<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Site-Server v@build.version@ (http://www.squarespace.com) on Fri, 03 Apr 2026 20:52:57 GMT
--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://www.rssboard.org/media-rss" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog - Bergen Street Music</title><link>https://www.bergenstreetmusic.com/blog/</link><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate><language>en-US</language><generator>Site-Server v@build.version@ (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><description><![CDATA[]]></description><item><title>How To Play What You Hear </title><dc:creator>David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.bergenstreetmusic.com/blog/2017/8/30/how-to-play-what-you-hear</link><guid isPermaLink="false">591b354437c5818ed2a2d96c:591bc513579fb3ffe50caaf2:59a6f159893fc02cee011796</guid><description><![CDATA[<h2>The Problem:</h2><p>When musicians talk about improving their playing, they talk a lot about their ears: "I wish I had better ears", "She's got a great ear", "He has <em>massive</em>&nbsp;ears". What's that all about? Well, they aren't really talking about the size or shape of their ears;&nbsp;they aren't exactly bragging about the sensitivity of their ears to sound in general, either.&nbsp;When a musician refers to "good ears", they are talking about their ability to <em>identify by name </em>and <em>accurately reproduce</em>&nbsp;different pitches.</p><p>By <em>pitch</em>&nbsp;I mean the names we give to various frequencies,&nbsp;like "A" or "C-sharp"&nbsp;or "<em>fa". </em>Pitch is completely separate from the rhythmic value of a note (a short "A" or a long "A" are both the same pitch), and it's not affected by the type of instrument or the person singing the note. Since every sound that isn't 100% noise has some sort of predominant frequency, even inanimate objects can produce identifiable pitches.</p>























&nbsp;&nbsp;


