Backside Internet. La mejor información

Video Chistoso | El juego de Wii para Mujeres | Wii for Women | Funny

2011-03-30T15:15:00.000-05:00

Backside Internet
Dale Click en Me gusta | Share en Facebook | Tweet

Video super recomendado, el juego para Wii de mujeres lavar, planchar, depilarse,,.,, jajaja

Si su novia, esposa, amiga o mujer se aburre mientras juega Need for Speed, Call of Duty, FiFa, Winning Eleven, PES, esta es la solución. Desearás verla jugar.

O si el caso es que es una mujer aburrida porque no le gustan los juegos de deportes o acción, y está aburrida de jugar solitario, Shii es lo que necesitas.

Dale En Tweet | Share en Facebook.

Ver Partido Tolima Vs Estudiantes La Plata | Stream | Libertadores

2011-03-30T14:11:00.000-05:00

Estadio: Manuel Murillo Toro, Ibagué, Colombia
Hora de Inicio: 30 de marzo de 2011, 17:30 Colombia
Árbitro Rivera, Víctor

Ver Deportes Tolima vs Estudiantes La Plata en VIVO

A continuación selecciona el partido Tolima Vs Estudiantes La Plata, los Streams se encuentran disponibles 5 minutos antes de la transmisión (5:25 pm Hora Colombiana GMT-5).

<p>&amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;lt;/p&amp;amp;amp;gt;</p>

Ver Partido Tolima Vs Estudiantes La Plata | Stream | Libertadores

Synthetic Biology's Hunt for the Genetic Transistor | Biological Transistors

2011-03-29T22:49:00.000-05:00

How genetic circuits will unlock the true potential of bioengineering

By Julius B. Lucks, Adam P. Arkin / March 2011 /IEEE Spectrum

In 1977, a small group of researchers in California changed the world when they wrangled a common gut bacterium into producing a human protein. Using every technique in the book—and inventing some of their own—they scavenged, snipped, and glued together genetic components to synthesize a tiny filament of DNA. They then inserted the new segment into some Escherichia coli cells, tricking them into making the human hormone somatostatin.

A year later, these scientists had an E. coli strain that produced insulin, an invaluable drug in the treatment of diabetes. With that, the era of biotechnology was born. A plethora of novel—or at least cheaper—drugs seemed to loom on the horizon.

Thirty-odd years on, molecular biologists have delivered on many parts of that early promise, engineering microbes to produce a wide range of pharmaceuticals, including experimental antimalarial medicines and antibiotics. A quick glance in the pantry or storage closet is likely to reveal other products of genetic engineering, too, including foods, food additives and colorings, and even laundry detergent. The list goes on and on.

The economic impact of all this has been enormous. Genetic engineering and other forms of biotechnology account for some 40 percent of the recent growth in the U.S. gross domestic product, for example. The biotech sectors in other countries have also made sizable contributions to their economies. And you can expect that trend to continue as genetically engineered organisms tackle even more diverse challenges, such as producing renewable fuels and cleaning up toxic waste.

Genetic engineers have indeed accomplished a great deal, but they've also run up against many obstacles in transforming microbial cells into factories that churn out useful substances. In a real-world factory, you need all your production machinery and employees operating in sync to run an efficient business. A cell also has components that act like machines, producing complex biological molecules, and other parts that act like messengers, ferrying around information in the form of chemical signals. Bioengineers have to do quite a bit of tricky fine-tuning to their cellular factories, manipulating the operation of many subcellular components so the cells don't die as they crank out the desired product in copious amounts.

For the bioengineers who do that tuning, a more apt analogy than the factory is that of an electronic circuit. We essentially want to make a cell programmable. We'd like to give it a command and have it perform a new function, just as if it were a tiny computer. To gain this power, we first need to amass a collection of well-characterized biological circuit elements that we can arrange however we like. This is one core focus of a subset of bioengineers, known as synthetic biologists, who are trying to revamp how genetic engineering is done.

Synthetic biologists take their circuit analogy quite seriously, despite the fact that a cell is a whole lot squishier than a silicon wafer or circuit board. A cell is basically a little bag full of biomolecular signals that cause cellular machinery to read chunks of DNA and with that information produce other useful biomolecules, typically proteins. Millions of different kinds of proteins are found in nature, and they participate in countless cellular processes, including the very ones that govern their production.

