<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CkUDRX08fCp7ImA9WhRRFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369</id><updated>2011-11-27T19:31:14.374-05:00</updated><category term="price to sales" /><category term="FAS 156/157 valuations" /><category term="$700 billion bailout" /><category term="Microsoft Corporation" /><category term="recession and silicon valley" /><category term="iPhones" /><category term="Patent Valuation" /><category term="small business" /><category term="private equity" /><category term="Credit rating" /><category term="immunology" /><category term="Cloud Computing Valuation" /><category term="Apple" /><category term="Advertising" /><category term="Goldman" /><category term="AdWords" /><category term="Searching" /><category term="tax court" /><category term="US dollar" /><category term="fair market valuation" /><category term="Shiva Badruswamy" /><category term="IMF SDRs" /><category term="iPAD" /><category term="restricted stock" /><category term="magic money" /><category term="valuation methods accuracy" /><category term="SEC" /><category term="market share leadership" /><category term="Preferred stock valuation" /><category term="accuserve us" /><category term="private company valuations" /><category term="waterfall model" /><category term="exit multiples" /><category term="Cuil" /><category term="internal revenue service" /><category term="post money valuation" /><category term="minority common stock valuation" /><category term="website valuation" /><category term="409A valuation" /><category term="reform" /><category term="biotechnology valuation" /><category term="premoney valuation" /><category term="IRC 409A code" /><category term="sustainable competitive advantage" /><category term="Search Engines" /><category term="Valuation yardstick" /><category term="start-up companies" /><category term="start-up revenue model" /><category term="IP leadership" /><category term="silicon valley job report" /><category term="public insurance" /><category term="idea game" /><category term="valuations" /><category term="venture capital" /><category term="valuation bands" /><category term="green business models" /><category term="relative valuation" /><category term="global businesses" /><category term="IPScore model" /><category term="Wi-Fi service" /><category term="health care" /><category term="email sorting tool" /><category term="mortgage crisis" /><category term="emerging markets" /><category term="AdSense" /><category term="digital textbooks" /><category term="409A audit" /><category term="due diligence" /><category term="revenue models" /><category term="business valuations outsourcing" /><category term="EPO" /><category term="risk and reward" /><category term="start-up performance benchmarking" /><category term="Russia" /><category term="stock option valuation" /><category term="venture exit" /><category term="app platforms" /><category term="Virgin America" /><category term="Intangible Asset Valuation" /><category term="financing" /><category term="SDRs" /><category term="Xobni" /><category term="DigitalSky Technologies" /><category term="Microsoft" /><category term="valuation multiples" /><category term="royalty rates" /><category term="silicon valley innovation leader" /><category term="founder's RoI" /><category term="US Government" /><category term="equity fund" /><category term="valuing sustainable business models" /><category term="term sheet negotiations" /><category term="search engine" /><category term="Research and development budget" /><category term="anti-dilution" /><category term="start-up valuation" /><category term="Fair Valuation" /><category term="data analytics" /><category term="Google Adword" /><category term="indepent appraisal" /><category term="Recession" /><category term="409A tax cases" /><category term="Intellectual property valuation" /><category term="Drug development valuation" /><category term="biotechnology ETFs" /><category term="biomedical" /><category term="high multiples" /><category term="diversification" /><category term="start-up competition" /><category term="409A valuations" /><category term="IT valuation" /><category term="internet retailing" /><category term="ETFs" /><category term="venture capital exit" /><category term="value allocation" /><category term="small companies" /><category term="idea generation" /><category term="evidentiary requirement" /><category term="Android" /><category term="mark to market valuations" /><category term="Facebook" /><category term="Web search engine" /><category term="AccuServe" /><category term="participating preferred" /><category term="web business valuation" /><category term="Pharmaceutical" /><category term="Macintosh" /><category term="Silicon Valley" /><category term="healthcare ETFs" /><category term="bloatware" /><category term="topsy" /><category term="California" /><category term="FAS 123R valuations" /><category term="Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals valuation" /><category term="Santa Clara" /><category term="High tech" /><category term="bailout" /><category term="onboard plane" /><category term="entrepreneurship" /><category term="start-up revenue growth" /><category term="Bureau of Labor Statistics" /><category term="start-up revenue growth rates" /><category term="Google" /><category term="Business" /><category term="venture financing poll" /><category term="cheap stock valuations" /><category term="IP Valuation" /><category term="healthcare SPDRs" /><category term="Mergers and Acquisitions transactions" /><category term="Credit rating agency" /><category term="BRICs" /><category term="reserve currency" /><category term="Subprime lending" /><category term="US GAAP valuations" /><category term="investment" /><category term="early stage" /><category term="Fair market valuations" /><category term="venture idea plan" /><category term="Social network" /><category term="revenue multiples" /><category term="SaaS valuation multiples" /><category term="venture valuations" /><category term="Search Engine Technology" /><category term="employee stock options" /><category term="Wi-Fi speeds" /><category term="privately held companies" /><category term="IP trading" /><category term="Enterprise Value" /><category term="Companies" /><category term="founder's stock sale" /><title>Shiva Badruswamy's Idea Game</title><subtitle type="html">This blog is to share opinions and ideas that enhance valuations of emerging, venture-financed companies that are geared toward creating wealth in the near future. At AccuServe Inc., we advise clients on such matters for a fee.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>51</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BadruswamysIdeaGame" /><feedburner:info uri="badruswamysideagame" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEANRHk8eCp7ImA9Wx9TFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-3304810378223525184</id><published>2010-11-22T16:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-11-22T16:53:15.770-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-11-22T16:53:15.770-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Enterprise Value" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Valuation yardstick" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Is Enterprise Value per employee a good yardstick for valuation?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/3304810378223525184/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=3304810378223525184" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3304810378223525184?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3304810378223525184?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/W0eoY3sQIMQ/is-enterprise-value-per-employee-good.html" title="Is Enterprise Value per employee a good yardstick for valuation?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/TOrjjVmoA3I/AAAAAAAAAEw/LNGkmphdTsU/s72-c/EVperFTE.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I wanted to fit a distribution to the EV per employee metric I took from tens of 409A valuation data points. I constructed an excel chart using the "frequency" function to count the EV per employee metric as a histogram and then observed the shape and size of the histogram.



