<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Citizen Economists</title>
	
	<link>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs</link>
	<description>The Dismal Side of Healthcare, Economically Correct, No Widgets Here, Citizen Economists, and Fictionomics. Many blogs, one website: http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:57:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/AmateurEconomists" /><feedburner:info uri="amateureconomists" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>AmateurEconomists</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FAmateurEconomists" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FAmateurEconomists" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FAmateurEconomists" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/AmateurEconomists" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FAmateurEconomists" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FAmateurEconomists" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FAmateurEconomists" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:browserFriendly>Thank you for your interest in subscribing to Citizen Economists! Our latest blogs are available in full via your favorite news reader or daily email updates.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>(Fund)Raising Resources to help Eurozone Members in Need?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/_wPVGohRjOU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/09/fundraising-resources-to-help-eurozone-members-in-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Claus Vistesen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it might appear that my smug headline in the post below may not have been so appropriate after all. At least I find the news from the FT today that Eurozone members, headed by France and Germany, are considering to set up an internal IMF type fund very significant.
(from the FT)
Germany and France are [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Slim Pickings in the Eurozone?'>Slim Pickings in the Eurozone?</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/18/poor-eurozone-gdp-figures-for-q4-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009'>Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/06/danske-on-eurozone-debt-the-peril-of-internal-devaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations'>Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it might appear that my smug headline in <a href="http://clausvistesen.squarespace.com/alphasources-blog/2010/3/5/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone.html">the post below</a> may not have been so appropriate after all. At least I find <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fa9877f0-2a26-11df-b940-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">the news from the FT today</a> that Eurozone members, headed by France and Germany, are considering to set up an internal IMF type fund very significant.</p>
<p>(from the FT)</p>
<blockquote><p>Germany and France are planning to launch a sweeping new initiative to reinforce economic co-operation and surveillance within the eurozone, including the establishment of a European Monetary Fund, according to senior government officials.</p>
<p>Their intention is to set up the rules and tools to prevent any recurrence of instability in the <span>eurozone</span> stemming from the indebtedness of a single member state, such as Greece. The first details of the plan, including support for an EMF modelled on the <span>International Monetary Fund</span>, were revealed at the weekend by Wolfgang Schäuble, the German finance minister.</p>
<p>“I am in favour of stronger co-ordination of economic policies in the EU and in the eurozone,” Mr Schäuble told newspaper Welt am Sonntag.</p>
<p>If France and Germany can agree on such proposals – long urged by Paris – they are likely to set the basis for the most radical overhaul of the rules underpinning the euro since the currency was launched in 1999. The German thinking emerged as George Papandreou, the Greek prime minister, flew to Paris to seek the support of Nicolas Sarkozy, French president, for his government’s drastic austerity programme.</p>
<p>“We must support Greece, because they are making an effort,” Mr Sarkozy said before the meeting. “If we created the euro, we cannot let a country fall that is in the eurozone. Otherwise there was no point in creating the euro.”</p>
<p>His words appeared to underline the greater readiness in France than in Germany to provide some sort of financial support or guarantee for the Greek economy. Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, insisted that no such support had been sought or discussed when she met Mr Papandreou on Friday.</p>
<p>Both France and Germany agree Greece should not turn to the IMF for support, so the idea of an EMF has clear attractions for Paris, though it could hardly be set up in time to help Greece. Mr Schäuble said: “We are not planning a competitor . . . to the IMF, but we do need an institution for the internal equilibrium of the eurozone that would have at its disposal both the experience of the IMF, and comparable intervention mechanisms.”</p>
<p>According to German thinking, the plan could include tough penalties for eurozone members that fail to curb deficit spending or run up excessive government debt. Ideas include cutting off countries that fail to curb deficit spending from EU cohesion funds, temporarily removing their right to vote in EU ministerial meetings and suspension from the eurozone.</p>
<p>Those may prove very difficult for France to swallow, given its own record of greater fiscal laxity than Germany.</p></blockquote>
<p>Needless to say, this would draw the wrath from Euro skeptics and those, in general, opposed to tighter cooperation among Eurozone member countries. However, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b0260ac6-2a1b-11df-b940-00144feabdc0.html">as Munchau argues splendid in another FT piece today</a>; a monetary union needs a tight political and fiscal supranational framework to really make it work. Now, we must choose which solution we prefer.</p>
<div></div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Slim Pickings in the Eurozone?'>Slim Pickings in the Eurozone?</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/18/poor-eurozone-gdp-figures-for-q4-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009'>Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/06/danske-on-eurozone-debt-the-peril-of-internal-devaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations'>Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xuJeBhg6WytnHdXNTA2Slyrhzl8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xuJeBhg6WytnHdXNTA2Slyrhzl8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xuJeBhg6WytnHdXNTA2Slyrhzl8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xuJeBhg6WytnHdXNTA2Slyrhzl8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=_wPVGohRjOU:OgG12daH7Ao:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/_wPVGohRjOU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/09/fundraising-resources-to-help-eurozone-members-in-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/09/fundraising-resources-to-help-eurozone-members-in-need/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Debt and the Supply-Demand Dynamic</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/Gl-bnksb0dY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/09/consumer-debt-and-the-supply-demand-dynamic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynesianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently reminded of the old argument about Say’s Law, and that reminded me that it was Keynes who twisted Say’s theories around to create the ridiculous argument that supply created its own demand, which I say is a load of crap, which pretty much sums up a lot of what Keynes did, probably [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/03/30/supply-demand-and-price/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Supply, Demand and Price'>Supply, Demand and Price</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/true-fiscal-insanity-creating-money-to-buy-government-debt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt'>True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can'>Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently reminded of the old argument about Say’s Law, and that reminded me that it was Keynes who twisted Say’s theories around to create the ridiculous argument that supply created its own demand, which I say is a load of crap, which pretty much sums up a lot of what Keynes did, probably because he was an egotistical idiot-savant who erroneously thought that he could put economics and human behavior in terms of absolutes that you could turn into equations, a particular, arrogant stupidity that has, nonetheless, fascinated generations of economists since then, all of whom childishly delight in equations and computers, whether it means anything or not, which it doesn’t, which I can actually prove – prove! – with an entire storage area full (the “supply”) of ashtrays made out of dried dog crap, which nobody wanted to buy (the “demand”), proving that supply does NOT create its own demand.</p>
<p>Instead, it is actually true that demand created its own supply, like the “supply” of new “neighbors” at the storage place are demanding (“demand”) that I get that stinking, festering fecal mess out of there or they are going to sue me or something, to which I said “Great! I’ll pay you off with some of these ashtrays, which will make wonderful gifts for your friends and family!”</p>
<p>I bring this up not, as is often rumored, as a last minute appeal to you, the American consumer, to buy a bunch of these dog-poo ashtrays with their “keepsake quality”, and take them off my, literally, stinking hands, but to show you that one of the reasons why the economy is doing badly is that the latest unemployment numbers are Bad News Aplenty (BNA), as people do not buy as much stuff (demand) when they don’t make as much as much money, and the people who make stuff (supply) are then laid off, proving, once again, that supply follows demand.</p>
<p>And, since we are talking about it, people are not buying as much stuff, which I cleverly conclude from the fact that consumer installment debt has been going down since September 2008 as the American consumer is gradually, slowly, ever so slowly, almost glacially, paying down some of their super-sized, staggering $2.5 trillion in consumer installment debt.</p>
<p>How much? Consumers have, in a year and a half, paid down a measly $135 billion! Hahaha!</p>
<p>At this rate, one wonders, at 20% interest on the unpaid balance, how many freaking lifetimes will it take just for consumers to pay off their $2.5 trillion in existing debt, which doesn’t even count the debt they are going to incur in the future, just trying to buy the basics, as the inflation in prices from the insane inflation in the money supply makes things so costly that they get to the choice of debt or starvation, and even then, most people will buy food instead of gold, silver and oil.</p>
<p>Hoping to gently motivate them, and to provide the apparently necessary motivation delivered in a non-threatening, person-centric, positive way, I say, “Hey! You could stand to lose a few pounds there, chubby! Stop eating for a couple of days and use the ‘found’ money to buy yourself some gold, silver and oil, you moron!” but even then, they always act upset, like I said something wrong! See the kind of stupid crap I have to put up with around here all the damned time?</p>
<p>Anyway, their only hope is that everything survives a massive inflation, so that $135 billion dollars is, in terms of buying power, less than a week’s average minimum wage or something like that! Hahaha! Problem solved! Hahahaha!</p>
<p>In case you were curious, I put a lot of it down to the unholy combination of moronic do-gooders trying to save my life and greedy governments trying to drain my blood, as they, all over the place, raised cigarette taxes by several dollars per pack, so that the quarter of adults (54 million) who smoke a theoretical carton a week, have $40, $50, $60 sometimes more than $70 a week less money to spend on everything else, which comes to, at an average of $6 per pack, $3.24 billion per week, or a tidy $168 billion a year in lost spending power!</p>
<p>In short, tobacco addicts stopped buying other things so as to afford one thing that has become so expensive.</p>
<p>If they were smart, smokers would be spending their money on gold, silver and oil, waiting a little while until their prices soar as the government deficit-spends the massive, monstrous amounts of money that the Federal Reserve creates, and THEN taking up smoking when they could easily afford cigarettes at any price, the higher price for insurance, and the needed medical treatments, also at any price!</p>
<p>It’s enough to make you say, “Whee! This investing stuff is easy!”</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/consumer-debt-and-the-supply-demand-dynamic/">Consumer Debt and the Supply-Demand Dynamic</a> originally appeared in the <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com">Daily Reckoning</a>.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/03/30/supply-demand-and-price/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Supply, Demand and Price'>Supply, Demand and Price</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/true-fiscal-insanity-creating-money-to-buy-government-debt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt'>True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can'>Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/je_j1zkGXcehvKW_Z0R502YEwJs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/je_j1zkGXcehvKW_Z0R502YEwJs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/je_j1zkGXcehvKW_Z0R502YEwJs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/je_j1zkGXcehvKW_Z0R502YEwJs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Gl-bnksb0dY:Wt1fy9nY988:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/Gl-bnksb0dY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/09/consumer-debt-and-the-supply-demand-dynamic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/09/consumer-debt-and-the-supply-demand-dynamic/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Inflation: The Economic Factor that Never Stops</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/AEYQQATFDEw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/08/inflation-the-economic-factor-that-never-stops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiat currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a guy who thinks that such huge explosions in money supplies around the world and the explosions in government deficit-spending around the world will lead to catastrophic explosions in inflation in prices, probably around the world.
