<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- RSS generated by SunStar Media - http://www.ssmedia.com -->
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>California Republican Party News</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/</link>
<description>California Republican Party News</description>
<language>en-us</language> 
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 California Republican Party.</copyright> 
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
<generator>SunStar Media - http://www.ssmedia.com/</generator>
<managingEditor>info@cagop.org</managingEditor> 
<webMaster>coldfusion@ssmedia.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl> 



<item>
<category>Washington Updates</category>
<title>Walk The Plank Once, Shame On Pelosi & Walk The Plank Twice, Shame On You</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_858.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_858.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Press Release</category>
<title>California Republican Party Commemorates 20th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall and President Ronald Reagan's Leadership</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/press_release_859.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/press_release_859.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[SACRAMENTO -- Marking the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, the California Republican Party released a new video highlighting President Ronald Reagan's key role in leading America to victory in the Cold War.

Republican organizations will commemorate the importance of the anniversary with special events, house parties and other functions throughout the state today and California Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring issued the following statement...]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Capitol Updates</category>
<title>Imagine A Place That Is Rich With Oil</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/capitol-update_860.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/capitol-update_860.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Washington Updates</category>
<title>By The Numbers:  I Won, You'll Lose!</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_856.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_856.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>In Case You Missed It</category>
<title>Nehring, Other GOP Chairs Discuss Party's Future</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/in-case-you-missed-it_857.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/in-case-you-missed-it_857.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>CRP Praises CA Republicans on Health Care Vote</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/11/crp-praises-ca-republicans-on-health.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/11/crp-praises-ca-republicans-on-health.html</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;font-family:Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:100%;&quot;  >SACRAMENTO -- Citing the higher taxes and massive expansion of government control over individual health choices that will result from Nancy Pelosi's health care bill, California Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring tonight praised the members of the state's Republican delegation in the House of Representatives for voting unanimously in opposition.<br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;>&quot;California's Republican Members of Congress tonight stood together on the side of the American people and against a giant, costly new health care bureaucracy that will transfer decisions about Americans' health out of the hands of patients and doctors and into thousands of bureaucrats' little cubicles in Washington DC,&quot;</span> said California Republican Chairman Ron Nehring. <br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;>&quot;Nancy Pelosi's legislative monstrosity will make health care more expensive for families, raise taxes, cut Medicare, and put bureaucrats in between doctors and patients.  Other than that, it's a great bill,&quot;</span> he added.  <span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;>&quot;Republicans will continue to support fiscally responsible health care reforms that empower patients and doctors, not bureaucrats, trial lawyers and tax collectors.&quot;</span><br /><br />California is represented by 19 Republican Members of Congress, each of whom voted against the Pelosi bill this evening.<br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;>&quot;Tonight's vote demonstrates Democrats have no interest in learning the lessons of the 2009 elections that gave Republicans control of two governor's offices plus many state and local government posts.  As the Democrats lurch further to the left, we'll seize the opportunity to teach those same lessons again in 2010,&quot;</span> Nehring said.  </span><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4943507599110018319?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Statements</category>
<title>CRP Praises California Republican House Members for Opposing Pelosi's Government Health Care Bill</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_855.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_855.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>In Case You Missed It</category>
<title>What They're Saying ...    About California AG Jerry Brown's &quot;Tapegate&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/in-case-you-missed-it_852.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/in-case-you-missed-it_852.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Washington Updates</category>
<title>I'm Not Listening</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_853.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_853.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Statements</category>
<title>Statement from NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions on California's Election Results</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_850.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_850.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>In Case You Missed It</category>
<title>New Lane On 91 To Ease Eastern Commute</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/in-case-you-missed-it_851.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/in-case-you-missed-it_851.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Washington Updates</category>
<title>ELECTION, REJECTION, DEJECTION</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_848.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_848.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>New Federal Bureaucracies Created in Pelosi Health Care Bill</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/11/new-federal-bureaucracies-created-in.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/11/new-federal-bureaucracies-created-in.html</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The House Republican Conference has compiled a list of all the new boards, bureaucracies, commissions, and programs created in H.R. 3962, Speaker Pelosi&#8211;s government takeover of health care:<br /><br />1.     Retiree Reserve Trust Fund (Section 111(d), p. 61)<br />2.     Grant program for wellness programs to small employers (Section 112, p. 62)<br />3.     Grant program for State health access programs (Section 114, p. 72)<br />4.     Program of administrative simplification (Section 115, p. 76)<br />5.     Health Benefits Advisory Committee (Section 223, p. 111)<br />6.     Health Choices Administration (Section 241, p. 131)<br />7.     Qualified Health Benefits Plan Ombudsman (Section 244, p. 138)<br />8.     Health Insurance Exchange (Section 201, p. 155)<br />9.     Program for technical assistance to employees of small businesses buying Exchange coverage (Section 305(h), p. 191)<br />10.  Mechanism for insurance risk pooling to be established by Health Choices Commissioner (Section 306(b), p. 194)<br />11.  Health Insurance Exchange Trust Fund (Section 307, p. 195)<br />12.  State-based Health Insurance Exchanges (Section 308, p. 197)<br />13.  Grant program for health insurance cooperatives (Section 310, p. 206)<br />14.  &#8216;Public Health Insurance Option&#8217; (Section 321, p. 211)<br />15.  Ombudsman for &#8216;Public Health Insurance Option&#8217; (Section 321(d), p. 213)<br />16.  Account for receipts and disbursements for &#8216;Public Health Insurance Option&#8217; (Section 322(b), p. 215)<br />17.  Telehealth Advisory Committee (Section 1191 (b), p. 589)<br />18.  Demonstration program providing reimbursement for &#8216;culturally and linguistically appropriate services&#8217; (Section 1222, p. 617)<br />19.  Demonstration program for shared decision making using patient decision aids (Section 1236, p. 648)<br />20.  Accountable Care Organization pilot program under Medicare (Section 1301, p. 653)<br />21.  Independent patient-centered medical home pilot program under Medicare (Section 1302, p. 672)<br />22.  Community-based medical home pilot program under Medicare (Section 1302(d), p. 681)<br />23.  Independence at home demonstration program (Section 1312, p. 718)<br />24.  Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research (Section 1401(a), p. 734)<br />25.  Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission (Section 1401(a), p. 738)<br />26.  Patient ombudsman for comparative effectiveness research (Section 1401(a), p. 753)<br />27.  Quality assurance and performance improvement program for skilled nursing facilities (Section 1412(b)(1), p. 784)<br />28.  