Bud Meyers

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's tell-all book! (December 31, 2025)

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Wed, 31 Dec 2025 19:51:00 +0000

How the Georgia congresswoman went from the president’s loudest cheerleader to his loudest Republican critic.

(* Editor's Note: Robert Draper covers politics for The New York Times, and he refers to his paper as "the Times" in this article. He conducted two lengthy interviews with Marjorie Taylor Greene and spoke to close associates, congressional colleagues and White House officials. Quite stunning, really. The story is written in the first-person by him. It has the character of a novella and the tone of screenplay, rather than a typical news article. He disguised his editorial slant very creatively and with flair. Kudos!)

Eleven days after Charlie Kirk was killed in September, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the third-term Georgia congresswoman, was watching his memorial service on TV as the luminaries of the conservative movement and the Trump administration gathered to pay tribute to the young activist.

What stayed with Greene long afterward were the last two speakers who took the stage. First there was Kirk’s widow, Erika, who stood in white before the crowd filling the Arizona stadium, lifted her tear-filled eyes and said that she forgave her husband’s killer. And then there was President Trump. “He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose,” he said of Kirk. “He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them.”

"That was absolutely the worst statement,” Greene wrote to me in a text message months after the memorial service. And the contrast between Erika Kirk and the president was clarifying, she added. “It just shows where his heart is. And that’s the difference, with her having a sincere Christian faith, and it also proves that he does not have any faith.” Greene said it clarified something about herself.

Over the past five years, as Trump’s most notorious acolyte in Congress, she had adopted his unrepentant pugilism as her own. “Our side has been trained by Donald Trump to never apologize and to never admit when you’re wrong,” she told me in her Capitol Hill office one afternoon in early December. “You just keep pummeling your enemies, no matter what. And as a Christian, I don’t believe in doing that. I agree with Erika Kirk, who did the hardest thing possible and said it out loud.”

Greene’s reaction put her in a distinct minority among influential conservative figures. Almost immediately after Kirk was declared dead, many of her comrades on the right — the billionaire Elon Musk, the Fox News host Jesse Watters, the podcaster Steve Bannon — described the killing an act of war by the left and exhorted their audience to think in similar terms. But Greene — who for years took a back seat to no one when it came to reactionary rhetoric, going so far, before she was in office, as to accuse Democrats, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, of treasonous conduct and adding that treason was punishable by imprisonment or death — realized that she had suddenly lost all appetite for vengeance. She later told a friend, who confirmed the exchange: “After Charlie died, I realized that I’m part of this toxic culture. I really started looking at my faith. I wanted to be more like Christ.”

That was when the stress fracture that had been steadily widening between Greene and her political godfather became an irrevocable break. She had increasingly taken stands apart from the president and the Republican Party: declaring the war in Gaza a “genocide”; objecting to cryptocurrency and artificial-intelligence policies that, from her perspective, prioritized billionaire donors over working-class Americans; criticizing the Trump administration for approving foreign student visas, for enacting tariffs that hurt businesses in her district and for allowing Obamacare subsidies to expire.

Most significant, she defied the president and compliant House Republican leaders as she argued that all investigative material pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein should be released. “The Epstein files represent everything wrong with Washington,” Greene told me in December. “Rich, powerful elites doing horrible things and getting away with it. And the women are the victims.”

As Greene made her opinions known, first to Trump and his team and then publicly, she tested the affection of the man who once said of her in a posted statement endorsing her re-election: “Marjorie Taylor Greene is a warrior in Congress. She doesn’t back down, she doesn’t give up, and she has ALWAYS been with Trump."

Marjorie Taylor Greene was an enthusiastic regular at Donald Trump’s rallies since the day after she was sworn into office in January 2021. Now the cascade of perceived transgressions culminated in the president’s tarring her as “Marjorie ‘Traitor’ Green” in a social media post on Nov. 15, 2025.

Six days later, she announced in a video that she would resign from Congress on Jan. 5, a year before her term ends."

I have covered Greene, who is 51, extensively over the past five years, and it was evident during this recent visit that on one level nothing had changed.

Just outside the front door of her office stood the familiar placard blaring, “There are TWO genders: MALE & FEMALE.”

One sign on the door warned visitors that “NO FOREIGN LOBBYING” was allowed; another featured the image of Charlie Kirk. And hanging on the wall inside the waiting area were fan letters from all over America, some dating back to 2021, her first year in office. The television was, as always, set to Fox News, though Greene told me she no longer watched the network because she found it "factually unreliable." [Editor's Note: That's why I started watching Newsmax.]

The fact that her office remained the same reflected Greene’s sense of where she stood: She continued to be faithful to Trump’s campaign promises. If anything, she said, her sin was to have regarded them as more than slogans. “That’s what I’m guilty of,” she told me. “That’s what made me, in the president’s words, a traitor — which was truly believing in Make America Great Again, which I perceive to be America First.”

Greene’s last exchange with the president was by text message on Nov. 16. That day, she received an anonymous email in her personal Gmail account that threatened her college-aged son: “Derek will have his life snuffed out soon. Better watch his back.” The email’s subject heading used the nickname Trump had given her the day before: “Marjorie Traitor Greene.”

Greene promptly texted that information to the president. According to a source familiar with the exchange, his long reply made no mention of her son. Instead, Trump insulted her in personal terms. When she replied that children should remain off limits from their disagreements, Trump responded that she had only herself to blame.

In response to detailed questions and a request for comment, Davis Ingle, a White House spokesman, wrote in a statement: “President Trump remains the undisputed leader of the greatest and fastest growing political movement in American history — the MAGA movement. On the other hand, Congresswoman Greene is quitting on her constituents in the middle of her term and abandoning the consequential fight we’re in — we don’t have time for her petty bitterness.”

The president’s banishment of Greene can be viewed as the most recent of several cracks in a MAGA coalition that seemed shatterproof after Trump’s re-election in 2024.

The president’s brash Inauguration Day of a “golden age” has not borne out for most Americans. With polling increasingly showing a drop in his approval ratings and in the Republican forecast for next year’s midterm elections, a few voices on the right have dared to openly question the president’s judgment, even while fighting among themselves over how best to interpret and execute “America First.” Among them, Greene may be the least likely of Trump’s conscientious objectors.

The congresswoman discussed her break with President Trump and her journey from MAGA zealot to political isolation. It has been tempting for some observers to predict that the meteoric crash and burn of the MAGA movement’s loudest champion signals the beginning of the end for its leader as well. But it is Greene who is exiting the stage, while Trump continues to dominate it, as he did through impeachments and indictments and other controversies that no other politician would have survived.

Greene acknowledged to me that her abrupt ejection from Trump’s orbit is unlikely to diminish his stature with his party or its base. “He has trash-talked so many people,” Greene told me. “I promise you, I don’t hold myself up as more special than others he’s done this to. I get it. This is Trump. This is what he does.”

Still, her five-year trajectory on the national scene — from the president’s embrace to her excommunication — serves as an apt parable for this political moment. If Trump engendered loyalty on an unprecedented scale, Greene was his most fervent high-profile loyalist — and now, his most unlikely apostate. She arrived in Washington as one kind of misfit and departs as another, all while remaining more or less herself, but also changing in ways that compelled even her detractors to give her a second look. None of this is normal, like the rest of the Trump era.

But because it represents an evolution for Greene, she may yet again prove to be a harbinger of a sea change in the movement she once helped lead: during its weirdest time, as its weirdest character: a former believer in the QAnon conspiracy theory, a CrossFit competitor and a wealthy co-owner of her family’s construction firm with no political experience, now jetting around on Air Force One with the president of the United States, endeavoring to overturn the 2020 election results. Three days after Greene was sworn into office in January 2021, the Capitol fell siege to rioters trying to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s victory. According to Greene, she found herself sequestered with other House members in a conference room and arguing with another Republican freshman, Kat Cammack of Florida.

“B.L.M. and antifa have broken into the Capitol!” Greene insisted."

Grabbing Greene’s shoulders, Cammack replied firmly: “Marjorie. They’re wearing MAGA hats.” [Editor's Note: Was that all the proof she needed?]

Early that February, I stood outside the Capitol watching Greene hold a news conference. The day before, 11 Republicans joined with a unanimous Democratic House majority in voting to strip Greene of her committee assignments for the incendiary remarks she made before running for office. Now she defiantly, against all conventional wisdom, said that her adversaries had it wrong about Trump’s demise, and that the base had not deserted the exiled former president: “The party is his. It doesn’t belong to anybody else.”

At the time, frankly, I thought she sounded nuts. But as the year wore on, Greene’s prescience would become as evident as her emerging star power in the MAGA ecosystem, and I became convinced that in order to understand that ecosystem, it was essential to understand this figure at the heart of it. After months of background interviews with her top aides, I got word that she was willing to meet with me.

Early in 2022, I traveled to Rome, Georgia, which is in the northwestern corner of the state where the congresswoman lived. When her aides nervously buttonholed me in the doorway of the restaurant where Greene and I were due to meet and muttered that everything would have to be off the record, I realized how tenuous the situation was. Greene, a prolific user of the term “fake news media,” had never sat down with a Times reporter before. It occurred to me that the sum total of what she knew about this news organization, and others like it, came from Fox News and the confederates in her impermeable MAGA bubble. In her world, mainstream media outfits were perpetrators of the “Russia hoax” and were in league with the Democrats. She ignored them and distrusted them.

"What brings you to Rome?” she asked as she shook my hand. When I replied, “I’m just here to see you,” she blinked in surprise. It seemed to be a source of relief, if perhaps somewhat discombobulating, that I also had a Southern accent and was more interested in her current political beliefs than her previous statements. That none of her off-the-record remarks to me that day appeared in print or on social media further reduced her wariness.

Other on-the-record interviews soon followed — a few in her office, one back in her district and a couple in Washington restaurants. One autumn evening in 2022, I ventured to ask just how she thought the 2020 election was stolen. Did she really think that a grand conspiracy, perhaps masterminded by the Obamas and the C.I.A., had secretly rigged the results?

She asked: "Do you really think Joe Biden got 81 million votes without even campaigning?”

“Yes,” I said. “They counted all the votes. That was the final tally. Why wouldn’t I believe it?” The look she then gave me, which I will never forget, was one of bottomless pity. [Editor's Note: Maybe because he didn't understand that just re-counting counterfeit or invalid ballots is NOT an real "audit".Or maybe he was just playing dumb.]

I soon became accustomed to the “Is she as crazy as she seems?” queries from the same friends and peers who 15 years earlier had asked me, while I was spending time with President George W. Bush, if he was as stupid as he appeared. The answer was a qualified "no". Greene did harbor a genuine conspiratorial streak, often even wondering if this or that person wore a wire. But she was also becoming an increasingly shrewd and acerbic observer of life on Capitol Hill. By January 2023, the Republicans had reclaimed the House and Greene had developed a strong alliance with the new speaker, Kevin McCarthy, who bestowed on her an unofficial seat at the leadership table. Through it all, Greene remained a Trump die-hard. She first visited him at Mar-a-Lago in March 2021, a time when many other elected Republicans were keeping their distance. Three months later, when Trump staged his first rally since leaving office, Greene was there as his warm-up act in Ohio.

