<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Barely Legally</title>
	
	<link>http://barelylegally.com</link>
	<description>A techie lawyer gets down and nerdy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/AlmostLegally" /><feedburner:info uri="almostlegally" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><geo:lat>40.71209</geo:lat><geo:long>-73.954276</geo:long><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license><item>
		<title>Defendants Gone Wild</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/ReX8LBP5RpA/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/defendants-gone-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Irreverently Irrelevant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guy who made those really sleazy &#8220;Girls Gone Wild&#8221; videos, which at one point seemed to comprise half the ads on Comedy Central after midnight, has an interesting closing statement for his assault and false imprisonment trial: I want that jury to know that each and every one of you are mentally f–ing retarded [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy who made those really sleazy &#8220;Girls Gone Wild&#8221; videos, which at one point seemed to comprise half the ads on Comedy Central after midnight, has an interesting closing statement for his assault and false imprisonment trial:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I want that jury to know that each and every one of you are mentally f–ing retarded and you should be euthanized […] if that jury wants to convict me because I didn’t show up, which is the only reason why they did, then, you know, they should all be lined up and shot.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Actually, he was already found guilty, and he made <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/girls_gone_wild_creator_joe_francis_to_jury_you_should_be_euthanized/">these remarks (and more!)</a> to a reporter in an interview before his sentencing. I&#8217;m reminded of that hacker who did an AMA on Reddit the night before his sentencing, wherein he declaimed his lack of remorse and general lesson-learning that I think judges probably like hearing. <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/18/4118484/andrew-weev-auernheimer-sentenced-att-ipad-hack">Prosecutors and judge noticed</a>. Maybe the jury will notice this one.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/ReX8LBP5RpA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/defendants-gone-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/defendants-gone-wild/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Agents Seize Mt. Gox’s Bank Account</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/Wal3EijTxks/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/federal-agents-seize-mt-goxs-bank-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bitcoin, that digital currency only several orders of magnitude less useful than Xbox Live Points, has been the subject of some really fun news pieces recently. There was the e-sports league surreptitiously running a mining operation with its users&#8217; computers. There was the exchange which shut its doors and ran off with $260,000+ of its [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitcoin, that digital currency only several orders of magnitude less useful than Xbox Live Points, has been the subject of some really fun news pieces recently. There was the e-sports league surreptitiously <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2013/05/esea/">running a mining operation with its users&#8217; computers</a>. There was the exchange which shut its doors and <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/weeks-after-shutdown-bitcoin-exchange-customers-still-wait-for-refunds/">ran off with $260,000+</a> of its customers&#8217; &#8220;money&#8221;. A speculative bubble around Bitcoin popped last month, <a href="http://thenextweb.com/insider/2013/04/12/as-key-exchange-mtgox-reopens-bitcoin-falls-to-74-some-72-down-from-its-former-heights/">collapsing nearly $200 in under a week</a>. At least you know Bitcoin is always worth a funny story.</p>

<p>So the largest Bitcoin exchange (that thing which converts Bitcoins into money) is a Magic: The Gathering card trading site<sup><a href="http://barelylegally.com/post/federal-agents-seize-mt-goxs-bank-account/#footnote_0_1474" id="identifier_0_1474" class="footnote-link footnote-identifier-link" title="yes, really">1</a></sup> called Mt. Gox, which has trafficked in Bitcoin for the last few years. They just had (one of?) their bank account(s?) seized by Homeland Security. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/feds-reveal-the-search-warrant-that-seized-mt-gox-account/">Ars has a good writeup</a> of why this has happened, including detailed quotes from the key portion of <a href="http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Mt-Gox-Dwolla-Warrant-5-14-13.pdf">the warrant</a>.</p>

<p><strong>tl;dr: Mt. Gox forgot to register as a currency exchange, which is a federal felony.</strong></p>

