Atheists Help to Reality

What is reality?

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:51:00 +0000

A lot of people talk about "Real" and not "Real" as it is something easy. They ask a proof of God as if they already have a proof of universe and its nature! Materialism fails in our modern philosophy of science, there is no Sharp barrier between physics and metaphysics.

It is impossible to differentiate the real from its perception!! all universe at the end are composed of perceived ideas and information. The source of these ideas is GOD, so, no proof can be done for anything as it is "material", all universe is just stream of information relative to your consciousness, and this information must have a source which is NOT your consciousness because you have no idea about what will you see in the near future, so the information must have source which is not part of directly perceived information, but, GOD is who presents the universal information on your consciousness screen.

All we can know that we have re-named the information perceived as (seen, smelled, heard, touched and tasted) as material. It is just convention, but the reality is they all information with different flavors to our souls (our body is a part from informational universe, so we can't be our bodies, we are using them as the screen God presents his interactive presentation (universe) on it.

God, "I" and Universe

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:22:00 +0000

"I" feel through my brain feeling cells stimulation, but am "I" "my" brain?!

"Even "my" brain (and my body) is perceived by "me", it is a fishy loop except the possibility that "I" am not neither "my" brain "nor "my" body, "I" can feel "my" body, then "I" must be distict from "my" body.
If you think "I" were merely some complicated system of atoms, NO, this is "my" body, but not "me".
"I" feel information that "I" preceive as "visual info", audio info", "smell info" ..... , but at the end, "I" perceived information stream which is the universe for "me", but who is information stream author and streamer?. Definitly, it is not "me" , "I" feel things "I" don't know.
Some entity must be the author of information stream "I" feel who authored the information and stream it!! Is he God?
----------------
"I" die when "my" body can't comunicate with usual information you feel (if you still alive), but "I" am still feel another type of information stream ---------
Finally, It seems neither "me" nor God is a part of universe (information stream).
-------------------
Existence equation:
Existence= "me" + universe (information stream, including my body) + God (autheor and streamer of information stream (universe)

Question to, and ,favor from, Atheists!!

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:22:00 +0000

Since you see there is no design or intelligence [consequently, a designer (GOD)] put in our universe, I have a request and a question:
================================================
1-The request: Would you please ask a group of most brilliant atheist scientists in world to design a really elegant universe that bears "true design" and "high intelligence", just do that on theoretical basis, or do a simulation for it to see how the smart universe work, not the dumb one we live in!!
If they succeeded we can use the energy in this universe in designing another smart universe instead of our dumb one!!!
--------------------------------------------
2- I wonder, why our scientists failed till now to completely understand how this stupid not-designed dumb universe works?!! Till now through about 350 years from the modern scientific revolution, and 100 years from special relativity and photo-electric effect experiment, can't our brilliant scientists know in details how this dummy stupid existence, that is not designed at all, work?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Have you ever asked yourself this question before?

God, true science, Universe and true religion

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:16:00 +0000

True science doesn't contradict true religion, in contrary, they integrate.

As you know Universe more (science), you know more how greatness is his governor (helps you being more religious to thank God for making you an element of his Universe, moreover, research more in Universe to be more religious).
As you know God more (religion), you know more how greatness is his universe (helps you being more scientific to discover and use this wonderful Universe, moreover, understand more religion to be more scientific).

The design of the universe

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:39:00 +0000

George Fitzgerald Smoot III (born February 20, 1945) is an American astrophysicist, cosmologist and Nobel Prize in Physics laureate, and a $1 million TV quiz show prize winner. He won the Nobel Prize in 2006 for his work on COBE with John C. Mather that led to the measurement "...of the black body form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation."

This work helped further the big-bang theory of the universe using the Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE). According to the Nobel Prize committee, "the COBE-project can also be regarded as the starting point for cosmology as a precision science."[2] Smoot donated his share of the Nobel Prize money, less travel costs, to a charitable foundation. [3]

He is a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2003 he was awarded the Einstein Medal.
================================
References:
1-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y
2-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot

Elements of existence!!

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:51:00 +0000

I consider existence is information not anything else, if i assumed that i have brain as they told me, you can make me feel any thing you want by stimulating my brain cells in a proper way. ........
.......For me Existence has 3 entities
1-I (what ever its meaning), I who perceive what it think it is "in" physically !!
2-Stream of information that "I" feel ...... you call it universe!!
3-Some entity who is the source of information and who makes it streaming projection on "I" ......
I call this entity GOD.

I am sure that not me who put this streaming information in front of "I" (I have no idea about information that will come next picoseconds and sure that no information is self circulation!! so it must have a source .......

