Baseball Outlook

My New Endeavor

2012-06-18T14:41:00.001-04:00

I am extremely pleased to let you guys know that I have been asked to write on a very serious SABR slanted website called Beyond the Boxscore. I thank every single person that has ever read anything I've written on this blog for their time and effort.

Anyways my first post is up and for all you Mets fans out there, it's about Ike Davis' struggles at the plate. Enjoy.

A Closer Look at Pitchers Who Consistently Underperform their Peripherals

2012-04-16T08:24:00.002-04:00

As I started preparing for the fantasy baseball season, I found myself wondering which pitchers would maintain their low ERA despite their higher peripherals and which pitchers I should shy away from even though they have great peripherals. I couldn't help but think that there is some missing piece, a systematic flaw, in the peripheral metrics like FIP and SIERA. I then started thinking about what that flaw could be. For a few weeks I made no headway at all, until it just came to me. I thought back to this article I once read on Johan Santana consistently outpitching his peripherals. The article hypothesized that Santana's success in undeviatingly overperforming his peripherals had to do with his changeup inducing weak flyballs. The reason something like this would lower Santana's ERA while not effecting his FIP or SIERA is because peripheral based metrics cannot differentiate between flyballs. All flyballs are looked at the same in a stat like SIERA, which is obviously not true, but does not make any quantifiable difference to the vast majority of MLB pitchers. Apparently it does for changeup artists like Santana.

I used the same concept about changeups to try to understand the opposite, pitchers who underperform (ERA wise) their peripherals. I went to Fangraphs to check if pitchers with an ERA consistently higher than their FIP, tend to throw their changeups less often.

Name	Team	ERA	FIP	ERA-FIP	CH/FS %
Ricky Nolasco	Marlins	4.74	3.58	1.16	8%
Felipe Paulino	- - -	5.18	4.04	1.13	7%
Jake Peavy	- - -	4.36	3.37	0.98	7%
Luke Hochevar	Royals	5.28	4.35	0.92	7%
Francisco Liriano	Twins	4.74	3.87	0.87	19%
Kevin Slowey	Twins	5.01	4.16	0.85	8%
Kyle Davies	Royals	5.55	4.73	0.82	17%
Brandon Morrow	- - -	4.5	3.73	0.77	8%
John Lackey	- - -	4.8	4.06	0.74	5%
Derek Lowe	Braves	4.57	3.89	0.68	11%
Charlie Morton	Pirates	4.88	4.22	0.66	11%
Jonathon Niese	Mets	4.29	3.71	0.58	5%
Jason Hammel	Rockies	4.63	4.07	0.56	10%
Paul Maholm	Pirates	4.43	3.93	0.5	15%
Gavin Floyd	White Sox	4.17	3.68	0.49	5%
Chris Narveson	Brewers	4.62	4.15	0.47	26%
Zack Greinke	- - -	3.3	2.84	0.45	9%
Derek Holland	Rangers	4.73	4.33	0.4	10%
Homer Bailey	Reds	4.47	4.07	0.4	8%

These are all the pitchers who from 2009-2011 underperformed their peripherals

As you can see, out of the 19 pitchers only four threw their changeups over 11% of the time. This shows that the pitchers who have most recently been underperforming their FIPs, tend not to throw a lot of changeups, which is exactly what I was looking for. Wanting to take my analysis a step further, I then took all qualifying pitchers from the years 2009-2011 and correlated their changeup usage to their ERA-FIP.

Though not incredibly steep, there is a downward trend correlating pitchers who throw less changeups to higher than anticipated ERAs. The R is close to .2, which does not even come close to explaining the entire ERA to FIP discrepancy, but it does tell us that the less you throw a changeup the more likely you are to have a higher than expected ERA.

The real question is why. Why do pitchers who throw fewer changeups consistently underperform their FIP? To this I have no answer. We do know that changeups depress ERA and by not utilizing one you'll probably have a higher ERA than expected, so we now know the importance of a changeup.

The Jason Bay Power Outage

2010-07-29T03:20:00.001-04:00

As all of you have witnessed to this point in the season, Jason Bay hasn't been, well Jason Bay this year. He has only six homers thus far in 2010, a little less than a third of the amount he had last year at this same time. There are a few elements in Jason Bay's game that are uncharacteristically different this season and might be attributable to a new team philosophy focusing on putting more balls in play equating to fewer strikeouts and fewer walks. The Mets have a paltry team wide BB/K rate of .44 (9th worst in the majors) and an O-Swing rate (swinging percentage on balls out of the strike zone) of 31.9% good for second to last in the majors. When plate discipline becomes a team wide weakness one should attribute such failures to non other than the hitting coach. Swinging at balls is not the right approach if the Mets want to win baseball games. Anyways, back to Jason Bay.

When you compare Jason Bay's 2010 stat line to that of his 2009 one, you'll find three big differences. His homers, his walks and his strikeouts. Jason Bay has altered his hitting program (I'm looking at you Mr. Johnson) which entails him putting many more balls in play instead of being the high walk and high strikeout rate power hitter he has always been. While watching Saturday's Mets game against the Dodgers I noticed something about Bay I had never noticed before. Both his singles were groundballs pulled through the 5-6 hole. It dawned on me. Had Jason Bay been hitting lots of groundball singles to his pull field and fewer fly balls? I quickly went to the invaluable FanGraphs website and checked if I had gone crazy or if my gut was onto something. Lo and behold my gut was right.

Season	Split	BB%	K%	BB/K	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	wRC	wRAA	wOBA	wRC+

2009	as R to Left	0.0 %	0.0 %	0.00	.441	*.912*	1.353	*.466*	.363	61.7	38.3	.566	254
2009	as R to Center	0.0 %	0.0 %	0.00	.342	.670	1.011	.322	.294	23.0	9.0	.421	159
2009	as R to Right	0.0 %	0.0 %	0.00	.267	.533	.800	.267	.214	7.7	0.4	.337	103

Season	Split	BB%	K%	BB/K	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	wRC	wRAA	wOBA	wRC+

2010	as R to Left	0.0 %	0.0 %	0.00	.360	*.439*	.798	*.079*	.354	15.8	2.5	.351	120
2010	as R to Center	0.0 %	0.0 %	0.00	.406	.681	1.087	.266	.394	21.7	10.5	.460	193
2010	as R to Right	0.0 %	0.0 %	0.00	.196	.531	.727	.327	.146	4.7	-1.3	.293	81

If you look at his numbers to each field you'll notice that the only big difference is to his pull field, while centerfield and rightfield have essentially stayed the same. Jason Bay's wRC+ has dropped an astounding 134 points while his wOBA is also down a ton. While the drop in OBP is nothing to sneeze at, the drop in ISO (Isolated Power) is frightening. Let's look at Jason Bay's batted balls to try to get a better picture.

Season	Split	GB/FB	LD%	GB%	FB%	IFFB%	HR/FB	IFH%	BUH%	Pitches	Balls	Strikes

2009	as R to Left	1.65	22.6 %	*48.2 %*	*29.2 %*	3.5 %	*42.1 %*	9.6 %	0.0 %	629	216	413
2009	as R to Center	0.29	13.7 %	19.7 %	66.7 %	9.0 %	10.3 %	8.7 %	0.0 %	375	118	257
2009	as R to Right	0.15	9.8 %	11.5 %	78.7 %	20.8 %	8.3 %	0.0 %	0.0 %	224	82	142

Season	Split	GB/FB	LD%	GB%	FB%	IFFB%	HR/FB	IFH%	BUH%	Pitches	Balls	Strikes

2010	as R to Left	3.35	23.7 %	*58.8 %*	*17.5 %*	0.0 %	*5.0 %*	16.4 %	0.0 %	359	109	250
2010	as R to Center	0.45	19.8 %	25.0 %	55.2 %	1.9 %	3.8 %	4.2 %	0.0 %	313	106	207
2010	as R to Right	0.04	7.8 %	3.9 %	88.2 %	22.2 %	6.7 %	0.0 %	0.0 %	174	59	115

Wow. Jason Bay has morphed into Luis Castillo, pounding 58.8% of his pulled batted balls into the ground. About 10% of his flyballs to leftfield have turned into groundballs which is awful and can help explain his loss in homeruns. The more flyballs a hitter hits, the more extra base hits and homeruns he'll have. Jason Bay, being a pull hitter, has to raise that FB% to leftfield back up to around 30% if he wants to get his power back. But something else is also manifesting itself in these numbers. It looks like Jason Bay just isn't hitting the ball with as much authority as he was last year. If you look at his HR/FB% you'll notice the crazy 37% drop. Can this be attributed solely to luck or is there something else going on here? Jason Bay is probably suffering from some kind of combination of not hitting enough flyballs along with not hitting the ball as far, playing in Citi Field as opposed to Fenway Park and some tough luck. Here are a couple graphs from TexasLeaguer.com and a couple from HitTrackerOnline.com hat will hopefully help us come to a conclusion. (2009 on left, 2010 on right)

Where the 2009 data has a large cluster of light green (denoting a hit) in deep leftfield the 2010 data has an empty space of dark green (denoting unoccupied space on the spray chart). This supports Jason Bay's extremely low HR/FB% this season, Jason Bay just isn't hitting the ball as hard as he was one season ago. Last season, being a power and a pull hitter, Jason Bay hit the vast majority of his home runs to leftfield. This season three of his six homers have been hit to rightfield. Also, as shown on Greg Rybarczyk's website Hit Tracker Online, Jason Bay's "average speed of bat" for his home runs have decreased on average by 2.2 MPH. I don't know if this is siginificant but it still sheds some light on our Jason Bay dilemma. So now that it is pretty clear that Jason Bay is hitting the ball with less authority this season after hitting 36 homers last season, the question is why'd he change his approach? After all the famous mantra states "if it ain't broke don't fix it". So why did Jason Bay try to fix a non-existent problem? We can theorize all day long. One possibility is that he was scared he wouldn't be able to produce big enough power numbers given the fact that Citi Field suppresses the home run, or it could be Howard Johnson got to him (see Wright, David 2009), or it could be something else entirely. The question I want to answer is how did this happen?

Season	Team	O-Swing%	Z-Swing%	Swing%	O-Contact%	Z-Contact%	Contact%	Zone%	F-Strike%	SwStr%
Total *	- - -	*20.1 %*	63.9 %	42.4 %	*51.3 %*	81.1 %	74.2 %	50.9 %	57.3 %	10.8 %

2009	Red Sox	*20.1 %*	63.1 %	40.7 %	*48.5 %*	79.4 %	71.5 %	47.9 %	57.6 %	11.3 %
2010	Mets	*27.0 %*	65.6 %	45.7 %	*57.8 %*	81.0 %	73.9 %	48.4 %	57.6 %	11.7 %

As shown on the graph, Jason Bay has not only increased his O-Swing rate by 7% he has also increased his O-Contact rate by 9%. So while Jason Bay is making more contact in 2010, he is making weaker and poorer contact. Weak, poor contact generally leads to soft hit groundballs, so this looks to be the reason for the increase in GB% to Jason Bay's pull field, leftfield. This has led to a lower flyball rate to leftfield, his power field, which has effectively lowered Bay's power production to his pull field, thus leading to many fewer homeruns. So as you can see, everything in baseball can be traced back to plate discipline. The difference between the power hitting Jason Bay and the slap hitting Jason Bay is essentially taking seven more pitches thrown outside the strike zone every hundred pitches. These few pitches afford him the opportunity to wait for a pitch to drive and hit a flyball off of, equating to more home runs, instead of going out of the strike zone and making poor contact and hitting more groundballs. These slight changes for Jason Bay could be the difference between the power hitting, high OBP monster and the slap hitting 2010 version the Mets got. So Jason, try to be more patient, wait for your pitches and make sure to hit lots of flyballs to leftfield, even if it means striking out more. Oh, and for the future don't listen to Howard Johnson.

REFERENCES

-Fangraphs.com (the tables)

-TexasLeaguer.com (the balls in play spray charts)

-HitTrackerOnline.com (the home run spray charts)

The Curious Case of Julius Peppers

2009-04-06T11:34:00.005-04:00

I know this is a little off topic but it's something I believe is extremely interesting. The New England Patriots of the NFL have expressed interest and are very serious about acquiring one of the best Defensive Ends in the NFL. Julius Peppers, at 6'7, is one of the tallest players in the league. With the Panthers, Peppers played Defensive End in a 4-3 defense. This offseason Peppers has come out and said that he wants to play Outside LineBacker, in a 3-4 defense. OLB in the 3-4 is practically the equivalent of a DE in th 4-3, meaning they basically play the same roles. The issue is that you'll be hard pressed to find a 3-4 OLB not between the heights of 6'3 and 6'5. Peppers is a whopping 6'7. The OLB has to be fast, athletic and good in pass coverage as well as being a very good pass rusher. The good news for Peppers is that we know that he possesses three of these four qualities. The problem is, he is unproven in pass coverage, for he has never played a position where he's needed that skill.

So why is this story so intriguing? Because this offseason Peppers was a free agent and in the NFL teams have the option of paying a premium in order to keep their top players, this option is called a Franchise Tag. Therefore, the Panthers signed Peppers to a Franchise Tag. This tag is a one year deal where you are paid the average salary of the top five highest paid players at your position. If your salary from the previous season is higher than the average top five salaries at your position then you get a 20% raise instead. Julius Peppers this offseason was franchise tagged, and given the average pay of the top five DEs in the NFL. Thus, he is signed for the next season at the average rate. Or is he?

Julius Peppers did not want to be franchise tagged because he could get more money and security via free agency. Therefore Peppers is holding out of training camp and sending a message to the Panthers front office that he wants out. There have been rumors surrounding Peppers being traded to the Patriots for a second round draft pick. The reason being traded to the Patriots is significant is because Peppers would then get his wish of playing 3-4 OLB. What does this mean for Peppers' contract(franchise designation) if he does not sign a new pact and he's traded to the Pats? Does the Franchise Tag allow for modifications when a player switches positions? These are all unanswered questions.

Therefore if Peppers would to be traded to the Patriots, would his franchise tender act as a regular contract and thus it wouldn't matter if he switches positions, or would he have to sign a new franchise tender? Would his contract automatically terminate and the Patriots would have until a certain time to sign Peppers and if they do not he would become a free agent? Or would the Patriots have to sign him to an extension in order to complete this deal?

I do not have the answer to any of these question and are therefore wondering what would happen under such a scenario. I also wonder if the NFL has a rule regarding these types of predicaments or if something like this ever happened before. And if it has, how the NFL sorted the issue out. It is a complex situation because of all its components. A player switching positions has no obstacles standing in his way. Same as making a trade. And also for designating a player as your franchise player. An issue only arises when you combine these three elements into one compound.

Why the Oliver Perez signing was bad and it had nothing to do with this upcoming season

2009-02-20T08:32:00.012-05:00

The Oliver Perez signing was a big and costly mistake for the Mets to make. No matter how good Ollie does this year(unless of course Scott Boras is right and he really is the next Sandy Koufax or Randy Johnson), the signing will still be deemed as a bad one in my book.

The reasons for this are very simple. The Mets could've done better. Not this season but next season. What I dislike about Omar Minaya is that he only thinks about the coming season. Especially this offseason's moves. If you take a look at the Mets farm system, you'll see that they built it in a way where as soon as Billy Wagner's contract expired(after this season) the Mets would recieve an influx of young talented pitchers to their major league bullpen. But there was one problem, Wagner didn't last until the end of his contract. This causd the Mets to freak and acquire two of the five best closers in baseball(Don't get me wrong, I still love Putz and K-Rod). If all would've gone according to plan, this year Wagner would still be closing and next year the Mets would have a combination of Eddie Kunz(AAA closer), Bobby Parnell(who'll probably get a bullpen role this year), Brant Rustich(AA closer), Michael Antonini(AA starter) and Nick Carr(A starter) and others in their pen. But since Wagner finished up a year early they went out and got themselves two of the best(Yankeesque) instead of waiting for their own homegrown prospects to develop(Red Soxesque).

