The Ancestry Insider

Ron Tanner interviewed

2009-12-23T00:05:00.000-07:00

Dear Ancestry Insider,

If it seems helpful to your readers, they can use this link to click-to-listen to an audio interview with Ron Tanner, product manager for the New FamilySearch program. It appears now on The Cricket and Seagull Fireside Chat podcast, and will run later this week on MeridianMagazine.com and MormonTimes.com online.

http://media.libsyn.com/media/skperry/cs-newfamilysearch.mp3

I hope you find it useful. Best to you in your work,
Steven Kapp Perry
--
Host of The Cricket and Seagull Fireside Chat podcast at:
http://www.TheCricketAndSeagull.com

Southern California Genealogy Society Jamboree Video

2009-12-22T12:05:00.000-07:00

Starting to publicize for the 2010 Southern California Genealogy Jamboree, the Southern California Genealogical Society posted a video shot at the 2009 event, where yours truly participated in Son of Blogger: Summit 2.

If you can’t see the video above, try viewing it on YouTube.

Here’s another still from the video. Panelist (from right to left, not all pictured) were: George G. Morgan, Stephen Danko, Leland Meitzler, The Ancestry Insider, Craig Manson, DearMYRTLE, Dick Eastman, Schelly Talalay Dardashti, and Lisa Louise Cooke.

Above the Fold

2009-12-21T00:05:00.000-07:00

This is another mostly unimportant article in my series filling the days between Thanksgiving and Christmas. I’ll return with more valuable topics after the holidays.

There’s a tool in Google Labs right now that may be of interest to bloggers and those of you with family history websites. Browser Size allows website owners and designers to see how much of their websites are visible without scrolling when viewed on older computers. Older computers have “smaller” screens, either smaller in physical size, or having fewer pixels, or both.

The fold is a concept borrowed from the newspaper world and refers to the fold separating the top half of the front page from the bottom. Just as some people never venture further into a newspaper than “above the fold,” so too many website visitors never scroll beyond the visible portion of a web page.

The illustration above shows a Browser Size analysis of Ancestry.com. Long time Ancestry.com users remember when “Start your tree” pushed “Search” below the fold. The message boards filled with complaints that Ancestry.com had removed search from the home page from users that didn’t think to scroll down. Google’s Browser Size shows that the Search button is above the fold for just 30% of Internet users (as measured by Google visitors, not Ancestry.com visitors).

Almost 98% of visitors will see the Start Your Tree button without scrolling. Only 50% of visitors will see the newsletter subscription button.

One benefit of registering on Ancestry.com for non-subscribers is homepage customization, which allows adding or moving page elements as desired.

For more information about Browser Size, see “Browser Size: a tool to see how others view your website” on the Official Google Blog.

Thank You, Thank You, and More Thank Yous

2009-12-17T00:05:00.000-07:00

Thank you, Randy, for the "Follow Friday" recommendation last month. It is an honor. Figuring the number of blogs you follow into my calculation, if you honor a new blog every Friday, you won't need to repeat any blog until 4 November 2016. That's my new goal in life: I want to be Randy Seaver's Follow Friday recommendation on the 4th of November 2016, making me the first blog he's recommended twice. By then you'll actually look like your Santa photograph.

I also received the Kreativ Blogger award from Randy. Thank you very much. The award originated from Hulda's Husfruas Memoarer blog in Norway. I haven't spoken much Norwegian since serving in the underground during the War. Scroll down to the Google Translate widget to translate her post into English. The original award had a fan-out of 4, if I understand correctly. When bestowing the award, one presented suitable praise on the recipient, who was under no obligation to do anything. Thanks to Simon Leong's Food Favourites blog for information about how the award has morphed.

Thank you, Janet and DearMYRTLE, for the Genea-Speak Award. The Genea-Speak Award is the one that started with the contraband graphic. It looks eerily similar to the logo of the National Genealogical Society. MYRT identifies Texicanwife as the originator of the award, bestowed "for excellence in writing, speaking, and the promoting of good genealogical practices." When informed of the mistake, Texicanwife explained she had found the graphic in a 1970’s clipart set. She immediately created a new award with advanced anti-infringement technology built in. Stare at the new graphic for 10 seconds. Concentrate on the white background. Concentrate... Concentrate... Nothing?

The original award

The NGS logo

The new award

OK. Maybe it's just me. Maybe wild mushrooms on my salad was not such a good idea.

Finally, Holly informs me that Family History Expos has given me a "Blogger of Honor" badge for my reporting at the Salt Lake City Expo. Thanks, Holly!

If you’re wondering why I haven’t followed all the rules for these awards, no offense is intended. Read my last article, “Awards, Awards, and More Awards.”

Awards, Awards, and More Awards

2009-12-16T00:05:00.000-07:00

I confess that I am no great fan of most of the award chain-letters that circulate. I am honestly honored that genealogy writers of high caliber see fit to pass awards on to me. Let there be no mistake; I admire most all the bloggers that see fit to honor me.

Here are my objections to some awards:

Awards that must be passed on to be received. Are these awards or social networking experiments? I can’t help but feel there are scientists on the other side of the mirror with clipboards saying things like, “Now let’s change the fan-out from 3 to 7 and measure the change in deployment speed.” From now on, I will pass awards on only at my discretion.
In particular, awards with high fan-outs are meaningless. When passed on to another seven people, it doesn’t take very many generations before 7 raised to the power of n completely covers the entire community. From now on, I will reduce to 1 the fan-out of any awards I choose to pass on.
Some awards apply peer pressure towards online exposure of personal information. While our children may grow up with no expectations of personal privacy, I still cherish my privacy as a time-honored American value that protects me from a variety of bothersome, intrusive, and even illegal or dangerous situations. (No, that’s not why I keep my name and appearance secret. That’s just for the fun of the mystery.)

Links are the currency of the Internet. When one links to another site, value flows along with the traffic. For websites with ad revenues, that currency converts into hard, U.S. dollars. Consequently, it is not surprising that some awards have ulterior motives involving links. Here are the various schemes that are used:

Some awards or badges require sourcing the image from the originating site. BEWARE! This scheme allows the originating site to monitor page views on your site! As an example, consider the Genealogy.org member badge: In the case of Genealogy.org, the measurements among members are intentional, not covert. Go to www.genealogy.org to see a traffic report, ranking member websites using the data collected through display of the badge. Always ignore this type of award.
Some awards require a link back to the sponsoring site. This increases the sponsor’s search ranking in Google and other search engines, even if no one actually follows the link. For legitimate award sponsors, I don’t begrudge them this benefit. My policy is to place awards in articles rather than displaying them in the sidebars of my website. That’s a personal decision, motivated a teeny-tiny bit by humility and huge-large parts of clean web design and avoiding the appearance of commercialism.
Some awards require a link to the website that awarded you the award. This requirement is often coupled with large fan-out requirement. This creates a pyramid scheme paying out in links instead of money. Get in early and your site will have a full set of fan-out links back to it. As with any pyramid scheme, it is the latecomers who suffer. Get in after everyone in the community has already received the award, and there is no one to accept the award from you.

To re-iterate, it is a legitimate honor to receive recognition from my fellow bloggers, regardless of the motives of the award creators. To that end, next time I have several awards to acknowledge. Stay tuned…

Crash Course in Family History

2009-12-15T00:05:00.000-07:00

This is one in a series of reviews. Important legal notices concerning my reviews can be found at ancestryinsider.blogspot.com .

