<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
     version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R</link>
      <description>Table of Contents for Australian Dental Journal. List of articles from both the latest and EarlyView issues.</description>
      <language>en-US</language>
      <copyright>© Australian Dental Association</copyright>
      <managingEditor>wileyonlinelibrary@wiley.com (Wiley Online Library)</managingEditor>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 07:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 07:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Atypon® Literatum™</generator>
      <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
      <ttl>10080</ttl>
      <dc:title>Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>Wiley-Online-Library</dc:publisher>
      <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
      <atom:link href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R"
                 rel="self"
                 type="application/atom+xml"/>
      
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70037?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70037</guid>
         <title>Odontogenic Orbital Abscess in Paediatric Patients: Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Three Cases</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 201-205, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
Paediatric orbital abscesses represent true emergencies requiring immediate recognition and multidisciplinary management to prevent permanent vision loss and life‐threatening complications.


Methods
We present three paediatric cases of orbital abscess (ages two, six, and eight years) presenting to emergency departments. Cases were analysed for emergency presentation patterns, imaging findings, and treatment outcomes.


Results
All patients presented with periorbital swelling and fever, and all three cases originated from odontogenic infections. Emergency CT imaging was crucial for diagnosis. Multidisciplinary management involving emergency medicine, ENT, and maxillofacial surgery achieved excellent outcomes with no visual or neurological complications.


Conclusions
Emergency physicians must maintain high clinical suspicion for orbital abscess in children with periorbital swelling and fever. Immediate CT imaging, broad‐spectrum antibiotics, and emergency surgical interventions can prevent catastrophic complications.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Paediatric orbital abscesses represent true emergencies requiring immediate recognition and multidisciplinary management to prevent permanent vision loss and life-threatening complications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We present three paediatric cases of orbital abscess (ages two, six, and eight years) presenting to emergency departments. Cases were analysed for emergency presentation patterns, imaging findings, and treatment outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All patients presented with periorbital swelling and fever, and all three cases originated from odontogenic infections. Emergency CT imaging was crucial for diagnosis. Multidisciplinary management involving emergency medicine, ENT, and maxillofacial surgery achieved excellent outcomes with no visual or neurological complications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emergency physicians must maintain high clinical suspicion for orbital abscess in children with periorbital swelling and fever. Immediate CT imaging, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and emergency surgical interventions can prevent catastrophic complications.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Naseem Maalouf, 
Imad Abu El‐Naaj, 
Shareef Araidy
</dc:creator>
         <category>CASE REPORT</category>
         <dc:title>Odontogenic Orbital Abscess in Paediatric Patients: Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Three Cases</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70037</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70037</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70037?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>CASE REPORT</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70038?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70038</guid>
         <title>Oral‐Onset Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis in a Noncompliant Adult: A Cautionary Case of Multisystem Progression</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 206-212, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare clonal proliferative disorder that may initially present with oral manifestations, posing diagnostic challenges, especially in adults. We report a rare case of a 27‐year‐old male who initially presented with painful ulcerative palatal lesions and advanced periodontal symptoms. Despite early biopsy‐confirmed LCH diagnosis and haematology referral, the patient's noncompliance led to delayed treatment, resulting in progression from localised oral involvement to multisystem disease, including mandibular, iliac, and vertebral bone lesions. Treatment ultimately required systemic chemotherapy after repeated biopsies and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging confirmed disease dissemination. Dental extractions and soft tissue excision were performed to manage oral symptoms. This case highlights the critical role of dental professionals in early LCH detection and underscores the impact of delayed intervention. Interdisciplinary collaboration and patient compliance are essential to prevent disease progression and improve outcomes in LCH with oral involvement.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare clonal proliferative disorder that may initially present with oral manifestations, posing diagnostic challenges, especially in adults. We report a rare case of a 27-year-old male who initially presented with painful ulcerative palatal lesions and advanced periodontal symptoms. Despite early biopsy-confirmed LCH diagnosis and haematology referral, the patient's noncompliance led to delayed treatment, resulting in progression from localised oral involvement to multisystem disease, including mandibular, iliac, and vertebral bone lesions. Treatment ultimately required systemic chemotherapy after repeated biopsies and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging confirmed disease dissemination. Dental extractions and soft tissue excision were performed to manage oral symptoms. This case highlights the critical role of dental professionals in early LCH detection and underscores the impact of delayed intervention. Interdisciplinary collaboration and patient compliance are essential to prevent disease progression and improve outcomes in LCH with oral involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Ayşe Ege Selman, 
Burcu Karaduman, 
Mustafa Cenk Durmuslar, 
Necat Vakur Olgac, 
Hanife Ataoğlu
</dc:creator>
         <category>CASE REPORT</category>
         <dc:title>Oral‐Onset Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis in a Noncompliant Adult: A Cautionary Case of Multisystem Progression</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70038</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70038</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70038?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>CASE REPORT</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70053?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70053</guid>
         <title>Misquoting of Scientific Literature</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 99-100, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Ivan Darby
</dc:creator>
         <category>EDITORIAL</category>
         <dc:title>Misquoting of Scientific Literature</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70053</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70053</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70053?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>EDITORIAL</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70033?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70033</guid>
         <title>Issue Information</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 97-98, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator/>
         <category>Issue Information</category>
         <dc:title>Issue Information</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70033</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70033</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70033?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>Issue Information</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70041?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70041</guid>
         <title>Chronic Traumatic Dental Occlusion: Its Impact on Temporomandibular Joint and Systemic Health, and Clinical Management Strategies</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 136-143, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Purpose
Traumatic dental occlusion (TDO) is a multifactorial and dynamic clinical condition that extends beyond localised tooth wear and has been reported to be associated with alterations in temporomandibular joint biomechanics, neuromuscular function and overall masticatory system performance. While acute dental trauma often receives greater clinical attention, chronic occlusal trauma may remain underrecognised in routine practice, despite its potential to influence mandibular movement patterns, modify joint loading and contribute to patient‐reported functional complaints.


