<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>CandidCritic.Com</title>
	<link>http://www.candidcritic.com</link>
	<description>reviews and commentary on movies, music, stocks, sports, and more?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CandidCritic" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>CandidCritic</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Amazon.com Still Overvalued (AMZN)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/MSAWhY3S-AM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-still-overvalued-amzn/2008/11/26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>tech</dc:subject><dc:subject>AAPL</dc:subject><dc:subject>Amazon.com</dc:subject><dc:subject>amzn</dc:subject><dc:subject>goog</dc:subject><dc:subject>online retailing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>tech</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-still-overvalued-amzn/2008/11/26/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though it is off 57% from its 52-week high ($97.43), Amazon.com (AMZN) is still overvalued.  It is trading at a lofty 28x the average analyst estimate for 2009 earnings (a PE/Growth that&#8217;s 20% higher than its comps) and an even more outlandish 15.3x enterprise value to EBITDA (double its comps). SEE COMPARABLE ANALYSIS BELOW
Sure, Amazon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though it is off 57% from its 52-week high ($97.43), Amazon.com (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMZN">AMZN</a>) is still overvalued.  It is trading at a lofty 28x the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=AMZN">average analyst estimate</a> for 2009 earnings (a PE/Growth that&#8217;s 20% higher than its comps) and an even more outlandish 15.3x enterprise value to EBITDA (double its comps). SEE COMPARABLE ANALYSIS BELOW</p>
<p>Sure, Amazon is by far the dominant online retailer.  But, the consumer is getting crushed right now and will continue to hurt well into 2009.  This will put a signifant drag on the margin-improvement story that had driven much of Amazon&#8217;s <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AMZN&#038;t=2y">run-up</a> during 2007 and early 2008.</p>
<p>Buy Januray puts now.  We would recommend the Jan 30&#8217;s trading at $1.95 (<a title="Amazon puts" href="hhttp://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ZQNMF.X">ZQNMF.X</a>)</p>
<p><img title="AMZN comps" alt="AMZN comps" src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/amzn_analysis_11.26.08.jpg" />
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=MSAWhY3S-AM:ImGq-Xu1DZc:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=MSAWhY3S-AM:ImGq-Xu1DZc:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=MSAWhY3S-AM:ImGq-Xu1DZc:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=MSAWhY3S-AM:ImGq-Xu1DZc:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-still-overvalued-amzn/2008/11/26/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMZN</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-still-overvalued-amzn/2008/11/26/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Blodget Must Be Short Research in Motion (RIMM)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/VdmTJFXPMWs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/blodget-must-be-short-research-in-motion-rimm/2008/11/05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>tech</dc:subject><dc:subject>AAPL</dc:subject><dc:subject>blackberry</dc:subject><dc:subject>Blodget</dc:subject><dc:subject>gadget</dc:subject><dc:subject>iPhone</dc:subject><dc:subject>mobile</dc:subject><dc:subject>rimm</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>tech</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/blodget-must-be-short-research-in-motion-rimm/2008/11/05/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry Blodget must be short RIMM.  What other explanation can there be for his grossly distorted take on WSJ�??s glowing review of the new BlackBerry Bold.
 
Blodget sifted every negative fleck from Katherine Boehret�??s review in order to concoct a blog post that would neatly fit his sensationalist, deceptive headline: �??Mossberg Pees On BlackBerry Bold: Bulky, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry Blodget must be short <a title="Research in Motion stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RIMM">RIMM</a>.  What other explanation can there be for his <a title="silicon alley insider" href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/11/mossberg-pees-on-blackberry-bold-bulky-heavy-expensive">grossly distorted take</a> on WSJ�??s <a title="Wall Street Journal review" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122584075545798843.html">glowing review</a> of the new BlackBerry Bold.</p>
<p><img title="BlackBerry Bold" alt="BlackBerry Bold" src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bold.jpg" /> </p>
<p>Blodget sifted every negative fleck from Katherine Boehret�??s review in order to concoct a blog post that would neatly fit his sensationalist, deceptive headline: �??Mossberg Pees On BlackBerry Bold: Bulky, Heavy, Expensive�??</p>
<p>First, Blodget chooses to ignore the critical point made by Boehret that the Bold was not intended to be an iPhone competitor (that�??s left to RIMM�??s forthcoming Storm, which will almost certainly be reviewed by Mossberg himself), and instead is designed to be an evolution of the BlackBerry 8800 series devices, which are popular with corporations because they focus on functionality over style.  This point, made by Boehert in paragraph two, places the entire review in a proper context.</p>
<p>Blodget, as any good yellow journalist would do, takes everything out of context.</p>
<p>Now, here are my takeways from Boehret�??s review:</p>
<p><em>�??The BlackBerry Bold has a bright, beautiful screen and one of the most comfortable keyboards I&#8217;ve used on a mobile device. It has a speedy processor that handles email, Web browsing and video playback with ease.�??</em></p>
<p><em>�??The Bold&#8217;s large size affords mobile extravagances like a keyboard I could use without looking down.�??</em></p>
<p><em>�??Emailing on the BlackBerry Bold was a breeze. I grew so fond of its keyboard&#8230;that I found myself touch typing without looking down after only three days of use.�??</em></p>
<p><em>�??The Bold opened Web addresses and videos with no problem, whether I was on AT&#038;T&#8217;s 3G network or Wi-Fi in my home or office.�??</em></p>
<p><em>�??I found the BlackBerry Bold to be a huge asset for on-the-go productivity�??</em></p>
<p><em>�??Users won&#8217;t mind this mobile device&#8217;s large build and higher price because of its luxuriously comfortable features.�??</em></p>
<p><em>�??The Bold is definitely worth a look.�??</em>
