Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Our commercial growers have kept asking us to produce a feminized strain that will yield and finish FAST. Well that time has come, we’re proud to introduce the 60 Day Wonder! It took us a bit longer to get this one released but it was definitely worth the wait!!Full product details: 60 Day Wonder ]]>
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
TGA is Subcool, Jill, Sunycheba & Badboy. Together they mix cannabis seeds genetics like DJs mix records. They should be called ‘Gene Jockeys’ because they know how to combine the best traits from the parent stock.All TGA Seeds come as regular seeds and you can choose from either single seeds or packs of ten. The Strains Here is the complete list of strains: 3D Third Dimension
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Sagarmatha White Russian is a brand automatic flowering strain bred from the multiple award winning Serious Seeds White Russian. It has high levels of THC making it very strong with a long lasting high. Flowering time: 9 weeksIt is available in packs of five or single seeds. ]]>
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Positronics Seeds Company collaborated closely and actively in the development and birth of the first cannabis hybrids at the start of the 80s. New varieties from Holland were acquired and it was decided to relocate there to start working on the first hybrid strains in a professional manner. They were pioneers in developing the revolutionary technique of cultivating sinsemilla plants from cuttings. Positronics became established as the most pioneering company in selective cannabis breeding.All Positronics Seeds come as feminised seeds and you can choose from either single seeds or packs of five. The Strains Here is the complete list of strains: Black Widow
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
David Nutt's comments have embarrassed the British government, which toughened the penalties for possessing marijuana earlier this year over the protests of many prominent British scientists.
Nutt said he was disappointed by his sacking, telling Sky News television that it might have something to do with the upcoming general election, which must be called by the middle of next year.
"Politics is politics and science is science, and there's a bit of a tension between them sometime," he told the broadcaster by telephone.
In later comments to BBC radio's "PM" program, Nutt accused British Prime Minister Gordon Brown of making "completely irrational statements" about the dangerousness of marijuana.
"I'm not prepared to mislead the public about the harmfulness of drugs like cannabis and Ecstasy," he said.
A call and an e-mail by The Associated Press seeking comment from the scientist were not immediately returned.
Britain's Home Office confirmed that Nutt, a professor of neuropsychopharmacology, had been removed from his position and said it would be seeking a replacement shortly.
In Britain, drugs are classified in three different categories, with Class A the most dangerous one. Marijuana was recently upgraded to Class B from Class C, joining amphetamines, Ritalin and pholcodine as drugs whose unlawful possession could result in up to five years in prison.
But the move ran counter to recommendations made by Nutt, who has long argued that marijuana is far less dangerous than legal drugs such as alcohol, which is responsible for nearly 9,000 deaths a year in the U.K., according to recent government statistics.
Nutt argues that while all drugs are dangerous, the restrictions placed on them should be proportional to their potential harm. Britain's Home Office has rejected his advice, saying the scientific evidence is uncertain and that a message needs to be sent to marijuana users that possessing the drug is a serious crime.
The move prompted a flurry of protest from scientists - among them two former chief scientific advisers to the government. They and others wrote an open letter to the government warning that reclassifying marijuana would send confusing messages about how dangerous it and other drugs really were.
Although Nutt's views have long been public knowledge, the government seems to have been angered by a recent lecture for the Center for Crime and Justice Studies at King's College in London during which Nutt accused former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith of "distorting and devaluing" researchers' work.
In the lecture, Nutt said Smith's decision to tighten restrictions on marijuana had undermined public faith in government science.
"I think we have to accept young people like to experiment - with drugs and other potentially harmful activities - and what we should be doing in all of this is to protect them from harm at this stage of their lives," he said.
"If you think that scaring kids will stop them using, you are probably wrong."
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g11SRHRYdrp_hpd_a-b0QlBqZmpgD9BLJECO0 ]]>Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Professor David Nutt warned that other experts on the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) could resign in protest at his sacking by the home secretary, Alan Johnson, yesterday.
Nutt was forced to quit after he accused ministers of "devaluing and distorting" the scientific evidence over illicit drugs when they decided last year to reclassify cannabis from class C to class B against the advice of the ACMD.
Nutt told the BBC today that Brown had "made up his mind" to reclassify cannabis despite evidence to the contrary.
"Gordon Brown comes into office and, soon after that, he starts saying absurd things like cannabis is lethal... it has to be a class B drug. He has made his mind up.
"We went back, we looked at the evidence, we said, 'No, no, there is no extra evidence of harm, it's still a class C drug.' He said, 'Tough, it's going to be class B'."
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Nutt said: "He is the first prime minister, this is the first government, that has ever in the history of the Misuse of Drugs Act gone against the advice of its scientific panel.
"And then it did it again with ecstasy and I have to say it's not about [me] overstepping the line, it's about the government overstepping the line. They are making scientific decisions before they've even consulted with their experts.
