The movement itself has been inflated by the organisers who already had contacts within the local media. Thus, the inflated number of around 20,000 fans on Facebook is the direct result of the semi-celebrity status and media contacts of the organisers, and not a natural adhesion from 20 thousand angry youngsters. Any movement inflated either by money or celebrity is bound to deflate afterwards, and will be ephemeral.

It is easy to like a Facebook group in front of one’s PC while sitting comfortably on a chair. Getting the numbers on Facebook is not so hard when you have the proper logistics and networking. However, what is really hard is to engage the fans into turning their “likes” into a concrete form of protest: marching on the streets on a Saturday afternoon. How many youngsters will choose to go to Port Louis instead of the revision sessions of private tuitions in the middle of the third term? How many Facebookers, who have been tired by a long working week, will really sacrifice a Saturday afternoon for an abstract cause?

Organising a protest march one day after the day dedicated to the Blessed Father Laval is a sign of political naivety and a disrespect to the sensibilities of the multi-cultural Mauritian community. This is the sort of mistake which tells you that the organisers do not have the proper knowledge and tact to handle a multi-cultural country. Alienating a sizeable section of the Mauritian community – the one which right now feels the more inclined to protest – by choosing a stage a protest march the day after 9/9 is a grave political mistake.

The laudable demands of the march are based on the assumption that the Mauritian Youth in general wants a country free of communalism and corruption: WRONG. The organisers would do well to attend one election campaign for the student unions of the UoM and UTM, and revise their expectations towards the Mauritian youngsters. In fact, I have seen enough to be convinced that equality and justice is a value truly cherished by a minority of idealist young people. Sadly, most Mauritian students nowadays are inclined to bend the rules or have resort to communalism if it suits their interests. Saken rod so bout!

The Mauritian people like to complain, but are not in urgent need of change. Most of them have enough to eat and enough drama to entertain themselves. They are truly well asleep with the bread and circuses provided by the three traditional parties, and the protest march will be yet another entertaining event, which will be long forgotten in a few weeks time.

The Fog Index is calculated as follows:

1. Count the number of words in a section of the written work. This section should be at least 100 words long.
2. Count the number of complete thoughts in the sections. These thoughts are short sentences, or part of sentences that are separated by commas, colons or semicolons.
3. Divide the number of words by the number of thoughts. This number is the average thought length.
4. Count the number of words with three or more syllables in the section. Ignore proper names, compound names that are formed of simple words, and words which are three syllables because of the following suffixes: -ed, -s, and -es.
5. Calculate the percentage of multi-syllable words in the section.
6. Add this percentage to the average number of thoughts, and multiply the sum by 0.4 to obtain the Fog Index.

14 May 2011. Fergie clinched United’s 19th title – the 12th under his tenure – with arguably one of the weakest team to win the championish. While Liverpool are stuck to 18, United are one of the most consistent title winning sides in Europe and are still hungry for more. With the record as the team with most championships under the belt, the Reds can now confidently prepare for the clash of the titans at Wembley on May 24 against Barcelona, with Europe’s most coveited trophy as the prize.

Logo:

<a href="http://mbl.blebon.com" target="_blank" title="All the Mauritian blogs under one page!"><img alt="Mauritius Blog List" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DuhZ3DuqU3U/SmmxkMBazNI/AAAAAAAAAeM/ELHjGvUfJZY/s400/logo.png" width="100%"/></a>

Badge:

<a href="http://mbl.blebon.com" target="_blank" title="All the Mauritian blogs under one page!"><img alt="Mauritius Blog List" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DuhZ3DuqU3U/SmmybRrlexI/AAAAAAAAAe0/GHAWOtrgpls/s400/badge.png"/></a>

Staple food, e.g. rice, wheat … is a significant source of the expenditure for a typical poor family living in a developing country. This large dependence is worrying since fluctuations in staple food price are bound to have a significant impact on poverty. This vulnerability of poor households to changing food prices motivates the need to understand the link between climate fluctuations, food prices and poverty.

Recent climate studies showed that hot, wet and dry extremes are becoming more and more frequent. There is direct evidence that such changes in climate patterns are already occurring. Crop damages resulting from this climate volatility will increase; the resulting reduction in crop production will put stress on food prices, which will shoot up.

The paper ‘Climate volatility deepens poverty vulnerability in developing countries’ suggests that wage earners in urban areas are hit the hardest when the price of staple food goes up. This category is extremely exposed to food prices increase: since food form a large portion of their expenditure, rising prices push them below the poverty threshold for consumption. This is a worrying pattern since rural populations are expected to decrease by more than one third between 2010 and 2050. Rural food producers are less hardly hit by rising food prices; they are partially insulated from these effects since they benefit from the higher selling prices.

The report recommends sub-Saharan countries to invest in measures mitigating extreme climate effects, e.g. irrigation upgrading in Tanzania. These measures aim at increasing agricultural productivity, thereby buffering the impact of climate volatility. However the authors warn that these investments must also be accompanied by the removal of barriers to both credit and information.

Reference:
S.A. Ahmed, N.S. Diffenbaugh and T.W. Hertel, Climate volatility deepens poverty vulnerability in developing countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (2009) 034004 (8p)

Early career scientists in the UK have previously appealed to the WHO to formally condemn the use of homeopathic treatment for these five serious diseases. This appeal aims at discouraging the use of inappropriate medication when people’s lives are at risk. The WHO currently works in partnership with many organisations promoting homeopathy or alternative treatment in developing countries.

Homeopathy is presented as a safe, natural and long term treatment for various illnesses. The basis of homeopathy lies in the beliefs that:

1. substances causing the same symptoms as the disease to be treated can effectively cure people, and
2. an over-diluted dose of the substance reduces its potential to harm and becomes very effective for healing.

However, scientific investigations have not proven these claims, but rather show that homeopathy merely acts as a placebo.

Placebos (from the latin I will please) are inert prescriptions which can induce physiological changes. The belief that the patient is receiving treatment is what brings relief to him. However, the placebo effect simply alleviates the symptoms of the disease and is by no way a cure. Homeopathy cannot thus cure serious diseases, such as HIV, TB, malaria, flu and diarrhoea.

Promoting irrational and ineffective treatments for these serious illnesses can lead to catastrophic consequences. This has been demonstrated in South Africa, where Thabo Mbeki’s reckless policy has led to an estimated 365,000 premature deaths. Advocating homeopathy for AIDS and flu in place of proper treatment is unethical, since homeopathy is no replacement for effective medication developed through rigorous clinical trials.

Life has always be problematic for us, physicists. Living organisms have long be regarded as magic entities, endowed with some obscure ‘life force’. Today, we know it’s no magic at all; living cells are merely made up of ordinary matter which do extraordinary things. This ordinary matter obeys the laws of physics. But then, why does life has so many astonishing characteristics?

In the 1940s and 1950s, physicists hoped that quantum mechanics would evolve to a point that the mystery of life could be explained. The founders of the quantum theory, boosted by successful prediction of the behaviour of non-living matter at atomic level, hoped that quantum mechanics would be powerful enough to explain the behaviour of living matter. 50 years later, this dream is yet to be fulfilled.

One big question is the problematic origin of life, which proves to be a stubborn mystery. How could the simplest known living organism, which is still astonishingly complex, arise by assembly of inanimate matter? These questions are still open, and this is what makes biophysics so interesting.

Reference:
Davies, P., The quantum life. Physics World. Vol 22 No 7 July 2009, pp 24—28.