As a matter of fact, she'd say things like, "He’s the greatest president this country has ever had. And he should be our president right now — but the dirty, rotten Democrats stole the election!” Trump in return would say, “She’s loved and respected, and she’s tough and smart and kind.

She said, "Our side has been trained by Donald Trump to never apologize and to never admit when you’re wrong.’"

While others in her party kept their options open as Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, entered the field for the 2024 presidential election, Greene’s allegiances were not up for debate. And Trump took notice.

By early 2022, she would tell me Trump had floated the idea of her as his 2024 running mate. That rolling discussion continued into the summer of 2024, she says, but Trump, she claims, was bothered by her steadfast opposition to abortion, which she has called “murder.” (A White House spokeswoman said that Greene was never under consideration. Vice President JD Vance also opposes abortion, but has deferred to Trump’s preference to leave the matter up to the states.) She ultimately joined Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk and Donald Trump Jr. as early advocates of Vance, then a first-term senator from Ohio. According to an aide, Greene would end up spending roughly $1 million from her own war chest to campaign for Trump’s re-election. (Editor's Note: Greene is a multi-millionaire through the family construction business.]

Greene’s fidelity to the MAGA cause masked some private misgivings, she now says. Some of Trump’s devotees struck Greene as worshipful in the extreme: “For a lot of MAGA, Trump is a savior, and he’s like a god to them.” She also disliked the unctuous, hedonistic posturing at Mar-a-Lago. In particular, she told me recently: “I never liked the MAGA Mar-a-Lago sexualization. I believe how women in leadership present themselves sends a message to younger women.”

She continued: “I have two daughters, and I’ve always been uncomfortable with how those women puff up their lips and enlarge their breasts. I’ve never spoken about it publicly, but I’ve been planning to.” Still, for everything that gave her pause about Trump and the MAGA faithful, there was always the LEFT to remind Greene of what she found truly appalling.

By 2024, Greene had become more politically sophisticated and also less inclined to vilify the news media. But she continued to criticize Trump’s Democratic opponents, and their positions, in the direst of terms: “radical communist Kamala Harris!" — “the perverted trans agenda against children that is an attack directly on God’s creation!” — “the party of pedophiles!”

The day after the assassination attempt on Trump in Pennsylvania that July, just days before the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, where he would receive the party’s official nomination, Greene [EDITOR'S NOTE: ----- NOT REDACTED, JUST MISSING TEXT IN EDITING ----- SORRY!]

I had plans to meet Greene for a drink on the second day of the convention. An hour before we were to get together, she texted me to say she received a better offer: Trump had asked her to sit next to him that evening. As she sat beside the man she called in her own convention speech the founding father of the America First movement,” Greene’s status as the Athena figure in that movement was on display for all to see.

At the height of her mutually supportive relationship with Trump, Greene spoke at the 2024 Republican National Convention, where she also sat with him. In turn, Greene’s belief in her MAGA Zeus was nearly absolute. Shortly after Trump secured the nomination, I convened a dinner with Greene; her boyfriend, Brian Glenn, now the White House correspondent for the right-wing outlet Real America’s Voice; and two of my fellow Times reporters. At one point, I mentioned Trump’s pledge to enact “retribution” against his perceived enemies. Greene’s demeanor turned icy. President Trump, she crisply informed me, was focused on saving America, not payback. Any suggestion to the contrary was asinine. She warned me that if my colleagues and I continued to pursue this ridiculous line of inquiry, she would get up and leave.

More than a year after that dinner, I asked Greene: “Was there ever a point before 2025 where you thought: 'You know what? Trump acts like a man of the people, and he talks about the forgotten men and women of this country, but I’m not so sure.'”

“I was just so naïve and outside of politics,” Greene said with a wince of a smile, “that it was easy for me to naïvely believe.”

But the year that would end with a seismic political rupture between Greene and Trump began with nothing but good vibes. “I can’t wait to get to work!”

Greene announced, in a news release on Jan. 17, 2025, just three days before Trump was sworn in for the second time, that she was newly elected to a third term herself and had been named chairwoman of the House Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency, or the DOGE subcommittee, which was set up to work in lock step with Elon Musk’s fund-slashing agency to downsize the federal government. Now, at last, Republicans controlled both the executive and legislative branches. Greene’s brash assessment of Trump in early 2021 that “the party is his” was, if anything, an understatement.

Greene’s eagerness to get to work became all too evident to the new administration. She sent long, insistent text messages to Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, along with her deputy, James Blair, and cabinet members. Greene’s congressional staff had long been accustomed to her I-will-not-be-ignored tactics, a playbook they jokingly referred to as “bitch, bully and bulldoze.”

But these recipients were the most powerful government officials in America, and in retrospect, the personal slights between her and them may have foreshadowed the ill feelings that would ensue. According to a person with knowledge of the matter, Greene’s missives could come off as pushy, unconstructive and at times disrespectful. “She wasn’t as prolific with me as she apparently was with others,” Wiles told me. “I would sometimes know when she texted the president because I’d be dispatched to do something she was asking for. I couldn’t get to all of her texts, but I acted when I could.”

From Greene’s perspective, the new White House team consisted mainly of latecomers to the MAGA movement, not Day 1 Trumpists like herself. Greene harbored suspicions that Wiles and Blair were a little too cozy with the billionaire donor class — and that in a contest between competing interests, the president’s MAGA faithful would be left out in the cold.

Greene was also chagrined to discover that the Republican-controlled House, under Speaker Mike Johnson, seemed to have no say in Trump’s agenda. “I want you to know that Johnson is not our speaker,” she told me in December. “He is not our leader. And in the legislative branch — a totally separate body of government — he is literally 100 percent under direct orders from the White House. And many, many Republicans are so furious about that, but they’re cowards.”

Hardly the first to discover that the House had in recent years become a marvel of inaction, Greene nonetheless began to wonder whether serving in it was worth all the family events she had missed and the death threats she had incurred. She considered running against Senator Jon Ossoff but in May that she had decided not to Greene’s stated reasoning at the time was that “the Senate is where good ideas go to die.”

But the week after her announcement, The Wall Street Journal that Trump had shared with her a survey from his pollster, Tony Fabrizio, projecting that Ossoff would beat her by 18 points. Later, Trump would in a Truth Social post that their split “seemed to all begin” when he sent her the poll — suggesting, in effect, that Greene was pouting over his lack of support: “All I see ‘Wacky’ Marjorie do is COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN!” Greene insisted to me, “It wasn’t about a Fabrizio poll.” She added: “I never had a single conversation with the president about it. Instead, he told me all the time, ‘You should run for governor — you’d win.’”

Still, Greene told me, it began to dawn on her that when it came to the president, loyalty is “a one-way street — and it ends like whenever it suits him.” Being disabused of the idea that subservience would be rewarded appeared to have a liberating effect on her.

In June, Greene did an about-face on the president’s One Big Beautiful Bill after that she voted for it without realizing that it contained a provision that would prevent states from enforcing restrictions on artificial intelligence for a period of 10 years. If the Senate did not strike the moratorium from the bill, Greene publicly warned, “when the O.B.B.B. comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it.”

On July 1, the Senate severed the provision from the bill, which Trump signed into law three days later.

Greene broke again from Trump on July 17, arguing on X that his cryptocurrency bill could permit a future president to “TURN OFF YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND STOP YOUR ABILITY TO BUY AND SELL!!!!!” This time, Trump made his displeasure known to her — and to her peers when Greene and her staff were at the Capitol complex in mid-December, when she cast her final vote on her last day working in Washington.

That same day, Greene and roughly a dozen other House Republicans who also had reservations about the bill were summoned to the Oval Office. In Greene’s recollection, Trump focused his wrath on her. “When you have a group of kids,” she said, “you pick the one that is the most well behaved, that always does everything right, and you beat the living shit out of them. Because then the rest of them are like: ‘Oh, man, holy shit. If Dad does that to her, what would he do to me?’” A White House spokeswoman disputes that the meeting was contentious. “Not surprising to me at all,” Greene replied when I informed her of this. “They have major problems, and it’s only starting to build.”

Greene believed that she was being true to the candidate, the ideals and the voters she campaigned for. “What have I been doing since he became president? I’ve worked very hard to keep everybody inside the guardrails of what we campaigned on: No, is what we said. This is what we promised. Now we have to deliver. And not through executive orders or red-meat rants on social media.’ And I always go back to the people that showed up at his rallies, because those are the people that should matter. Those people should matter over those big crypto donors or the A.I. big-tech people."

Greene had other reservations about the administration’s agenda. While she was initially supportive of Trump’s tariffs, she became fretful when carpet and flooring companies in her district said they were now less able to procure certain chemicals that were available only overseas. She complained that the hundreds of thousands of college student visas being issued by the administration to Chinese nationals gave them an unfair leg up on American students. And though Trump campaigned on ending transgender medical care for children, as president, she says, he offered little support to Greene’s bill, the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, which would do exactly that. Only when Greene threatened to oppose the continuing resolution in September to fund the government did the House majority leader, Steve Scalise, promise to bring her bill to the House floor in exchange for her vote.

Such acts of obstinance probably got under Trump’s skin, Greene told me. “But,” she then said, “it was Epstein. Epstein was everything.”

During the 2024 campaign, Trump indicated a willingness to release all files pertaining to his former friend Jeffrey Epstein, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Greene now says it didn’t register with her at the time that Trump never exhibited much relish for the subject — and, for that matter, that numerous photos had circulated showing him palling around with Epstein.

The reason for her lack of concern, as Greene explained it to me, might seem improbable to anyone who is unfamiliar with how the mainstream press and the right-wing media cover the same story differently — or not at all. “The story to me,” she said, “was that I’d seen pictures of Epstein with all these people. And Trump is just one of several. And then, for me, I’d seen that Bill Clinton is on the flight logs for his plane like 20-something times. So, for people like me, it wasn’t suspicious. And then we’d heard the general stories of how Epstein used to be a member of Mar-a-Lago, but Trump kicked him out. Why would I think he’s done anything wrong, right?”

For Greene, the decades that Epstein spent eluding justice for exploiting and sexually assaulting countless girls and young women while amassing a fortune, and the seeming efforts by the government to cover up the injustice, “represents everything wrong with Washington,” she told me. This September, Greene spoke with several of Epstein’s victims for the first time in a closed-door House Oversight Committee meeting. She knew that the women had paid their own way to come to Washington. She saw some of them trembling and crying as they spoke. Their accounts struck her as entirely believable. Greene herself had never been sexually abused, but she knew women who had. In her own small way, Greene later told me, she could understand what it was like for a woman to stand up to a powerful man."

"Am I going to get murdered, or one of my kids, because he’s calling me a traitor?"

