<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
    
    <title>c0t0d0s0.org - The IT Business</title>
    <link>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/</link>
    <description>the sun in a lighthungry universe</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.6 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness" /><feedburner:info uri="c0t0d0s0org-theitbusiness" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
    <title>Nanosecond</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/zmZAl6BUs2E/7468-Nanosecond.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7468-Nanosecond.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=7468</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7468</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Sometimes it's quite handy to have a good explanation, why distance equals time, and why this is important in computing. RDML Hopper finds a 30 cm cable quite useful  in order to explain that. Thanks to Youtube i find it really useful that there is now the opportunity to let her tell this for herself. Perhaps it would be really quite useful to have some nanoseconds on your desk. Or  threehundred metres Cat7 to demonstrate a microsecond.<br />
<center><!-- s9ymdb:868 --><a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEpsKnWZrJ8']);"  href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEpsKnWZrJ8"><img class="serendipity_image_center" width="400" height="243" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/hopper.serendipityThumb.PNG" alt=""  /></a><center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/zmZAl6BUs2E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:58:32 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7468-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7468-Nanosecond.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>IOPS, capacity, bandwidth - and something new to explain to the people in purchasing</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/yDYMKEyjkyk/7464-IOPS,-capacity,-bandwidth-and-something-new-to-explain-to-the-people-in-purchasing.html</link>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7464-IOPS,-capacity,-bandwidth-and-something-new-to-explain-to-the-people-in-purchasing.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=7464</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7464</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    When you size storage, you have to size for three things: IOPS, capacity and bandwidth. But that has an interesting implication. When we had 2,4 or 9 GB harddisks we needed many disks to provide the needed capacity and thus had often enough IOPS for the tasks of that time without needing further provisions. Then disks got bigger, and we created massive storage arrays with much to large capacity , but we did it for the IOPS. Now we have SSD in the TB range and with IOPS north of 100.000 and you would think that your problems are gone, however now the third parameter comes into the game: Bandwith.<br />
<br />
So far you had often enough disks  (either because of bandwidth or IOPS requirements) and thus enough raw bandwidth at least at the point right behind the disk). However it doesn't matter, when you have 1 TB and 100.000 IOPS, you still have just a storage connection that limits your transmission at 6 GBps, come hell or high water. So after explaining "No, a 1 TB USB disk from el-cheapo-component-shack isn't enough for the 1 TB database, because of IOPS yadda yadda yadda" to the people in the purchasing department,  we probably have to start to explain "No, the 1 TB SSDs aren't enough as well, because of the bandwidth requirements yadda yadda yadda" 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/yDYMKEyjkyk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:59:58 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7464-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7464-IOPS,-capacity,-bandwidth-and-something-new-to-explain-to-the-people-in-purchasing.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Vortrag "Deduplication" auf der Froson </title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/N_uC1cWDivM/7324-Vortrag-Deduplication-auf-der-Froson.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7324-Vortrag-Deduplication-auf-der-Froson.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=7324</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7324</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Gestern habe ich die Mitteilung bekommen, das mein Vortrag "Deduplication" auf der <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.froscon.de/']);"  href="http://www.froscon.de/">Froscon 2011</a> angenommen worden ist. Die  Froscon findet dieses Jahr am 20./21. August 2011 an Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg statt. Ich werde dort eine vollständig überarbeitete Version meines Deduplication-Vortrags von der GUUG halten. An vielen stellen allgemeiner und nicht so ZFS-zentrisch, an anderen Stellen allerdings sehr viel ZFS-zentrischer, da ich anhand des Sourcecodes von ZFS einige Konzepte erklaeren will. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/N_uC1cWDivM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:57:41 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7324-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7324-Vortrag-Deduplication-auf-der-Froson.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Apple start to make public contributions to OpenJDK</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/HUduwfWsoJI/7133-Apple-start-to-make-public-contributions-to-OpenJDK.html</link>
            <category>Apple</category>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>Technology</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7133-Apple-start-to-make-public-contributions-to-OpenJDK.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=7133</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7133</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Mike Swingler of Apple announced yesterday, that Apple has started to contribute to the OpenJDK project: <blockquote>I'm very happy to let you know that today we made the first public contribution of code to the OpenJDK project for Mac OS X. This initial contribution builds on the hard work of the BSD port, and initially has the same functionality. Today's contribution simply modifies the build process to create universal binary, and produces a .jdk bundle which is recognized by Java Preferences and the JVM detection logic in Mac OS X.</blockquote>You will find a list of important links in regard of this project in the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2011-January/000007.html']);"  href="http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2011-January/000007.html">announcement mail.</a> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/HUduwfWsoJI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:42:30 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7133-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7133-Apple-start-to-make-public-contributions-to-OpenJDK.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>About Java on MacOS X</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/5J4Oy62aU18/7027-About-Java-on-MacOS-X.html</link>
