Bizarro Theater

NEOCONS AND MORONI MORONS. THE ATTACKS ON TRUMP KEEP COMING.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:30:00 -0800

So there is this 32-year old Ben Shapiro who writes for Breitbart, Town Hall and other places.

Today, Benny spends his writing time writing against Donald Trump. However, back in 2011, Benny had nothing but praise for Trump (see: The Magic of Donald Trump by Ben Shapiro). Here are Benny's 2011 thoughts on Trump:

"Is Donald Trump the best Republican candidate for president out there? It would be tough to argue otherwise." ~ Ben Shapiro

"In the last several weeks, that ideal Republican candidate has materialized. His name is Donald Trump. His slogan is ready-made: "You're Fired." He does not give a damn what the media thinks of him...He can self-fund to the tune of $1 billion...And what's more, he can win." ~ Ben Shapiro

"Trump has across-the-board appeal. He even has union support -- he's made a political mint bashing outsourcing..." ~ Ben Shapiro

"Trump's image boils down to this: he's a no-nonsense businessman ..." ~ Ben Shapiro

"[Trump] has the makings of a breakout star; he's got bravado and the cash to back it up. If he really runs, he won't have any trouble finding supporters." ~ Ben Shapiro

In that 2011 work, before Shapiro mentioned Trump, Shapiro identified the qualities needed for a winner:

"If Republicans were to construct an ideal candidate, he would have to be rich beyond belief...The ideal Republican candidate would have significant name recognition with the general public...The ideal Republican candidate would have stage presence, an intimidation factor, and a willingness to play dirty." ~ Ben Shapiro

Trump has the same qualities today Shapiro claimed were needed in 2011. So is Shapiro confused? Does Shapiro not know what qualities a candidate needs?

27-year old Benny believed he was so right about Trump and now 32-year old Benny believes he is right about Trump. Of course, it is not about being right or wrong about the person.

For 32-year old Benny to be right, Benny would need to disavow his claims about what qualities a candidate needs. Yet, if 32-year old Benny does so, Benny would reveal himself to be stupid about matters of politics. And thus, Benny would need to find a new line of work.

So what changed 27-year old Benny into 32-year old Benny? Without doubt, Benny did not become smarter.

As a self-identifying Orthodox Jew, likely Shapiro is one of those dippy, Israel first, neocons, you know, those ex-Democratic Party Jews who are crypto-Zionists — and no, this is not a conspiracy theory claim. If this is so, that would make Shapiro among those internationalists who pushes a pro-massive immigration agenda for the USA.

In the same 2011 work, Shapiro had this to say about Mitt Romney, "Mitt Romney has about as much charm as a Ziploc bag, and his support for Romneycare in Massachusetts should immediately put him out of the running."

Yet, on March 2, 2016, Shapiro had this to write for the Daily Wire:

"Donald Trump’s yuge Super Tuesday win means that the Republican Smart Set™ have decided to unleash the big guns. Romney is now scheduled to speak at the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah, [delivering] a full-scale assault on Trump...Which is fine. I’ve done it myself."

Mitt Romney has come out to attack Donald Trump even though Mitt Romney has yet to announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination. Yet, back in 2012, Romney sought the nomimation and likely campaign funds of Donald Trump.

Like 27-year old Benny Shapiro, 65-year old Mitt Romney believed Donald Trump to have genius about the US economy:

"Donald Trump has shown an extraordinary ability to understand how our economy works, to create jobs for the American people. He's done it here in Nevada. He's done it across the country. He understand that our economy is facing threats from abroad. He is one of the few people who stood up and said, 'China has been cheating. They have taken jobs from Americans. They have not played fair. We have to have a president who stands up to cheaters. We believe in free trade and free enterprise. But we do not believe in allowing people to cheat day in and day out."

But now, 69-year old Romney believes otherwise. Yet, Trump's stance is the same today was it was in 2012.

For 69-year old Romney to be right, Mitty would need to disavow the claims 65-year old Mitty made about Trump. Yet, if Mitty were to do this, Mitty would need to acknowledge that he does not understand anything about the US economy and commerce.

Watch Romney speak his praise-filled words for Trump with ease and conviction:

All should recall that Mitt Romney was the failed Republican candidate who lost to Obama in 2012. Romney once worked as the Governor of Massachusetts and as such, saddled the people of Massachusetts with the horrible Romneycare, the model for Obamacare.

Mitt Romney's family have been cultists for generations. Mitt Romney believes that an angel named Moroni came to earth and gave an upstate New York hick non-existent golden tablets with the Book of Mormon written up those.

While I am no fan of Bill Maher, at least Bill gets it right about the biggest cult in the USA:

George W. Romney, Mitt's dad, ran for the presidency in 1968. And like illegal candidate of today, the natural-born Canadian-Cuban Ted Cruz (see: Natural-born Canadian, Ted Cruz), George W. Romney was an illegal Mexican candidate for the U.S. presidency.

George W. Romney was born in Mexico, in Colonia Dublán, Galeana, Chihuahua. Thus, Mitt's dad was not a natural-born American. Mitt's great-grandfather was noted polygamist, Helaman Pratt, the son of Parley P. Pratt, one of the co-founders of the Mormon cult.

As a grown-up cultist, Romney's dad was hired to run the newly formed American Motors and promptly ran it into the ground. Roy D. Chapin, Jr., had to be hired by the board of directors to try to save the firm that Mitt's idiotic dad trashed.

Like many business failures, George W. Romney straightaway went into politics and became governor of Michigan. George W. Romney barely won. Romney won by 80,000 votes and ended a fourteen-year rule by the Democrats.

How did George Romney win? Someone smart helped Romney get elected. George Romney's strategists had George Romney appeal to independent voters and suburbanites of Detroit, were more likely to vote Republican than the heavily Democratic residents of the city itself.

Mitt Romney was too stupid himself to run with the strategy against Obama in 2012. Interestingly, Trump is using the same strategy as George Romney used in 1962 to win the governorship of Michigan.

Political idiots like Mitt are begging Americans to get behind a new Nationalist party (see: WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS AND THE FORTHCOMING NATIONAL PARTY OF FREE-CAPITALISM PROGRESSIVES. THE GLOBALIZATION PARTY TIME OF INTERNATIONALISTS COULD BE COMING TO AN END IN THE USA).

Mitt Romney wants Brazilians, Chinese, Indians, Indonesians and Mexicans to become $12 an hour workers. Mitt's vision requires Americans to become $12 an hour workers. Should you care if Brazilians, Chinese, Indians, Indonesians or Mexicans rise up to become $12 an hour workers if Americans fall to become $12 an hour workers?

Idiots like Mitt Romney want to flood the USA with third world low IQ, never-going-to-be-skilled workers who do not speak English to depress wages. Mitt Romney wants skilled working-class Americans to commit economic suicide (see: AMERICANS ARE COMMITTING (ECONOMIC) SUICIDE DAILY WITH IPHONES AND IPADS). Mitt wants this because Mitt Romney does not understand commerce how capitalism works, at all (see: COMMERCIAL REALITY. A CRASH-COURSE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW IT ALL WORKS).

Main Street Americans will not lead the world in the 21st century if domestic capitalism gets crushed in favor of internationalist capitalism. Sure, the billionaires of the USA will get even richer. However, wage rates for Americans will fall continuously until those wage rates match the poor in Brazil, in China, in India, in Indonesia, in Vietnam.

Ronald Reagan's version for the Republican Party was loathed by the Rockefeller Northeastern Republicans who held control of the party. People like George Romney loathed Reagan.

Those Northeastern Republicans lost control of the party to Ronald Reagan. They since gained control under George Herbert Walker Bush. Mitt's vision for Americans is Bush's kinder, gentler, New World Order, equalized global wage rates, which is another way of saying, universal poverty.

If voting Republican means voting for anti-USA losers like Bushes — George, George Jr., and huge losers like the Mormon cultist Mitt, then why vote Republican, ever?

SUPER TUESDAY WAS NOT SO SUPER FOR MARCO. TRUMP TRIUMPHS. CRUZ CRUISES IN TEXAS BUT STRUGGLES ELSEWHERE.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:18:00 -0800

Marco Rubio managed to win the primary in Minnesota. The win netted Rubio one more delegate than the Canadian-Cuban Ted Cruz who is running an illegal campaign (see: THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES) and four more delegates than billionaire businessman Donald Trump.

Minnesota results:

38 delegates
Rubio won
Rubio, 14 delegates; Cruz, 13; Trump, 10
Rubio 1.08:1 over Cruz
Rubio 1.4:1 over Trump

Ted Cruz the junior senator from Texas managed to win his home state of Texas.

Texas results:

155 delegates
Cruz won
Cruz, 99 delegates; Trump, 33; Rubio, 3
Cruz 3:1 over Trump
Cruz 33:1 over Rubio

In three states combined, Alaska, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Cruz managed to net one delegate more than Trump though trump won Arkansas.

Alaska results:

28 delegates
Cruz won
Cruz, 12 delegates; Trump, 11; Rubio, 5
Cruz 1.09:1 over Trump
Cruz 2.4:1 over Rubio

Oklahoma results:

43 delegates
Cruz won
Cruz, 14 delegates; Trump, 12; Rubio, 11
Cruz 1.17:1 over Trump
Cruz 1.27:1 over Rubio

Donald Trump won the majority of delegates from Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia.

Arkansas results:

40 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 16; Cruz, 14 delegates; Rubio, 9
Trump 1.14:1 over Cruz
Trump 1.77:1 over Rubio

Alabama results:

50 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 36 delegates; Cruz, 13; Rubio, 1
Trump 2.77:1 over Cruz
Trump 36:1 over Rubio

Georgia results:

76 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 40 delegates; Rubio, 14; Cruz, 18
Trump 2.86:1 over Rubio
Trump 2.22:1 over Cruz

Massachusetts results:

42 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 22 delegates; Kasich, 8; Rubio, 8; Cruz, 4
Trump 2.75:1 over Kasich
Trump 2.78:1 over Rubio
Trump 5.5:1 over Cruz

Tennessee results:

58 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 31 delegates; Cruz, 14; Rubio, 9
Trump 2.21:1 over Cruz
Trump 3.4:1 over Rubio

Vermont results:

16 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 6 delegates; Kasich, 6
Trump 1:1 over Kasich

Virginia results:

49 delegates
Trump won
Trump, 17 delegates; Rubio, 16; Cruz, 8; Kasich, 5; Carson, 3
Trump 1.06:1 over Rubio
Trump 2.125:1 over Cruz
Trump 3.4:1 over Kasich
Trump 5.67:1 over Carson

So how much do the candidates need to spend to win the nomination? Note: The spending is in the billions. So Ted Cruz would need to spend $90 million vs Donald Trump who would need to spend $40 million at this pace. Rubio would needs to spend $465 million and Kasich, $756 million.

GETTING UPPITY OVER A SLOGAN. BLACK LIVES MATTER IS RACISM. IF ONLY BLM PROTESTERS SPOKE WITH ADVERBS.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:39:00 -0800

Organizers and followers of a black racist movement coined a slogan to identify themselves — Black Lives Matter. By shoving their slogan in the faces of Americans everywhere, they have triggered many Americans to counter with their own slogans such as All Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter, the latter which supports the police.

The problem comes down to English. Had only the organizers said any of these, they might have attracted much support from most Americans:

Black lives matter too.
Black lives matter as well.
Black lives matter also.
Black lives matter likewise.
Black lives matter similarly.

Omission of that little adverb makes all the difference.

In MOOKIE SPIKE LEE NEVER CAN DO THE RIGHT THING. THE EVIL STUPIDITY OF BLACKISM AND THE POLITICS BLACKS NEED MOST. #BLACKSSORACIST, I showed you the horrible doctrine of blackism. The organizers of Black Lives Matter are using the standard tactic of all social justice warriors in the USA to support their blackism. In AHAB MOBY DICK RACISM. WHAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT IS ALL ABOUT — HUNTING THE GREAT WHITE MALE, I revealed the rhetorical tactic of all of these racists.

True racism means living by preventing another from trading property for property through law or through collusion because of another's race — being one of people of common descent. Adherents of racism organize into groups based on arbitrary characteristics such as skin color (blacks), other-than English language spoken (Hispanics/Latinos), sexual preferences (gays) or sex (feminists) and then seek superior rights to gain property (right of ownership).
Racists have groups like the NAACP, La Raza, Act Up! and NOW.

Americans of European descent (see: HEART OF EUROPE? ARE GREEKS EVEN EUROPEAN?), so-called "whites" aren't organized into any group. There is no group of whites who live through law or through collusion by preventing others from trading property for property.

In Everett Dean Martin's work Behavior of Crowds, which the hate group the Southern Poverty Law Center adapted for their 1920 pamphlet, The Mob Mind vs Civil Liberty, Martin described factions known as struggle groups.

The Black Lives Matter faction is yet another racist struggle group in the USA fighting in the perpetual civil war of the USA. War always comes down to gaining property in the possessions of others whether through guns and bullets or through politics.

AMERICANS ARE FED UP! THE TRUMP REVOLUTION IS ON!

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 21 Feb 2016 14:16:00 -0800

This was such an easy call from the beginning. Margaret Thatcher called it for me a long time ago. Watch Thatcher talk about conviction vs consensus to know why Trump has it.

✓ A BRILLIANT LADY AND WHY DONALD TRUMP IS MOST POPULAR WITH AMERICANS

Here are a collection of links from Bizarro Theater since the beginning of 2015. Anyone who read me consistently could see why the Trump Revolution could happen.