After the hearing, Greene held a news conference at which she threatened to identify some of the men who had abused the women. (Greene says that she didn’t know those names herself but that she could have gotten them from the victims.) Trump called Greene to voice his displeasure. Greene was in her Capitol Hill office, and according to a staff member, everyone in the suite of rooms could hear him yelling at her as she listened to him on speakerphone. Greene says she expressed her perplexity over his intransigence. According to Greene, Trump replied, “My friends will get hurt.”

When she urged Trump to invite some of Epstein’s female victims to the Oval Office, she says, he angrily informed her that they had done nothing to merit the honor. It would be the last conversation Greene and Trump would ever have.

Rather than back down, Greene did something she had never done before as a congresswoman: She teamed up with a Democrat, Representative Ro Khanna of California, as well as the Republican maverick Thomas Massie, on a legislative maneuver that would compel the Justice Department to release all documents pertaining to Epstein. To say that Khanna — a progressive Democrat who had joined his colleagues four years earlier in voting to strip Greene of her committee assignments — did not regard Greene as a natural ally, was an understatement." Representative Thomas Massie was standing behind a lectern with microphones and a red sign that reads “Epstein Files Transparency Act.” Representatives Ro Khanna and Marjorie Taylor Greene were slightly behind him.

“I had the same caricatured opinion of her as everyone,” Khanna told me. “I saw her heckling President Biden at the State of the Union address. I thought she was a person on the fringes. But my view of her completely changed. At our press conferences, she didn’t even seek to speak. She was genuinely moved by the survivors, so much so that we hugged each other during one woman’s testimony. I found her to be a person of integrity and courage, considering the pressure she faced from the White House.”

The effort by Greene, Khanna and Massie to force the release of the Epstein files stalled in October, when a budget impasse caused the federal government to shut down. (For Speaker Johnson, who was allied with Trump in opposing the release of the Epstein files, the shutdown enabled him to avoid seating Adelita Grijalva, a newly elected Democrat from Arizona who would have provided the decisive 218th vote to ratify Greene’s legal maneuver.) Congress had already been in recess from July 28 to Sept. 2.

Now the Capitol was shuttered until Nov. 12. Greene spent most of this extended time back home in Georgia. “For the entire eight weeks,” she recalled, “I am raging. I am losing my mind. And when I would come back up here, I would give everybody in leadership hell. This is the most absurd thing I’ve ever seen. The American people work every day. Why are we not working?” From conversations with her constituents, she told me, she could tell that the issue of affordability was not, as Trump would term it, “perpetrated by Democrats".

Reading construction-industry newsletters, Greene learned that private-equity firms were buying up neighborhoods in Georgia and across America, which in turn was driving up housing costs. Her two adult daughters informed her that their health-insurance premiums would double if Greene’s party did not yield to the Democrats and extend the Obamacare subsidies that had been significantly expanded by the Biden administration.

Greene told me that she began to worry that her beloved MAGA movement was going off the rails. Its leading figures were no longer preoccupied with the pressing economic needs of her constituents. Instead, they were bickering over the Epstein files. “How did all of this end up to a point,” she recalls wondering at the time, “where it was about releasing files about women who were raped, and not the serious things that I think truly matter about helping to get our economy stabilized again? Help reduce the cost of living, fix the housing market, fix health insurance — for the love of God, what the [expletive] is the matter with these people?”

Greene decided to go public with her grievances. Her options were limited, however. She still had limited relations with the mainstream press. And while she had once been a regular on Tucker Carlson’s show on Fox News and had occasionally appeared on others, the right-wing media giant had otherwise kept her at arm’s length — perhaps because, Greene told me, “I’m not for their foreign wars. I won’t say, ‘Kill everybody in Gaza.’” She added: “And I said the election was stolen. Oh, and I said I’m against Covid vaccines, and all their ads are big pharma companies.” (A Fox News source confirmed Greene’s suspicion that her appearances had been held to a minimum by the network. A Fox News spokeswoman said that Greene appeared on the network a few times earlier in the year and had been invited to appear on “Fox & Friends” the day after she announced she was resigning from Congress.)

But a few unlikely venues had reached out to Greene, and now she responded to them. On Oct. 31, she appeared on “Real Time With Bill Maher,” the Friday night HBO show hosted by the contrarian commentator who had frequently lampooned her. Greene had never watched the show and did not know that she would be facing a live audience.

“Brian” — her boyfriend — “said I looked like a deer in the headlights” when she appeared onstage, she told me. But Greene quickly regained her composure. “Yeah, I disagree with that,” she said flatly when Maher raised Trump’s $40 billion bailout to Argentina. Asked about Trump’s desire to resume nuclear testing, Greene replied, “I would vote no to that.” When Greene criticized her party for failing to offer a viable alternative to Obamacare, the audience erupted in applause.

Four days later, she joined the hosts of “The View,” ABC’s popular morning show that takes a mostly liberal stance. One person who was on the set told me that the hosts were braced for combative dialogue, but Greene told me that she instantly felt comfortable in their company. “Those women were the same type of women that have always been my friends. College-educated, affluent suburban women — that’s who I am. So I couldn’t wait to talk to these ladies. I was so tired of the toxic politics.”

She said she instantly felt comfortable in the company of the liberal-leaning hosts. Still, Greene told me, she had no illusions about how her media mini-tour would be received in the White House. “All of a sudden, I’m in places” — Greene made her voice sound stern to mimic disapproving Republican leaders — “‘that you’re not supposed to be, little M.T.G. You get back in your little [expletive] box in the kitchen and shut up and cook us dinner and stay there.’"

On the evening of Nov. 14, she and Brian Glenn were at her home in Rome when Trump’s Truth Social post rescinding his endorsement of her popped up. The next morning, they read Trump’s new post calling her a “traitor” in shared disbelief. “Traitor,” she says she told Glenn. “Traitors are put in prison or put to death. That’s what he just called me.”

"Later that day, a bomb threat was called in to her family’s construction firm in Alpharetta. The day after that, Rome police officers informed her of a pipe bomb threat to her house. After texting the president with the information about the threat to her son and receiving his hostile reply, she sent it to the vice president. “He was very sympathetic and kind,” Greene told me. She reached out to others in the administration as well. In one text that a White House official read to me, Greene wrote, “Trump replied in the worst kind of way.” The president had endangered her family, she went on, “and none of you even gives a shit.”

That same day, Nov. 16, Greene appeared on the CNN program “State of the Union,” co-hosted by Dana Bash. The congresswoman was uncharacteristically somber, describing the threats she received. Bash referred to a recent post by Greene on X saying that Trump had unleashed a “hotbed of threats” against her. The CNN host then pointed out the long history of Trump’s attacks on others.

And with respect, Bash said, "I haven’t heard you speak out about it until it was directed at you.”

“Dana, I think that’s fair criticism,” Greene replied. “And I would like to say, humbly, I’m sorry for taking part in the toxic politics.”

I asked Greene in December to specify what she was referring to. There was a manifestly pugnacious side to her, I said, and I referred her to the period when, just before running for office, she was a far-right social media influencer practicing what she called “confrontational politics.”

She harassed the 18-year-old gun-control activist David Hogg on the street and roamed the halls of Congress, writing “You’re a traitor” in the guest book outside Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s office and barging into Pelosi’s office to chant “Lock her up!”

“We were terrifying everyone,” she boasted at the time in a video she posted on Facebook. And she went further, posting more videos that called Pelosi a “traitor” who deserved to either face prison or “suffer death.”

Was that the toxic politics she meant? “Yeah!” she exclaimed. “I was an angry citizen. An angry American.” She thought, she continued, that “Americans have to go through all this crap, constantly being lied to.” She went on: “And when I got here to Congress, I was attacked relentlessly and was enduring real pain in my personal life” — referring to her father’s brain cancer, which proved fatal, followed by the dissolution of her marriage. “And my emotions were just really raw.”

“And so, when you were apologizing about your role in the toxic politics,” I asked, “you were thinking about the times when your anger got the better of you, like the stuff about A.O.C. and Pelosi?”

“Yeah!” she exclaimed again. “Because a Christian shouldn’t be that way. And I’m a Christian.”

Greene’s fiancé, Brian Glenn, a White House correspondent for a right-wing outlet, helped her produce her surprise statement announcing she would quit Congress.

If Greene’s apology to Bash struck some as belated or insufficient, many on the right saw it as the sort of contrition that was unbecoming of a true MAGA warrior. Greene’s sudden isolation became evident on the afternoon of Nov. 18, when the Epstein Files Transparency Act finally made it to the House floor — after Trump abandoned the fight in the face of pressure brought by Greene, Massie and two more Republicans, Nancy Mace and Lauren Boebert.

"They brought Lauren Boebert into the Situation Room — that was so weird,” Greene recalled of the White House attempts to persuade the holdouts to cave and cast their votes against bringing the bill to the floor. “And they were calling Nancy Mace nonstop. She’s running for governor. She has an endorsement on the line. I give them both a lot of credit.”

That Massie was the only male Republican to side with Epstein’s victims on the vote was notable, Greene added. “There’s a significant reason why women overwhelmingly don’t vote Republican,” she said. “I think there’s a very big message here.”

In what should have been her moment of triumph (after Trump relented and threw his support behind the bill, it being 427 to 1), Greene sat by herself in the House chamber.Melanie Stansbury, the ranking Democratic member of Greene’s DOGE subcommittee, took notice. Though the two women agreed on very little, Stansbury told me, “I think it was very brave for her to stand up to the president and to stand with the victims. And the way the president went after her, in my opinion, was very similar to the way those women were attacked. So when I saw her sitting alone, I went and sat with her on the floor, and I checked in with her to see if she was safe.”

Greene wasn’t entirely sure. “Am I going to get murdered, or one of my kids, because he’s calling me a traitor?” she wondered. She also wondered about her political options. A part of her relished the prospect of destroying a Republican opponent anointed by Trump in the 2026 primary for the seat she held. But to what end? She thought of her constituents, like her neighbor across the street, a nice lady who supported both Greene and Trump but would soon be inundated with TV ads demanding that she choose one over the other. She thought of what it would be like to return to Washington as a marked woman, in what would most likely be a Democratically controlled House, in a legislative branch that accomplished nothing, in a city that she despised.

She was still turning things over in her head on the morning of Friday, Nov. 21, as she flew back home from Washington. By early afternoon, she was at home in Rome, typing on her laptop. Glenn sat beside her, offering a few edits. She called her three children and her chief of staff, Ed Buckham — and no one else. Then Glenn helped load up her text on a teleprompter. She sat on her living-room couch and spoke to the camera for 14 minutes. The second take felt right to her. Greene posted it at 8:01 p.m. and Glenn forwarded it to me — along with other members of the media — two minutes later.

Though Greene knew that her announcement would amount to major news, she did not anticipate the full breadth of the reaction. Her phone lit up with messages from former friends, former in-laws, third cousins and others she had not heard from in years, since she had left her life behind to become a MAGA warrior. “And,” she recalled, “they were like: ‘Hell yeah! F*ck Trump!”

“I don’t know what I’m doing,” Greene told me in mid-December, contemplating her future as she sipped a glass of red wine over dinner at a restaurant in downtown Washington. Almost to herself, she added, “I need a break.”