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=VdmTJFXPMWs:YoHdlS5yi1k:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=VdmTJFXPMWs:YoHdlS5yi1k:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=VdmTJFXPMWs:YoHdlS5yi1k:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=VdmTJFXPMWs:YoHdlS5yi1k:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/blodget-must-be-short-research-in-motion-rimm/2008/11/05/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/blodget-must-be-short-research-in-motion-rimm/2008/11/05/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry On Sale (RIMM)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/qP-3mfuMGz0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/blackberry-on-sale-rimm/2008/10/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>AAPL</dc:subject><dc:subject>blackberry</dc:subject><dc:subject>rimm</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/blackberry-on-sale-rimm/2008/10/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIMM was hit with two negative analyst calls yesterday and the stock traded off (down 8.6% on a day when the NASD was up 3.4%) as if it still carried a 40x multiple.  But it doesn&#8217;t.  At about $53 per share, RIMM is trading at 16x even the most conservative analyst estimates for FY2010 ($3.33 per share).  This, despite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RIMM">RIMM</a> was hit with two <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idCAN2053523420081020?rpc=44">negative analyst calls</a> yesterday and the stock traded off (down 8.6% on a day when the NASD was up 3.4%) as if it still carried a 40x multiple.  But it doesn&#8217;t.  At about $53 per share, RIMM is trading at 16x even the most conservative <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=RIMM">analyst estimates</a> for FY2010 ($3.33 per share).  This, despite the fact that RIMM is still generally expected to deliver 40%+ revenue growth and 30%+ earnings growth next year.  And, let&#8217;s not forget that RIMM has more than $1.5 billion of cash on its balance sheet and virtually no debt.</p>
<p>Sure, RIMM is experiencing some delays in getting the Bold (AT&#038;T) to market and is supposedly seeing less-then-stellar uptake on its new flip phone (T-Mobile) based on VERY early indications.  But, <a href="http://mobileroar.com/2008/10/08/blackberry-storm-first-reviews">initial reviews</a> of BlackBerry&#8217;s Storm (Verizon) touch-screen device have been surprisingly strong - even giving its touch-screen an edge over the iPhone&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Bottom line: RIMM just may be one of the most undervalued names out there right now.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=qP-3mfuMGz0:FVBbq3MSCJk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=qP-3mfuMGz0:FVBbq3MSCJk:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=qP-3mfuMGz0:FVBbq3MSCJk:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=qP-3mfuMGz0:FVBbq3MSCJk:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/blackberry-on-sale-rimm/2008/10/21/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/blackberry-on-sale-rimm/2008/10/21/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash is King (AAPL) (GOOG) (CSCO)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/nS0XTF_Tobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/cash-is-king-aapl-goog-csco/2008/10/10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>AAPL</dc:subject><dc:subject>csco</dc:subject><dc:subject>goog</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/cash-is-king-aapl-goog-csco/2008/10/10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While everyone else seems to be scrambling for cash to maintain operations, keep in mind&#8230; 
Apple (AAPL) is sitting on $20 billion of cash and has no debt.  That equates to about $23.50 per share in cash, or about 27% of its current stock price ($88.00).
Google (GOOG) is sittiing on $13 billion of cash and has no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While everyone else seems to be scrambling for cash to maintain operations, keep in mind&#8230; </p>
<p>Apple (<a title="Apple stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AAPL">AAPL</a>) is sitting on <strong>$20 billion of cash</strong> and has no debt.  That equates to about $23.50 per share in cash, or about 27% of its current stock price ($88.00).</p>
<p>Google (<a title="Google stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=goog">GOOG</a>) is sittiing on <strong>$13 billion of cash</strong> and has no debt.  That equates to about $40.50 per share in cash, or about 12% of its current stock price ($328.00).</p>
<p>Cisco (<a title="Cisco stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=csco">CSCO</a>) is sittiing on <strong>$26 billion of cash</strong> and has about $7 billion of debt.  That equates to about $3.25 per share in net cash, or about 19% of its current stock price ($17.21).
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=nS0XTF_Tobs:Ql6DuLoeDno:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=nS0XTF_Tobs:Ql6DuLoeDno:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=nS0XTF_Tobs:Ql6DuLoeDno:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=nS0XTF_Tobs:Ql6DuLoeDno:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/cash-is-king-aapl-goog-csco/2008/10/10/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CSCO</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/cash-is-king-aapl-goog-csco/2008/10/10/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>GOOG is a Steal</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/POAPEMiwPXM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/goog-is-a-steal/2008/07/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/goog-is-a-steal/2008/07/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At $470 a share, Google is one of the cheapest &#8221;best-in-class&#8221; stocks out there.  Its PEG ratio (P/E relative to growth rate) is 0.85.  Keep in mind, with GOOG, you&#8217;re not only getting the present value of the future cash flows from their existing stellar search ad business, you are also effectively getting a call option on YouTube, Android, any penetration of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At $470 a share, Google is one of the cheapest &#8221;best-in-class&#8221; stocks out there.  Its PEG ratio (P/E relative to growth rate) is 0.85.  Keep in mind, with <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a>, you&#8217;re not only getting the present value of the future cash flows from their existing stellar search ad business, you are also effectively getting a call option on YouTube, Android, any penetration of the non-online ad industry that Google&#8217;s been dabbling in (90% of the entire $<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/business/media/09adco.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin">280 billion ad industry</a>), etc</p>
<p>If you believe the U.S. and European economies will turn around within the 12-18 months and you can hold Google for at least that long you will see <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a> back to at least $600 during that time (a 27% return).
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=POAPEMiwPXM:zXgIqMPhUfg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=POAPEMiwPXM:zXgIqMPhUfg:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=POAPEMiwPXM:zXgIqMPhUfg:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=POAPEMiwPXM:zXgIqMPhUfg:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/goog-is-a-steal/2008/07/21/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/goog-is-a-steal/2008/07/21/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Dipping a Toe into Shark Infested Waters</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/obTz0LGMbQU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/dipping-a-toe-into-shark-infested-waters/2008/07/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>trading</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/dipping-a-toe-into-shark-infested-waters/2008/07/18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just picked up some Google (GOOG) at $496.50, some FedEx (FDX) at $79.28 and some Amdocs (DOX) at $29.38.
