<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>CALIFORNIA  YANKEE</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-10619</id>
    <updated>2009-07-15T08:15:22-04:00</updated>
    <subtitle>You Can't Make This Stuff Up!  </subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CaliforniaYankee" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry>
        <title>Obama administration to make mortgage payments for borrowers who can't? </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/4enOyNxaOLc/obama-administration-considers-making-mortgage-payments-for-borrowers-who-cant-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-administration-considers-making-mortgage-payments-for-borrowers-who-cant-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571103c35970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-15T08:15:22-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-15T08:15:22-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Not satisfied with owning General Government Motors, controlling the financial industry, and pushing for cap and tax and to remake the health care industry in a redistributionist's image, the Obama administration considers having the government making mortgage payments for borrowers who can't. When I wrote about Obama being the darling of the Communist Party USA, sounding like a Marxist or a redistributionist, I never imagined that he would take America this far down the socialist road.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Presidency" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Communist" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Marxist" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Mortgage Payments" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Redistributionist" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Socialist" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><span class="entry-content">Not satisfied with owning <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">General</span> Government Motors, controlling the financial industry, and pushing for cap and tax and to remake the health care industry in a redistributionist's image, the Obama administration considers having the 
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN1429265720090714?rpc=77">government making mortgage payments for borrowers who can't</a>. <br /></span></p><p>When I wrote about Obama being the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2008m6d24-Obama-Gets-The-Communists">darling of the Communist Party USA</a>, s<a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2008m10d28-Obama-sounds-like-a-Marxist">ounding like a Marxist</a> or  a redistributionist, I never imagined that he would take America this far down the socialist road. </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/4enOyNxaOLc" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-administration-considers-making-mortgage-payments-for-borrowers-who-cant-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Watch live coverage of the Sotomayor confirmation hearings here</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/1B7cL7cUAc8/watch-live-coverage-of-the-sotomayor-confirmation-hearings-here.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/watch-live-coverage-of-the-sotomayor-confirmation-hearings-here.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571fdebbd970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-13T12:29:49-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-13T12:29:49-04:00</updated>
        <summary />
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Supreme Court" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Confirmation" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Hearings" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Sonia Sotomayor" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p id='senView' align=center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;script type='text/javascript' src='http://www.senate.gov/fplayers/swfobject.js'&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
 &lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
 var s1 = new SWFObject('http://www.senate.gov/fplayers/mediaplayer.swf','mediaplayer','295','240','9');
s1.addParam('allowfullscreen','true');
s1.addParam('allowscriptaccess','always');
s1.addParam('flashvars','file=judiciary&amp;streamer=rtmp://fms.senate.gov/live/&amp;autostart=true&amp;type=video');
s1.write('senView');
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/1B7cL7cUAc8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/watch-live-coverage-of-the-sotomayor-confirmation-hearings-here.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Palin to campaign for conservative candidates, even Democrats</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/JOFoM87bk_Q/palin-to-campaign-for-conservative-candidates-even-democrats.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/palin-to-campaign-for-conservative-candidates-even-democrats.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-07-11T16:18:36-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571f543a4970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-11T14:44:27-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-11T14:44:27-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Governor Sarah Palin plans to hit the campaign trail to stump for conservative issues and Republican, Independent and even Democrat candidates who share her values on limited government, strong defense and "energy independence:" I will go around the country on behalf of candidates who believe in the right things, regardless of their party label or affiliation. People are so tired of the partisan stuff — even my own son is not a Republican.While pundits continue to debate the wisdom of her resignation, Palin remains popular among Republicans. In the following video, Gallup's Editor in Chief, Dr. Frank Newport, discusses the new Gallup poll and the fact that Palin's resignation did not did not affect most Americans' opinions of her:</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Presidential Campaign 2012" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Conservative" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Democrats" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Independents" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Republicans" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Sarah Palin" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;Governor Sarah Palin plans to &lt;a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/12/palin-stump-conservative-democrats/?feat=home_cube_position1"&gt;hit the campaign trail&lt;/a&gt; to stump for conservative issues and Republican, Independent and even Democrat candidates who share her values on limited government, strong defense and "energy independence:" &lt;blockquote&gt;I will go around the country on behalf of candidates who believe in the right things, regardless of their party label or affiliation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People are so tired of the partisan stuff — even my own son is not a Republican.&lt;/blockquote&gt;While pundits continue to debate the wisdom of her resignation, &lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/121514/Americans-Political-Future-Palin.aspx"&gt;Palin remains popular among Republicans&lt;/a&gt;. In the following video, Gallup's Editor in Chief, Dr. Frank Newport, discusses the new Gallup poll and the fact that Palin's resignation did not did not affect most Americans' opinions of her:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CP_KzNuXaZc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CP_KzNuXaZc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/JOFoM87bk_Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/palin-to-campaign-for-conservative-candidates-even-democrats.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Lou Dobbs discusses Palin's resignation with Mair and Lewis</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/Hxrl_aqQ2eI/lou-dobbs-discusses-governor-palins-resignation-with-liz-mair-and-matt-lewisembedded-video-from-cnn-video.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/lou-dobbs-discusses-governor-palins-resignation-with-liz-mair-and-matt-lewisembedded-video-from-cnn-video.