At the Salt Lake City Family History Expo many months ago Paul Larsen, author of Crash Course in Family History : An Easy Step-by-Step Illustrated Guidebook and Comprehensive Resource Book : The Easiest Way to Trace Your Own Family Roots and Stories approached me and asked if I would accept a complimentary copy for review. I explained that my column’s editorial focus was Ancestry.com and FamilySearch and since his book was not about either of them, I was not interested. He persisted, pointing out that the book had entire sections about the websites of these two organizations. I could tell from the length of the title of this book that Larsen was not the type to stop quickly, so I accepted a copy for review. I warned Larsen that I had several books that have been waiting for months and not to expect anything soon. Sure enough, it has taken me some time to get to it.

Actually, my pile of things that need to get done sits directly in front of my monitor and has grown so large that I can no longer see the bottom of the screen! I got some time this past weekend and Crash Course was the thickest object in the pile so I decided to bump the book to the top.

Graphically Rich

More than the thickness, this book’s design is fabulously inviting. It was drawing me to it more than any other book waiting for review. The pages are large (8.5" x 11") and full color. The binding is a double loop wire coil (or “Wire-O”) that is bound to a single piece hard cover using a method called semi-concealed or half-Canadian. I found it great for desk-top use, where the book lay completely flat, and awful for reading in bed, because the pages are bound only to the back cover.

The artistic design of Crash Course is terrific, incorporating a half-dozen color photographs, illustrations, or screen shots per page; color sidebars on nearly every page; plenty of white space; and a daring sans-serif font choice for the body text. While sans-serif fonts are generally panned for the body text of a book, I found the book’s large 16-point font (Laudatio BQ Condensed, maybe?) very easy on the eyes. I thought it an enjoyable change from the tired serif fonts we always see in books.

For LDS or not?

The copyright page discloses that this third edition of the book carries a new title. The previous title was Crash Course in Family History for Latter-day Saints : A Step-by-Step LDS Guidebook to Temple and Family History Work Using the New, Easy Way. The title change infers that the book is now suitable for a larger audience, not just members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. However, some readers may still feel uncomfortable with the number of inspirational quotes by leaders of the Church, despite the inclusion of genealogically-related quotes from non-Church sources.

The Preface includes the author’s story of spiritual direction, prompting him to write this book and even prescribing the title, “A Crash Course in Family History.” Given the number of fraud cases nationwide perpetuated by individuals leveraging their membership in a church, I think it inappropriate to include such an experience in an object offered for sale.

Who Is Fresh Mountain Air Publishing Company?

The copyright page advertizes the publisher of Crash Course as

Fresh Mountain Air Publishing Company
Published by
Fresh Mountain Air Publishing, LLC
P.O. Box 1758, St George, UT 84771-1758

A Google search for “Fresh Mountain Air Publishing” finds no mention. A Utah Department of Commerce “Business Name Availability” search indicates there was a Salt Lake City corporation with that name, but that license expired in 1982 and no LLC (Limited Liability Company) by that name is licensed in the State of Utah. A YellowPages.com search returns a listing for the company at a private residence in Orem, Utah. I called and was pleased to find the number is still valid. Even though I didn’t leave a message, Paul Larsen took the time to call me back. You can’t beat service like that. It turns out Paul has moved from the Orem location to St. George.

Step by Step Guidebook or Illustrated Resource Book?

In my opinion this book did not shine as a step-by-step guidebook. I would characterize the lion’s share of the book as an incredibly visually inviting illustrated resource book. Think Cyndi’s list with colored screen captures and I think you’ll capture the essence of this book. While I have no idea how much the author depended on Cyndi’s list for content, I know he freely lifted my stories of genealogical serendipity for use on the inside of the back cover without giving me the slightest amount of credit.

While that pretty much spoiled the book for me, I did ask a friend what he thought about the book, and he liked it.

Crash Course in Family History : An Easy Step-by-Step Illustrated Guidebook and Comprehensive Resource Book : The Easiest Way to Trace Your Own Family Roots and Stories
8.5" x 11" (pp.), 232 pp., hardback. 2009.
ISBN 978-0-9742695-4-2
Fresh Mountain Air Publishing, LLC
www.EasyFamilyHistory.com
$34.95 (list)

Internet Genealogy Going Down?

2009-12-11T00:05:00.000-07:00

First off, rumors of my demise have been premature. I may be preoccupied with the dead, but I still occupy a place among the living. More on my silence in just a moment.

Second off, rumors of the demise of Internet genealogy are also premature. Yes, I know that most of you have heard no such rumor. The news has been restricted to personnel at new genealogy sites experiencing their first December. I have a private message for you newbies. The rest of you can tune out for a couple of paragraphs if you like.

When you experience it for the first time, it's pretty scary. Ever since Thanksgiving site traffic has been dropping like a rock. The worst is yet to come. Hang on tight. The trend continues until the big day. Last year no more than a peck of us did online genealogy on Christmas day. I could hear echoes of my keyboard tapping as I wandered alone around Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org last year.

But don't despair. New Years resolutions are just around the corner. Come January your traffic will come storming back. You may even exceed your pre-Thanksgiving numbers. So tighten your belt. Celebrate the season of the year when the powers of light put an end to the encroaching darkness. We celebrate the turning of the tide--as Jack Sparrow might say--"astronomically and spiritually."

P.S. Thirdly, part and Christmas parcel with decreased time to do genealogy is decreased time to write and read blogs. Commensurately, I haven’t been writing much. What I do write I will keep short and inconsequential. My gift to you for the holidays... ;-)

Genealogical Maturity Model Definitions

2009-11-24T00:05:00.000-07:00

This is another article discussing my proposed Genealogical Maturity Model (GMM).

A year ago I learned some things from Elizabeth Shown Mills. I’m not certain they were the things she was trying to teach me. Nevertheless, I think they are quite valuable. Having grown up with PAF and its special definitions for source and citation, I was having problems understanding Evidence Explained. It took Elizabeth about six weeks to talk me out of the box I was in. The lessons I took away from that discussion were:

Ignoring the aggregated wisdom of past scholarship is unwise, and
Assigning specialized definitions to words is unwise.

Accordingly, I’ve tried to avoid special definitions in the GMM wherever possible. Here are definitions for the main terms:

source – 1. the origin that supplies information.¹ 2. “an artifact, book, document, film, person, recording, website, etc., from which information is obtained.”²

citation – 1. “citations are statements in which we identify our source or sources for…particular [information].”³ 2. “a citation states where you found [the cited] piece of information.”⁴

information - 1. “knowledge obtained from investigation.”⁵ 2. “the content of a source—that is, its factual statements or its raw data.”⁶

evidence – 1. “something that furnishes proof.”⁷ 2. “information that is relevant to the problem.”⁸ 3. analyzed and correlated information assessed to be of sufficient quality.⁹ 4. “the information that we conclude—after careful evaluation—supports or contradicts the statement we would like to make, or are about to make, about an ancestor.”¹⁰

conclusion – 1. “a reasoned judgment.”¹¹ 2. “a decision [that should be] based on well-reasoned and thoroughly documented evidence gleaned from sound research.”¹²

Note that the meanings are based on ordinary dictionary definitions and genealogical industry experts.

Conclusion tree will have to wait until next time. And since the above terms are largely defined in terms of one another, I’d like to spend some time talking about their interrelationships.

1. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, online edition (www.m-w.com : accessed 23 November 2009), “source.”

2. Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FNGS, FASG, FUGA, Evidence Explained: Citing History Sources from Artifacts to Cyberspace, 2nd ed. [hereinafter, EE2] (Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company, 2009), 828.

3. Mills, EE2, 42.

4. Patricia Law Hatcher, CG, FASG, quoted in The Source, ed. Loretto Dennis Szucs, FUGA, and Sandra Hargreaves Luebking, FUGA, 3rd ed. (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2006) p. 24; citing “How Do You Know?” in Producing a Quality Family History (Salt Lake City: Ancestry, 1996), 117.