On Google: picking up the preeminent company in its space at less than 1x growth is a no brainer.  Sure, Google disappointed a bit, but it still had gross revenue growth of 39% (organic revenue growth of 34%) and GAAP EPS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just picked up some Google (<a title="Google stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a>) at $496.50, some FedEx (<a title="FedEx stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FDX">FDX</a>) at $79.28 and some Amdocs (<a title="Amdocs stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DOX">DOX</a>) at $29.38.</p>
<p><strong>On Google:</strong> picking up the preeminent company in its space at less than 1x growth is a no brainer.  Sure, Google disappointed a bit, but it still had gross revenue growth of 39% (organic revenue growth of 34%) and GAAP EPS growth of 35% (non-GAAP growth of 30%).  <a title="Google stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a> is expected to generate 2009 GAAP EPS just north of $20.00.  So, at $496, <a title="Google stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a> is trading at around 25x earnings (about 30x 2008 projected GAAP EPS of $16.60). Oh, and did I mention that Google&#8217;s sitting on $12 billion of cash and has no debt?</p>
<p><strong>On FEDEX:</strong> I&#8217;ve had this one on my watch list for several months (mentioned it in my <a title="Stock on My Watch List" href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list-update/2008/06/24/">previous post</a>).  This is a great company that&#8217;s simply facing a cyclical downturn.  FEDEX will be one of the first companies to rebound strongly as we come out of the recession.  You want to get in before things start to look rosy - by then you&#8217;ll have missed a 20% move up.</p>
<p><strong>On Amdocs:</strong> <a title="Amdocs stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DOX">DOX</a> is a leading global provider of services and software to the communications industry (wireless and wireline).  I owned the stock earlier in the decade (got in just after the tech/telecom bust) and did quite well with it.   The stock is trading back down to about where it was just prior to announcing strong 1Q numbers in April.  I wanted to get in before the company announced 2Q numbers next week.</p>
<p> 
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=obTz0LGMbQU:beBT1d6xwxY:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=obTz0LGMbQU:beBT1d6xwxY:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=obTz0LGMbQU:beBT1d6xwxY:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=obTz0LGMbQU:beBT1d6xwxY:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/dipping-a-toe-into-shark-infested-waters/2008/07/18/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">FDX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">DOX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/dipping-a-toe-into-shark-infested-waters/2008/07/18/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stocks on My Watch List: Update</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/3o6q7NOMcqc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list-update/2008/06/24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list-update/2008/06/24/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a January 18 post I listed several stocks that I had on my watch list:
Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM) - $26.64 (01/17/08 close)
Cisco Systems, Inc (CSCO) - $24.33
3M Co. (MMM) - $74.96
Intel Corp (INTC) - $19.33
McDonald&#8217;s Corp (MCD) - $51.98
General Motors Corporation (GM) - $22.84
Starbucks Corp (SBUX) - $19.05
I subsequently took long positions in five [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a January 18 <a href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list/2008/01/18/">post</a> I listed several stocks that I had on my watch list:</p>
<p>Akamai Technologies Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AKAM">AKAM</a>) - $26.64 (01/17/08 close)<br />
Cisco Systems, Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CSCO">CSCO</a>) - $24.33<br />
3M Co. (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MMM">MMM</a>) - $74.96<br />
Intel Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=INTC">INTC</a>) - $19.33<br />
McDonald&#8217;s Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MCD">MCD</a>) - $51.98<br />
General Motors Corporation (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GM">GM</a>) - $22.84<br />
Starbucks Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SBUX">SBUX</a>) - $19.05</p>
<p>I subsequently took long positions in five of these stocks:</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AKAM">AKAM</a> purchased at $27.37 (on 01/22/08)<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=INTC">INTC</a> purchased at $18.54 (01/22/08)<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CSCO">CSCO</a> purchased at $23.44 (02/06/08)<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MMM">MMM</a> <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=INTC" /> purchased at $73.65 (01/22/08) sold at $77.05 (04/25/08)<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SBUX">SBUX</a> purchased at $16.48 (04/30/08)<br />
Thankfully, I avoided <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GM">GM</a>.</p>
<p>Although not on my watch list, I also purchased shares of Transocean (<a title="Transocean stock info" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RIG">RIG</a>) at $162.07 on 05/20/08).  This is a great way to play the supply constraints with crude oil, as Transocean is one of the largest providers of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells, particularly in deepwater and harsh environments.</p>
<p>Today, I have my eyes on FedEx (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FDX">FDX</a>), currently trading at about $79.25 and Ford (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=F">F</a>) currently trading at about $5.35.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=3o6q7NOMcqc:1vRIrfwrXN0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=3o6q7NOMcqc:1vRIrfwrXN0:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=3o6q7NOMcqc:1vRIrfwrXN0:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=3o6q7NOMcqc:1vRIrfwrXN0:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list-update/2008/06/24/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">FDX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SBUX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MMM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">F</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">RIG</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AKAM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MCD</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CSCO</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list-update/2008/06/24/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Akamai (AKAM) Is Looking Cheap Again</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/3tcntiCScFo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/akamai-akam-is-looking-cheap-again/2008/03/31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/akamai-akam-is-looking-cheap-again/2008/03/31/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure what the catalyst is, but AKAM is down about 20% over the past month - this, since rebounding 35% from the near-52 week low of $25.88 it hit back in mid-January.
We recommended taking a close look at AKAM back on January 18th, when the stock was at $26.64, and we do so again today.
* full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what the catalyst is, but <a title="AKAM" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AKAM">AKAM</a> is down about 20% over the past month - this, since rebounding 35% from the near-52 week low of $25.88 it hit back in mid-January.</p>
<p>We <a title="stocks on my watch list" href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list/2008/01/18/">recommended</a> taking a close look at <a title="AKAM" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AKAM">AKAM</a> back on January 18th, when the stock was at $26.64, and we do so again today.</p>
<p>* full disclosure: i own shares of AKAM (purchased shortly after my Jan 18 recommendation)</p>
<p> 
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=3tcntiCScFo:4AcM-_R4U6Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=3tcntiCScFo:4AcM-_R4U6Q:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=3tcntiCScFo:4AcM-_R4U6Q:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=3tcntiCScFo:4AcM-_R4U6Q:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/akamai-akam-is-looking-cheap-again/2008/03/31/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/akamai-akam-is-looking-cheap-again/2008/03/31/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stocks on My Watch List</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/qBMz6AjHkXY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list/2008/01/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>currently trading</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list/2008/01/18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following stocks are approaching valuation levels that I believe would make them highly attractive long term (more than one year) buying opportunities.  All of them have come down significantly from their 52-week highs (some, such as Akamai - down 55%, more than others).