I am also a guy who thinks that inflation in prices is the Thing Most Feared (TMF) in [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/03/18/m0-money-m0-problems-expect-massive-inflation-in-2009-and-beyond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: M0 Money, M0 Problems: Expect Massive Inflation in 2009 and Beyond'>M0 Money, M0 Problems: Expect Massive Inflation in 2009 and Beyond</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Borrow and Spend Economics to Pay for Borrowing and Spending'>Borrow and Spend Economics to Pay for Borrowing and Spending</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/true-fiscal-insanity-creating-money-to-buy-government-debt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt'>True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a guy who thinks that such huge explosions in money supplies around the world and the explosions in government deficit-spending around the world will lead to catastrophic explosions in inflation in prices, probably around the world.</p>
<p>I am also a guy who thinks that inflation in prices is the Thing Most Feared (TMF) in the whole world in terms of total sheer misery and suffering, judging by the entire last 4,500 years of history, except for, maybe, the plague.</p>
<p>Naturally, for one so dyspeptic and predisposed to paranoia because the people in charge are apparently overpaid, corrupt morons, I am visibly shaken at the news from <em>Bloomberg</em> that “The consumer-price index increased 0.2 percent for a fifth straight month, led by higher fuel costs, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington.” Yikes!</p>
<p>Inflation never stops! Even in a recession/depression like we have now! It’s terrifying!</p>
<p>Anyway, since insane levels of massive governmental deficit-spending of fiat money created by central banks is a world-wide phenomenon, there will be a massive inflation in consumer prices as a result of all of this unbelievably much new money being poured into the economy via governmental deficit-spending, and already the government is forced to report 2.6% inflation.</p>
<p>This is actually down from last month’s 2.7% inflation, and so immediately I get angry emails from people saying, “Dear Mogambo Stupid Head (MSH), You say that inflation is raging because of all the money that the Federal Reserve is creating, so how do you explain <em>Bloomberg</em> reporting ‘Excluding energy and food, the so-called core index unexpectedly fell 0.1 percent, reflecting a drop in new-car prices, clothing and shelter’? You can’t explain it because you are stupid and you are wrong and everybody hates you! Sincerely, Anonymous Reader.”</p>
<p>Well, as nice as it is to hear from my sister like that, it is doubly enjoyable this time because she is so wrong that I rate her as one who “has her own head up her own nasty butt” and I can hardly wait until Thanksgiving when everybody will be around the table and I can remind her of that ugly fact, getting back at her for what she said about me last year, by reminding her that she is so stupid (audience shouts out, “How stupid, Marvelous Manly Mogambo (MMM)?”) that she forgot to read farther into the article to learn that costs are being held down because “Even with higher production and material costs, US companies are reluctant to pass on the expenses to consumers”, which includes Wal-Mart, “the world’s largest retailer”, which “reported fourth-quarter sales that trailed its projection after cutting grocery and electronic prices” which, in a nutshell, explains why I am now screaming, “Inflation is here, you morons! It’s being temporarily absorbed by businesses and their stockholders making less money, and sometimes taking losses!”</p>
<p>That ought to shut her up pretty good, I figure, and if not, then I’ll scream at her until she confesses that she did not consider that the government now uses Hedonic Measurements of inflation, such as how that the turkey she is jamming into her pie-hole used to start getting stale and dried-out after a week or so in the refrigerator. But now, perhaps with the addition of small amounts of preservatives as part of a secret government experiment involving adding tiny little bits of nuclear waste during processing to produce enough radioactivity to kill all organisms that touch it, the leftover turkey will be just as tender and delicious a year from now as it is today!</p>
<p>Maybe even glowing, so you can make a sandwich in the dark!</p>
<p>This increased shelf life of the cooked turkey obviously increases the value of the turkey tremendously, and it also helps to deplete the nation’s nagging problem of its stockpile of dangerous, clumsy and expensive-to-store nuclear waste, producing a double benefit! Double!</p>
<p>Thus, the government calculates that the new, extra benefits of having turkey available for consumption for more days of the year (which is not a problem for my sister since she seems to be eager to eat lots of food, and she’ll probably finish the turkey carcass off pretty quick!), and simultaneously achieving a profound social good of disposing of dangerous radioactive waste, means that the turkey can never go up in price! Only the rising price of the new benefits makes it LOOK like it, because it costs more dollars per pound! Hahaha!</p>
<p>I am sure that she will come back with some of her stupid blah blah blah, but no matter what she says before I interrupt her, I am going to tell her that, even worse, the Labor Department report went on to say that “The CPI is the broadest of the three monthly price gauges from the Labor Department because it includes goods and services”, which was put in there to make you yawn and skip over the part that said that prices “showed 1.4 percent gains in both the cost of imported goods and wholesale prices in January”! Wowser!</p>
<p>As I said, inflation is the only thing that makes sense when considering such unbelievable, incomprehensibly massive increases in government borrowing-and-spending, overshadowed only by the enormous increases of money created by the Federal Reserve, and which makes sense since every doofus is town is yammering about how “inflation is impossible” and how “deflation is the bigger problem” since deflation means that the over-indebted middle class, the over-leveraged rich, the bloated financial services industry and the socialist government would lose, while inflation would affect mostly the poor, which are always the ultimate victim.</p>
<p>My suggestion to the poor? Buy gold, silver and oil immediately, because they will all rise right along with inflation, and probably more. Probably a lot more!</p>
<p>And if you don’t think that “the poor” today, after a half century of one bleeding-heart Congress after another finding ways to give them money and benefits, cannot come up with twenty bucks a month to buy an ounce of silver, then you don’t know squat about “the poor” in America today.</p>
<p>My suggestion to everyone else? Surprise! It’s the same! That makes it easy to remember, as in, “Whee! This investing stuff is easy!”</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/inflation-the-economic-factor-that-never-stops/">Inflation: The Economic Factor that Never Stops</a> originally appeared in the <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com">Daily Reckoning</a>.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/03/18/m0-money-m0-problems-expect-massive-inflation-in-2009-and-beyond/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: M0 Money, M0 Problems: Expect Massive Inflation in 2009 and Beyond'>M0 Money, M0 Problems: Expect Massive Inflation in 2009 and Beyond</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Borrow and Spend Economics to Pay for Borrowing and Spending'>Borrow and Spend Economics to Pay for Borrowing and Spending</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/true-fiscal-insanity-creating-money-to-buy-government-debt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt'>True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0siaHBnWmTJ_uCUekNcPEN_S7uw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0siaHBnWmTJ_uCUekNcPEN_S7uw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0siaHBnWmTJ_uCUekNcPEN_S7uw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0siaHBnWmTJ_uCUekNcPEN_S7uw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=AEYQQATFDEw:P87rlaIqaHo:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/AEYQQATFDEw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/08/inflation-the-economic-factor-that-never-stops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/08/inflation-the-economic-factor-that-never-stops/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>More Data Shows Labor Market Positioned for Big Gains</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/4nV11rcGLSE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/08/more-data-shows-labor-market-positioned-for-big-gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

On Friday the government reported that the unemployment rate in the U.S. held at 9.7% in February and employers cut fewer jobs than anticipated.  The stabilization in the labor market continued even as two East Coast blizzards of 2-3 feet each forced closings of some businesses during the period.