5. Merriam-Webster, “information.”

6. Mills, EE2, 24.

7. Merriam-Webster, “evidence.”

8. Mills, EE2, 822.

9. Christine Rose,CG, CGL, FASG,, Genealogical Proof Standard: Building a Solid Case (San Jose, California: CR Publications, 2005), 2.

10. The Board for Certification of Genealogists (BCG), The BCG Genealogical Standards Manual, ed. Helen F. M. Leary, CG, CGL, FASG, (Provo, Utah: Ancestry, 2000), 8.

11. Merriam-Webster, “conclusion.”

12. Mills, EE2, 820.

Digitized Records Not Just for Mormons

2009-11-23T00:05:00.000-07:00

Dear Ancestry Insider,

I've been reading your column/blog since you began - and have always been interested in the content -EXCEPT for the recent columns re "the rollout of New FamilySearch (NFS) to all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints around the world (‘cept for the Orient)."

At a recent Board meeting of the Jewish Genealogical Society of Palm Beach County, Florida - a Board member who had visited our local FHC in Boca Raton, informed us he was told that the digitalized records for the NEW FAMILY SEARCH would not be available in this location.

Is this correct?

Please clarify exactly what this means - and if the digitalized records will only be available at various FHCs in the Utah area.

Thank you.

Sylvia Furshman Nusinov
President Emerita
Genealogical Workbook Editor
JGSPBCI, FL

Sylvia subsequently forwarded a message she received Sunday morning:

I understand no LDS library outside Salt Lake City holds any films - they have to be ordered and yes, it takes up to 4 months for them to arrive. They seem to be closing Family History Centers regularly and I have been told that within the next two years they are going to make the whole collection available online - to members that is. At present it seems a mystery how non-members will be able to access the records. Any information welcome.

Nicole, Belgium

Dear Sylvia and Nicole,

I have good news for you. THIS RUMOR IS FALSE!

Have you ever played a party game variously called Gossip, Telephone (U.S.), Whispers, (England), Le Téléphone Arabe (France), or Stille Post (Germany)? Players sit in a circle. One person whispers a message to the next person, who passes it on around the circle. After the message has completed the circuit, the group compares the original message with its final incarnation.

At a publicity stunt in Las Vegas in 2004, a record breaking 614 participants played the game. The starting phrase, "Mac King is a comedy magic genius," became "Macaroni cantaloupe knows the future."

Let me catalog some possible sources for your rumor:

New FamilySearch

Don’t let my comment about New FamilySearch (NFS) confuse you. While it is currently available only to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as I’ve reported, the leaders of “the Church are anxious to get New FamilySearch out to genealogists outside the Church.”

Don’t let the name “New FamilySearch” confuse you. It is the FamilySearch Family Tree offering. The name is astonishingly ambiguous. The name practically demands misunderstanding and I’ve had to deal with my share. Back in September 2008 Carolynne vowed to never index again when the ambiguity led her to believe that only Church members would have access to the resulting records. Not true!

Record Search

You can already access some of the indexed, converted microfilm on the Record Search Pilot website (at pilot.familysearch.org or via labs.familysearch.org). Once Record Search emerges from the pilot stage, you will see lots more records show up. Once the pipeline emerges from its pilot stage, then you will see a continuous flow of lots more records. Click here to review articles I’ve written about Record Search.

Unfortunately, participation in FamilySearch Indexing is not expanding as fast as it could. While most of the 2.5 million rolls of microfilm may be digitized in 3 to 5 years, indexing at current rates will take several hundred years. Do yourself a favor and resolve to spend some time each week indexing.

New FamilySearch.org Website

Don’t be confused by information about a new FamilySearch.org website. Eventually, the old www.familysearch.org will be replaced with a new website that consolidates the many pieces currently under separate development:

new.familysearch.org – New FamilySearch (the tree)
pilot.familysearch.org – Record Search
indexing.familysearch.org – FamilySearch Indexing
forums.familysearch.org – Forums for research questions and FamilySearch product help
wiki.familysearch.org – Research Wiki
histfam.familysearch.org – Community Trees
contact.familysearch.org – Worldwide support contact information
www.familysearch.org – Some stuff from the old site not covered in the above offerings

A beta preview of the new site has replaced the alpha on labs.familysearch.org and can be seen fsbeta.familysearch.org.

To make the confusion worse, FamilySearch insists on using a lowercase “n” for “new FamilySearch” (the tree). As a result, it is easy to confuse the new FamilySearch and the new familysearch.org.

To avoid confusion, the Ancestry Insider always uses “New FamilySearch” (capital “N” and no “.org”) to reference the tree and “new familysearch.org” (lowercase “n” and always with “.org”) to reference the website. With other sources, you’re on your own.

FamilySearch Member

Don’t confuse the term “FamilySearch Member” with “Church Member.” As I reported last year, access to some images will be limited to FamilySearch Members, defined at the time as:

Volunteers and indexers who meet basic contribution requirements each quarter
Patrons at family history centers
Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; Church members provide the millions of dollars needed to keep FamilySearch operating

In the July 2008 announcement, FamilySearch pledged, “All data indexed by FamilySearch volunteers will continue to be made available for free to the public through FamilySearch.org—now and in the future.” This option has not yet shown up in the Record Search pilot and exact details have not been announced.

Family History Centers

As I’ve previously reported, rumors that FamilySearch is closing all its family history centers (FHCs) are not true. FamilySearch’s Russell Webster stated that the overall number of centers is actually on the increase. The number quoted on FamilySearch press releases recently jumped from 4,500 to 4,600.

Webster said that FHCs are being repurposed. In the past they were needed for microfilm access and TempleReady for Church members. As both these purposes are largely replaced by Internet offerings, the reasons to have FHCs become:

computer access,
Internet access,
access to FamilySearch Member records,
access to some premium genealogy websites,
access to CD databases that can’t be published on FamilySearch.org,
access to microfilms that can’t be digitized, and
face-to-face research assistance.

Home access to the internet only replaces the first three items, so there is an ongoing need for FHCs. The way I interpret Webster’s comments, repurposing leaves Utah and Idaho with too many centers, and developing countries with too few centers. (Also see KD 101753.)

Summary

In summary, Sylvia and Nicole, digitized records will be available to all, member or otherwise. If you do your part indexing, then you’ll have access in your home. Otherwise, you’ll have access in your local family history center—which generally is not closing. Even New FamilySearch, currently open only to Church members, will eventually be available to all.

Sincerely,

-- The Ancestry Insider

NFS 0.99 Beta

2009-11-20T00:05:00.000-07:00

We’re at the middle of the month at the middle of the quarter, so it should be time for the quarterly update to New FamilySearch (NFS). Yup. It’s been three months since the August release of NFS 0.98 so it is time for the November release, version 0.99.

Invitations to participate in the beta went out about a week ago. One beta tester shared the invitation with me. (There was no confidentiality agreement.)

If the font is too small, you’ll want to know the schedule laid out:

Beta test begins a few days after 11 November 2009
Beta test lasts until about 16 November 2009
Beta 2 begins about 20 November 2009
Beta 2 lasts until about 30 November 2009

That means we won’t see 0.99 released until December.

Gary Turner on FHCNET posted a summary of the new features, along with a link to some screenshots:

http://picasaweb.google.com/GarysTurn/NFS99Beta

Thanks, Gary!

NFS 1.0 for Non-Mormons

2009-11-19T00:05:00.000-07:00

This Thanksgiving may be the first holiday Jay Verkler (President and CEO of FamilySearch) relaxes since the rollout began for New FamilySearch (NFS) in May of 2007. That’s when St. Louis and Reno members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints received notice they would begin using NFS version 0.9.

