Islamic creationism."
(New Scientist Magazine,22 April 2001, United States of America )

New Scientist defined Harun Yahya as a creationist hero. Adnan Oktar used a pen name as a sign under of his books: Harun Yahya. He explained this Harun/Aaron is helper of Prophet Mosa and, Yahya/John the Baptist is a also helper of Jesus Christ. He said there is no any meaning to used these names.

He works to refute the Theory of Evolution and all materialistic philosophies which is take ideas to based Darwinism, Communism and Fascism; by what he express about.

He published a book to show his aganist about the theory of evolution in 1980's years. After that, He found many arguments to show this theory's falseness, "Piltdown Man" and "Nebraska Man". Many people thinks this theory were proven and supported by many scientists. But Oktar said: this is even not a theory, only is a religion as accepted paganic belief.

Adnan Oktar has many websites and even a national channel which broadcast 24 hours in Turkey. His sites are published almost in all languages, even an African language Kiswahili and Asian languages Sindhi and Bengali. His all e-books were free download from sites all over the world. He said 100 million books downloaded in 2009 from all sites.

MD. Oktar Babuna and students in Malaysia

Harun Yahya has many representatives who to organize conferences anywhere in the world. Mr. MD. Oktar Babuna is one of his close friends. He was invited from many universities by supporters of Yahya's works. He joined many talk-show to present strong evidences to refute evolution theory. He had met with Mr. Harun Yahya in mental hospital of Istanbul when he was a student in university.

Islam Denounces Terrorism

Yahya rejects Islamic terrorism, to based by Quran. He explains this so terrorists takes ideology from Darwinist philosophy. He said: If a person was educated so "human came from an ape", then a person may not think about humane values. So he has published that book 'Islam Denounces Terrorism' after 9/11 terrorist attacts. He presents Islamic morality to protect all people and its peace message. Today in the western world, many people debates about Islamic terrorism and Islamophobia. Harun Yahya as an intellectual leader rejects Islamic terror and this belief all over the world. His another book 'Only Love Can Defeat Terrorism' is important to see how to remove terrorism.

Harun Yahya is most popular author in muslim world. His books are very effective to see details of creation of living matters. Scientific discoveries shows the world was created from nothingness, "zero volume" and "infinite density". The Big Bang Theory proves the creation of the universe. Mr. Yahya used that argument to write this book 'The Creation of the Universe'.

Author published many books based on scientific truths on biology, cosmology, philosophy, zoology, paleontology, history and political systems and about theirs background, and also on the Islamic values and faith. So he has been an intellectual leader of the Islamic world.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Istanbul

Bölgesinde Lider Ülke: Türkiye

2011-06-22T14:59:00.000-07:00

Değişen Küresel Aktörler ve Türkiye Misyonu

Türkiye, küresel düzlemde yürütmüş olduğu istikrarlı dış politika ile bölgesinde saygınlığını arttırmaktadır. Orta Doğu'da yaşanan iç karışıklılıklar ile Türkiye'nin sahip olduğu güçlü demokrasi ve siyasi istikrar, Suriye, Irak ve Mısır halkları için herzaman bir model ülke olma durumunu korumaktadır. Türkiye'nin yakın tarihine baktığımızda bu gibi olayların birçok kez yaşandığı hatta darbe üzerine darbe ile tökezleyen demokrasi ancak 2000'li yıllar sonrasında tekrar işlerliğini kazanabildiğini söyleyebiliriz.

Ak Parti ile başlayan demokraside normalleşme süreci, siyasi zeminleri çok güçlü olmamasına karşın bugün CHP dahil olmak üzere birçok partinin ve kurumun yapısında birçok dönüşümler gerçekleştirebilmişlerdir. Liberal bir sağ parti olarak yorumlansa dahi bazı kesimler tarafından muhafazakar olarak da nitelendirilmişlerdir.

Ak Parti hükümeti, asker-sivil ilişkisini yargı ile korumuş; siyasi alanda askeri vesayetin kabul edilemeyeceğini darbeci zihniyetlerin baskılarına rağmen açık bir tavır ile ortaya koymuştur. Askeri darbelerin hayatın her alanına etki ettiği 60,70 ve 80'li yıllarda Türkiye, kendi iç hesaplaşmaları ile boğuşmaktadır. Ne dış dünyaya kapılarını açabilmiş ne de kendi içersinde bir atılım yapabilmiştir. Ekonomide, eğitimde, sağlıkta, istihdamda birçok sorun katlamalı olarak devam etmiştir.