Furthermore, the jobless rate, which has [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/03/people-with-disabilities-in-the-us-labor-market/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: People with Disabilities in the U.S. Labor Market'>People with Disabilities in the U.S. Labor Market</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/06/pending-home-sales-longest-string-of-monthly-gains-in-6-years/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Pending Home Sales:  Longest String of Monthly Gains in 6 years'>Pending Home Sales:  Longest String of Monthly Gains in 6 years</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/manufacturing-jobs-grow-for-third-straight-month/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Manufacturing Jobs Grow for Third Straight Month'>Manufacturing Jobs Grow for Third Straight Month</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kctjn6lgc_bHHusGsby3sv1FNtQ/0/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/66e79_di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kctjn6lgc_bHHusGsby3sv1FNtQ/1/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/4670a_di" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>On Friday the government reported that the unemployment rate in the U.S. held at 9.7% in February and employers cut fewer jobs than anticipated.  The stabilization in the labor market continued even as two East Coast blizzards of 2-3 feet each forced closings of some businesses during the period.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the jobless rate, which has not increased since October, held steady even as more people entered the workforce.</p>
<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/S5OqmXJw_0I/AAAAAAAAAd0/miNiFT3dMA4/s1600-h/jobshaver.jpg"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/4670a_jobshaver.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>The steady unemployment rate owed to a 308,000 increase in household employment following a 541,000 January gain. These increases follow monthly declines of as much as 967,000 during the recession. Moreover, the labor force started to expand, last month by 342,000, after a lesser January increase. Throughout 2009 the labor force contracted slightly. The labor force participation rate also rose.</p>
<p>&#8220;The weather effects were enough to transform [the data],&#8221; said David Resler, chief economist at Nomura Securities International Inc. &#8220;Job growth is happening as we speak.&#8221;</p>
<p>Over at Fortune, they continue to expand their <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0904/gallery.F500_hiring.fortune/index.html">list of employers</a> that have at least 150 openings. And the larger firms are now ramping up hiring significantly since the first of the year.</p>
<p>Among companies adding workers is Accenture Plc, the world’s second-largest technology-services provider, which plans to boost payrolls by about 50,000 this year.  Accenture says it is on track to have started new employees in as many as 9,000 jobs in the U.S. by the end of August.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are seeing a very broad uplift globally&#8221; in demand, says John Campagnino, director of worldwide recruiting, in a interview on Wednesday.</p>
<p>Beyond full-time hires, the number of temporary workers increased by 48,000 in February, the fifth straight monthly gain.</p>
<p>Amidst the snow, factory payrolls increased 1,000 in February after rising 20,000 in the prior month. Most economists had called for a drop of 15,000.  Manufacturing employment continues as a leading segment in labor growth.</p>
<p>Friday’s report showed that almost 1 million Americans said bad weather prevented them from getting to work during the survey week. About 290,000 people on average say bad weather has prevented them from getting to work, according to figures going back three decades.</p>
<p>Economists at Macroeconomic Advisers LLC project that the weather actually reduced the payroll count by anywhere from 150,000 to 220,000 workers. The drop will probably be reversed this month, they said.</p>
<p>The most recent storm of similar intensity that occurred during a survey week was in January 1996. The data for payrolls that month, which have gone through several revisions since the initial estimate, showed a 19,000 drop in employment in the January period followed by a gain of 434,000 in February.</p>
<p>We continue to look for the US economy to add a significant number of jobs in spring and summer this year with the unemployment rate beginning a steady decline in the monthly readings just ahead.</p>
<p>Many argue that the return to job growth as been &#8220;slow.&#8221;  On the contrary, this has been the most rapid turn from net jobs losses to net jobs gains of any business cycle in the last century.  A jobless recovery?  <a href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2009/10/jobless-recovery-not-this-time.html">Not this time.</a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/03/people-with-disabilities-in-the-us-labor-market/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: People with Disabilities in the U.S. Labor Market'>People with Disabilities in the U.S. Labor Market</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/06/pending-home-sales-longest-string-of-monthly-gains-in-6-years/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Pending Home Sales:  Longest String of Monthly Gains in 6 years'>Pending Home Sales:  Longest String of Monthly Gains in 6 years</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/manufacturing-jobs-grow-for-third-straight-month/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Manufacturing Jobs Grow for Third Straight Month'>Manufacturing Jobs Grow for Third Straight Month</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4jw4Mf-9TZNZAPpMRM5ldyANKzE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4jw4Mf-9TZNZAPpMRM5ldyANKzE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4jw4Mf-9TZNZAPpMRM5ldyANKzE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4jw4Mf-9TZNZAPpMRM5ldyANKzE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=4nV11rcGLSE:bNdHCMTCFrU:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/4nV11rcGLSE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/08/more-data-shows-labor-market-positioned-for-big-gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/08/more-data-shows-labor-market-positioned-for-big-gains/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Borrow and Spend Economics to Pay for Borrowing and Spending</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/Brc3l0xenhE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynesianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I will admit that we had a little accidental gunfire around here recently, but nobody was hurt, and all that really happened is that I wasted a lot of very expensive ammunition and scared the hell out of a lot of people, including myself, a commotion which instantly activated my Amazing Mogambo Reflexes (AMR), [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/true-fiscal-insanity-creating-money-to-buy-government-debt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt'>True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can'>Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/09/federal-spending-vs-candidate-spending/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Federal Spending vs. Candidate Spending'>Federal Spending vs. Candidate Spending</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I will admit that we had a little accidental gunfire around here recently, but nobody was hurt, and all that really happened is that I wasted a lot of very expensive ammunition and scared the hell out of a lot of people, including myself, a commotion which instantly activated my Amazing Mogambo Reflexes (AMR), making me drop the delicious Hostess Cupcake that I was noisily eating and take cover on the floor, falling, as I did, on top of the aforesaid cupcake, smashing it all over myself, and all over the floor, which made it taste terrible after that.</p>
<p>But the surprising gunfire was not my fault, as I had just read that the Federal Reserve is being as dangerously incompetent as ever by continuing to massively increase the money supply (which is so horrible because it causes inflation in prices) so that they can buy up (monetize) at least a part of the massive, monstrous, mega-moolah Treasury debt issuance that will be necessary to fund the unbelievable sum of, as I understand it, $1.9 trillion in government deficit-spending in the upcoming One Freaking Year (OFY) as a result of the massive spending of the terrible, awful, worse-than-I-had-feared, demon-from-hell Obama administration, plus trillions more for the needs of the private sector, and a trillion or so in Congressional “supplemental appropriations” throughout the year as Congress periodically, almost ritually in a Satanic kind of way, “discovers” that their original estimate of their borrowing needs was inadequate, and – surprise! – that these slimy, lying bastards need LOTS and lots more money!</p>
<p>I can see by rereading that paragraph that I was so wrapped up in heaping Massive Mogambo Scorn (MMS) on the arrogant, radical-Left Obama, on every sniveling Democrat in the place, most of the Republicans, and on the despicable, guilty-as-charged, incompetent Federal Reserve that I never actually got around to telling you how much money and credit the Fed created last week, which was the original point I was going to make for some reason other than decrying such irresponsible expansions of the money supply that will guarantee horrific, economy-destroying, dollar-destroying, soul-destroying inflation in prices, but I forgot what I was planning to say about it, to tell you the truth, but with or without it, the increase in Fed Credit last week was another $5.2 billion, which (although terrifying), is less than his usual increase, and at $5.2 billion, is merely twice the usual weekly rate of money and credit creation by the monster Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve, who – single-handedly! – created all the economic mess of the world by merely creating $10 billion-or-so per month of new Federal Reserve money and credit!</p>