In a cell, certain proteins can influence pieces of DNA that code for something else. Those gene products can in turn affect other stretches of DNA and so on, forming complex webs of biochemical interaction. Think of these as the genetic circuits making up the cell's CPU. If you want to program a cell to do something specific, you need a way to build—or at least control—these genetic circuits.

Developing the requisite cellular control mechanisms is one of this century's great technical challenges. The two of us belong to two of the largest academic groups pursuing this goal: the Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center, based at the University of California, Berkeley, and the BIOFAB: International Open Facility Advancing Biotechnology, which has its headquarters in nearby Emeryville, Calif. The goal of both projects is to help genetic engineers configure organisms the same way electrical engineers configure complex circuits. You could say we're trying to put some honest-to-goodness engineering into the 30-year-old discipline of genetic engineering.

Elaborate Lego creations, skyscrapers, and integrated circuits all have one fundamental feature in common: They are built from a multitude of simple constituent parts, which interact with one another in predictable ways.

Take electronics. Cellphones, iPads, and similar gadgets contain many millions of individual components, some highly specialized, some more generic. The latter category includes their many resistors, capacitors, and transistors. To reduce them to their bare essence, these generic parts take an input signal, transform it, and spit out a result. The same elements are used over and over for all sorts of things, their function being a product of their particular arrangement.

Curiously enough, the genetic machinery inside a cell works in much the same manner. It takes certain input signals—the concentration of one or more kinds of molecules—processes them in some fashion, and produces an output signal, the concentration of yet another kind of molecule. The problem for genetic engineers is to create the right processing "circuitry" to get a particular job done. This is tougher than in electrical engineering because the necessary parts have generally had to be handcrafted and assembled from scratch each time by teams of Ph.D.s working at the cutting edge of molecular biology. Someone trying to engineer a cell to do something new can't just mix and match standard components from a library of well-characterized parts the way electrical engineers generally can.

We and other synthetic biologists hope to change that. If we are successful, genetic engineers will one day be able to draw on a set of industry-standard tools for design and simulation. They will then combine widely available and well-characterized components to fashion organisms that produce valuable molecules.

So just how would you do that? To start with, you need hardy and prolific cells, typically bacteria or yeast, to serve as biological factories. These cells are easy enough to come by. But in most cases, you won't get them to crank out the molecule you want without first manipulating the machinery inside them. It's their genes that determine the nature of the molecules they make, so their genes are what you need to alter.

As you may recall from high school biology class, a gene is a segment of DNA containing a set of instructions for producing something (typically a protein) along with other bits and pieces that help control when that particular something gets made. When biologists talk about expressing a gene, they're referring to the many things that have to happen for those genetic instructions to be carried out. Cells use sophisticated means to control their genes, turning individual ones on and off as needed. They have to be sophisticated, because the process of switching a gene on is complicated.

First, a small section of the double-stranded DNA spiral must be made to peel open, exposing the gene's sequence of nucleotide bases—the alphabet soup of As, Cs, Gs, and Ts you probably remember from your school days. This enables the gene's DNA sequence to be converted into RNA, a close molecular cousin of DNA. This RNA strand is said to be complementary to the original DNA strand because the new RNA's As are matched with the original DNA's Ts; its Cs are matched with Gs. (In truth, RNA uses a nucleic acid denoted by the letter U to match up with DNA's A, but that's a minor complication.) Because DNA and RNA share essentially the same nucleic-acid language, biologists call the process of converting DNA into RNA transcription.

Some of these RNA molecules are the end product of the gene, serving the cell with a unique function. But most are just chemical messengers, which carry instructions for the later construction of proteins. So usually the next step is to convert the genetic sequence now coded in messenger RNA into a string of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. Because there are only 5 nucleotide bases and about 20 amino acids in cells, the language of DNA and RNA is fundamentally different from the language of proteins, which is why biologists call this next stage translation.

Cells use certain molecular clues to tell them when to begin and end the transcription of particular genes into messenger RNA. Other molecules can trigger the breakdown of RNA after it's made. That creates three potential points of control. Particular molecular cues likewise start and stop translation. Other molecules can degrade proteins. That gives three more, for a total of six distinct knobs for adjusting how a gene is expressed.