While there is some right handed tail because of skewed distributions due to biotechnology companies and some 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/il2xHlrvNDgtxX7cbJbBgewxAZs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/il2xHlrvNDgtxX7cbJbBgewxAZs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/il2xHlrvNDgtxX7cbJbBgewxAZs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/il2xHlrvNDgtxX7cbJbBgewxAZs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/W0eoY3sQIMQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/11/is-enterprise-value-per-employee-good.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEAHRH46fyp7ImA9Wx5WGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-181382534513448477</id><published>2010-10-01T18:37:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-10-01T18:38:55.017-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-10-01T18:38:55.017-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="data analytics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="valuation bands" /><title>An analysis of 409A valuation data points</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/181382534513448477/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=181382534513448477" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/181382534513448477?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/181382534513448477?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/lkE6bIqgkaY/analysis-of-409a-valuation-data-points.html" title="An analysis of 409A valuation data points" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/TKZfb_zMdvI/AAAAAAAAAEQ/Wj6AEsKFDbA/s72-c/chart1.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I took a sample of various valuation data points I obtained during the 409A valuation and charted it out. I believe the chart gives us some interesting conclusions.


The X-Axis in this picture is the AICPA Operational Development Level (the greater the operation level, the more mature the company is) and the Y-Axis is the Post-Money Valuation (PMV) Per Employee that a company got during its 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HdsTzlLD96s-F55rak2AusgdNH4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HdsTzlLD96s-F55rak2AusgdNH4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HdsTzlLD96s-F55rak2AusgdNH4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HdsTzlLD96s-F55rak2AusgdNH4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/lkE6bIqgkaY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/10/analysis-of-409a-valuation-data-points.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQMRX8-eyp7ImA9Wx5WFEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-3689101462370359222</id><published>2010-09-25T17:31:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-09-25T17:33:04.153-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-09-25T17:33:04.153-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="health care" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPAD" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="search engine" /><title>Ok, we have the search engine and the iPAD. Now what?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/3689101462370359222/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=3689101462370359222" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3689101462370359222?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3689101462370359222?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/kHyTfj7SGPU/ok-we-have-search-engine-and-ipad-now.html" title="Ok, we have the search engine and the iPAD. Now what?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">After looking at the issues facing our country in the last 2 years, one thing has become clear to me: technology has not been able to solve things that matter the most. The two things Americans spend most of their money are housing costs and healthcare. And the two areas that technology has been least helpful are in these areas. Technology has not helped bring about a rational housing market, 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0Kk3ifblrf4ja7l4tqMOF2yHDwQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0Kk3ifblrf4ja7l4tqMOF2yHDwQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0Kk3ifblrf4ja7l4tqMOF2yHDwQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0Kk3ifblrf4ja7l4tqMOF2yHDwQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/kHyTfj7SGPU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/09/ok-we-have-search-engine-and-ipad-now.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0ENQHk_fyp7ImA9Wx5QGEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-2073805446545815243</id><published>2010-09-07T12:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-09-07T12:08:11.747-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-09-07T12:08:11.747-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sustainable competitive advantage" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Intellectual property valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IP Valuation" /><title>Why Intellectual Property needs to be periodically valued?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/2073805446545815243/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=2073805446545815243" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/2073805446545815243?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/2073805446545815243?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/9m0MkE26VM4/why-intellectual-property-needs-to-be.html" title="Why Intellectual Property needs to be periodically valued?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">There has a been a research study which says that S&amp;amp;P 500 derives 67% of its value from Intellectual Property (IP) or Intangible assets. Think about it for a minute. The largest export from America today is IP. In a deteriorating business climate, what sets you apart from others are sustainable competitive advantages such as your workforce, patents, trade marks, copyrights, goodwill, client lists
