Chicago Divorce Blog

We are moving

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:37:00 +0000

We are moving!!
Here is our new contact information effective 12/18/2012:

Chicago, IL Office
205 W. Randolph Street
Suite 1240
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Ph. 312-346-7400
Fax 312-346-7401

Property division case

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:53:00 +0000

Here are the results of a recent appellate decision in Illinois about property division in divorce.

In re: the Marriage of Oden , No. 4-08-0687 (4th Dist. Sept. 21, 2009) POPE (Calhoun Co.) Affirmed.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it awarded the husband 52% of bank account which contained proceeds from husband's personal injury settlement. The court said the trial court's review of relevant factors was proper for the court to arrive at "just distribution"; here, 30-year marriage, including 20 years after injury, and settlement was paid jointly to parties 15 years prior to dissolution.

New Illinois House bill regarding presumptions under Section 602 & 607 & 609

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:23:00 +0000

Marriage Act presumptions
House Bill 3904 (Connelly, R-Lisle) creates a new presumption in the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act in three places.

The current law in Sec. 602 (best interest) states that there is a presumption that maximum involvement of both parents is in the best interest of the child unless there is an occurrence of ongoing abuse. This elaborates and widens the presumption to include "a history of abuse or a significant incident of abuse."

If it is ruled that any any of these instances of abuse has occurred, a presumption against joint custody arises, which the defending party can present evidence of sufficient steps taken to minimize the potential for abuse of the custodial parent or minor child.

The new law would create the same presumptions in the visitation section (Sec. 607) and removal section (Sec. 609). Should the court rule in any of these matters, the burden falls on the abusive parent in a removal proceeding. If the removal is sought, and granted, the court is prohibited from requiring the custodial parent to provide an address or telephone number to the noncustodial parent, but may designate an alternative manner of contact that does not give the abusive parent a means of directly contacting the custodial parent. Temporary removal can also be allowed by the state without having to give information, if that information could create a serious risk of substantial harm to the removing party.

IRA distributions is income for child support purposes

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:01:00 +0000

In re Marriage of Eberhardt, No. 1-07-0135 & 1-07-2142, Cons. (December 12, 2008) 6th div. (Cahill) Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded.
Trial court correctly concluded that there is no bar to treating distributions from IRA accounts, distributed to husband as property in dissolution of marriage proceeding, as income for purposes of child support; and trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied father's petition to modify his child support obligation. Further, trial court did not err when it denied husband's claim that personal funds held in bank accounts garnished by former wife are exempt. However, trial court erred when it awarded former wife's petition for attorney's fees without affording former husband evidentiary hearing which he requested.

Chicago Divorce attorney offices in Chicago, Illinois area

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:58:00 +0000

With the coming new year, we anticipate a surge in business. After all, holiday stress piles up, people will make New Year's resolutions to get their affairs in order, not to mention tax refund time as well.

I wanted to announce the opening of our new Joliet office location.
16 W. Van Buren, Suite 303, Joliet, IL 6043, which is just down from the Will County Courtroom. We offer free consultations, so don't hesitate to contact us for a free legal evaluation.

http://www.leederslaw.com

Our other office locations:

20 E. Jackson Blvd. Suite 850 Chicago, IL

10540 S. Western Ave Suite 402 Chicago, IL

2025 S. Arlington Heights Rd. Ste. 113 Arlington Heights, IL 60005

3333 W. Warrenville, Rd. Suite 200, Naperville, IL 60532

228 N. Genesee St. Suite 205, Waukegan, IL 60085

16 W. Van Buren, Suite 303, Joliet, IL 60432

Request to admit in divorce case- timing is everything

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:16:00 +0000

As seen below, in divorce proceedings, you must file documents, answers, responses timely, or else have a really good excuse why you didn't

