<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Barbarism</title>
	
	<link>http://barbarism.net</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BarbarismBeginsAtHome" /><feedburner:info uri="barbarismbeginsathome" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Secondary Kill</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/EhR9sYKU-3Q/</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/secondary-kill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth abides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the stand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new idea was shaping in his mind and a new phrase with it—Secondary Kill. Of those that the Great Disaster had spared, many would fall victim to some trouble from which civilization had previously protected them. With unlimited liquor &#8230; <a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/secondary-kill/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>A new idea was shaping in his mind and a new phrase with it—Secondary Kill. Of those that the Great Disaster had spared, many would fall victim to some trouble from which civilization had previously protected them. With unlimited liquor they would drink themselves to death. There had been, he guessed, murder; almost certainly there had been suicide. Some, like the old man, who ordinarily would have lived normal enough lives, would be pushed over the line into insanity by shock and the need of readjustment; such ones would probably not survive long. Some would meet with accident; being alone, they would die. Others would die of disease which no one was left to treat. He knew that, biologically speaking, there was a critical point in the numbers of any species—if the numbers were reduced below this point, the species could not recover. Was mankind going to survive? Well, that was one of those interesting points which gave him the will to live. But certainly the result of his day&#8217;s research gave him little confidence. In fact, if these survivors were typical, who would wish mankind to survive?</p>
</blockquote>

<p><i>Earth Abides, George Stewart</i></p>

<p>One of my favorite parts from <em>The Stand</em> was the section in the expanded edition in which King tells all the stories indirectly brought on by the superflu: people getting locked in walk-in refrigerators, that sort of thing.</p>

<p>The thing that makes apocalypse stories interesting isn&#8217;t what caused the world to end (oftentimes it isn&#8217;t even explained), but what survivors are willing do to each other to keep living and what that says about our true inner selves.</p>

<p>Even if it is just fiction.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/EhR9sYKU-3Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/secondary-kill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/secondary-kill/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[HTML Conversations]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/Vc5n41lRm7Q/links.html</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/html-conversations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I like posting fake dialogs and IM conversations here, but I&#8217;ve always wondered what the CORRECT way to mark it up is. Should it be a definition list? Maybe paragraph elements with line breaks? I WANT IT TO BE &#8230; <a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/html-conversations/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/html-conversations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'HTML Conversations'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I like posting fake dialogs and IM conversations here, but I&#8217;ve always wondered what the <strong>CORRECT</strong> way to mark it up is. Should it be a definition list? Maybe paragraph elements with line breaks? I WANT IT TO BE CORRECT!</p>

<p>But, like many things in HTML, there really is no correct way. HTML5 specs proposed a dialog element, but <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/0618.html">it was dropped back in 2009</a>.</p>

<p>So what should you do? I dunno…use paragraphs I guess. And if you want to style it use spans and other junk. What&#8217;s the big deal, nerd?</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/links.html#conversations">4.13.3 Conversations</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/html-conversations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'HTML Conversations'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/Vc5n41lRm7Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/html-conversations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/links.html#conversations</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Nile Rodgers and Daft Punk Working Together]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/Fv45v_SINwE/</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/nile-rodgers-and-daft-punk-working-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daft punk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nile rodgers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome news for those who like to keep their feet dancing.1 Daft Punk in Talks with Nile Rodgers for New Album See what i did there?&#160;&#8617; ∞ Permalink<a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/nile-rodgers-and-daft-punk-working-together/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'Nile Rodgers and Daft Punk Working Together'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome news for those who like to keep their feet dancing.<sup id="fnref:myfeetkeepdancing"><a href="#fn:myfeetkeepdancing" rel="footnote">1</a></sup></p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.pitchfork.com/news/45348-daft-punk-in-talks-with-nile-rodgers-for-new-album/">Daft Punk in Talks with Nile Rodgers for New Album</a></li>
</ul>

<div class="footnotes">
<hr />
<ol>

<li id="fn:myfeetkeepdancing">
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Feet_Keep_Dancing">See what i did there</a>?&#160;<a href="#fnref:myfeetkeepdancing" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
</li>

