<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>capitalism4good</title>
    
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1226040</id>
    <updated>2008-06-02T12:51:14-04:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Harnessing the power of the private sector for social and environmental good.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Capitalism4good" /><feedburner:info uri="capitalism4good" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" /><entry>
        <title>News Tidbits</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Capitalism4good/~3/MCq_Bf0scJA/news-tidbits.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/06/news-tidbits.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2008-06-02T12:58:45-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-50722500</id>
        <published>2008-06-02T12:51:14-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-02T12:51:14-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Just a few interesting and somewhat random things I've been reading: In a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal (titled "Common Sense Ecology for Homes"), someone pointed out a fundamental inconsistency in the green building craze. Basically,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Melissa Tritter</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Just a few interesting and somewhat random things I've been reading:<br /><ul>
<li>In a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal (titled "Common Sense Ecology for Homes"), someone pointed out a fundamental inconsistency in the green building craze.  Basically, the two goals of environmental footprint and healthy lifestyles have been conflated, and while they usually go together (making furniture with fewer toxins is good for the earth and good for your family), they are not always in alignment. In particular, tightly-sealed homes are good for energy efficiency but bad for indoor air quality.  So we can't always have our cake and eat it too, though that always seemed like a silly expression to me, since we generally do eat our servings of cake... but I digress...</li>
<li>There's a new book out that I've very much like to read, called <em>The Marketing of Thirst</em>,* by Elizabeth Royte.  Issues of water scarcity and the bottled-water industry are coming to the forefront, and I think they will (justifiably) be getting more and more attention over the coming years.  Another book review that caught my eye: <em>Labor Pains</em> by Steven Greenhouse, which chronicles the decline of unions and the corresponding systemic problems in how American workers are treated today.</li>
<li>There was an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/business/smallbusiness/21tooth.html?ref=smallbusiness">article</a> on Recycline, a company I've been following for some time because I admire its goal of creating a use for recycled plastic by making products that are also themselves recyclable.  However, I recently tried to walk my talk about them, and failed.  For one, their "disposable" plates and cutlery are so durable they are actually dishwasher-safe, which makes me feel that they must have more material in them than I really need - perhaps they are more like a substitute for regular plates than for disposable ones.  Second, they cost at least 5 times as much as the alternatives.  I don't mind a 20% markup, but 500% is tough.  I'll be looking for FSC certified paper plates instead.</li>
</ul>
*Note: Apologies, I inadvertently mixed up the book title and the book-review title. As you can see from the author's comment below, the real title is Bottlemania: <em>How Water Went on Sale and Why We Bought It</em>.  Great, that's a much better title!</div>
</content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/06/news-tidbits.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Green Weddings and the Absurdity of Gift Wrap</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Capitalism4good/~3/4sVzoMQNNLk/green-weddings-and-the-absurdity-of-gift-wrap.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/06/green-weddings-and-the-absurdity-of-gift-wrap.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2008-12-27T15:35:14-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-50714416</id>
        <published>2008-06-02T10:02:59-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-02T10:02:59-04:00</updated>
        <summary>I'm getting married in less than a month, and have been watching in delight as some early gifts come in - and in horror as I unwrap a 2ft x 2ft box to find that it contains 25 pieces of...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Melissa Tritter</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341eef9d53ef00e55297cfb28833-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="CrateGiftBox" class="at-xid-6a00d8341eef9d53ef00e55297cfb28833 " src="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341eef9d53ef00e55297cfb28833-120pi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="CrateGiftBox" /></a>
I'm getting married in less than a month, and have been watching in delight as some early gifts come in - and in horror as I unwrap a 2ft x 2ft box to find that it contains 25 pieces of indestructible silverware, along with enough packaging to double our normal weekly landfill contribution.<br /><br />Seriously, I don't expect everyone to be "green" and I'm certainly not
the perfect environmentalist myself, but it's absurd.  The silverware,
for example, came in 5 different boxes which were surrounded by yards
of bubblewrap inside a big cardboard box, which in turn had several
yards of cloth trademarked ribbon around it, and then a
huge volume of paper to fill up the space between it and the shipping
box.  You could have fit a small child in this thing.<br />
<br />
I've spoken to that particular vendor (Crate &amp; Barrel), and while
the staff is sympathetic, there is simply no way in the current system
to request less packaging - fairly hypocritical given the new in-store
"green packaging" program.  The other places we're registered aren't
much better.  Overall, I think REI has used the most minimal packaging
- but they've also tended to ship small items separately when combining
them would have been better.<br />