Working-class Americans are Done with Globalization:

✘ bad trade deals that send manufacturing jobs to Mexico and China because the return to capital at home is killed for the small factory owner
✘ the loss of small and medium sized employers

Working-class Americans are Done with Immigration:

✘ immigration, especially third world (non-white) immigration as well as illegal immigration
✘ the big lie that illegals take the jobs Americans won't do

Working-class Americans are Done with Mohammadans — Americans See Too Much Evidence: 9/11, Fort Hood, San Bernardino, the horde in Europe, ISIS, Obama

Working-class Americans are Done with Obama:

(White) Americans are Done with Social(ist) Liberal Political Correctness and Pandering to Minorities:

✘ black lives matter

✘ massive amounts of black crime — gun murders — as the excuse to violate the second amendment

✘ safe spaces and ridiculous feminism

✘ quotas for employment and college admissions

✘ extra welfare for skin-colored people

✘ rampant government corruption with government workers now getting paid more than private sector workers

Working-class Americans are Done with The Gay War:

✘ the big gay army of homosexists, most of whom are heterosexuals enlisted and indoctrinated to push the gay agenda

✘ forced association with the fringe population of homosexuals

Working-class Americans are Done with the Relentless Attacks on the Protestant Christian Origins of the USA and How Protestant Christians Made America the Greatest Sovereignty on Earth

CHRISTIANS FOUNDED AMERICA, NOT ATHEISTS, NOR JEWS, NOR HINDUS, NOR BUDDHISTS, NOR MUSLIMS.

Working-class Americans are Done with Mainstream Media Deception:

Working-class Americans are Done with Celebrities:

✘ moronic actors of Hollywood as the mouthpieces of both globalization and political correctness

Working-class Americans are Done with Neopotism:

Working-class Americans are Done with Government and Media Lying Propaganda about the Economy:

Working-class Americans are Done with World Figureheads like the Pope:

Working-class Americans are Done with False, Libertine Deception:

Working-class Americans are Done with Lying Supreme Court Judges:

OBAMACARE? CALL IT ROBERTSCARE. CHIEF PRIESTESS OF THE US SUPREME COURT DOES IT AGAIN!

Working-class Americans are Done with Illegal Political candidates:

Working-class Americans are Done with Sellout Politicians:

Working-class Americans are Done with Establishment Politics:

Working-class Americans are Done with Attacks on the Second Amendment and the Bill of Rights in General:

Working-class Americans Want the USA Restored:

TRUMP WINS AGAIN. TAKES SOUTH CAROLINA. KILLS THE BUSH DYNASTY AS LOW-ENERGY JEB! DROPS OUT. IT'S STILL THE ECONOMY, STUPID. MRS. BILL CLINTON WINS IN NEVADA, BUT BARELY.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Sat, 20 Feb 2016 20:10:00 -0800

Pro-American restorationist candidate Trump slaughtered his rivals for the GOPher party delegates in South Carolina today. Trump has secured all 50 delegates from South Carolina. That is a scathing win.

Trump's victory continues to surprise pundits but not Americans who have suffered since the collapse of peak GDP, which came in the fourth quarter of 2007. Since then American families have been wrecked by lengthened unemployment and lower wages.

For more on the economy, see my companion publication, OBAMA, YELLEN, BERNANKE AND MANY OTHERS HAVE LIED, SOVIET-STYLE ABOUT THE FALSE RECOVERY, COUNTLESS TIMES. YOU ARE STILL LIVING IN THE GREATEST DEPRESSION.

Trump managed to win South Carolina by only spending $35,600 each delegate. Rubio spent $12,050,000 and came up empty as did Ted Cruz who spent $7,070,000.

As well, Trump has spent the fewest dollars spent for each delegate. As a successful billionaire businessman, this should surprise no one. Trump knows how to process intel about markets.

Trump is much smarter at politics than the professional politicians.Politicians are wasteful. Politicians rely upon leeching consultants. Politicians are not smart.

After New Hampshire, I wrote that Jeb Bush was not viable as a candidate. South Carolina proved my claim. So it is no surprise that Jeb did Americans a favor and dropped out tonight.

Jeb was on pace to spend $26.7 billion to win the nomination. No nomination has ever required that much spending. Jeb spent 135 times more for each of his delegates than Donald Trump spent.

As can be seen, Marco Rubio is on pace to spend $6.9 billion to win the nomination. That insane sum of spending will not win Rubio the presidency. Rubio is not a viable candidate and needs to drop out.

Canadian natural-born Ted Cruz and illegal candidate (see: my works on Ted Cruz to know why cannot swear the oath of office of the presidency) would need to spend 8.6 times more than Donald Trump to win the nomination. That kind of spending would push the illegal candidate Cruz to about $1.7 billion.

Donald Trump would need to spend $162.1 million to win the nomination. This is a reasonable sum and well below what either Hillary Clinton ($1.118 billion) or Bernie Sanders ($924 million) must spend to win their Democratic Party nomination.

As I shared with you in THE LAST GASPS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. WHAT REINCE PRIEBUS MUST DO TO RESCUE THE INTERNATIONALIST GLOBALIZATION GOPHER PARTY FROM THE DONALD TRUMP JUGGERNAUT, GO ALL IN WITH JOHN KASICH, if the GOPher Party establishment does not want to work with Trump, their best shot at beating Trump going forward is to back Kasich, in spite of tonight's results.

Also, beware of false political polls trying to take down Trump. Rupert Murdoch tried to do with his Wall Street Journal. There is much false polling relying upon unscientific methods. For more on that, see THE AUGUSTA CHRONICLE, NBC TV, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL AND MARIST COLLEGE ENGAGE IN POLLING DECEPTION FOR THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PRIMARY

The Democratic Party held a caucus in Nevada today. The wife of former president Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton snagged four more delegates than socialist Bernie Sanders.

Though Hillary Clinton won, the race was close. A close race doesn't bode well for Hillary. If Bernie could spend more, he could tip the balance in his favor.

Hillary spent $196,579 each delegate while Bernie spent 2.58 times more than Hillary, having spent $507,333 each delegate.

Both candidates are on pace to spend around one billion dollars to secure the nomination.

The Democratic Party held a caucus on

Delegates nominate. Primaries and caucuses exist to secure delegates for the nomination.

According to The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process by the Council on Foreign Relations:

In 2016, a Democratic candidate must secure at least 2,382 out of 4,763 delegates to become the party’s nominee. The number of delegates allocated to each state takes into account the state’s Democratic vote in the previous three presidential elections and its assigned number of Electoral College votes.

Meanwhile, a Republican candidate must secure at least 1,237 out of 2,472 delegates to win the party’s nomination. The Republican Party allocates each state ten delegates, plus three for each congressional district, and bonus delegates for states that contributed electoral votes to the party in the previous presidential election, as well those that elected Republicans to high offices.

THE AUGUSTA CHRONICLE, NBC TV, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL AND MARIST COLLEGE ENGAGE IN POLLING DECEPTION FOR THE SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PRIMARY

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:25:00 -0800

Two recent surveys on the eve of the South Carolina Republican Primary reveal significant flaws such, which invalidate the results.

The principal owner of the Wall Street Journal happens to be Rupurt Murdoch. Murdoch is the principal owner of FOX News. Murdoch seems to be against the candidacy of Donald Trump. Perhaps this is why his survey uses flawed methods.

As it is, already, in THE DES MOINES REGISTER AND BLOOMBERG COMMIT POLLING FRAUD ON DECEMBER 12, 2015, FOR THE UPCOMING GOP CAUCUS and WHY EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION POLL FOR 2016 YOU SHALL SEE OR HEAR WILL BE WRONG, I have shown you significant flaws in how polling has been done, especially for nationwide polls

Let's look at two wrong polls.

The Augusta Chronicle

Claimed Result: Trump 27, Rubio 24, Cruz 19, Bush 11, Kasich 7, Carson 8
Claimed Winner Margin: Trump +3
Status: Invalid survey results
Why?: The sample is not drawn at random from telephone numbers who then get qualified first as adults, then as likely voters. Assertion of definitely voting and exclusion based on lack of recall of polling station tainted sample.

Flawed Methodology: Likely Republican primary voters were selected at random from a list of registered voters. Only voters determined likely to attend the 2016 South Carolina Republican primary were included in the sample.

Two questions served as selection variables. The first question asked whether the respondent intends to attend the primary on February 20th; all responses other than “definitely” or “voted absentee” were excluded from the dataset. The
second question asked whether the respondent knew where their primary will be held (e.g. church, school); all responses of “I don’t know” (for those who did not vote absentee) were excluded from the dataset.

NBC/WSJ/Marist

Claimed Result: Trump 28, Rubio 15, Cruz 23, Bush 13, Kasich 9, Carson 9
Claimed Winner Margin: Trump +5
Status: Invalid survey results
Why?: The sample is not drawn from the first adult contacted regardless of sex. Instead, the survey targeted the youngest male first.

As well, the randomness of the survey became further eroded when matching against another sample with embedded error.

Also the survey is spread over a few days, which calls into question voting based on different news about candidates.

Flawed Methodology:
This survey of 2,567 adults was conducted February 15th through February 17th, 2016 by The Marist Poll sponsored and funded in partnership with NBC News and The Wall Street Journal. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the state of South Carolina were interviewed in English by telephone using live interviewers.

Landline telephone numbers were randomly selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the state of South Carolina from ASDE Survey Sampler, Inc. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. To increase coverage, this landline sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of cell phone numbers from Survey Sampling International.

Respondents in the household were randomly selected by first asking for the youngest male.

Both samples were matched by telephone number to a voter registration list for the state. Voter information was appended to each matched case. Assistance was provided by Luce Research for data collection and L2 for voter registration information.

After the interviews were completed, the two samples were combined and balanced to reflect the 2013 American Community Survey 5-year estimates for age, gender, income, and region except for race, which is from the 2010 census.

Results are statistically significant within ±1.9 percentage points. There are 2,282 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within ±2.1 percentage points. Among registered voters, 823 had a phone match in the voter file and 1,459 did not. The results for these subsets are statistically significant within ±3.4 percentage points and ±2.6 percentage points, respectively. There are 1,227 voters in the potential Republican primary electorate. The potential Republican primary electorate in South Carolina includes all voters who prefer to vote in the Republican presidential primary and those who identify as Republicans or Republican leaning independents without a primary preference.

There are 836 voters in the potential Democratic primary electorate. The potential Democratic primary electorate in South Carolina includes all voters who prefer to vote in the Democratic presidential primary and those who identify as Democrats or Democratic leaning independents without a primary preference. The results for these subsets are statistically significant within ±2.8 percentage points and ±3.4 percentage points, respectively.

There are 722 likely Republican primary voters and 425 likely Democratic primary voters defined by a probability turnout model which determines the likelihood respondents will participate in the 2016 South Carolina Republican/Democratic Presidential Primary based upon their chance of vote, interest in the election, and past election participation. The results for these subsets are statistically significant within ±3.6 percentage points and ±4.8 percentage points, respectively. The error margin was not adjusted for sample weights and increases for cross-tabulations.

POLLING DONE RIGHT

The SC House GOP has done polling right.

Claimed Result: Trump 34, Rubio 18, Cruz 19, Bush 12, Kasich 8, Carson 5

Claimed Winner Margin: Trump +15

Why?: Respondents were contacted on the same day. The questions were asked in the same way. The calls were placed at random. The first adult contacted was the accepted contact.

Solid Methodology:

Likely Republican presidential primary voters were selected at random from a list of registered voters based on party participation and registration date. Household ages and locations were extracted as well from this list. In excess of 180,000 households were called over the duration of the poll. Each household participant was asked to opt-in to the survey if they planned to vote in the 2016 SC presidential primary.

Using automated voice response technology allows each participant to hear the questions exactly the same way, from the same voice, spoken with the same tone and nuance. Calls are placed to randomly-selected phone numbers through a stratified process that insures approrpiate geographic representation. These calls were placed from 10:30am to 8:30pm local time on Thursday, February 18th.

POPE FRANCIS ISSUES A MOHAMMADAN-STYLE FATWA AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. TRUMP HAS JESUS ON HIS SIDE.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:40:00 -0800

“A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian." ~ Francis, Theocratic President of Vatican City & Religious Leader of the Holy See

Today, the religious leader of the Roman Catholics decreed what is akin to a fatwa — a ruling on a point of Islamic law given by a recognized authority. In the Pope's case, he issued a Catholic-fatwa — a ruling on a point of Catholic indoctrination by Frankie himself.

With his Catholic-fatwa, the Roman Catholic Church boss Francis attacked Donald Trump. When commenting about Trump's stance on illegal aliens coming into the USA and committing violent crimes, Francis said, “I say only that this man is not Christian if he has said things like that.”

Trump replied, "For a religious leader to question a person's faith is disgraceful. I'm proud to be a Christian. And as president, I will not allow Christianity to be consistently attacked and weakened, unlike what is happening now with our current president.".

Anyone who claims that someone else doesn't love Jesus and believe Jesus died for every man and woman's sins isn't sharing the gospel. Since Trump believes in Jesus and loves Jesus, Trump has the gospel right.

The good news — good spell, hence gospel — about Jesus is so easy and clear. Yet, most religious men fail to preach it much less understand it.

✓ WHY JESUS? WHAT IS THE TRUE GOSPEL? HERE IS THE ONLY GOSPEL FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD

Francis doesn't understand Jesus and does not speak for Jesus. Of this, all can be sure.

Let's let Jesus speak on the matter of the Pope vs Trump:

"Condemn not, so that you may not be condemned. For according the sentence you pronounce, you yourself be convicted; and with same measure with which you measure, you will be measured." ~ Matthew 7:1-2

And more:

"But why do you take notice the dust in your brother's eye, you cannot observe the chip in own eye? or how can you say your brother, 'Let me remove the from your eye,' while the chip is your own eye? Pretender! First remove the chip from your own eye, and then you will see straight to remove the dust from the eye of brother." ~ Matthew 7:3-5

And now let's see what Jesus would say about Pope Francis and the Roman Catholic Church as he runs it and as it has been run by all the preceding popes:

"But guard yourselves from false teachers, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but who in hearts are plundering wolves. You can recognise them by their fruits. Do they ever gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles? Thus every useful tree produces useful fruit; but the worthless tree produces worth less fruit. A useful tree cannot produce bad fruit; nor can a worthless tree produce good fruit. Every tree not producing good fruit will be felled and used as firewood. Reject their produce; for by this you can recognize them." ~ Matthew 7:15-20

And:

"Not every one who says to Me, 'Master! Master! will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven; but only those who do the will of My Father Who is in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Master! Master! have we not preached in Your Name? and have we not cast out demons in Your Name and in Your Name have we not done many wonders?' And then I shall declare to them, 'I never knew you depart from Me you traders in lawlessness!'" ~ Matthew 7:21-23

MARCO RUBIO SMEARED. WATCH AN EXAMPLE OF AN EXCELLENT SMEAR AD AGAINST AMNESTY RUBIO.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:42:00 -0800

Ignore for the moment that both Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are illegal candidates. This is ad is worth a watch.