Quality assurance and performance improvement program for nursing facilities (Section 1412 (b)(2), p. 786)<br />29.  Special focus facility program for skilled nursing facilities (Section 1413(a)(3), p. 796)<br />30.  Special focus facility program for nursing facilities (Section 1413(b)(3), p. 804)<br />31.  National independent monitor pilot program for skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities (Section 1422, p. 859)<br />32.  Demonstration program for approved teaching health centers with respect to Medicare GME (Section 1502(d), p. 933)<br />33.  Pilot program to develop anti-fraud compliance systems for Medicare providers (Section 1635, p. 978)<br />34.  Special Inspector General for the Health Insurance Exchange (Section 1647, p. 1000)<br />35.  Medical home pilot program under Medicaid (Section 1722, p. 1058)<br />36.  Accountable Care Organization pilot program under Medicaid (Section 1730A, p. 1073)<br />37.  Nursing facility supplemental payment program (Section 1745, p. 1106)<br />38.  Demonstration program for Medicaid coverage to stabilize emergency medical conditions in institutions for mental diseases (Section 1787, p. 1149)<br />39.  Comparative Effectiveness Research Trust Fund (Section 1802, p. 1162)<br />40.  &#8216;Identifiable office or program&#8217; within CMS to &#8216;provide for improved coordination between Medicare and Medicaid in the case of dual eligibles&#8217; (Section 1905, p. 1191)<br />41.  Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (Section 1907, p. 1198)<br />42.  Public Health Investment Fund (Section 2002, p. 1214)<br />43.  Scholarships for service in health professional needs areas (Section 2211, p. 1224)<br />44.  Program for training medical residents in community-based settings (Section 2214, p. 1236)<br />45.  Grant program for training in dentistry programs (Section 2215, p. 1240)<br />46.  Public Health Workforce Corps (Section 2231, p. 1253)<br />47.  Public health workforce scholarship program (Section 2231, p. 1254)<br />48.  Public health workforce loan forgiveness program (Section 2231, p. 1258)<br />49.  Grant program for innovations in interdisciplinary care (Section 2252, p. 1272)<br />50.  Advisory Committee on Health Workforce Evaluation and Assessment (Section 2261, p. 1275)<br />51.  Prevention and Wellness Trust (Section 2301, p. 1286)<br />52.  Clinical Prevention Stakeholders Board (Section 2301, p. 1295)<br />53.  Community Prevention Stakeholders Board (Section 2301, p. 1301)<br />54.  Grant program for community prevention and wellness research (Section 2301, p. 1305)<br />55.  Grant program for research and demonstration projects related to wellness incentives (Section 2301, p. 1305)<br />56.  Grant program for community prevention and wellness services (Section 2301, p. 1308)<br />57.  Grant program for public health infrastructure (Section 2301, p. 1313)<br />58.  Center for Quality Improvement (Section 2401, p. 1322)<br />59.  Assistant Secretary for Health Information (Section 2402, p. 1330)<br />60.  Grant program to support the operation of school-based health clinics (Section 2511, p. 1352)<br />61.  Grant program for nurse-managed health centers (Section 2512, p. 1361)<br />62.  Grants for labor-management programs for nursing training (Section 2521, p. 1372)<br />63.  Grant program for interdisciplinary mental and behavioral health training (Section 2522, p. 1382)<br />64.  &#8216;No Child Left Unimmunized Against Influenza&#8217; demonstration grant program (Section 2524, p. 1391)<br />65.  Healthy Teen Initiative grant program regarding teen pregnancy (Section 2526, p. 1398)<br />66.  Grant program for interdisciplinary training, education, and services for individuals with autism (Section 2527(a), p. 1402)<br />67.  University centers for excellence in developmental disabilities education (Section 2527(b), p. 1410)<br />68.  Grant program to implement medication therapy management services (Section 2528, p. 1412)<br />69.  Grant program to promote positive health behaviors in underserved communities (Section 2530, p. 1422)<br />70.  Grant program for State alternative medical liability laws (Section 2531, p. 1431)<br />71.  Grant program to develop infant mortality programs (Section 2532, p. 1433)<br />72.  Grant program to prepare secondary school students for careers in health professions (Section 2533, p. 1437)<br />73.  Grant program for community-based collaborative care (Section 2534, p. 1440)<br />74.  Grant program for community-based overweight and obesity prevention (Section 2535, p. 1457)<br />75.  Grant program for reducing the student-to-school nurse ratio in primary and secondary schools (Section 2536, p. 1462)<br />76.  Demonstration project of grants to medical-legal partnerships (Section 2537, p. 1464)<br />77.  Center for Emergency Care under the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (Section 2552, p. 1478)<br />78.  Council for Emergency Care (Section 2552, p 1479)<br />79.  Grant program to support demonstration programs that design and implement regionalized emergency care systems (Section 2553, p. 1480)<br />80.  Grant program to assist veterans who wish to become emergency medical technicians upon discharge (Section 2554, p. 1487)<br />81.  Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee (Section 2562, p. 1494)<br />82.  National Medical Device Registry (Section 2571, p. 1501)<br />83.  CLASS Independence Fund (Section 2581, p. 1597)<br />84.  CLASS Independence Fund Board of Trustees (Section 2581, p. 1598)<br />85.  CLASS Independence Advisory Council (Section 2581, p. 1602)<br />86.  Health and Human Services Coordinating Committee on Women&#8211;s Health (Section 2588, p. 1610)<br />87.  National Women&#8211;s Health Information Center (Section 2588, p. 1611)<br />88.  Centers for Disease Control Office of Women&#8211;s Health (Section 2588, p. 1614)<br />89.  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Office of Women&#8211;s Health and Gender-Based Research (Section 2588, p. 1617)<br />90.  Health Resources and Services Administration Office of Women&#8211;s Health (Section 2588, p. 1618)<br />91.  Food and Drug Administration Office of Women&#8211;s Health (Section 2588, p. 1621)<br />92.  Personal Care Attendant Workforce Advisory Panel (Section 2589(a)(2), p. 1624)<br />93.  Grant program for national health workforce online training (Section 2591, p. 1629)<br />94.  Grant program to disseminate best practices on implementing health workforce investment programs (Section 2591, p. 1632)<br />95.  Demonstration program for chronic shortages of health professionals (Section 3101, p. 1717)<br />96.  Demonstration program for substance abuse counselor educational curricula (Section 3101, p. 1719)<br />97.  Program of Indian community education on mental illness (Section 3101, p. 1722)<br />98.  Intergovernmental Task Force on Indian environmental and nuclear hazards (Section 3101, p. 1754)<br />99.  Office of Indian Men&#8211;s Health (Section 3101, p. 1765)<br />100.        Indian Health facilities appropriation advisory board (Section 3101, p. 1774)<br />101.        Indian Health facilities needs assessment workgroup (Section 3101, p. 1775)<br />102.        Indian Health Service tribal facilities joint venture demonstration projects (Section 3101, p. 1809)<br />103.        Urban youth treatment center demonstration project (Section 3101, p. 1873)<br />104.        Grants to Urban Indian Organizations for diabetes prevention (Section 3101, p. 1874)<br />105.        Grants to Urban Indian Organizations for health IT adoption (Section 3101, p. 1877)<br />106.        Mental health technician training program (Section 3101, p. 1898)<br />107.        Indian youth telemental health demonstration project (Section 3101, p. 1909)<br />108.        Program for treatment of child sexual abuse victims and perpetrators (Section 3101, p. 1925)<br />109.        Program for treatment of domestic violence and sexual abuse (Section 3101, p. 1927)<br />110.        Native American Health and Wellness Foundation (Section 3103, p. 1966)Committee for the Establishment of the Native American Health and Wellness Foundation (Section 3103, p. 1968)<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-2249819163963225306?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Statements</category>
<title>Boxer: Too Little Too Late</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_846.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_846.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Statements</category>
<title>CRP Statement Concerning Gavin Newsom Dropping Out of the California Governor's Race</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_847.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/statement_847.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Washington Updates</category>
<title>What They Are Saying ... About Obama's White House Perks For Donors</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_843.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/washington-update_843.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description> </description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Press Release</category>
<title>Harmer web video: &quot;Garamendi Vows to Support the Public Option&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/press_release_844.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/press_release_844.htm</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[John Garamendi wants to join Nancy Pelosi in Congress and fight for government takeovers and tax-and-spend policies
...