NFS 0.9, it was explained, would be adequate for Church members to use as a replacement for TempleReady, but would lack many of the capabilities of mature desktop genealogy management programs such as The Master Genealogist. The “1.0” moniker was being saved for a future release of NFS that was ready-for-prime-time and would be released to genealogists both in and outside the Church.

But NFS 0.9 would prove to lack basic functionality present even in venerable (translation: out-dated) PAF. And thousands of questionable conclusion trees proved unsuitable seed for the original NFS architecture. This resulting in a long rollout freeze while the NFS architecture was retooled.

So Verkler may not be relaxing this Thanksgiving after all. His “To-Do” list still looks like this:

New FamilySearch still needs to rollout to members of the Church in the Orient. Oriental cultures and languages present special problems. The work still to be done is formidable.
His bosses at the Church are anxious to get New FamilySearch out to genealogists outside the Church. That is likely to be a phased rollout, just as it was inside the Church.
The National Genealogical Society 2010 annual conference is in Salt Lake City next year and Verkler is giving the keynote… …again.

I assume he has vivid recollections of his 2005 keynote at the Federation of Genealogical Societies annual conference in Salt Lake City (see his presentation). I remember his jaw-dropping demonstration of New FamilySearch. Everyone wanted to get their hands on it. After nearly five years he’ll stand in front of many of the same nationally-recognized genealogists.

I can imagine he’ll be very unhappy if he has to show up empty handed again.

Will Verkler have a most relaxing May Day? Stay tuned…

NFS Rollout News Is Nearing the End

2009-11-18T00:05:00.000-07:00

We are one week away from finishing the rollout of New FamilySearch (NFS) to all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints around the world (‘cept for the Orient).

Jordan River finished rolling out on 9 November 2009.
Oquirrh Mountain finished rolling out on 16 November 2009. (Jordan River and Oquirrh Mountain are located in the city of South Jordan, on the southwest side of the Salt Lake Valley.)
Thirty stakes in the Salt Lake Temple district rolled live on 16 November 2009.
The remaining 41 stakes have received word that they will roll live on 23 November 2009.

And it is time for a new map:

Heard anything on the rollout to the Orient? What about genealogists outside the Church? Keep me informed at AncestryInsider@gmail.com .

A Theoretical Basis for Maturity Models (Part 2)

2009-11-16T00:05:00.000-07:00

This is another article discussing my proposed Genealogical Maturity Model (GMM).

Last time, I abruptly closed in the middle of discussing using levels in maturity models. I’ll try and pick up right where I left off.

Levels Enable Aggregation of Multiple Factors

“Multiple, independent input variables” is a fancy way of saying that many factors determine maturity. For example, doctors may categorize premature infants by gestational week. Infant survival is dependent on many factors: respiratory development, birth weight, gender, single vs. multiple birth, brain blood vessel health, ductus arteriousus closure, intestinal health, liver development, anemia, immune system development, mother’s health, medical team, and medical facilities. Some of these factors are interdependent; infants without sufficient respiratory development are most likely to suffer bleeding around the brain.¹ Other factors are independent; the degree of respiratory development in the womb is largely independent of medical personnel available to the case.

Still, the medical community finds value in grouping preterm infants by weeks gestation. Likewise, maturity models of complex systems like software development and genealogy can also find value using groupings, despite the existence of multiple input variables—factors.

The result is a model that only approximates reality. The better the approximation, the more useful the model.

Totally Ordered Sets

Last time I also threw the term totally ordered set at you. That’s a fancy way of saying that to match the definition of “maturity,” the levels have to progress from one to the next. For example, if I gave you the numbers from 1 to 5, you could place them in ascending order. If I replaced one of the numbers with an apple, and another of the numbers with the color purple, there won’t be any natural order to the five items.

To match the definition of maturity, a maturity model must define levels such that they are a totally ordered set.

Narrow Objective

After reading all your comments, I believe one reason Humphrey was successful with his Capability Maturity Model (CMM) was by narrowly defining the objective of the model. The objective of CMM is not to rate a company’s ability to successfully develop software. The focus is much finer. CMM rates a company’s ability to successfully develop software on time and on budget. (Some of you that have used CMM might be able to narrow this even further. Might it predict success only for large, DoD sized projects?)²

1. “Quick Reference Fact Sheets: Premature Birth,” March of Dimes (www.marchofdimes.com : dated January 2009, accessed 15 November 2009).

2. Wikipedia contributors, "Capability Maturity Model," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org : accessed 11 November 2009).

Free, For a Limited Time

2009-11-13T00:05:00.000-07:00

It’s belated news, but in case you haven’t already seen these free offers, read on:

Holocaust Collection Free Through End of Year

I received the following from Footnote.com.

I wanted to provide you an update on our Holocaust Collection. Originally, we planned to have these records open to the public for only the month of October. However, due to the popularity of this collection, we have decided to keep the records open free to the public through the rest of this year. This will enable more people to search and explore the original records from the National Archives. On January 1, 2010 these records will become part of the paid subscription on Footnote.com. These records, however, will remain free to access through any of the National Archives physical locations. Please feel free to inform your audience of this news. The url for the microsite where these records can be accessed is: http://go.footnote.com/holocaust_records/.

Visit most any local family history center (FHC) to access other Footnote.com for free.

Ancestry Military Collection Free Today

I received the following news from Ancestry.com.

PROVO, UT (Nov. 11, 2009) – In honor of America’s military heroes, the entire U.S. Military Collection on Ancestry.com can be searched free through Nov. 13. To begin exploring your family’s military heritage, visit www.ancestry.com/military. …

Ancestry.com today added more than 600 Navy cruise books to its online collection of military records to commemorate Veterans Day. … The collection of Navy cruise books, …represents nearly 40 years of cruises following World War II (1950-1988) and chronicles an estimated 450,000 servicemen deployed at sea during that time. Styled after yearbooks, the cruise books include the names and photographs of individuals who served aboard the ship and highlight not only significant milestones that took place during the cruise, but also the day-to-day life on board ship. While not every Navy cruise was documented in a cruise book, the Navy Department Library has on file an estimated 3,500 cruise books, which Ancestry.com plans to digitize and add to this collection over time.

The entire press release is available at Ancestry.com. Visit many public libraries and a few FHCs to access other Ancestry.com content for free.

A Theoretical Basis for Maturity Models (Part 1)

2009-11-12T00:05:00.001-07:00

There has been some excellent discussion of the Genealogical Maturity Model (GMM), both here and elsewhere. I see some points raised against the proposal have arisen because of my poor ability to write. I will supplement the misunderstandings by hurriedly throwing together today’s article. At a future time I will post an update to the model, incorporating some of the ideas from your comments and attempting to correct some of the problems you’ve identified.

Today, let me address a couple of the concerns raised about the proposed GMM.

I’m OK, You’re OK

It is OK to have a maturity model for genealogy. The Capability Maturity Model (CMM) created by IBM’s Watts Humphrey at the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) may be the best known,¹ but other maturity models exist. Some are outside the realm of process improvement. Most are outside the realm of software development.² For example:

The Stages of Growth Model is a maturity model from the 1970’s that models use of information technology (IT) by businesses. The six stages are: initiation, contagion, control, integration, data administration, and maturity.³
The Services Integration Maturity Model (SIMM) by IBM, consists of seven levels: silo, integrated, componentized, simple services, composite services, virtualized services, dynamically reconfigurable services.⁴
The Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) by the Project Management Institute (PMI) applies to project management in any industry.⁵
The Business Technology Management (BTM) Maturity Model by the BTM Institute defines five levels of maturity scored across four categories: process, organization, information, and technology.⁶
The Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Maturity Model by Progress-Sonic Software is one of several different SOA models, including the aforementioned SIMM.⁷

Maturity Models

The definitions of the words mature (the verb) and maturation include the ideas of “natural growth and development,” “the emergence of personal and behavioral characteristics through growth processes,” and “attain[ing] a final or desired state.”⁸ The word maturity can also refer to the level of maturity on the continuum towards that final, desired state.

