<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>c0t0d0s0.org - Sun/Oracle</title>
    <link>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/</link>
    <description>the sun in a lighthungry universe</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/C0t0d0s0org-Sun" /><feedburner:info uri="c0t0d0s0org-sun" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
    <title>A large SMF/FMA putback to Opensolaris</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/U-uZobIFCtE/6800-A-large-SMFFMA-putback-to-Opensolaris.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6800-A-large-SMFFMA-putback-to-Opensolaris.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6800</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6800</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Last night a really large putback found it's way into the codebase: <a href="http://c0t0d0s0.org/codenews/display.php?fragment=ba6e1b84edd3713a0736331612b073aadc235f96">It centers around the Fault Management Architecture</a> of Solaris. A lot of new features found their way in Opensolaris. For example <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/619/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/619/">smtp-notify</a>:<blockquote>smtp-notify is a small, lightweight daemon that is fully managed by the Service Management Facility (SMF).  It uses the interfaces delivered in libfmevent to subscribe to both software and FMA problem lifecycle events.  Upon receipt of an event, it produces an email notification based on a set of notification preferences which are stored in the SMF service configuration repository.</blockquote> or <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/618/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/618/">snmp-notify</a><blockquote>snmp-notify will generate one of two types of SNMP traps, based on the event class.  For FMA events (list.* events), snmp-notify will generate the existing sunFmProblemTrap trap as defined in /etc/net-snmp/snmp/mibs/SUN-FM-MIB.mib.  For software events (swevent.*), snmp-notify will generate a sunSweventTrap trap as defined in /etc/net-snmp/snmp/mibs/SUN-SWEVENT-MIB.mib.</blockquote>Furthermore there are lot of other changes, for example a way to configure the notifications in the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/617/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/617/">SMF repository</a> or  <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/278/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/278/">the definition of FMA events </a> for instance state transitions (eg. a service going online or offline or in maintainance state). <br />
<br />
As SMF is running in each zone on it's own, the fmd (the fault management daemon) had to be enabled to run in non-global zones as well. This was introduced by <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/225/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/225/">PSARC 2010/225</a>:<blockquote>This RFE will enable fmd and associated SMF services in a non-global Solaris zone.  The set of fmd plugins delivered into a zone will be restricted to those that are relevant - the hardware-oriented modules, particularly, will not be delivered in a non-global zone.<br />
<br />
The first consumer of the fmd service in a non-global Solaris zone will be SMF; this will work with fmd to achieve snmp and email notifications of instance state transitions.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/U-uZobIFCtE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:25:20 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6800-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6800-A-large-SMFFMA-putback-to-Opensolaris.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems on non-Oracle hardware</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/CI9cZ1HXLvk/6798-Oracle-Premier-Support-for-Operating-Systems-on-non-Oracle-hardware.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6798-Oracle-Premier-Support-for-Operating-Systems-on-non-Oracle-hardware.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6798</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6798</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Yesterdays announcement regarding support subscriptions on HP and Dell x86 system has a much broader background. In this article i want to share this information with you:<br />
<br />
<ul>
 <li>Albeit the recent announcement just talked about HP and Dell, this offer is valid for <strong>all</strong> certified systems on the HCL. There are 508 server systems right now on the HCL. You will find the HCL <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/sol/systems/views/all_servers_all_results.page1.html']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/sol/systems/views/all_servers_all_results.page1.html">here</a>. If the systems isn't on the HCL, ask your vendor to certify it.