  <p>If you can recognize the famous opening to "Smells Like Teen Spirit", as interpreted here by a falling snow shovel, you are already halfway to recognizing pitches in the real world.&nbsp;</p><p>What's the use of this ability? Well, recognizing pitches by ear comes in handy when you are...</p><p>1. Learning a piece from a recording</p><p>2. Committing a piece to memory</p><p>3. Improvising and playing variations on a tune</p><p>4. Composing and arranging</p><p>5. Faking your way through an unfamiliar song in an ensemble setting</p><p>6. Transposing on-the-fly</p><p>7. Generally cribbing musical materials from other musicians and composers</p><h2>Where to Start</h2><p>There are literally hundreds of exercises out there that fall under the rubric of "ear training", and in this post I'm going to focus on just one of them. In my experience, the type of training I'm going to cover is pretty rare – most ear training curriculum starts with learning how to recognize "intervals". We're not going to bother with that; we're going to learn how to identify all the notes in the major scale (don't worry, there are only 7), by strengthening our sense of each note's "function". "Function" is just a $20 conservatory word the way for one note <em>leads</em> to another. After all, that's what a melody really is:&nbsp;just one note leading to the next.</p><p>In general, notes are much easier to understand in context, as you'll soon find out. Identifying a note is often compared to identifying colors, but notes connect sequentially in a way that color cannot. "Red, white, blue" doesn't feel particularly different from "blue, white, red", but "A, B, C" and "C, B, A" have completely different effects.</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347570368&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_83393&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <h2> </h2><p>Hear the difference? The exact reason why one sounds "sadder" than the other will have to wait for another post, but we are going to rely on our musical sense of direction to help us pin down the identities of our un-named notes.</p><h2>Getting started</h2><h3>A <strong><em>1 </em></strong>and a <strong><em>2</em></strong></h3><p>The first note we're learning is the final destination of nearly all melodies, the famous "home note". It doesn't lead anywhere, but rather just sits, very pleased with itself. Stable, restful, untroubled, final, it creates a sense of return or falling back into place.</p><p>Before I play you an example, I just want you to imagine the sound of the last line of "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star". Don't sing out loud yet, just try to imagine that sound as vividly and precisely as you can (this is called <em>audiation</em>, and the more you practice this, the easier it gets). It helps me to imagine a particular person singing the words, like Frank Sinatra or Stevie Wonder:&nbsp;</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "How I won-der what you <strong><em>are</em></strong>"&nbsp;🎶</p><p>That last note (🎶 "<strong><em>are</em></strong>"&nbsp;🎶) is the "home note". It doesn't seem to pull in any particular direction, it just ends the phrase, the musical equivalent of a period.</p><p>Now let's run through that line again, but imagine the band laying out, and Stevie leaning into the penultimate note:</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "How I won-der, what <em><strong>youuuuuuu...</strong></em>"&nbsp;🎶</p><p>Can you feel any tension building?</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "...<em><strong>uuuuuuu..."&nbsp;</strong></em>🎶</p><p>A sense of anticipation and expectation?</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "...<em><strong>uuuuuuu..."&nbsp;</strong></em>🎶</p><p>Like the melody is being pulled by a magnet? (How long can he hold this note?)</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "...<em><strong>uuuuuuuuu </strong></em><strong>arrrrrre!"&nbsp;</strong>🎶</p><p>What a relief!&nbsp;Any guesses as to what that note might have been? It was just one step above the home note.</p><p>But "one-step-up-from-the-home-note" is kind of a mouthful, so from here on out, I'm going to refer to notes by their number in the scale – the home note will be <strong><em>1</em></strong>&nbsp;and that note one step up is going to be <strong><em>2</em></strong>. The <strong><em>2</em></strong>, as you heard, is relatively unstable. The melody is unable to rest on the <strong><em>2</em></strong>, and it want to "resolve" to the <strong><em>1</em></strong>, creating "melodic tension" that builds up when the melody holds onto that note.</p><p>So to differentiate between these two notes, pay close attention the quality of "restfulness" or "tension" that they have. Imagine ending the melody on the note you are interested in; does that feel awkward and unfinished, like there's a litte more to be said? That's the unresolved sound of the <strong><em>2</em></strong>. The <strong><em>1</em></strong>, on the other hand, should feel like it's just brought the melody to a proper close.</p><h3><strong><em>5 to 7</em></strong></h3><p>We're going to learn two more notes before we start putting our ears to the test:&nbsp;<strong><em>5 </em></strong>and <strong><em>7</em></strong>. Both of these notes<strong><em>&nbsp;</em></strong>have a strong attraction toward the <strong><em>1</em></strong>. To get the sound of <strong><em>7</em></strong>&nbsp;in your ear, let Stevie get back on the mic, this time singing "Yankee Doodle". He's going to lean into the last note of the second line:&nbsp;</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Riding on a po-<em><strong>naaayyyy</strong></em>"&nbsp;🎶</p><p>I guess Stevie got a little funky there; the melody should feel pretty restless on that note and have a strong sense of direction.&nbsp;The <strong><em>7</em></strong>, which is often called the "leading tone",&nbsp;has an intense "stretchy" feeling that snaps back up to the <strong><em>1</em></strong>. It's a little bit spicier than the <strong><em>2</em></strong>. Another great example of the <strong><em>7 </em></strong>is the "Jurassic Park Theme" by John Williams, which starts:&nbsp;<strong><em>1 7 1 </em></strong>...&nbsp;<strong><em>1 7 1</em></strong>&nbsp;...<strong><em>&nbsp;1 7 1 </em></strong>...</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347731137&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508468730072_124145&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>On to the <strong><em>5.&nbsp;</em></strong>This note turns up in memorable places in melodies more than any other note, by approaching the <strong><em>1 </em></strong>from above or below. The approach from below is extremely common at the start of classic popular tunes:</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<strong><em>A-maaa-</em></strong>zing grace..."