<p>Now, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, a clueless academic, still stubbornly hews to that same, tired, insipid-yet-stupid neo-Keynesian econometric theory that has now been shown to be not only wrong, wrong, wrong, but also stupidly and catastrophically wrong, which doesn’t say anything at all about the morons, like Ben Bernanke and Alan Blinder, who are themselves mere representative examples of the neo-Keynesian econometric bozos rampant in the world today, all of whom believe in such imbecilities as their precious economic theories in the face of, literally, overwhelming evidence to the contrary! It is absurd on its face! Ya gotta laugh! Hahahaha!</p>
<p>Interestingly, a crucial part of the stupid Keynesian nonsense holds that the government can, by virtue of borrowing the money, replace any perceived lost “consumer demand”, in any economic downturn, by merely borrowing and spending money, even if borrowing and spending money was the cause of the original downturn, and that there are no repercussions that cannot be solved by more borrowing and spending, and that inflation in prices has nothing to do with the money supply but with irrational exuberance! Which doesn’t even make any sense! Hahahah! It doesn’t even freaking make sense!!</p>
<p>Sharp-eyed Junior Mogambo Rangers (JMRs) will recognize the two exclamation points as indicators of something, usually the preceding sentence (as in this case), as being very important, as, now that I notice, it is, in this case, in that it is Beyond Freaking Crazy (BFC)!!!</p>
<p>Horrors! The punctuation using the rare triple exclamation point! You can tell I am on a roll here! I suggest you go to someplace safe in your house where your enemies would have to attempt a painful frontal assault against you, and as you wait, you think to yourself, “Obviously, this is extremely important! As indeed it is, now that I think about it after it has been drawn to my attention, thanks to the Magnificent Mogambo (MM), because you do not get anything except total, unmitigated disaster from inept management by people who cannot be controlled and who are Beyond Freaking Crazy (BFC)!”</p>
<p>I am very proud of you for thinking this, as it shows that it has all become clear: The preponderance of people on this planet, and in our universities, and in our media, and in our governments, and in our central banks are BFC lunatics if they think that borrowing (racking up debt) and spending money will “cure” the bust of the boom produced by borrowing (racking up debt) and spending the money! Hahahaha!</p>
<p>I immediately think of the joke, “Doctor! I’ve been gorging myself, but I never lose any weight!” but it doesn’t seem to fit the conversation, somehow, and it doesn’t really seem to have anything to do with anything I was talking about, which makes me think that maybe my subconscious is telling me that I SHOULD have been talking about it, which doesn’t make any sense, either, because I don’t think anyone needs advice on how to gorge themselves, and in fact, people seem quite disgusted when I do it, although it makes their kids laugh, meaning that the kids like me better than they like their own parents, which is a small victory for me and, although small, is a victory.</p>
<p>So I say to the kids, who just showed how much they love me, “Hey, kids! Tell your parents that they are idiots unless they buy gold, silver and oil right now, because unless they do, they are going to be poor when excessive government deficit-spending and excessive Federal Reserve over-creation of money and credit make prices soar as the buying power of the dollar falls, which means that you will be poor, and you tell them how you don’t want to be poor, and how you have been thinking about, in an idle sort of economic self-defense way, the many, many advantages of being too young to be charged with a capital crime should they fail to acquire the aforesaid gold, silver and oil!”</p>
<p>This is where the parents turned around and gave me this “dirty look”, which I interpreted to mean, “I surrender, under protest, to your magnificent, powerful presentation of the case for gold, silver and oil, enhanced by the paranoid notion that my own children are threatening to kill me in some bizarre extortion racket involving gold, silver and oil that you have planted in my head, which I realize is all for my own good because I now see that only an idiot would not buy gold, silver and oil when the government and the banks are acting so despicably! Thank you, handsome stranger!”</p>
<p>The name’s Mogambo, ma’am. It’s my job.</p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending/">Borrow and Spend Economics to Pay for Borrowing and Spending</a> originally appeared in the <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com">Daily Reckoning</a>.</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/forum/monetary-policy/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/true-fiscal-insanity-creating-money-to-buy-government-debt/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt'>True Fiscal Insanity: Creating Money to Buy Government Debt</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can'>Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/09/federal-spending-vs-candidate-spending/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Federal Spending vs. Candidate Spending'>Federal Spending vs. Candidate Spending</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jRxjLwXUc6kcdwNyihNZWqC1fvs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jRxjLwXUc6kcdwNyihNZWqC1fvs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jRxjLwXUc6kcdwNyihNZWqC1fvs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jRxjLwXUc6kcdwNyihNZWqC1fvs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=Brc3l0xenhE:pt7y_Z91loI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/Brc3l0xenhE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/borrow-and-spend-economics-to-pay-for-borrowing-and-spending/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Slim Pickings in the Eurozone?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/xUhJM9TFZMw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Claus Vistesen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In a week when the Greek leadership declares it a historic moment for the European Union that the ailing country has agreed to swallow an additional austerity plan which, so far, seems to have calmed markets it would almost be too much to continue picking on the Eurozone. Yet pick I am going to nonetheless [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/18/poor-eurozone-gdp-figures-for-q4-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009'>Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/14/moodys-on-japan-and-the-eurozone-stating-the-obvious/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Moodys on Japan and the Eurozone &#8211; Stating the Obvious'>Moodys on Japan and the Eurozone &#8211; Stating the Obvious</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/06/danske-on-eurozone-debt-the-peril-of-internal-devaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations'>Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>In a week when the Greek leadership declares it a historic moment for the European Union that the ailing country has agreed to swallow an additional austerity plan which, so far, seems to have calmed markets it would almost be too much to continue picking on the Eurozone. Yet pick I am going to nonetheless even if I should add my support, and scepticism, to the road Greece currently appears destined and determined to travel.</p>
<p><strong>A Greek Plan and a Believing ECB </strong></p>
<p>On the plan itself <a href="http://macro-man.blogspot.com/2010/03/greek-marathon.html">Macro Man pretty well sums up</a> my reading of the situation too but more concretely, it is difficult to point a finger on the measures themselves. Consequently, George Papandreou’s government <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=a4ivuQvpxo9E">approved</a> this week of an additional 4.8 billion euros ($6.6 billion) of deficit cuts which include raising value-added tax to 21 percent from 19 percent, further increasing taxes on tobacco alcohol as well as of course further scything the public sector wage bill. All this is of course exactly what Greece needs to quell international investors of the worry that Greece will ultimately throw in the towel and default. However, at 2% of GDP (according to Bloomberg) it is almost but a drop in the ocean for an economy running a public deficit well in excess of 10% (which is pledged to be reduced from 12.7% to 8.7% of GDP this year).</p>
<p>Moreover, it was interesting to observe the manner in which Mr. Papandreou resoundingly used this week&#8217;s additional deficit cuts as a way to articulate <em>over to you then</em> pointing towards coming bilateral talks with Germany and France in which the implicit message was that now that Greece was honing up to its side of the bargain France and Germany should give something the other way. Alas both German chancellor Angela Merkel and her finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble explicitly pointing out that aside from a friendly tête-à-tête over a bottle of Metaxa future bilateral talks would deal with no such thing as aid commitments. In any case, as Wolfgang Schaeuble noted; the recent measures taken by Greece will probably convince international investors. Let us hope our good Wolfgang is right here and while this in itself may turn out to be a tight call, Germany (and France) have so far dodged the bullet in terms of engaging in direct bilateral aid talks with Greece (let alone Spain).</p>
<p>So far it also seems that EU has dodged the bullet of whether the Greek affair will end up <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f3f19f0c-26ad-11df-bd0c-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">in the arms of IMF</a> which, one assumes, would pave the way for other parts of the Eurozone periphery seeking out the aid of the fund. Moreover, the ECB moved at its monthly conference strongly backing the measures by the Greek government while also noting that it would be <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=a6aVMfQG6JS8">inappropriate for Greece</a> to seek help from the IMF.</p>
