<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512</id><updated>2012-09-13T00:23:28.121-07:00</updated><title type="text">Baker Pacific Blog</title><subtitle type="html">Corporate development and M&amp;amp;A in the Internet and telecommunications sectors</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>21</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BakerPacificBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="bakerpacificblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>BakerPacificBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FBakerPacificBlog" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FBakerPacificBlog" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FBakerPacificBlog" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/BakerPacificBlog" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FBakerPacificBlog" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FBakerPacificBlog" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-6021577296298370011</id><published>2011-07-01T08:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-07-01T08:11:32.685-07:00</updated><title type="text">The Optimal Size Acquisition</title><summary type="html">Is there an optimal size acquisition, either on an absolute basis or relative to the size of the acquirer?

Companies that are active acquirers are continually evaluating transactions across a wide range of sizes. Some employ criteria on the size of the M&amp;amp;A target, and the answer to the question posed here would be useful in refining such criteria. Likewise, the answer would give companies &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/H_Fp6TOHSWs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/6021577296298370011/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=6021577296298370011" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/6021577296298370011" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/6021577296298370011" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/H_Fp6TOHSWs/optimal-size-acquisition.html" title="The Optimal Size Acquisition" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2011/07/optimal-size-acquisition.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-4144375392910114893</id><published>2010-04-27T17:16:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-20T12:17:17.798-08:00</updated><title type="text">Welcome to the new location of the Baker Pacific Blog</title><summary type="html">The Baker Pacific Blog is now located at this location, http://blog.bakerpacific.com/.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/posts/default.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/3x7NdPgmPC4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="related" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/" title="Welcome to the new location of the Baker Pacific Blog" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/4144375392910114893/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=4144375392910114893" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/4144375392910114893" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/4144375392910114893" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/3x7NdPgmPC4/this-blog-has-moved.html" title="Welcome to the new location of the Baker Pacific Blog" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2010/04/this-blog-has-moved.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-7930697809947788757</id><published>2009-06-16T09:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T09:45:36.131-07:00</updated><title type="text">Who Can I Trust on This M&amp;A Deal?</title><summary type="html">In a recent segment of the Wall Street Journal’s Deal Journal Video: The Dark Arts of Investment Banking, Evan Newmark remarks, “… for the people involved, the incentives are almost always to get the deal done.” This captures a well-known problem in dealmaking, but what is the solution?In many cases, even company management has an incentive to complete a transaction (larger empire, financial &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/k3cVV8Jhl5M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/7930697809947788757/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=7930697809947788757" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/7930697809947788757" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/7930697809947788757" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/k3cVV8Jhl5M/who-can-i-trust-on-this-m-deal.html" title="Who Can I Trust on This M&amp;A Deal?" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2009/06/who-can-i-trust-on-this-m-deal.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-1907571947785078285</id><published>2009-01-20T09:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T17:26:08.131-07:00</updated><title type="text">Selling a Company During Tough Times – Part 2, The Deal</title><summary type="html">Proactively selling a company during this difficult economic environment is a delicate operation. How does one pursue the sale of a company without appearing desperate?

The previous article (below) covered what to do differently in locating and engaging with potential acquirers. This one will touch on how to handle the deal execution phase differently during tough times.


