<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>aRecentStudy.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com</link>
	<description>Studies, Surveys, Commentary and Comments</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Arecentstudycom" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>a Recent Study on The Daily Show - not quite journalism, but not just for laughs</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/a-recent-study-on-the-daily-show-not-quite-journalism-but-not-just-for-laughs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/a-recent-study-on-the-daily-show-not-quite-journalism-but-not-just-for-laughs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aRecentStudy.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description />
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; margin: 0px 10px 0 0;"><img src='http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/Jon_Stewart.jpg' alt='Jon Stewart - The Daily Show' class='alignnone' /></div>
<p>When Americans last year <a href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/pew-todays-journalists-less-prominent.pdf" target="pew study">were asked</a> to name the journalist they most admired, a comedian showed up at No. 4 on the list - Jon Stewart, host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central and former master of ceremonies at Academy Award shows. Jon Stewart tied in the rankings with anchormen Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Anderson Cooper.</p>
<p>Are Americans confused? What is Stewart doing on his program, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, that might cause people to consider him a journalist? How is the show similar to, and different from, what people get from the mainstream press? Beyond that, who—and what—gets skewered by Stewart and company, and who doesn&#8217;t? </p>
<p>The Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism <a href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/daily-show-methodology.pdf" target="Daily Show Methodology">studied</a> the content of The Daily Show for an entire year of 2007, compared its news agenda with that of the traditional news media, examined guest lineup and segments and tried to place the program into &#8220;media context&#8221;.</p>
<p><!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--></p>
<p>The results reveal a television program that draws on the news events of the day but picks selectively among them—heavily emphasizing national politics and ignoring other news events entirely. In that regard, The Daily Show closely resembles the news agenda of a number of cable news programs as well as talk radio.</p>
<p>The program also makes heavy use of news footage, often in a documentary way that employs archival video to show contrast and contradiction, even if the purpose is satirical rather than reportorial. At other times, the show also blends facts and fantasy in a way that no news program hopefully ever would. In addition, The Daily Show not only assumes, but even requires, previous and significant knowledge of the news on the part of viewers if they want to get the joke. And, in 2007 at least, the joke was more often on the Bush Administration and its fellow Republicans than on those from the liberal side of the aisle.</p>
<p>Among the study’s findings: </p>
<ul>
<li>The program’s clearest focus is politics, especially in Washington. U.S. foreign affairs, largely dominated by the Bush Administration’s policies in Iraq, Washington politics and government accounted for nearly half (47%) of the time spent on the program. Overall, The Daily Show news agenda is quite close to those of cable news talk shows.</li>
<li>The press itself is another significant focus on The Daily Show. In all, 8% of the time was made up of segments about the press and news media. That is more than double the amount of coverage of media in the mainstream press overall during the same period.</li>
<li>A good deal of the news, however, is also absent from The Daily Show. In 2007, for example, major events such as the tragic Minneapolis bridge collapse were never discussed. And the shootings at Virginia Tech, the most covered story within a given week in 2007 by the overall press, received only a cursory mention.</li>
<div style="float:right; margin: 0 0 10px 10px;"><img src='http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/the-daily-show.jpg' alt='The Daily Show Bias' class='alignnone' /></div>
<li>Republicans in 2007 tended to bear the brunt of ridicule from Stewart and his crew. From July 1 through November 1, Stewart’s humor targeted Republicans more than three times as often as Democrats. The Bush Administration alone was the focus of almost a quarter (22%) of the segments in this time period.</li>
<li>The lineup of on-air guests was more evenly balanced by political party. But our subjective sense from viewing the segments is that Republicans faced harsher criticism during the interviews with Stewart. Whether this is because the show is simply liberal or because the Republicans control the White House is harder to pin down.
</li>
</ul>
<p><!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--></p>
<p>Stewart has always insisted that his show isn’t journalism and given its comedic core, its blurring of truth and fiction, and its ignoring of many major events, that&#8217;s true. </p>
<p>But it’s also true that The Daily Show aims at more than comedy. In its choice of topics, its use of news footage to deconstruct the manipulations by public figures and its tendency toward pointed satire over playing just for laughs, The Daily Show performs a function that is close to journalistic in nature—getting people to think critically about the public square. In that sense, it is a variation of the tradition of Russell Baker, Art Hoppe, Art Buchwald, H.L. Mencken and other satirists who once graced the pages of American newspapers.</p>
<p>How popular is The Daily Show? According to <a href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/pew-public-knowledge.pdf" target="Pew Public Knowledge">a survey by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press</a> in April 2007, 16% of Americans said they regularly watched The Daily Show or the Comedy Central spin-off, the Colbert Report. Those numbers are comparable to some major news programs. For instance, 17% said they regularly watched Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor, and 14% watched PBS’ NewsHour with Jim Lehrer regularly.</p>
<p>The survey also suggests Daily Show viewers are highly informed<font color="red">*</font>, an indication that The Daily Show is not their lone source of news. Regular viewers of The Daily Show and the Colbert Report were most likely to score in the highest percentile on knowledge of current affairs.</p>
<p>The Daily Show, which began in 1996, now has an average audience of about 1.8 million. <font color="red">*</font> By comparison, Fox News’ primetime show Hannity &#038; Colmes had an average audience of 1.9 million in the first quarter of 2008, and CNN’s highest rated show, Election Center captured an average of <a href="http://nielsen-media-analysis.pdf" target="Nielsen Media Analysis">1.2 million viewers</a>. Stewart became host of the Show in 1999 and also serves as a writer and co-executive producer. </p>
<p>Structurally, The Daily Show combines elements of both traditional news shows and late night variety programs. Two commercial segments divide the 30 minute show into three distinct parts. Typically the first segment consists of Stewart’s monologue, which often uses video and audio clips. The second segment usually brings in correspondents who do skits, or staged interviews with Stewart. The third, and final, act of the show consists of a guest interview. Guests range from celebrities, to historians and politicians. <font color="red">*</font></p>
<p><font size=1><i>* “Well-informed audiences come from cable (Daily Show/Colbert Report, O&#8217;Reilly Factor), the internet (especially major newspaper websites), broadcast TV (NewsHour with Jim Lehrer) and radio (NPR, Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s program).”</i></font></p>
<p><font size=1><i>* Average total viewers, 2008 year to date. Viewership data provided by Comedy Central, April 29 2008</i></font></p>
<p><font size=1><i>* Once in a while guests appear for two separate segments: the second as well as the third. This is most frequently true for the most prominent figures, such as Presidential front-runners etc. Also, in one instance in 2007, a guest interview (with Ali Allawi on April 18) was aired as third and second to last story. A report on the falling stock market was the last story.</i></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/a-recent-study-on-the-daily-show-not-quite-journalism-but-not-just-for-laughs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on Black College Student Spirituality - Higher Than White Students</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-black-college-student-spirituality-higher-than-white-students/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-black-college-student-spirituality-higher-than-white-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Black Student Spirituality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[White Student Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aRecentStudy.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[