So you are able to buy support and for Fujitsu Systems as well as for IBM systems for example.</li>
 <li>Pricing is socket-based. You pay $1000 for Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems per year per socket for systems with one to four sockets and $2000 per socket per year for systems with more than five sockets.</li>
 <li>As most of my readers are interested in Solaris, i think i know the next question: As you may know, the Software License Agreement for Solaris for example just allows you to use Solaris 10 up to 90 days in production use without entitlement. This support offering provides you a non-perpetual entitlement to run Solaris 10 on a non-Oracle HW. To say it simple: It's a subscription. This entitlement is valid for the same period as your support. When you don't renew the support, you don't have an entitlement to use Solaris in production after your support expires.</li>  
 <li>The support is provided directly from Oracle.</li>
 <li>The rules with Sun servers are different: You get a bundled perpetual license with your server and pay only 8% (SW) or 12% (SW+HW) of the net systems price for support.</li>
 <li>Albeit you have now the choice to run Solaris on non-Oracle x86 servers, i see several advantages to use Solaris on Sun equipment. Those advantages range from "Same vendor of OS and HW" to "Better integration of the system into the Fault Management Architecture of Solaris"</li> 
</ul><br />
<small>(Safe Harbour: Keep in mind, that this blog is a private one. I don't write in my function as a Oracle employee. The interpretation of the rules expressed by an Oracle representant is the authoritative one)</small> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/CI9cZ1HXLvk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:12:12 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6798-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6798-Oracle-Premier-Support-for-Operating-Systems-on-non-Oracle-hardware.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>WTF?</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/Y7mEPGu3Qgw/6796-WTF.html</link>
            <category>About this blog</category>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6796-WTF.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6796</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6796</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Just choked on my tea and spew it halfway to my display while reading <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/29/oracle_hp_dell_solaris/']);"  href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/29/oracle_hp_dell_solaris/">this</a>:<br />
<br />
<center><a class="serendipity_image_link"  href='http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/moellenkampatregister.PNG'><!-- s9ymdb:774 --><img  width="399" height="222"  border=0 src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/moellenkampatregister.serendipityThumb.PNG"  alt="" /></a></center><br />
<br />
Okay, i won't call TPM by his other name, as he didn't called me SunHead or so ... <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/Y7mEPGu3Qgw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:34:42 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6796-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6796-WTF.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Oracle Premier support for OS on HP and Dell</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/WNdy8TLOfJ8/6794-Oracle-Premier-support-for-OS-on-HP-and-Dell.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6794-Oracle-Premier-support-for-OS-on-HP-and-Dell.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6794</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6794</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Oracle just <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333']);"  href="http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333">announced</a>:<blockquote><ul><li>Oracle today announced Dell and HP will certify and resell Oracle Solaris, Oracle Enterprise Linux and Oracle VM on their respective x86 platforms.</li><li>Customers will have full access to Oracles Premier Support for Oracle Solaris, Oracle Enterprise Linux and Oracle VM running on Dell and HP servers.  This will enable fast and accurate issue resolution and reduced risk in a companys operating environment</li></ul></blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/WNdy8TLOfJ8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:39:37 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6794-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6794-Oracle-Premier-support-for-OS-on-HP-and-Dell.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Forrester about the future of SPARC</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/nJpNAu8uzcY/6793-Forrester-about-the-future-of-SPARC.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-Forrester-about-the-future-of-SPARC.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6793</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6793</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Richard Fichera of Forrester writes in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/blogs.forrester.com/richard_fichera/10-07-28-does_sparc_have_future']);"  href="http://blogs.forrester.com/richard_fichera/10-07-28-does_sparc_have_future">"Does SPARC Have a Future?"</a>:<blockquote>Our net take is that while it may still be hard to convince a new customer to jump on board the SPARC bandwagon, existing customers have no reason to make an abrupt migration, and can wait and see if Sun delivers on the milestones that they will reveal over the remainder of 2010 and into 2011.  As these milestones are disclosed we will have further analysis.</blockquote>Interestingly there  is an  comment about Solaris on x86 at the end of the article:<blockquote>On a related topic which we will address in more depth in future posts, Solaris on x86 will remain a solid enterprise choice for both current and new users. Customer issues with Sun were centered around SPARC and the strategic future of the company as opposed to technical issues with Solaris functionality, performance or stability. The continued availability of this proven operating environment, with an anticipation of continued investment and improvement by Oracle, is a strong positive for any customer looking for an enterprise-class Unix environment on an x86 platform.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/nJpNAu8uzcY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:28:21 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-Forrester-about-the-future-of-SPARC.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>SATA TRIM support in Opensolaris</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/Kb85rCaSCwI/6792-SATA-TRIM-support-in-Opensolaris.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6792-SATA-TRIM-support-in-Opensolaris.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6792</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6792</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The Opensolaris SATA subsystem got <a href="http://c0t0d0s0.org/codenews/display.php?fragment=75692b5ad1dc5127a40a548228908fb96a5cc783">TRIM</a> support with this putback to the codebase.  The TRIM command is really interesting for SSDs, as the operating system can tell the SSD which blocks aren't used by the filesystem any longer with this comment. This helps the internal garbage collection of the drives to work more efficiently at erasing blocks ahead of their usage. As erasing is really an costly operating with Flash-SSD, erasing the blocks before you need them speed up things a lot. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/Kb85rCaSCwI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:23:44 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6792-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6792-SATA-TRIM-support-in-Opensolaris.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Präsentation auf der DOAG 2010 Konferenz</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/76f-nkSHwi8/6786-Praesentation-auf-der-DOAG-2010-Konferenz.html</link>