Maturity models, by their very name, are only models of the real world. The reduction from a real world maturity continuum to a model’s discrete number of maturity levels is arbitrary, although we’ll see some good reasons to do so. The number of levels varies among maturity models. Five may be the most popular number, but as we’ve seen, other numbers exist. Having more levels makes the effort to move from one up to the next smaller, which has motivational value. However, broad levels makes it possible to combine multiple, independent input variables while maintaining a totally ordered set of levels.

That’s a little abstract, but it’s late and I’m off to bed. Stay tuned for responses to more concerns. In the meantime, continue to post your comments.

1. Wikipedia contributors, "Capability Maturity Model," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capability_Maturity_Model : accessed 11 November 2009).

2. Lee Copeland, “The Maturity Maturity Model (M3), Guidelines for Improving the Maturity Process,” StickyMinds.com (www.stickyminds.com/sitewide.asp?Function=WEEKLYCOLUMN&ObjectId=6653 : accessed 11 November 2009); this satire on maturity models contains a list of 34 serious models.

3. Wikipedia contributors, "Stages of growth model," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stages_of_growth_model : accessed 11 November 2009); citing Richard Nolan, "Managing The Crisis In Data Processing," Harvard Business Review 57 (March-April 1979): 115–126.

4. Ali Arsanjani and Kerrie Holley, “Increase Flexibility with the Service Integration Maturity Model (SIMM),” IBM developerWorks (www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-soa-simm/ : 30 September 2005). See also the Open Group Service Integration Maturity Model (OSIMM).

5. “Organizational Project Management Maturity Model,” Project Management Institute (www.pmi.org/BusinessSolutions/Pages/OPM3.aspx : accessed 11 November 2009).

6. Wikipedia contributors, "Business Technology Management," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Business_Technology_Management : accessed 11 November 2009).

7. Sonic Software, “SOA Maturity Model,” Progress Sonic, a website of Progress Software(www.sonicsoftware.com/solutions/service_oriented_architecture/soa_maturity_model/index.ssp : accessed 11 November 2009).

8. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (www.m-w.com : accessed 11 November 2009).

Tim Sullivan Rings Opening Bell

2009-11-06T00:05:00.000-07:00

Thursday morning, Tim Sullivan, the CEO of Ancestry.com, rang the opening bell to start trading on the NASDAQ stock exchange. See a video of the event. (You must be a member of Facebook to view the video.) Here's a few shots from the video:

And here are some more photographs celebrating the occasion:

(L-R) Bruce Aust (Executive Vice President of NASDAQ), Tim Sullivan (President and Chief Executive Officer of Ancestry.com Inc., ACOM), and the unidentified guy in a green tie celebrate Ancestry.com’s initial public offering at The NASDAQ Stock Market. (© 2009, The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.)

I’m going to take an embarrassing stab at identifying the people in this photograph. Can somebody at Ancestry.com check me and post the corrections? (L-R):

Thomas Layton? (Director),
Benjamin Spero (Director),
Mike Wolfgramm (Chief Technology Officer),
Victor Parker (Chairman of the Board),
Eric Shoup (VP of Product),
Howard Hochhauser (Chief Financial Officer),
Joshua Hanna (Sr. VP & International GM),
Tim Sullivan (President, CEO, & Director),
Jonathan Young (VP of Development),
David H. Rinn (Sr. VP of Strategy),
Andrew Wait (Sr. VP and Family History GM),
Jeff Weber (HR),
Christopher Tracy (Sr. VP of Operations),
Not Glen Beck (Onion News),
Cheyenne Richards (VP Marketing),
William Stern (General Counsel),
David Goldberg (Director)

I’ve yet to receive the prospectuses I’ve requested from the underwriters. But Ancestry.com posted it today with the SEC. Click here to see it.

News Ketchup: Today's the Day

2009-11-05T00:05:00.006-07:00

Modification of an image
© 2005, The Facey Family
Some rights reserved.

It’s time for a little news ketchup!

Today’s the Ancestry.com IPO

Yesterday, Ancestry.com announced the pricing of its IPO at $13.50 per share. And today is the day that Ancestry.com goes public! They began trading on the NASDAQ this morning under the symbol ACOM. You can read the announcement in the new Investor Relations section of the Ancestry.com corporate website.

The Ancestry.com Investor Relations section includes a page for your smart phone with up to the minute news and stock quotes, no doubt delayed by 20 minutes. (As I write this before the market opens, the page optimistically shows a green up arrow.) And no doubt Ancestry.com employees will spend a record amount of time today watching the price of their stock change minute by minute and hour by hour.

To see Ancestry.com's latest filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, click here.

Today’s the Last Day to Vote

Today is the last day to vote for your favorite blog. You can vote more than once. Stuff the ballot box for the Ancestry Insider in category #8! Click here to vote. Click here for more information.

Today I fixed the NFS rollout news

Today I've fixed yesterday's NFS rollout news. I miscounted the number of stakes in the Jordan River temple district. Thoughtful reader, RayDean, alerted me to the error. Good news. The rollout will likely finish a week earlier, before Thanksgiving. The corrected article is "NFS Rollout News for Election Day 2009." The corrections have also been applied to "Temple Districts Using New FamilySearch."

For a little entertainment, try e-mailing a request for an Ancestry.com stock prospectus to the BofA Merrill Lynch e-mail address included in Ancestry.com press release yesterday (Prospectus.Requests@ml.com). Yesterday about 8:00pm e-mails sent to this address were answered with an automated message that they were out of the office until 16 November!

(Sarcasm Warning!) They're probably spending their big bonuses before the government can take the money back. Your tax dollars at work. Ancestry.com is really getting their money's worth for the $1.5 million fee they're paying Merrill Lynch. I'm sure the other underwriting banks don't mind Merrill Lynch taking a little time off during the IPO. It’s not like we’re in a risky environment, or anything. (Sarcasm warning ended.)

NFS Rollout News for Election Day 2009

2009-11-04T00:05:00.003-07:00

We are down to just one red temple district before the rollout of New FamilySearch (NFS) is complete for all members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (outside the Orient). All too soon the rollout of New FamilySearch will begin to genealogists outside the Church. What is the Genealogical Maturity Level (GML) of the data in New FamilySearch (NFS)? Would you be comfortable showing off what is in there today? Does it reflect your personal Genealogical Maturity Level? Make this the day you elect to start adding high quality sources for correct information in New FamilySearch (NFS)!

A lot has happened to the rollout map since the last update a few short weeks ago:

Mt. Timpanogos in American Fork went live on 19 October 2009!
Bountiful went live on 26 October 2009!
Draper went live earlier this week, 2 November 2009!
Jordan River began going live, also on Monday this week!
And finally, Monday also brought the announcement that Oquirrh Mountain in South Jordan will begin going live on 9 November 2009.

Those predicting that the Salt Lake Temple would be last are correct. It remains the only red dot on the map. My predictions for the rest of the red-zone rollout?

We already know that on 9 November 2009, Jordan River will complete, becoming temple number 123.
On 16 November 2009, Oquirrh Mountain will likely become temple number 124?
Also that day, Salt Lake will start with about 34 stakes going live?
Then on 23 Number 2009, the final stakes in the Salt Lake temple district will receive access?

Those are my guesses. And the red zone rollout of New FamilySearch will be over…

What will we do then? Keep you informed of the rollout to the Orient and to genealogists outside the Church, of course! Stay tuned!