<br />
Given the recent popularity of "green weddings," along with the cost of
packaging and shipping, this seems like a huge oversight - and also a
giant opportunity.  I'm sure some couples would choose to register at
one store over another if the environmental benefits were significant,
and there is certainly room for significant improvement.</div>
</content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/06/green-weddings-and-the-absurdity-of-gift-wrap.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>How green are consumers, really?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Capitalism4good/~3/HrVCy7o0Wx8/how-green-are-c.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/how-green-are-c.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-49957736</id>
        <published>2008-05-16T09:26:44-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-16T09:26:44-04:00</updated>
        <summary>This question has been asked again and again - just because consumers say the environment is important to them, does that translate to more dollars for eco-friendly products? A recent article from Ad Week ("Deflating a Myth") has a good...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Melissa Tritter</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a onclick="window.open(this.href, '_blank', 'width=300,height=250,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/16/deflated.jpg"&gt;&lt;img width="100" height="83" border="0" src="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/images/2008/05/16/deflated.jpg" title="Deflated" alt="Deflated" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; float: left;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
This question has been asked again and again - just because consumers say the environment is important to them, does that translate to more dollars for eco-friendly products?&amp;nbsp; A recent article from &lt;em&gt;Ad Week&lt;/em&gt; (&amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/agency/e3i5e732e045deaaba3fee80a6013a71471?pn=4"&gt;Deflating a Myth&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;) has a good and detailed analysis.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The authors conclude that it's not easy to find the profit in green marketing, but with a careful search for the right market segments and attention to other consumer needs, the potential is still very real.&amp;nbsp; And while the green trend does have characteristics of a passing fad, experts feel that responsiveness, transparency, and good intentions will continue to sell well for a long time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/how-green-are-c.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Responsible Business Summit in the UK (Part II)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Capitalism4good/~3/uPySPF8YHys/responsible-b-1.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/responsible-b-1.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-49845406</id>
        <published>2008-05-14T07:04:39-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-14T07:04:39-04:00</updated>
        <summary>While it's quite fascinating to observe the differences between US and UK/European sustainability, I don't really have anyone to talk to about them (except of course you, blog reader!). In the US, I'd be catching up with old friends at...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Melissa Tritter</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;While
it's quite fascinating to observe the differences between US and UK/European sustainability, I don't really have anyone to talk to
about them (except of course you, blog reader!).&amp;nbsp; In the US, I'd be catching up
with old friends at any given sustainability conference, but here there's only
one familiar face (and he's the Chairman and unlikely to remember me).&amp;nbsp; At the
cocktail hour last night I just stood around awkwardly, feeling like I was at a
middle-school dance.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;u1:p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today, at last, I've met a couple of very interesting people.&amp;nbsp; One works for a
company that produces a lifecycle management software, and apparently has not
only clients but also competitors - imagine that!&amp;nbsp; In the US, the folks
doing this tend to be early-phase start-ups&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/u1:p&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Another
person I met works for the Corporate Register, and we briefly debated
the usefulness of the GRI reporting standard - something I've publicly
supported in the
past.&amp;nbsp; He made some good points that the GRI is not as relevant in
Europe,
where a substantial number of companies began sustainability reporting
several
years before the GRI existed, and many of them continue reporting
without using
GRI.&amp;nbsp; In the US, companies seem to find it quite reassuring to know
that
there &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a standard as they embark on their reporting journey, but I suppose we
are several years behind.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;While of course it’s
good to finally be meeting people, a new problem has
cropped up: I’m not familiar with 90% of the organizations they
mention.&amp;nbsp;In the US, I believe I have a
reasonably competent grasp of what’s going on in the sustainability field – but
not here!&amp;nbsp;And embarrassingly enough,
several of these groups have opened offices right in Boston, where I live.&amp;nbsp;Five Winds is one, though my conversation
partner admitted that the organization has been embarrassed to realize that “wind”
can have alternate meanings in the US.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Good
to know that I’m not the only one facing cultural adjustment challenges!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/responsible-b-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Responsible Business Summit in the UK  (Part I)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Capitalism4good/~3/sOJ_BUoey58/responsible-bus.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/responsible-bus.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-49845278</id>