Garamendi supports a government-run, single-payer, European style health care system that would increase the size and scoop of government. (Interview with Garamendi, Calitics 8/5/09)]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Campaign Finance Laws Giving Government Excuse to Regulate Online Content</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/10/campaign-finance-laws-giving-government.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/10/campaign-finance-laws-giving-government.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span class=&quot;submitted&quot;>By Ron Nehring</span>  <div class=&quot;profile-about&quot;>Chairman of the California Republican Party<br />Fox &amp; Hounds Daily<br /></div>       <p> Thankfully, Internet content remains largely free of government intrusion and regulation. Americans are increasingly going online for news, to plan their travel, and perform other everyday tasks like banking and keeping up with relatives. They&#8211;re also going online for the information they need to determine how they will vote. As candidates and parties consequently step up their online presence, outdated campaign finance laws are giving the bureaucrats a new opening to impose restrictions and regulations on Internet content. </p> <p>Consider Scott Wagner, the candidate for St. Petersburg mayor whom the Florida Elections Commission ordered to take down an online ad because it didn&#8211;t include a &#8216;Paid for by&#8217; disclaimer. Wagner argued the &#8216;paid for by&#8217; disclaimer should not have been required because it was only &#8216;paid for&#8217; by someone once it was clicked on, not before. </p> <p>The possibilities for absurd regulation of online campaign content are endless. Consider this: As the FPPC takes a look at regulations involving California state and local candidates, should Twitter or Facebook recommending a candidate&#8211;s page or account be followed constitute an in-kind contribution? It will be interesting to see what the FPPC says, for if it determines such recommendations are in-kind contributions, will the Federal Election Commission do the same? If so, such Twitter and Facebook recommendations would constitute an illegal corporate in-kind contribution to the candidate. </p>  <p> Taken a step further, will the operators of sites such as Twitter and Facebook be required to track which accountholders are candidates, or potential candidates? And if these rules become too silly or complicated, what of sites that choose to be based outside of the United States? What if they are already? How much does it take to transfer your website to a server in Mexico? </p> <p> So here we see the proverbial camel&#8211;s nose under the tent as regulatory busybodies in 50 states, six territories and the federal government all potentially consider how to impose new rules on Internet content all in the name of &#8216;fairness.&#8217; </p> <p>Many of today&#8211;s state and federal campaign laws have their origin in the 1970&#8211;s, and today&#8211;s bureaucrats are attempting to apply those rules to a rapidly changing 21st century communications environment where websites and email are giving way to Twitter and Facebook as the latest communications powerhouses, often with little or no marginal costs to candidates. Government bureaucrats will never be able to keep up with the changes in how American voters and candidates are communicating. </p> <p>Perhaps this is a time to consider an alternative to promulgating thousands of additional pages of regulations governing political speech, and instead consider taking steps deregulating and decriminalizing political advocacy and discourse. Today&#8211;s governor&#8211;s race in Virginia is being waged in a state with no contribution limits to state candidates, and none of the reams of regulations that typically govern the application of such limits to fundraising, spending, and the like. Seems like democracy is functioning pretty well without such restrictions on speech. The bureaucrats should take notice.<br /></p><p>...</p><p>Link to posting <a href=&quot;http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/ron-nehring/5560-campaign-finance-laws-giving-government-excuse-regulate-online-content&quot;>here</a>.<br /></p><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-9061360566767425200?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>President Obama's Pattern of Bad Policies and Failed Efforts</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/10/president-obamas-pattern-of-bad.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/10/president-obamas-pattern-of-bad.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;&quot;><span><span style=&quot;;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;&quot;  > <p>President Obama's most recent failure to get the 2016 Olympics to come to  Chicago, is just another example of how Obama's &quot;hope&quot; and &quot;change&quot; mantra has,  in reality, only produced disappointment and failure. </p>  <p>President Obama's inability to push Chicago through even the first round of  the Olympic selection process, despite his lobbying trip to Denmark, highlights  a developing pattern of failed efforts and faulty policy decisions by this  president and his administration. </p>  <p>To refresh your memory, let's take a quick look at the some major failed  reforms and proposals, both domestic and international, that Obama has  spearheaded in only his first 9 months as president. Keep this in mind; <b>these  failures occurred while</b> <b>the Democrats are the majority leader in both  houses of congress.</b> </p> <p> </p> <p><u>Stimulus</u> - President Obama and the democrats rammed the nearly $800  billion dollar stimulus bill through congress as quickly as possible, promising  that the stimulus package would &quot;create or save 3½ million jobs over the next  two years&quot; and &quot;would keep unemployment under 8%.&quot;  Not only has this expanded  the reach of government into private industry, but thousands of people continued  to lose jobs every month at a record paced and employment in U.S. has reached  9.8%. </p>  <p>Obama's Stimulus Package: <b>Failed</b> </p><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;></span> <p><u>Healthcare</u> - President Obama &#8207;guaranteed' that his universal  healthcare reform would get passed this year.   Lack of public support,  inaccurate accounting for the cost of the bill, and push back from members of  his own democrat party, has stalled his version of the healthcare bill from even  getting out of a congress that is controlled by his own party. </p>  <p>Obama's Healthcare Bill: <b>Failed</b> </p><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>  </span> <p><u>Foreign Policy</u> - President Obama has traveled down the dangerous path  of appeasing and playing nice with nations that wish us ill in hopes that they  will play nice with us.  He has tried to open a friendly dialogue with Iran  without any preconditions and for this Iran recently admitted to having a second  nuclear plant, and by all appearances, is closer than ever to developing nuclear  weapons with no intention to stop. In addition, he pulled the plug on the US's  missile defense shield in order to appease Russia.  We abandoned and angered all  of our allies in Eastern Europe, yet Russia is still not playing any nicer. </p>  <p>Obama's Foreign Policies: <b>Failed</b> </p><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>  </span> <p><u>Closing Gitmo</u> - One of the first things that President Obama did when  he took office was to sign an executive order which set a deadline of January  22, 2010 for closing the terrorist detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.  But  President Obama's plan is stalling and has already missed key initial  deadlines.  The Senate voted 90-6 against appropriating funds for closing the  base. The House also went on record last week opposing bringing Gitmo detainees  to the US.  </p>  <p>Obama's Plan to Close Gitmo: <b>Failed</b> </p><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>  </span>  <p><u>The War in Afghanistan</u> - President Obama has taken a stand pat  approach in Afghanistan and continues to ignore the requests of his top  commanders for the deployment of more troops to fight the growing strength of  the Taliban.  Not only is he not giving General McChrystal, the commander of  U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, the men he has requested, but he has  ordered them to stop bombing before they go into areas, which means we don't  suppress the terrorists - making our troops more vulnerable to attack and  raising the casualty toll.</p><p>Obama's Promise to Improve the War in Afghanistan: <b>Failed</b>  </p><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>  </span> <p>Although these are the most glaring, these are only a fraction of the  failures that the Obama Administration has compiled in the infancy of his term.  </p>  <p>Let's hope the US Olympic team performs better in 2016 in Rio de Janeiro,  Brazil.</p></span></span></span><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-7831920877120967701?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>The New Political Reality</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/09/new-political-reality.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/09/new-political-reality.html</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The state of American politics is today fundamentally different than when President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid became the triumvirate of the legislative and federal branches of our government.<br /><br />Less than a year ago, Barack Obama and the Democrats won a national election giving them total control of both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. With Al Franken's belated Minnesota victory, they even have a filibuster-proof majority in the upper house.<br /><br />It's an enviable position. Or at least, it was.<br /><br />In the months since, President Obama has experienced the steepest decline of public support for any modern president other than Gerald Ford following Watergate, as columnist Charles Krauthammer observes.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the public's incredibly sour view of Nancy Pelosi has turned her into such a liability she is turning up in Republican television ads in much the same way Democrats featured Newt Gingrich in their messaging in the late '90s.<br /><br />As a direct consequence of the pubic turning against the majority party, their legislative agenda has become mired in a morass of conflicting interests and a leadership vacuum. Democrat House members who would like to keep their jobs next year but represent conservative districts have suddenly become unreliable supporters of the liberal agenda. In the other chamber, their 60-vote majority hasn't produced much.<br /><br />America remains a center-right country, yet the liberals in control of Washington assumed last year's election represented a fundamental leftward realignment of the electorate. If that were the case, the President would have had his health care bill signing ceremony by now.<br /><br />Clearly the American people wanted a change in direction and perceived priorities, yet the current state of politics makes clear they did not suddenly embrace a left wing view of the role of the federal government just because they had differences with President Bush. Americans want a government that will get the economy on track, make government less of a burden, and defend the nation from those who would do us harm.<br /><br />If the other team had focused on those priorities, they would be in a stronger position today.<br /><br />The response we've seen from the majority party to their train coming completely off the tracks has been all too predictable: blame Republicans, and if you can find a way to blame President Bush too, so much the better.<br /><br />It's a losing strategy, but the only one immediately available to them that does not involve adopting a more centrist policy agenda.<br /><br />Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton, who campaigned as a &quot;New Democrat&quot; distinct from the party's liberal wing and demonstrated a remarkable ability to adapt to changing political circumstances. First, he championed his wife's plan for a complete federal takeover of health care in America, only to later declare the &quot;era of big government is over.&quot;<br /><br />While Clinton demonstrated flexibility, Obama and his team exhibit a more dogmatic approach that they believe they have the majority, they're not going to have it forever, and they're going to plow through to get their agenda passed now while they have the chance.<br /><br />It's a blunt-force approach.<br /><br />And it's failed. Concurrent with the President's plummeting approval ratings, a new Rasmussen Reports poll shows 51% of Americans believe Congress is too liberal, while only 22% believe it's too conservative. Health care marks the end of this phase of the Obama presidency.<br /><br />Next week the President will attempt to reshuffle the deck with a speech to a joint session of Congress. With broad majorities in both chambers it's something he shouldn't have to do, yet it's something he must do, for while the liberal leadership in Congress may support the health care plan, the American people do not. The President will attempt to change the terms of the debate to get his way despite the objections of so many Americans.<br /><br />Going into 2010, Republican victory is not yet assured. We have to work for it. The President's numbers are unlikely to remain in the tank forever, and when they tick up a bit there will be a long line of liberals in the media to talk about the &quot;comeback.&quot;<br /><br />That comeback, however, is likely to be limited by what Bill Clinton possessed and Barack Obama lacks: an ability to put aside liberalism when it's a loser with the public. It was in 1994, and it is today.</p><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-604336696244597447?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Obama Policies a Step Backward in War on Terror</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/obama-policies-step-backward-in-war-on.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/obama-policies-step-backward-in-war-on.html</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The Obama Administration on Monday opted to ramp up the involvement of law enforcement in the global war on terror. What may surprise most Americans is that this new law enforcement emphasis is not aimed at those who plot and commit acts of violence, but rather the intelligence agents charged with defeating them.<br /><br />Attorney General Eric Holder has named John Durham as special prosecutor as the first step toward bringing chargest against current and former CIA personnel for the interrogation techniques used on detainees, mainly from Iraq and Afghanistan.<br /><br />Press reports indicate the decision to move forward toward prosecution was taken solely by AG Holder, and may even stand in contrast to the President's own stated position to move on from the national security &quot;controversies&quot; of the Bush Administration.<br /><br />Yet, it is implausible that Holder would take such action without at least tacit approval from his boss, the President. Additionally, this action is in line with the stated desires of liberal Democrat members of Congress, including several from California, who would clearly like nothing more than a full scale witch hunt of Bush Administration officials involved with protecting America and her allies from terrorist attacks following 9/11.<br /><br />Holder's moves are inconsistent with an effective national security policy, particularly regarding the global war on terror, and the related issues of securing victory in Iraq and Afghanistan.<br /><br />For instance, in recent weeks we have witnessed a dramatic increase in violence in Iraq, including the bombing of the Foreign Ministry building and other key government facilities, coinciding with the withdrawal of US military forces from urban areas, and the decision by the al Maliki government to remove protective concrete barriers from many areas in Baghdad, increasing their vulnerability to attack.<br /><br />Insurgents and terrorists have seen such moves as new opportunities to press on with their campaign of violence against the democratically elected government.<br /><br />Likewise, what signal does it send to terrorists and insurgents to have the United States engaged in the high profile prosecution of those who were charged with fighting and defeating their violent brethren?<br /><br />The answer: encouragement.<br /><br />The decision to prepare for a witch hunt of Bush Administration officials (which liberals in Congress would pursue, and still may, regardless of the direction the Obama Justice Department takes) comes on the heels of last week's complete failure of the Obama Administration to block the release of convicted Pan Am Flight 103 bomber Abdel Baset Ali al-Megrahi from prison in Scotland.<br /><br />Barack Obama is credited by Europeans and American liberals with having elevated America's stature and &quot;soft power.&quot; Yet, despite &quot;weeks and months&quot; of effort by the Obama State Department, it could not even convince America's closest ally, Great Britain, to not release the man responsible for the murder of 189 Americans. Instead, the bomber was released, picked up in Muammar Gaddafi's private plane, and flown back to Libya to be greeted by a massive state sponsored rally at the airport.<br /><br />So much for results from the Obama diplomatic team.<br /><br />Barack Obama is certainly bringing &quot;change&quot; to the global war on terror: treating attacks on America as law enforcement violations, and an overreliance on diplomacy that has witnessed the return of a mass murderer to his home country and fresh threats to the democratically elected government in Iraq.