The special biomolecules that twiddle these six knobs in the cell are called regulators. With the right ones turned up full blast, a cell will start making a particular kind of RNA and possibly protein continually, basically generating a steady current of this cellular stuff. But the buildup of a different kind of regulator molecule, called a repressor, could then halt the process, acting like a switch and cutting off that current. If this repressor is later removed, a steady current of protein molecules can once again flow into existence.

Genetic Circuitry

In electronics, currents usually travel through channels of solid metal or semiconductor, in a direction dictated by the directional push of an electric field. In the cellular world, molecules aren't so neatly localized. For the most part, they just diffuse through the watery cell interior.

Electronic circuits and cells differ in an even more fundamental way. Consider the transistors on a chip. As long as they are located a modest distance apart, they don't affect one another. So you can easily wire them together to construct logic gates and other important circuits. A group of transistors in an AND gate will thus function without affecting a different cluster of identical transistors forming an OR gate, for example. To electrical engineers, this degree of independence is so basic they take it for granted.

Molecular regulators are more difficult to work with. Let's say you want to use one to control the creation of a particular kind of messenger RNA. Transcription of a DNA sequence into that RNA starts when a molecule called RNA polymerase binds to a special region of the DNA upstream of the genetic sequence to be transcribed. This special chunk of DNA is called a promoter sequence. After an RNA-polymerase molecule lands on a promoter sequence, it marches along the DNA strand, grabbing nucleotides floating nearby and assembling a complementary RNA sequence.

The simplest way to block this process is to prevent the RNA-polymerase molecule from moving along the DNA strand. Indeed, cells make lots of repressor proteins that bind to DNA near promoter sequences and simply sit there, preventing the movement of RNA polymerase. Such a molecule makes a perfect switch—except that it's floating around the cell in the presence of millions of other molecules. Even if the regulator molecule recognizes perfectly where it is supposed to latch onto the DNA, it still must find its target, which can take several minutes. How would you like to have to work with switches, transistorized or otherwise, that take minutes to turn off? Cells can't tolerate such delays either, so they use many copies of a repressor molecule, increasing the probability that at any given time one of them is bound to the target, turning off the gene.

This creates a problem for genetic engineers. Let's say we want to turn off one gene right now and another gene later on. We can't just splice in the target sequence for a repressor "switch" near each gene. The presence of multiple repressor molecules in the cell would turn off both. To control them independently, we'd need to use different switches—regulator molecules that work with different target sequences. Nature has devised thousands of different regulator-target pairs over billions of years of evolution. Unfortunately, most of those are very difficult to apply more generally. Synthetic biologists have, however, used some of them as building blocks for their genetic circuits and have made some intriguing biological devices with them.

For example, by engineering DNA so that two different repressor-target sequences sit side by side on a single gene, bioengineers have created a situation where that gene is expressed only when neither regulator—that is, neither input signal—is present. This is the biological equivalent of a NOR gate: If one signal or the other is present at the input, the output is not on.

You can also wire up regulators so that different genes become interdependent, the presence of one gene product controlling a second gene and so on. If you arrange those regulators—some of which repress genes and some of which activate them—so that there is feedback, you can make genetic circuits that work like flip-flops or even as oscillators, where the concentration of some molecule ebbs and flows in a regular way.

These genetic circuits were some of the early successes of synthetic biology. But their functioning is rudimentary. In the future, synthetic biologists will be able to construct far more interesting genetic wetware. Trying to do so using only the natural regulators known to biologists would, however, be like trying to build sophisticated electronic circuits from a grab bag of unlabeled parts, where you'd have to ponder over and account for the poorly documented characteristics of every single component.

For this reason, we've decided to build our own regulators. For each of the six gene-expression knobs, we want regulators that differ in the target sequences (or target molecules) they work on but are otherwise identical. To construct them, we've identified promising natural molecules to use as starting points. With these molecules, we hope to come up with a whole family of standardized, independently acting components that genetic engineers can use over and over again.

