<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2929487946145338110</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Back Forty Backstory</title><description></description><link>http://backfortybackstory.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Steve Baragona)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2929487946145338110.post-5818895481631183230</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-17T10:49:04.506-07:00</atom:updated><title></title><atom:summary>The New York Times digs into Europe's farm subsidies:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/business/global/17farms.html?ref=global-home</atom:summary><link>http://backfortybackstory.blogspot.com/2009/07/new-york-times-digs-into-europes-farm.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Steve Baragona)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2929487946145338110.post-2273559484462233828</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-10T15:37:57.307-07:00</atom:updated><title>The Case of Malawi</title><atom:summary>Malawi presents an interesting case study in food aid vs. farm aid. I outlined the basics in my story about the G8's $20-billion pledge of agricultural aid. In a nutshell, the country went from food aid recipient to food aid supplier in two years thanks to President Bingu wa Mutharika's decision to buck the international donor community and subsidize his farmers.An interesting side-note on </atom:summary><link>http://backfortybackstory.blogspot.com/2009/07/case-of-malawi.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Steve Baragona)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2929487946145338110.post-3040591050154098674</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-10T14:44:05.762-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>food safety</category><title>Will Food Get Safer?</title><atom:summary>Today I reported on the Obama administration's announcement of steps intended to make the U.S. food supply safer.The produce industry is thrilled. They've actually been begging the Food and Drug Administration for more regulations for a couple years now. You know things are bad when an industry is begging the government for MORE regulations. Perhaps it's not surprising, though. After a string of </atom:summary><link>http://backfortybackstory.blogspot.com/2009/07/today-i-reported-on-obama.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Steve Baragona)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>