Sitting beside her was Glenn, who in a few days would become her fiancé and start making plans to move to Georgia from Washington. I agreed not to quote him, given that his job as the White House correspondent for Real America’s Voice has been to show unflagging support for Trump — and he was not in the mood to stay on script. More than any other journalist, Glenn has enjoyed extraordinary and sustained proximity to the president over the past year. It’s fair to say that nothing Greene has said or done in recent months has been met with his stern disagreement.

Some have wondered if Greene is conducting something of a redemption tour to reposition herself for the future. Such speculation presupposes that she has a kind of master plan in mind — and, for that matter, an abiding interest in politics as a vocation. But weeks after announcing her intention to resign from Congress, Greene emphatically maintained that she was leaving that world for good. “I hate politics,” she texted me — then added, “Hate it!!!” Even if Greene reconsiders her antipathy down the line, she acknowledged to me that she is, for the moment at least, politically homeless. “I’m, like, radioactive,” she said of her House colleagues on both sides of the aisle.

Instead, she spoke longingly of the day when she could walk unnoticed into a restaurant or a grocery store. Recalling a conversation she had with the host of “60 Minutes” who interviewed her, she said: “The funniest thing was when Lesley Stahl said, ‘You know, it’s hard to give up the limelight.’ I’m looking across at her, and I’m thinking,‘I don’t ever want to be like that when I’m her age.’”

And yet, Greene was showing no sign of withdrawing from political life. She continued to post on social media about her concerns on immigration, Covid vaccines, foreign interventions and the prospect of stolen elections. She was also still paying close attention to Trump, if from a more jaded perspective than before. During dinner, when Glenn brought up the president’s interactions with the White House press corps that day, Greene noted Trump’s amiable exchange with a female reporter — after several recent instances of his responding with insults to questions from women. “It’s because he knows he has a woman problem,” she said.

His overall behavior in recent months, she told me, was that of a president who would stop at nothing to remain in office even after his second term expires. “In my opinion,” Greene predicted, “we’re going to see more war. Because what do you do when you really lose power, when you become a lame duck? How do you cling to power? You go to war.”

Even without another campaign on the horizon or a donor base to rile up — even without being M.T.G., in other words — she was leaving Washington as the same polarizing figure who arrived in town five years earlier. When I asked Stansbury, the Democratic congresswoman, if she felt at all wistful about Greene’s abrupt departure, given that the two had developed a mutual respect and that other Democrats were interested in working with her, she paused for several seconds before finally saying: “I don’t think that’s an answerable question. What I can point you to is that just this week she used her remaining policy leverage on the vote over the N.D.A.A. to advance a bill that is anathema to the basic core values of civil rights in America.”

Stansbury was referring to the fact that a few hours before sitting down to dinner, Greene announced that in exchange for her vote to allow the National Defense Authorization Act to fund the Pentagon to come to the floor, the House leadership had agreed to finally bring her bill banning gender-related care for minors to the floor a week later. (It passed, 216 to 211, though its fate in the Senate is tenuous at best.)

That should have been all the information Stansbury needed to be glad that Greene was resigning. What complicated the matter was that Stansbury had come to see other qualities in Greene, including ones she finds commendable; Greene had treated her respectfully and had stood by Epstein’s victims when few Republicans would. “At the end of the day, members of Congress are just human beings,” Stansbury concluded. “They deserve to be treated with respect and dignity, even when you disagree with them.” It is likely that Stansbury, who like Greene entered Congress in 2021, would have been much harder pressed back then to muster empathy for the self-styled “angry American” and MAGA foot soldier.

But perhaps even to her own surprise, Greene was not that person any longer. “Everyone’s like, ‘She’s changed,’” Greene said to me. “I haven’t changed my views. But I’ve matured. I’ve developed depth.” And there was more, she said, to the education she’d received. “I’ve learned Washington, and I’ve come to understand the brokenness of the place. If none of us is learning lessons here and we can’t evolve and mature with our lessons, then what kind of people are we?”

MY RELATED VIDEOS

Marjorie Taylor Greene continues her Media Tour - December 30, 2025
https://rumble.com/v73nsd2-marjorie-taylor-greene-continues-her-media-tour-december-30-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene resignation speech - Nov. 21, 2025
https://rumble.com/v7236yy-full-rep.-marjorie-taylor-greene-resignation-speech-nov.-21-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on THE VIEW - November 2025
https://rumble.com/v71hsfu-me-thinks-mtg-is-running-in-the-2028-rnc-primary-november-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a

MAGA all-stars break with Trump on Epstein Files - Sept. 3, 2025
https://rumble.com/v6ygtae-maga-all-stars-break-with-trump-on-epstein-files-sept.-3-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_a

Original Time Article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/29/magazine/marjorie-taylor-greene-trump-maga-split.html

The BIG LIE about the January 6, 2021 Insurrection | Op-Ed by Bud Meyers

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Thu, 06 Jan 2022 14:37:00 +0000

* Editor's note and disclaimer: The facts and Bud Meyers's opinions does not reflect the facts and opinions of the tech company that owns this website; Bud is just expressing his own personal and political views and free speech. For more information, visit his social media site here https://gab.com/Bud_Meyers and see his videos about the January 6 riot here https://rumble.com/c/c-680685 and videos of the 2020 election fraud here: https://rumble.com/c/c-1036904 And if in doubt, Bud's full disclaimer is here: https://bud-meyers.blogspot.com/p/blog-disclaimer.html

The Democrats always "project", accusing others of what THEY themselves are guilty of doing. When they say #Trump and his supporters are telling a BIG LIE, it is THEY who are telling a BIG LIE — and accusing others of a conspiracy theory in an attempt to discredit Trump and his supporters and to further perpetuate the Democrat's own BIG LIE and the cover-up of THEIR conspiracy to rig the 2020 election. As a matter of fact, it worked out so well for them than now Senate Majority Leader #ChuckSchumer wants to pass a law to make the election fraud permanent by nationalizing the election laws under the guise of "voter rights" . . . even though not one single person has ever complained that they couldn't vote in the 2020 election. As a matter of fact, it was a record turn out. There was no "voter suppression". (That is another Democrat BIG LIE).

There is still be much ambiguity as to whether of not Vice President #MikePence had the legal and Constitutional option of sending the disputed electoral votes back to State legislatures for reconsideration after it was learned between Nov. 3, 2020 and Jan. 6, 2021 (because of a hearings held by State legislatures in #Pennsylvania, #Michigan, #Arizona, #Nevada and #Wisconsin) that there was an abundant amount of evidence discovered post-election to consider massive #ElectionFraud (not "voter fraud") in the 2020 elections. Not by ANY stretch of one's imagination can the "Stop the Steal" rally/protest and the "Save America" march to the Capital Building on January 6, 2021 — and then later, an instigated assault on the Capital Police nearby and inside the entrance of the tunnel on the West-side of the Capital Building — be considered an attempted insurrection, coup d'état coup or overthrow of the government. The word "insurrection" was a dramatic talking point the media began using during the riot that the Democrats adopted for political and propaganda purposes. Everybody in the entire world knows this (except for gullible ideological crackpots), and the media and Democrats KNOW WE KNOW, but yet they continue to push their BIG LIE. The actual election fraud is the "big lie". Exposing the election fraud is not a big lie, it is what it is: Election Fraud.

Adolf Hitler described the [#Marxist-#Democrat's] Big Lie in his book Mein Kampf:

"In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation…. From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.”

Most Democrat leaders probably studied Mein Kampf, but most Republicans probably read the Bible — and the Democrats only use the Bible to attack Republicans.

Did you hear A.G. Merrick Garland yesterday? Out of an estimated 900 #FBI arrests made in regards to the #J6 attempted overthrow of the United States of America (aka #Insurrection), 17 people are scheduled for trial. (For what, we don't know.) A.G. Dofuss made his speech as an excuse for the Marxist-#Democrats to pass a bill to takeover all the elections. He also mentioned #WhiteSupremacists, #DomesticTerrorists (just White ones) and racism too. Then he asked that we all bow our heads for 3 #CapitalPolice officers who died AFTER January 6 (1 from unknown causes the day after without reporting any illness to anyone previously. Weeks later 2 officers committed suicide for unknown reasons. Nothing was mentioned about #AshliBabbitt (the unarmed #AirForce female veteran of #Iraq and #Afghanistan that was murdered by a plain-clothes black Capital Police officer Lt. #MichaelByrd because he said he feared for his LIFE and who supports #BLM) with a single gun shot from his Glock to her neck without any verbal warnings. The #DOJ lied in their report and said Ashli was shot in her left shoulder; and another #Trump supporter #RosanneBoyland (a 34-year old woman from #Arizona) who may have died from trampling and asphyxiation because the people were packed tightly on the steps of the Capital Building and they couldn't flee the sea of tear gas and slew of flash-bang grenades from the police (packed tightly like the crowd surge at that rap concert). That's why they were chanting "I can't breath!", not to mock the career criminal whose death by cop set off the summer of riots. Then all of A.G. Doofus's comrades at the #DOJ applauded him for his brave words. (Normal people would have shouted "#LetsGoBrandon!") A.G. Dofuss took ZERO questions from the media. This how #Marxist/#Fascist regimes operate. They kill and they lie. (Himmler would have been so proud of him!)

As I post this, #Biden is NOW reading a speech > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVi33iqZ36A commemorating the peaceful #SaveAmerica rally a year ago at the #CapitalBuilding in D.C. that lasted from 9 a.m. to 1:11 p.m. — which was when #PresidentTrump concluded his speech, asking his supporters to go to the capital to peacefully make their voices heard. A little less than a hour later, just as #Arizona was making it's case to withdrawal its electoral votes after learning there was #ElectionFraud, a team of infiltrators (some say the #Oathkeepers, the #ThreePercenters and the #ProudBoys who were enlisted by the #FBI) broke into the building, and the Senate and House went into recess until 8:00 p.m. to conclude their business.

If the same people who rigged the 2020 election wanted to discredit Trump and his supporters so no one would take seriously their claims about election fraud, so what might that have planned for January 6, 2021? We've seen what these people are capable of doing: They used the #FISA courts, the #FBI and foreign agents to spy on #Trump's campaign and launch the #Mueller investigation. We witnessed TWO sham impeachments. There is NOTHING these ruthless people wouldn't do obtain and keep power. A small riot with 200 people in front of the tunnel on the west side of the capital building is something they would plan. They refuse election audits; they refuse to turn over 11,000 hours of security video; they lock up political prisoners in a D.C. jail in solitary confinement with no access to bail... I can go on and on for hours, but why bother? Most people already know how corrupt the Democrat Party leadership is in D.C. and throughout all 50 States.

Bud Meyers had 1,500 Trump videos deleted for the phrase "Election Fraud" | December 28, 2021

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:45:00 +0000

This December was the 2nd time #BudMeyers had his video account deleted by a company that hates #DonaldTrump but loves #China and the #Democrats. See the right side of this page for details of the first video account he had deleted (and if you file an appeal, don't ever expect a REAL human being to read or reply to your appeal. They use A.I. for everything.)