A recent study comparing black college-age spirituality to white college-age spirituality was conducted presumably to show that if the relative high spirituality of college-age blacks could be directed toward their health behaviors, the also relative high rate of morbidity and mortality among blacks could be decreased.
Definitely some interesting findings.
American Journal of Health Studies,  Summer-Fall, 2005  by Dixie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" src="http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/black spirituality.jpg" alt="Black college spirituality" height="234" style="width: 300px; height: 234px" title="Black college spirituality" /></p>
<p><!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/Spirituality%20among%20a%20predominately%20African%20American%20college%20student%20population.html" title="Black spirituality compared to white spirituality">A recent study comparing black college-age spirituality to white college-age spirituality</a> was conducted presumably to show that if the relative high spirituality of college-age blacks could be directed toward their health behaviors, the also relative high rate of morbidity and mortality among blacks could be decreased.</p>
<p>Definitely some interesting findings.</p>
<p><span class="artPubLine_span">American Journal of Health Studies</span>,  Summer-Fall, 2005  by Dixie L. Dennis,  Terence Hicks,  Priya Banerjee,  Brent G. Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-black-college-student-spirituality-higher-than-white-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on media bias consensus - even Harvard agrees!</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/media-bias-project-for-excellence-in-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/media-bias-project-for-excellence-in-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Study on Media Bias]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/media-bias-project-for-excellence-in-journalism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[