When you get a go live date, let me know at AncestryInsider@gmail.com . And stay tuned to the Ancestry Insider at “Temple Districts Using New FamilySearch” for the latest news!

Ancestry.com Goes Public This Week

2009-11-03T00:05:00.000-07:00

Plans seem to be proceeding for Ancestry.com to go public this week. Renaissance Capital has selected Ancestry.com as its featured IPO for the week. You can read more here and here.

Yesterday Ancestry.com filed a Form 8-A which I assume officially registered their stock for sale on the Nasdaq stock exchange. They also filed an amended S-1 statement reflecting a reverse 1-for-2 stock split that took place last Friday.

This is a common step taken just before an IPO when the value of each share is too low to fall within the desired price range. Ancestry.com is targeting a price between $12.50 and $14.50 a share. So, for example, if shares were valued at $7 each, a reverse 1-for-2 stock split would take two shares valued at $7 apiece and exchange them for one share valued at $14.

Ancestry.com is expected to price its stock tomorrow. On the following day it will begin trading on the Nasdaq using the symbol ACOM. (See coverage at Reuters ACOM.O.)

The offering consists of over 4 million shares of common stock offered by the company and under 3.4 million shares offered by current shareholders, making a total of about 7.4 million shares. This will bring the total number of common stock shares in the company to nearly 42.5 million. The company does not have any preferred shares, so Ancestry.com must expect a company valuation of about 658 million dollars on 217 million in revenues and 11 million in net income.

About $12.1 million of the money raised is earmarked to repay CIT, which declared bankruptcy on Sunday. The repayment from Ancestry.com is a drop in the bucket for CIT. With 71 billion dollars of assets, it is the fifth largest bankruptcy in US history. The 2.3 billion dollars invested in CIT Group by taxpayers last December is expected to be totally lost.

To see Ancestry.com’s amended S-1 filed yesterday, click here. To see their Form 8-A, Registration of Securities, click here.

The Genealogical Maturity Model

2009-11-01T23:05:00.001-07:00

This is what the
Genealogical Maturity Model
would look like if
implemented in chocolate.
© 2008, Jimmy McDonald.
Used with permission.

Cross-pollination from one field of knowledge to another is a common source of innovation. Today, I’d like to introduce a concept to the genealogy world that I learned from the software world: maturity models. Carnegie Mellon University studied software companies’ ability to successfully complete projects. Experts noticed that companies typically matured their software development capabilities in a specific order. They constructed a five level framework to model these improvements:¹

1.	Initial (chaotic, ad hoc)	The starting point
2.	Repeatable	The process is used repeatedly, with roughly repeatable outcomes
3.	Defined	The process is defined
4.	Managed	Process metrics are managed
5.	Optimized	Management includes process optimization and improvement

I’ve applied the concept of maturity models to genealogists to describe the growing maturity, capabilities, and knowledge through which I’ve observed genealogists progress. The Genealogical Maturity Model is a work-in-progress. I invite you to leave comments with your feedback, corrections, and additions.

The Genealogical Maturity Model

The Genealogy Maturity Model has five levels, GML 1 through GML 5.

1.	Entry	Newly interested in genealogy
2.	Emerging	Emerging knowledge of how to do genealogy
3.	Practicing	Usually produces verifiable genealogical conclusions
4.	Proficient	Produces verifiably correct genealogies
5.	Stellar	Produces well-regarded genealogies

Sources and Citations

One can describe the genealogical maturity level for many different categories. In the tables, below, some descriptions are additive. That means a genealogist not only performs as described for a given level, but also practices all positive skills mentioned in lower levels. The citation descriptions below are an example.

#	GML	Sources	Citations
1.	Entry	Typically relies on compiled genealogies.	Captures URLs for online sources and citations for published sources.
2.	Emerging	Mostly relies on compiled genealogies and online sources.	Increasingly captures necessary information for manuscript sources.
3.	Practicing	Uses a limited number of record types and repositories. Mostly relies on online and microfilmed sources.	Typically produces complete source citations.
4.	Proficient	Uses a wide variety of record types. Often contacts record custodians to obtain copies of high-quality sources.	Gives complete and accurate source citations including provenance and quality assessment.
5.	Stellar	Insightfully pursues research at multiple, targeted repositories, making use of a plethora of records and record types.	Overcomes limitations of genealogical software to create well organized, industry standard reference notes and source lists.

Information and Evidence

As genealogists learn, we handle information and evidence in more effective ways.

#	GML	Information	Evidence
1.	Entry	Has not learned to abstract information from sources (still thinking in terms of primary and secondary sources), making analysis more difficult.	Limited understanding of what constitutes evidence and the role it plays.
2.	Emerging	Learning to separate the concepts of sources and information. Beginning to see the need for healthy skepticism.	Growing dependence on evidence. Learning to evaluate the quality of sources, information, and evidence.
3.	Practicing	Collects information from the consulted sources and analyzes source characteristics separately from information characteristics.	Correlates the evidence arising from the collected information.
4.	Proficient	Captures all information from the consulted sources.	Carefully accounts for all conflicting evidence.
5.	Stellar	Recognizes usable information where others don't.	Able to find evidence in spite of burned counties, illegitimacy, and other dead ends that stump other researchers.

Conclusions and Conclusion Trees

As genealogists become more experienced, we make better conclusions and as our conclusions get better, our conclusion trees grow in quality.

#	GML	Conclusions	Conclusion Trees
1.	Entry	In the absence of evidence, uses logic and instinct to eyeball conclusions from available information.	Often incorrectly merges or combines individuals in trees.
2.	Emerging	May discount conflicting evidence in preference to the most prevalent evidence.	Growing hesitancy to merge or combine individuals without evidence.
3.	Practicing	Accurately assigns correspondence between records and people. Resolves conflicting evidence.	Never merges compiled genealogies into own tree. Contributes or changes community trees only with evidence.
4.	Proficient	Creates soundly reasoned, coherently documented conclusions. Can utilize indirect evidence.	Manages evidence separately from conclusion tree. Not interested in trusting high quality conclusions to a community tree.
5.	Stellar	Develops new research methodologies. Creates clear and convincing written conclusions. Teaches and inspires others.	Has put so much work into their conclusion tree, they are highly likely to publish it.

I invite the feedback of the entire genealogical community (including you grammarians, editors, and perfectionists).

In each category, see if you think I’ve described the natural maturity progression.
Do the single word GML names and the single sentence definitions reflect the descriptions across all the categories?
Also, I’m hoping a majority of genealogists would score the same GML in each category (sources, citations, etc.). Score yourselves and let me know if you think I need to make adjustments to any categories. Of course, since we are all different, we should expect that some people will have different scores in different categories.
Do you have another category you’d like to see added? Feel free to contribute draft descriptions for each level in the category. I have a couple of my own to introduce next time.

The Genealogical Maturity Model can be a useful tool for evaluating ourselves, setting goals, and improving our capabilities. Together we can fine tune this tool and we can optimize its value.

Stay tuned…

1. Wikipedia contributors, "Capability Maturity Model," Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capability_Maturity_Model&oldid=322826971 : accessed October 30, 2009).

Kory Meyerink to speak Saturday

2009-10-30T00:05:00.000-06:00

Note: This article is off topic and will be of interest primarily to Christians living in the Provo, Utah area.

Kory L. Meyerink, noted genealogist and adjunct professor of history and religion at Brigham Young University (BYU), is slated to speak at the Thirty-Eighth Annual Sidney B. Sperry Symposium tomorrow, 31 October 2009. Meyerink will address the topic, “Malachi and the Centrality of Families in the Gospel of Jesus Christ” at 9:00am in room 456 of the Martin Classroom Building (MARB) on the Provo, Utah campus of BYU.

