The existence of dark matter was suggested to help explain why galaxies rotate so quickly, including our own. Completely transparent, astronomers can detect it only through its gravitational pull, and they assume that about 80% of the Universe’s mass is made of dark matter.

Astronomers from Chile measured precisely the movement of  400 stars, especially stars far away from the galactic plan (up to 13,000 light-years away), to determine the amount of matter around the Sun. The volume covered by this new survey was four times bigger than previously.

According to galaxy formation theory, the Milky Way should be surrounded by a halo of dark matter. Although its shape is hard to determine, astronomers expect dark matter to be present in important amounts around the Sun. However, according to this new study, there doesn’t seem to be any dark matter at all in the region around the Sun! The team’s calculations are in excellent agreement with observations, but there is no place left for dark matter in what’s making up the mass of the region around the Sun.

© ESO/L. Calçada

Some exotic configurations such as an egg-shaped halo could explain these observations, but they are unlikely. While this doesn’t rule out completely the existence of dark matter, it may at least explain why researchers have so far been unable to detect dark matter in laboratories…

Another team of astronomers, from the University of Bonn, in Germany, studied the neighborhood of our galaxy in order to better understand what surrounds it. Thanks to a lot of data from various origins (ranging from photographic plates to recent images from the Sloan Deep Sky Survey), they obtained a detailed map of the various satellite galaxies and globular clusters (spherical clusters of stars) orbiting the Milky Way.

Looking at the results, all of the objects appear to be located in a plane perpendicular to the galactic disk: the structure they form spreads from 33,000 up to a million light-years away. When moving around the galaxy, the objects are creating trailss of material along their path: these trails are in the same perpendicular plane, showing that these objects have been there for a very long time.

This is where a problem appears with dark matter theory. According to the model, all of the Milky Way’s satellites have formed independently and were later captured by our galaxy. Thus, they should have come from various directions, which is almost impossible according to the new observations. Some members of the team suggest that this could be explained by an important collision between our galaxy and another some 11 billion years ago: all the objects would have then formed simultaneously.

Finally, a member of the team explains that their results seem to rule out the existence of dark matter in the Universe, seeing here a paradigm shift that could lead to a new understanding of our Universe.

Of course, astronomers are still far from ruling out the existence of dark matter, and it may well exist anyway. However, the hunt for the mysterious substance hasn’t given any answer yet, and more and more questions are raised; several alternatives also try to account for observations without the need for dark matter. What if, in the end, dark matter was just an illusion?

References

Kinematical and chemical vertical structure of the Galactic thick disk II. A lack of dark matter in the solar neighborhood, Moni-Bidin et al. arXiv:1204.3924v1

The VPOS: a vast polar structure of satellite galaxies, globular clusters and streams around the Milky Way, M. S. Pawlowski, et al. http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.5176

Among the ones questioning these results (that is to say almost everybody…), a failure of the GPS was often considered a possibility. It now seems that there is indeed a problem with it… According to ScienceInsider, the culprit may be a loose cable connecting the GPS to a computer.

Soon after this announcement yesterday, James Gillies, a spokesman for CERN, confirmed there were now doubts about the reliability of the results of the OPERA experiment.

In order to confirm the potential (and very probable) error, new measurements need to be performed.

Physicists of the OPERA experiment, who published these results, claimed they had rechecked and recontrolled everything over several months before anything was made public. Another test last November seemed to confirm their measurements.

Gillies finally added that a full statement will be issued tomorrow.

Special relativity is probably one of the most tested theories today, and it never failed. Also, it is almost certain that the results of the OPERA experiment are flawed. In the end, it looks like these results are just hanging by a “cable”…

The main objective of the Planck satellite, launched in 2009, is to study the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, in order to give more detailed data than its predecessor WMAP. The CMB radiation, the first “light” ever emitted by our Universe was one of the many predictions of the famous Big Bang theory. Its study is indispensable to our understanding of the Universe, it is in a way the echo of the Universe’s birth, 13.7 billion years ago.

The Planck mission isn’t limited to the study of the CMB radiation, it is also mapping the whole sky in great details as well as our galaxy. Indeed, for the measurements to be as accurate as possible, it is necessary to remove all the radiation coming from the Milky Way, and study it very closely. That’s actually the part of Planck’s work that offered astronomers a couple of surprises.

© ESA/Planck Collaboration

During an international meeting on Monday in Bologna, Italy, Planck scientists presented the intermediate results of the mission. The final data won’t be available before 2013.

“The images reveal two exciting aspects of the galaxy in which we live,” said Planck scientist Krzysztof M. Górski from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., and Warsaw University Observatory in Poland. “They show a haze around the center of the galaxy, and cold gas where we never saw it before.”

This microwave haze is being emitted from a region surrounding the core of the Milky Way; usually, this kind of emission is observed in regions with active supernovae. However, the spectrum of the detected radiation shows it is more energetic. Compared to the rest of the galaxy, the emission of the galaxy’s core is really peculiar. What could possibly generate it?

“Theories include higher numbers of supernovae, galactic winds and even the annihilation of dark-matter particles,” said Greg Dobler, Planck collaborator from the University of California in Santa Barbara, Calif.

The microwave emission seems to have the characteristics of synchrotron radiation, which is caused by particles interacting with strong magnetic fields. Dark matter, which is thought to make up more than 80% of the Universe’s mass, might also be generating this emission.

When scientists are short of explanations, dark matter often seems like a plug to make things work… Anyway, annihilation of dark matter clouds could generate enough energy to explain the phenomenon.

© ESA/Planck Collaboration

Planck hasn’t only discovered this anomaly, it has also detected several clouds of carbon monoxide, giving a new map of its distribution. Carbon monoxide clouds are used by astronomers to find other invisible clouds, made of hydrogen molecules. Molecular hydrogen is extremely difficult to detect because of its low emission rate, so carbon monoxide – which has similar processes of formation – is used to trace it. As stars form in molecular hydrogen clouds, detecting carbon monoxide indirectly allows astronomers to improve their understanding of star formation processes in the Milky Way.

That’s one of the beautiful things about astrophysics: even if on one hand something may be considered a nuisance, it is on the other hand an invaluable source of information. We will have to wait some time before Planck delivers all of its data, and we’ll have to wait even longer before any conclusions can be drawn. Who knows, maybe even bigger surprises are just waiting to be uncovered.

You will find it here on the App Store, it is called Atra Materia Mobile. I hope you guys will enjoy it, also I’m expecting you to give me some feedback, by leaving your comments here or on the App Store! Of course, the app will be regularly updated, so if you have requests of any kind, let me know!

Everything that is available here is available through the app: you will be able to read the news, share them on Facebook, Twitter or via email, and comment on them of course. You will also notice the “Forum” tab, which is available only in French (the French version of the blog has its own forum): the app being bilingual, this is why it also appears in the English version. There are also two image galleries, once again available only in French at the moment (well, the captions are in French).

Atra Materia’s twitter is available in the app too, and you can easily retweet anything. One more thing: the app is totally free and doesn’t have any ads, and there will never be any. However, I’m spending a lot of time taking care of the two blogs and now the application, so you also have the ability to make a donation via an in-app purchase if you want to support Atra Materia.

Those of you who do not have an iPhone can also make paypal donations right here on the blog (at the bottom right corner of the sidebar). Speaking about people who don’t have an iPhone, I am also planning to release an Android version of the application, so that Android users can also enjoy Atra Materia on their phones.

I really hope you will enjoy and use this app, as much as I enjoyed creating it!

Scientists from the University of California are on their way to measuring the free fall of antimatter, more precisely positronium, a bound state between an electron and a positron. The positron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of an electron: they are strictly identical, except for their opposite electrical charge. When the two particles meet each other, they annihilate, releasing energy in the form of two gamma rays.

So far the physicists managed to separate electrons and positrons in positronium, preventing this unstable system from annihilating too quickly, in order to measure the effects of gravity on it. This is indeed the main problem: in order to observe the physical properties of antimatter, it is necessary to keep it from annihilating too soon.

To do so, the researchers used lasers to excite positronium and bring it to a ‘Rydberg” state. In this state, the atom is weakly bound and the electron and the positron are far from each other:  this gives more time before the particles annihilate. Rydberg atoms are highly excited, and very useful to physicists, as many of their physical properties become exaggerated.

The scientists were able to increase positronium’s lifetime by a factor of 10 to 100, which unfortunately remains too little. They are hoping to use a technique that imparts a higher angular momentum to Rydberg atoms, which would allow to increase their lifetime by a factor of 10000, enough to study them closely.

The next step will be to excite positronium further in order to reach a lifetime of a few milliseconds. Then, the researchers will make a beam of these highly excited atoms and study its deflection due to gravity.

If the experiment shows that matter and antimatter don’t behave the same way, this may have unprecedented consequences in physics. Indeed, matter and antimatter were theoretically created in equal amounts at the time of the BIg Bang. However, the Universe as we see it today seems to be almost entirely made of matter. A difference like this one might explain the phenomenon. Other researchers even suggested that antimatter may have a negative gravitational charge, creating an effect similar to dark energy.

Reference

D. B. Cassidy, T. H. Hisakado, H. W. K. Tom, and A. P. Mills, Jr. Efficient Production of Rydberg Positronium
Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 043401

The key to this experimental test comes from black holes: when they evaporate, the radiation they emit could reveal footprints of loop quantum gravity. Aurélien Barrau from Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Grenoble, France, and colleagues suggest that primordial black holes should reveal two distinct loop quantum gravity signatures.

The scientists used Monte-Carlo simulations to check if they could discriminate those signatures (peaks at certain energy levels) and those of the Hawking radiation emitted by evaporating black holes. According to their results, if the number of black holes is big enough, or if the error on energy reconstruction is small enough, then the signatures should be identifiable.

While this might be the first experimental test for a quantum theory of gravity, there are still a few issues… Indeed, black hole evaporation has never been observed, thus remaining hypothetical, at least for the time being. Another detail, and it is quite a big one in ny opinion, is the recent result obtained by ESA’s Integral gamma-ray observatory: if there is any “quantum graininess” of space, it is so small that it simply rules out… loop quantum gravity.

Finally, the researchers are also investigating the possibility of finding loop quantum gravity signatures in the cosmic microwave background. This would have the advantage of being testable right away, or in the near future. Anyway, unless Integral’s results are wrong or scientists “tweak” loop quantum gravity, looking for such signatures might just be like trying to prove Earth is flat…

Reference

A. Barrau, et al. “Probing Loop Quantum Gravity with Evaporating Black Holes.” Physical Review Letters 107, 251301 (2011).DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.251301

The main problem with today’s chemical rockets (all current spacecrafts use them for launch) is that they are costly, and not very efficient; in fact, most of the propellant is needed to lift… the propellant. Being realistic, chemical rockets will be able to take astronauts to Mars, but they won’t take anyone much further. Some research is constantly being done in order to improve these rockets, and alternative means are also studied. While most of these alternatives require technological advances not yet available, one of them could be developed right now, and it was designed more than 50 years ago: the Project Orion.

Behind Project Orion was a spacecraft intended to be directly propelled by a series of explosions of atomic bombs behind the craft. This mode of propulsion, known as nuclear pulse propulsion, was first proposed by Stanislaw Ulam in 1946. Project Orion was initiated by Ted Taylor at General Atomics and physicist Freeman Dyson in 1958.

The architecture of the vehicle is pretty “simple”: nuclear explosives are thrown behind a pusher-plate mounted on the bottom of the spacecraft, and exploded. The shock wave and radiation caused by the explosion would then impact against the pusher-plate; in order to smoothly transmit the acceleration to the rest of the spacecraft, the pusher-plate is mounted on two-stage shock absorbers. The pulse units (bombs) also had a specific design, so that the wave of plasma debris is cigar-shaped, for a better efficiency. I won’t go into further details about Orion’s architecture, as we’re only interested in the general aspects of the project.

© NASA

Most spacecraft propulsion drives can achieve either a very high exhaust velocity, or a huge amount of thrust. Nuclear pulse rockets are the only proposed technology that could potentially deliver both. A considerable advantage is that for an Orion craft, weight is not a limitation anymore. Accelerations up to 100g could be tolerated, however manned spacecrafts would have to use the damping systems described previously to smooth the acceleration to a level tolerable for humans: about 2 to 4g.

Various sizes for the craft were considered by the designers of the project, ranging from 20 meters up to 400 meters in diameter! The bigger design, called “Super Orion” would have weighed 8 million tonnes, carrying 1,080 bombs weighing 3,000 tonnes each. Most of these 3,000 tonnes would actually be inert material used to transmit the force of the propulsion units detonation to the Orion’s pusher plate, and absorb neutrons to minimize fallout.

Because the Orion nuclear pulse rocket design has extremely high performance, both interplanetary and interstellar missions would be possible. Interplanetary missions for an Orion vehicle included a trip to Mars and back, as well as a trip to one of the moons of Saturn. In the case of interstellar missions, hydrogen bombs are used rather than fission bombs. The best pusher-plate design would allow a trip to Alpha Centauri in about 50 years, reaching a speed that is about 10% the speed of light (that’s 30,000 km/s). In other words, a trip to another star would be possible within a lifetime.

All the numbers given here come from calculations made in the 60′s, with a spaceship made from materials available then. With today’s technology, the maximum size and speed are likely to be even higher.

Of course, the use of nuclear weapons comes with a few potential problems. Ablation of the pusher plate as well as spalling were investigated: if the pusher-plate was sprayed with oil, there was no ablation at all, and with a surface layer of fiber glass spalling was significantly reduced and thought to be acceptable. The main unsolved problem was nuclear fallout, especially for a launch from the surface of the Earth. Using conventional explosives for the first detonation in a polar area would considerably reduce fallout. If a pure fusion explosive could be constructed, there wouldn’t be any fallout. Another option is a launch from Low Earth Orbit (LEO): the electromagnetic pulse generated would then be problematic as it could cause significant damage to computers and satellites. Once again, the problem might be solved by launching from very remote areas.

So, if such a spaceship could have been created then, why doesn’t it even exist now? You might think that danger to human life was the reason… It was not. The problems were of political origin. During its 5 years of existence, from 1958 to 1963, the project Orion was financed by DARPA, USAF and NASA. In 1963, the Partial Test Ban Treaty put an end to the project: nuclear weapon tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under water were banned (you’ll notice that you can still blow nuclear bombs underground, but that won’t take any spaceship anywhere).

Finally, I was also “surprised” by the reaction of a DARPA member in 1959: « We use bombs to blow things into pieces, not to make them fly »… That’s the problem with our world. As long as there will be someone to think that bombs should be used for killing and destruction, we won’t go too far… Actually, we won’t go anywhere. Even if political difficulties were overcome, I’m not sure the public reaction would be enthusiastic: mention the word “nuclear”, and most of the public will react violently. If a project like Orion was to become reality in the near future, what would you say?

Researchers at SETI are using radio signals in order to detect other possible civilizations elsewhere in the Galaxy for various reasons, the main one being our own civilization: we are emitting considerable amounts of electromagnetic radiation as a byproduct of communications, and many radio frequencies penetrate the atmosphere quite easily.

However, you might argue that this doesn’t mean any other civilization would do the same, especially considering that technology changes quickly, and that our own emissions are constantly decreasing. Also, any signal would have to be pretty strong to be detectable.

Abraham Loeb of Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and Edwin Turner of Princeton University have now suggested a new way for detecting alien civilization, and it is pretty simple: we should look for their city lights. So if it is that simple, why aren’t we already doing it? The only limitation is technology: to glimpse the light of alien cities, researchers would have to be able to distinguish it from the glare of their parent star. According to the two scientists, the slight change in light from an exoplanet as it moves around its star should be detectable. Indeed, an inhabited exoplanet with city lighting would emit more light than one without artificial lighting during a dark phase (when orbiting its star the planet would go through phases similar to those of our Moon).

With our current technology, the team estimates that we should be able to detect a Tokyo-sized metropolis on Pluto. Obviously, it’s very unlikely that there is any alien civilization out there or anywhere in the Kuiper Belt (the region in which Pluto is orbiting the Sun). However, by the time the first Earth-like exoplanets are found, our technology will have improved and should be able to detect the artificial lights of potential nearby Earth twins.

Although this technique also relies on the assumption that any alien civilization would use Earth-like technologies, it seems rather difficult to avoid artificial lighting, unlike radio signals. And that’s why I personally hope to see such research being done in the near future.

 Reference

Abraham Loeb, Edwin L. Turner. Detection Technique for Artificially-Illuminated Objects in the Outer Solar System and Beyond: arXiv:1110.6181v1

The standard model describes the Universe as being mainly made of dark energy and dark matter (I’d like to remind you that there are also various alternatives, at least as interesting). The vast majority of astronomers agree on the fact that dark matter is “cold” (moving slowly), and that over time clumps of dark matter are formed  and growing, attracting “normal” matter and forming galaxies.

Many simulations established that the density of dark matter is much higher in the centers of galaxies… But a new study just showed that a particular kind of galaxies – dwarf galaxies – have a rather homogeneous distribution of dark matter. In other words, this suggests that the standard model may be wrong.

Unless astronomers fiddle with the model, predictions don’t agree with observations…

Dwarf galaxies are mainly made of dark matter (up to 99% of their mass), the rest being stars. This feature makes dwarf galaxies the perfect candidates to study and try to better understand dark matter.

Matthew Walker from Harvard-Smithsonian Center of Astrophysics, and Jorge Peñarrubia from University of Cambridge analyzed the dark matter distribution in two Milky Way neighbors: the Fornax and Sculptor dwarf galaxies. They hold one to ten million stars (our Milky Way holds 200 to 400 billion stars). The two researchers measured the locations, speeds and chemical compositions of 1,500 to 2,500 stars.

According to their estimates, in both cases dark matter is uniformly distributed over large regions, several hundred light-years wide. This contradicts the prediction that the density of dark matter should significantly increase in the centers of these galaxies.

Some have suggested that interactions between matter and dark matter could have spread out the dark matter, but simulations haven’t shown this kind of phenomenon in dwarf galaxies. Thus, this new measurement shows that either there are some unexpected interactions between matter and dark matter, or that dark matter isn’t “cold”. Finally, this could also imply that there is no such thing as dark matter, and that an alternate explanation is necessary… Hopefully, the two scientists may find an answer by studying more dwarf galaxies, particularly ones containing even more dark matter.

Reference

Matthew G. Walker, Jorge Peñarrubia. A Method for Measuring (Slopes of) the Mass Profiles of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies: arXiv:1108.2404v3

Theoretically, the collision of two bubble universes produces peculiar features in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Previous attempts to identify the “signature” of such collisions were not successful, as the features found could be reproduced by other sources. A team of researchers has now predicted for the first time the detailed three-dimensional shape and CMB temperature and polarization signals produced by a bubble collision in the early Universe.

According to Matthew Kleban from New York University, USA, Thomas S. Levi and Kris Sigurdson from University of British Columbia, Canada, a bubble collision produces a “cosmic wake”: when another universe collides with ours, a special wave is produced and propagates into our bubble and affects the spacetime region to the causal future of the collision.

© Matthew Kleban, Thomas S. Levi, Kris Sigurdson

They determined that temperature and polarization signals in the CMB caused by collisions both have a circular symmetry. The polarization pattern exhibits a striking feature: there is a double peak in the magnitude of the polarization as a function of angle. According to the researchers, this pattern serves as a true smoking gun for the detection of cosmic bubble collisions. Then, the researchers determined the degree of detectability of the polarization signal for a selection of current and future experiments, such as Planck or CMBPol.

They observed that the bigger the spot is, the easier it is to detect with polarization, but the harder it is using temperature. Finally, the scientists add that future work will consist in quantifying the effect of cosmic wakes on large scale structures. Maybe future experiments will reveal strange patterns, the problem will then be to make sure that they are indeed patterns and not just something random…

Are there other universes out there? Who knows.

Reference

Matthew Kleban, Thomas S. Levi, Kris Sigurdson. Observing the Multiverse with cosmic wakes: arXiv:1109.3473v1

Scientists at CERN are still looking for the legendary particle, and it’s probably just a matter of months before we know whether it exists. According to a team of researchers from the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, the Higgs boson, which would help explain why particles have mass, might also have played a role in major events in the history and evolution of the Universe.

The standard model describes the Universe as extremely small, hot and dense at its birth. To explain the fact that the Universe we see today seems to be homogeneous and isotropic, cosmologists introduced a theoretical event known as inflation: very early, the Universe underwent an extremely short and fast period of expansion, during wich its size was multiplied by a factor of 10²⁶. Unfortunately, there is still no satisfactory explanation for this rapid growth.

© NASA / WMAP Science Team

However, it looks like the Higgs boson could bring an answer and explain both the speed and magnitude of this early phase of expansion, as well as the accelerating expansion we observe today. When the Universe was born, because the Higgs boson was in a condensate state, it behaved in a peculiar way. In fact, it would have literally changed the laws of physics and reduced the force of gravity. This could account for the inflationary period of the Universe.

What about today’s expansion, then? By applying a mathematical principle known as scale invariance to the standard model of particle physics, the researchers observed that the equations allowed the existence of another hypothetical particle, as the Higgs condensate disappeared: the dilaton. It turns out that this almost massless particle can play the role of a quintessence field – in other words, the mysterious dark energy.

This theory has the advantage of making predictions, and the upcoming data from Planck will constitute an important test to the scientists’ model. In the meantime, the Large Hadron Collider should have confirmed (or ruled out) the existence of the Higgs boson. And if the legendary particle turns out to exist, it looks like it might explain more than one long-standing mystery.

Reference

Juan García-Bellido, Javier Rubio, Mikhail Shaposhnikov, Daniel Zenhäusern, Higgs-Dilaton Cosmology: From the Early to the Late Universe: arXiv:1107.2163v1

The team, led by Michel Mayor from University of Geneva, Switzerland, used the HARPS (High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher) spectrograph on the 3.6-metre telescope at ESO’s La Silla Observatory in Chile. They observed 376 Sun-like stars (stars with a mass, size and temperature similar to that of our Sun), and found that at least 40% of them have at least one planet less massive than Saturn. That number is huge! Taking into account that roughly 10% of the stars in our Milky Way are like our Sun, that literally gives billions of such planets in our galaxy alone!