Basic Procedures
This narrative review synthesises current concepts from the literature regarding the proposed etiologic factors, functional implications and long‐term clinical consequences of traumatic dental occlusion. Particular emphasis is placed on the adaptive nature of the masticatory system and the variability of individual responses to occlusal disturbances. Contemporary digital diagnostic tools, occlusal analysis technologies and CAD/CAM‐assisted restorative workflows are discussed as adjunctive modalities that may support clinical assessment and treatment planning rather than as definitive solutions.


Main Findings
The review outlines commonly applied clinical approaches used in the management of TDO‐related structural and occlusal changes, including tooth wear and variations in occlusal vertical dimension, with reference to provisional strategies, indirect restorations and minimally invasive interventions.


Principal Conclusions
By providing an expert narrative synthesis and acknowledging ongoing controversies within occlusion and temporomandibular disorder research, this review aims to enhance clinician awareness, support cautious and patient‐centred decision‐making and encourage further research to clarify the clinical relevance of traumatic dental occlusion within contemporary dental practice.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Purpose&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Traumatic dental occlusion (TDO) is a multifactorial and dynamic clinical condition that extends beyond localised tooth wear and has been reported to be associated with alterations in temporomandibular joint biomechanics, neuromuscular function and overall masticatory system performance. While acute dental trauma often receives greater clinical attention, chronic occlusal trauma may remain underrecognised in routine practice, despite its potential to influence mandibular movement patterns, modify joint loading and contribute to patient-reported functional complaints.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Basic Procedures&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This narrative review synthesises current concepts from the literature regarding the proposed etiologic factors, functional implications and long-term clinical consequences of traumatic dental occlusion. Particular emphasis is placed on the adaptive nature of the masticatory system and the variability of individual responses to occlusal disturbances. Contemporary digital diagnostic tools, occlusal analysis technologies and CAD/CAM-assisted restorative workflows are discussed as adjunctive modalities that may support clinical assessment and treatment planning rather than as definitive solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Main Findings&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The review outlines commonly applied clinical approaches used in the management of TDO-related structural and occlusal changes, including tooth wear and variations in occlusal vertical dimension, with reference to provisional strategies, indirect restorations and minimally invasive interventions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Principal Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By providing an expert narrative synthesis and acknowledging ongoing controversies within occlusion and temporomandibular disorder research, this review aims to enhance clinician awareness, support cautious and patient-centred decision-making and encourage further research to clarify the clinical relevance of traumatic dental occlusion within contemporary dental practice.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Furkan Akkılıç, 
Hacer Balkaya
</dc:creator>
         <category>REVIEW ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Chronic Traumatic Dental Occlusion: Its Impact on Temporomandibular Joint and Systemic Health, and Clinical Management Strategies</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70041</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70041</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70041?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70035?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70035</guid>
         <title>The Safety and Effectiveness of the Hydraulic Pressure Sinus Floor Elevation Technique: A Systematic Review</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 101-118, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Aim
This project aims to systematically review and synthesise the data found in the literature regarding the survival of implants, complications, and gain in bone height using the hydraulic pressure technique to elevate the maxillary sinus floor.


Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane, covering studies from 2005 to July 2024. A total of 24 studies were included, comprising randomised control trials, cohort studies, and case series. The main outcomes evaluated were implant survival, complication rates, and endo‐sinus bone gain.


Results
The review included 3053 implants placed in 2290 Sinuses of 2231 patients. The patients' ages ranged from 23 to 84, with a mean of 51.6 years. The included studies reported a pooled implant survival rate of 98.40% over follow‐up periods ranging from 6 months to 8 years. The rate of sinus membrane perforation was relatively low (2.05%), and other complications, such as hematoma, sinusitis, nasal discharge, or oedema, occurred in 0.49% of cases. The average endo‐sinus bone gain achieved using this technique was 6.72 mm.


Conclusion
The hydraulic pressure technique for sinus floor elevation is one of the many proposed solutions to provide predictable, safe, and efficient sinus floor elevation. The results from this review provide some cause for optimism, with high survival rates, low complication rates, and adequate gain in bone height. There is still a need for further long‐term, high‐quality research by independent third parties to confirm the effectiveness and safety of this technique.


Clinical Relevance
There is limited information available for the hydraulic pressure technique for sinus floor elevation. It has only been briefly mentioned in a limited number of literary reviews, none of which quantify the available data. This study presents the first systematic review of the hydraulic pressure technique, synthesising the available data and suggesting that the hydraulic pressure technique demonstrates high success and safety.


Prospero
This review is registered in PROSPERO under ID: 1070614.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Aim&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This project aims to systematically review and synthesise the data found in the literature regarding the survival of implants, complications, and gain in bone height using the hydraulic pressure technique to elevate the maxillary sinus floor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A comprehensive literature search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane, covering studies from 2005 to July 2024. A total of 24 studies were included, comprising randomised control trials, cohort studies, and case series. The main outcomes evaluated were implant survival, complication rates, and endo-sinus bone gain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The review included 3053 implants placed in 2290 Sinuses of 2231 patients. The patients' ages ranged from 23 to 84, with a mean of 51.6 years. The included studies reported a pooled implant survival rate of 98.40% over follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 8 years. The rate of sinus membrane perforation was relatively low (2.05%), and other complications, such as hematoma, sinusitis, nasal discharge, or oedema, occurred in 0.49% of cases. The average endo-sinus bone gain achieved using this technique was 6.72 mm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hydraulic pressure technique for sinus floor elevation is one of the many proposed solutions to provide predictable, safe, and efficient sinus floor elevation. The results from this review provide some cause for optimism, with high survival rates, low complication rates, and adequate gain in bone height. There is still a need for further long-term, high-quality research by independent third parties to confirm the effectiveness and safety of this technique.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Clinical Relevance&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is limited information available for the hydraulic pressure technique for sinus floor elevation. It has only been briefly mentioned in a limited number of literary reviews, none of which quantify the available data. This study presents the first systematic review of the hydraulic pressure technique, synthesising the available data and suggesting that the hydraulic pressure technique demonstrates high success and safety.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Prospero&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This review is registered in PROSPERO under ID: 1070614.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Jared Hughes, 
Ajay Sharma, 
Lavanya Ajay Sharma
</dc:creator>
         <category>REVIEW ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>The Safety and Effectiveness of the Hydraulic Pressure Sinus Floor Elevation Technique: A Systematic Review</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70035</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70035</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70035?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70036?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70036</guid>
         <title>Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Cariogenic Streptococcus mutans Levels: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 119-135, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Objective
To systematically evaluate and quantitatively compare, through pairwise and network meta‐analysis, the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation in reducing cariogenic Streptococcus mutans levels in human subjects.


Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to October 2025. Randomised controlled trials assessing probiotic or synbiotic formulations with quantitative S. mutans outcomes were included. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation were synthesised under a random‐effects model using a frequentist network meta‐analysis (netmeta, R). Effect sizes were reported as mean differences (MD, 95% CI). To strengthen analytical validity, all outputs were cross‐validated through triangulation using the MetaInsight platform, confirming consistency between independent computational environments. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, and evidence certainty was appraised via CINeMA.


Results
Twenty trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most interventions showed a short‐term reduction in S. mutans counts, but differences versus placebo were small and not statistically significant across intervals. Forest‐plot synthesis and triangulated results indicated that effects were transient and strain‐dependent. SUCRA rankings suggested a high percentage of success, but those findings are only probabilistic, not conclusive superiority. Overall evidence certainty was low to moderate.


Conclusions
Probiotic supplementation exhibited a limited, time‐dependent capacity to modulate S. mutans levels without a consistent advantage over placebo. Current findings support its role as a safe adjunctive rather than as a standalone preventive strategy.


Clinical Significance
Within the available evidence, probiotics should be regarded as experimental adjuncts rather than as replacements for conventional caries‐prevention measures. Any observed microbiological benefits were modest, transient and strain‐specific, without consistent translation into clinical outcomes. Their recommendation should remain cautious until larger, long‐term randomised trials confirm durable effects.


Trial Registration
PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251180536

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Objective&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To systematically evaluate and quantitatively compare, through pairwise and network meta-analysis, the effectiveness of probiotic supplementation in reducing cariogenic &lt;i&gt;Streptococcus mutans&lt;/i&gt; levels in human subjects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to October 2025. Randomised controlled trials assessing probiotic or synbiotic formulations with quantitative &lt;i&gt;S. mutans&lt;/i&gt; outcomes were included. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation were synthesised under a random-effects model using a frequentist network meta-analysis (&lt;i&gt;netmeta&lt;/i&gt;, R). Effect sizes were reported as mean differences (MD, 95% CI). To strengthen analytical validity, all outputs were cross-validated through triangulation using the MetaInsight platform, confirming consistency between independent computational environments. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, and evidence certainty was appraised via CINeMA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Twenty trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most interventions showed a short-term reduction in &lt;i&gt;S. mutans&lt;/i&gt; counts, but differences versus placebo were small and not statistically significant across intervals. Forest-plot synthesis and triangulated results indicated that effects were transient and strain-dependent. SUCRA rankings suggested a high percentage of success, but those findings are only probabilistic, not conclusive superiority. Overall evidence certainty was low to moderate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Probiotic supplementation exhibited a limited, time-dependent capacity to modulate &lt;i&gt;S. mutans&lt;/i&gt; levels without a consistent advantage over placebo. Current findings support its role as a safe adjunctive rather than as a standalone preventive strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Clinical Significance&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within the available evidence, probiotics should be regarded as experimental adjuncts rather than as replacements for conventional caries-prevention measures. Any observed microbiological benefits were modest, transient and strain-specific, without consistent translation into clinical outcomes. Their recommendation should remain cautious until larger, long-term randomised trials confirm durable effects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Trial Registration&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251180536"&gt;PROSPERO&lt;/a&gt; registration number: CRD420251180536&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Alain Manuel Chaple Gil, 
Laura Pereda Vázquez, 
Meylin Santiesteban Velázquez, 
Jorge J. Menendez
</dc:creator>
         <category>REVIEW ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Cariogenic Streptococcus mutans Levels: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70036</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70036</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70036?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70043?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70043</guid>
         <title>Trauma‐Informed Care Practice for Dental Practitioners: A Scoping Review</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 144-159, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
Trauma‐informed care (TIC) is a patient care framework that recognises the widespread impact of trauma. While the likelihood of dental practitioners encountering patients with trauma is significant, there is limited guidance on TIC in dental care, highlighting the need for a clearer understanding. This scoping review was conducted to synthesise the literature to date concerning TIC practice for dental practitioners.


Methods
A search across six electronic databases and a manual search were conducted to find literatures from January 1992 to September 2025 that met inclusion criteria following the Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Of 176 identified papers, 27 papers informed this review.


Results
Identified TIC practices were categorised and synthesised according to ‘the four R's’ of TIC, such as safety and trust and other additional recurring TIC themes. This scoping review synthesised key concepts of TIC with the aim of informing clinical practice for dental practitioners.


