Brane Smasher Blog

2013-07-16T18:38:00.002-05:00

The New Racial Urban-Understanding of Cultural Differences and Bigotry Dictionary…

Rate This

I have learned sooo much on race relations and bigotry today, it's hard to know where to begin. Rachel Jeantel (chief witness for the persecution of George Zimmerman) took the time to bring us all closer in understanding by appearing on the Piers Morgan Show. So here's what I know now: #1. All males, white black, asian, hispanic or "siamese" as Jeantel put it are "Niggas". I cannot tell you all what a huge relief it was to finally understand that. I mean since the 1950's I have struggled with that "N" word, believing it was actually NOT Nigga, but the "er" version. But Jeantel made it clear that no no no, the word is "Nigga" and no one should feel it racist to call another man Nigga, that's just the "old-school" in us. Nigga according to Jeantel, means "male" as in any man of any race, complexion or sexual orientatio... ya well maybe not orientation since Jeantel also stated that she believed George Zimmerman was #2. "that way" as in a gay child-rapist, so I extrapolate that a gay "male" can't by urban definition, be a Nigga.

Then after all of that, I come to find out that according to Jeantel #3. "cracker" is not the actual term used in the new urban vernacular. It's actually "Cracka", which again without the "er" means something entirely different than a "white" man. It means "a police" or someone attempting to behave like a police. Wow, no wonder Trayvon was so freaked, He thought he was being pursued by a creepy-ass'd --likely homosexual child rapist-- "police" who was probably following Trayvon home in order to rape his little brother and eat all their Skittles. So, in Rachel's estimation, Trayvon ignored her pleas to "run Trayvon run" for home because when a homosexual-Nigga-Cracka is following someone who isn't "that way" it could be really bad. If only Trayvon would have listened to Rachel and just ran away home, none of this would have happened. But he didn't. As Rachel indicated, Trayvon turned back to pursue Zimmerman because he was a creepy-ass'd Cracka that was gonna rape him and his little brotha then eat their Skittles and wash it all down with the ice tea (not the famous Nigga Ice T but the actual tea based drink. (I'm bettin it wasn't Two if by Tea, ehr ahhh -- but I digress).

Now as I have researched, in urban lingo a girl or woman is still spelled "Ho". So we had on that night, two Nigga's one suspected of homosexual-child-rapist tendencies, and the other Nigga --Trayvon-- on top beating the shit out of the gay Nigga --Zimmerman-- about whom the Ho Jeantel had just alerted Trayvon, in order to save two family Nigga's and a Ho at home so to keep them all safe from the gay child rapist cracka with an official "police" aura about him. All was cool until a third Nigga came out to see WTF was goin on and witnessed the Bigga Nigga straddling the Smalla Nigga and layin some Kung Fu style hurtin on his ass, which in terms of the hood is defined as #4. "Whoop-Asss". Now we did not get any New Racial Urban guidance on the particular definition of “ass” from Jeantel so I have to assume ass --old school-- simply refers to the act of beating the hell outta one Nigga's body by anotha Nigga without specifically targeting the posterior "butt" or "bumpa-cola" (spanish) area which given the narative Jeantel presented might bring the sexuality of Trayvon into question as well. Of course he's not here to deny it so the accusation might have stuck. Thank god it nevah came to that.

I think much more could be done to bring all races to a greater understanding of Black culture if NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN, HBO, TLC, BHC... or some such network would create a future for Jeantel by coming up with an educational "Ask Jeantel" show where viewers and or listeners could call in and ask Jeantel to define the many other words in terms of The New Racial Urban-Understanding of Cultural Differences and Bigotry Dictionary. Dedicated of course to Trayvon Martin, one Bad-ass'd though tragically deceased "N" word with an "A" not an "er".

2013-07-14T11:39:00.003-05:00

Trayvon Martin Was Not Innocent and Not a Child (Zimmerman Not Guilty) Originally Posted at my WordPress.com Blog 7/10/2013

I base my opinion today on my own experiences, on everything I’ve seen and heard during the Zimmerman trial, and from an alternate media (God knows the lame-stream media wouldn’t) that has researched thoroughly over the past 16 months who Trayvon Martin was and who George Zimmerman is. Based thereon, I believe as follows: that Trayvon Martin was a thug, a punk who fancied himself a bad-ass. Trayvon set out to prove himself “bad” the night of February 26th 2012, when he doubled back to confront — blindside and cold-cock — George Zimmerman who had every right to be suspicious of any hooded-stranger walking in the dark through the yards of his neighbors rather than on the sidewalk or in the street. George Zimmerman was as most of us know, a neighborhood “watch captain” whose neighbor’s had suffered many burglaries by characters that would likely appear just as Martin did lurking about in dark shadows. Zimmerman had actually followed proper procedure by calling and alerting Police of the situation he observed. George Zimmerman clearly thought it important that the police be enabled to find the guy in the hoodie (Martin) making every effort to provide them with accurate intel. Doesn’t sound like the act of a racist that’s hell-bent on killing a black man.

Trayvon Martin, on the other hand, had an entirely different agenda that night. After Zimmerman had abandoned the effort to keep track of Trayvon, at the behest of the police dispatcher, and was returning to his car after checking the street-signs where he’d last seen Martin, poor old George was cold-cocked by Trayvon Martin who had doubled back to pursue and lay a world-class beating on him, most likely to convince his “cultural” peers that he was indeed one bad-ass’d “N”-word — as self-described on Twitter. Yup, and to prove it, Trayvon intended to kill the “creepy-ass’d [white] cracker”, telling Zimmerman “you’re gonna die tonight”. Yeah, Trayvon Martin was a real innocent victim,and he was also the thug that tested positive for drugs in his system, the same one that bragged about being into fighting and who routinely made racist comments about whites not to mention depraved sexual comments about women. And on the night of February 26, 2012 Trayvon Martin finally got the opportunity to prove to the sub-culture he most wanted to impress just how really really “BAD” he was. But little Trayvon didn’t anticipate that Zimmerman — who was not a tough guy by any standard or description — would have a gun which he was prepared to use as his ultimate defense in a life threatening situation. Oooops!

Truth be told, Zimmerman after having his nose broken by Martin, screamed repeatedly for help while pinned to the ground and being beaten. It wasn’t until he realized Martin was about to detect his (Zimmerman’s) gun, that Zimmerman truly believed Trayvon’s forewarning that he was “going to die” that night. In Zimmerman’s mind, his only chance of survival was to actually use the gun he carried, in self defense before it was used on him. So, Trayvon was just an innocent boy? Bullshit! I can tell you from first hand encounters that in the street, many 12 year olds learn how to become thugs and drug dealers first and, especially in the prevalent gang-banger sub-culture across this country, by the time they reach sixteen or seventeen most of that type are stone-cold killers. George Zimmerman is lucky to be alive and the only thing that saved his life was the last desperate act, before losing consciousness, of being first to use the GUN in self-defense. I find it curious that no-one has to this day considered that just maybe Trayvon could have been linked to the neighborhood burglaries. Statistically most burglaries are local. He was familiar enough with the neighborhood though he was just visiting a relative for a while; and judging from his own self-portrayed-image on Twitter this bottom-feeding wannabe bad ass was IMO definitely capable of it.

Let’s be absolutely clear about one thing — George Zimmerman was on that night as he remains to this day, a neighborhood HERO! But won’t be remembered for it. And Trayvon Martin — unfortunately for himself and his family — died being the thug he chose to be. And HE won’t be remembered for that.

UPDATE: VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY FOR GEORGE ZIMMERMAN. JUSTICE WAS FINALLY SERVED BY A JURY THAT SAW A SIMPLE TRUTH THAT THE RACE BAITERS, PROSECUTORS AND POLITICIANS REFUSED TO SEE — GEORGE ZIMMERMAN HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO SAVE HIS OWN LIFE OR LOSE IT TO THE ANGRY AND VICIOUS ATTACK BY TRAYVON MARTIN. WE ALL KNOW THAT FOR RACISTS LIKE rev. Al, like Eric Holder, like rev. Jesse, BHO and now also according to Harry Reid this isn’t over. Judging from recent Twitter feeds George Zimmerman and his family will be in fear for their lives for the rest of their lives. What a shame it is that the aforementioned race-baiters have led the entire nation to the brink of a racial war. Shame on them!

To:Representatives Boehner and Cantor...

2010-12-01T16:23:00.011-06:00

Get your heads out of your asses! I shouldn't have been surprised I guess. I've heard over and over and over what dim-wits neo-cons are. And now the two of you have converted that assertion into an indisputable truth... I am depressed!

Mr. Boehner, just what common ground would you suggest we look for with a devout communist, hmmm? This is no time for open arms and civility -- we are at war with the enemy of our liberty who has acquired the high ground within our White House. Obama is the radicalized son of a devout communist. His associations have long been with radical communists and my dear Mr. Boehner, as has been repeated and proven countless times throughout history, "the apple does not fall far from the tree". In this case we have a real bad apple that a BUSHel of mindless dolts known as neo-cons allowed to become the first completely un-vetted president in our nation's history. Common ground indeed!

And as for you Mr. Cantor, so now all the big hearted republicans such as yourself want to force insurance companies to cover pre-existing--unhealthy--conditions, and if that weren't enough you also like the idea of requiring them to continue coverage for "young people" via their parent's insurance plan until age 26? You presumptuous arrogant jerk! Apparently it's true, neo-con idiots are just the slower road to a Global Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Hey by the way, Representative Cantor, I can't afford car insurance with 3 buck a gallon gas and having taken a 40% cut in income the past 18 months, so how about making sure I get full after-the-fact collision coverage, with an order of life insurance on the side, when I drive my car off the frkng road next time I'm listening on the car radio and hear you two idiots gittin all kumbaya with Obama?