<p>Yet, all is not well.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://globaleconomydoesmatter.blogspot.com/2010/03/hanging-in-balance-over-at-ecb.html">Edward noted earlier this week</a>, recent PMI data from the Eurozone confirms what we already knows in the sense that the recovery is moving very slowly and is essentially non-existing in key economies.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the first place we have the latest batch of Eurozone PMI data, which suggest that the process of economic recovery is going to be neither so rapid, nor so straight forward, as was initially thought. And even more to the point, exit from the recession is being more characterised for its unevenness than it is for its uniformity. Growth in February was heavily weighted to the manufacturing rather than the services sector, and in manufacturing there was more dynamic in demand from the ex-Eurozone export area, than from internal orders, suggesting that the 6% drop in the Euro is having a positive impact on external competitiveness, while domestic demand remains weak and lacklustre.</p></blockquote>
<p>Turning to the issue of monetary policy I have to admit that I did not look forward to Thursday&#8217;s session of ECB newspeak with the same eager as did Edward, but it was interesting to scrutinize <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=a6aVMfQG6JS8">the announcement by the ECB</a> that it intends to continue withdrawing liquidity from the system despite the obvious travails of Greece and Spain. It appears then that the ECB is currently playing by the book believing that EU and Greece may sort out the problems without further aid from either the IMF or extraordinary ECB funding. Yet, as Edward shows with <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ngczZkrw340/S4-pGPAvybI/AAAAAAAAQZo/5M_tDdHvWvA/s1600-h/ecb+funding+to+Spanish+banks.png">a very telling graph</a> Spanish graphs are completely dependent for ECB financing at the current juncture which raises the question of what happens as we move forward towards the summer. Especially the expiration in July of the 1 year bn 442 € bumper tender could mark a turning point.</p>
<p><strong>Reverse Decoupling in the Eurozone? </strong></p>
<p><em>(click on picture for better viewing)</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><span><span> </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vhPkPUN2aT8/S5ADgYjcZFI/AAAAAAAABcI/HH-_ToJKk4c/s1600-h/eur+usd.JPG"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vhPkPUN2aT8/S5ADgYjcZFI/AAAAAAAABcI/HH-_ToJKk4c/s320/eur+usd.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267729319395" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The steady build up of problems in the Eurozone and the consistent divergence in bond spreads among Eurozone economies have had a notable effect on the Euro. In a post Lehman world the EUR/USD peaked so far in the autumn of 2009 at around 1.44 to 1.45 with some analysts at the time hailing the return of a EUR/USD poised to move into the 1.50s and perhaps even to break the, so far, &#8220;magic&#8221; 1.60 sticker. Alas, this was not what happened.</p>
<p>Since the autumn of 2009 the Euro has consequently lost some 6% against the USD and is currently trading in the range of 1.35 to 1.36. This value will hardly scare anyone either side of the neutral fence and actually, in my humble opinion, still signifies a grossly over valued Euro based on economic fundamentals. Yet, the recent slide of the Euro (as tepid as it may be) actually represents a double edged sword. In the first instance it is naturally a direct function of the growing problems in Greece, Spain, Ireland etc and thus a sign of weakness. Yet, its real economic effect is decidedly positive as it helps support Eurozone exports which is now, more than ever, instrumental as a driving force of aggregate Eurozone economic growth. In the jargon of Alpha.Sources market lingo, the Eurozone seems to be passing on old maid to the US which of course itself needs a weaker currency. This of course, as debated before, is exactly the rub in a world where would be exporters are a plenty while importers are not.</p>
<p>In this context, it was with some fascination that I recently read <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aD6mJGvUqkRE">the following Bloomberg headline </a>implying that the Eurozone might be subject to <em>reverse</em> decoupling.</p>
<p>(quote Bloomberg)</p>
<blockquote><p>Europe’s economy may be coming unstuck from the global recovery as governments to the south of the region struggle to reverse budget deficits and consumers in the north pull back spending.</p>
<p>After the 16-nation euro economy almost stagnated in the fourth quarter, data this week showed the weakness reaching into 2010. <a onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, 'EUESEMU:IND' ))" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=EUESEMU%3AIND">Confidence</a> among households and companies worsened unexpectedly, French <a onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, 'FRHCIMOM:IND' ))" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=FRHCIMOM%3AIND">consumer spending</a> fell and bank loans to the private sector slid for a fifth month. At the same time, Standard &amp; Poor’s said it may soon downgrade Greece again as the country grapples with the region’s largest budget shortfall.</p>
<p>Signs of a flagging recovery risk extending the euro’s slide against the dollar. They are also prompting Citigroup Inc. to advise investors to favor German <a onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, 'GDBR10:IND' ))" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=GDBR10%3AIND">government bonds</a> and UBS AG to recommend European stocks with links to the faster-growing U.S., such as <a onmouseover="return escape( popwQuoteShort( this, 'DAI:GY' ))" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=DAI%3AGY">Daimler AG</a>. As they cut their growth forecasts, economists predict slower interest-rate increases from the European Central Bank, whose governing council meets next week.</p></blockquote>
<p>Astute readers will notice immediately that it is not the first time that <em>decoupling</em> has been used in a Eurozone context, but this time of course it means something else entirely. The last time was back in the heaty days of 2006 when Bernanke slashed rates and where Japan and Europe were pinned as the economies who were to take over the baton from the US in a new Bretton Woods II(I). I shall not belabour here just how misplaced that was, but merely note how this alternative idea of Eurozone decoupling from global growth <em>might</em> be equally misplaced; at least if using a falling Euro as a premise. I emphasize might here since the irony is that the extent to which the Euro takes a beating on the back of the travails of the problems in the periphery it should actually help the Eurozone lock on to whatever global growth there is in the pipeline in the coming years. The main qualifier here is naturally that the homegrown problems themselves may still lead to an implosion in the form of a sovereign debt crisis as well as the real difficulties in terms of actually sticking to the code of an internal devaluation lies ahead of us, in this respect the following point by Edward is very important I think;</p>
<blockquote><p>Ironically, market concerns will in all probability now shift to worries that Athens has gone too far in slashing budgets and raising taxes, and that the fiscal measures announced will simply act as a massive brake on economic activity. The risk is that Greece is now in a vicious circle in which fiscal austerity sends the country ever deeper into recession &#8211; and Athens has to react even more aggressively to bring down the public sector deficit as a share of GDP.</p></blockquote>
<p>No easy way out here at all it seems and this more than anything signifies the current position in the Eurozone.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Slim)Pickings? </strong></p>
<p>Another week, another show of good will by the Greek government and another indication that the ECB means business in terms of withdrawing excess liquidity provisions. In this sense there is not much new under the sun. However, this comes on the backdrop of a growing realization among market participants and analysts that the recovery, despite policy makers&#8217; most ardent efforts, just isn&#8217;t coming. In fact, the real preoccupation now is what happens on the backdrop of an increasingly hawkish stance towards what is deemed excessively loose fiscal and monetary positions since if we could not foster a recovery with such impressive stimulus measures, what happens next?</p>
<p>The best thing we can hope for at the current juncture is to muddle through and specifically that we manage to prevent some of the more scarier and all together realistic scenarios from materializing. Here I would like to see a little more team spirit from Germany in terms of supporting Greece in her endeavors even though of course, what Merkel probably <em>really</em> wants is for Greece to move to the IMF and thus one step closer to a break with EMU.</p>