They also discovered that most of the Neptune-mass planets (as well as less massive planets) appear to be in systems with multiple planets.

Another extremely interesting detail: 16 of these planets are super-Earths, with masses up to 5 times that of our home planet. One of them, called HD 85512 b, is approximately 3.6 times the mass of the Earth, and it happens to be located at the edge of its parent star’s habitable zone (allowing the existence of liquid water on the planet’s surface). Unfortunately, that’s all HARPS can tell about these planets, so it’s impossible to know if these planets have atmospheres, or what their size is. Anyway, this is once again some very exciting news!

In the coming years, new instruments will allow astronomers to push the limits further. Another spectrograph called ESPRESSO (Echelle SPectrograph for Rocky Exoplanet and Stable Spectroscopic Observations) will be much more sensitive than HARPS. In fact, it should be able to detect planets with the mass of Earth around other stars!

About 20 years ago, the only planets we knew of were the ones of our solar system… Today, we have confirmed the existence of 680 exoplanets, dancing around other stars, and it now looks like planets may well be billions in our galaxy. Who knows, someday, we might not even be surprised that the Universe is swarming with life.

Reference

Many observations have confirmed this idea, for example the distribution of galaxies is more or less the same everywhere, no matter where you look.

However, in the recent years, some cosmologists started to have doubts about the truthfulness of this principle. More precisely, it looks like there is an anisotropy on the cosmic scale: the acceleration of the expansion of the Universe is not the same in every direction.

© Cai, et al

In 1998, cosmologists discovered that the expansion of the Universe was accelerating, thanks to a particular kind of stars, type IA supernovae. Rong-Gen Cai and Zhong-Liang Tuo  from the Chines Academy of Sciences in Beijing re-analyzed the data of 557 type IA supernovae, and they observed that the acceleration of the expansion was faster in a given direction, towards the constellation Vulpecula in the northern hemisphere. It is interesting to note that this anisotropy has apparently been observed in the cosmic microwave background, too.

As the scientists mention in their paper, previous analyses of type IA supernovae data haven’t found any evidence for significant anisotropies, and many observations are supporting the idea of a homogeneous and isotropic Universe. Further studies are necessary before coming to any conclusion.

Finally, it is important to realize that the cosmological principle is one of the pillars of modern cosmology. If it ever turns out to be wrong, it is needless to say it’ll come as a small huge bombshell…

Reference

Rong-Gen Cai, et al. “Direction dependence of the acceleration in type Ia supernovae.” arXiv:1109.0941v2

For those of you who wouldn’t be Stargate fans, wormholes would be “tunnels” between two different locations in the Universe (they could also allow to travel in time, or to parallel universes). Basically, while it would normally take millions or even billions of years to go to a remote destination, a wormhole would allow you to go there in a handful of seconds.

Wormholes appeared as mathematical solutions to the Einstein field equations, and they’ve never been observed (a mathematical possibility is not necessarily a physical reality).

After some research had been done on the topic, it occurred that if wormholes did exist, they would be useless anyway: as soon as it comes to life, a wormhole vanishes. In order to sidestep this “problem”, Kip Thorne and Mike Morris imagined that a new form of matter, known as exotic matter, could keep a wormhole open and stable. The annoying detail is that exotic matter, which has a negative mass, is even more hypothetical that wormholes themselves…

© Burkhard Kleihaus and Jutta Kunz

Now, string theory is tackling the problem of wormhole’s existence. Indeed, it seems that string theory can make stable wormholes, without any addition of exotic matter. I’m not going to make a course on string theory, it would be too long and too complicated… In a few words, it postulates that the building blocks of the Universe are not point particles, but vibrating strings: everything we observe as distinct particles would actually be the same strings vibrating differently. String theory was born from the necessity to give a quantum description of gravity (in order to unify quantum theory and relativity), and it also claims to be a contender for the Theory of Everything, unifying all known interactions in a quantum mechanically consistent way.

According to Panagiota Kanti from University of Ioannina, Greece, Burkhard Kleihaus and Jutta Kunz from University of Oldenberg in Germany, if the corrections of string theory are taken into account, wormholes can exist without any exotic matter to keep them open. The researchers also add that these wormholes can be “arbitrarily large”, that is big enough for something to make its way through.

So, does that mean we can hope that someday we’ll wander in the Universe a la SG1? Probably not… Actually, the problem with string theory is that you can do almost anything with it… Seriously. String theory advocates will argue that their theory is mathematically complete or “beautiful”… Maybe, but at the time being, the whole theory is just unverifiable… All this, for now, is only pure speculation…

Reference

Of course, astronomers are carefully observing the event, gathering as much data as they can, but this is also an excellent occasion for amateurs to observe M101.

Supernovae are stellar explosions, and they are among the most violent events in the Universe. They come in various types, and the one we’re interested in is probably due to a white dwarf (the core of a dead star) which is literally sucking matter from a companion star. If the white dwarf  accumulates enough matter, it starts to fuse hydrogen atoms into helium, causing the whole star to explode. Such an explosion releases so much energy that it can outshine its parent galaxy!

As you can imagine, these supernovae are so bright that are relatively easy to observe, even over very long distances (this one won’t be visible to the naked eye, but a backyard telescope or good binoculars should be enough to see it). Here is a picture taken by the Faulkes North telescope in Hawaii:

© D. Andrew Howell (LCOGT) et al., Faulkes Telescope North, LCOGT

Why is this event so important? Type IA supernovae are a bit special, as we think they all explode in a similar way, which allows to use them to determine distances of far away galaxies. It is actually thanks to these stars that scientists discovered the expansion of the Universe was accelerating.

M101 is a spiral galaxy, located about 25 million light-years away. It is also huge, as it contains about a trillion stars, 10 times more than our Milky Way Galaxy!

Because it’s very close, the study of this supernova should be rather easy, and it was spotted pretty early. Most supernovae occur very far away, and they are detected only after a few days, when they reach their maximum brightness. The earlier they are observed, the better: scientists gather more data, and it is essential to better understand these phenomena.

© Peter Nugent & the Palomar Transient Factory

M101 was already photographed 9 years ago by Hubble, so astronomers were able to check that nothing was visible then. They observed that two stars were very close to the location of the supernova we observe today. According to their size and color, these stars are red giants, stars pretty much like our Sun, but at the end of their lives. They are so big that if a white dwarf was close, it could have sucked enough of their matter to trigger the supernova. Further observations will tell if it is the case. If so, that would be really great news, as very few supernovae progenitors have been observed so far.

Finally, the supernova should reach its maximum brightness very soon (probably in the next few days), so if the conditions are good, that’s a unique occasion to go out with your telescope or binoculars! Don’t miss it!

Here is his latest time-lapse video, “Tempest Milky Way” (don’t forget to set the video to HD):

Click here to view the embedded video.

There are a lot of things to see in the video: at 1:57, a visitor’s silhouette shows up – a whitetail buck – and at 2:25 the storm appears. At 3:25, you can also glimpse a meteor burning through the sky, and its reflection in the lake below!

The whole video is literally gorgeous, accompanied by great music. I highly recommend you to check Randy’s website, Dakota Lapse, for much more of his amazing work. I hope you’ll like this time-lapse as much as I did, enjoying the beauty of our Universe.

Image and video: Randy Halverson, used by permission

According to the standard model of cosmology, our Universe was born some 13.7 billion years ago, when it started to expand from an insanely hot and dense state. Very early, after 10^-34 second approximately, the Universe expanded at an extremely fast rate for a very short period of time, smoothing out its original lumpiness: this period is known as inflation. The Universe we see today is homogeneous and isotropic, and it is still expanding and cooling.

© NASA / WMAP Science Team

The standard model describes the present composition of the Universe as follows:

• about 5% of matter: stars, gas, neutrinos and various heavy elements
• about 25% of cold dark matter: an unknown form of matter , inferred to exist from gravitational effects on visible matter
• about 70% of dark energy: an unknown form of energy, thought to be responsible for the apparent acceleration of the expansion of the Universe

In short, 95% of our Universe is made of… unknown dark stuff. And the problem is that there is not a shred of evidence that either dark energy or dark matter exist. Nothing. So far, every attempt to detect dark matter particles has failed. You might have read articles saying ‘Dark energy is real‘ or ‘Dark matter confirmed‘, which would be cool if it was true, but it’s not. These are titles or headlines intended to hook the reader: the only things that are confirmed in such cases are the fact that the Universe appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate, or that some mass appears to be missing.

Just to be clear, I am not saying that dark matter and dark energy don’t exist, I am saying that we still don’t know if they do. Both of them help describe our observable Universe, and they do it very well: that’s why they are part of the standard model that most cosmologists agree upon.

However, there are a few alternative theories that attempt to describe the Universe, without the addition of any dark component. And some of them seem to reproduce observations pretty well too! I am not going to give an exhaustive list of the alternatives, but I’ll give a short description of the most interesting ones, which I have already addressed on the blog.

What if dark matter was just an illusion? Dragan S. Hajdukovic suggests that the quantum vacuum could be a dipolar fluid. Assuming that antimatter has a negative gravitational charge (there would be a gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter), a gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum caused by baryonic matter would produce the same effect as dark matter. The cancellation of gravitational charges in the vacuum may also produce a similar effect to that of dark energy. If future experiments don’t reveal any gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter, this hypothesis will be ruled out. Otherwise, if a gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter is observed, then dark matter and dark energy might be an effect of interactions between the quantum vacuum and matter.

Spacetime torsion is another extremely interesting alternative. The Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble (ECSK) theory of gravity naturally extends general relativity to account for the intrinsic angular momentum (spin) of elementary particles. It causes spacetime to exhibit a geometric property called torsion. Torsion manifests itself as a force countering gravitational attraction, accounting for the flatness of the Universe without requiring inflation. It could also explain the nature of dark energy, as well as dark matter which would actually be made of antimatter.

Another alternative theory, modified gravity (MOG) may also offer a description of the Universe without any dark component. MOG postulates the existence of a massive vector field, introducing a repulsive modification of the law of gravitation at short range. Like the standard model, MOG can account for a variety of key cosmological observations like gravitational lensing, rotation curves of galaxies, the distribution of mass in the Universe… Because some of the predictions of MOG differ from the standard model, further observations with higher resolutions will tell which model is the best.

So this is the current situation: whether you accept the standard model and try to identify the dark side of the Universe, or you try to find alternatives without adding any unknown dark substance. And between “The standard model describes our Universe, and it’s almost entirely made of stuff we don’t know” and “Maybe the standard model is incomplete, maybe we need to rethink our theories”, I wouldn’t say that the first option is obviously the best one…

Maybe the Universe is mostly made of dark energy and dark matter, but there is still no evidence supporting their existence, and none of them has been confirmed to be “real” yet. There are alternative theories trying to describe our world without them, and they deserve at least as much attention. Further experiments and studies will help confirm, or rule out, the wrong theories. Maybe the answer is something no one has even thought of yet…

Finally, here are a few words by a fictional green creature living in a galaxy far, far away, that I find quite appropriate:

“Hard to see, the dark side is. We must investigate further before drawing a conclusion to the identity of your adversary.” 

© Ron Garan/NASA

The picture was taken during the annual Perseid meteor shower, on August 13, so this meteor was probably a Perseid. Ron Garan posted this picture on his twitter account, writing:

“What a “Shooting Star” looks like #FromSpace Taken yesterday during Perseids Meteor Shower.”

Meteor showers are caused by streams of cosmic debris called meteoroids entering Earth’s atmosphere at extremely high speeds on parallel trajectories. When these debris burn in the atmosphere, a number of meteors are observed to radiate from one point in the night sky. The Perseids meteor shower is generally the most visible one: it usually peaks on August 12, at a rate of over 60 meteors per hour.

Another famous meteor shower is the Leonids, which is the most spectacular one. It is associated with the comet Tempel-Tuttle and usually peaks around November 17, at a much higher rate. Each 33 years, the Leonids create a “meteor storm”, peaking at rates of thousands of meteors per hour! The most famous of these storms is probably the one that occurred in 1833, when it was first realized that the meteors radiated from near the star Gamma Leonis. On November 17, 1833, the storm peaked at literally insane rates: between 100,000 and 200,000 meteors per hour! That’s 30 to 55 meteors per second! This exceptional storm was due to a direct impact with the comet’s dust trail left 33 years earlier.

While such fierce storms are very unlikely for the next several decades, astronauts on board the ISS can give us an idea of the stunning sight they have up there, and share with us a few very, very special moments.

Located 325 light-years away in the constellation Phoenix, WASP-18b is about 10 times the mass of Jupiter, and it orbits its star in slightly less than a day. The planet was discovered in 2009, as it caused the star to dim, when passing between us and its star. The existence of the exoplanet was later confirmed by measurement of the Doppler shifts in the light of WASP-18.

Usually, when a planet orbits very close to its star, the orbit tends to become a circle rather than an ellipse, because of very strong tides. However, the Doppler shifts suggested that WASP-18b had a slightly elliptical orbit.

Phil Arras from University of Virginia and colleagues think that the planet’s orbit is actually circular. The Doppler shifts that make the orbit seem elliptical would be, in fact, caused by the star’s surface rising and falling with the pull of its planet’s tides: the same thing happens with the rise and fall of sea levels on Earth, which are due to the gravitational forces exerted by the Moon (and the Sun).

As the star’s surface rises towards us, its spectrum is slightly blueshifted (the frequency increases), and it is slightly redshifted (the frequency decreases) when it falls away from us.

According to the team’s calculations, the star’s surface would rise and fall at approximately 30 meters per second, which is already easily detectable. Of all the planets known so far, WASP-18b raises the greatest tides in its star. Additional observations would probably help confirm this theory, and may even help distinguish tidal movements from elliptical orbits, avoiding possible confusions.

Reference

Dr. Michael Callahan of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. and colleagues closely analyzed samples from 12 different carbon-rich meteorites, 9 of which were recovered from Antarctica. They used a liquid chromatograph to isolate a mixture of compounds, which they further analyzed with a mass spectrometer to determine their chemical structure.

© NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Chris Smith

The team found adenine and guanine, two of the four building blocks of DNA called nucleobases, as well as hypoxanthine and xanthine. They also found a variety of nucleobase analogs (they have the same core molecule as nucleobases but with a structure added or removed), including three that are rarely found on Earth.

These nucleobase analogs are the first piece of evidence that the compounds came from space and not terrestrial contamination. The team also analyzed samples of ice  from Antarctica, where the meteorites were found, and observed significantly different amounts of the two nucleobases. Moreover, none of the nucleobase analogs were found in the ice, showing once again that the compounds probably came from space. The team finally found that these nucleobases are produced in completely non-biological chemical reactions containing hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, and water: this provides a plausible mechanism for their synthesis in asteroids, supporting the idea that they are of extraterrestrial origin.

Here is a short video that gives an overview of the exciting discovery:

Click here to view the embedded video.

This discovery adds to a growing body of evidence that the building blocks of essential biological molecules may actually originate in space, and may raise new questions about the dawn of life on our planet Earth, and possibly eslsewhere in the Universe.

The need for dark matter and dark energy appeared with various observations. Rotational speeds of galaxies, or gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters for example, are very well explained by the presence of some invisible, transparent dark matter. The observation of type Ia supernovae showed that the Universe seems to be expanding at an accelerating rate: cosmologists concluded that some form of energy acting repulsively caused the acceleration of the expansion. They called it dark energy. The nature of both dark matter and dark energy remains completely unknown today.

Because the standard model is in very good agreement with observations, any attempt to give an alternative explanation will have to match observations at least as well as the ΛCDM model does.

Scalar-tensor-vector gravity (STVG) theory, often referred to as MOG (MOdified Gravity), was developed by John Moffat, from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario. It is a fully relativistic theory of gravitation that is derived from the action principle, which does not require any dark matter or dark energy. MOG postulates the existence of a massive vector field, which is motivated by the desire to introduce a repulsive modification of the law of gravitation at short range. In other words, far from a source gravity is stronger than the Newtonian prediction; at shorter distances, it is counteracted by a repulsive “fifth force” due to the vector field.

So far, MOG has been able to account for a range of key cosmological observations: galaxy rotation curves, galaxy cluster masses, lensing, the distribution of mass in the Universe (matter power spectrum), and the acoustic peaks in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB).

Regarding the matter power spectrum, MOG and the ΛCDM model notably differ: while the ΛCDM cosmology shows a significant dampening of baryonic oscillations, these are present in MOG. The current resolution of the available data is not high enough to tell whether these oscillations are here: as galaxy surveys are growing in size, the resolution will improve and tell if MOG is correct.

It is also important to note that the angular power spectrum of the CMB was calculated using a semi-analytical approximation. This is not as accurate as numerical software, which is generally used: in the case of MOG, these software packages cannot be easily adapted. However, the results of the semi-analytical approach achieves agreement with observational data.

Additionally, on the scale of the solar system, MOG predicts no deviation from the previous results of Newton and Einstein.

Curiously, while MOG may be able to describe our Universe without requiring any additional dark component, the theory doesn’t seem to be as popular as other alternatives like MOND (which actually fails at describing various cosmological observations, such as gravitational lensing)… Finally, further studies to obtain interior solutions to the MOG field equations and the development of N-body simulations, may be able to show MOG as a solid and exciting alternative to the standard model of cosmology.

References

Moffat, J. W. (2006). Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity Theory. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.  doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/03/004  arXiv:gr-qc/0506021v7

Moffat, J. W. (2010). Modified gravity or dark matter? arXiv:1101.1935v2

Moffat, J. W., Toth, V. T. (2011). Cosmological observations in a modified theory of gravity (MOG). arXiv:1104.2957v1

The laws of nature are assumed to obey a fundamental symmetry, known as CPT-symmetry (Charge conjugation, Parity and Time reversal). This symmetry implies that a mirror-image of our Universe, where left and right are inverted (parity inversion), all momenta are reversed (time inversion) and all matter is replaced by antimatter (charge inversion), would evolve under the same physical laws as ours. If any deviation was to be observed, this fundamental symmetry would be broken.

Because matter and antimatter annihilate with each other when they come into contact, converting into energy and new particles, it is extremely difficult to handle antimatter in the laboratory. Back in 1997, an international collaboration developed a facility called the Antiproton Decelerator at CERN: antiprotons are produced in high-energy collisions and collected in a vacuum pipe. They are then slowed down and transported to several experiments. One of these experiments, ASACUSA1 (Atomic Spectroscopy and Collisions using Slow Antiprotons), sends the antiprotons into a helium target to create and study antiprotonic helium atoms.

The nucleus of a helium atom is orbited by two electrons; in antiprotonic helium, one of these electrons is replaced by an antiproton in an excited state. By firing a laser beam onto the atom, scientists are able to tune the antiproton frequency until it makes a quantum jump from one orbit to another. This frequency can be compared with theoretical calculations, allowing to determine the mass of the antiproton relative to the electron.

Unfortunately, measurements are imprecise because of the Doppler effect: depending on their thermal energy, the antiprotonic atoms will jiggle around randomly. Some of them will move towards the laser beam, while others move away, resulting in different frequencies.

To improve the precision of their measurements, Dr . Masaki Hori and colleagues used a technique called “two-photon laser spectroscopy”. Thanks to a second laser beam, the scientists are able to partially cancel the effect previously described: the first laser is used to bring the antiproton to a virtual energy level not allowed by quantum mechanics, and the second one then brings the antiproton to the closest allowed state. This results in measurements four to six times more precise.

This new experiment showed that the antiproton is 1836.1526736(23) times heavier than the electron, which is exactly the mass of the proton with a similar precision (the parenthetical error represents one standard deviation). While this measurement seems to confirm the CPT theorem, the researchers also observed that antiprotons obey the same laws of nonlinear quantum optics as normal particles.

If a violation of CPT symmetry was ever to be observed, this would require a complete rethink of our understanding of nature. Ironically, a mystery remains unsolved: according to modern cosmology, matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts at the beginning of the Universe – which today seems to be made entirely out of matter. As half the Universe has apparently gone missing, it looks like we will have to reconsider our understanding of the Universe, anyway…

Reference

Masaki Hori, Anna Sótér, Daniel Barna, Andreas Dax, Ryugo Hayano, Susanne Friedreich, Bertalan Juhász, Thomas Pask, Eberhard Widmann, Dezsö Horváth, Luca Venturelli, Nicola Zurlo. Two-photon laser spectroscopy of antiprotonic helium and the antiproton to electron mass ratio. Nature, 28 July 2011

In the video below, a set of pictures taken by the Solar Dynamics Observatory Spacecraft shows the Sun in different wavelengths. The pictures, taken on December 9, 2010, are shown in order from the lowest temperature material being imaged to the highest. As the images go further from our star’s surface, out to its upper corona, the features of a face begin to appear.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Finally, this “old man in the Sun” is a good way to remember that in different wavelengths, the same object reveals different features.

I recently found this paper by Jorge L. Cervantes-Cota and George Smoot on arXiv, and thought some of you might be interested. It gives a short review on the standard model of cosmology.

From the Big Bang to inflation, it quickly reviews cosmic distances and their measurements within the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric, as well as thermodynamics and inhomogeneities in the early universe. Anyone interested in reading this paper should have a sufficient background in physics, as a few inevitable equations are presented.

Obviously, this is just a very short review and it only deals with the standard model of cosmology:  you will not find anything about modified gravity theories or any other alternative theories.

For more details about modern cosmology, I will also recommend this set of lectures by Leonard Susskind that I posted some time ago. Of course, keep browsing the blog as well (there are a few articles about black holes, the shape of the Universe, its fate…)! I will leave the final word to Galileo, who once said:

“Philosophy [nature] is written in that great book which ever is before our eyes — I mean the universe — but we cannot understand it if we do not first learn the language and grasp the symbols in which it is written. The book is written in mathematical language, and the symbols are triangles, circles and other geometrical figures, without whose help it is impossible to comprehend a single word of it; without which one wanders in vain through a dark labyrinth.”

Reference

Astronomers generally focus on exoplanets orbiting stars in the Galactic Habitable Zone (GHZ) when looking for planets that could support complex life. The GHZ has the shape of a donut: it is estimated to be 6,000 light-years thick and located 25,000 light-years away from the galactic center. This zone contains many stars similar to our Sun, containing high proportions of heavy elements: they are called metallic stars.