How much more simply could the mandate of this past election have been put to you? In case you were out on the day it was discussed in the media, the TEA Party, primarily responsible for said mandate, put it something like this: 1). Stop the Obama, Reid, Pelosi communist agenda dead in it's tracks. 2). Repeal Obama care as often as it takes until it can be accomplished permanently. 3). Cut spending and prevent the Democrats from raising taxes. Oh and by the way, if I hear you morons refer to that as "extending the Bush tax cuts..." one more time I'm gonna blow out every last vein, vessel, artery and capillary in my body. The Bush tax cuts were tax cuts only once -- the day they were enacted then signed into law. You aren't "extending tax cuts" YOU ARE CONTINUING CURRENT TAX RATES and the Democrats are attempting to RAISE those TAX RATES. But I digress! Number 4). Hold your ground, do not negotiate, do not compromise do not look for common ground with Democrats because we -- the people of these several united States of America -- WON! Do you understand? WE WON!!!$#@^%$$!$#@!

Now as I said, get yer heads outta yer asses and do our will, or prepare for a buttt thrashin the likes of which even your daddies never imagined to put upon you!

Welcome to a neo-Nightmare

2010-09-21T14:56:00.012-05:00

There’s no sense wasting time with pointless details from the past several weeks. Let it suffice to say that my new friend, Abdi, whom I’ve known only that long just told me a story, one ringing with such truth, that whatever came before is simply irrelevant. Less than two hours ago I found myself engaged in a friendly debate over the political situation here in America. In the course of our discussion I said to Abdi “my greatest fear is that we’ve already spiraled irrevocably down the Marxist path and that November’s elections might be more or less a sideshow of the kind…” but before I could finish the point Abdi stopped me with a gesture and an emphatic “No!” followed by a soft “no” spoken as he shook his head.

Now this fellow’s a gentle soul of Somali descent, early to mid-thirties, heavyset for the type. Working day and night at two jobs, assimilating into our culture, trying hard to fulfill an American dream. Abdi said he came here a decade ago from Western Europe with his wife, hoping to escape the growing radical Muslim tyranny steadily eroding personal liberty over-there. So what he said next was credible in as much as I’m convinced he believed every word…

“No my friend, you do not understand. This is not about Marxism. Marxism is simply the most compatible platform from which to launch Sharia, and for radicals of the Muslim faith an America dominated under Sharia law is the objective. The President – Obama -- is fraudulent, whether or not he is known as a Muslim, he is not a Christian. Think of the political debate in this country as one might consider a game of chess. Diversion is a most useful tactic. The entire debate regarding whether your constitution is being cast aside and replaced with socialist dictatorship is a diversion. Truly, it is being cast aside, though to be replaced with fascist Sharia not socialism. To Muslim radicals who are not content to worship God in peace and live a life of moderation as their free will might allow, only three ways exist to deal with the American infidels; convert them to Islam, force non-believers into submission under Sharia where they will be taxed for the privilege to exist, or, kill them.”

I said “yeah I’ve heard all that before Abdi and this isn’t Western Europe, it’s America; we have guns and we vote. We aren’t the push-overs our cousins across the pond seem to be.”

“And that”, said friend Abdi, “is why you are in the greatest danger of losing. Consider this, you have all your life grown accustomed to an assumption that elections will occur every two years and that the results will be honored. But Americans are not so accustomed to third world politics where elections are simply there to appease. But you have already seen the signs of such corruption here. Many have suspected that certain elections were tampered with in recent years, is that not true?” Well what could I say other than yes. “Whether that is true or not, whether such tampering is even effective or not, the outcomes of future American elections are being assured by powerful forces. Most inner city and minority communities have been organized by radical activists seeking to corrupt the political process by any means necessary, and they are now in place, ready to take the next step when called to do so”.

I asked Abdi what on earth that meant, to which he responded as follows: “remember in the past election, the neo Black Panthers intimidating voters and the tens of thousands of Acorn activists?” yes, I said, of course. “They are radical revolutionaries just as their brethren from within organizations as the ‘Nation of Islam’. They have formed alliances with Islamic radicals who follow assorted mullahs and clerics from abroad that ascribe to the most extreme orthodoxy of the holy Quran. They’ve been preparing for holy Jihad against the American infidel, to overtake this country in the name of Alah, to convert as slaves those who can be converted, to impose oppressive taxes upon those who will submit to Sharia under their new masters for the privilege just to exist, and, to kill those who persist in resistance to this change. Many black-American Muslims, Hispanic converts and gang members as well as self-hating liberals lacking self-respect, are supporting this revolution from positions of anger, desiring to subordinate white men, women and all non-Muslims to a permanent underclass”.

I laughed, though uneasy, and said “Abdi that’s nuts, and if that’s what’s going on, they’re underestimating the free-will and resolve of we Americans to unite in common to remain free”.

Abdi replied softly, “no my friend you underestimate how a statistically few, well-armed revolutionaries can overthrow a government and take control of an entire nation. In addition to the millions of Muslims 10% to 15% of whom are radical Islamists, there are by most estimates 20 million illegal aliens in America, some are Muslim, many more are third world criminals, members of the drug cartels from South American places such as Venezuela, where men as Hugo Chavez export them to become mercenaries for Islam, enjoying the thought of over-throwing the constitutional government of the United States in favor of a fascist regime similar to their own. But even they have no real understanding of what a regime governed by Sharia law would eventually mean to their own dictatorships. They do not understand their eventual role. Just as laboring masses have always become the useful idiots necessary to support Marxist dictatorships, infidels and even devout Muslims of all colors and nationalities will serve the same purpose for radicalized Islam. The goal in imposing Sharia is not to overtake America per se, it is to provide a system of law similar in affect to socialism. A law intolerant of free will, intolerant of free speech, intolerant of individual liberty, incompatible with free enterprise and private sector profits which empower individuals. Their goal is an incremental step towards overtaking the entire world for Alah. And to that end, my friend conquering the most powerful nation, one which possesses the most effective and technologically advanced Nuclear arsenal , one with the military capability to threaten the entire world, is the objective. Militarily, America’s generals will be replaced, the ranks replenished with those willing to submit to Sharia or too fearful not to, as for the non-compliant, they must be eliminated”.

He ended the conversation with this. “I came here with my wife in the hope America would remain free, that Radical Islam would be rejected and never allowed to thrive. I could never imagine, especially after the September 11, 2001 attacks that Americans would act so foolishly in electing corrupt individuals to positions of power in their own government and that they could be so ignorant of what evil looked them in the eye. Is anyone paying attention to the extremists President Obama has appointed to positions of power as Czars and employees in his administration? If they had they would know these people have said as much as I have told you throughout their careers. The arrogance with which so many Americans have ignored these warnings is the same arrogance which has always empowered the fascist rulers who intend to enslave them.”

As happens every day at this time, my alarm went off. I reached over to smack the snooze button, knocking the clock off the night-stand in the process; man this one was way too real. So 'I woke up, got outta bed, dragged a comb across my head'... splashed cold tap water over my dry craggy face, then had me coffee and a roll before I set about writing it down.

We The People...

2010-08-20T22:03:00.001-05:00

We the people are bearing witness to the destruction of our country and our freedom.

We hold these truths to be self evident that we will not stand for any oppressive government of which would undermine the woven fabric of our free society as American citizens.

We have not forgotten the struggles of the great men and women who fought to free this nation from oppression.

We have not forgotten the bravery of those who have united us under one flag, under one Republic as Americans with justice for all.

We have not forgotten how we won our freedom or how to regain it if lost.

We have not forgotten our duty under our Declaration of Independence to remove any oppressive government from power.

Those men, women and children who risked death for sake of freedom live with us in our hearts as we ensure our freedom as Americans.

No longer will we stand for corruption in our political system and be held hostage in our own land by those who do not believe in our constitution.

Obama's Ground Zero Sanctuary

2010-08-13T21:37:00.002-05:00

Is it really a surprise to anyone that Obama would endorse this new Mosque being built at Ground Zero? Here is a fine example of Obama having no love for this country. Obamas love for America would get in the way of his great love for his Muslim heritage. Liberals keep on telling us that 9/11 was an inside job.... maybe it was.... maybe it was Barrack Hussein Obama who really planned it!

Obama is not just a terrible president, he is a terrible person. He is a sick, distorted, would be dictator who is more interested in the well being of Islam than that of the USA. After all, he is letting our enemies slap us in the face with this ground zero Mosque. The sole purpose for this Mosque being built is so terrorists can thumb their noses at us and all while Obama tries to arrange meetings with the neo Hitlers of the world like Ahmadinejad who keep these terror groups alive and well.

Our country that once sent the message to enemies far and wide that we will not be pushed around, we will not be terrorized and we will not stand despotism is now the country of the weak and spineless who would rather take hand outs and eat from the hands of emperors than be strong enough to feed and protect ourselves.

We have NOTHING to apologize for as Americans! Obama is NOT an American which must be why he feels so comfortable apologizing to our enemies, including our former enemies. This brings me to another point. How long are we going to keep on trying to cozy up with enemies like Russia, China and all of the other nations who would rather see us suffer than see us prosper? Did we really believe that empowering China to no end would make the world a better place? Thanks Bill Clinton, Bush and Obama. By the way, did we really believe that Russia would work to keep Iran from attaining nuclear weapons when Mother Russia herself was helping Iran go nuclear long before the rest of the world including the UN new what was going on? We should just rename Clinton, Bush and Obama to Hells Trinity. Thanks to these devils we are all going to have the chance to experience hell first hand in the New World Order, AKA: hell on earth.

Thanks again to all of the liberals in our nation who have handed over the best place on earth to satans comrades. Now we can all live in poverty just like the impoverished nations you so wish to model the USA after.

What Useful Contributions Have Liberals Made to America?

2010-08-08T23:21:00.003-05:00

I honestly think this should be a tough one for most conservatives to list. I really have trouble coming up with any myself. I think it would probably make more sense to talk about how liberals have destroyed American society instead but that one is far to easy.

I would love to hear what you have to say about this. Leave your comments and lets kick off the debate.

What Useful Contributions Have Liberals Made to America?

If Any.....

-PVP

About The 2012 Campaign...