Conclusion
The review highlights core TIC themes in the literature and identifies priorities for future research. As trauma is pervasive and often undisclosed, TIC practice by dental practitioners is recommended as a universal precaution approach in all patient care.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trauma-informed care (TIC) is a patient care framework that recognises the widespread impact of trauma. While the likelihood of dental practitioners encountering patients with trauma is significant, there is limited guidance on TIC in dental care, highlighting the need for a clearer understanding. This scoping review was conducted to synthesise the literature to date concerning TIC practice for dental practitioners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A search across six electronic databases and a manual search were conducted to find literatures from January 1992 to September 2025 that met inclusion criteria following the Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Of 176 identified papers, 27 papers informed this review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Identified TIC practices were categorised and synthesised according to ‘the four R's’ of TIC, such as safety and trust and other additional recurring TIC themes. This scoping review synthesised key concepts of TIC with the aim of informing clinical practice for dental practitioners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The review highlights core TIC themes in the literature and identifies priorities for future research. As trauma is pervasive and often undisclosed, TIC practice by dental practitioners is recommended as a universal precaution approach in all patient care.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Kristy S. Choi, 
Woosung Sohn, 
Delyse Leadbeatter
</dc:creator>
         <category>REVIEW ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Trauma‐Informed Care Practice for Dental Practitioners: A Scoping Review</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70043</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70043</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70043?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70039?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70039</guid>
         <title>The Letter to Editor Regarding ‘Photogrammetry in Implant Dentistry’</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 213-213, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Jiayi Chen
</dc:creator>
         <category>LETTER TO THE EDITOR</category>
         <dc:title>The Letter to Editor Regarding ‘Photogrammetry in Implant Dentistry’</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70039</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70039</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70039?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>LETTER TO THE EDITOR</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70044?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70044</guid>
         <title>Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life of Western Australian Refugee Children With Childhood Caries</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 192-200, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Objectives
Dental caries remains the most common chronic childhood condition and in Australia persists as a leading cause of potentially preventable hospitalisation. Despite various public health initiatives and improvements in oral health among the wider community, significant disparities exist among refugee families due to the unique challenges they face. Beyond the effects on a tooth level, dental caries profoundly influences a child's oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) which encompasses the physical, psychological and social impacts oral health has on daily life, an area that is often overlooked. This study explores the OHRQoL of Western Australian refugee children who experience childhood caries.


Methods
This nested study was conducted within a larger randomised controlled trial (ACTRN12616000456459) investigating caries arrest in newly resettled refugee children. Participants were recruited from the tertiary paediatric Refugee Health Service (RHS), where demographic information, clinical dental examination findings and OHRQoL data were collected using the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Non‐parametric methods were employed to assess differences in total and domain‐specific ECOHIS scores across stratification groups, including caries burden, caries depth, age and geographical region.


Results
A total of 223 children were included with a mean age of 4.6 years. Approximately, 65% of the children had high caries burden (&gt; 5 affected teeth), and 160 out of 223 (72%) had frank dentine lesions. The mean (SD) total ECOHIS score was 6.52 (6.68). Parental distress had the highest mean score among the ECOHIS domains (1.79), while the symptoms domain score was unexpectedly low (0.96), despite participants experiencing severe and extensive caries.


Conclusion
Refugee children experience a high burden of caries, yet reported symptoms were low, suggesting under recognition of oral pain. Conversely, high parental distress scores reveal the significant psychological impact on families. These findings highlight the need for early, culturally appropriate dental care within a family‐centred model of care.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Objectives&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dental caries remains the most common chronic childhood condition and in Australia persists as a leading cause of potentially preventable hospitalisation. Despite various public health initiatives and improvements in oral health among the wider community, significant disparities exist among refugee families due to the unique challenges they face. Beyond the effects on a tooth level, dental caries profoundly influences a child's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) which encompasses the physical, psychological and social impacts oral health has on daily life, an area that is often overlooked. This study explores the OHRQoL of Western Australian refugee children who experience childhood caries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This nested study was conducted within a larger randomised controlled trial (ACTRN12616000456459) investigating caries arrest in newly resettled refugee children. Participants were recruited from the tertiary paediatric Refugee Health Service (RHS), where demographic information, clinical dental examination findings and OHRQoL data were collected using the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Non-parametric methods were employed to assess differences in total and domain-specific ECOHIS scores across stratification groups, including caries burden, caries depth, age and geographical region.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A total of 223 children were included with a mean age of 4.6 years. Approximately, 65% of the children had high caries burden (&amp;gt; 5 affected teeth), and 160 out of 223 (72%) had frank dentine lesions. The mean (SD) total ECOHIS score was 6.52 (6.68). Parental distress had the highest mean score among the ECOHIS domains (1.79), while the symptoms domain score was unexpectedly low (0.96), despite participants experiencing severe and extensive caries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Refugee children experience a high burden of caries, yet reported symptoms were low, suggesting under recognition of oral pain. Conversely, high parental distress scores reveal the significant psychological impact on families. These findings highlight the need for early, culturally appropriate dental care within a family-centred model of care.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Jilen Patel, 
Joshua Tze Jen Ong, 
Sarah Cherian, 
Zac Dempsey, 
Bathsheba Turton, 
Robert Anthonappa
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Oral Health‐Related Quality of Life of Western Australian Refugee Children With Childhood Caries</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70044</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70044</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70044?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70034?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70034</guid>
         <title>Association of Migration Status of Parents With Their Satisfaction With Oral Care Provision for Their Children in Australia—Insights From a National Study</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 160-172, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
Globally, the number of migrants with limited language proficiency and low health literacy has been steadily increasing. In Australia, while most state governments have recognised these individuals as a priority population and provide free or subsidised access to oral healthcare services, their satisfaction levels regarding the received dental care remain uncertain. Studies suggest that patients with communication barriers often report greater dissatisfaction and anxiety in healthcare settings, with cultural insensitivity further worsening their experience. Therefore, feedback on oral healthcare services is crucial for improving service delivery and care quality.


Objective and Methods
This study aims to compare and assess the satisfaction of migrant and Australian‐born parents with the oral healthcare received by their children in Australia. Data from the 2012–2014 National Child Oral Health Survey (NCOHS) was utilised, which involved a cross‐sectional survey of 24,664 representative school children aged 5–14 years and their parents in Australia. This study used the Child Oral Care Performance Assessment Scale (COPAS), which was originally developed to collect parental observation and assessment of dental care received by their child. In the present study, the COPAS was used as a proxy measure for gauging the parents' satisfaction. Data were analysed using the complex samples' general linear model regression analyses to confirm the association between the factors.