Michael Gowanlock from the University of Hawaii and colleagues wanted a more detailed study of habitability within our Galaxy, and examined various important factors. They took into account sterilised regions of the Galaxy caused by supernovae, and also included the time required for complex life to evolve. Finally, they considered habitability on tidally locked and non-tidally locked planets separately.

Taking all these factors into account (as well as a few others), they estimated that up to 1.2% of stars in our Galaxy could have planets with complex life. Knowing that there are between 200-400 billion stars in the Milky Way, that gives roughly 2.5 to 5 billion stars potentially having planets with complex life!

Another important detail is that there seems to be much more of these stars in the inner galaxy, about 2.7% of the stars in that region.

© ESO

However, their model also predicts that about 75% of the planets orbiting these stars would be tidally locked: the same side is constantly facing their parent star, making it a burning hell, while the other side remains frozen in an everlasting night. Such planets would be uninhabitable.

Of course, there is still a lot of work to do, and the first habitable exoplanet will have to wait a long time before being discovered, and confirmed.  Many factors may influence habitability, and researchers are constantly improving their models. Thanks to studies like this one, astronomers know where to look and where Earth-like planets might be; and maybe someday, they will finally find another world much like our own.

Reference

Click here to view the embedded video.

Because of this special location, you can admire our Milky Way spreading across the sky above the ocean, parallel to the horizon. It took more than a year to compile 31 hours of exposure, resulting in this breathtaking time lapse video.

Sit comfortably, and enjoy the beautiful Australian night sky!

Image and Video by Alex Cherney.

In Einstein’s theory of relativity, space is a smooth, continuous fabric. In quantum theory, there is an inherent discreteness present in physics. In an attempt to reconcile the two theories, it is postulated that spacetime should be quantized at the smallest scales, that is grainy.

Now, ESA’s Integral gamma-ray observatory has placed new limits on the size of these quantum “grains” in space: if they exist, then they are much smaller than most quantum gravity theories predict.

Philippe Laurent of CEA Saclay and his colleagues used data from one of Integral’s instruments, IBIS, to study the difference in polarization between high and low-energy gamma rays emitted during one of the most powerful gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) ever seen.

GRBs are the most energetic explosions known in the Universe. Most of them are thought to occur during supernovae explosions (some are of unknown origin), producing a huge pulse of gamma rays that outshine entire galaxies during a few seconds, up to a few minutes.

© ESA/SPI Team/ECF

If space has an underlying grainy structure, these tiny grains should twist light rays, changing the direction in which they vibrate, their polarization. In the case of gamma rays, high-energy ones should be more twisted than low-energy ones. By measuring the difference in polarization between  high and low-energy gamma rays, astrophysicists can estimate the size of the grains.

That is precisely what Dr Laurent and his colleagues did with GRB 041219A, a gamma ray burst that took place on December 19, 2004.

According to some quantum gravity theories, the quantum nature of space should manifest itself at the Planck scale, around 10^-35 meter, which can be defined from three fundamental physical constants: the speed of light in a vacuum, Planck’s constant and the gravitational constant.

However, Integral’s observations, the most precise ever made, show that if there is any quantum “graininess”, it is at a level of 10^-48 meter or smaller!

An important detail is the distance at which GRB 041219A was observed: at least 300 million light years. Over large distances, the twisting effect should accumulate into a detectable signal. Here, absolutely nothing was detected, pushing the limits further.

What are the implications of this result? They are pretty important for many theories. Indeed, according to quantum theory, and more precisely string theory, any measurement below the Planck scale is meaningless to physics… Loop quantum gravity is also completely ruled out by this new result. This could also disprove the holographic universe hypothesis.

Finally, in the light of this new result, quantum theoreticians will have to rethink their theories, as most of quantum gravity theories have now been seriously challenged. Maybe Einstein was right once again, and spacetime is indeed perfectly smooth and continuous…

Reference

P. Laurent, D. Götz, P. Binétruy, S. Covino, A. Fernandez-Soto. Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation using integral/IBIS observations of GRB041219A. Physical Review D, 2011; 83 (12) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.121301

The Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble (ECSK) theory of gravity naturally extends general relativity to account for the intrinsic angular momentum (spin) of elementary particles. This theory, named after Albert Einstein, Élie Cartan, Dennis Sciama, and Tom Kibble, causes spacetime to exhibit a geometric property called torsion.

The Big Bang cosmology based on Einstein’s theory of general relativity successfully describes most of the properties of our Universe. However, it does not answer some important questions such as the nature of dark energy and inflation, what caused the observed asymmetry between matter and antimatter, or the origin of the rapid expansion of the Universe. Also, general relativity breaks down inside black holes and at the beginning of the big bang.

The ECSK theory, outside situations of high matter densities such as black holes or in the very early Universe, reduces to general relativity, thus passing its experimental and observational tests. According to Nikodem Poplawski, from Indiana University, ECSK gravity may eliminate the major problems previously mentioned.

First, torsion manifests itself as a force that counters gravitational attraction, avoiding singularities. As a result, the big bang is replaced by a big bounce that resulted from the contraction of another Universe. Also, spacetime torsion naturally explains today’s apparent flatness of the Universe, without requiring cosmic inflation (an extremely short and fast period of expansion).

Another interesting phenomenon is that matter inside a black hole won’t compress into a singularity; it will rebound and expand to produce a closed, new universe inside. Our Universe itself may have originated from the interior of an intermediate-mass black hole!

The ECSK theory of gravity may also explain the nature of dark energy, the observed matter-antimatter imbalance in the Universe and the origin of dark matter. For example, four-fermion interactions can act like a cosmological constant, and torsion can lead to a scenario in which dark matter is actually made of antimatter.

So, could ECSK gravity be the answer to the most important problems in cosmology? Maybe. It is, at least, an elegant proposition that does not involve any modification of existing theories (it is an extension of Einstein’s relativity), and which, like general relativity, does not have any free parameter.

Reference

Neutron stars, forming after the death of massive stars, are so dense they generate extremely strong gravitational fields. The clump of matter came from a blue supergiant, orbited by a companion neutron star. It was much bigger than the compact star, which is only 10 km in diameter. Actually, it was so big that most of it did not hit the star.

© ESA/AOES Medialab

During four hours, the flare was heated to millions of degrees by the gravitational field of the neutron star. If the neutron star had not been on its way, the flare would have disappeared into space without trace.

The flare was caught by ESA’s XMM-Newton, during a scheduled observation of the system, called IGR J18410-0535. It’s only when they received the data on Earth, 10 days later,  that astronomers realised the X-ray observatory caught something special. Fortunately, the observation lasted long enough  to see the flare from beginning to end.

© ESA-C. Carreau

Astronomers were able to estimate the size of the flare: it was about 16 million km across. That is 100 billion times the volume of our Moon! Although it was incredibly big, it was still much lighter than our satellite, about one thousandth of its mass.

Thanks to this incredible luck, astronomers will be able to better understand the behavior of the blue supergiant and the way it emits matter into space. Each and every star ejects matter into space, creating stellar wind: in this case, astronomers know that it seems to be emitted in a clumpy fashion.

At least four galaxy clusters had to collide to form Abell 2744, or Pandora’s cluster. Its nickname comes from the multiple strange phenomena that were unleashed during the enormous collision. Thanks to combined data from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT), the Japanese Subaru telescope and NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory, scientists were able to recount 350 million years of history.

Although the galaxies in the cluster are clearly visible, they account for only about 5% of its mass. Gas accounts for another 20% and only shines in X-rays, while the rest is invisible dark matter. Dark matter’s presence is betrayed by a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing: light rays are bent by dark matter’s gravitational field, producing distortions in the images from Hubble and VLT. This allows astronomers to map the distribution of dark matter in the cluster.

© ESO and D. Coe (STScI)/J. Merten (Heidelberg/Bologna)

Pandora’s cluster seems to have formed from four different clusters that collided over a period of 350 million years, creating many curious features. The hot gas, observable in X-rays, dark matter and the visible galaxies all lie apart from each other. In the center of the cluster, a “bullet” is visible: during a collision, the clusters’ gas collided and created a shock wave. Dark matter wasn’t affected by the collision. Somewhere else in the cluster, gas has disappeared, leaving only dark matter and galaxies.

The outer parts of the cluster contain only dark matter, maybe telling astronomers how it behaves and how all the ingredients making up our Universe interact with each other.

Clusters of galaxies are the biggest structures in the cosmos, and studying their formation and evolution is invaluable, and will help better understand our Universe.

Reference

Video credit: ESA/Hubble, ESO

The two stars, known as UZ For, are both smaller than our Sun. One of them is a white dwarf, the other a red dwarf. They are so close to each other that it takes only a bit more than two hours to complete a revolution. In fact, the whole stellar binary would fit in our Sun!

Because they are aligned with Earth, when the stars pass in front of one another, they produce eclipses, which allow astronomers to determine their properties very accurately. When observing these eclipses with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT), researchers noticed that they don’t occur regularly. Instead, some of the eclipses occur too early, others too late (they also used archival data from multiple observatories and satellites). To explain the phenomenon, the scientists suggest that two giant planets could cause the orbits of the stars to wobble because of their strong gravitational pull.

For this model to work, they estimate the two planets should be at least 6.3 and 7.7 times more massive than Jupiter. The planets would complete one orbit each 5.25 and 16 years. The system, located in constellation Fornax, is unfortunately too far for the planets to be directly imaged.

Because of their proximity, the more massive star is constantly accreting matter from its smaller companion, emitting enormous amounts of X-rays. This very inhospitable environment, because of the nature of the two stars composing the binary, would be quite a weird new planetary system if the existence of these planets is confirmed.

Reference

Imagine yourself leaving Earth and looking at it as you are going further and further. You would first see it becoming smaller, then see other planets. When far enough, you would only be able to distinguish a dot of light, our Sun. Further, you would see many stars, then our Galaxy, and other galaxies. Finally, you would see a cluster of galaxies, surrounded by other clusters of galaxies. As you are going further, the Universe looks smoother and smoother.

Click here to view the embedded video.

The clumpiness of the Universe comes from the fluctuations in the density of matter in the early Universe: simulations show us what our Universe should look like at different scales, based on its content and the physical laws expected to hold in the currently known cosmologies.

Shaun Thomas of University College London, and colleagues used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, which covers about a fifth of the entire sky, to create a 3-D map of 723,556 galaxies that are at least 4 billion light-years away. They found that the Universe is not as smooth as previously thought: there are more clumps of stars and galaxies than models predict.

The results of their research are published on Physical Review Letters.

According to the cosmologists’ results, the clumpiness of the Universe varies by 2% from one point to another: although it is still rather smooth, it is twice clumpier than what models predict.

What does that mean, exactly? If the results are not due to systematics (it is very unlikely, but possible), the consequences could be extremely important. It could be that general relativity breaks down on large scales, or that cosmologists need to rethink dark matter and dark energy. It is still too early to draw any conclusions, and upcoming studies like the Dark Energy Survey are needed before anything can be confirmed (or not). If future observations do confirm these results, the implications on cosmology might be truly fascinating.

Reference

Shaun A. Thomas, Filipe B. Abdalla, and Ofer Lahav. Excess Clustering on Large Scales in the MegaZ DR7 Photometric Redshift Survey. Physical Review Letters, 106, 241301, June 13, 2011. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241301

In a Universe with a mirror symmetry, the image of a counter-clockwise rotating galaxy is a galaxy with a clockwise rotation. The two kinds of galaxies should be present in equal amounts: if one of the two types is more abundant than the other, there is a breakdown of mirror symmetry, or parity violation.

Michael Longo of the University of Michigan’s Physics Department and his team used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to study the rotation directions of spiral galaxies. After studying tens of thousands of galaxies, the team found an excess of left-handed spirals in the direction of the north pole. Although the excess is only of 7%, it is very unlikely to be a cosmic accident (one chance in a million). Our Milky Way Galaxy rotates the same way, and the effect extended out to distances over 600 million light-years.

The team’s results have recently been published in Physics Letters B.

What does this result mean, exactly? It is today accepted that according to what is called “the cosmological principle”, the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic on large scales: whoever and wherever you are, the Universe looks the same. If spiral galaxies tend to have their rotation axes aligned, that means there is a preferred direction in the Universe: it is not isotropic.

Most of the data analyzed came from the northern hemisphere of the sky, as the Sloan Telescope is located in the northern hemisphere. An important test of this new result will be to see if there is an excess of right-handed spiral galaxies in the southern hemisphere, once more data is available.

If these results are confirmed, this might have extremely important consequences on cosmology: the cosmological principle is a required assumption in many models and theories. If the Universe is shown not to be isotropic, it might completely change our view of the cosmos.

Reference

Michael J. Longo. Detection of a dipole in the handedness of spiral galaxies with redshifts z?0.04. Physics Letters B, 2011; 699 (4): 224 DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.008

© ESA/NASA

I highly recommend you to check out all the other pictures, they’re all truly amazing, and give you a quite good idea of how huge and  sophisticated the space station is.

Not only did Nespoli take pictures of the ISS and Endeavour, he also filmed them! Here’s the video, released by NASA:

These are the last images of this kind you will ever see, so take your time to watch them. As you already know, Atlantis, the last Shuttle launch, will fly to the space station on July 8.

The need for dark matter first appeared with the galaxy rotation problem. Theoretically, the farther a star is from the galactic center, the lower its orbital velocity is. This is not what observations have shown: outside the galactic bulge, the speed is nearly constant. The addition of extra invisible mass within the galactic halo, called dark matter, is able to explain this discrepancy.

Although dark matter gives good results, the problem is that so far every attempt to detect dark particles has failed. Dragan S. Hajdukovic from CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, suggests a completely different solution to the problem. He decides to assume that particles and anti-particles have an opposite gravitational charge (in addition to their opposite electrical charge). Consequently, virtual particle-antiparticle pairs in the quantum vacuum would be gravitational dipoles: the quantum vacuum could be considered as a dipolar fluid.

Because of the repulsion between opposite gravitational charges, the gravitational field outside a massive baryonic (made of ordinary matter) object should be stronger than predicted by Newton’s law. However, Newton’s law is not violated, just like Coulomb’s law is not violated in the case of electric polarization.

Would gravitational polarization of the vacuum produce the same effect as dark matter? According to Hajdukovic’s calculations, yes. The size of our Galaxy’s halo as well at the mass enclosed within a radius of 60 kpc (200,000 light-years) are in good agreement with current estimates.

So, is dark matter an illusion created by the gravitational repulsion between matter and antimatter and the corresponding gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum by the existing baryonic matter? Maybe, but it is much to early to give an answer. As the author writes, this new hypothesis can explain the rotational curves of galaxies, but dark matter is also used to explain other phenomena: density fluctuations and the structure formation of the Universe are two examples.

A lot of work is needed to see if gravitational vacuum polarization can account for other phenomena, all well explained by dark matter. Also, this hypothesis relies on the assumption that antimatter has a negative gravitational charge: so far, there is absolutely no evidence supporting that idea.

Reference

In the most popular scenario, our Moon formed after Earth and another planet collided: over time, the debris produced by the titanic collision coalesced and gave birth to our planet’s satellite. Sebastian Elser and  his colleagues have now run computer simulations to calculate the probability of having Moon-like satellites orbiting Earth-like planets.

Their results are very interesting: according to their simulations, the odds of such a scenario are somewhere between 1 in 6 and 1 in 45. Even with the low-end estimate, this gives quite a large number of planets with an orbiting moon!

The motivation behind this study is actually the search for habitable exoplanets. Indeed, a planet orbiting its parent star in the habitable zone is a first requirement, but it is far from being enough to label an Earth-like planet “habitable” (especially that the concept of habitable zone is still far from being clearly defined). Theoretically, this would allow the presence of liquid water on a planet’s surface; another important ingredient for the emergence and the evolution of life is a stable climate.

This is where massive moons play a major role. Global climate is mostly influenced by the distribution of solar insolation. While the annual-averaged insolation on the surface of a planet is related to the distance to the parent star, it is also strongly linked to obliquity – the angle between an object’s rotational axis and the normal of its orbital plane. Without the Moon, the Earth’s obliquity would undergo very large and chaotic variations, with dramatic consequences for global climate: a Moon-like satellite orbiting an Earth-like planet would considerably help stabilizing the planet’s obliquity, thus increasing the chances for life to emerge and evolve.

Of course, there are many variables to take into account in such studies, and more research has to be done. Finally, if these results are confirmed, this could be another sign that after all, life might exist somewhere else, and might not be so rare in our vast Universe.

Reference

Image: ”Tide pools of Azimech” by moodflow

Before getting into the thick of things, what makes black holes incompatible with quantum theory? There are two things to consider: the information paradox, and the singularity at the heart of a black hole.

According to general relativity, when matter falls into a black hole, all information is lost and disappears into a singularity: many different physical states evolve into the same state. In quantum theory, quantum information must be conserved: complete information about a physical system at one point in time should determine its state at any other time. This incompatibility is known as the information paradox.

Another problem comes from the singularity at the center of a black hole: it has zero volume, and spacetime curvature is infinite. This is not possible in quantum physics, which requires absolute time, for example.

Gravastar

Pawel Mazur and Emil Mottola proposed an alternative to black holes in 2001, incorporating quantum mechanics in general relativity. To do so, they imposed to the Universe the Planck length as the smallest size possible, according to quantum theory: this length is derived using the speed of light, Planck’s constant and the gravitational constant.

When a star collapses under its own gravity, it results in the formation of an extremely compact object. Because of the limits imposed, there is a region of “immeasurability” surrounding the center of the object, a gravitational vacuum: it is literally a void in the fabric of spacetime. Outside this region would be a very dense form of matter, called Bose-Einstein condensate. An outside observer would see a the core of a gravastar as a Bose-Einstein condensate, extremely cold due to the severe redshifting of spacetime. Externally, a gravastar would appear strictly identical to a black hole.

But it doesn’t stop here… Infalling matter hitting the shell is converted into energy; inside the shell, a small amount of the energy is converted back into matter. A soon as the matter is formed, the repulsive force of the internal vacuum energy pushes on the particles, which then race away from each other at ever-increasing speeds.

Doesn’t that remind you of anything?.. Matter appearing “out of nowhere” , pushed away faster and faster… That’s the Big Bang. In other words, we would be inside a gravastar!

Dark Energy Star

In 2005, physicist George Chapline claimed that black holes almost certainly don’t exist, relying on quantum mechanics. Instead, they would be dark energy stars: infalling matter is converted to dark energy (which is here assumed to be vacuum energy) as matter crosses the event horizon.

In a dark energy star, matter approaching the event horizon keeps decaying into lighter particles, including proton decay close to the event horizon (this would be a possible explanation for high energy cosmic rays). As it passes through the event horizon, the energy equivalent of part or all of that matter is converted into dark energy. Because of its negative pressure, singularities cannot form and no information is destroyed.

Such stars could also potentially explain dark matter, as “primordial” dark energy stars could be formed by fluctuations of spacetime itself.

Fuzzball

In superstring theory, fuzzballs are supposed to be the true quantum description of black holes. Samir Mathur and Oleg Lunin proposed that black holes are not a singularity, but a sphere of strings – the ultimate building blocks of matter and energy – with a definite volume. A fuzzball can be regarded as the most extreme form of degenerate matter. Unlike black holes, the event-horizon of fuzzballs wouldn’t be clearly defined, rather fuzzy, hence the name “fuzzball”.

Fuzzballs are exactly like black holes: anything crossing the event horizon will not be able to escape; they only differ internally. When more matter falls onto a fuzzball, strings fuse together: all the quantum information of the infalling strings becomes part of larger, more complex strings.

Here, both the information paradox and the gravitational singularity are avoided. According to their proponents, this makes fuzzballs the true quantum description of black holes.

Of course, these are only hypotheses, and black holes might be yet something different. Or quantum theory itself may be incomplete and currently unable to explain black holes. There is still a long way before relativity and quantum mechanics can be reconciled. Meanwhile, both theories have proven themselves extremely accurate… You thought black holes were strange? Quantum theory made them even stranger.

Massive stars, after they explode into supernovae, don’t have a unique fate. While the most massive ones will eventually turn into a black hole, swallowing anything crossing their event horizon, others, less massive, will become neutron stars. Neutron stars – their name speaks for itself – are essentially made of neutrons. They are extremely hot and dense: the density of a neutron star would be equivalent to the entire human population squeezed down to the size of a sugar cube!

Could there be anything denser than this, that wouldn’t turn into a black hole? Could there be stars that are too massive to become neutron stars, but not enough to become black holes? The answer is yes, at least theoretically.

Something called neutron degeneracy pressure prevents neutron stars from collapsing under their own gravity: two neutrons cannot be in the same quantum state in the same place. In case this pressure cannot hold up against the star’s gravity, neutrons then break down into their constituents, called quarks, and then form a quark star.

© NASA

Quarks are one of the fundamental constituent of matter, and they come in six “flavors”: up, down, top, bottom, charm and strange. They combine to form other particles, such as protons and neutrons, among others. Neutrons are made of up and down quarks; when neutrons break down, some of their quarks may become strange quarks and form strange matter. This is why quark stars are often called strange stars.

So far, no quark star has ever been detected, or confirmed. Indeed, a couple of overdense neutron stars have been observed and proposed as possible candidates: RX J1856.5-3754 and 3C58. However, there isn’t much supporting evidence.

What if we could push the limits even further?.. Some stars could theoretically reach even more extreme densities in their core: their density would be the same as that of the universe 10^-10 seconds after the big bang! At that point, quarks inside the star are converted into pure energy and neutrinos, and the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces become indistinguishable: radiation pressure resulting from this “electroweak burning” prevents the star from collapsing. Such stars are called electroweak stars, and they could live at least 10 million years, burning strange matter in their core.

© Casey Reed

While electroweak stars wouldn’t be much different from usual neutron stars on the outside, their core, which is about the size of an apple, would be the only place in the Universe where matter naturally goes back to its primordial state. In other words, at such an insane density, matter would be back to what it was a fraction of nanosecond after our Universe was born.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Images by Stéphane Guisard and José Francisco Salgado, editing by Nicolas Bustos. Music: “We Happy Few” by The Calm Blue Sea (2008).

Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) were proposed to explain the galaxy rotation problem. Unexpectedly, when it was first observed, the velocity of rotation of galaxies appeared to be uniform: Newton’s theory of gravity predicts that the farther away an object is from the center of the galaxy it belongs to, the lower its velocity will be (for example, the velocity of a planet orbiting a star decreases as the distance between them increases). These observations gave birth to the idea that a halo of invisible stuff was surrounding each galaxy: dark matter.

MOND is another way to model the observed uniform velocity. In a few words, MOND proposes that when the acceleration due to gravity goes below a fixed value, Newton’s law doesn’t work anymore. And this happens to match the observations much better than dark matter!

So, why is the vast majority of cosmologists sticking to dark matter? Because although MOND models very well the rotation curves of galaxies, that’s actually the only thing it does.

I’ll start with an empirical example: the Bullet Cluster, a system of two colliding galaxy clusters (in visible light in the image above; in a composite image below). Dark matter is required to explain the phenomenon of gravitational lensing observed in the cluster. MOND alone cannot explain it.

© X-ray: NASA/ CXC/ CfA/ M.Markevitch, Optical and lensing map: NASA/STScI, Magellan/ U.Arizona/ D.Clowe, Lensing map: ESO/WFI

MOND predictions concerning large-scale structures, such as galaxy clusters, are very far from being good at reproducing observations. Dark matter does it pretty well.

Finally, a relativistic version of MOND, called TeVeS, seems to be able to explain gravitational lensing, structure formation, and it can also explain the cosmic microwave background anisotropies (more or less…). But it comes with a surprise: although TeVeS doesn’t require cold dark matter (which travels at low speeds), it needs hot dark matter (which travels at relativistic speeds) to work… And once again, it is anyway quite far from fitting the data as well as dark matter.

These observations don’t mean that gravity cannot be modified, but there is no evidence for it and it seems extremely difficult to avoid dark matter.

A common criticism made against MOND is that it is not possible to test it, or at least nowhere near our solar system: the regime of acceleration required is too low. X. Hernandez, M. A. Jimenez and C. Allen have now proposed a new test: such regimes can be observed with a particular type of stars, wide orbit binary stars. It becomes interesting when they actually perform their test on a statistical survey. According to them, this test proves that classical gravity fails in the weak acceleration regime!

For various reasons, including the ones mentions above, as well as some related to the content of the paper itself, I must say that I have a few serious doubts about their results. It is for sure too early to claim that gravity exhibits a change of regime at very small acceleration scales, and even if it did, I can’t see how this would definitely rule out dark matter. Anyway, if this test is reliable, this offers a new way  to check what happens in low acceleration regimes, and it will be interesting to wait for further studies.

Reference

In 2005, the Cassini spacecraft discovered water-rich plumes venting from Enceladus’ south polar region, when performing close flybys of Saturn’s moon. These jets, composed mainly of water vapor, could be fed by an underground liquid ocean, scientists hope. There are also other possible explanations, which do not involve liquid water at all.

© NASA/JPL-Caltech

However, recent findings seem to back the hypothesis of a liquid water ocean beneath the frozen surface of Enceladus. First, the amounts of ice and gas in the plumes are very similar: such proportions would be difficult to observe in the absence of liquid water. Second, the chemistry of the materials inside the plumes also points to liquid water. Saturn’s E-ring, in which Enceladus is orbiting the gas giant, is rich in sodium. Enceladus is suspected to be the main source of particles for that ring: if the ice crystals were originally vapor which later re-condensed to ice, there would not be any sodium. Cassini also found traces of compounds such as carbonates and dust grains, strengthening evidence that there is an ocean under the frozen surface.

On the other hand, Cassini also revealed the presence of some compounds that is inconsistent with liquid water. Hydrogen cyanide, for example, reacts with liquid water to form other compounds: hydrogen cyanide has been found in the plumes, but not the compounds resulting from its interaction with water. A possible explanation would be that the plumes are fed by a variety of simultaneous processes.

© NASA/JPL-Caltech

Another interesting finding indicates that the plumes might have been active for a very long time. So far, it was thought they had been active for a few hundred years, enough to form Saturn’s E ring. Because of the thickness of the layer of ice crystals and the rate at which they fall back to the moon’s surface, new estimates suggest the plumes could have been active for tens of millions of years.

Radioactive decay and tidal flexing from Saturn’s gravitational pull cannot account for the necessary energy to drive the plumes: the origin of this energy remains unknown. This suggests that the plumes are not a continuous phenomenon, but rather something sporadic.

Finally, the most important and exciting question is to know whether Enceladus produces enough heat to harbor a liquid-water ocean beneath its icy surface. Although it seems very unlikely that Enceladus could maintain a global ocean, it is not impossible that a smaller, regional ocean might exist. If any is found to exist, this would make Enceladus a good candidate for the harboring of extraterrestrial life.

Gamma-ray bursts are classified in two categories: long gamma-ray bursts, and short gamma-ray bursts, according to their duration. Long bursts last more than two seconds; they usually occur in star-forming galaxies and they are in many cases related to supernovae explosions. Short bursts occur in regions of low star-formation, which rules out an association with massive stars. They probably originate from the mergers of binary neutron stars, but their true nature is still unknown.

Some gamma-ray bursts do not belong to any of these categories, as they show features of both groups. GRB 060614 is one of them: it lasted about 102 seconds, with no supernova emission. Retter and Heller now suggest that such bursts might actually be white holes.

An HST image of the location of GRB 060614.

White holes are, basically, the reverse of black holes. They cannot be entered from the outside, but matter and light can escape from them. Although white holes appear in the solutions of Einstein’s field equations, they remain hypothetical as none have been observed so far. Their origin comes from the idea that spacetime should not have any “edges”. Then, how to avoid the problem raised by the gravitational singularity at the center of a black hole? A possible solution comes from the hypothetical connection of a black hole and a white hole, known as a wormhole.

As they can be understood as the time reversal of black holes, white holes would constantly eject matter. Because of their gravitational pull, white holes would accrete matter around their event horizon, until eventually everything collapses… into a black hole. Retter and Heller have a different view: they suggest that white holes would actually eject all matter at once in a single instance.

It was proposed that the Universe itself originated from a white hole: a weaker white hole would then be a “Small Bang”. When a large amount of mass is ejected, the white hole would eventually collapse into a black hole. As these white holes are not connected to any supernova event and can theoretically appear anywhere, the authors suggest they might be the origin of peculiar gamma-ray bursts such as GRB 060614. They also believe that such white holes could explain the formation of asymmetric structures in the early universe, leading to the formation of galaxies and galaxy clusters we observe today.

Of course, all this is just an idea, and it is impossible to tell whether some gamma-ray bursts are white holes. Maybe GRB 060614 was a white hole. The only way to know is to wait for future similar events, and carry on observations. Maybe then something in the data will back this new proposal, or rule it out completely.

Reference

First, I would like to say a few words about the picture I chose for this article. While most of you will have recognized Einstein, you might wonder who that priest standing next to him is. Georges Lemaître was a priest, a cosmologist and a professor of physics. His contribution to physics has been extremely important, and he was a pioneer in applying Einstein’s general relativity to cosmology. His most famous contribution is probably his theory of the primeval atom, today known as the Big Bang theory. Yes, you read correctly: the Big Bang theory was proposed by a scientist who was also a priest.

Let’s take a quick look at History. There has been a few clashes between science and religion, especially between astronomy and religion. The most famous conflict between them is probably the trial of Galileo Galilei. Because of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, he was found ”vehemently suspect of heresy” by the Inquisition. He remained under house arrest until the end of his life. Interestingly, it is the Catholic Church that got interested in Galileo’s claims, not the contrary: Galileo never involved religion in his work, but the Catholic Church judged heliocentrism contrary to Scripture. If Galileo stood by his claims in spite of their implications regarding the Church, it is because science doesn’t need religion, there is no way to integrate religion into science.

After Hawking’s interview, when observing people’s reactions, it is pretty easy to realize once again that there are still a few prejudices around. For many people, being a scientist necessarily means you’re either an atheist or a skeptic. As I’ll explain later, it is not necessarily that obvious, and definitely not true.

Astrophysics is a field of science, among many others. By definition, science (coming from the latin “scientia”, meaning knowledge”) is knowledge attained through testable explanations and predictions about the world. Clearly, God is totally dismissed in such a definition: you can try as hard as you want, there is no evidence, no possible test, to attest the existence of any God. Astrophysics doesn’t need God.

So, is that it? Not exactly. Because astrophysics doesn’t need God doesn’t mean that some astrophysicists, or scientists, don’t need God either. As I said previously, Lemaître for example, was both a man of science and a man of faith. And there are many other scientists in this case. Although most of the astrophysicists I met were atheists or agnostics, some of them also believed in God. Some others also believed that something was responsible for the existence of the Universe, but not in the form of a supernatural creator, rather as something abstract and impersonal. Whatever their beliefs were, they always kept it separate from science.

How is that possible? Scientists have shown, through various studies, that our brains are wired to believe. In other words, believing in God or the supernatural would be an inborn tendency. Education also probably plays an important role. On some occasions, because a scientist cannot find any satisfactory explanation or reason to our existence, they might also turn to a spiritual conception of our origins.

In the end, some will choose to believe, others will choose not to, and look for verifiable answers.

So, finally, is there a place for God in astrophysics? No. But somehow, sometimes, they find their way to coexist.

Takahiro Sumi, from Osaka University, Japan, and colleagues, observed the Galactic Bulge surrounding the centre of the Milky Way, and found 10 lonely Jupiter-sized planets floating freely, far from any star. To detect them, they used a technique called gravitational microlensing. Based on various parameters, they estimated the total number of such rogue planets: there could be as many as 400 billion of them! To give you an idea of their abundance, we estimate the number of stars in our Galaxy to be between 100 and 400 billion: these planets would be as common as stars!

© NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt

The researchers’ work is published today in Nature.

Such planets have been predicted to exist by models, but their number was a mystery. If the models are right, there might actually be a huge number of lighter planets also wandering around, they should even be more common.

Gravitational microlensing, the technique used by the scientists for their observations, is due to massive object bending the light coming from background stars: while the lens mass is too low to observe the displacement of light, changes in brightness can be detected.

But how did these planets form? There are two possibilities. Simulations show that in the early stages of planetary formation, gravitational interactions between many massive planets can result in one of them literally being kicked out of the stellar system. However, such objects could have also formed on their own, via a gravitational collapse of matter.

Of course, with so many other planets populating our Galaxy, the question of alien life is raised again. Although the presence of life on objects that massive seems very unlikely, it does not necessarily mean that such worlds wouldn’t be worth studying. Indeed, some of these wandering planets might have carried along an orbiting body: these moons, heated by tides, might be able to sustain liquid water on their surface.

In the near future, new instruments should allow the detection of many more of these roaming worlds. If they turn out to be as common as the rearchers estimated, I like to think that we could be lucky enough to have such a planet not too far from home. Who knows, it could even be closer to us than Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to the Sun. If someday we are able to travel interstellar distances, that would definitely be an exciting desination.

Professor Chris Regan and graduate student Matthew Mecklenburg, when studying the electronic properties of graphene, found that an electron can acquire two different quantum states depending on its position on a layer of graphene.

Graphene is a specific kind of carbon, or allotrope, structured in one-atom-thick planar sheets in a hexagonal formation. In their model, the researchers showed that graphene’s pseudospin  - a spin equivalent - is also a real angular momentum. They considered a space with two different positions, like tiles on a chessboard; the electron can acquire spin if the tiles are so close together that their separation cannot be detected.

“An electron’s spin might arise because space at very small distances is not smooth, but rather segmented, like a chessboard,” Regan said.

© Chris Regan/CNSI

The physicists’ findings are published in the March 18 edition of the journal Physical review Letters.

The spin of an electron is peculiar for two reasons. First, it cannot be a rotational property: if electrons had a radius, they would have to spin faster than the speed of light, violating Einstein’s relativity. Second, experiments showed that the electron is a pure point particle without any radius, so there is really nothing that could possibly spin.

However, pushing their idea further, the scientists suggest that like pseudospin, the electron’s intrinsic spin could arise from a hidden substructure in spacetime itself. To put it differently, spacetime would be quantized. Of course, moving from the two-dimensional space of a graphene layer to our four-dimensional spacetime is far from being easy, but it will be interesting to see if there are other lattices capable of generating spin. Is there a hidden structure underlying reality? Who knows…

Reference

Matthew Mecklenburg, B. Regan. Spin and the Honeycomb Lattice: Lessons from Graphene. Physical Review Letters, 2011; 106 (11) DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.116803

In 2007, scientists reported the detection of two planets orbiting the red dwarf Gliese 581, not far from the edges of its habitable zone: in this area, planets are neither too cold, nor too hot to maintain liquid water on their surface (which is considered a requirement for life – as we know it – to develop). Quickly, the more distant planet Gliese 581d was judged to be too cold for life. The other planet, closer to the red dwarf, was thought to be potentially habitable. However, further analysis showed that liquid oceans would quickly evaporate in a “runaway greenhouse” effect, similar to the one that may have occurred on Venus.

Later, in 2010, another team of astronomers claimed they had discovered a new planet, Gliese 581g, also known as “Zarmina’s World”. According to the researchers, this planet was close to the center of the habitable zone and had a mass similar to that of Earth. After several months, various independent teams raised serious doubts about the planet’s existence: it is now believed that the planet might not exist at all, as the observation made may simply be some noise in the measurements.

Now, Gliese 581d might in the end become the first confirmed habitable alien planet. It is likely to be a rocky planet with a mass at least seven times that of Earth, and about twice as big. Because it receives less than a third of the stellar energy Earth does and may be tidally locked (the same side of the planet being constantly facing the star), the planet was thought to be too could to be habitable.

Robin Wordsworth, François Forget and colleagues from Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (CNRS, UPMC, ENS Paris, Ecole Polytechnique) at the Institute Pierre Simon Laplace in Paris wanted to test this intuition. They developed a new computer model capable of accurately simulating possible exoplanet climates. The model simulates a planet’s atmosphere and surface in three dimensions, and allows a very wide range of conditions for the atmosphere content.

© LMD/CNRS

Surprisingly, the researchers found that with a dense carbon dioxide atmosphere, the climate of Gliese 581d would be stable and warm enough to have oceans, clouds and rainfalls. And such an atmosphere happens to be a likely scenario on such a large planet. Rayleigh scattering, which makes our sky blue, limits the amount of sunlight a thick atmosphere can absorb: an important part of the scattered blue light is reflected back to space. However, Gliese 581d is not affected by this phenomenon: the light of its parent star is red. In other words, the starlight can penetrate much deeper into the atmosphere, heating the planet thanks to the carbon dioxide atmosphere and carbon dioxide ice clouds predicted to form at high altitudes. There is one more thing: the simulations showed that the daylight heating was efficiently redistributed across the planet by the atmosphere, preventing atmospheric collapse on the night side or at the poles.

Another exciting detail is that Gliese 581 is a close neighbour. The star is only 20 light-years away from Earth, so in the future telescopes should be able to detect the planet’s atmosphere directly. Of course, the conditions might be completely different and the planet totally inhospitable, so the researchers developed a few tests that a future telescope should be able to perform.

Finally, if the exoplanet turns out to be habitable, it would still be quite different from what we know… Plunged into a perpetual red twilight, the planet would have a surface gravity about twice stronger than that of Earth. Anyway, that would surely be one of the most important discoveries ever made, and it would have important implications: if there are other habitable worlds, it is easy to imagine that life might exist somewhere else. If we were to find the evidence of life elsewhere, this would certainly change our view of the Universe.

Reference

Robin D. Wordsworth, François Forget, Franck Selsis, Ehouarn Millour, Benjamin Charnay, Jean-Baptiste Madeleine. Gliese 581d is the first discovered terrestrial-mass exoplanet in the habitable zone. The Astrophysical Journal, 2011; 733 (2): L48 DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/L48

The Green Bank telescope, located in West Virginia, is the wold’s largest fully steerable radio telescope, and the world’s largest land-based movable structure. The massive dish began last week to home in on 86 planets, out of 1,235, and will collect 24 hours of data on each one.

The mission is part of the SETI program, which has recently put into hibernation the Allen Telescope Array, due to a lack of funds.

In this context, the Green Bank Telescope is the best tool available to undertake this search. The surface of the telescope is 100 by 110 meters and it can record nearly one gigabyte of data per second. The 7.7 million kilogram telescope became operational in 2000 and is a project of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

“We’ve picked out the planets with nice temperatures — between zero and 100 degrees Celsius — because they are a lot more likely to harbor life,” said physicist Dan Werthimer, who heads a SETI project in Puerto Rico.

The project will take about one year to complete, with the aid of numerous SETI@home users, who will help process the data on their personal computers.

Of course, 86 possible planets might seem a very small number (as these are exoplanet candidates, it could actually be less) to look for a sign of alien intelligence. But for the first time astronomers are looking where they know there might be planets, maybe similar to our own, and not just at a star similar to our Sun. That is a good start, and it is only the beginning.

If they exist, mini black holes form in a completely different way than “usual” black holes. Astrophysical black holes are formed by the collapse of massive stars, under their own gravity: they have a mass of at least 10³⁰kg. Mini black holes are thought to have formed during the Big Bang; they are also called primordial black holes. The mass of laboratory produced mini black holes is expected to be less than 10^-23kg, whereas the mass of primordial mini black holes is assumed to be less than 10⁶kg.

Searching for a way to test quantum evaporation (thermal radiation emitted by a black hole), which remains an open question, Aaron P. VanDevender from Halcyon Molecular in Redwood City, California, and J. Pace VanDevender from Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, suggested that mini black holes with masses below 10¹²kg should have evaporated by now. In other words, if primordial black holes ever existed, they do not anymore.

On the other hand, if quantum evaporation does not exist, mini black holes would have a peculiar behavior. Stellar (and supermassive) black holes are so dense that any object crossing their event horizon cannot escape their gravity, not even light. In the absence of quantum evaporation, mini black holes would gravitationally bind matter, without absorbing it: matter orbits the black hole at a certain distance. The researchers name it the Gravitational Equivalent of an Atom (GEA). If these GEAs exist and can be detected, it would provide a way to test quantum evaporation.

In the process of quantum evaporation, mini black holes produce X-rays while losing mass, until they eventually disappear. Although there has been many attempts to observe these X-ray signatures, they have never been detected, suggesting that mini black holes were not created in large numbers as expected, or that they do not evaporate.

This is where comes the idea of the VanDevenders: instead of looking for this X-ray signature, scientists should look for evidence of the existence of mini black holes. If their model is correct, GEAs should produce emissions that could be detected with current detectors, even though the probability of detection would be rather small.

Could a GEA collapse and absorb the Earth? Rather not. Black holes with a mass of 10¹²kg have a Schwarzschild radius (the radius of the event horizon) equal to the ground state radius: this is the smallest distance at which matter particles orbit, thus GEAs cannot be heavier than this limit. The researchers compare the probability of a terrestrial GEA absorbing the Earth to that of an electron being captured by the nucleus of the atom it is orbiting: it is “vanishingly small”, they write in their paper. Particles orbiting the black hole at the center of a GEA are also unlikely to be absorbed. However, a few of them could fall into the black hole, and would then provide energy for observable emissions.

Mini black holes could also be interesting candidates for dark matter. The researchers calculated that if dark matter is primarily composed of mini black holes and evenly distributed throughout our galaxy, millions of kilograms of them should hit the Earth each and every year. They also determined that approximately 400 mini black holes per year could, in principle, be detectable through their strong electromagnetic emissions.

Because mini black holes would have a very high velocity, the researchers note that the search for electromagnetic signals from a GEA should be done in the space surrounding the Earth. Indeed, a fast-moving GEA would be quickly stripped of all mass as it passes through the Earth.

Finally, mini black holes that might be created at the LHC would be much too small to bind any matter and produce a detectable radiation. And there is no way any mini black hole created there could swallow our world: for a black hole with a mass of 1kg, which is high above what the LHC could produce, it would take 10³³ years to swallow the Earth. That is more than 70 sextillion times (7 followed by 22 zeros!) the current age of the Universe. So, even though many experiments are still running at the French-Swiss border, you can sleep like a log.

Reference

Notes: There are 10 questions, with only one possible answer for each of them. If you need help with some of the questions, you will be able to find most of the answers somewhere on the blog. Of course, the previous quiz is still available here.

Start the Quiz

Some of these massive outflows can reach extremely high velocities, up to 1,000 kilometers per second, thousands of times faster than in terrestrial hurricanes. Star formation and supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies are thought to be triggered by the merger of gas-rich galaxies; however, this increased activity seems to stop relatively quickly, after a few million years only.

An international team of scientists led by the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics suggests this could be explained by powerful winds that blow gas outwards from the centre of the galaxy. These storms, powered by newly formed stars, shocks from stellar explosions or the central black hole, would sweep away the galaxy’s entire reservoir of gas. Eventually, it would halt star formation and the growth of the black hole, which ironically initiated the phenomenon.

© ESA/AOES Medialab

“Outflows are key features in models of galactic formation and evolution, but prior to our work no decisive evidence of their active role in such processes had been gathered,” explains Eckhard Sturm from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (MPE). The PACS instrument on board Herschel revealed massive outflows of molecular gas, which contributes to star formation, in ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs). These galaxies, enshrouded in gas and dust, shine brightly in the infrared.

“By detecting outflows in cold molecular gas from which stars are born, we can finally witness their direct impact on star formation,” Sturm adds. “Star formation stalls as the gas supply is blown out of the centres of the galaxies with a rate of up to a thousand solar masses per year.”

These observations could also explain another empirical property: the central black hole’s mass and the mass of stars in the inner regions of a galaxy seem to correlate. As these newly found galactic outflows remove the galaxy’s entire reservoir of gas, inhibiting star formation and the growth of the black hole, this correlation appears natural.

It is not clear yet how the outflows are produced: it appears that slower outflows may be initiated by star forming regions, whereas those with higher velocity appear to be related to the activity of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) powered by central black holes. The brighter the AGN is, the faster it seems to sweep gas away.