&nbsp;🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<strong><em>We wish</em></strong>&nbsp;you a Merry Christmas..."&nbsp;🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<strong><em>Here comes </em></strong>the bride..."&nbsp;🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<strong><em>Should auld </em></strong>acquaintance be for-got..."&nbsp;🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<strong><em>O Christmas </em></strong>tree, O Christmas tree..."&nbsp;🎶</p><p>The list goes on: the main themes from "Harry Potter" and "Jeopardy", "The Maple Leaf Rag",and <em>La Marseillaise </em>start with a leap up from <strong><em>5 </em></strong>to <strong><em>1 </em></strong>as well.</p><p>The opposite motion, a fall from above, is a little clunky and thus somewhat less common, usually showing up in melodies meant to sound a bit rustic. Think of the melody in "<strong><em>Flint</em></strong>-stones..." – or the first two notes of the theme from <em>Game of Thrones</em>.</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347731165&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508468730072_129519&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <h2>The first test</h2><p>Great, so now we've got a handle on three different notes, and how each one of them "resolves" back to the home note. That sense of direction is the key concept.&nbsp;I'll recap each note's distinctive features with a few musical examples. Try to sing along, saying the scale numbers out loud.</p><p><strong><em>1</em></strong>&nbsp;- the "home note": stable, restful, inert, final, has a sense of arrival or return</p><p>Sing:</p><p class="text-align-center">&nbsp;🎶 <strong><em>"4 4 3 3 2 2 1 ...&nbsp;1______ ... 1_______<strong>"</strong></em>&nbsp;</strong>🎶</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571049&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_90007&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p><strong><em>2 </em></strong>- the upper neighbor of the home note: moderately active and unstable, resolves down by step</p><p>Sing:&nbsp;</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 <em><strong>"4 4 3 3 2 2 1 ...&nbsp;2____ 1____ ... 2____ 1____"</strong></em>&nbsp;🎶</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571164&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_116889&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p><em><strong>7</strong>&nbsp;</em>- the lower neighbor of the home note: intensely active and unstable, dissonant and stretchy, resolves up by step</p><p>Sing:&nbsp;</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 <em><strong>"4 4 3 3 2 2 1 ... 7____ 1____ ... 7____ 1____"</strong></em>&nbsp;🎶</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571158&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_125210&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p><strong><em>5 </em></strong>- a few steps up or down from the home note: stable but active as well;&nbsp;has a sense of continuation, not arrival, resolves by leap (the example has a high <strong><em>5</em></strong>, then a low <strong><em>5</em></strong>)</p><p>Sing:&nbsp;</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 <em><strong>"4 4 3 3 2 2 1 ... 5____ 1____ ... 5____ 1____"</strong></em>&nbsp;🎶</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347572141&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508468730072_157421&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>If the notes are out of your range, don't sweat it! Just keep that sound ringing in your inner ear, like you have a song stuck in your head.</p><p>Onto the first real test. Get out a piece of scratch paper and a pencil, and mark out lines for five answers. I'm going to play five <em>pairs</em> of notes; the second note of the pair will always be <em><strong>1</strong></em>, so be alert for that melodic movement as we stretch and relax into the home note. Write down what you think the first note is. Listen carefully ...</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571155&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_134644&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>Was that a challenge? Did you hear the <strong><em>5 </em></strong>approaching from above at the start, then from below at the end?&nbsp;The pairs played were {<strong><em>5 1</em></strong>},&nbsp;{<em><strong>2</strong></em><strong><em>&nbsp;1</em></strong>},&nbsp;{<em><strong>7</strong></em><strong><em>&nbsp;1</em></strong>},&nbsp;{<em><strong>2</strong></em><strong><em>&nbsp;1</em></strong>}, and {<strong><em>5 1</em></strong>}.&nbsp;If you had trouble with this one, go back with the answers in hand, and sing along a few times.</p><p>When you're ready, here are five more pairs, played the same way:</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571153&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_137201&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>These pairs were {<em><strong>2</strong></em><strong><em>&nbsp;1</em></strong>},&nbsp;{<strong><em>1</em></strong><strong><em>&nbsp;1</em></strong>},&nbsp;{<strong><em>5</em></strong><strong><em>&nbsp;1</em></strong>},&nbsp;{<strong><em>2 1</em></strong>}, and {<strong><em>7 1</em></strong>}. Again, if you're struggling a little bit, that's ok! Go back and sing through it a few times before you move on.</p><p>Now I'm going to raise the difficulty level:&nbsp;I'll give you a <strong><em>1 </em></strong>at the very start to give you a reference point, but after that each note will stand by itself – it's up to you to keep the home note ringing in your memory. I'll play each note twice, including the <strong><em>1</em></strong>&nbsp;at the very start.</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571149&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_139759&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>If you got every one right, congratulations! You're ready to move on to the last three notes. If not, keep practicing this section in short, focused sessions for a day or two. Sing along as much as you can, and keep the home note in your memory at all times.</p><h2>The Final Three:&nbsp;<strong><em>3, 4,&nbsp;</em></strong>and <strong><em>6</em></strong></h2><p>These three notes are a little different, because they don't have an especially strong pull directly to <strong><em>1</em></strong>. It's not that they can't resolve directly to the home note, but more that it's not the path of least resistance. They each will tend to move, by step, to one of the notes we've learned already, and then from there to the <strong><em>1</em></strong>. As such, they tend to hide somewhere in the middle of the melody as a "passing note".</p><p>Take the <strong><em>3</em></strong>, for example. Here are a few melodies, many that I've referenced before,&nbsp;that move from <strong><em>3 </em></strong>to <strong><em>1</em></strong>&nbsp;and pass through the <strong><em>2</em></strong>&nbsp;on the way.