            <category>Apple</category>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7027-About-Java-on-MacOS-X.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=7027</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7027</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There is an interesting <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/11/12openjdk.html']);"  href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/11/12openjdk.html">joint statement about the future of Java on MacOS X</a>:<blockquote>Oracle and Apple today announced the OpenJDK project for Mac OS X. Apple will contribute most of the key components, tools and technology required for a Java SE 7 implementation on Mac OS X, including a 32-bit and 64-bit HotSpot-based Java virtual machine, class libraries, a networking stack and the foundation for a new graphical client. OpenJDK will make Apples Java technology available to open source developers so they can access and contribute to the effort.</blockquote><br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/5J4Oy62aU18" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:26:17 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7027-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/7027-About-Java-on-MacOS-X.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Dissecting a TCO study</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/hdwHiKYc0HA/6277-Dissecting-a-TCO-study.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6277-Dissecting-a-TCO-study.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6277</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6277</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There are lies, obvious nonsense and this TCO study. Or to say it differently: Sometimes there are studies having an obvious bias, maybe introduced by the people that ordered that study. <br />
<br />
But let's start at the beginning. A few days ago, i've got a TCO study named <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.google.de/search?hl=de&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;channel=s&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Ade%3Aofficial&amp;amp;hs=rjT&amp;amp;q=The+Business+Value+of+Novell+SUSE+Linux+Enterprise+Server+on+HP+ProLiant+x86+Servers+vs.+Sun+Solaris+10+on+Sun+Servers&amp;amp;btnG=Suche&amp;amp;meta=&amp;amp;aq=f&amp;amp;oq=']);"  href="http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;channel=s&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Ade%3Aofficial&amp;hs=rjT&amp;q=The+Business+Value+of+Novell+SUSE+Linux+Enterprise+Server+on+HP+ProLiant+x86+Servers+vs.+Sun+Solaris+10+on+Sun+Servers&amp;btnG=Suche&amp;meta=&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=">"The Business Value of Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server on HP ProLiant x86 Servers vs. Sun Solaris 10 on Sun Servers"</a>. You can download it at various location at Google ... no need to provide a direct link to this pile of ... well ... don't know what it is. I hope after reading my article you have an impression where you should put this "study". <br />
<br />
Just to make it clear, i don't want to discuss about the HP servers or HP (albeit i feel as naughty about buying a Procurve switch recently as other people feel about downloading a porno video <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> ) , i just want to show that this TCO study is totally nonsense. It's just the way that i have the strong feel that this "study" was ordered by HP. Otherwise many statements are somewhat unexplainable to me. <br /><a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6277-Dissecting-a-TCO-study.html#extended">Continue reading "Dissecting a TCO study"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/hdwHiKYc0HA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:45:08 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6277-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6277-Dissecting-a-TCO-study.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>dd is not a benchmark</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/MsTpcYkRsq0/6269-dd-is-not-a-benchmark.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6269-dd-is-not-a-benchmark.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6269</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6269</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <code>dd</code> was never a reasonable benchmark, albeit people were using this tools as one. Lisa Noordergraaf wrote an interesting article explaining why <code>dd</code> is an especially bad choice for benchmarking modern storage like SSDs: <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/blogs.sun.com/lisan/entry/pitfalls_of_benchmarking_flash_with']);"  href="http://blogs.sun.com/lisan/entry/pitfalls_of_benchmarking_flash_with">Pitfalls of Benchmarking Flash with dd(1M)</a>: 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/MsTpcYkRsq0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:00:16 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6269-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6269-dd-is-not-a-benchmark.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A prototypical opensource user</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/rFknmH7XYLg/6251-A-prototypical-opensource-user.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6251-A-prototypical-opensource-user.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6251</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6251</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    We just found out, that a colleage of mine is a typical open source users behaviour - rants about missing features and clamours about bugs, but don't change  a thing about it <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/rFknmH7XYLg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:30:47 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6251-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6251-A-prototypical-opensource-user.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Job offering at microsoft.com</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/jA4iuu8aLxE/6250-Job-offering-at-microsoft.com.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6250-Job-offering-at-microsoft.com.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6250</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6250</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Looks like Opensource is really huring Microsoft, so if you don't mind to work for the evil empire, there is an interesting job offering: <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/careers.microsoft.com/JobDetails.aspx?ss=&amp;amp;pg=0&amp;amp;so=&amp;amp;rw=1&amp;amp;jid=9914&amp;amp;jlang=EN']);"  href="https://careers.microsoft.com/JobDetails.aspx?ss=&amp;pg=0&amp;so=&amp;rw=1&amp;jid=9914&amp;jlang=EN">Linux and Open Office Compete Lead</a><blockquote>If youre looking for a new role where youll focus on one of the biggest issues that is top of mind for KT and Steve B in Compete, build a complete left to right understanding of the subsidiary, have a large amount of executive exposure, build and manage the activities of a v-team of 13 district Linux&amp; Open Office Compete Leads, and develop a broad set of marketing skills and report to a management team committed to development and recognized for high WHI this is the position for you!</blockquote>Well ... additionally we know now from this job offering that Microsoft has a large affinity to abbreviations <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /><br />
<blockquote>[...] KT [...] Steve B [...] v-team [...] WHI [...] CSI [...] GM [...] BG [...] BMO [...] CSI [...] CSI Lead US [...] BMO [...] IW [...] CSI [...]</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/jA4iuu8aLxE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:00:46 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6250-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6250-Job-offering-at-microsoft.com.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>FTC sues Intel</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/Ls0_cC2cGAo/6212-FTC-sues-Intel.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6212-FTC-sues-Intel.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6212</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6212</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Okay ...  after the <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6094-Lawsuit-against-Intel.html">lawsuit filed  by the New York State Attorney</a>, there is another legal problem for Intel: The FTC sued Intel for anticompetitive tactics. You will find the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/12/intel.shtm']);"  href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/12/intel.shtm">press release</a> as well as <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9341/091216intelcmpt.pdf']);"  href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/adjpro/d9341/091216intelcmpt.pdf">the complaint</a> at the FTC website. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/Ls0_cC2cGAo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:43:11 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6212-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6212-FTC-sues-Intel.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Rumour: EC will say, it's okay </title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/dH4Z3tSJ8sQ/6209-Rumour-EC-will-say,-its-okay.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6209-Rumour-EC-will-say,-its-okay.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6209</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6209</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The New York Posts reports about an rumour that the EC will give it's permission for the Oracle/Sun-Deal:<a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.nypost.com/p/news/business/oracle_sun_day_8JM3CjHrKVL20vtVAMmn4K#ixzz0Zm5pTg7I%252']);"  href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/oracle_sun_day_8JM3CjHrKVL20vtVAMmn4K#ixzz0Zm5pTg7I%252">"Oracle's 'Sun'day - European official OKs $7.4B merger"</a>:<blockquote>According to a person with direct knowledge of the talks, European Commissioner Neelie Kroes approved the deal after Oracle agreed to fund the open database software, dubbed MySQL, for the next three years at more than $24 million annually.[...]Kroes is expected to write a clearance decision over the next few weeks and circulate it to member states, with final approval due in mid-January, the source said. [...] Oracle declined to comment.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/dH4Z3tSJ8sQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:08:39 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6209-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6209-Rumour-EC-will-say,-its-okay.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Monty tries to get public support for his cause</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/YoH20l2lWvs/6206-Monty-tries-to-get-public-support-for-his-cause.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6206-Monty-tries-to-get-public-support-for-his-cause.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6206</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6206</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    <small>Disclaimer: This is my personal opion. Not the one of Sun, Oracle or someone else. Period. I wrote this article this morning, but just found time to put it online</small><br />
<br />
I'm standing on the parking lot of my customer, but i have some time before my meeting starts, so i decided to write a short comment. Mr. Widenius proceed to use classic FUD tactics about his endeavor to regain control of Mysql, a control he lost  when Sun purchased Mysql for 1 billion dollars from the people owning it before. One of them was Mr. Widenius.<br />
<br />
I've got a mail from Mr. Widenius about a telephon call, but after <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html']);"  href="http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html">this blog article and his FUD comment (especially the one at DECEMBER 15, 2009 12:20 AM)</a>, i don't feel like having a senseless telephone call with this person.<br />
<br />
In my personal opinion, a line must be drawn ...  right here, right now. The offerings of Oracle provide a safe harbor for the further development of Mysql even for the more paranoid people. And 5 years are more than enough to build an own business around Mysql not needing the help of the moniker Mysql. Even when Oracle decides to throw away all commitments after the five years. And by the way: Given the speed of the NoSQL movement, i'm not really sure that Mysql will play the same role than today in five years from now. Within or outside of Oracle.<br />
<br />
 I really think this is more than enough to ensure to future of Mysql, more is just to ease the business for Mr. Widenius. And i don't think that the EC should work in favor a single person. Personally i'm thinking that his article "Help Saving MySQL" should be renamed to "Help Saving Monty Program AB" ... but that's a different story <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/YoH20l2lWvs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:03:54 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6206-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6206-Monty-tries-to-get-public-support-for-his-cause.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>The reaction of the EC to the Oracle announcement</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/yNKeP3umXYA/6205-The-reaction-of-the-EC-to-the-Oracle-announcement.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6205-The-reaction-of-the-EC-to-the-Oracle-announcement.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6205</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6205</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The EC issued an press release in reaction to the Oracle announcment about Mysql - <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/09/551&amp;amp;format=HTML&amp;amp;aged=0&amp;amp;language=EN&amp;amp;guiLanguage=en']);"  href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/09/551&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en">"Mergers: Commission welcomes Oracle's MySQL announcement"</a>:<blockquote><small>The European Commission can confirm that it has engaged in constructive discussions with Oracle regarding the maintenance of MySQL as an important competitive force in the database market after Oracle's acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Today's announcement by Oracle of a series of undertakings to customers, developers and users of MySQL is an important new element to be taken into account in the ongoing proceedings. In particular, Oracle's binding contractual undertakings to storage engine vendors regarding copyright non-assertion and the extension over a period of up to 5 years of the terms and conditions of existing commercial licenses are significant new facts. In this context, Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes recalls and confirms her statement of 9 December 2009 that she is optimistic that the case will have a satisfactory outcome, while ensuring that the transaction will not have an adverse impact on effective competition in the European database market.</small></blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/yNKeP3umXYA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:38:43 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6205-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6205-The-reaction-of-the-EC-to-the-Oracle-announcement.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Some good signs in regard of the Oracle/Sun deal</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/T0-RU4fAAxc/6203-Some-good-signs-in-regard-of-the-OracleSun-deal.html</link>
            <category>German</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6203-Some-good-signs-in-regard-of-the-OracleSun-deal.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6203</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6203</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Oracle made an announcement about commitments to the EC to assure them about the intentions of Oracle.  The commitments reach from "1. Continued Availability of Storage Engine APIs.", "4. Commitment to enhance MySQL in the future under the GPL",  over "6. Increase spending on MySQL research and development", "9. MySQL Reference Manual" and "10. Preserve Customer Choice for Support". This announcement were made via an press release, which is available under <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.marketwire.com/press-release/Oracle-Corporation-NASDAQ-ORCL-1090000.html']);"  href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Oracle-Corporation-NASDAQ-ORCL-1090000.html">at Market Wire for example</a>.<br />
