Century of the Common Iowan

John Culver Speech at Ted Kennedy's Memorial

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:04:00 +0000

Former Senator John Culver spoke last night at Ted Kennedy's Memorial Service. Culver recounted a story sailing with Ted and had everyone laughing.

Health Care Ad from AARP

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:12:00 +0000

Here's a new ad from AARP about the Health Care reform debate...

50 Americans die each day from lack of Health Care

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:27:00 +0000

More discussion on health care reform from the Thom Hartmann radio show...

The Truth about the Canadian Health Care System

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:12:00 +0000

Information about the Canadian health care system from the Thom Hartmann radio show...

First Distribution of I-JOBS Funds go to 948 Communities and all 99 Counties

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:45:00 +0000

The Governor's office issued a press release today giving details about the first distribution of I-JOBS funds that will be going out next week.

Continuing to lead the way in efforts to create jobs and strengthen the economy, Governor Chet Culver visited the Des Moines Public Works this morning to announce nearly $100 million in additional road and bridge funding from I-JOBS for transportation projects across the state.
“I-JOBS is about creating jobs, improving our infrastructure and strengthening our economy,” said Governor Culver. “Today, I’m proud to announce that, within a matter of days, these funds will be flowing to every community in Iowa. I-JOBS will not only fix our roads, but create new jobs and new opportunities for our communities, and build a stronger, safer Iowa.”
Every city and county in Iowa will receive a portion of $45 million in additional funding under I-JOBS for local street and road projects. These funds will begin being distributed to cities and counties starting next Tuesday.

Iowa Ranked First in Young Voter Turnout in 2008

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:57:00 +0000

From the Quad City Times...

Iowa ranked highest of the 50 states in the percentage of its young people to turn out to vote in the last presidential election, according to a new federal report.
The U.S. Census Bureau estimated Monday that 63 percent of Iowa's eligible voters between the ages of 18 and 24 cast ballots in the Nov. 4 election.
Nationwide, the report said, 49 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds voted. In Illinois, it was 50 percent.
The closest state to Iowa in turnout for 18- to 24-year-olds was Minnesota, at 62 percent, a statistically insignificant difference, the Census Bureau said.
Youth turnout was a focus of last year's election because President Barack Obama's campaign was particularly appealing to young people.
That was evident in Iowa, where caucuses kicked off the election season. More young people than ever took part in those.

The largest increase in voter turnout in Iowa was amongst 25-34 year olds with 30,000 more voters in 2008 than in 2004.

Rationing Public Education

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:32:00 +0000

Matthew Yglesias dismisses concerns over rationing health care in a public option by comparing it to public educaiton. He concludes those concerns are irrational...

Thinking about the “rationing” question in health care it’s worth trying to get clear. Sometimes there are shortages of something relative to demand—think of a huge oil shock—and the government decides it wants to impose price controls. That, in turn, leads to shortages. So you can attempt to ameliorate the shortages by rationing. Everyone is only allowed to buy so much gas. During World War II, Great Britain had comprehensive rationing for lots of staple food products—you were only allowed so much sugar, so much tea, so much bacon, etc. That’s rationing.
Now consider something else. If you’re a parent in Montgomery County Maryland, you pay taxes to the county and you get to send your kids to very good public schools. But even though the schools are good, they won’t just do anything you want. Your kid can learn Spanish at government expense, but the taxpayers won’t foot the bill for your kid to learn Burmese. But you don’t normally hear anyone say that the presence of a “public option” for elementary and secondary education involves “rationing” of foreign language instruction. If people have the means and want to arrange private lessons for their children of various kinds nobody is stopping them. And certain forms of this sort of supplemental instruction—Hebrew school in synagogues, Sunday school in churches, piano lessons or Kaplan test prep—are quite common.

Gov. Culver Now Tweets

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:00:00 +0000

Governor Culver has officially joined Twitter. You can follow him at @GovChetCulver on Twitter.