Most of these companies are leaders in their field with strong balance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following stocks are approaching valuation levels that I believe would make them highly attractive long term (more than one year) buying opportunities.  All of them have come down significantly from their 52-week highs (some, such as Akamai - down 55%, more than others).</p>
<p>Most of these companies are leaders in their field with strong balance sheets and cash flow.  Others, such as General Motors, have a significant turnaround opportunity ahead of them (strong slate of new car models - Malibu, Enclave, etc., substantial declines in labor costs) once we get beyond the current economic malaise.  And, most have strong international exposure (geographic diversification) and overseas growth opportunities.</p>
<p>Akamai is probably the riskiest bet of the bunch (although some might argue that GM is even riskier), yet, its core business of speeding the delivery of content around the web offers the best opportunities for continued long-term growth.</p>
<p>The best way to play GM, may be to purchase long-term options (the Jan 09 $25&#8217;s are currently going for $4.30 and the Jan 10 $25&#8217;s are going for $5.90).  This is a great bet if you believe GM will turn itself around even modorately and the econimc downturn will be relativelty short-lived.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Akamai Technologies Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AKAM">AKAM</a>) - $26.64 (01/17/08 close)</p>
<p>Cisco Systems, Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CSCO">CSCO</a>) - $24.33</p>
<p>3M Co. (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MMM">MMM</a>) - $74.96</p>
<p>Intel Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=INTC">INTC</a>) - $19.33</p>
<p>McDonald&#8217;s Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MCD">MCD</a>) - $51.98</p>
<p>General Motors Corporation (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GM">GM</a>) - $22.84</p>
<p>Starbucks Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SBUX">SBUX</a>) - $19.05
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=qBMz6AjHkXY:v4zbKcnXkqo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=qBMz6AjHkXY:v4zbKcnXkqo:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=qBMz6AjHkXY:v4zbKcnXkqo:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=qBMz6AjHkXY:v4zbKcnXkqo:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list/2008/01/18/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SBUX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MMM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AKAM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MCD</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">INTC</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CSCO</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stocks-on-my-watch-list/2008/01/18/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Pick of the Week: The Knot, Inc (KNOT)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/SvWM2yyB-X8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/11/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/11/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KNOT was recently trading at $13.73.  At this level, the shares are starting to look pretty attractive.  The Knot&#8217;s PE is now around 28x and its Enterprise Value to EBITDA is just under 14x.  Given organic top-line growth in the low 20% range and projected earnings growth of 30%, KNOT&#8217;s valuation is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KNOT">KNOT</a> was recently trading at $13.73.  At this level, the shares are starting to look pretty attractive.  The Knot&#8217;s PE is now around 28x and its Enterprise Value to EBITDA is just under 14x.  Given organic top-line growth in the low 20% range and projected earnings growth of 30%, <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KNOT">KNOT</a>&#8217;s valuation is compelling.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=SvWM2yyB-X8:RuTJCTFSkzY:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=SvWM2yyB-X8:RuTJCTFSkzY:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=SvWM2yyB-X8:RuTJCTFSkzY:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=SvWM2yyB-X8:RuTJCTFSkzY:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/11/21/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/11/21/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon.com (AMZN) Insanity the Sequel</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/5kgxpklvZ9U/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-amzn-insanity-the-sequel/2007/10/25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>AAPL</dc:subject><dc:subject>Amazon</dc:subject><dc:subject>amzn</dc:subject><dc:subject>Apple</dc:subject><dc:subject>GGO</dc:subject><dc:subject>Google</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-amzn-insanity-the-sequel/2007/10/25/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Full Disclosure:  I own the AMZN Jan 2008 70 puts
Despite a forecast for declining margins in the 4th quarter, Amazon.com (AMZN) finished at $88.73 yesterday, down just 2.8% below the $91.28 price the stock had been at when the market opened the previous day (before surging nearly 10% that day on euphoric earnings expectations).  Further, according to MarketWatch.com, 12 of the 22 analysts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Full Disclosure:  I own the AMZN Jan 2008 70 puts</p>
<p>Despite a forecast for <a title="Amazon's weak margins" href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071024/amazon_mover.html?.v=2">declining margins</a> in the 4th quarter, Amazon.com (<a title="amazon.com" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMZN">AMZN</a>) finished at $88.73 yesterday, down just 2.8% below the $91.28 price the stock had been at when the market opened the previous day (before surging nearly 10% that day on euphoric earnings expectations).  Further, according to <a title="marketwatch story on Amazon" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/street-raises-bets-amazon-despite/story.aspx?guid=%7BA13D3C6A%2DADBE%2D49C2%2D961A%2D6C5922274FC2%7D&#038;siteid=yhoof">MarketWatch.com</a>, 12 of the 22 analysts that cover the stock actually <em>increased </em>their target price on AMZN by an average of 12% after the earnings release.  This is a stunning outcome.</p>
<p>Amazon has surged more than 120% since April due almost entirely to an improving profit margin story.  Analysts have chased the stock upward with ever-increasing price targets as CEO, Jeff Bezos, delivered on Wall Street&#8217;s request for decreased technology investment spending.  Rapidly expanding margins have served as the catalyst behind the stock&#8217;s sky high forward PE of nearly 60x.  That&#8217;s a PEG Ratio (PE to Growth) of 2.5x, compared with Google&#8217;s (<a title="Google" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a>) PEG of just under under 1x, Apple&#8217;s (<a title="Apple Inc" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AAPL">AAPL</a>) of 1.3x and eBay&#8217;s (<a title="eBay" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=EBAY">EBAY</a>)of 1.2x.  SEE ANALYSIS BELOW.</p>
<p>Another sign of possible trouble ahead for Amazon - seemingly overlooked by Wall Street - was a <a title="UPS downbeat holiday forecast" href="http://mail.google.com/mail/?auth=DQAAAH8AAAC3uXJkjQmYo94O6lJJwG4XeXC-AxbF0Ea5e5J9sZAKB1PankTfLnJ2M0Xb6jXDQTvI4jZs8Dev-FTGmU0Q52Y8gb65QMj8ZU-pcESYLxqxo4BWOCjn72RFJVGHw29jdIMxmSI2XpDXH2bDg97ivrG0LsJCYwMNF5lxXVLnUHJySA">downbeat forecast</a> from UPS for holiday sales released yesterday.  UPS cautioned that this year&#8217;s surge in peak-season deliveries is likely to be the weakest since 2003.</p>
<p>Two other reasons to be cautious about Amazon: (1) analysts are overly bullish on the prospects for the third-party sellers program that has helped Amazon grow revenue and expand margins.  It won&#8217;t be long before Amazon has to cut back on this program due to a rise in customer complaints related to less-than-Amazon-level quality service (e.g. inventory availability issues, etc); (2) it won&#8217;t be long before Amazon needs to begin investing in technology again to keep pace with its competitors (Wal-Mart.com, Target.com, etc) and customer expectations for top web companies in general.</p>
<p><img title="amzn analysis" alt="amzn analysis" src="/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/amzn_10.24.07.jpg" />
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=5kgxpklvZ9U:i6F1Ew6bH7o:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=5kgxpklvZ9U:i6F1Ew6bH7o:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=5kgxpklvZ9U:i6F1Ew6bH7o:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=5kgxpklvZ9U:i6F1Ew6bH7o:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-amzn-insanity-the-sequel/2007/10/25/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMZN</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">EBAY</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-amzn-insanity-the-sequel/2007/10/25/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Short of the Week: Omniture, Inc (OMTR)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/nBWNlR69wuo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-omniture-inc-omtr/2007/10/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Uncategorized</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-omniture-inc-omtr/2007/10/09/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Omniture (OMTR), the largest pure-play web analytics company, is incredibly overvalued at its current price of $34.50 per share.
