<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>blog.brightstartutors.com</title>
	
	<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog</link>
	<description>mathematics and physics - learning and enjoying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Blogbrightstartutorscom" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="blogbrightstartutorscom" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Forgetting Mathematics</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/05/03/forgetting-mathematics/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/05/03/forgetting-mathematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning Math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1746</guid>
		<description>As a math tutor, I have seen this forgotten math attitude before, most recently from a fellow who was going to be taking the graduate school exam (GRE). He contacted me when he found that there was some of that forgotten math in the exam.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/GP_4qQFWkWY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/05/03/forgetting-mathematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Transit of Venus</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/04/26/the-transit-of-venus/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/04/26/the-transit-of-venus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Physics Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1698</guid>
		<description>On June 5, 2012, a rare astronomical event will occur: a transit of Venus.  This just means that Venus will be between the Earth and Sun, so that Venus will appear as a small dot on the Sun’s surface.  The relative motion of Venus and the Earth will cause the silhouette of Venus to drift across the Sun’s face over a period of several hours. Venus transits happen in pairs, eight years apart, so that the 2012 event is the second of a pair.  Once we have a pair of these transits, there will be no more for the next 105 years.  This odd timing is due to the vagaries of the orbits of the Earth and Venus.  If both orbits were exactly in the same plane, there would be a transit whenever Venus and Earth were in line with the Sun; roughly once every two years. As it happens, in almost every Earth-Venus-Sun alignment, Venus is in the sky either above or below the Sun’s disk.

Astronomers will observe the June event mostly as a curiosity, but the Venus transits that occurred in the eighteenth century were of intense interest, and the efforts to observe them constituted the biggest scientific enterprise of the century.   Britain, Austria, and France each launched expeditions to observe and time the transits from several locations throughout the world.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/QUHh01vgGmc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/04/26/the-transit-of-venus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atoms and Molecules</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/04/03/atoms-and-molecules/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/04/03/atoms-and-molecules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1688</guid>
		<description>Physicist Richard Feynman, in his Lectures on Physics, asked us to imagine that somehow all knowledge about nature, except for a single fact, was to be destroyed.  What fact, he asked, should scientists choose to pass on to their successors?  His choice was “Everything is made of atoms”. This, Feynman said, is the most important single piece of scientific knowledge that we have.

I thought of this recently when I read Steven Weinberg’s book The Discovery of Subatomic Particles (an excellent book, by the way, and written for a general audience).  At various places in the book, Weinberg describes the experiments and reasoning that lead from simple speculation about atoms to the eventual certainty that they exist. This post is a summary of that chain of thought.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/nZpG-2kYFo8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2012/04/03/atoms-and-molecules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding Formulas by Guessing</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/10/05/formulasbyguessing/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/10/05/formulasbyguessing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 06:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers and Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Number Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving Techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1594</guid>
		<description>In my high school library, there was a copy of the classic book "Men of Mathematics" by E.T. Bell. Each chapter is a short biography of a notable mathematician of the past (and yes, they are all men). In the chapter on Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855), I first encountered the famous story of how, as a 10 year old student, Gauss baffled his teacher by instantly solving a problem that the teacher assumed would occupy his student's an hour or more.

In this post, I will describe Gauss' insight, then show how a related problem can be solved by using some informed guesswork.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/JXSKa6yz0kM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/10/05/formulasbyguessing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>L2: What is it, and Where is it?</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/08/23/l2-what-is-it-and-where-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/08/23/l2-what-is-it-and-where-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1492</guid>
		<description>Instead of orbiting Earth, the James Webb Space Telescope will orbit the Sun in a special spot beyond the Earth that is a sort of gravitational island. The location is called “L2” (Lagrange Point 2). In this post, I will describe what L2 is, then show how to compute where it is relative to Earth. It's a terrific example of the power of basic algebra.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/KkxOVdDDnhs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/08/23/l2-what-is-it-and-where-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Gem From Newton’s Principia</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/04/26/a-gem-from-newtons-principia/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/04/26/a-gem-from-newtons-principia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrilling Math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1456</guid>
		<description>Isaac Newton's Mathematica Principia (1687) has been described as the most important, but also the least read, scientific book ever written. It has been little read mostly because it has been little comprehended. The book is filled with complex geometric diagrams, and Newton's explanations are brief, the assumption being that the reader's mathematical knowledge and ability is very high. 
However, there is at least one result that Newton derived in the Principia that is fairly easy to understand, and I will describe it in this post. It also happens to be one of the important theorems in the Principia: a proof that Kepler's Second Law  of planetary motion isa consequence of mechanics.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/T1WOTPHkbDA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/04/26/a-gem-from-newtons-principia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word Processing and Mathematics</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/03/06/word-processing-and-mathematics/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/03/06/word-processing-and-mathematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 06:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers and Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1412</guid>
		<description>This post is about creating, displaying, and publishing documents that have mathematical content. This is a troublesome thing for mathematics and science workers, because most word processing systems treat math as an add-on or an afterthought, if they have any provision for it at all.  Even when mathematics is supported, it may be difficult or impossible to do much more than print the document on paper.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/-IxOckoydY0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/03/06/word-processing-and-mathematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dimensional Analysis</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/02/05/dimensional-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/02/05/dimensional-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1265</guid>
		<description>Most people who have studied some physics or chemistry know that it is important to keep the units of our numbers straight when we do calculations. Failure to attend to units usually leads to wrong answers.  
What is not well known is that the analysis of units can often help scientists to derive formulas, even when the underlying physics is not well understood. How it works seems a bit mysterious, and the technique was not understood or appreciated until about 1870, when the great physicist James Clerk Maxwell laid out the principles of the technique, which is formally known as Dimensional Analysis.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/92YSW8XHwEw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2011/02/05/dimensional-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bayes Formula</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2010/12/29/bayes-formula/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2010/12/29/bayes-formula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 07:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Probability and Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math statistics probability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=1094</guid>
		<description>Most people who have been exposed to probability and statistics have come across Bayes’ Formula, but I suspect that many have not fully understood and internalized what the formula tells us.  This is unfortunate because, as we will see, the formula applies to situations where our intuition about probability can lead to wildly incorrect judgments. What is more, those situations often involve critical issues, such as interpreting the results of medical tests.
The importance of the formula is such that a whole branch of thought in science and statistics, Bayesian inference, or Bayesianism, springs directly from the formula and its implications.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/AJOnQ_vZ7Mg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2010/12/29/bayes-formula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Measuring the Speed of Light in 1676</title>
		<link>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2010/10/25/speedoflight/</link>
		<comments>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2010/10/25/speedoflight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiousCharacter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Physics Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brightstartutors.com/blog/?p=842</guid>
		<description>In 1676, the Danish astronomer Ole Romer did something quite remarkable for his time – he measured the speed of light. Although his value was not very accurate, it was the first demonstration that light does not travel instantaneously, a belief that been held by almost everyone from Aristotle on down. In this post I will describe how Romer did it, and then describe my little experiment to reproduce his measurements and calculations.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Blogbrightstartutorscom/~4/P2yY2F1_FGY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://brightstartutors.com/blog/2010/10/25/speedoflight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