1. My opinion on &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/8OMw6eWRPIU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/1907571947785078285/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=1907571947785078285" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/1907571947785078285" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/1907571947785078285" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/8OMw6eWRPIU/selling-company-during-tough-times-part.html" title="Selling a Company During Tough Times – Part 2, The Deal" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2009/01/selling-company-during-tough-times-part.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-4445387336282650089</id><published>2008-12-05T08:56:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-05T08:59:44.542-08:00</updated><title type="text">Selling a Company During Tough Times – Part 1, The Search</title><summary type="html">Proactively selling a company during this difficult economic environment is a delicate operation. How does one pursue the sale of a company without appearing desperate?There are still potential acquirers out there. However, the field is much smaller, with many buyers conserving cash, unwilling to issue “undervalued” stock as consideration, or simply focused on business execution. Therefore, the &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/DtctH2xErJY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/4445387336282650089/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=4445387336282650089" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/4445387336282650089" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/4445387336282650089" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/DtctH2xErJY/selling-company-during-tough-times-part.html" title="Selling a Company During Tough Times – Part 1, The Search" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2008/12/selling-company-during-tough-times-part.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-6552595382804336760</id><published>2008-06-06T18:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-01-20T19:26:37.270-08:00</updated><title type="text">Due Diligence in Reverse</title><summary type="html">Companies in the midst of being acquired expect the potential acquirer to perform a thorough due diligence review. But what level of due diligence on the acquirer, or “reverse due diligence,” should they demand?There are several aspects this question.Cash as considerationFirst, for the investors / shareholders, does the health of the acquirer affect the consideration received? In the case of an &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/Mdo-OYZuBMM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/6552595382804336760/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=6552595382804336760" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/6552595382804336760" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/6552595382804336760" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/Mdo-OYZuBMM/due-diligence-in-reverse.html" title="Due Diligence in Reverse" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2008/06/due-diligence-in-reverse.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-8689854162841375636</id><published>2007-09-30T22:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-10-21T16:41:46.867-07:00</updated><title type="text">Should We Make That Strategic Investment?</title><summary type="html">As a large technology company, is investing in a smaller commercial partner a great opportunity strategically and financially, or is it a distraction and a waste of resources?I’ve seen quite a bit of discussion on the subject of whether a small, growing technology company should take a strategic investment from a larger company in the same industry. However, I’ve seen much less that addresses the&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/Ji7RUjSn0zE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/8689854162841375636/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=8689854162841375636" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/8689854162841375636" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/8689854162841375636" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/Ji7RUjSn0zE/should-we-make-that-strategic.html" title="Should We Make That Strategic Investment?" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2007/09/should-we-make-that-strategic.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-6055783776213119749</id><published>2007-08-29T16:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T14:32:47.071-07:00</updated><title type="text">Four Important Things to Know Before You Sell Your Company</title><summary type="html">The idea of selling your company, receiving a huge payment, and then relaxing on a quiet beach sounds very attractive – what’s not to like? However, it’s important to know what to expect before making the decision to sell.Here are a few of the basics to be prepared for when contemplating selling your company:1. Be patientEven with interested buyers, the process of getting to an acceptable price &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/GkAW_tv6oCU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/6055783776213119749/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=6055783776213119749" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/6055783776213119749" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/6055783776213119749" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/GkAW_tv6oCU/four-important-things-to-know-before.html" title="Four Important Things to Know Before You Sell Your Company" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2007/08/four-important-things-to-know-before.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-404525515764208764</id><published>2007-06-05T22:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-06-05T22:44:43.351-07:00</updated><title type="text">Which Comes First, the M&amp;A Strategy or the M&amp;A Execution?</title><summary type="html">The obvious answer to this is that M&amp;amp;A strategy comes first, and M&amp;amp;A execution follows the strategy. I agree with this as the ideal and preferred method for determining acquisitions, but I’d argue that there is actually room for the reverse as well, with proper discipline.Clearly, the textbook order of progression is:1. Corporate strategy2. M&amp;amp;A strategy3. M&amp;amp;A screening and targeting4. M&amp;amp;A &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/lZQ0C32A54U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/404525515764208764/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=404525515764208764" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/404525515764208764" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/404525515764208764" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/lZQ0C32A54U/which-comes-first-m-strategy-or-m.html" title="Which Comes First, the M&amp;A Strategy or the M&amp;A Execution?" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2007/06/which-comes-first-m-strategy-or-m.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-588920918104289365</id><published>2007-05-14T12:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T17:16:55.782-07:00</updated><title type="text">Planning Ahead to be Acquired</title><summary type="html">In Mergers &amp;amp; Acquisitions, a logical corollary to the acquiring company asking itself “What am I buying?” is the selling company asking itself:

“What am I selling?”
A company should be run as an ongoing business, not with the express purpose of an exit. However, there are measures that can be taken to increase the odds of eventually being acquired.