<br />
There are already some reaction available in regard to this announcement: Bloomberg writes in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=a4SRxTHKHzTA&amp;amp;pos=7']);"  href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a4SRxTHKHzTA&amp;pos=7">"Oracle Offers Proposal to Win Approval for Sun Deal"</a>: <blockquote>The European Commission said Oracles proposal addresses concerns about the acquisition of Suns MySQL database product, signaling the EU will approve the acquisition next month. European Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes said in a statement that shes optimistic that the case will have a satisfactory outcome.</blockquote>and<blockquote>Neelie Kroes has switched on the green traffic light, Charles van Sasse van Ysselt, a competition lawyer at NautaDutilh in Brussels, said in a telephone interview today. She is optimistic and this is a step in the right direction.</blockquote><br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/T0-RU4fAAxc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:41:15 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6203-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6203-Some-good-signs-in-regard-of-the-OracleSun-deal.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Power consumption</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/-CnU4xYjXjU/6196-Power-consumption.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6196-Power-consumption.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6196</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6196</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    In <a href="https://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6193-Case-design.html#c218249">a comment</a> i wasn't able to deliver the power consumption for the HP system. However I finally found a Windows license and want to hand in this numbers now: Both systems were configured similary with 4 disks, 4 PCIe-cards, 8 procs at 2.4 GHz and full blown memory (64*8 GB). The Power Calculation tools were configured for for an 100% utilisation. The result: Sun Fire X4640 631 watts idle and 1368 watts at full load. HP DL785G6 needs  1496.23 watts at full load  and 794.72 at idle. <br />
<br />
Update: The numbers for the HP box are for the G6, not for the G5. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/-CnU4xYjXjU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:27:26 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6196-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6196-Power-consumption.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Some thoughts about the SAP 8-socket benchmark at HP and Sun</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/kVZY64bxFP4/6194-Some-thoughts-about-the-SAP-8-socket-benchmark-at-HP-and-Sun.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6194-Some-thoughts-about-the-SAP-8-socket-benchmark-at-HP-and-Sun.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6194</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6194</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    I thought a while just write another comment about the HP785G6 benchmark in the comment section of the <a href="">"Case Design"</a> or the <a href="">Do more with less"</a> article. At the end i thought, this will be a fine article.<br />
<br />
At first: Yes, the benchmark of Sun used 256 GByte, whereas as the HP 128 GByte. At first this sounds like benchmark not comparable to each other. One of the basics in SoHo benchmarks is to compare benchmarks with the same memory size. The problem: You can't use this knowledge here.<br />
<br />
But: The amount of memory just matters in SAP-SD when you don't have enough.  When you don't believe me, ask your favorite vendor of IT equipment and ask for SAP-SD numbers with different memory sizes. The answer will be similar. To be more exact, the speed of the memory has a bigger impact than the size of the memory, given that you have enough memory.<br />
<br />
Another reader summarized it in a good manner: If HP could get a better result just by adding memory, they would have done it. It's difficult to increase compute power when you are already using the fastest CPU. It's difficult to increase the core count when you are already using the  the CPU with the highest number of cores. But just plugging more memory into the system is easy. I haven't heard any news about HP having a shortage of memory modules.<br />
<br />
But it think there is a different reason, why HP just used 128 GB. When you look at page 15 of the quick specs pdf of the HP DL785G6 speed you will find the following note:<blockquote> When only PC2-6400 DIMMs modules are installed with a processor then memory bus speeds for 4 or fewer, 6 or 8 DIMMs per processor will operate at PC2-6400, PC2-5300 and PC2-4200 respectively. All other processor and memory configurations will operate at PC2-5300 with 4 or fewer DIMMs and PC2-4200 with</blockquote>The largest memory flavor with PC2-6400 is "8 GB REG PC2-6400 2 x 4 GB". The DL785 has 64 DIMM slots. To keep the memory bus at PC6400, you can just populate 32 of them. 32x4=128GB. They've ran the system at the top configuration that allowed them to use faster DIMMs. But you just to that, when you have enough memory in the smaller configuration, because the impact of having not enough memory is much larger than the impact of 133 MHz more memory speed. <br />
<br />
From this point it get's even more strangely: The X4640 didn's just had slower a slower CPU (200 MHz), it has also a tad slower memory (a X4640 use PC2-5300 for all memory configurations). This makes the difference between the systems even larger as suggested by the pure SAPS numbers.<br />
<br />
For the database something similar is valid. Roundabout 3-4% percent of an SAP-SD benchmark are database-bound and basic math suggests, that even a database 25% faster has a rather small impact on the database. <br />
<br />
Of course it would be nicer to have an exact proof by having benchmark results just differing by a single point but we have to live with it, that such results aren't available.<br />
<br />
But Sun is in a nice situation here, when you look at the situation with some logic. The vast difference between the HP DL785 and the X4640 can be explained by three major points:<ul>
 <li>The X4640 is vastly better than the DL785.</li>
 <li>Solaris is vastly better than Windows/Linux.</li>
 <li>The benchmarking team at HP is just outright incompetent.</li>
</ul>I think we can say that the third point can be erased from the list. I know HP as a competent company. As usual the an organisation of such a size is a victim of the bell curve, thus it has it share of dumb asses and outright geniuses. So your personal experience may differ, but let's just assume that HP is competent enough to tune a SAP.<br />
<br />
So we are at:<ul>
 <li>The X4640 is vastly better than the DL785.</li>
 <li>Solaris is vastly better than Windows/Linux.</li>
 <li><s>The benchmarking team at HP is just outright incompetent.</s></li>
</ul>Leaves us with "better OS" or "better HW".  Either way it's nice for Sun and that's exactly the reason why we won't see an Solaris/DL785/Oracle result from HP. Such a benchmark could have two outcomes: The DL785 yields the same result than the X4640 or it delivers worse result. The first would show that Solaris is a better operating system than Linux, the second outcome would show that the X4640 is a better system. Both is positive for Sun, both outcomes are negative for HP. <br />
<br />
When the system is 25% slower, this would really kill the DL785. If Solaris is 25% better, then this would kill all the arguments that Linux is as scaleable as an enterprise Unix. If it's a combination of both, well ... then this just proofs that Sun has a more competitive package. I'm fine with all three outcomes. <br />
<br />