Universe & Google !!!

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:14:00 +0000

When you look around and see every think is in harmony and persistence with time and it is apparent by some little thinking that all universe appears to be governed!! I see any normal healthy brain should ask, who is governing that huge system? and who is managing it?

It would be extremely ridiculous if I entered Google company and said ,(mmmm it seems that Google has no owner nor manager)?!! Then one employee at Google documented how this huge company is going in an amazing way, and wrote a huge document that describes this impressive discipline that all things are governed with in the company.

The employee knows very well that he just do a documentation, suddenly, a foolish employee came to him and said, oh you are brilliant, I now understood why we don't see the CEO and manager of the company ,mmmm because your document is the CEO and manager, your brilliant document is a genius, so there is no manager nor CEO, yaaaaaah, we had known "the reason" of everything happening in Google and Google is self managed by laws in those papers, so why stick to an "old fashion" idea that most low IQ employees are adopting that there are a manager?! why we believe in his existence and we haven't seen him?
NO NO we are the scientists, we know now the "reason" of every thing, and those "low score" employees are definitely in that miserable state because they think there is a real manager !!!

So let them believe that they will be awarded after the next Tornado that is expected to hit the company and destroys it.
They are so low IQ ,,,, they believe that if they did well in work not only they will take good salary, but also they will get a reward from their claimed "unseen" manager .......how..miserable they are !!

Are you an atheist? If yes, then:
You convinced your self that the documentations that described how universe is governed in past, this documentation (laws of physics) are now promoted to a new position (Governerof universe behaviour) after you IGNORED the real governor just because you don't smell him!!!
THIS IS CALLED THE CYCLIC LOGIC :
"laws are description of behavior, but it is NOT "the reason" of the behavior it describes".

Falsification test is not valid for so clear entities:(Too clear to need proof!!)

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:21:00 +0000

Examples that are definitely exit but not falsifiable!!
1-Statements of mathematical axioms.
2-Universe (as a whole) existence.
3-Oneself existence relative to himself.
4-You are awake, not asleep and in dream.

So When some one tells me that God is not falsifiable, I can simply tell him I am feeling GOD directly by my soul, it is like your eyes when see the sun!!.

Moreover, for whom is not convinced of anti-generalization of falsification, God left a documentation with prophet Muhammad, named Qur'an) that prove by its NOT MAN-LIKE way of writing through challenging all world to come with just one chapter (even the shortest) like this book chapters, in its way of writing that have not common factor with the intelligent creatures way of writing, let alone, its miraculous fitting with every place and time through 1400 years and its stated events before it happens and the time proves the truth of the Qur'an. This book has been signed by GOD, if any one else has wrote it, why hasn't object? If it is Muhammad who wrote it, why he hasen't claimed that he is a God (like what Christians believe in Jesus!!). So Qur'an itself is falifiable but God is not.

Does God Exist?

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:20:00 +0000

Bertrand Russell, although an atheist, in his book,“Why I am not a Christian”, has admitted this fact. He says that the argument centering on design, propounded by theologians to prove the existence of God, is scientifically valid Since ancient days, theologians have argued that when there is a design there must also be a designer. As we see that our world is well designed, it compels us to believe that there is a designer
======
Reference: Does God Exist?
By:Wahiduddin Khan

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:59:00 +0000

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good.

According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!

God, the absolute reference of existence

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:44:00 +0000

To say "Universe exists" without reference, is like to say " A car is moving" without reference, both have no meaning.
Every event in space-time exists with respect to another point in the same space time, but considering all space-time points (Universe) and thought in its existence, we would discover that Universe existence needs a reference, otherwise, it would has no meaning!!. This reference mustn't have any need to any reference for it existence meaning. The existence reference must be independent in its existence of any other existence in the Universe or/and the Universe existence as a whole. This reference must be not inside universe (nor outside it!!) and it gives every thing its existence meaning from referencing it to the reference existence. This reference is GOD, the creator of Universe. No Universe's existence is possible without God, but God's existence is possible without universe!

Fraud of evolution

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:58:00 +0000

"Evolution has never happened" ........ My statement is falsifiable.

