<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

  <channel>
    <title>Recent Comments on Big Red Network</title>
    <link>http://bigrednetwork.com/</link>
    <description />
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>jason@bigrednetwork.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2" />
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:brandon@bigrednetwork.com" />
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>


<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BigRedNetworkComments" /><feedburner:info uri="bigrednetworkcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/LaWU6v0rmOA/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180339</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: tom<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010 10:59 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180339">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180339</a>
</p>

<p>
I'm on board with the Eric Martin pick as a potential defensive star of 2010.  What one word was used to describe Suh all of last season that I've heard associated with this guy?  Motor.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180339</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/Fzf7NazLrfY/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180337</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Colt<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  9:52 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180337">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180337</a>
</p>

<p>
why are OU and NU pumped? Just another year of getting beat down by UT.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180337</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/IYqbC3JGEMY/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180332</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Trojan<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  8:59 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180332">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180332</a>
</p>

<p>
Jimbo why are you on a Husker Website???????
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180332</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/Y1WgCmCmtdw/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180331</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: OU7times<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  8:53 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180331">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180331</a>
</p>

<p>
I am already pumped for this season.

It's going to be awesome!
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180331</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Huskerpedia Down then Frozen</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/j-JkfEph1_o/huskerpedia_down_then_frozen.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/huskerpedia_down_then_frozen.html#180327</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-02T18:05:35-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jason <br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  7:54 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/huskerpedia_down_then_frozen.html#180327">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/huskerpedia_down_then_frozen.html#180327</a>
</p>

<p>
After seeing countless posters defrauded by David Max because they didn't ascribe to his little group's version of events, it's fun to finally see some come-uppance served.  Now that HP is under more competent management, it's also refreshing to see that the gaggle of psychopaths and internet stalkers that Max catered to are getting taken out with the trash.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/huskerpedia_down_then_frozen.html#180327</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/NGImqsmyq4E/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180320</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jimbo<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  5:35 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180320">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180320</a>
</p>

<p>
Voice of reason: YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH LOL :)
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180320</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/gtBOId_Myoo/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180317</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Voice of reason<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  5:10 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180317">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180317</a>
</p>

<p>
Why is Jimbo even on a Husker website? (this question is not directed at you Jimbo, no need to respond). They are called Trolls, just ignore them.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180317</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/BqUAceQrdE0/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180315</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jimbo<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  4:55 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180315">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180315</a>
</p>

<p>
Hi Jason, I already said the rule is stupid and I do not see why Maryland (the one suing the NCAA) does not just change the person's title back. Does anyone here think NU would have an advantage if Carl has the "coach in waiting" added to his title? This really is much to do about nothing. If a guy gets a great offer the "coach in waiting" title is not going to stop him from leaving a school to coach somewhere else. What this is all about (and rightfully so) is kids go to a school with the underlying promise that the coach that they built a relationship with will be there while they attend college. Actually it is a forward thinking concept to help kids but as with heatlh care or anything else there is always another way to spin it. Thanks for responding. :)
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180315</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/Mpeg2lzsWhc/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180313</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jimbo<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  4:42 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180313">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180313</a>
</p>

<p>
Yep Mack Brown just read this article and said he is quitting coaching. He is sooooooooo scared. LOL
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180313</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/kTYLmGbtUVA/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180311</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jason<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  3:39 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180311">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180311</a>
</p>

<p>
Simmer down Jimbo. Texas has their pick of the litter talent wise. We all get that. Care to offer any insight as to how this new rule might impact UT (if at all)?
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180311</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/-ATHjKqpO0s/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180308</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jimbo<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  3:26 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180308">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180308</a>
</p>

<p>
Mak, why lie. Texas did NOT offer Lewis period. YOU DO NOT GET AN OFFER TO PLAY FOR UT UNTIL AFTER YOU COME TO CAMPUS WITH YOUR PARENTS. WHY DO YOU KEEP TRYING TO SPIN IT ANOTHER WAY? ALSO UT ASK MANY KIDS TO COME TO THE JUNIOR DAYS THEY SET UP - THAT IS NOT A FRICKEN OFFER PAL. IN FACT MANY ARE UPSET IF THEY LEAVE WITHOUT THE OFFER BUT THAT IS WHY THEY GO, HOPING ONE IS COMING AND NOT THE WAY YOU PAINT IT - THAT ONE IS THERE ALREADY. DOUBT ANYTHING I SAID IS GOING TO CHANGE YOUR MIND. WHY NOT GOOGLE MACKS RECRUITING DAY PRESS CONFERENCE? INSTEAD OF ARGUING WITH ME CALL MACK A LIAR IF IT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER. I AM AFRAID OCT 16TH IS NOT GOING TO MAKE YOU FEEL BETTER.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180308</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/BRTcGSCpUCc/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180306</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Mak<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  3:15 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180306">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180306</a>
</p>

