<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUCSXkyfCp7ImA9WhRUF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977</id><updated>2012-01-28T16:31:08.794-05:00</updated><category term="The Mother of All Bailouts" /><category term="Home Improvement" /><category term="bankrutpcy" /><category term="Construction Employment" /><category term="unemployment rate" /><category term="Off Topic" /><category term="Mortgage Fraud" /><category term="bean-counting" /><category term="Servicing" /><category term="Bricolage" /><category term="the day the cookies died" /><category term="Economics" /><category term="Fed Funds Rate" /><category term="Appraisals" /><category term="Rational Exuberance" /><category term="Monetary Policy" /><category term="Paulson" /><category term="GSEs" /><category term="cartoons" /><category term="RE Fraud" /><category term="New home inventory" /><category term="vacancies" /><category term="Daily Color" /><category term="budget deficit" /><category term="housing bubble" /><category term="Weekly Summary" /><category term="Conforming Limits" /><category term="mortgage rates" /><category term="loan modifications." /><category term="Weekly Schedule" /><category term="Credit Crunch" /><category term="housing economics" /><category term="consumer credit" /><category term="rail traffic" /><category term="Bank Run" /><category term="Pre-Confessional" /><category term="ee cummings" /><category term="Dollar" /><category term="RE Bust" /><category term="Freddie" /><category term="humor" /><category term="Flow of Funds" /><category term="modifications" /><category term="oil" /><category term="Property Taxes" /><category term="CDO" /><category term="Alt-A" /><category term="Chutzpah" /><category term="Rating Agencies" /><category term="Credit Cards" /><category term="FHA" /><category term="Freddie Mac" /><category term="PCE" /><category term="Mortgage" /><category term="UberNerd" /><category term="UberNerd GuestNerd" /><category term="GuestNerd" /><category term="Employment" /><category term="Spreadsheets" /><category term="non-residential investment" /><category term="Residential Investment" /><category term="Unternerd" /><category term="Negative Equity" /><category term="Hedge Funds" /><category term="Confessional" /><category term="CRE" /><category term="Foreclosure" /><category term="Speculation" /><category term="MEW" /><category term="HELOC" /><category term="Housing Starts" /><category term="Securitization" /><category term="Pricing" /><category term="Picking On Poor Gretchen" /><category term="FASB" /><category term="HMDA" /><category term="Existing Home Sales" /><category term="Nerdly Data" /><category term="Mortgage Pig" /><category term="Commercial Paper" /><category term="summary" /><category term="CMBX" /><category term="EMI" /><category term="Media" /><category term="delinquency" /><category term="LBO" /><category term="Nothingburger" /><category term="bank failures" /><category term="auto" /><category term="Nuclear Waste" /><category term="Musée des Beaux Arts" /><category term="New Home Sales" /><category term="Regulatory" /><category term="revisions" /><category term="GDP" /><category term="Countrywide" /><category term="retail" /><category term="Fleck" /><category term="Greenspan" /><category term="WASN" /><category term="MBA" /><category term="Fannie Mae" /><category term="Option ARM" /><category term="The Mother of All Stimulus Plans" /><category term="Recession" /><category term="You Must Be Kidding" /><category term="mark" /><category term="da" /><category term="Bernanke" /><category term="Hotel" /><category term="Cancellations" /><category term="Loan Limits" /><category term="Short sales" /><category term="Bankruptcy" /><category term="Rock" /><category term="Brokers" /><category term="CPI" /><category term="Fore" /><category term="FOMC" /><category term="But The Lender Won't Go To Jail" /><category term="Northern Rock" /><category term="ABX Indices" /><category term="Pier Loans" /><category term="a failure by any other name" /><category term="default" /><category term="housing bubble II" /><category term="short sale" /><category term="LIGHTBULB" /><category term="Counterparty Risk" /><category term="SIVs" /><category term="Workouts" /><category term="Ephemera. MMI" /><category term="Credit Indicators" /><category term="Rental Market" /><category term="DataQuick" /><category term="NAHB" /><category term="homebuilders" /><category term="Construction Spending" /><category term="Credit Unions" /><category term="deliquency" /><category term="Yikes" /><category term="House Prices" /><category term="REO" /><category term="Bank Failure" /><category term="Lawyers Guns and Money" /><category term="Fed Speeches" /><category term="jumbo" /><category term="que" /><category term="Subprime" /><category term="MMI" /><category term="Inflation" /><category term="Trade Deficit" /><category term="Loan Modifications" /><category term="Demographics" /><category term="shell game" /><category term="Existing Home Inventory" /><category term="ARS" /><category term="Ephemera" /><category term="Financial Accounting" /><category term="FDIC" /><category term="bagholders" /><category term="Mortgage Insurance" /><category term="ARM Resets" /><category term="Kennedy-Greenspan" /><category term="transportation" /><title>Calculated Risk</title><subtitle type="html">Finance and Economics</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>12921</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><feedburner:info uri="calculatedrisk" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/atom.xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>CalculatedRisk</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUCSXY6eyp7ImA9WhRUF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-3324189320554583504</id><published>2012-01-28T16:29:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-28T16:31:08.813-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-28T16:31:08.813-05:00</app:edited><title>Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 958 Institutions</title><content type="html">This is an &lt;b&gt;unofficial&lt;/b&gt; list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Here is the &lt;a href="http://cr4re.com/PBL01272012.html"&gt;unofficial problem bank list&lt;/a&gt; for Jan 27, 2012.&lt;/b&gt;  (table is sortable by assets, state, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Changes and comments from surferdude808: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Busy week with many changes to the Unofficial Problem Bank List as the FDIC released its enforcement action activity for December 2011 and they closed several banks.  In total, there were 11 removals and six additions, which leave the list with 958 institutions with assets of $389.0 billion.  A year ago, there were 949 institutions with assets of $410.9 billion on the list.  For the month of January 2012, changes to the list were nine cures, six failures, four unassisted mergers, one voluntary liquidation, and eight additions.  The list fell by 12 institutions during the current month and it is the seventh consecutive monthly decline after the list peaked on a month-end basis at 1,001 institutions in June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FDIC terminated actions against Open Bank, Los Angeles, CA ($136 million  Ticker: OPBK); Citizens Bank &amp; Trust Company, Covington, LA ($110 million); First Security Bank &amp; Trust Company, Norton, KS ($63 million); and West One Bank, Kalispell, MT ($44 million).  Three banks were removed as they were acquired through unassisted deals including Ravalli County Bank, Hamilton, MT ($187 million); First State Bank of Red Bud, Red Bud, IL ($94 million); and Griffith Savings Bank, Griffith, IN ($89 million), which was acquired by United Federal Credit Union in the reportedly first successful acquisition of a commercial bank by a federally chartered credit union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FDIC stepped up its closing activities this week with four closures.  The last time the FDIC closed this many banks in a week was on October 21, 2011.  Failures include Tennessee Commerce Bank, Franklin, TN ($1.2 billion  Ticker: TNCC); First Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL ($378 million); BankEast, Knoxville, TN ($273 million); and Patriot Bank Minnesota, Forest Lake, MN ($111 million).  The failures in Tennessee are the first in that state since the on-set of the financial crisis.  Conspicuously, the state stood out for not having yet experienced a failure.  Ironically, the banking trade publication American Banker had an &lt;a href="http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/177_18/Tennessee-bank-failures-watch-list-FDIC-1046107-1.html"&gt;article today&lt;/a&gt; that questioned how much longer the state could remain failure free and said several lawyers thought the state banking commissioner wanted to avoid failures.  While avoiding failures is laudable; however, some may say the delay in closing leads to higher resolution costs.  As a share of their assets, the FDIC estimates the resolution of Tennessee Commerce Bank will cost 35.2% and BankEast 27.7%.  Perhaps the reluctance for closings as mentioned in the article contributed to the high resolution costs of these banks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The additions this week include Colorado East Bank &amp; Trust, Lamar, CO ($829 million); Chambers Bank, Danville, AR ($722 million); American Gateway Bank, Port Allen, LA ($434 million); Pacific International Bank, Seattle, WA ($250 million  Ticker: PIBW); Prairie Community Bank, Marengo, IL ($128 million); and Woodland Bank, Deer River, MN ($108 million).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FDIC issued Prompt Corrective Action Orders against Mile High Banks, Longmont, CO ($1.0 billion) and Waukegan Savings Bank, Waukegan, IL ($88 million).  Also, the FDIC issued an order terminating the deposit insurance of Fireside Bank, Pleasanton, CA ($278 million).  Usually a chartering authority does not allow an institution to operate very long after receiving a deposit insurance termination order.  Under a deposit insurance termination order, existing deposits eligible for insurance are covered for two years but any new deposits are not covered.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Earlier:&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/summary-for-week-ending-january-27th.html"&gt;Summary for Week Ending January 27th&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/schedule-for-week-of-jan-29th.html"&gt;Schedule for Week of Jan 29th&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-3324189320554583504?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-sCGGFPAA9w9KwTFSd52AX8fR3M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-sCGGFPAA9w9KwTFSd52AX8fR3M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-sCGGFPAA9w9KwTFSd52AX8fR3M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-sCGGFPAA9w9KwTFSd52AX8fR3M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/Bq7E3acXXgE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/3324189320554583504/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=3324189320554583504" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/3324189320554583504?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/3324189320554583504?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/Bq7E3acXXgE/unofficial-problem-bank-list-declines_28.html" title="Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 958 Institutions" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/unofficial-problem-bank-list-declines_28.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkIHR34-fip7ImA9WhRUF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-2516060140844389312</id><published>2012-01-28T13:07:00.012-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-28T16:02:16.056-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-28T16:02:16.056-05:00</app:edited><title>Schedule for Week of Jan 29th</title><content type="html">Earlier:&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/summary-for-week-ending-january-27th.html"&gt;Summary for Week Ending January 27th&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will be a very busy week for economic releases.  The key report is the January employment report to be released on Friday, Feb 3rd. Other key reports include the Case-Shiller house price index on Tuesday, the ISM manufacturing index on Wednesday, vehicle sales on Wednesday, and the ISM non-manufacturing (service) index on Friday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Thursday, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke provides testimony to Congress on the economic outlook.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;b&gt;----- Monday, Jan 30th -----&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
8:30 AM ET: &lt;b&gt;Personal Income and Outlays&lt;/b&gt; for December.  The consensus is for a 0.4% increase in personal income in December, and a 0.1% increase in personal spending, and for the Core PCE price index to increase 0.1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:30 AM: &lt;b&gt;Dallas Fed Manufacturing Survey&lt;/b&gt; for January. The consensus is for expansion of 1.0 from contraction of -1.3 in December.  This is the last of the regional Fed manufacturing surveys for January, and the other surveys have shown stronger expansion in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2:00 PM: The &lt;b&gt;January 2011 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices&lt;/b&gt; from the Federal Reserve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;b&gt;----- Tuesday, Jan 31st -----&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i2XqzNouJeI/TvnY12g58-I/AAAAAAAALtM/EoX8-jgbpGE/s1600/CSOct2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Case-Shiller House Prices Indices" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i2XqzNouJeI/TvnY12g58-I/AAAAAAAALtM/EoX8-jgbpGE/s320/CSOct2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;9:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;S&amp;amp;P/Case-Shiller House Price Index&lt;/b&gt; for November. Although this is the November report, it is really a 3 month average of September, October and November.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This graph shows the nominal seasonally adjusted Composite 10 and Composite 20 indexes (the Composite 20 was started in January 2000).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consensus is for a 0.4% decrease in prices in November.  I expect a larger decline NSA, and a decline of 0.1% to 0.2% seasonally adjusted.  The &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/corelogic-house-price-index-declined-14.html"&gt;CoreLogic&lt;/a&gt; index declined 1.4% decrease in November (NSA). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9:45 AM: &lt;b&gt;Chicago Purchasing Managers Index&lt;/b&gt; for January. The consensus is for an increase to 63.0, up from 62.5 in December.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;Conference Board's consumer confidence index&lt;/b&gt; for January.  The consensus is for an increase to 68.0 from 64.5 last month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;Q4 Housing Vacancies and Homeownership&lt;/b&gt; report from the Census Bureau. As a reminder: &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2011/07/be-careful-with-housing-vacancies-and.html"&gt;Be careful with the Housing Vacancies and Homeownership report&lt;/a&gt;.   This report is frequently mentioned by analysts and the media to track the homeownership rate, and the homeowner and rental vacancy rates. Unfortunately the report is based on a fairly small sample, and does not track the decennial Census data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;b&gt;----- Wednesday, Feb 1st -----&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