In re Marriage of Holtaus, No. 2-07-0562 (November 17, 2008) DuPage County (Zenoff) Reversed and remanded.
Because wife has failed to demonstrate that she had any good cause for serving response to request to admit two days late, and because lack of prejudice to husband in dissolution of marriage proceeding is not sufficient, trial court did not abuse its discretion when it struck her untimely response. Further, the trial court's refusal to treat the payment of attorney's fees as advances on the distribution of the marital estate, and skewing the property division in favor of the husband in order to adjust for the excess fees he incurred as the result of the wife's behavior during the proceeding, fits within the dictates of Section 501(c-1)(2) of the IMDMA. However, the trial court erred when it selected the relevant date for the purpose of calculating the wife's dissipation at the date that the husband moved out of the marital home; because it is clear that the marriage was in the process of breaking down long before then.

Divorce debt and bankrutpcy filing

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:39:00 +0000

Here is a recent question I have been asked regarding bankruptcy and divorce decrees.

Question:
I'm due to be divorced on Tuesday, Thursday a credit card company is taking me to court for non-payment over the last year. I've been trying to get a divorce for 1 year, I have 2 children, had to move home with my parents and while I do have an income I still do not make enough money to pay the credit card debt created by my husband. I do not get child support (he's not working) and seldom sees the kids. What should I do about the court date on Thursday? I cannot afford another lawyer, I have to pay this one $100 monthly!! Should I have filed for bankruptcy before they set a court date for the judgment?

Answer:

Your divorce decree will control who would be responsible for the debt. I assume it is a joint debt, or the decree is saying you will be responsible. Even though a bankruptcy may discharge your obligation, if the divorce decree says you will pay it, then you would still be responsible,despite the bankruptcy filing. If you are not responsible for the debt, bring your decree to court to show the judge.

maintenance and property division caselaw decisions

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:05:00 +0000

Divorce Illinois.
Here is an appeal of a divorce case decision. The court reviews the totality of the circumstances when awarding maintenance...income, assets, bonuses, retirements etc

In re: the Marriage of Walker, No. 4-07-0730 (November 26, 2008) Adams County (Myerscough) (COOK, special concurrence, TURNER, partial concurrence, partial dissent) Affirmed.
Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it awarded wife permanent maintenance after 26 year marriage with wife earning $37,000 and husband $204,000 by the court's calculation. Further, trial court was not required to believe husband's testimony that his 2006 bonus was extraordinary. In addition, trial court's award of property based on approximately 60/40 split, with the wife receiving mostly illiquid assets, is not error; and trial court had the authority to order the husband to maintain life insurance as security for his maintenance obligation.

Divorce: post dissolution injunction

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:43:00 +0000

Post Dissolution of marriage - divorce case.
Court can order pension to be turned over to ex-spouse, even if that person moved out of the country.

In re Marriage of Winter, No. 1-07-0619 (November 24, 2008) 1st div. (Garcia) Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
On interlocutory appeal, when former husband was located in England, where he is a permanent resident and beyond the contempt powers of the court, the trial court properly exercised its powers of equity when, after final judgment of dissolution of marriage awarding a portion of husband's teacher's pension to wife, husband refused to execute QUILDRO, and was receiving entire annuity, it imposed constructive trust on the pension payments, named husband's attorney as Trustee, enjoined Pension Fund from making any further payments directly to husband, and directed that husband's attorney receive payments and hold proceeds in his IOLTA account. However, it exceeded its authority when it directed that payments be made payable to attorney.

Are Sick Days Marital property in IL?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:27:00 +0000

Civil - Dissolution Of Marriage/ Maintenance / Property Division 4th Dist.
In re Marriage of Abrell, No. 4-06-0974 (November 19, 2008) Sangamon County (Knecht) (MYERSCOUGH, partial concurrence, partial dissent) Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded.
Trial court erred when it concluded that accumulated sick and vacation days by husband, a State employee, are marital property subject to division in the dissolution of the parties' marriage. However, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied husband's motion to reconsider its award of maintenance. Although trial court concluded that wife was essentially, unemployable in its memorandum of opinion, fact that she obtained full time employment, after proofs had closed in case but before judgment was entered, is not newly discovered evidence. The trial court, instead, properly considered the motion to reconsider as a motion to modify. However, it should have reduced the maintenance award based on the wife's newly acquired employment as of the date of filing the motion; although it was not required to reduce the maintenance by more than the $250 per month set by the court.