<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-5192883268609049531?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>CA Unemployment Spike Highlights Lack of Competitiveness</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/ca-unemployment-spike-highlights-lack.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/ca-unemployment-spike-highlights-lack.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[While the national unemployment rate is leveling off at 9.7%, California's jobless rate just hit a post-World War II high of 11.9%, further underscoring the state's lack of competitiveness at precisely the time we need it most.<br /><br />Globally, we're seeing Asia move ahead while France and Germany have emerged from recession <strong>ahead</strong> of the United States.  Within our own country we're seeing a huge difference in how well, or poorly, states are coping with the economic downturn.<br /><br />Texas has an unemployment rate well below the national average: 8% compared to the national rate of 9.7%.  Meanwhile, California's high tax/high regulation model continues to force people out of work at a rate substantially higher than the rest of the nation: 2.2% higher than the national average, and 3.9 percentage points higher than Texas.<br /><br />Liberals really enjoy playing the class warfare card when our team proposes to loosen up job killing regulations or ease the tax burden on job-generating small businesses.  Yet, the liberal model of a big, intrusive and expensive government can in these times be seen for what it really does to working people: eliminating jobs and the opportunities that come with those jobs.<br /><br /><a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-caljobs22-2009aug22,0,6343107.story&quot;>LA Times Story: California Unemployment Hits Post-World War II High</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-467222426019554725?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>The GOP &quot;Conspiracy&quot; on Health Care</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/gop-conspiracy-on-health-care.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/gop-conspiracy-on-health-care.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[You know the wheels have come off the Democrat campaign to put the experts who run the post office in charge of your personal health when the President of the United States takes the time to complain that his plan is off the tracks because of a nefarious GOP &quot;conspiracy.&quot;<br /><br />All of a sudden the Republican Party's efforts to provide a better alternative to health care reform gets cast as a &quot;conspiracy.&quot;  This is political spin from a party which has lost control of a signature issue, both internally and externally.  When Democrats work together to plan a legislative initiative it's a campaign, when Republicans do it it's a &quot;conspiracy.&quot;  Got it.<br /><br />Whether it's the same &quot;Vast Right Wing Conspiracy&quot; Hillary Clinton blamed for the crushing defeat of her own health care takeover plan, we're not sure. <br /><br />The reality is that the President and his the leaders of his party in Congress are to blame for the public's sour reaction to their plans to have a lot more of the decisions about people's health made in Washington D.C. instead of at the doctor's office.  Americans know it's possible to improve the system without vastly expanding the government's role in health.<br /><br />The Democrats control both houses of Congress, they have a filibuser-proof majority in the Senate, they control the White House -- and yet it's the Republicans who are to blame for the fact they can't get their own team together to vote for their poorly written bill. <br /><br />No one credible believes this nonsense.<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4082867905503529327?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Politico: Dem Party Ratings Plummet</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/politico-dem-party-ratings-plummet.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/politico-dem-party-ratings-plummet.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[I'll let this morning's Politico <a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26262.html&quot;>article</a> speak for itself:<br /><br /><blockquote><em>The percentage of Americans who hold a favorable view of the Democratic Party has slipped below 50 percent for the first time since President Barack Obama took office, according to a new Pew Research Center poll released Wednesday.<br /><br />Only 49 percent of Americans now hold a favorable view of the Democratic Party, down from 62 percent in the same poll shortly after Obama assumed office. Democratic favorable ratings hovered around 60 percent as recently as April, when 59 percent of those polled held a favorable view.<br /></em></blockquote><br />So the Democrats are down to 49% favorable, and our party is at 40%: a 9% advantage to the Democrats, down from the 22% advantage they enjoyed at the beginning of the year. I would be more concerned about their 9% advantage, but a quick look over at the <a href=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot&quot;>Rasmussen numbers</a> out today shows that Republicans are leading in the generic Congressional ballot test by 5%.<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-7098230436477665238?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Obama: You &quot;More than Likely&quot; Won't Lose Your Insurance</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/obama-you-more-than-likely-wont-lose.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/obama-you-more-than-likely-wont-lose.html</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Republicans have been quick to point out that under the Democrats' big government health &quot;reform&quot; plan, millions of Americans could be forced out of their health insurance plan and onto the government plan.  Interestingly, here's what Barack Obama had to say in a bit of a Freudian slip on the issue a few days ago:<br /><br />&quot;The only point I want to make about this is, whether you're for or against a public option, just understand that the public option is not a government takeover of health insurance. Everybody here who still has -- who has currently private insurance, you know, <strong>you would more than likely</strong> still be on your private insurance plan. Employers wouldn't stop suddenly providing health insurance.&quot; (President Barack Obama, <a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pr5cC2SuXrk&quot;>Remarks At Town Hall On Health Insurance Reform,</a> Belgrade, MT, 8/14/09)<br /><br />&quot;More than likely.&quot;<br /><br />How reassuring.<br /><br />The &quot;more than likely&quot; standard runs counter to what Obama and the Democrats have been claiming all along, like when he said, &quot;If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan.&quot;  (President Barack Obama, <a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Town-Hall-on-Health-Insurance-Reform-in-Portsmouth-New-Hampshire/&quot;>Remarks At Town Hall On Health Insurance Reform,</a> Portsmouth, NH, 8/11/09)<br /><br />Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, the reality is that under their plan over 88 million people could be forced onto government-run health insurance. &quot;Under current law, there will be about 158.1 million people who are covered under an employer plan as workers, dependents or early retirees in 2011. If the act were fully implemented in that year, about 88.1 million workers would shift from private employer insurance to the public plan.&quot; (John Shelis, Vice President, Lewin Group, &quot;<a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/Research/HealthCare/upload/HouseBillHeritageRevised.pdf&quot;>Analysis Of The July 15 draft Of The American Affordable Health Choices Act Of 2009</a>,&quot; 7/23/09)<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-1068112711182265562?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Governor Tackling Unsustainable Govt Employee Pensions</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/governor-tackling-unsustainable-govt.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/governor-tackling-unsustainable-govt.html</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Governor Schwarzenegger and Republicans have for years called attention to the unsustainable pension obligations state and local governments owe and will owe to past, current and future workers under current plans that far outstrip government's ability to pay.  Reform is necessary and Republicans are leading the charge again.<br /><br />In today's Sacramento Bee, Dale Kasler covers the <a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2114606.html&quot;>story</a>:<br /><blockquote><em>Weeks after wrapping up a deal to close a $26 billion budget deficit, Gov.