Needless to say, #BudMeyers won't be posting videos at that anti-American multi-national corporation any more. Now he uses a Canadian company called Rumble, that's more "American" than the other company . . . because Rumble allows FREE SPEECH! Here is where Bud Meyers started posting his newest videos: https://rumble.com/user/BudMeyers

And because #Twitter is just as anti-American and pro-China as that other company, Bud had his account deleted there too. So now he's uses Gab for social media: https://gab.com/Bud_Meyers — which is much better than Twitter, and they allow you 3,000 characters per post, not just a measly 280. ~ TRUMP 2024!

The Big Pharma Covid Scandal - June 20, 2021

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sun, 20 Jun 2021 21:36:00 +0000

The Biden administration, Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla, Dr. Anthony Fauci, U.S. federal health agencies (e.g. CDC, FDA, etc.), social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook, etc.), the W.H.O. and the so-called mainstream media (e.g. CNN, MSNBC, etc.) all have a lot of explaining to do. The current Democrat Party persistently uses a propaganda term from Adolf Hitler's political manifesto "Mein Kampf" (“My Struggle”) when using the term "The Big Lie" to attack Republicans and Trump supporters — when in fact (and history will show), it's been THEY who have been telling all the big lies.

Recently the New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet have retracted their previous claims that may breathe new life into the anti-malarial drugs hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, promoted by President Trump. And some scientists and researchers are only NOW coming forward, because earlier, they worried more about being associated in any way with Trump (because of the relentless slandering he had received about his character from the media over the last 5 years); so these "professionals" feared rejection by their peer more so than they did about saving human lives.

In a BOMB-SHELL REPORT today (Sunday, June 20, 2021) from the well-known and highly respected journalist #MariaBartiromo at #FoxNews, we have learned stunning revelations about what could well be the REAL cause of over 600,000 American deaths due to the #Covid19 Coronavirus that [most likely] escaped from the lab in #Wuhan, China (pop. 11 million), and then afterwards, may have been deliberately released on the entire world by the Chinese Communist Party during the Chinese New Year by allowing millions of their citizens in Wahun to travel to the New York City and Northern #Italy, but at the same time, banned all internal travel and blocked off all access to the lab (Five Eyes INTEL reveals there was no cellphone activity from this area as well).

Bartiromo's report today outlines how BIG PHARMA colluded to cover-up the therapeutic effects of #Hydroxychloroquine (that President #Trump had safely used) and #Ivermectin for the early treatment of covid-19 that could have saved millions of lives world-wide. These are drugs that are safe and abundant and have been is use for decades, but the only problem was . . the patents had expired and BIG PHARMA wouldn't be able to rake in billions without a new drug and/or vaccine!

Watch the video below, then continue reading some related information that was put out PRIOR to Bartiromo's report. Also, keep in mind that those same aforementioned scientists and researchers who never came forward were also reluctant to admit the origin of the virus came from the Chinese lab . . . just because Trump (based on INTEL) argued the possibility. And they wouldn't come forward because they feared losing government grants for their research. (Big omissions are also BIG LIES.)

#Pfizer and its collaborator #BioNTech released early study results on November 9, 2020 indicating that their COVID-19 vaccine prevented more than 90% of infections. Two days later #CharlieKirk (founder of Turning Point USA) claimed that Pfizer withheld the news of their phenomenal results for their #mRNA vaccine to be submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use in the U.S. until after the Democrat presidential candidate #JoeBiden secured enough electoral votes to become president-elect on November 7th. (Here is Pfizer's press release on November 9, 2020)

"Isn't it interesting that probably the best news for the market and for potential swing voters that voted a week ago was just released this morning? Regardless of your views on vaccinations, I think it is widely agreed upon that the news of an effective vaccine would help the markets and also help President Trump. "Why is it that Pfizer did not release this news when they had it 10 days ago? The reason? Election interference. Why did Pfizer not even announce the results on Friday, or Thursday? The reason is, Pfizer wanted to wait until Joe Biden was coronated as president, so that Joe Biden could get the credit for this. They sat on this news. They directly interfered in the U.S. presidential election." Kirk stated.

Kirk also noted that Pfizer considered releasing interim results after analyzing 32 cases in late October 2020. But in consultation with the FDA, the pharmaceutical giant decided against it and released fuller interim analysis results from 94 cases on Nov. 9th.

President Donald Trump also leveled such accusations against Pfizer and the FDA on Twitter the day the news was announced:

"As I have long said, Pfizer and the others would only announce a Vaccine after the Election, because they didn’t have the courage to do it before. Likewise, the FDA should have announced it earlier, not for political purposes, but for saving lives!"

But Albert Bourla, Pfizer's CEO, claimed that the data didn't come in until November 5th OR 6th, after Election Day on November 3rd. This is [an unverified] "fact check" by Camille Caldera at 4:27 p.m. ET on November 18, 2020 at USA TODAY (if you still believe MS media.) "Pfizer received COVID-19 vaccine data after Election Day, released within days" [Source]

Below is a transcript (with audio) from an interview with Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla by Dan Primack at Axios [Source]

Dan Primack: We're joined now by Dr. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer. So Dr. Bourla, can we just start with timeline here? The company today releases these efficacy results. When should we get kind of the other shoe to drop, which is safety.

Albert Bourla: I think the safety data will mature next week, the third week of November. As I've said, it's already preset, the day, because we want the median, two months from the median [NOTE: this refers to a median of two months of safety data], and we know when that is going to occur. And then soon after, we should be able to apply to FDA, with whom we are going to continue discussing the application and other authorities in Europe, Japan, Canada, etc., etc.

DP: You mentioned today or the company mentioned today that, if approved, there could be up to 50 million doses available by the end of 2020 — and I understand people ultimately require two doses, so that's 25 million patients. How soon after, if you were to get an EUA approval, would you actually be able to begin distributing the vaccine?

AB: I believe immediately because we have already a few million already produced and we hope that we will be able to make sure that all these batches are cleared by the FDA and that we continue producing as we speak. So we will have immediately some millions doses to be able to release after safety, after quality controls. And by the end of the year, we hope to be able to release up to 50 altogether, globally.

DP: The FDA obviously had this 50% threshold for efficacy kind of its baseline. Obviously everyone would like 100% efficacy because why wouldn't you in a vaccine? What was Pfizer's target? Or at least where did you think this was going to come in?

AB: We were hoping for the best. I have to admit that I never hoped that it would be — because it's not 90, I said it is more than 90 — so I never hoped that we'd be more than 90%. And that's a very, very strong, overwhelming indication of efficacy.

DP: Can I ask about that? You guys keep saying over 90%. Do we take that to mean like 90.02%? Or are you able to give us a more specific number?

AB: The reason why we're not giving a specific number is first of all, we are not even telling our teams what the specific number is. And also the number would change. So for example, if it is 91, it could become 92. If it is 94, it could become 95, or vice versa by 1 point. So we don't want to confuse people with different numbers, but it is more than 90 and I believe will remain more than 90. So we just have to say what would be the final number when you read the results.

DP: You know, over the past several months, when you talk to folks in the field on particularly the possible politicization of this, they all say the same thing, which is: So long as the company comes out and there is a vaccine and the data becomes publicly available and people outside the company and outside of even the independent review boards at the company can review it — at what point should outside physicians, outside virologists, etc., feel that they are going to be able to see your data?

AB: Yeah, I think there are two batches of data here. One: It is what we will submit to the FDA. And there's a question mark if the study will be fully completed by that time, because also this possibility exists. Those data, whatever they are at the time, will be given to FDA, and I'm sure that FDA based on what they have said, they will analyze them and they will give them to an external group of advisers. They are meeting publicly. So those data will become public knowledge.

The second is: Once we have ourselves completed the 164 [NOTE: this refers to 164 confirmed cases, Pfizer’s threshold to complete the clinical trial], which is the end of the study as per the protocol, those data we will publish in a peer review magazine, as we do always, which is a scientific magazine [where] high caliber scientists are reviewing the data before accepting for publication. And then the entire world will have visibility on those data.

DP: Pfizer didn’t take Operation Warp Speed money for the development of this vaccine. Just from a fiduciary standpoint, why not? It was kind of free money, or were there major strings attached from your perspective?

AB: There was free money, but always I think that there's never free lunch. When you take money from someone, there are always strings attached. But it was not an easy decision from a fiduciary point of view because the level of investment eventually is approaching or will exceed the $2 billion eventually. But the reason why I did that was because I wanted to liberate our scientists [from] any bureaucracy that comes with having to give reports and agree how we are going to spend the money in parallel or together, etc."

* Editor's Note: Was it avoid any federal oversight? Per the NPR on November 24, 20204:46 PM ET (source):

"When the Department of Health and Human Services released Pfizer's $1.95 billion coronavirus vaccine contract with Operation Warp Speed last Wednesday, the agreement revealed that the Trump administration didn't include government rights to intellectual property typically found in federal contracts. The drugmaker has downplayed its involvement in Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration's more than $10 billion program to make a coronavirus vaccine available in record time. Although Pfizer didn't receive government funding this spring toward research and development of the vaccine, it nevertheless received one of the largest Operation Warp Speed supply contracts to date on July 21."

"And with that I unleashed the power of science, I think. And in retrospect, looking back, I'm very happy that I made this decision because we had the results I think much faster than otherwise if we were not unencumbered. And every day costs 1,000 lives only in the U.S. right now. So it's a very big toll that we’re paying. Also I wanted to keep Pfizer out of politics. I didn't take money, not only from the U.S. government, but then the other government in the world that they were offering.

DP: I want to come back to that in a second, but I'm just curious. You do, however, have an agreement with U.S. government and Operation Warp Speed in terms of production and distribution. On the distribution side, who decides — if there are, you know, 25 million patients who are able to get access to this year — who decides who those people are and who's in charge of the actual distribution? Is that you, or is that the feds?

AB: We are having agreements not only with the U.S. government, we have agreements with the European governments, with Japanese government, with Australia, with New Zealand, with Canada. With multiple governments in the world. I believe that it is not for Pfizer to decide who gets the vaccine. It is for the health authorities of its country. And I believe that in many cases, the health authorities should customize their recommendation based on different states, or in the U.S. for example, it could be based on the needs of the states, or the needs of the regions in some other countries.

Pfizer will work and is working already with all of these people, so that we can provide the scientific background and insight as to how our vaccine can be used as part of an overall program that will control the disease. In the beginning, it is clear that there will be more limited distribution. As you said, 50 million doses is 25 million people globally. Even if half goes to the U.S., that means that it's going to be 12 million people that we can protect in the next 1½ months. Very important protection, but still a small part of the population.

It needs to be strategically decided. I don't think it is for us. I think it is for the CDC or the authorities of the country, but they need to do it on a very equitable, only scientific basis.

DP: You said one of the reasons you didn't want to take the development money was to keep Pfizer out of politics. Judging by Twitter at least today, you have not completely succeeded in that. I'm curious, I guess, can you just walk me through a little bit when you knew that you were going to be able to release this data? And candidly, if it had been one week earlier, if you had had this report ready for Monday a week ago, would you have released it?