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OUFgLxsT3oLkvnRvlPkLdSZP29Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OUFgLxsT3oLkvnRvlPkLdSZP29Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OUFgLxsT3oLkvnRvlPkLdSZP29Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OUFgLxsT3oLkvnRvlPkLdSZP29Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/9m0MkE26VM4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-intellectual-property-needs-to-be.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkIHQnwzfip7ImA9Wx5TEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-7925521632286967470</id><published>2010-07-26T17:39:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-07-26T17:42:13.286-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-07-26T17:42:13.286-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="waterfall model" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="participating preferred" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AccuServe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="magic money" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="venture valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Why participating preferences maybe absurd and how 409A valuations can consider this absurdity?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/7925521632286967470/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=7925521632286967470" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7925521632286967470?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7925521632286967470?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/pzbMOSuOf3w/why-participating-preferences-maybe.html" title="Why participating preferences maybe absurd and how 409A valuations can consider this absurdity?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Imagine a term sheet where your pre-money valuation is $25million and you raised $5 million. The post money valuation therefore is $30 million and the VCs share of the company is 5/30 or 16.7%. Now, the liquidation preference (typically at 1X the investment dollars or issue price) would be $5 million and let us say the VC wants another 1X in participating preference. One of the interesting things
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FVdjnta7m3wXzLte7Uq-By61tck/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FVdjnta7m3wXzLte7Uq-By61tck/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FVdjnta7m3wXzLte7Uq-By61tck/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FVdjnta7m3wXzLte7Uq-By61tck/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/pzbMOSuOf3w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-participating-preferences-maybe.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcDSXY4eip7ImA9WxFaE00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-3259338079075443368</id><published>2010-07-16T13:57:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-07-16T13:57:58.832-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-07-16T13:57:58.832-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="US GAAP valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="FAS 156/157 valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mark to market valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>409A valuation and mark-to-market reconciliation</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/3259338079075443368/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=3259338079075443368" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3259338079075443368?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3259338079075443368?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/0tM0ZAUR8AY/409a-valuation-and-mark-to-market.html" title="409A valuation and mark-to-market reconciliation" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">409A valuation, as we know by now, is supposed to be a legally sound valuation, though some offshore companies would never get this concept due to the poor legal environments in their own countries. But what about the FAS 156/157 US GAAP mark-to-market accounting that venture capitalists and other institutional investors are supposed to maintain? Currently, the 409A valuation study and US GAAP 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/O0jKp2UIOFqJISPzbGEhNG6ChjM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/O0jKp2UIOFqJISPzbGEhNG6ChjM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/O0jKp2UIOFqJISPzbGEhNG6ChjM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/O0jKp2UIOFqJISPzbGEhNG6ChjM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/0tM0ZAUR8AY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/07/409a-valuation-and-mark-to-market.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMER3YzcSp7ImA9WxFbEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-6881074405304206522</id><published>2010-07-01T12:39:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-07-01T12:40:06.889-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-07-01T12:40:06.889-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="biotechnology valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="royalty rates" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Valuation trends and Royalty Rates in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical deals</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/6881074405304206522/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=6881074405304206522" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/6881074405304206522?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/6881074405304206522?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/2Cq04Ltgdag/valuation-trends-and-royalty-rates-in.html" title="Valuation trends and Royalty Rates in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical deals" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">The Licensing Executive Society of USA and Canada (http://www.lesusacanada.org/MainNav/Resources/biopharmrates.aspx), reports in their 2008 Royalty rate survey (a total of 230 deal responses were submitted, out of which 155 completed deals were analyzed) that:

Small Molecule compounds were included in close to 50% of deals 
Anti-cancer compounds/drugs comprised almost 33% of all deals reported 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Pvf8o6se4_O-G2enrLtpJNCkzMg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Pvf8o6se4_O-G2enrLtpJNCkzMg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Pvf8o6se4_O-G2enrLtpJNCkzMg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Pvf8o6se4_O-G2enrLtpJNCkzMg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/2Cq04Ltgdag" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/07/valuation-trends-and-royalty-rates-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8NQH85cCp7ImA9WxFUFE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-4184902573421385436</id><published>2010-06-24T14:08:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-24T14:08:11.128-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-06-24T14:08:11.128-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="private company valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="valuation methods accuracy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AccuServe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Shiva Badruswamy" /><title>Valuation methods and public markets debacle: Are there lessons for private company valuations?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/4184902573421385436/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=4184902573421385436" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/4184902573421385436?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/4184902573421385436?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/XapoeuJXEs0/valuation-methods-and-public-markets.html" title="Valuation methods and public markets debacle: Are there lessons for private company valuations?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">While examining a number of valuation models and arguments by audit personnel, we found that many were overly focused on the use of sophisticated valuation tools rather than on the validity of the underlying data. The idiom "Garbage In, Garbage Out" holds true here. Like we witnessed in the Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO) debacle on Wall Street, sophisticated valuation models with the wrong