2010-07-25T06:38:00.018-05:00

There's a few things we need to get straight before choosing our side's candidate for POTUS or the next best hope for America, in 2012. First, any serious candidate must have a well articulated message regarding limited government, national security, income taxes, and individual liberty. There can be no ambiguity in our candidate's public position on those issues and the primary duty of all elected officials to uphold our COTUS and its intended restraint upon government power. This immediately eliminates several candidates from serious contention, including Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.here's a few things we need to get straight before choosing our side's candidate for POTUS or the next best hope for America come 2012. First, any serious candidate must have a well articulated message regarding limited government, national security, income taxes, and individual liberty. There can be no ambiguity between our candidate's public position on those issues and the primary duty of the POTUS to uphold the COTUS and its restraint upon government power. This immediately eliminates several candidates from serious contention, including Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.

Why Mitt Romney? Well for starters, he's a former Massachusetts "conservative" which means he's probably at best just barely to the right of John McCain. Mitt's still defending Massachusetts care and it's "mandatory coverage" provision as a successful program. Pathetic! Consider that new "conservative" Senator from Massachusetts, Scott Brown, who just voted with the Dems to create a money monopoly by the nation's largest Banks. In Massachusetts saying one is a conservative is a lot like calling 25 degree (fahrenheit) temps during an Antarctic summer, a heatwave. 'nuff said.

Sarah Palin? Well she supports John McCain and that alone should disqualify her. But then there's her completely ambiguous posture on Cap 'n Trade. You tell me, is she for it or against it? I don't trust her.

Newt Gingrich: Smart as he is, nonetheless, he cheated on his wife and got caught, he keeps company with globalists and he sat down with Nancy Pelosi to talk then agree that global warming and our dependence on oil were issues legislators just have to deal with. Thereby, tacitly supporting Cap 'n Trade. None of these three are worthy of real consideration for the post.

So who will it be? Obama and crew will continue doing damage to our economy. Even if conservatives win big this mid-term, the Dems have plans as a lame-duck to push through all of the most radical socialist spending and regulation left on Obama's list. That means we'll need to elect a conservative super majority to over-ride Obama's veto power, or legislative repeals will be meaningless -- Repeals In Name Only... but then what's another species of RINO among republicans anyhow? By the time 2012 arrives the political landscape will have changed. Two more years is more than enough to destroy what remains of our economy and bring the weak kneed among us begging for a personal socialist bailout, also known as extended benefits and other sundry redistributions of the wealth,. The candidates we choose must have unambiguous positions on every issue. No more charming progressives like GW Bush.

Choose wisely.

King Shabazz??

2010-07-11T11:59:00.007-05:00

King of who exactly? This is a disturbing clip:

Eric Holder dropped the charges against this piece of black-nationalist-dog-dung but now he is talking about slapping a suit on Arizona for grounds of racial profiling in regards to SB1070. What a damn hypocrite! If you can't see who the real racists are then you must be one of them! I wonder if Eric Holder is a member of this new black panther party as well. The DOJ is saying the Arizona law is not consistent with federal policy. Which policy is that exactly? The policy they have about ripping down our borders and giving amnesty to Illegal aliens? Is that the policy Holder is referring to? Well I guess he is correct then because the policy behind SB1070 is about strengthening our borders and keeping illegal aliens out!

This is not a fact but just a premonition, I have no doubt that Democrats are the leaders in just about all frivolous lawsuits our nation has seen. Did anyone ever check to see if the woman who spilled hot coffee on herself and then sued McDonalds was a Democrat too? The recent suit by Holder is just one of these frivolous law suits that end up costing Americans a lot of money. What a waste of tax payer dollars.

November 2010 ~ A New Independence Day

2010-07-03T08:49:00.030-05:00

Have a great July 4th! Hopefully we'll have a new Independence Day to celebrate come November. The fourth of July reminds that we're a nation founded on the notion that human beings are God's creation, endowed thereby with natural inviolable rights including the right to LIFE without which no other rights would be necessary; and LIBERTY, an essential to our PURSUIT of HAPPINESS. Wretched and whore-mongering tyrants have in perpetuity dominated the ignorant masses, satisfying their own desires for wealth and power by treating the nations of the earth as their private estates; and upon which more or less "common" or "small" people have been nothing more than a commodity -- bought, sold, traded and to one degree or another, as determined by the prejudices of skin color and/or social efficacy, ENSLAVED. Along with discovery of the Americas, came a desire by many Europeans of Christian tradition to separate from that model.

Our forefathers, architects of a new albeit imperfect republic, believed that a government of free men must at its core operate on the assumption that human beings are individual and sovereign creations, possessing the same rights over their own actions, property and affairs as the kings of the Earth. It was the mandate of such government, to protect the natural rights and property of every Citizen: the right to Life which invokes the right to Liberty by which one might acquire property and other artifacts of personal security in the Pursuit of Happiness. They believed the free exercise of these basic rights would allow men, women and children to live in a state of relative tranquility and peace.

Unfortunately, the tyrannical would-be rulers of planet Earth have waited patiently and it is they we must defeat this November. How staggering, to realize that so many continue to believe the majority of human beings on our planet exist for their pleasure; to be herded, marketed, enslaved or slaughtered as they deem fit or necessary.

This November's election is the most important election any of us will ever participate in. These global-elitists, masquerading as agents of hope and change, have continued relentlessly behind closed doors and dark curtains with efforts to force we upstart Americans back into the long established global order. Right now our nation is in a kind of political "check". We must vote in this November's election, bringing as many to our way of thinking as possible. To Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Libertarians or other party affiliation: there's no time for prideful attachments to strict political ideology. The most conservative candidates i.e. agreeing to support the Constitutional system of government, including a smaller government and a lower fair system of taxation, must win in every race, that's the TEA Party's strength. Putting the Genie back in the bottle is no small task. Please vote for the candidates that present the best chance of winning. In future elections the TEA Party made up of regular folks having just begun to acquire greater knowledge and wisdom, will serve to enlighten the rest of our electorate.

Footnote: I was chastised roundly for voting McCain in the '08 elections, especially when I knew there was a better candidate in a third party. I voted McCain because the alternative was an absolute default vote for Obama. McCain was logically the only viable option to derail the Obama nightmare. If the only criteria for casting my vote was to choose the lesser of two progressive elitists, then obviously McCain was at best marginally better than Obama. But, for me at least, that wasn't the choice. We're seeing the real choice right now. Their names are Sotomayor and Kagan. Assuming Kagan will be confirmed to the court, we're just one retiring Justice away -- Kennedy -- from a judicial and perhaps political Checkmate. I believe many things happen for a reason. There is a reason Barack Obama and the rest of the Radicals infesting our government have risen to power. The back-lash against their tyranny may be that reason.

It will take many years to hold the treasonous and seditious elements currently operating within our government accountable for their misdeeds. But in order to ensure future generations can live free of such evil, held to account they must be.

I'm looking forward to a new Independence day coming November 2010. God Bless America, land that we love. We will stand beside her and we will guide her through this dark night with the truth and light from above..

Al Gore.... And so many other liberals

2010-06-23T20:18:00.004-05:00

I was just thinking earlier how garbage like Al Gore, Bill Clinton, the entire Kennedy family and on and on are able to get people to even listen to them. All of these pieces of crap in office that cheat on their wives and people do not stop and think...... hey...... these people have absolutely no problem betraying there own families and without remorse, maybe they would have no problem betraying our country as well.

This is what happens when society starts to lose the moral grounding we get from religion. To me that's like saying, oh well... this person killed his wife and his family, but I think he has a great plan for health care. Let's give him a break and ignore the fact that this person is a murderer so we can get our health care plan passed, there is no reason for this person to go to jail over this one tiny incident.

To me that is the exact same type of mentality one would have to have to keep trusting trash like Al Gore, Bill Clinton, etc.....

AL GORE, YOU ARE A PIECE OF TRASH.

Mind your own damn business MEXICO

2010-06-23T00:36:00.003-05:00

So Mexico is going to SUE Arizona over the recent immigration law too??? What business does Mexico have suing ANY of our states for ANY of OUR LAWS! Maybe we should sue Mexico for the poor treatment American citizens get from their federal police force (Federalies) when we LEGALLY go there for vacation and they illegally try to extort money from us with threats.

Felipe wants to lecture us on civil rights and our treatment of illegal immigrants? You have got to be joking. Maybe we should focus more on how Mexico treats illegal aliens. In my mind if you are knowingly crossing our borders to reside in the United States illegally then you are a criminal and should be treated like one. These people are knowingly breaking our laws. Just like a thief knowingly steals from you. These people are knowingly stealing identities and ruining peoples lives. Just like a murderer knowingly kills destroying life. These people come here with absolutely no regard for our laws, our people, our borders or our culture.

Our constitution does not protect the rights of foreigners, especially illegal aliens. So let me just say this simply so everyone can understand....

GO TO HELL FELIPE CALDERON AND STAY OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!

Let's just be frank

2010-06-20T23:36:00.006-05:00

I am getting so tired of hearing people tell Obama that if you truly loved our country you would do this, or you would do that. Really... stop wasting your breath. OBAMA DOES NOT LOVE OUR COUNTRY! His actions speak loudly, he means to rip apart our land and our freedom handing our sovereignty over to the NEW WORLD ORDER, of which he intends to eventually rule. HE and his garbage wife Michelle along with his entire cabinet are ALL TRASH. It saddens me to know that the majority of voters were so damn ignorant and STUPID that they would vote for this piece of garbage even though all of the writing was clearly written on the wall. SHAME ON YOU if you voted for this criminal. OBAMA IS THE WORST SORT OF COMMUNIST! HE will end up making MAO look like Winston Churchill if he get’s his way.