One of those is to determine the companies &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/F7CrNo_JnRM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/588920918104289365/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=588920918104289365" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/588920918104289365" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/588920918104289365" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/F7CrNo_JnRM/planning-ahead-to-be-acquired.html" title="Planning Ahead to be Acquired" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2007/05/planning-ahead-to-be-acquired.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-7827838477561152798</id><published>2007-02-28T21:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T17:23:25.476-07:00</updated><title type="text">The Most Important Question in Mergers &amp; Acquisitions</title><summary type="html">An acquisition is obviously a very involved process, involving strategic considerations and numerous qualitative and quantitative criteria. The importance of being thoughtful, thorough, analytical, and prepared cannot be overstated. However, it’s frequently helpful to take a step back during the acquisition process to ask:

“What am I buying?”

Of course, there’s no right answer, but there should&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/-URYlVkxqkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/7827838477561152798/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=7827838477561152798" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/7827838477561152798" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/7827838477561152798" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/-URYlVkxqkU/most-important-question-in-mergers.html" title="The Most Important Question in Mergers &amp; Acquisitions" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2007/02/most-important-question-in-mergers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-2302315655378918509</id><published>2007-01-25T17:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T17:14:30.373-07:00</updated><title type="text">Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Complete Series</title><summary type="html">For convenience, the full four-part series on “The Basics of Mergers &amp;amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence” is now available as a single reference document. It can be accessed here or on the Baker Pacific website.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/jJZ_J00rOHE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/2302315655378918509/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=2302315655378918509" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/2302315655378918509" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/2302315655378918509" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/jJZ_J00rOHE/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html" title="Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Complete Series" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2007/01/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-116496064243781398</id><published>2006-12-01T00:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T17:22:14.272-07:00</updated><title type="text">Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 4</title><summary type="html">In advising companies that are acquisition candidates, two of the questions that I most frequently receive are:

1. What should I expect from the due diligence process?
and
2. How can I best protect my confidential information while still moving the process forward?

I already covered #1 (see Due Diligence, Part 1) and Parts A and B of #2 (see Due Diligence, Part 2 and Due Diligence, Part 3). I’&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/4C25KWsreWw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/116496064243781398/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=116496064243781398" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116496064243781398" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116496064243781398" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/4C25KWsreWw/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html" title="Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 4" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/12/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-116373008729393965</id><published>2006-11-16T18:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T17:21:07.248-07:00</updated><title type="text">Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 3</title><summary type="html">In advising companies that are acquisition candidates, two of the questions that I most frequently receive are:

1. What should I expect from the due diligence process?
and
2. How can I best protect my confidential information while still moving the process forward?

I already covered #1 (see Due Diligence, Part 1) and Part A of #2 (see Due Diligence, Part 2). I’ll cover the Part B of #2 in this &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/Jg739wM7ZoY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/116373008729393965/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=116373008729393965" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116373008729393965" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116373008729393965" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/Jg739wM7ZoY/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence_16.html" title="Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 3" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/11/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence_16.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-116328826568658003</id><published>2006-11-11T15:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-24T23:02:18.226-07:00</updated><title type="text">Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 2</title><summary type="html">In advising companies that are acquisition candidates, two of the questions that I most frequently receive are:

1. What should I expect from the due diligence process?
and
2. How can I best protect my confidential information while still moving the process forward?