Dissolution of Marriage -Maintenance case law updates

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:12:00 +0000

Civil - Dissolution Of Marriage/ Property Division / Maintenance 1st Dist.
In re Marriage of Heroy, No. 1-07-0308 (September 17, 2008) 3rd div. (Greiman) Affirmed as modified, remanded.

Trial court was not required to make specific findings with regards to each of the relevant factors it considered when awarding wife in 26 year marriage $35,000 per month in permanent maintenance; and award is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Although wife has law and library degrees, publishes newsletter, and formerly worked as law librarian, she has not worked as law librarian for twenty years, and could never earn enough to maintain the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage. Further, although trial court made minor errors in calculation of marital estate, they are harmless in light of size of multi-million dollar marital estate; and court was not required to itemize its finding on each statutory factor. In addition, merely using marital accounts as conduit to transfer funds between sale of non marital asset and purchase of new asset does not make purchased property marital. However, trial court did fail to give husband proper credit for adv ances he made from marital estate to cover wife's expenses and attorney's fees during pendency of case.

illinois family law case law updates

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:25:00 +0000

Illinois Cases

Civil - Abuse And Neglect/ Termination Of Parental Rights / Guardianship 1st Dist.
In re Mark W., a Minor, No. 1-05-3370 (June 19, 2008) 4th div. (Neville) Affirmed.
Evidence that disabled adult mother of minor was unfit within meaning of Adoption Act by virtue of her failure to maintain a reasonable degree of care and concern and failure to make reasonable progress toward the return of her child is not against the manifest weight of the evidence; because mother, and her guardian were uncooperative, mother's guardian refused to sign consents for State to obtain her progress at therapy, mother and her guardian took advantage of only one fourth of the opportunities given them for visitation, and mother demonstrated no bond with child. Further, mother's guardian, without court order providing for it, was not child's custodian pursuant to provisions of Section 11a-17 of Probate Act, and was not entitled to temporary custody hearing. In addition, considering testimony of child's therapist that it would be detrimental for him to testify, trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to allow mother's guardian to call him as wit ness.

Civil - Child Custody/ Attorneys' Fees / Child Representative 1st Dist.
In re Marriage of Thompson, No. 1-06-0472 (June 23, 2008) 1st div. (Cahill) (GARCIA, dissent) Reversed and remanded.
After trial court discharged child representative, and father asked for court to conduct evidentiary hearing on representative's final fee petition, trial court erred when it allowed child representative fees without first conducting an evidentiary hearing.

caselaw update

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:05:00 +0000

Civil - Child Support/ Garnishment / Judgments 3rd Dist.
In re Marriage of Takata, No. 3-07-0175 (June 12, 2008) Peoria County (O'brien) Reversed and remanded.
Trial court erred when it denied motion for turnover order of father's current wife's 401K account to satisfy judgment against father for child support arrearage. Funds in account are marital property, having been accumulated during marriage between father and his current wife; and are not exempt from collection for child support judgment. (Appellee's failed to file briefs)

Pregnancy and delivery expenses

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:04:00 +0000

Pregnancy and delivery expenses
Senate Bill 2594 (Millner, R-Carol Stream; Ramey, R-Carol Stream) amends the Illinois Parentage Act to allow the court to order either parent to pay the reasonable expenses related to the mother?s pregnancy and delivery incurred by either parent or the Department of Healthcare and Family Services. Allows such actions to be filed within two years after a judicial determination of parentage. Current law is shorter; two years within the date of the child?s birth. Sent to the Governor.

new family law task force

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:04:00 +0000

In an effort to improve the illinois divorce proccess there has been a resolution to create a task force to study the process.