Now back to Oliver Perez. He was the Mets third big move of the offseason and was also a terribly nearsighted one. If you look take a look at the current economic downfall in America and consider how much it'll influence next year's free agent class then you'll realize that even good pitchers will have to sign at a reduced price next offseason. Oliver Perez went into free agency as the fourth best starter. The Yankees quickly snatched up the top two*(Sabathia and Burnett) and signed them to mega deals leaving Derek Lowe and Perez as the best remaining options. The Mets went out and targeted Lowe, who's coming off a career year, and was the only** option available better than Perez. They failed to sign him thanks to a late signing push by Frank Wren and the Atlanta Braves. The contract the Braves signed Lowe to was utterly ridiculous. Even when the economy was afloat, a soon to be 36 year old wouldn't have received a 4 year contract especially at $15MM per year. And again, this put pressure on the Mets, for there was no one left to fill their number 3/4 spot besides Perez. And this is what caused the Mets to sign Ollie who is by the way one of the most inconsistent pitchers ever. One game he could shut out the Phillies and have seven strikeouts and the next he'll let up seven runs(against the Pirates) and get pulled after one and 2/3's innings-true story. So they signed him to a 3 year $36MM contract, the exact same one they offered to Lowe and the exact same one Lowe was about to agree to. If the Mets upped their offer to 3 years $40MM they might've gotten him, but anyone can play the what if game.

*The reason I have Burnett rated above Lowe is because Burnett has nasty stuff and he's much younger. Also what's up with the Yankees signing guys with initials as their first name, e.g. A.J., C.C. What's up with that?

**There was actually one pitcher that's better than Burnett and Lowe. His name is Ben Sheets. If he hadn't torn up his elbow, he would've gotten a contract similar to Burnett's if not more.

I proposed back in October for the Mets to sign someone similar to Brad Penny. These pitchers are low risk and high reward and this makes them very worthwhile. Someone coming off an injury but was previously a pretty good major league pitcher. The reason why these types of signings are useful are because they're cheaper and the pitchers could be just as good as non-injured pitchers. Also they are only one year deals, so if something goes wrong you're not stuck with them long term and they're also more motivated to get back to pre-injury form so they can score a long term deal the year after. The Mets tried to do this but failed. They signed pitchers that were too injured(Freddy Garcia, Tim Redding) and ones that don't have any potential(Livan Hernandez, Tim Redding).

Another reason why the Mets should've gone this route is next year's pitching crop(if they signed a guy like Brad Penny to a one year deal, they would be in the SP market again next year). Also, for the first time in a while, small market teams will be looking to dump there talented but expensive players for lesser prospect packages than before because they simply cannot afford to keep their players. Teams like the Padres, Brewers, Royals, Twins, etc. will all be looking to dump expensive players. This is great news for big market teams like the Red Sox, Yankees and Mets. For example, everyones been gauging the Jake Peavy situation in San Diego, but what about Chris Young? He's due $10.75MM over the next two seasons followed by an escalating $8.5MM club option. For a team like the Padres it might be worth it to shed his contract now, but for a team like the Mets, the contract is ridiculously team friendly. After the season John Lackey, Rich Harden, Erik Bedard, Todd Wellemeyer, Doug Davis, Justin Duchscherer, Brad Penny, Andy Pettitte and Joel Pineiro will all be free agents. There's also Josh Beckett, Brandon Webb, Tim Hudson, Cliff Lee and Kevin Millwood but they all have club friendly options that will most probably be picked up. Any of these guys would be better options than Perez. Since there are many starting pitching options, this will deflate the cost of starting pitchers and along with being a down year for MLB revenue, it'll be a lot cheaper to sign a starting pitcher next offseason.

The most intriguing option to me though isn't from free agency and isn't on a major league roster. He's the star of the NPB(Nippon Professional Baseball). His name is Yu Darvish. This guy was the number 2 starter and closer for Nippon/Japan in this years World Baseball Classic. He's supposedly better than Daisuke "Dice-K" Matsuzaka and he's only 22 years old. He's 6'5 and he's a very strong and lanky kid. Who wouldn't want a 6'5, 22 year old, half Iranian, ace pitcher on their team? Darvish throws at 93-95 MPH, he has a nasty 2-seem fastball, a terrific slider, a knuckle-curve, a devastating forkball which he throws as his changeup and like Dice-K, a lot more. This guy is just nasty. Why is he better than Matsuzaka? Darvish isn't afraid of contact and unlike Dice-K, Darvish doesn't let up walks or homers. Darvish also likes to keep the ball on the ground which is made easy by his two most wicked pitches, 2-seemer and forkball. Did I mention that he's a great fielder? Basically this guy is sick. He's a workhorse has wicked stuff and he's overpowering, the last person like that to pitch in the MLB was the young version of Pedro Martinez.

The only problem is attaining him. The Mets could either persuade the Nippon-Ham Fighters to post him(the only way to acquire an NPB player under contract) or could just wait and see if Nippon-Ham decide to post him(without any "persuasion"/money). They could technically sign Darvish to a mega deal to come over to pitch in the MLB because he's not under contract in the major leagues but this would be unethical and moreover a violation of the IBAF's(International Baseball Federation) rules. Still, he would be the perfect 1B(to Santana's 1A) and to dream of a rotation of Santana, Darvish, Pelfrey, Maine and Jonathan Niese/Brad Holt just seems unfair.

As you can see the signing of Oliver Perez has a lot more negatives than positives and therefore it was a bad signing and I'm able to come to that conclusion even before he throws his first official pitch of 2009. Just the circumstance is what deems this contract a bad one. Even if the fact that Ollie hasn't rattled off 3 quality starts in a row since 2004 wasn't true, it would still be a poor signing that I hope the Mets never make again. Here's to Darvish in 2010!

Minor League Free Agents: Where Teams Should Be Looking

2008-12-07T09:54:00.012-05:00

Every year one player has the big question attached to him; where'd he come from? Here I'm going to try to answer that question. Every year along with Major League free agents, there are Minor League free agents. These players are sometimes good players and former highly touted prospect that for one reason or another didn't pan out or didn't parlay their minor league success into Major League success. These players deserve a second chance(and for some, a first chance). Most of these players' next stop, if they don't make the cut, is out of baseball, therefore they're motivated. More and more MLB teams have recently been giving these types of players(Ryan Ludwick) second chances to a great avail, this is the reason I don't understand why it's not being done more. So what I want to do now is run through a bunch of, what I believe to be, talented and possible MLB contributors on the cheap.

UPDATE: Most of these players have already been signed. Leading the pack have been Theo Epstein and now former GM, Jim Bowden.

SP's: Shane Komine-Is 28 years old, but has some potential and has okay stuff.

Roof: 5th Starter

Kevin Cameron-Also 28, has a lot to offer, I believe if he throws his fastball a little more he'd be excellent. Has a repertoire of a fastball, cutter, changeup, slider and another breaking ball.

Roof: Setup Man

Bobby Livingston-This former 4th rounder, is a lefty and is 26. That's appealing in it of itself. If given a chance Livingston could become a very good LOOGY(specialist).

Roof: good LOOGY

RP's: Brandon Medders-He was excellent in 05'-06' and all of the sudden dropped off in 2007. He has control issues.

Roof: Closer

Jose Capellan-The former highly touted prospect, is still just 27 and has plenty left. Has said to have hit 100 MPH several times and has a nasty sharp slider.

Roof: 3rd Starter/Closer

Roman Colon-This guy is the true definition of a chucker. He has little control but nasty stuff. A good pitching coach and life coach could help him resurrect his career.

Roof: Closer

C: Mat Tupman-A great defensive catcher who can also get on base. Also throws 95 MPH.

Roof: Defensive Minded Backstop

1B: Brad Eldred-Former 6th Rounder, is 6"5 270 with tons of power. At 28, plate discipline is what's standing between being him and being Adam Dunn.

Roof: Power Hitting 1B

2B: Brandon Fahey-At 27, Fahey's the kind of player that teammates love and opposing players hate. He's also great defensively.

Roof: The next David Eckstein

3B: Justin Huber-This Aussie used to be the Mets top prospect. At 26, he's still never reached his potential. A little work and he could be a solid utility player.

Roof: Super Utility with Good Hitting Skills(plays C, 1B, 2B, 3B, OF)

Joel Guzman-The former top Dodgers prospect has tons of potential and is only 24. He still hasn't adjusted to the Bigs but I still believe he's a special ballplayer.

Roof: All-Star

SS: Anderson Machado-Has soft hands, good range, quick feet and a cannon for an arm but has never put it together offensively in the minors.

Roof: Late Inning Defensive Replacement

Drew Meyer-The former first rounder, has solid numbers but never fully reached his potential as a power hitting SS.

Roof: Pinch Hitter

LF: Sean Barker-Has put up superb offensive numbers in the high minor leagues. If given a chance he may take it and run.

Roof: Starting LF

Chase Lambin-Terrific minor league numbers but strikes out way to much(24.5%). At age 30, if Chase can lower the K's he'd be good.

Roof: Platoon LF

Val Pascucci-This guy has tremendous power, draws lots of walks, strikes out a ton and plays poor defense. He has old player skills.

Roof: Starting 1B/LF

CF: Tommy Murphy-The former 3rd round pick was never given a real shot in the majors. He's a speed demon and plays a superb CF but has horrible plate discipline.

Roof: 4th Outfielder

Freddy Guzman-Don't really like this guy but he was a former top prospect and is projected by Marcel to be a league average CFer and therefore should be in the MLB.

Roof: League average CFer on a bad team

Chris Duffy-Duffy's a solid fielder and a below average hitter. He could still become an MLB average CFer.

Roof: MLB average CFer

RF: Paul McAnulty-The 27 year old is very patient and has tons of power. He doesn't make consistent contact and has never proved himself at the MLB level.

Roof: Platoon Corner Outfielder/Firstbasemen

George Lombard-Getting old and not performing isn't very useful but this all glove speedy outfielder could eventually find success at the bigs.

Roof: 4th Outfielder

As you can see from all the aforementioned players, there is plenty of talent under the surface that plenty of GM's never give a fair chances to show their worth(even though plenty are signed). This is a real shame because most of these players are getting too old to be starting an MLB career. The point that I'm trying to make has nothing to do with these players. These players are just this year's sample and most of them have already signed minor league contracts with other teams. This is fine, but how many of these players will actually get serious looks? Maybe one or two. If I was a GM I'd be able to build a slightly below average team(70-80 wins) with theses players alone, and that's better than the Pirates were. If teams like the Pirates would take a long hard look at these types of players, those teams wouldn't have to sign expensive free agent veterans to just fill holes until their prospects are ready, and instead could allocate the extra money into the draft and scouting.

What this does is: a) gives these players a chance to prove themselves, b) saves small market teams from spending on unimportant areas and c) depresses free agent prices because all the small market teams would be looking elsewhere for fill-ins(players that fill in until a team's top prospect is MLB ready). All this would be great for the game of baseball and would also save small market teams invaluable assets which could then be used for making that team a serious contender down the road(via scouting/drafting or adding the final piece through free agency/trade).

The Maine Reason

2008-11-07T04:26:00.006-05:00

2008 was supposed to be the year John Maine really evolved into the topflight pitcher he showed glimpses of at the beginnings of the 2006 and 2007 seasons. But that didn't happen. Instead John Maine was good for 5 innings, not more and the icing on the cake in 2008 was his injury. I believe the reason for Maine's injury was because he was trying to throw harder than he normally can. His fastball the whole year was around 92 MPH and in August it was around 94 MPH. Why would Maine want this? Two reasons: a) last year the whole season he was pitching 93-95 MPH and this year he was at 90-93, therefore he felt something was missing. b) he was getting pulled after five innings because of his high pitch counts so he wanted to try and overpower hitters.

From these two points a couple of questions could be asked. a)why was John Maine's velocity down? and b) why were his pitch counts so high? The answer to the former question is simple. After John Maine had pitched a career high in innings pitched in 2006 with 151 2/3(minors and majors) he topped that number with 191 innings in 2007. The unwritten rule is that you're not supposed to top your previous season's IP total by more than 30 innings from season to season and he topped his by 39 1/3. This, moreover made Maine more easily succumb to injury and ineffectiveness while also slowing down his arm. This explains the drop in his velocity.

John Maine consistently had 100 pitch pitch counts by the 5th inning in 2008, this is because of his ridiculously insane number of foul balls hit against him, but why did that happen? I believe the reason for the increase in foul balls was because he pitched 4.1% more fastballs than he did last year. He also pitched 11.3% less sliders, increased his change-ups thrown by 6.2% and reinstituted his curve, throwing it 1% of the time after not throwing it at all in 2007(my guess is that Peterson nixed the pitch and after he left he started mixing it in a bit). All this means less strikeouts and more foul balls. Maine's K/9 rate slipped from a great rate of 8.48 in 2007 to a good rate of 7.84 in 2008. In 2009 Maine will be feeling much better after his surgery and will hopefully be pitching at a higher velocity and throw more breaking balls and less fastballs resulting in lower pitch counts and higher K rates.

Steven Goldman's Q's and my A's

2008-11-07T04:16:00.003-05:00

On September 29 Steven Goldman wrote an article for the New York Sun(R.I.P.) entitled "Team now faces Plenty of Offseason Questions" where he wrote about and listed all of the Mets issues and questions. The impression this article leaves on you is that they have quite a few of them. At the end of his article he poses five questions that are integral to the Mets offseason and asks how they'd answer them. So when I read this I thought to myself that it would be interesting to answer all these questions on this blog. So that's what I did. (The questions are written by Steven Goldman and answered by me):

Q: How do the Mets rebuild their troublesome bullpen, which will lack closer Billy Wagner, without falling into the trap of spending money on "names," despite ample evidence that only a very few relievers provide consistent value from season to season?

A: I believe the Mets can simply cobble together a cheap but effective and talented bullpen of mostly younger pitchers. I would also add a veteran presence to this group so that the young inexperienced pitchers could all learn from him. Just look at the Rays bullpen, they had a bunch of young and talented pitchers who all had different styles of pitching, i.e. a sidearmer, a fireballer, a starting pitcher. But most importantly they had Troy Percival. If you look at the Rays bullpen you'll find that some of the guys that were horrible last year were great this year(J.P. Howell, Grant Balfour). The only real difference between this year and last was them having a veteran presence their in the bullpen. So my idea to fix the Mets bullpen issues goes like this: they need a veteran presence, a closer/future closer, a fireballer, a swingman(Snoop Manuel's term for a good reliever), a lefty specialist and a long reliever that can work as a swingman if needed. How can they fix all this in one offseason? Simple, they should sign Trevor Hoffman to be the closer until midseason at the latest while mentoring the likes of Eddie Kunz, Robert Parnell, Joe Smith, Carlos Muniz and Brian Stokes. Whichever one of Eddie Kunz, Robert Parnell and Joe Smith win the eight inning job(can get both lefties and righties outwith ease) will pick up the closer title after the all-star break. The losers(two of Kunz, Parnell and Smith) will battle for the seventh inning job. The rest of the pitchers mentioned above will compete with one of Kunz, Parnell and Smith for the middle reliever spot while Brian Stokes and Robert Parnell battle for the long relief spot(although Parnell will probably get on of the better 3 spots). Onto the last two spots in the bullpen. Scott Schoeneweis needs to go. If the Mets prefer two LHers in their 'pen I would suggest going with two of Pedro Feliciano, Willie Collazo, Jason Vargas(who dominated in the Arizona Fall League), Adam Bostick and Ricardo Rincon. If the Mets want to go with one lefty then all of those right handed pitchers mentioned above would make the team while only one of the left handed pitchers mentioned above would make it also. The Mets were rumored to have been offered a trade of Aaron Heilman and Pedro Feliciano for Huston Street, if this deal is still on the table I would take it and run.

Q: Should Carlos Delgado's option be picked up based on a dominant half-season which followed a year and a half of slugging hitting and worse fielding? If not, who will replace him? And what if he reverts to his 2006/first-half-2007 levels at age 37?