This company is the dominant player in a great space - web traffic reporting and optimization tools (recently announced a smart acquisition of a company called Offermatica).  However, a quick, back-of-the-envelope analysis shows that OMTR is worth no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omniture (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=OMTR">OMTR</a>), the largest pure-play web analytics company, is incredibly overvalued at its current price of $34.50 per share.</p>
<p>This company is the dominant player in a great space - web traffic reporting and optimization tools (recently announced a smart acquisition of a company called Offermatica).  However, a quick, back-of-the-envelope analysis shows that OMTR is worth no more than $27 per share:</p>
<p>The company will do around $139.5 million of revenue (around 72% year-over-year growth) and $20.5 million of adjusted EBITDA this year.  Assuming they grow revenue 60% next year and then 50% in 2009, they will do about $335 million of revenue and $84 million of adjusted EBITDA (this assumes they can grow EBITDA margins from the mid-teens in 2007 to 25% in 2009).  Applying a 15x EBITDA multiple implies a $1.255 billion enterprise value and $1.4 billion equity value ($146 million of cash on hand, net of debt). With about 51 million shares outstanding, that implies a share price of $27.59.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d buy the Dec &#8216;07 $30 puts (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MOQXF.X">MOQXF</a>), currently trading at $1.80.</p>
<p>Crazy Prediction: Mark Cuban will purchase Imax Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=IMAX">IMAX</a>) as a distribution play for his HDNet and film ventures.</p>
<p> 
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=nBWNlR69wuo:3Svie_qfj1E:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=nBWNlR69wuo:3Svie_qfj1E:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=nBWNlR69wuo:3Svie_qfj1E:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=nBWNlR69wuo:3Svie_qfj1E:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-omniture-inc-omtr/2007/10/09/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">OMTR</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IMAX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MOQXF</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-omniture-inc-omtr/2007/10/09/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Inc. (AMZN) Continues to Be Way Overvalued</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/ghoMJJ7IeDY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazon-inc-amzn-continues-to-be-way-overvalued/2007/06/25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/amazon-inc-amzn-continues-to-be-way-overvalued/2007/06/25/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times ran a story in its Sunday business section that reinforces the point I&#8217;ve been making about the massive valuation discrepancy between Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOG). In a story called The Human Touch That May Loosen Google�??s Grip, Randoll Stross, a professor of business at San Jose State University, points out:
Profit margins [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times ran a story in its Sunday business section that reinforces the point I&#8217;ve been making about the massive valuation discrepancy between Amazon (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMZN">AMZN</a>) and Google (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG">GOOG</a>). In a story called <a title="NYTime story" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/24/business/yourmoney/24digi.html?em&#038;ex=1182830400&#038;en=babe96c9986e2e5e&#038;ei=5087%0A">The Human Touch That May Loosen Google�??s Grip</a>, Randoll Stross, a professor of business at San Jose State University, points out:</p>
<p><em>Profit margins in the search business are mind-boggling, and cannot be obtained in other segments of the technology world. <strong>Google�??s net profit margin last year was 29 percent. Amazon�??s was 1.8 percent �?? yes, that is a �??1�?? followed by a decimal point. Which business would you rather be in?</strong></em></p>
<p>Even the biggest AMZN bulls would be hard-pressed to justify the stock&#8217;s valuation relative to GOOG.  AMZN is trading at a 134% premium to GOOG when comparing the 2008 average PE-to-growth ratios of the two stocks (and a still hefty 77% premium when using the top estimates of both stocks).</p>
<p><img title="AMZN vs GOOG" alt="AMZN vs GOOG" src="/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/AMZN%20v%20GOOG.jpg" /></p>
<p> 
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=ghoMJJ7IeDY:9UTpYJS9EAg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=ghoMJJ7IeDY:9UTpYJS9EAg:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=ghoMJJ7IeDY:9UTpYJS9EAg:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=ghoMJJ7IeDY:9UTpYJS9EAg:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazon-inc-amzn-continues-to-be-way-overvalued/2007/06/25/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMZN</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazon-inc-amzn-continues-to-be-way-overvalued/2007/06/25/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon.com Inc (AMZN) Insanity</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/lTBsNKVGLsw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-insanity/2007/06/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-insanity/2007/06/06/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon (AMZN) rose 4.6% yesterday, hitting a seven-year high of $73.65.  The reason for the surge - Jeff Bezos announced that the company plans to increase its investment in China, where its Joyo.com unit is Amazon&#8217;s fastest growing business. After a quick look at the most basic facts, you&#8217;ll see why this is completely insane:
The Wall Street Journal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon (<a title="Amazon stock quote" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMZN">AMZN</a>) rose 4.6% yesterday, hitting a seven-year high of $73.65.  The reason for the surge - Jeff Bezos <a title="Amazon.com hits new seven-year high on China news" href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/external/cbsm/SIG=12luf17sm/*http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/amazoncom-hits-new-seven-year-high/story.aspx?guid=%7BEF4A0C2E%2D0B13%2D4E3A%2DA1DC%2DEA0549D3D766%7D&#038;siteid=yhoof">announced</a> that the company plans to increase its investment in China, where its Joyo.com unit is Amazon&#8217;s fastest growing business. After a quick look at the most basic facts, you&#8217;ll see why this is completely insane:</p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118101997012424647.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">reported</a> that according to Analysys International, a Beijing tech consulting firm, the entire Chinese online-retail market accounted for $133 million during 1Q2007.  Amazon&#8217;s Joyo.com unit is the #2 player in the market with a 12% share (behind #1 player Dangdong.com which has an 18% share).  So, Joyo.com generated roughly $16 million during 1Q07, which representes a whopping 0.53% of the $3.02 billion that Amazon generated overall.</p>