7:00 AM: The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the &lt;b&gt;mortgage purchase applications index&lt;/b&gt;. This index was especially weak last year, although this does not include all the cash buyers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8:15 AM: The &lt;b&gt;ADP Employment Report&lt;/b&gt; for January. This report is for private payrolls only (no government). The consensus is for 172,000 payroll jobs added in January, down from the 325,000 reported last month. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;Construction Spending&lt;/b&gt; for December. The consensus is for a 0.5% increase in construction spending.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ruc6uiFwoaE/TwMYfOS6wJI/AAAAAAAALxc/b5VE2byays4/s1600/ISMMfgDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="ISM PMI" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ruc6uiFwoaE/TwMYfOS6wJI/AAAAAAAALxc/b5VE2byays4/s320/ISMMfgDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;10:00 AM ET: &lt;b&gt;ISM Manufacturing Index&lt;/b&gt; for January. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a long term graph of the ISM manufacturing index.  The consensus is for a slight increase to 54.5 from 53.9 in December.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All day: &lt;b&gt;Light vehicle sales&lt;/b&gt; for January. Light vehicle sales are expected to increase to 13.6 million from 13.5 million in December (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XphVwIRPGi4/TwTH-fpLPDI/AAAAAAAALyQ/mCtHN9fFYaE/s1600/VehicleSalesLongDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Vehicle Sales" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XphVwIRPGi4/TwTH-fpLPDI/AAAAAAAALyQ/mCtHN9fFYaE/s320/VehicleSalesLongDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This graph shows light vehicle sales since the BEA started keeping data in 1967. The dashed line is the December sales rate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Edmunds is &lt;a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120126006273/en/Edmunds.com-Auto-Sales-Forecast-Analysts-Chrysler-35"&gt;forecasting&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;[A] projected Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) of 13.4 million units, forecasts Edmunds.com ... This sales pace is relatively flat from the 13.5 million SAAR recorded last month, but up from the 12.6 million SAAR from January 2011.&lt;/blockquote&gt;And TrueCar is &lt;a href="http://blog.truecar.com/2012/01/25/strong-new-car-sales-in-january-shows-good-start-for-2012-according-to-truecar-com/"&gt;forecasting&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The January 2012 forecast translates into a Seasonally Adjusted Annualized Rate (SAAR) of 13.6 million new car sales, up from 12.7 million in January 2011&lt;/blockquote&gt;Expected: National Multi Housing Council &lt;b&gt;(NMHC) Quarterly Apartment Survey&lt;/b&gt;.  This is a key survey for apartment vacancy rates and rents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;b&gt;----- Thursday, Feb 2nd -----&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
8:30 AM: The &lt;b&gt;initial weekly unemployment claims&lt;/b&gt; report will be released.  The consensus is for a dencrease to 370,000 from 377,000 last week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;Testimony from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke&lt;/b&gt;, "The Economic Outlook and the Federal Budget Situation", Before the Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;b&gt;----- Friday, Feb 3rd -----&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-B-BAfQNyiS4/TyOM7AHXQbI/AAAAAAAAL_k/_FHQOJQ7hLg/s1600/PayrollForecastJan2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Percent Job Losses During Recessions" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-B-BAfQNyiS4/TyOM7AHXQbI/AAAAAAAAL_k/_FHQOJQ7hLg/s320/PayrollForecastJan2012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;8:30 AM: &lt;b&gt;Employment Report&lt;/b&gt; for December.  The consensus is for an increase of 135,000 non-farm payroll jobs in January, down from the 200,000 jobs added in December.  Note: it appears the seasonal adjustment for "Transportation and warehousing" over-counted employment in December by about 42,000 and this should be unwound in January.  So December payroll growth was probably overstated, and January will be understated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consensus is for the unemployment rate to remain unchanged at 8.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mhJ23eDtsEk/Twb5ugluE4I/AAAAAAAALzk/mXthpwuDxZI/s1600/EmployRecessDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Percent Job Losses During Recessions" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mhJ23eDtsEk/Twb5ugluE4I/AAAAAAAALzk/mXthpwuDxZI/s320/EmployRecessDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This second employment graph shows the percentage of payroll jobs lost during post WWII recessions through December.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy has added 2.65 million jobs since employment bottomed in February 2010 (3.16 million private sector jobs added, and 500 thousand public sector jobs lost).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are still 5.7 million fewer private sector jobs now than when the recession started.  (6.1 million fewer total nonfarm jobs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;ISM non-Manufacturing Index&lt;/b&gt; for January. The consensus is for an increase to 53.3 in January from 52.6 in December. Note: Above 50 indicates expansion, below 50 contraction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10:00 AM: &lt;b&gt;Manufacturers' Shipments, Inventories and Orders&lt;/b&gt; (Factory Orders) for December.  The consensus is for a 1.5% increase in orders.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-2516060140844389312?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bX1PCh69jI2IyzP3BZMMWrQgUDQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bX1PCh69jI2IyzP3BZMMWrQgUDQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bX1PCh69jI2IyzP3BZMMWrQgUDQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bX1PCh69jI2IyzP3BZMMWrQgUDQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/C_Yz8GRyj8M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/2516060140844389312/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=2516060140844389312" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/2516060140844389312?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/2516060140844389312?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/C_Yz8GRyj8M/schedule-for-week-of-jan-29th.html" title="Schedule for Week of Jan 29th" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i2XqzNouJeI/TvnY12g58-I/AAAAAAAALtM/EoX8-jgbpGE/s72-c/CSOct2011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/schedule-for-week-of-jan-29th.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEQGQX09eSp7ImA9WhRUF0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-6637043057992937946</id><published>2012-01-28T08:12:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-28T08:12:00.361-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-28T08:12:00.361-05:00</app:edited><title>Summary for Week ending January 27th</title><content type="html">The key story last week was that the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) noted that “economic conditions … are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.”  This was a change from mid-2013. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition the FOMC released their inaugural forecasts of the appropriate path for the Fed Funds rate, and most participants expect rates to be low for a long long time.  The FOMC also set a long run inflation target of 2 percent (this was understood, but now it is official).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The January Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) showed the FOMC is projecting inflation will remain below target through 2014, whereas the unemployment rate will remain too high for years.  This suggest that further action is likely, and Fed Chairman Bernanke seemed to &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/analysis-bernanke-paves-way-for-qe3.html"&gt;pave the way for QE3&lt;/a&gt; with his comments at the press briefing.  My view is QE3 could be announced as early as the next FOMC meeting in March, or perhaps at one of the two day meetings in April or June.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general the economic data released last week was disappointing.  The advance report showed that real GDP only increased at a 2.8% annual rate in Q4.  Much of the increase was related to changes in private inventories, and PCE only increased at a 2.0% annual rate.  New home sales also disappointed, with sales falling to 307 thousand annual rate in December.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was some mild good news: two regional Fed manufacturing surveys (Richmond and Kansas City) showed faster expansion in January, and consumer sentiment increased again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall this is consistent with sluggish growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a summary in graphs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;Real GDP increased 2.8% annual rate in Q4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The BEA &lt;a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm"&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; that "Real gross domestic product ... increased at an annual rate of 2.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011"&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DitjkJ-Gi9A/TyKnvc5yMPI/AAAAAAAAL-c/144CnGZICgU/s1600/GDPQ42011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="GDP Forecast" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DitjkJ-Gi9A/TyKnvc5yMPI/AAAAAAAAL-c/144CnGZICgU/s320/GDPQ42011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This graph shows the quarterly GDP growth (at an annual rate) for the last 30 years. The dashed line is the current growth rate. Growth in Q4 at 2.8% annualized was below trend growth (around 3%) - and very weak for a recovery - but the best since Q2 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PCE increased at a 2.0 percent annual rate.  GDP was boosted significantly by the "change in private inventories" that added 1.94 percentage points.  That was somewhat offset by a decline in government spending (subtracted 0.93 percentage points). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another key story is that residential investment is now adding to GDP.  Since RI is historically the best leading indicator for the economy, this suggests further growth in 2012 (although still sluggish).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;New Home Sales declined in December to 307,000 Annual Rate&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bvDcmcO1O_A/TyFsORfHAzI/AAAAAAAAL9c/Ymt_Pq9mrHY/s1600/NHSDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="New Home Sales" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bvDcmcO1O_A/TyFsORfHAzI/AAAAAAAAL9c/Ymt_Pq9mrHY/s320/NHSDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The Census Bureau &lt;a href="http://www.census.gov/const/newressales.pdf"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; New Home Sales in December were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 307 thousand. This was down from a revised 314 thousand in November (revised down from 315 thousand).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Z0Uoie27JSY/TyFsPHndWNI/AAAAAAAAL9k/CUJH2RPgR6Y/s1600/NHSInventoryDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="New Home Sales, Inventory" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Z0Uoie27JSY/TyFsPHndWNI/AAAAAAAAL9k/CUJH2RPgR6Y/s320/NHSInventoryDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke down inventory into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.  This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The inventory of completed homes for sale was at 61,000 units in December. The combined total of completed and under construction is at the lowest level since this series started.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New home sales have averaged only 300 thousand SAAR over the 20 months since the expiration of the tax credit ... mostly moving sideways at a very low level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/new-home-sales.html"&gt;All New Home Sales graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;ATA Trucking Index increased sharply in December&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Oqi6s083_Rc/Tx7qzVMGthI/AAAAAAAAL8Y/-c8flW65PYY/s1600/ATATruckingDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="ATA Trucking" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Oqi6s083_Rc/Tx7qzVMGthI/AAAAAAAAL8Y/-c8flW65PYY/s320/ATATruckingDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;"The American Trucking Associations’ advanced seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index jumped 6.8% in December after rising 0.3% in November 2011.  The latest gain put the SA index at 124.5 (2000=100) in December, up from the November level of 116.6."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a long term graph that shows ATA's For-Hire Truck Tonnage index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dashed line is the current level of the index.  This index stalled early in 2011, but increased sharply at the end of the year.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/09/transportation-graphs.html"&gt;All current Transportation Graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;State Unemployment Rates "slightly lower" in December&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-q5TZ12StM94/Tx7NM_RDy8I/AAAAAAAAL8Q/JRkXMt4Lj50/s1600/StateUnemployDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="State Unemployment" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-q5TZ12StM94/Tx7NM_RDy8I/AAAAAAAAL8Q/JRkXMt4Lj50/s320/StateUnemployDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This graph shows the current unemployment rate for each state (red), and the max during the recession (blue). Every state has some blue - indicating no state is currently at the maximum during the recession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states are ranked by the highest current unemployment rate.  Only four states and the District of Columbia still have double digit unemployment rates.  This is the fewest since early 2009.  At the end of 2009, 18 states and D.C. had double digit unemployment rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/employment-graphs.html"&gt;All current employment graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims increased to 377,000&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E6HlztgNJEk/TyFWcgwFkfI/AAAAAAAAL9M/m4cHvrK2ZG4/s1600/WeeklyClaimsJan262012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="213" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E6HlztgNJEk/TyFWcgwFkfI/AAAAAAAAL9M/m4cHvrK2ZG4/s320/WeeklyClaimsJan262012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week to 377,500.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4-week moving average remains below 400,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weekly claims have been bouncing around lately - January is a period with large seasonal adjustments and that can lead to some large swings - but the 4-week average of weekly claims have been mostly trending down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/employment-graphs.html"&gt;All current Employment Graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;Consumer Sentiment increased in January&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6xNmDUsxloc/TyK7NZnTGVI/AAAAAAAAL-k/kO9QDBH-x2E/s1600/ConsumerSentFinalJan2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Consumer Sentiment" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6xNmDUsxloc/TyK7NZnTGVI/AAAAAAAAL-k/kO9QDBH-x2E/s320/ConsumerSentFinalJan2012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The final January Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index increased to 75.0, up from the preliminary reading of 74.0, and up from the December reading of 69.9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sentiment is still fairly weak, although above the consensus forecast of 74.0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;b&gt;Other Economic Stories ... &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/fomc-statement-rates-likely.html"&gt;FOMC Statement: Rates likely exceptionally low through late 2014&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/fomc-sets-2-inflation-target-january.html"&gt;FOMC: Sets 2% Inflation Target, January Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) and Press Briefing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/analysis-bernanke-paves-way-for-qe3.html"&gt;Analysis: Bernanke paves the way for QE3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/pending-home-sales-decline-in-december.html"&gt;Pending Home Sales Decline in December&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• From the Richmond Fed: &lt;a href="http://www.richmondfed.org/research/regional_economy/surveys_of_business_conditions/manufacturing/2012/mfg_01_24_12.cfm"&gt;Manufacturing Activity Picks Up the Pace in January; Expectations Upbeat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• Kansas City Fed: &lt;a href="http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/research/indicatorsdata/mfg/pdf/2012Jan26mfg.pdf"&gt;Tenth District Manufacturing Activity Rebounded in January&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/dot-vehicle-miles-driven-declined-09-in.html"&gt;DOT: Vehicle Miles Driven declined 0.9% in November&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-6637043057992937946?