Der Spiegel:"Boğaz'da Yükselen Güç"

Bugün Del Spiegel Dergisi, yapmış olduğu analizde, Türkiye ekonomisinin gelişmiş Avrupa ülkeleri ekonomileri ile karşılaştırıldığında çok önemli bir konumda olduğunu ifade etmiştir. Türkiye'yi yükselen bir güç olarak tanımlarken Osmanlı haritasının sınırlarını çizmekten çekinmemiştir. Dergi, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan'ı karizmatik lider olarak yorumlamakta, ekonomideki yaşanan gelişmeler ile halkın güvenini kazandığı sonucuna varmaktadır.

Türkiye sürdürmüş olduğu dış politikada, bölgesinde sıfır sorun anlayışıyla Hamas ile El Fetih arasında uzlaştırıcı tavrı, Suriye olaylarına gösterdiği hassasiyeti, Libya'da Kaddafi'ye verdiği mesaj ile bölgedeki saygınlığını ve ağırlığını hissettirir konuma gelmiştir. Bununla birlikte Balkanlarda Sırbistan ve Bosna Hersek arasındaki ilişkileri güçlendirmek, geliştirmek için yaptığı güçlü diplomatik ilişkilerin merkezinde yer almaktadır.

Niall Ferguson'un Newsweek Dergisi'nde yayınlanan yazısında Osmanlı kavramının tekrar bu dönemde tartışılacağı, izlenen bu süreçte Erdoğan'ın bölgesinde bir Osmanlı yaratmak düşüncesinde olduğunu, tarihteki gücünü tekrar göstereceği kehanetinde bulunmuştur. Yazar, Türkiye'nin ılımlı tavrını sürdüreceğini yazmıştır. Yapılan Türkiye varsayımlarının sadece bir düşünceden ibaret olmaması ve geniş bir analiz ile değerlendirilebilmesi bu açıdan önemlidir.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

A Call to Bashar al-Assad: Leave the Government to Turkey

2011-06-22T07:25:00.000-07:00

"With Turkey flexing its muscles, we may soon face a revived Ottoman Empire." (Niall Ferguson, Newsweek, June 19, 2011)

Turkey's Government has a mission also for the Middle East's lands. Some people are expressing the idea of this mission on the new Ottoman Empire. But, Turkey's new mission is to collect all the Islamic countries under one flag. The meaning of this flag is to have an unity understanding of Islamic countries. The Arab Spring idea was established to be against to dictatorship by connected people. When we looked to the protest events, it's showing people wants something: strong democracy, to believe to leaders, social justice...etc.

Turkish State helps to Syrians

When syrian people came to Turkey's border, they saw a salvation by Turkish State at least. Turkey welcomes so warmly them and helps for every needs. Still Assad wants them come back to Syria. He has done many errors to using guns to own people. The Syrian people want a change like another arab countries.

Turkey is being a model to countries to who are living The Arab Spring. Turkey's model is based to have strong democracy and secularism. Arab socialist mind is takes idea to establish a government who had one power and one voice. Such as The Green Book or Baath Party formations are collapsing at this time. People are shaking "fossil chairs" of them.

Finally, Assad's Government cannot present any solution to Syrian people. Turkish Army can help to build a tranquility for Syria. The Middle East lands again can have a stability as had in the history of the Ottoman Empire. On the Turkey's new mission there are many solutions for Islamic countries.

*Abdullah Korkmaz
.

Turkish–Israeli relations after Davos and Mavi Marmara

2011-06-16T08:27:00.000-07:00

Recep Tayyip Erdogan been again Prime Minister of the Turkey with 50% of votes in 2011 elections. He is a leader of the Turkey with majority votes. He stands very strong to some issues of Turkey and also on foreign policy.

While Peres listening Erdogan

Firstly; He talked very hard to Israeli PM Shimon Peres in the Davos Economic Forum. He won a strong personality in the Islamic world. After this event, all palestinian people used Turkish flags at everywhere to show Erdogan's strong posture. Many states shut up to no saying anything for Gaza people. This event been very effective to win Palestinian people's pride.

Some authors criticizes him so hard because of he answer so hard to some question of them. In the Turkey, some intellectuals discuss his political understanding and personality. He has known as a conservative in the Turkey. But His party cabinet is so tolerance and large to have different opinions.