</ol>
</div>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/nile-rodgers-and-daft-punk-working-together/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'Nile Rodgers and Daft Punk Working Together'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/Fv45v_SINwE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/nile-rodgers-and-daft-punk-working-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.pitchfork.com/news/45348-daft-punk-in-talks-with-nile-rodgers-for-new-album/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[&#8220;I didn&#8217;t work this f***ing hard to date my past self&#8221;]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/jzFhbB2XYdU/pd3bw</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/i-didnt-work-this-fing-hard-to-date-my-past-self/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attitudes on dating fat people from formerly obese people. For those who have lost quite a bit of weight, what is your attitude to dating people who are overweight/obese? ∞ Permalink<a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/i-didnt-work-this-fing-hard-to-date-my-past-self/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;I didn&#8217;t work this f***ing hard to date my past self&#8221;'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attitudes on dating fat people from formerly obese people.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://redd.it/pd3bw">For those who have lost quite a bit of weight, what is your attitude to dating people who are overweight/obese?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/i-didnt-work-this-fing-hard-to-date-my-past-self/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;I didn&#8217;t work this f***ing hard to date my past self&#8221;'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/jzFhbB2XYdU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/i-didnt-work-this-fing-hard-to-date-my-past-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://redd.it/pd3bw</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Samsung&#8217;s 2012 Super Bowl Ad]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/LnbU9l-LWzE/watch</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/samsungs-2012-super-bowl-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the darkness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problems with bashing your competition in ads: It acknowledges your competition It makes it seem like everyone who uses your competitor&#8217;s product is an idiot, which fails to endear them to your product and makes you seem like a &#8230; <a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/samsungs-2012-super-bowl-ad/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/samsungs-2012-super-bowl-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'Samsung&#8217;s 2012 Super Bowl Ad'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe width="550" height="309" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CgfknZidYq0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<p>The problems with bashing your competition in ads:</p>

<ol>
<li>It acknowledges your competition</li>
<li>It makes it seem like everyone who uses your competitor&#8217;s product is an idiot, which fails to endear them to your product and makes you seem like a jerk</li>
</ol>

<p>Also <em>hey you guys remember that song from 10 years ago by what was that band anyway they were in an ad for something last night, gonna go download it on iTunes now</em>.</p>

<p>Not sure if this is an ad for The Darkness or an ad for Samsung.</p>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/samsungs-2012-super-bowl-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'Samsung&#8217;s 2012 Super Bowl Ad'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/LnbU9l-LWzE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/samsungs-2012-super-bowl-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgfknZidYq0</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve done it again]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/K1m2ALFqHqo/166329382284169218</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/youve-done-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[∞ Permalink<a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/youve-done-it-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'You&#8217;ve done it again'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="ModernMediaTweetShortcode"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" width="550"><p>Madonna, you've done it again...made me want to sleep with a 50 year old woman. Thank you.</p>&mdash; PAtrick (@Unclear99) <a href="https://twitter.com/Unclear99/status/166329382284169218" data-datetime="2012-02-06T01:16:29+00:00">February 6, 2012</a></blockquote></div>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/youve-done-it-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'You&#8217;ve done it again'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/K1m2ALFqHqo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/youve-done-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://twitter.com/Unclear99/status/166329382284169218</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[&#8220;I’m Confused, BioWare…&#8221; by Susan Arendt]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/PM6IdR8YkkE/</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/im-confused-bioware-by-susan-arendt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass effect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arendt on Mass Effect 3&#8216;s guest star, a sexy female personality from TV network G4. The emphasis should be on the game, not the guest star. The character is the important person on that equation, not the person playing them. &#8230; <a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/im-confused-bioware-by-susan-arendt/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/im-confused-bioware-by-susan-arendt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;I’m Confused, BioWare…&#8221; by Susan Arendt'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arendt on <em>Mass Effect 3</em>&#8216;s guest star, a sexy female personality from TV network G4.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The emphasis should be on the game, not the guest star. The character is the important person on that equation, not the person playing them. Every single time her journalist character comes on screen, I’m supposed to remember that it’s Jessica Chobot, which is unfair because it takes away my ability to escape into the game world.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>If this is the direction the series is going in then maybe it&#8217;s not so bad that my 360 died halfway through <em>Mass Effect 2</em>.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://susanarendt.com/2012/02/01/im-confused-bioware/">I’m Confused, BioWare… | Quest Board</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/im-confused-bioware-by-susan-arendt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;I’m Confused, BioWare…&#8221; by Susan Arendt'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/PM6IdR8YkkE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/im-confused-bioware-by-susan-arendt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://susanarendt.com/2012/02/01/im-confused-bioware/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[&#8220;Talking Copycats with Zynga&#8217;s Design Chief&#8221; by Kris Gaft]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/zdOZrEgYlRI/talking_copycats_with_zyngas_.php</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/talking-copycats-with-zyngas-design-chief-by-kris-gaft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamasutra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zynga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zynga thinks of their games as inspirations from other games, like the similarities between Command and Conquer and Warcraft, or shooters like Quake and Unreal: games that came out at around the same time that built upon elements from each &#8230; <a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/talking-copycats-with-zyngas-design-chief-by-kris-gaft/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/talking-copycats-with-zyngas-design-chief-by-kris-gaft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;Talking Copycats with Zynga&#8217;s Design Chief&#8221; by Kris Gaft'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zynga thinks of their games as inspirations from other games, like the similarities between <em>Command and Conquer</em> and <em>Warcraft</em>, or shooters like <em>Quake</em> and <em>Unreal</em>: games that came out at around the same time that built upon elements from each other.</p>