To falsify it give me an evidence of links in the sequence of fossil (Intermediate ancestors' fossils).
===================================
Even Darwin was aware of the missing evidence for evolution.
-----
Evolutionist Sir Edmund Leach stated in Nature 293:19 (1981), “Missing links in the sequence of fossil evidence were a worry to Darwin. He felt sure they would eventually turn up, but they are still missing and seem likely to remain so.”
===================================
Mark Nash stated in his research How science cheats at proving its pet theory at ,May 29, 2007:
Evolutionists claim that if one creature is physically similar to another, it is evidence of a common ancestor. An example used to demonstrate this hypothesis is found in the bones of the forelimbs of various animals and man. Pictures of the bones in whale flippers, monkey arms and human arms do appear similar.
The possibility that bones in the forelimbs are similar because they were planned and created by the same Designer seems to elude the thinking of evolution scientists. Why? If science is a search for truth, shouldn’t scientists consider every option? It seems they will consider every option except that of God!!!

Is life physical phenomenon?

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:31:00 +0000

As Atheism denies the role of soul in life, it considers the life emergence on earth as just physical phenomenon, and they claim that the living organism have all its living from only the physical world and no ingredients from the "metaphysical" world, as they deny the "metaphysical world as whole.
Now assume that we have fed a quantum simulator operating on a quantum computer all single atoms information + (atom-atom) interaction information + boundary conditions and initial condition for the whole system.
Now we have the total human body is macroscopic system, so its epsi function would collapse on merely 1 scenario, so the question now:
Can we use a quantum simulator installed on a quantum computer to know what is the behavior of this human after ,say, 1 hour?!

"God of gaps" is very big myth

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:10:00 +0000

"God of gaps" is very big myth for both science and religion.
Let us consider just event A , like falling apple from a tree, when Newton has discovered the mathematical relation between M (earth mass), r (distance from center of earth) and G (gravitational constant) and the rate of change of falling apple momentum. The Question now.. Does Newton provide any explanation of what happened? If you asked him he would say, it Earth attracted the apple but I don't have an idea about "why" it attracted the apple!!

Let us look from another side, if one religious man has the myth of "God of gaps", he would say, God has pulled the apple toward the earth, so I don't need science to tell me the reason of apple fall!!
That's right, but, what would you gain if you know just that God is the reason of every event happens according to his will??!! You have no idea about the description of the action of God in quantitative manner.
So religion give the answer "why" the apple falls down not up, the answer is that this is God's design, but God himself orders people ,in Islam for instance, to explore world to know "how" universe runs based on his willing "why".
==================================
This big myth either at the religious side or scientific side came from misunderstanding the difference between the behavior description (science rule) and the behavior reason (religion rule).
==================================
Conclusively, physics laws is just math documentation of "great will" does whatever it wants in the universe but does it in constant manner to stabilize universe and ease our use for it.

Strong anthropic principle

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:38:00 +0000

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good. "According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!"

Moreover, taking into account the hypothesis of God versus of infinite number of universes, we find that they equal from being not falsifiable, but the hypothesis of God much more satisfactory for Occam's razor than the multiple universe.

Actually what is more important that the same argument which is taken against theists when taking about God existence, namely, falsifiability, is used to reject God existence, it is double standard logic.

Conclusion:
1-Strong Anthropic Principle is a very strong sign for design argument.
2-Universe is created and made suitable for intelligent life to live in.

Qur'an: 31:20 " Do ye not see that Allah has subjected to your (use) all things in the heavens and on earth, and has made his bounties flow to you in exceeding measure, (both) seen and unseen? Yet there are among men those who dispute about Allah, without knowledge and without guidance, and without a Book to enlighten them! "

GOD existence is of an axiomatic nature

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:33:00 +0000

GOD existence is of an axiomatic nature. I feel flood of information every second by my consciousness, I asked myself, since I am not neither the creator nor the exhibitor of this information flood, then, there must be a great creator for this continuous stream of information and also exhibit it by certain rate on my consciousness!!

Existence meaning:

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:13:00 +0000

Lot of people think that existence is energy, let us take the following imaginary example:
We have a room that contains only two masses (1kg) and (-1kg), so what is the total energy in the room? Of course it is ZERO, but can anyone deny the existence of something in the room?! No, but what is that "something"? It is the information describing the room content like the masses state, separation and their mass amounts, moreover, the information telling that their sum is Zero!!!

Another remarkable example:
When can we call something as exists? Must it be energy? What is energy? What is material? When you dream you feel a materialistic world!! right? Is that real?! Yes. But with another degree of reality abstraction level. Does x^2-1=0 solution set exist? Yes but with even more degree of reality abstraction level.

Conclusion:
Existence is information and all the universe in just an information that is interpreted by our "brain" to artificial terms like energy, momentum, ... etc.