<p>So let me get this straight, Bezos created $1.3 billion in market value for Amazon by announcing that the company would be investing more in China where its relatively insignificant Joyo unit lags behind its chief local rival.  Sure, Joyo could one day become a major contributor to Amazon&#8217;s revenue (and profits), but it will take major investment to get there and one of the main reasons <a title="Amazon stock quote" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118101997012424647.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">AMZN</a> has had such an incredible run lately is because Bezos said the company would be cutting back on its investments to boost profit.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, no Wall Street analysts have raised the above issue.  As <a title="Amazon stock quote" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118101997012424647.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">AMZN</a> approaches trading at 75x 2007 estimates (and 50x even the highest 2008 estimates), they just keep raising their price targets and providing shoddy rationale for doing so.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s <a title="Henry Blodget's famous $400 price target on Amazon" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Blodget">Henry Blodget</a> when you need him?
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=lTBsNKVGLsw:gvZdzdlVRn8:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=lTBsNKVGLsw:gvZdzdlVRn8:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=lTBsNKVGLsw:gvZdzdlVRn8:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=lTBsNKVGLsw:gvZdzdlVRn8:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-insanity/2007/06/06/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMZN</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-insanity/2007/06/06/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon.com Inc (AMZN) Could Drop 50%</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/Hz3QbgRZ9s4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-could-drop-50/2007/05/23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>trading</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-could-drop-50/2007/05/23/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 17, we recommended buying puts on Amazon (AMZN).  Since that time, the stock has traded up about 9% and the July $60 puts have gobe from $2.35 to around $1.15.
** Full disclosue - I purchased the July $60 puts at $1.70 on May 21.
Nothing has changed fundamentally with the story on Amazon, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 17, we <a title="candidcritic says short AMZN" href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-amazoncom-inc-amzn/2007/05/17/">recommended</a> buying puts on Amazon (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=amzn">AMZN</a>).  Since that time, the stock has traded up about 9% and the July $60 <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ZQNSL.X">puts</a> have gobe from $2.35 to around $1.15.</p>
<p>** Full disclosue - I purchased the July $60 puts at $1.70 on May 21.</p>
<p>Nothing has changed fundamentally with the story on Amazon, so we now STRONGLY reiterate buying the July $60 puts.  TheStreet.com has a good piece on the recent surge in valuation: <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/newsanalysis/technet/10358382.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&#038;cm_cat=FREE&#038;cm_ite=NA">Amazon Ripping the Shorts</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s further evidence that shares of AMZN are insanely valued at current levels, particularly when compared to other a basket of comparable growth stocks - Google (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=goog">GOOG</a>), Apple (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=aapl">AAPL</a>), eBay (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ebay">EBAY</a>) and Starbucks (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=sbux">SBUX</a>).  You&#8217;ll see that <strong>AMZN&#8217;s valuation relative to its growth rate (PE/Growth, or PEG Ratio) is more than double that of the basket of comparables</strong>.  Amazon should be trading in the mid-$30s.</p>
<p><img title="AMZN analysis" alt="AMZN analysis" src="/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/amzn%20analysis.jpg" />
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=Hz3QbgRZ9s4:3jLOC2wZMdw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=Hz3QbgRZ9s4:3jLOC2wZMdw:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=Hz3QbgRZ9s4:3jLOC2wZMdw:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=Hz3QbgRZ9s4:3jLOC2wZMdw:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-could-drop-50/2007/05/23/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SBUX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMZN</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">EBAY</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/amazoncom-inc-amzn-could-drop-50/2007/05/23/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Short of the Week: Amazon.com Inc (AMZN)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/7b9LR-amHpw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-amazoncom-inc-amzn/2007/05/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>trading</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-amazoncom-inc-amzn/2007/05/17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shares of Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) are currently trading at just above $63 per share.  That�??s 55x even the most bullish estimate of $1.14 per share for 2007 earnings.  At 25% projected annual earnings growth over the next 5 years, that gives AMZN a PE/Growth ratio of 2.2x.  Sure, we all love and use Amazon to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shares of Amazon.com Inc. (<a title="Amazon stock price" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMZN">AMZN</a>) are currently trading at just above $63 per share.  That�??s 55x even the most bullish estimate of $1.14 per share for 2007 earnings.  At 25% projected annual earnings growth over the next 5 years, that gives AMZN a PE/Growth ratio of 2.2x.  Sure, we all love and use Amazon to have everything from the latest Harry Potter book to 2.5 lb. packs of <a title="rattlesnake meat" href="http://www.amazon.com/Rattlesnake-meat-Medium-2-5-pack/dp/B000NNKJRS/ref=sr_1_10/102-0479963-0370528?ie=UTF8&#038;s=gourmet-food&#038;qid=1179409348&#038;sr=1-1http://www.amazon.com/Rattlesnake-meat-Medium-2-5-pack/dp/B000NNKJRS/ref=sr_1_10/102-0479963-0370528?ie=UTF8&#038;s">rattlesnake meat</a> conveniently shipped to our homes.  And, yes, AMZN did surprise investors with a particularly strong 1st Quarter (prfit margins expanded for the first time in two years). </p>
<p>But, does that make AMZN significantly more valuable than other stellar performers? By comparison, Google (<a title="Google stock price" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=goog">GOOG</a>) is currently trading at about 31x earnings for a PEG ratio of 1.0x, Apple <a title="Apple stock price" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AAPL">(AAPL</a>) is also trading at roughly 31x earnings for a PEG ratio of 1.5x and Starbucks (<a title="Starbuck stock price" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SBUX">SBUX</a>) is trading at roughly 32x earnings for a PEG ratio of 1.4x.</p>
<p>Therefore, we would recommend purchasing the July �??07 $60 puts (<a title="Amazon puts" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ZQNSL.X">ZQNSL.X</a>) - currently trading at $2.35 as a way to play this current overvaluation.</p>