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570f27d8a970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-11T13:11:48-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-11T13:10:46-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Lou Dobbs discusses Governor Palin's resignation with Liz Mair and Matt Lewis: Embedded video from CNN Video</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Presidential Campaign 2012" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Liz Mair" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Lou Dobbs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Matt Lewis" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Sarah Palin" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;Lou Dobbs discusses Governor Palin's resignation with Liz Mair and Matt Lewis:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;script src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/js/2.0/video/evp/module.js?loc=dom&amp;vid=/video/bestoftv/2009/07/08/ldt.palin.critics.cnn" type="text/javascript"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;Embedded video from &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/video"&gt;CNN Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/Hxrl_aqQ2eI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/lou-dobbs-discusses-governor-palins-resignation-with-liz-mair-and-matt-lewisembedded-video-from-cnn-video.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Schwartz defends Democrats' $550 billion health care spending tax</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/iZpjCUIeK60/schwartz-defends-democrats-550-billion-health-care-spending-tax.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/schwartz-defends-democrats-550-billion-health-care-spending-tax.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571f424fe970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-11T09:40:40-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-11T09:40:40-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Pennsylvania's Democrat Representative Allyson Schwartz defends the Democrats' new $550 billion health care spending tax: Right, Democrats are going to spend another $trillion or so to save money on health care.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Health Care" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Allyson Schwartz" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Cuts" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Democrats" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Health Care" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Medicare" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Spending" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Taxes" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Pennsylvania's Democrat Representative Allyson Schwartz defends the Democrats' new $550 billion health care spending tax:</p><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="playerId=videolandingpage&amp;playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&amp;categoryTitle=Politics&amp;referralObject=6730265&amp;referralParentPlaylistId=14dd8d0f134b75c8565df1685e721eff8f003aac&amp;referralPlaylistId=c985e69916535a2170b2b18ab0ab7eb60401f9bb" height="275" id="mediumFlashEmbedded" menu="false" name="undefined" play="false" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" salign="LT" scale="noscale" scriptaccess="always" src="http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="305" wmode="false" /><br /><p><br />Right, Democrats are going to spend another $trillion or so to save money on health care. </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/iZpjCUIeK60" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/schwartz-defends-democrats-550-billion-health-care-spending-tax.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Democrats agree to raise taxes and cut Medicare to fund health care</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/4fCevJv9yos/democrats-agree-to-raise-taxes-and-cut-medicare-to-fund-health-care.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/democrats-agree-to-raise-taxes-and-cut-medicare-to-fund-health-care.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570ff27e7970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-11T07:53:34-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-11T07:53:34-04:00</updated>
        <summary>House Democrats agreed Friday to raise taxes by about $550 billion to pay for their sweeping expansion of the nation's health care system. The huge tax increase will only pay for about half the cost of the Democrats' health spending plans, so according to the New York Times, the Democrats will also cut Medicare spending, the government health plan for the elderly, and other health care savings to pay for the rest of the $trillion-plus health care spending spree. The top federal tax rate is now 35 percent, but Democrats have vowed to raise it to 39.6 percent next year. The Washington Post quotes Robert Carroll, a senior fellow at the nonprofit Tax Foundation, as saying that combined with other federal tax adjustments, the Democrats' new health care spending tax increase could leave some taxpayers facing top federal rates of at least 45 percent. The Democrats' new health care spending tax increase agreement enables House Democrat leaders to unveil health legislation Monday and bring it to a vote before the Congress takes an August vacation.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Health Care" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Cuts" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Democrats" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Health Care" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Medicare" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Spending" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Taxes" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>House Democrats agreed Friday to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/11/AR2009071100482.html?wprss=rss_politics">raise taxes by about $550 billion</a> to pay
for their sweeping expansion of the nation's health care system. </p><p>The huge tax increase will only pay for about half the cost of the Democrats' health spending plans, so according to the New York Times, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/11/health/policy/11health.html">Democrats will also cut Medicare spending</a>, the government health plan for the elderly, and other health care savings to pay for the rest of the $trillion-plus health care spending spree.</p><p>The top federal tax rate is now 35 percent, but Democrats have vowed to raise it to 39.6 percent next year. The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/11/AR2009071100482.html?wprss=rss_politics">Washington Post</a> quotes Robert Carroll, a senior fellow at the nonprofit Tax Foundation, as saying that combined with other federal tax adjustments, the Democrats' new health care spending tax increase could leave some taxpayers facing top federal rates of at least 45 percent.</p><p>The Democrats' new health care spending tax increase agreement enables House Democrat leaders to unveil health legislation Monday and bring it to a vote before the Congress takes an August vacation.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/4fCevJv9yos" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/democrats-agree-to-raise-taxes-and-cut-medicare-to-fund-health-care.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Cantor on Obama's failed stimulus</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/6UurMesshWA/cantor-on-obamas-failed-stimulus.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/cantor-on-obamas-failed-stimulus.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571f3ddd8970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-11T06:47:41-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-11T06:54:26-04:00</updated>
        <summary>"They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved." - Eric Cantor In today's weekly Republican address, House Republican Whip Eric Cantor took on President Obama's failed stimulus and out of control spending: The President, in tandem with Democrats in Congress, have pushed through a $787 billion dollar bill full of pork barrel spending, government waste and massive borrowing cleverly called "stimulus." There is no doubt that our nation faces many challenges, but the plain truth is that President Obama’s economic decisions have not produced jobs, have not produced prosperity and have not worked. President Obama has already asked you to borrow trillions, and so far nearly 3 million jobs have been lost this year alone. Remember the promises? They promised you if you paid for their stimulus, jobs would be created immediately. In fact, they said that unemployment would stay under eight percent. Yet just months later, they are telling us to brace for unemployment to climb over ten percent. They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved. Full transcript of Congressman Cantor's remarks: &gt;Hello. I’m House Republican Whip Eric Cantor and I have the great privilege of representing the hardworking people of Virginia’s Seventh District. American families and small businesses today are struggling. Republicans have put forth thoughtful, serious and comprehensive plans of action that put jobs first. We offered an economic recovery plan that would have revitalized struggling small businesses and helped middle-class families by putting Americans back to work. Yet, the President, in tandem with Democrats in Congress, have pushed through a $787 billion dollar bill full of pork barrel spending, government waste and massive borrowing cleverly called ‘stimulus.’ There is no doubt that our nation faces many challenges, but the plain truth is that President Obama’s economic decisions have not produced jobs, have not produced prosperity and have not worked. President Obama has already asked you to borrow trillions, and so far nearly 3 million jobs have been lost this year alone. Remember the promises? They promised you if you paid for their stimulus, jobs would be created immediately. In fact, they said that unemployment would stay under eight percent. Yet just months later, they are telling us to brace for unemployment to climb over ten percent. They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved. Simply put, this is now President Obama’s economy and the American people are beginning to question whether his policies are working. But that doesn’t mean we are out of options. Together, we can bring about a strong and real recovery. We can create an environment that empowers small businesses and American workers to thrive. We must focus on job creation and restoring the financial and retirement security lost by millions. And for the sake of our children and our long-term fiscal viability,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Eric Cantor" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Government Waste" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Massive Borrowing" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Pork Barrel Spending" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Stimulus" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><blockquote><p><strong>"They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved</strong>." - Eric Cantor </p></blockquote><p>In today's weekly Republican address, House Republican Whip Eric Cantor took on President Obama's failed stimulus and out of control spending:</p><blockquote><p>The President, in tandem with Democrats in Congress, have pushed through a $787 billion dollar bill full of pork barrel spending, government waste and massive borrowing cleverly called "stimulus."</p><p>There is no doubt that our nation faces many challenges, but the plain truth is that President Obama’s economic decisions have not produced jobs, have not produced prosperity and have not worked.</p><p>President Obama has already asked you to borrow trillions, and so far nearly 3 million jobs have been lost this year alone. </p><p>Remember the promises? They promised you if you paid for their stimulus, jobs would be created immediately. In fact, they said that unemployment would stay under eight percent.</p><p>Yet just months later, they are telling us to brace for unemployment to climb over ten percent. They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved.</p></blockquote><p><object height="276" width="450"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/D9KSbmmTqVE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="276" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/D9KSbmmTqVE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" /></object></p><p>
</p>
<p>Full transcript of Congressman Cantor's remarks:</p><blockquote><p>&gt;Hello. I’m House Republican Whip Eric Cantor and I have the great privilege of representing the hardworking people of Virginia’s Seventh District. </p><p>American families and small businesses today are struggling.</p><p>Republicans have put forth thoughtful, serious and comprehensive plans of action that put jobs first. We offered an economic recovery plan that would have revitalized struggling small businesses and helped middle-class families by putting Americans back to work. </p><p>Yet, the President, in tandem with Democrats in Congress, have pushed through a $787 billion dollar bill full of pork barrel spending, government waste and massive borrowing cleverly called ‘stimulus.’</p><p>There is no doubt that our nation faces many challenges, but the plain truth is that President Obama’s economic decisions have not produced jobs, have not produced prosperity and have not worked.</p><p>President Obama has already asked you to borrow trillions, and so far nearly 3 million jobs have been lost this year alone. </p><p>Remember the promises? They promised you if you paid for their stimulus, jobs would be created immediately. In fact, they said that unemployment would stay under eight percent.</p><p>Yet just months later, they are telling us to brace for unemployment to climb over ten percent. They promised jobs created. Now they scramble to find a way to play games with government numbers by claiming jobs saved.</p><p>Simply put, this is now President Obama’s economy and the American people are beginning to question whether his policies are working. </p><p>But that doesn’t mean we are out of options. Together, we can bring about a strong and real recovery. We can create an environment that empowers small businesses and American workers to thrive. We must focus on job creation and restoring the financial and retirement security lost by millions. </p><p>And for the sake of our children and our long-term fiscal viability, Washington must stop spending money that it doesn’t have. </p><p>That’s why every day, my Republican colleagues are fighting to enact policies that will stabilize our economy, create jobs and ignite prosperity. You and your family deserve no less. </p><p>Since January, we have offered alternatives to the out-of-control, big government, Democrat agenda that unfortunately became law and has completely failed to create jobs. Our plan is simple and smart— and its strength is that it doesn’t invest in Washington, it invests in the American people.</p><p>We believe Washington should stop its war on the Middle Class and reduce tax rates so every hardworking, taxpaying-family in America will see an immediate increase in their income. A prosperous middle class is critical for our entire nation’s well being.</p><p>We believe Washington must stop targeting America’s small businesses and instead should empower them by allowing employers to take a tax deduction to free up funds to retain and hire new employees.</p><p>Our history proves that it is the small businessmen and women who will reignite our economy by putting people back to work. Washington should get out of the way and encourage small business employers to start or grow a business.</p><p>Lastly, we believe Washington must be responsible for every taxpayer dollar that it spends. Washington MUST live within its means. We will not support taxes hikes to pay for even more so-called stimulus spending.</p><p>The overwhelming majority of Americans are working hard and are playing by the rules. They are providing for their families and doing their part to return America to the pinnacle of prosperity.</p><p>Their reward? Trillions more in debt. </p><p>For the ‘stimulus’ alone, Washington borrowed nearly ten thousand dollars from every American household. Let me ask you: do you feel $10,000 richer today?  Do you feel $10,000 better off? If you don’t, please know most people agree.</p><p>That is why we continue our fight because during these tough economic times, it often seems that Washington is offering you few choices except for spend and borrow. I’m here today to let you know there are alternatives—common-sense tax relief; smart and necessary reductions in spending and intelligent policies that do not bankrupt our nation.</p><p>That is why I’m asking you to join our fight for accountability and common-sense. We can do better and we will do better, but first we have to come together to change what is going on. The time is critical, the choice is yours. I’m Eric Cantor, and on behalf of my Republican colleagues, join with us to get Washington working for you once again. Thank you for listening.</p></blockquote><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/6UurMesshWA" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/cantor-on-obamas-failed-stimulus.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>AIG bonus scandal redux - AIG prepares to pay millions of dollars more in bonuses</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/loy2nCJaKx0/aig-bonus-scandal-redux-aig-prepares-to-pay-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/aig-bonus-scandal-redux-aig-prepares-to-pay-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570f7a945970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-10T09:51:28-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-10T09:51:28-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Learning nothing from outrage over the millions already paid to executives and presidential candidates, American International Group Inc. is preparing to pay millions of dollars more in bonuses to several dozen of its executives. AIG wants the Obama Administration to bless the additional bonuses. I doubt that Obama will stop the additional payments. After all, during the presidential campaign Obama received $101,332 in "bonus" money from AIG.