While other synthetic biologists have focused their efforts on manipulating proteins, we have concentrated on engineering RNA. Far from being just an intermediary in gene expression, RNA can adjust five of the six knobs of gene expression, with its ability to start and stop transcription, start and stop translation, and in some cases trigger its own degradation. So it's a very powerful molecule. Also, from an engineering perspective, RNA is much simpler than protein to work with because its alphabet consists of only four letters, meaning there are fewer variables. Biologists also have a better grasp of how RNA molecules fold into the complex shapes that define their function.

For a long time, synthetic biologists focused on protein repressors to make genetic circuits. The problem is that each of these protein repressors comes from a messenger RNA molecule, which adds an extra middleman in the flow of the circuit. But recently we found an RNA regulator that controls its own transcription based on whether or not another RNA molecule is present, allowing us to build circuits without proteins. So now we can operate solely with RNA. Only a couple of such molecules exist in nature, but by introducing changes in their nucleotide sequences, we've created several versions that don't affect one another's actions. We've also shown that these regulators can be combined in one way to create genetic logic gates and in another way to propagate the signals in genetic circuits, reminiscent of the electrical transistors that inspired our goals.

Our work, and that going on in other synthetic biology laboratories, will slowly build up families of regulators for adjusting the six knobs of gene expression. These families, accompanied by a set of design principles for how to wire them together (figuratively speaking), will eventually give bioengineers the means to manipulate gene expression with great precision and flexibility.

It's likely that the work synthetic biologists are doing will at first simply add to our collective grasp of the underlying science. And that's okay. But we're optimistic that given enough time, we will be able to create and control complex genetic circuits that function as designed. After that, we can start to tackle other challenges, such as constructing more specialized components to accompany our transistor-like building blocks. At that point, genetic engineers will be well positioned to solve some of the world's biggest problems—including those of food production, land use, pollution, and health. That's because we'll finally be using standardized parts and design tools, just as other kinds of engineers have been doing for a great many years.

This article originally appeared in print as "The Hunt for the Biological Transistor."

About the Author

Julius B. Lucks and Adam P. Arkin write about how to make genetic engineering more like electrical engineering in "The Hunt for the Biological Transistor." Arkin is a professor of bioengineering at the University of California, Berkeley. Lucks, currently a postdoctoral fellow at UC Berkeley, will be joining the chemical engineering faculty at Cornell. Although trained in chemistry, Lucks has done plenty of Python coding, and Arkin's hacking goes all the way "back to the days when they had Heathkit stores and Radio Shack had stuff you could actually use," he says.

Fuente:IEEE Spectrum

Video Recomendado Sak Noel | La gente esta muy Loca| WTF| What the Fuck|

2011-03-28T22:25:00.001-05:00

Jhonny La gente esta muy loca
Video Recomendado Sak Noel | La gente esta muy Loca| WTF| What the Fuck|Backside

10 Cosas que no debes decir cuando te encuentran con la Otra |in Fraganti

2011-03-09T08:12:00.003-05:00

1. No es lo que estás pensando... es mucho mejor.
2. ¡Qué bueno que llegaste!, ella me acaba de decir que le gustaría un trio.
3. ¡Mira lo que encontré en nuestra cama!
4. ¿Quién es usted? "a la amante".
5. Ella me obligó.
6. Tranquila le pagué con mi dinero.
7.¿Quién es usted?, no conozco a esta mujer. "a la novia".
8. Tranquilas chicas hay suficiente para todas.
9.Ustedes realmente se parecen.
10.¿ No te había dicho? Ahora realizo pruebas de condones.

Backside |Backside Internet | Lo mejor.

Duck Sauce | Barbra Streisand |backside

2011-03-03T00:47:00.001-05:00

Buen Video, Buen Sonido|backside

Comercial Preservativos Francés |

2011-02-22T22:14:00.000-05:00

En este comercial promueven el uso del condón usando una caricatura a la cual se le alejan las posibles parejas. Luego que usa el condón tiene placer por doquier.

Disfruten un rato de humor.