<p>Overall, growth prospects in the Eurozone remain weak and with this also the uncertainty. Greece should take whatever comfort it can in Thursday&#8217;s nod of approvement from the ECB as well as take whatever direct support it gets from the EU. On the latter, this week&#8217;s message is, not unlike above I hope, that it will be slim pickings indeed.</p></div>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/forum/international-economics/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/18/poor-eurozone-gdp-figures-for-q4-2009/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009'>Poor Eurozone GDP Figures for Q4-2009</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/14/moodys-on-japan-and-the-eurozone-stating-the-obvious/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Moodys on Japan and the Eurozone &#8211; Stating the Obvious'>Moodys on Japan and the Eurozone &#8211; Stating the Obvious</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/01/06/danske-on-eurozone-debt-the-peril-of-internal-devaluations/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations'>Danske on Eurozone Debt &#8211; The Peril of Internal Devaluations</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gYDT-IctBYNocbk6EU1LQDn4HiI/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gYDT-IctBYNocbk6EU1LQDn4HiI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gYDT-IctBYNocbk6EU1LQDn4HiI/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gYDT-IctBYNocbk6EU1LQDn4HiI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=xUhJM9TFZMw:mf0kGHNx3VE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/xUhJM9TFZMw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/05/slim-pickings-in-the-eurozone/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/WY6tO4Hju4U/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Daughty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian Douglas of MarketForceAnalysis.com took a look at a summary of the goings-on at the Comex, and says, “the data reveals a very shocking trend. That is that the registered (dealer) inventory is being drawn down at a phenomenal rate. In silver the inventory has dropped by 24% in 6 months while in gold it [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/06/a-bull-in-a-silver-shop/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: A Bull in a Silver Shop'>A Bull in a Silver Shop</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/12/17/comex-gold-and-silver-margin-requirements-raised/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: COMEX Gold And Silver Margin Requirements Raised'>COMEX Gold And Silver Margin Requirements Raised</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/06/23/gold-and-silver-coin-shortages-again/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold And Silver Coin Shortages Again'>Gold And Silver Coin Shortages Again</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian Douglas of MarketForceAnalysis.com took a look at a summary of the goings-on at the Comex, and says, “the data reveals a very shocking trend. That is that the registered (dealer) inventory is being drawn down at a phenomenal rate. In silver the inventory has dropped by 24% in 6 months while in gold it has dropped an eye-popping 41% in 6 months!”</p>
<p>Already my eyes are glazing over at the sudden overload of information, most of which I know nothing about, but know that I should, and feel uneasy that I don’t, and guilty that I don’t even want to because it involves work and initiative, or, in this case, listening to the equivalent of, “blah blah blah silver and gold are going to go to the moon not only because the Fabulous Mogambo has thus foretold it, and the Austrian school of economics has explained it, but that blah blah blah at the Comex warehouses” and then I end up getting most of it wrong anyway and I look like an idiot.</p>
<p>So, already reeling in confusion, I was thus rendered almost comatose when he relentlessly went on, “The withdrawal to deposit ratio for registered silver is 14:1 and in gold it is 5:1” and which, again, is meaningless to me because I am, as I already admitted, ignorant and lazy, which is a crushing handicap, now that we are talking about it, that should enable you to qualify for a Handicapped Parking sticker for your damned car so that you can get some of those terrific Handicapped-Only parking spots, right up front, wherever you go, but the application for which can be rejected by a snotty clerk, out of hand, on her personal say-so, although she volunteered that my “abrasive, demanding, incoherent and repellent personality is a real handicap, too, but there is no sticker for that, either.”</p>
<p>As I fell asleep, eager to again escape reality and responsibility, I began dreaming of some snappy comebacks I could have said to the Handicapped Sticker lady, like, “Well, I assume that there is a Handicapped Sticker for anyone who is mentally handicapped, and I can tell by looking at your stupid Department of Motor Vehicles face that you are not buying gold, silver and oil to protect yourself against the government’s massive deficit-spending and the Federal Reserve’s creation of all the new money and credit that will be necessary to soak it up, which is really stupid of you! Hahahaha!”</p>
<p>I really like it when the dream gets to the stage where some hot young honeys make their appearance, stage left or stage right, it makes no difference to me, but we never got there because apparently the sound of my snoring made Mr. Douglas aware that he is talking “over the head” of the biggest dullard in the crowd, which violates the politically-correct stance on “inclusion” and “diversity” of persons such as me.</p>
<p>So, quickly remedying the situation, he explains that this means that “If this rate of drawdown continues, the registered inventory of silver will be exhausted in 18.8 months and in just 8.5 months for gold!”</p>
<p>And before there is any mistake made by the casual reader, that concluding exclamation point in the previous sentence was his, not mine, although it was totally unnecessary, as I was already freaked out at the implications!</p>
<p>Thus, I was ready to race home and frantically root around in my wife’s purse for some extra money, so that I could buy some more gold and silver, when I was transfixed to the spot when he went on that he estimates, “as much as 50,000 tonnes of gold has been sold that does not exist. That is equivalent to all the gold reserves in the world that are yet to be mined, or put another way, 25 years of gold production.”</p>
<p>I was ready to edit his remarks to put an exclamation point at the end, as it certainly deserves one, but before I could do it, he followed up with, “That is the grand-daddy of all short positions!”, which had an exclamation point, and so I let it go at that, and saved myself a lot of work that will – I guarantee! – show up in the narrative section of my Productivity Report, which is coming due pretty soon, and which is always pretty disagreeable.</p>
<p>But I will get through this new assault by “higher-ups in the executive food chain” with Classic Mogambo Equanimity (CME), as I always do, and I would probably have gone completely Mogambo Freaking Nuts (MFN) a hundred times before this if I hadn’t always remembered, sometimes at the last minute, that I own gold, silver and oil, whereas these gold-less, silver-less and oil-less bozos are questioning my ability (“I think you are too stupid!”), my competence (“You seem to have no idea what you are doing!”) or my sanity (“I think you are insane!”), while never even mentioning my numerous off-setting good qualities, such as my twinkling blue eyes or the fact that none of my employees or former customers have a Restraining Order on me that is still in force.</p>
<p>If you are even half as smart as I think you are, then you get the obvious message, which is to buy gold, silver and oil.</p>
<p>Some of you, on the other hand, also got the more subtle message that a long list of miscellaneous people are all going to be very, very upset and angry at the horrifying inflation in prices that is inescapably coming, due to this massive expansion of the money supply by the Federal Reserve to pay for the unbelievable tons of money Congress is deficit-spending, and you had better take your gold, silver and oil into a bunker of some sort and arm yourself to the teeth because it is going to get Very, Very Ugly (VVU), and you will want the options of buying your way out or shooting your way out.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you do not buy gold, silver and oil, then, as they say, “the angels will weep for you.”</p>
<p>I, personally, will laugh at you. It will sound sort of like this: “Hahahaha! Moron!”</p>
<p><a title="The Mogambo Guru" href="http://dailyreckoning.com/author/mogamboguru/" target="_blank">The Mogambo Guru</a><br />
for <a title="The Daily Reckoning" href="http://dailyreckoning.com/" target="_blank"><em>The Daily Reckoning</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://dailyreckoning.com/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/">Gold and Silver Supply: Get Some While You Can</a> originally appeared in the <a href="http://dailyreckoning.com">Daily Reckoning</a>.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/10/06/a-bull-in-a-silver-shop/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: A Bull in a Silver Shop'>A Bull in a Silver Shop</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/12/17/comex-gold-and-silver-margin-requirements-raised/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: COMEX Gold And Silver Margin Requirements Raised'>COMEX Gold And Silver Margin Requirements Raised</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/06/23/gold-and-silver-coin-shortages-again/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold And Silver Coin Shortages Again'>Gold And Silver Coin Shortages Again</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xRv6kbwumLGuHo-gh4OYU-1cgo4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xRv6kbwumLGuHo-gh4OYU-1cgo4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xRv6kbwumLGuHo-gh4OYU-1cgo4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xRv6kbwumLGuHo-gh4OYU-1cgo4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=WY6tO4Hju4U:dLZkEEU5sVk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/WY6tO4Hju4U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/gold-and-silver-supply-get-some-while-you-can/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment Firm to Fund First Commercial-Scale Solar Installation In VA</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/rq_ZZCMW3Ng/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/investment-firm-to-fund-first-commercial-scale-solar-installation-in-va/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Virginia&#8217;s Landmark Solar Power Project to be Hosted on University Campus
Eastern Mennonite University (EMU) in Harrisonburg will soon be the site of Virginia&#8217;s first commercial-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) installation in the Commonwealth.