So far Culver's Tweets have been pretty officially, posting links to press releases regarding flood relief, the National Governor's Association meetings, the I-JOBS program, and the Microsoft data center. Culver definitely hasn't been as folksy as Sen. Grassley is on Twitter.

Are Antiques Green?

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:06:00 +0000

My wife and I live in an older home and we frequent antique stores in hopes of finding the perfect peice of furniture that matches our home's style. I've always considered antiques to be green as it is a perfect reuse of old 'junk' and the quality is a lot better than what you'd find at a big box store.

This article at Tree Hugger takes a closer look at how green antiques are.

My latest predicament is this - my wife and I love to buy antique furniture - especially as we prepare ourselves for our first child. It's green, right? I mean what could be more sustainable than buying furniture built to last, and reused over-and-over again? The trouble is, I'm not so sure...
You see, the more I get to know about the antique trade, the more I find out how far dealers will travel to find salable pieces. And as we all know - travel has a high carbon footprint - especially if that travel is done in a private car or van, as opposed to a shipping container or a truck that is packed for maximum capacity. So is a truck-load of flat-pack Ikea furniture really any more polluting than 12 vans full of ancient artifacts? How do we weigh efficiency of transportation against durability and longevity, or emissions in manufacture? [...]
Having talked this over with my fellow TreeHuggers, I suspect that antiques are still a net positive - but it might make sense to look for antiques that are native to your region, and look to hold on to them for a long time (estate sales are obviously a good place to start!). As my colleague Mike pointed out, it's hard to imagine that furniture that lasts for 100 years, and may be sold maybe three or four times, has a higher carbon footprint than flatpack mass manufactured stuff that may be trashed in ten years.

Iowa CCI Convention This Saturday

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:04:00 +0000

The top 5 reasons you should be @ CCI's Convention Saturday, July 18:

#1 Connect and reconnect. Experience what it feels like to be a part of something. The number one thing members will tell you they like most about the CCI convention is meeting up with members from across the state and learning about each other's issues. Meet up with old friends and make new ones while reconnecting to what's important - standing together for action.

#2 Speak truth to power. CCI members don't just stand by and let things happen. They put pressure where it needs to be put. That is why we have invited legislative leaders and other decision-makers to our workshops and a plenary session. And...if they don't show up to meet with us, in true direct-action organizing fashion, we just might have to take the meeting to them. Be there to hold these decision makers accountable and stand with hundreds of others as we demand that everyday people be put first.

#3 Great lineup of guest speakers and workshop presenters. We've tapped our strategic, national allies in our fight to put people before polluters, profits and politics. Lunch keynote speaker Deepak Bhargava, from the Center for Community Change (www.communitychange.org), has years of Organizing to Win! experience. He'll talk about the opportunity we have to stand up for the common good and set the political agenda -- local, state, and national -- that impacts our lives.

Other guests include top staff from:

Food & Water Watch - the folks that brought you www.factoryfarmmap.org, the Global Grocerand more fascinating resources, reports and victories.

Public Campaign - leaders in the fight for clean election reform at the state and national levels. Visitwww.publiccampaign.org to read their reports and watch Law & Order actor Sam Waterston defend Clean Elections on national TV.

National People's Action - who helps groups like CCI build power to win locally and nationally. NPA's organizing was recently featured in an article in The Nation.

#4 You like pie. In addition to lunch made with family farm and locally produced foods and dessert provided by Chocolaterie Stam (yum!) -- we'll have a homemade pie silent auction. Let the bidding wars begin! (If you'd like to make and donate a pie, please contact Katie at 515-255-0800 orkatie@iowacci.org.)

#5 High energy, fun! From meeting other members to taking action with hundreds of others to the victory stories to the workshops, you'll be inspired and cheering from your chairs.