<p>By the way, we do like GOOG at $472 a share.  We also suggest keeping an eye on TheStreet.com (<a title="TheStreet.com stock price" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TSCM">TSCM</a>) �?? start buying if it gets to the low-$10 range.  And, TheKnot.com (<a title="KNOT stock price" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KNOT">KNOT</a>) is starting to look attractive again at around $18.75 per share �?? we�??d be buyers if it goes below $18.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=7b9LR-amHpw:OBHvCCGdWOU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=7b9LR-amHpw:OBHvCCGdWOU:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=7b9LR-amHpw:OBHvCCGdWOU:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=7b9LR-amHpw:OBHvCCGdWOU:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-amazoncom-inc-amzn/2007/05/17/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">SBUX</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AMZN</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">TSCM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">KNOT</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">AAPL</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GOOG</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-amazoncom-inc-amzn/2007/05/17/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Short Update: The Knot, Inc (KNOT)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/PN2-El27UpU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-update-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/02/15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-update-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/02/15/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 16, we advised that The Knot (KNOT) was overvalued at its then current share price of $31. We recommended purchasing the April �??07 $25 puts (BQCPE.X) - then trading at $1.20 as a way to play that overvaluation.  Well, earlier this week, KNOT reported disappointing 4th quarter 2006 results and the stock has since traded down to $25 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 16, <a href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/01/16/">we advised</a> that The Knot (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KNOT">KNOT</a>) was overvalued at its then current share price of $31. We recommended purchasing the April �??07 $25 puts (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BQCPE.X">BQCPE.X</a>) - then trading at $1.20 as a way to play that overvaluation.  Well, earlier this week, KNOT <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070213/the_knot_mover.html?.v=1">reported</a> disappointing 4th quarter 2006 results and the stock has since traded down to $25 per share at last night&#8217;s close.  The April �??07 $25 puts closed at $2.30 - <strong>up 92% from our recommended purchase just four weeks ago</strong>.  Now would be a good time to sell those puts and lock in a rather nice gain.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=PN2-El27UpU:DcVB3rcfCIw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=PN2-El27UpU:DcVB3rcfCIw:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=PN2-El27UpU:DcVB3rcfCIw:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=PN2-El27UpU:DcVB3rcfCIw:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-update-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/02/15/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">KNOT</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-update-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/02/15/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Short of the Week: The Knot, Inc (KNOT)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/fLUH7_tcqGY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/01/16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>business</dc:subject><dc:subject>advertising</dc:subject><dc:subject>internet</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>Yahoo</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/01/16/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shares of The Knot (KNOT) are currently trading just above $31 per share.  Even with our enormous enthusiasm for the web and online advertising (we still like CNET, YHOO and TFSM), we believe KNOT is overvalued at current levels. Yes, we love the fact that it is a pure-play, niche content site (like CNET [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shares of The Knot (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KNOT">KNOT</a>) are currently trading just above $31 per share.  Even with our enormous enthusiasm for the web and online advertising (we <a href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-picks-of-the-week-update/2006/08/07/">still like</a> CNET, YHOO and TFSM), we believe KNOT is overvalued at current levels. Yes, we love the fact that it is a pure-play, niche content site (like CNET and even more like iVillage which was one of our all-time favorites). Sure, it will continue to grow its topline and bottom line significantly - double-digit rates. But, a very quick, back-of-the-envelope analysis shows that The Knot is currently trading at nearly 20x a highly optimistic forecast for 2008 EBITDA (assuming an $850 million eneterprise value, 40% revenue growth in 2007, 33% in 2008 and then 35% EBITDA margins).</p>
<p>We would recommend purchasing the April &#8216;07 $25 puts (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BQCPE.X">BQCPE.X</a>) - currently trading at $1.20 as a way to play this current overvaluation (a true naked short is too risky for our liking). If nothing else, this can provide a bit of a hedge against your long positions in YHOO, CNET and TFSM (buy the way, we also recently picked up shares of <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=goog">GOOG</a> at $475 and like it up to $550.</p>
<p>We do very much like the company and its business model.  We&#8217;d be buyers of the stock if fell back to the low $20s range.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=fLUH7_tcqGY:BM-IDC35CoE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=fLUH7_tcqGY:BM-IDC35CoE:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=fLUH7_tcqGY:BM-IDC35CoE:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=fLUH7_tcqGY:BM-IDC35CoE:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/01/16/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">KNOT</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-short-of-the-week-the-knot-inc-knot/2007/01/16/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Picks Update - IMAX Shocker</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/-RVUZyWFx8I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-picks-update-imax-shocker/2006/09/10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>investing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>currently trading</dc:subject><dc:subject>investing</dc:subject><dc:subject>microvision</dc:subject><dc:subject>movies</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock</dc:subject><dc:subject>stock market</dc:subject><dc:subject>stocks</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject><dc:subject>Yahoo</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-picks-update-imax-shocker/2006/09/10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here�??s a quick update on our Stock Picks of the Week:
CNET Networks (CNET)
Recommended on June 2 at a share price of $8.91.�  The stock closed at $9.15 Friday, up 3%.