Anyway, it will be necessary to analyze a much larger sample of galaxies in order to confirm this claim and identify the driving force behind these outflows.

Reference

E. Sturm, E. González-Alfonso, S. Veilleux, J. Fischer, J. Graciá-Carpio, S. Hailey-Dunsheath, A. Contursi, A. Poglitsch, A. Sternberg, R. Davies, R. Genzel, D. Lutz, L. Tacconi, A. Verma, R. Maiolino, J. A. de Jong. Massive molecular outflows and negative feedback in ULIRGs observed by Herschel-PACS. The Astrophysical Journal, 2011; 733 (1): L16 DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/733/1/L16

The Allen Telescope Array (ATA), a group of 42 radio telescopes, has been placed into hibernation. While this does not mean the end of SETI, which has a lot of ongoing projects, nobody is hunting for intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy. To help the ATA return to operations, everyone can contribute via their donation page.

Many people are asking why they should spend money on  programs like SETI, and wonder if we need them. It is simply in our nature to be curious, and the question whether intelligent life exists elsewhere is among the most fascinating ones.

Some say we are all alone, and that if any other civilization, possibly much more advanced, was somewhere out there, contact would have already been made. Well, the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.

First, we have only scanned an extremely small part of our galaxy. Imagine yourself in a huge house: it’s as if you looked inside one of the rooms, saw that nobody’s here and concluded that the house is empty. In the case of SETI, the house is really, really big, and we have barely caught a glimpse through the front door’s keyhole.

Recently, NASA’s Kepler mission discovered many exoplanet candidates, some of which might be Earth-like planets (take a look here and here). And once again, only an extremely small portion of the sky has been observed. The next step for SETI and the Allen Telescope Array was to listen to these newly discovered worlds, and maybe catch an unusual signal.

We are at the dawn of a fascinating new era in astrophysics, discovering new worlds and maybe, one day, another Earth, where another civilization has emerged. Maybe we are alone, but that’s something we won’t ever be able to prove. So, should we miss the chance to find out that maybe we are not?

Some say: “Even if some other intelligent species exist, why would they try to communicate with other ones? Why should we be listening, when there might be nothing to hear?”. Because of all the civilizations that might inhabit our Universe, we know that one already tried to communicate with other intelligent species. Us.

When it comes to black holes, we usually hear about supermassive black holes, at the center of galaxies, or stellar black holes, formed after a star collapsed under its own gravity. Unlike the latter, a dwarf black hole would form when dust and gas are compressed from without during extreme astrophysical phenomena.

Andrew Hayes and Neil Comins of the University of Maine in Orono say that such black holes could form in the turbulence of a supernova explosion. Arbitrary volumes in supernovae ejecta could be compressed to such a high density they would eventually undergo gravitational collapse. These dwarf black holes would have a mass equivalent to a gas giant planet, with an event horizon of a few kilometers (under 10 kilometers in diameter).

As supernova ejecta is expelled at high speed, dwarf black holes may be located in the galactic halo, or even outside the halo, in the intergalactic medium, when they are ejected at speeds greater than the escape velocity of their parent galaxies (that would make them extremely difficult to detect).

In other words, if they exist, dwarf black holes would contribute to the mass of dark matter in the Universe. The researchers’ model also suggest that these black holes are being continuously created: their contribution to the dark matter content of the universe should increase with time, and hence decrease as we look further in the past.

Reference

The Gravity Probe B (GP-B) experiment used four ultra-precise gyroscopes to measure two aspects of Einstein’s theory about gravity. The first one, the geodetic effect, describes the warping of space and time around a gravitational body. The second one, called frame-dragging, describes how a spinning object pulls space and time with it as it rotates.

© Stanford University

The project was initiated 52 years ago, making it one of NASA’s longest-running projects. While in a polar orbit around Earth, the satellite pointed at a single star, IM Pegasi, measuring the two effects with unprecedented precision. Stanford and NASA researchers observed a change in the direction of the gyroscopes’ spin as they were pulled by Earth’s gravity. If gravity did not affect space and time, the gyroscopes would have pointed in the same direction forever while in orbit.

The findings are online in the journal Physical Review Letters.

“Imagine the Earth as if it were immersed in honey. As the planet rotated its axis and orbited the Sun, the honey around it would warp and swirl, and it’s the same with space and time,” said Francis Everitt, a Stanford physicist and principal investigator for Gravity Probe B.

GP-B enabled a lot of innovations, used in other missions such as COBE or in GPS technologies to allow airplanes to land unaided. Its development led to groundbraking technologies making a number of Earth-observing satellites possible. It also provided a practical training ground for numerous students and high school students, among which were the first American woman in space, Sally Ride, and the Nobel laureate Eric Cornell.

These results are extremely important and will have a strong impact on theoretical physics. Future attempts to test Einstein’s theories will face a difficult challenge: they will have to be more accurate, and do better than GP-B.

For more information about Gravity Probe B:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/gpb/

http://einstein.stanford.edu/

Sleeping since 1966

T Pyxidis is a recurrent nova, i.e. a couple of stars in which a white dwarf is ripping matter off its companion, a Sun-like star.

When the accretion of matter crosses a certain threshold, a nuclear explosion is triggered, resulting in a burst of luminosity (see the video below). This phenomenon is more or less periodic, it already happened to T Pyxidis in 1890, 1902, 1920, 1944 and 1966. And then nothing, until April 15, 2011.

© ESO/M. Kornmesser

Unjustified fear

Last year, T Pyxidis had its moment of fame. Erroneous information provoked the fear that, given its proximity (3,300 light-years), its explosion into a type Ia supernova could threaten Earth. Indeed, a researcher mixed up the effects of this kind of supernova, harmless at such a distance, with those of a gamma-ray burst.

In addition, T Pyxidis will not explode into a supernova anytime soon: it will enter a state of hibernation for the next 2.6 million years (during this period of time, the white dwarf will not accrete any matter from its companion). A good reason to observe T Pyxidis right now!

© Mike Shara, Bob Williams, and David Zurek ( Space Telescope Science Institute); Roberto Gilmozzi (European Southern Observatory); Dina Prialnik (Tel Aviv University); and NASA/ESA

A “new” star visible in the Southern hemisphere

If some of you happen to live somewhere in the Southern hemisphere, don’t lose the rare opportunity to see this nova. Its constantly increasing magnitude, which will reach a maximum of 6.4 on May 20, 2011, makes it visible with binoculars (usually with a 15.5 magnitude, it is only visible to bigger telescopes). The star is visible in the early evening in the constellation Pyxis, and you will find it at the following coordinates: 9 h 4 min 41 s and -32°22’47″.

Note: There are 15 questions.

Start the Quiz

In the image below, you can see a simulation of the silhouette of this exoplanet, 55 Cancri e, passing in front of its parent star, compared to the Earth and Jupiter transiting our Sun, as seen from outside the Solar System. At first glance, everything looks almost the same. Actually apart from being rocky planets orbiting two stars that are very similar, our Earth and 55 Cancri e don’t have that much in common…

© Jason Rowe, NASA Ames and SETI Institute and Prof. Jaymie Matthews, UBC

According to a team led by astronomers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the University of British Columbia (UBC), the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and the University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC), the exoplanet is 60% larger and twice as dense as Earth. It is the densest solid planet known, almost as dense as lead.

The research, based on observations from Canada’s MOST (Microvariability & Oscillations of STars) space telescope, was released online at arXiv.org and has been submitted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

55 Cancri e is approximately 40 light-years away from us, orbiting a star called 55 Cancri A. It is so close to its star that it takes only 18 hours for the exoplanet to complete an orbit.

“You could set dates on this world by your wrist watch, not a calendar,” says UBC astronomer Jaymie Matthews.

The planet’s surface is pretty hot, maybe as high as 2,700 degrees Celsius! With such a high temperature, the planet probably does not have any atmosphere. In other words, you can forget about finding life out there.

However, the planet is still extremely interesting. According to the lead author John Winn of MIT, many types of sensitive measurements are possible, thanks to the host star’s brightness; it could help test theories about planet formation, evolution and survival.

In case you are wondering where the planetary system is in our night sky, the star can be observed with the naked eye for the next two months. Of course, the planet itself is not visible, but it is quite fascinating to be able to look at a star, actually knowing that there are planets orbiting around it. Yes, planets. Indeed, 55 Cancri e is not alone, there are four more exoplanets in this system.

All of them were detected using the Doppler technique: the change in the wavelength of light coming from a star, due to the gravitational pull of the unseen planets, is measured over the course of days, months and years.

After Rebekah Dawson, an astronomy PhD student at Harvard and Daniel Fabrycky, a Hubble Fellow at UCSC, suggested that the orbital period of 55 Cancri e could be much shorter than others had assumed, MOST was used to detect subtle dips in the brightness of star 55 Cancri A as planet e passed in front of it during each orbit.

As predicted by Dawson and Fabrycky, the research team observed an orbital period of 17 hours and 41 minutes. The starlight is dimmed by only 0.02% during each transit, telling the astronomers the exoplanet is about 21,000 kilometers in diameter.

“On this world – the densest solid planet found anywhere so far, in the Solar System or beyond – you would weigh three times heavier than you do on Earth. By day, the sun would look 60 times bigger and shine 3,600 times brighter in the sky,” says Matthews, MOST Mission Scientist and second author on the paper.

Finally, if you are lucky enough to have a clear dark sky tonight, go out for a few minutes and try to spot 55 Cancri A. Isn’t that cool to know that around this tiny dot of light, there are five other planets?

Reference

Amrit Sorli, Davide Fiscaletti, and Dusan Klinar from the Scientific Research Centre Bistra in Ptuj, Slovenia, explain that time (t) has only a mathematical value, and no primary physical meaning. We usually consider time as an absolute physical quantity, but the scientists explain that we never really measure t: we measure an object’s speed, frequency, etc., but not t itself. What is really measured is the tick of a clock together with the motion of an object, which are then compared to measure the object’s speed or frequency.

Does it mean that time doesn’t exist? No. This view suggests that our usual 4D spacetime made of three dimensions of space and one dimension of time, is rather made of four dimensions of space. In short, the Universe is timeless.

Here, time is viewed as being the numerical order of material change. The scientists illustrate their concept with the motion of a photon. As the smallest distance a photon can cover is the Planck distance, the corresponding Planck time is considered to be the fundamental unit for measuring the numerical order of photon motion. In space, “before” and “after” exist only as a numerical order.

The three researchers write in their paper: “Minkowski space is not 3D + T, it is 4D”. This has the advantage to better correspond to the physical world: a 4D space is a medium in which immediate information transfer, as in EPR-like experiments or quantum tunneling, has a numerical order equal to zero. This cannot be explained in the usual concept of spacetime where all physical phenomena happen in space and time.

Their model also gives a solution to Zeno’s paradoxes. For their demonstration, the scientists used the paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise: Achilles is in a footrace with a tortoise, and gives it a head start of 100 meters. Although Achilles runs much faster than the tortoise, he will never be able to surpass it. Assuming Achilles runs 10 times faster than the tortoise, when Achilles reaches the tortoise’s starting point, the tortoise will be 10 meters ahead. It will then take Achilles some further time to run that distance, by which time the tortoise will have advanced farther; and then more time still to reach this third point, while the tortoise moves ahead.

Of course, the fact that Achilles can never overtake the tortoise is blatantly false. In the scientists perspective, motion only exists in space, not in time. As Achilles and the tortoise move through space only, Achilles can surpass the Tortoise in space, although he won’t in absolute time.

Finally, this interpretation of time has another important consequence: time travel is simply impossible. Time being the numerical order of an object’s motion in space, an object only moves in space, not in time. I will leave the final word to Einstein who once said:

“Time has no independent existence apart from the order of events by which we measure it”.

References

• Amrit Sorli, Davide Fiscaletti, and Dusan Klinar. Replacing time with numerical order of material change resolves Zeno problems of motion. Physics Essays, 24, 1 (2011). DOI: 10.4006/1.3525416
• Amrit Sorli, Dusan Klinar, and Davide Fiscaletti. New Insights into the Special Theory of Relativity. Physics Essays 24, 2 (2011). To be published.

First observed in 2008 by a NASA team led by Alexander Kashlinsky, the dark flow describes the coherent motion of galaxy clusters. This is in contradiction with the standard model, which predicts that all matter in the Universe should flow randomly in all directions, with respect to the cosmic microwave background.

Various theories tried to explain what could cause this strange motion. One of them suggests that there might be another universe existing beyond our own, dragging matter in our Universe closer and closer through its gravitational pull. Another hypothesis suggests this could be due to a region of spacetime fundamentally different from our observable Universe.

© A. Kashlinsky

A new study from the University at Buffalo has now found evidence against the dark flow theory: exploding stars in different parts of the Universe do not appear to be moving in sync. The findings appeared in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

De-Chang Dai, William H Kinney and Dejan Stojkovic used data from 557 type IA supernovae: the closest supernovae to Earth all share a coherent motion in one direction, while others further out are heading to different directions. The difference in motion becomes noticeable for distances above 680 million light-years.

These measurements are inconsistent with the dark flow theory, but in good agreement with the standard cosmological model, known as ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model.

Is there a sibling universe beyond the bounds of our own, or some fundamentally different region of spacetime? This new study seems to answer the question negatively. However, it is still too early and further measurements are needed to definitely rule out the dark flow theory, or not…

Reference

De-Chang Dai, William H Kinney, Dejan Stojkovic. Measuring the cosmological bulk flow using the peculiar velocities of supernovae. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2011; 2011 (04): 015 DOI:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/04/015

Hubble was launched April 24, 1990, aboard Discovery’s STS-31 mission. It has made numerous discoveries, some of them leading to revolutions in all areas of astronomical research, from planetary science to cosmology. For 21 years, it has also allowed everyone to get a glimpse of what these tiny dots in our night sky really look like, revealing the beauty of our cosmos through breathtaking images. It has inspired, and will keep inspiring generations of astronomers.

© NASA, ESA and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

This new image (click to enlarge) shows a pair of interacting galaxies called Arp 273. The larger of the spiral galaxies, called UGC 1810, shows a rose-like shape: its disk is distorted by the gravitational tidal pull of its smaller companion galaxy, UGC 1813. The shiny blue dots at the top of this “galactic rose” are clusters of extremely bright young and massive blue stars, glowing in ultraviolet light.

The smaller companion harbors a star forming region at its nucleus: many baby stars are being born in this area, perhaps because of the encounter with the other galaxy.

Arp 273 is located about 300 million light-years away from our home planet, in the constellation Andromeda. The two galaxies are tens of thousands of light-years away from each other, with a tidal bridge of material between them, visible in the image.

The outer arm of the larger galaxy appears partially as a ring, suggesting the smaller galaxy actually passed through the larger one, off-center. Many uncommon spiral patterns visible in UGC 1810 are also a strong sign of interaction. One of the inner arms of the galaxy goes behind the bulge and comes back out the other side; the inner set of spiral arms is highly warped out of the plane. The connection between these two spiral patterns is not precisely known.

The larger galaxy in this rose-like pair is about five times heavier than its companion. In such galaxy pairs, the rapid passage of a companion galaxy produces the asymmetric structure in the main spiral. In that kind of encounters, the starburst activity usually begins in the minor galaxies, probably because they have consumed less of the gas present in their nuclei, from which new stars are born.

In case some of you would like a higher resolution of the picture, the original file is available here (do this at your own risk! – the file is about 120 MB).

Finally, let’s wish hubble a happy birthday one more time, waiting for more astonishing images of the Universe we live in.

Clusters of galaxies are the largest gravitationally bound structures in our Universe. Their gravity is so strong that they bend the ray of lights coming from galaxies located behind them. As a result, multiple and often distorted images of the background galaxy are produced (see the animation below). These gravitational lenses also amplify the light coming from these otherwise invisible objects.

Click here to view the embedded video.

© NASA, ESA & L. Calçada

Johan Richard and his colleagues used the cluster named Abell 383 to identify a galaxy so far away that we see it as it was when the Universe was around 950 million years old. The team of researchers used recent observations from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and then verified everything with observations from the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope. They finally measured the galaxy’s distance using the Keck-II telescope in Hawaii. The research will appear in a paper entitled “Discovery of a possibly old galaxy at z=6.027, multiply imaged by the massive cluster Abell 383”, to be published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

© NASA, ESA, J. Richard (CRAL) and J.-P. Kneib (LAM). Acknowledgement: Marc Postman (STScI)

Actually, more distant galaxies have already been observed: one of these galaxies, for example, is seen as it was when the Universe was around 450 million years old. However, the newly discovered galaxy does not shine brightly with only young stars, unlike other remote galaxies. Spitzer revealed that the galaxy is made of very old and relatively faint stars, some of them being nearly 750 million years old. In other words, this means the galaxy was formed only 200 million years after the Big Bang: this suggests that galaxies have been around for a lot longer than previously thought.

The discovery may also help explain why the Universe became transparent to ultraviolet light in the first billion years after the Big Bang. In the early Universe, ultraviolet light was blocked by a diffuse fog of neutral hydrogen gas; to make this fog transparent to ultraviolet light as it is today, some source of radiation must have ionized the gas: this process is known as reionization.

It is believed that this source of radiation must have come from galaxies, but their very small number is not enough to provide the necessary radiation. If many other galaxies are as old and faint as the one newly discovered, this could provide the missing radiation that cleared the hydrogen fog.

Unfortunately, for the time being, such galaxies can only be observed through gravitational lenses. The NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope, to be launched in a few years, will be the perfect tool to help solve this mystery.

A few days ago, the XENON100 collaboration announced at a seminar in Gran Sasso National Laboratory, in Italy, that they have not detected any dark matter particles. One of the most popular hypothesis suggests dark matter is made of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), that interact only through the weak force and gravity. XENON100 is looking for this particular kind of particles as they pass through the central portion of 161 kilograms of liquid xenon beneath 1.4 kilometres of rock at Gran Sasso. When colliding with the xenon nuclei, the particles should produce electric charge and light signals.

© XENON100 Collaboration

The XENON100 researchers reported here that 100 days’ worth of data taking turned up three events that could be due to dark matter particles. However, the scientists expected roughly two false positives due to interactions caused by a radioactive contaminant in the xenon: the three events are probably background events, and the result is statistically negative. This no-show rules out the existence of many of the heavier WIMPs, and also has important implications regarding supersymmetry: this theory, proposed to solve the hierarchy problem of the standard model, predicts the existence of  a few particles that may be WIMPs.

Other large-scale experiments are planned in the near future, such as the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) detector. These new experiments should be able to detect lighter WIMPs, or to discard them too…

Reference

Metamaterials have fascinating properties: with their periodic structure, light can be manipulated very easily in many different ways. By controlling the values of the permittivity and permeability of the “electromagnetic space”, metamaterials allowed researchers to create invisibility cloaks, bending light around objects. But metamaterials also allow to mimic many of the features of space-time, such as creating a multiverse or light being trapped in a black hole.

Igor Smolyaninov and Yu-Ju Hung at the University of Maryland, College Park, recreated the arrow of time inside a metamaterial, in an attempt to explain why the cosmological arrow of time and the thermodynamic arrow of time point in the same direction.

It is today commonly accepted that the Universe began with the Big Bang, expanding since then: this defines the cosmological arrow of time, pointing forward from the Big Bang to the expansion of the Universe.

Our common definition of time comes from the thermodynamic arrow of time. According to the second law of thermodynamics, entropy (or disorder) must always increase with time: this is why you won’t ever be 20 years old a second time or nuts can’t become untracked.

Even though it is generally believed that the cosmological and thermodynamic arrows of time are connected, why should they point in the same direction?

© Igor Smolyaninov

For their experiment, Smolyaninov and Hung created nothing less than a metamaterial Big Bang! Actually, they were able to simulate how light behaved and time flowed when the Universe was born.

To build their model, the researchers used specially shaped plastic strips placed on a gold substrate. Laser light hitting the metal excites waves of plasmons (oscillations of free electrons) that propagate across the gold surface while being distorted by the plastic strips. The way light moves in this metamaterial is exactly analogous to how massive particles move through a flat Minkowski space, made of two dimensions of space, and one dimension of time: light paths in this material are then equivalent to the “world lines” of a particle in a Minkowski space-time, similar to our Universe. These world lines model the cosmological arrow of time.

Because the metamaterial is not perfect, it distorts the light rays as they spread, establishing a thermodynamic arrow of time. It occurs that in the metamaterial, both arrows of time flow in the same direction.

But the researchers did not stop here. They used their model to study time travel! They tried to see if it was possible to create what cosmologists call closed time-like curves in their metamaterial. In other words, they wanted to check if it was possible for light rays to follow circular paths that return to the point from where they started, in space and time. It turned out that circular paths in the metamaterial are impossible: in this model, at least, time travel seems to be impossible.

Of course, this experiment will not give the final answer about the real Big bang and real time, but it might help explain why time behaves the way it does.

Reference

Of course, Gagarin only knew what it was to be the first man up there, but thanks to Christopher Riley, we now have a glimpse of what Gagarin saw from his spacecraft Vostok 1.

While audio recordings of Gagarin exist, there were no video recordings. Italian astronaut Paolo Nespoli, currently living on the ISS, recorded images of the Earth following a similar plot of Gagarin’s trip.

These images have now been combined to the original audio recordings from Gagarin’s flight to commemorate the 50th anniversary of his flight, resulting in the film below. The film is simply wonderful, so go grab some pop-corn and sit comfortably to feel the amazement.

Enjoy the trip!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKs6ikmrLgg

To these questions, known as the Fermi paradox, the easiest answer would be that we are all alone, or at least that no other species is advanced enough to wander in space or try to establish communication with other civilizations.

Adrian Kent, of the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, imagined a completely different scenario: what if our galaxy is crowded with advanced aliens, who remain quiet to avoid conflicts?

In his paper, available here, Kent says that evolutionary selection on a cosmic scale would tend to the extinction of species advertising their presence. The main driving force behind this extinction would be some sort of competition for resources, for example. Thus, intelligent species would keep their heads down to avoid the attention of some aggressive aliens: the best way to ensure survival in a cosmic scale ecosystem is to remain inconspicuous.