I hope you'll join us and feel the power that is the CCI convention.
Saturday, July 18 9am- 4:30pm
Hotel Fort Des Moines in downtown Des Moines
You can't beat the price -- only $45 per person includes the full convention, lunch made with family farm and local foods, the keynote address, strategy workshops and more.
* Save $10 if you say "CCI is awesome" in the reason you heard about the convention!

To register, follow this link to sign up online.

Please register for the convention today, bring your friends and neighbors, and help us stand up, stand together and Organize to Win!

The Cost of NOT Having a Public Option

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:18:00 +0000

This diary at Daily Kos takes a look at the cost of NOT having a public option.

But what does it cost us to not have a public option?
Some of the costs of not having a public option are simple to calculate, but immeasurable in value. Infant mortality rates in the United States are 6.37 deaths/1,000 live births. A sampling of other industrialized nations with public health care finds the United Kingdom at 5.01 deaths / 1,000 live births. Canada at 4.63. France at 3.41. If the United States infant mortality matched that of the United Kingdom, just under 6,000 fewer infants would have died in the United States last year. If we could match France around 13,000 fewer infants would have died.
Let's move to the other end of the spectrum. As of 2009, life expectancy in the United States is 78.11 years. Which sounds pretty good, until you realize it puts us one slot above Albania. For the United Kingdom, this number is 79.01 years. For France it's 80.98. For Canada, 81.23. for the United States, that means about 270,000,000 years lost compared just to the slightly better numbers of the UK. 936,000,000 years lost compared to Canada. Want to stick a monetary value on it? Say that just a fourth of these Americans in their golden years are pulling down 20 hours a week and getting minimum wage to wave you into the local big box or bag your groceries. That's $442 billion worth of time lost compared to the UK. About $1.5 trillion lost if those workers had lived as long as Canadians.
There are good things to be said about the American system. When you're in an American hospital, a very good level of immediate care makes you more likely to survive the immediate aftermath of a health crisis. Just had a heart attack? Hug that cardiac care unit close and you're 20% more likely to hang around than your neighbor to the north. However, a low quality of long term and follow up care erodes that difference over the course of a year. Sorry.
But those are only a few of the direct effects of the cost of health care that's distributed by wealth rather than need. There are indirect effects that are equally dramatic.
Millions of Americans are in what's called "job lock." They can't leave their jobs because they feel they can't get the same health insurance benefits on their own or at the next job. A new poll by NPR News, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard's Kennedy School of Government shows that one out of four Americans has experienced job lock, in the last couple of years, or someone in their immediate family has. That's despite legislation enacted six years ago to deal with the problem.
Having health care that, for most Americans, continues to be directly tied to their employment has one very clear cost: it makes people less likely to voluntarily leave their current job. Sure, COBRA is now available, but the cost of continuing health insurance on your own is enough to make it of questionable value. The complex and highly variable nature of coverage makes it almost impossible for the average consumer to tell which, if any, insurance plan available to them represents a reasonable deal. Many Americans decide to stick with "the devil they know" rather than face rising costs, the uncertainty of acceptance, and the fear related to going it on your own.

Add to that a hidden tax of $1000 that people with insurance pay for those who do not have insurance.

Smoking Declines in Iowa

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:40:00 +0000

The smoking rate among Iowans has delcined from 19% in 2007 to 14% in 2008.

From Bleeding Heartland...

...it's been a full year since the Iowa Smokefree Air Act went into effect. The public smoking ban was one of the most controversial bills considered during the 2008 legislative session, and advocates praised the law's success at a press conference this week.
According to a recent Iowa Department of Public Health survey, 14 percent of Iowans smoke. In 2007, IDPH research estimated the smoking rate at 19 percent. That's a significant decline, suggesting that around one-quarter of Iowans who smoked in 2007 have since quit. The $1 a pack tax hike on cigarettes approved in 2007 was probably a major factor in this trend as well.

Why Iowa Needs Health Reform

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:22:00 +0000

From HealthReform.Gov...

