Bonefarm

Aaron Ben-Zeév's recent article entitled Is Chatting Cheating? prompted me to do some thinking about emotional infidelity. Although not a new phenomenon, emotional infidelity is a notion that, in recent years, has come to some prominence at least as language, due mainly to the inescapable juggernaut of media convergence. It is also, to some degree, a reflection on the generalized loosening of social mores that once would have kept button-down dads buttoned up and soccer moms carpooling, instead of "Seeking Friends" at Match.com or blogging on Facebook.

Sexual infidelity is pretty clear cut; someone steps outside the bounds of a relationship and engages in some form of sexual contact with another person. Although the implications and consequences are similar, emotional infidelity as a construct is a bit more murky, as it does not simply apply to sexual or romantic interpersonal relationships.

See All Stories In

Infidelity: Who Cheats, and Why?

Extramarital attractions are a fact of life. How you handle your impulses is another matter entirely.

Find a Therapist

Search for a mental health professional near you.

Find Local:

The notion of emotional infidelity can also apply to platonic same- or trans-gender relationships, as well as activities, work, exs, siblings, extended family, hobbies and even kids. Many women in the part of the country where I live and work ruefully refer to themselves as Wall Street Widows - non-interpersonal emotional infidelity in full flower.

Emotional infidelity is any situation that creates or causes some degree of emotional unavailability on the part of one partner that interferes with one particular aspect of the relationship, along with the quality of the relationship as a whole.

Obviously, and speaking to the thesis of Aaron's article, the most salient form of emotional infidelity is that which involves another person, and engages that person in a pseudo-romantic or pseudo-sexual relationship, whether proximal or at a distance. Stated plainly, it's a crush that's reciprocated, but not demonstrably acted upon.

Two things are true here. One is that the nature of communication and the ability to communicate with just about anyone anywhere has greatly increased opportunity. Human nature is such that if the opportunity for a behavior is increased, and the drive to engage in that behavior is for whatever reason unchecked, that opportunity will in all probability be exploited. Infidelity, whether extra-relational (see I Wasn't Looking for an Affair; It Just Happened), or emotional, is usually a matter of opportunity.

The second truth is something of a twist on the old "absence makes the heart grow fonder" line; the constancy of current communication actually intensifies this type of relationship and promotes its distortion. Whereas the absence of a lover increases desire, the constancy of a lover-at-a-distance can turn that person into a drug.

So, we have means and opportunity; what's the motive? Aside from the obvious motivations that one may harbor for stepping outside of his/her primary relationship, the two that seem to avail themselves most prominently to situations of emotional infidelity are fear and safety; fear of not wanting to get caught "doing anything" couched in the perceived safety of ostensibly not doing anything.

Taken from the perspective of risk management, emotional infidelity makes perfect sense. On the one hand you're not going to get caught with the babysitter, your secretary or the contractor. And on the other, are you really ever going to actually hook up with your cyber-soulmate from Boston when you have a spouse, kids and a job in Cincinnati? Not likely - so, there's a built in stop gap.

Regardless of the rationalization behind it, emotional infidelity is an expression of either the need or the desire to absent oneself from one's primary relationship, without actually leaving that relationship. Therein lies the core of the issue, and it is what defines emotional infidelity as if not exactly the same at least the social equivalent of sexual infidelity.

Whether you are physical engaged with another person or not, when you absent yourself from your primary relationship you are taking your attention away from that relationship in a way that interferes with it. It comes back to emotional availability. A great cinematic depiction of this is an interchange between Hilary Swank's character and that of her husband in Freedom Writers. He's not getting his needs met because she's focused on her students, so he ends up leaving.

What really complicates matters is that for the "cheating" partner, there is no real sense that s/he has transgressed because s/he isn't "doing anything" that can be demonstrated as "cheating", i.e. sex. Non-interpersonal "cheating" behavior is rationalized away as a necessity - long hours, relaxation, working out, etc. In the case of interpersonal emotional infidelity, the same sensibility holds true.

While there may indeed be a trail of emails or text messages to mark as a smoking gun, in the mind of the "cheater" s/he isn't really "doing anything". That leaves the other partner in the curious position of experiencing all of the hurt, anger and sense of rejection associated with an affair, while the "cheater" shrugs it off and "doesn't get it."

We are trained from a very young age that behavior begets consequences. Most of us understand that, but if you are doing something that is not really "doing anything", then why should there be consequences?

Somewhere along the line, the moral gravity associated with this sort of social transgression became transformed into the moral relativism that allows us to take office supplies from work. Who's it really going to hurt? - well, no one, but it's still stealing.

Here's the rub - in the case of emotional infidelity, you're stealing from yourself.

15 Must-Have Free Apps For Your Mac & Giveaway

2011-08-28T02:18:00.000-07:00

15 Must-Have Free Apps For Your Mac & Giveaway

KeyRemap4MacBook

2011-08-28T02:11:00.000-07:00

KeyRemap4MacBook

KeyRemap4MacBook is an awesome utility for keyboard customization for Mac OS X.

You can re-map any key without any restriction.
You can accelerate speed of the key repeat.
You can enter the keypad numbers by Fn+jkl..

Blog This! - Chrome Web Store

2011-08-28T02:06:00.000-07:00

Blog This! - Chrome Web Store

The Difficult Act of Giving A Girl Space

2011-08-20T13:54:00.000-07:00

The Difficult Act of Giving A Girl Space

The Difficult Act of Giving A Girl Space
I am posting this in the relationships section because I think it most heavily applies to LTRs.

One of the most difficult things to do is to give a girl the space she needs to not feel smothered by you. We all know that it is essentially impossible to prevent a woman from cheating on you. The emotional roller coaster that is the life of a woman provides men with some very difficult tasks. Among these tasks is the ability to keep a woman invested in the relationship and stable in her attraction to be a part of your life. Learning game makes it even more apparent to me that when engaged in a opportune senario, most girls (if not all) are vulnerable to disloyal temptations. In my humble opinion, this is heavily caused by a woman's drive/need to validate herself and lack of ability (in most women) to control her emotions.