AB: Yes. In the, I think, one or two days after the first presidential debate, I wrote a letter to our employees and I said that some people want us to do it faster, some people want us to do it slower. I'm telling to all of you that we will move with the speed of science. So if it was before, I would have released it before. If it is now, I’ll release them now. I learned about those results yesterday, Sunday, at 2:00. And the independent experts’ committee, independent from Pfizer, that unblinded the data and reviewed, they met at 11 and they finished their meeting at 1:30.

DP: Was the 11:00 meeting, was that pre-scheduled for yesterday at 11? Or was that just “the data's in, everybody get around the table?”

AB: Sunday we knew that the data are in. So the data came in on Thursday or Friday. And on — but you know, from the time that the data comes in, before the committee meets, some people need to prepare for each case a very big and accurate narrative. And the physician should sign it. So there's a lot of work that needs to be done. But we did it with the speed of light. And once we had the 94 cases, they worked on the narratives, they worked on the tabulation of the results. So on Sunday morning, we didn't want to lose a day, right? They didn't do it Monday. They did it Sunday. The committee met and they reviewed the data.

DP: President-elect Biden said that he received late last night the information. Did the White House receive it also? The efficacy data.

AB: We are speaking with both parts of the administration and the campaign, both political leaders from both spectrums regularly. And so I don't know when exactly each one of them received it, but they all have been briefed.

DP: Final question for you. There is kind of a narrative starting to go around that Pfizer might've helped, candidly, save society, which isn't, you know, curing a certain number of people from a particular disease, which is what you guys are used to doing. How do you think about that? Just what you have done over the last eight months or so, and where you are today. It would seem to be something very hard to wrap your mind around.

AB: You're right. It was a great relief. I had the goosebumps and tears in my eyes. And I was cautiously optimistic, but I was nervous. Not because if we don't, if we're not successful, we are going to lose the billion dollars. But if we’re not successful, the world is losing hope. And I could feel this weight on my shoulders so I can tell you that I had the emotional reaction with everyone will have when they hear this news, exact same.

DP: Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer. Thank you so much for joining us.

AB: Thank you very, very much.

Now the American public will be waiting for indictments for the BIGGEST LIE every told (other than the denial of the #Holocaust by the #NewYorkTimes) by the #FBI, who's been known to regularly cover-up for Democrat administrations — and very wealthy individuals.

And then, there's the problem we had with the nursing homes, the conspiracies and their cover-ups in several BLUE STATES. If the FBI director #ChrisWray would launch an honest and non-political investigation, we might eventually learn the whole truth.

FINAL NOTE: President Donald J. Trump's brainchild for "Operation Warp Speed" will eventually save millions of lives all around the world, and that will be one of the BIGGEST TRUTHS ever told — other than God's.

Gab and Rumble has Free Speech! * Bud Meyers * May 29, 2021

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sat, 29 May 2021 11:36:00 +0000

I rarely blog anymore because I've been spending most of my time posting videos at Youtube and Rumble and using Gab for social media since I was banned from Twitter for being a Trump supporter.

My Gab account
https://gab.com/Bud_Meyers

My Rumble videos
https://rumble.com/user/BudMeyers

My Youtube videos (check out my "playists" too)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiUhIhME1T_7l0QtDGeA1Vg/videos

* My last Youtube channel was deleted (because I was a Trump supporter) so I started a new Youtube channel, but I try not to post anything I think Youtube might not like at my Rumble account . . . like a Trump interview. Below are my latest Gabs, which are like mini-blogs, because at Gab we get 3,000 characters for each post compared to Twitter's 280. And we can post images and videos and links just like at Twitter — BUT — we also have Free Speech at Gab. And it's much better than Parler too!

================== Just a few of my recent diatribes at Gab this week =================

The funds for #Bido's $6 Trillion budget will be allocated to un-elected officials, corporate cronies, activists and lobbyists with very little accountability as to how how the money is spent, leading to ultra-massive fraud.

Add to that, all the welfare money spent for free college tuition, free child care, free healthcare (etc.) which will also help contribute to runaway hyper-inflation, increasing the cost of consumer goods and services exponentially.

On the other side of of the equation, Bido's tax plan will see HUGE increases on the fossil fuel industry, which will jack up our energy costs for electricity, gasoline and natural gas & heating oil. (Also, oil is used in the production of 95% of everything you see in your homes).

The #Marxists (aka "progressives") currently in the White House and Congress will destroy America in the same way Marxism has destroyed #Venezuela, #Cuba and other communist/Socialist nations. This is what we get when the #CIA and #FBI (and "woke" generals) allow and help the #Marxist-Democrats rig elections.

It's no surprise. All those old white men and old black women that you saw in all the inquisition hearings for #Trump, all dressed up in their suits and matching custom covid masks, are all part of the radical armies of anarchists that plagued the nation in the 60's and 70s. And I'm not talking about the hippies, but those who firebombed police stations and federal buildings and killed police officers and robbed armored cars. These Marxist radicals belonged to organizations like the Weather Underground, Black Panthers and SDS: https://freebeacon.com/democrats/dems-hosted-ex-black-panther-implicated-in-torture-for-event-where-panelists-praised-cop-killers/

Ironically, the #FBI protects these people today! (They're #Marxist-#Democrats in #Congress now!) https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/weather-underground-bombings

Now that the #CDC says there's no need to wear masks any more if we've already been vaccinated, when will #Bido be brave enough to hold a REAL White House press briefing and take REAL questions from reporters at #Newsmax or #OAN? #PeterDoocy at #FoxNews (while better than the indoctrinated activists in the press room) won't ask press secretary #JenPaski hard questions — like about the kiddy porn on #HunterBiden's laptop that the #FBI is supposed to be "investigating" — or about #Bido being "the Big Guy" who gets a 10% cut from his son's pay-for-play schemes. (It took far less time to send #PaulManafort and #MichaelCohen to prison).

Will #SusanRice take questions from #TuckerCarlson, #MariaBartiromo or #SeanHannity about unmasking all those people before she left the #Obama administration? Of course not. Because they all know we all hate what they're doing. They all know that we know that they rigged the election, and that they and Bido's entire administration is a BIG LIE and a fraud on the American people.

Why do the Marxist-#Democrats want congressional Trumplicans to vote for a January 6 commission? As #JoePinion at Newsmax pointed out, there's already been an investigation underway by the #FBI, who has already arrested 500 people. The #Marxists just want a C-Span TV camera aimed at them so they can pontificate and spew BIG LIES about Trump and his supporters.

We know their game. We've seen their witch hunts. We've seen how they spy on and investigate innocent people. We've seen how they brutally bankrupt people. We've seen how they slander and defame good people. We've seen them send people to jail and ruin their lives. We've watched all their hearings and impeachment trials. We know how they manipulate the media to spread disinformation and propaganda.

The current #DemocratParty is mostly like the most evil and dishonest political party in the history of this country. They lie while accusing others of lying. They abuse their power while accusing others of abusing power.They say no one is above the law when clearly they seem to be. The FBI openly runs cover for and works for these Marxist seditionists, who rig elections and break all laws with impunity. We don't need another rigged investigation, rigged hearing or rigged election. We need to purge our nation of these evil people.

Good Riots vs. Bad Riots

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:18:00 +0000

The George Floyd protests began May 26, 2020 in Minnesota before quickly spreading nationwide. Dozens of people were killed — including police officers who were murdered in cold blood. There were billions of dollars in property damages with buildings and vehicles set on fire (including an historic church near the White House); and there were hundreds of assaults upon innocent citizens and many police officers. Polls that summer estimated that about 20 million people had participated at some point in the protests, looting and riots in the United States, making the revolt the largest in U.S. history. That was all because a WHITE homicidal rogue cop brutally murdered an innocent BLACK man — which was a tragedy and travesty.

The violent riot and Capital breach on January 6, 2021 consisted of about 200 people from a crowd of about 750,000 peaceful protesters in D.C. that day. One unarmed Trump supporter was killed while climbing through a broken window and one Capital police officer was killed on the steps of the Capital by one the rioters. The "Save America March" had been mostly a peaceful protest, but was sabotaged with an assault on the capital that had been planned far in advance by what were described later by the Biden administration and media as an "insurrection committed by White Nationalist militant groups and Q-Anon Trump supporters." The huge gathering in D.C that day was in response to a rigged election, not to physically take over the government or to illegally overturn a fair and honest election. But nonetheless, the assault on the U.S. Capital also ended up being a tragedy and travesty.

After President Trump was elected in 2016, the Democrats accused him of colluding with Russia to rig the election. The FBI , the Democrats and the media at the time knew that wasn't true, but yet they lied and put the new president and his family though HELL for the next 4 years. During the 2020 election the Democrats (with knowledge by the DOJ/FBI) rigged the election for Biden -- hence, the protest and subsequent riot and Capital breach that day in D.C.

Now imagine if in 2016 Donald Trump had colluded with Dominion Voting Systems (rather then Putin) to rig that election, and used White Nationalist militant groups (rather the Black Lives Matter) to count the ballots, and had "Bikers For Trump" blocking Democrat poll watchers from witnessing the vote count. What might have happened? Would it be something WORSE than the George Floyd riots, or something much less than the Capital breach (FYI: The people inside were taking selfies, not slaughtering crooked politicians or the Capital Police officers.)

* 99.999999% of all Americans were outraged at the George Floyd murder, but only half the population agreed with the nation-wide riots.

* 99.999999% of all Americans were outraged at the U.S. Capital riot, but only half the population agreed with the rigged election results.

If the FBI and CIA didn't allow the Democrats to rig the 2020 election for the Biden crime family, there wouldn't have been an "insurrection" at the Capital building on January 6, 2021. How many talking heads on cable news had asked "WHY" did 750,000 Americans from all over the country that went to the Save America March in D.C. believed there was election fraud -- and why they thought the election was stolen?

All the liars say, "Because Trump told them so" -- Which is a total lie. Many people say it not about Trump at all, but about the integrity of our elections. Millions of Americans watched those hearings held by State legislatures online at Right Side Broadcasting that showed election fraud, but cable news wouldn't air those hearings, nor would the vote-counters allow anyone to inspect the voting machines and ballots.

So why NOT "storm" the capital? 75 million Americans were disenfranchised!!! Isn't someone's vote in a true democracy one of the most valuable rights we have? Why would the DOJ (Bill Barr) and the FBI (Chris Wray) cover up this treason? Watch these videos while you can, because Youtube has begun deleting them to cover up all the election fraud.