            <category>German</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6786-Praesentation-auf-der-DOAG-2010-Konferenz.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6786</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6786</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Habe heute vormittag die Mitteilung bekommen, das mein Vortrag auf der  DOAG 2010 angenommen worden ist. Damit werde ich dort einen Vortrag zum Thema "Performance Analyse - oder: Was macht eigentlich mein Solaris?" halten.  Die <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.doag.org/konferenz/doag/2010/']);"  href="http://www.doag.org/konferenz/doag/2010/">DOAG Konferenz 2010</a> findet von 16. bis 18. November 2010 in Nürnberg statt.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/76f-nkSHwi8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:36:47 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6786-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6786-Praesentation-auf-der-DOAG-2010-Konferenz.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>New server docs</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/dOavtSwU7d4/6785-New-server-docs.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6785-New-server-docs.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6785</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6785</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    At docs.sun.com you will now find the docs for the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4800?l=en&amp;amp;a=view']);"  href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4800?l=en&amp;a=view">X4800</a>, the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4470?l=en&amp;amp;a=view']);"  href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4470?l=en&amp;a=view">X4470</a>, the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4270m2?l=en&amp;amp;a=view']);"  href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4270m2?l=en&amp;a=view">X4270M2</a> and the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4170m2?l=en&amp;amp;a=view']);"  href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/prod/sf.x4170m2?l=en&amp;a=view">X4170M2</a>. I prefer the the manuals over the slide decks <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/dOavtSwU7d4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:05:20 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6785-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6785-New-server-docs.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>The world isn't just a datasheet ...</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/sukOrw0OqJs/6784-The-world-isnt-just-a-datasheet-....html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6784-The-world-isnt-just-a-datasheet-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6784</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6784</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    In a discussion at eWeek a commenter wrote, that the world of IT news doesn't just consists out of datasheet. Yes he is right, it contains reading manuals and to take press releases with a large grain of salt.<br />
<br />
Oracle upgraded the Oracle SL8500 library to house 100.000 tapes. This is done by linking 10 libraries together with 10.000 tapes each. This is the largest library you can purchase at the moment. More information is available in the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/tape-storage/034341.pdf']);"  href="http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/tape-storage/034341.pdf">data sheet</a>.<br />
<br />
Of course the Chris Mellor of TheRegister can't let Oracle get away with this and points in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/27/sl8500_upgrade/']);"  href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/27/sl8500_upgrade/">"Oracle unleashes robo-tapeswapping monster"</a> to the T-Finity library of Spectralogic, and indeed the press release of Spectralogic talks about 120.000 tapes in 4 linked tape library with something called "Skyway". <br />
<br />
But there is just one kink with that: The datasheet says "future", the promotional video says "future" and there is no manual (1st rule of IT: When you really want to know something about a device before buying, read the manual, not the datasheet) available at the Spectralogic website. Of course you can't find the word "future" in the press release.<br />
<br />
BTW: The Skyway looks like a concept i want to see working for a while before believing that it will work reasonably problem-free. The T-finity complex housing that large number of the tapes consists out of 4 libraries that are linked at both ends by something called skyways. So a tape going from one library to another has to be transported to the ends of the library (sounds unproblematic), has to be put into a device at the top of the connecting racks that builds the T-finity (sounds relatively unproblematic), then it has to be put into the gadget called "skyway", which connects the rows of racks by spanning over the aisle between the tape racks. And that sounds not unproblematic at all to me. In theory this sounds like a nice idea, but i would like to read the manual to see, how they circumvented all the problems i can think of. However .... there is no manual available.<br />
<br />
But when we talk about future numbers, i want to cite from the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/96154KB']);"  href="http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/96154KB">users manual of the SL8500</a> on page 19: <blockquote>31 libraries for Automated Cartridge System Library Software (ACSLS) connection, connected through PTPs, containing over 320,000 cartridge slots and 1,984 tape drives.</blockquote>But that's a "Mine is longer/mine are bigger" contest on a scale totally irrelevant for us mere mortals ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/sukOrw0OqJs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:45:25 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6784-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6784-The-world-isnt-just-a-datasheet-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>PSARC 2010/296 - tunable read-modify-write for flash</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/vIPzSmyEEmk/6782-PSARC-2010296-tunable-read-modify-write-for-flash.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6782-PSARC-2010296-tunable-read-modify-write-for-flash.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6782</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6782</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Bo Steven Zhou proposed an interesting feature for Solaris in the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/296/mail']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/296/mail">"PSARC 2010/296: Add tunable to control RMW for Flash Devices"</a>. <br />