A: His option has already been picked up. I would've also picked it up, but I would now explore the trade market for Delgado for a few reasons: a) Delgado could easily go back to his 2007 ways(for three months of the 2008 season he was horrible April-.204, June-.229 and August-.248). b) Delgado is 37 and his best years are behind him it's just natural for him to decline in '09. c)There are better and cheaper options out on the free agent market(Jason Giambi) and d) Delgado doesn't get on base. Jason Giambi is a better choice because although he can't field he's cheaper and gets on base at a higher rate. In a supposed down year for Giambi and great year for Delgado, Giambi still trumped Delgado in OBP. Giambi had a lower Avg.(.247) and still had a higher OBP(.373), while Delgado had a higher Avg.(.271) but a lower OBP(.353). Old timers would say Delgado gets more hits hence the higher Avg. and therefore he's a better player. Because the same people that say that also say that a walk is as good as a hit. This. proves that traditional baseball people are morons because they're clearly contradicting themselves here. Whoever gets on base at a higher rate is clearly more valuable per Billy Beane and Bill James who are the more knowledgeable people. Also Delgado might attract some serious interest and therefore it might be worth it to trade Delgado and his $12MM contract for a young, cheap and useful player and then go out and sign Jason Giambi for $8MM. If Delgado gets no interest on the trade market the Mets should just keep him and if he fails they could either promote Mike Carp(their top 1B prospect) or hand Nick Evans(a player with huge platoon splits and will probably start the year in a platoon in LF) the job. They could also look into trading for Nick Johnson.
Q:Ryan Church was quite productive before post-concussive syndrome shelved him for almost two months. When he returned in August, he became part of the problem, hitting .227 AVG/.315 OBA/.318 SLG with two home runs and playing through additional injuries. Should he be counted on as a regular last season? If not, can Tatis come back from a separated shoulder and do it again at age 34?

A: Tatis cannot be trusted with a starting job he will only decline. Church should compete for one of the two corner outfield jobs along with Nick Evans, Val Pascucci and Chris Aguila. They could also look at some interesting trade candidates(i.e. Travis Buck).
Q: How aggressively should the Mets try to bring back erratic free-agent-to-be Oliver Perez? If he does not return, how do the Mets best replace the 53 starts given to Perez and the departing Pedro Martinez? Can John Maine come back healthy and perform over a full season? Are they ready to trust Jon Niese? Will they be players for CC Sabathia, potentially picking up their second big-ticket lefty in a year?

A: I believe, that OP should only be offered arbitration and Pedro should be let go. Therefore the Mets save money and collect to draft picks. To replace them I'd make some bargain basement signings(i.e. Horacio Ramirez, Brad Penny) and have them compete against Jon Niese and Aaron Heilman for the two last rotation spots. If the rumors of the Luis Castillo and Aaron Heilman for Javier Vazquez trade is true I would make that trade. Ideally we'd want Niese to start in AAA to refine and polish is almost big league ready stuff, but if he proves ready in Spring he might as well start the year in New York. If Heilman loses the job he'd have to be traded.
Q: Do the Mets continue the Murphy-Evans platoon next season? Murphy's minor league statistics suggest he is not the .300 hitter he appeared to be in the majors. If he regresses, what is the fallback position?

A: I would prefer to lose(get rid of him at any cost) Luis Castillo and put Daniel Murphy at 2B full time. Instead of being an average LF he'd be a well above average hitting 2B while giving up some defense. This is much like what the Phillies have with Chase Utley. Murphy has great plate discipline so it'll be easier for him to adjust to the MLB, therefore even though he might not sustain his .300 Avg. he'll probably have a .370+ OBP which is superb(better than Delgado). Ideally you'd want Evans to show that he's ready to start in LF full time but that most likely won't happen. Therefore the Mets should seriously look into acquiring a young outfielder who play defense well and gets on base.

Why the phillies Won't Repeat

2008-10-30T11:02:00.006-04:00

For winning the World Series, the phillies have officially become my new lower case team. After all I was only missing a lower case team for about a month. From the time of the Yankees not making the playoffs until the phillies World Series victory. Anyways, about those phillies, they were the first team since after the MLB expanded the schedule to 162 games to not lose a single game after the 8th inning, that's right not one. Just to show you how ridiculously bad the Mets bullpen was compared to the Phillies bullpen; the Mets bullpen lost 13 games after the 8th inning to the phillies 0. If they swapped, the Mets would've had 100 wins and a World Series while the phillies would've had 78 wins and a third place finish. This just shows you how bad the phillies actually were. If the Mets and the phillies had the same great bullpens the Mets would've won the division by 11 games. If they both had the same crappy pens the Mets would've won the division by 5 games over the Marlins!

This is how crazy the phillies bullpen was. 87-0(including playoffs) after the eighth inning is unheard of and especially unrepeatable. Anything short of what the phillies bullpen produced last year will have the phillies watching from the sidelines come October 2009.

Bullpen Pitchers	2008 FIP**	2008 ERA	2008 K/BB Rate	2008 BABIP	Career K/BB Rate	Career BABIP
Brad Lidge	2.41	1.95	2.63	.317	3.19	.322
J.C. Romero	4.66	2.75	1.37	.239	1.46	.296
Ryan Madson	3.33	3.05	2.91	.305	2.45	.313
Chad Durbin	3.77	2.87	1.80	.292	1.44	.302
Clay Condrey	4.19	3.26	1.79	.330	1.62	.322
Scott Eyre*	2.36	1.88	6.00	.238	1.63	.310
Rudy Seanez*	4.15	3.53	1.20	.281	2.01	.309

*=Half Season

**=Fielding Independent Pitching, a stat that takes your peripherals into account and disregards fielding, park and opposition factors

As you can see(or can't see) almost all of the phillies relievers overachieved. The FIP and ERA categories are there to show you how much the luck factor influenced their stats. If you subtract a pitcher's ERA from their FIP you'll find the amount of runs that are the product of luck and nothing else. What is luck? In this case luck is playing on a good team, having an easy schedule, having a good defense. (Time Lincecum has a lower FIP than ERA, while Johan Santana has a lower ERA than FIP). BABIP's there to show you how most of the pitchers got lucky this year. How most of the reliever's balls in play were caught. K/BB rate's there to show that some of the phillies pitchers are declining hence the lower peripherals and that others had their best season in 2008(meaning they'll decline). Peripherals are a great way of being able to tell whether a year was a fluke or not. Meaning if you had a boatload of saves, had an ERA under 2.00, but had a K/BB under 2.00 there's no chance you'd be able to repeat that performance next year.

So let's go over the phillies' bullpen numbers from 2008. If Brad Lidge played for an average team that only played other average teams in an average league in a neutral park, he would've had an ERA of 2.41(his FIP). This means that his numbers were boosted solely by other components of the game, ones that don't involve pitching. And he wasn't really all that he was made out to be. He's clearly declining, shown by his .66 decline in K/BB from this season compared to his career numbers. Expect a slight, not a vast decline from this year to next, and for his 40+ save streak to come to an end.

Now onto the rest of the bullpen. The phillies had a combined .853 FIP to ERA differential, and that there is their division title. The phillies got lucky and therefore had robust numbers which cannot be repeated. The phillies setup men, J.C. Romero and Ryan Madson, are maddeningly overrated because of their inflated stats. J.C. Romero's FIP-ERA differential was 1.91. That's the difference between Mariano Rivera and Aaron Heilman. Ryan Madson is at his peak and will probably put up similar numbers to this year's for the next couple years. Their other solid bullpen guys, Chad Durbin and Clay Condrey had "terrific" seasons. They each had about a run of difference between their ERA's and their FIP's and both had lower BABIPs than their career numbers and posted slightly higher K/BB rates. What this means is that they'll regress to their means in 2009(a.k.a screw up) because of their subpar peripherals and their high BABIPs. Scott Eyre and Rudy Seanez had basically the same thing happen to them but they were only in Philly for a small portion of the season. Altogether the bullpen pitchers who are supposed to have the better peripherals because of small sample size(60-80 innings) had very bad numbers with the exception of 20 innings from Scott Eyre. The relievers also had great ERA's(second in the NL) in spite of high FIP's. The only possible explanation is luck and that is one factor that cannot be repeated or quantified.

At Bats and Sacrifices: The Mistakes of Latter-Day Baseball

2008-10-29T15:26:00.008-04:00

Self-Sacrifice - sacrifice of one's interests, desires, etc., as for duty or the good of another.

Sacrifice - the surrender or destruction of something prized or desirable for the sake of something considered as having a higher or more pressing claim.

At bats were created in an attempt to uncouple all of the hitter's options from those of the manager and pitcher. Meaning, everything that the batter has control over(hits, strikeouts) is isolated from everything he doesn't have control over. This was unsuccessful in the eyes of many. There are huge flaws in this concept and it's problems have been well spread through books and blogs. Therefore in this article I'm going to try and say something a little different from what people usually say.

The at-bat perceives that the batter has more control over the plate appearance than the pitcher does. While the at-bat also implies that the pitcher dictates the at-bat. This is the reason walks aren't included in the at-bat equation. Thus at-bats aren't an appropriate measuring stick for at-bats imply that the batter dictates the outcome of the at-bats yet it still subtracts all of the "non decisions" of the batter from the equation, like walks. This makes no sense at all. If you say that the batter controls the game then it has to mean he chose to walk and not that the pitcher chose to walk him. This proves that at-bats not only have a glitch but also contradicts itself. The at-bat doesn't include walks or sacrifices. Why not? Because the pitcher issues the walk and the managers call for the sacrifices, therefore these two integral factors of a plate appearance and a batter's decision are removed from this so called vital/original hence irreplaceable stat.

Nowadays we know that the batter, and the pitcher, and the baserunners all have a certain effect on causing a walk, so we can now focus on sacrifices. This is because at bats are clearly problematic and are therefore not worth dealing with.

There are two types of sacrifices: sacrifice bunts and sacrifice flies. Sac bunts are usually called for by the manager so I could understand why they'd be removed from this equation. Even though there is no point of removing them. No matter what the manager tells the batter, it's the batter's decision once he steps into the batter's box. Therefore, even sac bunts should be included in your at-bats/plate appearance stat. Sac flies are a different story. What's hard for me to understand is why this play is even attributed as a sacrifice. As you can see at the top of the article, a sacrifice bunt fits the criteria of self-sacrifice but sacrifice flies do not. The reason for this is that even if the manager tells player x to hit the ball to the outfield(spot y) chances are he'll hit the ball to the outfield at the same rate as he usually does(z% of the time). Showing that even if a batter gets a sacrifice fly it was more of random variance than anything else. If a batter was able to hit the ball to the outfield every plate appearance they would. For the simple reason of more fly balls means more home-runs and the three-run homer is the best play in baseball.

If batters could choose where they wanted to hit the ball, batters wouldn't be batting .300 they would be batting .700. This proves that batters have less control over a plate appearance and the pitchers have more control. What business would pay a guy $20MM a year for doing his task at a lower than 50% efficiency rate? This is essentially what baseball does with its hitters. This shows us that batters have very little control over the events that occur every at-bat and have little influence on hit ball placement. Now you know that sacrifice flies are not sacrifices because the batter cannot choose whether to strikeout, hit the ball to the outfield or hit a homerun it simply depends on his usual tendencies(and the pitch/pitcher). I hope you've now realized the shortcomings of the at-bats and what we call "sacrifices". And will now try to use plate appearances and OBA(on-base average) more than AVG and SLA(slugging average). OBA uses plate appearances as its denominator while AVG and SLA use at-bats as theirs.

Uprooting Omar Minaya...I Mean Building The Mets

2008-10-22T12:26:00.026-04:00

The Mets failed to make it to the playoffs this year for the second straight year. This means there's a flaw in the Mets scheme. Whether it's the front office, the coaching staff or the personnel there's a problem that has to be fixed. Even though Omar Minaya has made strides as the top gun for the Mets(the CEO, COO and President are all owners) he still hasn't delivered his side of the deal with the fans. It's true that he's ushered in a new era of winning in the Mets organization and it's true that he's maintained Wilpon's level of competition. When the Mets hired Omar, Mr. Wilpon said that the Mets should now be playing meaningful games in September, and has he ever been more correct. It just doesn't make sense to me why an owner would say that he hopes for his team to play meaningful games in September instead of saying that he hopes for his team to be PLAYING in October period. Also, under Minaya's watchful eye the team has started their own cable network, and last but maybe most importantly the team's new stadium is being built right now. From a business standpoint his tenure has been a success, the Mets have made tons of money and the Mets are in competition every year. The one problem is, baseball is unlike other businesses because the only real accomplishment in baseball is winning the World Series and I'm pretty sure the Mets haven't won one since 1986. My point is he still could've been doing better than he is, but with Wilpon doing his best impression of Steinbrenner this wasn't going to be an easy task. Instead Omar opted to build a playoff contender the easy way but the insufficient way, by signing free agents.

So my idea is to hire a player development overseer. Who takes care of all minor league operations and runs the amateur scouting department. I have a feeling that this job would be perfect for Terry Ryan. He stepped down as the Twins GM before this season because he claimed that he had lost a step and did not want to hamper the Twins. He would be coming back to his career roots for he started his career as an executive by scouting for the Mets way back in 1980. He had been a GM in Minnesota for 14 years before stepping down and I'm sure he at least misses it just a tad. Ryan's specialty is building excellent, cheap teams through the farm system. Also, Ryan's top assistant from his days in Minnesota, Wayne Krivsky, was brought on as some kind of scouting adviser right after the Reds relieved him of his general managing duties. So now the Mets can afford to let Tony Bernazard go because Terry Ryan is essentially taking his job but just with a better title(Overseer of Minor Leagues). I would suggest the Mets clear the cupboard and fire all of Omar Minaya's assistants starting with Bernazard. I would then promote Krivsky to Director of Scouting and would hire Chuck LaMar(the old Devil Rays GM) as Senior Vice President/Director of the Amateur(Rule 4) and Rule 5 Drafts. He is very qualified because A)he worked under John Schierholz for a while, b)he was a GM. c)He just won the World Series as an assistant with the Phillies and d)he is terrific at drafting players. If you look at his drafts from his time with the D___l Rays he drafted so many high risk high reward players(Josh Hamilton) throughout the draft. In the middle rounds of the draft he was especially good picking Jacoby Ellsbury and Michael A. Pelfrey to name a few. His draft philosophy is to take as many risks on highly athletic, 5-tool players you can and hope for them to develop into stars(B.J. Upton).

Now by letting Omar Minaya keep his job, you allow Omar to redeem himself and if he succeeds he would then be in line for a promotion to President. I think he'll excel now that he has additional help and can now focus on who's going to be on the 2009 Mets instead of the 2013 Mets. Also, I believe he'll succeed because he's now feeling the pressure for he is surrounded by three former GMs. Moreover, this means that if Omar falters he'd be gone before you could say "Hey Omar". Everything that I'm about to write cannot happen because all of the coaching decisions have already been made. Therefore this is just my opinion of who should've gotten these jobs. Cleaning up the coaching staff and hiring a new field manager is a little simpler. Hire John Farrell as your Manager and promote first base coach Ken Oberkfell to bench coach and fire Sandy Alomar Sr.(period) Oberkfell will act more like an Assistant Manager and will help out with the managing. He has more experience(AAA) than Farrell does and Farrell(along with Dan Warthen) will have to deal with the pitching staff for the first few months of his rein. Howard Johnson(hitting coach), Dan Warthen(pitching coach) and Luis Aguayo(3B coach) should all be brought back. Or you could just hire a Shiny Razor to coach 3B. Tim Teufel, the current manager in High A(Port St. Lucie), should be promoted to coach first base for the Mets. He has been outstanding in that role and has a great influence on the younger players.

Part I - Talent Evaluation

Now onto the personnel. The Mets were one of the top five best teams in the MLB last year and missed the playoffs. There is two problems with that. First, the Mets missed the playoffs last year and second, the Mets should've made the playoffs and didn't. The chances of the Mets missing the playoffs in both '07 and '08 were less then 2% but somehow the Mets managed to pull it off. The Mets sole issue last year was their bullpen, but in order to prevent another collapse the Mets should find it in their best interest to shore up all their other holes and problems. This does not mean using up all your money on signing Mark Teixeira and C.C. "Hefty Lefty" Sabathia to whopping contracts, it means investing time and resources to find the optimal solution to each of their problems.