The 2009 symposium theme is “the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the Old Testament” and the keynote will be delivered by Elder F. Melvin Hammond, an emeritus leader of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Friday the 30th at 6:30pm in the Joseph Smith Building Auditorium of BYU. The Sperry Symposium is free and open to the public and runs Friday after the keynote until 9:30pm, and Saturday, the 31st, from 9:00am until 1:00pm. A schedule of classes is available here. Five different tracks run simultaneously in classrooms in the JSB Auditorium and the MARB.

FamilySearch Community Trees

2009-10-26T00:05:00.000-06:00

Last week a new project appeared on FamilySearch Labs.

Historical Family Trees

Ever wish you could reconstruct the families that lived in your ancestral village in the 1750s? FamilySearch works with individuals and groups with the expertise to piece together the families that lived together historically in a community. We’re experimenting with ways to make these richly-sourced lineage-linked trees more available and expand the number of people helping with this effort. Check it out and tell us what you think.

Updated 21 Oct 2009.

The website currently hosts 19 collections (“Trees”) with 484,048 families containing 1,189,105 individuals. For individuals with surnames, there are 77,130 unique surnames across all the trees. The 3901 sources are linked to 106 repositories.

While titled historical on the labs website and bearing the URL histfam.familysearch.org, the website itself is titled “Community Trees.” The website seems to be a combination of community trees documenting a specific community and historical trees, documenting nobility back to medieval times. Community trees were produced by the FamilySearch Family Reconstitution team headed by Raymond W. Madsen in combination with local partners. Workers canvassed particular record sets to reconstitute all the families of the locality. Historical trees were produced by the Medieval Families Unit, now identified as the Historical Families Unit.

Some trees can be downloaded in GEDCOM format. One has oral genealogies attached. Some partners may have additional information on their own websites. Partners can make corrections and additions to the information shown. Some of the trees are works in progress.

According to the website, the current collections are:

British Isles: Peerage, Gentry and Colonial American Connections: This database was compiled from 15 reputable publications. These lines are very important because they connect to many immigrants to America.
Canada: New Brunswick: Southampton: Millville Communities Family Tree: The Millville Community Family Tree is a joint project with the community of Millville, New Brunswick and FamilySearch International to preserve the heritage of the communities of Southampton parish and other communities including some in Bright and Queensbury parish, through genealogy.
Canada: Nova Scotia: Kings County: Community Family Tree: Kings County Community Family Tree is a joint project with the Kings Historical Society and FamilySearch International to preserve the county heritage through genealogy.
Canada: Toronto: Youngs in Toronto: Extracted and linked records of Young families in Toronto, Ontario from provincial civil registration: births (1869-1909), marriages (1869-1924), and deaths (1869-1934). Also includes allied families.
England: London: Residence of London: The London Project consists of individuals living in London extracted from Boyd's Citizen's of London; controlled extraction records from the International Genealogical Index (IGI); and other records dealing with London.
England: Norfolk Visitations, 1563: The Visitation of Norfolk conducted by William Harvey, Clarenceux King of Arms. This database contains lineage linked families.
England: Todd Knowles Jewish Collection: Jewish database from the British Isles
Europe: Royal and Noble Houses (predominately England and France):This database contains ancestors and descendants of Charlemagne; Louis IX of France; Edward I of England; Charles I of England; Scandinavian and Spanish Royal families; plus many other royal, noble and gentry lineages.
Europe: Royal and Noble Houses (predominately German): This database was first compiled by the previous Medieval Families Unit and has been updated and corrected using on-line databases, Schwennicke, and other nobility sources.
Iceland: Iceland Historical Family Trees: Linked Genealogies of Iceland from 100 A.D to the 1800s extracted from sagas, parish registers, census records and compiled family histories.
Norway: Oppland County: Sør-Aurdal Clerical District: Norway project by FamilySearch International Family Reconstitution team to build community family trees for the several clerical districts of Norway.
Pacific Islands: Cole Jensen Collection: This important collection is one of the best sources for family records, pedigrees, and historical information that is available for the Pacific Island People.
Pacific Islands: French Polynesia: Atuona Island: Atuona, located on the southern side of Hiva Oa island, is the centrer of the of Hiva-Oa. Atuona was the capital of all the Marquesas Islands but it has been replaced by Taiohae (on Nuku Hiva). Atuona comprises the valleys of Atuona, Taaoa, Tahauku and Hanamate.
Pacific Islands: New Zealand: Maori: Meha Genealogy: Information entered from Maori pedigree charts, 13 B.C. 1790 A.D.
Pacific Islands: Tonga: Oral Genealogies and Community Trees: Tonga Oral History, Siosifa Tu'Iketei Pule of Kolofo'ou, Nuku'alofa. Tape 2 Interviewer: Tevita 'Uatahausi Mapa Dates 4th July and 25 August 1973.
Peru: Community Family Tree: Extracted from compiled family and historical records. Many of the notes are in Spanish.
Scotland: Fasti Ecclesiae Scoticanae: Lineage linked families for ministers of the Church of Scotland from the Reformation.
United States: Washington: Lewis County: Community Family Trees: This database contains the records of families listed in the 1850, 1860, 1870, 1880, and 1900 US Census for Lewis County, Washington. We have merged families that appear in multiple census records together to provide a better view of the family over the years. The data that came from each census can be seen in the source citation for that record. This is a preliminary version of the merging and will be updated with an improved version containing additional records from the History of Lewis County, Washington (by Nix) in October 2009.
Wales: Medieval Records Primarily of Nobility and Gentry: This Welsh database, when complete, will include lineage linked data for approximately 350,000 individuals, living from about 100 A.D. to 1700 A.D. The base data was extracted from Peter Bartrum's Welsh Genealogies.

The website suggests,

If you have a database you have created from original source material that you think would be a good addition to the FamilySearch Community Trees or would like to participate somehow, contact Raymond W. Madsen at madsenrw@familysearch.org.

Interestingly, the website icon is “TNG” and examining the source code shows the message, “The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding, v.7.0.3 (14 January 2009), Written by Darrin Lythgoe, 2001-2009.”

The “labs” nature of the website was observed in several deficiencies. I found some operations extremely slow. I found no way to browse. Some links showed no useful purpose. The single photograph would not display. A PDF family group report displayed the wrong site URL.

The Historical Trees Unit and the Family Reconstitution Unit are producing conclusion trees that are GML (Genealogical Maturity Level) 3 and GML 4. By contrast, New FamilySearch (NFS), the tree, has been pre-populated by lots and lots of data at GML 1 and 2 and is subject to edit by genealogists of any level, making it an unsuitable environment for publication of more mature genealogical data. Community Trees is a wonderful forward move allowing FamilySearch to publish their high maturity lineage linked trees.

Salt Lake Institute of Genealogy 2010

2009-10-23T00:05:00.000-06:00

Dear Ancestry Insider,

Would you consider including information from the attached document on your blog? Please let me know if you are interested in additional details.

Best,
-Thomas McGill
SLIG Director 2010

Dear Tom,

For you, I would be happy to. Did you know that since that C+ from Lynn, you’ve been my favorite coworker?

Sincerely,
-- The Ancestry Insider

2010 Salt Lake Institute of Genealogy

Announcing the Salt Lake Institute of Genealogy, to be held January 11-15, 2010 at the Radisson Hotel [located at 215 West South Temple] in downtown Salt Lake City. This is a week-long educational experience taught by expert genealogists.

BECOME more effective with:
   Computers and Technology
   Accreditation and Certification Preparation
   Personal Project Problem Solving

EXPLORE the many possibilities of the records of:
   Scotland
   Central and Eastern Europe
   Mid-Atlantic States (New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland)

FOCUS on:
   American Records and Research
   Immigrant Origins
   Producing a Quality Family Narrative
   American Land and Court Records
   U.S. Military Records

Classes finish in the afternoon each day allowing research time at the world-renowned FAMILY HISTORY LIBRARY, located just two blocks away.

