Comments for BlawgIT

Comment on So You Want to Protect Your Trademark? by Brett Trout

Brett Trout — Wed, 16 May 2012 19:45:55 +0000

Ha. I was not aware of that.

Comment on So You Want to Protect Your Trademark? by Mark Clipsham

Mark Clipsham — Wed, 16 May 2012 19:40:41 +0000

It is kind of ironic that you would use the term “yellow delicious” to (not) describe a banana because that IS the name of an apple.

Comment on So You Want to Protect Your Trademark? by THE TRADEMARK OF SUCCESS « MY LIFE THROUGH MY LINES

THE TRADEMARK OF SUCCESS « MY LIFE THROUGH MY LINES — Tue, 08 May 2012 15:44:22 +0000

[...] So You Want to Protect Your Trademark? (blawgit.com) [...]

Comment on Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus by Brett Trout

Brett Trout — Tue, 01 May 2012 17:05:52 +0000

I just cannot believe people still vote for politicians who take away their constitutional rights. SOPA, TSA, CISPA, things are getting worse, not better.

Comment on Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus by Anne Roberts

Anne Roberts — Tue, 01 May 2012 17:02:04 +0000

The government gets hold of everything nowadays. I realized I am not surprised.

Comment on Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus by CISPA Bill Heads for The Senate: Tell Them No, No, HELL NO! « News Worldwide

CISPA Bill Heads for The Senate: Tell Them No, No, HELL NO! « News Worldwide — Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:13:10 +0000

[...] Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus (blawgit.com) [...]

Comment on Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus by CISPA, could be the End of Privacy for Americans if You Let it Pass! | I am a Citizen Blog

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 04:42:53 +0000

[...] Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus (blawgit.com) [...]

Comment on Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus by CISPA Supporters List: 800+ Companies That Could Help Uncle Sam Snag Your Data « News Worldwide

Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:58:33 +0000

[...] Congress Just Threw You Under a Bus (blawgit.com) [...]

Comment on Judge Rules Bloggers Do Not Have to Be Paid by Brett Trout

Brett Trout — Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:44:07 +0000

Consideration need only be a peppercorn, but contract cases are so fact determinative, it is difficult to make generalizations devoid of dozens of different kinds of exceptions. One tiny fact can mean the difference between whether a judge finds consideration or not, and, therefore, whether the writer is owed anything for his or her work.

Comment on Judge Rules Bloggers Do Not Have to Be Paid by Bernardo

Bernardo — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 01:12:50 +0000

Hi Brett, greetings from Uruguay. Nice post! I have a question, I hope this is not out of line (meaning I should pay fees for an answer), if so, please apologize and disregard. I understand by your article that a judge in the USA will not enter into the fairness of the consideration, as long as one is established by the parties on the agreement. However it seems that none was written (just implied) in the terms and conditions by HuffPost and a judge anyway analyzed the relationship and found out that there was a fair consideration in the case (exposure, etc.). Can a judge then find implicit consideration in an agreement, or can she/he find that one written is unfair (in case of clear imbalance, e.g an airplane in exchange for $1?)?