&nbsp;</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<strong><em>Hot </em></strong>cross buns, <strong><em>h</em></strong><strong><em>ot </em></strong>cross buns" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Its fleece was <strong><em>white</em></strong>&nbsp;as snow" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "How I <strong><em>wonder </em></strong>what you are" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<em><strong>Three</strong>&nbsp;</em>blind mice, <em><strong>three</strong></em> blind mice" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Speaking words of wisdom,&nbsp;<em><strong>let</strong></em>&nbsp;it be" 🎶</p><p>Compared to <strong><em>2 </em></strong>and <strong><em>7</em></strong>, the <strong><em>3 </em></strong>is pretty stable and can serve as the final resolution in more sophisticated musical lines, but it delivers a certain suspended, ethereal effect that isn't as final or conclusive as the <strong><em>1</em></strong>. Sing through the melodic examples above, and get acquainted with the sound of the <strong><em>3 </em></strong>"walking back" to the <strong><em>1</em></strong>.</p><p>The <strong><em>6</em></strong>, much like its neighbor,&nbsp;<strong><em>5</em></strong>, can often approach the home note from above or below. When it occurs above the home note, quite high up on the octave, it tends to relax back onto the <strong><em>5</em></strong>, like in "Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star" (<strong><em>1 1 5 5 6 6 5</em></strong>):</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Twinkle, twinkle, <strong><em>little </em></strong>star" 🎶</p><p>It does the same thing in "London Bridge is Falling Down" (<strong><em>5 6 5 4 3 4 5</em></strong>), "<em>Frère Jacque</em><em>s</em><strong>" </strong>(<em>5 6 5 4 3 1), </em>and "Camptown Races" (<em><strong>5 5 3 5 6 5 3</strong></em>)<em>; </em>it's the highest point in all three melodies:</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Lon-<strong><em>don</em></strong>&nbsp;Bridge is falling down" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "...son<em>-</em><strong><em>nez</em></strong>&nbsp;le matines" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Camptown Ladies <em><strong>sing </strong></em>this song..." 🎶</p><p>However, quite often the <strong><em>6</em></strong>&nbsp;shows up below the home note, at the openings of "Happy Birthday" (<strong><em>5 5 6 5 1 7</em></strong>) and "Old MacDonald Had a Farm" (<strong><em>1 1 1 5 6 6 5</em></strong>). In both these examples, the <strong><em>6 </em></strong>resolves to the <strong><em>5.</em></strong></p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Happy <strong><em>Birth</em></strong>-day to you!" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Old MacDonald <strong><em>had a </em></strong>farm..." 🎶</p><p>The <strong><em>6 </em></strong>can also walk up to home note, passing <strong><em>7 </em></strong>on the way.</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Stuck a feather in his cap and called it <strong><em>mac</em></strong>-a-ro-ni!" 🎶</p><p>The main riff from "The Addams Family"&nbsp;theme (<em><strong>5 6 7 1 </strong></em><strong>*snap* *snap*</strong>&nbsp;<em><strong>5 6 7 1 </strong></em><strong>*snap* *snap*</strong>)&nbsp;works the same way.</p><p>Since the <strong><em>6 </em></strong>is often a passing note,&nbsp;it can slip by you without making a big splash; that makes it one of<strong><em>&nbsp;</em></strong>the trickiest notes to identify by ear.</p><p>Finally, the <strong><em>4</em></strong>.&nbsp; Melody-wise, the <strong><em>4 </em></strong>is about as far away from the home note at you can get. This is because it strongly pulls toward the <strong><em>3</em></strong>, in much the same "stretchy" way that the <strong><em>7 </em></strong>resolves to the <strong><em>1</em></strong>. From the <strong><em>3</em></strong>, we usually still need two more steps to get to the home note. The ends of "Twinkle Twinkle" and "Skip to My Lou" show this exact melodic motion:</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<em><strong>How I </strong></em>wonder what you are!" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "Skip to <em><strong>my</strong></em> Lou, my darling!" 🎶</p><p>Like the <strong><em>7</em></strong>, it is a very "active" and "restless" step on the scale, and adds emphasis and drama when prolonged, like at the end of "Happy Birthday" or "Jingle Bells:</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<em><strong>Haaaa-ppy</strong></em>&nbsp;Birthday to you!" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "<em><strong>Oh what fun it is</strong></em>&nbsp;to ride..." 🎶</p><p>Watch out though, there is another common use of <strong><em>4</em></strong>&nbsp;that skips down to the <strong><em>2</em></strong>, often at the end of a phrase. This has to do with the underlying harmony, and the melody "tracing" the set of notes that make up the accompanying chord. This happens at the end of "Jingle Bells" (<strong><em>3 3 </em></strong><strong><em>5 5 4 2 1</em></strong>) and "Silent Night" (<strong><em>5 4 2 1</em></strong>):</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "...in a one horse <strong><em>o</em></strong>-pen sleigh!" 🎶</p><p class="text-align-center">🎶 "...hea-<strong><em>ven</em></strong>-ly peace!" 🎶</p><h3>Putting it all together</h3><p>Ok, we've introduced all seven scale degrees, and the particular effects they can have in simple melodies. Let's see how you do when put to the test. Go back to your worksheet and mark out 5 more answer spaces.</p><p>Like last time, I'll start simple, but this time there's a little more to it. I'll play groups of <em>three</em>&nbsp;notes; the final note of each group will always be <strong><em>1</em></strong>, so use the last note as your reference point.&nbsp;If you need to, go back to the previous exercise and refresh. I'll start out with pretty simple melodies with small steps. No peeking!</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571146&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_142325&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>All done? The answers are:</p><p>{<strong><em>6, 7, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>3, 2, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>6, 7, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>6, 5</em></strong><strong><em>, 1</em></strong>}&nbsp;{<strong><em>4, 2, 1</em></strong>}</p><p>Now I'll do five more pairs, this time with groups of <em>four </em>notes. These groups are now long enough to sound like fragments of familiar melodies. You might find it surprisingly easier than single notes. As before, the groups will resolve to <strong><em>1</em></strong>.</p>