✓ IS NATIVE-BORN MARCO RUBIO A NATURAL-BORN AMERICAN OR IS RUBIO ANOTHER CANDIDATE INELIGIBLE TO SWEAR THE PRESIDENCY OATH LIKE NATURAL-BORN CANADIAN TED CRUZ?

✓ THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

✓ TAKE OFF, EH. IS TED CRUZ IS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN? PUNDIT LAWYERS GET THIS SO WRONG, THE HOSERS.

✓ TED CRUZ COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HIGHEST SERVICE TO HER MAJESTY, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, IN CANADA. SO HOW CAN TED BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA?

✓ WAS TED CRUZ A U.S. CITIZEN AT BIRTH? THE MCCARRAN-WALTER ACT (THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT OF 1952) WHICH THE RULED OVER HIM SAYS MAYBE, BUT IT ALSO COULD HAVE STRIPPED HIM OF CITIZENSHIP

✓ THE 8 U.S. CODE § 1401 DEFENSE OF TED CRUZ FAILS TO SUPPORT CRUZ' NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP, BUT DOES MAKE HIM A CITIZEN.

MOOKIE SPIKE LEE NEVER CAN DO THE RIGHT THING. THE EVIL STUPIDITY OF BLACKISM AND THE POLITICS BLACKS NEED MOST. #BLACKSSORACIST

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:38:00 -0800

Recently, black entertainers have taken to the Internet and television to decry the awards given to those who produce motion pictures. Their rallying cry is an Internet hashtag, #Oscarssowhite.

What is the flip side to #Oscarssowhite? Why does a guy like Spike Lee care so much about getting rewards from whites? It is as if Spike Lee seeks praise from whites as a means to self-validation.

"Look, look massah. I done good. I done made this here picture show jes like you good white folk do. So hows bouts gimme me ones youse statues? Please massah, please."

Guys like Spike Lee simply lack intellects needed for deep contemplation on such matters. Worse, hobbled by inferior intellects, guys like Spike Lee engage in little more than blackism.

Would Spike Lee prefer blaxsploitation type dialogue and roles in movies? Would the rest of us?

If Spike Lee cared about his people, Spike Lee would only tell black stories with full black casts, made by all-black crews and only shown in Magic Johnson theaters.

Now, because of #Oscarssowhite, who can believe if Denzel Washington really won or he was given an Affirmative Action Oscar? Were the Oscars of Jamie Foxx, Forest Whitaker, Halle Berry, Jennifer Hudson, Mo'Nique, Octavia Spencer and Lupita Nyong'o merely Affirmative Action Oscars? Suspiciously, all of them supposedly won theirs during the 2000s.

Did Steven Rodney McQueen and John Ridley win their Affirmative Action Oscars for Best Picture and Adapted Screenplay for 12 Years a Slave merely because a slavery themed movie would automatically win in the same way an AIDS movie or gay movie would win (Dallas Buyers Club, Philadelphia, Milk)?

No longer can I believe that any Oscar won in the 2000s by Americans with swarthy skin are legitimate wins. Because of #oscarssowhite, I can only believe those Oscars were Affirmative Action gifts.

Blackism is a horrible doctrine. Until Americans see themselves as full-fledged citizens and individuals first, nothing with change for them.

Indian Reservations have been a bad deal for tribal Americans. Ben Franklin wanted to admit tribal Americans into the union as co-equal states. Yet look how it turned out for them.

Anyone who is a slave-descendant American need only look to tribal Americans to see the error in segregation of any kind, whether by treaty, force or self-imposed. Blackism is self-imposed segregation forged under mythical sub-cultural bonds that don't exist.

Slave-descendant Americans need to awaken to their individualism and reject blackism. Blackism that has arisen from the civil rights movement has been a hex upon slave-descendant Americans. Its latest iteration — #blacklivesmatter, space spaces — only is driving slave-descendant Americans further into a trap from which they won't escape.

Blackism is the chief cause of poverty among blacks in the USA. Poverty isn't caused by a lack of cash. It's caused by a lack of trust of your fellow man, the kind of trust you need to foster economic growth thru credit.

The only way blacks are ever going to be given the skills, the mindset needed to escape poverty is if the black subculture gets eradicated in the USA. Instead, its been encouraged to flourish since the 1960s. Since the 1960s, so-called blacks have put themselves on the path of American Indian. They have isolated themselves. They continue to attack the mass of individuals, wrongly labeling each of us as racist.

Until blacks ditch their subculture / counterculture and embrace individualism, they will continue to struggle. It's impossible to be in society — free association — with all who seek that when some organize into a group, a cult — in this case blackhood — in an exclusionary manner.

And to this day, it is shame to Congress for flooding the USA with Mexicans and illegal Mexicans and other illegals from Central America without taking care of our first nations people.

Slave-descendant Americans need to reject blackism and embrace the surest path to raising themselves up — a deportation of all illegal aliens, a moratorium on all legal immigration not for months, but perhaps years, and cancellation of all works visas in the USA.

Illegal immigration and excessive legal immigration has only undermined the livelihoods of Americans who claim to be black.

True racism is the doctrine of those who organize into a group based on an arbitrary characteristic such as skin color (blacks), other-than English language spoken (Hispanics/Latinos), sexual preferences (gays) or sex (feminists) and then who seek superior rights.

Racism is civil war by other means. Racists seek to acquire the property (right of ownership) by force as all do who engage in war. True racists strive to prevent those they oppose from trading property for property either through law or through collusion because of race — being one of people of common descent.

Racism will end when racists ditch their respective racist groups — blacks, Hispanics, gays, feminists — and when individuals pressure politicians as law givers to stop giving extra rights to those who become part of these racist groups.

Watch the best "black" actor ever, Kirk Lazarus.

AHAB MOBY DICK RACISM. WHAT THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT IS ALL ABOUT — HUNTING THE GREAT WHITE MALE.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:25:00 -0800

The Great White Male is the great white whale, the Moby Dick for all racists and feminists. They're all Captain Ahabs.

Their template is the same:

[Group X] is a worthy cultural contributor.
[Group X] has a history of oppression.
Through their economic and political dominance, white males have been the oppressors of [Group X].
Therefore, [Group X] needs reparations.
And White Males need to be stripped of economic power and political power.

You can put any name for Group X — blacks, chicanos, women, homosexual men, homosexual women — and the argument always works.

I devised that template from extrapolating what I saw bleeding into the Internet back in 1996 from 20-somethings who were fresh from hearing preaching and sermons from their university professors. That template works for Afro-American Studies, Latino Studies, Women's Studies, LGBT Studies, Asian-American Studies, you name it.

That should go to you show you that such academic programs and departments are little more than political agencies of leftist Marxism masquerading as higher education.

Every group you can imagine more than for themselves is against one group — white males, straight white males, mostly.

NAACP are against white males more than for themselves.
NOW are against white males more than for themselves.
La Raza are against white males more than for themselves.

Even white females are against white males. They know they can breed with males of any race. They too see the great white male as their Moby Dick.

Social justice warriors are leftists who leverage feminism, blackism, Hispanicism, homosexism (political homosexuality). Their goal is to eradicate heterosexual white males. Their chief strategy is to label their anointed adversary — white males — as racists. One of their many tactics is to stifle any dissent by saying any speech that questions their motives or agenda is politically incorrect “hate speech.”

Another tactic is to claim white males derive privilege merely from being white and male. That is why they say "Check your privilege."

And thus, they rely upon the template to claim white males perpetrated social injustice against themselves or those alike to them in the past. They try to appeal to the innate sense of fairness — its fair to divide a pie equally among everyone — to agitate for what they claim is social justice. Social justice takes typical get expressed as reparation or quotas, in short, anything that advances themselves at the expense of others most of whom are white males.

Quite often, their arguments rely upon the fallacy of consensus gentium. Mostly, they leverage peer pressure, particularly the fear of being outcast from the group for not accepting the group ethos.

As I showed you in THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS THE MOST DANGEROUS HATE GROUP IN THE USA TODAY. KEEP YOUR DAUGHTERS AWAY FROM THEM., Social Justice Warriors use the same method used by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Everett Dean Martin knew all about the machination of evil groups way back in 1920 as he reveals in his work Behavior of Crowds.

As stated above, their goal is to rid themselves of white guys. Yet, only dead white guys and specifically, dead Protestant Christian white guys founded and created the United States of America. No other persons did. Women didn't. Blacks didn't. Hispanics didn't.

King James authorized all of the colonization of America. King James was a white guy and now is a dead white. King James was a Church of Scotland, Church of England Christian Protestant guy. United States history is really a combined history of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, colonial America and the United States itself. And it's almost exclusively a history of dead white guys, almost all of whom were Protestant Christians.

CHRISTIANS FOUNDED AMERICA, NOT ATHEISTS, NOR JEWS, NOR HINDUS, NOR BUDDHISTS, NOR MUSLIMS.

The dead Protestant white guys of the British Enlightenment were the ones who promoted freedom and individualism.

Everywhere the earth over and for all time, all colored people have promoted tribalism and servitude. There isn't a country on earth today or in the past dominated by colored people who devised the concepts of freedom and individualism that whites did during the era of the British Enlightenment.

In every country on earth occupied by a majority of colored people, if they have anything at all, they have come by it exclusively through white men primarily white men of North Sea Germanic ancestry. The de facto language of commerce, politics and science is the white man's English. All thoughts thought in English are white thoughts and white concepts. The de facto rules of commerce were devised by whites.

It's not coincidence that almost all migration goes from lands of color people with sovereignty to lands of whites with sovereignty.

The basis of an authentic America and thus an authentic cradle-to-grave life for all Americans still ought to be meritocracy — rewards go to those with superior intellects, skills, characters.

If anyone hates that, he or she should hate his parents and his ancestry for their inferior DNA.

Historical realism trumps any fool's charge of white supremacist every time.

FORGET SCALIA. DEATH COULD COME FOR THREE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (SCUSA) SOON ENOUGH.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:53:00 -0800

With the death of Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCUSA) justice Antonin Scalia, politicians and pundits have gone into overtime arguing over the merits and demerits of blocking any Obama nomination. Democrats demand that an Obama nomination should be vetted quickly and confirmed. Republicans demand that Obama must be thwarted and thus leaving it up to the next president.

Forget Scalia. His death is but one vacancy. The real story of the SCUSA is the aged state of three justices — Kennedy, Ginsburg and Breyer.

It's likely that all three either die or become incapacitated over the next eight years. So whoever gets sworn in as president in January, 2017, likely will put three new judges on the SCUSA and thus change the trajectory of law-of-the-land legal rulings for decades to come.

All three aforementioned judges are either nearing or have past life expectancy for the typical American. Kennedy Is 79 and and a half. Stephen Breyer is 77 and a half. Ginsburg is a decrepit 82 and 11 months.

Removing those judges from thought, right now the court has three republican nominated judges — Clarence Thomas (67), John G. Roberts (61), Samuel A. Alito (65). Two Democrat nominated judges sit on the court — Sonia Sotomayor (61) and Elena Kagan (55).

The Republicans should not be short-sighted here. They should pressure Obama to nominate a left-of-center judge and then confirm that judge, quickly, but after the ruling session, which maybe ends in June.

The next president needs to nominate three Scalia-type judges to replace Kennedy, Breyer and Ginsburg when their days are done.

Also, it's time to put a Protestant Christian back on the SCUSA. As it is right now, only Roman Catholics and Jews sit on the US Supreme Court — Catholics: Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor; Jews — Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan.

Yet, American jurisprudence has its basis in Protestant Christian morality and thought. It has nothing from Catholic or Judaic thought.

IS THE RESTORATIONIST DONALD TRUMP GOING TO DITCH THE GOPHER PARTY?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:06:00 -0800

After the first debate for the 2016 Republican Party nomination, the head of the Republican party badgered front runner Donald Trump to sign a pledge to support the Republican party nominee should Trump lose. Trump did so. And then the party itself began attacking Trump. Trump has declared the deal to be void.

In many ways, a Trump presidential victory as an independent would be much sweeter. A Trump win as an independent would a crushing blow to party politics in general. This would be dangerous for professional politicians allied with either of the two parties who work in collusion against all others.

It would be a historical first if Trump would win as an independent.

There hasn't be someone who has won an electoral college vote also who was not a Democrat nor a Republican since John Hospers won one vote as a Libertarian in 1972. There hasn't been a candidate not a Dem or GOPher who has won a sizeable number from the electoral college since Theodore Roosevelt won 88 as a Progressive in 1912.

Though the winner of the Republican party nomination twice and twice elected president of the United States, the Republican party establishment reviled Ronald Reagan. They did their best to derail Reagan from winning the nomination as well as the presidency. The establishment hated Reagan.

The ex-Democrat Ronald Reagan was not really a conservative. Reagan so much wanted to be a restorationist president.

Today, Trump is the restorationist candidate. Trump seeks to return the USA back to its wholesome core and away from the failed doctrines of globalization. The candidates are globalization open-borders, H-1B visa internationalists.

Americans who want a restorationist candidate won't care if Trump is the GOP nominee or an independent. Trump is that candidate (see: THE FOUNDERS OF THE USA WERE RADICALS. THEY WERE NEVER CONSERVATIVES NOR TRIBALISTS. YOU MIGHT BE A RESTORATIONIST BUT LIKELY YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE NOR TRIBALIST).

Independents are the largest "party" in the USA! In 2014, 43% of Americans identified politically as independents. Only 26% of Americans self-report as Republicans. The time is now for a National Independence Party.

What have the post-New Deal Republican and Democratic parties given Americans since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of communism?