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5cuPBo-G1DQBZfjlPL6i3rV2tzA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5cuPBo-G1DQBZfjlPL6i3rV2tzA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5cuPBo-G1DQBZfjlPL6i3rV2tzA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5cuPBo-G1DQBZfjlPL6i3rV2tzA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/XapoeuJXEs0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/06/valuation-methods-and-public-markets.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAMRXY_eip7ImA9WxFVFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-5520218031028486285</id><published>2010-06-15T20:23:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-15T20:23:04.842-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-06-15T20:23:04.842-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IRC 409A code" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evidentiary requirement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="employee stock options" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="stock option valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Evidentiary requirement and 409A valuation</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/5520218031028486285/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=5520218031028486285" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/5520218031028486285?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/5520218031028486285?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/l7muAcpTDi4/evidentiary-requirement-and-409a.html" title="Evidentiary requirement and 409A valuation" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Several clients ask us questions about what types of information is collected and why. You see, 409A valuations have got more to do with substantiation and evidence and less to do with valuation techniques and number crunching. One of the things we have noticed, especially, in valuation work from overseas is use of data sources, enumeration and explanation of data, and calculation methods that 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QFPa_Jxmlm10nrb9AxOxk4dEhnQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QFPa_Jxmlm10nrb9AxOxk4dEhnQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QFPa_Jxmlm10nrb9AxOxk4dEhnQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QFPa_Jxmlm10nrb9AxOxk4dEhnQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/l7muAcpTDi4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/06/evidentiary-requirement-and-409a.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUAQXY9fip7ImA9WxFWEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-3318788353749085222</id><published>2010-05-29T21:21:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-29T22:40:40.866-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-29T22:40:40.866-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Search Engines" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AccuServe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="website valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AdWords" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AdSense" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Website value calculators are not appropriate for all website valuations!</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/3318788353749085222/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=3318788353749085222" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3318788353749085222?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3318788353749085222?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/v4z6pJDJIeM/website-value-calculators-are-not.html" title="Website value calculators are not appropriate for all website valuations!" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">There has been a mushrooming of website valuation calculators that purportedly calculate the value of websites. Most algorithms claim that they use a host of freely available information over the web such as back links, page views, rankings and other similar information to calculate the value of your website. Then they also also claim that they "estimate" how much advertising dollars the website 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jqj-hP9jpTLj9bp7DRrV_ph2MLA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jqj-hP9jpTLj9bp7DRrV_ph2MLA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jqj-hP9jpTLj9bp7DRrV_ph2MLA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jqj-hP9jpTLj9bp7DRrV_ph2MLA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/v4z6pJDJIeM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/website-value-calculators-are-not.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEABQXw9eyp7ImA9WxFXEkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-2904303662302442537</id><published>2010-05-19T13:04:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-19T14:12:30.263-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-19T14:12:30.263-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="employee stock options" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AccuServe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="privately held companies" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="start-up companies" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="restricted stock" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Too small to cope with 409A regulations? Try Restricted Stock!</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/2904303662302442537/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=2904303662302442537" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/2904303662302442537?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/2904303662302442537?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/zvn57sKu_Sk/too-small-to-fall-under-409a.html" title="Too small to cope with 409A regulations? Try Restricted Stock!" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">One of the things about 409A regulations is that it imposes a valuation requirement on you, which could be expensive depending on the service provider. Not every service provider operates efficiently and only a few like us are able to provide the highest quality at affordable rates. It took a lot of trial and error work, technology utilization and template work to get to this business proposition