"I know that my committee was very, very upset by the attitude the prime minister took over cannabis. We actually formally wrote to him to complain about it," he said. "I wouldn't be surprised if some of them stepped down. Maybe all of them will."
Nutt's sacking is likely to raise concerns among scientists over the independence of advice to the government and may trigger further resignations. The Home Office describes the ACMD as an independent expert body that advises on drug-related issues, including recommendations on classification under the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act.
It is not thought that the home secretary spoke directly to Nutt before requesting his resignation in writing.
Johnson accused the professor of going beyond his remit as an evidence-based scientist and accused him of "lobbying for a change in government policy" rather than giving impartial advice.
"It is important that the government's messages on drugs are clear and as an adviser you do nothing to undermine the public understanding of them," Johnson wrote to Nutt.
"As my lead adviser on drugs harms I am afraid the manner in which you have acted runs contrary to your responsibilities.
"I cannot have public confusion between scientific advice and policy and have therefore lost confidence in your ability to advise me as chair of the ACMD."
The decision followed the publication of a paper by the Centre for Crime and Justice at King's College London, based on a lecture Nutt delivered in July. He repeated his familiar view that illicit drugs should be classified according to the actual evidence of the harm they cause and pointed out that alcohol and tobacco caused more harm than LSD, ecstasy and cannabis.
He accused the former home secretary, Jacqui Smith, of distorting and devaluing scientific research when she reclassified cannabis, and repeated his claim that the risks of taking ecstasy were no worse than riding a horse.
The charity DrugScope's director of communications, Harry Shapiro, said: "The home secretary's decision to force the resignation of the chair of an independent advisory body is an extremely serious and concerning development and raises serious questions about the means by which drug policy is informed and kept under review."
Richard Garside, the director of the Centre for Crime and Justice at King's College London, accused Johnson of undermining scientific research.
He said: "I'm shocked and dismayed that the home secretary appears to believe that political calculation trumps honest and informed scientific opinion."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/oct/31/david-nutt-drugs-adviser-sacked ]]>Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
● Cannabis is a harmful drug and there are concerns about the widespread use of cannabis among young people.On that final point, there has been a lot of commentary and some research as to whether cannabis is associated with schizophrenia, and the results are really quite difficult to interpret. What we can say is that cannabis use is associated with an increased experience of psychotic disorders. That is quite a complicated thing to disentangle because, of course, the reason people take cannabis is that it produces a change in their mental state. These changes are a bit akin to being psychotic – they include distortions of perception, especially in visual and auditory perception, as well as in the way one thinks. So it can be quite hard to know whether, when you analyse the incidence of psychotic disorders with cannabis, you are simply looking at the acute effects of cannabis, as opposed to some consequence of cannabis use. If we look on the generous side, there is a likelihood that taking cannabis, particularly if you use a lot of it, will make you more prone to having psychotic experiences. That includes schizophrenia. But schizophrenia is a relatively rare condition, so it's very hard to be sure about its causation. The analysis we came up with was that smokers of cannabis are about 2.6 times more likely to have a psychotic-like experience than non-smokers. To put that figure in proportion, you are 20 times more likely to get lung cancer if you smoke tobacco than if you don't. The other paradox is that schizophrenia seems to be disappearing (from the general population), even though cannabis use has increased markedly in the last 30 years. So, even though skunk has been around now for 10 years, there has been no upswing in schizophrenia. In fact, where people have looked, they haven't found any evidence linking cannabis use in a population and schizophrenia. Nevertheless, one of the key arguments in moving cannabis from class C to B was the concern that skunk would cause more psychosis. What is very regularly invoked in this debate is the precautionary principle, which is that, if you're not sure about a drug harm, rank it high, make all drugs class A and get rid of the problem. In her statement to the Commons, after receiving the ACMD's report but rejecting its recommendation to keep cannabis as a class C drug, Jacqui Smith, the former home secretary, said: "We must err on the side of caution and protect the public." As this is protection from the known unknowns, at first sight it might seem the obvious decision – why wouldn't you take the precautionary principle? But the precautionary principle is also an act of faith in deterrence, and this is one of the key issues for lawyers. Does deterrence impact on drug use? We don't know. In fact, the outcome may be the opposite of that predicted. It may be that if you move a drug up a class, it has a greater cachet. I think we have to accept young people like to experiment, and what we should be doing is to protect them from harm at this stage of their lives. We therefore have to provide more accurate and credible information. We have to tell them the truth, so that they use us as their preferred source of information. If you think that scaring kids will stop them using, you're probably wrong. This article is based on a longer version published by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies at Kings College, London, which itself was based on a lecture delivered by Professor Nutt earlier in the year. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/29/cannabis-david-nutt-drug-classification ]]>
● A concerted public health response is required to drastically reduce its use.
● Current evidence suggests a probable, but weak, causal link between psychotic illness and cannabis use.
● The harms caused by cannabis are not considered to be as serious as drugs in class B and therefore it should remain a class C drug.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Much of the criticism that has been levelled at the Obama administration in recent months by progressives forgets this basic truth of politics. It's one thing to bang the "change drum" in an election campaign. It's another thing to use the levers of power wisely, in a way that makes that change durable.