<iframe scrolling="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F347571145&amp;show_artwork=true&amp;callback=YUI.Env.JSONP.yui_3_17_2_1_1508380755787_144914&amp;wmode=opaque" width="100%" frameborder="no" height="400"></iframe>


  <p>The answers to the final test are:</p><p>{<strong><em>5, 6, 7, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>4, 3, 2, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>5, 1, 7, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>7, 1, 2, 1</em></strong>} {<strong><em>5, 6, 5, 1</em></strong>}</p><h2> </h2><h3>Building up your ears</h3><p>Now that you have a little experience naming notes by ear, try and identify each note in the following simple melodies. The fewer large leaps a melody has, the easier a melody will be, so I'm putting them in a rough order of difficulty.</p><p><em>Hot Cross Buns</em></p><p><em>Mary Had A Little Lamb</em></p><p><em>The Itsy Bitsy Spider</em></p><p><em>Ode to Joy</em></p><p><em>Yankee Doodle</em></p><p><em>Frere Jacques</em></p><p><em>London Bridge is Falling Down</em></p><p><em>Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star</em></p><p><em>Happy Birthday</em></p><p>After you've mastered these melodies, take it to the next level and identify the chorus of one of your favorite pop songs. Anything Top 40 will repeat the main melody many times, but the hooks are often pretty surprising or hide an unusual resolution. Watch out though, sometimes pop choruses start from the home note and end their lines on an unresolved note. This makes a strong connection from the end of the melody back to the beginning, which can bump up the "catchiness".&nbsp;Pinning down exactly where the home note is can be the hardest part. Some recommended easy starters:</p><p><em>Hello </em>or <em>Rolling in the Deep </em>by Adele</p><p><em>Get Lucky</em>&nbsp;by Daft Punk</p><p><em>Royals</em>&nbsp;by Lorde</p><p><em>Creep</em>&nbsp;by Radiohead</p><p>With practice, you'll build a precise and effortless sense of the shape and direction of any musical line. You'll find hidden connections between related melodies, and start to form a sense of how strong and memorable melodies are formed. Then you can write or improvise your own lines, or perform pieces with musicality, creativity and conviction,&nbsp;<em>as if</em>&nbsp;they were written by you.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p class="text-align-center"> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>]]></description></item><item><title>How Often Should I Practice?</title><dc:creator>David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.bergenstreetmusic.com/blog/2017/8/6/how-often-should-i-practice</link><guid isPermaLink="false">591b354437c5818ed2a2d96c:591bc513579fb3ffe50caaf2:5987a8dcf14aa110adc95c9d</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll start with the simple stuff that we've all heard a million times: it's 
very important to make sure that you practice at least once a day. If I had 
to distill learning piano down to a single concept, this would be it. 
Practice. Every. Single. Day.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, back after a long summer hiatus! Today I'm going to go over scheduling your practice sessions, and how it can have an effect on the total amount of time you actually have to spend practicing.</p><p>I'll start with the simple stuff that we've all heard a million times: it's very important to make sure that you practice at least once a day. If I had to distill learning piano down to a single concept, this would be it. Practice. Every. Single. Day.</p><h2>Daily Practice is Real Practice</h2><p>Practicing is about sustained power, not speed, and this goes double for the complex physical skills that piano playing involves. It's been confirmed for many years that bite-sized daily practice beats out intermittent marathon sessions. The scientific research on this subject goes back to the 1940s. In a landmark study, Grace Rubin-Rabson wanted to measure the amount of material that professional pianists could remember after equal amounts of practice. The twist was that the participants were divided into three groups:&nbsp;some did the whole session in one day, others did it in two smaller sessions in one day, and the last group spaced out the two sessions over two days. Result? The pianists that spaced their practice out over two days remembered the best.&nbsp;</p><p>Why should this be? The answer probably has to do with a good night's sleep. Sleep is the secret sauce for forming strong memories, especially the "motor sequence" memories used in piano playing. A study in 2004 confirmed this by testing two groups as they practiced tapping out finger patterns. Think: thumb, pointer, thumb, pinky;&nbsp;just the kind of movements that form the foundation of piano playing. The performance of the groups was rated by their speed and fluidity as they moved through these patterns.&nbsp;Next, one group slept for a night and the other simply rested for eight hours. Then both groups were retested.</p><p>Participants who had 8 hours of sleep before their second test showed significant improvement, <em>particularly</em> in the sections that had been especially challenging the day before. That is, they didn't only improve overall, but improved more in the tougher parts. The researchers concluded that late-night REM sleep helps consolidate motor memories into stable "chunks". This effect has also been measured in studies on foreign language acquisition.</p><p>The takeaway: your learning process doesn't end when you get up from the instrument; your brain continues to refine and strengthen the connections from one day to the next. Progress can be like a glacier: its movement is nearly imperceptible, but its power is monumental.&nbsp;If 7 hours of practice is broken up over a week, with good sleep in between each session, the results with be much stronger than 7 hours in one go. And that means fewer minutes actually spent at the keyboard to make the same progress.</p><h2>Making Minutes Count</h2><p>What if you don't have all week, and you need to do those 7 hours today? Well, if we go back to Rubin-Rabson's study from the 40s, we can see there's a little more to it: although the pianists who practiced twice the same day did not remember as much as the overnighters, they did have an advantage over the crammers.&nbsp;This gives us some important clues about how to distribute a single day's practice, and how to actually get results from multiple hours of practice.</p><p>Many beginning players don't take advantage of well-timed breaks to refresh their focus. It seems like an obvious and easy trick, but sometimes stereotypical ideas of "discipline" and "focus" can trip us up and trap us in an unproductive grind. Those principles are important, but not at the cost of misery and frustration. After a certain point, a continuous practice session will inevitably deliver diminishing returns. Attention starts to drift and the playing becomes less vivid. Your mind wanders to other things and improvement becomes marginal – or worse, mistakes can creep in while you are fatigued.&nbsp;Massive repetition doesn't do much to cultivate accurate playing. A handful of deliberate and mindful repetitions is all it takes. So leave out mindless grinding. Taking a break and returning the same passage lets you approach it with fresh ears and hands.</p><p>Another advantage to short sessions that I've noticed over the years: sometimes students get the impression that they "don't have enough time to practice" because they are waiting for that pristine uninterrupted hour. Don't wait! Just start now and get in a good 10 minutes while you wait for the coffee to brew. It'll be a better 10 minutes than the tail end of an hour-long slog, and infinitely better than no practice at all. Short sessions can much more easily woven into a packed schedule.</p><p>In fact, this is how professionals practice when they are chopping out 8 hours a day. It is <em>never </em>all at once on a single passage or piece. It's a constantly flowing cycle of learning, review, improvisation, listening, reflection, and a lot of breaks for everyday things. There is certainly a high level of intensity and discipline in play, but the best practicers know how to be flexible and work with their own bodies and minds.&nbsp;</p><p>To recap: Practice daily, in multiple short sessions if you can. Pace yourself, take breaks, stay positive, and rest assured that a lot of progress is taking place, so as long as you show up every day and do the work.</p><p>Happy Practicing!</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Song that Never Ends: Practicing Away from the Piano</title><dc:creator>David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:18:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.bergenstreetmusic.com/blog/2017/5/28/the-song-that-never-ends-practicing-away-from-the-piano</link><guid isPermaLink="false">591b354437c5818ed2a2d96c:591bc513579fb3ffe50caaf2:592b73a0893fc05fa7cddeda</guid><description><![CDATA[But Gould was a once-in-a-century musical genius; surely mere mortals can't 
follow his example, right? Actually, research shows that mental rehearsal 
improves performance almost as well as physical practice, even for 
beginners. When combined with just a little bit of physical practice, the 
gap between mental and physical practice narrows even further.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I have students with limited access to an actual keyboard – they go away on breaks and weekends, or their packed schedule just doesn't give them time with the instrument every single day. And one of the key aspects of effective practice is maintaining a <em>daily </em>habit.&nbsp;So what can they do to keep making progress every day?</p><p>Plenty! It turns out that there is a long tradition of learning music and developing musical skill away from the instrument. Many concert pianists, most famously Glenn Gould, were known to do silent "mental practice" with the score. Gould claimed it helped him develop a clear and complete understanding of the piece, before he started hacking away at the keyboard.</p><p>But Gould was a once-in-a-century musical genius; surely mere mortals can't follow his example, right?&nbsp;Actually, research shows that mental rehearsal improves performance almost as well as physical practice, even for beginners.&nbsp;When combined with just a little bit of physical practice, the gap between mental and physical practice narrows even further.</p><p>There are also a lot of possibilities that lie in between practice on the instrument and silent mental practice. These include physical and vocal exercises such as singing, chanting,&nbsp;hand drumming, and finger tapping. Many musical cultures, especially those rooted in oral traditions, start out new pieces with vocal and gestural practice. Tabla students in the Hindustani traditions, for example, learn to recite the <em>padhant</em>&nbsp;of a piece by heart –&nbsp;a sort of rhythmic do-re-mi –&nbsp;before they pick up the drums at all. And the Western system of <em>so</em><em>lfeggio</em>&nbsp;brings out musical shapes and sharpens melodic memories.</p><p>So, with these options in mind,&nbsp;how do we get started learning pieces on the beach?</p>























