<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Itty Bitty Rants</title>
	
	<link>http://www.cavort.org</link>
	<description>Infrequent posts about stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CavortComments" /><feedburner:info uri="cavortcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on New Marvel Trades on Nook (12/23/2011) by Cavorter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/wIdPKYc-JnQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=1091#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>I think you've got two different things going on:

1 - "Do recent comics have decent storylines?" I can't really speak to the overall quality of recent storylines since for all intents and purposes I haven't been reading comics for about 5 years and I'm just now starting to catch up as Marvel releases these trades digitally (and so far only on the Nook). So I don't think I'm qualified to make any sort of generic comment on Marvel comics specifically or all comics generally.

That said, the stuff I have been able to read that has been published in the last few years appears to have about the same mix of good/bad that there seems to always have been. A good example of that would be the Planet Hulk and World War Hulk trades that were available when the Nook Tablet launched. I thought Planet Hulk was good though perhaps not excellent. Plotting was fairly solid, characterization was decent, dialog was interesting, but then they &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCUQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unheardtaunts.com%2Fwir%2F&amp;ei=J630TsuDOcK4twfpgL3QBg&amp;usg=AFQjCNHP3ClWyUHIq1vv9El5juDrQVavYQ&amp;sig2=oHU8NLwgzuLP6E6o1JEgHA" rel="nofollow"&gt;fridged&lt;/a&gt; Hulk's wife starting World War Hulk and everything went downhill in an apparent attempt to make sure anyone who cared about any characters in the Marvel U would have a reason to read it. It sucked. The recent Spider-Man trades I've gotten through so far have been equally diverse in quality.

2 - "Is the history of the X-Men a convoluted mess?" Yes, the X-Men are messed up. Is that news? :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:3fd2b152e003f718b086829ba4133792fb8094ec'>I think you&#8217;ve got two different things going on:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; &#8220;Do recent comics have decent storylines?&#8221; I can&#8217;t really speak to the overall quality of recent storylines since for all intents and purposes I haven&#8217;t been reading comics for about 5 years and I&#8217;m just now starting to catch up as Marvel releases these trades digitally (and so far only on the Nook). So I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m qualified to make any sort of generic comment on Marvel comics specifically or all comics generally.</p>
<p>That said, the stuff I have been able to read that has been published in the last few years appears to have about the same mix of good/bad that there seems to always have been. A good example of that would be the Planet Hulk and World War Hulk trades that were available when the Nook Tablet launched. I thought Planet Hulk was good though perhaps not excellent. Plotting was fairly solid, characterization was decent, dialog was interesting, but then they <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;rct=j&#038;q=&#038;esrc=s&#038;source=web&#038;cd=1&#038;ved=0CCUQFjAA&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unheardtaunts.com%2Fwir%2F&#038;ei=J630TsuDOcK4twfpgL3QBg&#038;usg=AFQjCNHP3ClWyUHIq1vv9El5juDrQVavYQ&#038;sig2=oHU8NLwgzuLP6E6o1JEgHA" rel="nofollow">fridged</a> Hulk&#8217;s wife starting World War Hulk and everything went downhill in an apparent attempt to make sure anyone who cared about any characters in the Marvel U would have a reason to read it. It sucked. The recent Spider-Man trades I&#8217;ve gotten through so far have been equally diverse in quality.</p>
<p>2 &#8211; &#8220;Is the history of the X-Men a convoluted mess?&#8221; Yes, the X-Men are messed up. Is that news? <img src='http://www.cavort.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2011/12/23/new-marvel-trades-on-nook-12232011/comment-page-1/#comment-2086</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Marvel Trades on Nook (12/23/2011) by Don</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/-gT_DydTgrE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=1091#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>What's your take on the quality of the latest storylines? I found an interesting article in Wired (http://www.wired.com/magazine/tag/uncanny-x-men/) covering the X-Men. The "Naught '00s" review ended with "Then his twin brother, Xorn, showed up. Then we stopped reading comics."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:49c7049ebb03e98ba64843930ead925b0995aab9'>What&#8217;s your take on the quality of the latest storylines? I found an interesting article in Wired (<a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/tag/uncanny-x-men/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/magazine/tag/uncanny-x-men/</a>) covering the X-Men. The &#8220;Naught &#8217;00s&#8221; review ended with &#8220;Then his twin brother, Xorn, showed up. Then we stopped reading comics.&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2011/12/23/new-marvel-trades-on-nook-12232011/comment-page-1/#comment-2085</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Environment and Path Variables in InstallShield by Cavorter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/SCN9TvwJrQo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=1078#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>I left out a bit: The environment variable was already created before starting up InstallShield and it still won't resolve as anything useful unless I go through the process outlined. I might make an edit in the post to reflect that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:f6256a81e6d28e700618bbeb87c3ebf1b2306b3b'>I left out a bit: The environment variable was already created before starting up InstallShield and it still won&#8217;t resolve as anything useful unless I go through the process outlined. I might make an edit in the post to reflect that&#8230;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2011/11/15/environment-and-path-variables-in-installshield/comment-page-1/#comment-1985</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Environment and Path Variables in InstallShield by colby</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/u1HSYIGgAFw/</link>
		<dc:creator>colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=1078#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>"I had originally just gone straight to the Path Variables section of the IDE and created a new entry and changed the type to “Environment”..."