Common Ethics and God Existence

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:49:00 +0000

When one thinks why all people are in agreement that the truthful is good and the liar is bad, I find it is extremely amazing that all these dozens of people are different in language, color, race, nationality and religion but are agreeing at the same time on simple fact like "Truthful Is Good!!". There is no way for that to happen except all these people have a common factor who is not human being, otherwise they would divide into groups regarding the truth or fallacy of "Truthful Is Good" because there would be another human beings that adopt the opposite!!, what do you think? I think the reference is God who implanted this original and common value inside our unconsciousness even before we get born.

Qur'an is not contaminated

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:19:00 +0000

Uniquely, among all heavenly books, Qur'an was not contaminated and here is the evidence:
Qur'an preservation was not done by copying a chain a books in series way. It depended mainly of memorizing it by huge number of independent people chain who till now transfer it by memorizing and each one can not take a certificate that he/she memorized the Qur'an and can review other people memorization except he/she has continuous chain till Prophet Mohammad, and by the way the book itself was written from brain of memorizing people with two witnesses for each single memorized verse that this verse is correct, and this happened (the writing process) few years after prophet Mohammad death.

When you know that piece of information about Qur'an, I can ask you a simple question, if the Qur'an was contaminated it would be contaminated not only from single point of memorizing chains, and hence it would generated (contamination process i mean) a huge versions of Qur'an and you would find the Islamic world is divided according to the version each group think it is the right. But this is not the case.So the first assumption is wrong.

Again I say proudly it is surely uncontaminated. BTW this method of licensing the memorizing people and transferring Qur'an is called in Arabic "Tawator" and it is unique.You can say also that the referencing method has emerged to world since Muslims have done it in Islamic religion, the only religion that have references for its book.Every memorizing one has a certificate including the names of his/her chain till reaching prophet Mohammad then God.

Who Turned-ON Physics Laws?

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:12:00 +0000

Super-string theory informs us that at the moment of Big-Bang (formally, the space time origin), the physics laws collapse, so that there is physics laws at this moment!!. This result brings to mind two questions:
1- How was the behavior of the universe at this big-bang and what was governing the universe then, if there are no physics laws then?!
2- At some point, the physics laws started tom work!! so what has selected this point (it is not for sure a physical law! as there was no)?

It seems the answer of the second question is pretty clear: The one who has "turned-on" physics law must be not governed by them and must be independent on space-time! so "he" must be extraordinary entity that is not in the universe and have the will to author and turn-on the laws that is governing our universe till now. Just think in it, he is God, the creator and governor of the universe who has created it, authored the laws that is governing it, conquer the universe to follow these laws and finally maintained these laws as well as its physical constants from vanishing again or altering in random fashion.

Is there afterlife?

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:10:00 +0000

Most atheists believe there is no after life, just because they see the bodies of dead people vanish after death and are no more valid for being alive.
If you are aware and convinced that every statement should be falsifiable to be valid from practical point of view. So is this statement "My awareness will vanish after death" falsifiable or not? It is apparent that it is not falsifiable, right?May be one says, but also the opposite statement "My awareness will continue after death" is not falsifiable too. I say yes, this is right, so at least you don't have mental proof or disproof for afterlife. Then if you are told that you will have afterlife by a book that claims, it is from God and this claim is augmented by a lot of evidences there is no human being can author a book (Qur'an in specific), then, there is reason to believe in afterlife.

Soul Existence

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:02:00 +0000

Just if we have deep though regarding the following statement "I am composed from body only without any soul". Have you thought before when you say "my body", who is taking? Can your body be who is talking and say "my body"?! It seems that the answer is clearly; NO. It seems that there is "someone" not included among "body parts" is who is saying "my body". What do you think?

Universe; the wonderful symphony

noreply@blogger.com (انسان متأمل) — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:00:00 +0000

When we find a wonderful symphony that admires all who hears it, it is pretty difficult to say that this beautiful symphony has came from noise, actually this has probability zero to have beauty from noise.

Super string theory informs us that universe is composed at the end of the day from extremely tiny strings that oscillate in different modes and tones and every tone for each string gives the elementary particle certain feature, like mass, charge, spin, etc ...

When we have a deep look into this extremely complicated and beautiful symphony, we find that there must be a great mind behind this symphony who has composed it. No way to escape from this fact. One can not see the British encyclopedia and jump to a conclusion that this encyclopedia with its vast amount of well written books has no author!!.So what about the whole wonderful universe, can this sophisticated design has no author?!! When one be honest with him/herself he/she must reach the same conclusion that the must be God who authored physics laws with its sophisticated form and who choses carefully the values of physical constants to build this whole universe and make it stable.

Just have fair deep thinking, you will find the wise of God in every equation discovered that are followed by whole universe in complete state of obey.