Results
In general, the satisfaction scores were significantly lower in migrants than non‐migrant parents regarding the oral healthcare provided to their children in efficient, responsive, accessible and capable domains of COPAS. The overall satisfaction score, across all domains, revealed that migrant parents had lower satisfaction levels than non‐migrants (B = −1.64; 95% CI, −3.11 to −0.17). Parental language and income were also linked to satisfaction levels, with migrant parents from countries where English is not the primary language having notably lower scores than migrant parents from countries where English is the primary language (B = −4.16; 95% CI, −5.98 to −2.34). Among the other factors studied, parents in lower‐income (B = −7.55; 95% CI, −9.14 to −5.95) and middle‐income (B = −4.31; 95% CI, −5.45 to −3.17) groups were less satisfied with oral healthcare compared to higher‐income parents. Single‐adult households also reported lower satisfaction (B = −5.01; 95% CI, −9.67 to −0.35). On the other hand, having fewer children was associated with higher parental satisfaction.


Conclusions
Notable differences in satisfaction levels with oral healthcare of their children were observed between migrant and non‐migrant parents. These findings help guide policymakers in developing public health measures to improve satisfaction among migrant parents.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Globally, the number of migrants with limited language proficiency and low health literacy has been steadily increasing. In Australia, while most state governments have recognised these individuals as a priority population and provide free or subsidised access to oral healthcare services, their satisfaction levels regarding the received dental care remain uncertain. Studies suggest that patients with communication barriers often report greater dissatisfaction and anxiety in healthcare settings, with cultural insensitivity further worsening their experience. Therefore, feedback on oral healthcare services is crucial for improving service delivery and care quality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Objective and Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study aims to compare and assess the satisfaction of migrant and Australian-born parents with the oral healthcare received by their children in Australia. Data from the 2012–2014 National Child Oral Health Survey (NCOHS) was utilised, which involved a cross-sectional survey of 24,664 representative school children aged 5–14 years and their parents in Australia. This study used the Child Oral Care Performance Assessment Scale (COPAS), which was originally developed to collect parental observation and assessment of dental care received by their child. In the present study, the COPAS was used as a proxy measure for gauging the parents' satisfaction. Data were analysed using the complex samples' general linear model regression analyses to confirm the association between the factors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, the satisfaction scores were significantly lower in migrants than non-migrant parents regarding the oral healthcare provided to their children in efficient, responsive, accessible and capable domains of COPAS. The overall satisfaction score, across all domains, revealed that migrant parents had lower satisfaction levels than non-migrants (&lt;i&gt;B&lt;/i&gt; = −1.64; 95% CI, −3.11 to −0.17). Parental language and income were also linked to satisfaction levels, with migrant parents from countries where English is not the primary language having notably lower scores than migrant parents from countries where English is the primary language (&lt;i&gt;B&lt;/i&gt; = −4.16; 95% CI, −5.98 to −2.34). Among the other factors studied, parents in lower-income (&lt;i&gt;B&lt;/i&gt; = −7.55; 95% CI, −9.14 to −5.95) and middle-income (&lt;i&gt;B&lt;/i&gt; = −4.31; 95% CI, −5.45 to −3.17) groups were less satisfied with oral healthcare compared to higher-income parents. Single-adult households also reported lower satisfaction (&lt;i&gt;B&lt;/i&gt; = −5.01; 95% CI, −9.67 to −0.35). On the other hand, having fewer children was associated with higher parental satisfaction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Notable differences in satisfaction levels with oral healthcare of their children were observed between migrant and non-migrant parents. These findings help guide policymakers in developing public health measures to improve satisfaction among migrant parents.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Sudheer Babu Balla, 
Jyothi Tadakamadla, 
Diep H. Ha, 
Loc G. Do, 
Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Association of Migration Status of Parents With Their Satisfaction With Oral Care Provision for Their Children in Australia—Insights From a National Study</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70034</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70034</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70034?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70040?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70040</guid>
         <title>Root Canal Treatment for Older Adults: New Zealand Dentists’ Experiences and Approach to Practice</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 173-183, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
This study investigated the experiences and approach to practice of New Zealand (NZ) general dental practitioners (GDP) providing root canal treatment (RCT) for older adults.


Methods
A national online survey collected data from GDPs managing older adults including their approaches to pulpal diagnosis and RCT techniques. Questions also explored informed consent, specialist referrals, confidence, treatment outcomes and engagement with continuing education. Data were analysed descriptively and bivariate analysis of categorical variables used Chi‐square and Fisher's exact tests.


Results
A total of 382 GDPs participated (response rate 23.6%). RCT for older adults was common, and most dentists felt confident and incorporated contemporary techniques, although they were less comfortable managing polypharmacy or complex medical conditions. Verbal consent was usual. Almost three‐quarters had updated their endodontic knowledge and skills within the previous 2 years through continuing professional development. Around two‐thirds found diagnosis challenging; however, RCT was viewed as successful. Females were less confident, and a proportion did not treat molars.


Conclusion
Older adults commonly require RCT, and enhancing GDPs’ knowledge and skills to manage patients with a range of medical conditions is important. Written consent is advised for RCT when patient or tooth factors are complex, or where patients’ capacity may be impaired.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study investigated the experiences and approach to practice of New Zealand (NZ) general dental practitioners (GDP) providing root canal treatment (RCT) for older adults.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A national online survey collected data from GDPs managing older adults including their approaches to pulpal diagnosis and RCT techniques. Questions also explored informed consent, specialist referrals, confidence, treatment outcomes and engagement with continuing education. Data were analysed descriptively and bivariate analysis of categorical variables used Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A total of 382 GDPs participated (response rate 23.6%). RCT for older adults was common, and most dentists felt confident and incorporated contemporary techniques, although they were less comfortable managing polypharmacy or complex medical conditions. Verbal consent was usual. Almost three-quarters had updated their endodontic knowledge and skills within the previous 2 years through continuing professional development. Around two-thirds found diagnosis challenging; however, RCT was viewed as successful. Females were less confident, and a proportion did not treat molars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Older adults commonly require RCT, and enhancing GDPs’ knowledge and skills to manage patients with a range of medical conditions is important. Written consent is advised for RCT when patient or tooth factors are complex, or where patients’ capacity may be impaired.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Lara Friedlander, 
Payman Hamadani, 
Nicholas Chandler, 
Ben Daniel
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Root Canal Treatment for Older Adults: New Zealand Dentists’ Experiences and Approach to Practice</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70040</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70040</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70040?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70042?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70042</guid>
         <title>Exploring Clinical Decision‐Making in Static Computer‐Assisted Guided Implant Placement: A Survey of Clinicians in Australia and New Zealand</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 184-191, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
Static computer‐assisted guided implant placement (sCAIP) has been shown to enhance accuracy and predictability; however, little is known about the multifactorial decision‐making processes impacting use among clinicians.


