<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biblical Evidence for Catholicism</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong</link>
	<description>Catholic biblical apologetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 15:40:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Defense of 50 NT Passages Against “Faith Alone”, Pt. 5</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-5.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-5.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 15:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation caused by actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  I’m replying to a lengthy, multi-part critique of my article, 50 Unanswerable NT Passages Against “Faith Alone” (2-24-26) by a very nice Reformed / Calvinist woman who goes by “C Xa” online. We have corresponded off and on, and she promised to make this critique after I challenged her. I greatly appreciate the engagement, which is [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invocation of Dead Saints: 100 Biblical Arguments</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/invocation-of-dead-saints-100-biblical-arguments.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/invocation-of-dead-saints-100-biblical-arguments.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Saints & Purgatory & Penance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communion of saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercession of angels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercession of the saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invocation of angels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invocation of saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[praying to saints]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  [important preliminary note: Catholics don’t ultimately pray to anyone besides God, if this is construed as any creature being able to answer prayers by themselves, rather than (necessarily) as a helper or delegated representative of God (helping to get a petition to Him, for an answer). We ask departed saints and angels to intercede [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/invocation-of-dead-saints-100-biblical-arguments.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense of 50 NT Passages Against “Faith Alone”, Pt. 4</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-4.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-4.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation caused by actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  I’m replying to a lengthy, multi-part critique of my article, 50 Unanswerable NT Passages Against “Faith Alone” (2-24-26) by a very nice Reformed / Calvinist woman who goes by “C Xa” online. We have corresponded off and on, and she promised to make this critique after I challenged her. I greatly appreciate the engagement, which is [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense of 50 NT Passages Against “Faith Alone”, Pt. 3</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-3.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-3.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 14:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation caused by actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[See Part One See Part Two I’m replying to a lengthy, multi-part critique of my article, 50 Unanswerable NT Passages Against “Faith Alone” (2-24-26) by a very nice Reformed / Calvinist woman who goes by “C Xa” online. We have corresponded off and on, and she promised to make this critique after I challenged her. I greatly [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense of 50 NT Passages Against &#8220;Faith Alone&#8221;, Pt. 2</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-2.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-2.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation caused by actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[See Part One I’m replying to a lengthy, multi-part critique of my article, 50 Unanswerable NT Passages Against “Faith Alone” (2-24-26) by a very nice Reformed / Calvinist woman who goes by “C Xa” online. We have corresponded off and on, and she promised to make this critique after I challenged her. I greatly appreciate [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone-pt-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defense of 50 NT Passages Against “Faith Alone”</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation caused by actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  I’m replying to a lengthy, multi-part critique of my article, 50 Unanswerable NT Passages Against “Faith Alone” (2-24-26) by a very nice Reformed / Calvinist woman who goes by “C Xa” online. We have corresponded off and on, and she promised to make this critique after I challenged her. I greatly appreciate the engagement, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/defense-of-50-nt-passages-against-faith-alone.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing &#8220;Faith Alone: The &#8216;Theological Novum&#8217;”</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/introducing-faith-alone-the-theological-novum.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/introducing-faith-alone-the-theological-novum.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books by Dave Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone: The "Theological Novum"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[→ Make a gift of $25 or more and quickly receive Faith Alone: The “Theological Novum” ***** ***** Go to my Blog Book Page with the Table of Contents, Introduction, and two sample chapters that can be read. ***** *** A Doctrine That Came From Nowhere: Announcing Faith Alone: The “Theological Novum” There’s a striking [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/introducing-faith-alone-the-theological-novum.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faith Alone: The &#8220;Theological Novum&#8221; (Dave Armstrong Book)</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/faith-alone-the-theological-novum-dave-armstrong-book.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/faith-alone-the-theological-novum-dave-armstrong-book.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 14:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books by Dave Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvation & Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith Alone: The "Theological Novum"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infused justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant soteriology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Fide]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Subtitle: Disproofs from 525 Bible Passages &#38; 30 Church Fathers Available only as a gift for premium supporters, as PDF, ePub, and Amazon Kindle (AZW3) files, for a 100% tax-deductible donation of $25 or more to my apologetics apostolate. Just click on the smaller book image above for a quick and easy transaction. Many thanks [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/faith-alone-the-theological-novum-dave-armstrong-book.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Un-Protestant Bible #5: Paul Prays for a Dead Man</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/un-protestant-bible-5-paul-prays-for-a-dead-man.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/un-protestant-bible-5-paul-prays-for-a-dead-man.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 18:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Saints & Purgatory & Penance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 Timothy 1:16-18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercessory prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Onesiphorus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul prayed for the dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prayer for the dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purgatory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  This is the transcript of the initial presentation of the video, “PROOF! Catholic Prayer For The Dead is Biblical” (Catholic Bible Highlights with Kenny Burchard, 5-8-26). ***** 2 Timothy 1:16, 18 (RSV) May the Lord grant mercy to the household of Onesiphorus, . . . [18] may the Lord grant him to find mercy [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/un-protestant-bible-5-paul-prays-for-a-dead-man.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temporal Punishment of Believers (vs. Sean Luke)</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/temporal-punishment-of-believers-vs-sean-luke.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/temporal-punishment-of-believers-vs-sean-luke.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Saints & Purgatory & Penance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgiveness of sins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indulgences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal punishment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=99056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  Sean Luke obtained Masters of Divinity and Masters of Systematic Theology degrees from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He runs the YouTube channel, Anglican Aesthetics, and a Substack site with the same name. He is a member of GAFCON (Global Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans), which is a traditionalist or “orthodox” reform movement of “authentic Anglicans”. It [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/05/temporal-punishment-of-believers-vs-sean-luke.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