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Presidency" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="AIG" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Bailout" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Bonuses" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Learning nothing from outrage over the millions already paid to executives and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m3d17-Obama-Received-a-101332-Bonus-from-AIG">presidential candidates</a>, American International Group Inc. is <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-aig10-2009jul10,0,4253840.story">preparing to pay millions of dollars more</a> in bonuses to several dozen of its executives.</p><p>AIG wants the Obama Administration to bless the additional bonuses. I doubt that Obama will stop the additional payments. After all, during the presidential campaign <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m3d17-Obama-Received-a-101332-Bonus-from-AIG">Obama received $101,332 in "bonus" money from AIG</a>.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/loy2nCJaKx0" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/aig-bonus-scandal-redux-aig-prepares-to-pay-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Obama would have done nothing differently </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/kaP_vcjYBPI/the-republican-national-committee-released-the-following-web-video-which-takes-president-obama-to-task-for-his-failed-stimulu.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/the-republican-national-committee-released-the-following-web-video-which-takes-president-obama-to-task-for-his-failed-stimulu.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571ebee27970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-10T08:34:20-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-10T09:16:11-04:00</updated>
        <summary>"There's nothing that we would have done differently." - Barack Obama, Moscow, July 7, 2009 Obama, when asked in Moscow about Vice President Biden's statement that team Obama "misread" the economy, replied: "There's nothing that we would have done differently." The Republican National Committee released the following web video, which takes President Obama to task for his failed stimulus and for Obama's statement that there's nothing he would have done differently:</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Presidency" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="BarackObama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Failed" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Joe Biden" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Misread" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Nothing" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Stimulus" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;"&lt;strong&gt;There's nothing that we would have done differently&lt;/strong&gt;." - Barack Obama, Moscow, July 7, 2009&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;

Obama, when &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8021156&amp;amp;page=1"&gt;asked in Moscow&lt;/a&gt; about Vice President Biden's statement that team Obama &lt;a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/07/biden-we-misread-the-economy-.html"&gt;"misread" the economy&lt;/a&gt;, replied: "There's nothing that we would have done differently." &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Republican National Committee released the following&amp;nbsp; web video, which takes President Obama to task for his failed stimulus and for Obama's statement that there's nothing he would have done differently:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="450" height="283"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RMuQZTgciNE&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RMuQZTgciNE&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="283"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/kaP_vcjYBPI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/the-republican-national-committee-released-the-following-web-video-which-takes-president-obama-to-task-for-his-failed-stimulu.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Burris won't run for Obama's Senate seat </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/fSrNa_iFCqg/burris-wont-run-for-obamas-senate-seat-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/burris-wont-run-for-obamas-senate-seat-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570f7347d970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-10T08:19:49-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-10T08:19:49-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Michael Sneed reports U.S. Sen. Roland Burris has decided not to seek election to President Obama's Senate seat to which he was appointed by indicted by former Illinois Governor Blagojevich. The Blogojevich appointment landed Burris in the midst of the Blagojevich pay-to-play corruption scandal. Burris, who has been unable to raise significant campaign funds, plans to announce his decision later today. Watch the following video report from NBC Nightly News: Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="2010 Elections" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Corruption" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Illinois" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Pay to Play" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Rod Blogojevich" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Roland Burris" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Senate" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Michael Sneed reports U.S. Sen. Roland Burris has decided not to seek election to President Obama's Senate seat to which he was appointed by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040201763.html">indicted by former Illinois Governor Blagojevich</a>.</p><p>The Blogojevich appointment landed Burris in the midst of the Blagojevich pay-to-play corruption scandal. </p><p>Burris, who has been unable to raise significant campaign funds, plans to announce his decision later today.</p><p>Watch the following video report from NBC Nightly News:</p><div><iframe frameborder="0" height="339" scrolling="no" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/31836992#31836992" width="425" /><p style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; font-size: 11px; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: #999999; margin-top: 5px; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #999999 ! important; text-decoration: none ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; height: 13px; color: #5799db ! important;">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #999999 ! important; text-decoration: none ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; height: 13px; color: #5799db ! important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #999999 ! important; text-decoration: none ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; height: 13px; color: #5799db ! important;">News about the Economy</a></p></div><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/fSrNa_iFCqg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/burris-wont-run-for-obamas-senate-seat-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>ABC's Jake Tapper on the Obama stimulus failure</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/C0eV847A-48/abcs-jake-tapper-on-the-obama-stimulus-failure.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/abcs-jake-tapper-on-the-obama-stimulus-failure.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-07-10T05:58:12-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571e6e97c970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-09T15:56:27-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-09T15:56:27-04:00</updated>
        <summary>On "Good Morning America," Jake Tapper reports on the failure of President Obama so-called stimulus:</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Failure" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Stimulus" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;On "Good Morning America," Jake Tapper reports on the failure of President Obama so-called stimulus:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;object width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8GnNuyHLkd8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8GnNuyHLkd8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/C0eV847A-48" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/abcs-jake-tapper-on-the-obama-stimulus-failure.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Obama signs climate pact at G-8 meeting</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/vsVCeUb3gHA/obama-signs-climate-pact-at-g8-meeting.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-signs-climate-pact-at-g8-meeting.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-07-10T05:49:41-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571e698f8970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-09T15:11:33-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-09T15:11:33-04:00</updated>