<br />Arnold Schwarzenegger is taking aim at what he calls California's next great<br />fiscal problem: the state's battered pension system.<br /><br />Reviving an idea he floated during budget negotiations in June,<br />Schwarzenegger wants legislation creating a two-tier system that would deliver<br />lower benefits to newly hired public employees &#732; not only state workers but<br />firefighters, police officers, teachers, and other local-government<br />employees.<br /><br />Along with proposed cutbacks in retiree health benefits, Schwarzenegger<br />says, the plan would save $90 billion over the next 30 years.<br /></em></blockquote><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-1484032802961606739?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>House Republicans Release New Video on Dems and Health Care</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/house-republicans-release-new-video-on.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/house-republicans-release-new-video-on.html</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The House Republican Conference has released a new web video, <a href=&quot;http://team.republicanwhip.house.gov/Components/Redirect/r.aspx?ID=24479-3197647&quot;>&#8216;Disinformation,&#8217;</a> to further highlight the discrepencies in Barack Obama&#8211;s and Congressional Democrats&#8211; rhetoric vs. the reality on health care reform.<br /><br /><a href=&quot;http://www.gop.gov/media/features/09/08/06/disinformation&quot;>Watch the video: Disinformation</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4638099307138032052?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Independents Weigh in on Heathcare Town Halls: More Trouble for Dems</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/independents-weigh-in-on-heathcare-town.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/independents-weigh-in-on-heathcare-town.html</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Another sign that the Democrats are in big trouble with their big government healthcare takeover ideas is the reaction independent voters have had to the Democrat townhall meetings this month where they have gotten more than an earful from concerned citizens.<br /><br />From USA Today/Gallup:<br /><br /><em>In a survey of 1,000 adults taken Tuesday, 34% say demonstrations at the hometown sessions have made them more sympathetic to the protesters' views; 21% say they are less sympathetic.  Independents by 2-to-1, 35%-16%, say they are more sympathetic to the protesters now.</em><br /><br /><a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-08-12-poll-12_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip&quot;>Complete story in USA Today</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-3783821819814622837?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Myths About Taxing the Rich</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/myths-about-taxing-rich.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/myths-about-taxing-rich.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Liberals try to talk their way out of raising taxes most often by claiming they're only taxing &quot;the rich.&quot;  Nevermind the fact that the first tax increase the Democrats passed was an increase on tobacco products, which studies show disproportionately impacts not the rich but the poor.<br /><br />In any case, our friends at the Heritage Foundation have published an excellent quick reference guide to seven myths the left likes to perpetuate to justify tax increases.<br /><br />Read the brief article:<br /><a href=&quot;http://www.insideronline.org/summary.cfm?id=10789&quot;>Seven Myths About Taxing the Rich</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-3685501833683966253?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Liberals Propose Taxpayers Fund Congressional Campaigns</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/liberals-propose-taxpayers-fund.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/liberals-propose-taxpayers-fund.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[It's one thing when you see outrageous claims made by a Congressional candidate you oppose.  At least you're not paying for it.  Under a new plan advocated by liberal Democrats, you will be.<br /><br />The Fair Elections Now Act (what is it with liberals and always having to add the word &quot;now&quot; to everything, usually while screaming it?) would put taxpayers on the hook for paying for Congressional campaigns.  Of course, what the government pays for, it also controls.<br /><br />John Samples, Director of the Center for Responsive Government at the Cato Institute, makes the case as to why this is a terrible idea.<br /><br />Testimony:<br /><a href=&quot;http://www.insideronline.org/summary.cfm?id=10796&quot;>A Look at HR 1826 and the Public Financing of Congressional Campaigns</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4294553026360259698?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>As Predicted: Obama's Labor Department Goes to Bat for Labor Officals</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/as-predicted-obamas-labor-department.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/as-predicted-obamas-labor-department.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The guys running organized labor must be pretty satisfied with Californian Hilda Solis, named by Barack Obama to run the Labor Department.<br /><br />Under her predecessor, Elaine Chao, the Department adopted a long list of reforms aimed at increasing transparency in how unions operate and giving union members the tools and information needed to make good decisions concerning who runs their union.<br /><br />These reforms were vehemently opposed by the guys running today's national unions -- people with little interest in, say, increasing the disclosure of financial information to members, rigorously enforcing rules against conflicts of interest, etc. <br /><br />By properly funding the Office of Labor Management Standards (OLMS), the Bush Labor Department increased audits from 238 to 791, indicted 1,004 union officials leading to 929 convictions of those guilty of defrauding union members.  Over $93 million was recovered.<br /><br />Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is taking the Department in an entirely different direction.<br /><br />Read the full article:<br /><a href=&quot;http://www.insideronline.org/summary.cfm?id=10794&quot;>The Anti-Chao: Hilda Solis Goes to Bat for Big Labor</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4225440615417985351?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Unions Push for Job Killing Tax on Tires</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/unions-push-for-job-killing-tax-on.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/unions-push-for-job-killing-tax-on.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The United Steelworkers union wants a new tax (tariff) on Chinese-made tires, ignoring a study which shows that for every one job saved in manufacturing, up to 25 jobs in installation and distribution could be lost.<br /><br />More of the kind of &quot;change&quot; people were not looking for last November.<br /><br />WSJ Story: <a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203609204574318201692908082.html&quot;>Obama's Trade Test</a><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-1454905455037087510?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Young Republicans Critical to Our Success</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/young-republicans-critical-to-our.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/08/young-republicans-critical-to-our.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Our party benefits from a strong Young Republicans presence throughout the state, organized under the California Young Republicans and the Young Republican Federation of California. <br /><br />To become a majority in California, and across the country, the growth and success of our YR chapters is essential.  YR chapters are organizing hubs for campaign volunteers, activists, and a growing number of elected officials and candidates. <br /><br />This weekend the YRFC is meeting in Ventura County with headline speaker former Miss California Carrie Prejean and featuring speakers including Congressman Dan Lungren, AG candidate Tom Harman, Senator Tony Strickland, and more. The high quality of the speakers the YR's are drawing speaks to the importance of this group and a recognition that a strong and growing YR presence is essential for a strong and growing party.<br /><br /><em>For more information, visit their convention </em><a href=&quot;http://www.yrfc2009.com/&quot;><em>website</em></a><em>.</em><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-5456660140742849703?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Assemblyman Dan Logue on Retaining Jobs and Businesses in California</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/07/assemblyman-dan-logue-on-retaining-jobs.