I addressed #1 last time (see Due Diligence, Part 1) and will cover Part A of #2 in this post, with the remainder in the next two &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/uziE5W2FF4k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/116328826568658003/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=116328826568658003" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116328826568658003" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116328826568658003" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/uziE5W2FF4k/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html" title="Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 2" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/11/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-116233578476243476</id><published>2006-10-31T14:57:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-11-01T15:47:50.753-08:00</updated><title type="text">Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 1</title><summary type="html">In advising companies that are acquisition candidates, two of the questions that I most frequently receive are:1. What should I expect from the due diligence process?and2. How can I best protect my confidential information while still moving the process forward?Of course, the due diligence process varies widely based on a number of characteristics of both the acquiring company and the target &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/qDJJNAXbRAQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/116233578476243476/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=116233578476243476" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116233578476243476" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/116233578476243476" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/qDJJNAXbRAQ/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html" title="Mergers &amp; Acquisitions Due Diligence, Part 1" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/10/mergers-acquisitions-due-diligence.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-115818067830628152</id><published>2006-09-13T13:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-09-13T18:10:52.290-07:00</updated><title type="text">Swimming upstream – What about upstream bandwidth?</title><summary type="html">The big 5 ILECs and the big 5 cable companies nearly all have broadband offerings that provide downstream bandwidth of up to 5-8 Mbps for $45 per month or less. In two cases, Verizon and Cablevision, each has a set of broadband services that provides up to 10-50 Mbps downstream.That kind of downstream speed covers the bulk of consumer applications in use today and coming in the near &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/y_D3FlEgquA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/115818067830628152/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=115818067830628152" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115818067830628152" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115818067830628152" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/y_D3FlEgquA/swimming-upstream-what-about-upstream.html" title="Swimming upstream – What about upstream bandwidth?" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/09/swimming-upstream-what-about-upstream.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-115708841009625529</id><published>2006-08-31T22:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-01-25T18:24:17.837-08:00</updated><title type="text">Insider Trading and Avoiding Leaks</title><summary type="html">Insider trading is a popular topic in the press this week.Last Sunday’s New York Times highlights the frequency of suspicious trading activity ahead of M&amp;amp;A news (Whispers of Mergers Set Off Suspicious Trading). The conclusions are based on an analysis by Measuredmarkets Inc. for the NY Times. What is particularly telling is that in some of the cases, “the abnormal trading occurred during periods &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/Kj9sqV2-KMk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/115708841009625529/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=115708841009625529" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115708841009625529" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115708841009625529" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/Kj9sqV2-KMk/insider-trading-and-avoiding-leaks.html" title="Insider Trading and Avoiding Leaks" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/08/insider-trading-and-avoiding-leaks.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-115431307585649028</id><published>2006-07-30T19:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T14:29:14.512-07:00</updated><title type="text">Josh King’s AT&amp;T Wireless Post-Mortem</title><summary type="html">I enjoyed reading Josh King’s account of the sale of AT&amp;amp;T Wireless in the Corporate Dealmaker. It certainly brings back memories of my nearly 7 years in corporate development at SBC, including a couple of multi-billion dollar deals.I found the account interesting reading on its own, but also useful for helping to compare how others run the deal process with my own experiences. This one was &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/VbXHsFGouq4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/115431307585649028/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=115431307585649028" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115431307585649028" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115431307585649028" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/VbXHsFGouq4/josh-kings-att-wireless-post-mortem.html" title="Josh King’s AT&amp;T Wireless Post-Mortem" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/07/josh-kings-att-wireless-post-mortem.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-115430803130711741</id><published>2006-07-30T18:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2006-07-30T19:39:20.473-07:00</updated><title type="text">Welcome to the Baker Pacific Blog</title><summary type="html">I’m finally launching this forum for informal observations, comments, and insights on select topics, which fall into two broad categories:1. Issues of interest from the perspective of the corporate development executive – mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, alliances, and strategy.2. Key developments in the telecommunications and Internet sectors, particularly focused on services and software &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/Rl7dr8BsEj8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/115430803130711741/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=115430803130711741" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115430803130711741" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115430803130711741" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/Rl7dr8BsEj8/welcome-to-baker-pacific-blog.html" title="Welcome to the Baker Pacific Blog" /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/07/welcome-to-baker-pacific-blog.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31652512.post-115406950616917733</id><published>2006-07-27T23:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-17T09:55:44.234-07:00</updated><title type="text">Coming Soon ...</title><summary type="html">...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~4/Rd4oZikIOnY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.bakerpacific.com/feeds/115406950616917733/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=31652512&amp;postID=115406950616917733" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115406950616917733" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/31652512/posts/default/115406950616917733" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BakerPacificBlog/~3/Rd4oZikIOnY/coming-soon_27.html" title="Coming Soon ..." /><author><name>David Shanberg</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.bakerpacific.com/2006/07/coming-soon_27.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