<p>Gaft questions the comparison. This excerpt reveals a lot:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Well, that’s the thing, though. With that example in particular, you&#8217;ve got &#8220;some of this&#8221; and you&#8217;ve got &#8220;some of that&#8221; and it’s got some new stuff thrown in. The games in question are games that are being accused of taking too much, and not adding enough.</p>
  
  <p>Like Dream Heights &#8212; it’s being accused of not taking anything from anywhere else, that it’s not taking a little bit from there or a little bit from here or adding new stuff. A lot of people are seeing, &#8220;Hey, this is a reskinned Tiny Tower,&#8221; and I think that’s the difference, though, between the example you gave and what’s happening now.</p>
  
  <p>[PR steered the conversation away from Dream Heights at this point.]</p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6687/talking_copycats_with_zyngas_.php?print=1">Gamasutra &#8211; Features &#8211; Talking Copycats with Zynga&#8217;s Design Chief</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/talking-copycats-with-zyngas-design-chief-by-kris-gaft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;Talking Copycats with Zynga&#8217;s Design Chief&#8221; by Kris Gaft'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/zdOZrEgYlRI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/talking-copycats-with-zyngas-design-chief-by-kris-gaft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6687/talking_copycats_with_zyngas_.php?print=1</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Primary Care Physicians on the Decline]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/uW2OSBHxAB0/article_ad337502-4fac-11e1-9674-0019bb2963f4.html</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/primary-care-physicians-on-the-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the number of U.S.-born physicians expected to become primary care practitioners &#8211; internal medicine, family practice and pediatrics &#8211; decreased 31 percent from 2000 to 2010. And the group expects the shortage &#8230; <a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/primary-care-physicians-on-the-decline/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/primary-care-physicians-on-the-decline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'Primary Care Physicians on the Decline'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <p>According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the number of U.S.-born physicians expected to become primary care practitioners &#8211; internal medicine, family practice and pediatrics &#8211; decreased 31 percent from 2000 to 2010. And the group expects the shortage to get worse.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Also cited for the shortage is the amount of doctors who go towards specialties because they&#8217;re more lucrative than being a general practitioner.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://poststar.com/news/local/primary-care-physicians-increasingly-rare/article_ad337502-4fac-11e1-9674-0019bb2963f4.html">Primary Care physicians increasingly rare</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/primary-care-physicians-on-the-decline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to 'Primary Care Physicians on the Decline'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/uW2OSBHxAB0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/primary-care-physicians-on-the-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://poststar.com/news/local/primary-care-physicians-increasingly-rare/article_ad337502-4fac-11e1-9674-0019bb2963f4.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[&#8220;No Pet For You&#8221;  by Emily Yoffe]]></title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~3/Hoz-9mzezn8/animal_rescue_want_to_adopt_a_dog_or_cat_prepare_for_an_inquisition_.single.html</link>
		<comments>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/no-pet-for-you-by-emily-yoffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Studnicky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barbarism.net/?p=6424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes adopting a pet is harder than it should be. High standards in screenings of potential owners leave many animals without a home. No Pet For You ∞ Permalink<a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/no-pet-for-you-by-emily-yoffe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;No Pet For You&#8221;  by Emily Yoffe'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes adopting a pet is harder than it should be. High standards in screenings of potential owners leave many animals without a home.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/life/heavy_petting/2012/01/animal_rescue_want_to_adopt_a_dog_or_cat_prepare_for_an_inquisition_.single.html">No Pet For You</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://barbarism.net/2012/02/no-pet-for-you-by-emily-yoffe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to '&#8220;No Pet For You&#8221;  by Emily Yoffe'" class="glyph">∞ Permalink</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BarbarismBeginsAtHome/~4/Hoz-9mzezn8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barbarism.net/2012/02/no-pet-for-you-by-emily-yoffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.slate.com/articles/life/heavy_petting/2012/01/animal_rescue_want_to_adopt_a_dog_or_cat_prepare_for_an_inquisition_.single.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.469 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-07 20:05:53 -->