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NFmm8ACFbgQ7Mixk81sSXLLe18A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NFmm8ACFbgQ7Mixk81sSXLLe18A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NFmm8ACFbgQ7Mixk81sSXLLe18A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NFmm8ACFbgQ7Mixk81sSXLLe18A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/sdR1WrjAvwM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/6637043057992937946/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=6637043057992937946" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6637043057992937946?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6637043057992937946?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/sdR1WrjAvwM/summary-for-week-ending-january-27th.html" title="Summary for Week ending January 27th" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DitjkJ-Gi9A/TyKnvc5yMPI/AAAAAAAAL-c/144CnGZICgU/s72-c/GDPQ42011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/summary-for-week-ending-january-27th.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEYNR3g6eip7ImA9WhRUF0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-4668124217995454228</id><published>2012-01-27T21:03:00.025-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T21:03:16.612-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T21:03:16.612-05:00</app:edited><title>Government to triple HAMP payments for principal reductions</title><content type="html">From Jon Prior at HousingWire: &lt;a href="http://www.housingwire.com/2012/01/27/treasury-to-pay-investors-triple-for-hamp-principal-reductions"&gt;Treasury to pay investors triple for HAMP principal reductions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The Treasury Department will triple payments to mortgage investors for reducing borrower principal through an expanded Home Affordable Modification Program announced Friday [CR note: Treasury will pay incentives ranging from .18 to .63 cents on the dollar - depending on the change in LTV]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials announced several critical changes to HAMP, including an enrollment extension to Dec. 31, 2013, from its original expiration date at the end of this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Treasury will also require servicers to factor in second liens and other obligations in the debt-to-income ratio calculation. Previously, if a borrower's first-lien mortgage monthly payment was below 31% of the income, the borrower was deemed ineligible. Factoring other debts to the DTI evaluation will expand the pool of borrowers who could receive the assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To combat blight, officials said they would also expand HAMP to investors who are renting properties to tenants.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan said in the conference call Friday that the Treasury would make these payments to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if they participate in the principal reduction program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date, the GSEs have not committed to such a program.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
"FHFA’s assessment of the investor incentives now being offered will follow its previous analysis, including consideration of the eligible universe, operational costs to implement such changes, and potential borrower incentive effects," said FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco in a statement Friday.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Based on DeMarco's comments, it doesn't sound like Fannie and Freddie will participate in the principal reductions.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-4668124217995454228?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5lYkEE4XLgF74cSIOyY0MOFx5No/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5lYkEE4XLgF74cSIOyY0MOFx5No/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5lYkEE4XLgF74cSIOyY0MOFx5No/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5lYkEE4XLgF74cSIOyY0MOFx5No/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/JNNLEX0UjYo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/4668124217995454228/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=4668124217995454228" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/4668124217995454228?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/4668124217995454228?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/JNNLEX0UjYo/government-to-triple-hamp-payments-for.html" title="Government to triple HAMP payments for principal reductions" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/government-to-triple-hamp-payments-for.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkMFQX07fip7ImA9WhRUF00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-5924320377336035934</id><published>2012-01-27T18:10:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T18:53:30.306-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T18:53:30.306-05:00</app:edited><title>Bank Failure #6 &amp; 7: Tennessee and Minnesota</title><content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;em&gt;Knoxville Bank K.O. &lt;br /&gt;
Forest Lake Friday failure &lt;br /&gt;
A quickening pace.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Soylent Green is People&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2012/pr12012.html"&gt;From the FDIC:&lt;/a&gt; First Resource Bank, Savage, Minnesota, Assumes All of the Deposits of Patriot Bank Minnesota, Forest Lake, Minnesota &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;As of September 30, 2011, Patriot Bank Minnesota had approximately $111.3 million in total assets and $108.3 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $32.6 million. ... Patriot Bank Minnesota is the sixth FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Minnesota. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was The Riverbank, Wyoming, Minnesota, on October 7, 2011.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2012/pr12013.html"&gt;From the FDIC:&lt;/a&gt; U.S. Bank National Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, Assumes All of the Deposits of BankEast, Knoxville, Tennessee &lt;blockquote&gt;As of September 30, 2011, BankEast had approximately $272.6 million in total assets and $268.8 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $75.6 million. ... BankEast is the seventh FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the second in Tennessee. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Tennessee Commerce Bank, Franklin, earlier today.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That makes four today.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-5924320377336035934?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2uy6TPcouIXKwE1EizIhkCkcQk8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2uy6TPcouIXKwE1EizIhkCkcQk8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2uy6TPcouIXKwE1EizIhkCkcQk8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2uy6TPcouIXKwE1EizIhkCkcQk8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/jjLMZT4pjyM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/5924320377336035934/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=5924320377336035934" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/5924320377336035934?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/5924320377336035934?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/jjLMZT4pjyM/bank-failure-6-7-tennessee-and.html" title="Bank Failure #6 &amp; 7: Tennessee and Minnesota" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/bank-failure-6-7-tennessee-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcGRns7eyp7ImA9WhRUF00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-2887754716749042703</id><published>2012-01-27T17:13:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T17:23:47.503-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T17:23:47.503-05:00</app:edited><title>Bank Failures #4 and 5 in 2012: Florida and Tennessee</title><content type="html">&lt;center&gt;&lt;em&gt;Federal Giants &lt;br /&gt;
Sack Panther and Titan banks &lt;br /&gt;
A Patriots chore&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by Soylent Green is People&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2012/pr12010.html"&gt;From the FDIC:&lt;/a&gt; CenterState Bank of Florida, National Association, Winter Haven, Florida, Assumes All of the Deposits of First Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida&lt;blockquote&gt;As of September 30, 2011, First Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Jacksonville had approximately $377.9 million in total assets and $349.5 million in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $82.0 million. ... First Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Jacksonville is the fourth FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the second in Florida. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Central Florida State Bank, Belleview, on January 20, 2012.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/press/2012/pr12011.html"&gt;From the FDIC:&lt;/a&gt; Republic Bank &amp; Trust Company, Louisville, Kentucky, Assumes All of the Deposits of Tennessee Commerce Bank, Franklin, Tennessee&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;As of September 30, 2011, Tennessee Commerce Bank had approximately $1.185 billion in total assets and $1.156 billion in total deposits. ... The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $416.8 million. ... Tennessee Commerce Bank is the fifth FDIC-insured institution to fail in the nation this year, and the first in Tennessee. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Bank of Alamo, Alamo, on November 8, 2002.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Hey, Tennessee is on the board.  Another failure in Florida? No surprise.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-2887754716749042703?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7MKBXBaIh4HhtadqEY76WgTMXts/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7MKBXBaIh4HhtadqEY76WgTMXts/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7MKBXBaIh4HhtadqEY76WgTMXts/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7MKBXBaIh4HhtadqEY76WgTMXts/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/uRTokIA0IrE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/2887754716749042703/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=2887754716749042703" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/2887754716749042703?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/2887754716749042703?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/uRTokIA0IrE/bank-failures-4-and-5-in-2012-florida.html" title="Bank Failures #4 and 5 in 2012: Florida and Tennessee" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/bank-failures-4-and-5-in-2012-florida.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUINR3c7eSp7ImA9WhRUFkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-8705153260705970231</id><published>2012-01-27T14:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T14:46:36.901-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T14:46:36.901-05:00</app:edited><title>LPS: 2010, 2011 Mortgage Originations have record low default rates</title><content type="html">From LPS Applied Analytics: &lt;a href="http://www.lpsvcs.com/LPSCorporateInformation/NewsRoom/Pages/20111227.aspx"&gt;LPS' Mortgage Monitor Shows 2010, 2011 Originations Among Best Quality on Record &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The December Mortgage Monitor report released by Lender Processing Services shows mortgage originations continued their decline from 2011’s September peak, down 10.1 percent from the month before. At the same time, those &lt;b&gt;loans originated over the last two years have proven to be some of the best quality originations on record&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at judicial vs. non-judicial foreclosure states, LPS found that half of all loans in foreclosure in judicial states have not made a payment in more than two years. Foreclosure sale rates in non-judicial states stood at approximately four times that of judicial foreclosure states in December. Still, on average, pipeline ratios (the time it would take to clear through the inventory of loans either seriously delinquent or in foreclosure at the current rate of foreclosure sales) have declined significantly from earlier this year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;According to LPS, 8.15% of mortgages were delinquent in December, unchanged from November, and down from 8.83% in December 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS reports that 4.11% of mortgages were in the foreclosure process, down from 4.16% in November, and down slightly from 4.15% in December 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This gives a total of 12.26% delinquent or in foreclosure. It breaks down as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• 2.31 million loans less than 90 days delinquent.&lt;br /&gt;
• 1.79 million loans 90+ days delinquent.&lt;br /&gt;
• 2.07 million loans in foreclosure process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a total of 6.17 million loans delinquent or in foreclosure in December.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eVpk9KXIYmg/TyLnbajTyOI/AAAAAAAAL_U/vVWe5R9VRjI/s1600/LPSDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Delinquency Rate" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eVpk9KXIYmg/TyLnbajTyOI/AAAAAAAAL_U/vVWe5R9VRjI/s320/LPSDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This graph shows the total delinquent and in-foreclosure rates since 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total delinquent rate has fallen to 8.15% from the peak in January 2010 of 10.97%, but the decline has "halted". A normal rate is probably in the 4% to 5% range, so there is a long ways to go.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The in-foreclosure rate was at 4.11%, down from the record high in October 2011 of 4.29%.  There are still a large number of loans in this category (about 2.07 million).  LPS reported that foreclosure starts were down nearly 40% in December, probably due to process issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-udwSEepXrCs/TyLnaqijy4I/AAAAAAAAL_M/FiFMJyVnHRU/s1600/ForeclosureInvJudicialDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Foreclosure Inventory" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-udwSEepXrCs/TyLnaqijy4I/AAAAAAAAL_M/FiFMJyVnHRU/s320/ForeclosureInvJudicialDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; This graph provided by LPS Applied Analytics shows foreclosure inventories by process.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As LPS noted earlier: "Judicial vs. non-judicial foreclosure processes remain a significant factor in the reduction of foreclosure pipelines from state to state, with non-judicial foreclosure inventory percentages less than half that of judicial states. This is largely a result of the fact that foreclosure sale rates in non-judicial states have been proceeding at four to five times that of judicial. Non-judicial foreclosure states made up the entirety of the top 10 states with the largest year-over-year decline in non-current loans percentages."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BLNJpnKg4j4/TyLnbt8PQjI/AAAAAAAAL_c/yeBX0zYPiNc/s1600/LPSVintageDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Pipeline Ratio" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BLNJpnKg4j4/TyLnbt8PQjI/AAAAAAAAL_c/yeBX0zYPiNc/s320/LPSVintageDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The third graph shows the 90+ day default rate by vintage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LPS noted "2010 and 2011 originations are among the best on record".