 <br /><a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6782-PSARC-2010296-tunable-read-modify-write-for-flash.html#extended">Continue reading "PSARC 2010/296 - tunable read-modify-write for flash"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/vIPzSmyEEmk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:39:47 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6782-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6782-PSARC-2010296-tunable-read-modify-write-for-flash.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Solaris x86 not longer from IBM.</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/eboEq_4qXAA/6779-Solaris-x86-not-longer-from-IBM..html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6779-Solaris-x86-not-longer-from-IBM..html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6779</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6779</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The register writes <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/26/ibm_solaris10_x64_dead/']);"  href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/26/ibm_solaris10_x64_dead/">"IBM splits with Solaris 10 on x64"</a>  and expresses, that this is the second vendor after HP. Albeit it was published after  the <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6765-Oracle-Solaris-Support-on-HP-Proliant-and-BladeServers.html">announcement of HP to resell Oracle Solaris licenses</a>, it seems, that TPM wasn't aware of the newest developments . Bets anyone? 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/eboEq_4qXAA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:40:36 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6779-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6779-Solaris-x86-not-longer-from-IBM..html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>PSARC 2010/291: zonestat</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/peS7ej37Egs/6777-PSARC-2010291-zonestat.html</link>
            <category>General</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6777-PSARC-2010291-zonestat.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6777</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6777</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    An interesting ARC case found it's way into the case log: Stephen Lawrence proposed the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/291']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/291"><code>zonestat</code></a> to the architecture review comitee. <br />
<br />
This feature consists out of two components. The <code>zonestatd</code> and the <code>zonestat</code> command. Stephen writes about the <code>zonestatd</code>:<blockquote>A new smf service svc:/system/zones-monitoring:default will execute a zones monitoring daemon.  This daemon will implement monitoring the system configuration, managing extended accounting, and computing memory utilization on behalf of clients.</blockquote>This <code>zonestatd</code> is queried by the <code>zonestat</code> command to deliver data about the resource utilization of zones.<br />
<blockquote><code><pre>
# zonestat 5 1
    SUMMARY
                        -----CPU------------- ----PHYSICAL--- ----VIRTUAL----
                   ZONE USED %PART %CAP %SHRU USED  PCT  %CAP  USED  PCT %CAP
                [total] 9.74   30%    -     - 7576M  23%    - 11.6G  24%    -
               [system] 0.28  0.8%    -     - 6535M  19%    - 10.4G  21%    -
                 global 9.10   28%    -     -  272M 0.8%    -  366M 0.7%    -
              kodiak-ab 0.32  1.0%    -     -  256M 0.7%    -  265M 0.5%    -
             kodiak-rie 0.00  0.0%    -     - 22.7M 0.0%    - 49.4M 0.1%    -
</pre></code></blockquote>Due to the implementation with a daemonized part, you can even tell the daemon to compute a report about the utilization in certain intervals:<blockquote><code># zonestat -p -r memory -q -R average,high 30s 24h 1h</code></blockquote>Please read <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/291/20100726_stephen.lawrence']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/291/20100726_stephen.lawrence">Stephens</a> case document for for more information. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/peS7ej37Egs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:06:34 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6777-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6777-PSARC-2010291-zonestat.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Bryan Cantrill is leaving Sun/Oracle</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/fBNJNyDd8EE/6774-Bryan-Cantrill-is-leaving-SunOracle.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6774-Bryan-Cantrill-is-leaving-SunOracle.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6774</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6774</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Sad news ... Bryan Cantrill announced <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2010/07/25/good-bye-sun/']);"  href="http://dtrace.org/blogs/bmc/2010/07/25/good-bye-sun/">in his blog</a> that he is leaving Sun. Wish you all the best, Bryan!<br />
<br />
As important some people are, the development of an OS lies on many shoulders. However this won't deny many people from postulating the end ....  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/fBNJNyDd8EE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:44:23 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6774-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6774-Bryan-Cantrill-is-leaving-SunOracle.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Alan Coopersmith about Phoronix</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/_oKUxIfzlDY/6773-Alan-Coopersmith-about-Phoronix.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6773-Alan-Coopersmith-about-Phoronix.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6773</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6773</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Alan Coopersmith posted a good article about the Phoronix article, that speculated about a new release of OpenSolaris: <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/blogs.sun.com/alanc/entry/revelations_145']);"  href="http://blogs.sun.com/alanc/entry/revelations_145">"Revelations: 145</a>". This article shows nicely the problem of current IT media. Doing no research like at the case of overblowing Alan's mail or doing rolodex journalism before having done the basics (like the CNA story without out googling for "+CNA +Oracle" at eWeek) before.<br />
<br />