The new installation is part of a proposed revision to the campus master plan to allow for approximately 600 kilowatts of solar energy panels [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/08/renewable-energy-rewiring-america-green/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Renewable Energy: Rewiring America Green'>Renewable Energy: Rewiring America Green</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/27/water-based-energy-may-make-food-and-fossil-based-fuels-unnecessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Water-Based Energy May Make Food and Fossil-Based Fuels Unnecessary'>Water-Based Energy May Make Food and Fossil-Based Fuels Unnecessary</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/06/17/the-economics-of-advancing-alternative-energy-in-the-united-states/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The economics of advancing alternative energy in the United States'>The economics of advancing alternative energy in the United States</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lcf9qnzo6ywmUeSkV3Q9eI6XmG0/0/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0b8b8_di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Lcf9qnzo6ywmUeSkV3Q9eI6XmG0/1/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0b8b8_di" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><em>Virginia&#8217;s Landmark Solar Power Project to be Hosted on University Campus</em></p>
<p>Eastern Mennonite University (EMU) in Harrisonburg will soon be the site of Virginia&#8217;s first commercial-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) installation in the Commonwealth.</p>
<p>The new installation is part of a proposed revision to the campus master plan to allow for approximately 600 kilowatts of solar energy panels to be installed on the campus. The installation is expected to generate about 12 percent of EMU&#8217;s total electricity use and save the university an estimated $2 million in avoided electricity costs over the 25-year project.</p>
<p>EMU was one of the three national leaders in efficient energy use out of 90 colleges and universities surveyed by the Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers in 2007. In addition to the new solar initiative, EMU sponsors numerous green programs on campus, including an institutional commitment to sustainability.</p>
<p>Under an innovative financing program that has been used extensively by universities in states like California and Colorado, EMU will effectively &#8220;host&#8221; the installation, paying only for the electricity generated by the panels installed on the campus through a 25-year power purchase agreement with Secure Futures, LLC, a private solar development company based in Staunton, Va.</p>
<p>&#8220;This will represent a signature project for EMU, as it embodies the stewardship values of our institution as well as building on our record as a leading green university,&#8221; said EMU President Loren Swartzendruber.</p>
<p>&#8220;The signature components of this project include using state-of-the-art solar technology, and, through Secure Futures&#8217; unique financing model, supporting a three-tiered sustainability program including campus, curriculum and community sustainability,&#8221; said Ron Piper, vice president for finance at EMU.</p>
<p>Staunton-based Secure Futures, LLC, obtained a grant commitment of $225,000 from the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) for the project. Tony Smith, CEO of Secure Futures, said &#8220;this project will represent a milestone for renewable energy in Virginia insofar as scale and impact. We&#8217;re excited to see a first example of a solar project achieving electricity rates comparable to those offered on the electric grid, especially since Virginia has among the lowest electricity rates in the country.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ken Jurman, renewable energy manager for the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME), noted that &#8220;The EMU solar project as described fits well within the scope and intent of Virginia energy policy to encourage renewable energy resources. I&#8217;m very pleased that this initiative is moving ahead &#8211; it&#8217;s exactly the kind of thing we want to encourage across the Commonwealth to move toward a sustainable energy future.&#8221;</p>
<p>Secure Futures designs, develops, finances and maintains turnkey distributed solar solutions in collaboration with tax-exempt entities to reduce their electricity costs and to create environmental and economic benefits for customers and their communities.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/09/08/renewable-energy-rewiring-america-green/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Renewable Energy: Rewiring America Green'>Renewable Energy: Rewiring America Green</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2008/08/27/water-based-energy-may-make-food-and-fossil-based-fuels-unnecessary/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Water-Based Energy May Make Food and Fossil-Based Fuels Unnecessary'>Water-Based Energy May Make Food and Fossil-Based Fuels Unnecessary</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/06/17/the-economics-of-advancing-alternative-energy-in-the-united-states/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The economics of advancing alternative energy in the United States'>The economics of advancing alternative energy in the United States</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rI4VljGFspHsp5Q9_VYODyHwQlw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rI4VljGFspHsp5Q9_VYODyHwQlw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rI4VljGFspHsp5Q9_VYODyHwQlw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rI4VljGFspHsp5Q9_VYODyHwQlw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=rq_ZZCMW3Ng:xZLYHrTWypM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/rq_ZZCMW3Ng" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/investment-firm-to-fund-first-commercial-scale-solar-installation-in-va/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/04/investment-firm-to-fund-first-commercial-scale-solar-installation-in-va/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Tungsten Gold Story</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/53bPHCUbWAw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/fake-tungsten-gold-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bron Suchecki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gold bars filled with tungsten story is getting another run &#8211; see Zero Hedge and RunToGold.
Nick from ShareLynx Gold passed on to me today the following from the producers of the video (all personal info was removed by him before forwarding):
vielen Dank für Ihre Anfrage.
MANY THANKS FOR YOUR ENQUIRY
Das Video ist tatsächlich bei Argor [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/fake-tungsten-gold-found/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Fake Tungsten Gold Found'>Fake Tungsten Gold Found</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/05/22/silver-premiums-and-fake-spots/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Silver premiums and fake spots'>Silver premiums and fake spots</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/10/gold-etf-league-table/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold ETF League Table'>Gold ETF League Table</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The gold bars filled with tungsten story is getting another run &#8211; see <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/german-prosieben-tv-channel-finds-500-gram-tungsten-bar-wcheraeus-gold-foundary-bank-origin">Zero Hedge</a> and <a href="http://www.runtogold.com/2010/03/fake-tungsten-gold-found/">RunToGold</a>.</p>
<p>Nick from <a href="http://www.sharelynx.com/index2.php">ShareLynx Gold</a> passed on to me today the following from the producers of the video (all personal info was removed by him before forwarding):</p>
<p><em>vielen Dank für Ihre Anfrage.<br />
MANY THANKS FOR YOUR ENQUIRY</em></p>
<p><em>Das Video ist tatsächlich bei Argor in der Schweiz aufgenommen worden, allerdings in einem ganz anderen Zusammenhang.</em></p>
<p><em>THE VIDEO WAS EFFECTIVELY TAKEN AT ARGOR IN SWITZERLAND, ALTHOUGH IN A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT CONTEXT</em></p>
<p><em>Unten eine englischsprachige Erklärung hierzu, die Ihnen einige weitere Hintergrundinformationen gibt. Der Barren wurde übrigens schon vor über 10 Jahren bei Argor zum Einschmelzen abgegeben; sofort entdeckt und aus dem Verkehr gezogen. Gefälschte Barren kommen extrem selten vor, unsere Kollegen in den Schmelzen können sich an keinen Fall in den letzten Jahren erinnern, in denen ein solcher bei Heraeus zur Aufarbeitung eingeliefert wurde.</em></p>
<p><em>BELOW AN EXPLANATION IN ENGLISH TO THIS ISSUE, THAT WILL GIVE YOU SOME FURTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION. THE BARS, BY THE WAY, WERE DELIVERED TO ARGOR ALREADY MORE THAN TEN YEARS AGO FOR SMELTING; WERE IMMEDIATELY DISCOVERED AND WITHDRAWN FROM CIRCULATION. COUNTERFEIT BARS ARE EXTREMELY RARE, OUR COLLEAGUES FROM THE FOUNDRY CANNOT RECALL A SINGLE INSTANCE IN THE LAST YEARS IN WHICH SUCH A BAR WAS DELIVERED TO HERAEUS FOR PROCESSING.</em></p>
<p><em>Statement:</em></p>
<p><em>The video shown on www.youtube.com is an extract from the weekly German television broadcast Galileo that discusses scientific topics. This particular broadcast covered the topic of gold including testing the purity of gold bars.</em></p>
<p><em>The presentation of the scene of (gold) production at the Argor Heraeus refinery – that was put on youtube.com in another context – when seen together with the text could therefore give an incorrect impression.</em></p>
<p><em>The false bar shown in the broadcast was a bar not produced by Heraeus; it was sent to the company for refining and detected already at the time of delivery. Compliance Management at Argor-Heraeus is very important and plays an important role at the company. Among others, it has very stringent rules for handling and dealing with precious metals.</em></p>
<p><em>Therefore, and combined also with strong and effective quality controls, Argor-Heraeus is able to assure the authenticity of gold bars produced by the company itself at all times.</em></p>
<p><em>Internet: www.heraeus-edelmetallhandel.de<br />
Heraeus Metallhandelsgesellschaft mbH<br />
Heraeusstr. 12-14, 63450 Hanau, Germany</em></p>
<p>So the video is about ten year old fake bars. Another example of commentators jumping the gun and hyping a story without any fact/background checking. To be fair, it really is only someone like Nick who has a worldwide well-connected subscriber base who can do that sort of checking.</p>