Let’s start with Arizona. Drug smugglers and illegal immigrants are taking over our borders and we are unable to control an easily controlled situation. Instead of providing guards to protect our borders we have signs on our own land for Americans to stay away. Instead of protecting our borders this criminal organization (the Obamatrash administration) is going to use our tax money to pursue legal action against the state of Arizona to fight Arizona’s legislation against illegal immigration; a law which I may add mirrors that of our federal law. There is a serious problem on our southern borders and Obama is not even concerned about it. Do you know why? BECAUSE HE WANTS OUR BORDERS TO WEAKEN! Obama wants to strip us of our culture, our heritage, our borders, our language and our sovereignty. You can’t hand a nation over to a world government that is able to protect its land.

So that leads us to more of Obama’s treachery against our sovereignty. It should have been a clear sign when he signed the executive order to change the language in our laws allowing INTERPOL to have free access to our country without repercussion. INTERPOL has total immunity and can operate however they please within our borders thanks to OBAMA. Is that not the sound of a first step towards the destruction of a sovereign nation, allowing an international police force total access to our country, our lands and our neighborhoods? Who knows what the hell they are up to at this moment now that they can operate freely in the USA? They can do what they please with absolutely NO oversight what so ever. What would stop this international police force from expanding so large within our borders that they decide to police the communities that we live holding Americans accountable to “INTERNATIONAL LAW” and not the laws of our own nation?

I can go on and on and I am sure most of the people who will read this can as well. I know I am preaching to the choir but its making me very mad and maybe it’s time I start speaking up a little more than I have. The truth is, like I started out saying… OBAMA WANTS THE DESTRUCTION OF THIS NATION. Is his response…. Ahem.. I mean lack of response to the gulf oil crisis not proof enough. HE has already weakened our borders, now it’s time to further destruct our economy as well. Stopping drilling on the gulf is a step toward his agenda and it has nothing to do with the environment what so ever. So if you are one of those dumb ass liberal hippy / pseudo intellects and happen to be reading this…. YES, OBAMA DID NOT STOP DRILLING FOR SAKE OF THE ENVIORNMENT. This is just one more step to destroy our country.

It is equally hard to hand a free and wealthy country over to a world government. The only way it can be done is by destroying wealth. Inflation is critical to the destruction of wealth. Watch our gasoline prices skyrocket from Obama’s actions. There is no possible way that Obama could not have known what will happen by stopping gulf drilling. Is this a war against our suburbs and commuters as proposed by media? Or is it really just another tool to take the largest voting base in America, which happens to be the middle class and push them into poverty stricken Americans who can no longer afford to drive to work, or feed their families. Obama wants you on welfare, because when you are dependent on government to take care of your needs you have NO Sovereignty and thus can be easily handed over to a world government as subject to that government.

So as you can see, STOP saying that if Obama loved our country, yaddi, yadda. START standing up to the fact that OBAMA DOES NOT love our country. OBAMA HATES AMERICA, just like all of the other illegal immigrants who share similar sentiment. Do you think these people want to become citizens? HELL NO! They do not give a rat’s ass about the USA. All they care about is getting our money so they can send it home to their families who are starving in Mexico. The corrupt garbage that runs Mexico is only interested in personal gain and control of Mexico, not the strength of the nation. Felipe Calderon, who in my opinion can rot in hell, is only concerned with American money flowing into Mexico. With all of the devaluation going with our own dollar it’s still far more valuable than the peso. In the end, who do you think this money goes to, the Mexican economy or Felipe’s greedy pockets? Obama who is ALSO an illegal immigrant, and as far as I am concerned he is showing he thinks the same way, however instead of his hard earned money flowing back to family in Kenya (which by the way have not seen a dime from him) He wants to take our wealth and redistribute it to other nations. When I say our wealth, I do not mean HIS wealth. While we are forced to give up more and more of our money he will be making more money along with the rest of the Washington elite’s who “play ball”.

Let’s put a stop to this. It all can start to change by voting the trash out of office. In my opinion, there is no way that ANY liberal politician should survive the next midterm election but I am also a realist and understand there are enough morons out there who will continue to vote these people back into office.

My Email To Congressman Joe Barton

2010-06-19T05:32:00.025-05:00

Dear Congressman Barton, I'm proud of you for having the passion to call President Obama's presidential fiat -- requiring BP to create a 20 billion$ trust fund -- the "shakedown" it really is! This latest extra-constitutional act came right out of the Al Sharpton -- Jesse Jackson play book, and he, Obama, can't be allowed to get away with it! If his action goes unchallenged, our constitutional republic will be doomed. You are owed an apology, and I'm sorry... sorry that you were taken to the mat by Pence, Boehner and Cantor. They should be ashamed. You owed the party nothing more than a clarification of your words not a retraction of your apology to BP.

Sir, the problem with Washington DC conservatism is that men like Boehner, Pence and Cantor are completely misreading the mood of the people. You advanced conservatism and the TEA party movement several steps by taking up the sword of truth regarding Obama's outrageous power-grabbing tactics. Unfortunately, Boehner, Pence and Cantor pressured you into setting it right back. They are the ones that need to be taken to the mat, and if they aren't careful, that's exactly what we "small people" (voters) are about to do. Hang tough, do not let them muzzle the truth or the passion with which you deliver it. Clearly your allegiance is to our constitutional republic and with the people. And frankly, misters Boehner, Pence and Cantor need to grow a set.

A Word to the Wise: Support Joe Barton! (click here)

CEO's Today, Who's Next Tomorrow? YOU ARE!!!

2010-04-01T08:13:00.006-05:00

CEO's speaking out against HC legislation and administrative policies

are summoned to appear before congress

When CORRUPT Democrats summon a person to kangaroo court for a grilling, their treachery is (no surprise) without limit. Spouting inane verbosities in place of intelligent inquiry the Dems will lead, mislead, browbeat and otherwise attempt to confuse in hopes of catching these "evil" CEO's in a technical misrepresentation of fact for which they might be charged with the felony of lying to congress. Of course CEO's willing to be contrite in an admission of guilt, will be shown the merciful side of congress. But BE YE NOT FOOLED! Government persecution isn't going to end with a few CEO's, they're just the high profile media targets intended to send us ALL a message regarding the lack of "free speech" we should expect in the Obama-nation. As a matter of fact, recalling Joe the plumber, persecution and intimidation of individual PRIVATE Citizens got started in earnest during the '08 presidential campaign.

Are you currently speaking out as private citizens? Are you forming groups of like minded patriots hoping there's strength and protection from government over-reach in sheer numbers? Are you refusing to answer ALL the Census questions? Are you openly railing against MANDATORY participation in another government ponzi scheme? Then expect eventual visits from the IRS, FBI and/or the ATF. Are you a CONSERVATIVE: Christian, Jew, African or Hispanic American? Expect to be ridiculed, smeared, profiled and cataloged -- by the Southern Poverty Law Center -- for surveillance.

This administration's intimidation and persecution apparatus has just begun rev-v-v-ing up. We're one government exploited emergency away from an Obama executive order stripping us of all remaining privacy, liberty and property. Consider this: in third world dictatorships private property is siezed from the critics of corrupt regimes then awarded to supporters of such regimes; In this country our land and dwellings would likely be taken under yet another perversion of eminent domain to be redistributed among the "less fortunate" in the name of social "justice" as part of reparations.

The Democrat congress is in the pocket of the President and his handlers, and because of their collusion not even the semblance of separation between executive and legislative power remains. Representative democracy is all but finished unless we can prevail in a free election come November.

LET'S START A NEW CHANT: VOTE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE, IMPRISON -- VOTE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE, IMPRISON -- VOTE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE, IMPRISON -- VOTE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE, IMPRISON -- VOTE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE, IMPRISON -- VOTE, IMPEACH, PROSECUTE, IMPRISON...

When the Capo di Tutti Capi Calls...

2010-03-27T15:00:00.004-05:00

You're answering with your life!

(any similarity to people, places and events, real or imagined, is totally not intended - dudes)

The Following took place between 4p.m. and 5p.m. -- At various offices somewhere in D.C. In an effort to avoid devastating consequences to the economy, Don Obamleone sent his most senior aide, Rahm "the Fish" EmanU-haul, to the office of congressman Schtuppak to deliver an invitation;

Rahm to Congressman Schtuppak: "The administration would like to have a brief discussion with you regarding some family business. Don Obamleone has been very distressed that you might not share his enthusiasm for -- shall we say -- his "health" care legislation. There's a car waiting out front, your attendance is very strongly, recommended."

30 minutes later, upon arrival at "the House" Schtuppak is ushered into "the Office".

Rahm to Don Obamleone: "Don Obamleone this is our friend Mr. Schtuppak."

Don Obamleone: "Thank you for coming on such short notice, I am very grateful for this small honor, please, sit down".

Schtuppak: "You're most welcome Don Obamleone, the honor is all mine". Schtuppak takes a seat to the left of Rahm "the Fish"...

Don Obamleone: "As you know, I am attempting to make a marriage, to bring the families together that we might do a little business for the better health of the American people. My consigliere advises that I have, perhaps, not made my intentions to get this business done clear enough to certain young turks, such as yourself, who might benefit from knowing first hand the degree to which I am willing to negotiate'.

Schtuppak: "I believe I understand you sir".

Don Obamleone: "No I don't think that you do. But, in order that you should better understand how deep is my commitment, I've brought you here today. I've been told by Don Pelousi that your crew will respond favorably should we come to an understanding here".

Schtuppak: "But Don Obamleone, with all due respect, I have based my entire business on a trust by my constituents that I won't support the icing of unborn babies. How can I go back on my word to them and retain my office?"

Don Obamleone: "These are not matters I am concerned with, but..."

Rahm "the Fish" EmanU-haul interupts and speaks on behalf of the Don

Rahm to Schtuppak: Don Obamleone would be willing to provide you with a paper, an executive order stating that no babies will be iced with Federal funds or mandates. A very generous offer to give you cover with your constituents".

Schtuppak: "But Don Obamleone, they'll never buy that; an executive order isn't worth the paper it's written on, here today gone tomorrow. And besides it can't trump legislative enactments such as statutes so once your agenda is the law, it's the law."