THE HEALTH CARE STATUS QUO:
Why Iowa Needs Health Reform
Congress and the President are working to enact health care reform legislation that protects what works about health care and fixes what is broken. Iowans know that inaction is not an option. Sky-rocketing health care costs are hurting families, forcing businesses to cut or drop health benefits, and straining state budgets. Millions are paying more for less. Families and businesses in Iowa deserve better.
IOWANS CAN’T AFFORD THE STATUS QUO
Roughly 1.9 million people in Iowa get health insurance on the job¹, where family premiums average $12,206, about the annual earning of a full-time minimum wage job.²
Since 2000 alone, average family premiums have increased by 88 percent in Iowa.³
Household budgets are strained by high costs: 19 percent of middle-income Iowa families spend more than 10 percent of their income on health care.⁴
High costs block access to care: 8 percent of people in Iowa report not visiting a doctor due to high costs.⁵
Iowa businesses and families shoulder a hidden health tax of roughly $600 per year on premiums as a direct result of subsidizing the costs of the uninsured.⁶
AFFORDABLE HEALTH COVERAGE IS INCREASINGLY OUT OF REACH IN IOWA
10 percent of people in Iowa are uninsured, and 71 percent of them are in families with at least one full-time worker.⁷
The percent of Iowans with employer coverage is declining: from 71 to 65 percent between 2000 and 2007.⁸
Much of the decline is among workers in small businesses. While small businesses make up 76 percent of Iowa businesses,⁹ only 39 percent of them offered health coverage benefits in 2006 -- down 2 percent since 2000.¹⁰
Choice of health insurance is limited in Iowa. Wellmark BC and BS alone constitutes 71 percent of the health insurance market share in Iowa, with the top two insurance providers accounting for 80 percent.¹¹
Choice is even more limited for people with pre-existing conditions. In Iowa, premiums can vary, within limits, based on demographic factors and health status, and coverage can exclude pre-existing conditions or even be denied completely.
IOWANS NEED HIGHER QUALITY, GREATER VALUE, AND MORE PREVENTATIVE CARE
The overall quality of care in Iowa is rated as “Average.”¹²
Preventative measures that could keep Iowans healthier and out of the hospital are deficient, leading to problems across the age spectrum:
11 percent of children in Iowa are obese.¹³
21 percent of women over the age of 50 in Iowa have not received a mammogram in the past two years.
36 percent of men over the age of 50 in Iowa have never had a colorectal cancer screening.
74 percent of adults over the age of 65 in Iowa have received a flu vaccine in the past year.¹⁴
The need for reform in Iowa and across the country is clear. Iowa families simply can’t afford the status quo and deserve better. President Obama is committed to working with Congress to pass health reform this year that reduces costs for families, businesses and government; protects people’s choice of doctors, hospitals and health plans; and assures affordable, quality health care for all Americans.

Health Care Reform: All or Nothing? Grassley Says Nothing

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:35:00 +0000

Here's a quote from Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D-WV) about bipartisanship and health care reform...

"But do you want to be non-partisan and get nothing? Or do you want to be partisan and end up with a good health care plan? That is the choice."

-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), quoted in the Charleston Gazette, expecting little Republican support in passing health care reform.

Sen. Grassley, however, thinks the bill must be bipartisan and Republicans need to make sure there is no public option.

What's Wrong With this Picture?

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:52:00 +0000

Here's a screenshot from Fox News's coverage yesterday of South Carolina Governor, Republican Mark Sanford's press conference.

Sanford admitted to having an affair after going missing for 6 days when he was seeing his mistress in Argentina.

Notice anything wrong with the with the ticker Fox News showed in this picture?

Healthy Americans Against Reforming Medicine: Secret Meeting Details Uncovered!

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:57:00 +0000

Obama, The Deficit Hawk

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:15:00 +0000

From Matthew Yglesias...