Are the Aliens staying quiet in their corner of the galaxy? Maybe, but there might be many other possible explanations to the complete absence of evidence of advanced alien civilizations. You could start by asking this simple question: why would aliens try to communicate via radio transmissions? After all, that is only a tiny fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum, and it can easily get altered by all kinds of obstacles. We could also imagine that we are living in an isolated area of the Milky Way, far from any other civilization. There could be many different explanations, more or less realistic.

Of course, Kent himself stresses the fact in his paper, discussing such topic as the existence of alien civilizations is pure speculation. Anyway, this scenario doesn’t seem implausible, and could be an answer to the problem raised by Fermi, among others.

Finally, whatever the answer to the Fermi paradox is, this new hypothesis might be worth considering. Perhaps, we should remain quiet?

The two stars, located 7,800 light-years away in the constellation Cetus, are white dwarfs: they are dying stars, in their final evolutionary state.
“These stars have already lived a full life. When they merge, they’ll essentially be ‘reborn’ and enjoy a second life,” said Smithsonian astronomer Mukremin Kilic (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics), lead author on the paper announcing the discovery. This paper will be published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Only a few similar systems are known in our Milky Way Galaxy, home to 100 billion stars. Most of them were found by Kilic and his colleagues. The latest system, with the catchy name of SDSS J010657.39 – 100003.3, will be the first one to merge and be reborn.

© David A. Aguilar (CfA)

It consists of a visible star and an unseen companion, both believed to be made of helium. The presence of the latter is betrayed by the visible star’s motion around it. The visible one weighs approximately 17% as much as the Sun, while the other weighs about 43% as much. The two white dwarfs orbit each other at a distance of about 225,000 kilometers (140,000 miles), at an incredible speed of 1.6 million kilometers per hour (1 million miles per hour). They are closer to each other than the Moon is to the Earth, completing one orbit in only 39 minutes.

Because they whirl around so close to each other, they produce a huge amount of gravitational waves, or “ripples” in the spacetime continuum. As these waves are carrying away orbital energy, the stars are getting closer and closer together in a spiral movement: in about 37 million years, they will collide and merge.

As the pair of white dwarfs is too light, they will not explode as a supernova whan they collide. Instead, they will start a new life as a single star fusing helium, shining like its “parents” once did, a very long time ago.

Reference

Click here to view the embedded video.

The video consists of some of the visual effects from BBC’s show Wonders of the Universe, hosted by physicist Brian Cox. All the effects were done by Burrell Durrant Hifle, who has posted this video and many others here.

Accompanied by the excellent music of Timo Baker, the video takes you to various objects of our Universe, amazingly rendered through BDH’s art. Although this is an artist’s conception, almost everything looks pretty much the way it should. The only complaint you might have is, as noted by Phil Plait, that the animations are not titled – the casual viewer might not know what they are looking at (so, if anyone has questions, feel free to ask!).

Anyway, take some time to check BDH’s other videos here, and enjoy the show!

Back in the 1960′s, physicist Ray Davis found that the flux of neutrinos coming from the Sun was only about a third of the amount predicted theoretically. Decades later, in 2001, the mystery was solved when the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) in Canada found the missing two-thirds by realizing there are actually three flavors (or types) of the particle: electron, muon and tau. Only the smallest kind, the electron neutrino, had been detected by Davis.

But now, another mystery has appeared. Thierry Lasserre and his colleagues at the French atomic energy commission (CEA) in Saclay, while waiting for the Double Chooz neutrino experiment to be fully operational, checked the predictions for antineutrinos against the actual amount produced by nuclear reactors. The previous calculations were made in the 1980′s, and so far experiments produced results roughly consistent with the theory.

Because they used more modern techniques, the researchers were more precise: they estimated that the rate of production of anitneutrinos is actually 3% more than previously predicted. That is a surprise: if the previous calculations were wrong but the subsequent results correct, this means that several experiments missed a small fraction of the particles!

Then, where are these particles? The answer might lie in a fourth flavor, a so-called sterile version of the particle: in this state, neutrinos and antineutrinos do not interact with ordinary matter.

This might also be the solution to another long-standing problem, that has left researchers in the dark… If they don’t interact with matter, these particles could be the constituent of the susbtance accounting for the Universe’s hidden mass, dark matter (or it could just be part of it). Other experiments, such as the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and the Mini Booster Neutrino Experiment, at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, have also seen evidence for sterile particles.

Finally, although the result is very interesting, it is not significant on its own. Other experiments with similar observations are needed, and there is still a long way before sterile particles can be proven to exist.

References

1. Mention, G. et al. http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2755
2. Abdurashitov, J. N. et al. http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/0512041

Just like planets orbit their stars, stars orbit the center of their galaxies. Usually, all of them orbit in the same direction. For a long time, astronomers have noticed that some stars are orbiting the core of their galaxies in the opposite direction of those further out. A suggestion was that these stars were actually coming from another galaxy, swallowed up by a bigger one before they finally formed the one astronomers are observing. Unfortunately, there was no evidence of such a scenario.

New observations by Kaj Kolja Kleineberg of La Laguna University in Tenerife, Spain, and colleagues are now boosting the galactic cannibalism theory. Their results will appear in a paper in Astrophysical Journal Letters.

They examined the stars of an elliptical galaxy called NGC 1700, located 160 million light years away, with its core rotating backwards, relative to the rest of it. The researchers found that the stars in the core are much younger than the ones in the outer regions, which would be impossible if all the stars were born in the same galaxy.

There is also another clue. “Normal” elliptical galaxies (where all the stars are orbiting the same way) usually have stars with high levels of heavy elements in their core. The core stars of NGC 1700 contain only a small fraction of these elements, suggesting once again that a galaxy was once devoured by another, bigger one.

Here is a new awesome picture of Rho Ophiuchi, taken by NASA’s Wide-field Infrared Explorer, or WISE (click the image to enjoy a bigger view):

© NASA/JPL-Caltech/WISE Team

You can also grab the original file here (do this at your own risk!).

The various colors visible in the picture represent different wavelengths of infrared light. One of the most striking details is the bright white nebula in the center: nearby stars heat it up and make it glow – this is called an emission nebula. The same phenomenon is happening with the bluish bow-shaped feature in the bottom right corner of the image. The bright red area is a reflection nebula: light from Sigma Scorpii, the star in the center, is reflected off of the dust surrounding it. The darker areas scattered throughout the image are made of cool dense gas, blocking out the background light: they are called dark nebulae, or absorption nebulae.

You probably also noticed those pink objects near the center of the image: they are baby stars just forming, still enveloped in their own tiny nebulae. These young stellar objects, or YSOs, are normally hidden in visible light because of the dark nebula surrounding them. This dark nebula is often referred to as their “baby blanket”.

Near the edges of the picture (top right corner, and near the center, at the bottom), two very compact and dense groups of blue stars are visible. They are actually  globular clusters, M80 and NGC 6144, both being composed of some of the oldest stars in our Milky Way: some of them are as old as 13 billion years, born soon after our Universe was formed.

Finally, there are two other interesting details in this image. The two lines visible at the bottom of the image are optical artifacts from the space telescope, due to the bright star Antares that is just out of the field of view. Next to the central white nebula, at the 3 o’clock position, there is a small faint red dot. This dot is a far away galaxy, known as PGC 090239.

This image gives us an example of what the tiny dots of light we see in our night sky look like when we can get a closer view… Who would have imagined it could look like that?

Joseph Kittinger, a former Command pilot and military officer in the United States Air Force, jumped from Excelsior III at about 31.3 kilometers (102,800 feet). He fell for 4 minutes and 36 seconds, reaching a maximum speed of 988 kilometers per hour (614 miles per hour), before opening his parachute at 5.5 kilometers (18,000 feet). This is still the record for the highest, fastest, and longest skydive. Kittinger previously established another record, while preparing for this jump: because of a malfunction during a previous jump from about 23.3 km, the g-forces at his extremities (he went into a flat spin) have been calculated to be 22 times over the force of gravity.

In case you are wondering what this insane jump might have been like, here are some of the original images, with Kittinger himself commenting:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VdSeDqU3EY

Kittinger has probably been a strong source of inspiration for many people. As you can see in the cool video below, he has not only inspired skydivers or astronauts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrlIB1rzlZs

Recently, former French Air Force colonel Michel Fournier attempted to make record-breaking freefall jumps on three occasions. The first attempt, in 1998, was canceled. During the second attempt, the balloon supposed to take him 40 kilometers high ripped while being filled. The next attempt was unsuccessful due to the skydiver’s reserve parachute deploying inside the capsule during a pre-launch test while the balloon was being filled. As Fournier doesn’t seem to give up, his next attempt has been tentatively announced for May 2011.

Another famous skydiver, Felix Baumgartner was also preparing to attempt the highest skydive on record, but the project was placed on hold in October 2010 after a lawsuit.

So far, it looks like the ones trying to take over Kittinger’s record have been quite unluncky… Pushing the idea a bit further, we could even imagine space diving as a sport… Would you give it a try?

For a planet to be able to maintain liquid water on its surface, scientists assume it has to be located in the habitable zone of its parent star: the planet lies far/close enough to its star for starlight to provide the energy needed to maintain liquid water. There are also a few other sources of energy that could possibly warm up a planet: a thick atmosphere driving a greenhouse effect, or radioactive elements decaying in rocks.

Now, in a paper they submitted to the Astrophysical Journal, Dan Hooper and Jason H. Steffen, from the Center for Particle Astrophysics, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, have considered another energy source for planetary heating: the annihilations of dark matter particles.

Dark matter is the invisible stuff that makes up more than 80% of the matter in the Universe, and almost does not interact with anything. Its nature is still unknown, but many theories give possible descriptions. The most popular one suggests dark matter is made of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), that interact only through the weak force and gravity. WIMPs have an interesting property: as they are their own antiparticles, they annihilate each other, releasing energy.

Because WIMPs can be gravitationally bound and captured by stars or planets, if enough dark matter is accumulated in a planet’s interior, dark matter particles can subsequently annihilate to produce energetic particles that are then absorbed by the surrounding material. This could warm the planet enough to sustain liquid water on its surface.

For their calculations, the researchers considered two different phenomenological models of WIMPs: one that is about 300 times heavier than a proton, and another one 7 times heavier. Then they calculated the capture rate of these particles in Earth-like and super-Earth planets. Finally, they determined the resulting surface temperature of those planets that would come from dark matter annihilations.

On Earth, they found that dark matter does not make any difference: its contribution is negligible compared to sunlight . This is mainly due to the fact that our planet lies in a region of the Milky Way with a relatively low amount of dark matter.

However, the density of dark matter is much higher in the central region of galaxies: a rocky planet lying within about 30 light-years of the galactic center, and with a mass 10 times greater than that of Earth could maintain liquid water on its surface. This does not even require any additional energy from starlight or other sources.

Hooper and Steffen’s model relies on WIMPs only: if dark matter turns out to be anything else, their model is no longer valid. Finally, if such planets exist, they would have an incredible advantage over planets like ours: they would have an extremely long lifetime, literally trillions of years, outliving even the smallest, and longest-lived, main sequence stars.

“Such planets may prove to be the ultimate bastion of life in our universe,” concluded the authors.

Reference

© NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington

The bright crater at the top of the image is called Debussy. The smaller crater Matabei with its unusual dark rays is visible to the west of Debussy. The bottom portion of this image is near Mercury’s south pole and includes a region of Mercury’s surface not previously seen by spacecraft.

The orbiter took 363 more images of the planet’s surface over the following six hours: these images are part of the commissioning phase, supposed to check that all the instruments are working. The science phase of the mission will begin on April 4, acquiring 75,000 images in support of Messenger’s science goals.

NASA will hold a teleconference at 2 p.m. EDT Wednesday to discuss this first shot of the innermost planet and release more photos.

Cygnus X-1 was the first black hole discovered by astronomers, in 1964. It is part of an X-ray binary located 6,000 light-years away from the Sun: it is about 8.7 times the mass of the Sun, and it is closely orbited by a supergiant variable star. The black hole is sucking in gas from its companion star, heating it up to the point it emits high energy X-rays and gamma-rays.

© NASA/CXC/SAO

Philippe Laurent, CEA Saclay, France, and colleagues made the discovery using the Ibis telescope onboard ESA’s INTEGRAL satellite. For the first time, the measurements revealed the presence of polarized light originating in the black hole’s immediate surroundings. This provides critical insight into how Cygnus X-1 behaves.

In space, light can vibrate in any direction. Under some circumstances (when passing through matter, for example), light can get polarized: it will vibrate in only one direction. Astronomers constantly observed the black hole over the course of 7 years, focusing on the corona of Cygnus X-1, roughly about 800 kilometers in diameter. Thanks to these observations, astronomers now know that this chaotic region surrounding Cygnus X-1 has a strong magnetic field.

INTEGRAL also reveals that these highly structured magnetic fields are forming an escape tunnel: they are strong enough to tear away particles from the black hole’s gravitation, focusing them into a jet away from it. As a result, the gamma-ray radiation coming from them is polarized: this is what the team observed.

Jets around black holes have already been observed many times, but without enough details to know how they are formed. Since the phenomenon is observed so close to the black hole’s event horizon, astrophysicists could learn a lot about the physics close in and the properties of the black hole itself.

The team detailed their findings online March 24 in the journal Science.

Dwarf stars

Dwarf stars are stars with a luminosity up to 20,000 times that of the Sun, and a mass up to 20 solar masses. In other words, they are normal stars (90% of the stars are dwarfs). Our Sun itself is a dwarf star, a yellow dwarf. There are other types of dwarfs: white dwarfs, red dwarfs, brown dwarfs and black dwarfs (these are actually not emitting any form of radiation). Why calling the majority of stars “dwarf stars”? The reason is partly historical: in 1906, the Danish astronomer Ejnar Hertzsprung noticed that the reddest stars could be divided into two distinct groups. These stars are either much brighter than the Sun, or much fainter. To distinguish these groups, he called them “giant” and “dwarf” stars.

Dark matter

Dark matter is maybe one of the most famous mysteries of our Universe. According to observations made in the early 30′s, and other subsequent observations, some of the Universe’s mass is “missing” (dark matter accounts for 23% of the mass-energy density of the Universe). Although dark matter was postulated by Fritz Zwicky in 1934 to account for the “missing mass” of the Universe, the term “dark matter” has an older origin. It was first used by the Dutch astronomer Jacobus Cornelius Kapetyn in 1922, to denote invisible matter whose existence is suggested by its gravity only. The term dark matter is now commonly used by astrophysicists, and the real nature of this missing mass remains a mystery.

Dark energy

Dark energy is the name given to the unknown form of energy responsible for the acceleration of the expansion of the Universe (there is a detailed article about it here). Nobody knows what it is, and various theories try to describe its possible nature. We don’t know much about our Universe: dark energy currently accounts for 73% of its total mass-energy density. With a quick calculation, you realize that what we know of our Universe only accounts for 4%… Rather than naming it “unknown stuff with negative pressure that fills all of space and makes it expand at an accelerating rate while laughing at that poor gravity” (well, that would have been a bit long), astrophysicists chose the term “dark energy”, echoing the term “dark matter”. It was coined by Michael S. Turner, a theoretical cosmologist, in 1988.

Big Bang

It is today commonly accepted that the Big Bang is the event that led to the formation of the Universe. Originally described by the Belgian priest and astronomer Georges Lemaître, he called it the “hypothesis of the primeval atom”. According to this model, the Universe expanded from a singularity of infinite density and infinite temperature 13.75 billion years ago approximately. The term “Big Bang” was coined as a jocular and pejorative name by the English astronomer Fred Hoyle during a 1949 radio broadcast. He later denied it was meant to be pejorative, and said it was just a striking image to highlight the difference between this model and the one he favored, the “steady state” model.

Wormholes

Wormholes are another strange feature of the Universe: a wormhole is a hypothetical “shortcut” through spacetime (see here). Widely used in science fiction, a particular type of wormhole could allow someone to travel between two extremely distant parts of the Universe very quickly, or even to travel through time. You could think of it as a very special door: while a usual door allows you to go from one room to another, this one would take you to another galaxy almost instantly, for example. The American theoretical physicist John Wheeler coined the term “wormhole” in 1957, referring to a worm digging through an apple to reach the other side, instead of traveling on its surface.

Phantom Energy

As you might have guessed, phantom energy is a particular form of dark energy which, if it exists, would accelerate the expansion of the Universe so quickly that it would end in a Big Rip (take a look here). Robert Caldwell first used the name “phantom energy” in 2002, as it refers to “something which is apparent to the sight or other senses but has no corporeal existence” (these are Caldwell’s words). Looking at the title of his article might indicate that he also found inspiration in Star Wars!

For sure, astrophysics may sometimes look like science-fiction, but these catchy names are simple and easy to remember. Finally, there might also be something to what Doc Brown said:

“The way I see it, if you’re gonna build a time machine into a car, why not do it with some style?”

Considering the number of Sun-like stars in the Milky Way, billions of Earth-like planets might exist in our Galaxy alone. Scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, calculated that there could be up to at least 2 billion planets similar to our own.

© Lynette Cook

What is exactly an Earth-like planet? Such a planet is between 0.8 and 2 times the size of Earth, and within the habitable zone of its star (the distance from a star where an Earth-like planet can maintain liquid water on its surface).

With four months of data, the researchers determined that 1.4 to 2.7 percent of the stars similar to our Sun are home to Earth-like planets. Extrapolating to the total amount of Sun-like stars in the Milky Way, that gives 2 billion stars.

It is interesting to note that this only concerns stars similar to the Sun. Red dwarfs, which are much smaller and dimmer could also theoretically support habitable planets. As there are many more of them than Sun-like stars, if they happened to have habitable planets in the same proportions, the number of possible alien earths could skyrocket.

Anyway, even if scientists were to find only one twin planet to ours, that would surely be one of mankind’s greatest discoveries.

Recently, physicists Jonas Mureika from Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, California, and Dejan Stojkovic from SUNY at Buffalo in Buffalo, New York, have proposed an interesting way to investigate lower dimensions of the Universe. They’ve published their study in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

According to them, our four-dimensional spacetime may not have been the same in the past: it may have existed in a lower dimensional state. In the beginning, spacetime would have only two dimensions, one dimension of space and one dimension of time. In other words, shortly after the Big Bang, the Universe was a straight line. With the expansion, this straight line “wrapped up” so that it appears as the four-dimensional spacetime we see today, after going through a three-dimensional state, with two dimensions of space.

Although they don’t know exactly at which energy levels (or when) the transitions between higher dimensional states occurred, they gave some estimates assuming that the Universe’s energy level and size determine its number of dimensions. The first transition from one dimension of space to two dimensions of space happened when the Universe’s energy level was about 100 Tev (Tera-electron volt – a unit of energy used in particle physics). Later, when the Universe cooled down to an energy level of about 1 TeV (about the kinetic energy of a flying mosquito), it reached its third dimension of space: it is the Universe we live in today. The current energy level of the Universe is about 0.001 eV.

Is there any evidence of a lower-dimensional structure for the Universe? Maybe. Indeed, when observing cosmic ray particles in space, scientists found that at energies higher than 1 TeV they appear to align in a two-dimensional plane.

Mureika and Stojkovic even propose another test: in a Universe with two dimensions of space, there are no gravitational degrees of freedom, hence there are no gravitational waves. If the Universe was ever in a three-dimensional state, then no primordial gravitational waves of this epoch can exist today: the cut-off in gravitational wave frequency would represent the transition between a two-dimensional space and a three-dimensional space. It would be like observing one of our dimensions “vanishing” in the past.

Pushing the idea further, we can imagine that a fourth dimension of space will appear in the future, as the Universe keeps cooling down: this could provide a solution to the cosmological constant problem, where energy would be hidden in our four-dimensional spacetime before the Universe is promoted to a five-dimensional state.

Reference

French astrophotographer Serge Brunier spent several weeks during the period between August 2008 and February 2009 capturing the sky, mostly from ESO observatories at La Silla and Paranal in Chile. In order to cover the full Milky Way, Brunier also made a weeklong trip to La Palma, one of the Canary Islands, to photograph the northern skies. With a lot of patience, an incredible work and the will to show everyone the sky that surrounds us, he photographed the most beautiful 360-degree image of our night sky. The original image is 800 Megapixels! It is composed of almost 300 fields each individually captured by Brunier four times, adding up to nearly 1200 photos that encompass the entire night sky.

Covering the whole celestial sphere, our Milky Way Galaxy, seen edge-on, goes all the way across the image. Using the picture available at Gigagalaxyzoom (© ESO/S.Brunier), I created this virtual panorama (click and drag the image to navigate in the celestial sphere; use the shift and ctrl keys to zoom in and out):

[See post to watch QuickTime movie]

Click here for a much more awesome view!

Because an astonishing image never comes alone, you will find below a bonus video by Frédéric Tapissier, based on Serge Brunier’s work. Have a nice journey in our Galaxy!

Click here to view the embedded video.

Of course, I highly recommend you to check Serge Brunier’s website, and his amazing gallery, where there is much more to see!

Video and images used by permission of Serge Brunier.

© NASA/GSFC

A team led by Douglas Finkbeiner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, revealed the bubbles thanks to the sensitivity of Fermi’s Large Area Telescope; previously, because of the diffuse emission – a fog of gamma rays all over the sky, astronomers could not detect the structures.

© NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT/D. Finkbeiner et al.

Now, Kwong Sang Cheng of the University of Hong Kong and his colleagues propose that these bubbles are the result of a periodic star capture by the supermassive black hole at the center of our Galaxy. Their results will be published in the upcoming edition of The Astrophysical Journal Letters. With thousands of stars orbiting the black hole, they calculated that a star is captured every 30,000 years: half the star’s mass falls into the black hole, while the remainder is ejected at high speed. Later, shocking gas that surrounds the Milky Way’s disc, it eventually emits gamma rays.

However, Finkbeiner thinks that such individual star captures are probably not enough to produce the sharp edges seen around the bubbles; according to him, a much more dramatic and rare event occurring every one to ten million years, where the black hole swallows a huge cloud of gas or an entire star cluster, could produce such bubbles. The most recent of these events would have produced the Fermi bubbles we see today.