When Barack Obama came into power, drug policy reformers were hopeful that, finally, the ill-conceived war on drugs – a war that has cost hundreds of billions of dollars, incarcerated millions of Americans, created narco-states throughout much of Latin America and failed to reduce the availability or use of illegal substances – would be ended.
After all, Obama himself had frankly admitted to his youthful experiments with an array of drugs. The new drug tsar, Gil Kerlikowske, favoured a "harm reduction" strategy that viewed drugs more as a medical than a criminal justice problem. And senior administration officials were committed to ending the sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine offences.
Well, not surprisingly, big-picture changes didn't occur instantaneously. And, if you follow the chatter on drug policy reform sites, much of the initial optimism faded. On Monday, it came roaring back.
Eric Holder, the US attorney general, announced that the feds would no longer launch raids against, and prosecute, legitimate medical marijuana dispensers and users in the 14 states around the country that have passed legislation (or citizen initiatives) allowing for the use of medical marijuana.
In and of itself, this is a relatively minor event, a common-sense corrective to another rigid and bullying Bush-era policy. And, in and of itself, there's not much political capital at stake here for Obama. After all, you've got to be a pretty zealous drug-warrior to get truly morally outraged by cancer patients taking a few hits of weed to ease their nausea. With all the other troubles facing America, most Americans probably aren't too happy with scarce resources being spent on prosecuting doper-grannies and their prescription pot suppliers.
But, there's a bigger story here. And it's that story of the ship of state.
If you exercise too sharp a turn, you risk capsizing. If you go into the turn gradually, giving yourself plenty of room to manoeuvre, you've got a much better chance of getting where you want to ultimately go.
There's popular support for leaving medical marijuana dispensaries and users alone. Nationally, support for marijuana legalisation is at its highest point in decades, and in some states, including California, there's now majority popular support for a broad legalisation of the drug. Last year Arnold Schwarzenegger himself broached the notion that it might be time to have a debate on this. After years in the policy wilderness, reform groups such as the Drug Policy Alliance and the National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (Norml) are attracting high-profile followers to their causes.
Like the medical marijuana laws, the legalisation of pot would place individual states in legal conflict with the federal government. Under previous administrations, the knee-jerk war on drugs response would have been to launch prosecutions, to prove to the states that the feds had the muscle and the willpower to nip legalisation in the bud (as it were).
With the current policy shift on medical marijuana, and the implicit understanding that Washington is now ready to leave enforcement of such laws up to the states, there's room for the feds to step back if and when the next wave of marijuana laws comes to pass at the state level.
And, if the sky doesn't fall as a result of this new federal stance (or non-stance), over time the American public – conditioned since Richard Nixon launched the war on drugs in the early 1970s to regard drugs first and foremost as a criminal justice issue – will likely become more tolerant of this new, gentler, approach. And, once opinion poll numbers start moving away from more general support for the war on drugs, an increasing number of politicians will feel they have cover to do what they already know needs to be done: wind down a war that has long been unwinnable and which is now, in an era of straitened public finances, increasingly unaffordable.
If you analyse politics simply via the 24-hour-news-cycle, then Obama's achievements in reforming drug policy have been modest. But, if you think long term – and in writing my book Inside Obama's Brain I came to understand that Obama thinks long-term in a way that few recent presidents have done – then I would venture to bet that Monday's shift on medical marijuana presages some fundamental changes in how America approaches its many drug problems in the years to come.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/oct/21/obama-medical-marijuana-drug-war]]>Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday denied review and let stand a 3rd District Court of Appeal opinion in July upholding the right of patients to collective growth of marijuana.
The opinion also affirmed the ability of patients to sue if their right to collectively cultivate is violated by local law enforcement.
The 3rd District’s decision upheld a 2007 ruling by Butte Superior Court Judge Barbara Roberts that seriously ill people cultivating collectively “should not be required to risk criminal penalties and the stress and expense of a criminal trial in order to assert their rights.”
The county had argued grower David Williams should have allowed himself to be arrested and then sought vindication through prosecution.
Williams was forced by a sheriff’s deputy in 2005 to uproot 29 of 42 plants on his Paradise property or face arrest and prosecution. Americans for Safe Access, an advocacy group, filed a lawsuit against Butte County in 2006 on behalf of Williams and the six other collective members.
Roberts rejected the county’s argument that California’s Compassionate Use Act prohibits collective cultivation. The case now goes back to Roberts.
ASA spokesman Kris Hermes said Thursday the plaintiffs will seek damages and attorneys’ fees from the county.
http://www.sacbee.com/
]]>Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.
http://www.alternet.org/media/142815/5_things_the_corporate_media_don%27t_want_you_to_know_about_cannabis?page=entire
]]>Pick 'n' Mix Seeds - single cannabis seeds from all the top seed banks.