        <published>2008-05-14T06:59:30-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-14T06:59:30-04:00</updated>
        <summary>As an American, part of the attraction of Ethical Corporation's London-based "Responsible Business Summit" was the opportunity to observe cultural differences between the UK sustainability community and the parallel movement in the US – though perhaps to call them parallel...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Melissa Tritter</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;





&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;As an American, part of the attraction of &lt;em&gt;Ethical Corporation&lt;/em&gt;'s London-based &amp;quot;Responsible
Business Summit&amp;quot; was the opportunity to observe cultural differences between
the UK sustainability community and the parallel movement in the US – though
perhaps to call them parallel does not do justice to how far the British
movement has come.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;For some time, I’ve been impressed by the volume and quality
of sustainability-related news coming out of the UK, but I did wonder: are the
British are really that much more engaged in sustainability issues?&amp;nbsp;And would I be able to see real evidence of
that in just a couple of days?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;The short
answer: absolutely.&amp;nbsp;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;After waking up and pulling a bag of fair-trade coffee out
of my friend’s energy-efficient freezer, I walked to the Tube and picked up a
copy of the Metro – where the front-page article was on climate change.&amp;nbsp;At the Park Plaza hotel, I was momentarily
confused by the “Responsibility to Opportunity” conference being held one floor
up from Ethical Corporation’s Responsible Business Summit.&amp;nbsp;Sustainability was everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the start of the first session, I sat next to a local professor who teaches on sustainability issues - something I found to be quite amazing, given extremely slow adoption of sustainability curricula in the US.&amp;nbsp; During the first Q&amp;amp;A, another sustainability professor stood up to ask something.&amp;nbsp; And another.&amp;nbsp; And I think maybe even one more.&amp;nbsp; These profs were everywhere, and no longer seemed to consider it extraordinary that their job descriptions focused explicitly on sustainability issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Then there were the offhand comments in the keynotes and panels.&amp;nbsp; On speaker referenced the fact that &amp;quot;ten years ago, fair trade used to be almost a joke, and now it's everywhere.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; In the US, I can still hear the laughter, especially when the Starbucks barista has no idea where the fair trade coffee is located.&amp;nbsp; Here, even the gas station convenience stores stock fair-trade products (and the Kleenex is FSC-certified).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another interesting comment was on the successful campaign against genetically modified foods, which are now considered across the UK and Europe to be absolutely horrible, and something no one would touch.&amp;nbsp; While Europeans are just starting to consider relaxing this hard-line approach, most American have no idea what in their diet might be GM, nor do they much care.&amp;nbsp; The debate pretty much passed us by, though broader food movements (slow-food, organic, local) might eventually encompass it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then one of my favorite comments, on the need for an entrepreneurial approach to seeking sustainability innovation: &amp;quot;Whenever people here the word &lt;em&gt;risk&lt;/em&gt;, they think of the precautionary principle....&amp;nbsp; we need to be less afraid of risk.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; In the US, not so much.&amp;nbsp; We're full of serial entrepreneurs, and for many a first-time failure is like a rite of passage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally, there was the sudden realization that I might want to stop by the breakout sessions on climate change, because they are being discussed in an entirely different context.&amp;nbsp; In the US, it's about proactively addressing something on which the Bush administration is dragging its heels, and it's about voluntary compliance and carbon &amp;quot;markets&amp;quot; based on purely voluntary actions.&amp;nbsp; But here, it's a legal system that's non-optional, and the value contained in carbon markets is absolutely real.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/responsible-bus.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>A web portal for environmental information
</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Capitalism4good/~3/pmiZtjb-Fcc/a-web-portal-fo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/a-web-portal-fo.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-49770268</id>
        <published>2008-05-12T20:07:34-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-12T20:07:34-04:00</updated>
        <summary>I just found a cool site for the environmentally-inclined: EcoEarth.Info. It takes a “portal” approach to getting lots of ecological information out there, including a newsfeed, blog, campaign network, and search functionality. While EcoEarth isn’t specifically focused on business and...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Melissa Tritter</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just found a cool site for the environmentally-inclined:
&lt;a href="http://www.ecoearth.info/"&gt;EcoEarth.Info&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;It takes a “portal” approach to getting lots of ecological information
out there, including a newsfeed, blog, campaign network, and search
functionality.&amp;nbsp;While EcoEarth isn’t
specifically focused on business and the environment, it includes some good information
about private-sector issues and impacts.

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://capitalism4good.typepad.com/blog/2008/05/a-web-portal-fo.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->