When He won 2002 of elections the war started in the 2003. He had to done a strong foreign policy and specify a location near of Iraq or United States. People who was against to the war in Turkey wanted to be close to Iraq people. So government rejected for help to US Army. But There was a few negative status. Turkey chose a middle way for being impartial between of US and Israel. In the Middle East, there are two power: Israel and USA's overseas fleet formations; so Israel governs to arabic politicians and administrators with behind closed doors. Turkish policy is increasing the effectiveness in the Middle East. After of years; Turks are having old lands of Ottoman Empire with tolerance and love. At least; the people of the middle east are following news what happen in the Turkey. For example; Erdogan met so warmly by people when visited Lebanon and other Middle East countries. Israel State is worrying Turkey's rising policy in the Middle East.

An activist killed during the raid on the Mavi Marmara

Mavi Marmara, in the event Israel defends itself. IHH humanity foundation organized the aid campaign for Palestinian people. In international law, this is the crime to attack to force to seeing any dangerous events in international water. Israel state cannot explain this event to using law. How can Israel explain to stop a humanity aid? Many Turkish and activists people were killed by this attack. So after Israel seized the ship soldiers behaved so hard to these people. We have many evidences to show Israel's bloody policy in this event.

Turkey and Palestine flags together

In the Davos; Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan said "One Minute" to Isreal's holocaust and its bloody actions in the Palestinian's lands and he been most popular leader in the Arabic states. He won the humanitarian attitude all over the world. The relation of Turkey and Palestine has never existed so strong after 1960's years. Today Turkey is so easy saying something for freedom to exist with Palestine's people.

*Abdullah Korkmaz

Terrorism, Darwinism & Materialism

2010-12-17T10:44:00.000-08:00

Most people think the theory of evolution was first proposed by Charles Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and experiments. However, in the same way that Darwin was not its originator neither does the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory consists of an adaptation to nature of an ancient dogma called materialist philosophy. Although it is backed up by no scientific evidence, the theory is blindly supported in the name of materialist philosophy.

This fanaticism has resulted in many of disasters. That is because together with the spread of Darwinism and the materialist philosophy it supports, the answer to the question 'What is a human being?' has changed. People who used to answer: 'Human beings were created by God and have to live according to the morality He teaches' have now begun to think that 'Man came into being by chance, and is an animal who developed with the fight for survival.' There is a heavy price to pay for this great deception. Violent ideologies such as racism, fascism and communism, and many other cruel world views based on conflict have all drawn strength from this deception.

This article will examine this disaster Darwinism has brought to the world and reveal its connection with terrorism, one of the most important global problems of our time.

The Darwinist Misconception: 'Life is conflict'

Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory:'The development of living things depends on the fight for survival. The strong win the struggle. The weak are condemned to defeat and oblivion.'

According to Darwin, there was a ruthless struggle for survival and eternal conflict in nature. The strong always overcome the weak, and this enables development to take place. The subtitle he gave to his book The Origin of Species, "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life", encapsulates that view.

Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the 'fight for survival' also applied between human races. According to that claim, 'favored races' were victorious in the struggle. Favored races, in Darwin's view, were white Europeans. African or Asian races had lagged behind in the struggle for survival. Darwin went further, and suggested that these races would soon lose the 'struggle for survival' entirely, and thus disappear:

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes … will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. (Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, 2nd edition, New York, A L. Burt Co., 1874, p. 178)

The Indian anthropologist Lalita Vidyarthi explains how Darwin's theory of evolution imposed racism on the social sciences:

His (Darwin's) theory of the survival of the fittest was warmly welcomed by the social scientists of the day, and they believed mankind had achieved various levels of evolution culminating in the white man's civilization. By the second half of the nineteenth century racism was accepted as fact by the vast majority of Western scientists. (Lalita Prasad Vidyarthi, Racism, Science and Pseudo-Science, Unesco, France, Vendôme, 1983. s. 54)

Darwin's Source of Inspiration: Malthus's Theory of Ruthlessness

Darwin was influenced by the social theories of Malthus, who defined ruthlessness as a law of nature.

Darwin's source of inspiration on this subject was the British economist Thomas Malthus's book An Essay on the Principle of Population. Left to their own devices, Malthus calculated that the human population increased rapidly. In his view, the main influences that kept populations under control were disasters such as war, famine and disease. In short, according to this brutal claim, some people had to die for others to live. Existence came to mean 'permanent war.'