Globalization has been a disaster for working-class Americans.
Open-borders illegal immigration of Central Americans and Mexicans has been a disaster for working-class Americans.
Excessive legal immigration has been a disaster for working-class Americans.
Obamacare and the end of the Gingrich-Clinton welfare reform has been a disaster for Americans.
Unneeded wars in the Middle East have been a disaster for Americans.
Muslim immigration and Muslim education visas were a disaster to all those on 9/11 who had to leap to their deaths from the World Trade Center.

There have been way too many immigrants from too many countries from when George Herbert Walker Bush took office through Obama.

Immigration law should follow two good, easy rules:

Foreign-born population never should exceed 5% of total population in any year.
No one should gain entry into the USA with an IQ under 105.

Americans need smarter people not stupider ones. It takes about an 118 IQ to complete a four-year degree in the sciences at an accredited university.

The globalization agenda pursued by post-Reagan Bushian Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats — so-called neo-liberalism — has everything to do with the rise of Trump and perhaps the now forming National Independence Party.

In my years, I have found almost all to be budding, teeny tyrants in the making. To them, it's always all right to steal property from others who are better off than they are to fund their personal Utopia schemes, e.g., save the whales, save the blacks, save the this. And property has always only meant the right of ownership in things. Too many don't know the first thing about jurisprudence. So they don't know that property doesn't mean chattel possessed, e.g., a house. For landlords have property in rentals but never have possession of those rentals, renters do.

So this is why all should see reality for what it is — most of mankind live in the throes of evil by choice. They are greedy and slothful. They seek only to join forces with enough others to force the weak or the solitary types to fork over parts of their honest dealings. It's enslavement by other means.

The righteous man or woman believes in a few things: Society is more important than government; government should only exist to protect individuals as individuals and never groups; there should be no specific welfare or subsidy of any kind.

All other belief is error and reveals corruption as well as malformed character.

Soon I will present what the platform and agenda of a National Independence Party might look like. Until then:

U.S. PRESIDENTS, THEIR PARTIES AND THE FAILURES OF TODAY'S PRESIDENTS

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:46:00 -0800

The first presidential election featuring at least two parties happened in 1792. George Washington, the winner of that election, returned Washington to the presidency not as a member of a political party. The losers were political party members, John Adams of the Federalist party and George Clinton of the original Republican party (wrongly called the Democratic-Republican Party today by historians).

U.S. Presidents from 1789 to 1901

After Washington, the Federalist Party gave us John Adams. The original Republicans gave us Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe and John Quincy Adams.

The original Republican party of Jeffersonian democracy best exemplifies what many Americans would like to have today — republicanism. Among the Jeffersonian democracy core ideals are these:

The Bill of Rights is supreme — The federal government must not violate the rights of individuals.
The federal government must not violate the rights of the states.
Freedom of speech and the press are the best methods to prevent tyranny.
Separation of church and state
All men had the right to be informed, and thus, to have a say in the government.
The judiciary should be subservient to the elected branches.

Along the way, other political parties came and went. These parties produced national candidates for the presidency but with the exception of the Whig Party, never won: the National Republicans (not to be confused with today's Republican Party), the Nullifer Party, the Anti-Masonic Party, the Whig Party, the Liberty Party, the Free Soil Party, the American Party (aka "Know Nothing"), the Constitutional Union Party, the Liberal Republican Party, the Greenback Party, the Prohibition Party, the Union Labor Party, the Populist Party, the Socialist Party, the Progressive Party of 1912, the Progressive Party of 1924, the Union Party, the States' Rights Democrat Party ("Dixiecrats"), the Progressive Party of 1948, the American Labor Party, the American Independent Party. A few lesser parties still exist: the Libertarian Party, the Reform Party and the Green Party.

The Whig Party gave us William Henry Harrison, John Tyler, Zachary Taylor and Millard Fillmore.

The original Democratic Party came into being in 1828. The original Democratic Party advocated individual liberalism, the good kind of liberalism — the supremacy of freedom rather than regulation combined with representative democracy. The original Democratic Party of 1828 attempted to express British Enlightenment ideals.

Today, the Democratic Party advocates what they call social liberalism. What they support is merely socialism — the supremacy of law rather than freedom combined with universal voting rather than representative democracy, the supremacy of the community over the individual, wealth redistribution to equalize incomes regardless of effort, along with regulatory intervention to game outcomes.

I would have been a Democratic Party supporter had I lived in 1828. Never could I be a supporter of the post-16th Amendment Democratic Party. Their beliefs are unscientific and their agendas unenlightened.

The original Democratic Party gave us these: Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, James Polk, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson and Grover Cleveland.

Continuously operating party since 1854, there have been three versions of the anti-slavery Republican Party — the original anti-slavery radical version, the post-reconstruction version and the post-New Deal contemporary Republican version.

The anti-slavery Republican Party gave us these: Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes. The post-reconstruction Republican party gave us these: James Garfield, Benjamin Harrison, William McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover.

U.S. Presidents from 1901 to 2016

Today's post-16th Amendment Democratic Party has given us these: Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama. Today's post-New Deal Republican party has given us these: Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush.

On the whole Republicans have produced bad presidents. Some of the worst presidents have been Republicans — Lincoln, Grant, Nixon, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush. Teddy Roosevelt and Eisenhower were so-so Republican presidents. Harrison, Taft, and Ford were mediocre at best. Hayes and Harding were bad. Garfield died in office too quickly to know if they would have been good or bad.

Before Reagan, the only great Republican president was Calvin Coolidge. The only other good Republican presidents were Chester Arthur and William McKinley. It should be noted that Arthur was not elected.

The post-New Deal Republicans mostly have been loser presidents.

Nixon — closed the gold window pulling Americans off gold for international balance of payments; price controls; Watergate; saddled Americans with the EPA.
Bush 1 — worked for the Saudis to oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait; we read his lips and then he raised taxes; started the Kinder Gentler NWO USA; accelerated immigration; established the globalization doctrine for Republicans.
Bush 2 — idiot wars against Afghanistan and Iraq; let the Saudi Arabians murder 3,000 Americans and didn't attack the Saudis; nodded approval over the residential realty bubble; Bush's Iraq War led to a post-war civil war among vying tribes and the rise of ISIS; failed to support a sovereign Kurdistan in the aftermath of his stupidity; did little to stem the flow of illegals which came to build realty bubble houses many of which still remain empty; infamously said, "I've abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system," to justify bailing out bankrupt General Motors and bankrupt Chrysler; saddled Americans with the Department of Homeland Security

As well, all of the social liberal Democrats have been among the worst presidents.

Woodrow Wilson — lied about keeping Americans out of World War (1), signed the Federal Reserve bill into law.
Franklin Roosevelt — wickedly used welfare as a carrot to get votes; stuck Americans with a raw deal called the New Deal; lengthened a depression into a Great Depression; and sided with the Soviets over eastern Europe.
Harry Truman — needlessly killed Japanese civilians with two atomic. bombs. He could have dropped those bombs away from civilians to prove a point.
John Kennedy — almost had us all blown up in a nuclear war; started the shameful Vietnam War.
Lyndon Johnson — escalated the shameful Vietnam War; stuck us with the Civil Rights Act and crappy Hart-Celler Act (pro-third world immigration law).
Jimmy Carter — sold off the Panama Canal; failed to back the Shah, which led to a theocracy in Iran that fuels global terrorism; saddled Americans with the Department of Education, Department of Energy
Obama — is a strong candidate for the worst president ever; stuck Americans with Obamacare; ISIS; works as Mohammadan apologist; presided over an economic depression lasting his entire presidency

Here is my take on the presidents.

Best: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson
Better: Andrew Jackson, James K. Polk, Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, Calvin Coolidge, Ronald Reagan
Good: Chester A. Arthur
OK: John Tyler, Andrew Johnson, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Bill Clinton
Lame: John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Martin Van Buren, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, Rutherford B. Hayes, William Howard Taft, Gerald Ford
Bad: James Monroe, James Buchanan, Ulysses S. Grant, Warren G. Harding, Herbert Hoover, Jimmy Carter
Worst: James Madison, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, Barack Obama
No opinion: William Henry Harrison, James A. Garfield

THE LAST GASPS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. WHAT REINCE PRIEBUS MUST DO TO RESCUE THE INTERNATIONALIST GLOBALIZATION GOPHER PARTY FROM THE DONALD TRUMP JUGGERNAUT, GO ALL IN WITH JOHN KASICH

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:00 -0800

The Trump march to victory should have been easy to see from the start by anyone. I've shared why with thousands.

As I stated before, it's going to be hard for a white guy to beat the first woman who has a shot at being the first woman president. In NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH), I showed you the inescapable reality of demographic science.

A Hillary as nominee would win in a landslide against the unliked Ted Cruz, the rookie Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush. A Bernie Sanders as nominee would beat the unliked Ted Cruz, the rookie Marco Rubio and low-energy Jeb Bush.

Only two candidates can beat either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. Those two candidates are Donald Trump and John Kasich. However, only Trump would triumph with ease. Kasich would have a fight against Hillary.

A Trump victory would be dangerous for professional politicians of all stripes, both the Republicans and the Democrats.

The Last Hope of the Professional Politician Republicans

And now I will share with you the only hope the Conservatives and their Republican Party can do anything about Trump.

First, Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus needs to come out and attack both natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz and native-born U.S. citizen but not natural-born American Marco Rubio. Priebus needs to run them out of the campaign. Priebus needs to declare them ineligible precisely because they are not natural-born Americans.

✓ IS NATIVE-BORN MARCO RUBIO A NATURAL-BORN AMERICAN OR IS RUBIO ANOTHER CANDIDATE INELIGIBLE TO SWEAR THE PRESIDENCY OATH LIKE NATURAL-BORN CANADIAN TED CRUZ?

✓ THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

✓ TAKE OFF, EH. IS TED CRUZ IS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN? PUNDIT LAWYERS GET THIS SO WRONG, THE HOSERS.

✓ TED CRUZ COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HIGHEST SERVICE TO HER MAJESTY, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, IN CANADA. SO HOW CAN TED BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA?

✓ WAS TED CRUZ A U.S. CITIZEN AT BIRTH? THE MCCARRAN-WALTER ACT (THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT OF 1952) WHICH THE RULED OVER HIM SAYS MAYBE, BUT IT ALSO COULD HAVE STRIPPED HIM OF CITIZENSHIP

✓ THE 8 U.S. CODE § 1401 DEFENSE OF TED CRUZ FAILS TO SUPPORT CRUZ' NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP, BUT DOES MAKE HIM A CITIZEN.

Next, Reince Priebus must denounce the candidacy of Donald Trump. Priebus should state that although Trump is running for the Republican Party nomination, the party intends to ignore the primaries and at convention, nominate an actual Republican Party candidate rather than an outsider who should be running as an independent.

And then Reince Priebus needs to put all the support behind who seems now as the unlikely candidate, John Kasich. The Republicans need to cut loose Jeb Bush.

Why Kasich?

So why John Kasich? Kasich is a governor with a long resume of political experience.

Kasich served nine terms in the House of Representatives. He sat on the House Armed Services Committee for 18 years and the House Budget Committee for six. With Kasich, the establishment Republicans can brag about his welfare reform and Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

Kasich is a known quantity to FOX News watchers. Kasich hosted Heartland with John Kasich from 2001 to 2007.

John Kasich does not come saddled with the baggage of the Bush family name. Americans loathe the Bushes. They see George W. Bush as a failure and an ignorant hick. They see his dad as wimpy and an enabler.

But the establishment Republicans have something much more to leverage in John Kasich. They can position John Kasich as a get-it-done pragmatist in times that demand a get-it-done pragmatist.

They can position John Kasich as a political deal-maker and not merely a real estate deal-maker lacking political experience.

Yet the establishment Republicans need to get Kasich to propose a tougher stance on illegal aliens in the USA. Simply, they need to get Kasich to take this stance:

I'm the grandson of immigrants, legal immigrants. My grand dad was Czech and my grand ma a Croatian. We grew up blue collar, skilled blue collar workers in the industrial heartland of Pittsburgh.

And my story is your story. Legal immigrants make America great. Illegal ones do not. So we need to send back all the working-age single men and women.

Illegal single men push down wages. We can't have that for our skilled American women and men who get up every morning and make the USA what it is. I'm going to stop your paycheck cuts caused by illegal immigrants.

But we can't kick out families. Kids who have been born here are as American as you or me, even if their parents did something wrong and came here illegally. So we're stuck with the parents who we need to take care of their kids.

So we're going to send back the working-age single men and women with no kids who are making it tougher for you to make ends meet while protecting American kids because that is fair.

And that is what my presidency is all about — not foolish communism and socialism like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton — and not a shoot-from-the-hip wild idea guy like Donald Trump who has no deal-making experience with Congress.

Right now, at his pace, John Kasich would need to spend $4.36 billion to secure the nomination. That is a crazy sum. Yet, Jeb Bush would need to spend $21.03 billion! Jeb Bush is loathed, universally so (see: IT'S THE DELEGATES, STUPID. HOW MUCH ARE CANDIDATES SPENDING TO WIN DELEGATES FOR THE 2016 PRESIDENCY?)

Disclosure: I am NOT supporting a John Kasich candidacy.

The Republican Party could be over with a Trump nomination and presidential victory. Trump easily could form a new party for a re-election bid run. That would kill the GOPher party for sure.

IT'S TIME. ABANDON TWITTER FOR TUMBLR. TUMBLR IS THE MASSIVELY BETTER ALTERNATIVE TO TWITTER.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:14:00 -0800

Two years ago, I showed how Twitter was dying:

And now, at Breitbart reports that Twitter executives are trying to control speech so as to run off from the platform anyone who isn't a leftist, social justice commie (see: MILO: Twitter ‘Embarking on a War Against Conservative Points of View’).

There is a capable alternative to Twitter — Tumblr. Tumblr has all the key features of Twitter and then some.

Tumblr is the anti-Twitter and anti-Blogger platform. Tumblr wins by doing two things:

Tumblr lets you hide through being obscure and pseudo-anonymous.
Since Tumblr lets you have more than one publishing stream, Tumblr lets you be found by friends and strangers by the identity of that stream.

Tumblr is like Twitter, Instagram and Facebook all rolled up into one. You can feed pictures, video, text or audio posts into your stream. You can re-share public content of others.