There’s a lot of political concern in Washington about public anxiety about budget deficits. Substantively, the public’s concerns don’t really make sense, as deficit-reduction amidst a severe recession will only make the recession more severe. But Stan Collender, whose deficit hawk credentials should not be in question, observes that the political problem is largely a mirage as well:
If you look beyond the very short-term, the deficit situation will begin to turnaround next year, that is, before the election. Under current forecasts, the deficit will fall by a record amount from 2009 to 2010. It will still be high by virtually anyone’s standards — probably around $1 trillion or so. But the big change in the right direction will give the White House the breathing room it needs and alter the politics substantially. Anyone want to bet that there will be a cover story somewhere next year calling Obama the deficit killer?
This will, of course, not be a substantive fix for anything. But the nominal deficit reduction will, indeed, be huge. As the economy recovers, tax revenues will rise, social safety net outlays will fall, and stimulus measures will begin to tamp down. If we can assume further growth in 2011, the complete expiry of Recovery Act provisions, and the winding down of the Iraq War, that’ll be further deficit reduction.

Obama, The Nerd Presidency

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:59:00 +0000

John Hodgeman spoke at the Radio and TV Correspondents Dinner over the weekend and discects the culture of war of our time: jocks vs nerd. Hodgeman concludes that the Obama administration is the first nerd presidency.

Is a Public Option for Health Insurance a Good Idea?

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:27:00 +0000

The Des Moines Register wrote this editorial this morning about the merits of a public option.

So how do you decide whether a public option for health insurance is a good idea?

Ask people who already have it.

And you won't have any trouble finding them. About one-third of Americans - nearly 100 million people - already use Medicare and Medicaid, which together cover seniors, the disabled and the poor. The programs are administered by the government and heavily funded by taxpayers.

They're optional. No one has to sign up. But millions do.
Ask them why they opted to join a government program instead of just going out to purchase health insurance in the private sector, as every American is free to try to do. Ask people with Medicaid whether the government has denied enrolling them (if they met income requirements) or charged them more because of a pre-existing medical condition. Ask seniors with Medicare whether they're worried about losing health insurance if they change jobs or get too sick or can no longer afford to pay the premiums.
If you have time for only one question, ask this: Did a government employee accompany you to your last doctor's appointment?

The Paradox of Health Care Reform

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:22:00 +0000

Matthew Yglesisas explains the paradox of health care reform that left must overcome...

The big problem, politically speaking, with health care is that you basically have people on the left arguing both sides of the question. On the one hand, insofar as your plan is “big government” that’s left-wing. But insofar as your plan is expensive, that’s also left-wing. Which is because people normally think of big government programs as expensive. But when it comes to health care, heavy-handed government intervention is actually way cheaper than private sector alternatives. Consequently, every time you try to make the plan more “moderate” by, for example, curbing the influence of a public option you actually wind up making the plan more “left wing” by needing to raise more taxes. And if you want to make the plan cheaper, while still actually achieving its goals, then you need to make it more left-wing not more moderate. But in the United States,ideological correctness and special interest politics prevents us from admitting this.

Rants Makes It Official

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:21:00 +0000

Yesterday, State Rep. Christopher Rants (R-Sioux City) posted on Twitter that he plans to file exploratory committee papers so he can being raising money and officially campaign for the 2010 race for governor.

Here's more from the Des Moines Register...

Rants, who has been meeting with GOP activists for months about a possible campaign, said he had met his early target for fundraising pledges. He also estimated it would take $2 million to mount a successful primary campaign.

Rants, 41, is among the party's younger prospects. His announcement via Twitter, the popular social networking Web site, signaled his response to Democrats' advantages in reaching voters through new media.

But Rants added during the program that the Iowa GOP, beset by consecutive statewide election losses and a voter registration gap of 110,000 with Democrats, would need a winning message as well as media.
"If we talk to those Republicans who believe the party has lost its way on things like fiscal discipline and accountability, if we become the party that's about transparency and reforming government - and that's who we are as Republicans - if we're successful in doing that, I believe we'll bring those independents back, we'll bring the majority back," he said.