&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this isn't just because of tighter lending standards, LPS also noted (see report) that there were vintage improvements for high risk cohorts too (high risk defined as "Credit Score less than 660 and LTV greater than 80").&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice the early payment default for the bubble years.  The jump in payment 3 means the buyer missed the first three payments!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall this means newer loans are performing very well, but that there are a large number of delinquent loans stuck in the pipeline - especially in the judicial states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/mortgage-delinquency-graphs.html"&gt;All current mortgage delinquency graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-8705153260705970231?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ic7WUpUsB2bIZN8_zoa1sk5CZtA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ic7WUpUsB2bIZN8_zoa1sk5CZtA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ic7WUpUsB2bIZN8_zoa1sk5CZtA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ic7WUpUsB2bIZN8_zoa1sk5CZtA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/jDRCarz_QAs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/8705153260705970231/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=8705153260705970231" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/8705153260705970231?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/8705153260705970231?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/jDRCarz_QAs/lps-2010-2011-mortgage-originations.html" title="LPS: 2010, 2011 Mortgage Originations have record low default rates" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eVpk9KXIYmg/TyLnbajTyOI/AAAAAAAAL_U/vVWe5R9VRjI/s72-c/LPSDec2011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/lps-2010-2011-mortgage-originations.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0YNR3Y5fCp7ImA9WhRUFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-1014901504259519485</id><published>2012-01-27T11:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T11:19:56.824-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T11:19:56.824-05:00</app:edited><title>Q4 GDP: Residential Investment now making a positive contribution</title><content type="html">The following graph shows the contribution to GDP from residential investment, equipment and software, and nonresidential structures (3 quarter centered average). This is important to follow because residential investment tends to lead the economy, equipment and software is generally coincident, and nonresidential structure investment trails the economy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the following graph, red is residential, green is equipment and software, and blue is investment in non-residential structures. So the usual pattern - both into and out of recessions is - red, green, blue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dashed gray line is the contribution from the change in private inventories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZAVRUCeZPW0/TyLNxQY1mqI/AAAAAAAAL_E/Gb1EOjHwkG0/s1600/InvestmentContributionGDPQ42011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Investment Contributions" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZAVRUCeZPW0/TyLNxQY1mqI/AAAAAAAAL_E/Gb1EOjHwkG0/s320/InvestmentContributionGDPQ42011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Residential Investment (RI) made a positive contribution to GDP in Q4 for the third consecutive quarter.  Usually residential investment leads the economy, but not this time because of the huge overhang of existing inventory.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The contribution from RI will probably continue to be sluggish compared to previous recoveries.  Still the positive contribution is a significant story.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equipment and software investment has made a significant positive contribution to GDP for ten straight quarters (it is coincident).  However the contribution from equipment and software investment in Q4 was the weakest since the recovery started.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The contribution from nonresidential investment in structures was negative in Q4. Nonresidential investment in structures typically lags the recovery, however investment in energy and power has masked the ongoing weakness in office, mall and hotel investment (the underlying details will be released next week).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bWAuPREEN5g/TyLEq4KAXmI/AAAAAAAAL-8/G2MthKENZT8/s1600/RIGDPQ42011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Residential Investment" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bWAuPREEN5g/TyLEq4KAXmI/AAAAAAAAL-8/G2MthKENZT8/s320/RIGDPQ42011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Residential Investment as a percent of GDP increased slightly in Q4.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the increase was probably due to multifamily and home improvement investment.  I'll break down Residential Investment (RI) into components after the GDP details are released this coming week. Note: Residential investment (RI) includes new single family structures, multifamily structures, home improvement, broker's commissions, and a few minor categories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Residential investment will increase further in 2012, and I expect investment in single family structures will also add to growth this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-S6l4V70BjRE/TyLEqGIS84I/AAAAAAAAL-0/hiURXgglMl0/s1600/NonRIGDPQ42011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="non-Residential Investment" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-S6l4V70BjRE/TyLEqGIS84I/AAAAAAAAL-0/hiURXgglMl0/s320/NonRIGDPQ42011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The last graph shows non-residential investment in structures and equipment and software. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equipment and software investment had been increasing sharply, however the growth slowed in Q4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-residential investment in structures decreased in Q4 and is still near record lows as a percent of GDP.  The recent small increase has come from investment in energy and power. I'll add details for investment in offices, malls and hotels next week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key story is that residential investment is starting to increase.  This trend will probably continue in 2012 - although the recovery in RI will be sluggish.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier ...&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/real-gdp-increased-28-annual-rate-in-q4.html"&gt;Real GDP increased 2.8% annual rate in Q4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-1014901504259519485?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BkfnwltVua8tysp_Xw1v7F-RQ6A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BkfnwltVua8tysp_Xw1v7F-RQ6A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BkfnwltVua8tysp_Xw1v7F-RQ6A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BkfnwltVua8tysp_Xw1v7F-RQ6A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/mmQhlYDy3UE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/1014901504259519485/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=1014901504259519485" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/1014901504259519485?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/1014901504259519485?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/mmQhlYDy3UE/q4-gdp-residential-investment-now.html" title="Q4 GDP: Residential Investment now making a positive contribution" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZAVRUCeZPW0/TyLNxQY1mqI/AAAAAAAAL_E/Gb1EOjHwkG0/s72-c/InvestmentContributionGDPQ42011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/q4-gdp-residential-investment-now.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUCRXszfCp7ImA9WhRUFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-3629940013015144532</id><published>2012-01-27T09:55:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T09:57:44.584-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T09:57:44.584-05:00</app:edited><title>Consumer Sentiment increases in January</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6xNmDUsxloc/TyK7NZnTGVI/AAAAAAAAL-k/kO9QDBH-x2E/s1600/ConsumerSentFinalJan2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Consumer Sentiment" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6xNmDUsxloc/TyK7NZnTGVI/AAAAAAAAL-k/kO9QDBH-x2E/s320/ConsumerSentFinalJan2012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The final January Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index increased to 75.0, up from the preliminary reading of 74.0, and up from the December reading of 69.9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sentiment is still fairly weak, although above the consensus forecast of 74.0.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-3629940013015144532?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-uqJbGZX62k16xBAN2nitYe4nc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-uqJbGZX62k16xBAN2nitYe4nc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-uqJbGZX62k16xBAN2nitYe4nc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/w-uqJbGZX62k16xBAN2nitYe4nc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/aEkcT47l4sY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/3629940013015144532/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=3629940013015144532" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/3629940013015144532?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/3629940013015144532?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/aEkcT47l4sY/consumer-sentiment-increases-in-january_27.html" title="Consumer Sentiment increases in January" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6xNmDUsxloc/TyK7NZnTGVI/AAAAAAAAL-k/kO9QDBH-x2E/s72-c/ConsumerSentFinalJan2012.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/consumer-sentiment-increases-in-january_27.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0INSHs4fCp7ImA9WhRUFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-9082139993292664026</id><published>2012-01-27T08:30:00.031-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T08:39:59.534-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-27T08:39:59.534-05:00</app:edited><title>Real GDP increased 2.8% annual rate in Q4</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm"&gt;From the BEA:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 2.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011 (that is, from the third quarter to the fourth quarter), according to the "advance" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The acceleration in real GDP in the fourth quarter primarily reflected an upturn in private inventory investment and accelerations in PCE and in residential fixed investment that were partly offset by a deceleration in nonresidential fixed investment, a downturn in federal government spending, an acceleration in imports, and a larger decrease in state and local government spending. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The following graph shows the quarterly GDP growth (at an annual rate) for the last 30 years. The dashed line is the current growth rate. Growth in Q4 at 2.8% annualized was below trend growth (around 3%) - and very weak for a recovery - but the best since Q2 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DitjkJ-Gi9A/TyKnvc5yMPI/AAAAAAAAL-c/144CnGZICgU/s1600/GDPQ42011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="GDP Forecast" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DitjkJ-Gi9A/TyKnvc5yMPI/AAAAAAAAL-c/144CnGZICgU/s320/GDPQ42011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few key numbers:&lt;br /&gt;
• Real personal consumption expenditures increased 2.0 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 1.7 percent in the third. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Change in private inventories added 1.94 percentage point.  This was partially ffset by a decline in government spending (subtracted 0.93 percentage points). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Investment growth slowed, except residential investment: "Real nonresidential fixed investment increased 1.7 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with an increase of 15.7 percent in the third. Nonresidential structures decreased 7.2 percent, in contrast to an increase of 14.4 percent.  Equipment and software increased 5.2 percent, compared with an increase of 16.2 percent.  Real residential fixed investment increased 10.9 percent, compared with an increase of 1.3 percent."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll have more on GDP later ...&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-9082139993292664026?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AsFfYzhh6CjPuO0kJSZACMJ12-M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AsFfYzhh6CjPuO0kJSZACMJ12-M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AsFfYzhh6CjPuO0kJSZACMJ12-M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AsFfYzhh6CjPuO0kJSZACMJ12-M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/B8JbNCd5ZTE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/9082139993292664026/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=9082139993292664026" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/9082139993292664026?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/9082139993292664026?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/B8JbNCd5ZTE/real-gdp-increased-28-annual-rate-in-q4.html" title="Real GDP increased 2.8% annual rate in Q4" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DitjkJ-Gi9A/TyKnvc5yMPI/AAAAAAAAL-c/144CnGZICgU/s72-c/GDPQ42011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/real-gdp-increased-28-annual-rate-in-q4.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUIAQXg-fSp7ImA9WhRUFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-7500652913487730038</id><published>2012-01-26T22:05:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T22:05:40.655-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T22:05:40.655-05:00</app:edited><title>GDP Report expected to show 3% annualized growth</title><content type="html">On December New Home Sales:&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/new-home-sales-decline-in-december-to.html"&gt;New Home Sales decline in December to 307,000 Annual Rate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/2011-record-low-new-home-sales-and.html"&gt;2011: Record Low New Home Sales and 'Distressing Gap'&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/new-home-sales.html"&gt;New Home Sales graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last week on Existing Home sales:&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/existing-home-sales-in-december-461.html"&gt;Existing Home Sales in December: 4.61 million SAAR, 6.2 months of supply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/existing-home-sales-inventory-and-nsa.html"&gt;Existing Home Sales: Inventory and NSA Sales Graph&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/existing-home-sales.html"&gt;Existing Home Sales graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AVucp3h-Xyc/TxnwPqaZewI/AAAAAAAAL7w/Am30omdcFIs/s1600/GDPForecastQ42011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="GDP Forecast" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AVucp3h-Xyc/TxnwPqaZewI/AAAAAAAAL7w/Am30omdcFIs/s320/GDPForecastQ42011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; The BEA will release the Q4 advance GDP report Friday morning.  The consensus is that real GDP increased 3.0% annualized in Q4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This graph shows the quarterly GDP growth (at an annual rate) for the last 30 years.  The Red column is the forecast for Q4 GDP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At 3% this would be the fastest growth rate since Q2 2010, however PCE growth will probably still be weak and will probably be closer to 2% annualized.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-7500652913487730038?