<p>As part of the <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5330">Money Laundering Suppression Act of 1994</a>, all Money Transmitting Businesses must register with the Department of the Treasury. Neither Mt. Gox nor its US subsidiary Mutum Sigullum, LLC. are registered as such. Whoops. The <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ee0bc/feds_reveal_the_search_warrant_used_to_seize_mt/">Bitcoin subreddit</a> is directing their displeasure toward Mt. Gox, whose navigation of regulatory matters is admittedly pretty displeasure-worthy. It&#8217;s okay, guys! An efficient market would never allow such egregious incompetence to handle two-thirds of all Bitcoin exchanges. (<a href="http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/volumepie/">Yes, Virginia</a>, etc.)</p>

<p>So wait, the coming crypto-currency wars? The stateless society? Post-capitalism anarcho-digital-libertarian utopia? All sidetracked because someone didn&#8217;t do their homework? What, don&#8217;t any lawyers take bitcoins? Hm. </p>

<p>How about Magic cards?</p>
<ol class="footnotes"><li id="footnote_0_1474" class="footnote">yes, <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070817170606/http://mtgox.com/gwt/mtgox.php">really</a></li></ol><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/Wal3EijTxks" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/federal-agents-seize-mt-goxs-bank-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/federal-agents-seize-mt-goxs-bank-account/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Luck With That</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/nyYCxNfR0KM/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/good-luck-with-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Digital Age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prince is DMCAing videos with his music in the background. This isn&#8217;t new. What&#8217;s new is that he&#8217;s sending takedown notices to Vine, a video service which hosts six second videos. Vine launched less than three months ago, but the first DMCA takedown notices are already coming in. Among the first rights holders to file [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prince is DMCAing videos with his music in the background. This isn&#8217;t new. What&#8217;s new is that he&#8217;s sending takedown notices to Vine, a video service which hosts six second videos. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Vine launched less than three months ago, but the first DMCA takedown notices are already coming in. Among the first rights holders to file a grievance with Twitter is NPG Records, Princes music label. […] Chilling Effects, a watchdog site where Twitter publicizes such takedown requests, reveals that on March 22nd, NPG Records contacted the company and asked for eight videos to be brought down. As best we can tell, Twitter complied with the request, as none of the URLs are currently functioning. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>via <a href='http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/2/4174840/prince-record-label-delivers-dmca-takedown-vine-videos'>The Verge</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/nyYCxNfR0KM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/good-luck-with-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/good-luck-with-that/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote Unquote</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/G7J6QSrQPNQ/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/quote-unquote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gov 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York World reports on the New York City Open Data Law of 2012, and includes a couple of choice quotes from a certain open government activist: It is unclear what consequences agencies will face if they are not compliant with Local Law 11. “Ideally, someone would step up and be the policeman,” said [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York World <a href="http://www.thenewyorkworld.com/2013/03/07/data-deluge/">reports on the New York City Open Data Law of 2012</a>, and includes a couple of choice quotes from a certain open government activist:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>It is unclear what consequences agencies will face if they are not compliant with Local Law 11. “Ideally, someone would step up and be the policeman,” said Dominic Mauro, staff attorney for the good government group Reinvent Albany.</p>
  
  <p>Mauro says that that a new administration will have to get on board, because the information tracked by city agencies ultimately belongs to the public. “Taxpayers fund the government and the government collects the data,” he said. “Its our data. We don’t pay taxes so we can not know what goes on.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Aside from the double negative there at the end, this Mauro guy sounds both insightful and handsome.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/G7J6QSrQPNQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/quote-unquote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/quote-unquote/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Do As I Say Not As I Leech</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/w0lItXYmq2o/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-leech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Digital Age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#8217;s pretty safe to say I&#8217;m not exactly a copyright maximalist. Occasionally, I write sarcastic/whiny bits about absurdly long copyright duration and point out that we might still be able to have nice things if we had slightly less copyright. Congress doesn&#8217;t seem to agree, as the only time they address copyright law [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty safe to say I&#8217;m not exactly a copyright maximalist. Occasionally, I write sarcastic/whiny bits about <a href="http://barelylegally.com/post/still-waiting/">absurdly long copyright duration</a> and point out that we might still be able to have nice things if we had slightly less copyright. Congress doesn&#8217;t seem to agree, as the only time they address copyright law seems to be when they&#8217;re trying to make more of it, not less of it. See: the <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17327">Mickey Mouse copyright extension</a> and wait until 2023 for Disney&#8217;s flagship  <em>mus musculus</em> to almost enter the public domain before being snapped back up.</p>