In addition, there are 15 optional evening classes on dynamic topics ranging from maximizing Internet searching to organizing what you find to solving research problems. Evening classes are only $10 each, payable at the door or online.

No matter which course you attend, you will have improved skills by January 15th. The early bird special ends November 16, 2009. For more information or to enroll online, visit www.infouga.org.

A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources

2009-10-20T00:05:00.000-06:00

This is one in a series of reviews. Important legal notices regarding reviews can be found at ancestryinsider.blogspot.com .

A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources, is written by the incomparable Kip Sperry. (See “Kip Sperry,” my recent article about the author.) This book covers many original records of genealogical value created about Mormons, or as they are more formally known, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

I’m not keeping up with the commitments I’ve made to publishers for reviews. (Sorry!) I accepted this book over a year ago and still haven’t reviewed it. So while preparing the article, “Jay Burrup: the Church History Library,” I thought it would be a good test of Sperry’s Guide to see if he covered all the sources at the Church History Library covered by Burrup.

But before I tell you how well Guide did, let me tell you a little about the book. Book pages, at 8.5 x 10.9 inches, are nearly the size of a regular sheet of paper. Unfortunately, this means that if you buy cheap book cases like I do, only the bottom shelf, and sometimes the next one up, is tall enough to stow this book on. But the 231 pages and paperback covers amount to just 0.6 inches of thickness, so it doesn’t take up too much space.

This book covers many original records created about Mormons by the Church and by others. The majority of these are held by three repositories: the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University, the Church History Library and Church Archives, and the Family History Library. But Guide goes beyond these basic three, particularly for sources available on the Internet.

Chapter 1 summarizes Church historical events from 1800 to 2006. It includes about 12 pages of very helpful chronology. Wondering what probable dates to check for the immigration of your pioneer ancestor from Germany? Wondering if your 1866 convert travelled by steamship? By handcart? By train? Did your ancestor come during the years of the Perpetual Emigration Fund? Did your great-grandparents live during a Church Census? Did they live long enough to participate in the three- or four-generation submission program?

Chapter 2 is a 6 page introduction to family history research. A printed list of websites in the chapter exposes the rapidly changing landscape of the Internet. Ancestry.com has dropped Ancestry World Tree from new search results, but Sperry lists an address for the database (www.ancestry.com/trees/awt) that still works. Interestingly, he excludes the address where this database can be searched for free, RootsWeb’s World Connect. Probably aware of coming changes to FamilySearch.org, Sperry doesn’t give specific addresses for its International Genealogical Index or Pedigree Resource File (PRF). As an alternative address for the PRF, Sperry gives www.findyourfamilytree.com, an address of the private partner that produces PRF, Progeny Genealogy. (See “Pedigree Resource File Q and A.”) Elsewhere Sperry suggests using Google to locate pages that have moved since the book went to press.

I found Chapter 2’s “Preliminary Survey” to be very helpful. It is a list of basic sources to consult when beginning the research for each Mormon ancestor.

I have misgivings about chapter 2 targeting new genealogists. I believe the book will appeal mostly to intermediate and advanced genealogists, making chapter 2 of limited value. It would have been more valuable to explain how to use these sources, understand and classify the information therein, weigh evidence therefrom, and from thence make reliable conclusions. But this is a minor point, and some of this information is included elsewhere, such as the beginning of chapter 5.

Subsequent chapters are

3 – Indexes, Finding Aids, and Guides (14 pp.)
4 – Compiled and Printed Records (12 pp.)
5 – Original Records (14 pp.)
6 – Migration, Emigration, and Immigration Records (8 pp.)
7 – Computer Resources and Databases (24 pp.)
8 – Internet Sites (20 pp.)
9 – Periodicals, Newsletters, and Newspapers (12 pp.)
Appendix A: Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Terms (12 pp.)
Appendix B: Addresses (14 pp.)
End notes (14 pp.)
Bibliography (52 pp.)
Index (8 pp.)

I was hoping for more information about 19th century polygamy. (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints practiced polygamy until 1890, but no longer tolerates the practice. See “FamilySearch Not Affiliated With Texas Polygamists.”) Chapter 1 lacked all the anti-polygamy legislation dates and the periods of active Federal prosecution that are necessary to interpret some anomalies in Federal census records. I could find nothing in the contents or index for information about the Federal court records of the prosecution of polygamists that might contain genealogical information. What records exist? What Federal repositories hold the records? What are the record titles? Are there indexes?

I was disappointed that Guide did not include call numbers and film numbers, but I understand that like web addresses these too change. There’s no doubt A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources is valuable enough to outlast the numbering systems for many of the sources therein.

So how did Guide do against Burrup’s lecture? Exceptional. Sperry covered every single collection of genealogical value from Burrup’s lecture. The information was exceptional, often calling to mind details mentioned by Burrup, but not present in the class handout. And Guide usually went into greater detail. Using these sources as a statistical sample, I think it safe to assume that A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources is an amazingly complete catalog of Mormon family history sources.

Highly recommended for serious, active researchers of Mormon family history.

A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources
8.5" x 10.9", 231 pp., paperback. 2009.
ISBN 978-1-59331-301-2
Ancestry Publishing
1-800-262-3787, www.theancestrystore.com
$16.95 (list)

Kip Sperry

2009-10-19T00:05:00.000-06:00

This is another in a series of encyclopedia-like articles.

The biography from Kip Sperry’s latest book begins:

Kip Sperry is a professor of family history in the Department of Church History and Doctrine at Brigham Young University [BYU], Provo, Utah, where he teaches American and LDS genealogical research methods and sources. He is an Accredited Genealogist^® [AG]; Certified Genealogist^SM [CG]; Certified Genealogical Lecturer^SM [CGL]; Fellow, American Society of Genealogists [FASG]; Fellow, National Genealogical Society [FNGS]; and Fellow, Utah Genealogical Association [FUGA].¹

That’s enough post-nominals for several cans of alphabet soup! Continuing Sperry’s biography from a BYU web site:

He is author of Abbreviations and Acronyms: A Guide for Family Historians; Genealogical Research in Ohio; A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources; Kirtland Ohio: A Guide to Family History and Historical Sources; Reading Early American Handwriting; other books, chapters, journal articles, and faculty advisor for two Internet tutorials: Personal Ancestral File (http://paftutorial.byu.edu) and United States Census (http://census.byu.edu).

He has lectured at national, regional, and state family history and genealogy conferences and seminars, including BYU Annual Computerized Genealogy Conferences, BYU Annual Genealogy and Family History Conferences, BYU Campus Education Weeks, BYU-Hawaii, BYU-Idaho, Federation of Genealogical Societies, Mormon History Association, National Genealogical Society, and Sidney B. Sperry Symposiums.

He received graduate and undergraduate degrees from BYU and was presented the 2003 Richard Lloyd Anderson Research Award from BYU Religious Education. Biographical sketches appear in Contemporary Authors, Directory of American Scholars, Who’s Who in Genealogy and Heraldry, Who's Who in the West, and other biographical sources. Born in Ohio, he and his wife, Anne, are the parents of one son, Daniel, a medical school student in Syracuse, New York.²

For more information about Sperry, visit www.kipsperry.com .

1. Kip Sperry, A Guide to Mormon Family History Sources (Provo, Utah: Ancestry Publishing, 2007), 231; internet links added.

2. “Kip Sperry,” Religious Education Faculty (religion.byu.edu : Brigham Young University, accessed 17 October 2009); internet links added.