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Yn_YlCDU0fTcAdZZSm-Kotb1dw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Yn_YlCDU0fTcAdZZSm-Kotb1dw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Yn_YlCDU0fTcAdZZSm-Kotb1dw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Yn_YlCDU0fTcAdZZSm-Kotb1dw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/zvn57sKu_Sk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/too-small-to-fall-under-409a.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YHRH44fip7ImA9WxFXEkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-7014713858387979422</id><published>2010-05-19T02:05:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-19T02:05:35.036-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-19T02:05:35.036-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="indepent appraisal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fair market valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Are some service providers violating the Independent Appraisal Presumption that is a MUST for a 409A valuation?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/7014713858387979422/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=7014713858387979422" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7014713858387979422?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7014713858387979422?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/uv6UlYhmZLg/are-some-service-providers-violating.html" title="Are some service providers violating the Independent Appraisal Presumption that is a MUST for a 409A valuation?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">When we analyzed some of the service providers out there for 409A valuation services, we have come across some companies that provide 409A valuation services possibly in violation of the independent appraisal presumption. These companies provide other services such as banking, receivables collection, IPO advisory, CFO rental services and similar such services for a fee to privately held companies
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xlIh_0q4lfNmISvcw0hKXTakIqY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xlIh_0q4lfNmISvcw0hKXTakIqY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xlIh_0q4lfNmISvcw0hKXTakIqY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xlIh_0q4lfNmISvcw0hKXTakIqY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/uv6UlYhmZLg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/are-some-service-providers-violating.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkcCSHg7eCp7ImA9WxFXEk8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-7283956861381123333</id><published>2010-05-18T19:07:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-18T19:07:49.600-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-18T19:07:49.600-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Advertising" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Search Engines" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google Adword" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Web search engine" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AdWords" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Searching" /><title>Does Google click for you? Are there link frauds, bid frauds and click frauds?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/7283956861381123333/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=7283956861381123333" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7283956861381123333?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7283956861381123333?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/WBi-jG8aWLk/does-google-click-for-you-are-there.html" title="Does Google click for you? Are there link frauds, bid frauds and click frauds?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I have learnt quite a bit from using Google Adwords for my advertising campaign. I have been able to tweak key words  and write blogs that have pushed Accuserve to the #1 result when the keywords "409A valuation", the most relevant keywords for our business, are used in the search engines. My blog results also show up as #1 for that keyword. But here's the problem: Google seems to want me to 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z6ML9_WYFjgzX9aPDiP4atc0UNc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z6ML9_WYFjgzX9aPDiP4atc0UNc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z6ML9_WYFjgzX9aPDiP4atc0UNc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z6ML9_WYFjgzX9aPDiP4atc0UNc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/WBi-jG8aWLk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/does-google-click-for-you-are-there.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04NRXs5cSp7ImA9WxFQEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-8939123098990307949</id><published>2010-05-04T12:54:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-05T09:26:34.529-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-05T09:26:34.529-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="start-up revenue growth rates" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="revenue models" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="venture capital exit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="start-up competition" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fair market valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="venture exit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>The "Take Notice" effect on revenue modeling for start-ups</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/8939123098990307949/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=8939123098990307949" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8939123098990307949?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8939123098990307949?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/0Cd_EmqNj-0/take-notice-effect-on-revenue-modeling.html" title="The &quot;Take Notice&quot; effect on revenue modeling for start-ups" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">After completing more than 400 valuation reports including 409A valuations, we have obtained certain heuristic knowledge that we can share for the benefit of the start-up community. In this blog, I want to analyze something called the "Take Notice" effect. We have reviewed business models of so many companies that have almost similar hockey stick type projection of revenues. When we review these 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2I5FOFlLUhkbZJ9IS8hCFmS5xvE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2I5FOFlLUhkbZJ9IS8hCFmS5xvE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2I5FOFlLUhkbZJ9IS8hCFmS5xvE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2I5FOFlLUhkbZJ9IS8hCFmS5xvE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/0Cd_EmqNj-0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/take-notice-effect-on-revenue-modeling.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4DRX07eCp7ImA9WxFQEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-8250586389738027478</id><published>2010-05-04T12:38:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-04T23:42:54.300-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-04T23:42:54.300-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="start-up revenue growth" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="start-up performance benchmarking" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="SaaS valuation multiples" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="start-up revenue model" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fair market valuation" /><title>Do start-ups have to project a growth of 150%+ to get a good valuation?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/8250586389738027478/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=8250586389738027478" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8250586389738027478?