Methods
An exploratory cross‐sectional electronic survey was distributed to implant practitioners across Australia and New Zealand, including general dentists and specialists (periodontists, prosthodontists, oral surgeons, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons) involved in implant placement. Items covered demographics, training profiles, clinical experience, utilisation patterns, and attitudes towards sCAIP, with free‐text reflections. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and t‐tests; qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.


Results
Thirty‐three respondents completed the survey, with 90.9% reporting current use of sCAIP. Sixteen respondents (48.5%) were classified as analytical decision‐makers and 17 (51.5%) as intuitive. Factor analysis identified seven components that explained 84.2% of the variance in decision‐making, including surgical complexity and soft tissue conditions, case timing, aesthetic site sensitivity, cost, anatomical risk, training exposure, and clinical experience. Internal consistency across items was high (Cronbach's alpha, α = 0.95). Analytical decision‐makers placed significantly more weight on anatomical risk and bone quality compared to intuitive decision‐makers (p = 0.038, d = 0.93). Intuitive decision‐makers reported higher levels of training exposure (p = 0.04, d = 0.80). Thematic analysis revealed three key influences on sCAIP use: clinician capability, surgical planning and risk mitigation, and restorative outcomes. In addition, several barriers were identified including financial cost, workflow integration, and attitudinal factors.


Conclusion
Clinicians with an analytical decision‐making style placed greater emphasis on anatomical risk and were more likely to adopt sCAIP in complex or high‐risk cases. Because intuitive clinicians reported higher training exposure, education alone did not explain these patterns, indicating that cognitive style and risk appraisal are central determinants of sCAIP adoption.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Static computer-assisted guided implant placement (sCAIP) has been shown to enhance accuracy and predictability; however, little is known about the multifactorial decision-making processes impacting use among clinicians.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An exploratory cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to implant practitioners across Australia and New Zealand, including general dentists and specialists (periodontists, prosthodontists, oral surgeons, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons) involved in implant placement. Items covered demographics, training profiles, clinical experience, utilisation patterns, and attitudes towards sCAIP, with free-text reflections. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and t-tests; qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thirty-three respondents completed the survey, with 90.9% reporting current use of sCAIP. Sixteen respondents (48.5%) were classified as analytical decision-makers and 17 (51.5%) as intuitive. Factor analysis identified seven components that explained 84.2% of the variance in decision-making, including surgical complexity and soft tissue conditions, case timing, aesthetic site sensitivity, cost, anatomical risk, training exposure, and clinical experience. Internal consistency across items was high (Cronbach's alpha, &lt;i&gt;α&lt;/i&gt; = 0.95). Analytical decision-makers placed significantly more weight on anatomical risk and bone quality compared to intuitive decision-makers (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.038, &lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt; = 0.93). Intuitive decision-makers reported higher levels of training exposure (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.04, &lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt; = 0.80). Thematic analysis revealed three key influences on sCAIP use: clinician capability, surgical planning and risk mitigation, and restorative outcomes. In addition, several barriers were identified including financial cost, workflow integration, and attitudinal factors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clinicians with an analytical decision-making style placed greater emphasis on anatomical risk and were more likely to adopt sCAIP in complex or high-risk cases. Because intuitive clinicians reported higher training exposure, education alone did not explain these patterns, indicating that cognitive style and risk appraisal are central determinants of sCAIP adoption.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Mathew Amen, 
Jake Ball, 
Jing Sun, 
Anthony Dawson
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Exploring Clinical Decision‐Making in Static Computer‐Assisted Guided Implant Placement: A Survey of Clinicians in Australia and New Zealand</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70042</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70042</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70042?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70049?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:04:57 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-26T07:04:57-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70049</guid>
         <title>Trauma‐Informed Care Practice for Dental Practitioners: A Scoping Review</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, Volume 71, Issue 2, Page 214-214, June 2026. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Kristy S. Choi, 
Woosung Sohn, 
Delyse Leadbeatter
</dc:creator>
         <category>CPD</category>
         <dc:title>Trauma‐Informed Care Practice for Dental Practitioners: A Scoping Review</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70049</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70049</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70049?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>CPD</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>71</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70054?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 09:28:45 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-24T09:28:45-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate/>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate/>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70054</guid>
         <title>Perspectives of Oral Health Practitioners Working in Rural New South Wales: Culture, Wellbeing and Workforce Sustainability</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, EarlyView. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
While limited research has explored the experiences of this workforce, oral health practitioners in rural areas face distinct cultural and personal challenges that influence workforce sustainability and delivery of care. This study aims to understand the cultural and personal experiences of oral health practitioners working in rural New South Wales and identify factors influencing their cultural capabilities, personal wellbeing and workforce sustainability.


Methods
A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among oral health practitioners across three rural Local Health Districts in New South Wales. The survey included items on sociodemographic characteristics, cultural capabilities and awareness, and personal experiences. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons made based on profession (dentists vs. other oral health practitioners) and years of experience (less or more than 10 years).


Results
Nineteen participants completed the survey, primarily dentists and oral health therapists, with few dental therapists. Most reported initial cultural awareness training; however, less than half reported ongoing training. Most participants reported personal growth associated with their role. Dentists reported greater access to support systems and training opportunities than other oral health practitioners.