Tumblr has other great features. The Tumblr Dashboard lets you consume lots of content and “reblog” easily. Tumblr supports full animated GIFs

Before we get to it, I setup my Tumblr to look like Twitter using the easy to apply theme — Twitter Theme. So if you want to follow me, click here.

@ Mentioning

Like Twitter, Tumblr supports @mention other users. It's easy too. When writing a new post, type an @ symbol and as you continue to type, Tumblr will automatically complete ("autocomplete") from the names of those you follow or even strangers. Any user who you mention in a post will receive a notification.

The mentioning feature turns Tumblr into an IM-style chat tool.

Hashtags

Tumblr doesn't have those ugly in-text hashtags as you see Twitter that clog up your timeline. You add hashtags to the tags-field. You can write into your hashtags spaces, apostrophes, commas, dots, and many other symbols in your Tumblr hashtags.

Tumblr will index only your first five hashtags. So don't bother writing more than five hash tags.

Any hashtag search will bring up users for you to follow who recently used those hashtags. So hashtags are key for acquiring followers on Tumblr.

Tumblr filters hashtag search results by "most popular" by default. You can switch this to "most recent".

On the Tumblr dashboard, Tumblr has a “track your tags” feature so you can add hashtag search results to the dashboard side bar.

EMAIL Publishing

Write to Tumblr through email. Send an email to your Tumblr-given email publishing address. Use the subject line of the email for your title. You can even add hashtags at the bottom of the email.

For all of the ways to write content to Tumblr, check out Tumblr's Guide to Posting

Tumblr “Queue” System

Tumblr supports queueing. This lets you to line up posts into your queue for scheduled posts. It is simple to use. Once turned on, keep sharing stuff on your Tumblr. Tumblr will automatically stagger posts throughout the day. As well, you can embargo publishing of content until specific dates and times.

IT'S ISLAMOMISIA, NOT ISLAMOPHOBIA. THE WORLDWIDE PESTILENCE KNOWN AS ISLAM.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:21:00 -0800

There is no such thing is Islamophobia. There is only Islamomisia.

Saying there is Islamophobia is alike saying there is Marxistophobia or Communismophobia. Are there those who are Republicanophobic?

The practitioners of Mohammadism ("Islam") continue to be the worldwide cancer of mankind.

There are 1.62 billion misguided on this earth who are adherents of Mohammadism, a totalitarian doctrine steeped in pseudo-theology much much alike to the way communism was steeped in pseudo-science. Like communism, Mohammadism is a kind of tribalism, a doctrine diametrically opposed to individualism.

Mohammadans want to impose their medieval, unscientific, retrogressive totalitarianism upon the world, which they believe brings peace to all who are Mohammadans. To Mohammadans, the concept of peace for them means they will live in peace when they vanquish all non-believers.

If mankind wants world peace, Mohammadism must be eradicated. Almost all of the world's hot spot wars involve devout Mohammadans ("Muslims") seeking to rule by sharia law.

Anti-Civilization

Mohammadans and their doctrine of Mohammadism reject liberty, science and progress.

Followers of Mohammadism never can produce civilization much less live by civilization. For the true meaning of civilization is rule by impartial law in protection of the individual. And the true meaning of progress is the advance of the individual and his property, which is the right of ownership, from any overlord or over group acting in concert as an overlord.

If there has been life in Mohammadan communities, it has been life imparted from appropriated by conquest. Nothing they have has been generated by themselves.

95% of the wars on earth right now are being fought by Mohammadans against others in struggles to gain sovereign power under the guise of their religion. The other 5% are being fought by drug lords. For more, see: Wars in the World.

Mohammadans

The average IQ for the ummah — worldwide Mohammadans is 81. Before 1973, all psychologists would have considered the Mohammadan world as being mentally retarded. Today, Mohammadans are a mere 11 points what psychologists recognize as Mild Mental Retardation and nine points below what psychologists recognize as normal.

So few Mohammadans can complete Western-standards high school and college education.

Many Mohammadans have minimal independent self-help skills and simple learning skills. Though many can dress and bathe independently, they can do little more than simple jobs requiring little more than elementary school academics. They can live independently but with difficulties. At best, some can perform jobs with simple and repetitive tasks. Some can complete vocational education and live independently.

Mohammadism

Mohammadism is a wicked political doctrine masquerading as a religious doctrine. Mohammadism is a kind of totalitarianism, the same as Communism. Mohammadism is a kind of totalitarianism that hides behind pseudo-theology in the same way that communism hid behind pseudo-science.

Mohammadism is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich, micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below. The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology – a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.

Mohammadism was devised by a power-hungry madman, Mohammad, to control many other men, millions of them and eventually all, if his plan would be realized by him or his followers. All of the religious talk is a lever to get initiates to turn into true believers by submitting.

Mohammadism isn't one of the great religions of the world. Mohammadism is a bastardization of Judaism combined with false narratives about Jesus.

Mohammadism ("Islam") is the doctrine of a cult. Mohammadism has all of the telling signs of a cult. It's the largest cult among the world. The adherents of Mohammadism are hyper indoctrinated.

Mohammadism is a horrible doctrine of totalitarianism that only the mindless could follow. Mohammadism appeals to the masses with low IQs.

Though almost all Mohammadan males can't be part of the leadership — the upper echelon that enjoy the fruits of control, as all cult leaders do — Mohammadan males get to be dictators of their households. That is why there are 1.62 billion Mohammadan adherents to this pseudo-religion.

Even the claim of Mohammadans to having the "the religion of peace" is a great propaganda deception. For more on the truth of that, see right here on Bizarro Theater: MOHAMMADAN ("MUSLIM") ROSE HAMID DISRUPTS TRUMP RALLY IN AN UNPEACEFUL ACT WHILE CLAIMING TO COME IN PEACE.

Sharia Law and Sovereignty

Over half of the 1.62 billion Mohammadan world want to live under Sharia law or already do.The ummah — which is worldwide Mohammadans — want sharia law to replace all laws of every country on earth.

According to the writers of Wikipedia, an Mohammadan state is a state that has adopted Mohammadism, specifically sharia, as its foundations for political institutions, or laws, exclusively, and has implemented the Islamic ruling system — khilafah — and is therefore a theocracy.

Sharia is the official basis for state laws in the following countries:

Afghanistan (29.82 million)
Iran (76.42 million)
Mauritania (3.796 million)
Saudi Arabia (28.29 million)
Somalia (10.2 million)
Sudan (37.2 million)
Yemen (23.85 million).

Mohammadism is the official religion of Pakistan (179.2 million) and its Federal Sharia Court has the duty of striking down any law not complying with the Sharia Mohammadan law.

No one should be forced to give up his life and ways so that Mohammadans can dominate and impose their idiotic Sharia Law.

Militarism

Mohammadism is the military religion of the plundering Bedouin. Militarism, despotism, fatalism, polygamy, concubinage, and slavery cleave to it as parts of its nature everywhere and in all times.

Of all systems, Mohammadism seems to be about the most effectual for destroying spiritual, moral, social and political life ever devised by man of those Mohammadans seek to conquer.

Jihad

Jihad means the struggle to expand Mohammadism in effort to realize the Mohammadan ideal of world domination with Mohammadan leaders in control. Mohammadans seek to extend their borders as widely as they can. Under the Mohammadan ideal, only those who profess to be Mohammadans are allowed to live.

Mohammadans who do not join the fight are called hypocrites. To induce action through fear, their religious leaders try to scare them into joining in the jihad. The are told The Lah will send them to Hell if they do not.

Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:

“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Mohammadism, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Mohammadism: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Mohammadism; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Mohammadism, or die.”

Hijrah

Hijrah is Jihad by other means. Hijrah is the spreading of the Ummah — worldwide Mohammadans — through immigration. It is spreading the reach of Mohammadism through earthly migration.

ISIS / ISIS / Islamic State

As I shared with you in WE INTERRUPT YOUR PROGRAMMING TO BRING YOU OUR LATEST WAR AGAINST ISLAMIC JIHADISTS, ISIS, OH AND SYRIA, the first I in ISIS stands for Islamic. ISIS is the epitome of what it means to be Muslim and Islamic.

ISIS is the eptome of what it means to be a Mohammadan. In his speech, Obama listed the atrocities of ISIS — threatening those who are not Sunni Mohammadans with genocide, excution of prisoners, killing of children, raping of women, forcing women into marriages. In short, Obama pointed out that ISIS are Mohammadans who are carrying out Mohammadan jihad, though Obama failed to name it for what it is — Mohammadan jihad.

Mohammadism is False Theology

There is no con like a religious con and Mohammad was the biggest religious con artist of all-time. Mohammad was a confidence man who decided to set up his own religion to take over.

Mohammadism is radical, false theology, a radical Judaism. At bottom, Mohammadism is the bastard offspring of a Christian father and a Jewish mother. It's heresy, a heretical pseudo-Christian cult.

The basis of it is a badly plagiarized Judaism combined with heretical works about Jesus. An illiterate from the Arabian desert, Mohammad made it up from non-biblical sources including long rejected phony gospels written about Jesus. Scholars have studied this and have known this since the 1800s. The never-was-a-prophet Mohammad turned his badly plagiarized work into an aggressive war mongering doctrine.

The illiterate Mohammad must of thought of himself as the über Jew. The illiterate Mohammad who couldn't possibly have studied the Torah nor the Gospels as he demanded that Jews must believe more and Christians must believe less.

It's all too convenient when a guy claims an angel visited him and told him things that somehow the omnipotent creator of the universe inconveniently forgot to mention to a whole bunch of other people — the Jews — over thousands of years. Illiterate Mohammad's trick is akin to me claiming that I have been visited by the Jewish angel Gabriel only the other day and he said to me that God forgot to mention that he lied to Mohammad in a giant supernatural joke.

There is no evidence in the Koran that Mohammad ever read a copy of the New Testament. Yet, Mohammad gave a name to the New Testament. Mohammad called it the Injil.

Idiotically, Mohammad claims the New Testament was given to given Jesus. Considering the New Testament is a collection of books formed after Jesus' death, Mohammad's publicly-expressed idiocy alone reveals that Mohammad didn't know much of anything about Jesus and the rise of Christianity after Jesus' death.

Mohammad claimed that after Jesus left the earth, his disciples disputed as to whether he was a prophet like Moses or Isaiah or a part of the Godhead making up the Trinity as The Father, the Mother and the Son. Again, as the Trinity doesn't consist of Mary, Mohammad could not have been given the inspired word of God through Gabriel.

Its morality is vitiated and paralyzed as a motive by the admixture of the most abject ceremonialism — postures, pilgrimages, ablutions — with their most frivolous details being placed on a level with matters of its Law. Prayer being assessed by an absurd tariff according to the place in it is made.

For more on the false theology, see heading The Koran at the end of this work.

The Lah, a Puny False Deity

The monotheism of Mohammadism is unreal. Its The Lah is power who gives the world over as prey to Mohammadism.

To Mohammadans, the concept of peace for them means they will live in peace when they vanquish all non-believers. Any "god" who decides some will be unbelievers who reject Mohammadism so that anointed others can kill them could only ever be a great deceiver, a Satan and never any kind of god much less the real God.

Wouldn't a supreme being have the power to instantly kill off all the infidels and save his faithful all of the trouble of doing the work of a god?

How could the Lah have the power of a god much less be the God if the Lah must hire ordinary puny men to kill other men on his behalf? The Lah seems like a weak-assed wimp, a coward and hardly worthy of the title of god.

The Shahada

The basis of Mohammadism is a simple creed called the Shahada. As parroted by Mohammadans, the Shahada goes like this:

"there is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah."

But truly what Mohammadans are saying is this:

The God of Jesus won't save you (There is no god) Only Satan will (but Allah) and Muhammad is the spreader of Satanism (Muhammad is his messenger).

Mohammadans are telling the world: Don't worship God [There is no God]. Instead worship Satan [but Allah], and Muhammad is the messenger of Satan [Allah]."

Mohammad vs Jesus

There is a big difference between Mohammadism and what Jesus taught, which is separate from what men who go into the religion business peddle about Jesus.

Murder for Mohammad is the slogan of Mohammadism. No one on earth can deny that reality.

Mohammad taught anyone who wasn't willing to submit to Mohammad's plan ought to be murdered because that one lacked fidelity to Mohammad's plan. Hence Mohammad called them infidels. An infidel is someone who lacks fidelity, that is, exacting adherence.

The concept of dying for Jesus or dying to Jesus is most misunderstood by religionists of all stripes, be them adherents to Catholicism or a Protestant doctrine.

Jesus taught that man needed to lose himself, in essence, his old self had to die so that his new self could be born. And by that Jesus meant, that a man needed to stop adhering to the religion of other men, the foolishness taught by other men, that men had to stop following religious rules, and striving to be seen as pious by doing such foolery as praying in public.

Once a man had stopped all status seeking and approval through religion, a man could find his true self and in so doing, a man would be as a child, as all children implicitly love others who are good to them, who are kind to them, who even are normal to them without being overly kind or overly good to them.

Jesus was an individualist who taught without wavering, an individualist message, as the way to living a fulfilling, loving life in the right now, here on earth and not in some after life.

For the truth of the true gospel, the good news about Jesus and you, check out: WHY JESUS? WHAT IS THE TRUE GOSPEL? HERE IS THE ONLY GOSPEL FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD.

Sacrifice vs Marytrdom

Sacrifice is what Mohammadans do when they blow up themselves trying to kill others. Mohammadans are doing something to others — trying to kill them — and are willing to die trying to kill others for the sake of their deity, their Satan known as The Lah.

Early Christians were murdered for professing the truth of Jesus. In the history of early Christianity, some Christians were tortured to death for their professed belief. They experienced martyrdom.

Men can attest the word martyr in Old English and taken from Late Latin, in turn taken from Doric Greek to mean torture-witness. The word martyrdom means torture-witness judgment. In late the Old English period, men said the Latin word confessor to mean one who avows his religion especially in the face of danger, but does not suffer martyrdom.

