<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Brooklyn Law Office Blawg</title>
	
	<link>http://alexroshuk.com</link>
	<description>Observations of a Brooklyn lawyer in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>marriage or fiancee visa?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/-k36AMflyhA/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/07/12/marriage-or-fiancee-visa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiancee visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description>Many times we get calls from individuals wishing to sponsor their &amp;#8220;significant other&amp;#8221; to come to the United States.  A common question is: should I marry my girlfriend (or boyfriend) before they come here, or should I get them a fiance (fiancee) visa? Usually the question is: which is faster?
The first thing one should consider [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/-k36AMflyhA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/07/12/marriage-or-fiancee-visa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/07/12/marriage-or-fiancee-visa/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversity Visas or the Green Card Lottery</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/bCMiVJWccVc/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/05/31/diversity-visas-or-the-green-card-lottery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fraud and "con" schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Card Lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration to USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description>At present the United State DV lottery (DV stands for Diversity Visa), also known as the &amp;#8220;green card lottery&amp;#8221; is done online. The next DV or diversity visa lottery, (also known as the green card lottery) is open to application in the late fall each year. Here is the link to the information about this [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/bCMiVJWccVc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/05/31/diversity-visas-or-the-green-card-lottery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/05/31/diversity-visas-or-the-green-card-lottery/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What to do when your lawsuit hits the Blogosphere?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/P3booUuAFrQ/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/04/28/lawsuit-hits-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting legal cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet law and blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not-for-profit law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description>The astounding thing was that some of the commentary misstated the alleged facts, or drew erroneous conclusions, i.e. that my client's career had been permanently ruined. True, the failed performance had a negative impact on him, but to his credit he has returned to creating music of a very high caliber having recently received prizes and awards which show the depth of his talent and virtuosity.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/P3booUuAFrQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/04/28/lawsuit-hits-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2009/04/28/lawsuit-hits-the-blogosphere/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Removing stolen blog content with a Takedown Notice</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/ZezcYWjYy68/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2008/02/08/removing-stolen-blog-content-with-a-takedown-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet law and blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2008/02/08/removing-stolen-blog-content-with-a-takedown-notice/</guid>
		<description>You often read about blog authors who complain that some &amp;#8220;scraper&amp;#8221; has republished their blog content on a completely unaffiliated  site without permission even when then blog owner has not released that content with an &amp;#8220;open source&amp;#8221; or so-called &amp;#8220;copyleft&amp;#8221; license. Can a blog owner easily stop such vandalism? Yes. Under United States Copyright [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/ZezcYWjYy68" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2008/02/08/removing-stolen-blog-content-with-a-takedown-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2008/02/08/removing-stolen-blog-content-with-a-takedown-notice/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tying a will with red tape</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/zE6R3HHnPOI/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/21/tying-a-will-with-red-tape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estates and Probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/15/tying-a-will-with-red-tape/</guid>
		<description>One of the most important document fraud protection devices is using &amp;#8220;red tape&amp;#8221; to tie and seal a legal document. Once the document has been tied and sealed it is virtually impossible to alter the document without destroying it and making such destruction known to anyone who comes into possession of the document.
This method was [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/zE6R3HHnPOI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/21/tying-a-will-with-red-tape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/21/tying-a-will-with-red-tape/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation in the blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/M8TB50dH56A/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/11/defamation-in-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defamation - libel and slander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet law and blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/11/defamation-in-the-blogosphere/</guid>
		<description>Are you responsible  if some anonymous poster writes a comment about someone on a blog and it is defamatory?  It is certainly true if you own the blog and you write a posting on the blog that you are responsible for the legal consequences of your authorship, but if a third party writes [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/M8TB50dH56A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/11/defamation-in-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/11/defamation-in-the-blogosphere/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright ideas? Is it possible?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/-9lnAzwcxSo/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/copyright-ideas-is-it-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2007/11/27/copyright-ideas-is-it-possible/</guid>
		<description>The idea-expression dichotomy or divide is embodied in Section 102(b) of the United States copyright code. It states:
(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/-9lnAzwcxSo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/copyright-ideas-is-it-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/copyright-ideas-is-it-possible/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Restorative Justice</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/455S_8v6fhM/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/restorative-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Restorative Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruminations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/10/restorative-justice/</guid>
		<description>The Restorative Justice movement aims at reevaluating the criminal justice system and undertaking reforms to make justice not a punitive undertaking that views punishment through incarceration as the fundamental means to justice but one that sees more proactive approaches such as rehabilitation, transitional services, family support services, pre-trial services and fair representation of defendants in [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/455S_8v6fhM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/restorative-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/restorative-justice/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware mortgage foreclosure confidence schemes</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/VUYXenQXYjc/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/beware-mortgage-foreclosure-or-refinance-confidence-fraud-schemes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud and "con" schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/beware-mortgage-foreclosure-or-refinance-confidence-fraud-schemes/</guid>
		<description>With foreclosures on the rise due to the &amp;#8220;subprime&amp;#8221; mortgage meltdown there are  more and more credit repair and foreclosure rescue &amp;#8220;specialists&amp;#8221; that promise to solve the problems of  the defaulting homeowner.  Some of these individuals are providing  their clients with valuable expertise and  some  relief  (due to [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/VUYXenQXYjc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/beware-mortgage-foreclosure-or-refinance-confidence-fraud-schemes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/12/01/beware-mortgage-foreclosure-or-refinance-confidence-fraud-schemes/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Black’s Law Dictionary</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~3/yM33eGsvKtE/</link>
		<comments>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/11/30/blacks-law-dictionary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roshuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General legal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexroshuk.com/2007/11/30/blacks-law-dictionary/</guid>
		<description>One of the best legal books I ever purchased is Black&amp;#8217;s Law Dictionary, an American law dictionary.  It was founded by Henry Campbell Black.  It has been cited as legal authority in many Supreme Court cases.  The latest editions, including abridged and pocket versions, are useful starting points for the layman or [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/BrooklynLawOfficeBlawg/~4/yM33eGsvKtE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/11/30/blacks-law-dictionary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://alexroshuk.com/2007/11/30/blacks-law-dictionary/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