But back to Alans article: <blockquote>As others have pointed out, checking the facts or contacting the developers to find out the story is less juicy than it seems doesn't play well with that business model (and that's not just true for Phoronix - look at any number of the columnists for other web-based "trade publications" that generate traffic via controversial posts, and the more outraged the community gets over them and angrily passes them around to denounce, the better their numbers are - you can just imagine how many of their articles are designed to bait Groklaw or Slashdot readers).</blockquote>Thank you for writing this as i had to answer to several Twitter DM, ICQ messages because of questions about the Phoronix article. However articles like this one show another point: The Solaris franchise isn't in the irrelevance niche like some people with their own hidden or open agenda want to tell you. Otherwise you wouldn't that much reaction to such an article as my logfiles speak a totally different language. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/_oKUxIfzlDY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:04:23 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6773-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6773-Alan-Coopersmith-about-Phoronix.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>exclusive IP for Solaris10-branded Zones in Opensolaris</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/XqJAebSE5tY/6770-exclusive-IP-for-Solaris10-branded-Zones-in-Opensolaris.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6770-exclusive-IP-for-Solaris10-branded-Zones-in-Opensolaris.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6770</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6770</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    With the integration of <a href="http://c0t0d0s0.org/codenews/display.php?fragment=60fec312983dd311de207c2f50b51d23fa706adc">"PSARC/2010/111 exclusive IP for s10c"</a> the zone facility of Opensolaris got an interesting new feature. It's possible for quite a while now to create a branded Solaris 10 zone (a Solaris 10 zone in Opensolaris, not unlike to the Solaris 8 or 9 zones in Solaris 10). Now this Solaris 10 branded zones zones support exclusive IP like native zones:<blockquote>This case adds exclusive IP stack support to Solaris 10 containers.The initial Solaris 10 container case only added support for the shared IP stack model (see PSARC/2009/253)</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/XqJAebSE5tY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:01:36 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6770-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6770-exclusive-IP-for-Solaris10-branded-Zones-in-Opensolaris.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Upset ...</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/B6KGdDTf0qU/6767-Upset-....html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6767-Upset-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6767</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6767</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There is one point in the media reporting that is really upsetting me: Some news outlets were touting the hybrid mainframe as the development that will save this technology for decades. IBM gets an overly positive press for placing a rack besides the mainframe.<br />
<br />
Sun was talking about the concept of workload computing for years now: Use x86, UltraSPARC T* and SPARC64 where it fits best and use Solaris as the overarching umbrella. The same OS on all components. <br />
<br />
However nobody was touting this as a major step forward ... Just as a reason to bash Sun, because they interpreted is as uncertainity about their technology. There were even people seeing this as an excuse for the single thread performance of T1/T2.<br />
<br />
They didn't looked at it as the basic point behind it: That one size doesn't fit all and one proc doesn't fit all needs, and a proc can't fulfill all needs.<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/B6KGdDTf0qU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:45:29 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6767-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6767-Upset-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Oracle Solaris Support on HP Proliant and BladeServers</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/lWlB_pVGrkA/6765-Oracle-Solaris-Support-on-HP-Proliant-and-BladeServers.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6765-Oracle-Solaris-Support-on-HP-Proliant-and-BladeServers.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6765</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6765</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Just got the news, that  Oracle Solaris Premier (24x7 Support) Support is available on HP servers via HP again. You have to order it via HP Software License Management Services. For details ask your friendly HP sales rep. However:there is (and was) a way to buy Support for Solaris on HP via Oracle, about that way ask you friendly Oracle sales rep. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/lWlB_pVGrkA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:35:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6765-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6765-Oracle-Solaris-Support-on-HP-Proliant-and-BladeServers.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>PSARC/2010/280 - NFS Instances</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/T1efflHYC_Q/6761-PSARC2010280-NFS-Instances.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6761-PSARC2010280-NFS-Instances.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6761</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6761</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/280/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/280/">PSARC case 2010/280</a> is a really interesting one - NFS Instances:<blockquote>The proposed changes are needed to support an NFS server in a non-global zone; however, the changes are not specific to NFS. They would also be used when enabling any file sharing protocol (ie. CIFS) server for non-global zones.</blockquote>The implementation of this case in conjunction with some other changes would enable you to create an NFS server in a zone. That's interesting to create virtualized file servers for example.<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/T1efflHYC_Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:10:05 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6761-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6761-PSARC2010280-NFS-Instances.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>c0t0d0s0.org gets a new home</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/LOmxsj-hSMg/6760-c0t0d0s0.org-gets-a-new-home.html</link>
            <category>About this blog</category>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6760-c0t0d0s0.org-gets-a-new-home.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6760</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6760</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    c0t0d0s0.org will get a new home in the next 4 weeks:<br />
<blockquote><code><small><pre>jmoekamp@solsystem:~$ uname -a 
SunOS solsystem 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
jmoekamp@solsystem:~$ lgrpinfo 
lgroup 0 (root):
        Children: none
        CPUs: 0-7
        Memory: installed 8.0G, allocated 3.5G, free 4.5G
        Lgroup resources: 0 (CPU); 0 (memory)
        Load: 0.0784
        Latency: 0
jmoekamp@solsystem:~$ psrinfo  -v
Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:00.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:04.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 2 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:04.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 3 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:04.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 4 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:04.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 5 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:05.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 6 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:05.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.