Men can attest the word sacrifice to about 1300. Taken from the Old French, it means to offer something to a deity, especially a life in appeasement, duty.

Killing yourself for what you believe is sacrifice. Being killed by others is martyrdom.

Mohammadans engage in sacrifice during jihad. Christians killed by Romans, Mohammadans and others have been killed by martyrdom.

False Religion vs True Religion

True religion is individualistic and works as wisdom to guide an individual to betterment regardless what the mass of people do. True religion helps the individual help himself in his relationships with his fellows.

False religion requires submission of individuals to the dictates of the group. False religion leads the deceived to submit on their knees, to subordinate themselves to political leaders of all stripes, even those who speak with religious words. All cults rely upon false religion, whether communism, socialism or Mohammadism.

Anyone can follow Jesus on his own. No one can follow Mohammadism on his own. No one can follow communism on his own.

The Crusades

Many point to ancient history and the Crusades as the same evil, wrongdoing as Mohammadans. Crusaders were Roman Catholics.

To suggest they were Christians adhering to the teachings of Jesus rather than what they were doing — adhering to the teachings of popes and priests — is a huge stretch. That said, the Crusades began as a push back against the jihad of Mohammadans.

The Erased Genocide Against Armenians

The Ottoman Empire was the last caliphate. That is what the jokers behind ISIS, the wahhabist Mohammadans are trying to re-establish.

All should be reminded what happened to the Armenians under the last Mohammadan caliphate — Armenian Genocide. The caliphate Mohammadans slaughtered 1.5 million Armenians, all Christians who were members of either the Armenian Apostolic Church or the Armenian Catholic Church. As well, the caliphate Mohammadans of the Ottoman Empire slaughtered Assyrian Christians in the Assyrian Genocide and Christian Ottoman Greeks in the Anatolia Greek Genocide.

To give you perspective, in the Armenian Genocide, the caliphate Mohammadans wiped out the equivalent to Philadelphia, PA, or Phoenix, Arizona

U.S. Congress and the Obama Policy Toward the Middle East

What a mess Obama Administration has made in the world. The Obama policy of Containment is a failed, dangerous policy.

ISIS has already established a caliphate to attract Mohammadans to immigrate to the Islamic State. The Ummah — worldwide Mohammadans — see the rise of the Islamic State as a blessing from The Lah.

The right policy is to let Middle Easter Mohammadans fight it out until they kill each other. Perhaps it is time to block imports from all Sharia-law Mohammadan countries and prohibit exports to the same.

The Sunni Saudis and Kuwaits and their hated Shia neighbors, the Iranians, have the most to lose if ISIS were to prevail.

Instead, if the U.S. political establishment were to make peace with the Russians and then make the Russians Americans' biggest ally, Americans could isolate the whole Mohammadan Middle East, the source of worldwide craziness.

As well, Congress needs to divest Americans from any trade and cooperation with Saudi Arabians. The Saudi Arabians are the chief exporter of worldwide jihad. The Saudi Arabians with their wahhabism brand of Mohammadism fund almost all of the Wars for Mohammadan Conquest. They are trying to usher in an era of Mohammadan dominance.

U.S. Congress Policy Toward Domestic Mohammadism

Mohammadism and American life are incompatible. American life, or Americanism, if you prefer, arose from British Enlightenment idealism — the sanctity of the individual and his right of ownership (property). Further, Americanism arose from Protestant Christians establishing religious freedom for themselves.

There are no such persons as "American muslims". There are only Mohammadans or Mohammadans converts who have U.S. citizen status.

Congress needs to strip persons who practice Mohammadism from their non-profit religious status and designate them what they are — insurgents who are trying to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and the various states' constitutions so they can institute sharia law.

Mohammadans are Winning (for now)

Of late, the Mohammadans have been winning. They slaughtered Americans on 9/11 forcing many to leap 100 stories to their deaths. They booby-trapped our guys in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Obama has been importing Mohammadans into the USA more by the hundreds of thousands. These people will end up overthrowing the USA without ever firing a shot.

Even school district officials are giving off heathen holidays for Mohammadan worshipers.

Hope

Mohammadans need to awaken to their idiocy and renounce their evil way before it is too late. If only self-identifying Mohammadans would awaken to the cult under which they live and subjugate themselves. If only they would walk away from their warring, world-domination questing cult of Mohammed that claims they can usher in peace only first by murdering all who do not want to join their cult.

Everyone of the world would be safer if 1.62 billion individuals quit the warring, world-domination questing cult of Mohammed, a false-god totalitarianism of quite real hate.

Mohammadism is a political system, not a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and stops referring to it as a religion, there is no hope.

If mankind wants world peace, Mohammadism must be eradicated. It is the greatest evil of our time.

Doubters

Doubters need to learn the meanings of these words — taqiyya, ummah, hijrah, jihad, fatwa, kafir, hunda, haram.

Watch on YouTube what a Canadian woman Mohammadan activist says about her own religion — the statistics and the beliefs:

—————

Koran ("Quran")

The Koran contains at least 109 verses that call Mohammadans to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Mohammadan rule. Behold some of the words of the Koran.

Koran (2:191-193) -
"And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Mohammadans] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]...and fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah."
Koran (2:244) -
"Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Koran (2:216)
"Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
Koran (3:56) -
"As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Koran (3:151) -
"Soon shall We cast TERROR into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".
Koran (4:74) -
"Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."
Koran (4:76) -
"Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"
Koran (4:89) -
"They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."
Koran (4:95) -
"Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward"
Koran (4:104) -
"And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."
Koran (5:33) -
"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"
Koran (8:12) -
"I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."
Koran (8:15) -
"O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."
Koran (8:39) -
"And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah."
Koran (8:57) -
"If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."
Koran (9:5) -
"So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."
Koran (9:14) -
"Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace..."
Koran (9:20) -
"Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."
Koran (9:29) -
"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."
Koran (9:30) -
"And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"
Koran (9:38-39) -
"O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."
Koran (9:41) -
"Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them."
Koran (9:73) -
"O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."
Koran (9:88) -
"But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."
Koran (9:111) -
"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Koran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."
Koran (9:123) -
"O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."
Koran (25:52) -
"Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."
Koran (33:60-62) -
"If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."
Koran (47:3-4) -
"Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similtudes. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners,"
Koran (47:35) -
"Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"
Koran (48:17) -
"There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."
Koran (48:29) -
"Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves."
Koran (61:4) -
"Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way."
Koran (61:10-12) -
"O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity."
Koran (66:9) -
"O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."

IS NATIVE-BORN MARCO RUBIO A NATURAL-BORN AMERICAN OR IS RUBIO ANOTHER CANDIDATE INELIGIBLE TO SWEAR THE PRESIDENCY OATH LIKE NATURAL-BORN CANADIAN TED CRUZ?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:30:00 -0800

Back in January, I shared with you NATURAL-BORN U.S. CITIZENS. READ SNIPPETS FROM RECOGNIZED AMERICAN WORKS ON THE TOPIC INCLUDING CITED CASES.

As well, I have shared with you all of the legal reasons why the natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz is ineligible to become president of the United States of America in these:

✓ TAKE OFF, EH. IS TED CRUZ IS A NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN? PUNDIT LAWYERS GET THIS SO WRONG, THE HOSERS.

✓ TED CRUZ COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE HIGHEST SERVICE TO HER MAJESTY, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, IN CANADA. SO HOW CAN TED BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA?

✓ THE TED CRUZ CRIB SHEET. THE 34 REASONS WHY TED ISN'T NATURAL-BORN AND CAN'T BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

✓ WAS TED CRUZ A U.S. CITIZEN AT BIRTH? THE MCCARRAN-WALTER ACT (THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT OF 1952) WHICH THE RULED OVER HIM SAYS MAYBE, BUT IT ALSO COULD HAVE STRIPPED HIM OF CITIZENSHIP

Marco Rubio is a native-born U.S. citizen. That is not in question. Yet, being native-born does not equate with being natural-born.

All courts would recognize Rubio as a native-born under the 14th Amendment as well as under Congress' naturalizing law, 8 U.S. CODE § 1401. However, the purpose of the the 14th Amendment was to impose upon the states prohibition of passing laws that could strip ex-slave Americans of the full and equal protection of any law. The 14th Amendment fails to make anyone natural-born.

For more on the 14th see below. For more on 8 U.S. CODE § 1401, check out: THE 8 U.S. CODE § 1401 DEFENSE OF TED CRUZ FAILS TO SUPPORT CRUZ' NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP, BUT DOES MAKE HIM A CITIZEN.

A key concept of being natural-born is natural allegiance. Natural allegiance arises from jurisdiction and citizenship of parents.

A.O. Wright wrote, "A child born of American parents in any place under American [Congress] jurisdiction is unquestionably a natural-born American citizen." And when you think about it even without being a lawyer, this should seem right. If your parents are U.S. citizens and you're born in any of the 50 states or if you were born in any of the organized, incorporated territories of the United States, you're natural born.

Today, the USA lacks organized, incorporated territories. The last two became the states of Hawaii and Alaska.

When Marco Rubio was born, both of his parents were natural-born Cubans and citizens of Cuba residing within Florida, clearly a state of the United States of America. Marco Rubio's parents had natural allegiance to Cuba. They could have worked as spies for the Communist Castro Cuban government. They could have been sent to produce a Manchurian candidate.

As Rubio's parents lacked natural allegiance to Congress and as their natural-born son, that is, not adopted son, it's quite likely that Rubio also lacked natural allegiance to Congress in spite of being born under the jurisdiction of Congress.

Thus, it's quite likely that Marco Rubio is not a natural-born American and therefore, like natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio cannot swear the oath of office for the presidency of the USA.

It is the lack of citizenship of his parents that calls into jeopardy Marco Rubio's eligibility to run for the presidency.

And though many would like this to mean the entire Obama presidency has been illegal, it's not likely as Obama's mamma was a natural-born U.S. citizen.

Here is an interesting video from a woman who bills herself as Publius Hudlah. Hudlah publishes her work at Publius-Huldah's Blog

Natural Born Citizen Explained! from Publius Huldah on Vimeo.

Section 1 of the the Fourteenth Amendment states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall any State deprive any person of life liberty or property without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

In The Constitution of the United States: Notes of the Decisions of the Supreme Court Thereon from the Organization of the Court till October, 1900 Edwin Eustace Bryant wrote:

In Our Constitution: Why and How it Was Made - Who Made It, and What It Is, Edward Waterman Townsend wrote:

WHY EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION POLL FOR 2016 YOU SHALL SEE OR HEAR WILL BE WRONG

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:53:00 -0800

Every poll that you will see and hear reported by television broadcasters, hear reported by radio broadcasters, or read published by newspapers and websites regarding the upcoming presidential race will be fabricated and not scientific. Every survey will be flawed and unscientific. Thus no results they claim can get projected to the universe of voters.

Pollsters use a totally wrong, unscientific method. Typically, they survey between 700 and 1,000 people chosen randomly. Let's say these 1,000 people get chosen by equal distribution, that is, 20 in each state.

No one can project the results from a mere 20 persons to the universe of voters in any state. Thus, the number of surveys completed would be too small. Every statistician worth his salt should know this truth.

However, there is a far more damning reason why you should denounce all polls being foisted upon you. Because of the electoral college, the presidential election is fifty seven (57) separate elections and requires 57 surveys for full coverage to predict the full results. An accurate poll must account for the electoral college since presidential election doesn't get decided by the popular vote.

There is one election in each of 48 states that have winner-take-all elections for the electoral college electors. Two states, Maine and Nebraska, lack winner-take-all elections. Those states combine for nine elections.

According to The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration

The founding fathers established [the Electoral College] in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.

The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress.

The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. Your state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for your Senators.

Under the 23rd Amendment of the Constitution, the District of Columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purposes of the Electoral College. For this reason, in the following discussion, the word “state” also refers to the District of Columbia.

If a pollster did not need to account for the electoral college, to get a margin of error ± 4% would require 784 completed surveys at the 95% confidence level. Yet, because a presidential election is 57 separate elections and not one, proper polling requires 57 polls, each with 784 completed questionnaires for a margin of error of ±4%. That's 48 polls for the all-or-nothing states and nine polls for each electoral district of Maine and Nebraska.

For results that have a margin of error ±4% at the 95% confidence anyone surveying would need to complete 44,688 surveys and all on the same day! Otherwise, you don't have a scientifically conducted poll with results that can get projected to the universe of voters.

The math: 784 surveys × 57 = 44,688

The United States Election Assistance Commission, which Congress established by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) as an independent, bipartisan commission, serves as a national clearinghouse of information on election administration and produces the foremost data collection effort related to voter registration, election administration, and the ways in which Americans cast their ballots.

The EAC defines two concepts:

Voting Age Population (VAP): People who are 18 years of age or older, regardless of whether they are eligible to register to vote.
Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP): Persons who are citizens and of voting age (18 years or older). These numbers are estimates generated by the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey.

We only care about the CVAP numbers. With the CVAP numbers, for each state, we can adjust the number of needed completed questionnaires to the count of legal voters in each state and still maintain our targeted margin of error with confidence. As it turns out, we can cut down the number of completed questionnaires to 600 for each state, except Wyoming, which we can cut down by one less to 599.

Here is what the completed questionnaire counts should look like:

Also, if some of the survey respondents complete a questionnaire before a candidate said something controversial, say freeze all immigration from countries with Mohammadans, while other survey respondents complete\ the same questionnaire afterward, the results cannot be used since the opinions are collected on different facts. Time-sensitive surveys like voting surveys must be done on the same day for all respondents to be accurate.

Now, during the 2012 presidential election campaign, a pollster would have needed to complete 9,000 questionnaires all on the same day to predict Obama the winner.

Nearly all presidential election polls have completed survey counts of 500 to 1,000. Thus, the results from such polls cannot be projected to the universe of likely voters, hence such pollsters report wrong results. In short, do not believe any of those polls.

Also, every time another variable gets added, doubling of completed surveys must happen. So if a legit pollster wants to know how Latina females plan to vote, such a pollster would need to complete a whopping 89,376 surveys on the same day within a tight news window!