<p>So amidst all that, it&#8217;s nice to see folks in Congress taking bold action on copyright. By <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2013/01/14/congress-continues-to-illegally-download-movies-and-tv-shows">downloading TV shows and movies</a> repeatedly:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>In late October, someone at the U.S. House of Representatives decided to catch up on the latest season of Dexter, illegally downloading an episode of the TV series while at a congressional office. In the days that followed, with Hurricane Sandy threatening to keep federal workers hunkered down at home, employees of Congress downloaded the 2012 mob film Lawless, a Halloween-themed episode of The Middle, and an episode from Season 9 of CSI: New York.</p>
  
  <p>Over the last four months, employees of the House of Representatives have illegally downloaded dozens of films and TV shows, according to a report shared with Whispers by ScanEye, a website that tracks what IP addresses have downloaded on BitTorrent. BitTorrent is a protocol for sharing large files over the Internet. Unauthorized downloads of copyrighted material is illegal in the U.S.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The full article has a full list of what was downloaded from tracked Congressional office: my personal favorite? DeGrassi. Frankly, if they want to watch people bickering like teens and high school power struggles, I wouldn&#8217;t have imagined they&#8217;d need to download something.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/w0lItXYmq2o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-leech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-leech/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sponsored Posts</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/WyacQa1-V1M/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/sponsored-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Irreverently Irrelevant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, The Atlantic ran an ad from noted Anti-Xenu enthusiasts Scientology, before being ridiculed for taking money from crazy people, and ultimately pulling the ad from their site. I guess some of the uproar was about taking money from people who&#8217;ve been accused of running a cult, or possibly some perceived ambiguity of the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, The Atlantic ran an ad from noted Anti-Xenu enthusiasts Scientology, before being ridiculed for taking money from crazy people, and ultimately <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/200593/the-atlantic-pulls-sponsored-content-from-church-of-scientology/">pulling the ad</a> from their site. I guess some of the uproar was about taking money from people who&#8217;ve been accused of running a cult, or possibly some perceived ambiguity of the term &#8220;sponsored post&#8221; (what do you mean &#8216;a word from our sponsors&#8217; NBC? do you believe the Dodge Dart is the #1 car in America or not help i&#8217;m so confused). Whatever. Post went up, post went down, and The Atlantic issued an apology. </p>

<p>But not before noted internet institution Boing Boing took the <a href="http://boingboing.net/2013/01/14/dread-cthulhu-leads-his-cult-t.html">opportunity to lampoon</a> either the outcry, the original ad, or Scientology itself. I&#8217;m not sure:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The driving force behind this unparalleled era of growth is Cthulhu himself, who is not only a cosmic entity of inordinate and terrible power, but also chairman of the board of the Esoteric Order of Dagon. Mr. Cthulhu is unrelenting in His work, providing charitable assistance to worthwhile causes, serving communities with fresh humanitarian initiatives, and afflicting all mankind with a transcendent anxiety though His eldritch murmurs.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Never to be outdone, America&#8217;s Finest News Source Comma The Onion ran <a href="http://www.theonion.com/articles/sponsored-the-taliban-is-a-vibrant-and-thriving-po,30910/?ref=auto">an even sillier sponsored post</a>: </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>2012 proved to be just another in a succession of landmark years for the Taliban, as the influential Islamic fundamentalist organization continued its awe-inspiring push toward unprecedented expansion.</p>
  