Status of virtual processor 7 as of: 07/22/2010 15:33:50
  on-line since 07/21/2010 20:24:05.
  The i386 processor operates at 2667 MHz,
        and has an i387 compatible floating point processor.</pre></small></code></blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/LOmxsj-hSMg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:32:21 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6760-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6760-c0t0d0s0.org-gets-a-new-home.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Phoronix speculates about a 145 build</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/Xk-2O1a8mzs/6757-Phoronix-speculates-about-a-145-build.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6757-Phoronix-speculates-about-a-145-build.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6757</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6757</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Phoronix speculates in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&amp;amp;x=ODQyOQ']);"  href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&amp;x=ODQyOQ">"Woah, It Looks Like Oracle Will Stand Behind OpenSolaris"</a> about an upcoming release of OpenSolaris on the foundation of the 145 build. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/Xk-2O1a8mzs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:35:09 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6757-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6757-Phoronix-speculates-about-a-145-build.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Opensolaris putbacks - with comments</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/GvJx-01P1YM/6756-Opensolaris-putbacks-with-comments.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6756-Opensolaris-putbacks-with-comments.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6756</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6756</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Well it looks like the chart i've published yesterday isn't speaking without comments. <br />
<br />
1. The cart published yesterday is based on the database that enables my website to create the <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/codenews/overview.php">codenews twitterfeed and webpage</a><br />
2. For clarity, i created a chart with a moving average on the last 15 values.<br />
<center><a class="serendipity_image_link"  href='http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/putback2.png'><!-- s9ymdb:767 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="400" height="379"  src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/putback2.serendipityThumb.png"  border=0 alt="" /></a></center><br />
3. We are talking about Opensolaris code putbacks here. Whenever an developer or a development team thinks, the code is ready for the integration into the mainline kernel, a putback is done. <br />
4. All the putbacks are available at <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/']);"  href="http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/">onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/</a>. Those putbacks are public.<br />
5. We aren't talking about a binary distribution (OpenSolaris) here, it's the source code (Opensolaris).  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/GvJx-01P1YM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:52:04 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6756-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6756-Opensolaris-putbacks-with-comments.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Opensolaris putbacks</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/t5M0LA6U3KQ/6754-Opensolaris-putbacks.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6754-Opensolaris-putbacks.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6754</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6754</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Number of putback mails per day ...<br />
<center><a class="serendipity_image_link"  href='http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/putbacks_annotated.png' target="_blank"><!-- s9ymdb:766 --><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="400" height="321"  border=0 src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/putbacks_annotated.serendipityThumb.png"  alt="" /></a></center><br />
Without a further comment ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/t5M0LA6U3KQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:27:20 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6754-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6754-Opensolaris-putbacks.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>New  Oracles Sun Ray Software release available</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/tUKBtHJMudk/6742-New-Oracles-Sun-Ray-Software-release-available.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6742-New-Oracles-Sun-Ray-Software-release-available.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6742</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6742</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Yesterday Oracle <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/150887']);"  href="http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/150887">announced the release</a> of a new version of the Sun Ray Software. There are a number of  new features aside of bug fixes in this release. Think Thin has a nice summary of the changes. The software is now supported on Oracle Enterprise Linux as well as on Solaris, RHEL and SLES. The soft client (aka Oracle Virtual Desktop Client 2.0) supports hot desking in conjunction with a smartcard reader for example between a SunRay and a soft client.  And even more interesting: A MacOS X version of the  softclient. Just read <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/blogs.sun.com/ThinkThin/entry/srs_5_big_updates_disguised']);"  href="http://blogs.sun.com/ThinkThin/entry/srs_5_big_updates_disguised">Craig Bender</A> article in the ThinkThin group blog for more information. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/tUKBtHJMudk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:09:03 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6742-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6742-New-Oracles-Sun-Ray-Software-release-available.