Don Obamleone: "Let me say this to you another way. And I do not want that you should think I am threatening harm to you, but I'm a superstitious man. And if some unlucky accident should befall you or your family - If you should get randomly audited by the IRS, or if you should perhaps become entangled in a bed sheet and be hanged accidentally in your sleep - or if your wife were to be struck by an out of control golf cart while putting par for the course, then I'm personally going to blame the TEA parties for your misfortunes, and them I will never forgive. But, aside from that, let me say that I swear, on the souls of my grandchildren which are themselves not yet born, that I will not be the one to bring such disasters upon your house".

Schtuppak: "Thank you Don Obamleone, for making this clear to me. I see now that there are no provisions to ice unborn babies or mandate such practices. I'll hold a conference with our associates and let them know of our agreement".

Don Obamleone: "I can not express to you how deeply touched and grateful I am that you have understood my situation. My driver will return you to your office".

Schtuppak is escorted out of "the House".

Don Obamleone to Rahm: "Clock him, make sure he follows through. Call Don Pelousi, tell her to make sure there are earmarks for his district - that it looks as if he sold out at their end. Perhaps I should have shown him a view of the city from 10,000 feet as with that little twerp Dennis the Menace, where we carefully explained how long it takes for a man to hit the ground without the aid of a parachute".

Rahm: "I don't believe we'll have any further concerns with Mr. Schtuppak, let's order in, perhaps fish and chips?"

Don Obamleone: "Yes, tempura, jumbo prawns with malt vinegar, hot sauce and imported beer. Now where'd I put my cigarettes?"

Dissolution of Political Bands

2010-03-22T01:08:00.002-05:00

When our very own constitution becomes rendered as a useless or un-repairable document the only sound course of action available resides within our own Declaration of Independence. The necessary action to dissolve our political bands as our natural right entitled to us through the laws of nature and natures God becomes eminent, when the vast majority of our nation’s sovereign citizens lose voice amongst our several elected leaders, the time has long past to remove these leaders from power, reestablishing our sovereignty. When decisions are made against the will of the people, decisions which directly affect our country, economy and individual liberty it becomes necessary to take firm action to ensure that our inalienable natural rights do not become reduced under absolute despotism.

Today, on the twentieth day of March two thousand and ten our constitution has become rendered powerless to keep our current Government from reducing our individual freedom. No longer can we stand aside and let a tyrannical group of oppressive officials dictate our individual freedom thus removing our natural rights and sovereignty. The corruption within our existing Government has become so entrenched within our current structure of government that we can no longer afford to let this resolve itself through the standard process checks and balances.

Many of the same grievances suffered by colonists of the first 13 colonies, as declared in our Declaration of Independence have resurfaced again within our current federal Government. As Americans it is time for us to band together and stand against unjust oppressors who wish to enslave us to a state of welfare and government take over of our freedom and natural rights. No longer can we afford to debate against evil and corruption. Our words have not been heard, it is time to replace words with action. We must not let the mighty fist of despotism divide us from each other. We must stand together as one people and defend our freedom from the despotic tyrants who wish to keep us prisoners of their oppressive rule.

To Pacifists of Every Stripe:

2010-02-27T15:15:00.006-06:00

Sam Adams:

"In a state of tranquillity, wealth, and luxury, our descendants would forget the arts of war and the noble activity and zeal which made their ancestors invincible. Every art of corruption would be employed to loosen the bond of union which renders our resistance formidable. When the spirit of liberty, which now animates our hearts and gives success to our arms, is extinct, our numbers will accelerate our ruin and render us easier victims to tyranny. If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom—go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!"

There is no doubt that our founding fathers understood the slow insidious nature of corruption and tyranny. While they would not have condoned an intentional effort to nation-build or look for trouble in the world, they knew, inevitably, that tyrants and despotism would seek the destruction of liberty and free will wherever it exists. They were prepared to defend against assaults upon liberty and free will be it within our borders, within our own government, or by encroachments from abroad.

The cause of liberty is the cause of our humanity. God gave to us His design for personal liberty which is the exercise of "free will". God also tells us that we are our brother's keeper. Hence, we owe to the creator of humanity from which all liberty springs, the debt of supporting and defending freedom when and where it comes under assault by tyrants who intend, given the chance, to steal it from us all.

Isolationist policies are short sighted and supremely selfish. To pretend that we can live with liberty and free will as though in a vacuum, is to say to hell with the world, I've got mine -- you get your own. Where ever people that seek the liberty to exercise free will -- absent tyranny and oppression -- are, we must lend our support by whatever means possible. It may not, and in reality can not, always be military help, but military help should never be ruled out. We form alliances in the world with the governments of liberty loving peoples. If their governments fail them and the people lose liberty to despots and tyrants, then we, the United States of America, have a moral obligation to help them regain their freedom. Their loss of liberty will eventually have an affect on our own. In the past, and I point to Iran as just one example, we have let the people who desire the personal liberty to exercise their free will down, and the world is paying the price for it. In an ideologically unified and perfect world -- UTOPIA -- there would be no need for military interventions; but we have no such world, never have and never will. So for those of you believing that the United States of America -- Ronald Wilson Reagan's shining city upon a hill, our beacon of safe harbour to the world -- should gain for itself safety by forsaking the causes of liberty elsewhere, then you neither understand liberty nor do you deserve to have it.

7 Rules For Liberals

2010-02-22T07:20:00.007-06:00

There's a real problem needs to be addressed regarding how Liberals interact with conservatives on the blogs. NEVER forget who you are. Say it often "liberal" but quietly so "they" won't hear you. Okay, here goes:

1). Never consider conservatives as your political "adversaries", they are your ENEMIES and must not be rewarded! Concede no ground to them. Seek them out wherever they blog. Infiltrate and harass constantly and remember this: we do not take prisoners. Always -- preemptively -- accuse your ENEMIES of doing exactly what you're doing or intend to do, it provides you with some immunity to their attacks.

2). You must learn to demonize your ENEMIES, paint them with broad brush strokes, being sure to cover the entire spectrum of conservative thought. Show no respect for conservatives, refer to them in gross generality as "Republicans", "Neocons", or just "Cons". Refer to them individually as Morons, Idiots, Insane, Dolts, Warmongers, Murderers... including variations to their screen names designed to disparage and offend. Do not be afraid of vulgarity, this is war and in attacking the ENEMY there's no time for civility. Use vulgarity and name calling to bait the ENEMY. Be arrogant and condescend in order to gain psychological command and control of the ENEMY!

3). Co-opt their good ideas -- the ones that actually work -- and repackage them as your own, make sure you treat every threadbare shopworn concept you come up with on your own or by plagiarism as though it's the newest thing under the sun. This is essential to convincing the sheep that we're the ones with the ideas to change the paradigm in DC (of course we'll do no such thing but we need to create that impression here).

4). Trash the Military and blame every war in the world on "Republican or Neocon" policies; again, be sure you apply the Warmonger, murderer and rapist label often. It doesn't hurt to throw the word "torture" around either. Complain about the expense of fighting and by all means refer to Michael Moore's admonition that there is no terrorist threat to our nation (this one drives them nuts!) Remember, the world hates America because of our Military interventions and our economic meddling beyond the borders of our own natrion.

5). ALWAYS inject Christianity when discussing issues of war or crime with conservatives or about conservatives. Dredge up names like Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart, or the nut who went to prison in the 90's. Be sure that's the face you paint of Christianity, and be sure to equate Christianity with every war, every murder, every rape and terrorist attack EVER. AND ALWAYS Remember this: if you've seen one Christian, you've seen them all! NEVER forget that they, conservative Republicans, are "race-ists"!!! Say it again! "RACE-ISTS!!! Has a nice ring to it doesn't it? (btw - thanks Eric!)

6). Point out that there are flaws in the US Constitution especially where it concerns the actions of the three "dysfunctional" branches of government. Insist that the problem with the constitution is that everything the ENEMY does is patently UN-constitutional but allowed by the SCOTUS; Get the message out that liberals understand what constitutional is and what it is not. Tell 'em it's too arcane for the common conservative man, woman or child to grasp and that the framers could never have imagined the kind of world we live in today. Offer a solution such as a constitutional convention to rewrite or replace that document with one easily understandable and infinitely more precise.

7). Tie TEA Partiers into every horrific event in the "news" and when discussing the issues of the day with others, mention "TEA Party" in the same sentence with crime, terrorist plots, drug abuse, shootings or any nut-bar behavior. And don't forget to tie them into events like Columbine -- they hate that. And while you're at it, trash Ronald Reagan a few times a week,especially since that moron bstrd left us decades ago to become one of them!!! Forget ye not -- no quarter and no respect for Reagan, after all the lucky bastrd's dead! And beat 'em over the head with libs like Bush 41 and 43 and wanna-be McLiberalpublitarian (McCain).

FINALLY: Have no regrets about changing your political "appearance" from time to time! Say something like "I'm a libertarian" and/or "I voted for Ron Paul"... after all civil libertarianism is at the heart of progressive liberalism, sort of. It's definitely the freedom to reject the Christian's God and its basis as the founding of the country; the freedom to abort babies from 0 to 9 months before natural birth (we're still working on immediately after natural birth especially if they might be conservatives); the freedom to engage in all manner of drug use and perversion; the FREEDOM to choose whatever our free will leads us to. Now really, I ask you, ain't that America?

Crush the Libertarian Menace -- Vote For Republican Candidates in 2010

2010-01-19T12:19:00.007-06:00

For 30 years I've heard from Libertarians, that the problem in American politics is our two party system. Libertarians have a lengthy track record so far as failed attempts at becoming a viable 3rd party are concerned. But they've never managed more than the margin of error in votes cast for their presidential candidates. They haven't fared much better in congressional races. So what's the problem? Well for starters, it's their belief that they alone possess a monopoly on truth, justice and liberty. Libertarians have been con'd into believing the Libertarian Party's ideal for America is better than the one created by the founders. That so many Libertarians presume they have the intellect and wisdom to, as their oft discussed first order of business, rewrite our nation's constitution and cure it's "defects" just staggers the imagination. Much like our NOTUS -- Barack Obama -- their arrogance knows few if any limits.