  <p>Even following a decade marked with some difficulties, the devoted members of the Afghani cultural and political movement have proven consistently successful in their trailblazing efforts to continue the Taliban’s constant recruiting of talented and diverse young insurgents and building its thriving base of support from politicians and citizens alike to over 30 times that of a decade ago.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Scientology might be a parody of itself, but I&#8217;m quite thankful for the actual parodies.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/WyacQa1-V1M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/sponsored-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/sponsored-posts/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BWAAAAM BWAAAAAAM BWAAAAAM</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/zXnyCI7c4U0/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/bwaaaam-bwaaaaaam-bwaaaaam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Irreverently Irrelevant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the coolest name for the coolest and scariest piece of software I&#8217;ve seen in quite some time. Inception: a program that you run on your computer, and then plug your computer into someone else&#8217;s locked computer. Inception then breaks into the other guy&#8217;s computer. How? By being insanely awesome/scary: Inception’s main mode works [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the coolest name for the coolest and scariest piece of software I&#8217;ve seen in quite some time. <strong><a href="http://www.breaknenter.org/projects/inception/">Inception</a></strong>: a program that you run on your computer, and then plug your computer into someone else&#8217;s locked computer. Inception then breaks into the other guy&#8217;s computer. How? By being insanely awesome/scary: </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Inception’s main mode works as follows: By presenting a Serial Bus Protocol 2 (SBP-2) unit directory to the victim machine over the IEEE1394 FireWire interface, the victim operating system thinks that a SBP-2 device has connected to the FireWire port. Since SBP-2 devices utilize Direct Memory Access (DMA) for fast, large bulk data transfers (e.g., FireWire hard drives and digital camcorders), the victim lowers its shields and enables DMA for the device. </p>
  
  <p>The tool now has full read/write access to the lower 4GB of RAM on the victim. Once DMA is granted, the tool proceeds to search through available memory pages for signatures at certain offsets in the operating system’s password authentication modules. Once found, the tool short circuits the code that is triggered if an incorrect password is entered.</p>
  
  <p>An analogy for this operation is planting an idea into the memory of the machine; <em>the idea that every password is correct</em> (ed: omg wtf). In other words, the nerdy equivalent of a memory inception.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>By virtue of the specific kind of high-speed connection Firewire has, Inception makes the target machine think that every password is the right password. I really really hope it makes that <a href="http://inception.davepedu.com">absurdly loud BWAAAAM sound</a> while it works. Then again, that might not be so stealthy.</p>

<p>Either way, I definitely recommend you stick gum in pretty much every port your computer has.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/zXnyCI7c4U0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/bwaaaam-bwaaaaaam-bwaaaaam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/bwaaaam-bwaaaaaam-bwaaaaam/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Still Waiting</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/IR4vaGSDVkk/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/still-waiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year, the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School catalogs the copyrighted movies, books, and songs which would be public domain had Congress not retroactively prolonged their copyright in 1976. This year&#8217;s crop is a good one. On January 1, 2013, Old Yeller, Minority Report, and even a James [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School catalogs the copyrighted movies, books, and songs which would be public domain had Congress not retroactively prolonged their copyright in 1976. <a href="http://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2013/pre-1976">This year&#8217;s crop</a> is a good one. On January 1, 2013, Old Yeller, Minority Report, and even a James Bond book would all be free for common use; the public, having given the authors a monopoly on their works for decades, has presumably earned the right to share in these cultural landmarks by now.</p>

<p>But Congress, in its infinite wisdom, prolonged copyright in 1976. So now, the 1956 book Old Yeller will not be public domain until 2052. I&#8217;m sure <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Gipson">Fred Gipson</a>, who died in 1973, would have never written his book unless he would have a monopoly on it through 2052. I mean, he <em>did</em> technically write it anyway. And he died before Congress decided to incentivize him further, but I&#8217;m sure it was retroactively really great motivation. Or something. </p>

<p>Likewise, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Fleming">Ian Fleming</a> (James Bond) died in 1964 and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_K._Dick">Philip K. Dick</a> (Minority Report) died in 1982, but their works are still under copyright for another 40 years.</p>