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>The state of the OpenSolaris Community, July 2010 as seen by the OGB</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/RZ0O3ooOmIU/6738-The-state-of-the-OpenSolaris-Community,-July-2010-as-seen-by-the-OGB.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6738-The-state-of-the-OpenSolaris-Community,-July-2010-as-seen-by-the-OGB.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6738</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6738</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    As i have to leave home for a customer meeting in a few minutes, just without any further  comments: <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2010-July/007984.html']);"  href="http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2010-July/007984.html">The state of the OpenSolaris Community, July 2010</a> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/RZ0O3ooOmIU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:03:16 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6738-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6738-The-state-of-the-OpenSolaris-Community,-July-2010-as-seen-by-the-OGB.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>New x86 servers from Oracle - Technical Deepdive </title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/gUGx4TPLvik/6732-New-x86-servers-from-Oracle-Technical-Deepdive.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6732-New-x86-servers-from-Oracle-Technical-Deepdive.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6732</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6732</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Last year there were a number of webcast. This series finds it's continuation with a deep-dive webcast about our new x86 servers. On July, 21st at 16:00 CEST my colleague Elke Freymann will hold this webcast in German language. You can register for this webcast <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/event.on24.com/r.htm?e=226817&amp;amp;s=1&amp;amp;k=0AFCC215A220C03AB60DBC60EFA6B14C']);"  href="http://event.on24.com/r.htm?e=226817&amp;s=1&amp;k=0AFCC215A220C03AB60DBC60EFA6B14C">at the registration page for "Die neuen Sun Fire x86 Server von Oracle im Detail"</a>. I know Elke as a very knowledgeable person, thus i expect this webcast to be a really interesting one. On July, 21st at 11:00 BST/12:00 CEST  a similar webcast is held in English language. The registration for this webcast is available at <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&amp;amp;eventid=226565&amp;amp;sessionid=1&amp;amp;key=EB4D4C91E80DB999416B2A137F809B94&amp;amp;sourcepage=register']);"  href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&amp;eventid=226565&amp;sessionid=1&amp;key=EB4D4C91E80DB999416B2A137F809B94&amp;sourcepage=register">"Oracle's New X86 Systems Technical Deep Dive"</a>. <br />
<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/gUGx4TPLvik" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:30:51 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6732-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6732-New-x86-servers-from-Oracle-Technical-Deepdive.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Different perspective.</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/5Rc6XNZgN3I/6728-Different-perspective..html</link>
            <category>Business Travel</category>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6728-Different-perspective..html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6728</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6728</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Was a long day today ... wake up at 05:45, flew to Nuremberg today, actually via Duesseldorf with one and a half our wait time (no problem, my office is the location of my notebook). And don't ask ... it was actually cheaper than flying directly and actually i was able to have breakfast while working in the FTL lounge in DUS. It was fscking warm in Nuremberg today .... 10 degrees less would be really nice. But it was an really interesting discussion at the customer site: Four hours live demo Solaris. Now I'm back home and the unread mail counter is down to zero.<br />
<br />
But that isn't the point i want to make in this blog entry. I've learned a thing in such meetings: Working with Solaris all day long make let you take some features for granted. You don't think that this or that feature is something interesting because it is just this way things go for you: You talk about the virtues of deduplication, compression, and the probabilities of a false positive in dedup, but the customer is  enthusiastic about snapshot shiping with ssh and zfs send/receive. You talk about DTrace, but the customer is exalted about prstat -m.<br />
<br />
This is the basic reason, why i started to dislike  Solaris presentations with slides and prefer to use the presentation program "shell". Because while working with the system on the way that comes natural to you, you give the audience a much better insight into the system. And on the way you show all the small features ... 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/5Rc6XNZgN3I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:34:01 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6728-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6728-Different-perspective..html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Multitude of JVM - misinterpreted ;)</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/giBhH3lzqfI/6726-Multitude-of-JVM-misinterpreted-;.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>On Benchmarketing</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6726-Multitude-of-JVM-misinterpreted-;.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6726</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6726</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    TPM is bragging about the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh071210-story02.html']);"  href="http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh071210-story02.html">SPECjbb2005 performance of the p7 system</a>. Interestingly he is talking about the nonsensical benchmark again: Multiple JVMs per system with 32 bit.  