I admit, at first glance there are some points of agreement between conservatives and the Libertarian Party's updated platform; however, that document is more a masterpiece of ambiguity than a reflection of intellect and wisdom. For instance, while the Libertarian platform holds that every human being has a right to life, that same platform is against proscribing the taking of such life by abortion. On recreational drug use, prostitution and pornography the platform makes clear it's none of the government's business what people choose to do with their own bodies. Yet they completely ignore the statistical data which makes clear the damage proliferation of drugs like pot and cocaine -- both considered "recreational" by Libertarians -- as well as prostitution and pornography have done to the social fabric of our nation. In the Netherlands they're trying to find ways of UN-doing the damage done by decades of their laissez faire social policy. On that score, Libertarians have more in common with Obama and the rest of the French leaning radical left than with mainstream conservative Americans.

And apparently Libertarians accept corruption from their own candidates even as they point fingers at everyone else. Rationalizations abound for Ron Paul's abhorrent behavior in congress. Which demonstrates just how delusional Libertarians can be. Ron Paul has long been the face of their party. And Ron Paul who ran as a Republican because he couldn't have gotten elected sanitation superintendent as a Libertarian, figured out how to scam the system by voting “NO” on appropriations bills he knew would pass with or without his vote. The scam is this. Good ol' RP loads the bill with millions and millions of earmarked dollars for projects in his district. He then vote's against the bill so he can say he's a fiscal conservative in press releases and campaign materials. Then – and here's the real diabolical part – he concocts a cover story in case he gets caught with his hands in our pocket books. He says it's a political necessity to use earmarks because they are the only way to assure that money appropriated by congress gets spent responsibly; as, of course, Ron Paul determines best.

I live in Minnesota and I don't want money taken from me or my family and friends for projects the Federal government has no business funding in the first place -- be they in Texas or anywhere else. Ron Paul is a slick insider same as the rest of 'em. Of course he defends his ear marks, but consider more than a few words once spoken to Davy Crockett by Horatio Bunce while Crockett, then a member of the United States Congress, was on the campaign trail. Bunce had this to say regarding an appropriation bill of $20,000 to benefit the widow of a once distinguished Naval Officer :

"It is not the amount that I complain of, it is the principle. In the first place, the government ought to have in the Treasury no more than enough for its legitimate purposes. But that has nothing to do with the question. The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be intrusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue by a tariff, which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be and the poorer he is, the more he pays in proportion to his means.
What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how much he pays to the government. So you see, that while you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing it from thousands who are even worse off than he. If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20,000,000 as $20,000.
If you had the right to give to one, you have the right to give to all and as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity, and to any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other. No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity...
The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation and a violation of the Constitution.
So you see, you have violated the constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger for the country. For when congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the constitution, there is no limit to it and no security for the people... I cannot vote for you."

Are appropriations for pet projects back home in Texas any different Mr. Paul?

Libertarians share much in common with Liberals and Democrats, they cling to rigid idealism, and both purport to have the blueprint for a more perfect society; a vote for a Libertarian candidate is a wasted vote and with the stakes as high as they are now there are no votes to waste. Forget the Libertarian or any other 3rd party in 2010. If there is to be a third party, it will emerge from the grass roots and it will not be Libertarian. Until such occurs, vote for the best candidates your local Republican party can muster. Work to get the best people into the running by participating in the caucus and primary systems. Work at the local level to get credible candidates into the process. It won't happen in one election cycle, it will take many. In the interim vote for the most conservative candidates the republican party of your State puts forward. The immediate goal is to defeat the Obama machine and the Marxists now at the helm. Over time we can and will weed the pseudo-conservatives out.

The Mark of the Beast

2010-01-12T17:10:00.001-06:00

As foretold by the revelation of John, no one will buy or sell save that he/she has the Mark of the Beast upon the hand or forehead. The so called "health-care" bill, the new euphemism for Marxist/Fascist State, mandates that you shall buy and you shall sell health-care coverage in that market place. It gives one no choice. To be sure, the idea of forcing the average Joe to accept the "Mark" 'tis of Satanic origins. I've discussed the "mark of the beast" topic many times with Christian friends and have discovered that the Beast's Mark upon the forehead or hand is not physical it's allegorical, a type of metaphor, wherein the forehead represents heart or mind and hand represents actions, deeds or works. Hence, evidence of the Beast's Mark is in what you say, think and do. If, for instance, you make a conscious choice to participate in and legitimize government health-care coverage, against the constitutional limitations on such intrusive government regulation of your life, then you've accepted the Mark in your heart and/or mind. Likewise, if you seek to legislate government health care coverage or attempt to coerce or entice others into doing so, then you've bourne the Mark upon your hand -- by your actions.

Mandatory health care coverage is nothing more than a means to force government regulation upon your free will, under the guise of being a right. Very serpent-like. A right is something for which we have the free will to exercise or not. I have the right to spend my money as I see fit. The fact that I might need a house to live in and have the means by which to make mortgage payments, doesn't give the government a right to force me into buying a house, does it? The fact that I could end up homeless and in some manner burden the rest of the population doesn't give the government the right to force me into buying public subsidized housing, does it?

Even in cases of the most reprehensible nature, our Supreme Court has upheld the notion so eloquently articulated by John Locke that, "Every man has a property in his own person. This, nobody has a right to but himself." Locke goes on to state that “The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property." The idea being that life, liberty and property preceded government and that governments are formed for the protection thereof. Perhaps Ayn Rand in contemporary parlance best stated Locke's ideal when she wrote: "Just as man can't exist without his body, so no rights can exist without the right to translate one's rights into reality, to think, to work andkeep the results, which means: the right of property."

The government can not tell us when, where or how to spend our money under threat of punishment, fines or imprisonment. If it can, then the blood and treasure spent in creating our Constitution wasn't worth the ink nor the parchment it was written on in the first place. Health-care coverage is all part of the Obama administration's effort to destroy our private sector capitalist economy in order to replace it with a neoMarxist political economy. Here's my paraphrase of how Marx put it : In order to unbind the working class from the shackles of individual private property rights, the working class must by world-wide socialist revolution seize political power. It must then deprive the capitalist classes of their individual property and place all means of productivity into collective ownership (that means government). Once the foundations of material property ownership are destroyed, (capitalism and natural rights), all citizens will be equal owners of production and equal participants in its benefits. Yeah right. How well has that worked -- NOT -- EVER.

#1 New Year's Resolution: Remove Democrats From Power

2010-01-08T06:53:00.000-06:00

On December 16th 2009, Barack Obama amended executive order 12425 abridging the Reagan Administration Order which -- while recognizing INTERPOL (international police agency) as a public international organization -- had limited INTERPOL's privileges and immunities within the United States. Until Dec 16th 2009, INTERPOL did not have full immunity from U.S. laws. They were subject to search and seizure of their premises and assets, subject to Freedom of Information Act requests and subject while operating in the United States to our criminal rules of procedure. All that has changed.

Barack Obama has, with the stroke of his executive pen, elevated INTERPOL above U.S. law and above our own law enforcement agencies, in effect subjugating our sovereignty and immunity to the whim of foreign courts. Currently, the inferences being made are that "war criminals" as determined in the Hague, Netherlands, by the "World Court" and the International Criminal Court (ICC) are now subject to arrest and apprehension without U.S. protection and due process of law. The names of Dick Cheney and George Bush are being mentioned. However, any one of us, any U.S. Citizen found in violation of an international law or agreement could in theory be apprehended and hauled before the World Court, ICC or any other foreign court, without due process protection of (U.S.) law.

Some might say, as if this isn't bad enough in and of itself, that only our political leaders and military would be subject to such arrest. I don't want our soldiers apprehended and brought before a foreign court, do you? Can you imagine the legislation we'll be subjected to as our elected representatives attempt to avoid violating international laws? What about those among us, individuals or small businesses, who might be found guilty of violating international Environmental laws; or the international rights of the child laws; or hate speech violations such as got radio talk host Michael Savage banned from Britain? The list goes on.

In addition to its role as the de facto enforcement agency of the world court and ICC, INTERPOL works WITH foreign governments to help them arrest individuals found in violation of their laws but that are residing beyond their borders. The Obama amendment and abridgment of the Reagan executive order allows INTERPOL and thus foreign powers to sidestep U.S. and State law. They can now reach into the heart of our nation and snatch up anyone deemed guilty of crime by foreign courts. The Obama amendment holds that all INTERPOL assets, files, investigative tools and so on are "inviolable". The term "assets" can include some of the following: agents, cars, weapons, offices, airplanes, helicopters, boats or ships... really it includes all gathered intelligence as well as people and hardware of any kind deployed by the agency to accomplish its law enforcement objective.

I doubt the Obama Administration can produce a rational and reasoned answer to the question "why was executive order 12425 amended in this way?" It's time at the conservative grass roots level to do ALL that is necessary and sufficient to win the congress back completely and strip these looney Marxist democrats of their power.

My blog post

2010-01-06T09:01:00.000-06:00

Cloward-Piven the Radicals Behind Obama's Agenda

Originally Posted on TownHall.com by AfterShock on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 7:38:33 PM

Actually, what's happening to our capitalist economy and to our representative democracy, the present neo-Marxist assault, has been underway since the early stages of the twentieth century. Notwithstanding, the extreme radical politics we're witnessing today -- the attempt to destroy capitalism and individual liberty in favor of Marxist style collectivism -- has been the not so subtle policy objective of extremists within the Democrat party since the election of Bill and Hill in 1992. I, for one, was absolutely sure Bill and Hillary Clinton would be the one's to crash our economy with socialist health-care, huge deficits, and taxes reset to pre-Reagan levels. In so doing they'd have created an economic crisis that would have us all begging for mercy - their mercy, and their Utopian agenda. I was wrong. The American people were having none of the Clinton agenda back then and the Democrats suffered defeats in mid term elections that stunned their party faithful. So much so in fact, it appeared to most observers that Democrats had been cast from majority status as far into the future as the mind's eye could imagine. Nonetheless, our ever prepared to look a gift-horse in the mouth republicans, especially those of the Bush, McCain, Graham, Specter variety, have blown the royal-flush-opportunity we'd been given -- in spades.