Here I've identified the areas of need for the Mets and possible solutions, internal and external. Here it is:

1)Bullpen-internal:Eddie Kunz, Carlos Muniz, Bobby Parnell, Willie Collazo; free agents:Juan Cruz, Trevor Hoffman, Eric Gagne; trades:Huston Street, Bobby Jenks, Frank Francisco, *Joel Hanrahan, *David Aardsma, Chad Cordero(recovering from a difficult arm injury/surgery)

2)RF/LF-internal:Ryan Church, Nick Evans, Daniel Murphy, Fernando Martinez; free agents:Bobby Abreu(A), Milton Bradley(injury prone), Rocco Baldelli, Juan Rivera; trades:Travis Buck, Brandon Boggs, Brian Barton

3)Starters 4/5-internal:Jon Niese, Aaron Heilman(I believe he'd be good in his return to Starting), Bobby Parnell; free agents:Brad Penny, Mark Mulder, Mark Prior, Horacio Ramirez; trades:Jason Hammel, J.P. Howell(was a starter in the minors), Sean Marshall, **

4)2B-internal:Daniel Murphy, Argenis Reyes, Luis Castillo; free agents:Orlando Hudson

5)Backup/Starting 1B-internal:Mike Carp, Val Pascucci, Chris Aguila; free agents: Jason Giambi, Hank Blalock, Eric Hinske

6)RH PowerHitter off Bench-internal:Val Pascucci, Chris Aguila; free agents:Kevin Mench, Greg Norton

7)Utility-internal:Argenis Reyes; free agents:Alex Cora, Craig Counsell

8)Depth-Although at the bottom of the list this is probably the most important area of need the Mets have. The main quagmire that killed the Mets was that they weren't able to cover up their uncertainties even the slightest bit because they had no depth last years. Thus the Mets should stockpile cheap pitchers with good stuff and stick them in AAA if they don't make the team out of the spring. This way if a starter or a reliever goes down with an injury or are ineffective or tired one of these players can immediately come up and replace him. The same should be done with position players but more importantly with the pitchers.

The aforementioned paragraph talked about the Mets needs and player targets while the next paragraph will talk about the players the Mets should rid themselves of:

Duaner Sanchez(non-tender, if he'd sign a minor league deal I'd resign him), Scott Schoeneweis(trade), Luis Castillo(trade), Marlon Anderson(release) and Carlos Delgado if he'd bring back something decent in a trade. Now onto the major offseason plans. We are now officially ready for the offseason because we've successfully resolved the Mets front office complications, hired a new coaching staff and prepped ourselves for many player acquisitions.

Part II - Impending Free Agents

Oliver Perez, Pedro Martinez, Luis Ayala, El Injuryque, Damion Easley, Matt Wise, Moises Alou and Fernando Tatis are all free agents. I would not be willing to resign any of these players back for the apparent reasons(they stink). Tatis is going to suffer from regressing to the mean because he's clearly not the player he was last year career wise. Everyone else is either awful or injury prone except for OP. Oliver Perez is interesting because all Mets fans will of course want to resign him but New Yorkers tend to forget too easily when it comes to sports(who one the Super Bowl last year?). They remember Ollie defeating the Yankees and Phillies in crucial games last year. They don't remember that Oliver Perez had a 5.58 ERA in May and nearly had the same amount of walks as he did strikeouts(24/20), while letting up 8 homers. Following up that terrific performance Perez posted a 5.28 ERA in June and let up 7 homers. Then in the last month of the season Perez posted an ERA of 5.79, to help the Mets into the playoffs(what did I say about New Yorkers?). Mets fans have to realize that Perez's pitching is as inconsistent as the Knicks. Since Perez is going to command a mega contract around 5y/$75MM(Scott Boras is his agent) he isn't worth it. The Mets should offer him arbitration so when another team obliges to these preposterous demands the Mets will then collect two draft picks. So while the Mets are shaving around $32.7MM(after raises and losses not including arbitration raises) they're also collecting 2 drafts picks.

Part III - Acquiring The Wright Personnel

The Mets have many holes that need to be filled so I chose the optimal options for each and every hole the Mets have using the list of players above.

C: Brian Schneider and Ramon Castro should platoon again in 2009. I liked this platoon a lot because they are almost complete opposites, Castro's an offensive minded catcher and Schneider's one of the best with the glove. I believe giving Schneider another year to work with the Mets pitching staff would be an excellent idea. He works very well with young pitchers which the Mets now have in Jonathan Niese, Eddie Kunz, Robert Parnell and quite a few more good pitching prospects. Castro can also handle a pitching staff too and also is a fantastic, above average hitting catcher. If this LH/RH platoon manages to stay healthy it should be a good one for the Mets in 2009.

1B: The Mets should stick with Carlos Delgado at first base unless they get blown away with an offer. If he falters the Mets now have the personnel to replace him(Evans, Carp, Murphy, Pascucci) and if he continues his success the Mets will be solid at 1B.

2B: Daniel Murphy all the way. He'll pick up all of Castillo's offense with no problems and will probably also make up for the slight hitting discrepancy behind the dish.

3B: David Wright. I think that's the only thing I have to say, David Wright

SS: The same goes for Jose Reyes

LF: Nick Evans should at least win the RH side of the platoon in LF out of spring training if not the full time job. I believe the Mets should acquire Travis Buck the A's left handed hitting outfielder. He won't cost much because he had a brutal year this past season and the influx of a ton of top outfield prospects into the Athletics farm system(Carlos Gonzalez, Aaron Cunningham, Matt Murton, Ryan Sweeney, Eric Patterson, Matt Spencer and Chris Denorfia)should all but push Buck out the door. Since most of the A's top prospects are big league ready they now have no room for Travis Buck in their jam-packed outfield. He's an above average fielder, he gets on base and by playing against righties only his stats will be pretty inflated but very high.

CF: Carlos Beltran

RF: I would let Ryan Church, Val Pascucci and Chris Aguila vie for the rightfield starting job which might also end up as a platoon. Church can at least platoon in right field this season, I hope. I strongly believe Ryan Church will return healthy and improved and hopefully turn in a good season as the Mets starting rightfielder. If not and he truly cannot play baseball anymore in a bearable manner hopefully both of Travis Buck and Nick Evans step up and cause the platoon to be split into two.

BENCH

C: Like I mentioned before Ramon Castro and Brian Schneider should be platooning and in that case each one is the other's backup on the nights their not playing.

IF: Alex Cora. When he's called on he performs and he plays a good role in the clubhouse. He's also extremely versatile and has one a World Series title. When Murphy will need a break against LHP's Cora will fill in. Cora can also spell Wright and Reyes.

OF: Angel Pagan and Endy Chavez could battle it out for the speedy and plus defensive outfielder job.

Power-Hitting 1B/OF: I would let Pascucci, Aguila and Kevin Mench(minor league deal/invitation to spring training) compete for the 23rd spot on the roster and provide power off the bench.

OF: The other half of the Nick Evans/Travis Buck platoon sits in this spot.

Pitching

SP1: Who do you think it is? Pedro? Johan Santana of course!(say with hispanic accent)

SP2: This should be John Maine's spot but in crucial parts of the year he didn't play up to his potential and at the most crucial time, September, he got injured. I still believe he'll enter the year as the Mets number 2 though.

SP3: Expect a similar thing to what happened to Maine last year to happen to Mike Pelfrey this year. Remember that if you throw more than 30 IP than the year before you are a serious injury/ineffectiveness risk. Pelfrey in 2007 threw 152 2/3 IP(minors and majors combined) and this year threw 200 2/3 IP, an increase of 48 innings. It's true that Pelfrey is a big fellow and was/is capable of carrying this type of workload as the Mets number two starter this year, but he's still an injury/ineffectiveness risk for next season.

SP4/5: I am combining these two positions because a)there really isn't a need for a 5th starter

and b)the Mets should have an open competition for these two spots and have the two best start the season as the 4 and 5. So this is really one competition with two victors and not two separate competitions. I would sign Brad Penny and have him compete and be the frontrunner for the 4th starter spot and prove to the Mets that he's healthy enough to be effective. Last year he got really unlucky with the homerun ball having a whopping 13.4% HR/FB rate which is 4.4% above his career rate so that means it'll deflate this year. Up to June Penny's always great but after June he's been downright awful. In 2006 he had a 2.32, a 3.51 and a 3.05 ERA in each of April, May and June, followed by a 6.00, a 5.14 and a 6.83 in July, August and September. In 2007 he was the best first half pitcher in baseball throwing 1.95, 2.15 and 1.90 ERA's in April, May and June but followed that up with an atrocious 2nd half yet again posting ERA's of 4.91, 4.00 and 3.90 to finish the season. So the Mets should trade Penny on July 1st while he has max value, for a good young pitching prospect, and hand the job over to one of the losers of the last starting spot. If Penny's ineffective from the get go the Mets should just let him go[sign him to a contract with a clause that lets him become a free agent again after Spring Training if either a)he wants to become a free agent again after winning a roster spot with the Mets while getting no money from the Mets or b)if he loses the 4/5th starter battle the Mets would have to pay him $1MM to become a free agent]. The other candidates would be Jonathan Niese, Aaron Heilman, Robert Parnell and Jason Vargas(Just let up his first run in the AFL). I would also trade for David Aardsma because he has a superb fastball and will come cheaply. He's worth the gamble because he has excellent stuff, he probably won't win the starting job but he'll try out for a bullpen spot. If he loses out on the bullpen spot he could always be DFA'd and would then join an already excellent AAA staff. I would also sign Horacio Ramirez to a minor league deal with an invitation to Spring Training. This gives the Mets something they didn't have last year, pitching depth. Whether it'll be having all 5 starters healthy, whether it be having a few starters in their bullpen, or even having former MLB starters on their AAA pitching staff.

Barepen

CL: As I said before, you do not have to be a proven closer to be a major league closer, just look at David Price. The mannerisms you do need is a positive attitude, resiliency and swagger. You need these attributes to be able to give it your best one night while blowing a save and still be able to come back the next night and dominate a better team. You do not need experience to close it's a load of BS(Blown Saves). So signing Trevor Hoffman to mentor Eddie Kunz, Joe Smith and Robert Parnell doesn't look like such a good move now that I've mentioned all this. But the point of signing Hoffman is not to close, rather to help these young players gain these attributes because younger players are sometimes lacking in these areas. Hoffman will probably be able to hold the fort until midseason while then probably succumbing to injury or ineffectiveness due to his age. This is irrelevant because he'd have already completed his task in teaching the young ones the ways of the closer.

6-8th Inning: Eddie Kunz, Robert Parnell and Joe Smith will battle for the top spot and each of them will almost certainly win a roster spot. This is good news for the Mets because this young trio of relievers are all very unique and different than the other. Eddie Kunz has been a closer since his sophomore year in college and has thrived in that role. He throws his 4-seam fastball at 94-96 MPH, a hard sinker at 91-93 MPH and a great slider at 89 MPH. The only concern with Kunz are his struggles verses lefties because lefties kill right-handed pitcher's sliders. Robert Parnell has been a starter his whole professional baseball career but for lack of a breaking ball should be moved into the pen. He throws a fastball that tops out at 97 MPH and a slider that needs work but could be good in a little while along with a changeup which is nothing to write home about. Joe Smith is a submariner who has a wicked delivery and a nasty repertoire of a biting 4-seamer, a snapping 2-seamer, a looping slider and a deceiving changeup. As you can surely tell all these pitchers are extremely different.

Lefty Specialists: The Mets should start the season with two left handed relievers in their bullpen. They have to choose two of: Pedro Feliciano, Jason Vargas(not Claudio), Willie Collazo and Adam Bostick. Feliciano was misused last year by both Jerry and Willie because of the fact that he can face both left-handed batters and right-handed ones(unlike another lefty reliever we're all familiar with, cough...Schoeneweis...cough) but last year only pitched against lefty batters. Vargas, Collazo and Bostick are all starters but I believe they aren't good enough to be starters in the majors and should therefore relieve instead. Vargas is currently dominating the AFL after successfully recovering from knee surgery which caused him to miss most of last season. Collazo is a minor league veteran and has a similar arm slot to Feliciano's. All these pitchers fair pretty well against righties, so no need to worry if your manager is an idiot and leaves your lefty specialist in the game to face a right-handed batter in the most important game in the season.

Long Reliever: This job belongs to Brian Stokes although he may be challenged by Horacio Ramirez, Stokes should win the struggle and become this team's long reliever. By midseason however Trevor Hoffman should be out of the picture and Horacio Ramirez would then be pushed up to the major leagues and have his own bullpen role. Brian Stokes would probably shift to middle reliever/6th inning guy. This is a vital role and Stokes is perfect for it because of his hard fastball, 94-96 MPH, and his diving slider which gets excellent rotation, movement and speed.

Depth: Arguably the most important area of all, the Mets will have an excellent rotation in Buffalo(AAA) to help out if something goes wrong in Flushing. Led by Jonathan Niese the rotation will feature Tobi Stoner(Mets pitching prospect), Horacio Ramirez, David Aardsma, Willie Collazo and Adam Bostick(swingman). They will also have a pretty good bullpen with Carlos Muniz and Ricardo Rincon leading the pack.

Part IV - Transactions

I have the Mets making a number of transactions in the offseason but mostly tinkering and no big deals(i.e. Jake Peavy, Mark Teixeira or Brett Favre). In most offseason preps(mine of course isn't a prep it's what a smart GM would do) the writers have the Mets signing big name free agents, this of course is idiotic. I have Duaner Sanchez and Ruben Tejada(a 19 year old SS in high A) going to the A's in the aforementioned Travis Buck trade. The Signing of Brad Penny to a one year $6MM deal with incentives and an opt-out clause. Also picking up Horacio Ramirez, Kevin Mench and Chad Cordero from the scrap heap and signing them to minor league deals with invitations to spring in St. Lucie. The Mets will be filling their veteran utility role by signing Alex Cora to a one year $2.5MM deal with an evergreen clause that vests with 200 at-bats for $2MM in 2010 . And the Mets would acquiring David Aardsma who should cost next to nothing. The biggest move is signing Trevor Hoffman to a one year $6MM contract with a club option for a second year at $5MM. Luis Castillo and Scott Schoeneweis should be shipped out of town for anything short of a sack of baseballs. After June the Mets should trade Brad Penny for a top pitching prospect. This would then allow for the callup of the highly touted Jon Niese. They should also look to trade Delgado at the halfway point if Mike Carp is ready to take over or if Nick Evans has outgrown his platoon in LF. Pedro Feliciano could also be shipped off if one of Collazo, Bostick outperform AAA and are ready for a callup as well.

Part V - Conclusion

The Mets will be able to survive injuries this year unlike last year, if they'd go with this blueprint. The worst case scenario, I believe is Ryan Church being done, Delgado being finished, Hoffman getting injured in the first week of Spring Training, Pelfrey declining, Penny getting injured and the bullpen not growing because of missing Hoffman. If all this happens they could get move one of Chris Aguila, Val Pascucci, Travis Buck and Fernando Martinez to RF. One of Mike Carp, Pascucci and Nick Evans would replace Delgado at 1B. They could replace Pelf with Jon Niese, they could replace Penny with Ramirez or Aardsma. With many useful pieces aligned at AAA they could easily revamp their bullpen with fresh arms. But seriously what are the chances of all that happening in 2009 to the Mets? I mean the Mets aren't that unlucky, are they? As you can see all these question marks have apropos solutions and therefore this plan is as flawless as can be. I can imagine the bullpen having a bounce back year in 2009 with all their new arms and lots of talented young pitchers with a mentor in Hoffman. This team has not only improved but has also lowered their payroll, has gotten younger and healthier, added lots of depth and hasn't taken anything away from the farm system to make this grand plan work. Their only problem is not having a spot for Niese but I believe this problem will work itself out. So Mets fans look for Omar to sign Derek Lowe and Brian Fuentes each to 4 year deals paying them an excess of $90MM over the lifespan of their contracts. Or totally ruin his nicely built up farm system to get Matt Holliday(who is average outside Coors) or Jake Peavy who just isn't worth it. I just hope Minaya will wise up and make sure the Mets don't lose on the last day of the season again because then something really bad could happen. Sorry Mets fans for bringing you guys back down to earth, I also wish I was the Mets GM.

John Farrell: The Next Great Manager

2008-10-22T07:12:00.002-04:00

John Farrell is one of smartest baseball minds out their right now. He's not only been a coach but has also worked in the front office and has played the game of baseball. This guy just knows pitching. He can recognize pitching talent, he can develop pitching talent and can elevate pitching talent. He is currently the pitching coach of the Boston Red Sox(since 2007) and was formerly the Director of Player Development for the Indians(2001-2006). We both know the level of pitching in these two places is extremely high. Since 2002 the Indians have never been out of the top five minor league systems in all of baseball. In 2007 John Farrell led the Sox rotation to a 3.87 ERA in a hitters park which was second to only San Diego who have amazing pitching teachers(Bud Black, Darren Balsley), and also play in an extreme pitchers park and posted a 3.68 ERA.