As i wrote before: <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/5937-BlueToTheBone,-Sun,-SGI-and-the-SPECjbb2005-benchmark.html">When you want a cluster, buy a cluster and don't build one for an embarrassingly parallel problem in a box</a>. I think, <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6633-In-favour-of-more-reasonable-benchmarking-configurations.html">that the only relevant test today is 1 JVM/64-bit today</a>. By the way: Those multitude of JVMs/32-bit doesn't use the real advantage of the big machines (large heaps for you application), however it's the only chance those SGI systems or extremly-NUMA systems can compete with larger SMP systems, because of the vastly reduced interconnect usage (which is quite useful to avoid the long arm of Amdahl's law)  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/giBhH3lzqfI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:24:52 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6726-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6726-Multitude-of-JVM-misinterpreted-;.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Java SE 6.0 Update 21</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/9Eb5gXDmkUw/6719-Java-SE-6.0-Update-21.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6719-Java-SE-6.0-Update-21.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6719</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6719</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Update 21 of Java 6.0 found it's way into the public. You will find  the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/java.sun.com/javase/downloads/widget/jdk6.jsp']);"  href="http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/widget/jdk6.jsp">download</a>, the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u21.html']);"  href="http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u21.html">release notes</a> and the list of <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/BugFixes6u21.html']);"  href="http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/BugFixes6u21.html">bug fixes</a> at their usual locations. As a server guy the HotSpot VM Version 17 looks like the most interesting change to me. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/9Eb5gXDmkUw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:45:55 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6719-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6719-Java-SE-6.0-Update-21.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>With media outlets like this, you don't need enemies - revisited</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/KbObEl5WtW8/6714-With-media-outlets-like-this,-you-dont-need-enemies-revisited.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6714-With-media-outlets-like-this,-you-dont-need-enemies-revisited.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6714</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6714</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There are some changes to <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.silicon.com/technology/hardware/2010/07/05/how-oracle-has-made-sun-rise-again-39746033/']);"  href="http://www.silicon.com/technology/hardware/2010/07/05/how-oracle-has-made-sun-rise-again-39746033/">the article</a> i've <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6708-With-media-outlets-like-this,-you-dont-need-enemies.html">ranted</a> about. But at first i should note, that i was right about my opinion that Ronan Miles didn't told silicon.com, that Oracle has canceled x86 servers. Stefan Parvu simply asked Mr. Miles about this quote. The answer of Ronan as reported by Stefan in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/51338']);"  href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/message/51338">the solarisx86 newsgroup</a>:<blockquote>That is a complete mis-quote, never said anything of the sort about removal of<br />
technology. Sadly, journo's look for soundbytes.<br />
<br />
Thanks for the link, I will follow up.</blockquote><br />
It looks like this "follow-up" was successful. The article changed from <blockquote>President of the UK Oracle User Group Ronan Miles told silicon.com that Oracle has achieved much more on the hardware side of things than many expected through the rationalisation of the Sun business, including the removal of technology such as X86 servers.</blockquote>to<blockquote>President of the UK Oracle User Group Ronan Miles told silicon.com that Oracle has achieved much more on the hardware side of things than many expected through the rationalisation of the Sun business.</blockquote><br />
Of course there is no notice, that the article has changed. And of course the comment about killing x86  (now only attributed to Mrs Breen) is total nonsense. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/KbObEl5WtW8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:54:51 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6714-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6714-With-media-outlets-like-this,-you-dont-need-enemies-revisited.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>PSARC/2010/259 Ethernet over IB</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~3/PfCgspuxehk/6713-PSARC2010259-Ethernet-over-IB.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6713-PSARC2010259-Ethernet-over-IB.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6713</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6713</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    When you look at the list of PSARC cases, you can get the impression, that Infiniband is one bigger topics in the development of Solaris: PSARC/2010/234 IBTF 2010.Q2 Enhancements, PSARC/2010/239 OFUV Userland Interface and today, PSARC/2010/251 Fibre Channel over IB Support found their way <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/']);"  href="http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/">into the list over the last few days</a>. The newest addition:  PSARC/2010/259 Ethernet over IB - however additional information is not publicly available at the moment  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-Sun/~4/PfCgspuxehk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:41:32 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6713-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6713-PSARC2010259-Ethernet-over-IB.html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss>