PA https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
NV https://youtu.be/z-44TVFRk6U
NV https://youtu.be/W39MK-WRKhM
MI https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
MI https://youtu.be/s7scSfpwnqw
WI https://youtu.be/nDiNAqFOvcY
WI https://youtu.be/5PxOYdYCFPA
AZ https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
AZ https://youtu.be/RCfU2KizzdM
AZ https://youtu.be/b2JndZDZXBo
GA https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
GA https://youtu.be/pFs0Jag1Msc
GA https://youtu.be/u5ZP_HpBKos
SEN https://youtu.be/aM6q5sstAaE

Evidence piling up for Election Fraud! -- Updated 12/28/2020

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Mon, 28 Dec 2020 23:03:00 +0000

The evidence to-date as of this twitter thread >>> https://twitter.com/MrNeilio/status/1343586566082600960?s=20 is reposted here to save time and tweets! Think of this blog page as one big tweet!

Watch the hearings. They're not all boring. Some have great drama. Witnesses had their lives threatened, but pushed back when a legislator tried to bully them. The crazy BLM legislator that later threatened Trump supporters is in this hearing. https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU

All the evidence can't all fit in a tweet (we have much more), but to actually have to watch and listen! Here are a few hearings before State legislatures that have eye witnesses and IT experts. (Some say these aren't REAL hearings because they take place in hotel meeting rooms. That's horseshit! My legislators for Nevada met OUTSIDE to vote for Trump >>> https://youtu.be/W39MK-WRKhM

PA https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
AZ https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
MI https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
WI https://youtu.be/5PxOYdYCFPA
GA https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
MI https://youtu.be/s7scSfpwnqw

Although the voting machines COULD be hacked from anywhere in the world, they can also be manipulated with USB drives that witnesses saw. FYI: Trump did make these charts, they're from an IT expert. Democrats refuse to release evidence . Why? What are they hiding? ELECTION FRAUD!

The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, a national constitutional litigation organization, released the 39-page report, alleging that Zuckerberg’s $500 million given to election officials was used to improperly influence the election.
https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20428534-hava-and-non-profit-organization-report-final-w-attachments-and-preface-121420

Ryan Hartwig: Facebook Whistleblower on Election Fraud 12-23-2020
https://rumble.com/vc7yn9-ryan-hartwig-facebook-whistleblower-on-election-fraud-12-23-2020.html

Dec. 22, 2020 Mark Zukerberg spent $500 million to rig 2020 election!
https://rumble.com/vc45jz-dec.-22-2020-mark-zukerberg-spent-500-million-to-rig-2020-election.html

Matt Locke on Election Fraud 12-23-2020
https://rumble.com/vc7xt9-matt-locke-on-election-fraud-12-23-2020.html

One biased judge in #Nevada dismissed without seeing evidence or hearing witnesses. @SCOTUS didn't hear their case on procedural due process. The others you refer to have nothing to so with #Trump's legal team; THOSE cases are 3rd party lawsuits for related matters. FYI; Nevada electors saw the fraud and voted for Trump anyway.
NV https://youtu.be/z-44TVFRk6U Court
NV https://youtu.be/W39MK-WRKhM State legislators

The cyber-security #Resistance guy that #Trump fired for for doing a bad job (#ChrisKrebbs) admitted under oath at this recent hearing that the #DominionVotingSystems COULD access the internet. https://rumble.com/vc3qdb-senate-hearing-w-chris-krebs-deleted-by-youtube-dec.-22-2020.html (Edited for time with most relevant facts.)

DHS Senate Hearing: #ChrisKrebbs also admitted when he said "most secure election is history", he just meant hacking by foreigners like #Russia — which he failed at too (#SolarWinds), not domestic #ElectionFraud, like fake ballots hauled in in by trucks at 3 a.m. in the morning.
https://youtu.be/aM6q5sstAaE (Full)

Why Trump fired Chris Krebs & FBI proves Corrupt Again! Dec. 22, 2020
https://rumble.com/vc3wmb-why-trump-fired-chris-krebs-and-fbi-proves-corrupt-again-dec.-22-2020.html

T H E I M M A C U L A T E D E C E P T I O N
Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities (#TheNavarroReport)
https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf

Link to the original forensic audit of a #Dominion voting machine (In the DHS hearing he LIED about the [brackets].
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772/antrim-county-forensics-report.pdf

Patrick M. Byrne (CEO of Overstock.com) EXPOSES Deep State Election Fraud
https://rumble.com/vc4l9j-patrick-m.-byrne-ceo-of-overstock.com-exposes-deep-state-election-fraud.html
#PatrickByrne #FBI #JohnDurham

DHS Senate Hearing https://youtu.be/aM6q5sstAaE
NV https://youtu.be/z-44TVFRk6U
NV https://youtu.be/W39MK-WRKhM
PA https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
AZ https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
MI https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
MI https://youtu.be/s7scSfpwnqw
GA https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
GA https://youtu.be/pFs0Jag1Msc
WI https://youtu.be/nDiNAqFOvcY
WI https://youtu.be/5PxOYdYCFPA
AZ https://youtu.be/RCfU2KizzdM
AZ https://youtu.be/b2JndZDZXBo

This BLM legislator in #Michigan (that I mistakenly said was in PA) is in this hearing calling witnesses liars to their face. There's one moment (in this hearing?) where the entire room gasped in shock when they hard how much fraud was being committed. https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw

Rep. #MoBrooks (R-#Alabama) on #ElectionFraud. (This is NOT disputed, the #Democrats just won't admit it.)
https://rumble.com/vc8h35-rep.-mo-brookes-r-al-on-election-fraud-dec.-28-2020.html #KAG2021

The #BidenCrimeFamily was exposed in an official #Ukraine #PressBriefing last year but the #FBI never investigated because the federal agency has been corrupted by the Democrats. #Trump was #IMPEACHED for what #QuidProJoe had been doing and #BillBarr and the #FBI knew!
https://rumble.com/vc8ed3-ukraine-confirms-biden-corruption-in-press-conferencerecordings.html

#DominionVotingSystems #StoptheSteal #ElectionFraud

Free Speech for Thee, Hate Speech for Me! * MY TWITTER SUSPENSION!

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:25:00 +0000

I shared a video that I created with @TomiLahren from my account at Twitter @BudMeyers99 because I thought she supported @RealDonalTrump (and because she was in the video) and I foolishly thought she would appreciate it. Instead, she may have reported me to Twitter, who suspended my account and blocked my video for "Hate Speech".

But in all fairness, it could also have been someone at @FoxNews, who (like certain social media companies) have a media blackout on e-L-e-C-t-I-o-N f-R-a-U-d. See all the links below to all the hearings held by State Legislatures showing abundant evidence for MASSIVE e-L-e-C-t-I-o-N f-R-a-U-d!

But Fox News must get "hate speech" all the time, so I can't imagine why they'd go out of their way to tattle on little-ole-me (or maybe it's the Trump-Hater/Bush-Lover beatch @GillianHTurner"> (Oops! Is "beatch" considered "hate" speech? Check out Trump's Twitter feed if you want to see REAL hate speech!)

My notice from Twitter via email (Click to enlarge image) It's ironic that I was suspended from Twitter for hate speech on a post I did critizing the attack on free speech.)

The video I posted at Twitter that was blocked with my tweet.

I assume the "hate" speech" that Twitter was referring to weren't "China" or Biden" or "Fox News" or "Democrat" or "Gillian Turner" -- but may have been #Trump" or "lie" or "whore". So allow me to explain:

1) Trump is our President

2) Lie is something all humans do.

3) Whore was used in the context of definition #4 in the dictionary: "unscrupulous person" (which is only my opinion, and can pertain to a male or female or group of people. e.g. "Those damn low-life whores sold out our country by caving in to the media's censorship!"

I did not accuse Biden, Fox News, Democrats or Gillian Turner of being a prostitute (I have no idea what they do in their private time.) I was only expressing how "unscrupulous" it was to get paid to spread propaganda about censorship in the media and/or defending China -- especially with what we're learned recently.

I certainly don't "hate" anyone (well, maybe Nanny Pelosi and her crew), but certainly not Tomi Lahren -- who may have snitched on me to the social media police. After all, she has defended free speech and condemned censorship herself, so I would be surprised (and hurt) if she took the action she did. If Fox News did this, I might contact Lin Wood for advice.

Personally, this is what I always do with ANY comment I get (whether I'm offended or if I agree with someone)

1) Ignore the comment

2) reply to the comment

3) Mute the comment

4) Block the user

But I NEVER reported anyone for anything, and there is a lot of hateful and obscene stuff out there! If #TomiLahren were really a #Trump supporter, I can't understand how my video could offend her or another Trump supporter. She could have just blocked me, not attack by First Amendment Right of Free Speech guaranteed to me under the U.S. Constitution. WTF?! But if it was Fox News, then I'd understand, because now they are also #FakeNews . . . CNN 2.0

Videos of Hearings that has a Cable News Blackout (aka information warfare during a coup)

PA https://youtu.be/DSDZkXxFVEU
AZ https://youtu.be/rri6flxaXww
MI https://youtu.be/X0-vyw9qbdw
GA https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg
GA https://youtu.be/pFs0Jag1Msc
WI https://youtu.be/5PxOYdYCFPA
WI https://youtu.be/nDiNAqFOvcY
AZ https://youtu.be/RCfU2KizzdM
MI https://youtu.be/s7scSfpwnqw
AZ https://youtu.be/b2JndZDZXBo

* NOTE: https://youtu.be/aM6q5sstAaE < < < I posted a highlight clip of this OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT SENATE HEARING on my YOUKNOWWHO video channel that was deleted because it violated their new terms of service related to anything that had to do with e-L-e-C-t-I-o-N f-R-a-U-d! Wow!!!

Trump's little known E.O. to Stop the Steal - BOMBSHELL! - November 16, 2020

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sun, 22 Nov 2020 12:28:00 +0000

This story begins with the little-known executive order signed into existence on September 12, 2018, by President Donald J. Trump. That order, available at Whitehouse.gov, is entitled, “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.”

In that executive order, which almost no one has covered since the day it was signed, President Trump declares a national emergency. That emergency is still in play to this day, and the 2020 election was conducted under this state of emergency, which is a crucial point to understand what’s coming next.

In the EO, the President also states that people and organizations located, in part, outside the United States are known to be able to, “interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation.”

If you’re starting to see how this ties in to CNN, the NY Times, the Washington Post and MSNBC, you’re not alone. All those organizations, as you’ll soon see, have been caught under this emergency declaration of “foreign interference” in U.S. elections, aided by complicit corporations on U.S. soil.

The EO further states that this foreign interference in U.S. elections, “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

Why is this relevant to anything we’re seeing right now with the massive election fraud carried out by the Democrats and the deep state? Because Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian company. And Scytl is run out of Spain.

Scytl, by the way, is connected to George Soros and the Democrats, and according to TGP, “Bill Gates also own stock in Scytl.”

Great Game India reports:

Days after it was revealed how 2020 US Elections were rigged by Canadian Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems through a so-called “glitch”, now GreatGameIndia has found involvement of another dubious foreign company in US Election meddling. The votes cast by Americans were counted by a bankrupted Spanish company Scytl in Spain. Like Dominion Voting Systems, Scytl has a long history of election fraud in various nations including injecting backdoors in its election software. The issue has prompted experts to question why the sensitive job of counting votes was outsourced to a foreign company? How could a bankrupted Spanish company count American votes in Spain? Due to such widespread fraud, the Chairman of the US Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor believes that the 2020 US Presidential Elections is illegitimate.