<hr />


  <h3>Finger Exercises</h3><p>Most beginning and intermediate pieces stay in a five-finger position for extended periods of time. That means that the majority of physical motion in the piece comes down to moving your fingers in a specific sequence. In more advanced pieces, tricky finger crossings can be practiced in the same way.</p><p>Fingering sequences can be practiced anywhere there is a flat surface: just place your hands in a comfortable, relaxed posture and rehearse the finger motions. Take care to press firmly –&nbsp;this actually makes a neurological difference and forms a stronger memory. Use your imagination to visualize the keyboard and feel the sensation of the keys against the sides of your fingers. Do this with a recording or silently imagine the sound of the music. Even better, you can sing along!</p><h3>Tapping and Chanting Exercises</h3><p>If you are already comfortable counting meter while you tap rhythms, this is a no-brainer. Any time you're waiting for the train or standing on line (i.e. any time you would look at your phone), you can mentally count the meter and tap the rhythm of a phrase. If you have the sheet music on your phone or an audio recording, so much the better. Just like practice at the instrument, you should go slow enough that you can be perfectly accurate.</p><p>For more challenging rhythms, it can be easier to tap <em>in between</em>&nbsp;the notes. That is, chanting the rhythm with "ta" and tapping on the rests or after the held notes. This works really well for pop songs, especially when they are syncopated.</p><p>For a detailed breakdown of how this works, check out my post on it.</p><h3>Singing Exercises</h3><p>It's much easier to play a piece when we know the melody by heart. Keeping your attention on the sound of the melody instead of specific finger movements improves performance.&nbsp;</p><p>When one of my students is learning a new part, we learn to sing or hum the melody right away. It doesn't have to be a polished vocal performance or even particularly on-key. Just getting a sense of the rise and fall of the musical line can help, and the cycle of breath gives great clues about natural phrasing. Furthermore, singing all the way through is a quick way to get a bird's-eye view of all the parts of the piece before we get into the microscopic detail of learning each note.</p><p><em>Solfeggio </em>is a powerful tool for memorizing melodies, especially when there aren't existing lyrics to piece. You're probably already familiar with solfeggio from "The Sound of Music".&nbsp;It assigns a singable syllable (<em>do re mi fa sol la ti</em>) that relates to each note. This process is called "<em>solmization"</em>.&nbsp; With the guidance of a teacher, it's pretty easy to learn the melody of a piece in solfeggio. The different syllables give additional memory support and make repeated patterns in the melody obvious.&nbsp;</p><p>Singing, humming, and tapping can all be combined to bring the elements of rhythm and melody together in a single exercise. If you can reel off the whole melody in solfeggio with decisive and confident rhythm, fitting the fingers to the proper keys becomes a minor detail. Your memory of the sound of the piece will provide a rock solid foundation for all the technical exertions to come.</p>























<hr />


  <h3>Starting from Scratch</h3><p>So now we come back to Gould's method, which unites all of these skills (solmization, rhythm practice, finger tapping) to actually start learning a piece away from the instrument.</p><p>Start small. A short piece from a beginning method book or a phrase from an easy piece will be fine.&nbsp;</p><ol><li>Look over the whole piece and take note of the major characteristics: What is the time signature? What is the key signature? What is the texture? Block chords, arpeggiated, Alberti, contrapuntal? What is the range of the piece? What is the predominant rhythmic pulse? Quarter notes, eighth notes, sixteenth?</li><li>Take note of any outlying details, like hand shifts, key changes,&nbsp;unusual rhythms, drastic range changes. Mark them for special attention.</li><li>I prefer to start reading the rhythm first – it's easier to do accurately at the start, and it is usually what falls by the wayside once melody comes into the picture. Tap out the rhythm in whatever way you can to be fluent and precise. Sooner than you think you should, put the hands together and tap out the combined rhythm.</li><li>Write in complete fingerings for the entire piece. You don't have to write a number for every note, but your intended fingering should be clear to you. Mostly practice hands together, slowly, pressing firmly, observing staccatos, legatos, and dynamics. Visualize the keyboard and imagine the patterns you are following on the keys.</li><li>Learn the solfeggio for the melody – I have beginners write in the solmization beneath the notes. If you haven't done much sight-singing, chanting the syllables is enough, but if you can sing and hear the pitches so much the better. If you're a sight-singing beginner, try learning the syllables and then singing along with a recording. Sooner than you think you can, start singing the melody while you tap the rhythm in both hands. Go slow!</li><li>Do the same as 5. in the bass line.</li></ol><p>This is a strict approach that mostly assumes you do not have a recording to refer to. I think that up to a point, following these steps with a recording can be very helpful, especially when learning to sing the melody and bass line.&nbsp;</p><p>As you can see, practicing away from the piano introduces some constraints that encourage very thorough and engaged practicing. Without the instrument to create the sound for us, we're forced to understand the piece more musically, creating more detailed and vivid musical memories. It also allows us to avoid some of the easy mistakes that can crop up in mindless drills at the keyboard, where technical issues dominate the attention, and weaknesses in memory can be glossed over. Finally, we can more easily see the shape of the piece as a whole work and understand the context of the musical details.</p><p>Mental practice doesn't stand alone; the same practice techniques employed with a physical instrument will result in more progress. However, I think removing the instrument from the equation allows us to deepen our understanding of the music and the process of practicing.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rock Your Body: How to Count (and Feel) Syncopations</title><dc:creator>David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 19:56:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.bergenstreetmusic.com/blog/2017/5/29/rock-your-body-how-to-feel-and-count-syncopations</link><guid isPermaLink="false">591b354437c5818ed2a2d96c:591bc513579fb3ffe50caaf2:592c62ec6b8f5b4e64d04d02</guid><description><![CDATA[Most of the troubles start when students have to count a syncopation. 
Syncopation in general is not a challenge – usually the student plays a
 syncopation, just the wrong one.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was working on a longer post about practicing away from the instrument and I decided this section should be its own mini-post.</p><p>Many students have trouble with keeping accurate rhythm, and I even get some adult learners who say: I could never keep a beat, so don't even bother trying to teach me rhythm!&nbsp;This is of course completely untrue, since anyone who can walk down the street without falling on their face can keep basic time. But there is a disconnect somewhere along the line when it comes to understanding the physical nature of rhythm when we're at the piano.</p><h3>Mind the Gap</h3><p>Most of the troubles start when students have to count a <em>syncopation</em>. Syncopation in general is not a challenge – usually the student plays <strong><em>a</em></strong>&nbsp;syncopation, just the wrong one. Then the teacher says "Hey, play it like this" (plays the correct syncopation).&nbsp;The student says "OK" and plays <em>exactly the same</em>&nbsp;incorrect syncopation. Then the lesson goes off the rails into counting meter and a bunch of detail that obscures the main issue: <em>feeling</em> the precise location of the syncopation.&nbsp;</p><p>Ok, I'm already tired of saying "syncopation". What is syncopation anyway? We commonly speak of syncopation as something "funky" or "off-beat" or "turning the beat around". That's all correct, but I'm going to go straight to the source: ancient Greek. The root of syncopation is <strong>συγκοπή </strong>(sunkopé), which means "leaving out". In literature, syncope means leaving out syllables from a word to fit a poetic meter.&nbsp;In rhythmic terms, syncopation is leaving beats out of the rhythm.</p><p>There's a theory that the "toe-tapping" sensation we get from syncopated music is caused by these left out beats. As the music moves along, we subtly feel the "pulse" of the music; when the pulse is interrupted by a syncopation, our body "fills in the gap" with the nod of a head or the tap of a toe. The spaces created by syncopation clarify the pulse and give the listener room to actively interact with the piece.</p><p>I think the main obstacle to good syncopation arises when the player doesn't move or acknowledge the gap in the pulse in any physical way. Some students understand that you should leave something out, but can't tell <em>how much </em>to leave out. So this is where I like to start teaching a challenging syncopation – not mathematically by counting meters, but physically, by filling those interruptions in the pulse with movement and sound. That means clapping <em>in</em>&nbsp;<em>between</em>&nbsp;the notes, not on them.</p>