Under Farrell's watchful eye the Indians farm system slowly ascended to the top of the MLB. He signed and developed players like Fausto Carmona, Jeremy Guthrie(now with the Orioles), Jeremy Sowers, Rafael Perez, Rafael Betancourt and more. He also produced three current top 100 prospects that the Indians have: Aaron Laffey(LHP), Adam Miller(top 15) and Chuck Lofgren(LHP).

With the Red Sox he has worked wonders for Justin Masterson, Jon Lester, Hideki Okajima, Manny Delcarmen and Javier Lopez along with overseeing the terrific Josh Beckett, Jon Papelbon and Tim Wakefield and has really eased the transition for Dice-K. The Red Sox have a rotation consisting of Beckett, Dice-K, Lester, Wakefield and Buchholz(needs a lot of work). They also probably have the best bullpen in the MLB with Papelbon(also a starter), Masterson(also a starter), Delcarmen, Okajima, Javier Lopez and rookie Michael Bowden(a top prospect who's a starter).

The one thing that truly amazes me is that all these pitchers are different from the next. Papelbon has the demeanor of a closer and has overpowering stuff, Masterson on the other hand is a sinkerballer with excellent command. Okajima comes at you from the strangest arm-slots and angles, and Delcarmen is a power pitcher with outstanding breaking stuff(curveball, changeup). Then there is Javier Lopez who's a sidearmer and a lefty specialist but can face right handers one in a while, and Michael Bowden the highly touted prospect who has run out of minor league stops(he's dominated everywhere).

As you can see wherever Farrell has gone his teams pitching has flourished, now since he's had two years of tutelage under Terry Francona(arguably the best manager in the game) he should be ready to manage in the bigs. He knows how to handle a bullpen, knows how to handle the media(he's a coach in Boston) and has probably learned how to be a successful manager from Francona(a great tactician, a winner, a leader, disciplinarian, settles clubhouse issues). All this could mean that the MLB has a great manager in the making over in Boston and someone should get a hold of him(hopefully the Mets).

On The two Mets Collapses

2008-10-22T05:51:00.005-04:00

The Mets have "collapsed" for the second time in two years and lost their playoff berth both times on the last day of the season. How do you explain this? I'm not sure. But when I was watching the Mets play the last game of the season and the last few weeks of the season I thought I was watching a rerun of last season, because the exact same thing happened. This is where I was wrong. In 2007 the Mets cruised to the top ofd the NL, being 15 games over .500 already in the early stages of May. After that the Mets hovered around .500 until ending the season at 88-74. This means that from May 12-October 1, the Mets finished one game below .500, pathetic. This is called a collapse. The Mets of 2008 started the year off by going 30-31. After June 7, the Mets went 59-42, 17 games over .500, while the Phillies went 54-44. So in 2008 the Mets played excellent in the second half of the season, they lost their playoff spot in the first half. It's true that the Mets were 3 1/2 games up as late as September 1o, but they hadn't had an extended dry spell since the first two months of the season so they were bound to have one. You can't even say that the timing was unfortunate because if this would've happened in July the Mets season still would've ended with the same result, one game back, out of the playoffs.

The Mets last year had seen their pitching staff decline in every month starting out at a superb 3.5/9(runs per nine) for all of April and finishing off the season at a horrific 5.7/9 for September. This decline was the key to their demise and not the supposed hitting collapse that all the newspapers wrote about after the "collapse". The hitters actually had their best month of the year in September rising above their average of 4.6 runs scored per game all the way to 5.7 in September. This is because of the return of Moises Alou who hit .341/.392/.524 over the course of the 2007 season and hit even higher after he came off the DL in late August.

In 2008 the Mets had the second best offense in the NL(behind the Cubs) scoring 5 runs per game, along with leading the MLB in adjusted EqA(equivalent average). Their starting rotation which lost John Maine late in the season(for all of September) and had Pedro for only a small portion of the season still ranked 5th in SNLVR(Support Neutral Lineup Adjusted Value Above Replacement)in the majors. This means the Mets starting pitching saved the 5th most runs over what a AAA staff would've done in the MLB(the Jays led with 25.9) with 23.6. This stat takes these factors out of the equation: park effect, opponents, (your team's)lineup/hitting, (your team's)bullpen and (your team's)defense. It basically isolates pitching from every other aspect of the game. The Mets were also 2nd in the NL Defensive Efficiency. This clearly shows you that the Mets were in the top 5 teams in the MLB. But if the playoffs are supposed to have the top 8 teams in the MLB how'd the Mets not make it? The Mets outplayed the Phillies, Dodgers, Brewers and White Sox this past season and still didn't make it to the playoffs. This is all because of the Mets horrendous bullpen.

If the Mets had made it to the playoffs they would've had the 7th worst WXRL(a stat that isolates bullpen performance) in playoff history. The saddest part about this is that the bottom 6 all ranged from 11-16(the middle of the pack) overall in the MLB meaning that the Mets really would've had the worst bullpen in playoff history because they ranked 26th in the majors this year.

Both years the Mets lost because of pitching, both years they attribute the "collapse" to the hitting. In reality the Mets could've used a hitting first basemen, right fielder, catcher and second basemen for the whole season in 2007/2008 but this WAS NOT the reason for their team's collapse. I think the conclusion is now pretty clear, the Mets need to stockpile arms this offseason.

Building The Yankees

2008-10-16T05:51:00.015-04:00

The Yankees had the highest payroll in the MLB last season but still managed to come in third place in the AL East, eaking their streak of 13 consecutive playoff appearances. The Yankees epitomize the changes baseball's going through right now. The Yankees for many years have based their talent pool around old free agents who had previously led them to World Series titles. In baseball today if you rely on free agents you will get crushed. The MLB is slowly slipping away from free agents and drifting towards player development. The Yankees have still been acquiring these types old expensive players(Ivan Rodriguez)that are basically useless, and who have led to their team's demise, while taking many steps forward in player development the Yankees still like to lean on these old expensive guys for reinforcements. This causes teams to be thus losing the easiest way of acquiring talent, a.k.a. bringing up players from the minor leagues. The one part that the Yankees got down right is stressing OBP. On-Base Percentage is a key component of having success in the regular season. If you look at all their hand selected, old free agents signees they all at least get on base at an extremely high rates. So if you'd like to say that the Yankees are flawed go ahead but just remember that the Yankees one hidden talent before the start of the season, starting pitching, took hits to all its top three members; Chien-Ming Wang, Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes who all succumbed to injuries over the course of the season.

The Yankees(Hank and Hal Steinbrenner) have to learn that signing free agents doesn't work and that they now have to let Brian Cashmen do his job without them butting in. In my opinion the Yankees don't need much work at all but I'm almost positive that the Yankees will at least sign two big name, expensive free agents to bad contracts. The free agents that the Yankees already dished their cash out to aren't worth trading for three reasons: a)no one will take on their tremendous salaries, b)they are producing and getting on-base so you might as well keep them and c)for lack of better options to play at their positions. So without further ado your 2009 New York Yankees(if I was at the helm):

Part I - Impending Free Agents

Yankees have quite a few impending free agents but most of them are expensive, old and have replacements waiting in the wings. I would decline Jason Giambi's $22MM option and instead pay him his $5MM buyout because Jorge Posada will surely take over first base for he can no longer catch and he is under contract. I would also decline Carl Pavano's $13MM option and pay him his $1.95MM buyout(that's a given). Bobby Abreu is a free agent and will command at least a three year deal, since the Yankees have many outfielders they are better off letting him go and using the money elsewhere. Offering him arbitration is the smartest plan because he wants a long term contract, so if you offer him arbitration and he signs with another team the Yankees pick up a couple draft picks and if he accepts arbitration you get a .380 OBP player for around $16MM for one year, a true bargain. Andy Pettitte and Mike Mussina are both free agents and are both contemplating retirement. I believe one of them would accept a one year contract for around $10-12MM with a cheaper club option for a second year, I would bring back one of the two to be the fourth starter, but wouldn't push it because the Yankees have many other alternatives for the last two spots in the rotation(Alfredo Aceves, Darrell Rasner, Ian Kennedy, etc.). Even though Damaso Marte was roughed up in his two months as a Yankee I believe he'll return to form in 2009, his option is an easy choice at $6MM especially after shedding most of the other free agent's salaries. So I would let Jason Giambi, one of Pettitte/Mussina(or both), Pavano and Ivan Rodriguez go while offering arbitration to Bobby Abreu and bringing back one of Pettitte/Mussina(or neither) and Marte.

Part II - Free Agent Market Free agents are overpriced and old. The Yankees don't really need help at any of the positions with top free agents 1B(Teixeira), LF(Manny) and SP(Sabathia/Burnett). They're also very deep in the bullpen(K-Rod) so they could look to add a couple cheap high ceiling guys for the bench like the Rays did(Hinske, Pena) and he all know how that turned out(cough, World Series, cough). The Yankees should instead invest their money in long-term contracts for Joba, Hughes, Wang and others down the road(Austin Jackson a top 50 prospect who plays CF). They could also use the extra money to further develop their international and amateur scouting along with their player development.

Part III - Trades

What the Yankees should do is trade Derek Jeter. You can call me crazy but if you look at his stats from the past few years he's cleary been declining and has never in his career played defense well. The best part of trading Derek Jeter is that the Yankees already have a superior and younger SS on their 25-man roster in A-Rod. Now, who would take on Jeter and his enormous ego? The Dodgers. The Dodgers are losing both their starting SS(Rafael Furcal) and their icon(Manny Ramirez) to free agency this offseason and this trade would solve both problems for them, plus Joe Torre is the manager of the Dodgers meaning that if Jeter would hit the trade market he would demand the Dodgers to go all in, in order to acquire DJ. The Dodgers are said to be not overly enamored with his[Russell Martin's] makeup". The Yankees desperately need a young catcher who can take control of a game(on the pitching side) and help out his pitchers, along with hitting very well, this my friends is Russell Martin. Him alone isn't enough so I would demand James McDonald(a Dodgers major league ready, top pitching prospect) and Blake Dewitt(the Dodgers future 2B but can play all over). In order to settle the money matters the Yankees would also be getting Andruw Jones and his albatross contract. Andruw Jones would be a nice pickup for the Yankees because he could revive his career by playing for a perennial contender, playing in a hitters park and of course wearing pinstripes. This gives the Yankees a one year bridge in CF until their top prospect Austin Jackson is ready to roam centerfield in the new Yankee Stadium. This move doesn't only free up $23MM(Jeter's owed $41MM over '09-'10 minus Jones' $18MM one year commitment) but also fills in most of the team's holes with young talent.

Part IV - Overview The Yankees have almost every spot up for grabs in their bullpen along with the 5th starter spot. I would set up competitions for each of these spots along with a few others(bench spots) heading into spring training and wait and see which players come out victorious; the journeymen, the rookies or the veterans. This is what the Yankees '09 roster should look like:

C: Russell Martin
1B: Jorge Posada
2B: Robinson Cano
3B: Blake DeWitt(If he can’t handle the offensive production for a 3B, him and A-Rod could flip-flop)
SS: Alex Rodriguez
LF: Johnny Damon
CF: Andruw Jones
RF: Xavier Nady
DH: Hideki Matsui
C: Chad Moeller(not really needed, Russell Martin only misses a game or two per season)
IF: C.J. Henry/Cody Ranson(could use a new backup IFer)
1B/LF: Shelley Duncan
OF: Melky Cabrera/Brett Gardner(I would start Melky out in AAA to refine his swing)

SP: Chien-Ming Wang
SP: Joba Chamberlain
SP: Phil Hughes
SP: Andy Pettitte/Mike Mussina(If both leave McDonald becomes the #4)
SP: James McDonald(frontrunner)/Darrell Rasner/Ian Kennedy/Alfredo Aceves
CL:Mariano Rivera
LOOGY: Damaso Marte

The other 5 spots would be an open competition between a number of talented pitchers and I'll be listing them from "best to worst":
Darrell Rasner, Ian Kennedy, Mark Melancon, Jose Veras, Edwar Ramirez, Brian Bruney, Alfredo Aceves, Dan Giese, Phil Coke and Humberto Sanchez.

This is how the Yankees roster would look if I were in charge. To bad I'm not(it would be a really hard job for me). I have to say, the Yankees are based around young pitching and OBP which is what teams need to reach the playoffs(look at the Boston Red Sox). If Wang, Hughes and Joba didn't all get injured last season we might've been seeing a Yankees-Phillies World Series, no just kidding, but they would've been much better with those three atop their rotation. Anyways all this virtually has 0% chance of happening and instead the Yankees will probably sign CC Sabathia and Teixeira to monstrous contracts and in 2018 they'll come crying to me asking for help because they'll be stuck paying two 40 year olds $25MM a year.

Editor's Note: Sorry about the messed up format, I was experiencing some technical difficulties that have now hopefully been resolved(these problems always start from having a crappy technician). Not to mention that I'm my own technician.

Why the Chicago Cubs didn't make it out of the NLDS

2008-10-11T17:54:00.005-04:00

I once wrote a post about outcome and causation in postseason play. I mentioned that the only regular season stats with any significant causation to winning in the postseason are a team's closers WXRL(this isolates the amount of wins a closer has saved for a team over what a replacement player would've), Defensive Efficiency(a stat which measure the percentage of balls in play that are converted into outs), and K Rate(the amount of K's your team averages every 9 innings).

The Chicago Cubs are a unique case because they were second in the majors in DE, 5th in WXRL and first in K%. How does this follow? How does a team that is supposed to win a World Series get swept in the first round by an inferior team? How is it that the Cubs haven't won in 100 years?

This is all very puzzling but there is always an answer to everything. First off DE, WXRL and K% only cause about 15% of a win while the other 85% is all luck and variables. So even if the Cubs finished first in all three categories they could still have lost the series because if you for sure win 15% of the time in a short series you'd win a total of .75 of a game which doesn't help. So the first reason is that anything can happen in a short series between two of the four best teams in the NL(it never really is but just for the sake of argument). Reason two is that the Dodgers are motivated. They would've lost the division without Manny. Correction: Manny's motivated. He wants to prove to baseball that he doesn't have to be a headache, while playing like an MVP in a new league and leading another team besides the Red Sox to the World Series(along with making a ton of money this offseason). The point is an unmotivated Manny is scary, a motivated Manny could have a 1.200 OPS(On-Base% plus Slugging%). Joe Torre wants to prove to everyone that he doesn't need a $200MM payroll to succeed. By winning this year that's what he's doing.

The Cubs had so much pressure on them that they couldn't succeed. The Cubs need to play in a stress free environment and pretend like the playoffs are just a continuation of the regular season, Piniella being their makes this hard. The Cubs never really hit a dry spot the whole season, their longest losing streak was 6 games and that was at the beginning of September when Aramis Ramirez and Alfonso Soriano were injured. They were slowing down a bit in September and they were do for a losing streak sooner rather than later and the season was ending. Who better to face than the streaking Dodgers. The Dodgers finished off the slumping Cubs in 3 games. A combination of a mental disadvantage, a slump well overdue, the Dodgers motivation and just plain luck overrode the best team in the MLB this year. All this probably meant that the Dodgers had an 80% to 20% advantage with 77% luck going to the Dodgers and 8% going to the Cubs. With that big of an imbalance it's easy to understand why the Cubs failed to beat the Dodgers.

The Red Sox, The Rays and The '96 Yankees

2008-10-11T17:52:00.005-04:00

The part of baseball that I like the most is that it's like a poem. You can interpret a transaction in many different ways and be right, but still not have interpreted it the way the GM did before making the transaction. That's the beauty of baseball.

On Friday Jack Curry wrote an article in the New York Times saying that the '04-current Red Sox are basically the same as the '96-'00 Yankees(I can now capitalize the Y because they didn't make it to the playoffs). He is wrong on many accounts. Right after reading that article I read an article also written by Curry about the Rays turnaround. When I read this article the first thing that came to my mind was what a genius Andrew Friedman is. These three teams all chose different paths of success and this is the reason Curry isn't right to compare the '96-'00 Yankees with the Red Sox. The only similarities these teams have are that they're all from the AL East and they all were/are/will be prennial winners, but the similarities end there. these three yeams have all been built optimaly but all three in different ways. this is where Jack Curry is wrong.