In the 19th century, Malthus's ideas were widely accepted. European upper class intellectuals in particular supported his cruel ideas. In an article titled'The Nazis' Secret Scientific Agenda', the importance 19th century attached Europe attached to Malthus's views on population is described in this way:

In the opening half of the nineteenth century, throughout Europe, members of the ruling classes gathered to discuss the newly discovered "Population problem" and to devise ways of implementing the Malthusian mandate, to increase the mortality rate of the poor: "Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations," and so forth and so on. (Theodore D. Hall, The Scientific Background of the Nazi Race Purification Program)

As a result of this cruel policy, the weak, and those who lost the struggle for survival would be eliminated, and as a result the rapid rise in population would be balanced out. This so-called 'oppression of the poor' policy was actually carried out in 19th century Britain. An industrial order was set up in which children of eight and nine were made to work sixteen hours a day in the coal mines and thousands died from the terrible conditions. The 'struggle for survival' demanded by Malthus's theory led to millions of Britons leading lives full of suffering.

Influenced by these ideas, Darwin applied this concept of conflict to all of nature, and proposed that the strong and the fittest emerged victorious from this war of existence. Moreover, he claimed that the so-called struggle for survival was a justified an unchangeable law of nature. On the other hand, he invited people to abandon their religious beliefs by denying creation, and thus aimed at all ethical values that could prove an obstacle to the ruthlessness of the 'struggle for survival.'

The dissemination of these untrue ideas that led individuals to ruthlessness and cruelty, cost humanity a heavy price in the 20thcentury.

The Role of Darwinism in Preparing the Ground for World War I

As Darwinism dominated European culture, the effects of the 'struggle for survival' began to emerge. Colonialist European nations in particular began to portray the nations they colonized as 'evolutionary backward nations' and looked to Darwinism for justification.

The bloodiest political effect of Darwinism was the outbreak of World War I in 1914.

In his book Europe Since 1870, the well-known British professor of history James Joll explains that one of the factors that prepared the ground for World War I was the belief in Darwinism of European rulers at the time. For instance, the Austro-Hungarian chief of staff, Franz Baron Conrad von Hoetzendorff, wrote in his post-war memoirs:

Philanthropic religions, moral teachings and philosophical doctrines may certainly sometimes serve to weaken mankind's struggle for existence in its crudest form, but they will never succeed in removing it as a driving motive of the world… It is in accordance with this great principle that the catastrophe of the world war came about as the result of the motive forces in the lives of states and peoples, like a thunderstorm which must by its nature discharge itself. (James Joll, Europe Since 1870: An International History, Penguin Books, Middlesex, 1990, s. 164)

The leaders of Europe on the eve of World War I were mislead by the Social Darwinist dogma. They thought that war was a biological necessity.

It is not hard to understand why Conrad, with that ideological foundation, should have encouraged the Austro-Hungarian Empire to declare war. Such ideas at the time were not limited to the military. Kurt Riezler, the personal assistant and confidant of the German chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, wrote in 1914: 'Eternal and absolute enmity is fundamentally inherent in relations between peoples; and the hostility which we observe everywhere… is not the result of a perversion of human nature but is the essence of the world and the source of life itself.' (James Joll, Europe Since 1870: An International History, Penguin Books, Middlesex, 1990, s. 164)

Friedrich von Bernardi, a World War I general, made a similar connection between war and the laws of war in nature. "War" declared Bernhardi " is a biological necessity"; it "is as necessary as the struggle of the elements of nature"; it "gives a biologically just decision, since its decisions rest on the very nature of things." (M.F. Ashley-Montagu, Man in Process {New York: World. Pub. Co. 1961} pp. 76, 77 cited in Bolton Davidheiser, W E Lammers {ed} Scientific Studies in Special Creationism, 1971, p. 338-339)

As we have seen, World War I broke out because of European thinkers, generals and administrators who saw warfare, bloodshed and suffering as a kind of 'development', and thought they were an unchanging 'law of nature', The ideological root that dragged all of that generation to destruction was nothing else than Darwin's concepts of the 'struggle for survival' and 'favored races'.

World War I left behind it 8 million dead, hundreds of ruined cities, and millions of wounded, crippled, homeless and unemployed.

The basic cause of World War II, which broke out 21 years later and left 55 million dead behind it, was also based on Darwinism.

The Fruit of 'The Law of the Jungle': Fascism

As Darwinism fed racism in the 19th century, it formed the basis of an ideology that would develop and drown the world in blood in the 20th century: Nazism.

Both the race theory and the war hysteria of the Nazis were inspired from Darwinism.