Not only did elected Republicans fail to uphold the "conservative" ideological basis of the Republican party platform; they all but assured that a vast cross section of middle-of-the-road Americans would conclude there to be no substantive difference between Democrats and Republicans whatsoever. And today we're paying the price for that disconnect from middle America so very dearly. As a result our posterity, should the Democrats and assorted Marxist/Leninist radicals calling the shots succeed where the Clinton's failed, will be reading an historical account of America's transformation into neo-communism (created from whole cloth of course) which extols the virtue of the American communist revolution. All, of course, while painting the darkest possible picture of the blasphemers (that would be us) who attempted to preserve capitalism and free enterprise as the means by which Americans could and should exercise their God given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Today I read an article posted online at American Thinker, by James Simpson regarding the Cloward-Piven strategy of coup d'etat which linked me to an article he had written 14 months prior. @ http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

Simpson's prior article titled 'Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis' makes the Obama administration's radical hard-left-Marxist agenda all too clear. And as I said in a prior post, the damage Obama is able to do to our Republic remains to be seen. But damage, in fact mortally wounding, is precisely the policy under way by this administration. Read, if ye can stomach it, as follows:

The Strategy was first elucidated in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a pair of radical socialist Columbia University professors, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.

The following excerpt by David Horowitz enunciates Cloward-Plevin as THE strategem deployed to destroy our economy, obliterate free market capitalsim, and bring on economic collapse:

The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul Alinsky:

"Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one. (Courtesy Discover the Networks.org)

The following sourced articles were also referenced

Newsmax rounds out the picture:
Their strategy to create political, financial, and social chaos that would result in revolution blended Alinsky concepts with their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation's wealth.
In their Nation article, Cloward and Piven were specific about the kind of "crisis" they were trying to create:
By crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.
No matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following features:
The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse.
In his most recent article on American Thinker http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/clowardpiven_government.html James Simpson connects all the dots, here's just a small sampling regarding the radicals Obama can be tied to:

Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven were two lifelong members of Democratic Socialists of America who taught sociology at Columbia University (Piven later went on to City University of New York). In a May 1966 Nation magazine article titled "The Weight of the Poor," they outlined their strategy, proposing to use grassroots radical organizations to push ever more strident demands for public services at all levels of government.

The result, they predicted, would be "a profound financial and political crisis" that would unleash "powerful forces ... for major economic reform at the national level."
They implemented the strategy by creating a succession of radical organizations, most notable among them the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), with the help of veteran "organizer" Wade Rathke. Their crowning achievement was the "Motor Voter" act, signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1993 with Cloward and Piven standing behind him.

____________________________________________

Compare the foregoing to my post of Sept. 24th, 2009 on brane smasher blog at townhall.com, the following excerpts were originally published by the Socialist Labor Party in 1925. My post "Our Marxist in Chief" Connects Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to this current state of affairs:

http://branesmasher.blogtownhall.com/2009/09/24/our_marxist_in_chief,_an_historic_perspective.thtml

Please take note: The radical nexus to Columbia University and City College of New York is key to understanding the Khruschev admontion that America would be destroyed from within. Again, as reported in my post "Our Marxist in Chief" (linked above) -- Julius Rosenberg infamous traitor executed for espionage with his wife Ethel in 1953, attended City College of New York same said as City University. There are NO coincidences in this attack on America. Here are the roots of the Rosenberg's treachery as first published in the Weekly People August 1, 1925 titled "The Workers Party [USSR] vs The Socialist Labor Party [USA]" by Joseph Brandon (republished in 1926 as Arm & Hammer pamphlet #8) read as follows:

Russia's Problem and Ours: In Russia the problem was not to take the industries but to create them. In America the problem is the reverse. We do not have to create the industries, what we must do is to take them. The easiest task the Russians had, the seizing of power, is the hardest nut we have to crack, and the thing that is no task for us at all is what is puzzling the Russians night and day, all these years. When the working class seizes power in America it controls all that is necessary to run production on socialized lines. A dictatorship of the proletariat is unnecessary, the workers being in a majority. There will not even be a rule of the proletariat because the act of socializing the industries automatically abolishes all classes and therefore the proletariat as a class ceases to be.

Organization Must Preceed Revolution: Obviously the workers cannot wait until the Social Revolution has stepped upon the scene and then organize. Tactics therefore dictate the organization of the working class today, under capitalism, into an organization whose primary purpose is to seize the industries and act as the framework of the new social order. Just as the chick develops in the shell before the world as a distinct creature, so the future society must be built up under capitalism. And just as the fully developed chick breaks the shell of its egg, so the shell of capitalism will never be broken until the organization of future society is developed to the point where it is able to function. Does it not follow logically that the working class must organize today, under capitalism, in order to achieve its emancipation?
Ignorance Extends to Politics: The Workers Party wants a dictatorship of the proletariat. But it argues that the large mass of workers will never become Socialist and will have to be led by an intelligent [elitist] minority. So it is willing to unite with any movement of workers, no matter how wrong this may be, in order that they will have some masses to lead. This is called a united front. (blogger's note: the American Socialist Labor Party rejected this tactic)
How to "Bore" and How to Build: The SLP says, “Bore from within but bore to a purpose.” The purpose of working inside the trade unions is to destroy the bulwark of capitalism and establish bulwarks of Socialism, the industrial union.
The Revolutionary Organization: The SLP correctly holds that the political party must be a party of no compromise (blogger's note - does this remind anyone of Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the radical Dems?). The SLP mission is to point the way to the goal and it refuses to leave the main road to follow the small bypaths that lead into the swamp of reformism. Its skirts are clean. The banner of Socialism is held high, uncorrupted, and not dragged down into the mire of petty bourgeois reform. Capitalism cannot be reformed. It must be overthrown.
The Real Power of Labor: Here in America we have a right to come out openly and agitate for the overthrow of the government and the establishment of a workers’ republic. If we did not have this opportunity then no alternative would be open for us but to advocate a violent overthrow of capitalism...

Which brings us to The Cloward-Piven Strategy of "Orchestrated Crisis". Keeping in mind that Democrats at least as far back as FDR have used the strategy of creating crises for which they conveniently offer up the only possible solution that will get "mainstream" media attention, is #1 in their play-book. Is it a coincidence that Obama attended Columbia University, the same radicalized university that churned out the likes of Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven? or, that Piven and Julius Rosenberg, though not contemporaries, were both alumni of City College of New York? Is it any wonder there are no available academic records regarding Obama's time at Columbia? And let us not forget Rahm Emmanuel, Obama chief of staff, who said in the context of this current economic disaster, that a crisis is an opportunity to do that which might otherwise be impossible.

Our republic is threatened more seriously today than if Nikita Khruschev had succeeded in placing and making operational those nuclear warheads atop their Cuban based ballistic missiles in 1962. Yet in the 60's, Mutually Assured Destruction was a formidible deterrent to Soviet threats. The only deterrent we have in this day and age against the neo-communist revolution now under way, is the American people. If 'we the people' succeed by election, public pressure and whatever other means necessary to put down this attack on our American republic, then the conspirators in Obama's attempted coup d'etat should be arrested, tried and convicted for the crime of high treason. If we fail, if our elections are tampered with, or if they simply never occur due to some new crisis, it will be Game-Over for the America we once knew and loved.

I'm thankful that we're still able to discuss these issues openly, I wonder how long that liberty will last. It's up to each of us to determine how long, we know what the obamanation intends.

2010-01-05T09:29:00.000-06:00

Our Marxist in Chief, An Historic Perspective

Posted by AfterShock on Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:39:38 AM

It remains to be seen just how much damage to our nation Barrack Obama will get away with over the next 38 months. The damage he's done thus far is considerable, but as of September 23, 2009, it truly defy's description. His appearance before the UN Security Council left most conservatives and a good many centrists, speechless. And at no time in my 56 years has any president or high ranking administration member ever acted in such an anti American and disgracefull manner as has President Barrack Obama. Yet, the coming of a Barrack Obama and of worker/labor social justice organizations like STORM, ACORN and The Apollo Project were predicted some 45 years earlier by the profit and soviet premier, Nikita Khruschev. Khruschev stated then that "Revolutionaries are the locomotives of history"; and he prophesied that "[we] will not bury you with a shovel, your own working class will bury you." He boasted many times that the USSR wouldn't need to fire a shot, that we were being conquered from within. In communist Russia the working class was represented as the communist labor party. There were many American labor-union ties to the communist labor party throughout the 20th century. Radicals to say the least.

The very month and year I was born, June 1953, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed for treason. Accused of passing microfilm secrets -- which included the Manhatten project -- to the Soviets. But why, they were both born Americans. What led them to commit such a crime against their country? Thirty four years prior to their execution by electric chair, in 1919, the Communist Party of the USA (CPUSA) was founded. According to the CPUSA's bio, for approximately the first half of the century primarily in the 1920's, 30's and 40's, the CPUSA was "the largest and most influential communist party in the U.S"., playing a "prominent role" in the U.S. labor movement, as well as "founding most of the country's major industrial unions". They were also known for pursuing racial discrimination cases in workplaces and city communities. Also in 1919, the Socialist Labor Party another communist affiliate was formed; then came the Communist Labor Party of America. All three shared similar objectives but with varying degrees of aggressiveness; The Rosenbergs had connections to all three. By 1931 a young and impressionable -- 12 year old -- Julius Rosenberg had become a member of the Young Communist League, a sort of youth program of the CPUSA designed to indoctrinate would be communists. Though all three organizations are well documented, the following excerpts from the Socialist Labor Party are all too familiar when compared with radical community organizers of today:

The Workers Party [In USSR] vs. The Socialist Labor Party [in America] by Joseph Brandon

Published Aug 1, 1925 in the Weekly People. (reprinted 1925 as the Arm & Hammer pamphlet No. 8)

full text at http://www.marxists.org/history/usa/parties/slp/1925/0801-brandon-wpavsslp.pdf

Russia’s Problem and Ours.