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8250586389738027478?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/gWOAC_UGiVE/do-start-ups-have-to-project-growth-of.html" title="Do start-ups have to project a growth of 150%+ to get a good valuation?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">During one of our 409A valuation analysis and the subsequent sale of the company to a public company (known for bargaining fair valuation multiples), we discovered that the company had been strategically sold for a valuation multiple much higher than the MVIC to Sales or Price to Sales multiples available out there for comparable companies, even industry leaders. This high valuation multiple 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVTGhSnXXTultJ4ZRbicmpXxntA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVTGhSnXXTultJ4ZRbicmpXxntA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVTGhSnXXTultJ4ZRbicmpXxntA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVTGhSnXXTultJ4ZRbicmpXxntA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/gWOAC_UGiVE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/do-start-ups-have-to-project-growth-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cGRHw9eip7ImA9WxFQEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-3521857770272032394</id><published>2010-05-03T23:38:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-04T23:43:45.262-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-04T23:43:45.262-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Pharmaceutical" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Business" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Drug development valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fair market valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="venture capital" /><title>What methods are being used for biotechnology valuations?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/3521857770272032394/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=3521857770272032394" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3521857770272032394?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3521857770272032394?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/wXWngqeTaNE/what-methods-are-being-used-for.html" title="What methods are being used for biotechnology valuations?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">In March 2009, Sangeeta Puran, Senior Associate, of Mayer Brown International, London, UK completed a study examining the methods used to value drug development programs. The study was conducted by interviewing individuals in the UK for a period of four months from a representative sample of twelve leading industry participants, including small biotech business development, large pharma and large
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a2PilW6o8iigdrCH_xHiDrnJX80/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a2PilW6o8iigdrCH_xHiDrnJX80/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a2PilW6o8iigdrCH_xHiDrnJX80/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/a2PilW6o8iigdrCH_xHiDrnJX80/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/wXWngqeTaNE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/what-methods-are-being-used-for.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QAQHc-eyp7ImA9WxFRGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-1939193746478248686</id><published>2010-05-01T18:03:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-03T14:29:01.953-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-03T14:29:01.953-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="silicon valley job report" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="California" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="silicon valley innovation leader" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Santa Clara" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bureau of Labor Statistics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Silicon Valley" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="High tech" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Recession" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="recession and silicon valley" /><title>Post the dot com bubble: Silicon Valley job and innovation report</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/1939193746478248686/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=1939193746478248686" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/1939193746478248686?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/1939193746478248686?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/YCPR6Gle_qA/post-dot-com-bubble-silicon-valley-job.html" title="Post the dot com bubble: Silicon Valley job and innovation report" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The Bureau of Labor Statistics in its Regional Report dated August 2009 says "Of the 11 industries analyzed in this report, 8 experienced employment declines and 3 industries—pharmaceuticals, aerospace, and scientific research—exhibited employment growth during the 2001 to 2008 period. " The BLS report states that employment in silicon valley declined by 17% in the 2001-2008 period, while the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8doLil5a92z4cCq_yZZSLiDKZL4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8doLil5a92z4cCq_yZZSLiDKZL4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8doLil5a92z4cCq_yZZSLiDKZL4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8doLil5a92z4cCq_yZZSLiDKZL4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/YCPR6Gle_qA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/05/post-dot-com-bubble-silicon-valley-job.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0EFR30yfyp7ImA9WxFRFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-4419355116166385495</id><published>2010-04-29T13:55:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-04-29T14:26:56.397-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-29T14:26:56.397-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tax court" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A audit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="internal revenue service" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>IRS begins Section 409A audits?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/4419355116166385495/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=4419355116166385495" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/4419355116166385495?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/4419355116166385495?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/ufBMlIhV_sg/irs-begins-section-409a-audits.html" title="IRS begins Section 409A audits?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">According to a release by Jones Day (http://www.jonesday.com/newsknowledge/publicationdetail.aspx?publication=6738), the IRS has sent Information Document Requests (IDRs) to companies that fall under Section 409A. The 409A section, as we all know, was enacted in 2004 (signed into law as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of  2004 and became effective Jan. 1, 2005) but took effect for most 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tzZBJ2-UD7vSSc3ynNxYlYoiFPM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tzZBJ2-UD7vSSc3ynNxYlYoiFPM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tzZBJ2-UD7vSSc3ynNxYlYoiFPM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tzZBJ2-UD7vSSc3ynNxYlYoiFPM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/ufBMlIhV_sg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/04/irs-begins-section-409a-audits.