Family-Law Study
House Resolution 1101 Illinois Family-Law Task Force. House Resolution 1101 (Madigan, D-Chicago; Fritchey, D-Chicago) creates a legislative task force to study and recommend changes in the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. The House has passed this resolution; no further action is required for this resolution to take effect. Hearings all over the state are anticipated. Passed by both chambers.

caselaw update

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:03:00 +0000

Civil - 2-1401 Motions/ Dissolution Of Marriage / Attorney’s Fees 1st Dist.
Engel v. Loyfman, No. 1-07-1468 (June 6, 2008) 6th div. (Mcbride) Reversed and remanded.
Because trial court misconstrued the concept of subject matter jurisdiction when it allowed former client’s motion to vacate agreed judgment for attorney’s fees because complaint was filed within 90 days of order allowing attorney to withdraw, its order must be reversed and remanded. Although motion sufficiently demonstrates basis for vacating order, on remand, court must consider whether attorney’s affidavits provide a sufficient response to client’s motion; and conduct evidentiary hearing if it does

Illinois Order of Protection

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:15:00 +0000

Followup from my last post:
Recent bill:

Domestic violence orders
House Bill 5121 (Rose, R-Mahomet; Righter, R-Mattoon) requires clerks to send an order of protection to a health-care provider if the petitioner asks them to do so. If a health-care provider receives a copy of an order of protection, they are prohibited from allowing the respondent access to the records of a child who is a protected person under the order. This bill has been passed by both chambers.

Illinois Order of Protection

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:48:00 +0000

Many divorce cases begin with one party obtaining an order of protection.

It is important to determine what remedies to look for the person filing for the order of protection.

Order-of-protection remedies available under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act (IDVA).
750 ILCS 60/101

One purpose of the statute is to "[s]upport the efforts of victims of domestic violence to avoid further abuse by promptly entering and diligently enforcing court orders which prohibit abuse and, when necessary, reduce the abuser's access to the victim and address any related issues of child custody and economic support."

The 19 remedies can give the plaintiff a significant advantage in a divorce proceeding, especially in child custody.

General remedies
Prohibiting abuse, neglect, harassment, and exploitation.
"Abuse" is vaguely defined under the IDVA as "physical abuse, harassment, intimidation of a dependent..."

"Harassment" means knowing conduct which is not necessary to accomplish a purpose that is reasonable under the circumstances; would cause a reasonable person emotional distress; and does cause emotional distress to the petitioner. Unless the presumption is rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence, the following types of conduct shall be presumed to cause emotional distress:
(i) creating a disturbance at petitioner's place of employment or school;
(ii) repeatedly telephoning petitioner's place of employment, home or residence;
(iii) repeatedly following petitioner about in a public place or places;
(iv) repeatedly keeping petitioner under surveillance by remaining present outside his or her home, school, place of employment, vehicle or other place occupied by petitioner or by peering in petitioner's windows;
(v) improperly concealing a minor child from petitioner, repeatedly threatening to improperly remove a minor child of petitioner's from the jurisdiction or from the physical care of petitioner, repeatedly threatening to conceal a minor child from petitioner, or making a single such threat following an actual or attempted improper removal or concealment, unless respondent was fleeing an incident or pattern of domestic violence; or
(vi) threatening physical force, confinement or restraint on one or more occasions.

"Neglect" is also prohibited by the IDVA.
Exclusive possession of residence. The court has power to evict one party from the home, regardless of whose name is on the title or whether it is "marital property."

The court shall balance (i) the hardships to respondent and any minor child or dependent adult in respondent's care resulting from entry of this remedy with (ii) the hardships to petitioner and any minor child or dependent adult in petitioner's care resulting from continued exposure to the risk of abuse....The balance of hardships is presumed to favor possession by petitioner unless the presumption is rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence.

Stay-away orders. If the court grants the order of protection, it can require the defendant to stay away from plaintiff or any other person protected by the order. Unlike exclusive possession, the stay-away remedy provides for no balancing of hardships. Order-of-protection forms typically let the plaintiff specify how many feet away the defendant must stay. There is no set amount of space that must be given under current statutes or case law. Innocent encounters in public locations are not a violation.