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/07/assemblyman-dan-logue-on-retaining-jobs.html</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[In response to regulatory authorities in California stalking California  businesses,<b> </b> California Assemblyman Dan Logue discussed concerns about California's  regulatory climate and job loss with representatives of the business community at the  Capitol.<br /><br />One business testified they were inspected 150 times in one year  alone and paid over 9 million dollars in fees. Their crime was creating 300  jobs.<br /><br />All of them testified on how costly and difficult it is to do business  in California.<br /><br />It was heart breaking to see these businesses fight for their lives  and create opportunity for us and to be treated like criminals.<br /><br />View video <a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qzuq_rGI1cs&amp;feature=email&quot;>here</a>.<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-6738266016181254771?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Economy Must Be Focus</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/07/economy-must-be-focus_28.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/07/economy-must-be-focus_28.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;&quot;><span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;&quot;><p>An Editorial in the Sunday issue of the San Diego Union-Tribune accurately describes how California State Republican lawmakers are focusing on the critical issues that will help ease the economic burdens levied upon California Families, while State Democrats are adding to that burden.<br /></p><p>Read that article below:</p><p>Recent headlines about San Diego County's jobless rate hitting a 26-year high  of 10.1 percent and California's remaining at a record high of 11.6 percent are  an urgent reminder to state lawmakers that they must act to help the economy.  </p>  <p>This shouldn't be a partisan issue. All lawmakers must stop focusing on what  the recession means for state revenue and focus on what it means for  Californians. </p>  <p>Such a focus is plain in the agendas of Republican lawmakers from districts  entirely or partly in San Diego County - Senate GOP Leader Dennis Hollingsowrth  of Murrieta and Sen. Mark Wyland of Solana Beach and Assembly members Joel  Anderson of El Cajon, Nathan Fletcher of San Diego, Martin Garrick of Carlsbad,  Diane Harkey of Dana Point and Kevin Jeffries of Lake Elsinore. They have  introduced or supported a variety of bills to reduce heavy regulations and to  provide incentives for businesses to expand. </p>  <p>But this pro-jobs focus is absent when it comes to local Democratic lawmakers  - Sens. Denise Ducheny and Christine Kehoe of San Diego and Assembly members  Lori Salda&ntilde;a and Marty Block of San Diego and Mary Salas of Chula Vista.  Collectively, the four are listed as authors of 202 bills in the current session  (the number is inflated by the dozens of measures credited to Ducheny as chair  of the Senate budget committee). </p>  <p>There is a Kehoe bill to suspend onerous rules adopted during the state's  2000-01 energy crisis. There are also Ducheny bills including pro-jobs  concessions won by Republicans in budget negotiations. Outside of that,  virtually all the other bills either do nothing to help the economy or would  make the business climate worse. </p>  <p>All four lawmakers' districts include areas that are reeling. </p>  <p>Perhaps Ducheny thinks her bill requiring coupons to have an Internet address  is a priority. We suggest helping struggling family owned stores on Palm Avenue  in Imperial Beach is more important. </p>  <p>Perhaps Kehoe thinks changing bike-seat rules is crucial. We'd rather she  help the tiny shops and restaurants barely making it on University Avenue in  City Heights. </p>  <p>Perhaps Salda&ntilde;a thinks having a Lobster Management Enhancement Advisory  Committee is all-important. We suspect the hard-hit non-chain retailers on Ulric  Street in Linda Vista would prefer regulatory relief.</p> <p>Perhaps Block thinks urging Congress to go after tax havens is a smart use of  time. We suspect the beleaguered auto body shops on Broadway in Lemon Grove  would prefer tax relief. </p>  <p>Perhaps Salas thinks proclaiming May 3-9 as Drinking Water Week is a great  idea. We bet the car washes and fruit vendors on Main Street in Chula Vista wish  she thought about them instead. </p>  <p>Yes, lawmakers and parties have different priorities. But when unemployment  is setting records, creating and saving jobs should be every lawmaker's top  priority. </p>  <p>What will it take for this to finally sink in with Ducheny, Kehoe, Salda&ntilde;a,  Block and Salas? A jobless rate of 14 percent? 16 percent? 20 percent? We may  find out. </p> <p> </p> <p><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>View article </span><a href=&quot;http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jul/26/lz1ed26top225056-economy-must-be-focus/?opinion&amp;zIndex=138072&quot;><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>here</span></a><span style=&quot;font-size:8pt;&quot;>.<br /></span></p></span></span></span> <p align=&quot;center&quot;> </p> <p align=&quot;center&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;&quot;><span style=&quot;font-size:10pt;&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;&quot;>###</span><br /></span></span></p><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-1919196897876447852?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Our American Achievement</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/07/our-american-achievement.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/07/our-american-achievement.html</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Together, let us remember those who have sacrificed over the 233 years that have  led to this day to give us a nation founded on principles and defined by  ordinary Americans making extraordinary accomplishments.<br /><br />July 4th has  come to mean even more than independence from Great Britain and the impressive  journey that has followed. Today, it serves as an opportunity to appreciate the  blessings of liberty over tyranny, of democracy over dictatorship, and of  courage over fear.<br /><br />&quot;Freedom is never more than one generation away from  extinction,&quot; said Ronald Reagan. &quot;We didn't pass it to our children in the  bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the  same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our  children's children what it was once like in the United States when men were  free.&quot;<br /><br />Let each of us pray for those who are engaged in that ongoing  struggle to preserve and defend individual human freedom and self-determination  around the world. As so many have observed, the price of liberty is indeed  eternal vigilance, and our nation has been blessed with an abundance of sons and  daughters who have exercised that vigilance, and in so doing created a nation  that has served as a refuge and safe haven for oppressed people around the  world.<br /><br />That is our truly American achievement.<br /><br />Best wishes to you  for a safe and enjoyable Independence Day.<div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-4273893842597175761?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>McKeon Op-ed: Start by defeating job-killing measures such as card-check</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/mckeon-op-ed-start-by-defeating-job.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/mckeon-op-ed-start-by-defeating-job.html</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>California Congressman Buck McKeon has a great OpEd running in today's <em>The Hill</em> as part of their special report on job creation.  It's an excellent read, check it out:</span><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;><span style=&quot;font-size:85%;&quot;><strong>Start by defeating job-killing measures such as card-check<br /></strong><br />By Rep. Howard P. &#8216;Buck&#8217; McKeon (R-Calif.)</span></span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;></span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>Jobs. They&#8211;re the heart of our economic engine, transforming to meet the new realities of a changing global marketplace. They&#8211;re also a trusted barometer of economic health, and judging by employment figures, our economy remains far from healthy.</span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;></span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>The U.S. economy shed 345,000 jobs in the month of May. More than 2.5 million Americans have lost their jobs this year alone, with a total of 5.7 million jobs lost since the recession began in December 2007.