Reference

© ESO & Igor Chekalin

The image was captured using the Wide Field Imager camera on the MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope at the La Silla Observatory, Chile. The nebula Messier 78 is at the center, and the stars in the background are illuminating this beautiful sight. It is located 1,600 light-years away from Earth, in the Orion constellation.

M78 is a reflection nebula: the UV radiation coming from the stars that illuminate it is not enough to ionize the gas and make it glow – the dust particles are reflecting the light coming from these stars. In spite of this, M78 is one of the brightest reflection nebula in the sky, and it can be observed easily through a telescope.

In the picture, the pale blue tint is an exact representation of the nebula’s dominant colors. Blue hues are often observed in reflection nebulae, because the tiny dust particles they contain scatter the light coming from the stars: the shorter wavelength of blue light is scattered more easily than the longer wavelength of red light.

Here is a bonus, with this spectacular zoom sequence opening with a wide-field view of the Milky Way:

©ESO/S. Brunier/Chris Johnson, (cuttinedgeobservatory.com) and Igor Chekalin. Music: John Dyson (from the album Moonwind)

Have a nice trip!

While this could have been part of the article Will we ever travel to other stars?, I chose to write this one separately as there is a lot to say (you could actually write a whole book about that matter), and I surely won’t give an exhaustive list of all the possibilities.

Theory

First, let’s take a quick look at theory. Faster-than-light (FTL) communications and travel refer to the propagation of information or matter faster than the speed of light. As most of you probably heard, Einstein’s theory of relativity says that nothing can go faster than light in vacuum, which is not quite true. Special relativity gives us the total energy of a particle:

where m is the rest mass of the particle, v its speed and c the speed of light in vacuum.

For a particle with a speed v smaller than that of light c, it appears that an infinite amount of energy is needed to accelerate it to the speed of light, without ever reaching it. However, special relativity does not forbid the existence of particles that travel faster than light at all times, at least mathematically. Such particles are called tachyons.

According to the equation above, this implies an imaginary denominator, and an imaginary rest mass to keep the total energy a real number. At first, an imaginary mass seems to be shocking, but the rest mass of a particle can only be measured in a frame in which it is at rest. In the case of tachyons, such a frame cannot exist: just like ordinary particles, or bradyons, cannot accelerate up to the speed of light, tachyons cannot slow down to the speed of light, as it would require an infinite amount of energy. Thus, rest mass does not have any physical reality in this particular case.

Even if they exist (they haven’t been observed), tachyons are considered to be a sign of pathological behaviour in field theories, making faster than light information transmission and causality violation with tachyons impossible.

In the context of general relativity, where gravity is included, the principle that no object can accelerate to the speed of light in the reference frame of any coincident observer is maintained. However, as we will see later, it permits distortions in spacetime that allow an object to move faster than light from the point of view of a distant observer.

Trivial FTL phenomena

There are a few examples in which things appear to travel faster than light, but they do not convey energy or information faster than light, so they do not violate special relativity or causality.

1. Shadows and light spots: if a laser is swept across a distant object, the spot of light can easily be made to move at a speed greater than that of light. Similarly, a shadow projected onto a distant object can be made to move faster than c. In neither case does any matter or information travel faster than light.
2. Quantum entanglement: here, two particles are linked in such a way that the quantum state of any of them cannot be adequately described without full mention of the others, even if the individual objects are spatially separated. Apparently, information can be transmitted faster than light. Actually, it does not allow true communication, as there is no control over what is transmitted: it is useless.
3. Expansion of the Universe: distant galaxies recede from us faster than the speed of light. Expansion of the Universe is a growth of spacetime itself; this spacetime may move faster than the speed of light relative to some other location, but the two locations can’t communicate with each other.

Apparent FTL travel

We will now see that it is theoretically possible to travel faster than light. Except that… you actually wouldn’t travel faster than light! Two of these theoretical possibilities are known as wormholes and warp drives. Both these examples are using spacetime distortions to allow apparent FTL travel.

Wormholes

A wormhole is a hypothetical “shortcut” through spacetime. Wormholes are predicted by general relativity, and among the various solutions proposed, some would be traversable and allow to travel extremely quickly between two distant regions of the Universe (other solutions would allow time travel or inter-Universe travel, but I won’t describe them here). A wormhole is made up of three parts: two mouths and a throat.

Someone traveling through a wormhole would appear to have traveled faster than light to an external observer. This is actually not the case: a beam of light going through the wormhole would still travel much faster than anything else – the speed of light is not exceeded locally at any time. You can imagine yourself running as fast as you can around to the opposite side of a mountain; this may take much longer than walking through a tunnel crossing it.

For the wormhole to be traversable, some exotic matter with negative mass is required; otherwise, wormholes are unstable and pinch off too quickly for anything to go through. Other models also allow wormholes to remain open without  the need of exotic matter: they require a modification to general relativity involving extra spatial dimensions. Wormholes have never been observed, and these ideas are very speculative: stable wormholes (as well as unstable ones) may simply not exist at all.

Warp drives

Miguel Alcubierre theorized that it would be possible to create an Alcubierre drive, in which a ship would be enclosed in a “warp bubble” where the space at the front of the bubble is rapidly contracting and the space at the back is rapidly expanding. As a result the bubble can reach a distant destination much faster than a light beam moving outside the bubble, but without objects inside the bubble locally traveling faster than light. The tricky part is that the ship is actually not moving at all; space itself would be moving underneath the spacecraft.

In this case again, for an Alcubierre drive to work, exotic matter is needed. The problem is that unrealistic amounts are needed, and there are other issues: it has been shown that the crew inside the spacecraft would be causally disconnected with the walls of the warp bubble, making it impossible to control, steer or stop the ship.

Recently, another kind of warp drive has been proposed by Gerald Cleaver and Richard Obousy: the warp bubble would be created by manipulating the 11th dimension of the M-theory, an extension of string theory. Shrinking the 11th dimension behind the ship would create a bubble of dark energy, the same dark energy that is causing the expansion of the Universe to accelerate. Expanding the 11th dimension in front of the ship would cause it to decrease. The problem is that the M-theory is purely speculative, and how the 11th dimension would be expanded and shrunk is still unknown. Even assuming that M-theory is right and that such technology could be developed, the amount of energy needed would be insane: it would be equivalent to converting the entire mass of Jupiter into pure energy! It is needless to say that it is far beyond anything we can produce…

Finally, if mankind is ever going to travel at faster than light speeds (well, apparent FTL speeds), which currently seems quite improbable, it looks like it won’t be before a very, very long time.

Brown dwarfs are peculiar objects: they are neither planets, nor stars. Actually, they are often referred to as “failed stars”, as their mass is too low to sustain the hydrogen fusion required to become a star: the lower limit for hydrogen fusion to start is between 75 and 80 Jupiter masses.

If it’s not a star, then why is it not a planet either? For sure, brown dwarfs and gas giant planets like Jupiter share a few characteristics, but they also have some noticeable differences: brown dwarfs are roughly the same size as Jupiter, but they are much denser. Unlike gas giants, brown dwarfs also emit radiation in the X-ray and infrared spectra.

This typical infrared spectrum allowed NASA’s Spitzer telescope to detect the new cold brown dwarf candidate, nicely named WD 0806-661B. Another pretty cool brown dwarf was also discovered in the past few weeks, by the Keck II Telescope in Hawai: CFBDSIR J1458+1013B (another cute name) is 75 light-years away, and its temperature is of less than 100°C. However, as I mentioned before, the new brown dwarf discovered by Spitzer is even cooler with its 30°C, making it the candidate for the coolest known brown dwarf.

Interestingly, WD 0806-661B is orbiting a white dwarf (a star which used to be like our Sun), making the frontier between a brown dwarf and an exoplanet even thinner. Is it a planet? Is it a brown dwarf? The thing is that WD 0806-661B (one more time, and I am sure you will perfectly remember that name!) is orbiting its star at a huge distance: it is 2,500 times the distance between Earth and the Sun, which is too far for a planet to form. Even with such an orbit, it is still unclear what the object really is: as Ian O’Neill explains, models predict that planets surviving the expansion of a dying star into a supergiant, which later collapses back into a white dwarf, will drift into wider orbits.

Further examination is needed to reveal the nature of these two objects. If they are confirmed as being brown dwarfs, then they will be the first to belong to the Y-class : their temperature is cool enough for water vapor to condense into clouds in their atmospheres. This category has only been theorized, but if the two objects are confirmed as brown dwarfs, that would definitely make them much more “planet-like” than “star-like”.

Reference

The probe is orbiting the Moon at an altitude of approximately 50 kilometers, covering the whole satellite. The global mosaic comprised of 15,000 images (click to enlarge) shows the far side of the Moon, the side we cannot see from Earth.

If you compare this image with the one of the other side, you will notice that they look quite different. Unlike the near side showing wide maria (those large, dark, basaltic plains), the far side is covered with craters. The reason for that is that the crust on the far side is thicker than on the near side, making it more difficult for magmas to erupt on the surface, limiting the amount of far side mare basalts. However, there is still no explanation for this difference in thickness.

Of course, as for the near side, you can explore the hidden face of the Moon here, but the LROC team is even more generous: you can explore the entire Moon, in 60° increments. Just go there and have fun (take a look at the bottom of the page). But be careful, you might spend a lot of time exploring our wonderful and still enigmatic satellite!

The painting, from 1957, is called Trains du Soir (Night Trains). If you look carefully at the picture, you might find something unusual, something that doesn’t look right; I am not speaking about technique or realism, but about science.

Will you find what’s wrong with this picture?

© Thierry Legault

The picture was taken on February 28th 2011 at 17:58UT from the area of Weimar, Germany. At that time, Steve Bowen was working on a defective ammonia pump, as shown on the picture thanks to the annotations.

Now, for the pleasure of your eyes, Thierry made another sequence, even more amazing than the previous one!

http://atramateria.com/wp-content/uploads/iss_discovery_110228.mp4

There is even more on Thierry’s website, where the sequence is also available in 3D! There are two versions: an anaglyph, that will require a pair of red and blue glasses, and another one that will require a little gymnastics! Indeed, this latter version does not require any glasses, but you will have to squint to be able to see the sequence in 3D; at first, it might not be very easy, but it is worth the effort, and the result is pretty cool!

Both the sequence and the image are absolutely wonderful. After all these incredible images, I cannot help wondering what will be next!..

Sequence and image used by permission of Thierry Legault.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=treRHUlAQDs

The Ant Nebula

© NASA, ESA and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

The Ant Nebula, whose technical name is Mz3, resembles the head and thorax of an ant when observed with ground-based telescopes. The Ant Nebula is located between 3,000 and 6,000 light years from Earth in the southern constellation Norma.

The image challenges old ideas about what happens to dying stars. This observation, along with other pictures of various remnants of dying stars called planetary nebulae, shows that our Sun’s fate will probably be much more interesting, complex and dramatic than astronomers previously believed.

Although the ejection of gas from the dying star in the Ant Nebula is violent, it does not show the chaos one might expect from an ordinary explosion, but instead shows symmetrical patterns. One possibility is that the central star has a closely orbiting companion whose gravitational tidal forces shape the outflowing gas. A second possibility is that as the dying star spins, its strong magnetic fields are wound up into complex shapes like spaghetti in an eggbeater. Electrically charged winds, much like those in our Sun’s solar wind but millions of times denser and moving at speeds up to 1,000 kilometers per second (more than 600 miles per second) from the star, follow the twisted field lines on their way out into space.

Gomez’s Hamburger

© NASA/ESA and The Hubble Heritage Team STScI/AURA)

The object, nicknamed Gomez’s Hamburger (also known as IRAS 18059-3211, but it doesn’t sound as cool), is a sun-like star nearing the end of its life. It already has expelled large amounts of gas and dust and is on its way to becoming a colorful, glowing planetary nebula. The ingredients for the giant celestial hamburger are dust and light. The hamburger buns are light reflecting off dust and the patty is the dark band of dust in phe middle.

Hanny’s Voorwerp

© NASA, ESA, W. Keel (University of Alabama) and the Galaxy Zoo Team

The bizarre object, dubbed Hanny’s Voorwerp (Hanny’s Object in Dutch), is the only visible part of a 300,000-light-year-long streamer of gas stretching around the galaxy, called IC 2947. The greenish Voorwerp is visible because a beam of light from the galaxy’s core illuminated it. This beam came from a quasar–a bright, energetic object powered by a black hole. The quasar may have turned off about 200,000 years ago.

This Hubble view uncovers a pocket of star clusters, the yellowish-orange area at the tip of Hanny’s Voorwerp. The star clusters are confined to an area that is a few thousand light- years wide. The/youngest stars are a couple of million years old. The Voorwerp is the size of our Milky Way galaxy, and its bright green color is from glowing oxygen.

An interaction between IC 2947 and another galaxy about a billion years ago may have created Hanny’s Voorwerp and fueled the quasar. The Hubble image shows that IC 2947 has been disturbed, with complex dust patches, warped spiral arms, and regions of star formation around its core. These features suggest the aftermath of a galaxy merger. The bright spots in the central part of the galaxy are star-forming regions. The small, pinkish object to the lower right of IC 2397 is an edge-on spiral galaxy in the background.

The Red rectangle Nebula

© ESA, Hubble, NASA

How was the unusual Red Rectangle nebula created? At the nebula’s center is an aging binary star system that surely powers the nebula but does not, as yet, explain its colors. The unusual shape of the Red Rectangle is likely due to a thick dust torus which pinches the otherwise spherical outflow into tip-touching cone shapes. Because we view the torus edge-on, the boundary edges of the cone shapes seem to form an X. The distinct rungs suggest the outflow occurs in fits and starts. The unusual colors of the nebula are less well understood, however, and current speculation holds that they are partly provided by hydrocarbon molecules that may actually be building blocks for organic life. The Red Rectangle nebula lies about 2,300 light years away the constellation of the Unicorn (Monoceros). In a few million years, as one of the central stars becomes further depleted of nuclear fuel, the Red Rectangle nebula will likely bloom into a planetary nebula.

IRAS 23166+1655

© ESA/NASA & R. Sahai

The object (no funny name for this one) is thought to be a preplanetary nebula surrounding LL Pegasi (AFGL 3068), a binary system that includes an extreme carbon star. The pair is hidden by the dust cloud ejected from the carbon star and is only visible in infrared light.

The nebula displays an unusual spiral shape, thought to be formed through the interaction between the stellar companion and the carbon star, as has been seen in other binary systems (although not with such a precise geometric form). The distance between spiral layers is consistent with estimates of the pair’s orbital period based on their apparent angular separation.

ESO 510-G13

© NASA and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

The strong warping of the disk indicates that ESO 510-G13 has recently undergone a collision with a nearby galaxy and is in the process of swallowing it. Gravitational forces distort the structures of the galaxies as their stars, gas, and dust merge together in a process that takes millions of years. Eventually the disturbances will die out, and ESO 510-G13 will become a normal-appearing single galaxy.

In the outer regions of ESO 510-G13, especially on the right-hand side of the image, we see that the twisted disk contains not only dark dust, but also bright clouds of blue stars. This shows that hot, young stars are being formed in the disk. Astronomers believe that the formation of new stars may be triggered by collisions between galaxies, as their interstellar clouds smash together and are compressed.

Pulsar B1509

© NASA/CXC/SAO/P.Slane, et al.

A small, dense object only 12 miles in diameter is responsible for this beautiful X-ray nebula that spans 150 light years. At the center of this image made by NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory is a very young and powerful pulsar, known as PSR B1509-58, or B1509 for short. The pulsar is a rapidly spinning neutron star which is spewing energy out into the space around it to create complex and intriguing structures, including one that resembles a large cosmic hand.

In this image, the lowest energy X-rays that Chandra detects are red, the medium range is green, and the most energetic ones are colored blue. Astronomers think that B1509 is about 1,700 years old and it is located about 17,000 light years away.

Neutron stars are created when massive stars run out of fuel and collapse. B1509 is spinning completely around almost 7 times every second and is releasing energy into its environment at a prodigious rate — presumably because it has an intense magnetic field at its surface, estimated to be 15 trillion times stronger than the Earth’s magnetic field.

The combination of rapid rotation and ultra-strong magnetic field makes B1509 one of the most powerful electromagnetic generators in the galaxy. This generator drives an energetic wind of electrons and ions away from the neutron star. As the electrons move through the magnetized nebula, they radiate away their energy and create the elaborate nebula seen by Chandra.

Anemic Galaxy NGC 4921

© NASA, ESA, K. Cook (LLNL)

How far away is spiral galaxy NGC 4921? Although presently estimated to be about 320 million light years distant, a more precise determination could be coupled with its known recession speed to help humanity better calibrate the expansion rate of the entire visible universe. Toward this goal, this image was taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in order to help identify key stellar distance markers known as Cepheid variable stars. Since NGC 4921 is a member of the Coma Cluster of Galaxies, refining its distance would also allow a better distance determination to one of the largest nearby clusters in the local universe. The magnificent spiral NGC 4921 has been informally dubbed anemic because of its low rate of star formation and low surface brightness. The remarkably sharp image was made with Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys, currently in need of repair. Visible in the image are, from the center, a bright nucleus, a bright central bar, a prominent ring of dark dust, blue clusters of recently formed stars, several smaller companion galaxies, unrelated galaxies in the far distant universe, and unrelated stars in our Milky Way Galaxy.

NGC 1999

© Hubble Heritage Team (STScI) and NASA

A cloud of bright reflective gas known to astronomers as NGC 1999 sits next to a black patch of sky. For most of the 20th century, such black patches were known to be dense clouds of dust and gas that block light from passing through.

When Herschel looked in its direction to study nearby young stars, astronomers were surprised to see the cloud continued to look black, which shouldn’t have been the case. Herschel’s infrared eyes are designed to see into such clouds. Either the cloud was immensely dense or something was wrong.

Investigating further using ground-based telescopes, astronomers found the same story no matter how they looked: this patch looks black not because it is a dense pocket of gas but because it is truly empty. Something has blown a hole right through the cloud.

The astronomers think that the hole must have been opened when the narrow jets of gas from some of the young stars in the region punctured the sheet of dust and gas that forms NGC 1999. The powerful radiation from a nearby adolescent star may also have helped to clear the hole. Whatever the precise chain of events, it could be an important glimpse into the way newborn stars rip apart their birth clouds.

Hoag’s Object: A Strange Ring Galaxy

© R. Lucas (STScI/AURA), Hubble Heritage Team, NASA

Is this one galaxy or two? This question came to light in 1950 when astronomer Art Hoag chanced upon this unusual extragalactic object. On the outside is a ring dominated by bright blue stars, while near the center lies a ball of much redder stars that are likely much older. Between the two is a gap that appears almost completely dark. How Hoag’s Object formed remains unknown, although similar objects have now been identified and collectively labeled as a form of ring galaxy. Genesis hypotheses include a galaxy collision billions of years ago and perturbative gravitational interactions involving an unusually shaped core. The above photo taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in July 2001 reveals unprecedented details of Hoag’s Object and may yield a better understanding. Hoag’s Object spans about 100,000 light years and lies about 600 million light years away toward the constellation of Serpens. Coincidentally, visible in the gap (at about one o’clock) is yet another ring galaxy that likely lies far in the distance.

The Horsehead Nebula

© Nigel Sharp (NOAO), KPNO, AURA, NSF

One of the most identifiable nebulae in the sky, the Horsehead Nebula in Orion, is part of a large, dark, molecular cloud. Also known as Barnard 33, the unusual shape was first discovered on a photographic plate in the late 1800s. The red glow originates from hydrogen gas predominantly behind the nebula, ionized by the nearby bright star Sigma Orionis. The darkness of the Horsehead is caused mostly by thick dust, although the lower part of the Horsehead’s neck casts a shadow to the left. Streams of gas leaving the nebula are funneled by a strong magnetic field. Bright spots in the Horsehead Nebula’s base are young stars just in the process of forming. Light takes about 1500 years to reach us from the Horsehead Nebula.

[poll id="4"]

A closed timelike curve is a particular kind of worldline, the unique path of an object through spacetime: in that particular case, the object returns to its starting point, thus allowing a time traveller to interact with their own past.

Seth Lloyd from MIT, along with scientists from the Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy,  the University of Pavia in Pavia, Italy, the Tokyo Institute of Technology, and the University of Toronto, explore a new quantum formulation of CTCs. They have published their study in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.

In their theory, the CTCs behave like ideal, noiseless quantum channels that displace systems in time without affecting the correlations with external systems. To remain self-consistent (in other words, to avoid paradoxes), CTCs are post-selected (they are then called P-CTCs), which also allows them to be simulated experimentally. There is an important difference between this theory and another proposed by David Deutsch: in Deutsch’s theory, to avoid paradoxes, the time traveler is traveling to a past different from his own – here, the time traveler must travel to his own past.

The researchers have also reported the results of an experiment demonstrating their theory’s resolution of the grandfather paradox.

For their demonstration, the grandfather paradox is implemented through a quantum teleportation circuit: a “living” qubit (a unit of quantum information, described by a quantum state in a two-state quantum mechanical system) goes back in time and tries to “kill” itself (i.e. a bit in the state 1 flips to the state 0). They stored two qubits in a single photon: one of them represents the forward-traveling qubit, the other the backward-traveling qubit. The P-CTC starts from two systems prepared in a maximally entangled state, and ends by projecting them into the same state.

The qubits are then entangled, and their states are measured by two probe qubits. A “quantum gun” is later fired at the forward-traveling qubit in order to rotate its polarization (the rotation depends on the gun’s accuracy, which can be varied), and the state of the probe qubits is measured: if the two probe qubits are in the same state, then the quantum gun has failed to flip the polarization and the photon “survives”. If the probe qubits are not in the same state, then the photon has “killed” its past self. It turns out that the time travel occurs only when the quantum gun misfires, i.e. when the photon “survives”.

Although the experiment is not performed, the team shows that P-CTCs also solve another time travel paradox, the unproven theorem paradox:  a time traveller reveals the proof of a theorem to a mathematician, who includes it in the same book from which the traveller has learned it – how did the proof come to existence?

