Anonymums

Theory vs Experience

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:06:49 PDT

Its fantastic to have research and advocacy highlight the importance of mothers and children's experience of violence. It is when some of these people can no longer see human beings, but perceive them as subjects and then it goes a little further to "subjective" until the human being is no longer human being but a lab rat or perhaps the grounding of the pedestal that platforms their persona to

Organizations

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:58:46 PDT

Grassroots movements have an energy unlike anything else. She has her life, soul and knows exactly what needs to be done. Like any war, we know that hired soldiers are going to lose because they lack the passion, the stamina and meaning to keep on going and make it real. Its been a journey of understanding for everyone and perhaps why organizations clash with people, cage their passions and

Fathers Rights Testimonials

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:53:22 PDT

Fathers Rights Groups absolutely hate us and not for the nonsense reasons they mislead others to believe. Its because we exposed them for what they are. Here is the calculation: Abusers Were Stopped By Law + Gathered In Anger Management + Lobbied Government = Abusive law We have provided over the past two years screen shots of their verbal intimidations, true agendas, pedophiliac

From one survivor to another

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:15:44 PDT

We all know that crazy making is not only an abusers tactic but also one exploited by the family court as a reason to reverse custody. As Barbara Biggs said when she asked how many mothers lost custody were for "Mental Illness" reasons, "They cannot be all mentally ill". This is not to replace treatment by professionals, but just a simple trick a survivor did to thrive: Close your eyes and let

Remove the perpetrator, not the child

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:28:46 PDT

A recent case in the Australian where the family court decided that a child should be removed from their mother because of the boyfriends history was just another judgement that adds to the long line of ignorance that leads to stupidity when making decisions on family violence. I make no concessions at identifying a situations for what they truly are: Stupidity. That is what the Howard

Relief for families as tyrannical laws are on their way out

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:50:02 PDT

Shared parenting laws on way out Font Size:DecreaseIncrease Print Page:Print Caroline Overington | October 19, 2009 Article from: The Australian THE Rudd government is planning to roll back the controversial shared parenting law passed in the final term of the Howard government, enraging men's groups, which say the laws have finally given them access to their children after

Hero Mother: Her Story

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:02:14 PDT

In 2003 my abuser forged my signature and had it notarized on a court stipulation giving him "50/50" custody and all back child support dropped, this is a paternity case. The notary was his real estate/insurance agent. The only reason I found out about the forgery is that he tried to remove our daughter, Michaela from daycare and they contacted me immediately. I filed a police report regarding

Free From Violence: A Human Right Reminder

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:30:17 PDT

United NationsA/RES/48/104 General AssemblyDistr. GENERAL 20 December 1993ORIGINAL:ENGLISH A/RES/48/104 85th plenary meeting 20 December 1993 48/104. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women The General Assembly

Family Courts Lab Rats

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:50:18 PDT

Perhaps another strategy to avoid liability, the Family Court announced Shared parenting as a "social experiment". What they didn't tell you was the fact that the participants were not by consent and the grave risks that were involved. Thats in the fine print of the law that appears only the fathers rights groups have had access to. It wasn't until Dr Judith Reisman questioned Kinseys findings

Every Right To Run...

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:53:59 PDT

Recent articles have been floating around about enforcing family court orders. One of the latest compared mothers as criminals which is no different to the treatment of African Americans for many generations until it got to a point where enough was enough. If it were anymore barbaric to hunt mothers down like animals, they would be tying her to a ball and chain. Yes, they have actually done

AFCC: The Man behind the Curtain

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:28:50 PDT

AFCC was at one stage a judges slush fund of where bribes perverted the course of justice in California's family Court. Not only did it serve as a platform for corruption, but was also became the loudspeaker of Dr Richard Gardeners work in the 70s and 80s. The trail of devastation for victims was left behind with few who held accountable and more who profited upon these ills. Dr joan

One Big Happy Family

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:06:15 PDT

Up until earlier this year a very public death of a child sparked outrage in Australia, the Attorney General, the Chief Justice and the Shared Parenting Council were one big happy family. All were working in synchronicity to contain concerns about Australia's shared parenting bill. Outside the family court, few were aware of the Shared Parenting Councils views on violence against women and

Abusers vs The Abused

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:54:35 PDT

There is no logic in tip- toeing around the subject of who these movements are and what they really are about. On one side we have the movement that promotes the following messages:Children are brainwashed by their mothers(Parent Alienation Syndrome) Statistics on violence against women are false(RADAR)Pathways to full custody for fathers(Shared Parenting)Mothers are mostly abusers(RADAR)Abused