So what can you do to prevent another guy from triggering those emotional moments that cause her to forget her associations with you? Nothing. You absolutely cannot shelter a woman into social slavery. This is something that I was certainly guilty of in the past. It is the age old argument between lovers where the jealously and insecurities take over and each person tries to instill limitations as to the social functions that each other may attend and to with whom. I remember throwing fit after fit when my LTR wanted to have nights out with her girlfriends. I knew guys would be hitting on them. And I knew that they were looking for male attention. For the longest time this caused issues with my inner game . I wondered, what am I doing that is not enough for her? Isn't my validation all she needs? And lately I have questioned the ideals behind why I tried to create the environment for my significant other in the first place. I have learned that woman need constant validation from both men and women alike. And there is no one person that can provide another with enough validation to sustain a healthy level of confidence and satisfaction in todays society.

Sheltering a woman can have some devastating consequences. For one, you are lowering your own value by telegraphing insecurity and neediness. This could eventually add fuel to the fire. She will become increasingly less attracted to you and it will only make for an easier theft by another male.

But lets look at this from a different angle. Sometimes it is very hard to reason with yourself a strong enough argument to put her well being before yours. By sheltering someone, your preventing them from living the fulfilling life that they desire. Your limiting their self-validation and causing their social skillet to melt away slowly. By all means, woman are hardwired to satisfy themselves by satisfying a male, but to use this reasoning to shelter her is immoral. Many guys have the attitude "well if she doesn't like it, theres 11 million others out there..". And they will put there foot down to force a woman to comply. Your selfishly starving the person you may care about most. Starving her from living the best life possible for her. What kind of way is that to treat someone you love?

Most importantly, you might put your foot down and eliminate 95% of the situations where she may be coerced to be unfaithful. But what happens during that last 5%? Your fucking yourself. Because she will be less prepared to exhibit emotional control, due to her lack of experience being confronted with these temptations. And sheltered women usually have LSE and partake in extreme validation seeking behaviors, right?

Its the same principle that parents make mistakes on when raising children. They shelter the children from the world out of fear of corruption. The result is a difficult adaptation when the child is finally released to his own freewill. Remember that home school kid acquaintance of yours that suffers from anti-social behavior and poor social calibration? That is what your doing to your LTR by choking her freewill and social freedom out of her.

By being passive about her desires to satisfy herself, I've noticed that it actually causes a girl's inner game to become more stable. She will seek validation less. For the most part, I think girls need to get hit on every now and then, just to shut up that little self-conscious person inside of them. Many girls don't cheat, and I think its because they don't feel the need to. Enough guys hit on them to shut up that little person inside of them. So they don't feel the need to take it to the extreme of cheating. For this reason, I have chosen to give my girls all the freedom they want to explore what they wish. I am not condoning disloyalty. But I am no longer going to try and stand in the way when a stampede of guys try for her affection.

I doubt this will prevent her from cheating entirely. But I think its the only thing a guy can really do to maintain a healthy lifestyle for her as well as minimize her need to be placed in situations where men are validating her.

I hope this is helpful for all my jealous friends out there. I am also writing this as a reminder to myself, to back off, and let her live her life.

If anyone has anything to add or dispute, please do, I look forward to any thoughts on this issue no matter how tangent.

Swift

Source:

The Difficult Act of Giving A Girl Space

Linux Freedom

2011-07-13T04:34:00.000-07:00

http://linuxfreedom.com/

CDMA PRL Downloads

2011-07-01T14:19:00.000-07:00

http://www.corolada.com/prl/

Remotely track your Mac should it get stolen

2011-05-24T22:08:00.000-07:00

VUWER 1.4.5 (pronounced like "viewer") is an application designed to remotely track your MacBook or MacBook Pro (or any other Apple computer) in the event that it is lost or stolen. VUWER is not foolproof, but it is reasonably secure, easy to implement, and costs nothing but a little time and effort to set up. (1) VUWER is free of charge, open source, and relies on standard OS X commands and readily available freeware applications for installation and operation. Also, since VUWER is written in Applescript, it is relatively easy to modify or enhance in any way you choose.

(2) You are in complete control of where the captured data from your stolen laptop is sent and how it is more...

WHAT'S NEW

Version 1.4.5:

Fixed bug that caused VUWER to fail with some email passwords containing special characters (Installation Option 1).
VUWER setup modified to prevent installation with a blank control string (Installation Option 1) and eliminate invalid configurations.

REQUIREMENTS
PPC / Intel, Mac OS X 10.4.11 or later.

Dell -595B Keygen

2011-05-24T16:33:00.000-07:00

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Dell -595B Keygen

Before I get spammed with even more emails, here are the C sources for a keygen suitable for -595B and other dells (courtesy of hpgl):
http://pastebin.com/yEsiqyQy

You need a regular C compiler for compiling an executable (e.g. mingw32/gcc).

So now let's sit back and watch the inflation happen...

Update: small fix (Windows binaries) - see this post.

Quick How-To:

Download the archive of the keygen from the link above. It contains two files: a C file (source code) and an executable. If you are on Windows, just unpack and double-click the executable. If you are on Mac/Linux/BSD, compile the C file:
gcc -o dell dell.c
You are asked to enter the serial number of your device. Use ONLY CAPITALS for the serial number.
Press Enter and you'll get the password. Keep in mind that the passwords are encoded for a QWERTY-type keyboard layout (US-EN). Also, some models require you to press Ctrl+Enter after entering the password.

Nothing but the web.

2011-05-24T06:24:00.000-07:00

House GOP demands Google and Apple answer questions on privacy | Political News

2011-04-28T01:16:00.000-07:00

House GOP demands Google and Apple answer questions on privacy | Political News: "After the revelation of smartphones storing users location members of the Energy and Commerce Committee demanded Google and Apple respond to consumer concerns,"

Share|

14 Cool Keyboard Tricks On Your Mac

2011-04-22T18:54:00.000-07:00

Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: The last notebook you'll ever need

2011-04-02T08:09:00.000-07:00

By Tom Yager

Created 2011-03-30 03:00AM

Not to take such advances for granted -- after all, the one-piece machined aluminum frame and dynamic GPU switching were among many unique and jaw-dropping innovations -- but where's the ultimate to-die-for model year leap, the upgrade so substantial that we may not see its like again for five years? As tight as money is now, buyers want to see double, triple, and order-of-magnitude level improvements to justify spending $1,799 to $2,499 on a notebook.