It seems that a joint survey by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard&#8217;s Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy has found some consensus with what conservatives have believed for years - media is biased against Republicans! Here&#8217;s a few of the more interesting comparisons.
Media Tone of Coverage
Percent of all stories, by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="250" src="http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/media-bias.jpg" alt="Media Bias" height="352" style="width: 250px; height: 352px" title="Media Bias" /><br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
It seems that a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/media-bias-project-for-excellence-in-journalism.htm" title="Media Bias by the Project for Excellence in Hournalism and Harvard's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy">joint survey by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard&#8217;s Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy</a> has found some consensus with what conservatives have believed for years - media is biased against Republicans! Here&#8217;s a few of the more interesting comparisons.</p>
<p><strong>Media Tone of Coverage</strong></p>
<p>Percent of all stories, by party</p>
<p><strong>Newspapers                   <u>Positive</u>   <u>Neutral </u>  <u>Negative</u></strong><br />
Democrats                         58.8%     30.0%     11.3%<br />
Republicans                       26.4%     34.0%     39.6%</p>
<p><strong>Network evening news</strong><br />
Democrats                         39.5%     43.4%     17.1%<br />
Republicans                       18.6%     44.2%     37.2%</p>
<p><strong>PBS news</strong><br />
Democrats                         8.3%      66.7%     25.0%<br />
Republicans                       0%         77.8%     77.8%</p>
<p><strong>Cable news</strong><br />
Democrats                         33.9%     40.6%     25.5%<br />
Republicans                       28.7%     40.9%     30.4%</p>
<p><strong>NPR&#8217;s &#8220;Morning Edition&#8221;</strong><br />
Democrats                         41.2%     52.9%     5.9%<br />
Republicans                       30.0%     50.0%     20.0%</p>
<p>___________________________________________________</p>
<p>A couple questions that come up &#8212; is the media biased against whichever party has a president in office? If you were to perform this study during the Clinton Presidency, would the result have been the same? Before making assumptions, I recommend reading the full study linked above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/media-bias-project-for-excellence-in-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on Lost Wallet Honesty - 74% of people are honest.</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-lost-wallet-honesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-lost-wallet-honesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lost Wallet Honesty]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Study on honesty by race sex age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-lost-wallet-honesty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[�






Paul Kinsella performed a remarkable survey that tests a person&#8217;s honesty when faced with the prospect of keeping a $0.35 wallet containing $2.10 and a $50 gift certificate or returning it to the owner using the id card contained in the wallet. Paul had the bright idea of recording hilarious conversations from many of the thieves and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="314" src="http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/wallet.jpg" alt="Lost Wallet" height="219" style="width: 314px; height: 219px" title="Lost Wallet" />�<br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
Paul Kinsella performed a remarkable <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wallettest.com/Lost_Wallet_Test/Results_Page.html" title="Wallet Test Experiment">survey</a> that tests a person&#8217;s honesty when faced with the prospect of keeping a $0.35 wallet containing $2.10 and a $50 gift certificate or returning it to the owner using the id card contained in the wallet. Paul had the bright idea of recording <a target="_blank" href="http://www.wallettest.com/Lost_Wallet_Test/Phone_Recordings.html" title="Recordings of thieves">hilarious conversations</a> from many of the thieves and a few of the honest ones.</p>
<p>Some of the interesting results are:</p>
<ul>
<li>26% of the people kept the wallets</li>
<li>86% of women and 61% of men were honest</li>
<li>56% of young people were honest, 81% of middle aged people were honest, 88% of old people were honest</li>
<li>79% of white people were honest, 57% of black people were honest</li>
<li>The most honest group were white females (95%), the least honest group were young black people (40%)</li>
</ul>
<p>The author was careful to point out that &#8220;<font color="#ff0000"><strong>It was <u>not</u> the intention of this experiment to make any particular group look bad, reinforce stereotypes nor to further a hidden agenda of any kind. The actions of a few members in a group should not, of course, be used to judge the whole group.</strong></font><font color="#000000">&#8221; - </font><font color="#000000">I wonder why!</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-lost-wallet-honesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on S&amp;P 500 CEO’s - Top ten stats of S&amp;P CEOs</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/top-ten-stats-of-sp-ceos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/top-ten-stats-of-sp-ceos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CEO stats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[S&amp;P top 500 CEO's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/top-ten-stats-of-sp-ceos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[�






The stats of the rich, if not famous, has now been revealed in a study of many of the S&#38;P 500&#8217;s leaders. Spencer Stuart conducted this fascinating study which reveals things like:

Since 1980, the top 100 CEOs are getting younger
Harvard is no longer the most commonly attended school by top CEO&#8217;s
Less than 10% of top CEOs received [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="300" src="http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/steve-ballmer-ceo-nasdaq.jpg" alt="Steve Balmer Microsoft CEO funny guy" height="230" style="width: 300px; height: 230px" title="Steve Balmer Microsoft CEO funny guy" />�<br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
The stats of the rich, if not famous, has now been revealed in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/S&amp;P%20500%20CEOs.htm" title="S&amp;P 500 CEOs.htm">a study of many of the S&amp;P 500&#8217;s leaders</a>. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.spencerstuart.com/home/" title="Spencer Stuart">Spencer Stuart</a> conducted this fascinating study which reveals things like:</p>
<ul>
<li>Since 1980, the top 100 CEOs are getting <u>younger</u></li>
<li>Harvard is no longer the most commonly attended school by top CEO&#8217;s</li>
<li>Less than 10% of top CEOs received degrees from Ivy League schools</li>
<li>36% of all S&amp;P 500 CEOs <u>do not</u> have an advanced degree</li>
<li>33% of the S&amp;P 500 CEOs undergraduate degrees are in Engineering (only 11% in Business Administration)</li>
<li>The functional role that lead to becoming CEO was most commonly Finance at 15%, followed by General Management at 9%</li>
<li>Southern and Midwestern companies have the most loyal CEOs with 26%-27% having spent their entire career with the company</li>
<li>The industry containing the most S&amp;P 500 companies is &#8220;Computer &amp; Electronic Product Manufacturing&#8221;</li>
<li>CEOs of Utilities companies have the shortest company tenure at 8 years</li>
<li>CEOs of Utilities companies were the most highly educated; Printing, Publishing &amp; Related Support Activities the least educated</li>
</ul>
<p>If I wanted to join the rat race, I think this study looks like a blueprint to become CEO. Just follow the most commonly followed paths of these CEOs and you&#8217;re sure to be a success&#8230;right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/top-ten-stats-of-sp-ceos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on anthropogenic climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-anthropogenic-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-anthropogenic-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-anthropogenic-climate-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[�






Naomi Oreskes published an essay which summarized her 2004 lecture on a survey she performed of 928 papers relevant to global climate change. Of these papers, 75% either explicitly or implicitly supported the theory that global climate change is man made. The other 25% of the papers took no position on whether climate change was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="textTop" width="400" src="http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/global-warming.jpg" alt="Anthropogenic Global Warming" height="267" style="width: 400px; height: 267px" title="Anthropogenic Global Warming" />�<br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
Naomi Oreskes published an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686" title="Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change">essay</a> which summarized her 2004 lecture on a survey she performed of 928 papers relevant to global climate change. Of these papers, 75% either explicitly or implicitly supported the theory that global climate change is man made. The other 25% of the papers took no position on whether climate change was man made, but they did not deny it. This paper is one of the primary sources cited as proof of scientific consensus on man made climate change.</p>
<p>This essay leaves one to wonder why papers by people like <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen" title="Richard Lindzen">Richard Lindzen</a> are not part of the 928 Mrs. Oreskes studied. Mr. Lindzen is clearly opposed to the theory of anthropogenic climate change, although he does accept climate change in general. Mr. Lindzen says of his criticism of the anthropogenic warming&#8217;s lack of an alternative cause, &#8220;The notion that if you’re ignorant of something and somebody comes up with a wrong answer, and you have to accept that because you don’t have another wrong answer to offer is like faith healing, it’s like quackery in medicine – if somebody says you should take jelly beans for cancer and you say that’s stupid, and he says, well can you suggest something else and you say, no, does that mean you have to go with jelly beans?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/on-anthropogenic-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on Christian Obesity</title>
		<link>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/christian-obesity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/christian-obesity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christian Obesity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Study on Christian Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false" />
		<description><![CDATA[�






According to a recent study by Krista M. C. Cline and Kenneth F. Ferraro of Purdue University, Christians tend to overeat. Jared Binder of the Dallas Observer, observes:
&#8220;There’s this thing in the Bible called gluttony. The Bible says it’s a sin. But we don’t like to talk about that particular sin. We prefer to point [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="172" src="http://www.arecentstudy.com/images/fat-preacher.jpg" alt="Fat Preacher" height="177" style="width: 172px; height: 177px" title="Fat Preacher" />�<br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5292836207074664";
/* arecentstudy468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "9060063769";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><br />
<!--Google Ad--><br />
According to <a href="http://www.arecentstudy.com/studies/2006%20Cline%20and%20Ferraro%20JSSR.htm" title="Christians and obesity">a recent study</a> by Krista M. C. Cline and Kenneth F. Ferraro of Purdue University, Christians tend to overeat. Jared Binder of the Dallas Observer, <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2007/08/how_would_jesus_eat.php" title="observes">observes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There’s this thing in the Bible called gluttony. The Bible says it’s a sin. But we don’t like to talk about that particular sin. We prefer to point a pudgy finger at others and decry the evils of drugs and alcohol, pornography, abortion and homosexuality. Compared to those, gluttony is just a little sin.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>and:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So why aren’t more pastors and churches talking about it? One reason is pretty obvious. We don’t want to risk losing church members by offending anyone.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Honestly, the obesity problem is well known to be an American epidemic. The salient point of this study is that Christians in particular have an acute need for reducing the use of food as an indulgence to replace the indulgences reduced or eliminated in other areas of our lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aRecentStudy.com/index.php/christian-obesity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