1. Do that (above).
2. Save the changes, close and restart IS.

The problem occurs if you create a new environment variable while you have the IDE open because creating the new env var does not "broadcast" the change to currently running processes (such as isdev.exe). For the IDE to "see" the new env var you have to stop and restart the process.  I think most applications work this way too (for example, that's why you can't set an env var during an MSI install and reference the new env var before the install has completed - b/c the change isn't "broadcast" to the already running msiexec.exe process).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:080874dfdb7e299e2b57b01280f1a2722323d9d7'>&#8220;I had originally just gone straight to the Path Variables section of the IDE and created a new entry and changed the type to “Environment”&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>1. Do that (above).<br />
2. Save the changes, close and restart IS.</p>
<p>The problem occurs if you create a new environment variable while you have the IDE open because creating the new env var does not &#8220;broadcast&#8221; the change to currently running processes (such as isdev.exe). For the IDE to &#8220;see&#8221; the new env var you have to stop and restart the process.  I think most applications work this way too (for example, that&#8217;s why you can&#8217;t set an env var during an MSI install and reference the new env var before the install has completed &#8211; b/c the change isn&#8217;t &#8220;broadcast&#8221; to the already running msiexec.exe process).</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2011/11/15/environment-and-path-variables-in-installshield/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installations in Windows 8 by Cavorter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/iw4TS7uZaAA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=1061#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>Still using 2011. (2012 fulfillment is caught up in the bowels of bureaucracy at work) I've got a set of custom logging functions that I have a reference project for and it ran exactly as I expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:6512ce0239130c2b55546492a58eebc0b377f7da'>Still using 2011. (2012 fulfillment is caught up in the bowels of bureaucracy at work) I&#8217;ve got a set of custom logging functions that I have a reference project for and it ran exactly as I expected.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2011/09/14/installations-in-windows-8/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Installations in Windows 8 by JP</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/192rV5-VWu8/</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=1061#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this Nathan.  I did diff the logs and saw similar results as you.  I'm curious; what version of IS are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:55a1405a3447926a040aca6f7ffb1779b3cce3fb'>Thanks for posting this Nathan.  I did diff the logs and saw similar results as you.  I&#8217;m curious; what version of IS are you using?</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2011/09/14/installations-in-windows-8/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comment Subscription Test by Cavorter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/FMoUjlS5v5s/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=950#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Sorry that took me awhile to moderate Anika. I was out kind of late last night. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:6981fbd1b18c36cb3276008da95a2a716acb73f6'>Sorry that took me awhile to moderate Anika. I was out kind of late last night. <img src='http://www.cavort.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2010/06/28/comment-subscription-test/comment-page-1/#comment-903</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comment Subscription Test by Anika</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/Orj6myIMbGE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Anika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=950#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:ac8c33620a8bba90fb678d8e52550e63a00396c5'>Comment.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2010/06/28/comment-subscription-test/comment-page-1/#comment-902</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comment Subscription Test by Cavorter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/bX2PSSH2Qco/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 12:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=950#comment-901</guid>
		<description>FYI - The threaded comments for this theme are almost as functional as they should be, sorry for any weird indentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:6981fbd1b18c36cb3276008da95a2a716acb73f6'>FYI &#8211; The threaded comments for this theme are almost as functional as they should be, sorry for any weird indentation.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2010/06/28/comment-subscription-test/comment-page-1/#comment-901</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comment Subscription Test by Sigrid</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CavortComments/~3/MMgJCwKXKMI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cavort.org/?p=950#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Testing testing testing, keep them dogies testing, keep them dogies testing, RAW-HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-mailto+http:sha1:4cfa0e151880893340f14b418ee0cf41c3507070'>Testing testing testing, keep them dogies testing, keep them dogies testing, RAW-HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDE!!!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.cavort.org/2010/06/28/comment-subscription-test/comment-page-1/#comment-900</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