[ Read about the long-standing love affair between InfoWorld's Paul Venezia and the MacBook Air [1]. | Subscribe to InfoWorld's Technology: Apple newsletter [2]. ]
With the new Thunderbolt MacBook Pro, so nicknamed for its revolutionary high-speed I/O port, that's just what you'll get. The 15- and 17-inch quad-core models deliver twice the CPU performance of Core 2 Duo, three times the graphics performance of the previous generation's Nvidia GeForce GT 330M, and more than ten times the external I/O bandwidth of 800MHz FireWire. Even with a base price of just $1,199 and dual-core instead of quad-core CPUs, the new 13-inch MacBook Pro still outpaces prior Mac notebooks in terms of CPU and I/O performance.
This brand of magic can't be conjured by Apple's competitors. Sustained innovations like the MagSafe quick-disconnect charge port, the industrial-grade frame machined from a solid block of aluminum, digital optical audio input and output, automatic integrated/discrete GPU (graphics processing unit) switching, and a five-year battery already have no equal.
Now Apple has integrated Intel's just-released second-generation Core i5 (13-inch MacBook Pro) and Core i7 (15-inch and 17-inch models) into its popular commercial notebooks. By doing so, MacBook Pro has picked up the power of Intel's Turbo Boost dynamic overclocking, Hyper-Threading thread acceleration, 1,333MHz of DDR3 RAM, large Level 3 cache, and integrated memory controller. Intel's speedy new silicon and enlightened bus design, combined with Apple's full-custom motherboard and software, delivers those 2X CPU performance gains bragged about by Apple and proven in my benchmarks.
In the 15- and 17-inch models, Intel's stellar CPU is married with the most powerful and power-efficient mobile GPUs on the planet, AMD's Radeon HD 6000M series. The 17-inch MacBook Pro and the 2.2GHz 15-inch model feature AMD's Radeon HD 6750M GPU with 1GB of GDDR5 RAM, while the base 15-inch model uses the Radeon HD 6490M with 256MB of GDDR5 RAM. Apple uses a clever and simple technique to switch between low-power Intel integrated graphics and the gaming-grade AMD GPU on the fly. This is central to achieving a verified seven-hour battery life across all models, and that's without cheating: wireless networking active, display at midlevel brightness, and even battery-draining Flash Player running in the browser.
If, in all of this, you can't see a reason to upgrade your notebook, maybe I can bring the point home: This might be the last notebook computer you'll ever need or want. After more than two weeks of continuous testing, it's hard for me to imagine what I'd want in a notebook in three to five years that MacBook Pro doesn't deliver right now. Whatever I want, I'll plug into Thunderbolt, the game-changing 10-gigabit peripheral interconnect that deserves (and gets) its own section in this review. I have no lingering doubt that a PC notebook maker might trump MacBook Pro. What Apple has done requires metal, glass, genius, and OS X. It can't be replicated with plastic and Windows.

Test Center Scorecard

	20%	20%	20%	15%	15%	10%
MacBook Pro (Thunderbolt)	10	10	10	10	10	8	9.8 Excellent

Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: Configuration as testedThe system that Apple supplied for testing is the standard-configuration 17-inch MacBook Pro: 4GB of DDR3 DRAM, quad-core 2.2GHz second-generation Core i7 CPU, 750GB 5,400-rpm hard drive, 8X slot-loading SuperDrive DVD burner, and an AMD Radeon HD 6750M GPU with 1GB of GDDR5 memory. The price as tested: $2,499.
Because the configurations are virtually identical, nearly all of my discussion and conclusions can be applied directly to the 2.2GHz 15-inch MacBook Pro as well as the 17-inch unit under test. The more budget-conscious 15-inch model with a 2GHz CPU is obviously a tad slower, and it has a slightly less robust GPU (AMD Radeon HD 6490M with 256MB of GDDR5 memory). Even so, it shares the important traits of four cores, Hyper-Threading, Turbo Boost, fast memory, and a discrete GPU, so any performance hit should be well offset by the cost savings.
After a couple of passes through this review, I'm going to indulge in a bit of shorthand for your sake. From here out, when I say "Thunderbolt MacBook Pro," I'm referring to the virtually identical 2.2GHz 15- and 17-inch models. You can project my findings to the 2GHz 15-inch unit (not tested), adjusting for the slightly slower CPU and GPU. I tried to weave assumptions about the 13-inch MacBook Pro (not tested) into the story, but my preference for facts leads me to acknowledge the 13-inch model's existence, describe its configuration, and leave it at that. It's a fine machine at a very appealing price, but with two cores and no discrete GPU, it targets a different audience.
Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: CPU and videoThe 15- and 17-inch Thunderbolt MacBook Pro are nearly identical: Intel quad-core Core i7 CPU with 6MB of Level 3 cache and 4GB of 1,333MHz DDR3 RAM (user-expandable to 8GB). Video is supplied by an Intel HD Graphics 3000 integrated graphics chip and an AMD Radeon HD 6000-series discrete GPU.
To simplify things, we'll say that there are two GPUs in these MacBook Pro models: the Intel GPU and the AMD GPU. OS X switches between them as you launch and close apps, depending on whether those apps are deemed to benefit from the GPU. How does Apple know? It is a single-source supplier for all developer libraries (frameworks) for such features as video playback, 3D rendering, image manipulation, and PDF formatting. Apple also developed OpenCL, a programming language that's used to accelerate computation by off-loading math to the GPU. Whenever you load a GPU-enabled application, OS X seamlessly switches to the AMD GPU, and it keeps the AMD GPU in control until you close all GPU-enabled apps. The AMD GPU also kicks in when you plug in an external display.
I don't know your working style, but for me, the only thing the Intel GPU is good for is the log-in prompt. Intel's not particularly good at graphics -- a point to remember if you're comparison-shopping for notebooks. A Core i7 machine with integrated-only graphics is not a worthy alternative to MacBook Pro.
In previous MacBook Pro designs with Nvidia controllers, the discrete GPU put out a lot of heat, even at idle, and drained the battery rapidly -- not so with AMD's GPU. I see a more dramatic improvement in battery life from switching off Wi-Fi (do this when you plug in Ethernet) or lowering screen brightness than I do from closing GPU-enabled apps to put graphics in Intel mode.

Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: CPU architectureA mild warning for readers who didn't come for the science content: The next couple of sections are on the dense side, if only because they back up strong conclusions. If you find no beauty in the nuts and bolts, you'll miss nothing if you skip to the last paragraph under the "CPU benchmarks" heading.
This isn't the place to launch into a deep analysis of Intel's second-generation Core i7 technology, but a summary is in order. These are very new CPUs, released to retail by Intel in February 2011. They are based on a 32-nanometer fabrication process, allowing Intel to pack a lot of low-power transistors into a very small space. A single processor die houses four independent computing cores that run at widely varying clock speeds depending on workload and power management instructions from the OS.
Each core is capable of running considerably faster than its rated clock speed through a feature called Turbo Boost. For example, the 2.2GHz CPU in the 17-inch MacBook Pro can execute instructions at up to 3.3GHz if it can avoid getting too hot. Here's where the metal-vs.-plastic argument gains traction. A PC notebook's plastic case acts as an insulator, pooling heat around components, while MacBook Pro's unibody aluminum chassis dissipates it. The Mac is better able to keep heat-generating components like the CPU, GPU, wireless, RAM, hard drive, and battery (during charging) cool. In the past, this has allowed MacBook Pro to avoid the thermal throttling commonplace in PC notebooks. Today, it means Mac notebook cores can kick into Turbo Boost more often. That Mac notebooks are faster than PC counterparts isn't Apple fanboy mythology. It's by design.
Boosting the RAM speed by nearly one-third over prior generations, from 1,066MHz to 1,333MHz, figures significantly in speed improvements. This pairs nicely with the increase in Level 3 cache size, and it makes a RAM upgrade to the maximum 8GB a smart and affordable investment. You can upgrade your system's RAM yourself after purchase. Just don't buy the cheap stuff.
I elected to use SPECjbb2005 (Java server benchmark) as the primary CPU benchmark. This test simulates business transactions on a multithreaded host, providing insight into CPU and memory throughput and scalability. Progressive throughput benchmarks like SPECjbb2005 measure how much work can be put through the system before it slows down. You want to see significant increases in transactions as threads are added, up to the number of physical cores.
In server-class systems and clients with Hyper-Threading, I also look for a smooth downward ramp from the peak, indicating that the architecture will likely handle an overload of work without slowing down the whole system. To ensure a consistent environment, the tests were run with a maximum 1GB Java heap, which is just shy of what's needed to run 32 SPECjbb2005 threads.
Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: CPU benchmarksI tested the 2.2GHz 17-inch Thunderbolt MacBook Pro against two other Macs: a 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro and a two-processor, eight-core 2.93GHz Nehalem Mac Pro. The Mac Pro is architecturally closer to the new 17-inch MacBook Pro, and its results deserve consideration if you're looking at 17-inch MacBook Pro as a desktop replacement.
Note that the 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro I'm using for comparison hails from mid-2009. Apple followed this model with dual-core 15- and 17-inch MacBook Pro models, based on first-generation Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs and Nvidia GeForce GT 330M GPUs, less than a year ago. Compared to current models, these have slower RAM, half as many cores and Hyper-Threading units, smaller Level 3 cache, and less robust GPUs. However, if you bought a machine just nine months ago, you're not likely ready for an upgrade. It's far more likely that you're carrying a Core 2 Duo Mac or PC notebook, so that's my comparison target.

The SPECjbb2005 benchmark results are astonishing. It's not all about more cores. Faster memory, bigger L3 cache, and Turbo Boost help push the 17-inch Thunderbolt MacBook Pro past Mac Pro in single- and dual-threaded tests (see the table of SPECjbb2005 results[3]). You read that right -- for some workloads, a Core i7 MacBook Pro is measurably faster than a Nehalem Mac Pro. The new notebook's lead vaporizes once the Mac Pro's second CPU, bigger L3 cache, and split memory architecture kick in (the lesson: no single-socket workstations!), but any other result would point to faulty engineering. If you read my review of that machine [4], you'd know that's not a problem with the Mac Pro.
The Mac Pro redeems itself in the face of its DC-powered competition, but the not-so-old guard, the 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro, along with every notebook of its generation, gets thoroughly skunked, skinned, and shamed. Apple claims the new MacBook Pro is twice as fast as Core 2 Duo, my numbers back that up, and most important, it feels that fast. You'll notice the faster architecture most keenly with tasks that run from memory or CPU cache. Second launches of an app will be lightning-quick. Wake from sleep happens almost instantly. Most apps become significantly more responsive after you drive them a bit. That's because the activity moves most-used data from relatively slow memory (and even slower disk) to much faster cache.
As with all notebooks, the 5,400-rpm hard drive is the bottleneck. It's hard not to get impatient with disk speed when the rest of the computer is this fast, and Apple seems to recognize this. On the 2.2GHz 15- and 17-inch MacBook Pro, you can trade the 750GB, 5,400-rpm SATA drive for a 500GB, 7,200-rpm model, no charge. The 7,200-rpm drive upgrade closes the performance gap between notebook and desktop, but at the cost of added noise, heat, and battery drain. Solid-state drives (SSDs) are available options that I haven't tested in MacBook Pro.
While Intel should get loud applause for its second-generation Core CPUs, Apple deserves the credit for bringing a 2X speedup (Core i7 quad-core compared to Core 2 Duo) to market with a seven-hour battery life across all three models. Absent a custom-tuned OS with scheduling and power management that are fully enlightened about second-generation Core i7 and Core i5 features, it's just slightly faster silicon. OS X makes these processors sing.
Incidentally, make sure you use the OS that ships with the new MacBook Pro systems. If you boot from an older Mac or image a new MacBook Pro from an old disk, you'll miss out on the drivers that unlock the architecture's potential.