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/51urrOPJ0UYlY7_dW08wReOFG2Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/51urrOPJ0UYlY7_dW08wReOFG2Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/51urrOPJ0UYlY7_dW08wReOFG2Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/51urrOPJ0UYlY7_dW08wReOFG2Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/-kcgRi5m4Sc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/7500652913487730038/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=7500652913487730038" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/7500652913487730038?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/7500652913487730038?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/-kcgRi5m4Sc/gdp-report-expected-to-show-3.html" title="GDP Report expected to show 3% annualized growth" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AVucp3h-Xyc/TxnwPqaZewI/AAAAAAAAL7w/Am30omdcFIs/s72-c/GDPForecastQ42011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/gdp-report-expected-to-show-3.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0AHQXw9eCp7ImA9WhRUFkw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-4462163919251930557</id><published>2012-01-26T17:07:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T17:08:50.260-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T17:08:50.260-05:00</app:edited><title>Case Shiller House Price Forecasts: New Post-bubble lows Seasonally Adjusted</title><content type="html">The Case Shiller house price indexes for November will be released next Tuesday.  Here are a couple of forecasts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Zillow Forecast: &lt;a href="http://www.zillow.com/blog/research/2012/01/24/zillow-forecast-november-case-shiller-composite-20-expected-to-show-3-2-decline-from-one-year-ago/"&gt;November Case-Shiller Composite-20 Expected to Show 3.2% Decline from One Year Ago&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Zillow predicts that the 20-City Composite Home Price Index (non-seasonally adjusted, NSA) will decline by 3.2 percent on a year-over-year basis, while the 10-City Composite Home Price Index (NSA) will show a year-over-year decline of 2.7 percent. The seasonally adjusted (SA) month-over-month change from October to November will be -0.2 percent and -0.1 percent for the 20 and 10-City Composite Home Price Index (SA), respectively.&lt;/blockquote&gt;• From RadarLogic: &lt;a href="http://www.radarlogic.com/"&gt;Home Prices Declined at an Accelerating Rate in November as Sales Increased&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The S&amp;P/Case-Shiller Composite Home Price Indices for November 2011 will decline again on a month-over-month basis.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
This month, we expect the November 2011 10-City composite index to be about 152 and the 20-City index to be roughly 138.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Below is a summary table.  Case-Shiller will probably report house prices are at a new post-bubble low seasonally adjusted, but still above the NSA (Not Seasonally Adjusted) levels of March 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="2" rowspan="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th colspan="2"&gt;Case Shiller Composite 10&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th colspan="2"&gt;Case Shiller Composite 20&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;NSA&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;SA&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;NSA&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;SA&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Case Shiller (actual)&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;Nov-10&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;157.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;156.44&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;143.77&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;142.77&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;Oct-11&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;154.1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;152.24&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;140.3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;138.56&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Zillow Forecast&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;YoY&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-2.7%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-2.7%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-3.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-3.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;MoM&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-0.6%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-0.1%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-0.8%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;-0.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="2"&gt;Zillow Forecasts&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;153.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;152.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;139.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;138.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="2"&gt;RadarLogic Forecast&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;152&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;138&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="2"&gt;Post Bubble Lows&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;150.44&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;152.24&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;137.64&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;138.56&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan="6"&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;Estimate based on Year-over-year and Month-over-month Zillow forecasts&lt;/br&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;NSA lows were in March 2011, SA lows were last month.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-4462163919251930557?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KwkVzFMFmjN8GAMNWaPdc1GuNNQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KwkVzFMFmjN8GAMNWaPdc1GuNNQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KwkVzFMFmjN8GAMNWaPdc1GuNNQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KwkVzFMFmjN8GAMNWaPdc1GuNNQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/cqdzQBHrwK8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/4462163919251930557/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=4462163919251930557" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/4462163919251930557?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/4462163919251930557?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/cqdzQBHrwK8/case-shiller-house-price-forecasts-new.html" title="Case Shiller House Price Forecasts: New Post-bubble lows Seasonally Adjusted" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/case-shiller-house-price-forecasts-new.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUMSHYzeyp7ImA9WhRUFk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-8332865406711431368</id><published>2012-01-26T14:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T14:31:29.883-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T14:31:29.883-05:00</app:edited><title>Misc: Tenth District manufacturing increases, Chicago Fed National Activity Index, State Coincident indexes</title><content type="html">Catching up ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Kansas City Fed: &lt;a href="http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/research/indicatorsdata/mfg/pdf/2012Jan26mfg.pdf"&gt;Tenth District Manufacturing Activity Rebounded in January&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The month-over-month composite index was 7 in January, up from revised totals of -2 in December and 4 in November. The composite index is an average of the production, new orders, employment, supplier delivery time, and raw materials inventory indexes. ... The production and shipments indexes jumped to their highest levels since June, and the new orders index climbed from -2 to 8.&lt;/blockquote&gt;All of the regional manufacturing surveys have indicated stronger expansion in January (Empire state, Philly, Richmond and Kansas City).  The Dallas Fed survey is scheduled to be released on Monday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The Chicago Fed released the national activity index (a composite index of other indicators): &lt;a href="http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/cfnai/2012/cfnai_january2012.pdf"&gt;Index shows economic activity improved in December&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Led by improvements in production- and employment-related indicators, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index increased to +0.17 in December from –0.46 in November. ...&lt;br /&gt;
The index’s three-month moving average, CFNAI-MA3, increased from –0.19 in November to –0.08 in December—its highest value since March 2011. December’s CFNAI-MA3 suggests that &lt;b&gt;growth in national economic activity was slightly below its historical trend&lt;/b&gt;. The economic slack reflected in this level of the CFNAI-MA3 suggests limited inflationary pressure from economic activity over the coming year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;This graph shows the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (three month moving average) since 1967. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sYMh3f2qjPg/TyGo3frwJrI/AAAAAAAAL-E/QxqMgE7ei-0/s1600/CFNAIDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Chicago Fed National Activity Index" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sYMh3f2qjPg/TyGo3frwJrI/AAAAAAAAL-E/QxqMgE7ei-0/s320/CFNAIDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Chicago Fed:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;A zero value for the index indicates that the national economy is expanding at its historical trend rate of growth; negative values indicate below-average growth; and positive values indicate above-average growth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;• From the &lt;a href="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/index.cfm"&gt;Philly Fed&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia has released the coincident indexes for the 50 states for December 2011. In the past month, the indexes increased in 39 states, decreased in seven, and remained unchanged in four (Arizona, Nebraska, New York, and Wyoming) for a one-month diffusion index of 64.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-93De91JfvEw/TyGo42pVoNI/AAAAAAAAL-U/9QklyPfEXUo/s1600/PhillyFedStateDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Philly Fed Number of States with Increasing Activity" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-93De91JfvEw/TyGo42pVoNI/AAAAAAAAL-U/9QklyPfEXUo/s320/PhillyFedStateDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This is a graph is of the number of states with one month increasing activity according to the Philly Fed.  This graph includes states with minor increases (the Philly Fed lists as unchanged).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 42 states had increasing activity, down from 44 in November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: These are coincident indexes constructed from state employment data.  From the Philly Fed: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The coincident indexes combine four state-level indicators to summarize current economic conditions in a single statistic. The four state-level variables in each coincident index are nonfarm payroll employment, average hours worked in manufacturing, the unemployment rate, and wage and salary disbursements deflated by the consumer price index (U.S. city average). The trend for each state’s index is set to the trend of its gross domestic product (GDP), so long-term growth in the state’s index matches long-term growth in its GDP.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-MJMQDTCijn0/TyGo4F-9QCI/AAAAAAAAL-M/9tQwVmXBK_c/s1600/PhillyFedMapDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Philly Fed State Conincident Map" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-MJMQDTCijn0/TyGo4F-9QCI/AAAAAAAAL-M/9tQwVmXBK_c/s320/PhillyFedMapDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Here is a map of the three month change in the Philly Fed state coincident indicators.  This &lt;a href="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/regional-economy/indexes/coincident/maps/2009/2009-02.jpg"&gt;map was all red&lt;/a&gt; during the worst of the recession, and &lt;a href="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/regional-economy/indexes/coincident/maps/2011/2011-04.jpg"&gt;all green in early 2011&lt;/a&gt; - but this is an improvement from last summer.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-8332865406711431368?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/l0iRn19Y_f5_pws2lvPeav8pxNs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/l0iRn19Y_f5_pws2lvPeav8pxNs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/l0iRn19Y_f5_pws2lvPeav8pxNs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/l0iRn19Y_f5_pws2lvPeav8pxNs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/Rz-oRUsjVIg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/8332865406711431368/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=8332865406711431368" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/8332865406711431368?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/8332865406711431368?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/Rz-oRUsjVIg/misc-tenth-district-manufacturing.html" title="Misc: Tenth District manufacturing increases, Chicago Fed National Activity Index, State Coincident indexes" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sYMh3f2qjPg/TyGo3frwJrI/AAAAAAAAL-E/QxqMgE7ei-0/s72-c/CFNAIDec2011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/misc-tenth-district-manufacturing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkAHQ3k5fip7ImA9WhRUFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-3986030229272710743</id><published>2012-01-26T12:04:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T21:18:52.726-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T21:18:52.726-05:00</app:edited><title>2011: Record Low New Home Sales and 'Distressing Gap'</title><content type="html">2011 was the worst year for new home sales since the Census Bureau started tracking sales in 1963.  The three worst years were 2011, 2010, and 2009 - and 2008 is also on the worst ten list.  Although sales will probably increase in 2012, this year will probably be high in the list too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See list at bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following graph shows existing home sales (left axis) and new home sales (right axis) through December. This graph starts in 1994, but the relationship has been fairly steady back to the '60s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the housing bubble and bust, the "distressing gap" appeared mostly because of distressed sales. The flood of distressed sales has kept existing home sales elevated, and depressed new home sales since builders can't compete with the low prices of all the foreclosed properties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AGwrHYKPi0k/TyGG4aSLQpI/AAAAAAAAL98/E0DxMZg2-Tc/s1600/DistressingGapDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Distressing Gap" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AGwrHYKPi0k/TyGG4aSLQpI/AAAAAAAAL98/E0DxMZg2-Tc/s320/DistressingGapDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I expect this gap to eventually close once the number of distressed sales starts to decline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Existing home sales are counted when transactions are closed, and new home sales are counted when contracts are signed. So the timing of sales is different. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December New Home Sales:&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/new-home-sales-decline-in-december-to.html"&gt;New Home Sales decline in December to 307,000 Annual Rate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/new-home-sales.html"&gt;New Home Sales graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last week on Existing Home sales:&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/existing-home-sales-in-december-461.html"&gt;Existing Home Sales in December: 4.61 million SAAR, 6.2 months of supply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/existing-home-sales-inventory-and-nsa.html"&gt;Existing Home Sales: Inventory and NSA Sales Graph&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• &lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/existing-home-sales.html"&gt;Existing Home Sales graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 300px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="2"&gt;Ten Worst Years for New Home Sales since 1963&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr class="tableizer-firstrow"&gt;&lt;th&gt;Year&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;Sales (000s)&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2011&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;302&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2010&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;323&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2009&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;375&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1982&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;412&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1981&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;436&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1969&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;448&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1966&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;461&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1970&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;485&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2008&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;485&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1967&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;487&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-3986030229272710743?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HeUrOuy_BYw2nTWjiwO4NEcjh8o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HeUrOuy_BYw2nTWjiwO4NEcjh8o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HeUrOuy_BYw2nTWjiwO4NEcjh8o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HeUrOuy_BYw2nTWjiwO4NEcjh8o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/K0vcjgm3lDs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/3986030229272710743/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=3986030229272710743" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/3986030229272710743?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/3986030229272710743?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/K0vcjgm3lDs/2011-record-low-new-home-sales-and.html" title="2011: Record Low New Home Sales and 'Distressing Gap'" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AGwrHYKPi0k/TyGG4aSLQpI/AAAAAAAAL98/E0DxMZg2-Tc/s72-c/DistressingGapDec2011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/2011-record-low-new-home-sales-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4GRXY6fCp7ImA9WhRUFUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-1761799402599519711</id><published>2012-01-26T10:00:00.039-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T10:15:24.814-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T10:15:24.814-05:00</app:edited><title>New Home Sales decline in December to 307,000 Annual Rate</title><content type="html">The Census Bureau &lt;a href="http://www.census.gov/const/newressales.pdf"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; New Home Sales in December were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 307 thousand. This was down from a revised 314 thousand in November (revised down from 315 thousand).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first graph shows New Home Sales vs. recessions since 1963. The dashed line is the current sales rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sales of new single-family houses in December 2011 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 307,000 ... This is 2.2 percent (±13.2%) below the revised November rate of 314,000 and is 7.3 percent (±16.6%) below the December 2010 estimate of 331,000.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bvDcmcO1O_A/TyFsORfHAzI/AAAAAAAAL9c/Ymt_Pq9mrHY/s1600/NHSDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="New Home Sales" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bvDcmcO1O_A/TyFsORfHAzI/AAAAAAAAL9c/Ymt_Pq9mrHY/s320/NHSDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second graph shows New Home Months of Supply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Months of supply increased to 6.1 in December. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The all time record was 12.1 months of supply in January 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6XPWy9iOqWo/TyFsPm6ybmI/AAAAAAAAL9s/_YWSmlXUklY/s1600/NHSMonthsDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="New Home Sales, Months of Supply" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6XPWy9iOqWo/TyFsPm6ybmI/AAAAAAAAL9s/_YWSmlXUklY/s320/NHSMonthsDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; This is now close to normal (less than 6 months supply is normal).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of December was 157,000. This represents a supply of 6.1 months at the current sales rate.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;On inventory, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.census.gov/const/www/newressalesdoc.html#definitions"&gt;Census Bureau&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"A house is considered for sale when a permit to build has been issued in permit-issuing places or work has begun on the footings or foundation in nonpermit areas and a sales contract has not been signed nor a deposit accepted."&lt;/blockquote&gt;Starting in 1973 the Census Bureau broke this down into three categories: Not Started, Under Construction, and Completed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Z0Uoie27JSY/TyFsPHndWNI/AAAAAAAAL9k/CUJH2RPgR6Y/s1600/NHSInventoryDec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="New Home Sales, Inventory" border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Z0Uoie27JSY/TyFsPHndWNI/AAAAAAAAL9k/CUJH2RPgR6Y/s320/NHSInventoryDec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This graph shows the three categories of inventory starting in 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The inventory of completed homes for sale was at 61,000 units in December. The combined total of completed and under construction is at the lowest level since this series started.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last graph shows sales NSA (monthly sales, not seasonally adjusted annual rate).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2011 (red column), 21 thousand new homes were sold (NSA).  This was the  weakest December since this data has been tracked, and was below the previous record low for December of 23 thousand set in 1966 and tied in 2010.  The high for December was 87 thousand in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--QOC_d4H97o/TyFsQWt54iI/AAAAAAAAL90/7Q3AOUUPt-U/s1600/NHSNSADec2011.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="New Home Sales, NSA" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--QOC_d4H97o/TyFsQWt54iI/AAAAAAAAL90/7Q3AOUUPt-U/s320/NHSNSADec2011.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This was below the consensus forecast of 320 thousand, and was a new record low for the month of December (NSA).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New home sales have averaged only 300 thousand SAAR over the 20 months since the expiration of the tax credit ... mostly moving sideways at a very low level.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-1761799402599519711?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fKa0Hv3Td65GjUvckUVBElcQjR0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fKa0Hv3Td65GjUvckUVBElcQjR0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fKa0Hv3Td65GjUvckUVBElcQjR0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fKa0Hv3Td65GjUvckUVBElcQjR0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/zmnIoEgKd2Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/1761799402599519711/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=1761799402599519711" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/1761799402599519711?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/1761799402599519711?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/zmnIoEgKd2Q/new-home-sales-decline-in-december-to.html" title="New Home Sales decline in December to 307,000 Annual Rate" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-bvDcmcO1O_A/TyFsORfHAzI/AAAAAAAAL9c/Ymt_Pq9mrHY/s72-c/NHSDec2011.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/new-home-sales-decline-in-december-to.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0cDQnY_eCp7ImA9WhRUFUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-4229909030068572648</id><published>2012-01-26T08:30:00.017-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T08:37:53.840-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T08:37:53.840-05:00</app:edited><title>Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims increase to 377,000</title><content type="html">The DOL &lt;a href="http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/press/2012/012612.asp"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;In the week ending January 21, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 377,000, an increase of 21,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 356,000. The 4-week moving average was 377,500, a decrease of 2,500 from the previous week's revised average of 380,000.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The previous week was revised up to 356,000 from 352,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since January 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E6HlztgNJEk/TyFWcgwFkfI/AAAAAAAAL9M/m4cHvrK2ZG4/s1600/WeeklyClaimsJan262012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="213" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E6HlztgNJEk/TyFWcgwFkfI/AAAAAAAAL9M/m4cHvrK2ZG4/s320/WeeklyClaimsJan262012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 85%;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased this week to 377,500.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4-week moving average remains below 400,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is a long term graph of weekly claims:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ASoDXzUYnQY/TyFWdKeTOeI/AAAAAAAAL9U/TAA7anSH6Us/s1600/WeeklyLongJan262012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="213" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ASoDXzUYnQY/TyFWdKeTOeI/AAAAAAAAL9U/TAA7anSH6Us/s320/WeeklyLongJan262012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weekly claims have been bouncing around lately - January is a period with large seasonal adjustments and that can lead to some large swings - but the 4-week average of weekly claims have been mostly trending down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crgraphs.com/2011/10/employment-graphs.html"&gt;All current Employment Graphs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-4229909030068572648?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_InkgoPeT9nPpT-lWfQo9-LdhBc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_InkgoPeT9nPpT-lWfQo9-LdhBc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_InkgoPeT9nPpT-lWfQo9-LdhBc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_InkgoPeT9nPpT-lWfQo9-LdhBc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/3CA01Ikjm_A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/4229909030068572648/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=4229909030068572648" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/4229909030068572648?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/4229909030068572648?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/3CA01Ikjm_A/weekly-initial-unemployment-claims_26.html" title="Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims increase to 377,000" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E6HlztgNJEk/TyFWcgwFkfI/AAAAAAAAL9M/m4cHvrK2ZG4/s72-c/WeeklyClaimsJan262012.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/weekly-initial-unemployment-claims_26.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUYMRXs8fSp7ImA9WhRUFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-1271153230962546852</id><published>2012-01-25T19:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T19:19:44.575-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T19:19:44.575-05:00</app:edited><title>California AG: Mortgage settlement 'inadequate'</title><content type="html">From Alejandro Lazo at the LA Times: &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-mortgage-settlement-20120125,0,7414913.story"&gt;California calls $25-billion mortgage settlement 'inadequate'&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Calif. Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris' office has called a proposed $25-billion settlement with the nation’s mortgage industry “inadequate.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"We've reviewed the details of the latest settlement proposal from the banks, and we believe it is inadequate for California,” Shum Preston, a spokesman for Harris, said in a statement. “Our state has been clear about what any multistate settlement must contain: transparency, relief going to the most distressed homeowners and meaningful enforcement that ensures accountability.  At this point, this deal does not suffice for California."&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
[As part of the settlement] attorneys general would agree to release the banks from further action related to the improper servicing of loans as well as claims against originating mortgages. Several attorneys general, including New York's Eric Schneiderman and California's Harris, have voiced concerns that those releases are overly broad and would preclude them from carrying out ongoing investigations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schneiderman was appointed Tuesday by President Obama as co-chairman of a new investigative effort that will try to coordinate existing federal and state probes into mortgage practices before the financial crisis. Schneiderman promised Wednesday to move aggressively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A spokesman for Schneiderman said in a statement that the New York attorney general would not sign onto a foreclosure settlement that would limit his ability to carry out investigations of the mortgage crisis.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-1271153230962546852?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-rsae5oH-dhdlc3a6PHlkBu4yo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-rsae5oH-dhdlc3a6PHlkBu4yo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-rsae5oH-dhdlc3a6PHlkBu4yo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-rsae5oH-dhdlc3a6PHlkBu4yo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/2194ZVefx2U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/1271153230962546852/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=1271153230962546852" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/1271153230962546852?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/1271153230962546852?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/2194ZVefx2U/california-ag-mortgage-settlement.html" title="California AG: Mortgage settlement 'inadequate'" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/california-ag-mortgage-settlement.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUcMQXw9cCp7ImA9WhRUFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-5913055381622650625</id><published>2012-01-25T16:30:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T16:31:20.268-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T16:31:20.268-05:00</app:edited><title>Analysis: Bernanke paves the way for QE3</title><content type="html">A few quick thoughts ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke made it clear that no decision on additional asset purchases has been made and that any additional balance sheet expansion would be a "collective" decision, however ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Bernanke made it clear that maximum sustainable employment and stable prices (defined as 2% inflation of personal consumption expenditures) are on "equal footing".  