<hr />


  <h3>You've Got to Move</h3>























<iframe scrolling="no" data-image-dimensions="640x480" allowfullscreen="" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/1uYWYWPc9HU?v=1uYWYWPc9HU&amp;wmode=opaque&amp;enablejsapi=1#t=00m26s" width="640" data-embed="true" frameborder="0" height="480">
</iframe><p>Official Promo Video for Radiohead's "Karma Police".</p>


  <p>Let's try it on Radiohead's <a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uYWYWPc9HU#t=00m26s">"Karma Police"</a>. A simple melody that a lot of people know but a pretty tricky rhythm once you get both hands together. It's highly syncopated. Here's the first verse:</p><blockquote>Karma Police, arrest this man, he talks in maths, he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a de-tuned radio</blockquote><p>Here it is with claps/taps "<strong>$</strong>" in the syncopations:</p><blockquote><strong>$</strong> Kar <strong>$</strong> ma <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;Po <strong>$</strong><strong> </strong>lice</blockquote><blockquote><strong>$ $ $ $</strong> 'rest this <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;man</blockquote><blockquote><strong>$</strong>&nbsp;he <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;talks <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;in <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;maths</blockquote><blockquote><strong>$</strong> <strong>$</strong> <strong>$</strong> he buzz's like a fridge</blockquote><blockquote><strong>$&nbsp;</strong>he's <strong>$</strong> like <strong>$</strong> a <strong>$</strong> de-</blockquote><blockquote><strong>$</strong> -tuned <strong>$</strong> ra <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;di <strong>$</strong>&nbsp;o&nbsp;</blockquote><p>Give it a few tries,&nbsp;slowly and deliberately chanting the lyrics and clapping,&nbsp;and keep every pulse equal.&nbsp;Notice each line has 8 pulses in total.&nbsp;Try it with a metronome or along with the video. (Tip: You can set Youtube videos to slower speeds by clicking on the gear in the lower right of the video).</p><p>Did you notice a difference in how you imagined the rhythm before and after practicing it? Do you have a clearer idea of the exact moment that the beat "turns around" and when it comes back?&nbsp;</p><p>I find this to be a really useful tool for getting students "grounded" in their rhythm sense, without the distraction of numbers and counting. The rhythmic phrases fall into natural groups but are executed with precision. It works just as well for simple songs in 3/4 as it does for advanced pieces. And it works great for practicing rests as well, which are often given short shrift by beginners.</p><h3>Putting it into Practice</h3><p>How do you figure out the syncopation pattern on your own?</p><p>To get a feel for the method, try this out on a piece that you already know very well first. Start by clapping or tapping along with the piece at the smallest subdivision (that is, the shortest note in the phrase, usually an 8th note, a quarter note for very simple pieces).&nbsp;Practice doing this for a little while – for best results, practice clapping along for a few days before trying to work out the rhythm.</p><p>After you are comfortable marking the pulse with claps or taps,&nbsp;count how many subdivisions fall <em>in between </em>the <em>start</em> of each note and the <em>start</em> of the next. Don't count any taps that line up with a note. If you have a score, mark out the claps with x's in between the notes. If there are lyrics, write them out like I did in the example above. If you do it correctly, every pulse will have a word, syllable, or clap in it. No spaces left.</p>























<hr />


  <p> </p><p>Try it on a simple piece like "Mary Had a Little Lamb" or "Jingle Bells" and see how it strengthens your feel. Leave a comment and let me know how it went; if you have a complex syncopation you can't work out, leave a link to the song in the comments and I'll try and work it out for you!</p><h2>Subscribe!</h2><p>Enter your email below to stay up-to-date with news and new blog posts. I respect your privacy and do not share your information with any third parties.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Work Smarter or: How to Practice in 15 Minutes a Day</title><dc:creator>David Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 03:27:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.bergenstreetmusic.com/blog/2017/5/24/working-smarter-or-how-to-practice-15-minutes-a-day-and-still-make-progress</link><guid isPermaLink="false">591b354437c5818ed2a2d96c:591bc513579fb3ffe50caaf2:59264f25197aea2527dabc35</guid><description><![CDATA[Of all the skills that students learn in lessons, practicing itself is the 
most important. Yet so often we forget that practicing is a skill that can 
be developed and strengthened. Lots of students get told to practice more, 
but not to practice better.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the skills that students learn in lessons, practicing itself is the most important. Yet so often we forget that practicing is a skill that can be developed and strengthened. Lots of students get told to practice <em>more</em>, but not to practice<em>&nbsp;better</em>.</p><p>I think that most people (including me) start out with a very thin, stereotypical idea of practicing, which basically boils down to "play just what you played in the lesson, except over and over again for an hour". Aimless but obligated, you burn through an hour grinding a few measures, playing in a rush, mostly thinking about what's for dinner, until the sweet relief of the timer comes.&nbsp;</p><p>I've encountered a few students with great musical sense and talent to spare, who just can't get the sound or speed that they want so badly. It's not for lack of time or lack of <em>playing</em>&nbsp;skill, but because they don't <em>practice</em>&nbsp;skillfully.&nbsp;</p><p>In this series of blog posts, I'm going to cover a few simple strategies that form the core of good, productive, efficient, satisfying practice.&nbsp;</p>























