Comments for BSonPoSH

Comment on Hyper-V and PowerShell : VMName to OSName mapping by Justin Barley

Justin Barley — Wed, 02 May 2012 16:14:29 +0000

indeed!

Comment on Citrix License Info (using WMI) by sam

sam — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:39:30 +0000

sorry, i see the answer.

Comment on Citrix License Info (using WMI) by sam

sam — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:24:59 +0000

only see

LicenseType :
License type – NFR(Not For Resale), Retail, Eval(Evaluation), and TP(Technology Preview)á

Comment on Citrix License Info (using WMI) by sam

sam — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:09:44 +0000

I use this ps1 and get the following result:

PS D:\> .\Get-CitrixLicense.ps1 127.0.0.1

Product : MPS_ENT_ENABLER
Model : Server
Type : Retail
Installed : 10
In Use : 0
Available : 10
% in use : 0

Product : MPS_ENT_CCU
Model : Server
Type : Retail
Installed : 10
In Use : 0
Available : 10
% in use : 0

Would you please explain what is the meaning of “Product” and “Type” which are different from your type, thanks in advance.

Comment on The 2011 Scripting Games by mytimelimit

mytimelimit — Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:19:13 +0000

sharing is caring post..

Comment on Hyper-V and PowerShell : VMName to OSName mapping by mytimelimit

mytimelimit — Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:12:05 +0000

nice

Comment on BSonPosh v1 Powershell Module finally ships! by intimateas

intimateas — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:42:56 +0000

I know about Test-Connection. I dont like it. I prefer my Test-Host cmdlet

Comment on BSonPosh v1 Powershell Module finally ships! by tomlommar

tomlommar — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:39:19 +0000

Thanks alot for this. I’ll give it a try right away.

Comment on BSonPosh v1 Powershell Module finally ships! by tshell

tshell — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:24:20 +0000

Thanks for you kind words and I am happy to share my work.

Regarding “Send-FTP:” That particular script was actually provided by Joel from http://huddledmasses.org

Comment on BSonPosh v1 Powershell Module finally ships! by Rob Wiley

Rob Wiley — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:36:13 +0000

Hi Brandon,

I really like bsonposh module. It is taking me a while to work my way through the various functions, but there are so many useful ones. I’ve worked Send-FTP into a number of my scripts. It’s so much nicer than using http://ftp.exe – and sometimes, it simply makes it possible to script what http://ftp.exe could not since it uses passive transfer.

I do wonder where Receive-FTP is though. I have to say that your scripting skills are quite a bit beyond me, though I am learning a lot from working through them. I use the following as Receive-FTP (which I got from StackOverflow at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/936108/how-to-script-ftp-upload-and-download ) but it doesn’t work in the same manner as your Send FTP.

So I was wondering – why did you build Send-FTP the way you did. As opposed to doing it in the manner of the StackOverflow post. Any chance you might create a Receive-FTP?

Thanks for the community involvement. I enjoy your work.

-Rob