<p>
So Jimbo what your saying is that Texas only offered 25 kids last year? Texas had offers to both Rex Burkhead and Cody Green in 09 but would not give them WRITTEN offers until they visited campus, just two that pop out off the top of my head. But neither of them were interested. How about Travis Lewis, LB for OU, same thing. He was an ealry commit to NU and Texas tried to get him to visit, but would not. Took one to OU and changed his commit. Texas does try to get kids to campus by telling them they have an offer but will not put it in writting until they get to campus. My brother-in-law played football at Texas, so beleive it or not, I do have some knowledge of what I talk about. 75% of kids receive an offer without ever stepping a foot on a campus. 
I guess bottom line is if Texas got their pick of the litter every year of the best players in the country, would they not have more NC's then they do? A great HS player does not always make a great college player now does it? 
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180306</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/9a8D9BjQF20/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180299</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jimbo<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  1:32 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180299">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180299</a>
</p>

<p>
TO Mak: Do not know about OU but UT DID NOT OFFER ANY RECRUITS YOU SIGNED PERIOD. How do I know that? Because UT will not offer a recruit until he makes a visit to campus and they offered 25 last year and all 25 accepted. UT did not offer anyone you signed. Again do not know about OU but if you care to check OU sent out over 200 offers last year. They send them to everyone and hope it sticks with someone. IF a top recruit shows interest AFTER THE OFFER FROM OU then the process begins of official visits, etc. Good try to spin it the way you want but sadly the facts got in the way of your brain process. BTW you guys do the same as OU as most colleges do what you guys do. It is not a knock because no one has the time to check thousands of recruits each year. I do know that in the 10th grade football players get a questionnaire and are ask to list 5 colleges THEY are interested in upon graduation. Keep reading Mak and maybe you will learn.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180299</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/jqelBF-riDI/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180296</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: nu-isu-fan<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010 11:58 AM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180296">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180296</a>
</p>

<p>
I don't about the odds, but I liked what I saw from Cameron Meredith and Eric Hagg last season.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180296</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/m4U7J-LbTYE/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180290</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: darren<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010 10:03 AM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180290">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180290</a>
</p>

<p>
First, great take, Brandon. That is a good list of candidates for "the next level." I agree with your odds, with one exception.

But, I'm kind of with Saunders45...I would put Dennard on this list, probably ahead of Gomes. Yes, Gomes made some huge clutch plays. THat counts for a lot. But, as an every down cornerback - playing on the outside - Dennard was lights out. Some of his film from last season is just sick, the OU game in particular. 

Prince is better at getting to the ball, and is great with the ball in his hands (hello, punt returns?), so he clearly gets the nod as the #1 guy back there. But the combo of Prince and Dennard is one reason I am so bullish on the NU D for 2010. 

Oh, and I LIKE the odds at Ankra at 50-1...that is a very good bet, imo. I would take that payday any day. 
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180290</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/PQvKjpbbF_M/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180287</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: irafreak<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  9:02 AM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180287">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180287</a>
</p>

<p>
Jimbo I really doubt recruits are swayed by fans on a message board...
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180287</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/13ZL15oyj4c/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180285</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Mak<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  8:42 AM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180285">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180285</a>
</p>

<p>
Really Jimbo...the article is about the recruiting LIMIT that is in place for HEAD coaches and how it hurts those with the title of HC in waiting. It is not a slam on Texas or Maryland or any other school that would chose to promote an assistant. As far as the Huskers picking up the scraps of OU and Texas, really? If I recall, of the recuits signed the last 2 years by NU, all but 4 have had an offer from either OU or Texas, and 2 of those were such early commits that they told schools to back off. No hate for Texas, just that there is an entire world out there beyond the state lines, you should experience it sometime...
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180285</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Defensive Star Search</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/LLsmuq2jgSU/defensive_star_search.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180277</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-16T04:00:58-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Saunders45<br/>
Date: Mar 16, 2010  6:44 AM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180277">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180277</a>
</p>

<p>
Um, Where's Alphonso Dennard? IMO, he's as good as Prince.
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/defensive_star_search.html#180277</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/2NTK1jhQDsU/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180224</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Jimbo<br/>
Date: Mar 15, 2010 11:20 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180224">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180224</a>
</p>

<p>
TO Andy, I think you just signed a QB out of Texas that Bo is very high on. Since you hate anything Texas I guess you will no longer be a NU fan? Sadly you hurt the team you want to love the most, and that is NU.  Because of people like YOU most recruits in Texas have already been told about how the fans feel about anything Texas. That is why you get the ones that OU and UT do NOT want...glad to see you helping UT out Andy but we do not really need the help..I think what  9 out of 10 times you lost? You must have had a very lousy last 10 years...lol
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180224</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Could New Recruiting Rule Hurt Texas?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BigRedNetworkComments/~3/K-x-O7rW_cY/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html</link>
<description>A Comment</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180220</guid>
<dc:subject>Comments</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-03-15T03:04:28-06:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
Author: Andy<br/>
Date: Mar 15, 2010 10:17 PM<br/>
URL: <a href="http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180220">http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180220</a>
</p>

<p>
Yep Jimbo, nothing but hate for ut, anything texas, and anything remotely associated with the university of texas.

Regards!
</p>

]]></content:encoded>

<feedburner:origLink>http://bigrednetwork.com/archives/2010/03/could_new_recruiting_rule_hurt.html#180220</feedburner:origLink></item>


</channel>
</rss>