Counseling.
Personal property.
Damages from abuse. The IDVA allows plaintiffs to seek damages for actual losses suffered as a result of defendant's abuse, including lost earnings, medical expenses, etc.

Entry while intoxicated, under the influence. The IDVA can prohibit the defendant from entering or staying in the home "while the respondent is under the influence of alcohol or drugs and constitutes a threat to the safety and well-being of the petitioner and petitioner's children."

Firearm possession. The IDVA requires the defendant to turn over weapons and guns to the police to hold "if the court is satisfied that there is any danger of illegal use of firearms."

Payment of shelter services. The defendant could be ordered to pay for the costs of a shelter that provided temporary housing to the abused.

Injunctive relief. The "order of injunctive relief" section is the catch-all "other appropriate relief" section of the statute.

Animals. Pursuant to Public Act 095-0234 signed by Governor Blagojevich on August 17, 2007, effective January 1, 2008, pets are also included as part of the remedies available in orders of protection as follows:

Protection of animals.Grant the petitioner the exclusive care, custody or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by either the petitioner or the respondent or a minor child residing in the residence or household of either the petitioner or the respondent and order the respondent to stay away from the animal and forbid the respondent from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, harming, or otherwise disposing of the animal.

Child-related remedies
Physical care and possession, temporary legal custody of minor child.
In an emergency order of protection, where there is no notice to the defendant, the court can only grant possession of the children, not custody.

Denying, restricting visitation. Under the IDVA, the court may deny or restrict visitation if the court finds that visitation presents an additional opportunity for the defendant to abuse the petitioner or other protected persons.

Child support. The IDVA allows the remedy of child support.
Removal or concealment of a minor child. This IDVA remedy is also automatic upon the service of a summons and petition or praecipe filed under the IMDMA under the dissolution action stay.

Ordering defendant to appear in court. The defendant could be ordered to appear in court either alone or with the minor child who has been wrongfully concealed from the plaintiff.

Prohibiting access to child's records. If the order of protection prohibits defendant from having contact with the minor child, school or other records of the child may also be kept from the defendant.

Order of protection hearings are usually expedited as much as possible.

Marital settlement agreements - retirement & disability benefits

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:10:00 +0000

Dissolution Of Marriage/ Marital Settlement Agreements / Pensions 3rd Dist.

In re Marriage of Schurtz, No. 3-07-0345 (May 28, 2007) Peoria County (Lytton) Affirmed.
Trial court did not err when it ordered 62 yr. old former husband to pay a portion of his disability pension over to his former wife based on provision of Marital Settlement Agreement allocating a portion of his retirement pension to her. Because former husband was entitled to retirement benefits but chose to receive disability benefits instead, the wife is entitled to what she would receive from his retirement benefits. Further, trial court did not abuse its discretion when it refused wife's petition for attorney's fees and interest on past due benefits; because husband had a good faith argument that she was not entitled to receive any portion of his disability.

No-fault divorce separation period

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:27:00 +0000

Clients also ask how long must they be separated before they can get divorced.
Normally, there is a two-year separation period, but if the spouses have lived separate and apart for a continuous period of not less than 6 months prior to the case, the 2 year time period can be waived if both parties agree in writing.
Thanks
Terry

Can I file for divorce if I don't know where my spouse is?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:18:00 +0000

Can I file for divorce if I don't know where my spouse is?
Yes. You can file for divorce if you do not know where your spouse is.
You must show the court that you have exhausted all reasonable means to find your spouse. Your spouse must have been gone for over a year as well. Usually, a process server is involved. They will perform a skip trace to see if they can locate the spouse. If that comes up empty, the petitioner will have to send the notice of filing to the last known address and to the last known place of work. If that fails, then the court will have the notice published in the paper. If there is no response in the required amount of time (per local/state law) then the court will allow one party to obtain a default divorce without the other spouse.