<hr />


  <h2>You Can Slow Down?</h2><p>I practiced unskillfully for a long time, most of my teenage years really. I managed to learn some major pieces, but it was always "two steps forward, one step back"&nbsp;and the final results were pretty shaky. My practice strategy, if I had ever written it out, would've looked like this:</p><ol><li>Play a piece at tempo as soon as you get a rough idea of the notes</li><li>Make the same mistakes 9 out of 10 times</li><li>???</li><li>Total mastery!</li></ol><p>Of course, I never made it to step 4.</p><p>I'll never forget the first time I got a clue about what practicing really was. I had dropped in on a classmate in a practice room to chat a little. We got to talking about her piece, and she said she was working through it with "slow practice".</p><p>I didn't get it. I said, You're not a beginner, what's the point of slowing down a little bit if you need to play it fast?&nbsp;</p><p>No, she said,&nbsp;she wasn't just slowing down just a little bit,&nbsp;she was playing the section <em>as slowly as she possibly could</em>&nbsp;and <em>as</em>&nbsp;<em>loud as possible</em>. Like her fingers were hard of hearing and a little slow to catch on. Slow enough, she said, that it was <em>more difficult</em>&nbsp;to play and you had to <em>really think </em>about it. She claimed that it was the foundation of her daily practice. Don't <em>you</em> practice that way?</p><p>I was dumbfounded. It had genuinely never occurred to me, at age 16, that practicing was anything other than playing as fast as you could all the time. I remember very clearly being a little mad that no one had ever told me about this! (They probably did, but I wasn't listening)</p>























<hr />


  <h2>Practice Makes Permanent</h2><p>So, what is slow practice and how does it work?&nbsp;</p><p>As Dr. Noa Kagayama so aptly puts in his <a href="http://www.bulletproofmusician.com/is-slow-practice-really-necessary/">excellent article</a> on Bulletproof Musician, slow practice is really "slow-motion" practice. The motion of the fingers, hands and arms is slowed down to a point where all the sounds and movements are <em>magnified</em>, so the practicer is fully aware of everything that's happening in her hands, her ears and her mind. This magnification creates plenty of room to play with intention and perfect accuracy.</p><p>To figure out why this is important, we need to delve a little into how the brain actually controls complex movements.&nbsp;Think for a moment about what it's like to tie your shoes. When you were five years old, the first ten times you tied your shoes, you had to plan it out, visualize it, talk your way through it, and really concentrate. Then you figured out the steps, but it still took you a good minute to get them tied and they came undone a lot.&nbsp;</p><p>But now you do it in seconds, without thinking, maybe without even noticing you are doing it at all. Quick test: Can you explain in detail how to tie your shoes? I know I can't!&nbsp;So what happened? How come I can tie my shoes without "knowing" how to do it? Should I go buy some velcro sneakers?</p><p>Well, when you repeat a complex motion, it gets learned by a region of your brain called the <em>cerebellum. </em>The cerebellum is only about 10% of the volume of the brain, but it contains as many neurons as the rest of the brain put together. It controls the complex and precise movements we do every day, without thinking: climbing stairs, riding a bike, catching a ball, cutting up vegetables, writing a note, playing video games.</p><p>If you can think back, there was a time in your life that all of those things required a lot of conscious, sustained effort. Now you don't have to worry about them, because your cerebellum learned how to do it for you. And the cherry on top is that your cerebellum <em>completely</em> outdoes the "thinking, planning" parts of your brain when it comes pulling off smooth moves in style. It adds precision, speed and fluidity you can't get from conscious effort.</p><p>The password for the cerebellum is "repetition": anything you do more than once, the cerebellum says "Hey! I better get that down!" And I mean <em>anything</em>. The blessing and curse of the cerebellum is that it is completely <em>non-judgmental</em>. The judgmental parts of your brain are a mile away, and by the time they say "Wait a minute now, that was supposed to be a B-flat!" the cerebellum has taken E-flat to heart. It can't wait to impress you with how well it knows how to play the wrong note. So, we have to be very, very careful about what we repeat around the cerebellum.</p><p>And this shows us why slow practice works so well and mindless, sloppy repetition works <em>so badly</em>. Practice as we know it is the process of taking patterns of motion from the conscious mind and handing them over to the cerebellum. If you practice slowly, you can make sure that you are playing only the right notes, with the best fingering, and a stable,&nbsp;relaxed form. Everything that your cerebellum is overhearing is solid gold.</p><p>And the cerebellum is such a sponge, it actually takes many fewer repetitions than you would think to start to feel very comfortable. You'll notice a change when the music starts to "play itself". That's the cerebellum learning its new trick! And you'll find that there are a lot fewer stubborn mistakes to grind away if you <em>never repeat</em>&nbsp;those mistakes in the first place. And that means less repetition overall. Sure,&nbsp;mistakes will still pop up, but you only have to listen to what those mistakes are telling you:&nbsp;slow down here, and pay attention.</p>























<hr />


  <p>Slow, engaged, intentional playing from the very start is the bedrock of skillful practice. There's a reason it's a deep-running tradition in the world of professional musicians. It turns your practice into a well-tuned machine that cranks out sturdy and confident performances. It's something I wish I had known about a lot sooner: go slow to go fast!</p><h3>Next week –&nbsp;Practicing Away from the Piano</h3>























<hr />


  <h2>Subscribe!</h2><p>Enter your email below to stay up-to-date with news and new blog posts. I respect your privacy and do not share your information with any third parties.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>