Of course you could ask "Why does Sun don't deliver an Windows/Linux result?". Well ... honestly: Would you believe us? We have our own operating system and i'm sure the prefered excuse when the benchmarks with Linux or Windows are made by Sun would be "Sun didn't tune Linux correctly, they just want to make Solaris looks good". Of course Sun won't make up the results, as this is too easy to detect and to confirm and would habe an horrible impact PR-wise. And at the end it's HPs task to show that their system is comparable, not ours.<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/kVZY64bxFP4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:12:41 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6194-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6194-Some-thoughts-about-the-SAP-8-socket-benchmark-at-HP-and-Sun.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Case design</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/8R_wmovLSSA/6193-Case-design.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6193-Case-design.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6193</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6193</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    While preparing a presentation, i just found a good example, why i prefer the Sun case design over the one of HP.<br />
<br />
This is an HP DL785G6 from the top (this one is from an HP video):<br />
<center><!-- s9ymdb:693 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="399" height="239" style=" border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/hpinside.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt=""  /></center><br />
<br />
This is the Sun X4640 from the top:<br />
<center><!-- s9ymdb:694 --><img class="serendipity_image_left" width="400" height="320" style=" border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;" src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/uploads/k3_sunfire-x4640_5.serendipityThumb.jpg" alt=""  /></center> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/8R_wmovLSSA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:07:23 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6193-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6193-Case-design.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Groklaw about the Moglen letter</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/jvoiOvLzATk/6180-Groklaw-about-the-Moglen-letter.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6180-Groklaw-about-the-Moglen-letter.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6180</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6180</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There is an <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091204095942328']);"  href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091204095942328">interesting article about the Moglen Letter</a> at Groklaw inclusive a really disgusting reaction of  Mr. Florian Müller (as we tend to say in german: I can't eat enough to vomit the amount i would like to) . But read it yourself.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/jvoiOvLzATk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:46:20 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6180-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6180-Groklaw-about-the-Moglen-letter.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Eben Moglen about the EU report on Sun/Oracle</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/jOkWhPanQUc/6177-Eben-Moglen-about-the-EU-report-on-SunOracle.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6177-Eben-Moglen-about-the-EU-report-on-SunOracle.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6177</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6177</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Reuters reports in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0310376420091203']);"  href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0310376420091203">"REFILE-Activist lawyer sees flaw in EU Oracle-Sun report"</a> about an analysis of the EU report in regard of the Sun/Oracle deal made by Eben Moglen<blockquote>Moglen said that the EU document contains factual errors in its analysis of the role MySQL's licensing terms plays in securing competition in the software industry.</blockquote>and<blockquote>"The issues raised (by the commission) concerning the GPLv2 status of the MySQL code base do not warrant a conclusion that this transaction threatens significant anti-competitive consequences," Moglen told EU regulators in a Nov. 19 letter.</blockquote>Just for the readers unaware of Mr. Moglen - he founded the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Freedom_Law_Center']);"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Freedom_Law_Center">SLFC</a>: <blockquote> The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) is an organization that provides pro bono legal representation and related services to not-for-profit developers of free software/open source software. It was launched in February 2005 with Eben Moglen as Chairman. Initial funding of $4 million USD was pledged by Open Source Development Labs.</blockquote> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/jOkWhPanQUc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:04:16 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6177-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6177-Eben-Moglen-about-the-EU-report-on-SunOracle.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>A slight atmospheric problem</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/AN6B_1u4RzY/6143-A-slight-atmospheric-problem.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6143-A-slight-atmospheric-problem.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6143</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6143</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Andreas Stiller wrote in his "Prozessorgeflüster" column (the last remaining island of constant high quality in the c't) about <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.h-online.com/newsticker/news/item/Processor-Whispers-About-War-and-Peace-865886.html']);"  href="http://www.h-online.com/newsticker/news/item/Processor-Whispers-About-War-and-Peace-865886.html">a nasty in the Intel Nehalem</a>. For i7 900 you will find the errata at "AAJ121. Unexpected Interrupts May Occur on C6 Exit If Using APIC Timer to Generate Interrupts" in the pdf <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/320836.pdf']);"  href="http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/320836.pdf">Intel® CoreTM i7-900 Desktop Processor Extreme Edition Series and Intel® CoreTM i7-900 Desktop Processor Series</a>. For other Nehalem procs you will find matching reports under AAK119 for Xeon 5500, AAM123 for Xeon 3500, AAO89 for Xeon 3400 and AAN87 (Core i7-800, Core i5). That's not that interesting ... bugs in CPUs are quite common<br />
<br />
However Intel thought, that this bug isn't triggered by any commercially available software.Well ... not exactly. There is one: <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B975530&amp;amp;x=9&amp;amp;y=15']);"  href="http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B975530&amp;x=9&amp;y=15">Windows Server 2008 R2 with enabled Hyper-V</a>.  An hot fix is available, but the interims workaround is really interesting: Switching those C-states and thus power-saving. But you will kill the Turbo Boost feature as well with such a step, as Turbo Boost is the other side of the medal of the  Power Saving feature.<br />
<br />
