<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biblical Evidence for Catholicism</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong</link>
	<description>Catholic biblical apologetics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 14:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>350 Bible Passages vs. Sola Scriptura</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/350-bible-passages-vs-sola-scriptura.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/350-bible-passages-vs-sola-scriptura.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 14:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible and Tradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church (Ecclesiology)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible Only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Scriptura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tradition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=98082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  [all Bible passages from RSV]   Definition of Sola Scriptura Let’s start with a definition of sola Scriptura, from Protestants. Terms must always be defined. The late Dr. Norman L. Geisler was a very prominent evangelical Protestant apologist, who published many books. His definition is as follows: By sola Scriptura orthodox Protestants mean that Scripture alone [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/350-bible-passages-vs-sola-scriptura.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>God, Modern Physics, &#038; Dark Energy: An Analogy</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/god-modern-physics-dark-energy-an-analogy.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/god-modern-physics-dark-energy-an-analogy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism & Agnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy & Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinitarianism & Christology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=98112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  This is the initial transcript for the video, What is God Made of? (Catholic Bible Highlights, with Kenny Burchard, 4-10-26). ***** Does modern science have anything to say about the existence of God, Whom Christians believe to be an eternal spirit? Is the idea of a spirit itself an absurd, unverifiable idea? Science by [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/god-modern-physics-dark-energy-an-analogy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholics R Christians! DUH! (vs. Steve Christie)</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/catholics-r-christians-duh-vs-steve-christie.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/catholics-r-christians-duh-vs-steve-christie.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antichrist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelagians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unregenerate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whore of babylon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Steve Christie runs the BornAgainRN YouTube channel, where he produced the video, A Response to Dr. Gavin Ortlund ‪@TruthUnites‬: “Are Catholics Christians?” (12-20-24). As of 4-6-26, it has 3,748 views and 671 comments. I think it deserves a thorough refutation, and so this is my reply. His words will be in blue. ***** [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/catholics-r-christians-duh-vs-steve-christie.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venerating Men &#038; Angels: Worship? 20 Bible Passages</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/is-venerating-men-angels-worship-20-bible-passages.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/is-venerating-men-angels-worship-20-bible-passages.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Saints & Purgatory & Penance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowed to the ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obeisance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prospipto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shachah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veneration of angels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veneration of saints]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  This is the transcript of the initial presentation in the video, Is Venerating Men and Angels Always Worship? 20 Biblical Examples say NO! (Catholic Bible Highlights, with Kenny Burchard, 4-3-26). ***** Revelation 19:10 (RSV) Then I fell down at his feet to worship him, but he said to me, “You must not do that! I am a fellow servant [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/is-venerating-men-angels-worship-20-bible-passages.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proof That Calvin Affirmed Mary&#8217;s Perpetual Virginity</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/proof-that-calvin-affirmed-marys-perpetual-virginity.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/proof-that-calvin-affirmed-marys-perpetual-virginity.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 16:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessed Virgin Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers of the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Calvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariology of John Calvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perpetual Virginity of Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestant Mariology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Staples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Horn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97690</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[. . . Contrary to the Claims of Protestant Apologist Steve Christie &#38; Catholic Apologist Trent Horn / St. Basil the Great and Almost All of the Church Fathers Held to Mary’s Perpetual Virginity / Early Protestantism Virtually Unanimously Agrees   [John Calvin’s words will be in blue; Steve Christie’s in green; St. Basil the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/04/proof-that-calvin-affirmed-marys-perpetual-virginity.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sola Scriptura: Self-Defeating, Unworkable, Unbiblical</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/sola-scriptura-self-defeating-unworkable-unbiblical.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/sola-scriptura-self-defeating-unworkable-unbiblical.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 13:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible and Tradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible Only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture Alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sola Scriptura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tradition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  This is an abridgment with a few minor additions and changes, of a 2003 article of mine, entitled, “Protestantism: Is it Logically Self-Defeating?”  It’s my argument against sola Scriptura in a nutshell. Protestantism cannot settle its internal differences; each branch or sect can only (ultimately arbitrarily) assert its own authority. It has no way [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/sola-scriptura-self-defeating-unworkable-unbiblical.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspired Prophets: An Analogy to Infallible Popes</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/inspired-prophets-an-analogy-to-infallible-popes.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/inspired-prophets-an-analogy-to-infallible-popes.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 17:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papacy & Infallibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Ortlund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infallible popes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspired Bible writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspired prophetic office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papal infallibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prophetic & papal infallibility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  This is the transcript of the initial portion of the video, “Infallible Pope? Yes! Contra Gavin Ortlund” (Catholic Bible Highlights, with Kenny Burchard, 3-27-26). ***** Dr. Gavin Ortlund is a Reformed Baptist apologist who earned a doctorate from Fuller Theological Seminary in historical theology. He runs the very popular YouTube channel Truth Unites. Today, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/inspired-prophets-an-analogy-to-infallible-popes.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Motown Stars: Info. &#038; Links / My Detroit Heritage</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/100-motown-stars-info-links-my-detroit-heritage.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/100-motown-stars-info-links-my-detroit-heritage.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60s pop music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berry Gordy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul music]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The classic period of the Motown music era was from 1960 to 1972, when Motown founder Berry Gordy and his company left Detroit. I was born in Detroit in 1958 at the Booth Memorial Hospital of the Salvation Army (late 1890s) at 130 W. Grand Boulevard, on the same street as the Motown Studio (photo [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/100-motown-stars-info-links-my-detroit-heritage.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mary Queen Mother &#038; Queen of Heaven: Biblical?</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/mary-queen-mother-queen-of-heaven-biblical.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/mary-queen-mother-queen-of-heaven-biblical.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blessed Virgin Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Mariology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gebhirah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen of Heaven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theotokos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veneration of Mary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  This is the initial transcript for the video, “Mary Queen of Heaven — What Protestants Get Wrong About This Catholic Title” (Catholic Bible Highlights, with Kenny Burchard, 3-20-26). ***** Evangelical Protestant theologian Kenneth J. Collins and Anglican philosopher Jerry L. Walls wrote a book called, Roman but Not Catholic: What Remains at Stake 500 [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/mary-queen-mother-queen-of-heaven-biblical.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mary&#8217;s Assumption: Biblical &#038; Patristic Data</title>
		<link>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/marys-assumption-biblical-patristic-data.html</link>
					<comments>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/marys-assumption-biblical-patristic-data.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Armstrong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blessed Virgin Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers of the Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assumption of Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Mariology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary's death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[original sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revelation 12]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/?p=97537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  Mary’s bodily Assumption is not directly addressed in the Bible. But (as always with Catholic doctrine), there are indirect, deductive arguments from things that are made clear in the Bible, and nothing in Scripture that would contradict its possibility. We see, for example, several instances of persons being transported bodily to heaven that are [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2026/03/marys-assumption-biblical-patristic-data.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