Backside |Backside Internet |Humor

Video Civiles Asesinados en Baghdad por Militares Estadounidenses | Usa Kills Civilians in Baghdad

2011-02-21T22:21:00.002-05:00

El siguiente video que fue obtenido por Wikileaks, y que fue pedido bajo demanda por la agencia internacional de noticias Reuters, se aprecia la manera indiscriminada como fueron asesinadas una docena de personas por tropas de aerotransportadas de Estados Unidos acantonadas en Irak, además de los adultos asesinados son heridos 2 niños que posteriormente son “rescatados” por unidades terrestres que llegan posteriormente al lugar de la acción despiadada.

El ataque es grabado desde la cámara que tiene el helicóptero como apoyo visual, una vez vistos los civiles en tierra hacen el primer rodeo al área, rodean una segunda vez los civiles entre ellos dos reporteros de guerra de la cadena Reuters, y empieza el “malentendido” al camarógrafo su equipo de video lo confunden o dicen para no justificarlos con un RPG, que son las armas con poder antiaéreo, a otros dicen que les observan fusiles AK-47, aún teniendo las imágenes y claramente observando que no eran ninguna clase de armas solicitan al comando permiso para disparar a las “tortugas” como llaman a los blancos civiles, en momentos desplegaron todo el poder cañones de 40mm y disparos de ametralladoras .50 son accionados sobre estos seres sin ninguna razón. Quedan unos heridos y son rematados sin ningún respeto por el derecho internacional humanitario. Luego el periodista de Reuters que alcanza a quedar vivo pese a semejante ataque hace una llamada por celular, en minutos llega una buseta minivan a ayudarlo, en momentos en el que estaban subiéndolo a la buseta vuelven a accionar las armas en contra de otros civiles, entre los cuales estaban 2 niños, que claramente son vistos por las ventanas de la minivan.

Bueno sin más palabras que ¨Nunca quisiera ver una intervención armada por militares de otro país en MI COLOMBIA¨. Sean ustedes testigos de la infamia de la guerra que solo deja huérfanos, pobreza y tristeza.

Es traído a ustedes por Jhovanny Uribe

Video gracias a Wikileaks y a Sunshine

Mapa Baghdad |Backside |Backside Internet | US Army Kills Civilians |wikileaks

Etiquetas de Technorati: wikileaks,civilians killed,usa kills,children irak,backside,backside internet,informacion,leaks us army,army usa,kills civilan,estados unidos asesina civiles,civiles asesinados en irak,civiles asesinados

Niña con 12 dedos en las manos y 14 en los pies en Yangon Myanmar | Tiene 26 dedos

2011-02-19T12:27:00.000-05:00

12 dedos en las manos y 14 en los pies | Tiene 26 dedos

Yangon, Myanmar

Una madre en Myanmar dice que su niña de 12 dedos y dedos de los pies 14 han sido ninguna desventaja - el agarre incluso puede ser más fuerte de lo normal - y ahora busca un récord Guinness.

Phyo Min Min Soe, de 26 años, sabía que su hija Le Yati Min había algo extra ya que casi el momento en que nació.

"Le pregunté a las enfermeras si mi hijo nació completa con las manos y las piernas", dice su madre. "Ellos dijeron que el bebé tiene incluso más de lo que necesita."
Nació con 12 dedos y dedos de los pies 14, Le puede ser más "digitalmente" la persona mayor dotada en el mundo. Ahora, la familia de la niña de 16 meses de edad en la empobrecida Myanmar está buscando un récord mundial Guinness para probarlo.
Un vecino está ayudando a su madre se aplican a la demanda de la audiencia constancia de que un niño de la India posee actualmente los derechos de fanfarronear para la mayoría de los dígitos, con 12 dedos y dedos de los pies 13.
Polidactilismo - haber nacido con un dedo de más o de los pies - es bastante inusual, pero es aún más raro que alguien tenga de repuesto dígitos funcionales en ambas manos y los pies, como Le tiene.
Le vive con su familia en una pequeña casa de madera en las afueras de la antigua capital del país del sudeste asiático de Yangon, donde recorre con siete dedos en cada pie.
Orgullosa madre Phyo Min Min Soe, de 26 años, dijo el martes que ella estaría feliz de ver a Le obtener un récord mundial, pero incluso sin eso, su hija ya tiene una vida feliz, e incluso algunas de las ventajas naturales.
"Ella parece tener un agarre más fuerte en las cosas - así que ella no baja mucho las cosas", dice ella, como Le juega cerca con un teléfono móvil.