The '96 yanks built themselves up by grooming a few top prospects, making a few nifty trades but most importantly signing expensive free agents to huge contracts. This catapulted baseball into a new era, an era loaded with monstrous contracts, steroids and drugs. The Yankees showed to the rest of baseball that the right way to win is by signing top free agents.

The Red Sox were one of the first teams to disobey the era change and decide to let Theo Epstein run his own ingenious plan. This was to create the image of the ideal baseball player in his mind and to acquire as many as he could. This is what he did. He first signed a bunch of cheaper free agents like Kevin Millar, Bill Mueller, David Ortiz(waiver wire pickup) and Mark Bellhorn all similar type players who fit his mold. These players mixed with the core of Pedro, Manny, Nomar and Johnny Damon to form a great team. This team failed the first time around in '03 by losing to the Yankees in extra innings of game 7 of the ALCS. He then decided to take a risk the next year by trading away their second most productive offensive player and their star Nomar Garciaparra. Theo Epstein realized that his player mold wasn't sought after and therefore was cheaper and easier to attain in free agency but more importantly the baseball draft. Younger players are under team control for 6 years, are cheaper and less injury prone than veterans. So this is what Theo did. He kept on signing cheap free agents mixing in a few nice trades(Nomar, Schilling) while most importantly developing top prospects. By signing the older players Theo was basically giving his 2007-08 team time to develop. Now that he's got this young talent he's pushed all the older players out of town(the players mentioned above, Lugo, Manny). His method was to utilize his flow of cash, but once his draftees are ready to play you get rid of the grizzled veterans.

The Rays are the most unique because this team rebuilt itself in a way that's unheard of today. Usually when a team rebuilds they trade all their better and older players for top prospects and develop the prospects, this doesn't always work. When the Rays rebuilt they didn't trade any veterans because they didn't have any of them to trade. This is what I find amazing. Andrew Friedman simply started rebuilding his farm system from scratch without receiving a boatload of prospects to help out from outside of the organization like what most teams do(Orioles, A's). Mr. Friedman just compiled a bunch of prospects and cheap pickups while dumping salary to form one of the best teams in baseball if not the best. This process is the hardest and takes the longest although Andrew managed to do it in 3 years time.

What we see here is that although both the Yankees of old and the Red Sox weren't/aren't afraid to hand out the cash these teams built their teams in different fashions. Theo Epstein took risks(i.e. trading 4 prospects for Schilling, trading Nomar and Manny) while the Steinbrenners always played it safe. The Yankees weren't smart they just compiled enough expensive veterans that some of them had to pan out. Since more teams have taken part in free agency since 2000 the Yankees haven't been able to do what they used to. This is why Theo's plan is more efficient because all his players have come from the farm system with a few exceptions(Mike Lowell, J.D. Drew and Josh Beckett). The Rays, playing in a pressure free area and situation had the luxury of "not trying to compete" for two years while developing this years team. As you can see these three methods all work it just depends on the team and the situation. The Yankees wouldn't of been able to use the method the Rays used because of their fan base's demands and the Rays wouldn't have been able to use the Red Sox or the Yankees methods because they don't have enough money, resources. I think just like the Yankees did in the 90's the Rays have started a new era. An era of homegrown talent and player development. Because of this free agency is going to go into a state of flux, look for baseball to try to work this out someway.

The Other Jew in the AL East

2008-09-19T05:43:00.005-04:00

Andrew Friedman was hired to be the Tampa Bay Rays GM, the offseason before the 2006 season. This means that this season is his third. He has managed to not only get the team over .500 after never accomplishing that feat in the Rays brief history, but has also made them into a playoff team and maybe even the best team in the AL. The Rays are also one of the youngest teams in the MLB, thus their core has many more years to play together. How has Mr. Friedman been able to turn the tables in just three years time? That's what I'm going to try to answer for you.

Everyone thinks that the Rays success has come solely from attaining many high draft picks in recent drafts because they've been so bad. But if you look closely and analyze their team you'll see that very few have been drafted early by the Rays. There's Carl Crawford(2nd Round 1998) who's been injured for a while, Rocco Baldelli(1st Round 2000) who before August hadn't played since obtaining some kind of cell disease, BJ Upton(1st Round 2002) a young star, Jeff Neimann(1st Round 2005) who hasn't played because the Rays have a surplus of pitchers, Evan Longoria(1st Round 2006) and David Price(1st overall 2007). That is quite a few players not to mention top prospects Ried Brignac and Wade Davis who were both drafted in the 2nd Round and Delmon Young a 2004 1st Round Pick who was traded to the Twins for Matt Garza, a key component to the Rays success. This list has three superstars and three up and coming, future stars. That still leaves six more hitters and four more starters along with some key bullpen roles that aren't taken by former 1st or 2nd round draft picks.

This is where Friedman has excelled as a GM. He loves picking up former highly touted prospects, that were supposed to excel at the Major League level but never panned out. He has picked these guys up cheaply and some of them have made big impacts for the Rays. He's also found some very nice prospects in the later rounds of the draft like Jeremy Hellickson in the 4th Round and Desmond Jennings in the 10th Round two of many players who have helped transform the Rays Minor League System into one of the better ones in the majors. When Friedman became the GM after the 2005 season the Rays had one of the worst Farm Systems in baseball, after the 2006 season they were ranked 1st. He has stockpiled many exciting young players like Jennings and Hellickson along with Wade Davis, Jake McGee(before Friedman's time), David Price, Ried Brignac and others. He's realized that building through the minor leagues is the right way to go, and since he came into a no pressure situation he was able to do exactly what he wanted. While his young star players were developing Andrew Friedman snagged some nice, cheap free agents that have contributed a lot to this year's success like Carlos Pena(leads team in HR's), Eric Hinske(a key component on offense), Cliff Floyd, Gabe Gross(both solid contributors) and Dan Johnson on offense. Troy Percival, JP Howell, Grant Balfour and Chad Bradford are all essential parts of their top bullpen this year.

The rest of the players are either pre-Andrew Friedman or were acquired via trade. Dioner Navarro and Edwin Jackson were acquired from the LA Dodgers for Julio Lugo and Danys Baez, at the time a huge rip off for the Rays who were getting...two highly touted prospects that never panned out. JP Howell was acquired from the Royals for Joey Gathright, and Willy Aybar came in the trade that had the Rays sending Jeff Ridgeway to the Braves. They also received Dan Wheeler in a deal that sent Ty Wigginton to the Astros at last year's trade deadline. Aki Iwamura was acquired through the posting method and has also been a solid contributor to this team. Kazmir, Shields, Sonnanstine, Crawford, Baldelli, Upton, Jason Hammel and Jeff Neimann are all from the pre-Friedman Rays who were not badly constructed at all by Chuck LaMar but LaMar just never had enough pitching.

Now that the Rays have tons of top prospects and a fully stocked major league team, they are ready to compete this year and in the future. The Rays are now 11 deep in the rotation and have three SS along with 6 OFers and have plenty more depth. Depth is a huge factor in winning championships and the Rays have lots of it. The Rays have had their fare share of injuries this year with Kazmir, Longoria and Crawford and none of them have had a crippling effect on the Rays because of their great depth. I believe the Rays will win at least one World Series in the next five years and maybe even more. This team is just so deep and talented they have the ability to be the next great dynasty in baseball, all thanks to Andrew Friedman. The Jew.

My Interview

2008-09-17T13:45:00.002-04:00

When I was in New York this summer I met a guy(Jared Zwerling) who works for Sports Illustrated. We wound up talking about sports and it led to the fact that I write a blog. He then asked if he could interview me about the blog, and here it is: http://sportzundercover.com/

Sports Prodigy is Next Theo Epstein

written by: Jared Zwerling

I boarded my returning flight to New York City, departing from Tel Aviv, and found my aisle seat towards the back of the plane. A buddy of mine filed into the center seat and a young boy was already reading by the window. As I was getting comfortable and thumbing through several magazines deciding what I wanted to read, I overheard them starting to chat casually about the flight and how they spent their time in Israel. Soon their conversation switched to sports, which prompted my friend to say, “He works at Sports Illustrated.” I looked up and the young boy leaned forward and said, poached with excitement, “You do?” followed immediately by, “You have to read my blog.”

This kid’s automatic approach was like a sales pitch, and he definitely had my attention. I wasn’t yet sure how old he was, but he carried a prodigious clout with him well beyond his years. I sensed this was the first time he had met a credentialed sports professional, like myself, and he really didn’t want to burn this bridge.

As he was promoting his blog and grilling me with questions about my profession, I noticed he had a baseball book nestled under his arms. When I asked about him this, he proceeded to scurry underneath his seat to show me his fleet of baseball books. Thinking they were fictional or autobiographical works written by authors like Mike Lupica, they were actually ones that Major League Baseball general managers would probably keep in their office libraries. One he had was called It Ain’t Over ‘Til It’s Over, which is a statistical analysis of the 10 greatest pennant races in baseball history. Along with the statistics behind the selections, the book’s contributors identify the key players and moments in each pennant race and provide reasons for the teams’ surges and collapses.

Okay, now it was time to ask, “How old are you?” His answer? “14.” His name? “Ari Berkowitz” (pictured). While growing up in New York, where he kept to his father’s faith in the Mets, Berkowitz became an obsessed baseball fan at just eight years old and started reading sports business books for fun, like Moneyball, that graduate school students in the industry are required to read. Two years ago, Berkowitz moved with his family to Efrat, a small town located in the West Bank of Israel, but he still spends his summers in Gotham living with his grandparents. All the while, he plays baseball and hardly misses an MLB game, dissecting the sport using statistics and formulas on his baseball blog, Baseball Outlook, which he started in March. Its tagline is: “Where Baseball, Mathematics, Science and Theory merge to form something more magnificent than art… Baseball Outlook.” Whereas most kids root for their favorite players, Berkowitz looks up to general managers and can be very critical at times about their business decisions.

Ari is a great role model for American youths for two main reasons: one, students are falling behind many other developed countries in math and science education; and two, an increasing number of teenagers are quitting sports as they enter high school because it’s a more competitive environment tailored to elite athletes. Through his dynamic blog, Ari demonstrates that sports can be used as a powerful teaching tool in math and science, and he represents alternative ways kids can find success in sports beyond the playing field. They can be a sports writer, sports photographer or, in Berkowitz’s case, a sports general manager one day, among other lines of related work.

I spoke with Ari as the summer wound down, and a few days before he returned to Israel, to find out more about how he got into blogging, what makes a successful general manager and the economics of global sports expansion. Turns out, I was the one who got schooled.

Q: Tell me more about the book you were reading on the plane, It Ain’t Over ‘Til It’s Over.
A: It’s a very good book. It’s about the best pennant races over the years where one team is leading and the other team comes back, or it’s a three-team race down to the end of the season. The chapter that I just finished was about the Dodgers and the Giants in 1961 in Brooklyn, New York. The Brooklyn Dodgers were leading by 13-and-a-half games with 50 games left, and the Giants somehow tied them for the division lead by the end of the season. And then they had a three-game playoff, and the Giants won the first game, the Dodgers won the second game and then in the third game the Dodgers were winning but in the ninth inning, this guy named Bobby Thompson hit a three-run home run for the Giants that is called “The Shot Heard Around the World.” That’s very famous

Q: When you started watching baseball, did you get into the numbers, like statistics and formulas, right away or as you fell in love with the sport?
A: Well, I first started watching the Mets every single day. I missed like 10 games a year – that’s it. Besides the games on Shabbat because I couldn’t watch them. I would watch every game and I would just look at the players and see how they were doing. I always liked homers and RBI’s and average. And then, when I was eight I think, I used to talk to this guy – a huge baseball fan at the time – about baseball and he said I should read this book called Moneyball. He knew I was advanced in baseball. At that age, I knew all the rosters and all the teams and stuff like that. I read the book from eight to nine years old. After that, I started looking at baseball in a different way. I started really looking at on-base percentage and statistical stuff. And then I read this book by John Schuerholz called Built to Win and it’s about the opposite perspective of scouting as opposed to statistics, and what are the pros of scouting. After I read these books, I became pretty obsessed and I started reading more Baseball Prospectus books.

Q: Who’s the best GM today in Major League Baseball?
A: The best GM in my eyes would be Theo Epstein. I actually have a very interesting idea, which is about trading away fallen stars who are leaders of a team. Like Frank Robinson with the Orioles, who was an MVP one season, and the next season he was horrible. And then the Orioles traded him. So even though he dropped off statistically a lot, he was still their key leader and they traded him. And then the next season after that, the Orioles failed. They made the playoffs seven straight years, and then they put an end to that when they traded Robinson. So I want to do a study on if trading away a fallen star but he’s still your team leader, like a Mike Piazza-type player, will that heavily affect your team’s chances of making the playoffs and winning more games?

Q: You made, though, a point in your blog about how there’s so much luck in baseball. Is it harder to do these kinds of studies if there’s so much luck in baseball?
A: Sometimes they do these studies and then figure out that since there are so many variables involved, they just put those off as luck. There’s sometimes no way to attest variables — they just happen.

Q: To that point, the GM in any sport is a frustrating job because your product on the field is constantly changing. Guys getting injured, guys not producing, etc. There are so many fluctuations.
A That’s what makes it so hard, but that’s what also makes it so exciting because at one point you created the perfect team, and then at another point the team’s all injured and all too old, and you have to revamp your whole team. Both are fun jobs: solidifying a good team and rebuilding a whole team.

Q: What skills does a good GM need? Actually, let me ask you like this: Say you just took a job as a GM for a team that’s sub-.500. How would you analyze the team and figure out the next steps looking ahead to the next couple of years?
A: I basically need to analyze my team, the situation, the players, the organization as a whole and the other executives. I will see if I need to improve the scouting and the statistical development of the team. If they aren’t good, that’s not good for the general manager. The scouts are the ones that tell the general manager, “This player performed that way.” That’s what makes the GM’s decision. He weighs them all and then decides. So I would have to take that into consideration and switch it up if I need to. I would hire the appropriate manager. In my opinion, there’s no good manager; there’s only an appropriate manger for the team’s current situation.

Q: Do you think managers and general managers generally get along in baseball?
A: In general, I do not think so because a general manager thinks things more from a second-hand perspective, meaning that he looks at the guy and his statistics and weighs one opinion against the other scouts where he gets his final opinion. The manager just sees everything first-hand, and then says, “Oh, well this guy has a lot of talent.” And then the coach and the GM get into an argument like with Willie Randolph and Omar Minaya. In the general manager’s eyes, a player might be producing, but the manager remembers the key situations when he puts the player in and he fails – not the other situations where he would start him one day and the player would go 2 for 4 with a double and a homer. A manager remembers more of the big moments in the game, like if a player needs a single and he fails, more so than just putting him in and the Mets won.

Q: So you’re saying that the GM is more focused on creating a balanced lineup and the manager is more focused on individual performance?
A: The general manager is further away; he’s basically digesting everything along with other aspects of the game, while the manager encounters one aspect of the game.

Q: How do you think the relationship could be improved so they can work better together?
A: Well, the mistake that general mangers make is hiring quote on quote “the best manager available” and not the best match for the situation the team is in. If I was hiring a manager, I would hire someone that has good chemistry with me, good chemistry with the players that I like and shares the same opinions and outlook as I do for a winning baseball team. The Dodgers hired this offseason Joe Torre, and the only reason why he was hired was because of his track record.

Q: The Yankees will not make the playoffs for the first time since 1993, and obviously GM Brian Cashman is on the hot seat. Are you surprised the team may offer him an extension?
A: I think the deal is that New Yorkers are just so impatient. Brian Cashman is a really good general manager; it’s just that George Steinbrenner, after Brian Cashman would develop a young player, would immediately say, “Trade him away for veteran players.” As George got older and couldn’t deal with that stuff anymore, Brian Cashman started developing these younger players, like Joba Chamberlain, Ian Kennedy, Darrell Rasner, Melky Cabrera – those types of players. Basically I think Brian’s doing a good job. Also George’s son, Hank, realizes that the Yankees have to build through the farm system to win. Therefore, the owners are giving a lot more command over personnel decisions to Brian Cashman. They know he’ll produce a winning team through the farm system, which is how you should do it nowadays. It’s OK to sacrifice a season by going through that process. It’s just that in New York, everything gets overblown.