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The current projections are for unemployment to be significantly too high for years and inflation to be at or below the Fed's target.  That is a strong argument for additional monetary accommodation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• In the Q&amp;A, Bernanke made it clear that even if inflation moved above the target - and unemployment was still very high - the Fed would only slowly pursue policies to reduce the inflation rate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The minutes for the FOMC meeting will probably contain discussion of the outlook for the balance sheet and possible further asset purchases.  Those minutes will be released in 3 weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the FOMC might still wait until one of the two day meetings in April or June, the likelihood of QE3 being announced at the March 13th meeting has increased significantly.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-5913055381622650625?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Q4kw-L6fbv2D-ZLSocwrkx5Jkqc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Q4kw-L6fbv2D-ZLSocwrkx5Jkqc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Q4kw-L6fbv2D-ZLSocwrkx5Jkqc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Q4kw-L6fbv2D-ZLSocwrkx5Jkqc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/u4NCVi-pfwQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/5913055381622650625/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=5913055381622650625" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/5913055381622650625?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/5913055381622650625?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/u4NCVi-pfwQ/analysis-bernanke-paves-way-for-qe3.html" title="Analysis: Bernanke paves the way for QE3" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/analysis-bernanke-paves-way-for-qe3.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak8BSHozfip7ImA9WhRUFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-724437717857585335</id><published>2012-01-25T14:00:00.042-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T14:14:19.486-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T14:14:19.486-05:00</app:edited><title>FOMC: Sets 2% Inflation Target, January Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) and Press Briefing</title><content type="html">Earlier the FOMC released a statement for the January meeting. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the &lt;a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20120125c.htm"&gt;longer run projections&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Committee judges that inflation at the rate of 2 percent, as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, is most consistent over the longer run with the Federal Reserve's statutory mandate. ... FOMC participants' estimates of the longer-run normal rate of unemployment had a central tendency of 5.2 percent to 6.0 percent.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Here are the &lt;a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/fomcprojtabl20120125.pdf"&gt;updated forecasts&lt;/a&gt; from the January meeting.  The key details are below the video.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will hold a press briefing at 2:15 PM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;iframe frameborder="0" height="368" scrolling="no" src="http://www.ustream.tv/embed/4944768" style="border: 0px none transparent;" width="608"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TROjXo-b-Ao/TyBTZi3po3I/AAAAAAAAL9A/nEwSqxUsg0Y/s1600/FOMCTiming.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Appropriate Timing of Policy Firming" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TROjXo-b-Ao/TyBTZi3po3I/AAAAAAAAL9A/nEwSqxUsg0Y/s320/FOMCTiming.JPG" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"The shaded bars represent the number of FOMC participants who project that the initial increase in the target federal funds rate (from its current range of 0 to ¼ percent) would appropriately occur in the specified calendar year."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most participants project the first rate hike will appropriately occur in 2014 or later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AwfKW9u_PoM/TyBTZSTL5aI/AAAAAAAAL84/yLCFoEzWqbU/s1600/FOMCPace.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="Appropriate Pace of Policy Firming" border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AwfKW9u_PoM/TyBTZSTL5aI/AAAAAAAAL84/yLCFoEzWqbU/s320/FOMCPace.JPG" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;"The dots represent individual policymakers’ projections of the appropriate federal funds rate target at the end of each of the next several years and in the longer run. Each dot in that chart represents one policymaker’s projection."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most participants think the Fed Funds rate will be in the current range into 2014.  Then there is some disagreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GDP projections were revised down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="4"&gt;GDP projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Change in Real GDP&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2012&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2013&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2014&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;January 2012 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2.2 to 2.7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2.8 to 3.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;3.3 to 4.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;November 2011 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;2.5 to 2.9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;3.0 to 3.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;3.0 to 3.9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; Projections of change in real GDP and in inflation are from the fourth quarter of the previous year to the fourth quarter of the year indicated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unemployment rate projections were also revised down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="4"&gt;Unemployment projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Unemployment Rate&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2012&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2013&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2014&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;January 2012 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;8.2 to 8.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;7.4 to 8.1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;6.7 to 7.6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;November 2011 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;8.5 to 8.7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;7.8 to 8.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;6.8 to 7.7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; Projections for the unemployment rate are for the average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And inflation projections were revised down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="4"&gt;Inflation projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;PCE Inflation&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2012&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2013&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2014&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;January 2012 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.4 to 1.8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.4 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.6 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;November 2011 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.4 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.5 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.5 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here is core inflation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="4"&gt;Core Inflation projections of Federal Reserve Governors and Reserve Bank presidents&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Core Inflation&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2012&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2013&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2014&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;January 2012 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.5 to 1.8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.5 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.6 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;November 2011 Projections&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.5 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.4 to 1.9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;1.5 to 2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If the economy under performs or even tracks the November projections, QE3 would seem likely at either of the two day meetings in April or June.  Some have argued that QE3 could happen sooner, perhaps at the March meeting.  Based on these projections, QE3 is very likely.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-724437717857585335?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RsXgrskAEDYbqft-b-irbIsO3_Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RsXgrskAEDYbqft-b-irbIsO3_Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RsXgrskAEDYbqft-b-irbIsO3_Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RsXgrskAEDYbqft-b-irbIsO3_Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/Tae5hUGWFB0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/724437717857585335/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=724437717857585335" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/724437717857585335?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/724437717857585335?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/Tae5hUGWFB0/fomc-sets-2-inflation-target-january.html" title="FOMC: Sets 2% Inflation Target, January Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) and Press Briefing" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TROjXo-b-Ao/TyBTZi3po3I/AAAAAAAAL9A/nEwSqxUsg0Y/s72-c/FOMCTiming.JPG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/fomc-sets-2-inflation-target-january.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8HR388fSp7ImA9WhRUFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-6459479068446322120</id><published>2012-01-25T12:30:00.013-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T12:33:56.175-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T12:33:56.175-05:00</app:edited><title>FOMC Statement: Rates likely exceptionally low through late 2014</title><content type="html">Note: The Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) will be released around 2 PM ET (including the new FOMC forecasts for the federal funds rate), and Ben Bernanke will hold a press briefing starting at 2:15 PM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20120125a.htm"&gt;FOMC Statement:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December suggests that the &lt;b&gt;economy has been expanding moderately, notwithstanding some slowing in global growth&lt;/b&gt;. While indicators point to some further improvement in overall labor market conditions, the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has continued to advance, but growth in business fixed investment has slowed, and the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has been subdued in recent months, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth over coming quarters to be modest and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. &lt;b&gt;Strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook&lt;/b&gt;. The Committee also anticipates that over coming quarters, inflation will run at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy.  In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--&lt;b&gt;are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Committee also decided to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in September. The Committee is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Dennis P. Lockhart; Sandra Pianalto; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Daniel K. Tarullo; John C. Williams; and Janet L. Yellen.  Voting against the action was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who preferred to omit the description of the time period over which economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-6459479068446322120?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9fWfcDlxOfM56f-bUytjhquqzcw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9fWfcDlxOfM56f-bUytjhquqzcw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9fWfcDlxOfM56f-bUytjhquqzcw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9fWfcDlxOfM56f-bUytjhquqzcw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/5VRb02nBwPw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/6459479068446322120/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=6459479068446322120" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6459479068446322120?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6459479068446322120?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/5VRb02nBwPw/fomc-statement-rates-likely.html" title="FOMC Statement: Rates likely exceptionally low through late 2014" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/fomc-statement-rates-likely.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU4MR3k-fSp7ImA9WhRUFU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-6556964269391000916</id><published>2012-01-25T10:00:00.008-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T10:06:26.755-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T10:06:26.755-05:00</app:edited><title>Pending Home Sales Decline in December</title><content type="html">From the NAR: &lt;a href="http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2012/01/phs_dec"&gt;Pending Home Sales Decline in December, Remain Above a Year Ago&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contract signings, declined 3.5 percent to 96.6 in December from 100.1 in November but is 5.6 percent above December 2010 when it was 91.5. The data reflects contracts but not closings.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