A strong Darwinist influence can be seen in Nazi ideologues. When one examines this theory, which was given shape by Adolf Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg, one comes across such concepts as 'natural selection', 'selected mating', and 'the struggle for survival between the races', which are repeated dozens of time in The Origin of Species. When calling his book Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler was inspired by the Darwinist struggle for survival and the principle that victory went to the fittest. He particularly talks about the struggle between the races:

'History would culminate in a new millennial empire of unparalleled splendor, based on a new racial hierarchy ordained by nature herself.' (L.H. Gann, "Adolf Hitler, The Complete Totalitarian", The Intercollegiate Review, Fall 1985, p. 24; cited in Henry M. Morris, The Long war Against God, Baker Book House, 1989, p. 78)

In the 1933 Nuremberg party rally, Hitler proclaimed that "a higher race subjects to itself a lower race… a right which we see in nature and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right."

That the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism is a fact that many historians accept. The historian Hickman describes Darwinism's influence on Hitler as follows:

(Hitler) was a firm believer and preacher of evolution. Whatever the deeper, profound, complexities of his psychosis, it is certain that [the concept of struggle was important because] … his book, Mein Kampf, clearly set forth a number of evolutionary ideas, particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival of the fittest and the extermination of the weak to produce a better society. (Hickman, R., Biocreation, Science Press, Worthington, OH, pp. 51-52, 1983; Jerry Bergman, "Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust", Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal 13 (2): 101-111, 1999)

Hitler, who emerged with these views, dragged the world to violence that had never before been seen. Many ethnic and political groups, and especially the Jews, were exposed to terrible cruelty and slaughter in the Nazi concentration camps. World War II, which began with the Nazi invasion, cost 55 million lives. What lay behind the greatest tragedy in world history was Darwinism's concept of the 'struggle for survival'.

The Bloody Alliance: Darwinism and Communism

The dialectical materialism of Marx defined violence as a constructive force that helped human progress.

While fascists are found on the right wing of Social Darwinism, the left wing is occupied by communists. Communists have always been among the fiercest defenders of Darwin's theory.

This relationship between Darwinism and communism goes right back to the founders of both these 'isms.' Marx and Engels, the founders of communism, read Darwin's The Origin of Species as soon as it came out, and were amazed at is 'dialectical materialist' attitude. The correspondence between Marx and Engels showed that they saw Darwin's theory as 'containing the basis in natural history for communism'. In his book The Dialectics of Nature, which he wrote under the influence of Darwin, Engels was full of praise for Darwin, and tried to make his own contribution to the theory in the chapter 'The Part Played by Labor in the Transition from Ape to Man.'

Russian communists who followed in the footsteps of Marx and Engels, such as Plekhanov, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, all agreed with Darwin's theory of evolution. Plekhanov, who is considered as the founder of Russian communism, regarded marxism as 'Darwinism in its application to social science'. (Robert M. Young DARWINIAN EVOLUTION AND HUMAN HISTORY, Historical Studies on Science and Belief, 1980)

Trotsky said, 'Darwin's discovery is the highest triumph of the dialectic in the whole field of organic matter.' (Alan Woods and Ted Grant. "Marxism and Darwinism", Reason in Revolt: Marxism and Modern Science, London, 1993)

'Darwinist education' had a major role in the formation of communist cadres. For instance, historians note the fact that Stalin was religious in his youth, but became an atheist because of Darwin's books. (Alex de Jonge, Stalin and The Shaping of the Soviet Uninon, William Collins Sons & Limited Co., Glasgow, 1987, s. 22)

Mao, who established communist rule in China and killed millions of people, openly stated that 'Chinese socialism is founded upon Darwin and the theory of evolution.' (Mehnert, Kampf um Mao's Erbe, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1977)

The Harvard University historian James Reeve Pusey goes into great detail regarding Darwinism's effect on Mao and Chinese communism in his research book China and Charles Darwin. (James Reeve Pusey, China and Charles Darwin, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983)

In short, there is an unbreakable link between the theory of evolution and communism. The theory claims that living things are the product of blind chance, and provides a so-called scientific support for atheism. Communism, an atheist ideology, is for that reason firmly tied to Darwinism. Moreover, the theory of evolution proposes that development in nature is possible thanks to conflict (in other words 'the struggle for survival') and supports the concept of 'dialectics' which is fundamental to communism.

If we think of the communist concept of 'dialectical conflict', which killed some 120 million people throughout the 20thcentury, as a 'killing machine' then we can better understand the dimension of the disaster that Darwinism visited on our planet.