Every poll ever reported on television and every poll ever printed in a newspaper regarding presidential races have been fabricated. Such polls were never scientific. Until polls adopt the scientific method of polling, all future presidential polls will be wrong.

Disclosure: I used to work as the director of public opinion polling and marketing research for a Dow Jones owned newspaper. My grad work at S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications included public opinion polling.

IT'S THE DELEGATES, STUPID. HOW MUCH ARE CANDIDATES SPENDING TO WIN DELEGATES FOR THE 2016 PRESIDENCY?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:03:00 -0800

Delegates nominate. Primaries and caucuses exist to secure delegates for the nomination.

According to The U.S. Presidential Nominating Process by the Council on Foreign Relations:

In 2016, a Democratic candidate must secure at least 2,382 out of 4,763 delegates to become the party’s nominee. The number of delegates allocated to each state takes into account the state’s Democratic vote in the previous three presidential elections and its assigned number of Electoral College votes.

Meanwhile, a Republican candidate must secure at least 1,237 out of 2,472 delegates to win the party’s nomination. The Republican Party allocates each state ten delegates, plus three for each congressional district, and bonus delegates for states that contributed electoral votes to the party in the previous presidential election, as well those that elected Republicans to high offices.

Right now, at his pace, Jeb Bush would need to spend $21.03 billion to secure the nomination. Marco Rubio would need to spend $4.771 billion to capture the GOPher party nomination. John Kasich would need to spend $4.36 billion.

Jeb, Rubio, Kasich — they are not viable considering the national election might need another billion or two in spending.

Meanwhile, self-funded billionaire businessman Donald Trump would only need to spend $509 million to win the Republican nomination from restorationist voters.

Jeb Bush was the Republican Party establishment's anointed candidate. Bush would need to spend 97% more than Trump. Said another way, for every one dollar Jeb Bush would need to spend to capture the nomination, Donald Trump would need to spend only two pennies.

It's the price per delegate and securing the most delegates that counts.

TRUMP HAS "YUGE" WIN. TRUMP AFFECTS THE OUTCOME FOR HILLARY AS SHE FEELS TRUMP'S "BERN." TRUMP IS THE MOST INTERESTING MAN IN POLITICS.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:30:00 -0800

Two candidates stood tall among their competitors in their respective parties. Donald Trump smashed his Republican Party establishment rivals capturing more than twice as many votes as the runner up John Kasich and more than three times as many votes as other Republican Party establishment candidates — Cruz, Jeb Bush, Rubio.

For the Democrats, for every 100 voters for Hillary Clinton, there were 154 for Bernie Sanders. So how did Bernie win?

First, all should notice that as a senator from Vermont, Sanders could be considered a favored-son candidate in next door New Hampshire. Yet, here are the reasons:

The Democratic Party continues to shift further left.
As even more of a leftist, Bernie Sanders is the heir apparent to Obama.
Three movements have pushed the Democratic Party left — Occupy Wall Street, Obamacare, #blackslivesmatter (see: Have Democrats Pulled Too Far Left? Peter Wehner, New York Times, May 27, 2015)
Hillary is a Blue Dog (near-center) as her husband was.
Skilled white Americans who aren't college grads and who come from traditional Democrat families will be voting for Trump if they vote.

#BlackLivesMatter has put white Democrats under scrutiny. Because Hillary is in the race to become the first woman president along with the sex scandals of her husband as well as her own scandals, Hillary is failing under that scrutiny (see: STAND BY YOUR HILLARY? HILLARY, LIES, EMAIL SHENANIGANS, WORK SHENANIGANS. WHY VOTE FOR HILLARY?)

Bernie is the guy who wants to give it all to the down-trodden — no-job blacks, fast-food Hispanics, no-hubby young mommies — and take all from rich white folks who are only rich because of white privilege.

In short, Bernie won the young new Democrat vote while the blue-collar white traditional household Democrats either stayed home in protest against Hillary or because they plan to vote for Trump in the general election.

As I wrote back in late November, NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH, Trump is that extraordinary white guy.

Back on November 14, 2014, in Why Democrats Can’t Win Over White Working-Class Voters, Jamelle Bouie of Slate (disclosure: I don't read Slate. I found the work by googling), wrote that white working-class Americans without college degrees no longer want anything to do with the Democratic Party.

Bouie stated, "Democrats don’t have to win this group as much as they have to avoid a rout." Hillary is the kind of Democrat who needs that group but they're going for Trump.

In the absence of white, no-college, skilled working-class voters, the remaining Democrats who show up to the polls are the leftists. So it should surprise no one, the leftists voted for Bernie.

It should be clear. Trump is having a huge effect on both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Trump might be more responsible for Bernie Sander's success than Sanders himself.

Donald Trump slaughtered the establishment Republican Party candidates today. Trump did so without wasted effort. Trump visited New Hampshire a small number but the right number of times. Trump focused his campaigning in a narrow geographic corridor near the Massachusetts border and along the coast.

John Kasich the Ohio governor who always talks about his post office working dad spent big to win a distant second. Some reports say Kasich spent as much as $14 million. Kasich also visited tiny New Hampshire 100 times or so.

Kasich put his marbles in winning New Hampshire because his strategy is to avoid the south and focus on the Northeast and the Great Lakes.

Natural-born Canadian Ted Cruz squeaked passed Jeb Bush for third. Cruz barely won last week in the burnt-over state, Iowa. And Cruz needed shenanigans to swipe Ben Carson's support.

Likely, Cruz picked up voters from race dropout Rand Paul. New Hampshire swings libertarian as it is known as the home of the Free State Project.

Cruz continues to face questions about his likely illegal campaign. For more on that see:

Most Americans are neither conservatives nor socialists. Many Americans don't vote.

Most Americans are hopeful restorationists. Like most good Americans, Trump is a restorationist. Trump set the restorationist agenda — Make America Great Again.

Trump is the candidate disparate voters have sought for a long time. To Tea Party people, Trump is the Tea Party candidate. For Pat Buchanan types, Trump is the Buchanan candidate. For Ross Perot types, Trump is the Perot candidate.

Trump is the Restorationist candidate who can capture power from the establishment Republican Party.

For more on the rise of the restorationists, check out my key works:

And to understand the seismic shift in American politics, check out: ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?

THE FOUNDERS OF THE USA WERE RADICALS. THEY WERE NEVER CONSERVATIVES NOR TRIBALISTS. YOU MIGHT BE A RESTORATIONIST BUT LIKELY YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE NOR TRIBALIST.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:06:00 -0800

The founders were radicals. They weren't conservatives.

The founders overthrew the conservatives — the King and the British loyalists. They established a radical, new form of governance, one based on republicanism and a union of sovereign states, a kind of government never tried anywhere by any people before.

The aim of radicalism is to destroy. The aim of conservatism is to preserve. The aim of true liberalism is to improve.

Progress means going from tribalism to individualism. It is the move away from communism in women and property to individual ownership of self, in things and in agreement with other individuals, from feudal arrangements to individuals voluntarily organizing around the trade of property in pursuit of profit.

Most Americans are free-capitalism progressives. They support the general political movement that has been ongoing since the British Enlightenment of the supremacy of the individual over the group.

They support buying and selling of goods and their own labor. Thus, they support markets. They support earning wages and thus they support how they get wages, the profitable efficiency achieved from capital. They support profits and the profit principle (see: CAPITALISM. BECAUSE WITHOUT IT, YOU WOULD BE LIVING AS A BARE SUBSISTENCE SAVAGE).

They support the right to start your own business and compete fairly without the help of government. And they support the primacy of the individual through ardent defense of the individual and his property (see: COMMERCIAL REALITY. A CRASH-COURSE IN UNDERSTANDING HOW IT ALL WORKS and THE THEORY OF TRADING PROPERTY FOR PROFIT).

That is what being a progressive truly means. Real progressives champion the individual and his property. Being progressive does not mean being hip or being a libertine.

And most Americans are restorationists. They want to revert to full adherence to the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution. Today's Americans are restorationists who want to enforce the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution in pursuit of limited politicians, enforced competition, self-rule and entrepreneuralism.

Restorationists are not conservatives. No authentic Bill of Rights American who believes in free-enterprise and the Protestant work ethic ever should want to help the Conservatives.

True conservatism means to maintain power typically derived from land ownership or monopoly or oligopoly franchise owing to laws and regulations. Conservatives seek to prevent change for themselves by discouraging every bit of competition.

Conservatives oppose true competition and defense of the individual and his property. Conservatives who tend to be the super-rich of the establishment seek to use laws and regulation to form oligopoly in markets and keep down the Middle Class (see: KILLING THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THE "WE WANT YOU TO BELIEVE CAPITAL GAINS INCOME IS DIFFERENT" TRICK).Conservatives are the champions of crony politics (see: IT'S ALWAYS CRONY POLITICS, CRONY GOVERNANCE AND CRONY REGULATORY CAPTURE and TRY CRONY POLITICS, CRONY GOVERNANCE AND CRONY REGULATORY CAPTURE BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS CRONY CAPITALISM.)

The propagandists of the Republican Party have been lying to Americans for decades. They have used hot button issues — gay marriage, abortion — to gain support of good Americans and in so doing, gain the political power needed to push a globalization internationalist agenda that runs opposed to the shop keepers, mechanics, subcontractors and restaurateurs of the USA, you know, middle-class, small-businessmen. Republicans have tricked Americans into getting their votes by saying they would argue against abortion and gay marriage.

Notice, they never said they would stop these things. And they have not. Merely they have said they would argue against such things.

Conservatives whether Blue Dog Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans have been defending open-borders internationalism globalization for 40 years and massive immigration for over 50 years. The internationalism agenda of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of supporting massive immigration has been killing working-class Americans.

Conservatives fight to keep the existing state of affairs. The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution and the ongoing push for globalization. Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going.

Voting for conservatives rather than nationalists for the middle class is personal economic suicide for most Americans (see: AMERICANS ARE COMMITTING (ECONOMIC) SUICIDE DAILY WITH IPHONES AND IPADS).

Rockefeller Republicans and Bushian Republicans are True Conservatives. They stand opposed the American Middle Class and the Bill of Rights.

George Herbert Walker Bush and the GOP Establishment stopped The Reagan Revolution after Reagan's departure from the White House. GHW Bush was a Trojan Horse in the Reagan White House. GHW Bush turned control of the GOP back to the eastern establishment, center-left internationalists.

We have had 27 years of Bushism globalization and internationalism in the USA and that ideological stance has brought the USA to near ruins.

Republican conservatives are fighting to keep globalization going. Forty-seven Republican conservatives voted yea for TPP/Fast track. Many on the pro-TPP list also support illegal alien amnesty on the path to citizenship. They need to be voted out of office and replaced with Nationalists.

Lisa Murkowski (AK), Dan Sullivan (AK), Jeff Flake (AZ), John McCain (AZ), John Boozman (AR), Tom Cotton (AR), Cory Gardner (CO), Marco Rubio (FL), John Isakson (GA), David Perdue (GA), Michael Crapo (ID), James Risch (ID), Mark Kirk (IL), Daniel Coats (IN), Joni Ernst (IA), Chuck Grassley (IA), Jerry Moran (KS), Pat Roberts (KS), Mitch McConnell (KY), Bill Cassidy (LA), David Vitter (LA), Thad Cochran (MS), Roger Wicker (MS), Roy Blunt (MO), Steve Daines (MT), Deb Fischer (NE), Benjamin Sasse (NE), Dean Heller (NV), Kelly Ayotte (NH), Richard Burr (NC), Thom Tillis (NC), John Hoeven (ND), Rob Portman (OH), Jim Inhofe (OK), James Lankford (OK), Pat Toomey (PA), Lindsey Graham (SC), Tim Scott (SC), Mike Rounds (SD), John Thune (SD), Lamar Alexander (TN), John Cornyn (TX), Orrin Hatch (UT), Shelley Capito (WV), Ron Johnson (WI), John Barrasso (WY)

Here are the few Republican heroes who voted nay against TPP / Fast-track:

Jeff Sessions (AL), Richard Shelby (AL), Rand Paul (KY), Susan Collins (ME)

Ted Cruz (TX), Michael Enzi (WY).

For more right from Bizarro Theater on the horrible Obamatrade and globalization pushed by conservatives:

It's too bad that the natural-born Canadian immigrant Ted Cruz seems like a constitutionalist except when it becomes inconvenient. Cruz is running for the Republican Party nomination for the presidency, but is ineligible as he was naturalized eight years after his birth. For more, see:

What does it tell you when the majority of Democrats voted to deny their own man Obama TPP/ Fast Track?

John McCain claims to be a conservative. Marco Rubio does. They voted for TPP/Fast Track. These people support amnesty for illegals.

Paul Ryan claims to be a conservative. Ryan gave Obama the farm to fund sanctuary cities and importation of Mohammadan immigrants from Syria.

Rupert Murdoch claims to be a conservative and he funds major open-border initiatives.

Look at all of the horrible conservative rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCUSA):

Kelo v. New London
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc
King v. Burwell

Three of five SCUSA robes who ruled in the affirmative in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), were GOPher Party nominees — Justices John Paul Stevens (Ford appointee), Anthony Kennedy (Reagan appointee), David Souter (GHW Bush appointee), Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton appointee) and Stephen Breyer (Clinton appointee). And Clinton was a Blue Dog (conservative) Democrat, in practicality, a Rockefeller Republican.

Kelo v New London lets big businessmen swipe property in land from small owners under the guise of improving municipal tax receipts.

Look at all of the horrible conservative reciprocal trade agreements with non-industrial countries, which only leads to the destruction of our own industry owing to wage differentials:

Colombia
Panama
Mexico
Chile
Peru
Morocco
Jordan
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Nicaragua
Dominican Republic

The Republican Party means center-left globalization party. They have not hid this fact since Goldwater lost to LBJ. They helped to pass LBJ's Great Society legislation. They helped to pass immigration reform in 1965, the law which has given us our current state of horrible affairs of too many immigrants.

Being tricked into getting your vote by claims of arguing against abortion and gay marriage doesn't make you a conservative. Unless you are get a paycheck from party headquarters, get an appointment to office or get laws passed to protect your business, you're not in the party. Merely you have been suckered into being a fan, a subscriber, like those fools with the Sierra Club and Greenpeace.

