<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CUEDRnk7fyp7ImA9WhZQFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968</id><updated>2011-04-21T18:07:57.707-04:00</updated><title>Aviation Law Blog</title><subtitle type="html">News and information about legal issues affecting the general aviation industries, pilots, FBOs, small aircraft manufacturers, airports, and airport tenants</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>8</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/AviationLawBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="aviationlawblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>AviationLawBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkIFQXw8cSp7ImA9WxRTFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-1933786549194834321</id><published>2008-09-03T09:28:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-03T09:28:30.279-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-03T09:28:30.279-04:00</app:edited><title>Lycoming Crankshaft Manufacturer Dodges Bullet in Failure Cases</title><summary type="html">  The Supreme Court  of Texas upheld a jury verdict in favor  of Interstate Southwest and against  Lycoming involving the manufacture of faulty crankshafts that were  installed in Lycoming engines. In 2005, a Texas jury only found Interstate blameless and determined that Lycoming was liable for fraud. Lycoming appealed  and the Supreme Court rejected the  appeal.   The case began in  2003 when &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/FSIetfFGNyQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/1933786549194834321?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/1933786549194834321?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/FSIetfFGNyQ/lycoming-crankshaft-manufacturer-dodges.html" title="Lycoming Crankshaft Manufacturer Dodges Bullet in Failure Cases" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/lycoming-crankshaft-manufacturer-dodges.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0MFRHk6eip7ImA9WxRTE0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-3095639384926056536</id><published>2008-09-02T14:49:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-02T14:50:15.712-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-02T14:50:15.712-04:00</app:edited><title>Eclipse VLJ Buyer Sues for Refund</title><summary type="html">&amp;lt;!-- Converted from text/plain format --&amp;gt; AvWeb reported  this week that the British buyer of an Eclipse 500 very light jet is  reportedly suing the manufacturer to recover its $180,000 deposit.   According to the report, the order has been cancelled and a refund of  the deposit is past due.  The buyer, London-based Ice Blue Air, signed  a purchase agreement in July of 2006 to purchase a $1.5 &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/FldmgIV8-PQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/3095639384926056536?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/3095639384926056536?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/FldmgIV8-PQ/eclipse-vlj-buyer-sues-for-refund.html" title="Eclipse VLJ Buyer Sues for Refund" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/eclipse-vlj-buyer-sues-for-refund.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEIHRXc8eCp7ImA9WxdaEk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-7441490517946000148</id><published>2008-08-20T08:34:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T08:48:54.970-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-20T08:48:54.970-04:00</app:edited><title>Helicopters Rescue Stranded Grand Canyon Tourists</title><summary type="html">The Associated Press reports that helicopters have rescued over 250 people stranded in Grand Canyon after severe flooding struck the area. The Arizona Republic reports that the village of Supai, home of the Havasupai Tribe, was devastated by the flood and major repairs will be required. The Arizona Republic article says: "getting workers and supplies to the rim of the Grand Canyon will be &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/DNzPi25HE0o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/7441490517946000148?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/7441490517946000148?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/DNzPi25HE0o/helicopters-rescue-stranded-grand.html" title="Helicopters Rescue Stranded Grand Canyon Tourists" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/helicopters-rescue-stranded-grand.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkcMRHs-cCp7ImA9WxdWF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-7139067293644815263</id><published>2008-07-11T10:43:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-11T10:54:45.558-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-11T10:54:45.558-04:00</app:edited><title>Taxpayers Rejoice!: Florida Taxing Authorities Dealt Serious Blows in Tax Cases</title><summary type="html">The Florida Department of Revenue and local taxing authorities suffered two significant losses within the past week. In one case, Crossings at Fleming Island Cmty. Dev. Dist. v. Echeverri, No. SC07-1556, the Supreme Court of Florida ruled that "a property appraiser does not have standing in his or her official capacity to raise the constitutionality of a statute as a defense in a tax suit filed &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/bBAJ2nsCPqY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/7139067293644815263?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/7139067293644815263?