</span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;></span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>The unemployment rate is 9.4 percent, its highest level in more than 25 years. It&#8211;s also 1.4 percent higher than the Obama administration forecasted as the unemployment peak in its urgent push to pass a nearly trillion-dollar economic stimulus package that &#8206; to date &#8206; hasn&#8211;t delivered the jobs that were promised.</span><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>It&#8211;s clear that America needs an economic policy that will create jobs. And it&#8211;s even clearer that we don&#8211;t need policies that will hamper innovation or make it harder for American businesses, large and small, to keep and create new jobs.</span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;></span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>That&#8211;s why the card-check plan &#8206; euphemistically dubbed the Employee Free Choice Act, although it offers employees anything but &#8206; is exactly the wrong elixir for what ails our economy.</span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;></span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>Read the whole piece </span><a href=&quot;http://thehill.com/op-eds/start-by-defeating-job-killing-measures-such-as-card-check-2009-06-24.html&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>here</span></a><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>.</span><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-1181415979646523890?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Jeffries Bill To End Backroom Deals Held Hostage...In A Backroom</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/jeffries-bill-to-end-backroom-deals.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/jeffries-bill-to-end-backroom-deals.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>As budget delays continue, Californians have made it abundantly clear that they are frustrated with the process and distrustful of the legislature. This has left many wondering what exactly is going on in the halls of the state capital. Hearing and understanding these frustrations, Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries (R- Lake Elsinore) wrote a bill five months ago that would increase transparency and accountability in Sacramento.<br /><br />Five months later, Democrats have still yet to even schedule a public hearing on the bill, let alone a vote.<br /><br />Jeffries&#8211; bill, ACA 8, would require public notice on all legislation and prohibit the legislature from voting on bills without notifying the public 72 hours in advance.  It would also require each bill to be available in print for at least 24 hours ahead of a vote. This bill would give legislators, members of the press, and the public at large the necessary time to read, review, and react to the measures being proposed.<br /><br /><strong>&#8216;I find it ironic that a bill that would put an end to back room deals, is being held hostage in a backroom somewhere,&#8217;</strong> said Assemblyman Jeffries.<br /><br />In a fiscal crisis such as the one we are in, it is critical that Californians be given the opportunity to review legislation with far-reaching consequences before they are haphazardly put into place.<br /><br />&#8216;This amendment [ACA 8] reinforces the bedrock principles of the First Amendment and public participation in our government, and I am confident that if the people of this state have the opportunity to vote for this measure, it will pass overwhelmingly.  Frankly, I can&#8211;t even imagine an intelligent opposition campaign being waged on this issue,&#8217; said Assemblyman Jeffries in a press release on the issue.  <strong>&#8216;The only motive for not passing this legislation is to keep the people in the dark.&#8217;<br /></strong><br />Knowing all this to be true, Democrats have still refused to allow the bill to move through the legislative process.  Perhaps the Democrats, the majority party in the legislature for the better part of 30 years, are afraid of what a little sunlight on the process might actually reveal.<br /><br />Learn more about Assemblyman Jeffries&#8211; bill </span><a href=&quot;http://arc.asm.ca.gov/member/66/?p=article&amp;sid=165&amp;id=220695&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>here</span></a><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>.</span><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-7881742311049957758?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Don't Miss The RJC '09 Summer Bash</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/dont-miss-rjc-09-summer-bash.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/dont-miss-rjc-09-summer-bash.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>The Republican Jewish Coalition has announced the date and lineup for its annual Summer Bash on Sunday, June 28 at the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel. This is the RJC&#8211;s biggest social event of the year and it&#8211;s sure to be a fantastic event<br /><br />Senator John Thune will deliver the keynote address and Congressman Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield will serve as MC.  Also, Assemblyman Chuck Devore and Congressman Dean Heller of Nevada have just confirmed their attendance.  Many other elected officials and celebrities have been invited and are expected to attend.<br /><br />Tickets are $125 per person.  Corporate or individual sponsorship levels begin at $1,000, and includes placement in the evening&#8211;s program.<br /><br />If you wish to learn more about the RJC Summer Bash and purchase tickets, please click on the link below or call the RJC at (310) 478-0752.<br /><br /></span><a href=&quot;http://www.rjchq.org/Events/eventdetail.aspx?id=af35473c-2267-46be-8350-6ff9b218d20e&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;>http://www.rjchq.org/Events/eventdetail.aspx?id=af35473c-2267-46be-8350-6ff9b218d20e</span></a><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;&quot;><br /><br />Check it out, you don&#8211;t want to miss this event!</span><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-2411882163833165759?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<category>Blog</category>
<title>Pay As You Go&Except When You Don&#8211;t</title>
<link>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/pay-as-you-goexcept-when-you-dont.html</link>
<guid>http://www.cagop.org/blog/2009/06/pay-as-you-goexcept-when-you-dont.html</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;>The doublespeak of the Obama Administration would be funny if it weren&#8211;t so depressing. As Obama rolled out proposed new budgeting rules on Tuesday, he touted the necessity of having limitations on spending commonly known as &#8216;PAYGO&#8217; or &#8216;pay as you go.&#8217; Meaning for every new dollar the government intends on spending, it must find a dollar in savings elsewhere in the budget.<br /><br />So what&#8211;s the problem with the Obama proposal? The rules he's proposing don&#8211;t apply to the whole budget. Obama has carved out exceptions, $2.5 trillion to be exact, to fund his favorite programs and priorities with borrowed money &#732; spending that doesn&#8211;t require offsets.<br /><br />Spending that adds to our current deficit.<br /><br />Yes, this year&#8211;s exploding, all-time record deficit of $1.8 trillion (and climbing).<br /><br />So when President Obama, his administration officials, and his liberal allies in congress claim they are going back to responsible budgeting of the Clinton years, remember that they support Pay As You Go rules, just not for the $2.5 trillion they&#8211;d like to spend first. </span><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;>***</span><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;></span><br /><a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_budget&quot;><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_budget</span></a><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;><strong>Obama: It's Ok To Borrow To Pay For Health Care</strong><br />Associated Press<br />By Andrew Taylor</span><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;>WASHINGTON &#732; President Barack Obama on Tuesday proposed budget rules that would allow Congress to borrow tens of billions of dollars and put the nation deeper in debt to jump-start the administration's emerging health care overhaul.</span><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;>The &quot;pay-as-you-go&quot; budget formula plan is significantly weaker than a proposal Obama issued with little fanfare last month.</span><br /><br /><span style=&quot;font-family:verdana;&quot;>It would carve out about $2.5 trillion worth of exemptions for Obama's priorities over the next decade. His health care reform plan also would get a green light to run big deficits in its early years. &</span><div class=&quot;blogger-post-footer&quot;><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4415342305243133312-361755608414431328?l=www.cagop.org%2Fblog%2Findex.html'/></div>]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