But that isn't still the most interesting point of this bug. The most interesting part is a atmospheric one. The relation between Intel and Microsoft must have experienced a cool down recently. <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> Andreas Stiller writes in his article:<blockquote>And it gets worse: the editorial office received a non-published raw version of the error report that even included the brusque preferred solution of not using the processors in question. Strong stuff: Microsoft advises against the application of Nehalem processors in servers  so Intel took to the barricades and was able to prevent Microsoft publishing this advice at the very last second.</blockquote>I would have really liked to see the reaction of the usual news outlets and the market, when Intel would have not been able to convince Microsoft to change the report <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" /> 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/AN6B_1u4RzY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:37:04 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6143-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6143-A-slight-atmospheric-problem.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Tea boiling thoughts: Hype recombination</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/e7hJBiVUoJg/6124-Tea-boiling-thoughts-Hype-recombination.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6124-Tea-boiling-thoughts-Hype-recombination.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6124</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6124</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    While waiting for my tea water boiling, i thought that it's great to work in IT. Hypes are recombinating faster than the newest flu strain. So you can hype the same stuff again and again: Combine grid computing with a credit card system and call it Cloud Computing. And you have stuff to about talk for hours again <img src="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png" alt=";-)" style="display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;" class="emoticon" />  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/e7hJBiVUoJg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:08:24 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6124-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6124-Tea-boiling-thoughts-Hype-recombination.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>European Commission objects to Sun Oracle merger</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/GXZuVXmithk/6097-European-Commission-objects-to-Sun-Oracle-merger.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6097-European-Commission-objects-to-Sun-Oracle-merger.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6097</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6097</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The European Commission has expressed their objections about the Sun acquisition by Oracle. Sun notified the SEC with an 8K filing available at <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709519/000118143109050589/rrd256710.htm']);"  href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709519/000118143109050589/rrd256710.htm">EDGAR</a><br />
<br />
It's based on the opinion, that the purchase of Mysql would harm the database market. I've already expressed my strong feeling, that this is utter nonsense. I think it's unnecessary to repeat it. I don't have any understanding for this decision, as it doesn't help competition and customers. In my opinion, it just helps some interested parties.<br />
<br />
Oracle answered with a <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/039824']);"  href="http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/039824">press release</a> to the filing of the objections:<blockquote><small>The Commission's Statement of Objections reveals a profound misunderstanding of both database competition and open source dynamics. It is well understood by those knowledgeable about open source software that because MySQL is open source, it cannot be controlled by anyone. That is the whole point of open source.</small></blockquote>Even the Department of Justice issued a <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2009/251782.htm']);"  href="http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2009/251782.htm">press release</a> regarding this EC decision: <blockquote><small>"Several factors led the Division to conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to be anticompetitive. There are many open-source and proprietary database competitors. The Division concluded, based on the specific facts at issue in the transaction, that consumer harm is unlikely because customers would continue to have choices from a variety of well established and widely accepted database products. The Department also concluded that there is a large community of developers and users of Sun's open source database with significant expertise in maintaining and improving the software, and who could support a derivative version of it.</small></blockquote>However the cards are on the table now and the EC should tell Oracle and Sun, what they want to solve those objections. So it's a good that they filed the objections now and not at the last possible moment.<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/GXZuVXmithk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:45:38 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6097-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6097-European-Commission-objects-to-Sun-Oracle-merger.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Lawsuit against Intel</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/PMqLuZAin00/6094-Lawsuit-against-Intel.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6094-Lawsuit-against-Intel.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6094</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6094</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The New York times reports about an lawsuit filing against Intel in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091104-723099.html']);"  href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091104-723099.html">"2nd UPDATE: NY AG: Dell Got $6B Via Secret Intel Pact >DELL"</a> : <blockquote>Dell, the world's third-biggest computer maker based on shipments, was allegedly paid about $6 billion between February 2002 and January 2007, according to the lawsuit. In one fiscal quarter, the lawsuit says payments from Intel constituted 116% of Dell's reported net income.</blockquote>Interesting news as this sheds a different light to the financial performance of Dell and you could just speculate about the margins of Intel that allow them to pay $6B and still making money.<br />
<br />
You will find the complaint for further reading at the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2009/nov/nov4a_09.html']);"  href="http://www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2009/nov/nov4a_09.html">site of the Attorney General of the State New York</a>. The pdf of the complaint is available <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2009/nov/NYAG_v_Intel_COMPLAINT_FINAL.pdf']);"  href="http://www.oag.state.ny.us/media_center/2009/nov/NYAG_v_Intel_COMPLAINT_FINAL.pdf">here</a>.<br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/PMqLuZAin00" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:29:34 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6094-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6094-Lawsuit-against-Intel.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Presentation at the Apache Hadoop Get Together Berlin</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/GqsAWfS5T5c/6083-Presentation-at-the-Apache-Hadoop-Get-Together-Berlin.html</link>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>Technology</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6083-Presentation-at-the-Apache-Hadoop-Get-Together-Berlin.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6083</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6083</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    On 16th December i will talk about Hadoop on Sun at the <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/upcoming.yahoo.com/event/4842528/']);"  href="http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/4842528/">Apache Hadoop Get Together</a> in Berlin. The talk will be divided in three parts: <br />
<ul>
 <li>Advantages of using Hadoop on CMT systems like the T5120</li>
 <li>Using Hadoop in conjunction with Solaris Features like Container and Resource Management in non-dedicated architectures</li>
 <li>Hadoop and Grid Engine</li>
</ul>There will be short live demonstrations in the second and third part of the presentation.<br />