        <summary>President Obama signs climate pact at the G-8 meeting. The agreement seeks to cut half of all emissions linked to climate change by 2050 and calls for halting the world's average temperature from rising 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above current levels by switching to green-energy sources, such as wind and solar power. Unfortunately, emerging industrial powers like China and India will not be parties. Obama Signing the G-8 climate change pact that does not require emission reductions by China and India is the same as Clinton/Gore signing Kyoto. At least in 1997 the Senate warned President Clinton not to give the emerging industrial powers an economic advantage. The Senate passed the Byrd-Hagel Resolution. Byrd-Hagel stated the sense of the Senate that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing nations as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States." Byrd-Hagel prevented Clinton from even trying to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Energy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Environment" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Presidency" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="G-8" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/07/09/2009-07-09_bam_signs_first_us_climate_pact_at_g8.html">President Obama signs climate pact</a> at the G-8 meeting. </p><p>The agreement seeks to cut half of all emissions linked to climate change by 2050 and calls for halting the world's average temperature from rising 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above current levels by switching to green-energy sources, such as wind and solar power. </p><p>Unfortunately, emerging industrial powers like <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/O/OBAMA?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">China and India will not be parties</a>.</p><p>Obama Signing the G-8 climate change pact that does not require emission reductions by China and India is the same as Clinton/Gore signing Kyoto. At least in 1997 the Senate warned President Clinton not to give the emerging industrial powers an economic advantage. The Senate passed the <a href="http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoSenate.html">Byrd-Hagel Resolution</a>. Byrd-Hagel stated the sense of the Senate that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing nations as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States." Byrd-Hagel prevented Clinton from even trying to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/vsVCeUb3gHA" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-signs-climate-pact-at-g8-meeting.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Obama approval index in free fall, now -8</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/aOGByY6JpgM/obama-approval-index-in-free-fall-now-8.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-approval-index-in-free-fall-now-8.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571e5e294970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-09T10:21:22-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-09T10:21:22-04:00</updated>
        <summary>President Obama's record low -5, just like Tuesday's -3, Presidential Approval Index didn't even last a day. Today, Rasmussen reports Obama's Presidential Approval Index fell to -8. Another record low. The tracking Poll shows that 30% of the nation's voters still strongly approve of Obama's performance, but 38% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen's Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve. Does the term free fall seem appropriate?</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Presidency" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Presidential Approval Index" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Presidential Tracking Poll" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Rasmussen" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>President Obama's <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m7d8-Obama-approval-index-falls-to-5">record low -5</a>, just like <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m7d7-Obama-approval-index-falls-to-3">Tuesday's -3</a>, Presidential Approval Index didn't even last a day.</p> <p>Today, Rasmussen reports <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll">Obama's Presidential Approval Index</a> fell to -8. <a _fcksavedurl="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history" href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history">Another record low</a>.</p><p><a href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345213db69e2011571e5d4bf970b-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Obama_index_july_9_2009" class="at-xid-6a00d8345213db69e2011571e5d4bf970b " src="http://cayankee.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345213db69e2011571e5d4bf970b-450wi" style="width: 450px;" /></a> </p><p>The tracking Poll shows that 30% of the nation's voters still strongly approve of Obama's performance, but 38% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen's Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve.</p><p>Does the term free fall seem appropriate?</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/aOGByY6JpgM" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-approval-index-in-free-fall-now-8.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Byrd blasts ‘cap and trade’</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/plR7NwMJcxc/byrd-blasts-cap-and-trade.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/byrd-blasts-cap-and-trade.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570ef6e97970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-09T06:24:03-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-09T06:24:03-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Senator Robert Byrd opposes the Waxman-Markey "cap and trade" climate change legislation pushed by President Obama and passed, but not read by the House: "I cannot support the House bill in its present form," Byrd said in a statement. "I continue to believe that clean coal can be a 'green' energy. Those of us who understand coal's great potential in our quest for energy independence must continue to work diligently in shaping a climate bill that will ensure access to affordable energy for West Virginians." It is no surprise that the Democrat, who grew up in grew up in West Virginia coalfields, would oppose cap and trade. After all, Obama says cap and trade will bankrupt anyone who builds a coal-powered plant. Also, Senator Byrd's was one of the two sponsors of the Byrd-Hagel Resolution, which the senate unanimously passed, 95–0, in 1997. Byrd-Hagel stated the sense of the Senate that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing nations as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States." Byrd-Hagel prevented Clinton from even trying to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, which like the Waxman-Markey "cap and trade" climate change legislation, would have put the U.S. economy at an economic disadvantage to China and India.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Energy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Environment" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Cap and Trade" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Coal" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Robert Byrd" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Waxman-Markey" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="West Virginia" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Senator Robert Byrd <a href="http://www.news-register.net/page/content.detail/id/525852.html">opposes the Waxman-Markey "cap and trade"</a> climate change legislation pushed by President Obama and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m6d26-House-Democrats-and-8-Republicans-pass-cap-and-Trade">passed, but not read by the House:</a></p><blockquote><p>"I cannot support the House bill in its present form," Byrd said in a statement. "I continue to believe that clean coal can be a 'green' energy. Those of us who understand coal's great potential in our quest for energy independence must continue to work diligently in shaping a climate bill that will ensure access to affordable energy for West Virginians."</p></blockquote><p> It is no surprise that the Democrat, who grew up in grew up in West Virginia coalfields, would oppose cap and trade. After all, Obama says cap and trade will <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2008m11d3-Obama-will-bankrupt-the-coal-industry">bankrupt anyone who builds a coal-powered plant</a>.