Notes: Thunderbolt MacBook Pro configured with 2.2GHz quad-core Core i7 CPU, 6MB L3 cache, 4GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM; Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro configured with 2.8GHz dual-core Core 2 Duo CPU, 6MB L3 cache, 4GB 1067MHz DDR3 RAM; Nehalem Mac Pro configured with two 2.93GHz quad-core Intel Xeon CPUs, 8MB L3 cache, 12GB 1066MHz DDR3 RAM.

Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: GPU performance
All benchmarks are controversial. There's no such thing as a typical user, so it's almost pointless to try to create performance benchmarks that emulate user experience. Instead, it's often best to try to push what you're testing to its limits and count the number of operations the target hardware can accomplish in a period of time.
Most GPU tests are based on video games. These are enormous fun for reviewers, but they bring in so many variables that results are tough for others to reproduce. It's impossible to know how much of the load is being shouldered by the CPU and how much is off-loaded to the GPU. I prefer pure GPU tests, and OpenCL, one of Apple's many patentable innovations made open instead, enables these findings.
[5]
The open source Displacement benchmark tests OpenCL and OpenGL performance by animating an irregular refractive shape. Taking the screen shot lowers the frame rate by about 20 frames per second.

Notes: Thunderbolt MacBook Pro configured with AMD Radeon HD 6750M discrete GPU, Intel HD 3000 integrated GPU, 1600 by 1000 pixel window; Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro configured with Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT discrete GPU, Nvidia GeForce 9400M integrated GPU, 1440 by 900 pixel window; Nehalem Mac Pro configured with AMD Radeon HD 4870 discrete GPU. Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro results are not directly comparable to Intel and AMD GPUs because a different shape is used, but do reflect relative performance.

I use the open source LuxRender as a raytracing back end for Blender 3D projects. It's fast, and the results are fantastic. The LuxRender team packaged its raytracer into a convenient benchmark called LuxMark. It solves the CPU/GPU problem by letting you test these components separately, but since LuxMark is a throughput benchmark, it also does a great job of testing GPU and CPU together. This is how GPU computing is supposed to be done, so to my mind, the GPU/CPU results are the most relevant.
Testing the throughput of the GPUs alone revealed that for the LuxMark benchmark, the AMD Radeon HD 6750M in the 2.2GHz 17-inch MacBook Pro (the same GPU is in the 2.2GHz 15-inch model) is about 4.25 times faster than the Nvidia GeForce 9600M that's in the 15-inch Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro. You can see the results in the accompanying table. No GPU is an island, though, so it's the combined CPU and GPU tests that better approximate real life and, it turns out, make for a more stunning multiplier than Apple marketing dishes out.
According to LuxMark, when the Intel CPU and AMD GPU in the new MacBook Pro join forces, they make a machine that's 7.5 times faster than Core 2 Duo. Not many commercial apps -- Final Cut Pro is one -- exploit this capability. Most apps, including Photoshop and other Adobe Creative Suite components, use OpenGL for drawing and the CPU for calculating. As GPU off-loading, a.k.a. GPGPU for general-purpose GPU, finds its way into software updates, mainstream apps as well as graphics apps will start knocking you out with multiples of the performance you're used to.
[6]
When Apple put Intel and AMD together, it created a monster. In the LuxMark raytracing test, 2.2GHz Thunderbolt MacBook Pro is 7.5 times faster than 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro.

Notes: Thunderbolt MacBook Pro configured with 2.2GHz quad-core Core i7 CPU, 6MB L3 cache, 4GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6750M discrete GPU; Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro configured with 2.8GHz dual-core Core 2 Duo CPU, 6MB L3 cache, 4GB 1067MHz DDR3 RAM, Nvidia GeForce 9600M GT discrete GPU; Nehalem Mac Pro configured with two 2.93GHz quad-core Intel Xeon CPUs, 8MB L3 cache, 12GB 1066MHz DDR3 RAM, AMD Radeon HD 4870 discrete GPU.

Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: ThunderboltThe ports along the left side of the new MacBook Pro look familiar, but there have been some key changes. The 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pro models have SD card slots, which are rated for SDXC. With capacities topping out at 128GB and transfer rates up to 30MBps, SDXC is inching closer to specs for solid-state storage devices. SD cards don't insert fully into the MacBook Pro, though, and you might knock the card out of place in midwrite. If you forget the SD card is sticking out and jam the notebook into a bag, you could easily damage the card or the port.
The 17-inch MacBook Pro trades the SD slot for ExpressCard/34, an expansion card standard that allows peripherals to tap the notebook's PCI Express bus. The port also provides USB 2.0 I/O, so many ExpressCard/34 cards are merely repackaged USB devices. Peripherals that actually leverage ExpressCard/34's high-speed bus link include gigabit Ethernet, solid-state storage, external SATA (eSATA) storage, video capture, and PCI bus card cages. But there will soon be a better way to connect such peripherals.
The headliner in MacBook Pro ports is Thunderbolt, the aforementioned order of magnitude (and then some) leap in external I/O. Camouflaged behind a mild-mannered Mini DisplayPort connector, Thunderbolt bypasses all other portable I/O standards and bounds straight to 20Gbps (10 gigabits per data channel, two channels) of potential bandwidth. This is the sort of innovation that sets my mind reeling with possibilities. Anyone disappointed by the absence of USB 3.0 in MacBook Pro needs to appreciate that Thunderbolt, which even graces the 13-inch model, blows the doors off USB 3.0. Apple had a chance to be first to market with Intel's innovative bus, and it was a brilliant move.
Regardless of what you read elsewhere, Thunderbolt is flat-out amazing. The second-generation Intel Core CPUs, especially the quad-core Core i7, have the headroom to drive much faster I/O. Apple demonstrated Thunderbolt by showing Final Cut Pro, its high-end video and film editing software, working in real time with four simultaneous streams of HD content fed by a Thunderbolt storage array. Up to six Thunderbolt devices can be daisy-chained together, all through the tiny Mini DisplayPort connector.
Thunderbolt will see its first widespread use in IT shops with multiple MacBook Pros. Target Disk Mode has been extended to Thunderbolt, and indeed, the quickest way to see if your MacBook Pro has Thunderbolt may be to boot it with "T" held down. If you have Thunderbolt, you'll see the lightning and FireWire logos side by side. Although it wouldn't be the most cost-effective use of a Mac, it's interesting that this will effectively create a FireWire 800/Thunderbolt gateway. Apple said that Thunderbolt cables will emerge this spring.
Because Thunderbolt uses PCI Express signaling, anything you can plug into a PCI Express bus can be turned into a Thunderbolt peripheral. It's up to vendors, but with Apple's adoption of Thunderbolt, I expect to see the same kinds of peripherals offered for ExpressCard/34 (yes, including USB 3.0), and then some. For example, Thunderbolt makes Fibre Channel and 10-gigabit Ethernet practical, creating interesting possibilities for the next Mac Mini server. For the MacBook Pro, Thunderbolt will redefine desktop docking.
As you'd hope given the AMD graphics firepower that Apple built into most MacBook Pros, the Thunderbolt connector is still useful for driving an external monitor. Thunderbolt treats displays as part of the device chain and speaks to them in their native protocol. No special display is necessary, and Apple's standard Mini DisplayPort adapters (for conversion to DVI, dual-link DVI, or HDMI) still work. If you use the HDMI adapter, multichannel digital audio output accompanies video. All MacBook Pro models drive dual-link DVI displays at resolutions up to 2,560 by 1,600. Thunderbolt's there if you need it, but it doesn't get in the way if all you have is a monitor.

Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: A lone issueWireless networking is well seen to by Broadcom components and well-placed antennas. The MacBook Pro's 802.11a/b/g/n radio is sensitive and power efficient, and Apple's drivers exploit its rapid multiband network scanning. Reconnecting after suspend is impressively quick. Bluetooth handles all worthwhile profiles, enabling tethering/modem, file transfer, serial port emulation, and high-fidelity stereo with remote control.
802.11 did present the single repeatable glitch encountered during my evaluation. Wireless ping tests between MacBook Pro and a Time Capsule base station revealed widely varying latency. In some cases, response packets lagged by more than 250ms -- latency that equates to forever in LAN terms. The lag was not present with an Ethernet connection or with a Hawking HWDN2 external USB Wi-Fi adapter.
I discovered that the problem disappears when the delay between packets is reduced to 200ms. I believe that OS X is aggressively powering down the wireless radio to extend battery life (radio is a major consumer of power), but that's opinion. Apple acknowledged my report and validated my tests, but a fix was neither deemed necessary nor made available by press time. Because the issue does not affect browsing, video or audio streaming, email, or other common network tasks, it may be purely academic, but I will continue to research it.
There's simply too much to say about the difference in user experience between the Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro and the new Thunderbolt Core i7 models. It's my job to transform subjective to objective through benchmarking and other tests, but in the end, what matters is how the machine feels, sounds, and drives.
After more than two weeks of carrying and living with the new 17-inch MacBook Pro, flipping over to the Core 2 Duo model periodically for testing, the difference is palpable. Every task and action starts and finishes markedly faster, making each return to the "old" MacBook Pro a frustrating experience. Two years is any Mac's prime.
Other differences, like the higher-quality built-in microphone, higher-resolution FaceTime HD Webcam, and support for the mic on an iPhone headset cord just made the experience that much more enjoyable. The only changes I'd make to the test machine are an increase in RAM to the 8GB maximum, and perhaps a trial of the 7,200-rpm hard drive. I expect that these tweaks would handily close the gap between the new MacBook Pro and a desktop. When Thunderbolt peripherals become more commonplace -- a given in light of Apple's brisk sales -- the Thunderbolt MacBook Pro won't just be the only notebook worth carrying. It may be the only computer a professional needs.
This article, "Thunderbolt MacBook Pro: The last notebook you'll ever need [7]," was originally published at InfoWorld.com [8]. Follow the latest developments in computer hardware [9] and mobile technology [10] at InfoWorld.com. For the latest business technology news, followInfoWorld.com on Twitter [11].

Source URL (retrieved on 2011-04-02 07:51AM): http://www.infoworld.com/d/computer-hardware/thunderbolt-macbook-pro-the-last-notebook-youll-ever-need-169

Links:
[1] http://www.infoworld.com/t/laptops/one-year-and-41-days-the-macbook-air-263?source=fssr
[2] http://www.infoworld.com/newsletters/subscribe?showlist=infoworld_tech_apple&source=ifwelg_fssr
[3] http://www.infoworld.com/sites/infoworld.com/files/media/image/specjbb2005_table.gif
[4] http://www.infoworld.com/d/mac/mac-pro-the-perfect-workstation-168
[5] http://www.infoworld.com/sites/infoworld.com/files/media/image/displacement_screen_lg.gif
[6] http://www.infoworld.com/sites/infoworld.com/files/media/image/luxmark_screen_lg.gif
[7] http://www.infoworld.com/d/computer-hardware/thunderbolt-macbook-pro-the-last-notebook-youll-ever-need-169?source=footer
[8] http://www.infoworld.com/?source=footer
[9] http://www.infoworld.com/d/computer-hardware?source=footer
[10] http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobile-technology?source=footer
[11] http://twitter.com/infoworld

Pure Mac: Software for Macintosh

2011-03-26T14:18:00.000-07:00

Pure Mac: Software for Macintosh

AppleDefects.com Product Wiki

2011-03-12T02:11:00.002-07:00

AppleComponents.com - Shop by Computer

2011-01-09T08:20:00.000-07:00

AppleComponents.com - Shop by Computer

REVIEW: PowerBook G4 Titanium

2010-12-17T09:07:00.000-07:00

Complete Model Number Listing

2010-12-04T11:29:00.001-07:00

This is a listing of all the models #s for Apple laptops, iPods, and iPhones.