Q: Is your dream to be a GM of an MLB team one day?
A: For sure.

Q: Do you see yourself going to Sports Business school?
A: Whatever leads to the brightest path in a baseball career.

Q: Are there any other parts of sports business you enjoy, like sponsorship, stadium development, marketing, etc.?
A: Stadium development. I also would for sure go for a President of an MLB team. Basically, as a President you oversee every aspect of the team. There’s a General Manager, or Executive Vice President of Baseball Operations. There’s also an Executive Vice President of Business Sales or for Marketing, PR, all that stuff. And there’s one President who oversees it all. He has the final decision. I also like accounting and stuff.

Q: What got you into blogging?
A: For the past year, I’ve been going to my father and telling him about my opinions. And he would concur. I would tell him about how scouts think and how fans don’t think in numbers and stuff. They think about, “Look at the player and if he’s not good, dispose of him” or “Well, he had a bad game and that’s it.” After awhile, my father said, “You should write your valuable opinions down.” I was pestering him with all these ideas about baseball, and he said, “You should just write a blog about baseball.”

Q: How big is baseball back home in Israel?
A: Where I live, there are a lot of Americans, so they’re die-hard baseball and football fans.

Q: When I was in Israel this summer, I didn’t get the feeling that sports was something people talked about.
A: You came during the offseason. Basketball and soccer are huge in Israel because those are European sports. Maccabi Tel Aviv is one of the top three basketball teams in the European league. The Israeli national league soccer team two years ago tied England in a game.

Q: Does Maccabi Tel Aviv have the kind of money to pay Kobe Bryant or LeBron James $50 million a year?
A: They have tons of money. They would for sure be one of the teams to go after them.

Q: How are these teams so wealthy?
A: Because in Europe, it’s not only the owners’ money; there’s also a pool of sponsors that donate money to the team to spend money on the players. So if you’re getting money from let’s say Geico, Chevy and an oil company, all that together adds up to a lot of money.

Q: In the U.S., Citibank is paying for the naming rights for the new Mets field. It’s going to be called Citi Field. So in Europe, some of Citibank’s money would actually go towards the team’s payroll?
A: Exactly. They sponsor players like boosters in college football.

Q: Do you see baseball becoming more popular in Europe, because outside of the U.S. there’s still more interest in Latin America?
A: I can see it in like 20 years. Because I mean, they’ve already started playing in Russia, and it’s becoming pretty big in China where the Yankees, Dodgers and Padres just opened up schools for baseball. It’ll probably catch on to like 10 million people in China, which is nothing compared to the entire population, but it’s something. And in the Netherlands, it’s already a big sport. Australia too. Also the World Baseball Classic is meant to publicize the sport more. The first one was in 2005 and the next one is going to be in 2009.

Q: There’s definitely a lot of global expansion going on right now with American-born sports.
A: Well, the economy is tough on America right now. It’s 5.5 shekels to the Euro and 3.4 shekels to the dollar. It’s a $1.50 something for every Euro.

Q: Lastly, give me your picks for this year. First, MVP in the American League?
A: I would pick Josh Hamilton.

Q: National League MVP?
A: C.C. Sabathia. He’s only been with the Brewers since the All-Star break. He’s 5-0 with like a 2.00 ERA.

Q: National League Cy Young?
A: C.C. Sabathia.

Q: American League Cy Young?
A: I would go with Cliff Lee.

Q: Most surprising player in Major League Baseball?
A: Josh Hamilton.

Q: Comeback player?
A: Fernando Tatis.

Q: How about the worst trade during the season?
A: Mark Teixeira to the Angels. The Braves got nothing. They got back a worse first baseman and a 26-year-old relief pitcher that’s in Double A.

Q: Best trade?
A: The worst trade is the best team for the other team. For the best trade, I’m going to go with Oakland getting four prospects from the Chicago Cubs who got Rich Harden and Chad Gaudin. Rich is a very injury-prone pitcher and he won’t sustain healthiness for a long period of time.

When kids show an interest in playing sports, parents, teachers and coaches should think outside the field and encourage them to get involved in other areas of sports, from sports writing to sports photography to sports entrepreneurship. Through fields like these, kids learn lifelong skills such as creative writing, critical thinking and teamwork. To emphasize this point, look at how many athletes take on second careers in sports, including broadcast journalists, business owners and charity organizers. These opportunities can be made easily attractive to kids, who are like sponges, with just a little exposure and education. I bet if you walked into a room filled with kids and asked right out of the gate, “What’s the best job in sports?” most would say “An athlete.” But if you told them that a team’s general manager has more power than the athletes because he’s in charge of which players stay and which ones get cut, I think some kids would turn to each other and say, “Really? They’re in charge? I want to be him!”

More on Quad-A Players

2008-09-10T14:19:00.005-04:00

A few weeks ago a number of extremely interesting articles were written all on the same topic, how to find cheap talent(i.e. Ryan Ludwick). Now, in these articles they refer to these types of players as Quad-A Players, but what really makes you a Quad-A Player? The writers of those articles used Quad-A to mean players that have excelled in the minors/AAA but cannot perform(because of small sample size) or are blocked at the Major League level. What it really means is a player that outperforms almost everyone in AAA but cannot survive in the MLB, even after given a whole season to prove himself. Now there's more. You also have to bring two other factors into the equation because these players might only be performing well because of them. a)age/experience and b)environment. These two factors always have to be taken into account because of the difference in the difficulty between AAA and the MLB. Veteran players will always put up better numbers in AAA than younger players because they've been around longer, meaning they've seen most pitchers and have played in most parks, thus giving the older guys the advantage.

A real good minor league player has to show a few qualities that are key in searching for hidden talent(not Quad-A Players, that's exactly what we don't want). LD%(Line-Drive Rate), BABIP(a BABIP more than 15 points higher than ones BA probably means that player's a fluke), a low strikeout rate, high walk rate and a high, pitches per PA Rate(the average amount of pitches one sees per PA). The latter three statistics show plate discipline which is a great tool for judging minor league talent because plate discipline you will always have no matter what league you play in because it is more of a skill than luck. Plate discipline is also extremely important at the major league level because if you wait long enough the pitcher will eventually make a mistake for you or for another teammate to capitalize on(look at last weeks Mets game against the Phil's where Daniel Murphy tired out the pitcher causing him to walk David Wright and let up a homer to Carlos Delgado). The first few stats determine how good the player actually is at hitting the ball. Another good stat to use to judge a player is HR/FB Rate because this gives you a little bit of insight on the players power stroke, like how many fly balls he hits and how many leave the park. A high average one year probably means the next year he'll have a low one and vise versa. We can also take common stats into account but we just have to remember to take nothing at face value and instead take 45 cents off of everything(adjust for league talent, ballpark, pitching and age). And now without further ado I'd like to present to all of you my own Hidden Talent(non-Quad-A) All-Star team that I've assembled in the early goings of this season. This group of players also includes young bench players in the MLB, also many of these players are playing now because of the September 1 roster expansion.

C: Kelly Shoppach-I have been in love with his stroke for two years now, and he's finally getting to show it off
1B: Jason Botts-playing in Japan owned by the Rangers
2B: Delwyn Young-was up and down with the Dodgers this season
3B: Ruben Gotay-I like his swagger and I believe he can be a decent player
SS: Brent Lillibridge-considered a top prospect but has fallen and is blocked by Yunel Escobar on the Braves
LF: Adam Lind-remember this was before the season! He is now doing great in the MLB
CF: Reggie Willits-bench player for Angels but has only had 80 ab's this years and is blocked by Torii Hunter
RF: Brandon Moss-traded to Pirates in the Manny deal, has supreme power and I believe he is the next Adam Dunn
DH: Juan Rivera-I believe, although older that Juan is a very good hitter and should be given a chance to play everyday
C: THAT'S WAY TO HARD
IF: Anderson Machado/Josh Barfield-similar type players both with great sticks
OF: Chris Carter-has great plate discipline
OF: Nelson Cruz-all the articles that I mentioned above were about Nelson Cruz, and I wrote this in the middle of April

SP: Brad Hennessey-was once a top prospect
SP: Chuck Lofgren-has a good repertoire with great command
SP: Jason Hammel-has great stuff, blocked by excellent pithcers in Tampa
SP: Jason Bergmann-quality pitcher with low 90's heat and a decent slider
SP: Hong-Chi Kuo-has good stuff, needs to locate better
6: JA Haap-an interesting project with a lively arm

Most of these players have taken part in my series called No Starting Gig which I basically ran through the pros and cons of the players listed above and mentioned teams which the player would be an upgrade for. There are a few updates necessary like replacements for Brandon Moss, Kelly Shoppach and Adam Lind and there are a few more intriguing young players out there that I 'd like to add. I would replace Kelly Shoppach with DELETED: Kaale Kaihiu(or something like that)who is a minor league catcher for the Royals and has posted really high home-run totals and walk rates along with a high OBP this year and looks very impressive. UPDATE: Kala Ka'aihue who catches for the AA Braves(I'm sorry that I mixed him up yesterday with his older 1B brother Kila Ka'aihue, I can't understand why I did that?) is a great hitting catcher who no one knows about. At AA this year he posted a .274/.412/.457(before adjustments) line which is extremely good for a AA catcher. He also has shown plenty power, hitting 14 homers and 23 doubles and last year had a career year with 22 homers and 20 doubles. As previously shown Kala hit .274 with a .412 OBP, this means that he walked %13.8 of his time at the plate an astounding number for a young player(23). With plate discipline and power Kala possess the two essential tools that translate to the MLB. Another impressive guy is Josh Whitesell who for two straight years has had an OBP over .420, but is 26 years old.

The pitching is more of a gut/scouting perspective than a statistical one. These guys are some of the non-famous pitchers that have made an impression on me for some reason or another(either having terrific stuff or totally ripping the Mets apart). What I'm trying to say is that there are many GMs in the MLB and even more holes in lineups that need to be filled in the offseason, why don't they fill them with the cheap high upside players instead of expensive players in decline to fill in. I've also been wondering how some GMs can repeatedly see division rivals pick up inexpensive talent and have them turn in a few terrific seasons while they themselves still shop for has-beens on the free agency market(yes, I'm looking at you Omar "oh yeah I was the one to sign Pedro and Billy to freakishly expensive long contracts but only manage to get 1+ good years out of them" Minaya). Guys like this(hidden talent type players) aren't so uncommon and can become very productive major league players.

Many of these kind of players have been picked up by Andrew Friedman(GM of Rays) and he has has fed off of them for the past 3 years while building his team through the minors. But if you look at the Rays, their two greatest power hitters are Carlos Pena and Eric Hinske both waiver-wire cheap additions(hidden talents). GMs should realize that free agency means paying a lot of money for players past their peaks while trading for hidden talent type players(or Quad-A Players) has less risk and more reward. Which one would you take? A declining veteran for $8-14 a year over 4-6 years or a guy that you'd have for the next 5-6 years at league minimum with a lot of upside. The new quick fix solution should be trading for these very good and useful young players while giving up nothing instead of spending a lot of money and draft picks on expensive declining veterans. These players are usually one dimensional but dominate those dimensions (i.e. Carlos Pena and hitting). This way you don't waste money and you can still build through your draft and farm system while also getting impact players for cheap. This guy Andrew Friedman is doing this right and everyone else should learn from him.

MLB Playoffs 2.0

2008-08-27T12:23:00.005-04:00

I think the baseball playoff system is not the greatest because sometimes worse teams end up in the playoffs. This year and 2006 are the best examples of this. In 2006 three teams in the AL Central had won 90 or more games while only two made the playoffs. Three teams in the AL East had 86 or more wins yet only the division winner made it to the playoffs and two teams in the AL West won 89 or more games but only the division winning Oakland "We can't win in the playoffs anyways" Athletics mad it. While if you look at the NL teams making the playoffs, it was the Mets with 97 wins and then two NL West team with 88 wins and the Cardinals with the least wins(the worst record, the lowest winning percentage, you name it) to ever make it into the playoffs with only 83 wins. As you can see not only did a team with 83 wins make it to the playoffs but what is unfair about it is the fact that the Phillies(I can't believe that I'm about to write this) who had 85 wins didn't make the playoffs. Other problems with these playoffs had the Padres with 88 wins being the second seed in the playoffs and that seven AL team had the same or better records than all of the NL playoff teams except for the Mets who tied with the Yankees for best record in the MLB.

This year there are several excellent playoff races going on in the AL and NL East, the AL and NL Central and the AL and NL Wild Card. Altogether there are 16 teams competing for playoff spots in the MLB while only 10 of those 16 teams are more than just 5 games over .500, that's sad. If the playoffs had a better system these bad teams would already be eliminated but since there are 2 great teams in the NL East and 3 superb teams in the NL Central and only three of them can make it, and even though all five are better than all the teams in the West, two of the East/Central group won't make it while one team from the West automatically earns a playoff berth which I think is just unfair. So I'm suggesting two things: a) The playoff seeding needs amending and b) the competitive balance between the two leagues and the six divisions are very disproportionate.

Instead of the current playoff seeding system I've developed a new one which has all MLB teams split up into two leagues and the four teams with the most wins from each league advance to the playoffs. This way everyone has the same schedule and therefore the real best four best teams from each league make it to the playoffs. The other issue though is the fact that the AL has so many more talented teams that the NL. If you look at the AL, in the East you have the Rays, Red Sox and Yankees. In the Central you have the whole division to worry about because the Indians will be back next year, the Twins are always good because of superb player development, the White Sox have terrific personnel for the upcoming season with plenty room on their budget for trades and free agents. The Royals are a team on the rise who I believe will be very good next year and the Tigers who might be the worst team in this superb division even after making in to the World Series just two years ago. The AL West has the Angels who might decline a bit next year because of key players leaving in free agency. There is the Oakland A's who only have Mark Ellis(an impending free agent), Eric Chavez(an impending nothing) and Huston Street left to trade away before they've completed trading away every single player from their 2006 AL West championship season in an effort to rebuild. The Rangers have great hitting and have a good farm system but lack the pitching to win this division and the Mariners are just pathetic.

This makes 10 good teams in the AL competing for 4 spots while the NL has the Mets, Phillies, Cubs and Brewers along with maybe the D-Backs. Only the Cubs and Brewers are doing very well this season so to me it just makes sense to pin all the second place AL teams against the likes of the Mets, Phillies, D-Backs, etc.(the underachieving top NL teams) This is why I think the Rays, the Twins and the Rangers should be moved over to the NL with the Phillies, Astros and the Rockies shifting over to the AL. The Rays-Phillies swap sends the Phillies over to the AL to really see what they're made out of, while also ending a long unsuccessful run in the NL. The Phillies are essentially an AL team because they don't steal many bases and they have a band-box for a stadium along with many power(good) hitters and therefore they play for the three-run homer. The Rays are a new team and can easily be shifted over to the NL. The Twins-Astros swap makes sense because they are both newish teams and the Twins are better than the Astros further leveling the playing field. Lastly you have the Rangers-Rockies swap, they are both new and both play in hitter's parks. I think the Rangers would benefit immensely by getting away from the A's and Angels. The Rockies could use a new league after only making the playoffs once(last year) in their whole existence.

With this shakeup you level the playing field between the AL and NL meaning more exciting World Series' and you also make it easier for good teams to make it to the playoffs while also making the playoffs more exciting. The top four teams from each league no matter where they're from make the playoffs and therefore you're always sending your best teams out in the playoffs which then means that whichever teams win in the playoffs can actually be called the better team and not only lucky(like the '06 Cardinals who snuck into the playoffs and luck led them to a World Series ring).

Theo Epstein a Genius!

2008-08-24T09:02:00.004-04:00

What makes a great GM? Is it his acquisitions, his maneuvering, player development or is it simply being at the helm of a great world championship team? This is why Theo Epstein is a genius. He not only has made spectacular acquisitions(trading prospects that never panned out for Curt Schilling) or has maneuvered creatively(picking up David Ortiz from the waiver wire) or has been at the helm of a fantastic, World Championship winning ballclub but has done all, that is why Theo Epstein is a genius.