</p><p>Also, Senator Byrd's was one of the two sponsors of the <a href="http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoSenate.html">Byrd-Hagel Resolution</a>, which the senate unanimously passed, <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00205">95–0</a>, in 1997. Byrd-Hagel stated the sense of the Senate that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing nations as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States." Byrd-Hagel prevented Clinton from even trying to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, which like the Waxman-Markey "cap and trade" climate change legislation, would have put the U.S. economy at an economic disadvantage to China and India.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/plR7NwMJcxc" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/byrd-blasts-cap-and-trade.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Obama added to Mount Rushmore</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/g9fzOAdSdtg/obama-added-to-mount-rushmore.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-added-to-mount-rushmore.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-07-13T06:35:32-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570e6a043970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-08T13:22:58-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-08T13:24:52-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Greenpeace activists environmental terrorists defaced Mount Rushmore by hanging a sixty-five feet high by thirty-five feet wide banner "featuring" a portrait of President Obama and the political message, "stop global warming." Shame on Greenpeace.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Terrorism" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Environmental Terrorists" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Greenpeace" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Mount Rushmore" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Greenpeace <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">activists</span> environmental terrorists <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/08/AR2009070802246.html">defaced Mount Rushmore</a> by hanging a sixty-five feet high by thirty-five feet wide banner "featuring" a portrait of President Obama and the political message, "stop global warming."</p><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="loc=%2F&amp;vid=1772518&amp;autoplay=false" height="361" src="http://www.ustream.tv/flash/video/1772518" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" /><p>Shame on Greenpeace.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/g9fzOAdSdtg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-added-to-mount-rushmore.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Obama approval index falls to -5</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/Dei41_gfGE8/obama-approval-index-falls-to-5.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-approval-index-falls-to-5.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570e57842970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-08T11:43:16-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-08T11:48:07-04:00</updated>
        <summary>President Obama's record low -3 Presidential Approval Index didn't even last a day. Today, Rasmussen reports Obama's Presidential Approval Index fell to -5. Another record low. The tracking Poll shows that 32% of the nation's voters still strongly approve of Obama's performance, but 37% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen's Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve. Obama's poll numbers began falling to earth as the Obama Presidency reached the 100-day mark, but slowed after the Presidential Approval Index hit +4. The more we find out about Obama's agenda the more Obama's Approval Index falls.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>President Obama's r<a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m7d7-Obama-approval-index-falls-to-3">ecord low -3 Presidential Approval Index</a> didn't even last a day. </p><p>Today, Rasmussen reports <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll">Obama's Presidential Approval Index</a> fell to -5. <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history">Another record low</a>.</p><p><a href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345213db69e2011570e573c7970c-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Obama_index_0708" class="at-xid-6a00d8345213db69e2011570e573c7970c " src="http://cayankee.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345213db69e2011570e573c7970c-450wi" style="width: 450px;" /></a> </p><p>The tracking Poll shows that 32% of the nation's voters still strongly
approve of Obama's performance, but 37% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen's
Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who
strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve.</p> <p>Obama's poll numbers began <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m3d13-Obamas-approval-rating-is-dropping">falling to earth</a> as the Obama Presidency reached the <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m3d10-The-Obama-first-100-days-halftime-report">100-day mark</a>, but slowed after the Presidential Approval Index <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m3d17-Obamas-approval-rating-continues-to-fall">hit +4</a>.</p><p>The more we find out about Obama's agenda the more Obama's Approval Index falls.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/Dei41_gfGE8" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-approval-index-falls-to-5.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Has the Obama/Democrats' stimulus done its job?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/DP_uCDYQRmk/has-the-obamademocrats-stimulus-done-its-job.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/has-the-obamademocrats-stimulus-done-its-job.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570e561d6970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-08T11:17:40-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-08T11:17:40-04:00</updated>
        <summary>President Obama says his so-called stimulus has "done its job." I did not think it would and I do not think it did. What do you think?</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barack Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Democrats" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Done Its Job" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Stimulus" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>President Obama says his so-called stimulus has "done its job."</p><p><object height="283" width="450"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8NGEfRBzB0s&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="283" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8NGEfRBzB0s&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" /></object></p><p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m1d10-Obama-ups-the-ante-and-loses-all-credibility-on-bailout-boondoggle">I did not think it would</a> and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2009m7d2-Obamas-jobless-recovery--unemployment-at-95">I do not think it did</a>.</p><p>What do you think?</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/DP_uCDYQRmk" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/has-the-obamademocrats-stimulus-done-its-job.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Democrats have no one to blame now</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/sNZbjEFsQSU/democrats-have-no-one-to-blame-now.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/democrats-have-no-one-to-blame-now.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571d97858970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-08T08:58:56-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-08T09:01:30-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Senator Franken was sworn in yesterday giving the Democrats 60 seats in the Senate and total control over the federal government. The National Republican Senatorial Committee marked the event with the release of a new video "60" No Checks. No Balances. No debate. No excuses. The Democrats own everything and have no one to blame now.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Congress" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="&quot;60&quot;" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Al Franken" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="National Republican Senatorial Committee" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Senate" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Senator Franken was sworn in yesterday giving the Democrats 60 seats in the Senate and total control over the federal government.