Rants also appeared on Iowa Press which aired Friday and will be shown again on Sunday morning at 11:30. You can watch the appearance here.

From the Democratic viewpoint, I believe this means 3 things...

Steve King isn't going to run for Governor. I don't think Rants would have run against King and instead would have run for King's seat in Congress if King ran for governor.
Rants is a more viable candidate than Bob Vander Plaats. Mainly because Rants has more fundraising connection through his leadership positions in the Iowa House.
Rants, Vander Plaats, or any of the other rumored candidates will not be able to beat Gov. Culver in the general election. Republican Doug Gross, the party's nominee for governor in 2002, said it himself...

“I think they are all fine people and I don’t think any of them will be the nominee,” Gross said. ”I think we want to win and our nominee is going to have to have that statewide reach.”

Grassley: "Greed is human nature."

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:43:00 +0000

Sen. Grassley appeared on MSNBC today to discuss economic regulation where he said greed is human nature.

And when asked if the banks are in any position to protest if they're not going to make as much money, Grassley comes back with this:
Greed is human nature. We shouldn't blame greed any more than you'd blame gravity when a plane has an accident and goes down.
I'm sorry Senator, but I think we can blame greed for the mess we're in. Greed and the unwillingness of the government to put a check on it.

You can watch the comment here at about the 3:05 mark.

Sen. Grassley says greed isn't the problem. Yet, in 1980 on average CEOs earned 42 times the salary of the average workes and now they earn about 476 times that salary.

Later in the video Grassley says that the problem is that banks didn't have enough money. He probably has a point. The banks were giving all of their money to their greedy CEOs.

Feingold Seeks Strong Public Option in Health Care Reform

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:58:00 +0000

Howard Dean has a petition online where you can send a letter to your Senators telling them to support a public option in health care reform. Sen. Grassley needs to hear from you.

Welcome to Iowa Governor Pawlenty

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:16:00 +0000

Image via Wikipedia

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty will probably be a frequent visitor in Iowa over the next couple years.

From Political Wire...

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R), who has decided against running for a third term in 2010, "will spend the next two years traveling the country to see if he can build enough support to run for president in 2012," his associates tell Washington Whispers.

"The Republican, who is expected to play up his humble roots and past in a populist bid against President Obama, will decide in 2011 if there is enough of a base on which to build his campaign. Those close to "T-Paw" said that his focus is the presidency, not a vice presidential nomination or an effort to raise his name recognition en route to a bid in 2016."

Iowa's Poor Air Quality

noreply@blogger.com (noneed4thneed) — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:13:00 +0000

The Des Moines Register published this story about the poor air quality in the state, saying that pollutant level are nearing federal limits, which would require the state to mandate costly improvements from bussinesses.

The air across Iowa is so polluted that the state is perilously close to violating new federal limits aimed at protecting human health. Yet Iowans have no way of knowing what chemicals they are breathing because of a limited - and often inaccurate - system of monitoring pollution statewide, a Des Moines Register investigation found.

Catharine Fitzsimmons, Iowa's top air-quality official, defended Iowa's existing air-monitoring system. Yet she said the state is under orders from the federal government to better monitor fine-particle and ozone pollution, among Iowa's most pressing air-quality problems.
"Both of those pollutants affect respiratory systems, particularly in the young, the elderly and those with compromised lung function," Fitzsimmons said. "They trigger heart attacks and other health problems."

Iowans should know better in a couple of years what is coming out of the stacks of Iowa's greatest polluters. The state's Department of Natural Resources will begin requiring major industries to do more thorough testing for fine particles after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency releases a long-awaited protocol.
But a top environmental advocate said what Iowans are breathing today is worse than people think.

"It's surprisingly bad," said Donna Wong-Gibbons, a physiologist with Plains Justice, an environmental advocacy group. "It's sort of a paradox in the sense that Iowa is thought of as this great state with farm country and open land, and at the same time there are serious problems with air pollution."