Theo Epstein is a Yale graduate and has a degree in law from the San Diego School of Law. Theo started off in the Orioles organization but soon after moved over to the Padres. While with the Padres Theo developed as one of the most intelligent young executives in the MLB. In 2002 Larry Lucchino was hired away from the Padres by the Red Sox to be their new CEO. He brought Theo Epstein with him to be an Assistant GM in Boston. Before the 2003 season Theo Epstein was assigned the project of hiring a new GM, so he picked Billy Beane. When the deal was all but done(since Billy was in the middle of his contract, the Sox had to give the A's compensation to the likes of a fat AAA kid who couldn't play defense...I mean Kevin Youkilis) Mr. Beane backed out and after the lengthy process of searching for a new GM, the top three in the Red Sox organization, John Henry(Owner), Tom Werner(Chairman) and Larry Lucchino(CEO) decided to go with the 28 year old Jew, Theo Epstein.

Theo Epstein then accomplished what no GM has accomplished since John Hart and the Indians in the 90's. He built a winning ballclub in one years time while also building a top farm system for a lot of future success which is unheard of. This feat happens once a decade at most. In his second year the Red Sox won their first World Series in 86 years and another world championship three years later. The first time they won it all, Theo Epstein built a team through veteran pieces offseason trades and free agent signings. The second time the Red Sox won the World Series by having proven veterans from their 2004 championship team and also a variety of homegrown talent. Lets take a look at the Red Sox team from 2004 and compare it to their 2007 team.

C:Jason Varitek/Jason Varitek(traded for by Dan Duquette along with Derek Lowe **)
1B:Kevin Millar(acquired in a midseason deal with the Marlins for cash)/Kevin Youkilis(homegrown)
2B:Mark Bellhorn(signed cheaply in the offseason)/Dustin Pedroia(homegrown)
3B:Bill Mueller(signed cheaply in the offseason)/Mike Lowell(acquired in trade with Josh Beckett for Anibal Sanchez, Hanley Ramirez*)
SS:Orlando Cabrera(acquired in the genius Nomar trade)/Julio Lugo(bad free agent signing)
LF:Manny Ramirez/Manny Ramirez(signed megadeal in 1998)
CF:Johnny Damon(signed pre-Epstein)/Jacoby Ellsbury(homegrown)
RF:Trot Nixon(homegrown)/JD Drew(signed expensively)
DH:David Ortiz/David Ortiz(picked up off waivers at the beginning of the 2003 season)
SP1:Pedro Martinez(traded for by Dan Duquette)/Josh Beckett(*)
SP2:Curt Schilling/Curt Schilling(Red Sox traded a boatload of prospects which "just happened" to never pan out for the ace)
SP3:Derek Lowe(**)/Daisuke Matsuzaka(signed megadeal before the 2007 season)
SP4:Tim Wakefield/Tim Wakefield(signed by Dan Duquette)
SP5:Bronson Arroyo(was Epstein's first move, a waiver wire pickup)/Jon Lester and Clay Buchholz(homegrown)
CL:Keith Foulke(free agent signing)/Jon Papelbon(homegrown)
SM:Mike Timlin, Scott Williamson(acquired cheaply in trades)/Hideki Okajima(signed for league minimum in the offseason), Manny Delcarmen(homegrown)

As you can see the first team that Epstein assembled was a group of fantastic pitchers and a bunch of hitters who were brought in for basically nothing, were between replacement level and below average(except for Varitek, Manny and Caveman) and all performed extremely well. The second championship team were basically a few of the veterans from the 2004 team and a bunch of homegrown, extremely talented players. They have now replaced Lugo with another homegrown player, Jed Lowrie, and have also replaced Curt Schilling and Tim Wakefield along with adding another top setup man to the bullpen with homegrown talent and they still have one of the top farm systems in the league.

Theo Epstein drafts all the expensive and talented players that fall in the draft because of salary worries(a common happening that leads to top draft picks falling to the rich teams because of seeking to much money for the poorer teams to pay) and also uses every draft pick strategically. He knows his farm system very well and therefore makes excellent trades, i.e. the Curt Schilling trade, he knew his system very well and therefore traded all the top prospects he either didn't like(didn't fit his mold) had no use for them or he knew that they would never pan out. Theo signs a lot of Japanese and Hispanic players because he knows that the more you sign the higher the chances of a few of them turning out to be good are, hence Hideki Okajima. Theo also has a certain mold for each player, hard nosed, tough, smart, plays defense well and gets on base. This mold works extremely well especially in the situation he was given, a small ballpark meaning more homers for players with less power and an already talented pitching core to build around. He realized that this kind of talent is easier to come by in drafts and free agency than the power, speed combination and therefore payed next to nothing for these types of players(Mueller, Millar, Bellhorn and Cabrera) for the 2004 season while simultaneously drafting the same exact types of players in the draft. The reason why he felt compelled to build through the draft and develop his farm system instead of just signing new free agents every year is that young players get injured less often and have a longer career in front of them than free agents do and also you can have many more minor leaguers than major leaguers and therefore there's a higher percentage of good players coming out of your farm system. Epstein has always payed a lot for pitching i.e. Curt Schilling, Keith Foulke and more recently with Josh Beckett and Dice-K because great pitching and great fielding along with getting on base wins pennants. As I mentioned in a previous post, the most causative in-season stats to World Series outcome are FRAA(the runs your defense has saved throughout the season over an average defense), WXRL(a stat that measures how many runs a reliever saves over a replacement level player) and K Rate(the percentage of times a pitcher strikes out a batter per nine innings). Theo Epstein constantly puts his team in the top five of all of these stats.

The one thing that really makes Theo Epstein the greatest in my mind is how he always manages to put his team in the best position to succeed from luck(the "secret sauce" of every World Champion). When a GM assembles a great team they don't always win the World Series(look at 2001-2005 Yankees) let alone make it to the playoffs(look at 2007 Mets) and this is because they're missing the final component to a Championship team, the luck. What Epstein does is he plays a game of risk-reward where things like losing in the eleventh inning of game seven in the Championship Series occur but things like coming from behind to win the World Series, down three games to none and losing in game four in the ninth inning of the ALCS happen also. In 2003 one of the most unlucky things happened to the Red Sox, in '04 they won the World Series, in '05 they lost in the playoffs and in '06 they didn't even make the playoffs before winning it all again last year. How does Theo put his team in these extreme risk-reward positions where most of the time the Red Sox get a boatload of luck and win the World Series? By making crazy moves, acquisitions and decisions. Like when he traded Nomar coming off a season where he hit .370 for an average SS in Orlando Cabrera(2004), depending on a lot of below average players to play like ALL-STARS(2004, 2005), depending on a couple Japanese stars and a ton of unproven rookies to fill out a team(2007) and finally trading Manny Ramirez for an inferior left fielder in Jason Bay. This kind of work is what separates the men from the boys in baseball front offices.

Solutions and Non-Solutions for Mets Bullpen

2008-08-21T12:22:00.004-04:00

Growing more and more likely is that the Mets will be without their All-Star closer, Billy Wagner, for the rest of this season(the good news is Ryan Church is back). So now a weak Mets bullpen gets even weaker with the loss of their best bullpen pitcher. So what does Jerry Manuel do? He goes and tells the media that the Mets are thinking of moving one of their starters to the pen. This idea shows that Omar is trying to be creative but also shows his lack of knowledge. How would it help to send e.a John Maine to the bullpen and have his spot in the rotation taken by Brian Stokes or Nelson Figueroa? When John Maine starts he shuts down the opposition for 5-7 innings and when one of Stokes, Figueroa start they let up 3-4 runs per 4-6 innings. First off this means that the bullpen would be worked harder every fifth day, and second the game would already be lost for the Mets before the bullpen even enters the game meaning the bullpen wouldn't need to blow it in order for the Mets to loose. With the Mets current rotation they have one of the top three in the MLB and besides John Maine who's been coming back slowly after a stint on the DL, every starter's last two times around each of them have gone at least 7 innings. The Mets bullpen problems really stem from mismanagement of he bullpen and also not having a long reliever(someone who can come into a blowout and finish the game, basically a 6th starter). Maybe they could also use another "crossover" guy like Jerry Manuel says.

The ways that Manuel misuses his bullpen are as follows: He uses to many guys as specialists(come into games, face one batter and leave), and although he's better than Randolph was he doesn't always pick the ideal spots for his bullpen(a key ability and a must for managers). Pedro Feliciano used to pitch full innings but since the beginning of last year has only pitched as a lefty specialist. This gives the Mets three specialists, two lefties and a righty which is way too many. He also doesn't realize that Heilman works in patterns pitching in two straight games effectively and then in the third game giving up 3-5 runs, this is why his ERA is so high. Another thing is that Manuel hasn't made it easier on his bullpen by subbing defensive replacements late in games for the likes of Damion Easley, Carlos Delgado and Fernando Tatis all better known for their hitting(a nice way of saying that they're crappy defensive players) and it's not like he doesn't have replacement options because he does in Endy Chavez, Argenis Reyes and Nick Evans all superb defensive players.

Here are my proposed solutions:
a) Bring up Jon Niese(AAA starter, top pitching prospect) who has a wicked curveball and a plus fastball(93-95 with movement) and put him in the bullpen as a setup man. This would be like what the Yankees did with Joba last year. Niese is about to reach the max innings in the minors so by putting him in the pen the Mets would also be limiting his innings. The reason this would work over moving Maine into the bullpen and Niese into the rotation is because it's harder for batters to face pitchers with the kind of stuff Niese has(hard curve and fastball combination) the first few times around. Hitters first need to see him a couple of times and then adjust to his pitches and by putting him into the bullpen the Mets would be limiting the amount of times that batters all over the league see him pitch hence utilizing his ability most effectively(Omar would never be able to think this up). This takes care of the eighth/ninth inning man for the Mets.

b) Oliver Perez is the Mets most durable pitcher therefore they should use him more, especially because of the state of the Mets bullpen. Meaning that he should pitch around eight innings every outing and on the days that he's supposed to have a bullpen session instead of throwing in the bullpen Manuel should put him into pitch the last inning or two. This way you maximize his performance while also saving some games and earning a few victories for the Mets

c) Look around the waiver wire for interesting targets and try to acquire a few, one will probably pan out.

This is what Omar did: He brought up Brian Stokes to be their long reliever and he has showed that he can be effective. He traded Anderson Hernandez to the Nats for Luis Ayala(a former top setup man blew his arm out in the spring of '05 and hasn't been the same since) and signed Al Reyes(a 38 year old former closer) to a minor league deal. The Luis Ayala deal was a great one since Anderson Hernandez can't hit and Luis Ayala could possibly return to form while pitching for a contender and with his former catcher Brian Schneider. Ayala's easily capable of being the 8th inning man for the Mets and possibly even their closer and he can get both lefties and righties out. Al Reyes barely has anything left in the tank and was only signed as an insurance policy. Look for him to come up a few days before September 1st so he could be eligible for postseason play. So Minaya listened to advice number three and will also call Jon Niese up during September callups, lets see how he's used.

Why Bud Selig is right for Instituting Instant Replay in The MLB

2008-08-21T12:16:00.005-04:00

If you look at baseball and what makes it so unique and different from every other sport is that it relies so heavily on statistics. What makes baseball rely so heavily on stats is that it's easier to quantify than other sports for two reasons: A) there is a set amount of chances each team has(27 outs in 9 innings) and they're not bound by time and B) The game is much easier to follow because there is less actual action happening in ball games. I want to focus on the latter. Look at the new generation of statistics, they disregard baseball statistical mainstays like RBI's, ERA and Errors. The reason for this is that there is a human factor involved with each of these statistics. RBI's depends on the amount of runners that are on base when you come to bat, ERA depends on Errors and Errors are decided by men keeping score of the games and are totally not mathematical. This means that Errors are imprecise which means ERA is also imprecise. For example Jose Reyes has 14 Errors on the season but Carlos Pena only has one, does that mean Carlos Pena is a better fielder? Of course not. If you're as fast as Reyes you get to many more balls and therefore commit more Errors, since when is it a crime to cover a lot of ground?

What does this have to do with Instant Replay? The MLB is doing to the game of baseball what smart mathematicians did to its stats 20 years ago, improving the system in order make it more precise and exact. Errors are one man's opinion and so are many homers/foul balls, so by adding Instant Replay to the game of baseball The MLB is making opinion into fact just like the statisticians did to the scouts, they made scouts' opinions take the back seat to their facts, statistics. The new Instant Replay of homers/foul balls rule is a new breakthrough in baseball in which all the purists are saying is awful just like when Bill James came out with his new extremely advanced and radical stats in the 1980's. So I hope you realize that without these new stats baseball wouldn't be the same as it is today it would still be the same old sport run by guys who are happy with 1 out of 65 success rate (the results of old time drafts and player development) and only rely on opinion and not fact. Same too in 20 years we'll be looking back and saying how great of an addition this was and how would baseball have been able to survive without it.

Trade Deadline Madness

2008-07-31T12:20:00.003-04:00

This time of year is the busiest for all baseball executives. Everyone has at least contacted every GM in the league once and maybe even more than that. Every bad team is looking to capitalize on this situation that puts buyers at a disadvantage. If the buyers think that they're "one player away" from the playoffs/world series they will go all out to acquire their guy therefore succumbing multiple top prospects to teams under .500 (the sellers). Sellers also have to make sure their top competitors don't acquire their top guys. To read first hand what GMs go through this time of year click here.

A GM has a long and complicated job to do in July. He first has to assess his team's needs which change on a daily basis because of injury, rookie emergence and waiver wire additions. He then has to gauge the talent being offered around the league. He then has to evaluate his prospects and mark some off limits. After, he has to call GMs around the league to either court offers for a player or ask about certain players. You then have to match up the prospects and the money alongside he centerpiece of the deal and walla you have your trade.

Sometimes a trade like the Manny trade happens, where a team has to pays extra because of the fact that they have to expose of a certain player who's corroding their clubhouse and identity. So instead of making a fair trade the Red Sox traded the superior player along with two prospects and $7M for a season and a half of the inferior Jason Bay. The Red Sox are in some ways repeating 2004, where they traded the superior Nomar Garciaparra for the inferior Orlando Cabrera but somehow managed to win the World Series. How did this work? Because Theo Epstein is a genius. He figured that although Nomar was the superior player he was extremely injury prone meaning that 30%-40% of the Red Sox performance at SS that year was coming from Pokey Reese. Orlando Cabrera easily trumped 40% Pokey Reese and 60% Nomar, therefore the trade strengthened the Red Sox. In Manny's case, he never gave 100%, he was destroying the clubhouse and was ditching important baseball games. Jason Bay at least equals this level of performance if not trumps it. Jason Bay is not that far behind Manny statistically and all in all he's a better fit for the current Red Sox therefore giving the Red Sox the advantage and not the disadvantage. These are the kind of things that make Theo Epstein a genius.

Analyzing Billy Beane's Trades

2008-07-28T13:51:00.002-04:00

Billy Beane has already made two big trades and can make a few more before the non-waiver trade deadline this year. He has traded Rich Harden and Chad Gaudin to the Cubs for Eric Patterson, Sean Gallagher, Matt Murton and Josh Donaldson and has also traded Joe Blanton to the Phillies for Adrian Cardenas, Matt Spencer and Josh Outman. He still has a few more pieces to trade, his top level players that he wants to deal are Huston Street, Justin Duchscherer, Mark Ellis and Alan Embree. The less attractive options are Eric Chavez, Bobby Crosby and Emil Brown. Billy Beane is overhauling/rebuilding this team. If he does manage to trade Justin Duchscherer he'd have managed to trade away his hole starting rotation from last year in a 6 month span.

Billy Beane is the master at finding diamonds in the rough and future star players in waiver pickups and in blockbuster deals. So if teams get ripped off how come they keep coming back for more? There are three reasons: A) teams focusing on their present before their future, B) no one's perfect(meaning that Billy's bound to make a mistake sooner or later, like in the Tim Hudson trade), and C) baseball teams are stupid.

So what did the A's get from these trades? They got two future extremely athletic 2nd basemen, a major league ready starter and a minor league very talented lefty, a couple outfielders with power and a young interesting projectable catcher. Altogether he got
seven young talented ballplayers for three pitchers. Altogether the pitchers are average, injury prone and below average. Meanwhile Billy Beane got a quarter of a baseball team. I can guarantee you that all of them will make it to the majors and at least 4 of them will become solid players while two will probably become stars. These are the kind of trades Billy Beane makes he just rips every team off(except for the Braves).