<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss version="2.0">
	
  <channel>
    <title>AOM In-Press Articles</title>
    <description>Latest AOM In-Press Articles</description>
    <link>http://journals.aomonline.org/inpress</link>
	<language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:37:49 EST]]></lastBuildDate>
	
		    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/AomIn-pressArticles" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		      <title><![CDATA[AMJ: DO CEOS ENCOUNTER WITHIN-TENURE “SETTLING UP”? A MULTIPERIOD PERSPECTIVE ON EXECUTIVE PAY AND DISMISSAL [Issue-Unassigned]]]></title>
		      <description><![CDATA[We focus on a central puzzle surrounding CEO accountability:  What explains the payoffs and penalties that CEOs receive?  Invoking Fama’s concept of “settling up,” we adopt a multiperiod perspective in examining how a CEO’s entire performance record, along with his or her prior over- or underpayment, affects current pay revisions.  We find that earlier performance and earlier over- and underpayment explain substantially more variance in current pay revisions than does current performance alone.  Additionally, we find that settling up is manifested in CEO dismissals.  As Fama envisioned, our study indicates that history matters when boards reward or punish their CEOs.]]></description>
		      <link>http://journals.aomonline.org/InPress/main.asp?action=preview&amp;art_id=704&amp;p_id=1&amp;p_short=AMJ</link>
		      <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:25:13 EST]]></pubDate>
		    </item>
	
		    <item>
		      <title><![CDATA[AMLE: DOES BUSINESS SCHOOL RESEARCH ADD ECONOMIC VALUE FOR STUDENTS? [Issue-Unassigned]]]></title>
		      <description><![CDATA[The scholarly research conducted by business school faculty has long been the subject of intense criticism for lacking relevance and value to practice. In contrast, we theorize that such research is relevant and valuable in that it contributes to what is arguably the most critical metric of relevance for B-school students: the economic value they accrue from their education. We investigate this counter argument on a sample of 658 business schools over an eight-year period. We find that research adds significant value in that it can potentially enhance student salaries by an average of $24,000 per year. However, we also observe that ‘excessive’ research activity can lead to diminishing or even negative returns for students, and a research focus solely on elite journals might rob students of the benefits of exposure to a broader array of new ideas.]]></description>
		      <link>http://journals.aomonline.org/InPress/main.asp?action=preview&amp;art_id=703&amp;p_id=2&amp;p_short=AMLE</link>
		      <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:56:40 EST]]></pubDate>
		    </item>
	
		    <item>
		      <title><![CDATA[AMP: THE IMPACT OF EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRMS ON EXECUTIVE CAREERS [Volume 24, Number 1 February 2010]]]></title>
		      <description><![CDATA[This paper presents empirical evidence on the impact of executive search firms on executive careers. It looks at three issues: 1) “Who gets headhunted?” What type of executive population do search firms target? 2) “Who moves?” Why are executives willing to engage in job search upon contacted by the search firm? 3) “Do the moves work?” Do executives who move to a new employer with the help of search firms make more successful moves than those moving without such an intervention? The search target database of a multinational executive search firm and 44 interviews with executive search consultants serve as the basis of the analyses.]]></description>
		      <link>http://journals.aomonline.org/InPress/main.asp?action=preview&amp;art_id=705&amp;p_id=3&amp;p_short=AMP</link>
		      <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:31:51 EST]]></pubDate>
		    </item>
	
		    <item>
		      <title><![CDATA[AMR: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR
THE ACADEMY IN THE NEXT DECADE
 [Volume 35, Number 2 April 2010]]]></title>
		      <description><![CDATA[The Academy of Management is a growing, thriving association, with membership for around the globe. Yet the Academy faces some interesting challenges in the next decade – some of them the result of the Academy’s success. I try to identify a few key challenges that I believe the Academy will be facing.  I also discuss how these are actually opportunities for growth and evolution. I suggest some ideas for how to deal with these challenges, but end with a note of optimism about the future of the Academy of Management, due primarily to the dedication of the leadership and the members of the Academy.]]></description>
		      <link>http://journals.aomonline.org/InPress/main.asp?action=preview&amp;art_id=706&amp;p_id=4&amp;p_short=AMR</link>
		      <pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:02:25 EST]]></pubDate>
		    </item>
	
  </channel>
</rss>