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The National Republican Senatorial Committee marked the event with the release of a new video "60"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="450" height="283"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lI3QM_p73oI&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lI3QM_p73oI&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="283"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No Checks. No Balances. No debate. No excuses. The Democrats own everything and have no one to blame now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/sNZbjEFsQSU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/democrats-have-no-one-to-blame-now.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Will Barney Frank's call for lower standards for condo buyers result in another housing crisis? </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/H4v-Sw508Ns/will-barney-franks-call-for-lower-standards-for-condo-buyers-result-in-another-housing-crisis-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/will-barney-franks-call-for-lower-standards-for-condo-buyers-result-in-another-housing-crisis-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011570e42d1f970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-08T06:36:17-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-08T06:36:17-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Here we go again. Massachusetts Democrat Congressman Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, wants to lower the lending standards for condo buyers. This is the way we got into the sub-prime mortgage crisis - "encouraging" Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to lower lending standards to encourage more home ownership. Dr. Thomas Sowell says Barney Frank and Freddie and Fannie are more responsible than anyone else for the financial crisis we are suffering right now: The banks did not choose to lower the lending standards. The government leaned on them. The Justice Department under Clinton threatened them with prosecution if their lending patterns didn't suit the government. So, we had regulations. It was precisely the regulators who pushed the lower lending standards, just as Barney Frank is doing now, and that's at the heart of the financial crisis we're going through now. You can watch Dr. Sowell discuss Frank's call for lower lending standards in the following video:</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Barney Frank" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Fannie Mae" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Freddie Mac" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Mortgages" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Sub-Prime" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Here we go again.</p><p>Massachusetts Democrat Congressman Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, wants to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124580784452945093.html">lower the lending standards</a> for condo buyers.</p><p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-268-Right-Side-Politics-Examiner%7Ey2008m9d26-Why-the-Dems-need-to-blame-McCain-for-their-failure-to-pass-the-bailout">This is the way we got into the sub-prime mortgage crisis</a> - "encouraging" Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to lower lending standards to encourage more home ownership.</p><p>Dr. Thomas Sowell says Barney Frank and Freddie and Fannie are more responsible than anyone else for the financial crisis we are suffering right now:</p><blockquote><p>The banks did not choose to lower the lending standards. The government leaned on them. The Justice Department under Clinton threatened them with prosecution if their lending patterns didn't suit the government. So, we had regulations. It was precisely the regulators who pushed the lower lending standards, just as Barney Frank is doing now, and that's at the heart of the financial crisis we're going through now.</p></blockquote><p>You can watch Dr. Sowell discuss Frank's call for lower lending standards in the following video:</p><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="playerId=011008&amp;playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&amp;categoryTitle=undefined&amp;referralObject=6602373" height="275" id="mediumFlashEmbedded" menu="false" name="FOX News" play="false" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" salign="LT" scale="noscale" scriptaccess="always" src="http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/largeplayer011008/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="305" wmode="false" /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/H4v-Sw508Ns" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/will-barney-franks-call-for-lower-standards-for-condo-buyers-result-in-another-housing-crisis-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Obama approval index hits -3</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/aWSm4ILEl0s/obama-approval-index-hits-3.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-approval-index-hits-3.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571d594ce970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-07T21:27:19-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-07T21:27:19-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Rasmussen reports President Obama's Presidential Approval Index fell to -3. That is Obama's lowest rating to date. The tracking Poll shows that 33% of the nation's voters strongly approve of Obama's performance and 36% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen's Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve. Those figures reflect the highest level of strong disapproval and the lowest level recorded for the overall Approval Index to date. Obama's poll numbers began falling to earth as the Obama Presidency reached the 100-day mark, but slowed after the Presidential Approval Index hit +4. A new Quinnipiac University poll found Obama's approval rating also fell below 50 percent in Ohio, a critical swing state. The 49-44 rating is Obama's lowest approval rating in any national or statewide Quinnipiac University poll since his was inauguration and is down from 62-31 percent in a May 6 Quinnipiac poll. In the new poll, voters disapprove of the way Obama is handling the economy 48-46 percent. This is down from 57-36 percent in May.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Presidency" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Presidential Approval Index" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Presidential Tracking Poll" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Rasmussen" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Rasmussen reports President Obama's <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll">Presidential Approval Index fell to -3</a>. That is Obama's lowest rating to date.</p><p><a href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345213db69e2011570e07357970c-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Obama_index_july_7_2009" class="at-xid-6a00d8345213db69e2011570e07357970c " src="http://cayankee.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8345213db69e2011570e07357970c-450wi" style="width: 450px;" /></a> </p><p /><p><img align="middle" alt="" height="407" src="/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/obama_approval_index_20080621.jpg" width="475" /></p>
<div style="margin: 5px; padding: 5px; font-size: 12px;"><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">The tracking Poll shows that 33% of the nation's voters strongly approve of Obama's performance and 36% strongly disapprove. Rasmussen's Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who strongly disapprove from the number who strongly approve.<br /><br />Those figures reflect the highest level of strong disapproval and the lowest level recorded for the overall Approval Index <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/obama_approval_index_history">to date</a>.<br /><br />Obama's poll numbers began </span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">falling to earth</span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;"> as the Obama Presidency reached the </span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">100-day mark</span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">, but slowed after the Presidential Approval Index </span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">hit +4</span><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">A new <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1322.xml?ReleaseID=1347">Quinnipiac University poll</a> found Obama's approval rating also fell below 50 percent in Ohio,  a critical swing state. The 49-44 rating is Obama's lowest approval rating in any national or statewide Quinnipiac University poll since his was inauguration and is down from 62-31 percent in a <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1322.xml?ReleaseID=1295">May 6 Quinnipiac poll</a>.