<p>Which is great, because we definitely wouldn&#8217;t want to cheat those guys out of profiting off their works. I mean, how is Ian Fleming going to feed his family if there&#8217;s only been like five different editions of the book itself, a comic book, and a movie starring Sean Connery? And if he died nearly 50 years ago? If he doesn&#8217;t have, say, another 40 years or so to profit off his work, then he might as well have become a chimney sweep.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/IR4vaGSDVkk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/still-waiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/still-waiting/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ceci n’est Pas Une Passenger</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/ZGRjSZpkseU/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/ceci-nest-pas-un-passenger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A guy out in California wants to make a point about corporate personhood, so he put a certificate of incorporation (the closest thing to a physical presence a corporation has) in the passenger seat of his car, and drove in the carpool lane until the cops pulled him over. He says: “If it gets there [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A guy out in California wants to make a point about corporate personhood, so he put a certificate of incorporation (the closest thing to a physical presence a corporation has) in the passenger seat of his car, and <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/01/corporation-carpool-flap/">drove in the carpool lane</a> until the cops pulled him over. He says:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>“If it gets there to the Supreme Court, it would be great. Large-scale corporations, they don’t go to jail for the crimes that they have committed,” the 56-year-old Marin County man said. “Personhood is one of the many absurdities we’ve given these corporations that we let run wild. It’s that kind of mind-fuck we’re asking to actually address.”</p>
  
  <p>Supreme Court precedent likening a corporation to a person dates back more than a century. So for years, Frieman has been driving without a breathing passenger in the carpool lane, in hopes of being pulled over and cited. Moreover, he notes, the state Vehicle Code defines a person as “natural persons and corporations.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Wait, for years? <a href="http://familyguy.wikia.com/wiki/CHiPs">What is the highway patrol doing</a>, anyway? </p>

<p>Also, this is doomed to fail for the same reason that driving with your wife&#8217;s birth certificate in the passenger seat isn&#8217;t the same thing as actually driving with your wife in the passenger seat. One is carpooling, the other is driving with a piece of paper.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/ZGRjSZpkseU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/ceci-nest-pas-un-passenger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/ceci-nest-pas-un-passenger/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 15 Phrases Used During Commission of Fraud</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~3/8XlJ-6QAMT4/</link>
		<comments>http://barelylegally.com/post/top-15-phrases-used-during-commission-of-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Irreverently Irrelevant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barelylegally.com/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can you tell if one of your employees has committed fraud, and is currently considering covering up their misdeeds? According to a new study published by accounting firm Ernst &#38; Young, apparently you can start by searching for the phrase &#8220;cover up.&#8221; No, really. Here are the top 15 phrases: Cover up Write off [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you tell if one of your employees has committed fraud, and is currently considering covering up their misdeeds? According to <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240175638/Ernst-Young-email-keyword-analysis-identifies-ID-fraudsters">a new study</a> published by accounting firm Ernst &amp; Young, apparently you can start by searching for the phrase &#8220;cover up.&#8221; No, really. Here are the top 15 phrases:</p>

<ol>
<li>Cover up</li>
<li>Write off</li>
<li>Illegal</li>
<li>Failed investment</li>
<li>Nobody will find out</li>
<li>Grey area</li>
<li>They owe it to me</li>
<li>Do not volunteer information</li>
<li>Not ethical</li>
<li>Off the books</li>
<li>Backdate</li>
<li>No inspection</li>
<li>Pull earnings forward</li>
<li>Special fees</li>
<li>Friendly payments</li>
</ol>

<p>I thought this was fake until I saw Ernst &amp; Young&#8217;s name pop up <em>eleven</em> times on Wikipedia&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accounting_scandals">article about accounting scandals</a>. They must be experts at this kind of thing.  Via <a href="http://qz.com/41048/nobody-will-find-out-and-other-phrases-commonly-used-in-emails-by-fraudsters/">Quartz</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AlmostLegally/~4/8XlJ-6QAMT4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelylegally.com/post/top-15-phrases-used-during-commission-of-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barelylegally.com/post/top-15-phrases-used-during-commission-of-fraud/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