Darwinism and Terrorism

As we have so far seen, Darwinism is at the root of various ideologies of violence that spelled disaster to mankind in the 20thcentury. However, as well as these ideologies, Darwinism also defines an 'ethical understanding' and 'method' that could influence various world views. The fundamental concept behind this understanding and method is 'fighting those who are not one of us'.

We can explain this in the following way: There are different beliefs, worldviews and philosophies in the world. These can look at each other in one of two ways:

They can respect the existence of those who are not one of them and try to establish dialogue with them, employing a humane method.
They can choose to fight others, and to try to secure an advantage by damaging them, in other words, behave like a wild animal.
The horror we call terrorism is nothing other than a statement of the second view.

The faith in the legitimacy of terror comes from materialist ideologies, not Theistic faiths.

When we consider the difference between these two approaches, we can see that the idea of "man as a fighting animal" which Darwinism has subconsciously imposed on people is particularly influential. Individuals and groups who choose the way of conflict may never have heard of Darwinism and the principles of that ideology. But in the final analysis, they agree with a view whose philosophical basis rests on Darwinism. What leads them to believe in the rightness of violence is such Darwinism-based slogans as; 'In this world, only the strong survive', 'Big fish swallow the little ones', 'War is a virtue', and 'Man advances by waging war'. Take Darwinism away, and these are nothing but empty slogans.

Actually, when Darwinism is taken away, no philosophy of 'conflict' remains. The three monotheistic religions that most people in the world believe in, Islam, Christianity and Judaism, all oppose violence. All three religions wish to bring peace and harmony to the world, and oppose innocent people being killed and suffering cruelty and torture. Conflict and violence violate the morality that God has set out for man, and are abnormal and undesired concepts. However, Darwinism sees and portrays conflict and violence as natural, justified and correct concepts that have to exist.

For this reason, if some people commit terrorism using the concepts and symbols of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the name of those religions, you can be sure that those people are not Muslims, Christians or Jews. They are in fact Social Darwinists. They hide under a cloak of religion, but they are not genuine believers. Even if they claim to be serving religion, they are actually enemies of religion and believers. That is because they are ruthlessly committing a crime that religion forbids, and in such a way as to blacken religion in peoples' eyes.

For this reason, the root of the terrorism that plagues our world is not in any of the monotheistic religions, but is in atheism, and the expression of atheism in our times: 'Darwinism' and 'materialism'.

Turkey's growing face in the Middle East and World

2010-11-30T01:03:00.000-08:00

Turkey's PM Erdogan visited Lebanon and met very warmly by Lebanese people. Turkey's solutions in the Middle East and peace messages looks serious in the Islamic world.

Erdogan's visiting Lebanon

Erdogan is known as a charismatic leader; Since election in 2007 is doing many reforms on Turkey's politic, challenge to old system and building a national conversion. This is looking very fastly and different in eye of EU and USA. But they cannot understand clearly somethings about, mades since republican history of Turkey. This is reality to think about "what happens in Turkey"?

I mean that sociological evidences supports Turkey is most fast growing and create a new system in the world policy. This man of CIA's strategist expert George Friedman wrote a book: “Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21'st Century” and talked about new system of world in 100 years. He said, Turkey will be strongest power in 20 years. And create a new unity in the Middle East. Even he means serious and suggest to learn turkish language to have a power near of Turkey for future.

Turkey's peace policy challenge to United States' made wrong policy in Iraq and Afghanistan and want to have this mission to configure by own. In history of Ottoman Empire in the Middle East, Turks has saved very well nations and theirs religions. Some thinkers talked about this reality; "Ottoman went and peace went.". The Middle Eastern people are religious always and want to have freedom for believers. Again these longed days will come. This idea is not a romantic saying.

Friedman's Turkey's map on future

Turkey's successful foreign policy was effected and loaded a mission to be a leader of Islamic world. Mr. Oktar express this: "Turkish-Islamic Union by Turkey. Turkey has a leadership experience in history and to have a brotherhood sense." We cannot see any country to want to have this mission in this age. Turkey's moderate policy always was loved and was been example to muslim countries. This is based secularist thinking by Turkey's national Leader Ataturk. His opinions gave an idea to be a strong state. Turkey's democratic and republic system was created to Turkey's light path. In the new mission of Turkey, the idea of secular and democracy are protected by AKP's Government.
Anyway, Turkey will open a strong doors in new world system.

*Abdullah Korkmaz , 30 Nov 2010, Istanbul