The Republican Party always have been internationalists. Here is point 14 from their party platform going all the way back to 1860, that is, before the Civil War:

That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.

Now, there will be some who will get triggered by cognitive dissonance and want to argue for themselves as conservatives. They will err with the fallacy of appeal to authority by citing a dictionary definition.

A dictionary is mere collection of usages whether those usages are right or wrong. Ask any dictionary editor. As well, various dictionaries get written for estimated reading levels.

American Thinker's own Selwyn Duke would agree with me. See what he had to say on the subject in Is Trump the First ‘European-conservative’ American Presidential Candidate?:

A prerequisite for grasping this is first understanding the true natures of liberalism and conservatism...While many have their own definitions of the latter -- and will stubbornly insist they’re correct -- the truth is that both political terms are provisional, meaning different things in different times and places. The term “conservative” in the 1970s referred to a communist in the USSR and someone staunchly anti-communist in the US... Liberalism is the process of inexorably trying to change the status quo; conservatism is the process of trying to preserve the status quo. Thus, what the terms represent will vary depending on the status quo in question."

The Russian communists fighting against the fall of the Soviet Union were conservatives. Yet, when Russian communists originally overthrew Czar Nicholas II, they were radicals.

The word conservative entered English from the Middle French conservatif in the late 1300s. The use of the word in politics traces to French disciples of Edmund Burke's opposition to the French Revolution and his call for clerical and political restoration in 1790. They called him "Le Conservateur."

By 1830 or so in Britain, conservative replaced the pejorative Tory as Tory was the name of a British political party first composed of Yorkist Tories of 1680. Tories were Irish Catholics who were dispossessed of their land and hence the label Tory, which means outlaw.

When the Democrats who controlled the 63rd United States Congress and the presidency in Woodrow Wilson established the Federal Reserve, they were radicals. Today, those who defend the Federal Reserve monetary system of 100% bank credit are conservatives.

The Republican Party started out as radicals. They overthrew the slavery system of the South and caused a civil war over it. They were radicals when they overthrew the monetary system based on money and went with one based on greenbacks.

The Republican Party have ended up as conservatives. They are trying to preserve their 40 years of globalization and internationalism.

Free-capitalist progressive restorationists are those who believe in a limited role for government and a strict adherence to the constitution. Conservatives do not believe in these things.

The existing state of affairs is the ongoing subversion of the Constitution. Obama is a radical. Bernie Sanders is a radical.

Bernie and Obama are tribalists. Marxist / Socialists are tribalists. Tribalism is not a kind of liberalism nor a kind of progressivism. To better understand Obama, check out BEATING THE DRUMS FOR OBAMA TRIBALISM.

Hillary Clinton is a conservative. She wants to preserve the status quo of the globalists as her husband was a globalist. Ted Cruz is a conservative. So too are Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich.

Either way, whether with Obama and Bernie, or Hillary, Cruz, Rubio, Bush, Christie, or Kasich, any of those people will wreck the USA. Open-borders and international ruling boards that aren't elected by Americans will kill the USA.

To better understand what is happening, check out these:

✓ ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?
✓ NO ORDINARY WHITE GUY COULD EVER HOPE TO WIN THE U.S. PRESIDENCY IN 2016 AND MAYBE NEVER AGAIN. THE GOP WILL BE OVER SOON ENOUGH.

We can have free trade deals with the Canadians, with the Australians and with the Kiwis, but we should never have free trade deals with low capital countries (see: SOPHIE'S CHOICE OF CAPITAL OR LABOR. A FREE-MARKETS LIBERTARIAN BECOMES AN ANTI-CAPITALIST AND PERPETUATES AN ECONOMICS MYTH).

Americans must demand Congress to rescind all of the trade deals with countries not close to our own in terms of industrial development as measured by GDP per capita. In fact, tariffs should be levied high against such local capital countries. Free trade deals with countries like China and Mexico kill the return on capital in the USA and thus kill high-paying jobs in the USA. All wages come from capital.

The big firms hate domestic competition. They love these trade deals with Third World countries. It kills domestic competitors.

To see the right tariff formula: WHY TRUMP IS WINNING. THE REST ARE INTERNATIONALIST SELLOUTS WHO STAND AGAINST WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS.

You must read these works. You must read all of my works on Bizarro Theater.

And for a general history of the Conservative Coalition, Wikipedia offers a write-up.

2016 FEB JOBS REPORT FOR JAN 2016 SHOWS A RISE IN TRUE UNEMPLOYMENT

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:00:00 -0800

Today, the True Dollar Journal reveals an uptick in the Jobless Rate in spite of the propaganda coming out of Obama's Department of Labor.

For more: THE 2016 FEBRUARY EMPLOYMENT SITUATION REPORT FOR JANUARY 2016 SHOWS A RISE IN THE TRUE JOBLESS RATE.

See the charts!

WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS AND THE FORTHCOMING NATIONAL PARTY OF FREE-CAPITALISM PROGRESSIVES. THE GLOBALIZATION PARTY TIME OF INTERNATIONALISTS COULD BE COMING TO AN END IN THE USA.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:37:00 -0800

Yesterday, the Gallup Organization published results of a major study — Red States Outnumber Blue for First Time in Gallup Tracking.
According to Gallup,

20 states are solidly Republican or leaning Republican, compared with 14 solidly Democratic or leaning Democratic states. The remaining 16 are competitive. This is the first time in Gallup's eight years of tracking partisanship by state that there have been more Republican than Democratic states. It also marks a dramatic shift from 2008, when Democratic strength nationally was its greatest in recent decades.

Here is is what the USA looks like right now:

But what would the USA look like if a nationalist party were to rise up? What if all of the competitive states went nationalist?

The Republican Party would fade away into obscurity and the Democratic Party would be marginalized.

For far too long there has been a status quo — balance of power among contending sub-factions each inspired by the fiction of its own importance by-self idealization and desire to rule. It has been an unstable equilibrium held in place by the dominant faction — the globalization internationalists of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

And while there has been quarreling within this faction, they have shared a key agenda — globalization for their billionaire donors. And so, to win their agenda, they have tricked the rank-and-file voters of both parties.

For Democrat voters, they have preached a message of Hispanic immigration is a right and reconquista. For Republican voters, they have preached a message of family values and Wal-mart free trade.

These master manipulators through propaganda have tricked voters into believing they are part of the upper set as if they were among the decision makers of the the parties themselves. These master manipulators have trained voters like dogs through repeating catchwords and grand themes. And they have scared all as being labeled heretics if they stand against their respective party.

A general revolution is not made in a day. A revolution happens when the dominant faction begins to weaken.

The globalization faction is losing their grip because of the collapse of the economy. I have shown you in pictures the real economy has been in decline ever year Obama has been in office. There has been no recovery, only inflated prices owing to more dollars in circulation.

✓ AWAKEN. YOU'RE LIVING THROUGH THE GREAT GLOBAL DEPRESSION. IT'S HERE, WORLDWIDE. I BET YOU DIDN'T KNOW IT.

The decline is real. I have shown in pictures that you don't have any representative in Congress, at all.

✓ THE BIGGEST LIE ALMOST ALL AMERICANS BELIEVE: AMERICANS HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY. BERNIE, HILLARY AND ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LOVE THE BIGGEST LIE.

Politicians have lied to you everyday of your lives. I have shown you in pictures the truth about their big lies.

✓ THE BIG LIE: AMERICANS ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

There is a big shake-up in American politics underway.

✓ ARE BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP A SURPRISE OR ARE PUNDITS STUPID? THE SHAKE-UP OF USA POLITICS CONTINUES. ARE NEW PARTIES EMERGING?

Working-class Americans are awakening to the idea of their own party — a nationalist party, a party not built on socialism like Obama and Bernie Sanders want for Americans, but a party built on American industry, American ingenuity, American competitiveness and American spirit.

✓ WORKING-CLASS AMERICANS STAND WITH TRUMP. RELENTLESS ATTACKS ON TRUMP FAIL TO DERAIL THEM.

Globalization has failed Americans and they know it. Because the Democratic Party continues to shift left toward full-blown socialism, core, blue-collar, working-class Democrats are leaving them. They are not conservatives in the making however.

A rising middle class always have been the true threat to Conservatives. That is why conservatives focus on killing the middle-class.

Conservatives whether Blue Dog Democrats or Rockefeller Republicans have been pushing open-borders internationalism (globalism) for 40 years. The internationalism agenda of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of supporting massive immigration has been killing working-class Americans.

True conservatism means maintaining the power by land and commerce monopolists and oligopolists. It has nothing to do with being a prude, being against gay marriage, couples living together out of wedlock and so forth.

You can recognize true conservatism by these features: hierarchy, authority and a singular moral order. Conservatives seek to prevent change for themselves by discouraging every bit of competition.

Most Americans are free-capitalism progressives. They happen not to know this about themselves, however. By free-capitalism, I mean free-markets, free-enterprise, productive efficiency under technological advance. By progressive, I mean the primacy of the individual through ardent defense of the individual and his property.

Free-capitalism progressives with a Nationalist Party focused on Bill of Rights Liberty (see: CASHING IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY) is the USA most Americans want. Our USA is an honest one:

Enforced competition
Regulated politicians
Self rule
Entrepreneurialism

It has become all too clear for most Americans. The USA is on the decline. The decline has come strictly from politics, politicians and rigging the system through law.

Lawgivers have interfered in the lives of Americans consistently. They do so through taxation, regulation and redistribution through welfare and subsidy.

They can because Americans have lost control of the government itself. Today, no one in the USA has popular representation. Today, Americans live under American-style totalitarianism — regulators and bureaucrats involved in every aspect of our lives.

The real purpose of government should be to enhance property and not impair it through taxation and regulation. The real and only social contract is fulfilling duty in contract of property and in so doing, contributing to the harmony of all.

Americans are living in dystopia of perpetual war — foreign wars and civil wars. All war is about property. People fight to dispossess each other of their property.

True progress is about individualism. Individualism is about property and contract, relationships and honest. True individualism is about justice.

True retrogression is about tribalism. Tribalism is about shackles, slavery, force, dispossession, rhetoric, deceit and trickery.

THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER IS THE MOST DANGEROUS HATE GROUP IN THE USA TODAY. KEEP YOUR DAUGHTERS AWAY FROM THEM.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:43:00 -0800

The venal Southern Poverty Law Center is the most hate-filled group in the USA. That should be clear to all. The jerks at the Southern Poverty Law Center spend their waking days deciding upon whom they can hate next.

Who anointed the jerks at the Southern Poverty Law Center to decide who comprise a hate group and who do not?

Why haven't all demanded the Southern Poverty Law Center to categorize all political groups in the USA by consistent manifest metrics so that all can judge whether or not the jerks at the Southern Poverty Law Center have assessed with accuracy.

The people of the Southern Poverty Law Center lack any legitimacy whatsoever. They are not elected.

Instead, the people of the Southern Poverty Law Center wage jihad against anyone they do not like, any laws they do not want to follow and any cultural traditions of authentic Americans that stand in the way of their quest for dominance and supremacy.

In a twist, the Southern Poverty Law Center adapted Everett Dean Martin's work Behavior of Crowds, for their 1920 pamphlet, The Mob Mind vs Civil Liberty. Martin was the Director of the Cooper Union Forum of the People's Institute New York City

In his work, Martin described factions known as struggle groups. The Southern Poverty Law Center has become a struggle group.

Here is what Martin had to say on struggle groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center:

The chief tactic of those in control of the Southern Poverty Law Center is to wage a public relations war against those they seek to take down. Hence, they label their victims as hate groups. Labeling their foes as hate groups makes it so much easier for the Southern Poverty Law Center to claim the high road — implying they are doing God's work by ridding us of hateful groups.

So when you think about it, those of the Southern Poverty Law Center are no better than the Spanish Inquisition who burned at the stake anyone they labeled heretics against the Roman Catholic Church.

Here is what Martin had to say on the tactic of heretics as used masterfully by those of the Southern Poverty Law Center when they label others as hate groups.

ALL GUN LAWS ARE ILLEGAL IN THE USA. DECODED: THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. KNOW THEIR DUTIES.

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:37:00 -0800

Here is the Second Amendment:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

And here is how to read it:

[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed [since] a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state [is made from the people, who are all individuals, voluntarily].

The second amendment is one of the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. All of the Bill of Rights declare that the U.S. Government never can infringe upon aspects of being an individual, in short, the U.S. Government cannot tread over any of these personal rights.

The Bill of Rights limit what the agents of Congress can do and not what individuals can do. As I showed you in CASHING IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY, all of the Bill of Rights deals with the duties the then newly formed federal government had with respect to any individual.

The biggest failing in discourse over the Bill of Rights is the lack of talk emphasizing the duties of Congress and agents of government has to any American. It is quite clear what is meant by Congress shall make no law as we see in the opening salvo to protect any individual from an overreaching government.

All laws that infringe upon the right of any individual to keep and bear arms such as requiring permits of any kind are illegal and against the Constitution of the United States of America.

In jurisprudence, which is what we're talking about here, liberty means that realm where the law (politicians) is content to leave you alone. Where politicians make laws, there are duties and rights. Always, there can be no right without a corresponding duty and thus no duty without a corresponding right.

The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with the states in compact, which is what the rest of the Constitution details. The Bill of Rights has nothing to do with conferring rights to states.

Many phrases of every day English spell out the reality of limiting government while identifying some of the weightier aspects of being an individual. In all cases, the phrase the people means anyone, even you.

The Bill of Rights is chock full of these phrases that deal solely with any American individual. The Bill of Rights does not confer rights to groups nor does it impose duties upon individuals. Congress and the states alone have duties imposed by the Bill of Rights.

the people to keep and bear Arms
without the consent of the Owner
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects
the persons or things to be seized
No person shall be held to answer
nor shall any person be subject for
nor shall be compelled
nor shall private property be taken
the accused shall enjoy
to be informed of the nature and cause
to be confronted with
to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
the right of trial by jury shall be preserved
Excessive bail shall not be required
retained by the people
or to the people