Client Question - Do Both Parties in a Divorce Proceeding Need an Attorney?

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:12:00 +0000

A client recently asked me if both parties in a divorce need a lawyer or could it be done with one lawyer?

The answer I give is that I always recommend both parties get a lawyer. While a divorce case may seem easy at first, it can often turn ugly, parties can change their minds, or what was thought to be in agreement, turns out not to be so. When only one party has a lawyer, the paperwork prepared, although could be fair, it is usually drafted in the clients best interest. An attorney cannot represent both sides of a conflict, which poses a conflict of interest as well.

The court will have any party that wishes to go forward pro-se (without an attorney) sign and notarize an affidavit that it was recommended that they hire a lawyer, and that they are declining to do so.

Therefore, it would be in your best interest to always get a lawyer, divorce lawyers in cases that are uncontested often offer a flat fee.

Terry

Owe Child Support Arrears? Kiss your license goodbye-unless you pay!

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:38:00 +0000

Illinois Ups Child Support Collection by Targeting Licenses
The threat of losing their driver's licenses has prompted more than 3,000 Illinois parents to pay about $1.3 million in child support since the beginning of the year, officials said Tuesday. From the Springfield State Journal-Register.

Under this procedure, the Department of Healthcare and Family Services (DHFS) will mail a warning notice to any parent who owes a minimum of $2,500 in child support arrears and who has an Illinois driver's license. If that individual does not answer, then their name is sent to the Illinois Secretary of State, who will then in turn, suspend their drivers license in 60 days.

QDRO

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:16:00 +0000

Pension Assets

Pensions that are acquired by either spouse after the marriage and before a judgment of dissolution is entered are presumed to be marital property. QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) divides this asset.

A court order that recognizes or creates a spouse’s or a former spouse’s right to a portion of a member’s retirement annuity. Commonly referred to as QDRO.

What is a QDRO Be Used For?
A QDRO is a court order that recognizes the right of the ex - spouse to receive all or part of a pension plan that belonged to their ex – spouse.
The QDRO can be used for:

* Providing support payments to an ex – spouse.
* Dividing marital property.

Certain situations have to be met for the QDRO to be valid.

QDROs are subject to ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) rules and regulatioins.
The QDRO is issued by a state authority, usually a state court through a judgment, court order or divorce decree, which addresses a marital property settlement.
The QDRO must stick to guidelines that are instituted by the pension administrator. Not all court orders are considered qualified domestic relations orders. The plan administrator will make the decision as to whether or not the QDRO qualifies. Often the administrator has their own version of the forms for the QDRO, and your attorney can draft or modify these accordingly. This is a very particular area of law, so speak with your lawyer about specifics.

Illinois Family Law Statutes

noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:12:00 +0000

Here is a list of the Illinois Family Law Statutes

Illinois Compiled Statutes

FAMILIES

* 750 ILCS 5/ Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act.
* 750 ILCS 10/ Illinois Uniform Premarital Agreement Act.
* 750 ILCS 16/ Non-Support Punishment Act.
* 750 ILCS 22/ Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.
* 750 ILCS 24/ Unified Child Support Services Act.
* 750 ILCS 25/ Expedited Child Support Act of 1990.
* 750 ILCS 27/ Child Support Payment Act.
* 750 ILCS 28/ Income Withholding for Support Act.
* 750 ILCS 30/ Emancipation of Minors Act.
* 750 ILCS 36/ Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act.
* 750 ILCS 40/ Illinois Parentage Act.
* 750 ILCS 45/ Illinois Parentage Act of 1984.
* 750 ILCS 47/ Gestational Surrogacy Act.
* 750 ILCS 50/ Adoption Act.
* 750 ILCS 55/ Contest of Adoptions Act.
* 750 ILCS 60/ Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986.
* 750 ILCS 61/ Address Confidentiality for Victims of Domestic Violence Act.
* 750 ILCS 65/ Rights of Married Persons Act.
* 750 ILCS 70/ Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995.