<br />
 My presentation will not be the only one. Richard Hutton from nugg.ad talks about data processing with hadoop in his presentation "Moving from five days to one hour." Nikolaus Pohle from Nurago talks about data analysis with Hadoop for online market research. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/GqsAWfS5T5c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:09:09 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6083-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6083-Presentation-at-the-Apache-Hadoop-Get-Together-Berlin.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Mysql competition by Amazon</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/2qBDrU7le_I/6074-Mysql-competition-by-Amazon.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Strange Days</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6074-Mysql-competition-by-Amazon.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6074</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6074</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    I wrote at several occasions, that this "Oracle purchase of Sun will limit database competition" isn't true as you can easily fork mysql and do your own development. Matt Asay has the same opinion and points to recently launched service by Amazon to substantiate his opinion:<blockquote>The European Commission must be feeling a bit silly right about now. Despite insisting that Oracle has not responded to its requests for comment and concessions in its planned acquisition of Sun Microsystems (and the open-source database MySQL), Amazon.com recently offered the EC all the proof it needs that MySQL competition remains alive and well.[....]Oracle hasn't even started with MySQL yet, and it already faces significant competition, not to mention the other MySQL forks (e.g., Drizzle).</blockquote>I think the steps of Amazon are a nice proof for the successful forkability of Mysql. Take the stuff, make a business out of it and make money. The more i think about this while situation, the more i think it's just a interest of a single person that blocks a merger that is good for everyone in IT. Nobody can be interested in IBM getting stronger (okay, of course: beside IBM), due to the FUD surrounding the situation of the Sun/Oracle merger. But this is the consequence at the moment.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/2qBDrU7le_I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:00:46 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6074-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6074-Mysql-competition-by-Amazon.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Quotes from the new overview/FAQ document regarding the Oracle/Sun merger</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/exze4oCKd0o/6057-Quotes-from-the-new-overviewFAQ-document-regarding-the-OracleSun-merger.html</link>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6057-Quotes-from-the-new-overviewFAQ-document-regarding-the-OracleSun-merger.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6057</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6057</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    There is a <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oracle.com/ocom/groups/public/documents/webcontent/038563.pdf']);"  href="http://www.oracle.com/ocom/groups/public/documents/webcontent/038563.pdf">new overview/FAQ document</a> regarding the planned  Oracle/Sun merger available at <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.oracle.com/us/sun/index.htm']);"  href="http://www.oracle.com/us/sun/index.htm">oracle.com</a>. I will cite some key passages in this article.<br />
 <br /><a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6057-Quotes-from-the-new-overviewFAQ-document-regarding-the-OracleSun-merger.html#extended">Continue reading "Quotes from the new overview/FAQ document regarding the Oracle/Sun merger"</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/exze4oCKd0o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:43:22 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6057-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6057-Quotes-from-the-new-overviewFAQ-document-regarding-the-OracleSun-merger.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Pretty clear objective ...</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/c1HWh8U8KXk/6056-Pretty-clear-objective-....html</link>
            <category>General</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6056-Pretty-clear-objective-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6056</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6056</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    In my humble opinion the objective of this "Oracle shouldn't get Mysql" is pretty clear now. The Register reports about an discussion with Florian Müller in <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/27/mysql_fork_debunked/']);"  href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/27/mysql_fork_debunked/">"Sun's MySQL fork survival theory ripped"</a>.<br />
<br />
It isn't about the source. It isn't about the technology. It isn't about competition. It's about the brand.<blockquote>"The value of the brand is huge - that's why the valuation is so great. MariaDB [the MySQL fork created by founder Monty Widenius] - it would take a long while to get there."</blockquote>I assume, that Mr. Widenius has recognized that that MariaDB is an horrible name for marketing and wants the "Mysql" back. The critics of the Oracle/Sun merger don't want to establish a new name. Some of the proponents just saw that you can't sell the cake and eat it, too.<br />
<br />
I think the article <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/10/press-release-concerning-oraclesun.html']);"  href="http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/10/press-release-concerning-oraclesun.html">"MYSQL FOUNDER OUTLINES SOLUTION: INSTEAD OF LETTING SUN SUFFER, ORACLE SHOULD SELL MYSQL (ORCL, JAVA)"</a> from Mr. Widenius is really interesting: <blockquote>In order to support the regulators' work on the case, Widenius' new company, Monty Program Ab, works closely with Florian Mueller, a MySQL and EU affairs expert. Widenius said: "Florian gave MySQL strategic advice from 2001 on and was a shareholder until the sale to Sun in 2008, and with our support led an award-winning campaign against a proposed EU law on software patents. <b>In August he helped us to demonstrate to the EC the need to investigate this merger and he is now on board again to meet the information needs of regulators, journalists and analysts.</b>"</blockquote>In my opinion, Mr. Mueller is not much more than a lobbyist for the interests of Monty Programm Ab. At least this press release reads this way.<br />
<br />
I can imagine how the proposed solution should look like: Oracle wants to stop loss, sell Mysql for a few million back to Monty AB (he has enough money due to the acquisition of Mysql by Sun) and Mr. Widenius has perfected the eat and sell cake.<br />
<br />
Sorry ... Sun paid a large heap of money to purchase Mysql ... not only for this code, but for the brand, too. As i assumed before, it's just the money that surrounds the mysql ... it's not about Mysql and it's development. "Hey ... selling it to you was a big mistake, we want it back ... but hey ... we keep the money". It doesn't work that way. This behaviour isn't that far away from blackmailing: "I was able to block something important for you, and i will only step out of the way, when i get what i want". Disgusting. They play with 30.000 employees. But i'm pretty opinionated, that Larry shouldn't give in to such a behavior. Really, really disgusting.<br />
<br />
By the way: Establishing a new fork is really simple because of the way, most Mysql installations were distributed to the customers. Just get Fedora, Debian, Suse and let's say Ubuntu into the boat when you fork Mysql and the branding is no issue at all. Because most of the Linux admins doesn't search for their packages at the internet ... they just ask their package manager.  