<br /><br />In the new poll, voters disapprove of the way Obama is handling the economy 48-46 percent. This is down from 57-36 percent in May. </span><br /></div><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/aWSm4ILEl0s" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/obama-approval-index-hits-3.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Palin resignation 'is about country' and a 'higher calling'</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~3/t4_97x8Yx9w/palin-says-resignation-is-about-country-and-a-higher-calling.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/palin-says-resignation-is-about-country-and-a-higher-calling.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-07-07T05:56:51-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345213db69e2011571c0b82e970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-05T08:58:13-04:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-05T08:58:13-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Amid all the rampant uniformed and mostly unflattering speculation about why she chose to resign, Governor Palin explained on Facebook that her rationale "is about country" and a "higher calling": How sad that Washington and the media will never understand; it’s about country. [. . .] I shared with you yesterday my heartfelt and candid reasons for this change; I’ve never thought I needed a title before one’s name to forge progress in America. I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention, greater energy independence, stronger national security, and much-needed fiscal restraint. You can read Palin's entire facebook message below. Palin also went on the offensive against those spreading inaccurate and libelous tall tales about her resignation. The Governor's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, warned legal action may be taken against bloggers and publications that reprint fraudulent claims: "To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as 'fact' that Governor Palin resigned because she is 'under federal investigation' for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation. This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law." Van Flein also said Palin is not in any criminal legal jeopardy: "I can say definitively I am aware of no criminal investigation whatsoever involving Sarah Palin. Zero." The FBI's Alaska spokesman said their is no FBI investigation of Palin for her activities as governor, as mayor or in any other capacity. Palin's Facebook message: Happy 4th of July from Alaska! Today at 4:55pm On this Independence Day, I am so very proud of all those who have chosen to serve our great nation and I honor their selflessness and the sacrifices of their families, too. If I may, I would like to take a moment to reflect on the last 24 hours and share my thoughts with you. First, I want to thank you for your support and hard work on the values we share. Those values led me to the decision my family and I made. Yesterday, my family and I announced a decision that is in Alaska’s best interest and it always feels good to do what is right. We have accomplished more during this one term than most governors do in two – and I am proud of the great team that helped to build these wonderful successes. Energy independence and national security, fiscal restraint, smaller government, and local control have been my priorities and will remain my priorities. For months now, I have consulted with friends and family, and with the Lieutenant Governor, about what is best for our wonderful state. I even made a few administrative changes over that course in time in...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Dan Spencer</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="2012 Elections" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Presidential Campaign 2012" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Alaska" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Defamation" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="FBI" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Fraud" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Sarah Palin" />
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amid all the rampant uniformed and mostly unflattering speculation about why she chose to resign, &lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0709/Palin_hammers_media_hints_at_national_ambitions.html"&gt;Governor Palin explained on Facebook&lt;/a&gt; that her rationale "is about country" and a "higher calling":&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;How sad that Washington and the media will never understand; it’s about
country. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[. . .]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I shared with you yesterday my heartfelt and candid reasons for this
change; I’ve never thought I needed a title before one’s name to forge
progress in America. I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this
country together with our values of less government intervention,
greater energy independence, stronger national security, and
much-needed fiscal restraint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can read Palin's entire facebook message below.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090705/ap_on_re_us/us_palin_resigning"&gt;Palin also went on the offensive&lt;/a&gt; against those spreading inaccurate and libelous tall tales about her resignation. The Governor's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, warned legal action may be taken against bloggers and publications that reprint fraudulent claims:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;"To the extent several websites, most notably liberal Alaska blogger Shannyn Moore, are now claiming as 'fact' that Governor Palin resigned because she is 'under federal investigation' for embezzlement or other criminal wrongdoing, we will be exploring legal options this week to address such defamation. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is to provide notice to Ms. Moore, and those who re-publish the defamation, such as Huffington Post, MSNBC, the New York Times and The Washington Post, that the Palins will not allow them to propagate defamatory material without answering to this in a court of law."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Van Flein also said &lt;a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/853746.html"&gt;Palin is not in any criminal legal jeopardy&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I can say definitively I am aware of no criminal investigation whatsoever involving Sarah Palin. Zero."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt; The FBI's Alaska spokesman said their is &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-palin5-2009jul05,0,7018263.story"&gt;no FBI investigation of Palin&lt;/a&gt; for her activities as governor, as mayor or in any other capacity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Palin's Facebook message:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Happy 4th of July from Alaska!&lt;br&gt;Today at 4:55pm &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On this Independence Day, I am so very proud of all those who have chosen to serve our great nation and I honor their selflessness and the sacrifices of their families, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I may, I would like to take a moment to reflect on the last 24 hours and share my thoughts with you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, I want to thank you for your support and hard work on the values we share. Those values led me to the decision my family and I made. Yesterday, my family and I announced a decision that is in Alaska’s best interest and it always feels good to do what is right. We have accomplished more during this one term than most governors do in two – and I am proud of the great team that helped to build these wonderful successes. Energy independence and national security, fiscal restraint, smaller government, and local control have been my priorities and will remain my priorities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For months now, I have consulted with friends and family, and with the Lieutenant Governor, about what is best for our wonderful state. I even made a few administrative changes over that course in time in preparation for yesterday. We have accomplished so much and there’s much more to do, but my family and I determined after prayerful consideration that sacrificing my title helps Alaska most. And once I decided not to run for re-election, my decision was that much easier – I’ve never been one to waste time or resources. Those who know me know this is the right decision and obvious decision at that, including Senator John McCain. I thank him for his kind, insightful comments.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The response in the main stream media has been most predictable, ironic, and as always, detached from the lives of ordinary Americans who are sick of the “politics of personal destruction”. How sad that Washington and the media will never understand; it’s about country. And though it's honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a different standard applies for the decisions I make. But every American understands what it takes to make a decision because it’s right for all, including your family.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I shared with you yesterday my heartfelt and candid reasons for this change; I’ve never thought I needed a title before one’s name to forge progress in America. I am now looking ahead and how we can advance this country together with our values of less government intervention, greater energy independence, stronger national security, and much-needed fiscal restraint. I hope you will join me. Now is the time to rebuild and help our nation achieve greatness!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;God bless you! And I look forward to making a difference – with you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sarah&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CaliforniaYankee/~4/t4_97x8Yx9w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2009/07/palin-says-resignation-is-about-country-and-a-higher-calling.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