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0YAR3g4fyp7ImA9WxFQEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-8208434939027683333</id><published>2010-04-29T02:54:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-04T23:45:46.637-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-04T23:45:46.637-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="due diligence" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fair market valuation" /><title>Due diligence in 409A valuation reports</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/8208434939027683333/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=8208434939027683333" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8208434939027683333?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8208434939027683333?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/fj8NZCDTfNo/due-diligence-in-409a-valuation-reports.html" title="Due diligence in 409A valuation reports" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I wanted to write this note because we are receiving projects/reports where lack of communications between appraisers and companies is leading to erroneous reports. In a 409A valuation report, the emphasis is always on due diligence and supportable data/conclusions and less on the tools to arrive at the final discounted value. It takes industry experience and an understanding of the risk factors 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fjYIEItfFM605vKg1pWCDQ-2Vmg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fjYIEItfFM605vKg1pWCDQ-2Vmg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fjYIEItfFM605vKg1pWCDQ-2Vmg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fjYIEItfFM605vKg1pWCDQ-2Vmg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/fj8NZCDTfNo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/04/due-diligence-in-409a-valuation-reports.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8MRHo8fSp7ImA9WxFRFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-8481826440079104816</id><published>2010-04-28T14:07:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-04-29T13:41:25.475-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-29T13:41:25.475-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="US GAAP valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IRC 409A code" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cheap stock valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="business valuations outsourcing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="FAS 123R valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A tax cases" /><title>IRC 409A tax court cases</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/8481826440079104816/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=8481826440079104816" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8481826440079104816?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/8481826440079104816?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/bITI50G6rWA/irc-409a-tax-court-cases.html" title="IRC 409A tax court cases" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">With some of the first court cases appearing in the 409A area (See Slater vs Commissioner of Internal Revenue at http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname=in20100111d35), it is time to assume that the IRS is auditing 409A provisions and associated valuations. It is in this background we have to note the mushrooming of firms in this area. It has come to our notice that several firms are 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J-0zxrrqyw8qlnf8hOM9fEO5P2k/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J-0zxrrqyw8qlnf8hOM9fEO5P2k/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J-0zxrrqyw8qlnf8hOM9fEO5P2k/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/J-0zxrrqyw8qlnf8hOM9fEO5P2k/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/bITI50G6rWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/04/irc-409a-tax-court-cases.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQHQXY6eyp7ImA9WxFRE0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-1299128905399942869</id><published>2010-04-27T00:42:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-04-27T00:42:10.813-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-04-27T00:42:10.813-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Credit rating" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Subprime lending" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Goldman" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Credit rating agency" /><title>Lets play the ratings game!</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/1299128905399942869/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=1299128905399942869" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/1299128905399942869?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/1299128905399942869?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/3s6mC-3uV4w/lets-play-ratings-game.html" title="Lets play the ratings game!" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Now that the Goldman imbroglio threatens the forward economic movement again, it is important that we ask plenty of questions. While Goldman is being sued for acts of negligence, why arent the rating agencies being sued? 93% of sub-prime mortgage was downgraded from AAA to junk status at the beginning of the crisis, yet the agencies get to have immunity. If the rating agencies cannot be sued, why
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BwZLqydw4tCHvEBTjuC_xo2TmvA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BwZLqydw4tCHvEBTjuC_xo2TmvA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BwZLqydw4tCHvEBTjuC_xo2TmvA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BwZLqydw4tCHvEBTjuC_xo2TmvA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/3s6mC-3uV4w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/04/lets-play-ratings-game.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QFR3g_eCp7ImA9WxFQEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-7575599873597408148</id><published>2010-04-16T21:18:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-05-04T23:48:36.640-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-05-04T23:48:36.640-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="term sheet negotiations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="participating preferred" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="founder's RoI" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fair market valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="anti-dilution" /><title>When negotiating term sheets, should a founder just focus on anti-dilution clauses?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/7575599873597408148/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=7575599873597408148" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7575599873597408148?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/7575599873597408148?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/guu7BEKzgZw/negotiating-term-sheets.html" title="When negotiating term sheets, should a founder just focus on anti-dilution clauses?" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">Many founders are focused on whether or not to include anti-dilution clauses. What they fail to realize is that the funding structure is more complex than just dilution. A VC can  invest in a way that it may look like you are holding 50% of the  company's common stock, but you may get allocated a much lesser value. For instance, if  the VC negotiates a 2X liquidation preference with a full 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6BiiH8it7Ezjwfehacbym9ExtRs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6BiiH8it7Ezjwfehacbym9ExtRs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6BiiH8it7Ezjwfehacbym9ExtRs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6BiiH8it7Ezjwfehacbym9ExtRs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/guu7BEKzgZw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/04/negotiating-term-sheets.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEMFQHg7eip7ImA9WxBVGUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-2823453137832929887</id><published>2010-02-23T18:02:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-23T18:06:51.602-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-23T18:06:51.602-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="healthcare SPDRs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="healthcare ETFs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="biotechnology ETFs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="biotechnology valuation" /><title>A good year for Biotechnology ETFs</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/2823453137832929887/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=2823453137832929887" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/2823453137832929887?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/2823453137832929887?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/Gz2b3ycxw2U/good-year-for-biotechnology-etfs.html" title="A good year for Biotechnology ETFs" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">AccuServe uses domestic, specialty ETFs focused on health care/biotechnology to assess how these funds performed and arrive at an overarching trend year-over-year for valuations. 1-year returns of such funds have ranged between 11.6% and 57.4% with a trading volume-weighted average of 25.8% return. Clearly, the valuations have improved significantly. The relatively highly traded (70.7% of trading
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UGvUBTQtTu9Lqj0BsEeFbEH5tFg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UGvUBTQtTu9Lqj0BsEeFbEH5tFg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UGvUBTQtTu9Lqj0BsEeFbEH5tFg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UGvUBTQtTu9Lqj0BsEeFbEH5tFg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/Gz2b3ycxw2U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/02/good-year-for-biotechnology-etfs.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0EDRHk4fyp7ImA9WxBVGEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-3857474442971415120</id><published>2010-02-22T12:18:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-22T12:27:55.737-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-22T12:27:55.737-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="waterfall model" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Preferred stock valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="FAS 156/157 valuations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Private equity/VC valuation and 409A</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/3857474442971415120/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=3857474442971415120" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3857474442971415120?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/3857474442971415120?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/gB9fHht5SoA/private-equityvc-valuation-and-409a.html" title="Private equity/VC valuation and 409A" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">At Accuserve, we serve both the venture capital/private equity companies (when we mark to market their portfolios) as well as portfolio companies when they issue stock options, acquire intangible assets and so on. One of the recent observations has been as to whether only one set of valuation is required for both mark-to-market purposes for the VC/PE firms as well as the underlying common stock 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e9g_XFqB6CsKbTUftnt-AlMX33w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e9g_XFqB6CsKbTUftnt-AlMX33w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e9g_XFqB6CsKbTUftnt-AlMX33w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/e9g_XFqB6CsKbTUftnt-AlMX33w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/gB9fHht5SoA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/02/private-equityvc-valuation-and-409a.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0MNQ3k8eSp7ImA9WxBXF0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3293550558981864369.post-6096269635637734798</id><published>2010-01-28T17:48:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-28T17:58:12.771-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-28T17:58:12.771-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="minority common stock valuation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="founder's stock sale" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="409A valuation" /><title>Founder Stock Sale and 409A valuation</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ideagame.blogspot.com/feeds/6096269635637734798/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3293550558981864369&amp;postID=6096269635637734798" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/6096269635637734798?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3293550558981864369/posts/default/6096269635637734798?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~3/ujXKoPpDMTU/founder-stock-sale-and-409a-valuation.html" title="Founder Stock Sale and 409A valuation" /><author><name>Shiva Badruswamy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18381430920699236569</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="24" height="32" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_xdiP0DR3x4w/SI2ER2zr0ZI/AAAAAAAAAAM/dlNIRobFWJY/S220/model_photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">In today's tough economy, founders of small companies are figuring out a way to get more liquidity for their stocks by partially liquidating their holdings with existing investors. This could mean that founder's common stocks are being bought at the latest preferred stock prices, thereby creating implied valuations that may make the minority common stock price jump by a degree of magnitude. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/G1ISXkDF64Xx5JogIgJ42VWtNQ0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/G1ISXkDF64Xx5JogIgJ42VWtNQ0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/G1ISXkDF64Xx5JogIgJ42VWtNQ0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/G1ISXkDF64Xx5JogIgJ42VWtNQ0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BadruswamysIdeaGame/~4/ujXKoPpDMTU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://ideagame.blogspot.com/2010/01/founder-stock-sale-and-409a-valuation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