Model #s and Speeds

Model #	Make	Display	Storage	Processor
3GS	iPhone
A1001	Titanium G4	15"		667MHz 667MHz/800MHz 867MHz
A1002	eMac	17"	40GB	1.0GHz 1.25GHz 1.42GHz
A1005	iBook G3	12"		600MHz 700MHz 800MHz 900MHz
A1007	iBook G3	14"		700MHz 800MHz 900MHz
A1009	Xserve	N/A
A1010	Aluminum G4	12"	60GB	1.0GHz 1.33GHz 867MHz
A1013	Aluminum G4	17"		1.0GHz
A1016	Apple Wireless Keyboard
A1019	iPod 2nd Gen	2"	10GB 20GB	90MHz
A1025	Titanium G4	15"		1.0GHz 867MHz
A1040	iPod 3rd Gen	2"	15GB 20GB 40GB	90MHz
A1044	Mac Mini	N/A		1.5GHz G4
A1046	Aluminum G4	15"		1.0GHz 1.25GHz
A1047	Power Mac G5	N/A	80GB	1.6GHz 1.8GHz 1.8GHz (x2) 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz/2.0GHz (x2) 2.0GHz 2.0GHz (x2) 2.3GHz (x2) 2.5GHz (x2) 2.7GHz (x2)
A1048	Apple Keyboard	N/A
A1051	iPod Mini	1.67"	4GB 6GB
A1052	Aluminum G4	17"		1.33GHz
A1054	iBook G4	12" 1TB	1TB	1.0GHz 1.2GHz 800MHz
A1055	iBook G4	14"		1.0GHz 1.2GHz 1.33GHz 933MHz
A1058	iMac G5	17"		1.6GHz 1.8GHz 2.0GHz
A1059	iPod 4th Gen	2"	20GB 40GB 60GB	80MHz
A1065	iMac G5	20"		1.25GHz
A1068	Xserve	N/A		2.0GHz 2.0GHz (x2) 2.3GHz (x2)
A1076	iMac G5	20"		1.8GHz 2.0GHz
A1081	Cinema Display	20"
A1082	Cinema Display	23"
A1085	Aluminum G4	17"		1.5GHz
A1095	Aluminum G4	15"		1.33GHz 1.5GHz 1.5GHz G4
A1099	iPod 4th Gen	2" 2.5"	30GB 40GB 60GB	80MHz
A1103	Mac Mini	N/A		1.25GHz 1.33GHz 1.42GHz 1.5GHz G4
A1104	Aluminum G4	12"		1.5GHz
A1106	Aluminum G4	15"		1.5GHz 1.67GHz
A1107	Aluminum G4	17"	160GB	1.67GHz
A1112	iPod Shuffle 1st Gen	N/A	1GB 512MB	65MHz
A1114	Mac Mini	N/A	120GB	1.5GHz Core Solo 1.67GHz Core Duo
A1117	Power Mac G5	N/A	160GB 250GB	2.0GHz 2.0GHz (x2) 2.0GHz Dual Core G5 2.3GHz 2.3GHz (x2) 2.3GHz Dual Core G5 2.5GHz (x2) 2.5GHz Quad Core G5
A1133	iBook G4	12"	40GB	1.33GHz
A1134	iBook G4	14"		1.42GHz
A1136	iPod 5th Gen	2.5"	30GB 60GB 80GB	80MHz
A1137	iPod Nano 1st Gen	1.5"	1GB 2GB 4GB	80MHz
A1138	Aluminum G4	15"		1.67GHz
A1139	Aluminum G4	17"		1.67GHz
A1144	iMac G5	17"		1.9GHz 1.9GHz G5
A1145	iMac G5	20"		2.1GHz
A1150	MacBook Pro	15"		1.83GHz Core Duo 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo 2.0GHz Core Duo 2.0GHz/2.16GHz Core Duo 2.16GHz Core Duo 2.2/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
A1151	MacBook Pro	17"	120GB	2.16GHz Core Duo
A1152	Apple Mighty Mouse	N/A
A1173	iMac Intel	17"		1.83GHz Core Duo
A1174	iMac Intel	20"	250GB	2.0GHz Core 2 Duo 2.0GHz Core Duo
A1176	Mac Mini	N/A		1.66GHz Core Duo 1.67GHz Core Duo 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz Core Duo 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo
A1177	Power Mac G5	N/A	160GB	2.0GHz (x2) 2.0GHz Dual Core G5 2.3GHz
A1181	MacBook	13.3" Glossy	120GB 13.3" 160GB 250GB 80GB	1.83GHz Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz Core Duo 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo 2.0GHz Core Duo 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo 2.1GHz Core 2 Duo 2.2/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2GHz
A1186	Mac Pro	N/A		1.66GHz Core Duo 2.66GHz (x2) 2.66GHz Quad Core Xeon 2.66GHz/2.93GHz Quad Core Xeon 2.66GHz/3.0GHz Eight Core Xeon 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo 3.0GHz Quad Core Xeon
A1195	iMac Intel	17"	80GB	1.83GHz Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz Core Duo 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo
A1196	Xserve	N/A	80GB	2.0GHz (x2)
A1199	iPod Nano 2nd Gen	1.5"	2GB 4GB 8GB	80MHz
A1200	iMac Intel	24"		2.16/2.33GHz Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo
A1203	iPhone 1st Gen	3.5"	16GB 8GB	400MHz
A1204	iPod Shuffle 2nd Gen	N/A	1GB 2GB	65MHz
A1207	iMac Intel	20"	250GB	2.16GHz Core 2 Duo
A1208	iMac Intel
A1211	MacBook Pro	15"	120GB	2.16GHz Core 2 Duo 2.33GHz Core 2 Duo 2.5GHz/2.6GHz Core 2 Duo
A1212	MacBook Pro	17"		2.33GHz Core 2 Duo
A1213	iPod Touch 1st Gen	3.5"	16GB 32GB 8GB
A1219	iPad Wi-Fi	9.7"	16GB 32GB 64GB	1.0GHz 1GHz
A1224	iMac Intel	20"	160GB	2.0GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo
A1225	iMac Intel	15" 24" 27"	160GB	2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz/2.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz/3.06GHz Core 2 Duo 2.93GHz Core 2 Duo 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo
A1226	MacBook Pro	15"	120GB 160GB	2.2/2.4GHZ Core 2 Duo 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz/2.6GHz Core 2 Duo
A1229	MacBook Pro	17"		2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz/2.6GHz Core 2 Duo 2.6GHz Core 2 Duo
A1236	iPod Nano 3rd Gen	2"	4GB 8GB	80MHz
A1237	MacBook Air	13.3"		1.6GHz Core 2 Duo 1.6GHz/1.8GHz Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.1GHz Core 2 Duo
A1238	iPod 6th Gen	2.5"	120GB 160GB 80GB
A1241	iPhone 3G	3.5"	16GB 8GB	600MHz
A1260	MacBook Pro	15"		2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.5/2.6GHz Core 2 Duo 2.5GHz Core 2 Duo 2.6GHz Core 2 Duo
A1261	MacBook Pro	17"		2.5/2.6GHz Core 2 Duo 2.5GHz Core 2 Duo 2.5GHz/2.6GHz Core 2 Duo 2.6GHz Core 2 Duo
A1271	iPod Shuffle 3rd Gen	N/A	2GB 4GB	65MHz
A1278	MacBook	13.3"	160GB 250GB	2.0GHz Core 2 Duo 2.26GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.53GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo
A1279	Xserve	N/A		2.26GHz Quad Core Xeon
A1283	Mac Mini	N/A		2.0GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo
A1285	iPod Nano 4th Gen	2"	16GB 8GB	80MHz
A1286	MacBook Pro	15"	120GB 250GB 320GB 500GB	2.2/2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core i5 2.53GHz Core 2 Duo 2.53GHz/2.66GHz Core i5 2.53GHz/2.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core i7 2.66GHz/2.93GHz Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz/3.06GHz Core 2 Duo
A1288	IPod Touch 2nd Gen	3.5"	16GB 2GB 32GB 8GB	400MHz
A1289	Mac Pro	N/A	640GB	2.66GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
A1297	MacBook Pro	17"	200GB 250GB 500GB	2.53GHz Core i5 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz Core i7 2.66GHz/2.8GHz Core i7 2.66GHz/2.93GHz Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz/3.06GHz Core 2 Duo 2.93GHz Core 2 Duo
A1303	iPhone 3GS	3.5"	16GB 32GB 8GB	600MHz
A1304	MacBook Air	13.3"	120GB	1.6GHz Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo
A1311	iMac Intel	21.5"	1TB 500GB	3.06GHz Core 2 Duo 3.2GHz Core i3
A1312	iMac Intel	27"	1TB 2TB	2.8GHz Core i5 2.93GHz Core i7 3.2GHz Core i3
A1318	iPod Touch 3rd Gen	3.5"	32GB 64GB 8GB
A1320	iPod Nano 5th Gen	2.2"	16GB 8GB	80MHz
A1332	iPhone 4	3.5"	16GB 32GB	1.0GHz A4 1GHz
A1337	iPad Wi-Fi + 3G	9.7"	16GB 32GB 64GB	1.0GHz 1GHz
A1342	MacBook	13.3"	250GB	2.26GHz Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
A1347	Mac Mini	N/A		2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
A1366	iPod Nano 6th Gen	1.54"	8GB
A1367	iPod Touch 4th Gen	3.5"	32GB 8GB	1.0GHz A4
A1369	MacBook Air	13.3"	250GB	2.13GHz Core 2 Duo
A1373	iPod Shuffle 4th Gen	N/A	2GB
A1378	Apple TV 2nd Gen	N/A	8GB	1GHz A4
iMac9,1	iMac Intel
M2453	iBook G3 Clamshell	12"		300MHz
M3979	Power Mac G3	N/A	8GB	300MHz
M4753	Powerbook G3 Wallstreet	12" 14"		233MHz 266MHz 292MHz 300MHz
M5183	Power Mac G4	N/A	10GB 20GB	350MHz 400MHz 450MHz 500MHz 733MHz
M5343	Powerbook G3 Lombard	14"		333MHz 400MHz
M5521	iMac G3	15"	20GB	400MHz 500MHz 600MHz
M5769	Apple Pro Mouse	N/A
M5884	Titanium G4	15"		400MHz 500MHz
M6411	iBook G3	12"		366MHz 466MHz
M6497	iBook G3	12"		500MHz 600MHz 700MHz
M6498	iMac G4	15" 17"		1.0GHz 700MHz 800MHz
M7572	Powerbook G3 Pismo	14"		400MHz 500MHz
M7642	Power Mac G4 Cube	N/A		450MHz
M7886	Power Mac G4 Cube	N/A		450MHz
M8407	Titanium G4	15"		550MHz 667MHz 800MHz
M8413	iBook G3	14"		600MHz
M8493	Power Mac G4	N/A	40GB 80GB	1.0GHz 733MHz 800MHz 867MHz 933MHz
M8541	iPod 1st Gen	2"	10GB 5GB	90MHz
M8570	Power Mac G4	N/A	160GB 80GB	1.0GHz 1.0GHz (x2) 1.25GHz 1.42GHz x2 867MHz
M8670	Power Mac G4	N/A		1.25GHz
M8689	Power Mac G4	N/A		1.0GHz
M9020	Power Mac G5	N/A		1.6GHz
M9435	iPod Mini	1.67"	4GB
Macbook	Macbook
Macbook Pro Unib	Macbook Pro
MacPro1,1	Mac Pro	N/A	250GB	2.66GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
MacPro2,1	Mac Pro	N/A		3.0GHz Eight Core Xeon 3.0GHz Quad Core Xeon
MacPro3,1	Mac Pro	N/A		2.8GHz Eight Core Xeon
MacPro4,1	Mac Pro	N/A		2.26GHz/2.93GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon
PowerMac8,1	iMac G5
Toshiba	Hard Drive	n/a	60 GB	n/a

Gainsaver - PowerBook Notebook 15.2" 1.67 GHz G4. - Apple Computer M9969LL/A

2010-11-18T21:57:00.001-07:00

Gainsaver - PowerBook Notebook 15.2" 1.67 GHz G4. - Apple Computer M9969LL/A

Share|

12" Powerbook Disassembly and Repair

2010-11-17T00:19:00.001-07:00