Conclusion
There is need for continuous cultural capability training and equitable support systems to strengthen rural oral health workforce sustainability. Despite small participant numbers, this study provides valuable insight into practitioner experiences and identifies opportunities for a culturally safe and wellbeing‐focused workforce in rural NSW.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While limited research has explored the experiences of this workforce, oral health practitioners in rural areas face distinct cultural and personal challenges that influence workforce sustainability and delivery of care. This study aims to understand the cultural and personal experiences of oral health practitioners working in rural New South Wales and identify factors influencing their cultural capabilities, personal wellbeing and workforce sustainability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cross-sectional survey was conducted among oral health practitioners across three rural Local Health Districts in New South Wales. The survey included items on sociodemographic characteristics, cultural capabilities and awareness, and personal experiences. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons made based on profession (dentists vs. other oral health practitioners) and years of experience (less or more than 10 years).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nineteen participants completed the survey, primarily dentists and oral health therapists, with few dental therapists. Most reported initial cultural awareness training; however, less than half reported ongoing training. Most participants reported personal growth associated with their role. Dentists reported greater access to support systems and training opportunities than other oral health practitioners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is need for continuous cultural capability training and equitable support systems to strengthen rural oral health workforce sustainability. Despite small participant numbers, this study provides valuable insight into practitioner experiences and identifies opportunities for a culturally safe and wellbeing-focused workforce in rural NSW.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Lisa Hai My Do, 
Jessica Biles, 
Bradley Christian, 
Woosung Sohn
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Perspectives of Oral Health Practitioners Working in Rural New South Wales: Culture, Wellbeing and Workforce Sustainability</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70054</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70054</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70054?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70051?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 22:40:47 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-11T10:40:47-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate/>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate/>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70051</guid>
         <title>Surface Physical and Mechanical Properties of Short Fibre Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, EarlyView. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
Short Fibre Reinforced Composite resins may be used to restore odontogenic tissues and have enhanced physical and mechanical properties compared with conventional resins. However, their surface characteristics remain a concern, and this has limited their use as direct dental restorative materials.


Methods
Five published and three grey literature electronic databases were searched in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines.


Results
This systematic review identified and assessed studies that examined surface hardness, surface roughness, surface wear, water solubility, water sorption, and surface energy of SFRC resins. Most studies were in vitro (n = 30), and only two clinical trials were identified. Minimal grey literature was found, all originating from manufacturers. The evidence from these studies suggests that matrix composition and fibre characteristics influence surface properties, consistent with findings reported for conventional particle filled composite resins.


Conclusions
The physical and mechanical surface properties of SFRC resins used as direct dental restorative materials appear appropriate and stable in the oral environment; however, long‐term clinical studies are needed to confirm this.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Short Fibre Reinforced Composite resins may be used to restore odontogenic tissues and have enhanced physical and mechanical properties compared with conventional resins. However, their surface characteristics remain a concern, and this has limited their use as direct dental restorative materials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five published and three grey literature electronic databases were searched in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This systematic review identified and assessed studies that examined surface hardness, surface roughness, surface wear, water solubility, water sorption, and surface energy of SFRC resins. Most studies were in vitro (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 30), and only two clinical trials were identified. Minimal grey literature was found, all originating from manufacturers. The evidence from these studies suggests that matrix composition and fibre characteristics influence surface properties, consistent with findings reported for conventional particle filled composite resins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The physical and mechanical surface properties of SFRC resins used as direct dental restorative materials appear appropriate and stable in the oral environment; however, long-term clinical studies are needed to confirm this.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Murray Macpherson, 
Michael Liddell, 
Touraj Nejatian
</dc:creator>
         <category>REVIEW ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Surface Physical and Mechanical Properties of Short Fibre Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70051</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70051</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70051?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>REVIEW ARTICLE</prism:section>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70052?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 03:13:08 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-05-07T03:13:08-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate/>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate/>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70052</guid>
         <title>Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D‐Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, EarlyView. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
This study evaluated the marginal and internal fit, surface roughness and fracture resistance of three hybrid crown materials fabricated using milling and 3D‐printing.


Methods
A maxillary premolar typodont tooth was prepared and scanned to produce 30 cobalt‐chromium dies through selective laser melting 3D printing. Thirty crowns were fabricated from two milled materials (Vita Enamic; Cerasmart) and one printed material (Irix Max) (n = 10). Marginal and internal fit were assessed using a three‐dimensional superimposition technique, while surface roughness was measured with an optical profilometer. After cementation, specimens underwent thermocycling for 3600 cycles, followed by 720,000 mechanical loading cycles. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine and failure modes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA test.


Results
No statistically significant differences were observed in marginal fit among the groups. Cerasmart showed significantly higher internal gaps but smoother surfaces than Vita Enamic and Irix Max. Vita Enamic exhibited significantly greater fracture resistance compared to Cerasmart. All failures were catastrophic.


Conclusion
All crowns exhibited comparable marginal fit. Cerasmart demonstrated smoother surfaces but inferior internal adaptation and fracture strength, whereas Vita Enamic provided superior mechanical performance.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study evaluated the marginal and internal fit, surface roughness and fracture resistance of three hybrid crown materials fabricated using milling and 3D-printing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A maxillary premolar typodont tooth was prepared and scanned to produce 30 cobalt-chromium dies through selective laser melting 3D printing. Thirty crowns were fabricated from two milled materials (Vita Enamic; Cerasmart) and one printed material (Irix Max) (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 10). Marginal and internal fit were assessed using a three-dimensional superimposition technique, while surface roughness was measured with an optical profilometer. After cementation, specimens underwent thermocycling for 3600 cycles, followed by 720,000 mechanical loading cycles. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine and failure modes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No statistically significant differences were observed in marginal fit among the groups. Cerasmart showed significantly higher internal gaps but smoother surfaces than Vita Enamic and Irix Max. Vita Enamic exhibited significantly greater fracture resistance compared to Cerasmart. All failures were catastrophic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All crowns exhibited comparable marginal fit. Cerasmart demonstrated smoother surfaces but inferior internal adaptation and fracture strength, whereas Vita Enamic provided superior mechanical performance.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Abdullah M. Al‐Rifai, 
Ahed Al‐Wahadni, 
Abedelmalek Tabanjah
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D‐Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70052</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70052</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70052?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70048?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-04-05T11:59:59-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate/>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate/>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70048</guid>
         <title>The Australian and New Zealand Dental Implant Registry: Regulatory Requirements and Registry Development</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, EarlyView. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
The Therapeutic Goods Administration is responsible for the Regulation of manufacture and supply of all medical devices including dental implants. Medically, the patient is given a ‘Patient Implant Card’ (PIC). It is recommended to monitor the performance of devices in an implant registry.