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/c1HWh8U8KXk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:21:20 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6056-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6056-Pretty-clear-objective-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Netapp/Sun ZFS lawsuit</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/CgVlg2bdw0s/6049-NetappSun-ZFS-lawsuit.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Solaris</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6049-NetappSun-ZFS-lawsuit.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6049</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6049</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The news about the removal of ZFS from Sourceforge resulted in a reinvigorated interest in the NetApp/Sun lawsuit. A multitude of web pages reported about this step. There is a comment from an <a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6046-Why-will-there-be-no-official-ZFS-in-MacOS.html">authoritative source about the "Why?"</a>. I will not add something to that.<br />
<br />
But i want to say something to the ever ocurring references to this lawsuit: Well ... i have to admit, that this lawsuit wasn't in my focus over the last few months, as i thought "Let the lawyers do their job, this can take a while". But with all this comments a short article looking into the developments since the beginning of this year looked as a necessary choice.<br />
<br />
There is one point that i find really interesting: Everyone is talking about the point that Sun may loose ZFS, but out of a strange reason most people aren't talking about the point that NetApp has a similar problem by the countersuing, as they can lose core patents behind WAFL. And they have already loosed some patents or at least important claims. <br />
<br />
A source of information is the ZFS <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/documents.jsp']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/documents.jsp">Sun/NetApp lawsuit page at Sun</a>. Let's just take the published PTO documents and not the comments by Sun.<br />
<br />
To dodge the countersuing, NetApp tried to invalidate  some patent (5761662 ("Personalized information retrieval using user-defined profil") for example) but had no success. The PTO send an <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US5761662NoticeofIntenttoIssue.pdf']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US5761662NoticeofIntenttoIssue.pdf">"Notice of Intent to Issue"</a> after the reexamination. The <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US6591303NoticeofIntenttoIssue.pdf']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US6591303NoticeofIntenttoIssue.pdf">same</a> is valid for 6591303 ("Method and apparatus for parallel trunking of interfaces to increase transfer bandwith").<br />
<br />
On the other side:<noautobr>
<ul>
<li>Many claims of NetApps patent 5819292 ("Method for maintaining consistent states of a file system and for creating user-accessible read-only copies of a file system") has been rejected by the PTO in a <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US5819292FinalOfficeActionJun2009.pdf']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US5819292FinalOfficeActionJun2009.pdf">Final Office Action</a>.</li>
<li>The PTO issued an <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US7174352OfficeAction2-2009.pdf']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US7174352OfficeAction2-2009.pdf">non-final office action</a> for Patent 7174352 ("File system image transfer") deleting all claims that have been disputed by Sun.</li>
<li>In December 2008 all claims of patent 7313720 ("Technique for increasing the number of persistent consistency point images") has been  <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US7313720OfficeAction12-2008.pdf']);"  href="http://www.sun.com/lawsuit/zfs/docs/US7313720OfficeAction12-2008.pdf">rejected by the PTO as stated in this non-final office action</a></li>
</ul>
</noautobr>At the moment i don't think that Sun will get problems in the NetApp/Sun lawsuit. I see more problems for NetApp when core patents are invalidated. However: At court and at sea you are in god's hand. 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/CgVlg2bdw0s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:10:46 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6049-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6049-NetappSun-ZFS-lawsuit.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Why will there be no official ZFS in MacOS?</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/AsWJKCz5hDw/6046-Why-will-there-be-no-official-ZFS-in-MacOS.html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6046-Why-will-there-be-no-official-ZFS-in-MacOS.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6046</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6046</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    Jeff Bonwick writes <a onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/extlink/mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-October/033125.html']);"  href="http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-October/033125.html">about this situation</a>:<br />
<blockquote><small> Apple can currently just take the ZFS CDDL code and incorporate it  <br />
> (like they did with DTrace), but it may be that they wanted a "private  <br />
> license" from Sun (with appropriate technical support and  <br />
> indemnification), and the two entities couldn't come to mutually  <br />
> agreeable terms.<br />
I cannot disclose details, but that is the essence of it.<br />
<br />
Jeff</small></blockquote><br />
 
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/AsWJKCz5hDw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:30:50 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6046-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6046-Why-will-there-be-no-official-ZFS-in-MacOS.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
    <title>Sun isn't just that small RDBMS ...</title>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~3/0uuzF0YyUf4/6045-Sun-isnt-just-that-small-RDBMS-....html</link>
            <category>English</category>
            <category>Sun/Oracle</category>
            <category>The IT Business</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6045-Sun-isnt-just-that-small-RDBMS-....html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=6045</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6045</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Joerg Moellenkamp)</author>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
    The discussion surrounding Mysql is somewhat depressing. At the moment it's a major road block on the way to the merger of Sun and Oracle. When you read all this stuff in the public discussion, you could come to the conclusion that Sun is just consisting out of Mysql. In my opinion it doesn't deserve this role. <br /><a href="http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6045-Sun-isnt-just-that-small-RDBMS-....html#extended">Continue reading "Sun isn't just that small RDBMS ..."</a>
    <img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/C0t0d0s0org-TheItBusiness/~4/0uuzF0YyUf4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:16:21 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6045-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6045-Sun-isnt-just-that-small-RDBMS-....html</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel>
</rss>