Canadian Media: Hiding the bodies

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:51:24 PDT

When using Canada's Google search to find women and children killed by court orders, I found barely anything. Three out of countless deaths were honored with a photo in the news. Others had a quick mention, especially when it was a child. When one mother loss the plot and killed her child(i don't even know if it actually happened or they just framed her for being female) had over twenty

We are with you Mama Liberty and every mother and child out there who is being tormented by the family court

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:25:08 PDT

BUTTERFLIES & HURRICANESSeptember 21, 2009 in Child Custody Issues, Child Custody for fathers, Children's Rights, Family Courts, activism, child abuse, domestic violence | Tags: aaron krzewinski, abused, abused children, abusers, abusive men, bad fathers, battered women, batterers, Carrie Silbernagel-Burke, corruption, Court, court whores, CPS, custody, cyber stalking, domestic abuse,

Family Court Ordered Murder - Why Are They Dead?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:00:22 PDT

http://theanonymums.com/Why_Are_They_Dead.php Family Court Ordered Murder The Untied Nations definition of Genocide set out in the Convention on Genocide is: Article 2 In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing

That's why the lawmakers are not interested in protecting victims

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:08:01 PDT

Steve Nunn, key legislator in United States shot Amanda Ross last Friday after an emergency hearing was held to prevent him from obtaining a gun. The myth that domestic violence only affects women from lower economic status has just been blown out of the water. Domestic violence is not isolated to a particular culture or economic status and largely a reason why so many men have invested in

The Outrage: Contact With a Father Who Murdered Her Baby Brother

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:03:46 PDT

Its beyond a simple sin of the conduct in the way that the Family Courts have treated mothers and children. No words describe the psychological, social and organizational abuse by this court towards the young girl and mother. Before walking through those Family Courts, I assumed that there was a civil line and expected that there was a limit as to how much a mother and a child is forced to

How Could Anyone Ignore These Beautiful Children?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:15:18 PDT

Another Court Ordered Tragedy of which police believe is a suspected murder-suicide. For two years, Suzanne Dillion did what we all did. She begged the courts to protect them. Those beautiful pictures of once happy children were wasted in a thoughtless act. The Family Court is growing a dangerous game of Russian roulette on our children and mothers. Experts say that most murder suicides occur

Just to Hurt Mum...

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:23:22 PDT

A father who received shared parenting of the children:1. Left a 14yo and 9yo alone in the home to see his girlfriend regularly.2. Threatened to deprive them of their mother, if they told.3. Took all of the furniture out of the house, leaving them with a few clothes and blankets. 4. Is relying on depression as an excuse of his negligence.In the article, it states:"Duty solicitor Mark Dollimore

Herald Sun Hijack: Fathers Rights Reporter Laurie Nowell?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:05:22 PDT

Laurie Nowell, supposedly a Family Court Reporter of the Herald Sun has written once again in favor of the fathers rights groups. Not only the agenda they promote, but includes stories from their perspectives denying that they were abusive or that they stalked their ex partners. Considering how difficult it is to prove when a parent is unsafe towards the child with the current laws in place, it

Joining Anonymums

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:52:34 PDT

Dear Friends and Supporters,Thank you for your recent correspondence and expression of interest in membership. There has been so many gatherings and support for this area of mothers and children s rights globally. Together in small groups, we have managed to accomplish a lot in raising awareness despite our own situations and peril that has had its grip over our lives. As the saying goes, "

Violence Against Women Deniers Beware - Your Propaganda Could Land You Jail Time

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:00:39 PDT

Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben to serve time in jail By Tim Dornin | August 13, 2009 Article from: Australian Associated Press HOLOCAUST denier Fredrick Toben has been taken into custody to serve a

Human Rights down the gurgler

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:42:35 PDT

One of the latest issues raised is about intellectual property that has infiltrated the minds of Australian media is intellectual property and genes. Last year, Melbourne Technologies requested that all of the hospitals cease testing for breast cancer, because the company owned a patent on the mutation gene. The value of life was put second to greed and diminished the exercise into a pure waste

Child Abuse Disclosure Causes Outrage

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymums) — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:42:22 PDT

A situation where radio presenters fumbled upon a disclosure of rape has broken out in scrutiny and distaste for the show. Fathers Rights groups have condemned the mother for humiliating the daughter, despite they are to blame for the community attitudes towards rape. Peter Gregory of Fathers4Equality stated,"What kind of a bitch is this woman! She knew her daughter had been raped and yet she