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/bBAJ2nsCPqY/taxpayers-rejoice-florida-taxing.html" title="Taxpayers Rejoice!: Florida Taxing Authorities Dealt Serious Blows in Tax Cases" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/taxpayers-rejoice-florida-taxing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C08NR3w_eyp7ImA9WxdWEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-1861131653558865820</id><published>2008-07-02T08:32:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-02T08:31:36.243-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-02T08:31:36.243-04:00</app:edited><title>Medevac Operations Under Scrutiny in Wake of Flagstaff Crash</title><summary type="html">The NTSB is stepping up its investigation of medevac services in the wake of a crash last Sunday in Flagstaff, Arizona, that killed 6 people and seriously injured one.  According to the The New York Times, NTSB chairman, Mark Rosenker, says he's "very concerned" that this was the tenth accident involving medical airlift aircraft this year.  "We are going to try very hard to make sure we &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/YrPoMuC1Asc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/1861131653558865820?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/1861131653558865820?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/YrPoMuC1Asc/medevac-operations-under-scrutiny-in.html" title="Medevac Operations Under Scrutiny in Wake of Flagstaff Crash" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/medevac-operations-under-scrutiny-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0QEQX4zcSp7ImA9WxdXFU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-8397112104667009974</id><published>2008-06-26T15:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-26T15:41:40.089-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-06-26T15:41:40.089-04:00</app:edited><title>Florida Aviation Trades Association Selects The Anderson Law Firm as General Counsel</title><summary type="html">The Anderson Law Firm announced today that it has been selected by the Florida Aviation Trades Association (FATA) to act as FATA General Counsel. The FATA is an aviation trade group that has been actively promoting and protecting the rights, interests and development of Florida’s aviation industry since 1946. Attorney Daniel Anderson said that the firm is honored to be selected by such a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/o45emin5NMU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/8397112104667009974?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/8397112104667009974?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/o45emin5NMU/florida-aviation-trades-association.html" title="Florida Aviation Trades Association Selects The Anderson Law Firm as General Counsel" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/florida-aviation-trades-association.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEQCRX44fSp7ImA9WxdXFE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-7226570519950277603</id><published>2008-06-25T10:02:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-25T09:59:24.035-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-06-25T09:59:24.035-04:00</app:edited><title>Burbank Airport Curfew Meets Resistance</title><summary type="html">According to  Aviation Week, the FAA and Los Angeles Mayor  Antonio Villaraigosa have voiced opposition to a proposed curfew at Burbank  Airport in California.  The curfew was proposed as a result of a Part  161 study conducted by the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority.   Interestingly, Airports Council International-North America and the Burbank  Chamber of Commerce submitted comments &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/xt9eXTkvits" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/7226570519950277603?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/7226570519950277603?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/xt9eXTkvits/burbank-airport-curfew-meets-resistance.html" title="Burbank Airport Curfew Meets Resistance" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/burbank-airport-curfew-meets-resistance.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0UHQHw5fCp7ImA9WxdXFE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3729723646590512968.post-8552333981647615621</id><published>2008-06-25T09:43:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-25T09:40:31.224-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-06-25T09:40:31.224-04:00</app:edited><title>Lawsuit Filed to Stop General Aviation Activities at March AFB</title><summary type="html"> A Riverside  County, California newspaper reports that an area environmental group has  launched a lawsuit to stop general  aviation activities at March Air  Reserve Base's military-civilian airport.   According to the report,  the Community Alliance for Riverside's  Economy and Environment (CAREE) has previously sought to curtail  aviation activities at March AFB.  In 2003, CAREE  halted  &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~4/Tw69-z2kekc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/8552333981647615621?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3729723646590512968/posts/default/8552333981647615621?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AviationLawBlog/~3/Tw69-z2kekc/lawsuit-filed-to-stop-general-aviation.html" title="Lawsuit Filed to Stop General Aviation Activities at March AFB" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://aviationlawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/lawsuit-filed-to-stop-general-aviation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