The PHSI in the Northeast declined 3.1 percent to 74.7 in December and is 0.8 percent below a year ago. In the Midwest the index rose 4.0 percent to 95.3 and is 13.3 percent higher than December 2010. Pending home sales in the South slipped 2.6 percent to an index of 101.1 in December but are 4.9 percent above a year ago. In the West the index fell 11.0 percent in December to 107.9 but is 3.7 percent higher than December 2010.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-6556964269391000916?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k04eBeIY895uAuzkM_Vkf2gBEU0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k04eBeIY895uAuzkM_Vkf2gBEU0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k04eBeIY895uAuzkM_Vkf2gBEU0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k04eBeIY895uAuzkM_Vkf2gBEU0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/pBcRSmA1xqI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/6556964269391000916/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=6556964269391000916" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6556964269391000916?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6556964269391000916?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/pBcRSmA1xqI/pending-home-sales-decline-in-december.html" title="Pending Home Sales Decline in December" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/pending-home-sales-decline-in-december.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAGR385fCp7ImA9WhRUFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-941679244550904012</id><published>2012-01-25T08:38:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T08:38:46.124-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T08:38:46.124-05:00</app:edited><title>MBA: Mortgage Purchase Application Index declined in Latest Survey</title><content type="html">From the MBA: &lt;a href="http://www.mbaa.org/NewsandMedia/PressCenter"&gt;Mortgage Applications Fall by 5 percent in Latest MBA Weekly Survey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Refinance Index decreased 5.2 percent from the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 5.4 percent from one week earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($417,500 or less) increased to 4.11 percent from 4.06 percent ... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with jumbo loan balances (greater than $417,500) decreased to 4.39 percent from 4.40 percent...&lt;/blockquote&gt;The following graph shows the MBA Purchase Index and four week moving average since 1990. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cczOsbDr2W0/TyAFNpDAqHI/AAAAAAAAL8w/FU4EZDFovvE/s1600/MBAJan252012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="MBA Purchase Index" border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cczOsbDr2W0/TyAFNpDAqHI/AAAAAAAAL8w/FU4EZDFovvE/s320/MBAJan252012.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 4-week average of the purchase index increased slightly last week.  This index has mostly moved sideways for the last 2 years, and is at about the same level as in 1997.  The refinance index will probably increase later in February or in March at the HARP refinance program picks up.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-941679244550904012?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mUci5Cx2WSfHMXkX-BtijgKJEYg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mUci5Cx2WSfHMXkX-BtijgKJEYg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mUci5Cx2WSfHMXkX-BtijgKJEYg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mUci5Cx2WSfHMXkX-BtijgKJEYg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/mHJ_lu6m0Ow" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/941679244550904012/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=941679244550904012" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/941679244550904012?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/941679244550904012?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/mHJ_lu6m0Ow/mba-mortgage-purchase-application-index_25.html" title="MBA: Mortgage Purchase Application Index declined in Latest Survey" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cczOsbDr2W0/TyAFNpDAqHI/AAAAAAAAL8w/FU4EZDFovvE/s72-c/MBAJan252012.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/mba-mortgage-purchase-application-index_25.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0MCRXs9fCp7ImA9WhRUFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-7869233975487048774</id><published>2012-01-24T22:17:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T22:17:44.564-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-24T22:17:44.564-05:00</app:edited><title>Comparing Ceridian Diesel Fuel Index and ATA Trucking Index</title><content type="html">Below is a graph that compares the Ceridian diesel fuel index and the ATA trucking index.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATA index showed a sharp increase in December: &lt;a href="http://www.truckline.com/pages/article.aspx?id=974%2F8e1c7279-ed27-4c03-b189-ceeee26bbb12"&gt;ATA Truck Tonnage Index Posts Largest Annual Gain in 13 Years&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The American Trucking Associations’ advanced seasonally adjusted (SA) For-Hire Truck Tonnage Index jumped 6.8% in December after rising 0.3% in November 2011.  The latest gain put the SA index at 124.5 (2000=100) in December, up from the November level of 116.6.&lt;/blockquote&gt;But the Ceridian index showed only a small increase: &lt;a href="http://ceridianindex.com/news/release/December-PCI-Increases/"&gt;Pulse of Commerce Index Increased 0.2 Percent in December&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index® (PCI®), issued ... by the UCLA Anderson School of Management and Ceridian Corporation, rose 0.2 percent in December following the 0.1 percent increase in November and the 1.1 percent increase in October. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_TwZnVcvWlU/Tx9uMI_RL0I/AAAAAAAAL8o/4wwbGXY98ns/s1600/DieselTrucking.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img alt="ATA Trucking and Ceridian Diesel Fuel" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_TwZnVcvWlU/Tx9uMI_RL0I/AAAAAAAAL8o/4wwbGXY98ns/s320/DieselTrucking.jpg" style="border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); float: right; margin: 10px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Click on graph for larger image.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a graph comparing the two indexes.  In general the two indexes move together, but there are periods when one index is strong than the other.  As an example the ATA trucking index was moving sideways prior to the recession, but the Ceridian index was still increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And recently the ATA index is showing a strong increase, but the Ceridian index is only increasing slightly.  Perhaps rail traffic is the tie breaker: &lt;a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/aar-rail-traffic-increased-73-percent.html"&gt;AAR: Rail Traffic increased 7.3 percent YoY in December&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-7869233975487048774?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FYR_Cgvc4ufZRWHqF2x6BP4_3QQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FYR_Cgvc4ufZRWHqF2x6BP4_3QQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FYR_Cgvc4ufZRWHqF2x6BP4_3QQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FYR_Cgvc4ufZRWHqF2x6BP4_3QQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/3vCwSZ666p8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/7869233975487048774/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=7869233975487048774" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/7869233975487048774?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/7869233975487048774?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/3vCwSZ666p8/comparing-ceridian-diesel-fuel-index.html" title="Comparing Ceridian Diesel Fuel Index and ATA Trucking Index" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_TwZnVcvWlU/Tx9uMI_RL0I/AAAAAAAAL8o/4wwbGXY98ns/s72-c/DieselTrucking.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/comparing-ceridian-diesel-fuel-index.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEBRXw9cSp7ImA9WhRUFEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-6937444624428889275</id><published>2012-01-24T20:55:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T21:30:54.269-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-24T21:30:54.269-05:00</app:edited><title>SOTU Video: 9 PM ET</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/24/transcript-obamas-2012-state-union/"&gt;Transcript: 2012 SOTU&lt;/a&gt;.  Not much on housing ...&lt;blockquote&gt;I'm sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates. No more red tape. No more runaround from the banks. A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won't add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Ezra Klein &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/sotu-liveblogging/2011/08/25/gIQA3QCVOQ_blog.html"&gt;SOTU liveblogging&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WkJAcIBYEYk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-6937444624428889275?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4WHjv3pYARBGJCVVpf8phcks1_k/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4WHjv3pYARBGJCVVpf8phcks1_k/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4WHjv3pYARBGJCVVpf8phcks1_k/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4WHjv3pYARBGJCVVpf8phcks1_k/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/Yp6SwtGcamc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/6937444624428889275/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=6937444624428889275" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6937444624428889275?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/6937444624428889275?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/Yp6SwtGcamc/sotu-video-9-pm-et.html" title="SOTU Video: 9 PM ET" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://img.youtube.com/vi/WkJAcIBYEYk/default.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/sotu-video-9-pm-et.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0QDQ309eip7ImA9WhRUFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10004977.post-8474960978525784953</id><published>2012-01-24T18:56:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T18:56:12.362-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-24T18:56:12.362-05:00</app:edited><title>Housing Initiatives Tonight</title><content type="html">The State of the Union Address is at 9 PM tonight.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama will probably mention some housing policy initiatives that do not require Congressional approval: 1) the updated HARP program (refinance activity will increase in March), 2) an REO to rental program for Fannie and Freddie, and 3) the mortgage settlement agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the possible REO to rental program, here is a story from Patrick Coolican at the Las Vegas Sun: &lt;a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/jan/24/your-next-landlord-could-be-hedge-fund/"&gt;Your next landlord in Las Vegas could be a hedge fund&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Hedge funds could be the next big player in the Las Vegas real estate market. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We’ve been contacted by a number of different groups who have never considered owning single-family residences as rental properties in their investment portfolios,” says Brian Krueger, vice president for strategic services at Coldwell Banker, the real estate firm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are organizing money and have started to come in and do due diligence,” he says.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doug Brien, managing director and co-founder of Waypoint Homes, tells me he was in Las Vegas last week to survey the landscape. Waypoint, an Oakland, Calif.-based company, has bought 1,000 homes as rental properties in other markets.&lt;/blockquote&gt;However in many areas selling REO in bulk doesn't seem to make much sense - since there are so many small investors already buying.  Here is an excerpt of a piece from economist Tom Lawler:&lt;blockquote&gt;Contrary to what some espousers of “bulk” REO sales to large investors to rent our SF properties might suggest, the number and % of single-family detached homes occupied by renters increased significantly during the latter half of last decade, with the largest gains coming in “bubbly” areas.  The table below is based on data from the American Community Survey.  The 2000 data are from Census 2000, while the 2006-07 and 2008-09 averages are derived from the 5-year, 3-year, and 1-year ACS results for the 2006-10, 2008-10, and 2010 periods released this year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;table border="2" cellpadding="4" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;th colspan="5"&gt;Percent of Occupied SF Detached Homes Occupied by Renters&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;th&gt;2000&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2006-07&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2008-09&lt;/th&gt;&lt;th&gt;2010&lt;/th&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;US&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;13.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;12.8%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;14.3%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;15.1%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Maricopa County&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;10.4%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;13.5%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;16.8%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;19.8%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Clark County&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;12.5%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;18.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;22.0%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;24.4%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Sacramento County&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;18.8%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;16.7%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;20.2%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;22.4%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;th&gt;Lee County&lt;/th&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;10.6%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;12.3%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;14.6%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align="center"&gt;17.3%&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan="5"&gt;Source:  Decennial Census 2000, American Community Survey 5-, 3-, and 1-year Estimates&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;According to ACS estimates – which sadly are just estimates – for the US as a whole the % of occupied SF detached homes that were occupied by renters increased from an average of 12.8% in the 2006-07 period to 15.1% in 2010.  That % increase translated into a 3,637,349 jump in the number of renters occupied SF detached homes.  By comparison, the number of owners occupied SF detached homes declined by 1,333,747.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For “distressed” areas, the numbers were even more striking, as the above table suggests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Maricopa County (home of Phoenix), the estimated number of SF detached homes occupied by renters increased to about 182,251 on average in 2010 from about 123,553 on average during the two-year 2006-07 period.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, SF homes lost to foreclosure rose sharply in Maricopa County in 2008, and remained at elevated levels through last year – though foreclosures in 2011 were down from 2010.  Investor buying also appeared to pick up dramatically in 2008, as (NOT coincidentally) the all-cash share of home sales in the county.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACS data, combined with investor/all-cash shares, suggests by 2010 a SIGNIFICANT share of SF homes lost to foreclosure in 2008-2010 period (1) were purchased by “investors;” and (2) had by 2010 been successfully rented out.&lt;br /&gt;
...&lt;br /&gt;
It is not clear why folks focusing on the rental market for SF housing have not actually looked at any data, much less analyzed or commented on the truly astounding increase in the rental share of the SF housing market in many parts of the country.  The astounding increase in the number of foreclosed SF detached homes in Maricopa County occurred, of course, without any mandated program to have bulk sales of REO at discounts to “large” investors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;CR note: Foreclosures will probably pick up significantly once (and if) a mortgage settlement is reached.  But right now it doesn't appear a bulk REO program is needed in most areas.  Hopefully, if a program is announced, it will be limited to areas where small investors will be overwhelmed by the volumes (perhaps Las Vegas and parts of Florida).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10004977-8474960978525784953?l=www.calculatedriskblog.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vgGbB9ul3bpxZd1T9T1etnBoDdU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vgGbB9ul3bpxZd1T9T1etnBoDdU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vgGbB9ul3bpxZd1T9T1etnBoDdU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vgGbB9ul3bpxZd1T9T1etnBoDdU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~4/kLmYDs-mBRs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/feeds/8474960978525784953/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10004977&amp;postID=8474960978525784953" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/8474960978525784953?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10004977/posts/default/8474960978525784953?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CalculatedRisk/~3/kLmYDs-mBRs/housing-initiatives-tonight.html" title="Housing Initiatives Tonight" /><author><name>CalculatedRisk</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08664541332908374389</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/01/housing-initiatives-tonight.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

