<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>California Litigation Attorney Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>News and views from California litigation lawyers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<feedburner:info uri="californialitigationattorneyblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><geo:lat>33.991181</geo:lat><geo:long>-117.370744</geo:long><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/feed/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/feed/" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhlaw.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2F" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>JURORS GONE WILD!  Emotions Run Amok?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/tQ7OU7ixdvI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/jurors-gone-wild-emotions-run-amok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James J. Manning</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor & Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awarded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1300</guid>
		<description>Recently, a California jury awarded a fired employee a stunning $167.7 million, made up of $125 million in punitives (emotional distress).... Have we placed our emotions above what remains of our intellects?&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=tQ7OU7ixdvI:Qm1iDIjHAPQ:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=tQ7OU7ixdvI:Qm1iDIjHAPQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/tQ7OU7ixdvI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/jurors-gone-wild-emotions-run-amok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/jurors-gone-wild-emotions-run-amok/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tired of Residential Tenants Smoking in Your Rentals? Civil Code Section 1947.5</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/tRJ5LNm2iwI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/tired-of-residential-tenants-smoking-in-your-rentals-civil-code-section-1947-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Code section 1947.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1311</guid>
		<description>California State Legislature passed Senate Bill 332, adding to Civil Code as section 1947.5, allowing landlords of residential property to ban smoking tobacco therein as of January 1, 2012.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=tRJ5LNm2iwI:bvoXUWBgR9U:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=tRJ5LNm2iwI:bvoXUWBgR9U:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/tRJ5LNm2iwI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/tired-of-residential-tenants-smoking-in-your-rentals-civil-code-section-1947-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/tired-of-residential-tenants-smoking-in-your-rentals-civil-code-section-1947-5/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>CEQA Hits Home – Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/PPDM6pVw5Cw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/ceqa-hits-home-berkeley-hillside-preservation-v-city-of-berkeley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Katz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Law & CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1288</guid>
		<description>The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was enacted to provide the fullest possible protection of the environment when governmental entities make decisions that have the potential of adversely affecting the environment.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=PPDM6pVw5Cw:Ya_Sxt5vuJ4:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=PPDM6pVw5Cw:Ya_Sxt5vuJ4:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/PPDM6pVw5Cw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/ceqa-hits-home-berkeley-hillside-preservation-v-city-of-berkeley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/ceqa-hits-home-berkeley-hillside-preservation-v-city-of-berkeley/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom to Choose Your Roommate: Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/Xm__O6UMlnA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/freedom-to-choose-your-roommate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Kerbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writs & Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roommate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1273</guid>
		<description>Can the selection of a roommate give rise to a legal claim for discrimination? The Ninth Circuit recently weighed in.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=Xm__O6UMlnA:wl5HXq783OQ:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=Xm__O6UMlnA:wl5HXq783OQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/Xm__O6UMlnA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/freedom-to-choose-your-roommate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/freedom-to-choose-your-roommate/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Marijuana Collectives v. Local Governments: California Supreme Court Cases Predicted to Change Legal Landscape</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/9xy2YUxuMf0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/medical-marijuana-collectives-v-local-governments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Talkov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1265</guid>
		<description>The California Supreme Court granted review of Inland Empire, Pack, G3, and Evergreen- cases that may change the legal landscape in the litigation between municipalities and medical marijuana dispensaries and collectives.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=9xy2YUxuMf0:Yv0OMjMvIKw:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=9xy2YUxuMf0:Yv0OMjMvIKw:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/9xy2YUxuMf0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/medical-marijuana-collectives-v-local-governments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/medical-marijuana-collectives-v-local-governments/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What You Should Not Do When Trying To Collect On A Debt</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/2fLA4yJHokY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/what-you-should-not-do-when-trying-to-collect-on-a-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven G. Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1248</guid>
		<description>Creditors, collection agencies, and even attorneys can be held liable for abusive collection practices under both federal and state law. There are steps you should avoid taking when attempting to collect on a debt:&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=2fLA4yJHokY:SWjXYrpJuRI:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=2fLA4yJHokY:SWjXYrpJuRI:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/2fLA4yJHokY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/what-you-should-not-do-when-trying-to-collect-on-a-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/what-you-should-not-do-when-trying-to-collect-on-a-debt/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Legal Effect of Boilerplate Email Disclaimers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/p5Whgh_kHWA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/legal-effect-of-boilerplate-email-disclaimers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Talkov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers and Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1240</guid>
		<description>Are boilerplate email disclaimers of any legal effect?  One website touts the necessity of these lengthy paragraphs, while The Economist wrote in 2011 that these automatic email footers are both annoying and “legally useless.” So who is correct?&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=p5Whgh_kHWA:mXT0ZKPqcF0:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=p5Whgh_kHWA:mXT0ZKPqcF0:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/p5Whgh_kHWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/legal-effect-of-boilerplate-email-disclaimers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/legal-effect-of-boilerplate-email-disclaimers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota Motor Corporation v. Superior Court – Corporate Person Most Qualified / Knowledgeable Depositions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/iFkczFtdkbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/toyota-motor-corporation-v-superior-cour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas A. Plazak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.260]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pmq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1223</guid>
		<description>Corporate employers with employees located outside California will have to decide whether to agree to send any out-of-state employees to California for future Person Most Qualified/Knowledgeable depositions.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=iFkczFtdkbs:7lTAtfYw5_M:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=iFkczFtdkbs:7lTAtfYw5_M:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/iFkczFtdkbs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/toyota-motor-corporation-v-superior-cour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/toyota-motor-corporation-v-superior-cour/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Uncertainty of Litigation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/JVRxg4W_oAM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/the-uncertainty-of-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas A. Plazak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation & Arbitration (ADR)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1232</guid>
		<description>Attorneys regularly counsel their clients regarding the unpredictability of juries. Less is said regarding the unpredictability of judges.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=JVRxg4W_oAM:pzcXZXgf1RY:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=JVRxg4W_oAM:pzcXZXgf1RY:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/JVRxg4W_oAM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/the-uncertainty-of-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/the-uncertainty-of-litigation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Someone to the IRS for Fun and Money</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~3/6UumrwvNw_Y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/irs-whistleblower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pietro E. Canestrelli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/?p=1213</guid>
		<description>Who are the IRS’s favorite superheroes?  The X-Men.  The IRS loves to hear from ex-spouses, ex-business partners and ex-employees about taxpayers who may not have fully met their federal tax obligations.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=6UumrwvNw_Y:eZHHfXQcQsQ:ZMKU6pOd71k"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=ZMKU6pOd71k" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?a=6UumrwvNw_Y:eZHHfXQcQsQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaLitigationAttorneyBlog/~4/6UumrwvNw_Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/irs-whistleblower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.rhlaw.com/blog/irs-whistleblower/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