Fuente

Backside Internet : Informa |Impactante

La Tabla Guija / The Ouija Board - Espiritismo Verdad o Mentira?

2011-02-17T14:15:00.001-05:00

Mucho hemos escuchado acerca de la tabla Guija, es el juego de mesa que se vende en mayor cantidad incluso que el conocido Monopoly, pero es verdad o mentira?. Les dejo un documental que nos habla sobre esta tabla misteriosa y unas pruebas que se hicieron con unos voluntarios.

Conspiración GOOGLE

2011-02-17T12:47:00.001-05:00

Conspiración GOOGLE

Temas: Compra Image America, SayNow

En lo que va de 2011 ya ha comprado para integrarlo a google voice, google books y a youtube eBook Technologies ,SayNow , fflick.

Otras compras anteriores

Lista de las adquisiciones del gigante Google en Mirar

HAARP Conspira USA?

2011-02-17T12:17:00.001-05:00

¿Qué es HAARP?

Es el Programa de Investigación de Aurora Activa de Alta Frecuencia, situado en Gakona , Alaska( (latitud 62°23’36″ Norte, longitud 145°08’03″ Oeste), es un campo de 180 antenas que emiten ondas de frecuencia bajas, según la versión oficial es para la investigación de la Ionosfera.

Según dictan las teorías conspirativas, el campo de antenas tendría una multitud de usos, uno es como arma geológica, capaz de producir terremotos, como el que ocurrió en Haiti, y Tsunamis como el que ocurrió en Indonesia.

Haarp como Arma Capaz de producir terremotos y Tsunamis

Sabemos que los Terremotos son producidos por la actividad Tectónica, existen 8 placas, y los terremotos son usados por los sismólogos para ver los componentes centrales de el núcleo terrestre, pues el núcleo consta de varias capas por así decirlo, la distancia al núcleo es aproximadamente 6.400 Km, y el hoyo más profundo que se haya efectuado está en Kola Rusia, pero este solo tiene aproximadamente 13Km. Eso no es nada, pues la corteza terrestre tiene más de 30 Km, el Manto aproximadamente 2.900 Km, y después viene el Núcleo externo y finalmente el núcleo interno (metal solido), el núcleo externo que está constituido de metal liquido(hierro y Níquel) es el productor del Campo Magnético de la Tierra, pero se preguntaran ¿qué tiene que ver el campo magnético aquí?, y la respuesta es mucho, pues sabemos que el campo magnético de la tierra, o magnetosfera , es la que nos protege de la Radiación cósmica, y los vientos solares que cada 11 años alcanzan su máximo apuntando a la tierra(el próximo máximo coincidentemente es el 2012), y hablamos de esto pues sabemos que en los Polos el campo es más débil, y cuando hay vientos solares(radiación cósmica), o sea, partículas super cargadas, una parte se filtra en los Polos dando lugar a lo que se conoce como Auroras(Boreal para el Polo Norte y Austral para el Polo Sur), y estás se producen cuando las partículas solares chocan con los gases de nuestra atmosfera provocando que brillen. Y aquí esta lo raro del asunto, se vio media hora antes del terremoto de China una Aurora, y también se vio en el Tsunami del 2004. Podría deberse no solo al HAARP sino algo más peligroso que está ocurriendo, que es el debilitamiento del campo magnético de la Tierra, estudiosos del tema dicen que esto pasa antes y después de un cambio de Polaridad de los campos Magnéticos, lo cual sería desastroso para la vida tal y cual la conocemos, pero ese punto lo tocaremos después. Pero también podría haberse producido por efecto del Rayo de la Muerte como se llama a Haarp, pues eventualmente se habría apuntado el rayo a una región tal como Haití, y haber producido el efecto como prueba. Se podrá refutar esto, de los terremotos etc, pero hay que saber que hemos descubierto más y explorado más en el espacio que en nuestro propia Tierra, y no se sabe mucho sobre los comportamientos del clima, y los terremotos, dados que son sistemas con muchas variables, y para poder predecir un evento futuro se necesitarían condiciones iniciales, pero no están, es un sistema cambiante, sino preguntemos a Lorentz.