24/7 Real Media (TFSM)
Recommended on June 13 at a share price of $7.19.�  The stock closed Friday at $8.87, up 23%.�  We also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here�??s a quick update on our Stock Picks of the Week:</p>
<p><strong>CNET Networks (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=cnet">CNET</a>)<br />
</strong><a href="http://candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-cnet/2006/06/02/">Recommended</a> on June 2 at a share price of $8.91.�  The stock closed at $9.15 Friday, up 3%.</p>
<p><strong>24/7 Real Media (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=tfsm">TFSM</a>)<br />
</strong><a href="http://candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-247-real-media/2006/06/13/">Recommended</a> on June 13 at a share price of $7.19.�  The stock closed Friday at $8.87, up 23%.�  We also <a href="http://www.candidcritic.com/reiterating-buy-on-247-real-media/2006/07/27/">reiterated our �??buy�??</a> when TFSM dipped to $6.88 due to an overall Internet sector selloff on July 27.�  The stock is up 29% since that time.</p>
<p><strong>IMAX Corporation (<a title="imax stock ticker" href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=IMAX">IMAX</a>)</strong><br />
<a href="http://candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-imax/2006/06/20/">Recommended</a> on June 20 at a share price of $8.31.�  After climbing as high as $10.80 just weeks after our recommendation, the stock tumbled when <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060810/imax_mover.html?.v=1">IMAX disclosed</a> an informal SEC inquiry into the company&#8217;s timing of revenue recognition for new theaters.�  The shares closed Friday at $4.76, down 43%.</p>
<p><strong>Yahoo Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=yhoo">YHOO</a>)</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-pick-of-the-week-yahoo-inc/2006/07/19/">Recommended</a> on July 19 at $26.41.�  The stock closed Friday at $28.14, up 7%.</p>
<p><strong>Microvision, Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=mvis">MVIS</a>)</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.candidcritic.com/beaten-down-stock-pick-of-the-week-microvision-inc-mvis/2006/06/30/">Recommended</a> on June 30 at a share price of $1.93.�  The stock closed Friday at $1.58, down 18%.
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=-RVUZyWFx8I:A4qrKUKdHhY:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=-RVUZyWFx8I:A4qrKUKdHhY:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=-RVUZyWFx8I:A4qrKUKdHhY:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=-RVUZyWFx8I:A4qrKUKdHhY:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-picks-update-imax-shocker/2006/09/10/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">YHOO</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MVIS</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">CNET</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">TFSM</category><category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IMAX</category><feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/stock-picks-update-imax-shocker/2006/09/10/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>One Man�??s List of the Worst Movies of My Lifetime</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CandidCritic/~3/kdAsep9jIgs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.candidcritic.com/one-man%e2%80%99s-list-of-the-worst-movies-of-my-lifetime/2006/08/30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>movies</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Lists</dc:subject><dc:subject>Angelina Jolie</dc:subject><dc:subject>Brad Pitt</dc:subject><dc:subject>Jennifer Aniston</dc:subject><dc:subject>Lists</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.candidcritic.com/one-man%e2%80%99s-list-of-the-worst-movies-of-my-lifetime/2006/08/30/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[� 
One Man�??s List of the worst movies of my lifetime:
5.) The Money Train.�  Just stupid.�  Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes play brothers.�  Enough said.�  But wait, there�??s more.�  Woody the cop decides to rob a train.�  Just an idiotic script.�  Robert Blake plays a psycho, which must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="The Object of My Affection" alt="The Object of My Affection" src="/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/object%20of%20my%20affection.jpg" />� </p>
<p>One Man�??s List of the worst movies of my lifetime:</p>
<p><strong>5.) <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113845/">The Money Train</a>.</strong>�  Just stupid.�  Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes play brothers.�  Enough said.�  But wait, there�??s more.�  Woody the cop decides to rob a train.�  Just an idiotic script.�  Robert Blake plays a psycho, which must have been a real stretch for him.� </p>
<p><strong>4.) <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094824/">Caddyshack II</a>.</strong>�  How can one of the greatest movies of all time be followed up by this disgrace?�  Dan Ackroyd must have needed the money badly.�  Very badly.�  It is fair that Rodney Dangerfield died before Jackie Mason?�  With the exception of his talk show, probably the worst decision of Chevy Chase�??s life.�  Jonathan Silverman would have been better off doing Weekend at Bernie�??s VIII.�  Hell, it would have been better for his career if he had done gay porn.</p>
<p><strong>3.) <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0452594/">The Breakup</a></strong>.�  A recent disaster which featured Vince Vaughn and Jennifer Aniston.�  No laughs.�  No compelling storyline.�  All the goodwill that Vaughn had engendered with Old School, Wedding Crashers, Dodgeball et al. was spent.�  The usually amusing Jason Bateman brought nothing to the table in his supporting role.�  And Anniston annoyed and whined throughout the film.�  Even when she showed her naked ass the camera was blurred.�  An abortion of a movie.</p>
<p><strong>2.) <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0205271/">Dr. T and the Women</a>.</strong>�  How can a movie where Liv Tyler and Kate Hudson play lesbian lovers suck?�  How can a movie when a then still hot Farah Fawcett gets naked in a public fountain suck?�  Well, it can.�  If you think infomercials are boring, watch this piece of shit.�  Helen Hunt as a sex symbol?�  Richard Gere as a pussy?�  Well, forget the last question.</p>
<p>1.) <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120772/">The Object of My Affection</a>.</strong>�  Another Aniston horror show.�  In this debacle, a girl desperate for love tries to turn her gay friend straight so they can be together.�  For Aniston�??s performance, see my comments regarding the Breakup above, except for the blurred naked ass part.�  I can�??t wait for a Friends Reunion, because if Aniston is working on that, it means she is not making movies.� </p>
<p>Honorable Mention:�  Rocky V, Showgirls, Night and the City (DeNiro can sell out too), Mr. and Mrs. Smith (maybe this should have been #5), Star Trek
</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=kdAsep9jIgs:892jv7EINR0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=kdAsep9jIgs:892jv7EINR0:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?a=kdAsep9jIgs:892jv7EINR0:JEwB19i1-c4"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CandidCritic?i=kdAsep9jIgs:892jv7EINR0:JEwB19i1-c4" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.candidcritic.com/one-man%e2%80%99s-list-of-the-worst-movies-of-my-lifetime/2006/08/30/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.candidcritic.com/one-man%e2%80%99s-list-of-the-worst-movies-of-my-lifetime/2006/08/30/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