Methods
The TGA Regulations were reviewed. The detailed methodology to establish a National Dental Implant Registry is presented and initial analysis performed.


Results
The placement of dental implants in Australia is not as regulated as other comparable medical devices. Currently the Registry has 43 clinics with 44 participating dental practitioners. The DIR has recorded dental implant related information from 4842 patients with 9429 devices (Australian and New Zealand data). Patients were usually over 60 years of age, more female and more implants were placed in the maxilla. The Australian replacement rate of dental implants was 1.83% and 1.42% for prostheses.


Conclusions
Improving the regulatory framework by introducing the issuing of Patient implant cards (PICs) so the specific device information type is transferable and retained long term and establishment of long‐term independent monitoring in a Dental Implant Registry, crucial in identifying problems with the aim of improving outcomes for patients and dental professionals should be considered.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Therapeutic Goods Administration is responsible for the Regulation of manufacture and supply of all medical devices including dental implants. Medically, the patient is given a ‘Patient Implant Card’ (PIC). It is recommended to monitor the performance of devices in an implant registry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methods&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The TGA Regulations were reviewed. The detailed methodology to establish a National Dental Implant Registry is presented and initial analysis performed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The placement of dental implants in Australia is not as regulated as other comparable medical devices. Currently the Registry has 43 clinics with 44 participating dental practitioners. The DIR has recorded dental implant related information from 4842 patients with 9429 devices (Australian and New Zealand data). Patients were usually over 60 years of age, more female and more implants were placed in the maxilla. The Australian replacement rate of dental implants was 1.83% and 1.42% for prostheses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Improving the regulatory framework by introducing the issuing of Patient implant cards (PICs) so the specific device information type is transferable and retained long term and establishment of long-term independent monitoring in a Dental Implant Registry, crucial in identifying problems with the aim of improving outcomes for patients and dental professionals should be considered.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
S. Soukoulis, 
S. Davis, 
A. Goss
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>The Australian and New Zealand Dental Implant Registry: Regulatory Requirements and Registry Development</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70048</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70048</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70048?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70047?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 02:14:44 -0800</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2026-03-07T02:14:44-08:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18347819?af=R">Wiley-Online-Library: Australian Dental Journal: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate/>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate/>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/adj.70047</guid>
         <title>Patterns of Surgical Prophylaxis Prescribing for Dentoalveolar Procedures in Australian Hospitals: 2016–2022</title>
         <description>Australian Dental Journal, EarlyView. </description>
         <dc:description>
ABSTRACT

Background
Antimicrobials are an adjunctive therapy in clinical dentistry. In dentoalveolar surgery, antimicrobials are not routinely required for surgical prophylaxis. This retrospective analysis of the Australian Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Surgical NAPS) dataset aimed to evaluate the guideline compliance and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing for dentoalveolar procedures in Australian hospitals.


Methodology
Deidentified Surgical NAPS data for dentoalveolar procedures (tooth extractions and implant placements) between 2016 and 2022 were extracted. Procedures outside the scope of a general dentist were excluded. Prescribed antimicrobials for surgical prophylaxis, including procedural prophylaxis doses and post‐procedural prescriptions, were assessed for guideline compliance and appropriateness according to the Surgical NAPS algorithm.


Results
1345 surgical episodes with dental procedures were included. This comprised 1077 procedural prophylaxis doses and 555 post‐procedural prescriptions. Of the post‐procedural prescriptions, 478 (86%) were for prophylaxis. Guideline compliance was demonstrated in 35.3% of procedural doses and 14.6% of post‐procedural prescriptions. Rates of appropriateness were 33.5% for procedural doses and 12.6% for post‐procedural prescriptions. Most procedural doses and post‐procedural prescriptions were deemed inappropriate as they were not required (72.5% and 93.0%, respectively).


Conclusions
Suboptimal guideline compliance and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for dentoalveolar surgery reinforces the need for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Background&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Antimicrobials are an adjunctive therapy in clinical dentistry. In dentoalveolar surgery, antimicrobials are not routinely required for surgical prophylaxis. This retrospective analysis of the Australian Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Surgical NAPS) dataset aimed to evaluate the guideline compliance and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing for dentoalveolar procedures in Australian hospitals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Methodology&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deidentified Surgical NAPS data for dentoalveolar procedures (tooth extractions and implant placements) between 2016 and 2022 were extracted. Procedures outside the scope of a general dentist were excluded. Prescribed antimicrobials for surgical prophylaxis, including procedural prophylaxis doses and post-procedural prescriptions, were assessed for guideline compliance and appropriateness according to the Surgical NAPS algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Results&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1345 surgical episodes with dental procedures were included. This comprised 1077 procedural prophylaxis doses and 555 post-procedural prescriptions. Of the post-procedural prescriptions, 478 (86%) were for prophylaxis. Guideline compliance was demonstrated in 35.3% of procedural doses and 14.6% of post-procedural prescriptions. Rates of appropriateness were 33.5% for procedural doses and 12.6% for post-procedural prescriptions. Most procedural doses and post-procedural prescriptions were deemed inappropriate as they were not required (72.5% and 93.0%, respectively).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suboptimal guideline compliance and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for dentoalveolar surgery reinforces the need for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Jane Chen, 
Marietta Taylor, 
Rodney James, 
Karin Thursky, 
Michael McCullough, 
Leanne Teoh, 
Courtney Ierano
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Patterns of Surgical Prophylaxis Prescribing for Dentoalveolar Procedures in Australian Hospitals: 2016–2022</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/adj.70047</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Australian Dental Journal</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/adj.70047</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adj.70047?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