What people are missing in all this is that Trump’s 2018 executive order gives the DOJ the power to seize all assets of individuals and companies that were complicit in aiding or covering up this foreign interference in U.S. elections.

The National Emergency order specifically calls for seizure of all assets of entities that have, “directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election.”

That would, of course, have to include practically every CNN fake news anchor, every Big Tech CEO, every fake news journo-terrorist from NBC News, the NY Times and the Washington Post. They are all complicit in gaslighting America and covering up the massive foreign election interference that just took place.

Trump’s EO further explains that asset seizures shall target people and entities which have:

…materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or (iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

In other words, the EO covers every person who has been corrupted or compromised by communist China. And that includes at least 80% of Democrat lawmakers, by our estimates, including Senators Feinstein and Schiff.

But that’s not even the full extent of what’s demanded by this Executive Order. In Section 8, the order explains that the term “person” also means, “a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.”

In other words, any media organization that assisted in covering up or assisting foreign interference in a U.S. election is specifically targeted by this Executive Order.

Further in the definitions section, the EO explains:

…the term “election infrastructure” means information and communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal Government or a State or local government in managing the election process, including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results.

That would include the Dominion voting systems as well as all other voting systems used in the recent election.

Finally, the EO describes what it means by the term “foreign interference.” It means: (emphasis added)

…any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions.

Note the important words of “altering the result or reported result of the election.” This is exactly what Big Tech and the lying fake news media have done to America. More that merely a crime, it’s treason… and it fell right into the national emergency trap that Trump publicly announced in 2018 which now means all these corporations and organizations can have their assets seized literally overnight.

In an interview with Lou Dobbs on Fox Business, Trump attorney Sidney Powell describes “staggering statistical evidence” and “staggering witness testimony” about the criminal election fraud that was carried out across America. She adds, “If you want to talk about foreign election interference, we certainly have it now.”

ORIG<>SOURCE:
https://dcdirtylaundry.com/bombshell-the-2020-election-took-place-under-a-trump-declared-national-emergency-that-set-an-election-day-trap-for-the-unauthorized-accessing-of-election-and-campaign-infra/

RELATED VIDEOS OF SIDNEY POWELL

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/11/17/sidney-powell-outlines-affidavit-showing-purpose-of-smartmatic-voting-system-to-control-elections/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_p1sonhp-k

Bud Meyers NEW Youtube channel created January 2020

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:18:00 +0000

Bud Meyers NEW Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiUhIhME1T_7l0QtDGeA1Vg/videos
Bud Meyers OLD Youtube channel that was ruthless and completely deleted with no reason at all given and with no chance in Hell to appeal: https://www.youtube.com/user/buddymeyers

My previous Youtube channel was terminated after 10 years (on New Years Eve on December 31, 2019) because of a #copyright claim by CNN for a 40-second clip from one of their broadcasts. Cable news channels can easily BLOCK your videos without filing a copyright strike against you, but they are ruthless and mean, so they file TAKE DOWN orders against you! I lost 10 years of work, more than 1,500 videos and over 10,800 subscribers! So much work, destroyed!

I had 2 copyright strikes: 1 from Fox News and 1 from #MSNBC that were set to expire. They weren't entire programs or segments, just short 5 to 10 minute clips. My previous Youtube channel (and now my new channel) was and never will be monetized, so I never made money. I only do this as a hobby since I retired. I carefully edited most of my videos and added long commentaries to many of them (most were political). I never posted anything obscene. Most of my recent clips were from the impeachment hearings on C-SPAN.

But after my 3rd copyright strike on Youtube, I thought I could appeal. But that's not the case. After 3 strikes, you're finished—even if the third copyright claim was a false or frivolous claim. Now I have to start all over again. Here's the 40-second video that destroyed my previous Youtube channel: https://twitter.com/BudMeyers99/status/1212165706197766144

I tried contacting Fox News at ContentProtection@fox.com to pitch my apology and to beg them for forgiveness, but the bastards and beatchs never replied! And I know for a fact that a human gets these emails because a friend wrote to them and gave them info that they acted on . . . so I don’t think an algorithm, A.I. or a website’s auto-response email program can do that (not yet at least).

CNN had filed 3 previous (and frivolous) copyright claims against me for content that wasn't even theirs, so I had to file disputes with Google. But stupid me, I should have known better; I thought that tiny 40-second clip would be considered "promotional' for them rather than an "infringement".

It's time for government to reform these ridiculous copyright laws just for posting short clips from news broadcasts. I carefully and specifically chose what to record, edit and post to my channel for my followers — and many thanked me, because many people don't have the time to watch entire broadcasts, political rallies or C-SPAN hearings . . . so I chose what I thought were the most relevant HIGHLIGHTS (always under 15-minutes) so that more people could know what's happening in American politics. (I didn’t just copy-and-paste their talking-heads to steal their viewers and advertising revenues from them! And I usually posted the content long after they aired the content!

As just ONE example of my work: My last Youtube project was to monitor every single minute of every single impeachment hearing on C-SPAN -- and then edit, organize and post all the clips separately with long commentaries. Then I posted all the links to my blog: https://bud-meyers.blogspot.com/2019/12/highlights-of-all-trump-impeachment.html

All this work, destroyed in one click by Youtube . . . 10 years of hard work! . . . down the drain! Now I'm staring over on New Years Day (on January 1, 2020). And like Youtube, my blog is also owned by Google. I don't have a lawyer, but who in the heck knows if I ever violated any of their "terms of service" within the last 10 years, just to have them delete my blog too! They have so much control in our lives; no one is safe from their influence or retaliation. It’s not right . . . but we have no choice, unless we want to surrender to a much more inferior video publishing service.

Peace!
Bud Meyers

* Besides CNN and MSNBC, I'm also adding Fox News to my THEY SUCK list. I can't add Google or Youtube because they might delete this blog and my NEW Youtube channel. THAT is the ral abuse of power!!!!

Highlights of ALL the Trump Impeachment Hearings in 2019

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:24:00 +0000

* UPDATE NOTICE!: On the very same day I posted the links to these videos on my blog on Dec. 31, 2019 Youtube (which is owned by Google, and who is also the owner this blog at Blogger and Blogspot) terminated by account at Youtube with no reason given. [UPDATE 1/27/20: AT that time.] So I wrote them in the little box they provided me to contact them to ask why.

* My OLD Channel does not exist anymore >>> https://www.youtube.com/user/buddymeyers/videos

* Here's my other Youtube channel that I started posting to after that on January 1, 2020: https://bud-meyers.blogspot.com/2020/01/bud-meyers-new-youtube-channel.html

The Mueller Hearings (links to cross examinations) July 24, 2019

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Fri, 26 Jul 2019 18:25:00 +0000

There was no evidence (not just "insufficient evidence") that Trump had ever conspired with Russia, so the Democrats focused on their "obstruction of justice" charges and their "No one is above the law!" rants. But Republicans had exposed corruption within the DOJ and FBI. If you never watch Fox News, you'd never know!

The Russian Collusion Witch Hunt

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:31:00 +0000

In an interview of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange by Fox News Sean Hannity that aired on Jan. 3, 2016, Assange said he didn't get the hacked DNC and Podesta emails from the Russian government, as John Brennan of the CIA claimed. Brennan had lied under oath and spied on the Senate — and he also said Trump was a Russian spy and traitor. So how can you believe him?

President Trump's historic speech at CPAC 2019

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Mon, 04 Mar 2019 10:31:00 +0000

President Trump gave his longest and best speech ever at #CPAC2019 (Conservative Political Action Conference) on March 3,2019 in National Harbor, MD. At his rallies and other events, his speeches usually last about 70 minutes (twice as long as any by Hillary Clinton). But Trump's speech at CPAC lasted 2 hours and 2 minutes.

Trump's 5 Pillars of Immigration Reform

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:55:00 +0000

"A tall border wall of a thousand miles with a big beautiful door begins with one brick." — Anonymous

Antifa attacks Patriot Prayer rally in Portland, Oregon

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Mon, 04 Jun 2018 14:57:00 +0000

The Portland rally on 6/3/18 (where 4 were arrested) was in response to the acquittal of an illegal immigrant who was deported multiple times and was acquitted of murdering Kate Steinle The group AntiFa ("Anti-Facist") is known to attack Free Speech and peaceful rallies if they don't agree (e.g. Charlottesville).

► Play ▌▌ Pause ■ Stop

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:19:00 +0000

In 2016 I transitioned from Bernie Sanders (who was running as a Democrat) to Donald Trump (who ran as a Republican). But I don't trust either party.

For numerous reasons, many of my previous blog posts will contradict how I now feel . . . because I have "evolved" . . . but if Trump kills Social Security and Medicare, I will evolve again.

I have been very busy re-arranging my life and moving these last few months, so I haven't posted here very often; but who knows, maybe soon one day I'll get back on track and begin posting every day again. But much shorter versions of my current daily rants can be found on my Twitter feed >>> https://twitter.com/BudMeyers99

Thanks for visiting!

Bud

GOP tax plan saves us $20 a week

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Wed, 20 Dec 2017 03:06:00 +0000

Median wage earners (half of all workers in America) will save a measly 20 bucks a week (or less) with the new GOP tax plan.

Turning 18 years old in America during the Trump Era

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:49:00 +0000

If Trump and the Republicans raised the minimum wage, they'd make 8 years of Obama look like a waste of time for the working-class.

GOP's proposed Tax Rates compared to 2017 Tax Rates

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sat, 11 Nov 2017 17:32:00 +0000

This post makes the argument using . . .

Politicians refuse to define "Middle-Class"

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Fri, 13 Oct 2017 20:00:00 +0000

* Here is an Update to the Update on November 11, 2017: The new Senate tax brackets per CNN shows those earning between $60,000 and $91,900 (the real MIDDLE-CLASS for single tax filers) will see no change in tax rate at 25%
Read more »

Trump Derangement Syndrome — TDS defined

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:20:00 +0000

One of the very first victims of TDS was the former presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is mental dysfunction causing President Donald Trump's detractors to have constant hateful thoughts and feelings. They always appear to be on the verge of becoming totally unhinged. To date, there is no known cure or treatment for this acute and irrational condition, other than death.

Why America needs Fox News, now more than ever

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Fri, 25 Aug 2017 02:52:00 +0000

How Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders drove me away from MSNBC and CNN — and into the arms of Fox News.

Translating Trumpenese for Trump

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sun, 20 Aug 2017 22:07:00 +0000

The one and only thing I could find in all of Trump's comments about Charlottesville Virginia (that could be misconstrued as controversial in any way) was when he had said:

Dallas Counter-Protesters: "Oink, oink, bang bang!"

noreply@blogger.com (Bud Meyers) — Sun, 20 Aug 2017 15:32:00 +0000

This is the hate speech of anti-police "counter-protesters" in Texas that CNN and MSNBC will never mention, because they also hate cops and Trump.