Haarp como arma para controlar la Mente

Esto sería inclusive más fácil, pues la mente funciona con frecuencias, y tenemos estados, ya sea: DELTA (0,2 a 3,5 Hz de frecuencia)(0-4?), THETA(3,5 a 7,5 Hz)(4-7 ?), ALFA(7,5 a 13 Hz )(8-12?), BETA(13 a 28 Hz)(12-30?) y RAM ALTA(+ de 28 Hz). La Beta es la que estamos habitualmente en el día, el ALFA es relajo, DELTA, sueño profundo, pero RAM ALTA(Gamma? 30-100+ Hz) es de confusión, stress y más. Por eso en centros clínicos ponen música clásica para tratar de calmar a los pacientes, etc etc etc…Así que si perturbamos la frecuencia de la mente podríamos hacer que los soldados no pelearan, o que estuvieran estresados durante días..Lo que se dice que ocurrió en Irak antes de la invasión, por ende la Guardia Republicana que había peleado 7 años ferozmente con Irán, se entregaba mansamente, después ya no se pudo, pues ya estaban los soldados norteamericanos dentro y si se irradiaba, irradiaban también a los suyos.

Puede ser todo más falso que billete de 3 dólares, pero al menos para las vacaciones esta divertido, y da para pensar, pues la historia nos ha enseñado que a veces las cosas que no creemos terminan siendo verdaderas.

Videos sobre HAARP

Explicado Oficialmente

Causa del Terremoto en Haiti?

Zeitgeist Moving Forward (completo) (subtítulos en español) . Despierta Tu Mente Y Tus Sentidos

2011-02-13T16:45:00.000-05:00

El Marketing de la Locura .Vendiendo la Enfermedad. Medicando Sin Necesidad

2011-02-13T16:30:00.001-05:00

Paraisos Fiscales - Sabes Cómo ocultan los Billonarios su Dinero en Paraisos Fiscales?

2011-02-13T13:06:00.000-05:00

Paraisos Fiscales Documental

Si deseas conocer un poco sobre el manejo que le dan los multimillonarios a sus dineros para lograr evadir el pago de impuestos sobre sus capitales, y evadir el pago de impuestos en exportaciones.

Parte 1 - 6

Fenomenoide - Lo niños de hoy No Saben de Buenos Cartoons

2011-02-13T12:29:00.000-05:00

Fenomenoide, Viejo Cartoon

Para todos los que crecieron viendo Cartoon Network, y hoy ven el canal y no entienden como pudo decaer!. No hay buenas caricaturas para ver.

Justin Bieber Baby Parody (Justin Bieber Hits Puberty)

2011-02-12T17:31:00.000-05:00

Justin Bieber Baby Parody (Justin Bieber Hits Puberty)

Chavez en el Brochavin Colorado, Chapulin

2011-02-12T17:16:00.000-05:00

Hugo Chavez Parodia

El Brochavin Colorado, Hugorila jajaja

La Teacher de Inglés NP&

2011-02-12T16:58:00.000-05:00

Los Reencauchados NP& Techer Inglés

CHAVEZ, URIBE Y CORREA EN LAURA EN AMÉRICA

2011-02-12T16:43:00.000-05:00

CHAVEZ, URIBE Y CORREA EN LAURA EN AMÉRICA

URIBE Y OBAMA EN EL FACTOR X

2011-02-12T16:29:00.000-05:00

URIBE Y OBAMA EN EL FACTOR X

Los de Yolombó el Prumm . Backside Internet

2011-02-12T16:22:00.000-05:00

Backside Internet

Video

el Prumm - Los de Yolombó

Vehículo diplomático Gringo atropella manifestantes en el Cairo

2011-02-05T11:10:00.000-05:00

Vehículo diplomático atropella ciudadanos Egipcios

Backside Internet -- Crisis en Egipto

Usted qué haría si fuese el conductor de este carro?

Wii Sex - Video Divertido

2011-02-05T10:30:00.001-05:00

Wii Sex - Video Divertido

Backside Internet -- Wii Sex

Un rato divertido!!

Comercial Divertido Superbowl

2011-02-05T10:02:00.001-05:00

Superbowl Comercial Divertido

Backside Superbowl

"For drivers who want to get the most out of their cars its Bridgestone or nothing!"