<p>I also find it interesting that the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKczs-7BFRI">video</a> Zero Hedge linked is the only upload of YouTube user wolframgold who only joined on 28 Feb 2010. This leads me to a conspiracy I am surprised none of the more rabid commentators have come up with yet, namely that the source of the tungsten rumours since October 2009 is either a refinery/mint trying to scare people away from the secondary market and ebay and into only buying new bars and coins OR producers of testing equipment!</p>
<p>Nick also passed on to me a link to <a href="http://www.bullionanalysis.com/">BullionAnalysis.com</a>, which has some nice pictures of fake Englehard silver bars that their equipment would have detected. This does undercut <a href="http://www.runtogold.com/2010/03/fake-tungsten-gold-found/">RunToGold</a>&#8217;s conclusion from the tungsten scare that &#8220;if one is concerned about the quality of their gold then the other precious metals like silver and platinum are good alternatives&#8221;. Ouch.</p>
<p>I would also disagree with RunToGold&#8217;s statement that &#8220;detecting a high-quality fake tungsten gold bar would be extremely difficult. It would likely require significant and material alterations to the bar being tested and this would negatively affect the marketability if its hallmark veracity were vindicated.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ultrasonic testers will do the job without having to damage a bar. I quote some techo stuff from <a href="http://www.kks.com.au/products/ultrasonics/">KK&amp;S Instruments</a>:</p>
<p><em>The 1090 Flaw Detector allows you to look into the Bar for voids/defects as well as UT velocity which is determined the products elastic modulus i.e Tungsten Velocity is 5183-5460m/sec and Gold is 3,240m/sec. For example if you calibrate for Au then the testing Tungsten bar of the same thickness, the UT thickness would read approximately half the actual because of the speeding-up of the sound through the Tungsten.</em></p>
<p>Problem is that it does require some technical knowledge to use the machine, so out of reach of retail investors and small coin dealers. It is probably prohibitively expensive as well.</p>
<p>I also think that it is fairly likely that the unintended consequence of commentators pushing the tungsten story is to drive mom &amp; pop newbie gold investors into the ETFs. Making the decision to buying gold is a big change for the average investor and you can be sure they are seeking reassurance. Sow doubts in their mind about the &#8220;dangers&#8221; of physical gold and you will push them into ETFs, because mom &amp; pop see them as regulated and thus safe. The very opposite of what many (if not all) commentators would want. I doubt they think about these consequences when they are looking for their next headline.</p></div>
<div><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/5957b_6089228851855763774-2107334826863845322?l=goldchat.blogspot.com" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/02/fake-tungsten-gold-found/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Fake Tungsten Gold Found'>Fake Tungsten Gold Found</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/05/22/silver-premiums-and-fake-spots/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Silver premiums and fake spots'>Silver premiums and fake spots</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/08/10/gold-etf-league-table/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gold ETF League Table'>Gold ETF League Table</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4uw4JBLxx36cmwzkYOev4OnuPnA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4uw4JBLxx36cmwzkYOev4OnuPnA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4uw4JBLxx36cmwzkYOev4OnuPnA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4uw4JBLxx36cmwzkYOev4OnuPnA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=53bPHCUbWAw:m5acFShnVtU:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/53bPHCUbWAw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/fake-tungsten-gold-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/fake-tungsten-gold-story/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Manufacturing Jobs Grow for Third Straight Month</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~3/1qFzmNxi4Ec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/manufacturing-jobs-grow-for-third-straight-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Mast</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/?p=3165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The Institute for Supply Management released its February 2010 Manufacturing Report On Business Monday.  The report shows that manufacturing jobs grew for the third month in a row.  Even more upbeat was the fact that the report indicates that job growth in the sector is now accelerating.
Furthermore, overall economic activity in the manufacturing [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/19/manufacturing-activity-continues-accelerated-expansion/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Manufacturing Activity Continues Accelerated Expansion'>Manufacturing Activity Continues Accelerated Expansion</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/07/02/us-economy-grows-for-second-consecutive-month/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: US Economy Grows for Second Consecutive Month'>US Economy Grows for Second Consecutive Month</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/11/03/us-growth-probably-now-at-4-5-percent/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: US Growth Probably Now at 4.5 percent'>US Growth Probably Now at 4.5 percent</a></li></ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zd-otdYn1iuGKNvdzwOs_ILmTZQ/0/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/93128_di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zd-otdYn1iuGKNvdzwOs_ILmTZQ/1/da"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/93128_di" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The Institute for Supply Management released its February 2010 Manufacturing Report On Business Monday.  The report shows that manufacturing jobs grew for the third month in a row.  Even more upbeat was the fact that the report indicates that job growth in the sector is now accelerating.</p>
<p>Furthermore, overall economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in February for the seventh consecutive month and index correlations with the larger U.S. economy indicate growth now for the 10th consecutive month.</p>
<p>ISM&#8217;s Employment Index registered 56.1% in February. That is 2.8% points higher than what was reported for January. This third consecutive month of growth in manufacturing employment represents the highest reading for the index since January 2005.</p>
<p><strong>Source: Institute for Supply Manufacturing</strong></p>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jlRX6zR7UgM/S41KYbqYebI/AAAAAAAAAds/05UGk4Twqm0/s1600-h/ABC-USA-Today001.jpg"><img src="http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/93128_ABC-USA-Today001.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Ten of the 18 manufacturing industries that are tracked by the ISM reported growth in employment in February.  They are: Textile Mills; Petroleum &amp; Coal Products; Apparel, Leather &amp; Allied Products; Paper Products; Machinery; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Transportation Equipment; Electrical Equipment, Appliances &amp; Components; Fabricated Metal Products; and Food, Beverage &amp; Tobacco Products.</p>
<p>An early indicator of what jobs growth will look like in the near future is registered in the ISM&#8217;s Backlog of Orders Index.  It registered 61 percent in February, accelerating 5% higher than in January. Of the respondents who report their backlog of orders to the ISM, a full third reported greater backlogs with only 1 in 10 reporting smaller backlogs.  You may remember that as backlog orders grow, employers have in increased propensity to hire new workers.</p>
<p>Norbert J. Ore, chair of the ISM&#8217;s Business Survey Committee said, &#8220;The past relationship between the PMI and the overall economy indicates that the average PMI for January and February (57.5 percent) corresponds to a 5.2 percent increase in real gross domestic product (GDP).&#8221;</p>
<p>The report is further evidence of a U.S. economy that is on track for healthy net <span><strong><a href="http://mast-economy.blogspot.com/2010/02/net-jobs-growth-begins-substantial.html">jobs creation by summer.</a></strong></span><br />
<span><br />
</span></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/02/19/manufacturing-activity-continues-accelerated-expansion/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Manufacturing Activity Continues Accelerated Expansion'>Manufacturing Activity Continues Accelerated Expansion</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/07/02/us-economy-grows-for-second-consecutive-month/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: US Economy Grows for Second Consecutive Month'>US Economy Grows for Second Consecutive Month</a></li><li><a href='http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2009/11/03/us-growth-probably-now-at-4-5-percent/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: US Growth Probably Now at 4.5 percent'>US Growth Probably Now at 4.5 percent</a></li></ol></p>
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8AIhOukQpiS8RjKNFnu0obWmzEU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8AIhOukQpiS8RjKNFnu0obWmzEU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8AIhOukQpiS8RjKNFnu0obWmzEU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8AIhOukQpiS8RjKNFnu0obWmzEU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:l6gmwiTKsz0"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:KwTdNBX3Jqk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:KwTdNBX3Jqk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?i=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?a=1qFzmNxi4Ec:BQ5LlihDLIg:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/AmateurEconomists?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AmateurEconomists/~4/1qFzmNxi4Ec" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/manufacturing-jobs-grow-for-third-straight-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.citizeneconomists.com/blogs/2010/03/03/manufacturing-jobs-grow-for-third-straight-month/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