In Russia the problem was not to take the industries but to create them. In America the problem is the reverse. We do not have to create the industries, what we must do is to take them. The easiest task the Russians had, the seizing of power, is the hardest nut we have to crack, and the thing that is no task for us at all is what is puzzling the Russians night and day, all these years. When the working class seizes power in America it controls all that is necessary to run production on socialized lines. A dictatorship of the proletariat is unnecessary, the workers being in a majority. There will not even be a rule of the proletariat because the act of socializing the industries automatically abolishes all classes and therefore the proletariat as a class ceases to be.

Organization Must Preceed Revolution.
Obviously the workers cannot wait until the Social Revolution has stepped upon the scene and then organize. Tactics therefore dictate the organization of the working class today, under capitalism, into an organization whose primary purpose is to seize the industries and act as the framework of the new social order. Just as the chick develops in the shell before the world as a distinct creature, so the future society must be built up under capitalism. And just as the fully developed chick breaks the shell of its egg, so the shell of capitalism will never be broken until the organization of future society is developed to the point where it is able to function. Does it not follow logically that the working class must organize today, under capitalism, in order to achieve its emancipation?

Ignorance Extends to Politics
The Workers Party wants a dictatorship of the proletariat. But it argues that the large mass of workers will never become Socialist and will have to be led by an intelligent [elitist] minority. So it is willing to unite with any movement of workers, no matter how wrong this may be, in order that they will have some masses to lead. This is called a united front. (blogger's note: the American Socialist Labor Party rejected this tactic)

How to “Bore” and How to Build.
The SLP says, “Bore from within but bore to a purpose.” The purpose of working inside the trade unions is to destroy the bulwark of capitalism and establish bulwarks of Socialism, the industrial union.

The Revolutionary Organization.
The SLP correctly holds that the political party must be a party of no compromise (blogger's note - does this remind anyone of Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the radical Dems?). The SLP mission is to point the way to the goal and it refuses to leave the main road to follow the small bypaths that lead into the swamp of reformism. Its skirts are clean. The banner of Socialism is held high, uncorrupted, and not dragged down into the mire of petty bourgeois reform. Capitalism cannot be reformed. It must be overthrown.

The Real Power of Labor.
Here in America we have a right to come out openly and agitate for the overthrow of the government and the establishment of a workers’ republic. If we did not have this opportunity then no alternative would be open for us but to advocate a violent overthrow of capitalism...

It was of course the great depression; injustice, poverty, hunger, jobless and homelessness were rampant. By 1932 Julius Rosenberg had become a radicalized activist and threw his support into a racially charged case know as the Scottsboro Boys, in defense of nine homeless black teenagers accused, tried and convicted of raping two homeless white women in a freight train boxcar. Thereafter, Rosenberg became a full member of the Communist Party of America -- the CPA.

In 1931 at age 16 already two years graduated from high school, Ethel Greenglass took a job with the National New York Shipping Company. Not long after she became a political activist and union organizer. Greenglass had grown up dirt poor, her family was destitute - the working poor underclass. She heard often from her Russian father the plight of the worker and the evils of a capitalist society. Inevitably she was drawn to the far left cause of worker's rights. In 1935 she organized a strike against her employer and was fired for her lack of loyalty. The communist party of the United States was heavily involved in union organizing and Ethel Greenglass had endeared herself to them with her efforts (against her employer and as an activist) to that point. In 1934 at only 16 years old, Julius Rosenberg also by then a high school graduate entered City College of New York. Continuing his prior activism against racial discrimination, Julius took an interest in far left radical politics both on and off campus. Though they had known each other previously through association with the Communist Party, in 1935 on New Year's Eve, the now twenty year old Ethel Greenglass, and 17 year old Julius Rosenberg met again at a union organized party where Ethel had been asked to entertain. This time 'round the two radicalized revolutionaries hit it off and four years later, 1939, Julius and Ethel were married.

WWII: after the December 7th, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor and the ensuing US participation in World War II, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg fearing retribution during a time of world war, went underground with their communist affiliation.

Nonetheless, the Rosenbergs remained radical activists. In 1943 Julius who had become a member of the United States Signal Corp., was approached by a Soviet KGB officer/recruiter -- Alexander Feklisov -- and asked to spy for the Soviet Union. Meanwhile Ethel Rosenberg's younger brother, David Greenglass, had been assigned to work on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos NM. Having accepted the assignment to spy, Julius Rosenberg set about convincing brother in-law David Greenglass to help pass classified information to the Soviets. Though history has since attempted to repaint the Rosenbergs as penny ante even sympathetic players in the affair, the fact remains that within a year of receiving intelligence provided by the Rosenbergs, the Soviets had an A-Bomb of their own.

To the Rosenbergs, America was a decadent capitalistic society that used people for the profit of rich industrialists. They viewed communism under Stalin as preferable, buying in to the worker/laborer propaganda of the time. They believed the perfect Marxist world could be created here without a dictator. Too bad neither of them were afforded the privilege to live their lives in the USSR, maybe they'd have realized how fortunate they were back in the US of A.

The parallels between radicalized youth from the 1920's and 30's and the process by which they, particularly the Rosenbergs, became radicalized as compared to American youth of the 60's and 70's, are compelling and too prevalent. Poor even destitute kids are enticed to get involved with radical activist organizations very similar to those the Rosenbergs associated with. Organizations, I might add, which have thoroughly infiltrated our political system. The difference is, the radicals of this era no longer feel the need to act "underground". They're in full view, openly taunting us with a brazen agenda to subvert the political process and constitutional system of self governance we've known for over 200 years

Today's radical community organizers are working to fundamentally change America into a neofascist socialist state, one among many intended to form a new world order, just as -- if you've truly been listening -- our President has been articulating to the rest of the world. Is it possible that we have in Barrack and Michelle Obama, the same devout anti-American radicals that were once embodied as Ethel and Julius Rosenberg? The Obama Administration is selling out capitalism, the locomotive that drives America, just as readily as the Rosenbergs did some 65 years ago. History has been repeating itself in just about every conceivable way since the 1920's. The only thing the radical left has learned is how to better infiltrate industry, education and politics. Come to think of it, what else is there?

We all say "God Bless America" from time to time (unless your name happens to be Rev. Wright or Pfleger) but how much longer will the America for which we've so often asked God's blessing, exist?

Barry Soetoro has a Bin Laden Agenda

2009-12-31T08:24:00.000-06:00

Barry Soetoro's agenda bears more than mere resemblance to that of Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden hates Israel and, by extension, the United States of America. Barry hates America too, apologizing every chance he gets for -- alleged -- American atrocities throughout the world. Barry gives Israel the political back of his hand, which is no doubt pleasing to Bin Laden. Fifteen years ago and many times since, Bin Laden instructed Muslims to strike at the heart of our American economy, to topple it by any means, into bankruptcy. Barry Soetoro -- born and raised a Muslim in Muslim schools -- has done everything in his power to accomplish that goal.

Bin Laden wants nothing less than the destruction of the two crusader states -- Israel and the United States. After all we are the great Satan ya know. And Barry -- so far as the United States defined by our Constitution is concerned -- appears to share that Bin Laden goal as well. Radical Muslims, with Osama Bin Laden foremost among them, believe that lying to the infidel(s) -- that would be us, the American people -- is completely acceptable when done to serve their radical Muslim objective. That fits fine with Barry Soetoro as he also believes in lying to the infidels as a means to achieve his objectives. And he does so, frequently. Take these few examples from Barry's own mouth;

(1). Barry pledged during his presidential campaign that lobbyists "won't find a job in my White House," He lied, they're not only in it, Barry invited them.
(2). Barry said: "I’ll make our government open and transparent, so that anyone can ensure that our business is the people’s business.” He lied. We still don't know anything about this guy, no college transcripts, no certified birth record, no medical records, none of the data any of us would be required to submit for the least of government employment. And we know even less at least from Barry and/or his WH staff, who the hell his 42 appointed Czars really are.

(3). “As President, I’m going to make it impossible for Congressmen or lobbyists to slip pork barrel projects or corporate welfare into laws when no one’s looking…” He lied, it's been easier now than ever, and both the stimulus package and Health Care bills are pure pork written by lobbyists whom represent any number of anti-American organizations.
.(4). "When I’m President, meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public. No more secrecy. That is the commitment I make to you as President.” He lied, they are totally secret, Republican/conservative representation has been shut out.
(5). “When there’s a bill that ends up on my desk as President, you the public will have five days to look online to see what's in it before I sign it.” He lied, we haven't seen one yet.
(6). “When there are meetings between lobbyists and a government agency, we’ll put as many of those meetings as possible online for every American to watch.” He lied, hasn't been one on line yet.
(7). “When there’s a tax bill being debated in Congress, you will know the names of the corporations that would benefit and how much money they would get, and we will put every corporate tax break and every pork barrel project online for every American to see. You will know who asked for them and you can decide whether your representative is actually representing you." Once again he lied.

For complete details go to the Freedom Post - http://www.myfreedompost.com/2009/12/video-obamas-seven-lies-in-under-two.html and watch the video.

The point is, that Barry Soetoro has more in common with Osama Bin Laden's objectives, including the practice of lying to the infidel (you and I), than he does with our American heritage, values and constitutional government. It's beyond contest that Barry hates America as he hates Israel. Barry lends silent consent to the abject corruption and evil of dictators, thugs and terrorists like Bin Laden, Chavez, Ahmadinejad and Ortega just to name a few, while abandoning our traditional and natural allies. Because of these facts, I'm left to conclude that Barry or Barack as he now likes to be called, isn't our President of the United States, he's their -- the dictator's, thug's and terrorist's -- President of America.