Unfortunately, as CTCs have never been observed (they might even not exist at all), it is impossible to know whether they are described by their theory.

Reference

Seth Lloyd, et al. “Closed Timelike Curves via Postselection: Theory and Experimental Test of Consistency.” Physical Review Letters 106, 040403 (2011). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.040403

Dr. Richard B. Hoover, an astrobiologist at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center has published his findings in the online Journal of Cosmology. He claims he found “indigenous fossils” of bacterial life in a rare type of meteorites – CI1 carbonaceous meteorites (he examined samples from the Ivuna and Orgueil meteorites). The pictures in the original paper, for sure, show intriguing structures, a few of them being similar to some kind of bacteria (which doesn’t mean they are bacteria).

© Richard B. Hoover

The possibility that the samples were contaminated by Earthly bacteria immediately comes to mind, but Hoover apparently ruled it out:

“Many of the filaments shown in the figures are clearly embedded in the meteorite rock matrix. Consequently, it is concluded that the Orgueil filaments cannot logically be interpreted as representing filamentous cyanobacteria that invaded the meteorite after its arrival. They are therefore interpreted as the indigenous remains of microfossils that were present in the meteorite rock matrix when the meteorite entered the Earth’s atmosphere.”

However, the astrobiologist doesn’t say anything about how the meteorites had been stored before he obtained them, or the tools he used during the examinations (he only states the tools were flame-sterilized)…

Hoover further concludes that the finding raises the possibility of life on comets and icy moons such as Europa and Enceladus.

In the past, many other such claims were made, all of them found to be false. For now, it is impossible to tell whether Hoover is right. Because of the controversial nature of the claim, the Journal of Cosmology sent 5,000 invitations to scientists to review the paper; it is also interesting to know that, as noted by Phil Plait, the Journal of Cosmology itself seems to be pretty familiar with “delicate” topics…

Has life been found on a meteorite? Maybe, but nothing has been confirmed and we are still very far from having a definitive answer, so let’s wait for further examinations by other scientists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_y4-z-kDqQ

So, what is wrong with the speech of Charlene Werner?

Actually, the whole thing starts pretty well, when after saying she is going to explain how homeopathy works, she asks people if they know what water is: the talk should have ended here, as homeopathy basically consists in drinking water. But this is not the point, and as she goes on, she starts explaining to her audience some fundamental physics. And everything from then on turns to an unbelievable demonstration of blatant ignorance. I won’t make a complete list of her (horrible) mistakes, I will just focus on the biggest ones…

The Bowling Ball Theory

It only takes Charlene Werner a few seconds to drop the name of Einstein, who as we all know, did a lot for homeopathy. She starts to talk about the mass-energy equivalence, before confusing mass with matter; then she explains that all the mass (understand matter) in the Universe can be consolidated down into the size of a bowling ball… Wow. She just created the densest ball ever of some unknown exotic stuff, avoiding the unavoidable singularity you all know as a black hole. But all this is just the introduction to a revolution.

Later, by using a new mathematical tool of her own, she redefines the properties of a risky operation, multiplication. In the world of Charlene, when you multiply a number by zero, just remove that zero from the equation. Thanks to that wonderful trick, you don’t have to bother about this stupid mass at all. There is also another trick: any number multiplied by itself remains equal to itself, or maybe that just works with 0, 1 and the speed of light, who knows (well, Charlene does, but she won’t explain). In the end, the mass-energy equivalence becomes what you’d call the speed of light-energy equivalence…

This is the Bowling Ball Theory: because you can put the Universe in a bowling ball, mass vanishes – in other words, energy equals the speed of light, to quote the author. And this is only the beginning.

The Cosmic Groove Theory

After being done with the Bowling Ball Theory, Charlene Werner goes on to quantum physics, with the string theory. Fortunately, for the audience to follow her, she reminds them that string theory is essentially the work of the mysterious physicist Stephen Hawkings (of course, she is speaking about Stephen Hawking, who, strangely, has nothing to do with string theory, a mathematical framework developed by many different physicists).

According to “Charlatene” Werner, “Hawkings” discovered other energetic particles with a funky shape, working by vibrations that human ears can pick up (strings are actually one-dimensional oscillating lines – apparently, in the vibrating mind of Charlene, all kinds of oscillations are acoustic waves)! That’s it. Welcome to the freakin’ Twilight Zone. So, if you happen to be in a quiet place, strain your ears, you might hear the Cosmic Groove.

The Final

Now, you are finally going to discover how homeopathy works (really?!!).

Charlene tells us that cells are nothing more than tiny pieces of energy, massless particles called protons, electrons and neutrons (remember, thanks to the Bowling Ball theory, everything becomes massless). So if you thought you were made of flesh and blood (and a lot of other things), think again: we are nothing but energy, and the number the scale in your bathroom indicates is nothing, you don’t weigh anything.

Here lies the secret of homeopathy: being sick has nothing to do with viruses or microbes, it’s only a matter of energy. Your state of energy has changed, and homeopathy will get you back to the previous better state of energy. And guess what the magic ingredient is: water!

Thanks for the enlightenment, Charlene, but I think you got a few things very wrong…

Anyway, even if you don’t agree with Charlene, don’t mess with her: she’ll get revenge, and might throw a homeopathic bowling ball-sized H₂O-bomb at you, and it will be so powerful that you’ll be wet.

The habitable zone, also known as Goldilocks zone, depends on the planet’s distance to its parent star. Of course, considering only this parameter is far from being enough. To be able to know if liquid water can exist on a planet’s surface, astronomers also have to determine the composition of its atmosphere.
René Heller of the Astrophysical Institute Potsdam (AIP) and his colleagues studied the tides caused by low-mass stars on their potential Earth-like companions: they have concluded that tidal effects modify the traditional concept of the habitable zone.

The scientists came to this conclusion considering three different effects. The first one describes the influence of tides on the rotation axis of a planet: after a few million years only, this axis can become perpendicular to the planet’s orbit. This would prevent seasonal variations, with huge temperature differences between the poles of the planets and their equators: the polar regions would be perpetually frozen, while the very hot equators would evaporate any atmosphere in the long run, causing extreme winds and storms.

Another effect would be similar to what is seen on Io, one of Jupiter’s moons: the exoplanet would be heated up by tides.

Finally, tides can cause the rotational period of the planet to synchronize with the orbital period: a day on such a planet would be synchronized with a year, making one side of the planet constantly facing the star, the other remaining in the dark (the phenomenon is called tidal locking; the exact same thing happens with the Earth and the Moon: the Moon is constantly showing us the same face). In this kind of configuration, one half of the planet would be constantly exposed to radiation from the star, when the other half remains completely frozen in the dark.

So far, low-mass stars have been the most promising candidates for habitable exoplanets. Taking into account tidal effects might seriously reduce the number of these candidates, making the habitable zone around such stars not that comfortable, maybe even uninhabitable.

Heller and his colleagues applied their theory to the exoplanet candidate Gliese 581 g (if confirmed, this planet would be located in the habitable zone of its star): Gl 581 g would be tidally locked, making the presence of liquid water on its surface very unlikely.

It looks like it is going to be pretty difficult to find exoplanets harboring life  in the traditional habitable zone of low-mass stars, when considering tidal effects. Even though the chances for life existing on other planets are very small, this won’t stop astronomers from trying to find them.

Reference

R. Heller, J. Leconte, R. Barnes. Tidal obliquity evolution of potentially habitable planets. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2011; 528: A27 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015809

http://atramateria.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/iss_discovery_110226.mp4

This awesome sequence was made by Thierry Legault on February 26 from Germany, using a 10″ telescope (more details about the equipment are given here). The scene takes place 30 minutes before docking, and it is sunset on the ISS at the end of the video sequence. The video is accelerated 2.5 times (acquisition at 10 fps, video at 25 fps). The altitude of the ISS is 360 km (200 miles), for a size of 100 metres. The speed of the ISS is 28,000 kilometers per hour (17,000 miles per hour) and its angular speed at zenith is 1.2° per second.

Thinking that such shots can be made from the ground, provided that the weather is good and you have a lot of patience (and talent), is literally fascinating. I highly recommend you to take a look at Thierry’s website, where you will find a lot more wonderful pictures.

Sequence and image used by permission of Thierry Legault.

If you are lucky enough to own a telescope, the Moon can be a really wonderful object to observe (even a simple pair of binoculars can reveal beautiful details of our satellite’s surface).

Recently, NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) created the most accurate map ever of the near side of the Moon. The spacecraft was orbiting the Moon 50 kilometers above the surface, and thanks to the data collected over two weeks, scientists were able to produce this image:

© NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University

You can browse the full size image here, but you’d better have a super fast connection, a lot of patience, and a cold room (because it’s gonna get really hot there)… Or you can also go here, and you will be able to browse and zoom in the surface of the near side of the Moon, up to a pretty impressive resolution. Here is an example of what you can get, with the Posidonius Crater, which is 95 kilometers wide (click to enlarge):

© NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University

As you can see, the quality is truly amazing, and you have the whole surface of the near side of the Moon to have fun with. A lot of interesting features can be seen here and there, and if you are curious, you will find yourself spending a lot of time looking at this image.

So go there, and have a nice trip on the near side of the Moon!

Physically speaking, the cosmological constant is equivalent to vacuum energy, an underlying background energy that exists in space even when this one is devoid of matter. Unfortunately, there is no known natural way to derive the cosmological constant used in cosmology from particle physics: the cosmological constant predicted by quantum field theories is 10⁶⁰ to 10¹²⁰ times bigger than observed. This is the cosmological constant problem.

The coincidence problem implies that we live at a special epoch: today, dark energy density is approximately equal to matter density. The ratio of these two quantities is rapidly changing as the universe expands: at early times the vacuum energy was negligible in comparison to matter and radiation, while at late times matter and radiation are negligible. There is only a brief epoch of the universe’s history during which it would be possible to witness the transition from domination by one type of component to another.  Various dark energy models offer a solution to the coincidence problem (quintessence models, for example), but they all require a high degree of fine tuning to match observations.

Cosmologists John Barrow and Douglas Shaw of the University of Cambridge have now proposed a new approach to solve the cosmological constant problems, without any fine tuning involved.

The essence of their new approach is that the bare cosmological constant is promoted from a parameter to a field, making the entire Universe a quantum mechanical wave function. Then, they applied their model to a Universe in which gravity is described by General Relativity. The model explains the time coincidence and cancels out enough of the quantum vacuum repulsion so that vacuum energy can account for the accelerating expansion of the Universe. Their results are matching observations, without any fine tuning: although their model implies that the cosmological constant changes with observation time, it would still appear constant in the observer’s causal past, remaining consistent with a non-evolving cosmological constant (however, another observer causally disconnected from this one would observe a different value).

The researchers’ results will be presented in the upcoming issue of Physical review Letters.

As their model presents the advantage of being falsifiable, the Planck satellite might prove them right or wrong within the next couple of years. At least, this time, cosmologists have something they can test.

References:

- A New Solution of The Cosmological Constant Problems – John D. Barrow, Douglas J. Shaw

arXiv.org > gr-qc > arXiv:1007.3086 > 19 Jul 2010 (v1), 10 Feb 2011 (v3)
Physical Review Letters (accepted 2011 Feb 09)

- A Testable Solution of the Cosmological Constant and Coincidence Problems – Douglas J. Shaw, John D. Barrow

Physical Review D 83 043518 (2011 Feb 18) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.043518
arXiv.org > gr-qc > arXiv:1010.4262 > 20 Oct 2010 (v1), 10 Feb 2011 (v2)

The Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) is a system of ten radio telescopes controlled remotely from the Array Operations Center in Socorro New Mexico USA by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. The array works together as the world’s largest dedicated, full-time astronomical instrument using the technique of very long baseline interferometry: it provides the greatest ability to see fine detail, called resolving power, of any telescope on Earth or in space.

New measurements with the VLBA have placed a galaxy called NGC 6264 at a distance of 450 million light-years from Earth, with an uncertainty of no more than 9 percent. This is the farthest distance ever directly measured, surpassing a measurement of 160 million light-years to another galaxy in 2009.

Until now, distances beyond the Milky Way have been estimated using indirect methods, sometimes complicated, depending on various assumptions.

Measuring cosmic distances precisely is extremely important, because such measurements are used to estimate the expansion rate of the Universe. More precise data will allow astrophysicists to better constrain the Hubble Constant (the value of the expansion rate), and help solving the dark energy problem (see here). The farther a galaxy is, the faster it is moving away from us; more of the galaxy’s motion is due to the expansion. Thus, the estimates of the Hubble Constant are more reliable with larger distances.

The VLBA is also currently being used to redraw the map of our Galaxy and it has already changed it: it indicated our Galaxy has four spiral arms instead of two, as previously thought. Our Galaxy is also more massive, and rotating faster than previous estimates had indicated.
Mark Reid, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and his team are also observing the Andromeda Galaxy to determine the direction and speed of its movement through space. As our Galaxy and Andromeda should collide in a few billion years, Reid’s team can determine with much greater accuracy if and when that will happen by measuring Andromeda’s motion.

Finally, the VLBA is also used to detect planets possibly orbiting stars smaller than our Sun, at a relatively long distance. This long-term project is studying a total of 30 stars.

Ongoing upgrades in electronics and computing have enhanced the VLBA’s capabilities. With improvements now nearing completion, the VLBA will be as much as 5,000 times more powerful as a scientific tool than the original VLBA of 1993.

Recently, the Kepler mission brought the constantly growing number of exoplanets up to 527 (these are confirmed exoplanets), with more than 1,200 planet candidates, including 54 in the habitable zones of their parent stars.

Considering the limitations of Kepler, the Kepler science team decided to give an estimate of the number of exoplanets in the Milky Way, our galaxy. And as a result, there would be at least 50 billion exoplanets in our galaxy! Among these, astronomers estimate that 500 million of these alien worlds are probably orbiting in the habitable zones of their stars!

This announcement was made on Saturday by Kepler science chief William Borucki at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington D.C.

So, how did astronomers come up with that number?

So far, Kepler has spotted 1,254 exoplanet candidates, studying only 1/400th of the sky. Also, it can only detect planets that transit in front of their parent stars. Considering there are approximately 300 billion stars in our galaxy, a lower estimate can be made: scientists took the frequency already observed and applied it to the number of stars in the Milky Way.

So there would be at least 50 billion alien worlds, including 500 million in the habitable zone, only in our galaxy. As the estimated number of galaxies in the Universe is 100 billion, that gives an astronomical (appropriate choice of word, right?) number of planets out there.

Of course, these are just estimates, but this raises the question of  how many worlds could possibly harbor intelligent forms of life advanced enough to be wandering in space (which we cannot estimate, as so far we only know one such planet, Earth…).

Borucki asked: “The next question is why haven’t they visited us?”, before answering: “I don’t know”.

As I said, these are only estimates, there might be many more, or much less exoplanets in our galaxy, but for sure, there are quite a lot of other worlds out there, and the hunt has just begun.

Since I wasn’t born back then, I can only imagine the amazement people felt when they were watching Armstrong on their TV sets, or listen to their stories when they recall the event. But even today, these images haven’t lost their strength, their power to astonish.

In the near future, other astronauts will probably walk on the surface of another planet, Mars. Of course, this will be the privilege of a few selected ones, but we are lucky enough to be able to have a glimpse of what these men will see.

Let’s take a walk… on Mars.

You can double-click and drag the image below to browse a 360° panoramic view of Mars (© NASA/JPL). It was shot on the Husband Hill summit, by the rover Spirit in December 2005. If you look down, you can even see the rover itself! As you browse the scenery, you will notice that the landscape is pretty barren, with nothing more to see than red rocks, sand dunes and hills, spreading to the horizon.

For a bigger view, you can also click here.

Anyone looking at the night sky has probably already seen Mars, but is the Earth visible in Mars’? Once again, the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit gives us an idea of what it looks like, with this amazing picture taken one hour before sunrise on the 63rd martian day, or sol, of its mission:

© NASA/JPL/Cornell/Texas A&M

The Earth is visible, in the middle of the picture, as a pale dot in the sky (click the picture to enlarge).

To end our short virtual journey on the Martian ground, what better way than to look at a wonderful sunset? As you will see in the video below recorded by Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity, as Mars is much further away from the Sun than Earth, our star appears much smaller. Dust particles make the Martian sky appear reddish and create a bluish glow around the sun.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNM7Qcbx-Tg

]]> http://atramateria.com/lets-take-a-walk-on-mars/feed/ 1 http://atramateria.com/a-family-portrait-coming-from-space/ http://atramateria.com/a-family-portrait-coming-from-space/#comments Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:02:30 +0000 Ashley Corbion http://atramateria.com/?p=1031 Have you ever wondered what our solar system looks like, what you would see if you had the chance to look at it?

Thanks to NASA’s MESSENGER probe, you can now have an idea of what you would see if you were looking at our solar system, from the inside out. The spacecraft was launched in 2004 to study the chemical composition, geology and the magnetic field of Mercury.

Before entering Mercury’s orbit, on March 17, the spacecraft was commanded to turn around and take a series of images. After piecing together the different images, the MESSENGER team obtained this amazing family portrait of our solar system:

© NASA, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington

Click the picture to enjoy a full view and see it in more detail. You will see five of the planets of our solar system, including the Earth, accompanied by the Moon. Uranus and Neptune are also on the picture, but they are unfortunately too faint to see. These photographs were taken by MESSENGER’s Wide Angle Camera (WAC) on November 3 and 16, 2010.

The fact that all the planets are here visible as dots reminds us how far the probe is from our planet, but this is still a wonderful picture. Venus appears the brightest on the picture, as the spacecraft was inside its orbit.

If you look at the Earth, you can see that it is not alone: its companion the Moon is also here! Another nice aspect of this picture is that it reminds us how far the Moon actually is from the Earth (between 360,000 and 400,000 kilometers away, approximately).

Jupiter is also surrounded by a few of its moons: Ganymede, Io, Europa and Callisto are visible. All of them are pretty big. Ganymede is the biggest satellite in the solar system, it is actually a bit bigger than Mercury itself! Callisto is approximately the size of Mercury, and Io and Europa are about the size of the Moon.

Finally, if you look at the area between Jupiter and Mars on the picture, you can see a hazy, darker, glowing streak: this is the Milky Way!

Telescopes like Hubble for example often offer us some amazing pictures of deep space, with breathtaking views of galaxies, nebulae, or star clusters; although we are able to see that, we shouldn’t forget how vast and magnificent our own solar system is. MESSENGER will soon be orbiting Mercury, and will send us some new astonishing pictures; we are still exploring our solar system, and will be for a very long time. The very solar system that another probe, Voyager 1, is about to leave.

]]> http://atramateria.com/a-family-portrait-coming-from-space/feed/ 0 http://atramateria.com/less-dark-matter-to-form-a-new-galaxy-bursting-with-stars/ http://atramateria.com/less-dark-matter-to-form-a-new-galaxy-bursting-with-stars/#comments Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:56:04 +0000 Ashley Corbion http://atramateria.com/?p=1012 The Herschel Space Observatory has revealed how much dark matter it takes to form a new galaxy bursting with stars.

Herschel launched into space in May 2009. The mission’s large, 3.5-meter telescope detects longer-wavelength infrared light from a host of objects, ranging from asteroids and planets in our own solar system to faraway galaxies.

The discovery made thanks to Herschel is a first step to help astrophysicists better understand how dark matter contributed to the birth of massive galaxies in the early universe.

“If you start with too little dark matter, then a developing galaxy would peter out,” said astronomer Asantha Cooray of the University of California, Irvine. “If you have too much, then gas doesn’t cool efficiently to form one large galaxy, and you end up with lots of smaller galaxies. But if you have the just the right amount of dark matter, then a galaxy bursting with stars will pop out.”

Cooray and his team used ESA’s Herschel telescope to measure infrared light from massive, star-forming galaxies located 10 to 11 billion light-years away. The 300-billion-solar-mass amount of dark matter in the area seems to encourage star formation more than any other previously recorded mass; it is less than previously thought.

© ESA/Herschel/SPIRE/HerMES

By mapping he cosmic infrared background (the infrared light from collections of very distant, massive star-forming galaxies), Herschel showed the galaxies are more clustered into groups than previously believed. Because the amount of galaxy clustering depends on the amount of dark matter, the astronomers were able to determine exactly how much dark matter is needed to form a single star-forming galaxy with numerical simulations.

There is still much to be learned, especially on the nature of dark matter, but this measurement is an important key to a better understanding of the galaxy formation process.

A solar flare is a large explosion in the Sun’s atmosphere, releasing up to approximately 16% of the total energy output of the Sun each second. Electrons, protons as well as ions are accelerated at speeds near that of light. Solar flares produce radiation, at all wavelengths and can sometimes affect our satellites and disrupt long-range radio communications. They are due to a phenomenon called magnetic reconnection (the rearrangement of magnetic lines of force when two oppositely directed magnetic fields are brought together), suddenly releasing energy stored in the corona.

© SDO/NASA

On Sunday February 13, sunspot 1158 produced an M6.6-level (see here for details) blast and on Tuesday, February 15, the same sunspot unleashed an X2.2-level flare (about three times stronger than the previous one), the strongest solar flare in more than four years. The sunspot was not even here a week ago, and it is now covering an area wider than Jupiter.

As I mentioned above, some strong solar flares (even much stronger than these two) may only temporarily affect satellites, but that’s about it, there is no danger for us.

If you happen to be living at extreme latitudes, you will likely be able to enjoy a few aurorae over the next couple of nights (today, NOAA forecasters estimate a 35% chance of geomagnetic activity). If anyone has the chance to witness one of these and takes pictures, feel free to send them, and I will create a reader gallery!

© NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell

At its closest approach, Stardust was only 178 kilometers away from Tempel 1′s nucleus. Tempel 1 was already visited by Deep Impact in 2005, and researchers will be able to estimate how the comet has changed since then: Starduct was indeed able to photograph the same area Deep Impact photographed six years ago.

The crater left by the impactor from Deep Impact is also visible in a few pictures (it is extremely difficult to see):

© NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell

© NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell

Tempel 1 was Stardust’s last stop; the spacecraft will keep taking pictures of the comet for a few more days, before it is finally put to rest in the dark vastness of space.